View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition - Structural Systems
High-Performance Reading Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
Team Mission Statement
Project Mission Statement
“Building to Unite Us”
“To build a stronger sense of community”
The Pennsylvania State University Senior BIM Thesis 2013 - Structural OptionDesign Team - Eric Cook and Devon Saunders
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINEPresentation OutlineProject Overview
Virtual Modeling & Analysis
Code and Load Considerations
Substructure
Superstructure
Areas of Interest
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINEPresentation OutlineProject Overview Competition Guidelines Building Overview
Virtual Modeling & Analysis Coordination Modeling and BIM
Substructure Grade Beams, Piles, and Pile Caps
Superstructure Gravity Framing Lateral Framing
Areas of Interest Building Envelope
Multi Purpose RoomNatatorium
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Teams should address:
“Construction and design issues related to a high performance building that meets the needs of both the school district and community”
Competition Guidelines“Innovation in the performance of building design and construction by advancing integration, collaboration, communication, and efficiency through new tools and technologies”
Project Overview Competition Guidelines
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building Overview
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Structural Competition GuidelinesThe design team shall:
“Consider the given Geotechnical Report and existing conditions ”
“Create a design development submittal of the structural systems (foundation and wall, floor, and roof framing systems)”
Project Overview Competition Guidelines
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building Overview
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Building Overview
Project Owner: Reading School DistrictProject Name: High-Performance Elementary SchoolProject Location: Intersection of 13th Street and Union Street Reading, PennsylvaniaDelivery Method: Integrated Project Delivery
Square Footage: 108,000 SF
Overall Cost: $21,344,312Cost per SF: $203.15
3 stories above grade, half-footprint basement level open to public
Multi Purpose Room, Community Health Clinic
6-lane, competition size swimming pool on the lower level
Applying for LEED GOLD certificationN
Green Roof Typical Classroom Pre-Fab Facade PanelMulti Purpose
Room
Cogeneration Plant Natatorium Community Garden
Project Overview Competition Guidelines
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building Overview
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Building Overview
Project Owner: Reading School DistrictProject Name: High-Performance Elementary SchoolProject Location: Intersection of 13th Street and Union Street Reading, PennsylvaniaDelivery Method: Integrated Project Delivery
Square Footage: 108,000 SF
Overall Cost: $21,344,312Cost per SF: $203.15
3 stories above grade, half-footprint basement level open to public
Multi Purpose Room, Community Health Clinic
6-lane, competition size swimming pool on the lower level
Applying for LEED GOLD certification
Green Roof Typical Classroom Pre-Fab Facade PanelMulti Purpose
Room
Cogeneration Plant Natatorium Community Garden
N
Community Based Criteria
- Transparent and open spaces that induce productivity in learning and allows for a crime-free environment
- A structural frame that defines educational spaces from community spaces
Project Overview Competition Guidelines
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building Overview
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Building Overview
Project Owner: Reading School DistrictProject Name: High-Performance Elementary SchoolProject Location: Intersection of 13th Street and Union Street Reading, PennsylvaniaDelivery Method: Integrated Project Delivery
Square Footage: 108,000 SF
Overall Cost: $21,344,312Cost per SF: $203.15
3 stories above grade, half-footprint basement level open to public
Multi Purpose Room, Community Health Clinic
6-lane, competition size swimming pool on the lower level
Applying for LEED GOLD certification
Green Roof Typical Classroom
Cogeneration Plant Community Garden
N
Community Based Criteria
- Transparent and open spaces that induce productivity in learning and allows for a crime-free environment
- A structural frame that defines educational spaces from community spaces
Design Based Criteria
- Capability of the frame integration with other engineering disciplines
- A design process and modeling techniques that allow for virtual and BIM based analyses
Multi Purpose Room
Natatorium
Pre-Fab Facade PanelProject Overview Competition Guidelines
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building Overview
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom Green Roof
SpecialEducation
Stairs
StairsStairs
Elevator
Building Overview - Floor Plans
DN
DN
Men's LockerRoom
Stairs
Lobby / ADA AccessibleRamp
ElectricalRoom
Mechanical Room
Stairs
Community GardenCommunity Pool
PoolMechanicalRoom
Women's LockerRoom
SchoolOffices
SchoolOffices
SchoolOffices
SchoolOffices
Mantrap
LobbyMultipurpose Gymnasium
Kitchen and Serving Area
Sto
