View
5
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
RECEIVED1988
M COEKCCHSTSUPERFUND BRANCH
CONTAMINATION EVALUATION AT THE U.S. COAST GUARDSTATION (FORMER ENGINEERS SCHOOL) FORT TOTTEN
FINAL ENGINEERING REPORT
CONTRACT DACW41-86-D-0112PROJECT NO. C02NY005700
Prepared by:
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.10 Harvard Mill Square
Wakefield, Massachusetts
Submitted to:
Department of the ArmyKansas City District, Corps of Engineers
700 Federal BuildingKansas City, Missouri
March 28, 1988
M3EMHcaN&Eddu 2 0 0 - l c
C02NY005701 01.09 0001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
a e
1 .0 EXECUTIVE'SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 .1 Summary of Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 .0 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 .2 Project Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 .3 Site Location and Physiography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 .4 Ownership and Prior Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3 .0 SITE INVESTIGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 .2 Monitoring Well Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3 .2 .1 Boring Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 .2 .2 Geologic Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 .2 .3 Monitoring Well Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 .2 .4 Well Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 .2 .5 Water Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 .2 .6 Hydraulic Conductivities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3 .3 Sampling Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 .3 .1 Work Plans . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 .3 .2 Sampling Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 .3 .3 Sampling Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3 .3 .3 .1 Groundwater Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 .3 .3 .2 Soil Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 .3 .3 .3 Wipe Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3 .4 ANALYTICAL METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303 .5 Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3 .5 .1 Field Sampling and Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . 303 .5 .2 Laboratory Analysis, Systems and
Performance Audit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 .5 .3 Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 .5 .4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4 .0 ELECTRO-MAGNETIC SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 .2 Subsurface Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 .3 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 .4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424 .5 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5 .0 BUNKER (BUILDING #619) PENETRATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 .2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 .3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465 .4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
6 .0 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476 .1 Analytical Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476.2 Water and Soil Standards and Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
7 .0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557 .1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557 .2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557 .3 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 567 .4 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
8 .0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Appendix A Well Logs and Field DataAppendix B Monitoring Well Completion DiagramsAppendix C Well Survey DataAppendix D RAI Analytical DataAppendix E Quality Control Sample ResultsAppendix F New Jersey Soil Cleanup Approaches
ii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
3 .1 Finished Well Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 .2 Well Development Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3 .3 Water Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3 .4 Well Purging Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3 .5 Analytical Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6 .1 Aqueous Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
6 .2 Soil Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49-50
6 .3 Sediment Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
6 .4 Wipe Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
6 .5 Water Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
6 .6 Soil Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
2 .1 Map of General Vicintiy of Fort Totten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2 .2 Base Map of Fort Totten, Coast Guard Property . . . . . . . . . . 6
3 .1 Sampling Locations Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3 .2 Cross-Section of Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4 .1 E .M . Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
iv
1 .0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A preliminary contamination evaluation has been conducted at
the U .S . Coast-Guard Station property at Fort Totten, Queens,
NY . This evaluation was performed under the Department of
Defense (DOD) Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) to
confirm or deny the presence of environmental contamination
onsite . The methods by which this evaluation was performed are
outlined in this report .
Contamination was found to exist on this site . The
contaminants detected consist of lead and chromium in
groundwater, mercury in soils and marine sediments, petroleum
hydrocarbons in marine sediments, and pesticides (DDD, DDT, and
DDE) in buildings #619 and #624 . Lastly, there does not appear
to be any buried ordnance and drums onsite, nor does there appear
to be a sealed room in building #619 .
DERP CONFIRMATION STUDYAT
ENGINEERING SCHOOL, FORT TOTTEN
DERA PROJECT #C02NY005700
1 .1 Summary of Findings
Groundwater, soil, sediment and building surface
contamination has been encountered at concentrations which may
require regulatory review for this location . The contamination
is reasonably suspected to have resulted from activities which
took place during the period of DOD control and therefore should
be referred to the appropriate office or agency for determination
of a future course of action .
1
2 .0 GENERAL
2 .1 Introduction
The Department of Defense (DOD) conducts maintenance and
manufacturing operations at defense installations . To assess
possible environmental contamination resulting from these
activities at former DOD sites, the Defense Appropriation Act was
adopted in 1984 and the Defense Environmental Restoration Program
(DERP) was begun . Responsibility for the management of DERP was
given to the Secretary of Defense to assure a consistent
approach .
The Huntsville Division of the Army Corps of Engineers is
responsible for the inventory phase of the investigation of
former DOD sites. This phase entails the collection and chemical
analysis of groundwater, surface water, sediments, and soil
samples to assess possible environmental contamination . Results
of these studies will be employed to compare, evaluate, and rank
individual DOD sites .
This report describes the inventory phase investigation
performed at the U.S . Coast Guard Station (previous DOD property)
at the Fort Totten Engineers School in Queens, New York . Project
objectives and background information are presented in
Section 2 . Details of the sampling program are described in
Section 3 . Results of an electromagnetic survey are included in
Section 4 . Bunker penetration in building #619 is described in
Section 5. Summary of analytical results is presented in
2
Section 6 . Conclusions and recommendations are discussed in
Section 7 . Well logs and field data are included in Appendix A,
monitoring well completion diagrams in Appendix B, well surveying
data in Appendix C, chemical analytical data in Appendix D,
quality control sample results in Appendix E, and New Jersey soil
cleanup approaches are presented in Appendix F.
2 .2 Project Objectives
The objectives of this investigation were to provide a
preliminary determination of the presence or absence of chemical
contamination which may have resulted from former DOD activities
at this site and to determine the potential of contamination to
local groundwater . To accomplish this objective, the following
work was conducted :
1 . Site visit for collection of background information andestablishment of preliminary monitoring well and samplinglocations .
2 . Installation of five groundwater, monitoring wells .
3 . Collection and analysis of groundwater, soil, sedimentsamples, and wipe tests .
4 . Performance of an electro-magnetic survey .
5 . Coring into bunker #619 to determine its contents .
6 . Evaluation of physical and analytical data to determinethe absence or presence of contamination .
2 .3 Site Location and Physiography
The U .S . Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten is located with
the U .S . Army Engineers School on the Fort Totten military
3
installation . Fort Totten is approximately 20 miles east of New
York City at the mouth of the East River in Queens, New York
(north shore of--Long Island) as shown in Figure 2 .1 . Access to
Fort Totten is via the Cross Island Parkway to Bell Boulevard .
Fort Totten is a 147 acre site and has been owned and
operated by the DOD since 1857 (at that time called Willets
Point) . From 1857 to 1944, Fort Totten was used by the U.S . Army
for national defense and engineer training purposes . From 1944
to present, Fort Totten has been operated by various U.S . Army
commands which includes a training center for U.S . Army reserves
and engineers . Today Fort Totten still functions as a training
center . However, the land which composes Fort Totten is now
owned by several federal agencies along with the DOD .
The U.S . Army still owns and operates the largest tract of
land on Fort Totten (92 .4 acres) . The General Services
Administration now owns and operates 45 acres, and the Department
of Transportation (DOT) owns 9 .6 acres which is operated by the
U .S . Coast Guard.
The U.S . Coast Guard operated property at Fort Totten (which
is the target of this investigation) occupies the north-west
portion of the peninsula and is bounded by U .S . Army property on
the north, east and west as shown in Figure 2 .2 . Access to this
property is gained via Willets Street which branches off of
Totten Avenue .
This site contains fifteen buildings and a pier . Grassy
lawns surround the station buildings in the southern half of the
4
t
00
Cost Guard St.STATE MARITIME COLL'EG ~ , " IS ,
`- -,,light141W T"It 06OUAORI LOCA11d1 Throgs Point O~~ `~O
Jr
14
a ~\r O /O 61 ,r N r U "" ~ ~\
. . J ,' I O~\\Its
Jl +~ C`
,p ~' A Willets , .1Point ~'
L It Qyeens oing- ' . espl~
" FORT 7Y1T1'mLittle ' flay A'* " 111. 10.94.11\'ATI114
mospo
.,. ,ee h'atS' . " ' " ~:to fItow say
A;NTERGHANGE` ~"4'I
.o,tom., ~ .a-- . - :..r7 I�Arr ... c_ r ~._.33
C "16
SOURCE : U.S. COAST GUARD
FIGURE, 2 .1 MAP OF GENERAL VICINITY OF FORT TOTTEN
s
LITTLE NECK BAY
16 a
°r ,
IJ~
J51 . .. . . ....o
4
U
a oo~ .s7~ 6 A SCALE
loo o mono goo
6-E3 Coast Guard Property
i1 _ ~p~r
SOURCE U S . COAST GUARD
o FIGURE 2 .2 RASP. MAP (1F FORT TOTTEN, COAST GUARD PROPERTY
site and northernmost areas . The northwestern area is heavily
overgrown and wooded . Most of the station buildings are grouped
along an axis boarding the waterfront on the western boundary .
These buildings consist of a station barracks and administration
gallery, workshops, storage spaces, and several vacant
buildings . A single structure which houses married Coast Guard
personnel is situated in the western section of this site and a
large frame building (sublet to a civilian organization) is
positioned in the center . Lastly, three small out-buildings are
located in the north-eastern section of this site . The site
elevation ranges from 10 to 60 feet above mean sea level .
2 .4 Ownership and Prior Use
Fort Totten has been used for military purposes since the
French and Indian War . However, the land on which Fort Totten is
built first came into public record in 1640, when it belonged to
a farmer named Thomas . From 1829 to 1857, the land passed
through the hands of many owners until purchased by the U.S .
Government in 1857 .
In 1857, Congress appropriated the funds to build a
fortification on Willets Point (Fort Totten) and in 1862
construction of the fort was initiated . This fortification was
part of what was then known as the "Third System" of seacoast
fortifications which began during a period of peace in 1817 . The
Fort Totten fortification complex was built and designed to
protect New York City from naval forces of the confederate states
during the Civil War. At that time, the fortification was built
7
at sea level from massive granite stones which were brought in by
barge from quarries in New York and Pennsylvania . Above the
stone fort on top of the hill, powder and munition magazines were
built. In 1864, construction of this fort was discontinued and
the partially completed stone fort can still be seen today on the
northern tip of Fort Totten facing Long Island Sound.
During the Civil War, Fort Totten was used as a training
post for troops enroute to the front even though its gun
batteries never fired in anger.
- In 1864, a hospital was built on Fort Totten which treated
sick and wounded patients until closed in 1865 . During this
time, the first permanent garrison for the fort was
established . This garrison consisted of 350 men and officers
which represented most of the Engineer Corps of the United States
Army at the time . In 1868, the War Department established Fort
Totten as an Engineering School and in 1869 another general
hospital was established on the property . During this period,
Fort Totten was the only military engineer depot in the United
States and became the arsenal for all mining, sapping tools,
school for submarine mining, arsenal for pontoon material, and a
depot for all material pertaining to the system of torpedo
defenses . Submarine mine defense systems, seacoast searchlights
and seacoast mortar batteries were also developed at Fort Totten
during this time .
During the Spanish American War, a second set of
fortifications was constructed on the hill in back of the first
8
set of fortifications . The second fortification sat 80 feet
above sea level and again was designed to defend against naval
attack penetrating into Long Island Sound. At the same time, a
skirmish line of torpedoes was laid from Fort Totten across the
channel to Fort Schuyler which was located on Throggs Point .
These torpedoes were designed to detonate by means of electric
batteries located at each end of the line . In addition, two
groups of submarine mines (22 per group) were positioned as anti-
ship weapons to assist in the defense of New York City . These
improved defenses were once again never used since an attack on
New York never occurred .
On July 23, 1898, President McKinley ordered that the fort
at Willets Point be named Fort Totten as it is called today. The
fort was named in honor of Brigadier General Joseph G . Totten,
Corps of Engineers, United States Army who designed and planned
many of the improvements of the United States coastal defenses .
In 1903, the Engineering School moved to Washington D.C . and
later to Fort Belvoir, Virginia where they remain today. At this
time, the Coast Artillery took over Fort Totten .
During World War I, additional guns were added to the
fortifications at Fort Totten and troops enroute to the front in
Europe were concentrated here .
In 1922, the 62nd Coastal Artillery Regiment was stationed
at Fort Totten . The 62nd Coastal Artillery Regiment was equipped
with anti-aircraft artillery and later became the mother unit for
the entire United States Anti-Aircraft defense system .
9
Between 1937-1942, many improvements were made at Fort
Totten . This included remodeling of buildings, new roads and
filling in marshland areas . These improvements made Fort Totten
one of the most attractive army establishments in the United
States at the time .
During World War II, Fort Totten became the headquarters for
the Anti-Aircraft Artillery Command of the Eastern Defense
Command . It was then charged with the defense against air attack
for the entire east coast and in 1941, the first radar system
used on the east coast was installed here .
The Army Anti-Aircraft command was deactivated in 1944 and
Fort Totten then became the base for the North Atlantic Wing of
the Air Transport Command. Aircraft under this command operated
from LaGuardia Air Field. In 1945, Fort Totten became the
headquarters for the entire Atlantic Division of the Air
Transport Command and functioned under the Army Air Corps . until
1947 when Fort Totten was designated as an Army Medical Center .
At that time, the old hospital was reconditioned, refurnished and
named the Fort Totten General Hospital until closed in 1949 .
When the hospital closed, Fort Totten became the headquarters of
the New York-New Jersey subarea of the army, and functioned as a
training facility for the organized Reserve Corps. and the
National Guard in the New York-New Jersey area .
Since 1967, Fort Totten has been a sub-installation of Fort
Hamilton, Brooklyn, New York and is still used today as an
engineering training school for the army . However, the land
10
composing Fort Totten has been sub-divided for use by other U .S .
Government agencies . The majority of Fort Totten (92 .4 acres) is
still owned and--used by the U .S . Army . The remaining tracts of
land are now in the possession of the U.S . Coast Guard
(9 .6 acres) and U.S . General Services Administration (45 acres) .
The land (9 .6 acres) which makes up the U .S . Coast Guard
Station at Fort Totten is now being investigated under the
Defense Environmental Restoration Program to determine if any
environmental contamination exists on this property from past DOD
activities .
At present, the U .S . Coast Guard operated property at Fort
Totten is used as a small boat station for search and rescue
activities, and tending aids to navigation .
3 .0 SITE INVESTIGATION
3 .1 Introduction
This site investigation was conducted to determine whether
contamination exists at the U.S . Coast Guard Station at Fort
Totten and whether this contamination appears to be related to
past DOD activities at this site . A contamination evaluation,
based on environmental samples collected at this site, has been
performed in an effort to assess levels of any constituents found
on site . The following subsections describe the methods employed
to make this determination . Specific items discussed include
drilling operations, geology, well construction and development
procedures, and the sampling program.
11
M&E conducted a preliminary site visit prior to beginning
any field activities . The preliminary site visit was conducted
in order to collect existing information regarding the history of
Fort Totten and to determine prospective sampling locations on
the Coast Guard property at Fort Totten . The site visit was
conducted on October 28, 1986 . Well locations and sample
locations were selected based on local geohydrology, known areas
of past DOD industrial activities, and visual observations .
Monitoring well/groundwater and soil sample locations are
illustrated in Figure 3 .1 .
Surface soil samples were taken near suspected areas of
hazardous materials handling operations . Groundwater monitoring
wells were positioned near suspected areas of contaminant
infiltration and migration to provide samples representative of
groundwater beneath the site and groundwater flowing off the
site . The wells were also positioned to gain a more accurate
understanding of the groundwater flow direction beneath the site .
3 .2 Monitoring Well Installation
Five shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed at
the U .S . Coast Guard Station in Fort Totten . All wells were
installed and completed as outlined in the approved well
Installation Plan of December 1986 . The following sections
briefly discuss the drilling procedures, geotechnical
information, well installation, well development and testing for
hydraulic conductivities .
12
r
LEGEND
® MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
O SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
0 WIPE SAMPLING LOCATIONS
]~c SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATIONS
PCO SAMPLING LOCATIONS
FIGURE 3.1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS MAP
13
! U UNORTH LOOP n /
NOT TO SCALE
wnCALF 0 coo .
3 .2 .1 . Boring Operation
Drilling-at the Fort Totten site began June 2, 1987 . A
mobile CME 75 drill rig was used for the drilling program. The
method employed 6 1/2 inch hollow stem augers which yielded an
approximate hole diameter of 11 inches through the unconsolidated
deposits .
The hollow stem auger method involved advancing 5 foot
flights of hollow stem augers into the ground . As the augers
were rotated into the overburden the wings on the augers carried
the drill cuttings to the land surface . As cuttings arrived at
the surface they were shoveled into a 55 gallon drum .
Two foot split spoon samples were continuously collected to
a depth of 10 feet or to the top of the rock surface, whichever
was encountered first.
The drill rig was steam cleaned according to the procedures
and protocol outlined in the approved Well Installation Plan .
All tools, flights of augers and accessories used for boring each
hole were steam cleaned prior to commencing work on side and in
between work on each of the boreholes . Split spoons were cleaned
with live steam and a natural bristle brush .
3 .2 .2 . Geologic Data
The unconsolidated deposits encountered during the drilling
of the five holes (Figure 3 .2) were similar in each of the
holes . Generally, a thin surface layer of brown silty sand with
14
70-
00-
50-
40 .
30 .
r
20 .
10 .
-0
MYV-5
T
" MW-1 "MialwoWELL I0
T ® sMENEO mrtm~MW-1 ; Q WaTIM UKe EWAUX"0w
NW-2 mW.3 0* emw
4, trnAncduPOC tart
ELI
® y VIA F: ML; Trwrxir VewowaoMC j Clld wr Code. STOWS Awo OWN
r. TWL: WOWN rn! aver NowrFEW.OCCASSOM PcsM$
MW-5utne amr M wAW.4 `-1 , w Mt : si q
150' 1 : Mfl!10@tDM FM lWM AM 9"RELATIVE
LOCATION PLAN B G aW. GWV CUW.OMOMrorncs, TWILT «WNXrco
FIGURE 3-2. STRATIGRAPi11C CROSS-SECTIONS, FORT TOTTEN, NY
MW-1
MW-2 -`MW-3
BOA T ~.
" 70
.60
.40
.30f
mm
-20 Omm2O
O-10
"0
occasional stones and organic matter overlay deposits of glacial
till of Pleistocene age . The layer of unconsolidated deposits
ranged from twelve to 33 feet thick . Most split spoons revealed
samples composed of brown fine sands and silts with occasional
pebbles and less commonly stones . Cinders were also encountered
during drilling in samples taken from wells MW-2, MW-3, and
MW-4 . Laboratory tests performed on soil samples (water content,
after boring limits, sieve analysis) in accordance with ASTM
methods, confirmed field observations . Soils were chiefly made
up of (SM) silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures and (ML)
organic silts and very fine sands with slight plasticity . In
accordance with task #6 (Scope of Work paragraph 3 .4 .1) bedrock,
which was not encountered upon refusal, was not cored and
therefore not analyzed in this report . -
3 .2 .3 . Monitoring Well Construction
Five monitoring wells were constructed on the U.S . Coast
Guard property at the Fort Totten site in accordance with the
well installation plan . All monitoring wells were constructed
with approximately 10 feet of screen set below the water table .
MW1, MW2, MW3, MW4, and MW5 extend to depths of 33 feet, 25 feet,
30 feet, 12 feet, and 25 feet respectively .
Each monitoring well was constructed with 2-inch, threaded
flush joint, No . 10 (0 .010 inch slot) PVC manufactured well
screen ; 2-inch PVC (schedule 80), threaded, flush joint, solid
riser pipe, No . 1 silica sand, bentonite pellets, grout mixture,
16
steel protective coverings with locking cover (or for MW4, one
road box cover) and concrete pads with steel protective posts .
Well construction plans for each monitoring well are presented in
Appendix B, and well survey data in Appendix C.
Drill holes were reamed and washed out with onsite potable
water in cases where obstructions existed at depth . Monitoring
wells were constructed by placing PVC screen and riser down the
hole . Sand was slowly added to the hole and periodically checked
to assure that no bridging occurred and that a proper interval of
sand pack filled the annular space between the PVC screen and the
borehole well . A minimum 2 foot bentonite seal was placed atop
the sand pack and the remainder of the hole was filled with a
grout mixture comprised of portland cement and bentonite
powder . A 3 foot square concrete pad was constructed on the
ground surface and a steal protective surface was emplaced on all
wells with the exception of MW4 which was constructed flush with
the land surface through the emplacement of a road box. Three
guard posts were placed around each steel protective casing .
Table 3 .1 summarized the Characteristics of each well .
TABLE 3 .1FINISHED WELL SPECIFICATIONS
U .S . COAST GUARD STATION, FORT TOTTEN, QUEENS, NEW YORK
Well Depth Screen Sand Bentonite GroutNo . (ft) Length (ft) pack (ft) (ft) Layer (ft)
MW-1 33 10 13 2 18MW-2 25 10 10 2 10MW-3 30 10 13 2 15MW-4 12 10 7 1 2MW-5 25 10 8 2 11
17
3 .2 .4 . Well Development
All grout seals in the monitoring wells were allowed to cure
a minimum of 48-hours prior to development . Monitoring wells
were developed using teflon bailers . After a well was bailed
dry, the well was allowed to recharge and bailed dry again . The
purpose of the well development is to assure the removal of fine
particles from the well, to assure a good hydraulic connection
between the well screen, filter pack and formation, and to remove
any contamination inadvertently introduced during the drilling
process . Well development information is summarized in
Table 3 .2 .
TABLE 3- 2WELL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS
U .S . COAST GUARD STATION, FORT TOTTEN, QUEENS, NEW YORK
Well Development Approximate Volume Development TimeNo . Process Of Water Removed (gal) (hrs)
MW-1 Bailer 30 4 .0MW-2 Bailer 45 4 .5MW-3 Bailer 45 4 .0MW-4 Bailer 25 4 .0MW-5 Bailer 100 4 .0
The monitoring wells at the Fort Totten site were developed
without incident . The depth and amount of recharge varied within
each monitoring well . Therefore a variety of well volumes were
required to develop each different well . The technique used to
develop the wells removed silts from the screened section of the
well and created a secure connection between the well screen,
filter pack and fractured formation .
18
3 .2 .5 . Water Levels
Water level measurements in each monitoring well were
recorded after-the completion of each well and prior to
sampling . This information is presented in Table 3 .3 . Surveyed
horizontal control positions and elevations of each monitoring
well are present in Appendix C of this report .
TABLE 3 .3WATER LEVELS
U .S . COAST GUARD STATION, FORT TOTTEN, QUEENS, NEW YORK
Land Water Level Water HydraulicWell Surface *TOC Below TOC Elevation ConductivityNo . **(NGVD) (NGVD) (ft) (NGVD) (ft/day)
MW-1 61 .50 63 .40 17 .09 46 .31 0 .1MW-2 58 .90 61 .06 16 .99 44 .07 0 .3MW-3 57 .10 59 .13 14 .56 44 .57 0 .4MW-4 12 .15 11 .87 5 .54 6 .28 0 .5MW-5 25 .0 27 .01 19 .04 7 .97 0 .3
* Top of Casing** NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum
Water level elevations vary significantly with each
location . Water elevations ranged between 46 .31 feet and
6 .28 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) .
Inferred groundwater gradients across the site, based on those
elevations, indicate that groundwater flow is generally to the
northwest downgradient toward Long Island Sound .
19
3 .2 .6 . Hydraulic Conductivities
Slug and bail tests were conducted at all five monitoring
well locations in accordance with the approved well installation
plan . Slug and bail tests were conducted as follows : The
initial water level was recorded . Both tests were initiated by
inducing a sudden change in water level and measuring the
response of the well . The change in water level was accomplished
by introducing a known quantity of previously bailed well water
(slugging the well) or removing (bailing the well) a known
quantity of water with a bailer . Data were recorded using a
water level tape . Data were analyzed using the Hvorslev method
when the well screen remained submerged during testing . The
modified Hvorslev method was used when data gathered from a well
whose screen was not submerged throughout the test .
The hydraulic conductivity (K) values which are based
specifically on slug test analysis are presented in Table 3 .3 .
The rate at which the monitoring well responds depends upon the
rate of recharge that occurs . This rate can vary by several
orders of magnitude depending upon the characteristics of the
formation in which each well is installed . Values for K (Table
3 .3) range from 0 .1 tc 0.5 feet per day which is less than one
order of magnitude of difference among the five wells . These
values fall into the standard range of values given for glacial
till deposits .
20
3 .3 Sampling Program
The preliminary contamination evaluation conducted by
Metcalf & Eddy-included the sampling and analysis of the
groundwater monitoring wells, soils, sediments, and wipe tests on
the structures . The field sampling episode was conducted from
July 18 - July 24, 1987 . Sampling protocol and procedures were
presented in project work plans submitted to the Army Corps of
Engineers in April 1987 .
The parameters chosen for analysis were outlined in the
scope of work provided by the U .S . Army Corps of Engineers . The
analyses selection reflect possible contamination expected
resulting from past DOD activities, and includes the measurement
of volatile compounds, petroleum hydrocarbons, selected metals,
PCB, pesticides, pH, conductivity, and temperature .
3 .3 .1 . Work Plans
After the site visit and prior to actual field work, work
plans were developed to outline site investigation procedures .
These work plans included :
Site Specific Health & Safety Plan
Site Specific Well Installation Plan
Site Specific Sampling Analysis and Quality AssuranceProject Plan (S&A/QAPP)
COE approval of these work plans was obtained prior to
commencement of well construction, sampling, electro-magnetic
survey, and coring into the bunker (Bldg. #619) . The field team
adhered to procedures described in the above work plans .21
The specific work plans were submitted to the COE as
separate documents and have not been presented within this
report . However, a summary of field techniques employed during
the investigation has been included in Section 3 .3 .3 . The
analytical methodology is provided in the SA/QAPP and is
summarized in Section 3 .4 . The analytical results of the QC
samples have been evaluated and compared against the goals stated
in the S&A/QAPP . A quality assurance summary for the project is
included in 3 .5 .
3 .3 .2 . Sampling Locations
The individual sampling locations were selected to assess
particular areas of the site . Each location is briefly described
to indicate the selection rationale . Sampling locations that are
described which could not be sampled during this program are
indicated as such . Sampling locations are illustrated in
Figure 3 .1 and are described as follows :
onitoring Wel
Monitoring Well MW-1 was installed in the eastern portion of
the site at the corner of Abbot Road and North Loop . This well
position was selected as an upgradient "background" monitoring
point to determine groundwater quality prior to movement through
the U.S . Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten . This well position
is located on the sites highest elevation with surrounding
vegetation consisting of grass and trees. It should also be
22
noted that a battery of gun mounts "Battery Ring" was
decommissioned and buried below the recreation field just
upgradient of MW-1 .
Monitoring Well MW-2
Monitoring Well MW-2 was installed downgradient of
building #624 . This well position was selected to intercept
potential groundwater contaminants which may have been released
in and around this building . Past DOD activities performed in
this area include vehicle repair, and electrical equipment
maintenance . In addition, there is some evidence that the area
behind building #624 was used as a solid waste "trash" dump .
onitoring Well MW-3
Monitoring Well MW-3 was installed downgradient of
building #625 . This well position was selected to intercept
potential groundwater contaminants which may have been released
in and around this building . Past DOD activities performed in
this area include fuel storage in above ground tanks. Dark
colored fuel stains were observed on surface soils near this
building during the site visit .
onitoring Well MW-4
Monitoring Well MW-4 was installed downgradient of
building #619 "bunker" . This well position was selected to
intercept potential groundwater contaminants which may have been
23
released in and around this building . In addition, this well
location would also intercept any contaminant migration from
building #624 and #625 . Past DOD activities in and around
building #619 may have resulted in the release of solvents, oils,
pesticides, and mercury .
itoring Well MW-5
Monitoring Well MW-5 was installed in the vicinity of
buildings #610, #611, and #612 . This well location was selected
to detect potential groundwater contaminants which may have been
released in and around these buildings . In addition, this well
location would also intercept any contaminant migration from
buildings #624 and #625 . The past DOD activities that took place
at this location were primarily administrative in nature with
some light industrial maintenance . However, this area is
contiguous to the waterfront area where torpedoes, mines, and
search lights were developed and maintained .
oil Sam
Soil Sample S-1 was collected in the eastern corner of the
U.S . Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten near MW-1 . This location
was selected as an upgradient location to serve as a background
sample .
24
Soil Sample S-2
Soil Sample S-2 was collected near MW-3 down slope from
bldg . #625 . This location was selected because of dark colored
fuel stains (possibly paraffins) on surface soils which were
observed during the site visit.
