View
6
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
3--.,,
i v#g .
''e..;
-Carolina Power & Ught Company4
'
(1 Brunswick Nuclear Project*
p P. O. Box 10429.
'
Southport, NC 28461-0429March 22, 1990
PILE: B09-135100:r. SERIAL: BSEP/90-0244
.
U U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN: Document Control Desk
,
Washington.-DC 20555y-ji BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2L DOCKET NOS. 50-324 & 50-325'
!- LICENSE NOS. DPR-62 & DPR-71F RESPONSE TO NRC IFI 50-325/88-36-02 AND 50-324/88-36-02s
Gentlemen:
[ The Final Summary Report for 15' Bulletin 79-02 is submitted in response to NRC..
Inspection Report 50-325/88-36 and 50-324/88-36, dated November 3, 1988. Item 44
s - of this| inspection report closed Pipe Support Base Plate Designs UsingConcrete Expansion Anchor Bolts - IEB 79-02, and opened Inspector Follow-up-
' Items 50-325/88-36-02 and 50-324/88-36-02, which stated that CP&L would submita Final Summary Report summarizing the bulletin requirements.and BSEP'sresponse. The review of Ililti Bolt allowables (Inspector Follow-up Item50-325/88-36-03:and 50-324/88-36-03) will be addressed at a later date, a
IE Bulletin 79-02 requirements coupled With appropriate CP&L actions are asfollows:
'1. Verify that pipe support base plate flexibility was accounted for in thecalculation'of anchor bolt loads.
CP&L action is as follows:
|' References:,
a. Details of NRC Exit Interview (dated 8/7/80)which reference LER 2-80-55
A b. Letter BSEP/81-0440 (dated 2/25/81)c. Letter BSEP/82-1616 (dated 7/26/82)
which provides a chronological account of CP&Ls actions taken toassure compliance of already installed base plates to the bulletinflexibility position.
|
~9003290176 900322 7 ~
ADOCK0500ggj4PDR
f6,
*- 9
_ >
- - - - z
'
:,,.;
'.,
U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory Commission -2-.
%u ' . .
Relative to new design, in order to ensure that new base ~ plate designs.took-'
into account the flexibility position, Attachment'l to CP&L Letter,.Serial: -GD-79-1739 was adopted and issued as a part of Power DisciplineTechnical Bulletin 7B to be used as.a design _ guideline for base plate design, ,
:This was'later included in UE&C's H-21 evaluation criteria and later in, '
the Brunswick Engineering Support Unit's (BESU). Structural Design Guides 2and.7 which are the on-site guideline for pipe support design. |
'
o2 .- Verify that the concrete expansion anchor. bolts have the following
minimum-factor of safety between the bolt design. load.and the bolt; ,
4 ultimate capacity determined'from static tests which sim'ulate:the actualconditions of. installation. .,.
$ .
I
CP&L action is as-follows:-i
r.
t References:
a. Letter GD-79-1739 (dated 7/12/79)'
'b. Letter GD-79-3130 (dated 12/6/79)c. Letter BSEP/80-2139 (dated 12/30/80) ;d. Letter BSEP/81-0440 (dated 2/25/81) '
e. Letter BSEP/82-1616-(dated 7/26/82)-f. Letter NLS 84-214 (dated 11/26/84) ,:
,
which discuss in detail CP&L's anchor bolt testing and reanalysis |programs which assure compliance of "in place" anchor bolts relative
' |,
to the accepted factors of safety.
Power Discipline Technical Bulletin 7B covers the new design and was jwritten to include the factors of safety provided by Bulletin 79-02.Ae' stated before this information was used in UE&C's M-21 evaluationcriteria and in BESU's Structural Design Guides 2 and 7.
.
3. Describe the. design requirements, if applicabic,-for anchor bolts to !
withstand cyclic loads such as seismic' loads and high cycle' operating ;
loads,,
E CP&L. action is as. follows:t
References: :, !
a. Letter GD-79-1739 (dated 7/12/79) ;b. Letter BSEP/82-1616 (dated 7/26/82)c. Letter NLS-84-214-(dated 11/26/84) !
which explain the position taken by CP&L relative to cyclic loading.
and the torquing program that was adopted to ensure that existing ;
expansion anchors could withstand such loading.,
;
v
h
-t
a
pq 3-
~r
, ,
?yqx ; < . ,,
6, ,.pp. ,
fy %|) *~
.
