View
229
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Shale Gas & Fracking ToolkitPlanning
Part 3
5606
Part 3: PlanningIn 2013, the Prime Minister publically backed the burgeoning shale gas industry in the UK:
“If neighbourhoods can see the benefits – and are reassured about its effects on the environment – then I don’t see why fracking shouldn’t receive real public support.... We want people to get behind fracking and a transparent planning process is an important ingredient.” David Cameron, Daily Telegraph, 11 August 2013
More recently, in his speech to the Conservative Party Conference, the Chancellor publically pledged his Party’s support for the industry.
“[The party fully intend to exploit] the extraordinary shale gas reserves untouched beneath our feet.” Conservative Party Conference, 29 September 2014
Minerals Planning PolicyMinerals planning policy is set out in paragraphs 142-149 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) which requires Minerals Planning Authorities (MPAs) to identify and include policies for extraction of mineral resources in their area. This encompasses the extraction of unconventional hydrocarbons such a shale gas and the legal regime relating to hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’ of potential shale gas reserves in the UK, discussed in this Toolkit.
“Minerals are essential to support economic growth.”NPPF, 2012
1 www.pinsentmasons.com/shale
2
Shale Gas Toolkit | Shale Gas & Fracking Toolkit: Part 3
Planning practice guidance for hydrocarbonsOn 19 July 2013, the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) published a 29 page document entitled “Planning Practice Guidance for Onshore Oil and Gas”. This guidance was welcomed by many who desired greater clarity and certainty regarding the planning process for shale gas exploration and extraction.
The guidance set out advice on planning issues associated with three identified phases of hydrocarbon extraction:• Exploration• Testing (appraisal)• Production.
The introduction specifically stated that it was not intended to be a source of definitive legal advice, nor was it intended to replace the need for judgment by MPAs and those making applications. As a result, some in the industry found that the guidance was in certain areas lacking; for example, in its failure to tackle key questions such as how planning boundaries should be drawn for directional and horizontal drilling once the appropriate rock formation is reached, how to deal with issues arising where the surface and subsurface are in different ownership and the way in which the guidance dealt with the consideration of ‘alternatives’ in the context of need and demand.
The guidance did, however, provide a basic run-through of the three phases of hydrocarbon extraction, with broad descriptions of what each entails and the timescales involved before going on to discuss in greater detail the regulatory function of the planning process in relation to each of the phases.
On 6 March 2014, DCLG announced the launch of a new online planning practice resource to support the NPPF. The new online guidance cancelled DCLG’s 2013 guidance and replaced it with “Planning for hydrocarbon extraction.” The new guidance broadly mirrors the 2013 guidance. It also encourages MPAs to make appropriate provision for hydrocarbons in Local Plans, highlighting areas where new proposals may come forward and managing potential conflicts for land use.
The minerals planning authority and the statutory frameworkThe requirement for planning permission is one of a number of regulatory consents which are required to authorise the shale gas extraction process. MPAs are expected to ensure that mineral extraction (be it through fracking or an alternative process) does not have an unacceptable adverse impact upon the environment or human health. This responsibility is carried out through the minerals planning process.
5606
The applicable statutory framework for obtaining planning permission for fracking operations is currently the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 in England and Wales and the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 in Scotland.
In England and Wales it is the MPAs in the first instance who will determine planning permission. In Scotland, it is the local planning authority and in Northern Ireland, the Minerals Unit has responsibility. In the majority of cases, the MPA is the County Council or Unitary Authority, however a National Park Authority is also an MPA.
A multi-stage processPlanning permission will be required at a number of stages throughout the lifetime of the fracking process from the initial exploratory phase through to the full development and production stage and finally abandonment.
As noted in part 1 of the Pinsent Masons’ Fracking Toolkit, there are 6 main stages to the process of shale gas extraction: • Stage 1 – Identification• Stage 2 – Exploration• Stage 3 – Appraisal• Stage 4 – Initial development• Stage 5 – Full development and production• Stage 6 – Production and abandonment
Stages 2 to 6 – the exploration, appraisal and production stages – can only be carried out in specified areas where the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has issued a Petroleum Exploration & Development Licence (PEDL) under the Petroleum Act 1998.
