SecureGuard

SECURING YOUR PERIMETER AGAINST VEHICLE INTRUSION

SecureGuard®Anti-Vehicle Perimeter Barrier

Protecting Your Perimeter – Why?

Glasgow Airport Terrorist Attack – June, 2007Suicide bombers put many lives at risk at a busy airport

FBI Building, Oklahoma, US – April 1995

US citizen detonates a car bomb outside a Government building used by FBI.

G4S Security Depot, UK – Nov 2007

Robbers ram through side of G4S Cash Handling Services depot.

VULNERABLE LOCATIONS

Airport PerimetersWhile a fence may stop a person from reaching this plane, would it stop a vehicle?

Airport EntrancesModern airport entrances are elaborate with high volumes of glass – easy to penetrate with a large vehicle.

Warehouses / Cash Handling Facilities

Despite their secure appearance, cash-handling facilities and warehouses with high-value goods are prime targets.This depot was robbed in 2006 of £53m GBP.

Power PlantsCritical site of national infrastructure. A key target for a terrorist wanting to disrupt an area.

Telecommunications SitesAnother critical location of national infrastructure.

Military Facilities / BasesExisting or temporary facilities on homeland or overseas soil.

Sport / Event StadiumsVenues, particularly during major events, are densely populated and provide a key opportunity for would-be terrorists.

PROTECTION OPTIONS

Plastic Water Filled Barriers

Units Often Not Connected

Units Often Not Filled With Water

Considered Advantages

Light weight

Easy to handle

Cheap to transport

Quick to move

Disadvantages

Large volume water

Water easily removable

Filled or unfilled – will not stop a moving vehicle

No Security Performance

Concrete Barrier

Units Not Connected

Considered Advantages

Strong

Cheap to purchase

Readily available

Visual deterrent

DisadvantagesHeavy – difficult to move

Expensive transport

Short life span – 5 years

Easy to damage

No Security Performance

Disadvantages

Shrapnel When Impacted or Exploded

SecureGuard

SecureGuard• Developed in 2007• Derived from road

barrier (BarrierGuard 800)

• Developed for UK CPNI (Centre for Protection of National Infrastructure)

SecureGuard• Steel barrier• Tested & approved

by UK CPNI• Tested BS PAS

68:2007• Three available

systems

SecureGuard 30KEY FEATURES• Light weight & no ballast

required• Strong structural design• Rapidly deployable• 25 year service life• Safe design – crash friendly for

‘bona fide’ motorists• Permanent & portable solutions

SecureGuard 30 SystemTested to BS PAS 68:2007

7,500 kilo truck, 90 degree impact, 30 kph

System is rapidly deployable for permanent or portable use

Also tested 7,500 kilo truck, 45 degree impact, 50 kph

Optional fence systems can be added

SecureGuard 30 SystemTypical Anchoring Layout

Anchored 72m intervals along length

SecureGuard anchor shoe arrangement – 8x fixings per anchor

SecureGuard 30 SystemSecureGuard 30 External Intermediate Anchor Shoe

8x Fixings required per shoe

SecureGuard 50Intermediate Anchor

Assembly Intermediate Anchor Location

SecureGuard 50 SystemTested to BS PAS 68:2007

7,500 kilo truck, 90 degree impact, 50 kph

Upgrade to existing SG30 system

System is rapidly deployable for permanent or portable use

Optional fence systems can be added

SecureGuard80 SystemTested to BS PAS 68:2007

7,500 kilo truck, 90 degree impact, 80 kph

Upgrade to existing SG 30 system

High performance permanent system

Shallow foundations

Optional fence systems can be added

SecureGuard80 SystemAssembly Layout

End anchor unit

6m in length

SecureGuard80 SystemAssembly Layout

Intermediate anchor uprights

2m spacings

SecureGuard80 SystemAssembly Layout

I Beam clamp assembly

1 per upright

Allows height adjustability for varying ground heights

SecureGuard80 SystemAirport Layout Arrangement

Foundation and positioning shown.

SecureGuard80 SystemFixing Layout

Shows general arrangement for SG80 fixings

SecureGuard

SecureGuard – Access Points

PAS 68 vs. DOS K –Testing

Table to the right shows energy level comparison between British PAS 68:2007 Standard and US DOS K Standard

Table clearly demonstrates PAS 68:2007 is equal to, if not higher performing compared to DOS K4, K8 and K12 tests

N/A K4 K8 K12 K540

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

PAS 68:2007 vs. DOS K

Impa

ct E

nerg

y (K

J)

Advantages

Transport cost

saving – 144m per

truck

Deployment speed saves

time

Simple installatio

n – not resource intensive

Advantages

Durable – withstands multiple impacts

Not vulnerable to tamper

Low maintenan

ce

Advantages

PROVEN SECURITY PERFORMANCE

Disadvantages

?

Major UK AirportSecureGuard 80 installed as part of perimeter upgrade in 2009. Anti-personnel fence was mounted to the top of the SecureGuard.

G4S Compound PerimeterSecureGuard 30 used to upgrade an existing security fencing to provide anti-vehicle solution.

Government Conference, UKSecureGuard 30 used during Government event as a portable protection.

Major Australian AirportSecureGuard 30 used as added protection along perimeter fence. Barrier positioned in front of existing fencing to continue to utilise as anti personnel fence.

WWW.BOYLANHOMELANDSECURITY.COM.AU

Thank you for your timePlease visit our website for further

information