MEETING PLACES IN A HERTZBERGER...

HERM

AN

HER

TZBE

RGER

Herman Hertzberger was born in Amsterdam 1932. After completing his studies at the TU Delft in 1958, he states that the reconstruction after the second World War is functionalistic, not making good nor beautiful buildings. He adheres to a philosophy of human relations, ‘human measure and human scale’. He always tries to stimulate meetings inside his buildings, which is called structuralism. Hertzberger has successfully applied his theory to a range of different building types, including houses, schools, theaters and offices.

MEETING PLACES IN A HERTZBERGER BUILDING

CONCLUSIONThe two buildings analyzed on meeting places, attain Hertzberger’s goals. There is a choice between meeting and seclusion, being in the open or hidden. It even gives the sense of a city within a building. The meeting places are always present in Hertzberger’s building, bu they changed overtime. In the MCO, the visual contact is reinforced by making split levels and one huge atrium. The place of the physical meeting has changed from ground floor or atrium in Centraal Beheer to the stairs connecting the atrium in MCO, making those places more lively. The angular, constructivist materialization is released for more free, fluid lines and more attention to the finish. In the end, we believe that Hertzberger’s buildings are put together in an interesting spatial fashion which encourage meetings.

BIBLIOGRAPHY-Ching, F.D.K. (2007) Architecture: form, space & order (Hoboken) Wiley and Sons Co. 2nd edition-Clark, R.H. & Pause, M. (1985)precedents in architecture (New York) van Nostrand Reinhold inc.-Reinink, W. (1990) Herman Hertzberger, (Rotterdam) 010 publishers-Hertzberger, H. (1999), Lessen uit de architectuur deel 2 (Rotterdam) 010 publishers-Centraal Beheer, Montessori College Oost (n.d.), consulted on oktober 10th, 2009. www.hertzberger.nl

Documentation

Mon

tess

ori s

choo

l, D

elft

1960

-196

6

Cen

traal

Beh

eer,

Ape

ldoo

rn19

68-1

972

Muz

iekc

entru

m, U

trech

t19

73-1

978

Basis

scho

ol D

e Ev

enaa

r, A

’dam

1948

-198

6

Cul

tuur

ond

er d

ak, A

peld

oorn

2000

-200

3

Woo

nzor

gcom

plex

, Mid

del

burg

2002

-200

8

Land

scha

ft Fr

eisin

g, D

uits

land

1993

Orp

heus

The

ater

, Ape

ldoo

rn19

99-2

004

Hoge

scho

ol, L

eeuw

ard

en20

04-2

009

Cha

ssé

Thea

ter,

Bred

a19

92-1

995

De

Titaa

n V

MBO

-sch

ool,

Hoor

n19

99-2

004

Univ

ersit

eit U

trech

t, Ut

rech

t20

06-2

010

War

enhu

is va

n d

er V

een,

Ass

en19

93-1

997

Villa

, Ber

gen

2004

-200

6

Muz

iekp

alei

s, Ut

rech

t20

03-2

013

Bijm

erm

onum

ent,

Am

ster

dam

1994

-199

8

Bred

esch

ool,

Haar

lem

2002

-200

7

Bijm

erm

onum

ent,

Am

ster

dam

1994

-199

8

Bran

wee

rkaz

erne

, Zw

olle

2003

-200

7

Para

dijs

sel,

Cap

elle

a/d

Ijss

el19

96-2

000

Bred

esch

ool,

Arn

hem

2004

-200

7

Mon

tess

ori s

choo

l-oos

t, A

’dam

1996

-200

0

Apolloscholen, A’dam1980/1983 De Eilanden bassischool, A’dam1980/1983Diagoonwoningen, Delft1967/1970 1 1-3-5 2-3-5

Introduction About the Architect

DocumentationCentraal Beheer-1972

Form FormOperation OperationPerformance

Montessori School Oost-2000

Spatial relations Topology Parti Spatial relations Topology Parti

Paul Bosters 4045327Durmus Gogus 4036166Jelte van Koperen 4036220

1. Hertzberger wants the users of the building to have visual con-tact as much as possible

2. Hertzberger wants social cohe-sion. By making everybody see each other, everyone knows who works there.

3. Hertzberger wants to create spaces along the path where people can have a chat

4. Hertzberger wants the users of the building to be able to meet when walking through the building

5. Hertzberger wants to have traf-fic spaces that have a positive atmosphere (so people can stop and chat)

6. Hertzberger doesnt want his meeting spaces to interfere with the function of the building

This poster contains a comparison of two buildings, made by Herman Hertzberger. The goal of this post-er is to understand the ideas the architect had during the design process and how these operate in his buildings. Since he makes a ‘city in a building’, we chose to analyze two buildings on the theme “meet-ing places in a Hertzberger building”. These are one of his first buildings, the Centraal Beheer headquar-ters in Apeldoorn (1972) and the later Montessori College Oost (MCO) in Amsterdam (2000). Centraal Beheer is an office building, built with the purpose of eliminating hierarchy and getting as much transparency as possible. It is located at the side of the city, because the new trainsation was planned nearby, but that never happened. The MCO is a high school for vMBO, getting ready for the work floor with practical and theoretical class-es. It is in the middle of a residential neighbourhood, not far from the Muiderpoort railway station.

Split levels for visual contact

An open cental traffic space

Wide stairs with places to sit

Natural light trough roof windows

Natural light trough roof windows

Visual contact

Meeting space

Closed walls against noise and distraction

Wide walkways with places to sit

Wide walkways with places to sit

Ground-floor

3rd-floorSituation SituationFourth-floor

Section A-A

Section A-A

Grid Organization

Steadman SteadmanChing ChingClark & Pause Clark & Pause

Linear Organization

Axonometrie

A

A

A

A

A

A

Separate working from traffic spaces