IT for ADR: The Procrustean Challenge

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

IT for ADR: The Procrustean Challenge. Pablo Noriega IIIA-CSIC. IT in ADR. Pervasive Useful Unavoidable. It may become a Procrustean bed. Adapt to type of ADR. 17. Different degrees and modes of automation. 17. 17. 17. 17. 19. 10. 10. 3. 16. 19. 10. 16. 3. 16. 16. 16. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

IT for ADR: The Procrustean Challenge

Pablo NoriegaIIIA-CSIC

IT in ADR

• Pervasive

• Useful

• Unavoidable

2Procrustean Challenge

It may become a Procrustean bed

3Procrustean Challenge

Adapt to type of ADRDifferent degrees and modes of automationdo

cum

enta

ción

com

unic

ació

n

virt

ualiz

ació

n

cont

rol d

el fl

ujo

form

as

estr

uctu

rada

s

mec

anism

os

de d

ecisi

ón

grad

o de

au

tom

atiza

ción

med

iaci

ón

grad

o de

au

tom

atiza

ción

nego

ciac

ión

reco

men

daci

ón

arbi

traj

e

quej

as

33

10

1919

1717 17

1613

1016

1010

16

1717

1016

conc

iliac

ión

20

13

13

3 CyberSettle10 Juripax

13 MediationRoom16 ODRWorld

16

4Procrustean Challenge

Adapt to type of ADR

• Support process

• Support participants

5

Different degrees and modes of automation

Design premises

Fair– Due process

Invisible– Accessible– Unobtrusive

Reliable– Privacy– Permanence

Effective

6Procrustean Challenge

Designing for effectiveness

1 conventions for communication• Specific ADR and domain ontologies• Roles• Standardized documents

2 procedural conventions• Repetitive activities• Sequence of activities• Rules of engagement / disengagement

3 obligation management• Establishment conventions• Satisfaction conventions

4 constitutive and “anchoring” conventions

7Procrustean Challenge

Designing for effectiveness

1 conventions for communication• Specific ADR and domain ontologies• Roles• Standardized documents

2 procedural conventions• Repetitive activities• Sequence of activities• Rules of engagement / disengagement

3 obligation management• Establishment conventions• Satisfaction conventions

4 constitutive and “anchoring” conventions

8Procrustean Challenge

Feasible:ExplicitFormalExecutable

Example of communication and procedural conventions 1:

Mediated Negotiation

Offer (proposer, receiver; deal[v1,v2,..,vn], t)

Invalidoffer(mediator, proposer; improvedeal[xi,xj], t)

9Procrustean Challenge

Example of procedural conventions 2:Generic Agreement Framework

10Procrustean Challenge

Qualities to guarantee

Fairness– Due process

Invisibility– Accessible– Unobtrusive

Reliability– Privacy– Permanence

Effectiveness

11Procrustean Challenge

Fairness– Due process

Invisibility– Accessible– Unobtrusive

Reliability– Privacy– Permanence

Effectiveness

12Procrustean Challenge

Recommended