, - 4 .
L U;S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission- -3-,
%$
-
j|A To ensure that e.'# design.is acceptable 1 relative to. cyclic loading*
.f -the same series of-design documents. listed under requirements i and 2 _. !
above nyre updated with the new pretensioning loads _ relative to the ;._
.
design allowable as mentioned in CP&L's torquing program.; '
,
~4. Verify from-existing QC documentation that design requirements have been>
met for anchor bolts relative to cyclic loading and bolt size and type.'
CP&L's compliance with this part of Bulletin 79-02/is. covered by'the= -|.
testing program as described in the letters referenced in Section11' j
above. That test program was used to check:for-indication of-incorrect- |
proload'and incorrect bolt size, type,.and embedment.
cf For nos design work- QC hold points were established-~as a part of site,'
installation specification BSEP 248-107, to ensure that these require-,
i monts were met'. i,
i ?
5. Determine the extent that= expansion anchor bolts were used in-concrete" ' block (masonry)' walls to attach piping supports in Seismic Category-+
,,
1/ Safety Related systems. ]CP&L |did- noti use expansion anchors . to attach safety-related'systen s',
~
to concrete block walls.
6', Determine:the extent that pipe supports with expansion" anchor' bolts used'N structural steel shapes instead of base. plates. 3
-As stated in CP&L Letter GD-79-3130, support.. meeting this criteriawere included in the inspection and reanalysis program which was-
,Iestablished.at the beginning of the bulletin compliance effort and
w continued until-program completion..
Relative:to new design work-the same criteria established in the
..design documents in Sections l', 2,-and 3 above' applies to supports. H
.
with' standard' structural steel shapes used in lieu of base plates, ["!~ although base plates are used almost exclusively for new design on
safety-related systems.t
N |Tho'remainderzof the requirements listed in IE Bulletin 79-02 refer to the- *
scheduling of requirement completion. ;,
' : Attachmcrit 1 provides a short synopsis'of those correspondences referred to inthis letter.
!
This report summarizes the correspondence between the Brunswick Steam Electric !Plant and the NRC pertaining to the requirements-of IE Bulletin 79-02.
t
h
.
1
!
[ d!
v , - , .
.4 : 1 * ' ' . , _ _ - . ._. _' 'r #. ,7 4 $ + Ir g, y-
._
-/ f. f 1 1 ;1)O -%tjp?ggf%m m) 7 p' ,r E ;d; i n.> t as T, 4(% . . s 1
. a, " ' ' ' T ,s,We ,m.
, , ,., y ,<
WNhk$d ( .|N th,.'|, ' ? U:g'.'m, 4 ~~-W, * * ;,
.
* * i + E kNU |$4, ,.
G l'- ,' s \ ai
p t.. 2 < .L F 1 74 -.T'- . j'c,.
. (r-' ;t ._ 7=> :, ~ .
;
go - a w. .n., 4.
Q.*_ (. 3
o -
4 , .,
. . j-f }
;e 4x4Cy [ ''' 44j '. - [ . ., Q; .g' ^ -4 (
2 I ''
-fy iv ;> r ura t
t e.+ ' _-
( i+ -- ;t
e - m'1:, i ,a :9- , . . .g :;* -,
_ f . f = m'' e
m , ' 's,v. 't_ff s h~ f |:)| 3
'"'d '
,,
+ c ,
{g[x).g, , , ,
','g. . . . . . c . 2 - , .. -M '. . -[ . . f . sJ~
/ TR. f~ ; U.S. ' Nuclearc-Regul' atory, Commission;,. c - 4,-,. -
> +
p,. w;w; ' s* , , , - , 4
~n. w m -
p 0,p r.w- i
.-,
,
y-E , i,
q.Q 4' >hM q
- <- - t,,. ,. s . ..+ , = . , 1
T Q:r , y,._! Please'refertany(questionsfregarding'this- submittal'to Mr.1Je W.: Moystrat.; y y
' '
f- | bW L(919) 457-24041'
~ ~
t, -..
