View
216
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
I-880Corridor System Management Plan
ACTAC MeetingAlameda County Transportation Commission
District 4Office of System PlanningOffice of Traffic Operations Strategies
September 7, 2010
I-880 CSMP OverviewCMIA Requirements
CSMP requirement is noted in the Baseline Agreements of all projects receiving CMIA funding.
CMIA funding has been allocated for three projects on I-880:
• NB/SB HOV Lanes, SR-237 to US-101• SB HOV lane, Marina to Hegenberger• I-880/I-280/Stevens Creek Interchange
I-880 (ALA/SCL) One of Nine TenCMIA Corridors
in Bay Area
US-101 North (MRN/SON) US-101 Peninsula (SM/SCL) I-80 East (SOL) I-80 West (ALA/CC) I-880 (ALA/SCL) I-580 East (ALA) SR-4 (CC) SR-24 (ALA/CC) SR-12 (NAP/SOL) SR-84 (SM/ALA) (recently added)
I-880 CSMP Status
880 Corridor Management Plan (CMP) Demo Begins 2005
880 Corridor TAC meetings 2006 - 2010
CMIA Baseline Agreements Signed June 2007
880 CMP Report Completed January, 2010
Incorporate Technical Analysis into CSMP Feb. - May 2010
Draft CSMP Complete June 2010
Most recent 880 Corridor TAC Meeting June 17, 2010
Draft Final CSMP Complete August 10, 2010
Key Milestones Chronology
I-880 CSMPStakeholder Engagement
Working GroupCaltransMetropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Congestion Management AgencySanta Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Corridor TAC Member Local Jurisdictions/Planning Agency PartnersCity of Oakland City of NewarkCity of Alameda City of FremontCity of San Leandro City of Union CityCity of Hayward Alameda CountyAC Transit BARTAlameda County Transportation Improvement Authority
I-880 CSMP Background
Corridor Limits • From I-280 in Santa Clara County to 7th Street in Oakland/Alameda County.• 42 miles including both Alameda and Santa Clara segments.
Corridor Issues
• Urban Development• Goods Movement• Connecting of Urban Centers• Severe Congestion
I-880 Supporting Studies Coverage
Map
The CSMP incorporates and builds upon technical information from these studies
The result is a system planning document to help guide future investment choices through traditional programming and planning processes.
I-880 CSMP:Existing Conditions and
Bottlenecks
Growing VHD during analysis period (2004-2008).
Most severe in PM
Major bottlenecks at 23rd, 98th, Davis, Marina, Tennyson, Dixon Landing, Brokaw, US-101 and Bascom.
I-880 CSMP:Recommended Strategies
• Implement and enhance advanced/adaptive ramp metering throughout the corridor.
• Complete CMIA and TCIF funded projects.
• Construct interchange improvements and auxiliary lanes.
• Complete HOV/express lane projects.
Key Improvement Metrics
• 29% VHD reduction from ALA improvements compared to “do nothing”
• 7/1 Benefit/Cost Ratio of Advanced Ramp Metering
• Mobility maintained for HOV, still expect increased congestion for SOV.
I-880 CSMP Document
CSMP Document Sections• Executive Summary• Section 1: CSMP Overview• Section 2: Corridor Description• Section 3: Performance Assessment• Section 4: Future Performance Assessment• Section 5: Strategy Evaluation and Recommendations• Appendices: Supporting Documents and Technical Documents
I-880 CSMPNext Steps
ACTAC September 7, 2010
VTA TAC September 9, 2010
ACTC September 23, 2010
CSMP Acceptance Late September 2010
CSMP Delivery to HQ Plng. and CTC Late September 2010
For more information regarding the
I-880 Corridor System Management Plan
please contact:
Caltrans:Katie Benouar, 510-286-5578 kbenouar@dot.ca.gov
Erik Alm, 510-286-6053 ealm@dot.ca.gov
Bob Rosevear, 510-286-5544 robert_rosevear@dot.ca.gov
The “second generation” CSMPswill take up the challenge of providing mobility and reducing highway congestion within the context of a new regional planning framework.
Sustainable Community Strategy as required by SB 375
2013 Regional Transportation Plan
I-880 Corridor:Future CSMPs
Recommended