Planning policy & regulation – the main stages of the processThe Planning Context
Each of the 6 stages is considered in turn below setting out the key planning requirements and issues which need to be addressed.
1. IdentificationDeveloper identifies suitable sitesAs discussed above, the NPPF requires MPAs to identify and include policies for extraction of mineral resource of local and national importance in their area. Given that shale gas exploration and exploitation or fracking is still an emerging industry in the UK it is unlikely that many Local Plans will have specifically considered the potential for shale gas reserves and fracking operations in the Local Plan process.
The Local Plan is, therefore, unlikely to be of specific assistance in identifying shale gas reserves and sites for possible fracking operations in many areas. However, as Local Plans catch up with industry, MPAs will need to identify potential shale gas reserves and PEDL areas on their proposals maps and in criteria-based policies for stages 2 to 6 and the exploration, appraisal and production phases for shale gas fracking and extraction. Indeed, 2014 planning practice guidance encourages
3
4
Shale Gas Toolkit | Shale Gas & Fracking Toolkit: Part 3
MPAs to do so. The initial identification phase will largely be undertaken through the gathering and assessment of existing geological data (e.g. information gathered from earlier drilling and also through various geological surveys and reports that are published).
2. ExplorationThe drilling of exploratory holesDuring the exploratory phase, the promoter and developer will carry out seismic surveys, exploratory drilling and hydraulic fracturing in order to ascertain whether shale hydrocarbons and reserves are present in the land.
Whilst some of the initial seismic work may have deemed planning permission (i.e. when planning permission is not required as it is deemed to be granted under Part 22 of Schedule 2 to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995) it is likely that the drilling of exploratory holes will require planning permission. The reason for this is two fold: firstly, it constitutes a change of use of the land which in many cases will be agricultural and secondly, the extent of drilling, both in terms of the number of holes and the length of time required for the drilling, is likely to be significant (certainly when compared to conventional hydrocarbons).
Whether the exploration phase will require an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will depend on whether the nature, size and location of the operations will have a likely significant effect on the environment.
In the majority of cases an EIA will not be required, but the prudent approach would be to seek a screening opinion from the MPA as to whether or not an EIA should be carried out. However, there could be circumstances where it could be beneficial to carry out an EIA and these may not necessarily be due to the applicable tests for an EIA being met. For instance, carrying out an EIA could be one way of being seen to be “open” about the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project. An EIA would explain in more detail the proposed drilling operations and what is involved, and thus could assist in alleviating concerns that the local community may have about the processes involved. It is interesting to note that the planning applications submitted to MPAs to date have been accompanied by an EIA.
Infrastructure BillThe Bill is currently making its way through the Parliamentary process. The Labour Party tabled amendments to the Bill in August 2014 that would, if enacted, have meant that EIA would be required for all applications for planning permission (including for sites of less than 1 hectare) “for the purposes of extracting shale.” However, these amendments were not officially moved forward and are not included in the current version of the Bill to be debated by the House of Lords.
3. AppraisalDrilling of wells to assess commercial viability of gas production. Gas produced at this stage can be used for small-scale commercial electricity generationThe appraisal stage arises where shale gas has been identified and proved but further evidence is required in order to clarify the extent of the deposit or its production characteristics to assess whether or not it is economically viable. This stage may involve significant works, including longer term testing and additional drilling, further wells and hydraulic fracturing.
Planning permission will be required at this stage of the process for drilling operations and any associated infrastructure such as drilling platforms.
The potential nature and extent of operations during the appraisal stage means that it is critically important to consider whether an EIA is required. Any assessments and assumptions which were carried out in connection with the exploration phase will need further consideration and may require refreshing or additional assessments to be carried out.
Again, a screening opinion should be sought from the MPA at this stage of the process.
If the appraisal shows positive results, the well will be safely isolated while consideration is given to the need for more appraisal drilling or the potential for a permanent development. If the developer does wish to proceed with a permanent development, they will then proceed to the initial development stage discussed in more detail below.
