Fritz Marinko Auto Research Center LLC

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Future opportunities in improving fuel efficiencies are possible, but a team efforts is needed!. Fleets. Manufacturers. Government. Fritz Marinko Auto Research Center LLC. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

Fritz MarinkoAuto Research Center LLC

Fleets

Manufacturers

Future opportunities in improving fuel efficiencies are possible, but a team efforts is needed!

Government

2

Trucks and trailers of all shapes and sizes are critical to the movement of this countries

freight and the national economy!

3

Many years ago we were primarily concerned about getting to our destination

without a breakdown!

4

Today we want to save fuel and fleets look like this

5

The delivery van has and will continue to evolve

6

The Impact of Aerodynamics on Fuel Economy is Dramatic for all Kinds of

Vehicles

Based on the Department of Energy study, once a vehicle reaches 50 MPH, Fuel economy depends significantly on aerodynamic design.

Source: Technology Roadmap for the 21st Century Truck Program (DOE, 2000-07)

7

Thinking about aerodynamics is not a new concept

8

4.5% to 5.5% improvement

Fleets today are proactively investing in proven, cost effective aerodynamic

solutions in mass!

9

9% to 10% fuel usage improvement together

Technology exists today in combination to save a lot more.

9% to 10% fuel usage improvement in

combination

10

The Super Truck program has uncovered some dramatic results and will stimulate a

lot of good idea for all types of fleets

11

One of the main reasons we are all here today is we all want to save energy,

for one reason or another!

• This could be to reduce GHG.• To help your clients reduce the amount of

fuel/energy they use on a daily bases.• Making this world we live in, a better, cleaner place.

• Gov’t may need to help fund the research

• Manufacturers may need to think out side the box

• Fleets may need to be a part of the innovation team

12

I don’t think we need to go this far

13

As I said earlier this is where we are todayBased on some of the data

presented earlier we could look like

It seems logical that the right tire and a tear drop roof line could generate an additional 8+% fuel

improvement without losing any carrying capacity.

Can the tire industry develop a tire to handle this with the DOE’s help?

14

Tear drop trailer roof empirical fleet data in the UK

18.96% savingScania:Standard Trailer: 10.83mpg (3.83 kms/ltr)Teardrop Trailer: 13.07mpg (4.63 kms/ltr)20.68% saving

Average: 19.82% saving

Trunking Operation Bradford/DunstableMainly M1 (171 miles one-way)

DAF:Standard Trailer: 9.65mpg (3.42 kms/ltr)Teardrop Trailer: 11.48mpg (4.06 kms/ltr)

Multiple Retailer: Health & BeautyTrunking OperationAverage from standard trailers: 3.55 kms/ltrTeardrop Trailer: 4.2 kms/ltr

Average: 18% saving

Major Operator: Parcels

Teardrop Trailer: 10.43 mpg (3.69 kms/ltr)

Average: 12.2% saving

Contract: Convenience Store Chain.Standard Trailer: 9.8 mpg (3.47 kms/ltr)Teardrop Trailer: 11.3 mpg (4.00 kms/ltr)

Average: 15.3% saving

Standard Trailer: 11.45 mpg (4.05 kms/ltr)Teardrop Trailer: 12.6 mpg (4.46 kms/ltr)

Average: 10.04% saving

Multiple Retailer: Value High Street Department StoresTrunkingStandard Trailer*: 9.30 mpg (3.29 kms/ltr)

Major FMCG Retailer:Garment OperationMulti-drop to Supermarkets

Average: 12.3% saving

Multiple Retailer:Garments: MAN 400bhp Tractor

Best results over 11%

6.36% saving

Multiple Retailer:Computer Hardware & AccessoriesStore Deliveries: No Trunking

Average: 5.5% saving

7.71% to 17.02% fuel saving

Average: 12.37% saving

Multiple Retailer:Car/Bike AccessoriesStandard Trailer: 3.59kms/ltrTeardrop Trailer: 3.87kms/ltr

Operator: Marks & Spencer under DHL ContractGarment Operation: Trunking

16% additional fill

10.14% saving

Multiple Retailer:Designer Garments/ Soft Furnishings

Average 7.89%

Average 4.5% saving

Average 4.03% saving

Average 8.2% saving

Average 16.22% saving

Average 18.54% saving

Average 4.75% saving

Average 11.37% saving

Average 4.5% saving

Teardrop Trailer

(km/ltr)Standard 45ft Trailer (km/ltr)

3.89 3.814.1 3.36

4.61 3.314.38 3.413.93 3.764.02 3.474.2 3.56

4.16 3.674.32 3.713.89 3.55

Average 4.15 3.561

Average 10% saving

11.26%

Blue Chip Multiple Retailer

The difference between the two averaged results is 0.589 km/ltr (1.66 mpg).

Average 16.5%

Healthcare Distribution Company

Current Saving Average

Multiple Retailer: Baby/Childrens Dept

Multiple Retailer: House & Home

Major 3PL: Technology Arm

Multiple Retailer: Office Products

Multiple Retailer: Budget Homewares

Blue Chip Department Stores

Major Brand: Electrical Brown Goods

Major FMCG Retailer:

Multiple Retailer: Catalog Department Stores(snapshot of best comparison)

15% saving

Multple Retailer: Garments

15

A Little Insight on How the Rest of the World is working together to save fuel/energy!

16

Thank you

Fritz MarinkoDirector of Business Development Worldwide

Auto Research Center LLCIndianapolis, IN – Detroit, MI – Mooresville, NC – Brackley, UK

Office: 317-291-8600 Ext. 1051Cell: 440-339-7536

fmarinko@arcindy.com www.arcindy.com

Recommended