High Performance Design in Oregon, Two Regional Case ......COWHORN VINEYARD AND GARDEN TASTING ROOM...

Preview:

Citation preview

High Performance Design

in Oregon, Two Regional

Case Studies

AFE 2.0

December 7, 2016

Presentation Agenda

Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of

Central Oregon – Bend, OR

2:00 -3:00 pm Presentation by Jonah

Cohen (Hacker) Marc Brune (PAE),

including brief audience Q&A

Cowhorn Vineyard – Jacksonville, OR

3:00 – 4:00 pm Presentation by Erica

Dunn and Alex Boetzel (Green Hammer)

including brief audience Q&A

Panel Discussion and audience Q&A

with both presentation teams

4:00 – 4:30 pm

Networking and Reception

4:30 – 5:00 pm

High-Performance Design in Oregon

Lessons from the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Central

Oregon December 7, 2016

Jonah Cohen

Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Central Oregon

Design Team

• Architect: Hacker

• Landscape Architect: Walker Macy

• Structural: Walker Engineering

• MEP/Lighting: PAE/Luma

• Sustainability: Vidas Architecture

• Acoustics: Listen

• Inter. Furnishings: Deca/Steele Assoc.

• Civil: D'agostino, Parker

• Owner’s Rep Marino Consulting

Sustainable adjective sus·tain·able \sə-ˈstā-nə-bəl\

Simple Definition Able to be used without being completely used up or destroyed Involving methods that do not completely use up or destroy natural resources Able to last or continue for a long time

Unitarian Universalist Principles 1st Principle: The inherent worth and dignity of every person 2nd Principle: Justice, equity and compassion in human relations 3rd Principle: Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations 4th Principle: A free and responsible search for truth and meaning; 5th Principle: The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large 6th Principle: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all 7th Principle: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.

Unitarian Universalist Principles 1st Principle: The inherent worth and dignity of every person 2nd Principle: Justice, equity and compassion in human relations 3rd Principle: Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations 4th Principle: A free and responsible search for truth and meaning; 5th Principle: The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large 6th Principle: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all 7th Principle: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part. 8th Principle: Unitarians employ very unique Principles of Democracy and Universal Consensus

ASPIRATIONS OF OUR NEW HOME

• Warm, Inviting, and Welcoming

• Nourishes our Spirituality

• Supports Connections Within Our Congregation

• Encourages Life Long Discovery, Curiosity, and Creativity

• Respectful of and Connected to Nature

• Imbued with Natural Light and Fresh Air

• Exemplar of Meaningful Sustainability

• Gracefully Adapts to Our Growth

• Enduring and Easy to Maintain

• Highly Functional and Universally Accessible

• Maximizes Value within our Resources

• Serves Our Greater Community

• Reflects Unitarian Universalist Principles

Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Central Oregon Sustainability Concepts and Applications

December 7, 2016 Presented to Energy Trust of Oregon by Marc Brune, PE, Associate Principal

Holistic Approach to Passive Design

Six Steps

Set Inspiring Goals

Net Zero Ready – BHAG: Big Harry Audacious Goal

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

Average Building(Energystar Target Finder

50)

Likely Code Building Energy Star Architecture 2030 Net Zero with 50% RoofCoverage

Net Zero EUI

Arch 2030 EUI

Energy Star EUI

Benchmark EUI

Regional Average

Electricity Usage

Natural Gas Usage

$13,000/yr

$11,000/yr

$9,000/yr

$5,000/yr

Analyze the Climate

Typical Building No Heating or Cooling Zone

Cold Winter Design: ~5F Summer Design: ~93F

Analyze the Climate

Optimizing Passive Solar

Analyze the Climate

Optimizing Passive Solar

Analyze the Climate

Optimizing Passive Solar

Analyze the Climate

Optimizing Passive Solar

Analyze the Climate

Optimizing Passive Solar

Analyze the Climate

Optimizing Passive Solar

Loads = Peak Power Requirement on worst day. Think acceleration power.

Loads vs. Energy Use

Energy Use = Energy consumed over the whole year Think of spending on gasoline.