-
' '
w ~ n7.- <
-
1 _ :.,
-9L.
- .g-~
{gbi Very,trulyfyoursb'
(
y,,
1n+ , --
1
,
D. .
,. , .-g g,1,
< ' ' .f-- .;i - - - -
s
m s . 7_ ,.
, -i
;a , A -" ' . L. IJarness,E General' Manager' f,
s.
'
&, t- . Brunswick NucleartProjectJ 4, -
..
=-
a,.-
-. . _ . .v ..,,
.
p' ~ TMJ/mcg1_ ,
1'
, ,
.upgy.p.
. q,
. .. ,
H c ! Enclosure. 's - mw , -.. ry.n v ; . >. r:.
R '+ 'cc: - Mrs S.: D. iEbneteri.
-
' ~ jM y -Mr.1E d G.5:Tourigny _.4:
' " . .. '-' 4' / ' f '1-
.
dia 'BSEP<NRC Resident Office < '
s
+ - - -
+.u\ ' 5
g ,'4ey - - . t -..g4
'
: (t a , 4. )w ,
'
- , / [ i,il'., ' $, ;5
; 4. '3
*1 .
,tg yw:v.. , .
: wy.
,> ;4A
, .,*r, m
#(~ 51 ,. t g
[ ! i ;. i j :. ' ,,-=
,-
p; v , m. . u . - g .(;) :- r < ,
'*'
qj;. Q , A; ' ',
f3_ ;m '. p . 7 / $,* *
, e-
>er.; ;;: + ~ - _-' ,:q '{ n . (gu -p. . -
- 3)L ,ii :
. pm: n r s 1 ,e
-
"s, ' . r..
g'e % . -h
f: f.,' ;-n ,. ,
'4.-s, ,
4.
}4 'h
4 3 .g; ..g.'"
. ..J
. . . - . , - - , -'-\_, l'.''*.b*-1'e
g
'
?l .?y@
%'s
- 4' i)'
, .
;$*>
i
J
f 4 L r ; >
| i, % 1
Ev ,7 ;,
: ry.
I #''.^~'f.- j g&4-g+ -.2 - -.r 4. , .* '' ' ;}.I -)
''
-
| ...l..'(
4'\ 'i&%s 4
.t> '- f;- ?-Q,, 3*-i .-r < y : \;.
' IiIsta --:T.
Nko x'!-t s' '*
-+cw u ,, f f W d i s n. '
', $Y!h . h b' a%,pqQC * t :
- 3'1 h j[.N. Ej
-
m;. i
;. I',w ' .
v y.. .y. -
,
,
r.,- -*: j
r}:cg
.
.i, =q-| .?.
,
.
i S w .p..f i
,,|
3
pm f,,.. >
,.
.vk,
y' k}.
\ .,j ,'
, ,'. .1 |-> ;4g ' ' '. !..
b r' ', v' ,
i 3- 1 ( r'e ''
f Yy % 1 i Yh Y . pp h .iw ?,e = o .. ,Q ? .7 X. 9 r. 2! !
y ..e w , V .s. . ,. e..tu - )J.h &.s ,4 ,
~~d' e t >.
*.
|;>
w%ynn,' f '''%y:c ,
fa [" Z h:# j I f [, .; .5v' 'j.. m+u - - p. ,w'.m '; N P y1 8 -..,
,N . ,
, M. . m ..sKa:n ,&. :e
v..w>
h , ' : 'p p t ,q' . c 3 ..- y.g g .. ,
r s; q. .
g ,.-g. -
...o
h"p . .. I
f ,.,'
$ ,p-:P*'{.' 6. 'e..v,
N O D ?,ya-g'| q ,'- 4
N' '
+ fh+t -,i,u..'
-
> '' ' \ ""h*,
,4 1g
- s. . g ~ .-
-
,i r .-' b i, jr
-
1 3-
- o ,
p x.; p .
