View
56
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Leslie Ries (SESYNC, University of MD) Cameron Scott ( NatureServe ) Timothy Howard (New York Natural Heritage Program) Tanja Schuster (Norton-Brown Herbarium, University of MD) Rick Reeves ( Foxgrove Solutions) Karen Oberhauser (University of MN). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A Mechanistic Species Distribution Model for Monarch Butterflies:
Towards a general platform for understanding large-scale butterfly distributions
Leslie Ries (SESYNC, University of MD)Cameron Scott (NatureServe)
Timothy Howard (New York Natural Heritage Program)
Tanja Schuster (Norton-Brown Herbarium, University of MD)
Rick Reeves (Foxgrove Solutions)Karen Oberhauser (University of MN)
Correlative vs. Mechanistic Species Distribution Models (SDMs) • Correlative (“Niche”) SDMs use occurrence data to infer ranges
• BENEFITS: Long history, broad applicability
• DRAWBACKS: Weak basis for causation, lack of test data
• Mechanistic (“process”) models use knowledge of species’ responses to abiotic or biotic conditions to predict ranges
• BENEFITS: A priori predictions of causal mechanisms can be tested with independent data
• DRAWBACKS: Species-specific
Banks et al. 2008
A simple mechanistic model for butterflies
Limited by host plant distribution Limited by physiological constraints General process-based model would combine host-
plant distributions, temperature tolerances, and climate data to predict distributions
+ +
Lab data on physiological tolerances
Climate dataHost-plant distribution data
Our key data sources:
Goal: build a mechanistic SDM for the monarch butterfly
Well-understood biology Data to test model predictions at large
scales, thanks to 1000’s of citizen scientist volunteers
A model that works for species with complex annual cycle could be broadly applicable across species, thus meeting a principle challenge of building mechanistic SDMs
The monarch butterfly annual cycle
Overwintering (Nov – Feb)
Spring migration and breeding (Mar – Apr)
Summer expansion and breeding (May – Aug)
Fall migration (Sept – Oct)
Today, focus on the eastern migratory population in North America during spring and summer
Talk outline
1. Development of predictor layers (host plant and temperature models)
2. Citizen-science data sources used to test the model
3. Relationships between predictor layers and monarch distributions
Modeling host-plant resources
Multiple niche models to predict distributions of monarch host plants (most in genus Asclepias, Apocynacaea)
~100 species in North America, ~50 with records of monarch use
Building Milkweed Prediction Maps with Niche Models
Collected observation records (GBIF, on-line herbaria, iNaturalist, and Journey North) with location and date Thinned to eliminate observations <12km apart and
<50 records after thinning 19,101 observations downloaded, 8,053 were left
after grouping into seasonal bins and thinning on minimum separation distance
36 environmental layers used to inform niche model Random Forests in R to provide a consensus map
based on 1000’s of individual regression trees Output maps for individual species compiled into
single seasonal maps showing number of modeled species.
Example for Asclepias syriaca, most common milkweed and
primary hostObservation records Summer “niche” map
Species modeled:7 spring27 summer
Diversity index
Modeling physiological responses to temperature using Degree Days (DD)
•Determine temperature at which growth can begin (DZmin), each degree above that over 24 hrs is considered a “degree day”
•Often, maximum temperature is set (DZmax) after which degree days are no longer accumulated
0
5
10
15
20
25
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Daily
deg
ree
days
(Tmin+Tmax)/2
Calculating daily degree days
DZmin = 11.5°C (52.7°F)
?Total GDD required:351DD+45DD
Zalucki 198245 DD
32DD
28DD
24DD
35DD
67DD
120DD
Plus 45DD before egg-laying begins
Most DD formulas do not account for lethal and sub-lethal effects of high temperature
Laboratory results (Batalden et al. in press) show that for monarchs: No growth at 38°C (100.4°F) Some lethal effects at 40°C (104°F) Only 20% survivorship at 42°C (107.6°F) 100% mortality at 44°C (111.2°F)
Model distinguishes Growing Degree Days (GDD: energy is accumulated) and Lethal Degree Days (LDD: slow growth or cause death)
0
5
10
15
20
25
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Daily
deg
ree
days
(Tmin+Tmax)/2
Calculating daily degree days
DZmin = 11.5°C
?
Sub-lethal and lethal effects
?
Mapping GDD and LDD
Temperature data from NOAA temperature stations
Used ordinary kriging to interpolate temperatures between stations every day from 1990-2009.
GDD and LDD were accumulated by season for spring (Mar-Apr) and summer (May-Aug) and converted to number of generations
3105 weather stations
Predicted generation
s
# Generations that could be produced based on available
GDDsSpring prediction map Summer prediction map
Predicted generations
Predicted generations
Number of LDD (degrees over 38°C) accumulated during
summer
Average # accumulated LDD
Butterfly distribution data from 2 Citizen Science Projects
Spring data: Journey North
Summer data: North American Butterfly
Association
No. Years
Spring: host-plant and climate resources both associated with monarch distributions
The center of milkweed diversity in TX is associated with the greatest number of spring monarch sightings
MILKWEED DISTRIBUTIONS
Modeled species predicted present
# observatio
ns
Spring: host-plant and climate resources both associated with monarch distributions
The center of milkweed diversity in TX is associated with the greatest number of spring monarch sightings
Monarch sightings in spring reaches their northern-most distribution within a zone where there is warmth for growth, but not enough for a full spring generation.
