DRAFT · 2020-08-01 · 1 | 29 Trip Distance >20 miles (10%) 5-20 miles (80%)

The Vision for the 2021 Regional Plan: A Deep Dive into the DetailsJoint Meeting of the Transportation, Regional Planning, and Borders Committees – August 7, 2020

Our Journey

2

1

2

DRAFT

| 3

A bold new approach to planning for the future

Embracing data-driven planning, emerging technologies, and listening to people

| 4

The Vision Lab: A collaborative space to innovate and ideate

3

4

DRAFT

Concept Development

5

| 6

Complete Corridors

Transit Leap

Mobility Hubs

Flexible Fleets

Next OS

Backbone of a multimodal system

Quality transit alternatives to automobiles

Connection and transfer points

First and Last mile options

Enabling technology

5 Big MovesKey strategies to envision our future transportation ecosystem

5

6

DRAFT

| 7

22 44 6633 55Sprint 11

+Data+Data

+Data+Data

+Data

SprintPlanningProcess

This iterative process brought in data andfeedback from residents at each phase

| 8

Engaging our Stakeholders

8

7

8

DRAFT

| 9

Getting input from communities

9

| 10

HumanCenteredDesign

By listening to residents throughout the region, we can plan for improvements that address the unique needs in each community

9

10

DRAFT

| 11

safety and security

I wouldn’t let my kids take public transit here because of safety and security concerns.

Safety is a huge factor in riding public transit for me and as a woman I don’t feel safe riding alone.

I wouldn’t let my kids take public transit here because of safety and security concerns.

The bus is not reliable and takes planning. Before I had a car, I would take the bus – I had to leave super early and really plan ahead.

reliability and speed

I wish I could take public transit, but it takes a long time and there is a lack of frequency options, and a last mile issue.

The network is too linear. If you go to any major city, public transit is just as easy and just as fast as driving.

incomplete transit network

I’m surprised there’s no transit to the airport… We need airport connectivity.

I don’t have a car, so I take the bus and COASTER to get to Encinitas for work. I leave Chula Vista at 6 a.m. for my 10 a.m. shift.

Inadequate service for transit dependent

I have to walk home from work at 11 p.m.because it’s too latefor the buses.

Insights: Transit doesn’t work for many people today

| 12

no school bus service

We used to have buses in middle school, but not anymore. People getting to school creates most of the traffic.

Trying to get across Mira Mesa Blvd. after picking up my daughter from school can take up to 20 minutes

Insights: People want safe, fast, and convenient choicesI like the scooters and bikes, especially around colleges and schools. If I had some dedicated lanes to take a scooter to school, I wouldn’t be driving.

unsafe conditions and not enough infrastructure for bikes and micromobility

Biking outside of the neighborhood is unsafe. People text and drive and go into the bike lanes a lot.

Scooters should have their own lanes and be regulated, or they should go altogether.

I like riding my bike at the beach, but I don’t feel safe on the roads.

commutes are stressful and long The traffic in Sorrento Valley is so bad, I would never take a job there.

More time on my commute means less time with my family.

At this point in my life, I am willing to pay a little more to gain some time back.

I plan my day around traffic patterns.

I plan my commute around when the red lines on Google Maps disappear.

drivers need flexibility, control, and privacyI’m all about the privacy andflexibility I have in my chariot. I like doing what I know.

My car is really my only option when I have my kids with me.

Nothing beats the privacy and control of taking my own car.