.
git
|- ,V . - -
b i /, ' L ATTACllMENT 11
Q/,y:'y !$hesfollowing list is composed of pertinent letters and memorandums dealing-~
; with' tho' BSEP closure of IEB 79-02 along with the . appropriate actions taken to'gf. . resolve any'open items., --Note that this. list,is intended to deal with IEB-
'79-02_tnly, even though much of the information-included references IEB'79-07.-.and:IEB 79-14,
~
-1. LLetter GD-79-1739 CP&L to NRC, dated July 12, 19794
R
y This letter explained, item by item, CP&L's current position regarding -g- cach-facet of IEB 79-02. Safety-related~ piping base plates ' wore -
reanalyzedifor new loads per the.new IEB 79.-07. guidelines. This was' done-
, ,
'by BSEP Plant ModAfications 79-123'and 79-124. Work was ongoing to-. .
J comply with the noe safety factors for expansion anchora. The nuts onif expansion anchorsJwere to be retorqued to satisfy the requirements for
cyclic loading. . An expansion alachor test program was initiated at.BSEP,.
y the results of which would be m31ntained on. site' for. NRC inspection.
2. Letter GD-79-3130, CP&L to NRC, dated December 6,1979m~
This letter stated that the requirements of IEB 79-02'had'been satisfied"' .by CP&L, -A few. inaccessible hangers were noted, butischeduled for
..
E completion during the next outage. Appropriate documentation was in the-plant vault available~.for NRC review.
~
3.. Detall's-of:NRC Exit Interview, dated August 7, 1980
y,~ Due to-LER 2-80-55, it was realized that the CRD-linerb4se plates were'
not included in the base plate flexibility roanalysis. Because of this,
~
the-Bulletin would remain open. 'A completion commitment date of3;j,"
LDecember 31,~1980, was given<by CP&L.
4. Letter BSEP/80-2139, CP&L to NRC, dated December- 30~ 1980'
,
, ,
CP&L stated that approximately 300- additional supports per unit' had been-
(identified for expansion anchor testing. requiring.that the final IEBs79-02schedule be pushed forward. The final schedule would be presented-February-25, 1981.
,W 5. ~. Letter BSEP/81-0440, CP&L to NRC, dateel February 25,L 1981
' Flexure acolysis was completied for the essential-CRD base plates.Completion of base plate flexibility tecting relative to piping not- . ,
, essential to safe shutdown was scheduled as.a part of the Phase IIc j, ~f program.(March 51,.1982). Test.ing of the-accessiblo-portion of the 600-
.
' additional supports (see above) was scheduled for completion by July 31,.o
p, 1981..
1
\
|Q' t
.
> }'
, ,
'''
,
'
e
g h'a 4' ' ,.- I1
4% '
, ,, , ,
,
NCT;46'
.I
g , Wpy * W <
j,'
oh 1y S ** ,'
,
: p; ATTACHMENT 1:(Cont'd)*
.
6. ' Letter.BSEPL82-1616,- CP&L to NRC' dated July' 26,11982 ,
'%' CP&L stated that nonessential-portions of the CRD system (Phase II) are.
~
*,
not safety related;and, therefore, reanalysis is not-required. Also.*
7 stated was the fact that the. additional BSEP-2 support: testing was:.
-
4
completed. -BSEP-1 testing-is essentially. complete with.the few: remainingsupports to be finished during the-upcoming' September 1982 outage.
-t
7. Letter NLS 84-214, CP&L to NRC,' dated November 26, 1984 .,
.. ;<
c -This was the last submittal concerning'IEB.79-02.~ . It statedLthat the"-
t
expansion anchor testing was completed. The BSEP-1-CRD support; fixes ;,
were' completed and BSEP-2 CRD supports'are to be completed pending'
-redesign of the Reactor Pressure-Vessel foundation wall window supports. ;.
The remaining work toL complete the obligation in Letter NLS -84-214 = (Item 7 - -
above) was done by;PlantiModification 82-147. This documents'the. completion,s
of the brunswick Steam Electric Plant. work pertinent to IE' Bulletin 79-02. .iBased onJthe information provided'to the NRC' relative to this Bulletin,' we- ?
irequest the closure.of-IEE 79-02.'
.
P
r
k
-
],>
;W 't
'+
-i
c
gf
4
i
,.
9/ .I
~'
bi,
1
t
!
C 41 3 .- r
,- < ii
P 4
Recommended