82
Streets and Local Roads Proper Design Details for PCC Pavement Performance Mike Byers Indiana Chapter – American Concrete Pavement Association

S60 mb proper_20_pccp_20design_20details_20for_20performance_20__20road_20school_202011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1.Streets and Local Roads Proper Design Details for PCC Pavement PerformanceMike Byers Indiana Chapter American Concrete Pavement Association

2. Streets & Local Roads Chapter/States Associations of ACPA North DakotaNorthwestMinnesota WisconsinSouth Dakota ColoradoWyoming Western StatesUtahMichiganIowaNortheastIndiana IllinoisOhioMissouri-Kansas Kentucky Oklahoma-Arkansas Southeast LouisianaAmerican Concrete Pavement Association 3. SLR Pavement Markets New/Reconstruction of Concrete Pavements Concrete Overlays Unbonded Whitetopping Ultra-Thin Whitetopping (UTW) Concrete Inlays Intersections Roundabouts Bus Pads Alleys Concrete Pavement Restoration 4. Thickness Design Procedures Empirical Design Procedures Based on observed performance AASHO Road TestMechanistic Design Procedures Based on mathematically calculated pavement responses PCA Design Procedure (PCAPAV) StreetPave (ACPA Design Method)Ottawa, Illinois (approximately 80 miles southwest of Chicago) between 1956 and 1960 5. New Design Tools for SLR MEPDG MechanisticEmperical Design Guide StreetPave Software Concrete Thickness Asphalt Institute Design Thickness Life Cycle Cost Analysis Information Sheet IS184 Thickness Design Manual for Concrete Streets and Local Roads EB109 Equivalent Pavement Design ChartsWhats Equivalent 6. Equivalent Pavement Design 7. StreetPave Software Concrete pavement thickness design based on revised criteria Asphalt equivalent section based on converted total carrying capacity Life-Cycle cost analysis based on initial costs of equivalent pavements and predicted maintenance 8. Different Pavement Types Concrete SectionAsphalt Section Asphalt LayerSubbase SubgradeBase Subbase Subgrade 9. How Pavements Carry Loads 7000 lb.7000 lb.pressure < 1-3 psi pressure 6-10 psiConcretes Rigidness spreads the load over a large area and keeps pressures on the subgrade low. 10. Comparison of Concrete vs. Asphalt Its not the same old Asphalt and Concrete anymore! Just look at the Gas Pumps! Gasoline prices are a good indicator of what asphalt pavement cost! 11. Streets and Local Roads Thickness Design Procedure Longitudinal jointSurface smoothness or rideabilityThickness DesignTransverse joint Surface TextureConcrete materials Dowel bars Tiebars Subgrade Subbase or base 12. Concrete Pavement Types Jointed Plain Undoweled Doweled Jointed Reinforced Continuously Reinforced 13. Jointed Plain Plan8 15 ftProfile or 14. Jointed Plain 15. Agencies Designing Jointed Plain Concrete Highway PavementsUse jointed plain designs Do not use jointed plain designs 16. Concrete Pavement Design Requires Selecting Appropriate Features Subgrade modification Drainage system Subbase Joint Spacing 15 ft 18 ft Dowels Thickness 6 in 8 in 10 in Reinforcement Joint Sealant None Hot pour Silicone Preformed Surface Texture Transverse tine Burlap drag Shoulder Asphalt Concrete 17. OptimizeCost PerformanceNow Using Mechanistic-Empirical Design (MEPDG) to Optimize 18. Principles of Design Load stressesThicknessCurling/Warping stressesJointingVolume change stresses 19. SLR Pavement Design Street classification and traffic Geometric design Subgrades and subbases Concrete quality Thickness design Jointing Construction specifications 20. Street Class DescriptionTwo-way Average Daily Traffic (ADT)Two-way Average Daily Truck Traffic (ADTT)Less than 2002-44.0 - 5.0 in. (100-125 mm)200-1,00010-505.0 - 7.0 in. (125-175 mm)Typical Range of Slab ThicknessLight ResidentialShort streets in subdivisions and similar residential areas often not throughstreets.ResidentialThrough-streets in subdivisions and similar residential areas that occasionally carry a heavy vehicle (truck or bus).CollectorStreets that collect traffic from several residential subdivisions, and that may serve buses and trucks.1,000-8,00050-5005.5 - 9.0 in. (135-225 mm)BusinessStreets that provide access to shopping and urban central business districts.11,000-17,000400-7006.0 - 9.0 in. (150-225 mm)IndustrialStreets that provide access to industrial areas or parks, and