11

12

DRAFT

| 13

Vision Advisory Panel

adaptability // resiliency // safety // power of data // public private partnerships //

| 14

Complete Corridors

| 14

13

14

DRAFT

| 15

Transit Leap

| 15

| 16

Flexible Fleets

| 16

15

16

DRAFT

| 17

Next OS

| 17

| 18

Mobility Hubs

| 18

17

18

DRAFT

1

Identifying Critical Connections

19

| 20

Data-Driven PlanningWhere people live and work

19

20

DRAFT

1

| 21

Census data helped make connections between where people live and where they work

| 21

| 22

Trips to and from employment centers are the most predictable

21

22

DRAFT

1

| 23

Other regional trips, including across the border and to recreation in Balboa Park and Mission Bay

| 24

Other work trips including military bases

23

24

DRAFT

1

Network Development and Refinement

25

| 26

CompleteCorridors

| 26

25

26

DRAFT

14

| 27

Trip Distance

>20 miles (60%)

5-20 miles (30%)

<5 miles (10%)

Peak Period Performance

Vehicle Miles Traveled (Freeway)

Approx. 2/3

Delay (Freeway)Approx.

2/3

Interregional Corridors

| 28

Trip Distance

>20 miles (10%)

5-20 miles (80%)

<5 miles (10%)

Peak Period Performance

Vehicle Miles Traveled (Freeway)

Approx. 1/3

Delay (Freeway)Approx.

1/3

UrbanCorridors

27

28

DRAFT

1

| 29

Trip Distance

>20 miles (10%)

5-20 miles (80%)

<5 miles (10%)

Peak Period Performance

Vehicle Miles Traveled (Freeway)

Approx. <5%

Delay (Freeway)Approx.

<5%

Rural Corridors

Complete CorridorNetworkA system of managed lanes on the most traveled corridors in the western part of our region

30

29

30

DRAFT

1

Regional ArterialNetworkAccess to freeways, major employment centers, and transit

31

Regional BikeNetwork

32

The San Diego Regional Bike Plan could be enhanced through the proposed improvements on the arterial network

31

32

DRAFT

1

| 3333

| 34

Transit Leap

| 34

33

34

DRAFT

1

| 35

Transit Leap Service Types• Commuter rail

Fully grade separated, higher speed, longer distance

• Light rail Fully/partially grade separated, medium speed, shorter distance

• Next Gen RapidRapid and Express (with transit priority)

• Local bus and Flexible Fleets

| 36

Data connects employment centers with areas that have the highest concentration of commute origins, revealing potential connections

36

35

36

DRAFT

1

| 37

TransitLeap

This network aligns with Complete Corridors and has three primary services

37

| 38

Mobility Hubs

| 38

37

38

DRAFT

2

| 39

RegionalMobility Hubnetwork

| 40

Flexible Fleets

| 40

39

40

DRAFT

2

| 41

Flexible Fleet Services

Low-speed devices

On-demand vehicles

Shared rides

On-demand shuttles

Ground and aerial package delivery

+

+

Micromobility

Ridehail & Carshare

Rideshare

Microtransit

Last Mile Delivery

| 42| 42

Driverless vehicles link for added capacity

Cleaning bot

Privacy screens offer a comfortable experience

Folding rack for bikesAccessible boarding

WiFi and mobiledevice charging

Space for personalbelongings

41

42

DRAFT

2

What we heard…

• Supportive infrastructure

• Operating incentives

• Evolving technology

• Complement transit

• Affordable and accessible choices

FlexibleFleetsoutreach

43

What we heard…

• Supportive infrastructure

• Operating incentives

• Complement transit

• Affordable and accessible choices

Flexible Fleets work in partnership with the private sector and communities

| 44

Flexible Fleets operate everywhere

44

43

44

DRAFT

2

| 45

Next OS

| 45

| 46

NEXT OS PLATFORM

APPLICATIONS & SERVICES

DATA SOURCES

Planners & Policymakers

Transportation Operators

Residents & Businesses

The technology that makes the transportation ecosystem work

45

46

DRAFT

24

| 47

A suite of integrated applications to

plan trips and book and pay for services

A suite of dashboards and tools with

advanced analytics

A platform with public and private data that

better informs decisions

Residents & Businesses

Transportation Operators

Planners & Policymakers

Tools for people who use the system, those who operate it, and the people who plan and set policies

| 48

Everyday uses for Next OS

47

48

DRAFT

2

| 49| 49

A Bold New VisionFaster, Fairer, Cleaner

49

DRAFT