LOOPER 2018 AESOP Young Academics Conference CO-DESIGN...

LOOPER

CO-DESIGN PRINCIPLES

2018 AESOP Young Academics Conference

Mareile WIegmann

Groningen

29/03/2018

1. Context: The LOOPER Project

2. Methods

3. Patterns emerging

4. Conclusions

Outline

Manchester (UK)

Brussels (BE)

Verona (IT)

Learning Loops in the Public Realm

Three parallel Urban Living Labs

► MANCHESTER

► VERONA

► BRUSSEL

► Street Safety

► Neighborhood Cohesion

► Air Quality

► Noise Pollution

► Safer streets

► Traffic Calming

Goals

► Creation of an online support platform through allsteps of co-creation

► Special emphasis on making learning loops tangibleand encouraged, both in face-to-face workshops and on the online platform

► Citizens, stakeholders and policy-makers iteratively learn together how to address urban challenges

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design 2b Evaluation3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

1b Data Collection

1c Visualization

Co-creation

VIV

GEOTAGGING TOOL

VIV

GEOTAGGING TOOL

VIV

GEOTAGGING TOOL

Going beyond Data Collection and Visualization

Co-Creation

Co-Design

Living Lab

Methods

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design 2b Evaluation3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

1b Data Collection

1c Visualization

Co-creation

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design 2b Evaluation3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

Empathize

Explore Problems

Define Problem

1b Data Collection

1c Visualization

Co-creation

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design 2b Evaluation3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

Ideate Design Test

Empathize

Explore Problems

Define Problem

1b Data Collection

1c Visualization

Co-creation

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design 2b Evaluation3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

Ideate Design Test

Organize Evaluate Agree

Empathize

Explore Problems

Define Problem

1b Data Collection

1c Visualization

Co-creation

:

Patterns emerging

► Five realms where people aim to co-design

► Breadth of resouces available

Patterns emerging

CollaborativePlanning

Patterns emerging

CollaborativePlanning Public Service

Design

Patterns emerging

CollaborativePlanning

CitizenEngagement

Public Service Design

Patterns emerging

CollaborativePlanning

CitizenEngagement

Public Service Design

DesignThinking

Patterns emerging

CollaborativePlanning

CitizenEngagement

Public Service Design

DesignThinking

CommunityArchitecture

Patterns emerging

Physical toolkits

FacilitationHandbooks

Training courses

Team co-cooperation platforms

Online co-creationproducts

CommunityExperts

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design

2b Evaluation

3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

1c Visualization

1b Data Collection

CommunityExperts

1a Scoping

2a Co-Design

2b Evaluation

3a Implementation

3b Monitoring

1c Visualization

1b Data Collection

Expertise too weak/too strong

Governance barriers

Conflict

Disconnection

Resources(money, land…)

Deeper resource potentialof community

Dissent

Uninvolved citizens disagreeConveying ideas

Policy window

Conclusion: Challenges going forward

► Making the breadth of information accessible online

► Highlighting the underlying principles that should be put in place rather than offering a tool

► Achknowledge the hurdles throughout the process, yet frame them positively

► Make it tanglible to the community when they have learned totackle a hurdle. Celebrate these successes.

Thank you!Mareile Wiegmann

VUB - MOBI

Tel: 02 629 22 91

Mareile.Wiegmann@vub.be

Imre Keserü

Cathy Macharis

Dichotomies