Soil Sample S-3
Soil Sample S-3 was collected at the east corner of building
625 down slope of MW-2 in an area of past oil storage/use
activities, and possible spills and leaks.
Soil Sample S-4
Soil Sample S-4 was collected near MW-2 located down slope
of building #624 . This location was selected due to past
maintenance and repair activities which took place in this area .
Soil Sample S-5
Soil Sample S-5 was collected approximately 40 feet behind
building #623 . This sample location was selected due to
suspected solid waste dumping "trash" in this area during past
DOD activities .
Soil Sample S-6
Soil Sample S-6 was collected at the corner of Willets
Street and the access road leading shoreside into the U.S . Coast
Guard Station at Fort Totten . This location was selected to
25
detect potential contaminants down slope from buildings #609,
#610, #611, and #612 .
Soil Sample S-7
Soil Sample S-7 was collected near MW-5 . This location was
selected to detect contaminants down slope of buildings #624 and
#625, and to detect contaminants in the area of buildings #610,
#611, and #612 .
Soil Sample S-8
Soil Sample S-8 was collected approximately 30 feet down
slope of building #619 "bunker" and in between buildings #615 and
#614 . This location was selected to detect potential
contamination which may have been released from and around these
buildings . This is also the area where past DOD industrial
activity was the greatest .
Soil SamRle S-11
Soil Sample S-11 was collected near building #609 . This
location was selected for PCB analysis because an electrical
transformer station is and has been located there for some years .
Soil Sample S-12
Soil Sample S-12 was collected on the east corner of
building #625 . This location for a PCB sample was selected
because of past oil storage activities and accidental spills or
leaks which caused staining on surrounding soils.
26
Wipe Test W#1
Wipe Test W#1 were taken in the left room facing the bay in
building #619 .---This location was selected because of past DOD
storage activities of DDT in this room .
Wipe'Test W#2
Wipe Test W#2 was taken in the right room facing the bay in
building #619 . This location was selected because of past DOD
storage activities of DDT in this room .
Wipe Test W#3
Wipe test W#3 was taken in the right room facing the bay in
building #624 . This location was selected because of potential
past DOD storage activities of DDT in this room .
Wipe Test W#4
Wipe test W#4 was taken in the left room facing the bay in
building #624 . This location was selected because of potential
past DOD storage activities of DDT in this room .
Sediment Samples (Sed-1, Sed-2 . & Sed-3)
Three sediment samples were collected in the bay along the
seawall at the U.S . Coast Guard Station . The three samples were
taken at 100 foot intervals between the pier and the back of
building #615 . The samples were collected at a depth of 6
inches . These locations were selected to detect potential
27
Cc,, 1-o r,"~ , v^a ,\t"t run-off from shore which might have occurred during
past DOD activities .
3 .3 .3 . Sampling Methods
Detained sampling and analytical procedures are provided in
the S&A/QAPP . Brief summaries of methodology are presented in
the following section and include methods for groundwater, soil,
and wipe tests .
3 .3 .3 .1 . Groundwater Sampling
At least 5 well casing volumes were removed from each
monitoring well prior to groundwater sampling . This was
necessary to assure that the samples collected were
representative of the water quality in the aquifer. Table 3 .4
presents well purging data . Sampling of the five monitoring
wells involved the following steps:
measurement of static water level
purging out 5 well casing volumes
allow groundwater to recover to static level
collection of sample
A teflon bailer was employed for well purging and sample
recovery .
28
TABLE 3 .4- WELL PURGING DATA
SWL WELL VOLUME VOLUME PURGED WELL VOLUME(feet) - (gallons) (gallons) PURGED
MW-1 14 .70 2 .40 12 .00 5MW-2 18 .35 1 .25 6 .25 5MW-3 16 .09 2 .45 12 .30 5MW-4 10 .85 0 .758 3 .79 5MW-5 19 .75 0 .905 4 .60 5
SWL = Standing water level to top of casing
3 .3 .3 .2 . Soil Sampling
Soil samples were collected at 10 locations throughout the
site . A hand-driven soil auger was employed to collect each soil
sample from a depth of approximately 6 inches . Samples were
scooped with a stainless steel spoon into a pyrex bowl and
homogenized prior to aliquotting into sample containers .
Volatile Organic compound samples were collected prior to
homogenization to minimize loss of volatile components .
3 .3 .3 .3 . Wipe Tests
Wipe tests were collected at four locations by wiping a 2" x
2" hexane rinsed gauze pad over a 9" x 9" area on each floor area
tested . The gauze pad was handled with forceps . The wipe test
sample "gauze pad" was then returned to its container "VOA Vial"
for analysis .
29
3 .4 Analytical Methods
The analytical methods employed to analyze samples are
presented in detail in the S&A/QAPP . Table 3 .5 summarizes the
specific analytical methods used .
3 .5 Ouality Assurance
As required by the Fort Totten S&A/QAPP a quality assurance
summary report was to be prepared upon the conclusion of all
sample collection, analysis and data reduction activities . The
purpose of such a report is to "summarize and present all
pertinent quality control data and discuss the influence of
quality assurance issues on the overall data quality." This
report consists of the discussion and results provided in this
section .
As applied to field measurements and laboratory analyses
performed during this project, Quality Assurance is the
demonstration and documentation of data quality. These
procedures include the recording of all quality control
activities undertaken by the field team, and the assessment of
analytical performance of the subcontract laboratory through the
analysis of internal and external control and audit samples.
3 .5 .1 . Field Sampling and Measurements
All field sampling was in compliance with the S&A/QAPP : all
field samples and QC samples were collected as planned; all wells
were surveyed before sampling, proper decontamination procedures
were utilized, field analytical parameters of conductivity, pH,
30
TABLE 3 .5ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
Sample Sample EPALocation Date No . Parameters Method No .
MW-1 7/22/87 2332-301 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 625Total Metals 200 Series
MW-2 7/22/87 2332-302, Volatile Organics 8240(triplicate) 2332-306, Extractable Organics 625
2332-307* Total Metals 200 Series
MW-3 7/22/87 2332-303 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 625Total Metals 200 Series
MW-4 7/22/87 2332-304 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 625Total Metals 200 Series
MW-5 7/23/87 2332-305 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 625Total Metals 200 Series
Well 7/22/87 2332-308, Volatile Organics 8240Sample Blk 2332-309* Extractable Organics 625
Total Metals 200 Series
Well 2332-310, Volatile Organics 8240Travel Blk 2332-311*
Well Travel 7/23/87 2332-360, Volatile Organics 8240Blk #2 2332-359*
S-1 7/20/87 2332-320 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
S-2 7/20/87 2332-321 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
S-3 7/20/87 2332-322, Volatile Organics 82402332-328, Extractable Organics 82702332-329* Total Metals 7000 Series
S-4 7/20/87 2332-323 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
31
TABLE 3 .5 (Continued)ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
Sample Sample EPALocation Date No . Parameters Method No .
S-5 7/20/87 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
S-6 7/20/87 2332-325 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
S-7 7/20/87 2332-326 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
S-8 7/20/87 2332-327 Volatile Organics 8240Extractable Organics 8270Total Metals 7000 Series
S-11 7/20/87 2332-330 PCBs 3540 & 8080
S-12 7/20/87 2332-331, PCBS 3540 & 8080(triplicate) 2332-358,
*2332-332
Soil Sample 7/20/87 2332-332, Volatile Organics 8240Blank *2332-333 Extractable Organics 8270
Total Metals 7000 Series
Soil Sample 7/20/87 2332-337 PCBs 3540 & 8080Blank #2
Soil Travel 7/20/87 2332-335, Volatile Organics 8240Blank #1 *2332-336
Sed-1 7/21/87 2332-341, Volatile Organics 8240(triplicate 2332-344, Total Metals 7000 Series
*2332-345 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,DStd Methods
Sed-2 7/21/87 2332-342 Volatile Organics 8240Total Metals 7000 SeriesPetroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,D
Std Methods
Sed-3 7/21/87 2332-343 Volatile Organics 8240Total Metals 7000 SeriesPetroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,D
Std Methods
32
TABLE 3 .5 (Continued)ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
Sample Sample EPALocation Date No . Parameters Method No .
Sediment 7/21/87 2332-346, Volatile Organics 8240Sample *2332-347 Total Metals 7000 SeriesBlank Petroleum Hydrocarbons 503 A,D
Std Methods
Sediment 7/21/87 2332-348, Volatile Organics 8240Travel *2332-349Blank
Wipe #1 7/21/87 2332-350 DDT, DDE, DDD 6082332-354,*2332-355
Wipe #2 7/21/87 2332-351 DDT, DDE, DDD 608
Wipe #3 7/21/87 2332-352 DDT, DDE, DDD 608
Wipe #4 7/21/87 2332-353 DDT, DDE, DDD 608
Wipe Sample 7/21/87 2332-356, DDT, DDE, DDD 608Blank 2332-357
* Note these samples were sent to MRDED-L for QA and have not beenincluded in this report .
33
and temperature were recorded as required, and chain of custody
procedures including sample labeling were adhered to .
3 .5 .2 . Metcalf & Eddy Laboratory Analysis, Systems and
Performance Audit
An on-site laboratory systems audit would normally be
performed by Metcalf & Eddy to assure that the subcontractor
laboratory is capable of maintaining the necessary minimum levels
of instrumentation and levels of experience of personnel, and
that laboratory quality assurance/control procedures are in
conformance with the requirements of the QAPP . However, since
the Army Corps of Engineers, Missouri River Division Laboratory
(MRD) decided to conduct a performance and system audit of
Resource Analysts, Inc . (RAI) to validate their ability to
perform work under this contract, Metcalf & Eddy did not schedule
any additional audits . The independent performance audit
conducted by the COE involved preparation and analysis of QA
samples prepared by the Army COE Missouri River Division (MRD)
Quality Assurance Laboratory. The purpose of those QA samples
was to provide an independent determination of any problem areas
in sample handling, analysis, and reporting by the subcontract
laboratory . The program also provided data to document
performance of the various measurement systems . Quality
assurance samples were submitted as blind samples to RAI for
comparison of results . The QA samples submitted had been
selected by the MRD QA Laboratory to include analyses of
duplicate standard pairs, low and high range standards, as well
34
as blanks . The QA samples were prepared in certified organic
free water, not actual site samples . The results of the MRD
audit were not.made available to M&E, only that MRD had approved
RAI Laboratory to conduct the required analyses under this
contract . The laboratory related quality control activities
undertaken during the course of this project were designed to
assure that measurement systems as well as activities specific to
a given site evaluation were under control .
The ongoing laboratory related quality control activities
consisted principally of the evaluation of data obtained from the
following sample categories : (a) calibration standards,
(b) working standards, (c) field samples, (d) laboratory
duplicates, (e) laboratory spikes, (f) laboratory methods blanks,
(g) trip blanks, (h) laboratory split samples. Procedures to be
used to evaluate that data would include calculation of
arithmetic means, standard deviations, relative percent
differences for duplicate samples and comparison of differences
between standards of spiked and experimentally determined values
expressed as percent recovery . Identification and treatment of
outliers was not appropriate as no marked deviations were noted
in the data set . The information used to evaluate the laboratory
quality control activities was to be obtained from the
subcontract laboratory performing the analytical work . An
assessment of the laboratory's compliance with stated objectives
presented in the Fort Totten S&A/QAPP is summarized below .
Quality Assurance data are presented in tables F .1 through
F.5 in Appendix E. The tables include results for field
35
duplicate analysis, laboratory sample spikes, laboratory
replicates, laboratory sample spikes, surrogate Recoveries and
laboratory control data .
All Field Duplicate Analysis with the exceptions of Chromium
and Lead in MW-2, Silver and Cadmium in S-3, and Silver and
Barium in Sed-3 were within QA objectives as presented in
Table F .1 . Laboratory Sample Spikes were within QA objectives
with the exception of selenium in MW-1, S-1, and S-7, Arsenic in
S-7, and petroleum hydrocarbons in Sed-1 field duplicate, as
presented in Table F .2 . Laboratory replicates, as presented in
Table F .3, were within QA objectives with the exception of Barium
in MW-l . The Surrogate Standard Recoveries for volatile
compounds as presented in Table F .4-were within the control range
with the exception of D(4)-1-2-Dichloroethane in S-3, D8-Toluene
in MW-2, MW-2 Field Duplicate, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5 Lab Replicate 2,
Well Travel Blank, and Lab Controls D0027, and D0012 . Surrogate
Standard Recoveries for Extractable organics were within control
ranges with the exception of 2-Fl-Phenol in S-3 Field Duplicate,
S-5, Blank A014 S-8, and S-8 Lab Duplicate, Nitrobenzene and
2-Fl-Biphenyl in S-1, S-2, S-3, S-3 Field Duplicate, S-7, Blank
A014, S-8, and S-8 Lab Duplicate, and Terphenyl-d14 in S-8 as
described in Table F .5 .
36
3 .5 .3 RAI Ouality Assurance
Well s
Spike recovery was below control limits for selenium . Since
both the calibration and verification and the laboratory control
sample were well within control limits, this probably represents
a matrix effect .
Silver recovery was low in the laboratory control sample,
however, since spike recovery was well within control, the data
was accepted for the series .
Silver, barium, cadmium and chromium for all samples and
lead for "Well #4 2332-304", (our laboratory number 10465-12)
were analyzed by method 7241 (Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy) .
Surrogate recoveries for d8-toluene were consistently low
for these samples . Some fell just below acceptance levels . This
would not have effected the detection of toluene however. No
toluene was found in the samples . Methylene chloride was found
in an instruments blank at 11 ug/L . It was not found in the
samples . One of the laboratory replicates had higher than normal
recovery for methylene chloride . This elevated level is likely
due to lab contamination . Matrix spike recoveries were
acceptable .
BIS-2-ethylhexyl phthalate was found in the blank for
semivolatiles at a level equivalent to 100 ug/L . Some samples
contained this compound at similar levels . These values should
be considered suspect . Matrix spike recoveries for the
37
semivolatiles ranged from 38 to 134% recovery . While some values
were outside project limits, they fell within EPA CLP acceptance
criteria .
Spike recoveries were below control limits for arsenic in
the soils samples and selenium in both the soil and water
samples . Since both the calibration verification and the
laboratory control sample were well within control limits, this
probably represents a matrix effect .
Silver recovery was low in the laboratory control sample,
however, since spike recoveries were well within control for both
the soil samples and the water sample, the data was accepted for
the series .
Silver, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, and Lead were analyzed by
Method 6010 (Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Spectroscopy) ICP.
No problems were encountered for Volatile Organics .
No problems were encountered for Acid/Base Neutral Extractable
Organic Compounds . No analytical problems were encountered for
PCB's .
Sediments
Spike Recoveries were below contract limits for arsenic in
the soil samples for the selenium in both the soil and water
samples . Since both the calibration verification and the
laboratory control sample were well within control limits, this
probably represents a matrix effect .
38
Silver recovery was low in the laboratory control sample,
however, since spike recoveries were well within control for both
the soil samples and the water sample, the data was accepted for
the series .
Silver, barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead were analyzed by
method 6010 (Inductively coupled Argon Plasma Spectoscopy) . Lead
was analyzed in the water sample "2332-346 FT Sed Sam Blk", (our
laboratory number 10,430-13) by method 7421 (Graphite Furnace
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy) .
Recoveries were low for the volatiles laboratory control
sample . Methylene chloride was found in the water blank at 13
ppb but was not found in the samples . Toluene was found at 0 .7
ug/g in the soil blank but was notfound in the samples . The
duplicate water matrix spikes showed higher than expected
recoveries (113 to 171%) . The detection of volatiles was not
effected however, and no compounds were detected in the
samples . Surrogate recoveries for all samples were acceptable
except for BFB in 2332-346 FT Sed Blk which was 83% with an
acceptance limit of 86% .
Matrix spike recovery for oil and grease was 156% and 6
for the two soils spiked . Inhomogeneity of the soils contributed
to the error.
Wines
Wipes were analyzed for pesticides by electron capture gas
chromotograph and confirmed using Hall Detector . Interferences
in the wipes may have been present and raised detected
39
quantities . These samples could not be subsampled for precision
and occurance determination . Laboratory Control Sample results
for pesticides were within CLP acceptance limits except for
Endrin and DDT which showed 51 and 27% recovery . CLP criteria
are 56 and 36% respectively . The calibration for DDT is updated
with each calibration check sample to compensate for changing DDT
breakdown characteristics . This is reflected in the reported
concentration for DDT in the mid-range calibration QC data .
3 .5 .4 Summary
The above observations are minor in nature, thus the
analytical sample data presented within this report is
satisfactory and completely usable for the original purpose of
this site characterization .
4 .0 ELECTRO-MAGNETIC SURVEY
4 .1 Introduction
An electro-magnetic (EM) survey was performed at the U .S .
Coast Guard Station at Fort Totten on December 8-10, 1986 . The
purpose of this survey was to detect potential buried ordnance
and drums, and to verify that groundwater monitoring wells could
be installed safely without drilling into buried obstructions
such as water lines, power lines, and communications lines .
The instrument employed in this survey was a GEONICS
EM-31 . This instrument is direct "continuous" reading in
millisiemens per meter (ms/m) . It has an effective exploration
depth of about 6 meters and is composed of a self-contained
40
dipole transmitter and dipole receiver which operates on a
9 .8 kHz frequency . The EM-31 is powered by alkaline "C" cell
batteries and has conductivity ranges from 3 to 1,000 ms/m .
4 .2 Subsurface Conditions
Prior to performing the EM survey, research at the Post
Engineers office at Fort Totten was conducted . This research
consisted of obtaining all known drawings of underground
utilities which included communications lines, potable water
lines, fire fighting water lines, electrical service lines, storm
drainage lines, and sewer lines . During this research, some
utility drawings were obtained . However, it was learned that
many drawings of underground utilities at Fort Totten were
destroyed during a fire . It was also learned that the U .S . Coast
Guard Station property at Fort Totten is a maze of abandoned
underground cables which served the old gun emplacements and
overall communications for the site . During the EM survey, some
of these cables could be seen in various states of decay
penetrating above the ground surface . Drawings of these
abandoned cable positions were not available .
4 .3 Method
The U .S . Coast Guard property at Fort Totten was mapped as a
grid system prior to performing the EM survey . The grid
consisted of 12' x 12' squares which were measured off in
horizontal and vertical lines with cloth tapes . The horizontal
and vertical lines were then walked while carrying the EM-31
41
which was set on 500 my at a maximum detection range of
30 mmho/m . All readings at or above 30 mmho/m during the survey
were marked with a wooden stake. Consistent readings in straight
lines were verified with utility location drawings or assumed to
be abandoned undocumented utility lines. Single non-consistent
EM hits were marked and later re-surveyed in an attempt to
establish a pattern.
4 .4 Results
As expected, the EM-31 detected all known utilities as well
as undocumented abandoned utilities . Many abandoned utility
lines detected were discussed with personnel of the U .S . Coast
Guard Station. Their local knowledge of this area verified the
existence of these abandoned lines . U.S . Coast Guard personnel
recalled unearthing many of these lines during station
improvements and maintenance .
The only major EM hit which could not be explained was in
the northeast area of the recreation field as shown in
Figure 4 .1 . This area covers a buried fortification "Battery
King" which might account for the unexplained EM hits . It was
later learned that Battery King still contains the metal ring gun
mounts, although the guns themselves were removed during the
battery's demobilization . It was also learned that a mini-
railway system existed between Battery King and the underground
bunker munitions storage facility on Fort Totten*s northern
tip. The railway was used to transport munitions to Battery King
and may still exist in whole or in part . Metal pieces of this
42
railway would include axles, wheels, tracks, spikes, and rail car
bodies .
4 .5 Conclusion
The subsurface area below the U .S . Coast Guard Station at
Fort Totten is a maze of utility lines and debris . This was
ascertained from old and new site drawings, interviews with Coast
Guard and Army personnel, visual observations, and EM survey
results . Historically, ordnance has been unearthed along the
waterfront of the U .S . Coast Guard Station and on U .S . Army
property to the north . This was ascertained by interviews with
U .S . Coast Guard and U .S . Army personnel . However, no buried
ordnance or drums were found on the U .S . Coast Guard Station
property by ME or the present U .S . Coast Guard personnel at the
station . In addition, the majority of the EM survey data
resulted in continuous and consistent detections which are
interpreted to as buried utilities . The exception to this is the
northeast area of the recreation field as shown in Figure 4 .1 .
This area contains magnetic anomolies which could be the remnants
of a buried rail road system that serviced Battery Ring . It can
not be concluded with certainty that buried ordnance or drums do
not exist on this property without performing excavations .
However, it is unlikely that buried ordnance and drums exist on
the U .S . Coast Guard property . This is based on interviews with
U .S . Coast Guard personnel presently assigned to Fort Totten,
results from the existing EM survey data, drawings and past DOD
activities that took place on this property .
43
FIGURE 4.1 EM SURVEY GRID SPACING
44
NCTCALF a Woo.
x / UNEXPLAINED EM DETECTIONS
5 .0 BUNKER (BUILDING #619) PENETRATION
5 .1 Introduction
The bunker (building #619) which stands at the east corner
of the U.S . Coast Guard property at Fort Totten across from
building #615 was thought to have a sealed room . This assumption
was made due to the fact that approximately three-fourths of the
structure has usable space and the remaining one-fourth (east
corner) appears to be sealed with concrete aggregate . Concrete
aggregate was also used to construct the entire bunker .
The bunker was constructed in the early 1900's . It was used
first as a communications center and later as a storage area .
DDT was once stored in this structure, but now it is used by the
U .S . Coast Guard Station as a general equipment storage area .
5 .2 Method
A 6-inch diameter diamond tip barrel coring devise powered
by a 6 hp electric motor was used to core through the front
outside wall and interior wall of the suspected room . During the
coring, operators used supplied air breathing systems and
continuously monitored the ambient air for organic vapors,
radiation, and explosive levels . Air monitoring was performed
and supplied air was breathed in the event wall penetration
resulted in a contaminant release .
The length of the coring barrel was 36 inches at full
penetration . A 36-inch barrel was selected since the average
thickness of the bunker wall in usable spaces was 18 inches .
45
5.3 Results
The coring barrel penetrated the front outside bunker wall
to a depth of 36 inches without reaching an interior space.
Coring was again performed on the inside bunker wall which was
accessed through the interior space. During the coring of the
interior wall, a 2-inch void was encountered at 16 inches of
penetration . The coring barrel passed through the 2-inch void
and continued coring into the next wall until a depth of
36 inches was achieved . At this depth no interior space was
found to exist in the suspected room .
5 .4 Conclusion
The east end of the bunker (building #619) does not appear
to be a sealed room . This area of the bunker appears to be solid
reinforced aggregate concrete . The matrix of the aggregate in
the suspected room is identical to that of the usable rooms and
walls . This probably means that all parts of the bunker were
constructed at the same time and that a room was not later sealed
off . In addition, construction of the bunker appears to be
prefabricated . Walls were probably pre-formed in pieces and
later assembled by a crane . This would account for the 2-inch
void between the bunker interior wall and the suspected room .
Lastly, the east corner faces Long Island Sound which would be
where a potential attack would come from . It is, therefore,
suspected that the east wall of the bunker was given extra
strength as was the roof . Both the roof and the east bunker wall
"suspected room" are constructed to a 7-foot thickness of
reinforced concrete aggregate .46
6 .0 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
This section-contains a summary of sample analysis results
and a presentation of groundwater standards and soil clean up
criteria associated with the analytes measured . The analytical
results are discussed and compared to the standards and criteria
in Section 7 to determine the presence or absence of
contamination at the site .
6 .1 Analytical Results
Table 6.1 summarizes the monitoring well and other aqueous
sample data . Soil sample data are presented in Table 6 .2,
sediment sample data are presented in Table 6 .3 and Wipe sample
data is presented in Table 6 .4 . Only analyte concentrations
greater than detection limits were reported in Tables 6 .1-6 .4 .
The complete analytical results are presented in Appendix D .
6 .2 Water and Soil Standards and Criteria
To present a basis for comparison of analyte concentrations
measured to those acceptable or suggested for groundwater and
soils, National Priority Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant
Levels (MCLs) and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs)
developed under the Safe Drinking Water Act, NY State groundwater
standards, US soil background metal levels, NJ soil cleanup
objectives and NJ surrogate or action levels of organics in soils
have been presented in Tables 6.5 and 6 .6 .
The NJ objectives are presented to place the concentrations
of metals and volatile organics detected in soil at the site into
perspective, because no New York State Standards or criteria were47
TABLE 6 .1 . AQUEOUS SAMPLES
/mm-1 Nw-2 mw-3 NW-4 Nw-5 lamp Ilk trw Ilk /1 Trw Ilk Q2332-301 2332-302 2332-303 2332-304 2332-305 2332-308 2332-310 2332-360
1loletile 0190 Ice NO NO No ND ND NO NO, No
Sao-1lolatlto Of ON leg4
"1s(2 ~be"lphth@I*t!) UEll 120 120 17d 120 120 110 IA NA
total petals
is Aranle w A" us/l 410 16 <10 <10 410 'CIO NA NAswim u N uo/L 200 230 4100 150 4100 <1OO 4A NACbra~iu~ u Cr u0/t 31 97 32 72 425 410 NA NA
Ls Lead s Pb w11. 7 30 7 330 <5 a NA NA
°° FIELD WAlME1ENTf
1111 ON u,Ito 6.6 6.4 7.5 6.9 5 .6teneuetirltr une. 430 210 a0 ' 790 210tompariture C 14 1. 13 17 14 QII 1111 IIM
IM - list "IYOd for this p8rWgttw" units uefnote: wily wal)rto earcwftrntlwr Wfttw then deteetlon limits how been reported101 " llet Afop elk " :wpls, "lurdtTrw elk " Travel "lwtIIO . not detected
waadaN0NNam̀4E+
as:p16
m:
+os'
^.
...^
._..
vvvv~:
vvw
^
ss=r~*'~~v
v
167$3~~sX~1J
C~K$~_~$$
"w'~
wv
sit
~iRRR7LiJ
iiia=ia
t
="s
'Ci`~~
~#
~~
49
49?0
x7!~
i
Wrrr
Nr
ms's
w1#t
!'i'9~?'~~4'~Y9
sssaast~f
49
TABLE 6.2 (Continued) . SOIL SAMPLES
O
f-11 l-12 sup Ilk 02 Lob Ilk 1 t2332-330 2332-331 2332-337 s-"102
u4/k'' tq/k4' u0/t ul/k''
pas
PCB-1242 40 40 go tooPO-1254 4160 4160 4160 4160PO-1221 40 40 400 -Cep
-1232 q0 400 q0 'Coono-1248 40 40 too 40M-1260 4160 4160 4160 4160!CO-1016 40 c0 q0 40
Ntretlen ltwits of sqiwous mplss or* low then soi l samples*ft wt bootsVA - Not snslpeed far this pa smetK
TABLE 6 .3 . SEDIMENT SAMPLES
Fr
total petals
SeA-1 Sod-2 Sed-3 Sed Sample Ilk Sed Trawl elk t2332-341 2332-342 2332-343 2332-356 2332-348
volatile 0190 leg 00 NO ND No* W*
Arsenic as As ug/kg 4,900 5,000 2,800 CIO*"eriuw so se uq/kg 00,000 18,000 10,000 <100&Chromium as Cr by/kg 13,000 19,000 12,000 CIO*Mercury es 019 u9/kg 270 200 1,500 < .5"Led h Pb u9/kg 210,000 225,000 270,000 CS*
Petroleuo Nydroeirbm» u,/kg 220,000 21+0,000 150,000 <1,0W
a - got analyzed for this parameter" units us/l.Note: only w+elyte concentrations greeter then detection limits be" been reportedOM " Not wessuredsap Ilk " Sample "lsnk1rw elk " travel W enk0 " Not detected
NANANAQANA
NA
TABLE 6.4 . WIPE SAMPLES
nsl.
rt-ss1
wipe"as:-su
w,. wusa-"s
"gawks suam %
Oowmthtlww fttwtlm Chit("/<>11M1 (UWl/M)
Otrsw left("hlpl
Ntatlw tidetwelve)
toeeotntlon NtsSt1w that(aVw1po1 (Us/Wipe)
twiewothtlw t+oteetiww thit(whop! (mvelp!
toemotMlon t+naetitw Mot(yhlr! (whhlpf
4,40 " w<4s " " In
4.11 .1 ~.n0.01
1.741 .290.42
0."0.010.61
9.110 .030.93
0.n0.�
4.10.20.4
0.nf."0.01
11., n »~t,~ 1~ 9.101r w 0.01r to 0.61
mean wt~et~+
NN
TABLE 6 .5 . WATER CRITERIA
ww
NATIONAL
MCLCK;IG
PRIMARYWATER
MCLYz'TIONS GROUNDWATRASTANDARDS (3) RANGES
ug/L ug/L ug/L
Arsenic 50 50 25 (10-M
Barium 1,500 - 1,000 (10-16
Chromium 120 50 50 (10-91
Lead 20 50 25 <5-330
bis(2ethylhexylphthalate) - - 4,200 110-170
Footnotes :
1 . MCLG - Maximum contaminant level goal ; proposed values taken from 50 Federal Register 46936(November 13, 1985) .