If the appraisal stage shows that either hydrocarbons are not present or are present in quantities that are not commercially viable, the well will be “abandoned” at this point. See stage 6 below for further details relating to the abandonment process.
56065
4. Initial Development First production wells constructed as well as necessary infrastructure to facilitate the sale of shale gas. Early sales revenue generated and project tailored to maximise productionIf the appraisal stage yields positive results and the developer decides to proceed to a permanent development, it must submit a Field Development Plan to the MPA and DECC, outlining its planned method for hydrocarbon extraction. Only once consent has been given by both the MPA and DECC can the developer install the equipment to extract the trapped hydrocarbons at the site. The planning application at this stage is an application for commercial exploitation, but not on a large scale. In order for DECC to approve any Field Development Plan submitted, the MPA must have firstly granted planning permission in consultation with the Environment Agency (or Natural Resources Wales in Wales and SEPA in Scotland) and the assessment would have considered the need for an EIA and environmental permits.
The initial development stage takes place prior to full development and production stages and provides the developer/operator with a greater understanding of production trends as well as an opportunity to tailor the well design to fit the specific circumstances of the project.
As with the appraisal stage the nature of the works are now more significant and therefore similar strategic considerations will apply to the approach to be adopted in respect of EIA.
5. Full Development and ProductionDrilling of production wells across licence area and construction of commercial production facilities and infrastructure for large volumes of shale gasPlanning permission will be required for large scale commercial drilling of production wells and further site upgrades (e.g. the construction of associated equipment such as pipelines, processing, facilities and temporary storage tanks). In some cases, the production life of a gas field can be in excess of 20 years plus. Consequently, careful consideration will need be given to the potential impact of the proposed development and operations on the surrounding area and the local community.
In terms of strategy, developers will need to carefully consider whether or not to submit a comprehensive planning application to cover as many of the associated elements of the proposed project as possible or whether separate planning applications should be submitted for development proposals such as the pipelines. However, developers will need to be careful not to fall foul of the EIA Directive and accused of “salami-slicing”.
6. AbandonmentWell plugged and surrounding area rehabilitated in accordance with prescribed standardsWhen production at a site ceases it will be necessary for the site or sites to be restored or in some cases put to a new appropriate use.
As shale gas exploration and fracking has a limited impact above ground it is unlikely to be subject to the detailed restoration conditions which apply in relation to mining operations such as quarries which are normally subject to onerous landscaping restoration conditions. The specific conditions that require restoration works will have been contained in any planning permission authorising full development. In practice, there are likely to be requirements for the submission to the MPA of specific details and plans for restoration so that the MPA can grant its approval.
6
Shale Gas Toolkit | Shale Gas & Fracking Toolkit: Part 3
Key issues to considerThere are a number of common key issues which are relevant throughout the planning process.
Pre-application engagement and consultation Effective pre-application engagement and consultation will be essential. Such engagement must be deployed at a serious level in advance of even the early stages of the planning process and should continue and develop as the planning applications relate to more significant development.
An engagement and consultation strategy should be drawn up at the outset and subjected to critical analysis before it is deployed. Whilst the more onerous consultation process under the Planning Act 2008 does not currently apply, it would seem sensible to adopt a similarly robust approach in any planning applications. For instance, consultation should be undertaken with local communities and interested bodies in addition to the MPA and mandatory consultees.
Environmental Impact Assessment As noted above, EIA will be a key consideration at all stages of the fracking process.
The nature of the environmental information to be considered as part of the planning applications will be wide ranging and may include the following which is not an exhaustive list: geological data, ecology, water, transportation, access flood risk, archaeological, contamination and landscape character. Where an EIA is to be undertaken, a scoping request should be submitted to the MPA to ensure that the EIA addresses the relevant environmental issues.
