Math Assessments: Creating Technology Enhanced Items and Adding Rigor Henrico County Public Schools...

Math Assessments:Creating Technology Enhanced Items and Adding RigorHenrico County Public SchoolsAugust 2012

Key Questions

•What do we want students to be able to do?

•How do we want them to demonstrate it?•How can our assessments help determine

the level of understanding?

•Why does Virginia/Henrico assess students?

•Why do teachers assess students?

We MUST change instruction!▫Teachers must instruct in the manner that

we are going to assess.▫Students must have experiences with these

assessments regularly in their classroom.▫Teachers must learn how to ask good

questions.

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Traditional

Assessment

Standards/Objectives

Instructional Activities Assessment

Standards/Objectives

Real-World “Ends”

Assessments

Instructional Activities

21st Century Assessment

SOL Assessment Changes – All Levels

•Increased focus on multistep and applied (“practical” or “real world”) problems

•Increased emphasis on models and multiple representations

11

Are you smarter than aGeometry student?

12

NEW

OLD

Increased Rigor

Understanding the “increased rigor” of the new SOL comes through analysis of

the SOL and the Curriculum Framework

Exercise #1

Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards Design

STEPS1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum

Framework- what students should be able to do

2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL3. Develop an assessment4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources/lesson

plans

16

Analyze the SOL and list at least 5 different things that students should know and be able to do.

SOL 6.13 The student will describe and identify properties of quadrilaterals• Sort and classify polygons as quadrilaterals,

parallelograms, rectangles, trapezoids, kites, rhombi, and squares based on their properties. Properties include number of parallel sides, angle measures, and number of congruent sides.

• Identify the sum of the measures of the angles of a quadrilateral as 360°.

17

Analysis - What should students be able to do?

Developing Assessments and Appropriate Instruction – Backwards Design

1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework- what students should be able to do

2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL3. Develop assessment items4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources

18

1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework- what students should be able to do

2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL3. Develop assessment items4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources

19

Developing Assessments and Appropriate Instruction – Backwards Design

Exercise #2

Compare the 2001 SOL to the 2009 SOL

group discussion

How has the rigor increased?

2001 SOL 7.22 The student willa) solve one-step linear equations and inequalities in one variable with strategies involving inverse operations and integers, using concrete materials, pictorial representations, and paper and pencil; andb) solve practical problems requiring the solution of a one-step linear equation.

2009 SOL 7.14 The student willa) solve one- and two-step linear equations in one variable; and b) solve practical problems requiring the solution of one- and two-step linear equations.

21

Technology Enhanced Items (TEI)

Format of Questions:• Fill in the blank• Drag and drop• Hot-spot: Select one or more “spots” to

respond to a test item, i.e. select answer option(s), shade region(s), place a point on a grid

• Creation of graphs

Technology Enhanced Items (TEI)

Spring 2012 Test AdministrationFor online tests that assess 2009

Mathematics SOL:•Grade 6 through End-of-Course (EOC):

TEI will be operational (approximately 15% of the test form)

24

Sample TEI – Fill in the Blank

25

Sample TEI – Drag and Drop

26

Sample TEI – Hot Spot

Sample TEI – Create Graphs

27

•It is essential that students have experiences with the Practice SOL Items prior to testing. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/sol/practice_items/index.shtml

•Use of the Practice Item Guides is STRONGLY recommended.

•Practice Item Guides provide:▫Guided practice with tools▫Information specific to TEI functionality▫Information on item format

28

Practice SOL Items

Modifying Assessment Items

Use these guiding questions to “upgrade” the following SOL questions

•How could a test item writer ask this in a TEI format?

•What types of classroom activities or assessments could I use to prepare students?

29

31

Modifying Assessments

32

Modifying Assessments

33

Modifying Assessments

Where can I get ideas for quality assessment items?• NAEP released items (searchable database)

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

• PISA released items http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/10/38709418.pdf

• APEC Mathematics Assessment Database http://hrd.apec.org/index.php/Mathematics_Assessments

• Heinemann Mathematics (not free, but cheap) http://books.heinemann.com/math/

• JMU Center for STEM Education Outreach (by SOL in Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II)http://www.jmu.edu/stem/outreach/features/pivotalquestions.html

34

Key Messages• We must not solely focus on multiple-

choice assessments• We must provide students with rich,

relevant, and rigorous tasks that focus on more than one specific skill and require application and synthesis of mathematical knowledge

• We must connect mathematics content within and among grade levels and subject areas to facilitate long term retention and application

• We must reflect on our own teaching and resist the urge to blame students