2 . MCL - Maximum contaminant level ; interim guidance levels .
3 . Water Quality Regulations, New York State Department or Conservation 11/29/84 and Environmental 8/31/78 .
TABLE 6.6 . SOIL CRITERIA
A
DATA RANGES NJug/kg Action Levels
Volatile Organics (500 1,000
Extractable Organics (300-1,700 10,000
NJ Background(192) U.S Background(3) Data Ranges NJ Cle~puplug/kg ug/kg ug/kg Levels ,
Silver NA 90 (1,000-4,500 5,000
Arsenic NA 1,100-16,700 2,700-20,000 20,000
Barium NA NA 16,000-100,000 NA
Cadmium 1,000-4,000 10-1,000 (500-1,200 3,000
Chromium 5,000-48,000 1,000-1,500,000 8,600-39,000 100,000
Mercury NA 10-4,600 70-1,200 1,000
Lead 1,000-180,000 2,000-200,000 45,000-250,000 250,000-1,000,000
Selenium 10-40,000 10-5,000 09000 4,000
Footnotes :
1 . NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection, Summary of Approaches to Soil Clean Up Levels, January 1987 .
2 . NJ Cleanup Objectives cited to put the level of soil contamination into perspective . No New YorkGuidance is available .
3 . NJ established surrogate or action level (1 ppm volatile organics in soil) .
identified . The NJ regulations listed are in no manner
applicable to the-Fort Totten, NY site . The New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection guidance related to soil
clean-up levels-is included n Appendix G .
7 .0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7 .1 Introduction
The objective of this investigation was to provide a
preliminary investigation to determine the presence or absence of
chemical contamination which may have resulted from former DOD
activities at Fort Totten and to determine the potential for
contamination of local groundwater or surface water supplies . To
accomplish this objective 5 groundwater wells were installed, and
the following samples were collected from areas most suspect of
contamination : 5 groundwater samples, 10 soil samples, 4 wipe
samples, and 3 sediment samples .
New York State groundwater standards served as a basis for
comparison . In the absence of New York soil clean-upc t'-a'
regulations, New Jersey soil slean-up guidance levels were
compared to analyte concentrations found .
7 .2 Results
Volatile organic compounds were below detection limits for
soils and groundwater, semivolatile organic compounds were
measurable in some soil samples but well below NJ Clean-up
criteria . PCBs in all soil samples were below detection limits .
Although most total metal concentrations were below New York
State groundwater standards, chromium and lead concentrations in
MW-2 and MW-4 exceeded these . Mercury at 1200 ug/kg in (S-7) and
55
r-~
1500 ug/kg (Sed-3)~ exceeded NJ Cleanup criteria of 1000 ug/kg .
Petroleum hydrocarbons concentrations of 220,000 ug/kg,
280,000 ug/kg and 150,000 ug/kg in Sed-1, Sed-2 and Sed-3,
respectively exceeded NJ action levels . DDT, DDD, and DDE were
detected in all wipe samples collected in buildings #619 and
#624 .
7 .3 Conclusions
There is little evidence of volatile or semivolatileorganic compound contamination in groundwater, soils, orsediments .
No evidence was detected of PCB contamination in soilsnear former locations of electrical transformers .
Lead contamination in the groundwater of MW-2 and MW-4may be attributed to past DOD activities . Lead is acommon contaminant at former defense sites . However,chromium disposal has not been identified in availableliterature and may or may not be attributed to formerdefense activities . Mercury disposal onsite wasreported . Therefore, mercury contamination in soils andsediments may have resulted from past DOD activities .
Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in sedimentsexceeded NJ action levels . This contamination may beattributed to past DOD activities due to numerous oilspills at the site, that had occurred during DODoperations .
The presence of pesticide contamination inbuildings #619 and #624 is most probably due to past DODactivities . The storage of pesticides in thesebuildings had been reported in available information.
Although results of the EM survey presented in Section 4resulted in heavy interference from utility lines anddebris, it is unlikely that drums or ordnance are buriedonsite . This conclusion is based upon interviews withcoast guard personnel, interpretation of survey data andexisting drawings and available information regardingpast DOD activities onsite .
The east end of building #619 does not appear to containa sealed room .
56
7 .4 Recommendations
Since the Scope of Work for this evaluation was to"confirm or deny" the presence of environmentalcontamination, it is recommended that a Risk Assessmentat a minimum or an RI/FS at a maximum be performed sincecontamination does exist on this site . However, itshould be noted that the groundwater on this site is notused as drinking water nor does it flow towards adrinking water source . Groundwater on this sitedischarges into Long Island Sound which is actually theAtlantic Ocean . The primary threat of concern to theenvironment and human health on this site appears to bethe presence of mercury contamination in soil, marinesediments, and in the floor drainage system of building#615 .
57
8 .0 REFERENCE
Scope of Work for the Contamination Evaluation at EngineersSchool, Fort Totten, Queens New York, Project NumberC02NY00570'0, September 26, 1986 .
Law Environmental Services, Draft Report : "Defense EnvironmentalRestoration Program Inventory Report for Former Nike SiteHM-69 Homestead, Florida" . September 1985 .
Federal Drinking Water Standards of the Safe Drinking WaterAct . Vol 50 Federal Register, November 13, 1985, pg . 46936 .
Water Quality Regulations Surface Water and GroundwaterClassifications and Standards Section 703 .5, 11/30/84 and8/31/78 .
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Summary ofApproaches to Soil Cleanup Levels . January 1987 .
Code of Federal Register Sections 261 .31 & 261 .33 . July 1, 1985,pg . 266 and 374 .
McMaster, B .N ., Sosebee, J .B ., Fraser, W.G ., Govro, K .C ., Jones,C .F ., Grainger, S .A ., and Civatarese, K .A ., "HistoricalOverview of the Nike Missile System" . September 1983 .
Bruce, M .C ., Roux, R .G ., "Survey of the Former Nike Sites Locatedat North Smithfield, Foster and Coventry, Rhode Island" .June 1981 .
Barcelona, M .J . et . al ., "Practical Guide for GroundwaterSampling", Illinois State Water Survey, SWS Contract Report374, 1985, pp . 43-45 .
Freeze, R.A . and Cherry, J .A ., Groundwater , Englewood, Cliffs,N .J ., Prentice Hall, Inc . 1979 pp . 604 .
58
APPENDIX A
WELL LOGS AND FIELD DATA
59
. . .METCAS-f & -EIDY
" "GEOLOG IC LOG
aWGIKEV: " w SRI LL
Q
b
P~OTEtT: - .T" wA" SNEE T $O.r.w~ ,No,4. ' . f . F, .nary Z 33 Z Z " z Is'1cv -/ ~"A -a
L Ol~TIOA/ : COOf'Lr~N/!..
Fs ~', ,ye� - 33 '!'ewTt.4Cte*awl. . iuvJn rmr r /y), Z,r ~,p~ L Fm;r : 1~E7 O~ .w
20A-/cc kiG eOIE 75 I7r;/C.&r Z7/T: NFL ATI/t ;' : GI'~+~w~; v"/71 i' Cja'r+ "
~A~~ING ..t-17 IN Noc! ~L~"-' :t : Dz1,6s iNW F,460,~- : Tel or X-erx + lit i1~,,
" W\ C41x`
-01A. ALM&? t wr!-?ESC r. 7Tie
,'\
h
aLOsdss" ' 7e+ epor j i c II Al Trt.is:/TIL .4Tit#v ^W ti
i r~4
. s.s~Yra+.i . . . .- '
"r'' " -ir,r L AVZat3 ACC. ~ t .T~
".Jew-
S-1J'
` Z 4- /.G 8-/3 -/ rwwt/~ " t1,{~.nai.l&' Q.vfm- f Y. ,.' G
I ..t~ " Drl ~alt.,.n.s" l7 ~. sf"d, ttrw
L /"stt Lw !r
*~sr L s t ',~+ar /, e''A~...+wf.6-5-16 ~
L ("-7 3 /" 7.5 -SD -? Io..rw af/s. ~'!(r . S t~+w.~+ . r"' .r' J* Iya.. s O
-I, ....,.; r. A.w. . ...../,^f ~~-y+ ti j;:d FIJ ... .!r .G.j_
N jAor e P*&--, A . It
ef a a.6 c Ap orep,pp or'" .0-DA'Aprnlaco,rw . j, ly . A~ .0A.&A owlWA'J Row, wn s~
~ '.~ ~IO s~w..rti~ we./ 11~t M~w~rtf~ s. fI1j
kr0e: neve-,
/S-/ I. - 10-9-a- IS" I~.L 13+"..+,, ww+~f, fad f, /" Hot" . O
SS - I~..f! c~s,~/~n+dn,w~tfsl,~��r,rF~
-- 1 M 010, r" Iw ct1& S-17 13- , iwti , o $i 1-0/t,1M .1 4.., Jim se. "f of.". s0 6- - _ ~ black M"Oftq, i-- .
Ifi1-vros r Te;1 S: ci~J7tl7i.N Ne'~tS : avtiN~ No-S''STr srwrttlr7se:~
- ~. Low " res r o esa~ r , _ ' /1lLtl - --
METCAL.r d EiDYEN~fNs f ~ .
~~07Ef T: - .7 MO. .to/ic T Xir.4ive. / . : .Arm" A'O ' Z#., Z ?3 2. ~. ~ " _ MW-~
v? " ~ r, 1 SD/ .L /~OL "t 41v07.:M4 ;4
7tv "ay, 0r+.+fI . C ;1 ' v. . so..t~ w" s=T~G.r-Ar. /f, ~4v~..r! /.3 la .̀ hoArc~ ?v-st ",
N *O
I __ ..~rr~(jw"7rw
12's,171 /.7 -A-A-24 ?rIL Bio,,y~,,.rsl, ~I7+"/oOqL/l. /hlw .7 . O
G .3-2f! d r,~.r� ,~i rIL/ 4. An�d,(~Kt~I Q t ~~ p/r~ r0. ,+y ~~'fY
9 _wri lrt~, ~o'a++~stfi, ~ia+~~l~a~ p/w~f
,T Ie~~ KN~a I' yt/~pij~,f~
5.3 e.0-- fi~f~f~ p ~c .is w//"07.7
- Set: ~', T , .Vi f/.1 Rscw... . _ _ . dL -22 ' Le /.r.. 6rmf.r{ -
2S " t .: Pvc.22. &e Ow 3
7 6ex,~ " " go-of 3 37- 20
t poniI"d t .13 .,+b., ~t ~8 ' d'
i
1-~
=.pt-iws Ns" .
ME'rCAJt,.r EDDY" twCiNLC~ :
GEOLOGIC "DRILL 1..0G
~~OSECT: sas Mo. sNEE r ~r..~.~ wo.2332 t " "' f f1 /o~.iN e ~7W Z_
-LO!h 7-/DAi : Vt i - . .. Gr~I1[ /fir/
r
~Pi~ ~~wT1,4CS4~: ~/~ I/. rN.l7~c rsilr - ~yJ, it ~r r :d oil~i~ : ,0 7 1Ole. ~!f7S Lr~~~Er " ~c sm. v .^ ::"-r : . 6
IVo.&E- zr/tf : s.+ ""r-r~r r :!rr. .' .rJ,Lf+ " f~ `:// ' Gig id Il~SA -
.
Ram, eo.i /S' w/ow (,ro u�e( '44,-.,eib _c>> ,.r s/0& e e":.~~'IW4+'f : Dr1« "ws sAN/L : or ~.-seA f z~r " .;
~esi ~IlrsA) I
AA01'
~ ~r ~ ; ti1~ 7~`x ~ e.&r ~ v~ t.v-s/ritrr~sw V itk ew: i , . . a '
/y�de e 1 Iwr fa..IrONr y~ fl~r.,+~ /r
Andisfi+..~s InJh
s- eo,.,d'r. 4WW6/Ord 9APs!S -f /. 3'-S-f-I- Nlrlfr atrl F,#,; /1! d'A rpl+ .
_O
Ii .s Ar"Mj wo~tl" /o++r, t.IY .r/F1: or-ft
i.wt~/lam'Awl f&.AeJ 047'tor.
- ,cr,. .r A*fs ~...~.. 'sc 3 -7 /. eL . -9-It /r Ld6 4..&..+w~as; .wool, 'A " " s Oh
&y/ ~'.,/~x+c s s~/f Awes ..n r,.
--- .e "L .s Q.e�~/ *too$/ I6ese~l ~ (f .. s.... W/s ~ I
.ref. fv+.A~nr~G,R 4 ZS " Alm4m s p
'-
&O. er IN~J,IwoJ'" // `"sowww/s .//J Iwo'w ttI9-,,3 4aet J ow,%/, *O sg,~'-c . sa..d ~ .
a S_ AD.n Z oas.r, vos s . #"o I Sr, s" vMN.. s .AI'/r, AI?rt
e%t.~c~~ " / l6/" t~1 ~ ~/'l ~
~
Ad a swfttiaJ w>. a
- - aa. f~e~- - - ~ c~ ,r.~r .f" ~roJl ~.i- .,~. t ,o
Sworn t Tfl::S.' : "?I "s s'.~...~." ST r l"1,jr s..tl
h~7ict s.erv oo"orls aat:.v~ ~a.---k_ Apes . <r: r o -L er ii& X ~4
i
"lssive ~~ot, r /O~ !.t/es < ~o f~aass d~lw~ o=fi
!11 %&, o`
S
i
FTCA~. ~C ~~DY - _ '& E-OLOG I CEN6~NFFi5 '
i
r
~Ro7E~ r: -r Cc fr O~iC!^
~a ivo.Z 331
~.rsc r~r .~
I ra jt .wc. .nre .f ./176v- " I
. .V
J2
t 4t
SO/L koct^ k "N ;
a A, .L GL o.+, r/;Z Fj ilk
t ~~ y
Z Cj "LSL~'/97/J11/
r IN r
"~ C; . w~~t: c~ " IwqYts "fLT"
I
...n. r . . r ., r...~r*
''" ~- H~4 =o1 p~+d 1 f A /Q trJ L
-..~~rr` 0s E $-? ,7 64-10 M essns~r~r<cf, ~: us�p(~3r r,s ", sa..cl f>l.~f r~0~
' Ra.d " iw.E. o . b. .25
"Sef roe
el 2 PrtSc .~r .,It~ o/~%r t- ¢~, , .o 'G `VCt. PR.~"" 1 ~ 2/f .
Sod. 74.y " So/so oA(w ".+r )r/... #F0
sic12 -2S
p /* 'j48... l .n~1~r r .,/o-is,
/7p hbrow r
/0 Amp a
1
i
I
71-I
di "rww~ Jf " J~Ms7rf.~/1~!i s f>'s ov~c . Ywt r !'ri f O : i" 7 Ott i
srr/wi N. . ._,~
e~ .
.i
METCA&..f $ -EVDY GEOLOGIC "DRILL . , t-O G . " , . , . .
f
r=
PROJECT: _. ... E - f1 T Ayr.
~ba N~.
Z 3 3ZS~IEET
t or y~.~.wi No, -Hf -
obis s ~t/f -Pr?itl-!'~wT1 .ot toJC -, uvin err1C ."~.T. (r I / .". t Fair= (, 3 f', 7Z7~-ICt .? i6 r~1!f La-~cct~ >',~ " .," ; : 6 (, ¢ 7pvac: zr/ler .
1/ ':.+ ".:r:.tr:!~r. rte:;: :
-w4f .wroIv fsGv.. ». e~~~ "! /2. SG 6e~ /aa~ ~arvcsi+e~
~~ <~sA I
,
aw
Soli-are."s- AptwcW
fcrr1e
Ie.&rPEC.
~As
ivA DEL.fSS/T/Lr0TiIAI
nW Nk r
A.-:A:: .. .- :!s....v . . ...., .
l'LVi~-~ . . ~: :... .r6,
~""''7oOfeA /IAi. y /Jwv * 2A d Im", 7c. A"u6.y sr..t Arm6 -0 w.-ow
0, 1A IV
rse~IllI~.u ~ .O~n .r - Lt ;
4-IM
_ ~...r ....- . , /t . smc.~r do ,.,4.-.0 ~r...~ = r!ls+I~,.: 01I7iv i/atr tiwf~sr. I1s"~- l'!"t~
~~/~lr~rll ICI S0NI// .l Y :Iw+
-- ,4 A.o ~.w/L4
....R,w -y,.,.., . s. s ,te;. ..loose . 1
~f .s .T44
I1L '~-ILlty .... , ..+wr.:V, /oev ~ 1'" l4. 9P 'AIJ
ir love
zo At
~h r't j; y~I =rw+QoI
Srww~, Irf"sifl ~C OV'~ ~". ~fwl~ - 04...
54foo-ia l Tfrrl:-~~Y. r~ !'.~.A., sT r l~+s.lr1..« I
_~~ 1e orr lr~i O a Os iie ~t'
ti~r7Y saw Ivirrs : /
'111
aotiw! ~/o.
n1 10- 3 - - '
re1V
u~
'n,O.r,OpAtP-0.04SIC
I=EI
~"/+~fwrf
tiw10Na~Iyb/
a~N~I
.....N:,,�ryawYt,I
.90,4l�y""IFt̀;A;
-s/qw4d"~VAg.~29
,f.v9oa/a*47%7 ols4*1
p~.~.'o,h/`ewnewore+oew
il.esI '~we9"s
7Ad,~e/si0'.,2~!Q/
oF`~.'
"/tired/Sns"'H
l~l~~"f!~'7!J,1f7ry~M~4"'71~~
ra~+r'YI'O.s
4AS
low t.Iw~y"f
e"m/lv/'i'1li~l
r.++t,rrsy~ry~++'~~`9Lt-:'Stf~s.eynN.ra.~/
-r
W-fl-L!-6fLYIIIN116t,
V'v+/rsIOVN0-","IVal-Lo-os-1615-JAI-51'a94
,oy.l/-i.ai:,-':oi.%(Q-J1'L71yJ11
770;17/Js~~~~ _V .tAJ.
.wr^#0,*w
.riww.r~J
,f!~'tON
£_i~Gt/
~1syl~M3~0-7-1-71:1.~~i~0-7o3lf~
METCALF EVDY' - - ENC~NtE~~
1
GEOLOGIC -DRILL l-OG
PX07ErT: JOa NI. S-Ve& T ~r,L~",vi No.~r..+e. E, - reflL~~ - 2 332 t wr _~- /196u-¢L OlAT/D.V : j'00;'~oiIVr7j, :
T~?it"L ~eWT2.4CT0~ ; ~R Iwfl. *VstrroJC-' B7Zlt-~tt i?~G L'ME 75 ?~t-~cttk .r/Otdr' .'r/m£ : "":i~LI?" :!~,r . I~..; ` . WA '9TI/t ~. - -'
elk . 6./ ' IS-7 fro/ C- ~.,..dC.~fSlw'6 ~t-J7 ,HSIl~c! -./ZCN"s' D?ictiw6 -0i or 7-oft 7~c ir " ,
~... .. (HsA ) j
lug?C 16 t
~' ~'TO .A.
? IALSeP.7r'owr 4 rd--" ac-asps
)) ~Jo A L 00 Ar T J h
..u .r . >. ....:',
00
v w ~?l! ~ k, si . , r
i.s ilitfir. fi h# 0"401.~ lw+w 1l f Jbrr OS, ~A. .+I~ .w'/ 'A' a.n j &l -l-s,+d Q/AC4 s4,+d f : Ow!
"!-?.l erv.s r, -+&r.-900o /croso" A ~w/s
?s- J t" -9-/2 " Q.w&M~ *We/..60 /*air ~', jr.~d . l,/� r :O
Ilaw, .+wm
L -J f //. V . O ,
Ir>r. &PdV.r( /hy ..s of sr...Q RAW, w.9 �,~- --- (/-! " 04 "r, ), S*~ s o'...// sluts ~7 : p " ~ 1;G .
c4�*l a',sc.l le ps.e+rs ,c4~ l... . ~ r"
7
0 4 /oar / a s-~ ~r-(. ro-ro.ts 6rw.w,, .~+~t~ /w +r, f. ss. " l~ ~"r~Or /~
Al,. . . o- _ R.s a fr+ .".S
/040-11.t &o�,,,,,.v/, /0069 , As,sw"Q, tip . # It,
- ,~! ~ sf~f~~ L'kt -
Pic
R#s.r t Q:~, " j ~, ~, ? " I V~' 5--0 S '/J j j0/j% OA..w .̂w "Il0 1 %! ~~, 1
*vw 6eom t t T s
_-E=!boa .- rem F O Pro,& 2-a W ^~a-
-. t
! I9// psPths H~~~a ~'i~ tar .r~I D row4s 4r ltr. .vy wroc,4mow trwc crs4pJ i6sr Ruw av P. . ... w+ .d or/,,f ,( !r i /L r 0 t d &..j A~lf ~Ot "ow 5 in r .b fL.lasMdd'~P'~'~j fe
' _ Ew~Ipit.E~s GEOLOG IC . "DRILL BOG .
~LoTECr: .Toa /vi. s~~E r ~Or,~ No.rw w fFr T e"", 233Z. Z or Z /yJ/U-
LOlI1*7OW : ~'00~'~I/N/7l~: ~rtw~wi ftl
Ienwew~f,:e~r.~ : vs i^' .
,//- = sIXrT/L,L ewrIAcrOk: R-r A *Vtfl heic ." G ~;-&7Z~-ict rO/G e0lC
/!0l0 ~ ~4."I "I ~ 7 " `l(iid d" L~ » . .
mil:/I1/6 ~C)7 MI Ne~tf ~ii.~~t.vf~~~ . Dr~~s.Ns i<o./L TiN as X-i/:t 1~~ i~ " ~ E t .J
_, . I .t/essr rNJA . '
i '.'k V- r SO /A. uoccx~ At I , '`t ` aPis'her
~,P ti ; h L /Wt. Art._ G i -2 ~s -3-~ 3
!3
f
4s 11.TI-4-
-7 /. C I- 4-lr.i0 , f
r.c
A
` is
~E?t!i7ri~.vAwD
tL~ISS/TiL~+TiIN
O -. .r 7wios/ . 50d} DR ammo--l-,~YG/a09, AM, t, ia..,.d 46,.r'+.A1
0, A
IS-d.t drwsa., n.ert, l~o "d,
/00
~Fh~r~ I~e~.n~, /i+~+rLe>.A~rl
,
!r- . s i /t " ~/a Atr~Ovs 07~r+/v t9- IS
www . &.& I-d:!
rot,,, go, f!
lz
Rao -r o. vm%
'Y" 6, 9, CR'araplovem :
a$elm,
ask
ll1
0props op. aw -C some~#.Pft-fioft
~t rr .SOWS/ f s 1
7 6-rrr+m, Alef, Aiwdt,r" sa4.rl, ?r. So P
is 7 -/& f Gp4b) , dof4, sff {lpA, /F ,1t
N.. ..R. .e . ." 0" . .i
//few s oRoof . mrqdK'
s
I S,4n0rtr TtrrISj + !a "vftlsieve NI'~CiXr. .r t'...o., IT ? mr./s.lr s-e! 1
III 1' s )kOet' !rt./ , O a 07I/L 't40se% e " p, ~t at 7' =w+ o vtd we/r
1~lrAIR
gored to 75 o., Ir.a k o Ie
Itavt/w!~ No. ~ '
Mw- IS
r1
t
.0i4p-ti~o"s~"~"y24+2_410+14'
1
M~Mo.19
1
f04//
s,t.7~~.~3.-
t-E
.v~�1'w"'yc"o!/,.",.
,.1.,..,oI.~1/~r»ff"od.~>'a~~
-r»"'w
ps"rN~p'r~Ow/+...9r.,s"+~,.g",j-.1-pi.6l"/i-o~Q'-tQS
i
'0t---- /Z-S�,�.tT:
.* axtip'/voi+r~ir/str7.%wr'sew.r't'A1!~1~i4 .jr+""a.1.0&a....w=NMl
Tl
t'/~J%iy'O77707"
~"f/Os' 7w Iavs.7s~,iv~~.~v
l
s~-2z~sz"1~~"1~"br.v'J/V.9/v/l6,.A7104C941'-~1»lOald
'~~.T
(T,.~~,.~:3NIIN3
?L~'F,S44e
a:
i
r.
`r
WATER CONTENT
LABORATORY NO. O
SAMPLE NO. VA F-I QS
DATE TESTED VU~C~r I7 ~~T_,
7-sL2n ,
ACCT. AE"R. i1 SL-t - f*_ it
ACCT. NO. L332
TESTED "Y W GHE~~ I
TEST NUMBER Pw116-S8 Mw-Z 5'7 Mu) 3 S'7 MUU y 5 HW 5-S 7TARE NUMBER 1, 1~!- I p IL w RA . WEIGHT OF WET SOIL+TARE 52 .-7 , qq4,O 67'2.S . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL+TARE 2,7q 34 ,7a 397,2(e t g,C. WEIGHT OF WATER, Wws(A-S) (v 0 8 00 2-9 1z ; Z0. 9 00. WEIGHT OF TARE S/13 (J 1' 57193 i 30 SI yE . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, w,=(9-D1 Z l . 0 opco .l.szo Z99, ZO S".7F. WATER CONTENT, W= (C/E a 1001
lZY,9 'L 3 , f~) 1 4ye l 9, Lr , 821
r
TEST NUMBER
TARE NUMBER 1 1,S '.',
A. WEIGHT OF WET SOIL +TARE Z071,Z," . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL+ TARE V/0 - (08C. WEIGHT OF WATER, w,- lA-dl 0
0. WEIG04T OF TARE
E. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, Ws " 1!-Dl I is 9,[F. WATER CONTENT, Ws IC/E a 1001 /&,t,
/eO7 liven ul;,-ucTEST NUMBER 3 $ 2 s07 M S S'1 ' S /~ltU I8 STARE NUMBER
A. WEIGHT OF WET SOIL+TARE
"" . WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL + TARE 16S.163 Q I ,0 S , 3S~ZZ
C. WEIGHT OF WATER, 1Afws (II- " )
0. WEIGHT OF TARE S1.66 3 1 -' I s I " y3 . 3 sb 42E. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, w, a is-01 77.0o Oy. `t 03t I B q. Oi WATER CONTENT, w s (CIE a 1001
TEST NUMBERTARE NUMBERA. WEIGHT OF WET SOIL+TARE
S. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL + TARE
C. WEIGHT OF WATER, Ww"(A- ")
0. WEIGHT OF TARE ~.
E. WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL,w,at"-D1 , pF. WATER CONTENT, ws(C/E &100) 777
GRADATION
LA90RATORYN0
.016--GEOTUN
FIELDSAMPLE
NOS.UWows
;TUL,
1,1!591
DATETESTED
CURVES
ACCT .
A98R
. usc~-
FT,T~~L
ACCT.NO.'Z332
TESTED6Y
l-1tC1~LCC1"
1w0
17 "Af*19$W1Aw»
113"
,mw
too
dgoo'
too-
too'f00'
Nto"00'
tJ
!fee'
Cl
W2
=too'
foat
''
_
wL00sec'
000'1~
'ti
~,"OC
10.W
!
¢Qd
=0s0
.V
_
t0'
t?O
w.o'
fo'.o'
fo'40,00:
.o'
IDo
:aA-?
s09Of
^Oi
i.tJv
w>s,
~33
e~
~Oi
YN
J
.Ot
"~,a
s~
st
zi
`WS
t/t
1111
111HIM
1111
111
l!
lota
tj
1I~
1I
t~
~j
t°'
I°s
~I
I~"
fs�,t
A
t,
o.Coal~1
~/1^
Q
A00130A!
