Preprints, short and sweet

  • View
    296

  • Download
    0

  • Category

    Science

Preview:

Citation preview

Preprints short and sweet

“… The purpose of this policy is twofold. In the first place, as Dr. Ingelfinger never hesitated to admit, it protects our newsworthiness.”

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198110013051408#t=article

Year: 1981 (rule origin: 1969)

“… We hope that our policies achieve a reasonable balance. We intend them to be flexible and open to appeal if the interests of the public are at stake. ”http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199111073251910#t=article

Year: 1991

More than half of US neuroscientists and more than 60% of German neuroscientists perceive the so-called Ingelfinger rule as still effective.

(2013)

Link to post

Link to article

Watch his Helsinki lecture, "Failures of journals and better ways of disseminating science" here!

“[The peer review system] is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-

innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily

abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant.”

- Richard Smith (former BMJ editor)

As a taxpayer, you should be concerned(See e.g. http://tiedonhinta.fi/en/english/)

http://www.nature.com/news/biologists-urged-to-hug-a-preprint-1.19384

http://blog.psyarxiv.com/psyarxiv/2016/09/19/psyarxiv-faq/

https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/

Link to post

Having posted a preprint, you have a time-stamped copy of your manuscript on a third-party server.

Is this really the situation, when you should worry about someone stealing your great idea?

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

Know your rights! (i.e. check what they are)

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

“Presentation of data at a scientific meeting, as a poster, abstract, orally, on a CD, or as an abstract on the web or on a pre-print server does not conflict with submission to The Lancet”

“Scientific communication is in the midst of major changes. Open access, open data, and open peer review are coming, and rules like Ingelfinger's are proving themselves to be increasingly outdated and counterintuitive. Publishing work openly and freely is in the spirit of development, and it's now easier than ever.”

Link to post

Recommended