typically carry heavier trucks than the business class.2,000-4,000300-8007.0 - 10.5 in. (175-260 mm)ArterialStreets that serve traffic from major expressways and carry traffic through metropolitan areas. Truck and bus routes are primarily on these roads.4,000-15,000 (minor) 4,000-30,000 (major)300-6006.0 - 9.0 in. (150-225 mm) 7.0 - 11.0 in. (175-275 mm)700-1,500 21. Geometric Design Utilities Increase Edge Support Integral Curb Tied Curb & Gutter Widened Lanes (2 feet no parking) Parking Lanes Rural Areas Tied Concrete Shoulders Street Widths Minimum width of 25 ft. Maximum Cross Slope of 2 percent ( per ft.) Traffic Lanes 10-12 feet Parking Lanes 7-8 feet 22. Subbase vs. NO Subbase For Concrete PavementsSubbase Subgrade 23. Subgrade and Subbases For Concrete PavementsSubbase Subgrade 24. Subgrade and Subbases Subgrade Natural ground, graded, and compacted on which the pavement is built.Subbase Layer of material directly below the concrete pavement. 25. UNIFORMITY: The Key ToGOOD PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE 26. Design for Uniform Support Three Major Causes for Non-Uniform Support Expansive Soils Differential Frost Heave Pumping (loss of support) 27. Subbase vs. NO Subbase Presence of fine-grained soil Presence of water Sufficient volume of trucks to cause soil pumping (> 100 trucks/day) Pavements on > 15% grade 28. Subgrade Properties Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k-valuePlate-Load Test ReactionPlate load on subgrade k = Plate deflection on subgrade 5.0 psi k = 0.5 in = 100 psi / in.Stacked PlatesPressure GaugeSubgrade 29. Subgrade Properties Plate-load test is rarely performed time consuming & expensiveEstimate k-value by correlation to other tests e.g. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) or R-value testsLean concrete subbases increases k-value substantially 30. Subgrade Properties Correlated k-values for Subgrade Support Historical k-values (pci)California Bearing Ratio (CBR), %Resistance Value (R-value)(ASTM D 1183)(ASTM D 2844)Low75 - 1202.5 - 3.510 - 22Sand and sand-gravel with moderate silt/clayMedium130 - 1704.5 - 7.529 - 41Sand and sand-gravel with little or no silt/clayHigh180 - 2208.5 - 1245 - 52TypeFine-grained with high amounts of silt/clayAmount of Support 31. Subgrade and Subbases Design Summary Subgrade strength is not a critical element in the thickness design. Has little impact on thickness.Need to know if pavement is on: Subgrade (k 25 MPa/m (100 psi/in.)), Granular subbase (k 40 MPa/m (150 psi/in.)), Asphalt treated subbase (k 80 MPa/m (300 psi/in.)) Cement treated/lean concrete subbase (k 125 MPa/m (500 psi/in.)). 32. Subgrade and Subbases Performance Summary Proper design and construction are absolutely necessary if the pavement is to perform. Must be uniform throughout pavements life.Poor subgrade/subbase preparation can not be overcome with thickness. Any concrete pavement, built of any thickness, will have problems on a poorly designed and constructed subgrade or subbase. 33. Subbase Effects At the AASHO Road Test, concrete pavements with granular bases could carry about 30% more traffic. The current design procedures allows concrete pavements built with granular bases to carry about 5 - 8% more traffic. 34. Drainable Subbase?? Aggregate Quality marginal Dcracking? Traffic Level high volume may warrant drainable subbase Edge drains behind curb still good detail 35. Concrete Quality Portland CementMaterials Supplementary Cementitious Materials Aggregates Chemical Admixtures WaterTesting 36. Concrete Quality Recommended Air Contents for Durable Concrete Maximum size aggregateTotal target air content, percent * Severe ExposureModerate Exposurein.mm3/89.57.561/212.575.53/419.06125.064.5137.55.54.5250.054Suggest 6.55 37. Concrete Quality Maximum Permissible Water-Cement Ratio for Durable Concrete Pavement Type of exposure Freezing/thawing with deicing chemicals Severe sulfate exposure [water-soluble sulfate (SO4) in soil > 0.20 % by weight] Moderate sulfate exposure [water-soluble sulfate (SO4) in soil of 0.10 to 0.20 % by weight]Maximum water-cementitious ratio by weight 0.45 INDOT max 0.42 0.450.50 38. Basics of Thickness DesignCT 39. The latest design and cost analysis tool from ACPA Determine and compare thickness requirements and costs for