0!w nlsnA1133103d
swwzwOOWVJ44u
IF4ml
GRADATIONCURVES
sicsi
sDWeJtfW
LABORATORYN0.
0GC-01TCH
ACCT.ABBR-.
Vu6
FT.
7piTvi
FIELDSAMPLE
NOS.VARIOIu
ACCT.N0
.Z33Z
DATETESTED
ZV
.,~~g
TESTEDByW
"CH&C44
I
1~"
t)"a""1tlii~I
1w»
r~~
$Y
loo
too'too'
too'too'
HiNtoo,
"00'
'ce'
ti
"00
'i"00'
Nr
"o0
'i
ZQ
,r,Loo"o0',
"00'
1~;,
for.lo'
W_
III
I
rd
s°,~
=0.
w
~I
t0'i0'
'CO'
t0"o'
oot
I'.
ooto"t'
°'1'N
°ii
r~
~'Z
o"r
~3
".°t
~i
sI
ElG
fliA
V~
EtI
IH
JS
Nf
nd
E,~n~
NN~
tflNt
JIM
11
1111
1111
1111
1111
111
111
"ll1
N
Hil
l1
1111
1111
111
11111
111
1111
111
1'
."/ "
08A
'J`
II
wtW
Iiof
!s
06w
la
tog001
ONN
V!1
zj
Tf
WJ
l
! iS
AR
Y009
EK?33
l»"I)r~f
Otri~atr1rfo
rs.
"1
SIEVE ANALYSIB
O
d
s
Z
1
\y
aI
I Y
7
=1 4t 1.
LABORATORY N0. 018- _4OMC1! ACCT. AW. VXM - FT . 7a ?7ENMw t 8 Sa uz~='~ ACCT. NO. Z35 2
FIELD SAMPLE N0.
DATE TESTED %TU6 lisp) TESTED By W " clibc-c t} i
WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE }3S X22
WT. TARE 0 co .7` '
WT . TOTAL On SAMPLE '~q .30
WT. RETAINED #10 SIEVE % PLUS R10
11R . PASSING #10 SIEVE % MINUS 110
SIT PORTION PASSING x10 SIEVE (opprox. 115 wn ffmax .)
SIT. PASSING x10 SIEVE + TARE '
WT . TARE II
SIT . PASSING 110 SIEVE
WASH PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE
Wt. RETAINED 1200 SIEVE + TARE
SIT . TARE II
WT . RETAINED 11200 SIEVE
Wt. PASSING 1200 SIEVE
U.S.SIEVENO.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED
1~RETAINED
..
_. .
1 1/2"
tr
yrL
No. 4110.10
PAN 1
U.S.SIEVENO.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHT
RETAINED
% PASSING10% RETAINED
A
% TOTALSAMPLERETAINED
0
020
m
#60
$140
n00 ,~o y, 7-200WASHED
1 -200OTAL
"" %PLUS 410 MINUS 110 xA
- -BIEVE ANALYSIS
LABORATORY NO. 1 - gv OT C ACCT. ABM. uSC& T-T. TOTICAJ
FIELD SAMPLE NO. _w-2 -S? L2.r<
ACCT. NO. 2337.
DATE TESTED `~ y ?-t98- TESTED BY - W " C4HLrCCiji
i08 .91WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE
WT . TARE 11 1 p 31 -917'7 .00WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE
.r
0
z
sO
WT. RETAINED 910 SIEVE
WT . PASSING 1110 SIEVE
SPLIT PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE (OPProx. 116 WT niax .)
111T. PASSING 1110 SIEVE +TARE
SIT. TARE It
WT. PASSING #10 SIEVE
WASH PORTION PASSING "10 SIEVE
WT. RETAINED 11200 SIEVE + TARE
WT. TARE I1
WT. RETAINED "200 SIEVE
WT. PASSING 0200 SIEVE
U.S.SIEVENO.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED
%RETAINED
..
2..
1 v2..rShe.
1r
NO . 4110.10
"AN
%KUS A10
% MINUS $10
U.S. CUMULATIVE % PASSING % TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 10% RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED
A 0
920
"40 .
40 b.01 7.88200 t3 .s~e /?. e00
-WASHED . ., , . .'oTOTAL A-200 -- -9-% MAX 010 + % MINUS 1110 x A
&-_ * x A
=0"M 309
.ow
sz~v~ ArTAZYS=s
LABORATORY N0. y ' 1 , `c'}I ACCT . ABBR . 0sS - FT, To- 4
FIELD SAMPLE N0. tAW~ 3 S? ACCT . N0. 2332DATE TESTED V a ~9 y TESTED 6Y W " C"6CCV4 4
SIT . TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE `g 'y
TARE N I t., 81,940WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE 1
O
O1
z
s
r
s
WT. RETAINED 1110 SIEVE X PLUS 1110
Wt . PASSING 010 SIEVE !1 MINUS x10
SPLIT PORTION PASSING 010 SIEVE (@Wox. 115 pn fn""
WT. PASSING 11'10 SIEVE + TARE
SIT. TARE 1f
Wt. PASSING 010 SIEVE
WASH PORTION PASSING 810 SIEVE
WT. RETAINED 11200 SIEVE + TARE
WT. TARE x
Wt. RETAINED X200 SIEVE
WT. PASSING 9200 SIEVE
U.S.SIEVEN0.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED
tiRETAINED
,.._. .1/2 . .
,-' ..wI~.
. . oNO. 10PAN
U.S . CUMULATIVE X PASSING % TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 10% RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED
A
.z0 1 e, l 7, y""0 13 -89 /0 " l
2Zs4 o Ib.LO y3. 3 3Z~o
s8.o l02 .5
oE°-2WTOTAL
" -% PLUS 1110 MINUS 1110 K A
8"_+ xA
L #A 300I . "m
6IEVE ANALYSIS
LABORATORY NO. d y GEOTSCH ACCT. ABOR. SE~ rr. 1D'fTZJ
FIELD SAMPLE NO. !"1t y Sy ` -~~ "ZI ACCT. NO . ~,~,~.,,
DATE TESTED "V . I `~g~ TESTED !Y W " oi6cco~
WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE 14 3 159
WT. TARE +1 5U , 69WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE ,
r
O
a
z
r
g
O
0
W
s
WT. RETAINED 910 SIEVE
WT. PASSING 010 SIEVE
SPLIT PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE (apProx. 116 W+ Max.)
WT. PASSING 010 SIEVE+TARE
WT. TARE R
WT. PASSING 010 SIEVE
WASH PORTION PASSING 010 SIEVE
WT . RETAINED 11200 SIEVE + TARE
WT. TARE 0
WT. RETAINED It200 SIEVE
WT. PASSING 0200 SIEVE
U.S.SIEVEN0.
CUOALLATIVEWEIGHT
RETAINEDti
!RETAINED
1 1/Z""
r214->wNO. sNO. 10
PAN
" PLUS #10
ti MINUS 1110
U.S.SIEVENO.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHT
RETAINED
% PASSING10% RETAINED
A
% TOTALSAMPLERETAINED
9
o a"o ea.t 6" ~ooleo ,'7#140 .50 In .7y6200 (00. Z e0
-WASHED h~'TOTAL
" " % PLUS 910 + t MINUS "10 x A
xA
=t M 309
it. . &E3
SIEVE ANALYSI6
U.S.SIEVEN0.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED RETAINED
z. .
ryrarmsNO. 4 6 0
NO. 10 0.95 ~ "9PAN
" PLUS "10
X MINUS K10
U.S . CUMULATIVE 11, PASSING !I, TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 10% RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED
A
t 1 ~5 I ~- Z940 sno11140 "79,3-rm e*7.-200 4~WASHM-200T0OTZ-
0a % PLUS A10 +% MINUS 1110 x A
go_ _xA
01 G" GE~"i'E~CN ACCT . ABBA. "SC- ~. ~iT~ ~ULABORATORY N0.
FIELD SAMPLE NOAUJ E s'7 Zo , (sub) ACCT. NO.
DATE TESTED yy1~-~ . t18-*7 TESTED BY [~1 . CHECGH;
WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE S 3' (e
WT . TARE If I C So .yaWT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE I O
WT . RETAINED 010 SIEVE
WT . PASSING 910 SIEVE
SPLIT PORTION PASSING 1110 SIEVE (aWrox. 116 on max.)
WT . PASSING 1110 SIEVE + TAREs
WT. TARE If
WT. PASSING 1110 SIEVE
WASM PORTION PASSING 1010 SIEVE _
WT. RETAINED 11200 SIEVE + TARE
SIT. TARE 11
`j WT. RETAINED 11200 SIEVE
Zb: WT. PASSING 11200 SIEVE
=C A 300
iEV. aw
- SIEVE ANALYFI6
WORATORY N0. _ GEOTr
14 ACCT . ABN. USCg " ` + "76T CA)
FIELD SAMPLE N0. '-'W S 62 _Zo , , ACCT. N0.
DATE TESTED `6`- #1 1181- TESTED Sr 4AJ -CM
WT. TOTAL DRY SAMPLE + TARE ISO 0 7
WT. TARE 9 s 1 . y3
WT. TOTAL DRY SAID 104 . (0(.*
O
W
s
WT. RETAINED #10 SIEVE % PLUS #10
WT. PASSING "10 SIEVE x MINUS #10
SPLIT PORTION PASSING 010 SIEVE (approx . 116 WT MR.)
WT. PASSING #10 SIEVE + TARE
SIT. TARE 11
WT. PASSING 110 SIEVE
WASM PORTION PASSING x10 SIEVE
WT. RETAINED 1200 SIEVE + TARE
WT. TARE II
51T. RETAINED #x200 SIEVE
SIT. PASSING #200 SIEVE
U.S .SIEVEN0.
CUMULATIVEWEIGHTRETAINED
1~RETAINED
1 1/2 . .
1"yr
NO. . 0 6No. 10 S,~.S 3 " SPAN
U.S . CUMULATIVE ti PASSING % TOTALSIEVE WEIGHT 109 RETAINED SAMPLEN0. RETAINED RETAINED
A
820 10, 19 9.77.
#Go 7-512. 2.4,139,11(o 331(0
4 1 . (o o 99-PAN:100WASKED-200OTAL12COD
5 - % PLUS "10 + !~ MINUS 010 x A
" n + XA
'"b1 300
/. i152
METCALF & EDDYGRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD
Project t1SCe - i,'TD Trw .fob No . 2332
Location of Project Q NS 1 Boring No. ~Sample No. `S
Description of Sots Depth of Sample 2'7 I
Tested By . UU CNfCU4-1 Date of Testing :TV T (, 9~$?
Hydrometer analysis 1~
Hydrometer no. 1S 2 G, of solids , . (goo
Dispersing agent 1V4P0g Amount _%1oWt. of soil. IN. 9Y, o
Zero cornction Meniscus oorrection L
O&
rowst
m.aingE1hpwdWw.wolf,
VW.do
AotudrHya .
AadingR,
Con.Mo.
madingO,
"1Row
CDRonly formenioewR
LAanTO*sa Y
Kroniebbsr wn
Za o Zc>
S t (do1 t 1. 0
I,~ 9q I 5c. Go ooze!2 55 SZ G la SL '7 .1 .07.511-5 1 sz '~ 0 1( 53 'zv 00233 50 1 41 M 91 1 7-11 10223.5 9? `{ SZ. 8 oi 6021
1 Mis 46 & +0201 I 31 36 . 03s, 0,S "o 1lZI 2a 25 29.4 " %I.S 40 1C3 2, 11 .'~ 7.3 ,1 z36 itA
'1 1 11 10 Z0 3.0 10056'l Is,S t.S ly~~ !o "S 13. .003
IR, JR,ow - nro corr"ion * C, % &W . IVOW, O-Rr
"11 y,*
9Z23y1y
99
ftv =0
METCALF 3 EDDYGRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD
Project USCE - r-1' t 1b 71t`1l) ,fob No. 2332.
Location of Project Q~~'Ns N~ Boring No. w sample No.
Description of Soil Depth of Sample 2Z
Tested By -W, Date o1 Testing VL"1 Y 11S!2
Hydrometer analysis
LooHydrometer no. ISZ " ' G, of solids " 2I ~"' a s
Dispersing agent N dLPO Amount ~~ Wt. of soil, W,
Zero correction Meniscus correction
w
-77.00
ata
Timed
reading
Etapwdtime.min
Amp.,4C
ActualMyd .
readingA,
Cot.Ho.
readingA,
%Finer
Con.only for
niaeusR
LUornTWO65
,~V t
KUomibba64 . mm
2 ~3 Zo #0137,s s3 Sa X1.9 ?-'1 .05z'
I yZ 4 G3.(* y3 0)42 ,0y14I~5 3-7 3y i 3 o,1 'o3s,2 31 2S 34, 32. list .0323 ZS 22 29 .te ~ X2.0 .oZ~
Zo 1~ 12 .1 zi 12 . 02412 74 to 1 %4 4-7 1 01S740 3 o 1s (a .00W
1% . A�,� . see awreexion . c, %liner a $VOW. D"KfUft
a
Y
z
flaft= 41M . 1M %,V\ "3 ISLO
METCALF & EDDY
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD
,� 1
Hydrometer no . ISZ H G. of solids " Z' `~ a 1#00
(0,9Diprsing agent Ay2I
Amount Wt. of soil, W, 13
Zero oorrection Meniscus correction
Project 11 SCS - RTi Mt .̀~1 ,Job No. Z332
Location of Project 0u&1S _ A1 "Y" Boring No. ,J -7 Sample No.
Description d Soil Depth of Sampleoz 0 .:z2
Tested By Date of Testing ~W L
Hydrometer anaysis
aTurwof
readingElapsedtime.fn
Temp .,cc
ActualI".
readingA.
CWT.Mo.
readingA.
%wW
Car.only kxmeniscus
R
LfteTable`s r
Khornbbl.6r . m+
/1 2119 0 W 037
I S-) S 3 . 5'8 t~,8 LOW-91.5 YSS S't.S 7.7 "o31 c
2 1 401 4k. 33,L So of 160?"7141 zi f 49 19 A 102:51
1 41 38 27, 1 1 914 1802.1 1$ .S 33 0 LI al 54 107 .01S
cS. t' t1. 0010~5 1 .S .S Io~~ IS .S 13.2 ~ooG-
Z (e " t. 13 1 .2 ~Ooy~W ,002
corhetjon G.1~, . 11��� . wrv % tar " 1VSW. D-^"0
2ar
a
METCALF & EDDYGRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD
k PO)41
Pew usCE - ?-To 3P TTIA2 ,roe No. Z33ZLxation of Projsd QVNS_ /VT- Boring No. Sample No. s
DescGiption of Soil Depth of Sample
Tested By w ` t1i4t CC %4- Date of Testing 'TV r-Hydrometer ana":
Hydrometer no. ~SZ- 17 (a, o1 solid=s 2~ ~r a
° 9~2 90Oispsrsing agent ~ Amount ~ Wt. asoil, w,
Zero Correction 3 Meniscus corncxion -
rut
Unaof
A"ng
EWPwdWN.wain
m0..10C
ActualHyd .
Aadinglk
ComMO.
tsadingl1,
%Finer
INO .corr.ony for
iA
L6w+1A~5 -
~Y t
KfmI"s" t wn
2~ $3 0 20 ' . 0I
.2S 3 1 33 3S30- Z. 2q I S1 II~Z ~oG~1P2? 2 ZVI$ Z.g, 11 .$ ~0 7
2 Z3 2o LI " Zy 1Z.y ,Zo 1'? 1f .3 21 12 ti .o'L
9 17.5 ±L& 1Sl(o l$ 13.25 00 14C9 1s 12, 12,J t(. %4jI poll(
31 I 11 ~I .a lS t3$ ,0815 to 7 7.5 11 I4 "S 10051,
9 4.q 10 1 .
I
0 60tr*
_ METCALF & EDDY
1~ Cl0)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD
Project U-4C6- FT. Ivrmd Job No. Z 332 .
Location of Project dT49 AL W S N~Boring No. KW S Sample No. S07
Description of Soil Depth of Sample 2-0 1 VAAq%)
vLAI 19$T?Tasted By Date of 7estin
Hydrometer analysis
Hydrometer no. IS?- N G, of solids a " 1 . OO
Dispersing agent Va fy3 Amount 4( yo wt. of soil, W,
Zerq correction Meniscus correction
ate
Timest
r"ding
EI4pedtimM .ruin
Amp. .6C
IIMuWMo.
madinpA,
COT"Yd .
madingR,
%Fwwr
corr.ony forniWusA
Lfrom7"6.5 t
KI~om~bl~64 . MM
/~ ~o ~zs Lo V7 UPS- 7.1 "Z. ,013 . 81y 11 to . it 138 - .M2
i lz,s 9.S 9.2 15.5^ ly~< <0v11 .0 8 '7 "S It ,3 #0y2
2. 10 .5 10S' ?. 3 11-S' %414 .03 C3 10 -) ('S It ~S "o
1~ r4 S 10 t4~~ .0249.5 8-S 5>y' S1'S . t "01121 .s 8 s y, s 9 ,6 10 /1111 . ~. 2 .9 7 IS,2 ,00L6z 5 2 t5'3 00
/t,. P1,00 - mm oort.Gion . c, p ,1L w +dw -
glow
~"K~
ZH 1~ ~~~
10~ . 18
0
3
1i3
METCALF & EDDYGRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS-HYDROMETER METHOD
Project VSCE - Er ?b 7THN ,Job No . 23 32
Location of Project qV~NS. ii-Y. Boring No. NUJSSample No. S7
ZOO 'Description of Soil Depth of Sample
Tested By W I CNtCCt Date of Testing 1V!4 (v 11 87
Hydrometer analysis Cq)1 " oOHydrometer no. 'SZ 14 G, of solids " 2" (Qg -a m
' Dispersing agent r+e' PDt Amount y% Wt. of aoil, W, OY. ~.
Zero correction Meniscus correction
A oe
Timeof
reading
Elapsedwn.,min
Tamp. .cc
ActualNo.
readingA,
Coat.NO.
readingA,
%Finer
clef.way1w
nlicusA
LftmVia.6-S t
Kfrom~b1.e"4 . mm
Z I 08 0 2.0 .ot 7
.S 4(.0o s?
, .S s sy s-11G 58 log edl.o2 5S 61 Mo SL l " 1 I SozS
.~ ~r r s ~.3 y2 y,y .ot8~5 3:.S 335 S2.n VS 10,6 .o/0,
1 31 2.5 U.S 3% th l 0067123 22,0 27 11 "
158 20 . I -7 Itt LI IZ '1 ,06 -3la43 1~~~ .5 l. o IS~s 13 .7 ~o~Z
1t " A,o�w- arro a«+8001 + C' w tin~r " ItJ~M+'. o"'
3'I y1~~
2D
3
APPENDIX H
MONITORING WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAMS
60
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PRa£cT : ~~N
yew NowE
. - wiLNO.2$ 3~ /w-Is d ~r+ .
DRILLING CONTRACTOR :- COORDINATES :/o I<rr 0 A h Q "f~_
BE ( .UN : t sle7 SUPERVISOR : ~~ "Z ~r ir k WELLSITE : WATER LEVEL DEPTMIELEVFill ISHEO (f/*t7 DRILLER : f. BvCI~fOr /'f' 6,-1-- 6e*, .q re
- DEPTH IN ELEV . INREFERENCE !00)NT & ELEVATION:. . 0'~- J rt oewpo& j~
TOP Of SURF ACE CASING : Z. Z 63 ~ 5'~
~~tlI!6 ~RRe~ TOP OF RISER CASING :
GROUND SURFACE (~ I " SGENERALIZED '~ R i r K ,¢ " 1 I
I
0
GEOLOGIC LOG R R SURFACE GAPING : TV~E : s 4It t ~
R R
R i
i R
t t
t R
R R
t R BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASINGR
t R
R
t
R R
BACKFILL : TYPE:Tyor:eov~.St - B'
i t /k'.~ l~s+ ~1sr ~N ~r+k.rs
R R tiDIA. " j
t RISER CASING : TYPE : PvCR R
R RtR R
TOP of SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL,: TYPE :f~~ rlss 6.s t liefa A~ ~/ 1
"' BOTTOM OF SEAL
" TOP OF SCREEN '
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE :
SCREEN : DIA . : 2 " TYKE : PVL
OPENING V11DTH . O/ TYPE : d/0
;i BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED : G A" #519ftNOTTOM OF MOLE
411E'lM00 EVELOPED : MOLE DIAMETER
J COMMENTS :
TO DEVELOPED
4 Aoulj
.b 16s .1
43.5
0 (L41 .5
zz- 139-111
4?z ' 12.9-15
MrItrM i Eaoy
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PRaECT : _ Jos No . WELL No.v w~ ~ F_ FI l Ilr .~ 'S~Z uJ
DRILLING CONTRACTOR : COORDINATES :" R n ~vleflv"rc
BEGUN : 61+11e7 SUPERVISOR, : 01 .Z,+bf I wELLSITE : WATER LEVEL DEPTM/ELEv .FINISHED C o E DRILLER : ~r, "g.t kAA, 4.'1a, " recw
DEPTH IN ELEV.INREFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION'Z - S "r S's ~Er~
y
11
TOP OF SURFACE CASING : -12 .3 b oi l,oei i ~"~
>T j" 3,~ 4 ~ TOP OF RISER CASING : 2 . O S8 .9GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED P =R
RR
r DIA. : do wGEOLOGIC LOG ~ R SURFACE CASING : TYPE : S
1 R
I aR R
a R
R =
a 1
Ra
Ri BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING ,7i 56 ,
R R
a aR R
aR .
"ACKFILL : TYPE: rmolf""~I r4r 4..+ A.. 6/r/0 k,v ...,
a a
` ` DIA . : P "a RISER CASING : TYPE : Pvc
R
a
R yg .9a a TOP of SEAL p
ANNULAR SEAL:IIYf"!1
TYPE :
/,*Iwlb-", ~II/7
' 40BOTTOM OF SEAL
., 4q 4 .9TOP OF :GREEN
~i -- '".' FILTER MATERIAL : TYPE:
7LIqj
- SCREEN : DIA. : Z w TYPE: Pvt
OPENING VADTM : .*I TYPE :" : sio><:r ¢-
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLEDr
BOTTOM OF SUMP
- 33 `1`y~ ~, , hlsA"
s .BOTTOM OF MOLE
MEir100 DEVELOPED : HOLE DIAMETER
' q' _~ .COMMENTS :,
TlMr- DEVELOPED
T ~t ocr rs WstroM! tow
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION UIECT ; JOB NU .7-'#7 Zr Z3ep;pL NO .P,.c,e" c ' 3,
DRILLING CONTRACTOR . COOROINATES :R pq a6rpqdL( IE(,UN &6 SUPERVISOR : 4W, Z 0 00 6 AVI SITE ; WATER LEVEL DEPTH/ELEV
F110SHE0 . DRILLER : doz. sz- 4fl"-, ec,DEPTm IN ELEV . IN
REFERENCE POINT& ELEVATION :3- r " "S'iAwlpash
TOP OF SURFACE CASING :MIS
. " . OF RISER CASING : P ~TOP1.22 . v 67. 1
«77ew+ Pat? ,,, GROUND SURFACEGENERALIZED
kt
t tGEOLOGIC LOG ~ o SURFACE CASING : TYPEt
a aa s 'a a
't 1
2' 9 Sa a BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING- t a
a aa t
fACKFILL : //J ~.J! TYPE : /~fII~~ Ti~rt I
s a _ . . .- a t
CIA . : 2a RISER CASING: TYPE : XIVC
a a
a a 4'TOP OF SEAL /,s p
ANNULAR SEAL : TYPE: Bvr~J/~. bre ~/ R./Qth 3~e
yp~ rBOTTOM OF SEAL
~g .o' 3g " 1TOPOfICREEN:f
-
~~FILTER MATERIAL: TYRE. 4/10
F/.w1r"A
SCREEN: OIA . : Z T11"E: Ave-
. OPENING MDTN: 0 / TYPE :SI&OPENING
:: _ ~~.
L
ta .c, Z8~ ~1 :~' BOTTOM OF WREEN
METHOD DRILLED :" Il. Ivv//o.d -farmG %
i;_" .; ;"
"~ " "
OF IUMPBOTTOM OF SUMPBOTTOM
27, '
`N"tI~
.BOTTOM OF~ BOTTOM OF MOLE' ~ v
ME1NOD DEVELOPED : HOLE DIAMETER
. J- "4 " , COMMENTS :
TIMC DEVELOPED
.
61ft oarvl Meual1 t E.oOy
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION r~PROJECT : JOB NO. `TWEB era .M F7 To~m 2 .972- &w -4L
DRILLING CONTRACTOR : COORDINATES :j?. R /.+ lee ir. .f #""a
SEWN . L/G107 SUPERVISOR : _07 . 2 LL SITE : WATER LEVEL DIEPTH/ELEV .
FIJoSMED 6/6 87 DRILLER : ,T. 8-chip r S. 7 ~l~o.a.> brow.' ;I
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATIONDEPTH IN I ELEV . IN
T
GENERALIZEDGEOLOGIC LOG
'
TOP of Rwod s.ir/- TOP Of RISER CASING :
ORDUNDSURFACEc
DIA. :' TYPE
t t
l
a
i
a aa a
a aaa st
aa t
a
a "ACKPILL : TYPE:a a A&. 'o" s
" aq/, 00.,*wa r,~a.all rt a . j `OIA . :o
RISER CASING: TYPE : /rGa aa a
t aTO. OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE :
BOTTOM OF SEAL
'TOP OF ICREEN
=V"" FILTER MATERIAL : TWE :: . o OAF .A-Z%s Ay + 301f`
I~M~I~"f.
SCREEN:SCREEN: DIA.: j TYPE : O
~. OPENING IIADTM : ~ T11~E :
BOTTOM OF SCREEN;z
LOTTaw of *A MAD" ." . "METHOD DRILLED :
id. BOTTOM OF HOLEI2
MEIN00 DEVELOPED : HOLE DIAMETERr
/ml COMMENTS : -IreI< ow tc~" -"ffr ootae...~
TOAi DEVELOPED : " '
4 Aottri
1-1 .1511 .92
.15
-7-15
6.15
1,15
0.15
I'p 9% OS
Meta
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PROJECT : Joe NO .� E ft ~orl~e.. 233Z WELLNO .
Btu-6DRILLING CONTRACTOR :
RRCOORDINATES :
" 1-n it lefiafIerrs."EGUN &/f/IT SUPERVISOR : /Y1 . Z1-p LCl WELL SITE : WATER LEVEL DEPTH/ELEVFIIoSMED G1a111 DRILLER : f'._ aV~ kbr *~ " LiIw
DEPTH IN ELEV.IN
REFERENCE POINT & E LEVATION:
PJ~j TOP OF SURFACE CASING : 2 _ ^-~
~ `' I ITOP OF RISER CASING :TOP OF RISER CASING : :~C
earwv Av Oe'~ GROUND SURFACE 12S-0GENERALIZED
R r k a a iGEOLOGIC LOG 1 s SURFACE CASING : PIPE ; ! l
a at t
t a 't a
a at a
'a a: a BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
a aa a
a a
t "ACKFILL : TYPE :a a p 1%f..q b,T.a a
DIA. : Zt 111SER CASING : TYPE : PVCa aa a
aa a ~~0it ,oTOP OF SEAL
SEAL : TYPE :k"' Qw"16.. it.~ 1q .0
~ BOTTOM OF SEAL
'12 . 0
TOP OF SCREEN
FILTER MATERIAL : TYPE :
- SCREEN : DIA . . T' Tm ; Pv
. a OPENING MDTM:, 0 1 TM .5to#
' . .t3 1~
;i BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED : '''" . " BOTTOM OF tuMPj . " , z 5.BOTTOM OF HOLE
ME1NOD DEVELOPED : MOLE DIAMETER
S01 I~/~ COMMENTS :
TIME DEVELOPED : [ `! 1
~frt l~ l~~IAetult t EOOy
APPENDIX C
WELL SURVEY DATA
61
z.332. FT. 1-0 TT Ajuse a
Dtsc Z. S. zt 19 "~9 I .S-7 r
:' `' " r S iTr r S. I I'7.-7B -7. 3L 12 .4'7.' ~u spin V. . 1 d t 13 .21 U. GI - ,32 13 .4V
. . . :; P R t _ TP z + 5.4 1-7"91 - yS2 12 .1 ~pjW.y.
