NICE Guidelines on Community Engagement

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

NICE Guidelines on Community Engagement. Professor Chris Drinkwater NICE Community Engagement PDG. What are the challenges? What works? What should government and local statutory agencies do? Why should we bother?. Framework of NICE Guidance. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

NICE Guidelines on Community Engagement

Professor Chris DrinkwaterNICE Community Engagement

PDG

• What are the challenges?

• What works?

• What should government and local statutory agencies do?

• Why should we bother?

Framework of NICE Guidance

Aimed at policy makers, commissioners and providers including V & CS, community representatives and members.

• Prerequisites – challenges?• Infrastructure – what do agencies need

to put in place?• Approaches – what works?• Evaluation – why bother?

Prerequisites/Challenges

• Coordinated implementation of the relevant policy initiatives.

• Commitment to long term investment.• Openness to organisational and cultural

change.• A willingness to share power, as

appropriate, between statutory and community organisations.

• Development of trust and respect among all those involved.

Organisational and cultural change

• Identify how the culture of public sector organisations supports or prevents community engagement.

• Manage conflicts between communities (and within them) and the agencies that serve them.

• Incorporate community views into induction and in service training.

Levels of engagement and power

• Negotiate and agree how power will be shared and distributed

- defining project objectives - resource allocation - decision making• Jointly agree ways of working

Incre

asin

g c

om

mu

nit

y p

art

icip

ati

on

, em

po

werm

en

t an

d c

on

tro

l

Community control

Delegated power

Co-production

Consultation

Informing

More

appro

priate

and a

ccess

ible

se

rvic

e a

nd im

pro

ved u

pta

ke

Impro

ved h

ealth

sta

tus

& r

educe

d

health

inequalit

ies

Service outcomes

Intermediate social outcomes

Health outcomes

Pathways from community participation, empowerment and control to health improvement

Enhance

d c

om

munity

em

pow

erm

ent

impro

ved s

oci

al &

mate

rial c

onditi

ons

Impact

on s

oci

al c

apita

l

Jennie Popay (2006)

Infrastructure/Challenges

• Partnership working – will LSPs, LAAs, and CAA make a difference?

• Joint training for staff and community members.

• Accessible local venues and need to think through wider accessibility issues.

• Area-based initiatives.

Approaches/What works?

• Recruit and train people from local communities to plan, design and deliver health promotion activities.

• Use existing forums and networks.• Start with what the local

community feels is important.

Evaluation

• Identify and agree objectives with members of the target community.

• Be clear about the theory of change required to achieve success.

• Use a mixed-method approach and make use of participatory research.

Why Bother - Paradigm Shift

20th Century – formalising provision of professional knowledge through systems of training and provision (hierarchical/paternalistic)

21st Century – need to “fully engage” the public as co-producers of health (collaborative partnership)

Health,individual and community oriented preventative action

Health

Hazards

povertypoor housingunemploymentpoor food & nutritionpoor education

Environmental hazards

Community

oriented

preventative

action

Individually

oriented

preventative

action

Intersectoral action for Health. WHO. 1986

Best Value for Alzheimer’s

NICE – drugs to delay progression only available for people with moderate symptoms (MTS over 10).

(5,000 + words of newsprint)

Annals of Internal Medicine – 15 minutes of exercise 3x per week for people over 65 reduces risk of Alzheimer’s by 40%. Greatest benefit to the most physically frail.

(600 + words of newsprint)

Joining-up Locally to Address Inequalities

LA PCT

Public & patient engagement Engaging frontline staff

Public Health Team

Health

NeedsEquity audits

Evidence

SettingsStaff

Services

Outcomes

Locality clustersvaluing diversity

Community development

Community engagement

Training / employinglocal people

Community action

Locality clustersplurality of providers

Shared quality & outcome data

Collaborative approaches

New ways of workingPartnership

TRUST

CONTINUITY

LSPs

NICE Community EngagementWeb-link

Quick Reference Guidewww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PH009CommunityEngagementQuickRefGuide.pdf

Full Guidancewww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PH009Guidance.pdf