concrete and asphalt pavements using StreetPave. Features: Updated mechanistic design method for concrete pavement Fatigue and erosion analysis Jointing spacing & load transfer recommendations Thickness rounding and reliability considerations Analysis of existing concrete pavements Asphalt design based on the Asphalt Institute method Comparison to equivalent concrete pavement Life cycle cost analysis module Printable summary reports and charts Design summary Design factor sensitivity & life-cycle plots User-friendly format and features Walkthrough Wizard Help information for all inputs Compatible with Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, XP 40. Thickness Design for Streets and Local Roads StreetPave User Inputs & Outputs Global Settings Region Units (English or Metric) Terminal Serviceability Percent Slabs Cracked at end of design Life Design Life Reliability Traffic Pavement Properties Thickness/Dowel/Jointing Recommendations 41. Design Example Inputs Design life = 30 years k-value = 100 pci Concrete flexural strength = 600 psi Load transfer (dowels) = yes Edge support = yes Traffic category = Collector 2-way ADTT = 100 Reliability = 80% Percent Slabs Cracked = 15% 42. Thickness Design Procedure Design controlled by: Fatigue usually controls design of light-traffic pavements Single-axles usually cause more fatigue damage Erosion usually controls design of undoweled medium- and heavy-traffic pavements Tandem-axles usually cause more erosion damage Tridem-axles usually cause more erosion damage 43. Thickness Design Procedure Concrete Properties Flexural Strength (Modulus of Rupture, ASTM C 78)Third-point LoadingAvg. 28-day strength in 3rd-point loadingd=L/ 6 Other Factors Concrete Strength Gain with Age Fatigue PropertiesL/3 Span Length = L 44. Thickness Design Procedure Concrete PropertiesCompressive Strength fcSc = 8-10 fcHead of Testing MachineCylinder Depthfc = Compressive Strength (psi) Sc = Flexural Strength (psi) 45. Basics of Thickness Design Stress / FatigueCT Compressive strength: ~4000 psi Flexural strength: ~600 psi 46. Strength Correlations MR = 7.5 x f'c^(0.5)MR = 9 x f'c^(0.5)MR = 10 x f'c^(0.5)800 750Flexural Strength, psi700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 200025003000350040004500Compressive Strength, psi500055006000 47. Concrete Strength Properties If specify minimum flexural strength at 28-day of 550 psi & allow 10% of beams to fall below minimum:Percentage of 28-day Strength160 140 120 100Type I (GU) Type III (HE)80 60 40 3d7d28d3mAge1y3y 5y 10y 20ySTEP 1 Estimate SDEV: 9% for typical ready mix. SDEV = 550 * 0.09 = 50 psi STEP 2 Sc design = Sc minimum + z * SDEV Sc design = 550 + 1.282 * 50 Sc design = 614 psi 48. Thickness Design Procedure Concrete PropertiesComparison of fc, MR, and Required Thickness Compressive Strength (psi)Flexural Strength Design Thickness (psi) (inches)3000450 550 (500)6.5 (6.43) PCA 7.04000510 630 (600)5.5 (5.25) PCA 6.55000570 710 (700)5.0 (4.86) PCA 6.0Life 30 years, Collector (2), k-value 162, Reliability 80 %, plus C & G, 2 % annual growth 49. Design Period/Life 20 to 35 years is commonly used Shorter or longer design period may be economically justified in some cases High performance concrete pavements Long-life pavements A special haul road to be used for only a few years Cross-overs Temporary lanes 50. Design Reliability Practically everything associated with pavement design is variable Variability in mean design inputstraffic, materials, subgrade, climate, and so on Error in performance prediction models In StreetPave design, the fatigue variability can be modeled and applied as an adjustment factor 51. Reliability Levels of Reliability for Pavement Design Functional Classification of RoadwayRecommended Reliability UrbanRuralInterstates, Freeways, and Tollways85 - 9980 99Principal Arterials80 - 9975 95Collectors80 - 9575 95Residential & Local Roads50 - 8050 80 52. Thickness DesignCombined Reliability & Slabs Cracked SpreadsheetRecommended Levels of Slab Cracking by Roadway Type Roadway TypeRecommended Percent of Slabs Cracked at End of Design Life(Default)15%Interstate Highways, Expressways, Tollways, Turnpikes5%State Roads, Arterials10%Collectors, County Roads15%Residential Streets25% 53. Basics of Thickness Design Deflection / Erosion Higher