1192 ~` l
. A_ I r- -S"1Z 11 . 81 t " R~t~rIMA 4 .o IS .i.o -3.o2. 14-S7
disc
~' 3 L = D~ 7T '! 4 12 .41 28 .80 "2 .2(, 116 3
.. -
<f: : .~ :'' 3. 5= = 17,73 MLLw~ TP -11 .35' 38 .5-0 -1 " a5 Z7 " IS VI-s. . . . . . :,r
: .: 7" 2-
ow4y0 -It-4 Z') . 0l
'yet t~G5-
07 Ta 21T. 0
RE.rucw . s 19 .89 s3 . l6y - VIC 33.'75', . .
. .4 r 1 TP~V B " bl "3 0-4 q 53.20. 3 V J ~0.2,L G1 .
ter t~orcW-2
1~3~ -0 .33 LI, o4
1 .~ ~S~ b .9 - .I -'' ' 1t0 . 2 -,r. 70 S9. r3 Mw-3
'AIP
`
- 7 , S u~3__13. 41. 4v D T. P. g a. 3 ,21 -1~3y 43.5"1 W"_°TC't
-3.38 ~3,yo ,+r eve' I II I I `s'. ~ I GI.S Icwo
asiq
, PPig
14~va
+41
Ash3
00
4v
03wl-
Ll
16-...
........
r(q0tL
am,a
'OWN
.4.,cp
APPENDIX D
R.AI ANALYTICAL DATA
62
Field Identification : 2333-301 Fort Totten Well 91 Matrix : WaterT,aboratory Number : 10,465-3
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (mg?L) 7/30/87 6010/1 <0 .01Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 <0 .01Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 .0 .2Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .005Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0 .031Mercury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1 (0 .0005Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1 0 .0072Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01
" Field Identification : 2332-302 Fort Totten Well 62 Matrix : WaterLaboratory Number : 10,465-6
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .01Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 - 0.016Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0.23Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .005
r .̂hromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0.097arcury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1 (0 .0005
Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1 0.030Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01
Field Identification : 2332-303 Fort Totten Well 63 Matrix : WaterLaboratory Number : 10,465-9
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .01''Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 (0 .01Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 <0 .1Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .005Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1 0 .032
'Mercury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1 (0 .0005Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1 0 .0069Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01
Field Identification : 2332-304 Fort Totten Well i4Laboratory Number : 10,465-12
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference
Silver, recoverable (mgr/1)Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L)Barium, recoverable (mg/L)Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L)Chromium, recoverable (mg/L)Mercury, recoverable (mg/L)Lead, recoverable (mg/L)Selenium, recoverable (mg/L)
7/30/87 6010/18/12/87 7060/17/30/87 6010/17/30/87 6010/17/30/87 6010/17/28/87 7470/18/11/87 6010/18/14/87 7740/1
Field Identification : 2332-306 Fort Totten Well #6Laboratory Number : 10,465-15
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference
Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/1Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87 6010/11ercury, recoverable (mg/L) 7/28/87 7470/1Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87 6010/1Selenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1
Field Identification : 2332-308 Well Samp HlkLaboratory Number : 10,465-18
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference
Silver, recoverable (mg/L)Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L)Barium, recoverable (mg/L)Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L)Chromium, recoverable (mg/L)Mercury, recoverable (mg/L)Lead, recoverable (mg/L)Selenium, recoverable (mg/L)
Matrix : Water
Concentration
<0 .01<0 .010 .15
<0 .0050 .072
<0 .00050 .33
<0 .01
Matrix : Water
Concentration
<0 .010 .0180 .19
<0 .0050 .071
(0 .00050 .016
(0 .01
Matrix : Water
Concentration
7/30/87 6010/1 (0 .018/12/87 7060/1 (0 .017/30/87 6010/1 <0 .17/30/87 6010/1 (0 .0057/30/87 6010/1 (0 .017/28/87 7470/1 (0 .00058/11/87 6010/1 (0 .0058/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01
Field Identification : 2332-305 Fort Totten Well 85Laboratory Number : 10, "65-22
DateParameter Analyzed
Silver, recoverable (ma/L) 7/30/87Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87Cadmium, recoverable (mQ/L) 7/30/87Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/30/87Mercury, recoverable (mQ/L) 7/28/87Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 8/11/87Selenium, recoverable (mQ/L) 8/1"/87
References : 1) EPA SW 846, 2nd Edition
ethod/Reference
6010/17060/16010/16010/16010/17.70/16010/177.0/1
Matrix : Water
oncentration
<0 .01<0 .01<0 .1(0 .005(0 .025(0 .0005(0 .005(0 .01
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
Lab Number : 10429 Site : Fort Totten
WS 378 CONC . 12 (DOUBLE CONC .)
True Value Found % Recovery Method
Silver 0 .092 0 .038 41 7760
Arsenic 0 .124 0 .123 99 7060
Barium 0 .924 0 .841 91 7080
Cadmium 0 .0148 0 .012 81 7130
Chromium 0 .134 0 .131 98 7190
Mercury 0 .016 0 .017 107 7470
Lead 0 .126 0 .117 93 7420
Selenium 0 .0186 0 .0161 87 7740
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
CALIBRATION VERIFICATIO14
tLab Number : 10429 Site : Fort Totten
Units : mq/L
HETIALS
True Value Found %R Met hod
Arsenic 0 .050 0 .048 96 7060
Barium 20 .0 20 .0 100 7080
Cadmium 0 .50 0 .492 98 7130
Chromium 1 .0 0 .985 98 .5 7190
Lead 10 .0 10 .0 100 7420
Mercury 0 .0050 0 .00515 103 7470
Selenium 0 .050 0 .049 99 7740
Silver 1 .0 0 .998 99 .8 7760
1) Control Limits : Mercury and T in 80-120 ; Other Metals 90-1102) Indicate Analytical Method Used : P-ICP ; A-Flame AA ; F-Furnace AA
CALIBRATION VERIFICAT ION SOURCES
Dilution of Commercial AA Standard unless otherwise specified .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
s
' QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
MERCURY
1. Blank DataResults
Blank Number _ (ua/a)
HQB 68 <0 .05
2 . AccuracyTotal
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found %
Sample Field I .D . (uQ/Q) (uo/a) (ual0) Recovery
10429-27 2332-328 0 .207 1 .0 1 .23 102
3. Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative" Sample Field I .D . (ua/o) (uQ/Q) (ua/0) Ranoe
10429-27 2332-328 0 .209 0 .204 0 .207 2 .4
SILVER
, . 1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number (uQ/Q)
MB 366 <0 .5
2 . AccuracyTotal
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found
Sample Field I .D . Spa/a) (ua/o) (ua/a) Recovery
10429-3 2332-320 <1 7 .2 7 .0 9710429-21 2332-326 <1 6 .0 5 .8 97
r
3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . (ua/o) ' . (uQ/sr) (uo/o) an e
10429-3 '2332-320 <1 <1 <1 NC10429-21 2332-326 <1 <1 <1 NC
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
' . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-316
3 . PrecisionF
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332 326
- ARSENIC
-Results(uo/Q)
c1
OriginalConcentration Spike Level
(uc/Q) (ua/a)
19 7 .220 6 .0
Replicate 1(ua/a)
2021
Replicate 2(uQ/Q)
1819
BARIUM
Results(ua/a)
<10
TotalConcentration
Found(uc/Q) Recovery
22 .5 4922 .8 47
Average Relative(uQ/c) Range
19 10 .520 10
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %(ua/a) (ua/a) (use/4) Recovery
94 724 757 915 602 617 102
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative(ua/a) (ua/Q) (ua/a) Range
93 95 94 258 56 57 3 .5
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
BARIUM
r
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
CADMIUM
Results_ (uc/Q)
<0 .5
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found(uQ/O) (uQ/Q) (uQ/Q) Recovery
0 .72 72 71 98(0 .6 60 .2 55 90
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Averagesample Field I .D . (uc/Q) WO/0) (ug/a)
10429-3 2332-320 0 .69 0 .74 0 .7210429-21 2332-326 <0 .6 <0 .6 c0 .6
CHROMIUM
- 1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Results(uQ/Q)
(l
RelativeRange
6 .9NC
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %(ua/Q) (ua/Q) (ugla) Recovery
39 725 796 10427 602 640 102
r Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (uQ/Q) (u0/al (ua/a)
10429-3 2332-320 38 39 3910429-21 2332-326 26 27 27
RelativeRange
2 .63 .7
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
BARIUM
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 367
2 . Accuracy
- Resultsm L
<0 .1
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level FoundSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 0 .2 5 .0 4 .94 95
3 . Prec ision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative. Sample Field I .D . m L m L m L Range
10465-3 2332-301 0 .1 0 .2 0 .2 50
CHROMIUM
1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number m L
MB 367 <0 .01
2 . Accuracy" Total
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found
Sampl e Field I .D . (ma/L) m L (ma/L) Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 0 .031 5.0 5.4 107
3 . Precision
" Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . (mc/L) m L m L ap e
10465-3 2332-301 0.032 0 .029 0 .031 9 .7
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
a
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 367
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10465-3 2332-301
3 . Precision
Resultsm L
<0 .1
LEAD
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found(ma/LL m L m L
<0 .1 5 .0 4 .97
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . m L m /L m L
10465-3 2332-301 0.1 <0 .1 <0 .1
NC - not calculable due to results below detection limit .
SELENIUM
1 . blank DataResults
Blank Number ma/L)
MB 367 (0 .01
2 . Accuracy
Recovery
99
RelativeRange
NC
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %Sample Field I .D . ma/L) (ma/L) (,mo/L) Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 0.05 0 .0111 22
r3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativefSample Field I .D. (ma/L) (ma/j!) m L Ranoe
10465-3 2332-301 M01 X0 .01 <0 .01 NC
NC - not calculable due to results below detection limit .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 367
2 . Accuracy
SILVER
-Resultsm L
<0 .02
Totaloriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level FoundSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 0 .05 0 .053 106
. 3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2Sample Field I .D . (ma/L) m L
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01
CADMIUM
1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number m L
MB 367 (0 .005
2 . Accuracy
Averagem L
<0 .01
RelativeRance
NC
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %Sample Field I .D . (ma/L) m L m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 (0 .005 0 .5 0 .477 94
3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2Sam2le Field I .D . (mQ/L) m L
10465-3 2332-301 (0 .005 (0 .005
Averagem L
(0 .005
NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit.
RelativeRange
NC
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
.
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
SELENIUM
Results(uc/4)
<1
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %Sua/cr) (ua/a) ,(uC/Q) Recovery
(l 7 .2 4 .1 57<l 6 .0 2 .6 43
' Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . (uQ/Q) (ua/2) (uQ/Q) Rance
10429-3 2332-320 c1 cl <1 NC10429-21 2332-326 <1 c1 c1 NC
NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit .
LEAD
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2. Accuracy
Sampl e Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Results(,ua/a )
<1
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %(use/a) (uQ/9) (ua/a) Recovery
40 724 684 8945 602 578 89
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (ua/a) (ua/o) (ua/o)
10429-3 2332-320 40 40 4010429-21 2332-326 47 43 45
RelativeRance
08 .9
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
ARSENIC
1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number m L
MB 367 <0 .01
2 . AccuracyTotal
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found
Sample Field I .D . m L m L m /L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .1 0 .05 0 .0427 85
i3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Rance
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01 NC
NC - Not calculable due to result below detection -limit .
MERCURY
1 . Blank Data' Results
Blank Number m L
MB 367 (0 .0005
2 . Accuracy \Total
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found %
Sample Field I .D . (ma/L} m L m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 (0.0005 0 .01 0 .00755 76
' 3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSa_m219 Field I .D . m L m L m L Ranae
10465-3 2332-301 (0 .0005 (0 .0005 (0 .0005 NC
NC - Not calculated due to result below detection limit .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :
STD 50 PPB (run as a sample)C38418/3/87Soil
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONC . OF CONC . % DETECTIONSTANDARD FOUND RECOVERY LIMIT(ug/g) (ug/g) (ug/g)
CHLOROMETHANE 6 .2 * 0 .0 1 .0VINYL CHLORIDE 6 .2 * 0 .0 1 .0CHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .8 109 .7 0 .5BROMOMETHANE 6 .2 * 0 .0 0 .5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 6 .2 3 .7 59 .7 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 5 .8 93 .5 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 5 .5 88 .7 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 5 .9 95 .2 0 .5CHLOROFORM 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .0 96 .8 0 .51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 6 .2 5 .7 91 .9 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE 4 .8 6 .2 129 .2 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 6 .2 100 .0 0 .5BENZENE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE 7 .8 6 .1 78 .2 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .7 108 .1 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 6 .2 6 .2 100 .0 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 6 .2 6 .5 104 .8 0 .5BROMOFORM 6 .2 6 .5 104 .8 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 6 .2 6 .4 103 .2 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 6 .2 6 .6 106 .5 0 .5TOLUENE 6 .2 6 .6 106 .5 0 .5CHLOROBE14ZENE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE 6 .2 5 .9 95 .2 0 .5
ACETONE 6 .2 5 .7 91 .9 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE 6 .2 5 .9 95 .2 0 .5THF 6 .2 6 .2 100 .0 2 .5MEK 6 .2 6 .6 106 .5 2 .5VINYL ACETATE 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 1 .0MIBK 6 .2 5 .6 90 .3 2 .52-HEXANONE 6 .2 6 .0 96 .8 2 .5STYRENE 6 .2 6 .1 98 .4 0 .5XYLENES 17 .0 16 .0 94 .1 0 .5
r
* The retention times have changed and Chloromethane elutedbefore scan start delay began. Vinylchloride and Bromomethane's
. baseline detection is poor due to new column bleed .
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : WPO17C1 HALOSample Designation : - C3823Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Water
0
VOLATILE ORGANICS TRUE colic . DETECTIONVALUE FOUND LIMIT RECOVERY(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)
CHLOROMETHATIE BDL BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE BDL BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 98 .0 65 .9 5 671,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 5CHLOROFORM 60 .4 39 .3 5 651,2-DICHLOROETHANE 90 .2 85 .0 5 941,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 73 .8 25 .4 5 34CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 92 .7 22 .8 5 24BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 84 .5 77 .7 5 921,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 55 .1 22 .3 5 40BENZENE BDL BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 71 .7 89 .0 5 124BROMOFORM 97 .8 122 5 125TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 48 .0 19 .0 5 391,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5TOLUE14E BDL BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE 79 .1 55 .6 5 70ETHYLBENZENE BDL BDL 5
ACETONE BDL BDL 25CARBOt1 DISULFIDE BDL BDL 5THF BDL BDL 25MEK BDL BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL BDL 10MIBK BDL BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL BDL 25STYRENE BDL BDL 5XYLENES BDL BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
RECOVERYM
100106102
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : BlankSample Designation : - C3816Date Analyzed : 8/3/874atrix : Water
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT_(ug/L) (ug/L)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VI14YL CHLORIDE BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 3 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARB014 TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 5BROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE 1 .6 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5
ACETONE BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MEK BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBK BDL 252-HEY.ANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
RECOVERYM9094
102
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115
BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, incorporated
Lab NumberSample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHAN EVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE,ETHYLBENZENE
MeOH Blank 7/29C38398/3/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDL1 .4BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL1 .0BDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
($)d4-DICHLOROETHANE 83 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 98 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 96 74 - 121
BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION IncorporatedResource AnalystsMETHOD 8240 ,
Lab Number : 10,429-1Sample Designation : -- 2332-320 Fort Totten Soil #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Solid
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g) (ug/g)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 1CHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE BDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5_1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5
' 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5BENZENE BDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL _ 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOFORM BDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5TOLUENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 0 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
RECOVERY
90111102
ACCEPTANCE LIMITSM
70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :
COMPOUND
ACID/BASE/NEUTRAL MATRIX SPIRE RECOVERY
10,429-22332-320 Fort Totten Soil "18/12/87Solid
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENSACENAPTHENE2,4-DINITROTOLUENEN-NITROSO-DI-N PROPYLAMINE
' PYRENEPHENOL2-CHLOROPHENOL'-CL-3-METHYLPHENOL-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
SAMPLE CONC .CONC . SPIRE ADDED(uQ/Q) (uQ/0)
0 3 .30 3 .30 3 .20 3 .50 3 .50 6 .80 9 .50 6 .7 -0 6 .70 6 .5
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : SPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 3550/8270
CONC . %SPIRE FOUND RECOVERY
(ufl/Q)
0 .3 9 .0902 60 .60
2 .4 752 .3 65 .711 .8 51 .423 .1 45 .583 .4 35 .788 .4 125 .31 .7 254 .3 66
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
t
Lab Number :Sample Designation :'gate Analyzed :atrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARB014 TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEZ-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE,,ETHYLBENZENE
10,429-42332-321 Fort Totten Soil #28/3/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1I4IBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
Wd4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 101 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 101 74 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD $240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
ACIJIASE ;NE'JT Al. E1-RAC''?- .
111w! It ve .. . Ci 'c : :tur~ LO^tQ(t : ~ .7~
CONCENTiA?ION DETECTION L : "" :itug/ ;) fu4/ ;?
r :N-Nr.1nGS .: D I . .E .M yrLkM" N C BD_, 0 . 0~%mENOL SDL 0 .3P :s (2-CHLOROETHYL ETr=5) SOL 0 .3.-C"LOROFHENOL BDL 0 .3. .3-)IC4L0RC6EN?ENE °_DL
i . .-V :Ch:GR~E:N :C!i : BDL D .3
4{LFHENV^L BDL 0.3
OF F NE D-,2-S :TisC~~:A :. BDL C 32 .o-D :ME'!+r;~cEr'_ BDL G,3E :K:rI~ ACID 61.1 .Ls I :-CHLORE'HOXYI "_1 ;W:: EDL C' .3_ .c-')ICH;CRC=HENG: BD . III:,2,6-Ti :CHLGF05EN ;ENE SOLNA?HTMA!EN! SOL 0 .3t-CHl2RGANILI'!E BD! .3fE~ACyL~zOB:'1A :IERE BD: 0 .3s-CHLOr.0-3-"ETHYLF~°!!G' : SOL ^.3
BDL C.,8D. 0.11
: .G .S-?tICM .GRC`-HEN :- BU 0.3, .i . :-TFICH;OROFwE-NG: SOL
. L-:I'_u "'sSkAi:d'nA::RE BJL 0.1
' :-'J1 i AJAN:! INE BOl t
+ ;NA?!"~YLENE BDL r .3
!-N:TA'ANIIINE °DLACENA=r'HENE SOL 0 .3_ .6-D :N:TRC?"ENCL SOL 1c-NiT'r.OPhEN : ; BD : IDIBENZOFURAN BDL 0 .3
'.t-NNITRGTOLUENE SOL 0 .3JIETMYLPHTHALATE BDL 0.3l-CHLOROPMENYL-PHENYLETHER SDL 0 .3fLUORENE BDL 0.3
~ .c-D1Ni?ir0 . .-M :T!!YLFHENC : °_~ :N-N?1RO~ ::DIFHENY;AM :YE 111 BDL C . :i-E'GM~PHEh1L-PHENYLETMER 9D! " .3HE XACH!OR02EN;ESE °0L _ .'?:NTACH!0KFHEN :! E~LFHENANT~IENE SOL . . .ANJ'HRA'ENE P,., G .'
I:!-N-e'JTYL-'-`HA ;ATE !DL C .r.FL!I(,R3ANT1 :NE 2 CBEN-DENE ?~! .PYRENE 1 .' G . .'_.'YL2EN:YLFHT~A.AT' :D : . . .. .J-DICF.iEKN:
C, AN 7.6 AC -. NE 1 .3Crzr~EKE:15' .-ET`'fLF .EXY.iFXTFA,ATE:'I-!:-OCTYLPtITHA:ATE BDLEEyP:70RAN'HENEKN::`Ik!FLUDFANTrEhE BD : c . :3cc :̀ :0 31 PYRE NEIDEN011 . ..3- : .d .?riENE C .6 e . .'DISEY10ia .h1ANTHRACENE EJL 0 . :SE .N :DIS,r, .i)FEFYLENE
5 ;'RRGSATE SIAK-DA=JS RECOVERYA:COVE;Y A, :EFTAS ;-
!1~ ;1~:-F:-'r!tEi Icdt-?4ENC;yl?ROBEy :ENE-d5 S := 1'
,_ 9TEEFHERYL-d:C :5 33
S3L = BE :CU DETECTION LIMITFIETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW !66 . 2ND EDITION
METHOD 3550/527
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
e
'Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Jatrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEL-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE --ETHYLBENZENE
10,429-72332-322 Fort Totten Soil #38/3/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uq/q)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
'.'BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(uq/q)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
d4-DICHLOROETHANE 66 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 90 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 76 74 - 121
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
. " . : :~r Nua :a " . .- .6 :4--
. .c' : . Dt : :vs ". : .rl :
. .J : : : eiDreBse'_ '. :3 .̂ec'- : C ba5 :_ .
C ")NCENTRA7IJh DETECTION LIMITlupls' t~?%s!
i Nk09JD141ETH%V :"E ?DL 0 . :
~H :N ;: BDL C " 3
E :s I2-:HL0n0ETH! : ET~EE' BDLBDL 0 .3
. ;-DICHlORO°E!l:EtiE~ . " ?DL 0.3-?^L
--'FQYI ALCO4 .̂L :D : 0 . .
20L
(H:uk I :)°.- ..- BDL C' .3
> N-' :A-?k:'Y 2D L C " 3
S. . LS . . E(I~ C . J
"`!'jA':E BD_ 0 .3
1 D.I(ML'A EK~_ BD : c .31 . .4-TRICM: "JkH :k.:' : -D= ^ " =
{ NA'M'MUNE BU'- J'3
A-CHLORCAN ::INE EDl 0 .3
iiEYACMAROBO'ADIEN : BDL e .3
-c,LeF0-3-r.EirY :FMEN' :"
CDL 0.3
2- .I .14IYL#41AFni'PIALENE BDL D.3MEXA;MLDRDCYC;OFENTA :?!N : BDLi . . ._ . . .5-'3ICML^F0rr!tNOL BD_ 1
2-L :OP.C'NA?~T~AL BC: G " 3
:-w:TRDANIL1NE 3DL;wTmAX--
'
ED 0 .!
Er;A=MTFtL :NEA : NL 0 .-
EN : `, r" ?'-N :T~)Ay : :IVE EDL 1ACE~A~ . .',r! :~E BDL 0.3
4-??~u°cE'~~l 6D16 1
EN :r.FUiAN EDL C' .3
.; ;:'HYLfmTHALAT? BDL 0.3
4- :H( ;+kOFH'_NY:-FMENY :E'MER 9D : 0 .3
FLINRENE BDL 0 .3
IU :i~ IU : .
c RC,-_-r.'6'4YLFrENU :N-NITRCS0DI 6_9YLA" :+:E I" ;D,. C .,
A-ORC`GEHEt+°l-'~ENYIETHER E!I: r' °
7
FEBTACML'. . .4EN :'_FHENAWTME :`:E E~-AN 7.IFA ;E E BD : . . .DI -,i-'UTY;FwT~A:A'_ DL - "'FLJOFCAS'tENE Tra:~ - " .E_"ZIDDENE E O'- -rYRCN :
t � Y : :N :
iC~17A1`I^IJ0
H% Y. F
I EN:Ci3.c!AN'Mn.ACESE^nN:{'is,h,i'FEkYLEK ED : - " -
;CRkG`v4TE STAN ::AK_ REC01'E ;'RECOVERY a(CE='ati : . _ :" :
i41
17
-1
. " -- . .'Trice' Cen�: :s roroDable oresence Delou 1 :3 ;ea cet!c ;i^r.
6D : = EEL0u DETECTIA L :~111:r1!~~G REFERENCE : EPA 56" '-4t, ND ENT :0N
PETH00 :5 :-C1182'C
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
r
r,
i
Lab Number :Sai:ple Designation :Date Analyzed :.atrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
10,429-10_ 2332-323 Fort Totten Soil #4
8/3/87Solid
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE
CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MER BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBR BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
Wd4-DICHLOROETHANE 100 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 105 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 103 74 - 121
BDL = BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITIO14
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
' ACI :'13A5EINEJTAA: EX'Fk'4e_ ,~"fC~ALDS
-= ;o-r N~ccE- . I 10 . G :9-11ie Desiqr-tic, . 2332-323 Fc-t Tot-.!r Sc :l 34
:!E Eztr : : ;E~ . 7i3[~4~a:E An,ali :ed : 8!3(2?�� -I : Jri i
eiorezset cr, = ~-Y !1'. . de ;r+t : C) basiS .
CONCENTRATIDN DETEC:ION LI :C:"' COn,_s'RaTIGti D_TEC' . ;ti
ti-A :TaC' .̀ :'SI"E?MYLA~ ;r~E EDt .VV
' -:W~_is 12-CM! OROETHYL ETHEi I SOL 0. 3 ti-A'.:nL~D~ =fiENY! A"ICE ! 1 ! !DL G. :
.-CH~3RiF h_10L BD! 9 .3 s-~F'D1:0=h?f1~L-FM ;NYLETHER BGl C .3° .3-OICMLOROBENIZENE SOL 0 .3 Ifa,;;KL'~r.VE_tN2 :NE BCL C .,.4-DICHLOROSENZEN: BDL 0.3 'F?f'0LDfUPHEKU: BD_ 1'ENZYL ALCOHOL ?DL 0 .3 ilHr'A'Rl'fi BD_ ~ . ?' .-D :CHLCRJE:N:EK: 8:! 0 .3 .A~iTtt;-..Arr;= fD'. C' .?-ME "YLFhENO! IDL C' .3 '1J~"~; .T°h.-.A :AT[ °D!r r .';s " 2-CF:UR:ISG~+~GErI ~ :THE ; B% C' .3 i~,JR;tAb?4V~E BDL _ .3
SD: 0 .3 ?-EN2IDfNf ED . 21aC~_UnC?ThAh : SOL 0 .3 TlfRENE BD : D . :
o-N :7 =^SC'C'--N-FPO°Y'_A~ :' : !DL : .3 2l,7R311Cf_~H?HALATE fCl C' . :;;TP.1F:QEN: BU : G .3 _ , ., -I.~ ±+�DT'c ;+E :~I171NE BD : C .":GFFC=O',: 9J' D . ;, I1acr-~RA:ENE BDL C . :
FnEN :_ ED! C' .3 -~Y:ikE - E..D! G . .'-"!ME THYLFtt;\^! EDL 0 .3 ?._ . ~-~"-'~'~t?EzY :iFMiH ' AT- ',6 C
:Ek1 :C :C A;IC BDL BD : . .3: : 12-CiLORE!M~zY? !!E-'!'A4~ BDL 0 .3 . .211ka) :11'FlV0AANTHtNE.E- ICH:OR('-MExu: SDL 0 .3 5=t'D ~kli_utIiAN'HEN: 6D ;. C .?
! .- .C-inI,HL CRR01ENZ SOL 0 .3 tiL,'2YiE4? 'DL . .'I -:A°~'HA:EN: SD . C' .3 C . .~=YP :" : f:~! - .?
