34
B-to-B Lead Generation:

B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This second annual study on B2B Lead Generation Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation examines the impact of the economic downturn on lead generation marketing effectiveness, current priorities for marketers, and the practices that distinguish those marketing organizations with better effectiveness and growth. Marketing excellence requires that marketers adapt to changing conditions as they work to maintain their effectiveness and deliver business results. There are lessons to be learned from those marketers who indicated their lead generation marketing was more effective than their competitors and how they differ from those with less effective marketing. Marketing organizations that can take actions to addess the challenges of today's economy are likely to adopt new practices and emerge stronger.

Citation preview

Page 1: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

B-to-B Lead Generation:

Page 2: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study
Page 4: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study
Page 6: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study
Page 9: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 1: Impact of Economic Conditions on Lead Generation Marketing Effectiveness

31% 19% 12%

16% 20% -4%

25% 30% -5%

19% 24% -5%

21% 28% -7%

14% 31% -17%

17% 37% -20%

14% 35% -21%

Page 10: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 2: Marketing Budget Alignment to Goals

26%

24%

35%

30%

23%

23%

6%

9%

3%

6%

8%

7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2009

2008

Page 11: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 3: Budget Level Relative to Value Potential

Page 12: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 4: Priorities to Impact Financial Performance

27%

36%

21%

16%

Page 13: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 5: Lead Generation Management Practices

Page 14: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 6: Lead Generation Effectiveness

Figure 7: Lead Generation Effectiveness Compared to 2008

Page 15: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 8: Expected Growth for Lead Generation Marketers

Page 16: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 9: Economic Impact Based on Expected Growth

Page 17: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 10: Lead Generation Effectiveness and Expected Growth

Page 18: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 11: Use of Marketing ROI / Profitability Metrics – B2B Lead Gen vs. All Marketers

Page 19: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 12: Lead Gen Marketing Effectiveness – Users of ROI Metrics vs. Traditional Metrics

Page 20: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 13: Lead Generation Management – Users of ROI Metrics vs. Traditional Metrics

Page 21: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 14: Lead Generation Practices Based on Effectiveness

Page 22: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 15: Comparison of Economic Downturn Impact by Lead Generation Management Effectiveness

Page 23: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 16: Budgets Relative to Profit Potential Based on Effectiveness

% with Budget Below Value Potential

Total More Effective Org's Less Effective Org's

Generating new lead volume 38% 25% 64%

Generating quality leads 43% 33% 63%

Nurturing stalled leads 48% 48% 60%

Improving sales conversion rates 37% 25% 56%

Conditioning leads to improve the average value per closed customer

39% 31% 49%

Decreasing the time from new lead to sale close for shorter sales cycles

37% 34% 46%

Page 24: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 17: Marketing Operations Comparisons Based on Effectiveness

Page 25: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 18: Marketing Budget Alignment by Effectiveness Relative to the Competition

Page 26: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 19: Marketing Operations Based on Budget Alignment

Page 27: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study
Page 28: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 20: Integrated Marketing by Company Size

Page 29: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 21: Improving Performance by Company Size

Figure 22: Budget Alignment by Company Size

Page 30: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study
Page 31: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 23: Region

Page 32: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 24: Company Size Based on Annual Revenue

Figure 25: Role of Marketing

Page 33: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study

Figure 26: Marketing Budget

Page 34: B-to-B Lead Generation: 2009 Marketing ROI & Performance Evaluation Study