Given that there are several elements to the fracking process each of these will need to be consented separately with the exception of abandonment which will be covered by the full development and production consent. This raises an interesting question over the extent of your environmental assessment – if you are carrying out an EIA for the exploratory stage – do you need to include in that assessment the appraisal stage? To answer this question, you have to consider whether the whole fracking process from stage 1 to stage 6 is a single project, or whether there is more than one project in that process. If all stages constitute a single project and you artificially sub-divide it into two or more projects, with each then being put forward in isolation, this is likely to fall foul of the EIA Directive’s requirements. Also, if the effect of sub-division is to mean that an EIA does not assess the full cumulative effects of the individual application, then the EIA will not be Directive-compliant. However, recent case law has shown that courts accept that some infrastructure proposals would be constructed in stages and this would not necessarily make them a single project which could only ever be assessed as such. Furthermore, the whole point of the exploratory stage is to ascertain whether there is a more permanent project, which would suggest that any EIA at the early stages of the process would not need to assess later stages.
Government Support The Government is supportive of fracking and has unveiled a number of incentives to ensure that it happens. This support is unsurprising given the benefits it will bring in being able to produce low cost gas in the UK whilst at the same time reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Whilst planning decisions will initially be considered on a local level, such support will play an important role should applications be determined by the Secretary of State either on appeal or call-in inquiry.
5606
Legal Challenge and Risk At all stages of the fracking process there is a risk of legal challenge against any of the planning permissions which may be granted. It is therefore imperative that a robust approach is taken in applying for planning permission at each stage of the fracking process. A successful legal challenge against any of the elements could have serious knock-on effects on the project as a whole.
The potential for legal challenge also reinforces the importance of carrying out effective pre-application engagement and consultation in order to try to allay any concerns that local residents/interested bodies may have about the proposed development. As explained above, careful consideration of the extent of your EIA is also recommended given EIA is one of the hottest areas for third parties to challenge.
Planning Performance Agreements (PPA) It is not mandatory to use a PPA, although as with any complex planning application serious consideration should be given to the use of one.
Interaction with other Regulatory Regimes The role of the planning system is to consider whether the development and use of the land is acceptable. This defined role is different from other regulatory regimes, for instance the requirement for an Environmental Permit, but at the same time will be complementary.
MPAs should take into account any relevant comments or information from other regulatory regimes where issues relate to the development and the land use. Otherwise, MPAs should assume that the other regulatory regimes will operate effectively.
7
8
Status as nationally significant infrastructure projectsThe Government confirmed in June 2013 that shale gas and fracking developments would not be treated as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) under the Planning Act 2008. This means that planning applications will continue to be made to the MPA rather than to the Secretary of State.
For many this was viewed as a lost opportunity to include shale gas and fracking expressly within the scope of the NSIP regime and the Planning Act 2008. It would have allowed applications for development consent for shale gas extraction to be made directly to the Secretary of State with the benefit of the streamlined examination procedure and the possibility of wrapping up other consents. Greater certainty for projects would have been forthcoming with the benefit of national policy underpinning projects and schemes.
If fracking were brought within the remit of the Planning Act 2008 regime, it would seem plausible that stages 4, 5 and 6 could potentially be brought within the NSIP regime, with earlier stages remaining under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 process.
Planning application notification requirements simplified for onshore operatorsFollowing DCLG’s 2013 consultation on simplifying and streamlining planning application requirements for onshore oil and gas operators, the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure and Section 62A Applications) (England) (Amendment No.2) Order 2013 came into force in January 2014. The Order amends the procedures and requirements for planning applications associated with underground oil and gas operations. The changes have introduced a new national standard planning application form. Also, for onshore oil and gas planning applications (including exploratory drilling) applicants are no longer required to notify owners when soley underground operations are envisaged.
Shale Gas Toolkit | Shale Gas & Fracking Toolkit: Part 3
56069
The
Shal
e Gas
ext
ract
ion
Proc
ess,
from
iden
tifica
tion
of a
pot
entia
l dev
elop
men
t are
a to
the
full
com
mer
cial
exp
loita
tion
of th
at a
rea,
con
tain
s man
y st
ages
and
can
last
ove
r 30
year
s. A
t eac
h st
age
Dev
elop
ers m
ust m
eet a
num
ber o
f reg
ulat
ory
requ
irem
ents
that
are
set
out i
n th
e tim
elin
e be
low
.