.-CH:OROANILINE °DL +LTU!~ .'.!AN'M ;A E4E eDL C .',EXAMOFO?J''ADIEN : BD. - .3 tL'_.̀~i..t . .IFfRI_Eh : Sk - .3-C~LCR-5- ;-,9E'HY_P=Ey _ SOL D.3-r:T,iYAAPhTHALENE BDDL D., ~itwV.:ATT STAKIARC : FECOV'ERY,EIA :n_OROCY ;LOPEtiTADHNE SOL C' .3 REC^V'ERY ACCE ;'ANC;?.~ .^-?= :CJ%MENC' BD: ..3 It) !1. . . .5-?RICMLOROPHENOL SOL 1 a-11.-'Mf'i1L1.-C~!(~% :NA~4?cAl°-k : SOL L.3 4:-HEM 0 1- -_-NANI :INE SOL 1 1~( : rF` EN2 NE-~5 63 33 - :1 .
rY!FhtiALAiE R'.~; 0 .3 -~T'F'!&'NYL 52 63 - Ilc.:NA_S!FYLESE M. D .3 7-A-fiOrOfAN"_ 5y :C - 12I
TRO?OLVEN: BD! 0 .3 'r .T'".~f$'A`Y;-;lt ?E 3: - 1~!:-~ :T?Oa4IlIyE ?DL 14CENAF~JHENE SOL o.3: .4-DINITROPMEV : SOL 1 ' -acx' zitno!ts orcbeclt oresenct below listed detectior !iii' .44117?0?HENIL SOL 1::If?N,OFURAI 8DL 0 .3".,4-[1INITROTOLUENE BDL 0 .3*,*arHYLP4THALATE SOL 0 .3 ?11L =$f-OY DETECTION LIMIT
!t! ORCPMENY :-PHENY:E'~ :F SOL 0 .3 *-1-~Z RffRENCE : EPA 5v '-ab . 2K EDITIOk-LUORENE SOL 0 .3 METHOD !j$U !2' j
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
a
Lab Number : _ -Sample Designation :-Date Analyzed :Matrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,'3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER7IBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE
10,429-132332-324 Fort8/3/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
Totten Soil #5
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
Md4-DICHLOROETHANE 98 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 107 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 105 74 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Fcr : :''ter, Soil :_
. ;- Af.31Y:tc : 9 3 ;a-
CONCENTRATION DETEiTICN LIMIT(UiiO~ ;Us~~i
h-N1IS05DDDImETi1TLA~: .4E ED : C . .~ ~ :N~ : eol 0 .3
'i : ; .-CHLOFOET~Y . ETHER ; !DL 0.3.-CH:~hPr.ENO ; BD ; U .3. :-DICHIOROBE`C .̀SE ?DL ~.3. .~-,''.tH_OAGZE!wZEh? 5DL 0.3
A. :OM:' : E)L : . :
E ^"6
VV "
B! . f . 3
_c' : . . A:ID :i .
0.7
~4-CMLOFOANI,'.NE 8D : C .3~;?1.aCr.:JRM:'.A : :EK: ED_G-Cel,0SC'-3-?ET rYLFr.EN" . 5D : . .3
-:XACK.0RLCY :,0FEu~ASE e4 . .3
~.:vcu :f in : .F: . .'i% aJl
C NA P i~ A . E N' ;
raCEC'aFPTeYLE.NE 2 : . . :
: TRROWL INE
'.-DIN!TROPHENOL BDL
I-NZOFURAN BD: 0 .3:.C-JiNITRQTr'L ;:Et~ BD: C .3DIETMY :P :'!?HA :ATE 8Dl 0 . :-CHLOROPHENYL-°'^lENYLETHE= BulUORENE BDL
N! T i CA%' : N ;H ~ L F H E N 0'.
,V-N!T1R0$CID1FHENY'-AM1NE ~1! DL C' .
6 )L
PWACHLI'POFHEN"-'~ENASIHFENE ED,AKIHFACEhE
%'-!UTY F~T'!A'X- DL
F'-!.! 0F A h 4EN 5ceE E N
E
F Z E E Z 1 1 NE
ATE
; 'v ;S ;NAN VL
e E%Cr*
A ~'7 4 RAC E N EE F E .: L NE
0t P'~; N
. .ENV .
Trs:e* len--:et vow!e oresence bel .-w lis:ed 0! :!C :~or
S.-I-
-z FE L OW CIE '.ECT 1ON LIM 1M; HFUENCE : EPA 5w !Lt, NJ WTICN
METHOD 355;;%~ :7 ::
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
t
r
Lab NumberSa .-ple DeEignation :Date Analyzed :atrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,I-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE?-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE
10,429-16_ 2332-325 Fort
8/3/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uq/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
Totten Soil #6
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/A)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
d4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 101 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 100 74 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ,METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION ' Resource Analysts, IncorporatedMETHOD 82 40
AC :? ;2A!EiNEU'RA ; E%T ; .CTAF_ :
-! :5 port Totter, S0 :1 3t
713Cii7
:/!/-;7-$0i
-1
"._ . . . :5 tnrt : :` : Cr -- :rv i :f': ~`0~!e: C1 DD: : : .
r,= :S :'.!t COQ' :er' .
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITNCO !u9/q1
` 4-W :TnC :J7I".ETHYLA". :SE BDL 0.1SDL r.3
:5 I : ;=LORD°'rfL F rIE : SDL 0.3-SDL
r :Cc!OEC?E ",_'Et _ BDL 0 .3
BBD .
r, `
E :F; :~ : : a! ;r ?D t
E .s i2-CFLUR :T':jXY, mE~-~'i_ G.J : : .3
1 .2 .i-TRICH :'.FC'BEN:aI !DL i .3NA :' H.:1A!EK_ BDL G.3
L-;NLROANI:IyE EDL
,2-''.TXYLhA%yThA:Et : E D'- 0 .31
;AA;hl^R:CfC:0FA; . aE SDL C' .3
-75.JONA:. .CAL :", :_ aL.! (' .t
-1'.'5(14 : :14: ED! IDDL
0.1
AC:NA=H'1YLENE SDL C .3I NIIW .,~'r1~~11 N:-DL . . Di~L J.0
3-!iIinJA~IIINE EDL 1
AC :NAFKNENE B:L 0.32 . .-DIN1TR0FHEN^L BDL 1
4411A~'PhEkk SD*- 14D:?ENZCFURAN BDL 0 .3'' . r-SIN:TRCTGL,ICNc E~ : 0 .3::'4YLFHTHALATE BDL O .J
4-CHLOirtuFdKYL-?6EN! :!7e.EF BD : 0 .3
f :QCRENE BD: 0.3
s-4:TRUNILINEd .S-)INIIRU- :-CIE''~r!FhENOI OJ_
Y-V;'Sy~'Jqr :uEar`ArTyE i, i E!'- r, . :
r:-~RCnJ~aEKY :-Pf1:1~LcrHc'.. :',' .
HE xAC~:CFOE:S:ESEFEATACHLC'RUPHEN~'_ Big!P~ENaNTHR=sE "! . . :A' RA E f,
iEA:9Iig . ."i . .l~ .
'! .
Y .jRJBEy :CV : r' LI 35 ' . . .
_-F :-eI~-EkY : J_ 43 - ; . .C : . ,
I RrY~N,.-VIG VY J.
'Tract' dero`e!orobatle orese-ce below liste: de'ec ; ::f . *. *~'. ' .
BDL = BELOW DETECTIN LIMITCIE?H0 : REFEFENCE : EPA 51.' Ut . AD EDITION
METHOC 35501 ; :70
Resource Analysts, incorporated
Lab Number : 10,429-19Sample Designation : -- 2332-326 Fort Totter. Soil #7r)ate Analyzed : 8/3/87.4atrix : _ Solid
t
s
r
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g) (ug/g)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 1CHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE BDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5BENZENE BDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOFORM BDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5TOLUENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE ' BDL 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 0 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
($)d4-DICHLOROETHANE 88 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 100 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 100 74 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts IncorporatedMETHOD 8240 ,
AC ;75A :EINE,'RA! ECF.A;~A:--
o : :- .tort hur. .!r : A, : .129- .I531;:f Dtsign :'.ICn : ' or : % 16 It r, So : 1, 4.7.) . :e Ei:re:teC : 7/301:7;ate Ans :YZe: : 7!3:12"%Z%x : 5~ :1
t1Dr : : : .̀ : Cr. . o"r 1 . :t owes : :I OaS . . .CGG:t' : : :0!
CONCENTRATION DETECTj0N LIMIT(v-,/ ;l f :p/s1
rr_n(_ 3:: - ,
.EDL
:E SDLZE'N :Y . A:CCH!: . BD! C .?
SD: ~' .
ti:xA:1;;^kD!'~A~ :.r
~ :'R:'?En:'.k~ 6DL 0 . :01
A= T rALEN .' SD: C' . :L . r.
L.xa ;F ;GF~ :CY!LGF,r:'A;'.E!~ : BDL D. :_ .4 .6-7FCF5?m!kC . BDL U .3
_-CH' MNAPPOITMA:EN : BJ! C .32-N; TRDANILINE BDL
ACENA?HTSYLENE BDL D.Z: .t-JINITECTOLUENE BD . U.3:-NIT,-:0A.N%!M! IDLACEKAF~I1;ENE BD! C.31 . wD:NITFCF4EN :~ : BDL IR-4'ITR0Fi=NC' : Bal ID1 :EK:ONFAN BJ : C.3
t-C-?4EN .̀' : . ET-.. BD : C' .3% :L'CREt.E ? : 0.3
l :r ;!
4 .6- 'KI7FC- l-HYLFh:NO,
a~!FENTAC!'.:4RO ;HEk"t, E~ :PKENANTHRENE ED: . .ANT~RACER : E- _ . :
D .'-y-?UTYL'`''^A.AT: :DL . . :FLUO~0ANTh=NE.EN;ICENE ?CL _
ANT NE
N:0 2
HENZQ a n AN'iRAC!VE
;0'-.RC"WE ''ANJAFi', FECOVE ;Y
.-. .-FxE
k :TnOEV:E":- : :.-°:Fr:ENYL
!EF:rhENY ;-d:4
:CQVF` - .-
~ETd:REFERENCE : EPA , . :4, . 2ND EDIT :~.krETND 3 :~ ":; :?74
, :
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : 10,429-22Sample Designation : 2332-327 Fort Totten Soil #8Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : _ Solid
r
t'
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBRO140METHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1 , 1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENE-ETHYLBENZENE
CONCENTRATION.(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBD"'BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE DDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
Irk) Md4-DICHLOROETHANE 88 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE (94) 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 101 74 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, IncorporatedMETHOD 8240
ACID/SASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
oratory Number : 10,129-23 _se8cle Designation : 2332-327 Fort Totten Soil 88Date Extracted : 7/30/87Date Analyzed : 7131/87Matrix: Solid
Results eipressed on a dry (103 degrees C) basis.Moisture content : 21%
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITREP 1 . REP 2 (u9/9)(u9/9) (u9/9)
N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE SOL SOL 0.8PHENOL SOL SOL 0.3Sis (2-CMLOROETHYL ETHER) SOL SOL 0.32-CHIOROPNENOL SOL 1DL 0.31,3-DICHIOROBENZENE SOL SOL 0.31,4-DICHLOROBENIENE SOL BDL 0.3BENZYI ALCOHOL SOL SOL 0.31,2-DICHLOROBENZENE SOL SOL 0 .32-flETHYLPHENOL SOL SOL 0 .3Bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER SOL BDL 0.34-METHYLPHENOL SOL SOL 0.3HEXACHLOROETHANE SOL SOL 0.3I!-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE SOL SOL 0.311TROBENZENE SOL SOL 0.3OPHORONE SOL BDL 0.3
2-NITROPMENOL SOL BDL 0.32,l-DIMETHYLPHENOI SOL SOL 0.3BENZOIC ACID SOL BDL 1$is (2-CHLORETHOXY) METHANE SOL SOL 0.32,4-DICHLOROPMENOL 6DL SOL 0.31,2,1-TRICHLOROBENZENE SOL SOL 0.3NAPHTHALENE SOL SOL 0.3i-CHLOROANILINE SOL SOL 0.3HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE SOL BOL 0.34-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL BDL SOL 0.32-METMYLNAPHTMALENE SOL SOL 0.3MEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE SOL SOL 0 .32,1,6-TRICHLOROPMENOL SOL SOL 0.32,4,$-TRICMLOROPMENOL SOL SOL 12-CHLORONAPHTMALENE SOL SOL 0.32-NITROANILINE SOL SOL 1OIMETHYLPHTMALATE SOL SOL 0.3ACENAPMTHYLENE SOL SOL 0.32,6-DINITROTOLUENE BOL SOL 0.33-NITROANILIRE SOL ODL 1ACENAPHTHENE SOL SOL 0 .32,l-DINITROPMENOL SOL SOL 14-NITROPHENOL SOL SOL 1DISENZOFURAA SOL SOL 0.3,l-DINITROTOLUENE SOL SOL 0.3
AETHYLPHTMALATE SOL SOL 0.3c-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER SOL SOL 0.3FLUORENE SOL SOL 0.3
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIREP 1 REP 2 WOO)NOW (u9/9)
l-NITROANILINE SOL SOL 1l,6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL BDL BLD 1N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE (1) SOL BDL 0.31,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (AZOBENZENE) SOL SOL 0 .3l-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER SOL SOL 0 .3HEXACHLOROSENZENE SOL SOL 0 .3PENTACKOROPHENOL BDL BDL 1PHENANTHRENE SOL Trace 0 .3ANTMRACENE BDL 1.0 0 .3DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE SOL SOL 0.3FLUOROANTHENE co .-6 1 .9 0.3BENZIDENE SOL SOLPYRENE 7Trece- 1 .2 0.3BUTYLBENZYLPHTKALATE SOL SOL 0 .33,3'-DICHLOROSENZIDINE SOL SOL 0 .7SENZO(e)ANTHRACENE ' BD-L . 0 .6 0 .3CHRYSENE 601
'0 .5 0 .3
Bis(2-ETHYLMEXYL)PHTMALATE O1 0.6 0 .3DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
_SOL BDL 0 .3
BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE ~Dl . 0.9 0.3SENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE BDL SOL 0.3BEN10(o)PYRENE
~SOL 0.5 0.3
IDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE , BDL SOL 0.3DISENZO(s,h)ANTHRACENE -BDL SOL 0.3SENZO(9,h,i)PERYLENE ,SDL BDL 0 .3
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMI'
(=1 (t)2-FL-PHENOL 9 11 21 - 100d6-PHENOL 20 26 10 - 96
NITROBENZENE-d5 1 5 23 - 1202-FL-BIPHENYL It 1t 30 - 115TRIBROMOPHENOL 24 16 10 - 123
TERPHENYL-414 12 18 18 - 137
'Trace' denotes probable Presence below listed detection limit .
SOL s BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 146, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 3550/8270
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Nurber : - 10,429-25Sample Designation : _ 2332-328 Fort Totten Soil #9Date Analyzed : 8/3/874atrix : Solid
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE
f CHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZEIJE .ETHYLBENZENE
CONCENTRATION(ug/g)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/g)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARB014 DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBR BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
($) Wd4-DICHLOROETHANE 92 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 105 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZE14E 103 74 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts IncorporatedMETHOD 8240 ,
ACI3qAiEINE'jTRA : EXTRACiAE__ CFAN :C CC11'CUNG1
.DOr.torr N�ctE : : 1: .4:?-io~a®o~d Dr:9rat :cr : 233:-3.? Fcr : Totter, Soil !40.'! Ett--tec : 7/30/°_7Date Analyzed : 7/3 :1°.7M :;'rl~ Solid-
7-
IF
CO"'' :NTRAT :,'N DET: .-I"y LI!7T
? :s ' :-(rll('q^I ;n :, . :`__-yE: 3~! G .3
ec'L4-h?'iC :^C :-N-FiiO :Y!A~r .- eC,~ C .3N'.'F,? :N:ENE SD'.
-NITa:~CNf.= Bn . J .3
'~A7~ 'ALEt : EDL C .3rF"AN : .I~'E 6ul
-, :IkC"Ln~nE':iAC :EA: VL+-(r:,CF0-:-r?TFY:F':N_
Tnl :hA=r'1A,a_ BOL 0 .3aEX1,Nl.ROCYCI^FENTAJ : :~+E EDL C, .3
ODL.,4,5-Tk :CMLOkO'~E~O'_ SDL '
1-WHANILINE 2'.LD:METHY;PNIMALA'E BD: 0.3AC :%APMTMYIENE 3G: 0.3: .o-"AI'ROTCLUE% : SOL 0.3'-tiI'aOAN ;LINE IDL 1ACENAPH1r.E&E BDL 0 .3
-n :Tc(+FMEftCIL UL 1r.,' :aZ:=l'RAN BDL C .3. .4-D NI RV L".11 .-N!
BD: c .3.vL
TFC: :I : :yE
~c\av'FE_ ~ . ._ : .
RAN'=EVE `_JL . . .ca:Z'F:UO;AN'r:NE
EN 7--,i .h e!.T6RACENE
i PE :'- LEENE
VAW:A? :' ;, FFE :0V?FY~,~ k('':AT :RErOVEFY A:CEF-AN-:E : :" :
NITROBENZENE-dz e '-' : - --
"T?IBR!MOFhENOL 1 :.
:a! : eE . ;u M EC ICN LI"ITfs :TMC: FEF_REN EPA SW ?t! . 2N0 EDT'ION
'E?MCC 355~1 : :~ :
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
aboratory Number : _ 10,429-28Sample Designation : 2332-330 Fort Totten Soil "i1Date analyzed : 8/18/87Matrix : Solid
PCB'S CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMITREP 1 REP 2 (uQ/9)(u9/0) (uq/0)
r PCB-1242 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1254 BDL BDL 0 .16PCB-1221 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1232 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1248 BDL BDL 0 .08PCB-1260 BDL BDL 0 .16PCB-1016 BDL BDL 0 .08
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHODS 3540 AND 8080
t
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :Date.Analyzed :Matrix :
PCB'S
PCB-1242PCB-1254PCB-1221PCB-1232PCB-1248
- PCB-1260PCB-1016
10,429-29- 232-331 Fort Totten Soil #12
8/01/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uQ/Q)
BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHODS 3540 AND 8080
DETECTION LIMIT(u9/Q)
0 .080 .160 .080 .080 .080 .160 .08
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : 10,429-31Sample Designation : - 2332-333 Ft Soil Sam Blk #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Water
r
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTIO14 LIMIT(uq/L) (ug/L)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 31 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51 , 1-DICHLOROETHAII£ BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 5BROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE 5 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5
ACET014E BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MEK BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBK BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
RECOVERY
8410093
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
ACIDIBA: :ISEcT ;A. i)7- _ : . . :~3 : . . �:: .
23 :?-3'T r : .a"tr 4 :
~01 I "N DF :
G-3F :kYY: .-X.R E: . : .:DL
:Ek~E .% :-
eEN:Y : ALLOH,'L --r ? . .-O :CHI'CA'If!N '.E ED : :C AsTHRr.:EN: B: : . .
Cry
' a-~ETHYLFHENOL BDL IC EENZ :DE'~= ED : l~' .
..-y :'6'?BCD:-N-f- ."cr:R! :+JE An : :. f_!='I,2Y : :.?? ED~_ . .7 7
. :c`F :k : !DL E --'DL
' _-" :-Pif::`ENL E0: 1'. E : " r- ~-.~YY~1=~T~A:A' : S? ,
'I Ar.~ L --
: .c-. :C :Orti:=~tEx . !r.'=:A;'-i:A d:' : . .
TN: BD . 1:^ I :'ENC.!.:~.s7!:. .x~-'YRLt : - 3( : .-.-C;i;OACANILINS SD. 11' " :?E : '? :T!4AN?4FACENE ?Dl : :H:XAF.L0RC31'AEN : 8t': ' ` BE '.::~t . . . ._ FFFY:;K:
L~L
2-"?"rYLNAPHTHA ::R : BD! -7.`. 5'J ;i?C'iw* : "OJIlG:JAf ." : ~E C0 .
l~ExAC 0A0F.YCLC.'- :N?A~. :NE C'Jl 1T REC I;EF,
. .A . .-Tf.IChLURL'FLLN% Er.L : :-
JR :JNAFnT~§A ; BE, ID c' ~FENo.c-N :?rt ;'RNII:NE IDL 5L Y;Trt :;E=l: 11E~'~~ . :!' is
A:!%'A'h'HY_3NE. . R'?TF.r.'TCL~Jfk : BD: .r: TF-=s .̀i'r .-~:1-" :-.SqAN ::1flE !DL
A ; ;NA~~THEN°_ 8~ : !C!6Cf'EY:' ; BDl 30
c-N:TV?HENS: BDLBDL
DINI'F;'7:1 :5 :. . .- BC := :='i! ._cu- .A'-A'E !Dl :r. cD'_ _ =V-IL t~EC'I0N LI! :TC'C.". :^RC?~ENY: i~CN\' .c'~r; BDL ::t MET=[.'": RATE : (C CFR FART :3 ." . FRIDAY . ^:T('' . . . . . " .-FL%R:NE :DL .; : 'ETH; 6: ;
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
r'
Lab NurberSample Designation :ate Analyzed :
Aatrix :
VOLATILE ORGAIIICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHFIIIEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1 , 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1 ,1-DICHLOROETHAP:E1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZE14EETHYLBENZENE
DETECTION LIMIT(ug/L)
101055555555555555555
55555
5
ACETONE BDL 2 5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MEK BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBK BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBE14ZENE
CONCENTRATIO14(ug/L)BDLBDLBDLBDL
12BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
6BDLBDL
RECOVERYM
8610094
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846,
METHOD 8240
I
10,429-34`- 2332-335 Ft Soil Trav Blk #1
8/3/87- Water
2ND EDITION
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Laboratory Nur:ber : 10, 4_29-34Sample Designation. : 2332-335 Ft Soil Trv B1k #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Solid
COMPOUND
REPLICATE 1ug/g IN ug/g ug/g %REC-SAMPLE SPIRE FOUND OVERY
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 0 54 62 115TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0 67 70 104BENZENE 0 52 57 110TOLUENE 6 54 61 102CHLOROBENZENE 0 58 65 112
METHOD REFERE14CE : EPA SW 846, 214D EDITIO14 METHOD 8240
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
A.NE: . "7RA- -xTEA"a=--
P. ;K
CNC :N'RA' :C'ti DE'ECTIJN
iDl C' .2 .-N.TF"I ?D .
Y .
,- -CNL,~fi00 :',~~ :r- BD! C .3 :Cr'IF~EAr:W : ( : .ti-N : Tn 2 :! . . .
ESC . 3D! v .3 c EiC, ,'FF :k': . '-MEkER B :-. .3 " DICr:OE^? :+~:Er: :D : . .3 I'EXAC~L 106EN :t_NE KIL
BDL ^ .3 °E N!ACt~ OK:°MEtiC' . E.? :
:y :'': A!CGHO'. 6C! 0 . 3 %~ENA!:'. ~cc.yE :7L.: . . i1 :0% OE E BD! - .3 ANL EN: B^ : C .3
EN'4! BDL . .= : :-'~-:UTY!%N : .-.A :A' . ?, .- . .'
n!.`' NI : % :u! ' : :S : AN :A*,*A y6- .a' : . . . . "
.NA=-''T~A_ . .:-nt- . .,_ . .' :~.
. :?E~ :cFUiaS V! . .3UEK: 9DC ~.3
ID! : .3 :7 : - 1E:% DE-!.TION LI~:ED! F;FE%EN : . . .'A 5W :6- . :k'.' E:IT"N
BDL
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :
PCB'
PCB-1242PCB-1254PCB-1221PCB-1232PCB-1248PCB-1260PCB-1016
i
B-Pled.Blank
- 8/13/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uQ/0)
BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHODS 3540 AND 8080
r
DETECTION LIMIT(uW/Q)
0.080 .160 .080 .080 .080 .160 .08
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
SOIL MATRIX SPIRE
Date : 8/13/87 Sample Number : S-P102(10,429-28 PCB Solid)
PCB SMO CONC . SPIRE SAMPLE CONC .SAMPLE NO . ADDED (uQ/Q) RESULTS MS . REC.
(u4/fl) (uQ/a)
PCB 1254 1 .3 .47 .60 48
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
RESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC .-LABORATORY CONTROL SPIRE
LAB NUMBER 10429 DATE 8/12/87 SAMPLE DESIGNATION WP780
COMPOUND TRUE VALUE ACCEPTANCE ACTUALGUIDELINES RECOVERY
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether
"
55 12 .0 - 84 .8 40
Bis (2-Chlororthyl) ether 20 4 .3 - 29 .1 9
.33is (2-chloroethoxy) methane 35 8 .4 - 41 .6 50
4-chlorophenyi-phenylether 40 5 .2 - 64 .4 23
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 75 3 .3 - 129 48
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
SOIL-MATRIX SPIKE - - .-
DATE SAMPLE NUMBER - / O o~ ( 10, y a of -a$~PCs 5~(- t v
pCa SMOSAMPLE N0 .
CONC. SPIKEADDED (ug/ q)
SAMPLERESULTu
CONC .ITS . . REC.
-4q U6 `I1I
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
RESOURCE ANALYSTS, INC .LABORATORY CONTROL SPIKE
LAB NUMBER S~(O3 DATE SAMPLE DESIGNATION l D ~I~~J -~`~Cr3 Scat I D
COMPOUND TRUE VALUE ACCEPTANCE ACTUALGUIDELINES RECOVERY
coL1~~ la5y . . . I$ / . .off- .a'~. ..l~
r
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
._i-brary used : SY : ACIDS -lata file name : SY : %)L731H1
,section time : 31-JUL-87 0_8 :52 :58Iments :ACID/SURR 50 STD. A '(.I t7S
Dilution factor : 1 .00
, ibrary entries as follows :Cp~~NJinJG
Standards :1S 1#4-DICHLORODENZENE-D42S NAPHTHALENE-DS3S ACENAPHTHENE-D10 V -3 1 - S--7-4S PHENANTHRENE D105S CHRYSENE D12
Targets :1T PHENOL2T 2-CHLOROPHENOL3T 2-METHYLPHENOL4T 4-METHYLPHENOL5T 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL6T 2-NITROPHENOL7T BENZOIC ACID8T 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL9T 4-CHLORD-3-METHYLPHENOL
10T 2 .4.6-TR I CHLOROPHENOL11T 2 .4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL12T 2.4-DINITROPHENOL.3T 4-NITROPHENOL14T 4.6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL15T PENTACHLOROPHENOL
No . Time Scan Tmass/Smass Tarea/Sarea Ref Fit Conc Units
1S 8.10 285 STD 1 .00 40.0 UG/L2S 11 .10 534 STD 0.76 40.0 UG/L3S 15.58 906 STD 1 .00 40.0 UG/L4S 19.35 1219 STD 0.85 40.0 UG/L5S 26.32 1796 STD 0.74 40.0 UG/L1T 7.55 240 94. / 152. 42652. / 18539. 1 0.93 50.9 UG/L2T 7.72 254 128 . / 152 . 31483. / 18539. 1 0.96 48.4 UG/L3T 8.62 345 108. / 152. 28389. / 18539. 1 1.00 47.4 UG/L4T 9.18 375 107 . / 132 . 36655. / 18539. 1 1.00 48.2 UG/L
1 5T 10.42 478 107. / 136 . 28926. / 70413. 2 1.00 31 .1 UG/L6T 10.23 463 139. / 136. 11342 . / 70413. 2 1.00 38.9 UG /L7T 11 .05 530 122. / 136 . 11588. / 70413. 2 0.94 43.4 UG/L8T 10.82 511 63. / 136 . 13623 . / 70413. 2 0.67 48.2 UG/L9T 12.67 664 107. / 136 . 20061 . / 70413. 2 1 .00 37.2 UG/L10T 13.70 750 198 . / 164 . 10099. / 28946. 3 1.00 43 .2 UG/L11T 13.82 759 198. / 164 . 10263 . / 28946. 3 0.93 44.9 UG/L12T 15 .90 933 184 . / 164 . 559 . / 28946. 3 0.77 6 .8 UG/L13T 16 .10 899 65 . / 164 . 3341 . / 28946. 3 0.00 18.0 UG /L44T 17.28 1047 198 . / 188 . 1861 . / 41381 . 4 0.63 20.0 UG /LIT 19.10 1198 266 . / 188. 3533. / 41381 . 4 0.77 26.8 UG/L
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
39T 25.05 1692 149. / -240 . 26836. / 52368 . 5 0 .96 34 .6 UG/L . .40T 26.30 1795 228. / 240 . 31931 . / 52368. 5 0.96 33.0 UG/L41T 26.40 1804 228. / 240. 72047. / 52368. 5 0.93 53.0 UG/L?T 26.60 1821 149. / 240 . 43427. / 32368. 5 0.96 44.5 UG/L
,3T 28 .18 2068 149 . / 264. 47261 . / 20734 . 6 0.85 31 .0 UG/L44T 29. 03 2068 252 . / 264. 66526. / 20734 . 6 0.00 107.6 UG/L45T 29.25 2068 252. / 264. 66526. / 20734. 6 1 .00 100.4 UG/L46T 30.02 2068 232.-1_ 264. 21749. / 20734. 6 0.00 36.3 UG/L47T 34.35 2068 276 . / 264. 8305. / 20734. 6 0.00 26.5 UG/L48T 34 .48 2068 278. / 264. 4732. / 20734. 6 0.00 16.0 UG/L49T 35.47 2068 276. / 264. 6350. / 20734. 6 0.28 28.1 UG/LSOT 26.28 1745 252. / 240. 3446. / 52368. 5 0.00 17.2 UG/L51T 23.00 1472 184. / 188. 104. / 96320. 4 0.00 1 . 1 UG /L
'GOq.t%/g47. .