k-value will lower deflections Load transfer will lower deflections 54. Concrete Pavement Design For Municipal StreetsLoad Transfer (slabs ability to share its load with neighboring slabs) Dowels Aggregate Interlock Edge Support Tied curb & gutter Integral curb & gutter Parking lane Tied concreteL= x U= 0 Poor Load Transfer = L x/2Good Load TransferU= x/2 55. Dowels vs. NO Dowels Load Transfer L=x U=0The slabs ability to share its load with its neighboring slab DowelsPoor Load TransferHigh Traffic Volumes (Pavements > 8 in.) (> 120 Trucks/day) Aggregate Interlock L=x Good Load TransferU=xLow Traffic Volumes (Pavements < 7 in.) 56. Load Transfer Efficiency Load Transfer Mechanism LTE, % aggregate interlock stabilized base dowel bars30 - 80 50 - 90 80 - 95 57. Aggregate InterlockShear between aggregate particles below the initial saw cut 58. Aggregate Interlock 59. Design - Erosion Conditions for Pumping Subgrade soil that will go into Suspension Free water between slab and subgrade Frequent heavy wheel loads / large deflections 60. Dowel bars Lengths from 15-18 in. 6.0 in. min. embedment length Diameter 1.00 - 1.25 in. for SLR Epoxy or other coating used in harsher climates for corrosion protection 61. Dowel Recommendations Dowels recommended when ADTT is greater than or equal to 80: If pavement thickness is 6 or less dowels not recommended If pavement thickness is 6.5 to 7.5 use 1 dowels If pavement thickness is 8 or greater use 1 dowels 62. Faulting Model Faulting, in 0.20Dense-graded base No dowel0.15Permeable base No dowel0.10Dense-graded base 1-in dowel0.05 0.00 0Dense-graded base 1.25-in dowel 510 15 Traffic, million ESALs20 63. Construction of Concrete Pavement Plant Operations Central Mixed Concrete Plant Operations Truck Mixed Concrete Paving Operations Slipform Paving Paving Operations Fixed Form Paving Saw & Seal Central Mix Concrete Batch Plant 64. Construction Specifications Smoothness 10-20 ft. Straightedge Profilograph Index Texture Speeds less than 40 mph Burlap Drag Astroturf Drag 65. Curing and Protection 66. Curing Curing is one of the most important steps in quality concrete construction and one of the most neglected. Effective curing is absolutely essential for surface durability. Durability = resistance to 67. Curing Curing requires adequate Moisture Temperature Time If any of these factors are neglected, the desired properties will not develop 68. Membrane Curing of Concrete Evaporation from water surfacePartially saturatedCuring membraneSaturated Concrete 69. Curing The simplest, most economical and widely used method is a liquid membrane which is sprayed on the surface of a slab as soon as possible after finishing. Apply at manufactures rate of coverage. Perform field check to verify application rate. 70. Effect of Adequate Curing on Hardened Concrete Increased Strength Watertightness Abrasion resistance Freeze-thaw resistance Volume stability 71. Effect of Curing on Strength Development 72. The latest design and cost analysis tool from ACPA Determine and compare thickness requirements and costs for concrete and asphalt pavements using StreetPave. Features: Updated mechanistic design method for concrete pavement Fatigue and erosion analysis Jointing spacing & load transfer recommendations Thickness rounding and reliability considerations Analysis of existing concrete pavements Asphalt design based on the Asphalt Institute method Comparison to equivalent concrete pavement Life cycle cost analysis module Printable summary reports and charts Design summary Design factor sensitivity & life-cycle plots User-friendly format and features Walkthrough Wizard Help information for all inputs Compatible with Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, XP 73. SLR PublicationsInformation SheetMaturity Testing of ConcreteInformation Sheet- (IS Concrete Pavement for GA Business &Commuter Aircraft Information SheetLongevity and Performance of DG Pavements Information SheetSpecification Guideline for Dowel Bar Retrofitwww.pavement.comEngineering Bulletin- (EB Early Cracking Causes/Solutions Engineering Bulletin-(EB 74. Indiana Concrete ResourcesJerry LarsonMike Byers Pat LongChris Tull, P.E., LEED AP 75. Questions? Contacts for further information www.irmca.comwww.indianaconcretepavement.com INDIANA CHAPTER 76. Thank You