Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Summary of the LIFT09 Asia Feedback Survey results.
Citation preview
Introduction
– Following the LIFT Asia 2009 conference (South Korea) of September 2009 an email invitation was sent to all participants (some 450)
– The survey was available in English and
2
– The survey was available in English and Korean
– 61 participants responded to the survey (45 in Korean and 16 in English)
– This is a response rate of 14% - on the lower end but still enough to learn from the results
Overall rating
3
Comparison between LIFT Asia 08 & LIFT Asia 09:
LIFT Asia 08 LIFT Asia 09
Very poor 4% (1) 2% (1)
Poor -- -- 7% (4)
Satisfactory 4% (1) 21%(13)
Good 48% (12) 41%(25)
Excellent 44% (11) 30%(18)
InfluenceLift Asia 09 provided me with interesting
information on the usage of emerging
technologies
Strongly disagree 1 (2 %)
Disagree 5 (8 %)
Neither agree nor disagree
15 (25 %)
Agree 28 (46 %)
Strongly agree 12 (20 %)
Lift Asia 09 Conference was relevant to my
interests
Strongly disagree 1 (2 %)
Disagree 2 (3 %)
Neither agree nor disagree
13 (21 %)
Agree 31 (51 %)
Strongly agree 14 (23 %)
4
Strongly agree 12 (20 %)
Lift Asia 09 was suitable for my
background and experience
Strongly disagree 2 (3 %)
Disagree 6 (10 %)
Neither agree nor disagree
15 (25 %)
Agree 24 (39 %)
Strongly agree 14 (23 %)
More participants selected “Neither agree nor disagree” compared to other LIFT conferences
Lift Asia 09 has influenced what I think
about the usage of emerging technologies
Strongly disagree 1 (2 %)
Disagree 5 (8 %)
Neither agree nor disagree
18 (30 %)
Agree 23 (38 %)
Strongly agree 14 (23 %)
Key factors
5
Venue quality rated higher compared to other LIFT conferences
Networking possibilities rated lower compared to other LIFT conferences
Key formats
6
All formats rated lower than other LIFT conferences
Open stage ranked higher than other LIFT conferences
Attend / recommend LIFT 10
LIFT Asia 08 LIFT Asia 09
Attend next LIFT?
Yes 80%(20) 82% (50)
No 20% (5) 18% (11)
7
Recommend to a friend?
Yes 92% (23) 84% (51)
No 8% (2) 16% (10)
Number of contacts made
8
Input & influence over LIFT
9
For LIFT Asia 08, the “Lobby break” provided the most influence
More “Don’t know” compared to other LIFT conferences
Value for money
10
LIFT Asia participants rated higher value (~10%) for money compared to other LIFT conferences
Payment for LIFT
11
Participants fee for LIFT Asia funded more by companies than at other LIFT conferences (~20%)
Profile of participantsWhat type of work do you do?
IT Services (including web services) 25 (41 %)
Marketing / Communications 11 (18 %)
Journalism/editing 1 (2 %)
General management 1 (2 %)
Company owner 1 (2 %)
Consultant 5 (8 %)
Research & Development 3 (5 %)
12
Manufacturing/Production 0 (0 %)
Other services (e.g. legal, finance, administration, purchasing)
0 (0 %)
Teaching/lecturing 1 (2 %)
Student 6 (10 %)
Unemployed 0 (0 %)
Other, please specify 7 (11 %)
More IT services (+20%) and less teachers (-7%), company owners (-6%) and other services (-3%) compared to LIFT Geneva 09
Profile of participantsWhat is the principal activity of your company or organization?
Government agency / department 1 (2 %)
Educational institution 8 (13 %)
International organisation/NGO 3 (5 %)
Professional association 0 (0 %)
13
Private sector (large company) 11 (18 %)
Private sector (small-medium company) 20 (33 %)
Private sector (consulting firm) 9 (15 %)
Media 6 (10 %)
Other, please specify 3 (5 %)
More small-medium companies (+10%) compared to LIFT Geneva 09
Profile of participants
14
Transport & carbon offset
15
10% of participants did something to compensate carbon emissions of their transport to the conference compared to 7% of LIFT Geneva 09 participants