rage
P.E
. Offi
ces
Stairs
HealthClinic
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
ClassroomSpecialEducationClassroom
Boys
Boys
Girls
Girls
ElevatorCommunity Garden
DN
Multi-Purpose Room (Below)
Stage(Below)
ArtFacultyDining
Libr
ary
Supp
ort
Library
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
LobbyOffices
Stairs
Stairs
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
ClassroomSpecial
EducationClassroom
Elevator
Stairs
Stairs
Boys
Boys
Girls
Girls
NNNLower Level First Floor
Third Floor
Second Floor
Project Overview Competition Guidelines
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building Overview
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Coordination Modeling and BIM
Team Collaboration
“Big Room” design approach
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Coordinaton Modeling and BIM
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Coordination Modeling and BIM
Coordination Model
Team Collaboration
“Big Room” design approach Structural layout with Revit
Structural Layout Using Revit
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Coordinaton Modeling and BIM
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Coordination Modeling and BIM
“Big Room” design approach Structural layout with Revit
Analysis in RAM Structural Systems
Coordination Model
Structural Layout Using RevitStructural Analysis Using RAM
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Coordinaton Modeling and BIM
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Coordination Modeling and BIM
“Big Room” design approach Structural layout with Revit
Analysis in RAM Structural Systems
Virtual modeling work sessions
Virtual Coordination ModelStructural Analysis Using RAM
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Coordinaton Modeling and BIM
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Code and Load ConsiderationsLocal Reading Building Codes
Ground snow load case study region
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Code and Load ConsiderationsLocal Reading Building Codes
Ground snow load case study region
IBC classification B type II Construction
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Local Reading Building Codes
Ground snow load case study region
IBC classification B type II Construction
Code and Load Considerations
Design Loads
Live and snow loads
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Local Reading Building Codes
Ground snow load case study region
IBC classification B type II Construction
Code and Load Considerations
Design Loads
Live and snow loads
Dead loads
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Grade Beams
Design Governed by:
Smallest x-sect dim shall be > smallest clear span between columns 20
Closed ties shall be provided at spacing < smallest cross sectional dimension 2
Project Overview
Substructure
Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Grade Beams, Piles, and Pile Caps
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Grade Beams
Design Governed by:
Smallest x-sect dim shall be > smallest clear span between columns 20
Closed ties shall be provided at spacing < smallest cross sectional dimension 2
Piles and Pile Caps
Pile and Pile Cap Design Criteria:
Embed piles into caps by 6”
Rebar clear cover is 3” minimum
Spacing between piles must be 3’ minimum for diameters < 12”
Designed per CRSI Templates
Project Overview
Substructure
Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Grade Beams, Piles, and Pile Caps
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Steel Frame
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure
Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Gravity FamingLateral Framing
Caters to assumptions made by geotechnical report
Ability to create open spaces
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Steel Frame
Caters to assumptions made by geotechnical report
Ability to create open spaces
Building Seperation
Achieved using a 1.5” building expansion joint
Accounts for abrupt changes in building orientation
West Wing [shelter] seismic importance factor = 1.5
East Wing seismc importance factor = 1.25
Wind importance factor = 1.15 for both buildings
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure
Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Gravity FamingLateral Framing
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Lateral Analysis and DesignMain Wind-Force Resisting System
Orhtogonal projected area optimized for calculations
Wind load forces control in the N-S direction for both structures and controls in the E-W direction for the West Wing
West Wing Wind Base Shear N-S = 245 kips E-W = 199 kips
Main Structure Wind Base Shear N-S = 476 kips E-W = 287 kips
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure
Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Gravity FamingLateral Framing
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Lateral Analysis and DesignSeismic Force Resisting System
Seismic Importance Factor for shelter
Equivalent Lateral Force Method analysis
West Wing Seismic Story Forces Roof = 49 kips Story 3 = 84 kips Story 2 = 20 kips
East Wing Seismic Story Forces Roof = 115 kips Story 3 = 140 kips Story 2 = 63 kips
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure
Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Gravity FamingLateral Framing
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Lateral Force Resisting System
Rectangular HSS members used for lateral cross bracing
Member sizes range from: 4.5 x 4.5 x 3/8 to 6 x 6 x 5/8
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure
Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Gravity FamingLateral Framing
Brace sizes were controlled by compression with a KL/r < 200 from column to column
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Areas of Interest
Pre-Fab Facade PanelMulti Purpose
Room
Natatorium
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building EnvelopeMulti Purpose RoomNatatorium
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Prefabricated Facade Panels
Panel design coordination - Panel assembly designed based off of “Big Room” meetings with the CM and Mechanical disciplines
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building EnvelopeMulti Purpose RoomNatatorium
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Panel design coordination - Panel assembly designed based off of “Big Room” meetings with the CM and Mechanical disciplines
Prefabricated Facade Panels
Panel structural design
- Layout and simplified design of connections to structural frame
- Reinforced concrete wythes
- Composite section created using carbon fiber reinforcement
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building EnvelopeMulti Purpose RoomNatatorium
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Multi Purpose Room [Hurricane Shelter]
Designed to Fema 320 / FEMA 361 Windborne Debris Standards - Polycarbonate glazing - Roof system designed to resist 26 psf due to wind uplift Long Span Joist Girders - 3NA22 accoustical steel deck supported by Vulcraft 48G10N10F joist girders - 20’ Spaced joist girders braced with 16K2 bar joists spaced at 6’
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building EnvelopeMulti Purpose RoomNatatorium Image from rwiunbraco-gb.inforce.dk
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Natatorium
Use of Cellular Beams - Allows smaller floor to deck heights - Decreases vibration issues from Multipurpose space above - Pre assembled off site
- More cost effcient than traditional W-Flange Beams
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
Building EnvelopeMulti Purpose RoomNatatorium
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
CONCLUSION
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
The Pennsylvania State University
Reading Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
Department of Architectural EngineeringApril 8, 2013
“In the middle of every difficulty lies opportunity”
- Vaughn D. Spencer, Mayor of Reading, Pennsylvania
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
CONCLUSION
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
The Pennsylvania State University
Reading Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
Department of Architectural EngineeringApril 8, 2013
Special Thanks to:
• ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition• City of Reading• Robert Holland• Kevin Parfitt• Andres Lepage• Richard Mistrick• Craig Dubler• Jelena Srebric• Unitus• Friends & Family
Project Overview
Substructure Superstructure Areas of Interest
Virtual Modelingand Analyses
Code and Load Considerations
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Appendix
Wind Design
Basic Wind Speed: 90 mph
Category: Shelter - IV Main Building - III
Importance Factor : 1.15
Exposure Category: B
Page taken from ASCE 7-05
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Appendix
Grade Beams and Pile Caps
Per ACI Chapter 21.12.3
- Smallest x-sect dim shall be > clr span between columns/20, hence 16” width.
- Grade beams can be separated from SOG
- Closed ties at < smallest x-sect dim/2, so 16”/2 = 8”
Grade Beams
- Depth = designed for 24”
- Width = 16”
- Reinf w/ (5) #9’s, 3” cc
- Increased to 24” depth to match 24” pile caps.
- Checked for simplified deflections [ACI 318] – l/21 (Beams, both ends continuous), accounts for sink hole formations
- Loads Considered: Self Weight , Pre-Fab Panel Weight , and Live Loads
Piles and Pile Caps
Per CRSI 2008
- Embed piles into caps by 6”
- Rebar cc is 3” min
- Pile spacing min = 3’ for piles up to 12” dia
- Checked for two way action
- 3 Pile, 4 Pile, and 6 Pile system designed for flexure and punch shear
- 3 Pile Cap Reinf = (6) #5 @ 6” 3-ways
- 4 Pile Cap Reinf = (9) #5 @ 6 1/2” each way
- 6 Pile Cap Reinf = (15) #5 @ 6 3/4” long (9) #5 @ 6 1/2” short
- 8” steel encased concrete pile designed for bearing capacity of 66 kips
UNITUSdes ign ing fo r peop le
BUILDING TO UNITE USenhancing environments
ASCE Charles Pankow Foundation Student Competition
High Performance Elementary SchoolReading, Pennsylvania
The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering
Devon SaundersEric Cook
STRUCTURAL
Brittany NotorDaniel McGee
MECHANICAL
Matthew HoernerBrian Blenner
CONSTRUCTION
Keith McMullenKyle Houser
LIGHTING / ELECTRICAL
OUTLINE
Appendix
FEMA Shelter Design Guidelines
Pages taken from FEMA P-361, Second Edition / August 2008 Pages taken from FEMA P-361, Second Edition / August 2008
Recommended