26
Project Success & Failure (2 sides of the same coin?) Stephen Carver FAPM

Project/programme success and failure

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Project/programme success and failure

Project Success & Failure(2 sides of the same coin?)

Stephen Carver FAPM

Page 2: Project/programme success and failure

68%Project Failure Rate

Page 3: Project/programme success and failure

APM 2020 Vision

A World in whichall

Projects Succeed

Page 4: Project/programme success and failure

“I think it is an immutable law in business that words are words, explanations are explanations,

promises are promises - but only performance is reality.”

Harold Geneenformer chief executive

ITT

Page 5: Project/programme success and failure

Objective Setting

S Specific

M Measurable

A Achievable

R Realistic

T Time-based

A Alibi

R Reasons

S Scapegoat

E Exit

Page 6: Project/programme success and failure

The Impossible Triangle

Page 7: Project/programme success and failure
Page 8: Project/programme success and failure

Success or Failure?

Page 9: Project/programme success and failure

Sir John Armitt

PM?

Page 10: Project/programme success and failure

On Time?On Budget?

Page 11: Project/programme success and failure

Jan 2012

The true cost of staging the 2012 Olympics is five times the figure given when London won the bid in 2005.

A Sky investigation has revealed the final cost for the Games will be more than £12bn.However, associated costs could make the bill as high as £24bn - a staggering 10 times the original estimate.

Page 12: Project/programme success and failure

18th Oct Daily Telegraph

Sports Minister announces that 2012 Olympics will be under budget by £0.5B

Page 13: Project/programme success and failure

Olympics chiefs to hold inquest on 2012 logo shamblesMailonline, 7 June 2007

Page 14: Project/programme success and failure
Page 15: Project/programme success and failure

“The successful company of the future will also need to demonstrate much greater openness and greater commitment to the involvement of key stakeholders.

Brent Spar and Nigeria were key turning points in the way in which Shell and other companies take important project decisions.”

Jeroen van der Veer Group Managing Director Royal Dutch/Shell Group

Page 16: Project/programme success and failure

“Anyone who can spoil my day”

Definition of a Project Stakeholder ?

Page 17: Project/programme success and failure

Where Do You Want Them?

•Championing•Support•Approval •Co-operation•Compliance•Neutrality•Inertia•Obstruction •Antagonism •Opposition•Rejection: “no”•Mutiny•Sabotage

level o

f su

pp

ort

Page 18: Project/programme success and failure

PPM – Maturity Levels

1

2

3

4

5

Ad Hoc Disorganised, accidental success

Minimal Some process, inconsistent success

Compliant Standardised, more predictable

Competitive Controlled and measured processes, results more in line with plans

World Class Continuous process improvement , success is normal

Page 19: Project/programme success and failure

1

2

3

4

5

Competitive: provides source of competitive advantage, focused, metrics determine areas for improvement, supports business strategy.

Compliant: follows industry-accepted norms, improvements sporadic, process-focused, cost of failure significant, little strategic contribution

Minimal: tasked with ‘not messing up’, some use of standards, reactive, high cost of failure, negative strategic contribution.

Ad hoc: unreliable delivery, very high cost of failure, strongly negative strategic contribution

World-class: redefines delivery in the industry, automatically improving, very hard to imitate by competitors, drives business strategy.

Limit of process based approach

PPM – Strategic Advantage Strategic Contribution

Page 20: Project/programme success and failure

What is Project Complexity?

• ‘Complicated’

e.g. a Swiss watch. Linear & predictable

• ‘Complex’: from the Latin ‘complexus’ (braided together). Nonlinear & unpredictable.

• Like quality – it is hard to quantify

• is something that is experienced.

Page 21: Project/programme success and failure

Complexities

• Structural Complexity:– Number, size, financial scale, interdependencies, variety,

pace, technology, breadth of scope, number of specialities, multiple locations/time-zones. IQ

Page 22: Project/programme success and failure

Complexities

• Emergent Complexity:– Technological and commercial maturity, novelty and change,

clarity of vision / goals, clear success criteria / benefits, previous experience, availability of information, unidentified stakeholders, “missing” plan, unforeseen, unknowable.

Page 23: Project/programme success and failure

• Socio-political Complexity:– People, politics, stakeholder / sponsor commitment,

resistance, shared understanding, fit, hidden agendas, conflicting priorities, personalities, transparency, culture, EQ

Socio Political Complexity

Page 24: Project/programme success and failure

              

“Eagles may soar high

but…….

rats don’t get sucked into jet engines”

Socio Political Complexity

Page 25: Project/programme success and failure

The 3 Complexities

“In your work, which of the 3 complexities is the most difficult

to manage?”

“In your own formal training and development, which of the

3 complexities has received the most attention?”

We asked a group of 246 PMs these questions

StructuralSocio-polit-icalEmergent

StructuralSocio-polit-icalEmergent

Page 26: Project/programme success and failure

Project Success & Failure(2 sides of the same coin?)

Stephen Carver FAPM