SEIS
MIC
ITY:
this
issu
e ha
s the
pot
entia
l to
be a
stu
mbl
ing
bloc
k to
pro
pose
d or
com
men
ced
oper
atio
ns a
nd is
som
ethi
ng to
whi
ch D
evel
oper
s m
ust g
ive
cons
ider
able
thou
ght.
Dev
elop
ers
mus
t ass
ess t
he ri
sk o
f act
ivat
ing
faul
ts in
the
prop
osed
lice
nce
area
and
al
so m
onito
r bac
kgro
und
seis
mic
ity b
efor
e fr
acki
ng o
pera
tions
com
men
ce. R
eal t
ime
seis
mic
mon
itorin
g w
ill a
lso
be n
eces
sary
dur
ing
oper
atio
ns a
nd o
pera
tions
will
nee
d to
be
paus
ed o
r hal
ted
whe
re s
eism
icity
pas
ses
a ce
rtai
n le
vel
Acr
onym
sPE
DL
– Pe
trol
eum
Exp
lora
tion
& D
evel
opm
ent L
icen
ceC
A –
Coa
l Aut
horit
yD
ECC
– D
epar
tmen
t for
Env
ironm
ent &
C
limat
e C
hang
eEA
– E
nviro
nmen
t Age
ncy
EIA
– E
nviro
nmen
t Im
pact
sse
ssm
ent
EP –
Env
ironm
enta
l Per
mit
HSE
– H
ealt
h &
Saf
ety
Exec
utiv
eLP
A –
Loc
al P
anni
ng A
utho
rity
MPA
– M
iner
als
Plan
ning
Aut
horit
yPE
DL
– Pe
trol
eum
Exp
lora
tion
& D
evel
opm
ent L
icen
cePP
– P
lann
ing
Perm
issi
onPP
A –
Pla
nnin
g Pe
rfor
man
ce A
gree
men
tW
AL
– W
ater
Abs
trac
tion
Lice
nce
Oth
er R
equi
rem
ents
:• P
EDL
Exte
nsio
n fo
r fu
ll co
mm
erci
al e
xplo
itatio
n• A
gain
, onc
e PP
gra
nted
the
Dev
elop
er m
ust r
epea
t the
pr
oces
s of n
otify
ing
the
EA
and
HSE
prio
r to
drill
ing
befo
re
DEC
C g
ive
the
ultim
ate
gree
n lig
ht to
com
men
ce o
pera
tions
.
Oth
er R
equi
rem
ents
:• A
gain
, onc
e PP
gra
nted
the
Dev
elop
er m
ust r
epea
t the
pr
oces
s of n
otify
ing
the
EA a
nd
HSE
prio
r to
drill
ing
befo
re b
eing
th
e gr
een
light
by
DEC
C.
Oth
er R
equi
rem
ents
:• E
Ps d
ealin
g with
envir
onm
enta
l risk
s•
WAL
nee
ded
whe
re w
ater
for
frack
ing
oper
atio
ns so
urce
d fro
m
grou
ndw
ater
/sur
face
wat
er• C
A CO
NSE
NT
to d
rill t
hrou
gh
coal
seem
s whe
re n
eces
sary
• Wel
l Exa
min
atio
n Sc
hem
e im
plem
ente
d to
confi
rm W
ell
desig
ned
and
cons
truc
ted
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith in
dust
ry• N
otify
EA
of in
tent
ion
to d
rill
• Not
ify H
SE o
f wel
l des
ign
and
oper
atio
ns 2
1 day
s prio
r to
drill
ing
• HSE
Con
sent
whe
re si
gnifi
cant
al
tera
tion
of w
ell n
eede
d• F
rack
ing
Plan
to a
ddre
ss th
e ris
k of
seism
icity
subm
itted
to D
ECC
• F
rack
ing
cons
ent f
rom
DEC
C.