Energy use will follow naturally

Typical Design Condition

Typical Design Condition

Reduce Loads

Summer Shading

Reduce Loads

Mass Walls

Reduce Loads

Thermal Mass

Reduce Loads

Thermal Mass

76

74

72

70

68

66

64

62

60

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Daily Temperature Swing

Zone A

ir T

em

pera

ture

Reduce Loads

Rules of Thumb: - 2x Floor Area - 3” Deep

Daily temperature profile applied to top surface

1’ thick simulated concrete slab

Reduce Loads

Lighting

Incandescent Compact Fluorescent

LED

Reduce Loads

Lighting

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

w/s

f

UUFCO ~0.6 W/SF

1985

Reduce Load & Energy Use

Envelope

Building Element Parameter 2010 Oregon Energy Code

Proposed Building Percent Better

than Code

Roof

Type Attic Insulation above roof

46% Minimum Insulation R-21 R-38

Maximum U-Value 0.048 0.026

Walls

Type Lightweight

42% Minimum Insulation R-13 + R-3.8ci

Maximum U-Value 0.064

Vertical Glazing

Type Non-metal framing

0% U-Value 0.46 0.46

SGHC 0.4 0.4

Slab On Grade

Heated Heated

R-15 for 24” R-15 for 24”

Choose Efficient Systems

Variable Speed Air Source Heat Pump

Choose Efficient Systems

Heat Recovery

Choose Efficient Systems

Heat Recovery

Reduce Loads

Thermal Comfort

Phase Changing Materials

Choose Efficient Systems

Choose Efficient Systems

Radiant Heating / Cooling Floor

Anticipated Energy Use

Energy Results

$19,000 annual energy cost savings from code baseline

Actual Energy Use

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17

TO

TAL E

NERG

Y (

KBTU

/SF)

Electricity Gas Modeled Electricity Modeled Gas

Actual Energy Use

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17

TO

TAL E

NERG

Y (

KBTU

/SF)

Electricity Gas Modeled Electricity Modeled Gas

Integrate Renewables

Solar Energy, Rain, Geothermal and Wind

Integrate Renewables

Commercial Building: NZE

Site EUI (kBtu/ft2/yr)

29

27

25

23

21

18

16

14

12

Assumptions: • 50% of Roof area available

for PV • 20% Efficient PV panels • 2 floor Credit: Marjorie Schott/Shanti Pless/ Paul Torcellini NREL

Integrate Renewables

Dollars per PV-Watt

$0

$2

$4

$6

$8

$10

$12

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$/P

V-W

att

Insta

lled C

ost

Integrate Renewables

Integrate Renewables

Energy Form Source Energy Conversion Factor ( r )

Imported Electricity 3.15

Exported Renewable Electricity 3.15

Natural Gas 1.09

Fuel Oil (1,2,4,5,6, Diesel, Kerosene)

1.19

Propane & Liquid Propane 1.15

Steam 1.45

Hot Water 1.35

Chilled Water 1.04

Coal or Other 1.05

Integrate Renewables

~80 kW PV array needed for zero energy operation 4,300 SF

Creating a better environment

Marc Brune PE

Associate Principal marc.brune@pae-engineers.com 503–226–2921 522 SW 5th Ave, Suite 1500 Portland, OR 97204

Questions?

AFE 2.0 | High Performance Design in Oregon

COWHORN VINEYARD AND GARDEN TASTING ROOM

COWHORN VINEYARD + GARDEN

DESIGN

DESIGN

DESIGN

DESIGN

DESIGN

DESIGN

SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES

Path to

Net Zero

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

Passivhaus as a Path to Net Zero

1. Minimize Loads

• Insulation & Airtightness

• Heat-Recovery Ventilation

• Exterior Shading

2. Simple, Efficient Systems

• Minimized Loads allow Simple, Affordable Systems

3. Renewable Supply

• Loads can be met with Sustainable Energy Grid

• Net Zero within Reach (now or later)

• “Winter Gap” is minimized

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

Passivhaus as a Path to Net Zero

Invest in this… …so we can heat like this (especially when solar power isn’t there)

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

Envelope Investment Opportunity

Residential Building Energy Use

We typically have one opportunity to address

40-50% of a building’s lifetime energy use

Building Component Lifespans

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

Benefits

• Health

• Comfort

• Durability

• Resiliency

• Energy Savings

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

Impact on Design

Deep walls and roof assemblies

Walls = 19” R-value = 60

Roof = 28” R-value = 96

PASSIVHAUS APPROACH

Impact on Design

Breathable Envelopes in High Performance Buildings

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

Details: Thermal Bridge-Free + Airtightness

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

Details: Thermal Bridge-Free + Airtightness

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

Details: Thermal Bridge-Free + Airtightness

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

HVAC Systems for low-load buildings

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

PH Challenges during Construction

New Assemblies

• Mock-ups

• Pre-Construction Meetings

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

PH Challenges during Construction

Air-tightness

• Signage

• QC

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

PH Challenges during Construction

Avoiding thermal bridges

• Sequencing

• QC and Thermal Imaging

PASSIVHAUS IN DETAIL

Energy Model Results and Incentives

• 51% Energy Savings over baseline using code-minimal heat pump

• 68% Energy Savings over baseline using code allowed electric resistance

LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGE

Material Selection Process

MATERIALS PETAL IN DETAIL

MATERIALS PETAL IN DETAIL

LBC Challenges during Construction

• PVC is in everything!

QUESTIONS

Recommended