Co-v -n Piv j or G~titQ+~-f~.oJ
b- 3- a--
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Laboratory Number : 10,429-1Sample Designation : 2332-320 Fort Totten Soil #1Date Analyzed : 8/3/87Matrix : Soil
COMPOUND
1,1-DICHLOROETHENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENETOLUENECHLOROBE14ZENE
ug/g IN ug/gSAMPLE SPIKE
0 70 80 70 70 7
REPLICATE 1ug/g %REC-FOUND OVERY
8 12310 1198 1228 1219 131
REPLICATE 2ug/g % REC-FOUIJD OVERY
8 11210 1158 1158 1249 124
RELATIVRANGE
93525
METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION METHOD 8240
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
AC1~18ASE/NEUTRAL EXTRA~!A!' : OE~-ANIC
;r_ ;orr Nur: :,e^ : 10.G2~-2;3 .D :e Desivnr ior. : 2332-3 :0 Fort Totten Soil 1 :
Cue!! Ar:b :YZed : °l~~C)
~ : . . :s : :+G1 :~-r
. . . . .:'.'. . iYDre : :t : on a .'Y i'.Z deirees CI h.515 .
'i : :SI'~ff 16Cnten: : := .i+
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT C :NTZA? : .n :E-?;- ;-r;1j9" ;'~ !1!3/9) ~u;/y`
-n1T,'-� SO)InET!;YlAM1yE BDL 0 .1 E-NITRGANI;1NE BD,F=:FC! 3! ) .3 i . .-UINITF : .-n.?~Y:PH:NUL ?U'.Y :s !i-CH.0RC'ETHY. ETHEi! SOL 0 .3 !11 ?9!2-CK0RRCF01ER :- : BD! 0 .3 t-EFOMuFNW L-P~EKILETHER dU : . . .: .3-DI:P.L0RC°,ESZEN : BD : 0 .3 XEXACH'-0iHENIZENE 2G . . .,
:CHLORC!E:-°:~E BD! : .~ FENTA'H:Cpo%'n:hl' : 8. :A!CCH ."I ZDL C' . : fk:kAY'FF~N_° F:! _ . :
CH,0KCEh:Eh: BD : 0 .3 WXAACEN=
.-"E'dv:fHEtiO : BDL U .3 :-N-!LIT YLFN'rA,AT : ?J :c :s ~ :-C4F,L,1 FF. YI c1 H , BDl 10 .3 FLU ;:At"HENE RU : . .3d-ME'MYLFHENG! BD: 0 .3 SENMENE EDL 2H;iAC-:C,n;:TONE BDL 0.3 FFYF,1 :NT6'SC,I-N-?k:=(LA SDL 0 .3 °-J'Y';BENZYL;M' ALATE _)L ~.'til-R,~E :n1EN: BD : C.? 3 .3CH!)kOB:NZ7D!NE BD : . . .'50P~ORCNE 3DL C . : ?EN;CItiA%7i1.RACEIIE BD : C . .'
t,'ITFC:HEN0L SDL 0 .3 CHR,SENE Bt- ~ - .2,l-DIMETHY ;PHENO: SOL 0 .3 L :3!2-ETHYLHEXY :'FMTHALATE 0 .7 . . :BENZ :C ACID BDL I DI-N-OCTYLPH?HALATE BDL : .3Bis (2-CHLORETHOXYi METHANE SOL 0 .3 BENZO(b1FLUORANTHENE 1% C.!2 .C-DICKOPOPMENOL SOL 0.3 9EhZ0(k)FLU0FANTMENE B:! C.31 .2,4-TRICHLOR09ENZENE SOL 0 .3 BENZU(aiPYRENE BDL 0.3NAPHTHALENE SOL 0 .3 IDEN0l1 .2 .3-CA )PYRENE BDL 0.3c-CHLOROANILINE BDL 0 .3 DISENZ0(e.h)AN1hRACENE BD! C.3MEXACHLORUB,'TA,'IENE SOL 0 .3 BENZ0(q .r. .i)FERYLEN: BD: 10 .3c-CHLCk0-3-METFY;FHEN^! SOL 0 .3_-r:TyYItiAP~?HA:Eh: BD : 0 .3 SUFROCATE S1Ak :~ARGS RECOVER'c_xACHLOROCYCLOP;NTAC:a: SOL C' .3 RECCVEFY ACCEFTAN ; : ~ . .
i .6 .5-TUCHL0A0FHENOL !DL 1 ?-'L-;HENCLi-CM;^c, :NA-HTnA!ENE BDL 0 .3 d:-P+ :NO; :3 1C - 9~_-S7TF'AN'L1NE. 3DL 1 N7TR^~EV :ENE-C : 1-. 35 - . .+:.'." : ;MY! Pi;1r+A ATE BDL 0 .3 .-F : "PMEA?! 2c 0 - . . .A:?NA ;H:4YLESE BDL l .3 Tt?2~0 .".r,-.ucy,: 3~ : . .
- . .-u?K :?f070-CE'E SOL 0 .3 . .r.%H :NY. : :e 61.-N'7ROANa1NE ILL 1ACENAP=?MENE 8% D . :?,4-DIN:TROPHENOL SOLi-hl!k:'?HENO. SOL 1MENZOFURAN BDL 0 .3^ .G-DIA:TF':1G!UEkE BD: 0 .3-1 :ETMY.PHTHA!ATE BDL 0 .3 E~.! - Hlcu CETEC'I00N LIM!T.-CHLCR0FHENYL-FHW::THEF BDL J .3 flE!HOU REFERENCE . E;A SW 2ND Er.1T?L'kFLUCRENE E.l 0.3 4ETHOD ;550 :?:? ;'
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
ield Identification : 2332-341 FT Sediment #1 Matrix : Solid-boratory Number : 10,430-2
Date.arameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
ilver, recoverable (uq/p)-- 7/29/87 6010/1 <1rsenic, recoverable (ug/g) 8/12/87 7060/1 4 .9Barium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <10^admium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .5hromium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 13
mercury, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 7471/1 0 .27Lead, recoverable (u9/9) 7/29/87 6010/1 210lelenium, recoverable (ug/g) 8/14/87 7740/1 <1
r"ield Identification : 2332-342 FT Sediment "2 Matrix : Solid,aboratory Number : 10,`30-5
Datelarameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <1irsenic, recoverable (ug/g) 8/12/87 7060/1 5.03arium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 18Cadmium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1- <0 .5,Chromium, recoverable.(uq/p) 7/29/87 6010/1 19
"ercury, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 7.71/1 0 .20:ad, recoverable (ug/g) 7/19/87 6010/1 225
Selenium, recoverable (uq/Q) 8/14/87 7740/1 <1
Field Identification : 2332-343 FT Sediment #3 Matrix : Soliduaboratory Number : 10,- "30-8
\ DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (up/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <1Arsenic, recoverable (ug/g) 8/12/87 7060/1 2 .8Barium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <10Cadmium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .5Chromium, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 12-Mercury, recoverable (ug/Q) 7/29/87 7.71/1 0 .15Lead, recoverable (ug/g) 7/29/87 6010/1 270Selenium, recoverable (ug/g) 8/14/87 77 .0/1 <1
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Field Identification : 2332-344 FT Sediment 64 Matrix : SolidLaboratory Number : 10,430-11
Date,rameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (uQ/0) 7/29/87 6010/1 <2Arsenic, recoverable (uq/Q) 8/12/87 7060/1 4 .6Barium, recoverable (u0/Q) 7/29/87 6010/1 27Cadmium, recoverable (ug/Q) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .6Chromium, recoverable (uq/9) 7/29/87 6010/1 14Mercury, recoverable (uQ/Q) 7/29/87 7471/1 0 .28Lead, recoverable WOO 7/29/87 6010/1 190Selenium, recoverable WOO 8/14/87 7740/1 <1
Field Identification : 2332-346 FT Sod Samp Blk Matrix : WaterLaboratory Number : 10,430-13
DateParameter Analyzed Method/Reference Concentration
Silver, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .01Arsenic, recoverable (mg/L) 8/12/87 7060/1 <0 .01
. Barium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1 <0 .1Cadmium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1 (0 .005Chromium, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 6010/1_ (0 .01Mercury, recoverable .(mg/L) 7/29/87 7470/1 (0 .0005Lead, recoverable (mg/L) 7/29/87 7421/1 (0 .005elenium, recoverable (mg/L) 8/14/87 7740/1 (0 .01
References : 1) EPA SW 846, 2nd Edition
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
Lab Number : 10430 - Site : Fort TottenUnits : mg/L
METALS :
r
True Value Found %R Method
Arsenic 0 .050 0 .048 96 7060
Barium 20 .0 20 .0 100 7080
Cadmium 0 .50 0 .492 98 7130
Chromium 1 .0 0 .985 98 .5 7190
Lead 10 .0 10 .0 100 7420
Mercury 0 .0050 0 .00515 103 7470
Selenium 0 .050 0 .009 99 77 .0
Silver 1 .0 0 .998 99 .8 7760
1) Control Limits : Mercury and Tin 80-120 ; Other Metals 90-1102) Indicate Analytical Method Used : P-ICP ; A-Flame AA ; F-Furnace AA
CALIBRATION VERIFICATION SOURCES
Dilution of Commercial Ah Standard unless otherwise specified .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
QUALITY ASSURANCE/~~UAL17
- - MERCURY
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
`HgB 68
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10430-8 2332-343
3. Precision
Results- (ua/a)
c0 .05
OriginalConcentration Spike Level
(uo/a) WO/0)
0.15 0 .99
f Replicate 1 Replicate 2Sample Field I .D . (ua/a) WO/0)
10430-8 2332-343 0 .14 0 .16
SILVER
. . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sam
1 10429-310429-21
3 . Prec
Sam
10429-310429-21
Field I .D .
2332-3202332-316
ision
Field I .D .
2332-3202332-326
Results,duo/a)
<0 .5
TotalConcentration
FoundWO/0)
1 .18
AverageWO/0)
0.15
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found(ua/a) (ua/a) (ua/a)
<1 7.2 7 .0ti 6.0 5 .8
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average(ua/a) (ua/c) (ua/a)
<1 <1 c1<1 <l c1
kRecovery
104
kRelative
Rance
13
Recovery
9797
RelativeRange
NCNC
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sampl e Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Sample Field I.D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332 326
ARSENIC
Results(ua/a)
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found(ua/o) WO/0) (ua/o)
19 7 .2 22 .520 6 .0 22 .8
Recovery
4947
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative(ua/a) (ua/a) (ua/a) Rance
20 18 19 10 .521 19 20 10
BARIUM
Results(ua/a)
c10
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found(ua/a) (ua/a) (uala) Recovery
94 724 757 915 602 617 102
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average Relative(ua/a) (ua/a) (ua/a) an e
93 95 94 258 56 57 3.5
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2. Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
1. Blank Data
Blank NumberI
MB 366
Z. Accuracy
Sam Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3. Precision
Sam Yield I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
CADMIUM
Results_ (ua/a)
<0 .5
Originalconcentration Spike Level
(use/o) (ua/a)
0 .72 72(0 .6 60 .2
Replicate 1Wala)
0 .69<0 .6
Replicate 2(ug o)
0 .74<0 .6
CHROMIUM
Results(ua/a)
<1
OriginalConcentration Spike Level
(ua/a) (ua/o)
39 72527 602
Replicate 1(ua/a)
3826
Replicate 2(ua/a)
3927
TotalConcentration
Found % .(uo/G) Recovery
71 9855 90
Average Relative(uo/a) _ Ranae
0 .72 6 .9<0 .6 NC
TotalConcentration
Found(ua/a)
796640
Recovery
104102
Average(up/a)
3927
RelativeBanco
2 .63 .7
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
ARIVM
Blank DataResults
Blank Number - m L
MB 367 <0 .1
2 . AccuracyTotal
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found %
sample Field I .D . (m°/L) (ma/L) m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 0 .2 5.0 4 .94 95
3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Ranoe
10465-3 2332-301 0 .1 0 .2 0.2 50
CHROMIUM
Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 367
Z. Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10465-3 1332-301
3 . Precision
Sam Field I .D .
' 10465-3 2332-301
Results(mo/L)
<0 .01
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level roundm L (ma/L) Sma/L) Recovery
0 .031 5 .0 5.4 107
Replicate 1 Replicate 2(mss/L) (ma/L)
0 .032 0 .029
Average(ma/L)
0.031
Relativean e
9 .7
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
CAL
1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number ` m L
MB 367 - <0 .1
2 . `Accuracy_
.Total
Original ConcentrationConcentration Spike Level Found %
Sample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .1 5 .0 4 .97 99
T3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L (ma/L) m L Rance
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .1 <0 .1 <0 .1 NC
NC - not calculable due to results below detection limit .
SELENIUM
1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number m L -
MB 367 <0 .012. Accuracy
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level FoundSample frield"I .D . (Mo/L) (ma/L-) (mQ/L) Recovery
10465-3 1332-301 <0 .01 0 .05 - 0 .0111 22
3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I.D . (mo/L) (mo/L) (ma/L) an e
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01 NC
NC a not calculable due to results below detection limit .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
SILVER
Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 367
2 . Accuracy
-Resultsm L
<0 .02
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %Sample Field I .D . m L m L m L Recovery
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 0 .05 0 .053 106
3 . Precision
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Average RelativeSample Field I .D . m L m L m L Range
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01 NC
CADMIUM
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
NB 367
2 . Accuracy
. Sample Field I .D .
10465-3 2332-301
3. Precision
Resultsm L
(0 .005
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Foundm L (ma/L) (ma/L) Recovery
(0 .005 0 .5 0 .477 94
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (ma/L) (ma/L) m L
10465-3 2332-301 (0 .005 (0 .005 (0 .005
NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit .
RelativeRanee
NC
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
l . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-320- 10429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
SELENIUM
`Results(uc/o)
c1
OriginalConcentration Spike Level
(ua/a) WO/0)
<1 7 .2(l 6 .0
TotalConcentration
FoundWO/0) Recovery
4 .1 572 .6 43
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . (uQ/o) (ua/a) (uo/a )
10429-3 2332-320 c1 <1 <110429-21 2332-326 <1 <1 c1
NC - Not calculable due to result below detection limit.
LEAD
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 366
2 . Accuracy
I
t Sample Field I .D .
10429-3 2332-32010429-21 2332-326
3 . Precision
Results(ua/0,
<1
OriginalConcentration Spike Level
(ua/a) (uo/Q)
40 71445 602
RelativeRange
NCNC
TotalConcentration
Found %(ua/o) Recovery
684 89578 89
Replicate 1 Replicate Z AverageSam field I .D . (uo/a) (ua/a) (ua/a)
10429-3 2332-320 40 40 4010429-21 2332-326 47 43 45
RelativeRance
08 .9
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
1 . Blank Data
Blank Number
MB 367
2 . Accuracy
Sam 1e Field I .D .
10465-3 2332-301if ''
3 . Precision
ARSENIC
Results-_ m L
<0 .01
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %m L m L m L Recovery
<0 .1 0 .05 0 .0427 85
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . m L m L m L
10465-3 2332-301 <0 .01 <0 .01 <0 .01
NC = Not calculable due to result below detection limit .
' MERCURY
1 . Blank DataResults
Blank Number (ma/L)
j MB 367 0.0005
2. Accuracy
Samflle Field I .D .
10465-3 2332-301
3 . Precision
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found(mo/L) (ma/L) (ma/L)
<0 .0005 0 .01 0 .00755
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSam l Field I .D . ,(ma/L) (ma/L) (ma/L)
10465-3 2332-301 (0 .0005 0.0005 (0.0005
NC - Not calculated due to result below detection limit.
RelativeRange
NC
Recovery
76
Relativean e
NC
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
QC DATA FOR PESTICIDES
1 . Laboratory Control Sample
-_ AcceptanceTrue Value Found Recovery Limits
I . (uQ/Q) SWO/0)
S-P105 Lindane 0 .2 0 .12 61 56 - 123Heptachlor 0 .2 0 .096 48 40 - 131Aldrin 0 .2 0 .11 57 40 - 120Dieldrin 0 .5 0 .27 54 52 - 126Endrin 0 .5 0.26 51 56 - 121DDT 0 .5 0 .14 27 32 - 127
2 . Blank
Blank Number
D 107No compounds detected .
3 . Mid-Range Calibration - Check
(True)Calibration Calibrati on
Standard Value Value %Compound 8-5-87 8-6-87 Recovery
(uq/mL) (uq/mL)
Lindane 0.025 0.020 79Heptachlor .050 .Aldrin 050 .0.1 82Heptachlor spoxide .050 .041 82Endosultan 1 .10 .075 75Dieldrin .050 .040 80Endosultan 2 .050 .038 76Endrin Aldehyde .125 .089 71
I DDT .10 .028 (100)Methoxychlor .50 .19 38
alpha BBC .025 .023 92beta BBC .050 .043 86delta BBC .050 .044 88aldrin .050 .041 82DDE .050 .041 82endrin .050 .041 82DDD .10 .081 81endosultan sulfate .10 .080 80endrin ketone .10 .073 73
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
d . Precision
Wipes were unable to ba-subsampled for precision assesment .
Accuracy
Wipes were unable to be subsampled for accuracy assesment .
11
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
' QC DATA FOR PETROLEUM HYDROCARBOIV5
1. Laboratory Control SampleTrue Value
I . (ma/L)
5-15 5 .04SD-13 5 .04
Foundm L
5 .05 .4
Recovery
99107
2. Mid Range Calibration Check Sample
True Value Found(mo/L) m L
50 53
3 . Blank
Blank Number Results
261 c60 uQ/Q260 (1 mq/L
4 . Precision
Recovery(%L-
106
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 AverageSample Field I .D . WO/0) ,qua/°) (uQ/a)
.0439-9 2332-343 190 150 170
t5 . Accuracy
RelativeRan e
24
TotalOriginal Concentration
Concentration Spike Level Found %Sampl e Field I .D . (uc/a) (ua/a) (ua/a) Recovery
10430-3 2332-341 220 320 710 15610430-11 2332-344 280 630 660 60
J
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Analysis : Petroleum Hydrocarbons (uq/Q) Matrix : SolidMethod/Reference : 503B,D,VStandard Methods, 16th Edition"ate Analyzed : August 4, 1987
Field Identification Lab . No . Concentration
2332-341 FT Sediment #1 ` 10,430-3 2202332-342 FT Sediment #2 10,430-6 2802332-343 FT Sediment #3 10,438-9 1502332-344 FT Sediment #4 10,430-11 280 .
Analysis : Petroleum Hydrocarbons (uq/Q) Matrix : WaterMethod/Reference : 503B,D,E/Standard Methods, 16th EditionDate Analyzed : August 4, 1987
rField Identification Lab . No . Concentration
2332-346 FT Sod Sam Blk 10,430-14 c1 .0
k It
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
y
f
Lab Number : _-Sample Designation :-Date Analyzed :Matrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCNLOROMETHJINEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE '1,1, Z , 2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE
10, "30-12332-3.1 FT Sediment "18/04/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uQ/0)BDLDDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/Q)
11
0 .51
0.50.50.50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 1 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2. 5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0.5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d"-DICHLOROETHRNEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 946,
METHOD 8240
RECOVERY
e78981
2ND EDITION
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
70 - 12181 - 1177" - 121
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : -Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :latrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE2,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE
. CHLOROFORM1, 2-DICHLOROETHIUJE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE
10,430-d2332-3`2 FT Sediment 828/04/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uQ/0)BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(up/Q)
11
0 .51
0.50 .50.50 .50.50 .50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50.50 .50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50.50.50 .50 .5
' ACETONE BDL 2 .5,CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MER BDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBK BDL 1 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
(R) (BId4-DICHLOROETHANE S" 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 84 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 83 7" - 111
DDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 8.6, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated
METHOD 82.0
f
Lab Number : - 10,430-7Sample Designation : 2332-343 PT Sediment 93Date Analyzed : 8/04/87tatrix : Solid
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/Q) (up/0)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 1CHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE BDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM DDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5-1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 0.51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE DDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .5BENZENE BDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 0.5'-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER DDL - 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DDL 0 .5BROMOFORM DDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .5TOLUENE DDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE BDL . 0 .5ETHYLBENZENE 5DL 0.5
ACETONE DDL 1 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF DDL 2 .5MER DDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE DDL 1MIBK DDL 2 .52-HEXANONE DDL 2 .5STYRENE DDL 0 .5XYLENES SDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
RECOVERY
869060
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121
BDL w BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :tatrix :
10,430-102332-344 FT Sediment 848/04/87Solid
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uW/0) (u0/9)
CHLOROMETHANE DDL 1VINYL CHLORIDE DDL 1CHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .5BROMOMETHANE DDL 1METHYLENE CHLORIDE DDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .51,1-DICHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .5CHLOROFORM DDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROETHANE 9DL 0 .5-1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 0 .5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DDL 0 .5BROMODICHLOROMETBANE DDL 0 .51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DDL 0 .51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE DDL 0 .5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 0 .5BENZENE DDL 0 .51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE DDL 0 .51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 0 .52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER DDL 0 .5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE DDL 0 .5BROMOFORM DDL 0 .5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DDL 0 .51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHARE NDL 0 .5TOLUENE RDL 0 .5CHLOROBENZENE DDL 0 .5ETHYLBENZBNE sDL 0 .5
ACETONE DDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE SDL 0 .5THF DDL 2 .5MER DDL 2 .5VINYL ACETATE DDL 1MIBR DDL 2.52-HEXANONE DDL 2.5STYRENE SDL 0.5XYLENES DDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENE
RECOVERY(" )
989078
ACCEPTANCE LIMITSM
70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated
METHOD 8240
Lab Number : - 10,430-12Sample Designation : _ 2332-346 FT Sod Sam BlkDate Analyzed : 8/04/87Matrix : Water
i
f
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT'- (uQ/L) (uQ/L)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE ' BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5NETHYLENE CHLORIDE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL
_5
3ROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5
ACETONE BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MER BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBR BDL 25Z-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 5XYLENES BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
d4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 76 - 11"d8-TOLUENE 100 88 - 110BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 83 86 - 115
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW $46, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated
METHOD 8240
Lab Number :Sample Designation:Date Analyzed :Matrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1,2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANEZ-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZZNE
CONCENTRATIONREP. 1 REP. 2(uU/L) (up/L)DDL BDLDDL BDLDDL BDLBDL DDLBDL DDLBDL BDLBDL BDLDDL BDLDDL BDLBDL BDLDDL BDLDDL DDLBDL DDLBDL BDLBDL BDLBDL BDLDDL BDLBDL DDLDDL BDLBDL BDLBDL DDLBDL BDLBDL BDLDDL DDLBDL BDLDDL DDLDDL DDL
DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/L)10105 _555555555555555555555555
ACETONE DDL BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE 8DL DDL 5TRY DDL DDL 25MER BDL DDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL DDL 10MIBR DDL DDL 252-HEXANONE DDL DDL 25STYRENE DDL BDL 5XYLENES SDL DDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYREP . 1 REP . 2
d4-DICHLOROETHANE 92 92d8-TOLUENE 96 94BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 85 83
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : ZPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
KSTHOD 8240
10,430-152332-348 FT Sod Trav Blk8/04/87Water
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
70 - 12181 - 11774 - 121
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :,)ate Analyzed :Matrix :
PESTICIDES
ALDRINALPHA-BHC
-- BETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4 , 4 ' -DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDETOXAPHENEENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLOR
' 10,430-162332-350 Fort Totten Wipe "18/07/87Solid
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/wipe) (ufl/Wipe)
BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .05
4 .2 0 .011 .1 0 .01
0 .69 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
" Pesticide identification is tentative .needed for positive identification .
GC confirmation is
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed :Matrix :
PESTICIDES
ALDRINALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN II
i ENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLOR3EPTACHLOR EPOXIDETOXAPHENEENDRIN KETONEMETHOXYCHLOR
10,430-172332-351 Fort Totten Wipe #28/07/87Solid
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/wipe) (ufl/Wipe)
BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .05
1 .7 0.010 .29 0 .010 .42 0.01
BDL 0.01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CYR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
ti " Pesticide identification is tentative . GC confirmation is
needed for positive identification .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :°ample Designation :ite Analyzed :
matrix :
PESTICIDES
ALDRINALPHA-BHC
_ BETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE''OXAPHENEIDRIN KETONE
METHOXYCHLORi
-- 10,430-182332-352 Fort Totten Wipe "3
_ 8/07/87Solid
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/wipe) (uq/wipe)
BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .05
3 .2 0 .010.05 0 .010 .53 0 .01
BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL _ 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05
' BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
" Pesticide identification is tentative . OC confirmation isneeded for positive identification .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
".aboratory Number : 10,430-19ample Designation: 2332-353 Fort Totten Wipe 6a
Date Analyzed : 8/07/87Matrix : Solid
PESTICIDES CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/wipe) (up/wipe)
ALDRIN BDL 0 .005ALPHA-BHC BDL 0 .005
` BETA-BHC BDL 0 .005GAMMA-BHC BDL 0 .005DELTA-BHC BDL 0 .005CHLORDANE BDL 0 .054,41-DDT 4 .1 0 .014,4'-DDE 0 .2 0 .014,4'-DDD 0 .8 0 .01DIELDRIN BDL 0 .01ENDOSULFAN I BDL 0 .005ENDOSULFAN II BDL 0 .01
' ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 0 .01' ENDRIN BDL 0 .01
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 0 .01HEPTACHLOR BDL 0 .005HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BDL 0 .005`OXAPHENE BDL 10ENDRIN KETONE BDL 0 .01
F METHOXYCHLOR BDL 0 .05
BDL s BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : "0 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
Pesticide identification is tentative .needed for positive identification .
