View
219
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Implementation Approach
UCP
UCP
Lessons LearnedRenewed and heightened focus on pedestrian mobility.
• Pedestrian realm (sidewalks and crosswalks)
• Building / sidewalk relationship
UCP
Elements Under Consideration
1. Pedestrian cross section
UCP
Elements Under Consideration
2. Build-within-zone
3. Minimum built frontage
4. Minimum transparency
5. Sidewalk entrances
6. Driveway spacing standards
UCP
Illustration
10’ Planting & Utilities
5’ Pedestrian Zone
75% Min. Transparency
25%
75%
Built Frontage
Curb
Edge of Pedestrian Realm
Property Line
Property Line
10’ Build Within Zone
UCP
Issues to Consider
1. Mandatory vs. incentivized
2. Geographic application
3. Neighborhood protection
UCP
Mandatory vs. Incentivized
1. Mandatory elements – all corridors
A. Pedestrian realm standard
B. Driveway spacing
2. Other elements may be incentivized
UCP
Mandatory vs. Incentivized
1. Economic / market implications
A. Direct costs
B. Market / risk (“1,321’ effect”)
2. Opportunities for incentives
A. Urban corridor standards
B. Obtainable benefits
• Increased buildable area
• Reduced parking requirements
UCP
Increased Buildable Area
UCP
Geographic Application
Pedestrian Core DistrictPedestrian Core DistrictOther CorridorOther Corridor
UniversityUniversity
UptownUptown
UCP
Geographic Application
1. Uptown
A. Incentivized
2. “Other corridor”
A. Incentivized
B. Linked to neighborhood protection
3. Core pedestrian district
A. Possibly mandatory elements & “automatic” benefits
B. Also possible additional incentives
UCP
Neighborhood Protections
1. Angular plane
A. Tied to incentives
2. Single family share threshold for withholding incentives
3. “Other corridor” areas only Angular Plane
Lot Line
UCP
Upcoming Process
1. Ordinance & Policy Drafting
2. Defined Review Process
A. Mixed Use / TOD Committee
B. Planning Commission
C. City Council Committee on Regulation, Nbhd Protection and Development
D. City Council
Implementation Approach
UCP
Recommended