1 –
3 Ye
ars
Oth
er R
equi
rem
ents
:• P
EDL
Exte
nsio
n• O
nce
PP g
rant
ed th
e D
evel
oper
m
ust r
epea
t the
pro
cess
of
notif
ying
the
EA a
nd H
SE o
f dr
illin
g be
fore
bei
ng th
e gr
een
light
by
DEC
C• A
dditi
onal
ly H
SE C
onse
nt
wou
ld b
e ne
cess
ary
whe
re
the
Dev
elop
er w
ishe
d to
si
gnifi
cant
ly a
lter e
xist
ing
wel
ls.
1 –
2 Ye
ars
2 –
3 Ye
ars
Ove
r 20
Year
s
Oth
er R
equi
rem
ents
:• R
ehab
ilita
tion
of a
rea
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith P
P co
nditi
ons
• Wel
l Aba
ndon
men
t in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
• HSE
stan
dard
s• A
fter
care
of t
he si
te in
ac
cord
ance
with
PP
cond
ition
s.
Aba
ndon
men
tW
ell p
lugg
ed a
nd
surr
ound
ing
area
re
habi
litat
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
pre
scrib
ed s
tand
ards
.
Expl
orat
ion
Onc
e PE
DL
secu
red,
Dev
elop
er
iden
tifie
s lo
cati
ons
wit
hin
licen
ce a
rea
wit
h hi
ghes
t po
tent
ial f
or s
hale
gas
and
ex
plor
ator
y dr
illin
g un
dert
aken
.
App
rais
alD
rilli
ng o
f wel
ls t
o as
sess
co
mm
erci
al v
iabi
lity
of g
as
prod
ucti
on. G
as p
rodu
ced
at t
his
stag
e ca
n be
use
d fo
r sm
all-
scal
e co
mm
erci
al
elec
tric
ity
gene
rati
on.
Init
ial D
evel
opm
ent
Firs
t pr
oduc
tion
wel
ls
cons
truc
ted
as w
ell a
s ne
cess
ary
infr
astr
uctu
re to
faci
litat
e th
e sa
le o
f sha
le g
as. E
arly
sal
es
reve
nue
gene
rate
d an
d pr
ojec
t ta
ilore
d to
axi
mis
e pr
oduc
tion
.
Full
Dev
elop
men
t & P
rodu
ctio
n D
rillin
g of
pro
duct
ion
wel
ls a
cros
s lic
ence
are
a an
d co
nstr
uctio
n of
co
mm
erci
al p
rodu
ctio
n fa
cilit
ies
and
infr
astr
uctu
re fo
r lar
ge
volu
mes
of s
hale
gas
.
Oth
er R
equi
rem
ents
:• P
EDL
to s
earc
h fo
r, an
d ex
trac
t sha
le g
as. (
PED
L mirr
ors s
tage
s –
ther
efor
e PE
DL e
xten
sions
will
be
nece
ssar
y)• P
rope
rty
Righ
ts –
neg
otia
te w
ith L
ando
wne
rs to
pur
chas
e or
sec
ure
right
s (le
ase
or li
cens
e) o
ver l
and
to fa
cilit
ate
the
proc
ess.
Iden
tific
atio
nD
evel
oper
iden
tifies
suita
ble
area
s for
shal
e ga
s exp
lora
tion.
1 –
3 Ye
ars
Plan
ning
Req
uire
men
ts:
• Non
e.Pl
anni
ng R
equi
rem
ents
:• P
P fr
om M
PA (L
PA in
Sco
tlan
d)
for d
rillin
g EX
PLO
RATO
RY
wel
ls, c
hang
e of
use
in la
nd a
nd
any
asso
ciat
ed w
orks
• EIA
– d
epen
ding
upo
n na
ture
, si
ze a
nd lo
catio
n of
dev
elop
men
t pr
opos
als a
nd c
onsu
ltatio
n st
rate
gy to
be
adop
ted.