GC confirmation is
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :sample Designation :ate Analyzed :
Matrix :
PESTICIDES
ALDRINALPHA-BHCBETA-BHC
r GAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDT
r14,4'-DDS4,4'-DDDDIELDRIN
' ENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRIN
' ENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE'"OXAPHENEHDRIN KETONE
METHOXYCHLOR
-- 10,430-202332-354 Fort Totten Wipe 65
_ 8/07/87Solid
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uq/wipe) (uQ/wipe)
BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .05
2 .3 0 .01.72 0 .01.60 0.01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0.01BDL 0.01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .005BDL 0 .005BDL 10BDL 0 .01BDL 0 .05
' BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
Pesticide identification is tentative . GC confirmation isneeded for positive identification .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :ample Designation :
date Analyzed :Matrix :
PESTICIDES
ALDRINALPHA-BHC
j BETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANE4,4'-DDTd,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDEHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDEOXAPHENE
ENDRIN KETONEI- METHOXYCHLOR
10,430-112332-356 PT Wipe Sam . Blk8/07/87Solid
REP 1 REP ZCONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/wipe) (uQ/wipe)
BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .05BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0.01BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 0 .005BDL BDL 10BDL BDL 0 .01BDL BDL 0 .05
BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CYR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : Laboratory Control Sample.Sample Designation :- C3823Date Analyzed : 8/03/87Matrix : Water
VOLATILE ORGANICS TRUE CONC . DETECTION %VALUE FOUND LIMIT RECOVERY(uQ/L) (uQ/L) (uQ/L)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL DDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE BDL BDL ' 10CHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5 .BROMOMETHANE BDL BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 98 .0 65 .9 5 671,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL BDL 5CHLOROFORM 60 .4 39 .3 5 651,2-DICHLOROETHANE 90 .2 85 .0 5 941,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 73 .8 25 .4 5 34CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 92 .7 22 .8 5 24BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 84 .5 77 .7 5 923,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 55 .1 22 .3 5 40BENZENE BDL BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL BDL 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL DDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 71 .7 89 .0 5 124BROMOFORM 97 .8 122 5 125TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 48 .0 19 .0 5 39
1 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL BDL 5TOLUENE BDL BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE 79 .1 55 .6 5 70ETHYLBENZENE BDL BDL 5
ACETONE BDL BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL BDL 5THF BDL BDL 25MER BDL BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL BDL 10MIBK DDL BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 8DL 25STYRENE DDL BDL 5XYLENES DDL BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERY
d4-DICHLOROETHANEd8-TOLUENEBROMOFLUOROBENZENZ
RECOVERY
100106102
ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
76 - 11488 - 11086 - 115
BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ---METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW $46, 2ND EDITION Resource Analysts, Incorporated
METHOD 8240
Lab Number : - Calibration VerificationSample Designation : C3849Date Analyzed : - 8/04/87Matrix : Water
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONC . OF CONC . % DETECTIONSTANDARD FOUND RECOVERY LIMIT(u9/L) (uQ/L) (uq/L)
CHLOROMETHANE 50 24 48 10VINYL CHLORIDE 50 29 58 10CHLOROETHANE 50 25 50 5BROMOMETHANE 50 24 48 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 50 53 106 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 50 50 100 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE 50 57 114 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE 50 46 92 5CHLOROFORM 50 42 84 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE 50 40 8D 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 50 34 68 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 50 32 64 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 50 42 84 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 50 54 108 51,3-traps-DICHLOROPROPSNE 38 40 105 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE 50 37 74 5BENZENE 50 49- 98 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE 62 53 85 51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 50 56 112 52-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 50 31 62 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 50 40 80 5BROMOFORM 50 45 90 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 50 34 68 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 50 57 114 5TOLUENE 50 52 104 5CHLOROBENZENE 50 42 84 5ETHYLBENZENE 50 46 92 5
ACETONE 50 43 86 25CARBON DISULFIDE 'SO 33 66 5THF 50 76 152 25MER 50 72 144 25VINYL ACETATE 50 58 116 10MIBK 50 72 144 252-HEXANONE 50 71 142 25STYRENE 50 46 92 5XYLENBS 134 130 97 5
BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Lab Number : BlankSample Designation :- -Date Analyzed : 8/04/87Matrix : - Water
VOLATILE ORGANICS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT(uQ/L) (ug/L)
CHLOROMETHANE BDL 10VINYL CHLORIDE > BDL 10CHLOROETHANE BDL 5BROMOMETHANE BDL 5METHYLENE CHLORIDE 13 51,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5CHLOROFORM BDL 51,2-DICHLOROETHANE BDL 51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 5BROMODICHLOROMETHANE BDL 51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 51,3-trans-DICHLOROPROPENE BDL 5TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 5BENZENE BDL 51,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPSNE BDL 52,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 5Z-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER BDL 5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE BDL 5BROMOFORM BDL 5TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 51,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 5TOLUENE BDL 5CHLOROBENZENE BDL 5ETHYLBENZENE BDL 5
ACETONE BDL 25CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 5THF BDL 25MER BDL 25VINYL ACETATE BDL 10MIBR BDL 252-HEXANONE BDL 25STYRENE BDL 53CYLENES BDL 5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITS
«) «)d4-DICHLOROETHANE 90 76 - 114d8-TOLUENE 101 88 - 110BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 87 86 - 115
BDL s BELOW DETECTION LIMIT ------ - ---METHOD REFERENCE : EPA 3W 846 . 2ND ZDITION
IncorporatedResource AnalystsMETHOD 8240 ,
i~-
Lab Number :Sample Designation :Date Analyzed : --Matrix :
VOLATILE ORGANICS
CHLOROMETHANEVINYL CHLORIDECHLOROETHANEBROMOMETHANEMETHYLENE CHLORIDE1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE1,1-DICHLOROETHANE1,2-trans-DICHLOROETHYLENECHLOROFORM1, 2-DICHLOROETHANE1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANECARBON TETRACHLORIDEBROMODICHLOROMETHANE1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE1,3-traps-DICHLOROPROPENETRICHLOROETHYLENEBENZENE1,3-cis-DICHLOROPROPENE1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHERDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMTETRACHLOROETHYLENE1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANETOLUENECHLOROBENZENEETHYLBENZENE
Blank 100 MEC38478/04/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uq/Q)BDLBDLBDLBDL1 .7BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLDDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL.7
BDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT(up/Q)
11
0 .51
0 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50.50.50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .5
ACETONE BDL 2 .5CARBON DISULFIDE BDL 0 .5THF BDL 2 .5MEK BDL 2 . 5VINYL ACETATE BDL 1MIBR BDL 2 .52-HEXANONE BDL 2 .5STYRENE BDL 0 .5XYLENES BDL 0 .5
SURROGATE STANDARDS RECOVERYRECOVERY ACCEPTANCE LIMITSW M
d4-DICHLOROETHANE 84 70 - 121d8-TOLUENE 92 81 - 117BROMOFLUOROBENZENE 81 74 - 121
BDL " BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITION
METHOD 8240 Resource Analysts, Incorporated
MATUX SPACE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Laboratory Number : 10,430-10Sample Designation : 2332-344 FT Sediment 94Date Analyzed : 8/04/87Matrix : Water
REPLICATE 1 REPLICATE 2 RELATIV .ug/L IN ug/L ug/L ,%REC- ug/L % REC- RANGE
COMPOUND SAMPLE SPIRE FOUND OVERY FOUND OVERY %
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 0 50 70 140 77 154 10I TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0 52 78 150 89 171 13
BENZENE 0 48 60 125 69 144 14TOLUENE 9 48 63 113 72 131 13CHLOROHENZENE 0 53 70 132 81 153 15
METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITIONMETHOD 8240
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
.
MATFaX SPIRE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Laboratory Number : 10,430-12 __ .Sample Designation : 2332=346 FT Sed Sam BlkDate Analysed : 8/04/87Matrix : Water
REPLICATE 1 REPLICATE 2 RELATIVIuQ/L IN uQ/L uQ/L %REC- uQ/L % REC- RANGE
COMPOUND SAMPLE SPACE FOUND OVERY FOUND OVERY
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 0 50 79 158 82 164 4TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0 52 89 171 87 167 2BENZENE 0 48 67 140 66 138 2TOLUENE 0 48 69 144 67 140 3CHLOROBENZENE 0 53 79 149 77 145 3
METHOD REFERENCE : EPA SW 846, 2ND EDITIONMETHOD 8240
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
Laboratory Number :Sample Designation :ate Analyzed :
_jatrix :
PESTICIDES
ALDRINALPHA-BHCBETA-BHCGAMMA-BHCDELTA-BHCCHLORDANEa,4'-DDT4,4'-DDE4,4'-DDDDIELDRINENDOSULFAN IENDOSULFAN IIENDOSULFAN SULFATEENDRINENDRIN ALDBHYDEHEPTACHLORHEPTACHLOR EPOXIDETOXAPHENE'NDRIN KETONEAETHOXYCHLOR
B-M107Blank8/10/87Solid
CONCENTRATION(uQ/wipe)
BDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDLBDL
DETECTION LIMIT' (up/wipe)
0 .0050 .0050.0050 .0050 .0050 .050 .010 .010 .010 .01
0 .0050 .010 .010 .010 .01
0 .0050 .005
100 .010 .05
BDL s BELOW DETECTION LIMITMETHOD REFERENCE : 40 CFR PART 136, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1984
METHOD 608
' " Pesticide identification is tentative . GC confirmation isneeded for positive identification .
Resource Analysts, Incorporated
APPENDIX E
QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE RESULTS
63
TABLE F.1 - FIELD 01»LICATE ANALYSIS
AGUEGUS SAMPLES 2332-302 233;-306 (x) (Z)w/L tig/L
Volatile Organies NO NO -- <30
Extractable organic*
8102-sthylWyl)phthslste 120,000 95,000 20 <30
Total Petals
Silver ss A, <10 <10 0 <30Arsenic as As 16 1a 12 <30Barium as b 230 190 19 <30Cdbium p Cd <S <S 0 <30Chromium se Cr 97 71 31 <30Mercury M 110 <.S <.S 0 <30Lead as Pb <30 16 61 <30Selenium as Se <10 <10 0 <30
S-3 S-3SOIL SAMPLES Field Duplicate Relative GAir
2332-322 2332-328 of ffefenee ObJKtiveug/kf ug/k' (X) (x)
Volatile Organies LID ND -- <30
Extractable Organies
§is(2-ettqrlhwl)phtb@tste 1,500 1,100 30 <30
TALE F.1 - FIELD DtfICATE ANAlrsis continued
SOIL SAMPLESs-3
2332-322
Total Itetate u0/ke
$1 War as AS 1,100Arsenic as As 15,000Ilariuw as Be 76,000Cedoium as Cd 530Chromium as Cr 32,000Mercury as 11, 420teed as Pb 80,000Selenium as se 41,000
fed-3SEDIMENT SAMPLES
2332-341u0/k9
s-3Field Duplicate Relative CAPP
ObjectiveM
23327A28 DifferenceM
uo/k#*
<2,000 5816,000 6100,000 27
4800 4142,000 27
450 790,000 1241,000 0
sed-3Field Duplicate Relative2332-344 Difference
us/its tx)
volatile Organics RD IA
Total Metals
silver 41,000 42,000 67Arsenic 4,900 4,600 6Sarium 410,000 27,000 92Cadmium 4500 <M 18Chromium 13,000 14,000 7Mercury 270 280 4lead 210,000 190,000 1sselenium 41,000 41,000 0
RD a Not Detected, ail volatile organics compounds were below detection limits" dry wt basisRotative X difference Range X 100
Mess
<30
<30430430<3 .430430
0APVObjective
cx~
00
030430<0430430430430<30
TABLE F.2 - LAOORATORT SAMPLE PIKES
a-1SOIL SAMPLE Simple 2332-320
Replicate 1 Replicate 2uo/kr uuke W/k0' Z uY/ke % Relative OAPV
CORmurd In Sample Spike Found Recovery Found Recovery % Difference Objective(X)
1,1 Dichloroethene 0 7,000 0,000 122 8,000 112 9 <30Trichlorethylene 0 0,000 10,000 119 10,000 115 3 <30semem 0 7,000 0,000 122 0,000 115 S <30Toluene 0 7,000 8.000 121 8,000 124 2 <30Chloreben:ens 0 7,000 9,000 131 9,000 124 S <30
*dry wt basisXRecovery " Amount found - amount in saxple x 100
amount spiked
Relative Percent Dlfference a Range X 100man
AGWON SAMPLE
UVI. U511 .Calpou+d In !ample Spike
1,1 01chlorosthene 0 S4Trichloretkylene 0 67Ouuens 0 52Toluene 0 S"Chlorobentane 0 so
Mw-1sample 2332-301
Replicate 1 Replicate 2us/l. % u0/l % Relative OAPPFound Recoaenr Found Recovery X Difference Objective
(X)60 126 SS 102 21 <3067 100 S9 80 13 <30se 112 S3 102 9 <30S4 100 40 09 12 <3061 105 S6 97 9 00
TABLE F.2-LA"ORATORT SAMPLE SPIKES continued
AQUEOUS SAMPLES
Total Metals
SilverArsenicBar iuscadmiumChromiumMercuryLeadSelenium
SOIL SAMPLES
Total Metals
silverArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadSelenium
Total 1letsls
siloArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumLeadSelenium
IRI-1Sample 2332-301
Original Spike TotalConcentration level i Concentration %
us/L ug/L Found ug/L Recovery
se Aq -CIO so 53 106as As 'C10 SO 42.7 e5e. me 200 5,000 4,940 95as cd <5 500 477 94as Cr 31 9,000 5,400 107ss Rg <0.9 10 7.6 76as Pb <1OO 9,000 4,970 99ss Se <10 50 11 .1 22
a-1Sample 2332-320
Original Spike TotalConcentration Level Concentration
W/kg" uq/kg" Found ug/kg" Recovery
me Ag 41,000 7,200 7,000 97se As 09,000 7,200 22,500 49es se 94,000 724,000 757,000 91e. Cd 720 72,000 71,000 96as. Cr 39,000 M,000 7%,000 104se Pb 40,000 724,000 "4,000 e9,s Se 0,000 7,200 4,100 57
S-7Sample 2332-326
Original Spike TotalConcentration Level Concentration 11
uq/kg" ug/kg" Found ug/kg* Recovery
se Ag 41,000 6,000 5,800 97ss As 20,000 6,000 22,800 .7u so 5,000 602,000 617,000 102ss Cd 4600 60,200 55,000 90.. Cr 27,000 602,000 640,000 102an /b 45,000 602,000 576,000 89" Se 41,000 6,000 2,600 43
OAVPObjective
(X)
70-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-130
GAOPObjective
tX)
70-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-130
OAVVObjective
(X)
70-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-13070-130
TALE F .2 - LABORATORY SAMPLE SPIKES continued
SEDIWRT SAMPLESSaxple 2332-341
Original Spike Total LAPPConcentration Level Concentration x Objective
ug/ke ug/ke Found ug/ke Recovery (x)
Petrole w Rpdroesrbon~ 220,000 320,000 710,000 156 70-130
Sed-iField DuplicateSexple 2332-344
Original Spike Total apPPConcentration Level Concentration x Objective
ug/ke ug/ke Found ug/k0" Recovery (X)
Patroleun Rydrociiboro 250,000 630,000 660,000 60 70-130
Sad-3Wple 2332-343
Original Spike Total LAPPConcentration Level Concentration x Objective
ug/ke uo/k9" Found ug/k9" Recovery (x)Total Rotate
rr .. x, ISO 9" 1,180 104 70-130
x Recovery " amount foul-woant In ample a 100mount spiked
" dry wt . basis
TABLE F .3 - LABORATORY REPLICATES
Mw-1AGUEM SAMPLES ; Sample 2332-301
Relative OAPVRaplleste 1 Replicate 2 Mean Difference Objectives
Total metals u0/L uD/L ug/L (X) (X)
Silver as 114 <10 <10 <10 0 <30Arsenic as As <10 <10 <10 0 <30Barium as Be 100 200 200 50 <30CaahitiR as w -ts 4s <9 0 "30Chromium as Cr 32 29 31 9.7 <30Ilereurr as of <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0 <30lead as Pb 4100 4100 4100 0 430Selenium as Se 410 410 410 0 <30
S01L SAMPLES$-1
Simple 2332-320
Relative owRqlleate t Raplleete 2 NM Difference Objectives
Total Natele Ul/ke uo/kg* uo/ke (x) (x)
:111rer as 11e 41,000 .1,000 41,000 0 430Arsenic as As 20,000 18.000 19,000 10.5 430$arius as as 93,000 95,000 94,000 2 430Cadmus h Cd 690 740 720 6.9 430chromium as Cr 38,000 39,000 39,000 3 430Lead as Pb 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 430Selenium " se 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 <30
TAKE f .3 - LABORATORY REKICATES continued
$-7Sample 2332-326
/ Relative CAPPReplicate 1 Replicate 2 Mean Difference Objectives
Total NotNs WASP us/k4' ug/ke (%) (X)
Silver as 11@ 0,000 11,000 0,000 0 <30Arsenic as As 21,000 19,000 20,000 10 <30Barium as me Sa,000 56,000 57,000 3 .5 <30Ceamium .s Ce 460 4600 4600 0 <30Chromium as Cr 26,000 27,000 27,000 3 .7 430lead as Pb 47,000 43,000 45,000 8 .9 <30Selenium as Se 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 430
s-eSample 2332-325
Relative CAPPReplicate 1 Replieste 2 Neon Difference Objectives
Total Metals ug/k9' u0/k0' u0/k0' (X) (X)
percarp os OR 209 204 207 2.4 430
SEDIRFRT SAIKEISed-3
11wple 2332-343
Relative OAPPkept ieet@ 1 Replicate 2 Neon Difference Objectives
Total Notsls uR/ke uo/ky* tq/ke (X)
Mercury u 119 140 160 150 13 430
Petroleum Rydroesrbo~s 190,000 150,000 170,000 24 <30
" Dry wt . basis
TABLE F .4 - SURR0611TE STANDARD RECOVERIES--Volatile Compound,
Sample Description Sample so.
1111-1 2332-301mw-2 2332-302MY-2 Field Duplicate 2332-306MY-3 2332-303MY-4 2332-304114-5 2332-305 Lob Rep 111w-S 2332-305 Lob Rep 2Yell Sample Ilk 2332-308Well Travel Rlk 2332-360Lob Control 00027Lob Control 00012$-1 2332-320S-2 2332-321S-3 2332-322S-3 Field Duplicate 2332-328S-4 2332-3231-3 2332-324S-6 2332-325S-7 2332-326:-e 2332-327sell Sexqle Ilk . 2332-333loll Travel Ilk 2332-335Sad-1 2332-341SW-1 Field OW leete 2332-344Sed-2 2332-342Sad-3 2332-343Sed Saple Ilk 2332-346Sad Train Ilk 2332-348 Lob Rap 1Sad Travel Ilk 2332-348 Lob Rep 2Lob Control C3d23
D(4)-1-2-Diehloroethane 08-Totue~+e "romofluorobenzene% Recovery Control Range % Recovery Control Range % Recovery Control Range
8. 76-114 79 SO-110 87 86-11590 76-114 81 88-110 ' 85 86-1158d 76-114 81 88-110 ' 85 86-115106 76-114 111 88-110 . 85 86-115105 76-114 81 88-110 . 85 86-11596 70-121 81 81-117 85 74-12190 70-121 77 81-117 " 81 74-121100 76-114 79 88-110 . 83 86-11594 76-114 79 88-110 . 87 86-11583 76-114 77 88-110 * 81 86-11596 76-114 79 88-110 * 83 86-11590 70-121 111 81-117 102 74-12190 70-121 101 81-117 101 74-12166 70-121 90 81-117 76 74-12192 70-121 105 81-117 103 74-121100 70-121 105 81-117 103 74-12196 70-121 107 81-117 105 74-12190 70-121 101 81-117 100 74-1218d 70-121 100 81-117 100 74-1218S 70-121 94 81-117 101 74-12184 76-114 100 88-110 93 86-11586 76-114 100 88-110 94 86-115a7 70-121 89 81-117 81 74-12196 70-121 90 81-117 7d 74-12184 70-121 84 81-117 83 74-12186 70-121 90 81-117 8o 74-12190 76-114 100 se-110 83 86-11592 70-121 96 61-117 85 74-12192 70-121 94 81-117 83 74-121100 76-114 106 88-110 102 86-115
x Reeoverp a Amount found X 100, it la assumed that analyte in ample is negligibleAmount 1n spike
% Recovery outside Control Range
"3
""V~~."YYN+^r
"YNNr
'-s
"r
ww s
-~n
~~a~a~
~n~n
L
1{
a
rr
++
"Z
:~a~=~~s~8aa~~=
a=s~s~
Oi"Vr1"iSr"vt~LLSvV=~7L
w3
rri
rrrr~rrrrrrirrrr
ftt
YYYOOYIAYYYIAYY
VYYYIYYYY
71srrrrirrrrrrrrrrr
?S~liwiwPLL~111~11iPP~~
S" K "
O~XrL"
YYI-r~PO"VVw--"LO
A
eeseee
eieeeeeeeeeoeee~
'
1rfA
1/1/4
1/1~w4WYyVWV
YIV
1/V
1/Y
+ "
r
1 1 i 1
Zr`"NV
.~VO"YVrr
.~P~-N-
O
1/~/
1A~~V
1/f/V
1IY
1~1Y
IVV
1AYYW
YIYI
~
iiir=i
rrrYY"rrrrr
rrr
rrrrrrr
iVVr
APPENDIX F
NEW JERSEY SOIL CLEANUP APPROACHES
64
rr Attachment 6
Cleanup Approaches used by 1JDEP
t'
Yew Jersey Department of tovironseatal Protection66
Summary of Approaches to =oil Cleanup Levels
(_) Discussion of !heretical Approaches .
IJDtp has investigated many theoretical approaches to elta"lishiajcleanup objectives for cootanioated soil including cleanup tobackground, cleanup to the analytical detection limits and Cleanup toa risk asses meet derived somber .
_ (A) Cleanup to taettroued bas been considered for a hraber of eoapooods .Development of a cleanup objective based on background requires anextensive environmental data base . This approach eat only be appliedto corpoueds which are normally found in mature . If it is applied toauthropoteeiic compounds the cleanup level could become "sero" whichequates to the current limit of detection of the analytical method innap . A cleanup objective based on background is determined by therange of concentrations observed on a specific site or based onliterature values . This approach bas been applied to inorganiccompounds . for petroleum hydrocarbons, as "industrial" background isgeneralised as 100 ppo .
` (1) Cleanup levels based or analytical detection limit$ Gave bees coo-iidered . in reality, the cleanup objective becomes the limit ofdetection of the analytical method, thus the cleanup objective becomesson-detectable '(cleanup to pristine conditions) . This approach isundesirable by itself because the limit of detection of analyticalmethods is a oovia$ target . Current treads in environmentalanalytical chemistry indicate that detection limits will continue todecrease to levels that are below those of environmental or publichealth concern . This approach is further complicated by the fact thatis Sony instances the method detection limit is influenced by thestore of the matrix sad the presesce of other interfering compounds .
Developing a cleanup objective based oa method detection limits eatonly be applied to aethropotesic compounds . ,If applied to compoundswhich occur ostnsally, the cleanup objective could be w11 below thelevels mormally found in the pewiromcat.
(C) fist assessment Sethodolo dtas lees used to establish elesanpobjectives* The 69e of~st assesasent is COMM to standard and/orcriteria aettiaj. The Water Treliainarp ttoteetive Concentration1{aits and Recommended ttasinus Contaminant Levels ate based se riskassessment methodologies which estimate tee risks from eareieosens sadooacarcieodeas Is drinking water. in the ease of carcinogens, it isassumed that so threshold exists below which cancer does Got develop.thus$ exposure to any. dose regardless of for aoall$ sesa1ts is acancer risk . For soacarcinosens, *a the other band, a thresholdexists below which so response is observed . Thus a "aafe" doseexists . !he susbera developed for risk based standards/criteria range
from sub parts per billions (carcinogens) to busdreds of parts perSillioo (son-careisogess) .
It gust 1e noted that the use of the risk asseenwst approach requiresthat an exposure pathway be defined in terms of the frequeecp andduration of exposure and that a suitable toxicology database nists
j' for the chemical -of concern . to the absence of either of these$ therisk assessment approach cannot 1e applied correctly. tibere there isuncertainty retarding the route or extent of espoaere, the riskassessment will reflect these uncertainties .
to Several, eooservati a worst case exposure sceneries are seed isdeveloping risk based standards or criteria. Qsfortusatelp, real lifeexposures say 1e quite different than those used to develop. the riskbased %umber. Thus a risk based *umber may 0avtrprottct" theindividuals being exposed . ?his can 1e avoided 1y developing
,, situation specific risk based cleanup criteria or by developing arange of exposure seeviarios which can be selectively applied tospecific situations . The cost conservative approach (and the leasttime consusin=) is to use reasonable worst case exposure sceearies toprotect the most sensitive individual likely to be exposed .
( (D) Chemical class clesnup ob jectives have bees set for classes ofI' compounds . Cleanup objectives white have been established for a class
of compounds are seed as a surrogate or action level to iodinate if acloser look at the individual ebesicals comprising the residue iswarranted .
(11) Ap_plication of Cleanus Approaches to WJDLT Trearass .
soil cleanup levels have "to developed based on anticipated background orrisk assessment . to pseral$ the Departseet attempts to establish a soilcleanup level that :
" protects human health from direct contact" protects groundwater from degradation due to leatbisg" protects surface water (is situations when oisraties of
contaminated soil to surface water to a possibility).
?be 'pepartueet bas also established surrogate or alarm levels for classesof compounds . These surrogates are usually conservatively set to sere asas indicator or "red flag" to /Mist the seed for further attesties . This
L approach allow staff sot trained is toxicology to detersise erbee theassistance of a toxicologist /enviroaSestal ebesist to seeded. to general,surrogate levels are lot cleanup susbers, but they could be is certainsituations .
` ("). Inorganic compounds '" Cleanup levels for setais bows bees establishedbased on expected background eoscentratioss to few Jersey soils . Thecleanup objectives are generally to 1 to 3 times laetprosed depeedissso the range of concentration observed sew toxicity. Table 1summarises Vow Jersey background, United States baek=rovsd sod soilcleanup objectives . Some of the cleanup objectives were proposed by
OW
tCU, tpplicints and have been accepted by the Department is gmelmups . The cleanup objectives applied at a specific site strap bedifferent that those listed to Table 1 depending on site specificfactors . These esceptions normally allow higher levels to cousin onsite . These situations include (1) if information exists to indicatethe soil background essite is different that values listed is thetable, (2) eootesinatioe from other sources is suspected (especiallylead on a site -star highways), (3) a contamination problem is areawide and (4) encapsulation is included as part of the cleanup plan .
(t) Or cnie eoatamlea- - Cleanup levels for individual organic toepouedsawe been developed based on s at assesmot methodologies . A worst
ease soil intestine model is good to calculate as acceptable soilcontaminant level (ASCL) to protect individuals fro* direct contactand a simple transport to groundwater model is used to calculate toASCL to protect groundwater quality . The ASCL9 ate then compared to
( analytical method detection limits to determine ii the calculatedconcentration can be measured accurately . If the risk based criterionis below the method detection limit, the method detection limitbecomes the cleanup objective.
[AsThis latter approach bas been used by the New Jersey Division of Ja=ardous-site Mitigation (DVSM) to develop an acceptable soil eestssisest level for
L LCSs based on direct contact . (Transport to groundwater was consideredissisoificaot since Me bind strongly to soils .) A ti"t assessmentutilising a pica and inhalation of soil scenario indicated that iedividaalscould !e esposed to soils contaminated with 274 ppb of Ms withoutexceeding a ore-in-a-million lifetime gauger risk doe to this esposure.The limit of detection of Me to soil using current analytical methods is2.3 pps. In reality S Dye or above can be detected with confidence. Thus
i_ the acceptable soil contaminant level (based en analytical methods) Is Sppe. In situations where the potential its children to ame is contact
/ with soils is treat (if., parts, schooipatds, residential areas) S ppe istot adequate to protect health and a cleanup objective of 1 pps sboaid beconsidered, to spite of the inherent eeee:taisty with retard to
- wantitation.
This risk approach bas bees embodied is a doeuftest ntitled Calculation ofCleanup Levels for Costasisated coils, recently prepared by WIN . Tee
s approach outlined is the document is composed of tyro steps (A) selection of, ebevieals of centers sod (1) eoculatiee of acceptable soil contaminant
levels to protect isdividaals frem direct sostaet avid to protectgroundwater and surface water quality . The approach has bees wood to tootand ealeaiate acceptable soil contaminant towels for 21 eoupooeds uriebinclude Mme chlorinated soieests, oosebloriested soivests, Dhesols,plpcplicaroustle bpdrocat"oes, and phthalates . This approach vasdeveloped is-boese and bas sot gone tbtonsb as external poor review. ORINis. finalising a request for proposal to 'hire a consultant to review .critique and sefiso the approach developed "y DW.
46
' (C) Purr tte or action levels have been developed for volatile organic$,&s# neutral estractables and petroleum hydrocarbons as shown below .
volatile organic# 1 rpmlate Neutrals 10 ppePetroleum Sydrocarboos 100 rpm
r' (n) Cbeaical Class Cleanup Objectives have beet set for petroleumhydrocarbons 'at 100 ppe . This vas assumed to be "industrialbackground".) The actual soil cleanup euober will vary depending onthe chemical constituents present in the petroleum residue . S.evelsgreater than 100 ppm may be acceptable it the residue is comprisedmainly of toluene or syleoes while a 1" .e1 lose that 100 rpm say bewarranted it the residue is comprised mostly of benzene and/or thecarcinogenic polyouclear aromatic hydrocarbons.
i
i
"iL
r
ADLt 1
t Itetsl ".1. 0.f . Cleanup Tile aboveL feckiroos"a tecktroosd . Objective "ack=rowad
arsenic ".A.u1~
1.1 - 16 .7G c (~
~~ 20 "ps ".4.%f, ;.r . ., I . to- f ~ ~~ 1
fCadmium 1.0-4.0 0.01 - 1.0pp. 2 "a
Chro.in. 5.0 -48 1- 1.500 100 pp. 2Copper 0.5 - $3.6 2 - 200 170Cyanide ".A. 0.0l, lit ".".
Load 1 .0 - 160 2 - 200 1150 - 1000! 1-2
J, mercury " .A . 0.01 - 4.6 1 ".".
"iekel 11.1 - 66 .5 6 - $50 100 t
:eloei~ 0.01 - 4k 0.01 - 5.0 4 1
silver P." . 0.01 - S S "." .
'' site , 4.5 - 169 10 - 3000 250 2
a. Data` isoe steppes Totb or "arrlr motto, Cook Colleges Itutsers" Ooiveraity .,
-4001 U
4%
C ~If. Agricultural aoile is ".J.
suggested "p a consultant sa as zC&A sane.
."i61thr
IL
} .
Recommended