MILKWEED DISTRIBUTIONS GROWING DEGREE DAYS
Modeled species predicted present
Predicted generations
# observatio
ns
Are host-plant and climate resources strongly associated with summer monarch distributions?
Monarch distributions north of center of milkweed diversity
MILKWEED DIVERSITY
Modeled species predicted present
Monarchs/PH
Are host-plant and climate resources associated with summer monarch distributions?
Monarch distributions north of center of milkweed diversity – but recall that their primary host (A. syriaca) is distributed throughout.
MILKWEED DISTRIBUTIONS
Modeled species predicted present
Monarchs/PH
Are host-plant and climate resources strongly associated with summer monarch distributions?
Monarch distributions north of center of milkweed diversity – but recall that their primary host (A. syriaca) is distributed throughout.
Monarch distributions north of where the maximum number of generations are predicted, but south of where multiple generations aren’t possible.
MILKWEED DISTRIBUTIONS GROWING DEGREE DAYS
Modeled species predicted present
Predicted generations
Monarchs/PH
Are monarchs avoiding excessive heat?
Average number of accumulated LDD
Monarchs seem to be found where they are least likely to encounter temperatures above 38°C.
Monarchs/PH
Conclusions Built models of milkweed distributions
and GDD/LDD Spring: Northward migration limited by
energy for growth, seems concentrated near the center of milkweed availability
Summer: Southern limits driven by stressful temperatures, northern by host-plant availability and sufficient energy for multiple generations
Acknowledgements Monarch Citizen Scientists for
documenting monarch distributions Elizabeth Howard and Journey North
Staff, Jeff Glassberg and NABA Staff, Xerces Society for starting and maintaining Journey North and Fourth of July Butterfly Counts
Emily Voelker for helping compile the milkweed database
NSF # DBI-1052875 to SESYNC, ABI-1147049 to SESYNC and UMD for providing funding
USGS’s John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis working group, Animal Migration and Spatial Subsidies: Establishing a Framework for Conservation Markets, for good conversations Photo by Tony Gomez
Towards a modeling platform for monarchs and other butterflies Our goal is to develop a modeling framework that can
account for both climate and host-plant resources Host-plant distributions and climate expressed as GDD and
LDD may prove to be a useful modeling framework for many species of butterflies (and potentially other invertebrate herbivores) – meaning this approach could provide a general mechanistic model for understanding butterfly range dynamics
Species interactions may also be critical for many species, and that may require more species-specific approaches
For the monarch, we want to be able to use this platform to explore many issues of conservation concern: Loss of milkweed habitat in the midwest due to Roundup-
Ready crops Increase in winter breeding in the southern US Track population trends and try to pinpoint their cause or
causes
Milkweed species modeled
Season Sp Start Thinned speciesSummer AS_AS 916 125asperula
Summer AS_CURA 488 146curassavicaSummer AS_EX 329 90exaltata
Summer AS_FA 273 82fascicularis
Summer AS_GL 181 75glaucescensSummer AS_HI 377 62hirtellaSummer AS_INC 2309 244incarnata
Summer AS_INV 279 53involucrata
Summer AS_LANU 121 62lanuginosaSummer AS_LAT 253 80latifoliaSummer AS_LINA 461 107linaria
Summer AS_OE 214 90oenotheroidesSummer AS_OV 138 54ovalifoliaSummer AS_PER 161 58perennisSummer AS_PUM 282 59pumila
Summer AS_PUR 379 91purpurascens
Summer AS_QUAD 409 104quadrifoliaSummer AS_SPEC 1138 180speciosa
Summer AS_STEN 250 74stenophylla
Summer AS_SUBV 855 108subverticillataSummer AS_SUL 314 67sullivantiiSummer AS_SYR 1457 184syriacaSummer AS_TUB 1818 255tuberosaSummer AS_VAR 183 76variegata
Summer AS_VERT 1398 195verticillata
SummerAS_VIRIDF 1088 192viridiflora
Summer AS_VIRIDI 376 86viridis
Spring AS_AS 113 94asperulaSpring AS_CURA 338 250curassavicaSpring AS_GL 102 76glaucescensSpring AS_LINA 153 121 linariaSpring AS_SUBU 86 74subulataSpring AS_VIRIDI 72 52viridis
predictor layers created for 36 different variables: percent forest, percent cropland, percent water, percent wetland, percent urban/barren land, population density, presence of railroads, mean annual temperature, mean annual temperature, mean monthly temperature (12 variables), mean monthly precipitation (12 variables), elevation, latitude, and longitude.
Recommended