Plan
ning
Req
uire
men
ts:
• PP
from
MPA
for d
rillin
g of
A
PPRA
ISA
L w
ells
and
any
as
soci
ated
wor
ks a
nd u
pgra
des
(e.g
. dril
ling
plat
form
s)• E
IA –
dep
endi
ng u
pon
natu
re,
size
and
loca
tion
of d
evel
opm
ent
prop
osal
s and
con
sulta
tion
stra
tegy
to b
e ad
opte
d• S
ecti
on 1
06 p
lann
ing
oblig
atio
ns li
nked
to P
P an
d PP
As
if ap
prop
riate
.
Plan
ning
Req
uire
men
ts:
• PP
from
MPA
for d
rillin
g of
initi
al
PRO
DU
CTIO
N w
ells
as a
ny
asso
ciat
ed w
orks
and
site
upg
rade
s• E
IA• P
ossi
ble
Sect
ion
106
plan
ning
ob
ligat
ions
link
ed to
PP
• PPA
s if
appr
opria
te.
Plan
ning
Req
uire
men
ts:
• PP
from
MPA
for l
arge
sc
ale
com
mer
cial
dril
ling
of
PRO
DU
CTIO
N w
ells
and
any
as
soci
ated
wor
ks o
r site
upg
rade
s (i.
e. c
onst
ruct
ion
of la
rge
scal
e pr
oduc
tion
infr
astr
uctu
re)
• EIA
• Pos
sibl
e Se
ctio
n 10
6 pl
anni
ng
oblig
atio
ns li
nked
to P
P • P
PAs
if ap
prop
riate
.
Plan
ning
Req
uire
men
ts:
• PP
from
MPA
(if f
urth
er
cons
ent
requ
ired
for c
hang
es to
the
deve
lopm
ent
stra
tegy
from
th
at c
onse
nted
in P
P fo
r st
age
5)• P
ossi
ble
EIA
con
nect
ed to
PP
dep
endi
ng o
n th
e ch
ange
s th
at h
ave
been
mad
e.
Shal
e G
as E
xtra
ctio
n Pr
oces
s Tim
elin
e
Shale Gas Toolkit | Shale Gas & Fracking Toolkit: Part 3
This note does not constitute legal advice. Specific legal advice should be taken before acting on any of the topics covered.
Bob RuddimanPartner and Sector HeadEnergy & Natural ResourcesT: +44 (0)1224 377 925E: bob.ruddiman@pinsentmasons.com
Paul RicePartner and Head of Client RelationshipsEnergy & Natural ResourcesT: +44 (0)20 7490 6282E: paul.rice@pinsentmasons.com
For further details and queries relating to Shale Gas or other matters, please contact:
Richard GriffithsPartnerPlanning & Environment Energy & InfrastructureT: +44 (0)20 7490 6981E: richard.griffiths@pinsentmasons.com
Richard FordPartnerPlanning & Environment Energy & InfrastructureT: +44 (0)20 7490 6241E: richard.ford@pinsentmasons.com
Robbie OwenPartnerPlanning & Environment Energy & InfrastructureT: +44 (0)20 7490 6420E: robbie.owen@pinsentmasons.com
Michael PocockPartnerPlanning & Environment Energy & InfrastructureT: +44 (0)161 250 0223E: michael.pocock@pinsentmasons.com
10
5606www.Out-Law.comwww.pinsentmasons.com
Pinsent Masons LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales (registered number: OC333653) authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the appropriate regulatory body in the other jurisdictions in which it operates. The word ‘partner’, used in relation to the LLP, refers to a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant of the
LLP or any affiliated firm of equivalent standing. A list of the members of the LLP, and of those non-members who are designated as partners, is displayed at the LLP’s registered office: 30 Crown Place, London EC2A 4ES, United Kingdom. We use ‘Pinsent Masons’ to refer to Pinsent Masons LLP, its subsidiaries and any affiliates which it or its partners operate as separate
businesses for regulatory or other reasons. Reference to ‘Pinsent Masons’ is to Pinsent Masons LLP and/or one or more of those subsidiaries or affiliates as the context requires. © Pinsent Masons LLP 2015.
For a full list of our locations around the globe please visit our websites:
For more information please visit: pinsentmasons.com/shale
Recommended