WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW. Legislative Water Task Force June 15, 2004. OBJECTIVES. ORIGIN OF UTAH WATER LAW BASIC CONCEPTS PROCESS AS IT EXISTS TODAY CASE STUDIES. Origin of the Doctrine of Prior Appropriation. Prior Appropriation Doctrine Main Features. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

WATER RIGHTS 101:OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW

Legislative Water Task ForceJune 15, 2004

OBJECTIVES• ORIGIN OF UTAH WATER LAW

• BASIC CONCEPTS

• PROCESS AS IT EXISTS TODAY

• CASE STUDIES

Origin of the Doctrine of Prior Appropriation

Prior Appropriation DoctrineMain Features

• Divert water to beneficial use.

• Priority date.

• First in time, first in right.

• Loss of right.

Basic Definitions

• All water in the state is property of the public (73-1-1).

• Beneficial use shall be the basis, the measure, and the limit of all rights to the use of water in the state (73-1-3).

Major Elements of a Water Right• Priority date.• Quantity of water.

– Flow rate.– Volume.

• Source of supply.• Point(s) of diversion.• Uses.

– Irrigation, domestic, stock water, mining, municipal, etc.

• Period of use.• Place of use.

Establishing a Water Right• Diligence Claim.

– Surface water uses prior to 1903.

• Underground Water Claim.

– Ground-water uses prior to 1935.

• Court Decreed.

• Applications filed with State Engineer.

Mutual Irrigation Companies

• Water Right held by Company

• Individuals own shares of stock

• Water Distributed – Hours, Acres or Quantity

• Shareholders have certain rights / obligations

• 73-3-3.5, Change Application by shareholder

Filing a Water Right Application

• File application in proper form.• Advertise for 2 consecutive weeks in local

newspaper.• 20 day protest period.• Protested?

– Hearing.

• Approval or rejection.– If approved, proof due date given, proof of

beneficial use, certificate.

• Judicial Review.

Approval Criteria (73-3-8)

• Unappropriated water in source.

• Will not impair existing rights.

• Physically and economically feasible.

• Not monopolistic / speculation.

• In the public interest / welfare.

• Won’t effect the natural stream environment or public recreation.

WaterAppropriation

Policy

Change ApplicationsSec. 73-3-3 UCA

• Owner may change:

– Point of diversion.

– Place of use.

– Nature of use.

– Period of use.

• Pertinent facts:

– Can’t impair existing rights

– Can’t enlarge the underlying water right

Example # 1Distribution of Water By Priority• 45 Distribution Systems

41 River System 4 Ground-Water Basins

• Water (River) Commissioner

• Times of shortage – cut by priority date

• Cost paid by water users

• Annual report prepared and submitted

Water Distribution by Priority Date

0

50

100

150

200

250

1-J

an

15-J

an

29-J

an

12-F

eb

26-F

eb

12-M

ar

26-M

ar

9-A

pr

23-A

pr

7-M

ay

21-M

ay

4-J

un

18-J

un

2-J

ul

16-J

ul

30-J

ul

13-A

ug

27-A

ug

10-S

ep

24-S

ep

8-O

ct

22-O

ct

5-N

ov

19-N

ov

3-D

ec

17-D

ec

31-D

ec

Day

CF

S

Streamflow

1st priority-1873

2rd priority-1922

3th priority-1949

Example # 2Beneficial Use

Evaluation of a Water Right

• Major ElementsFlow: 2.50 CFSSource: Spring CreekUse: Irrigation of 100 acresPeriod of Use: April 1 – Oct 31

• What is the beneficial use?• What are the diversion and depletion

limitations?

Irrigation Diversion Requirementfor Alfalfa at Logan, Utah

• Crop Consumptive Use (Alfalfa) = 31.35”

• Effective Precipitation = 7.73”

• Net Irrigation Requirement = 23.62”

• Irrigation Practices / Efficiency Flood 50%

• Irrigation Diversion Requirement = 47.24”Use 48” or 4.0 AF/A

Irrigation Return Flow

Diversion = 4.0 Ac Ft/Ac

ET = 2.0 Ac Ft/Ac

Return Flow = 2.0 Ac Ft/Ac

Changing an Irrigation Water Right to Industrial Uses

• Water right is for 100 acre of irrigation

• 100 ac x 4.0 ac ft /ac = 400 ac ft• Historical Depletion = 200 ac ft• Industrial use is 100% consumptive

Therefore, diversion & depletion limited to 200 ac ft.

Federal Reserved Water Rights

• Indian Reservations, National Forest, National Parks and other lands

• 1908 Winters decision

• 1963 Arizona v. California

• Quantification – primary purposes of the reservation

• Priority Date – date of reservation

The State Engineer has - “general administrative supervision of the

waters of the state, and of the measurement, appropriation, apportionment and

distribution thereof.” (Section 73-2-1)

State Engineer meets

with a water user

STATE ENGINEER

Thank You

Questions?

Recommended