On the Instantaneous Dynamics of the Large- Scale Structures In The Impinging Round Jet J. W. Hall...

On the Instantaneous Dynamics of the Large-Scale Structures In The Impinging Round Jet

J. W. Hall & D. EwingDepartment of Mechanical Engineering,McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Turbulent Round Impinging Jet

Flow visualization of impinging round jet, H/D=2.0, Re=20000,

Popiel and Trass (1991).

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Turbulent Plane Wall Jet

Gogineni and Shih (1997)http://www.eng.fsu.edu/~shih/succeed/flow-vis.htm

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Harvey and Perry’s Rebounding Vortex

Harvey and Perry (1971)

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Three-Dimensionality of Structures?

Tsubokura (2003) Re=2,000 Forced at Strouhal FrequencyFully Developed Pipe FlowH/D = 9

Landreth and Adrian (1991) observed instantaneous flow was not symmetric in PIV measurements

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Investigation of the Three-Dimensionality of Large-Scale Structures

Hall et al (2002)

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Effect of Nozzle-to-Plate Distance

0 1 2 3 40.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20 p/

0.5U

o2

r/D

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

H/D=2.0 H/D=3.0 H/D=4.0 H/D=6.0

Nu

Jet Exiting a Long Pipe

Re=23,000

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Pressure Spectra

10 100 10001E-4

1E-3

0.01

0.1 r/D=1.0 r/D=1.5 r/D=2.0 r/D=2.5

H/D=4.0

Fpp

(r1,

r2=

r 1, =

0,

f) {

Pa2 /H

z}

f (Hz)10 100 1000

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

0.1 H/D=3.0 r/D=1.0 r/D=1.5 r/D=2.0 r/D=2.5

Fpp

(r1,

r2=

r 1, =

0, f)

{P

a2 /Hz}

f (Hz)

10 100 10001E-4

1E-3

0.01

0.1 H/D=2.0 r/D=1.0 r/D=1.5 r/D=2.0 r/D=2.5

Fpp

(r1,

r2=

r 1, =

0, f)

{P

a2 /Hz}

f (Hz)

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

r/D=2.0

r/D=2.5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Azimuthal Spectra

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0H/D=2.0

Bpp

(r1,

r2=

r 1, m

, =

0)

(P

a2 )

Mode Number

r1=1.0D

r1=1.5D

r1=2.0D

r1=2.5D

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

H/D=3.0

Bpp

(r1,

r2=

r 1, m

, =

0)

(P

a2 )

Mode Number

r1=1.0D

r1=1.5D

r1=2.0D

r1=2.5D

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

H/D=4.0

Bp

p(r 1,

r2=

r 1, m

, =

0)

(P

a2 )

Mode Number

r1=1.0D

r1=1.5D

r1=2.0D

r1=2.5D

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

r/D=2.0

r/D=2.5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Azimuthal Frequency Spectra, H/D=2.0

101

102

103

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

f (Hz)F

pp(r

1,r

2=

r 1,m

,f)

(Pa2

/Hz)

All modesm=0m=1m=5

~10

110

210

3

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

f (Hz)

Fp

p(r

1,r

2=

r 1,m

,f)

(Pa2

/Hz)

all modesm=0m=1m=5

~

r/D=1.0 r/D=1.5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Two-Point, Two Time Correlations

H/D=2.0

H/D=4.0

r1/D =1.0

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Dynamics of the Instantaneous Structures Pressure sampled at 800Hz for 350 blocks of 400 data points ESP scanner system at Boundary

Layer Wind Tunnel, University of Western Ontario

Signals are phase corrected in post-processing

Perform Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in Azimuthal Direction Fourier Modes

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Pressure Field, H/D=2.0

Mean Pressure Fluctuating Pressure

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Comparison to microphone data

Hall et al. (2003)

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Pressure Spectra

m=0 m=0

All modes

All modes

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

H/D=2.0

All modes

m=0,+/-1

m=0

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

H/D=4.0

m=0,+/-1

All modes

m=0

m=0 to +/-5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Impinging Jet DNS

Tsubokura (2003)Re=2, 000

Forced at Strouhal FrequencyH/D = 9

Satake and Kunugi (1998)Re=10000

H/D = 6, Confined

Inlet Condition Fully Developed Pipe Flow

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Wavelet Analysis: Instantaneous Pressure

r/D=2.0

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

H/D=2

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Wavelet Analysis: Azimuthal Modes

All modes

m=0

m=1

m=5

H/D =2, r/D =1.5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Wavelet Coefficients: Mode 0

r/D=2.0

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

H/D=2

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Wavelet Coefficients: Mode 1

r/D=2.0

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

H/D=2

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Azimuthal Mode 1: Precessing?

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Wavelet Analysis: Effect of H/D

H/D =2, r/D =1.5

All modes

m=0

m=1

m=5

H/D =4, r/D =1.5

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Wavelet Analysis: Effect of H/D

r/D=1.0

r/D=1.5

H/D=2.0 H/D=4.0

Perry Fest 2004 Kingston

Concluding Remarks Measurements of the instantaneous wall pressure fluctuations were used to

examine the development of the large-scale structures in the near field of the radial wall jet.

The inclusion of at least azimuthal mode 1 was necessary to reasonable model the dynamics of the flow.

Contributions from azimuthal mode 0 and 1 underwent variations in magnitude that persisted over periods corresponding to the passage of several structures.

There were extended periods where the slope of the phase of mode 1 was linear suggesting there may be periods of jet precessing of varying duration and direction.

Structures contributing to fluctuating wall pressure did not appear to become significantly more intermittent as H/D increased.

There was less systematic variation of the phase of mode 1 as H/D increased suggesting less systematic jet precessing.