Upload
wwwffofrorg-foundation-for-oral-facial-rehabilitiation
View
639
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
19. Soft Tissue Procedures
Moustafa H El-Ghareeb BDS MS The Surgical Implant Center UCLA School of Dentistry
This program of instruction is protected by copyright ©. No portion of this program of instruction may be reproduced, recorded or transferred by any means electronic, digital, photographic, mechanical etc., or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission.
Anatomy & Biology of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue
Similarities betwee periodontal & peri-implant ST: ! Oral epithelium ! Sulcular epithelium ! Junctional epithelium
Differences in peri-implant ST include: ! Lack of CT attachment ! Hypovascular,
hypocellular CT zone adjacent to the implant
! Absence of periodontal ligament blood supply
Sclar AG, 2003
Clinical Exam
Hard Tissue Assessment: Esthetic soft tissue results rely on good bony foundation ! The height of the alveolar crest at
adjacent teeth or in between 2 dental implants is responsible for supporting the interdental papilla
! The height and thickness of the facial bone wall is responsible for supporting the overlying marginal gingiva & provides soft tissue framing
! In order to obtain good esthetic ST outcome, hard tissue defects (vertical &/or horizontal) should be reconstructed prior to implant placement
The systematic evaluation of the esthetic implant patient starts with assessment of the underlying hard tissue
Crestal Bone Facial bone wall
Buser D, 2004
Clinical Exam Facial & ST Assessment:
Upper lip line: ! At rest, relaxed, & fully
animated ! Determine how much of teeth &
soft tissue is visible during maximal smile
! Most common tooth/gingiva to lip relationship on maximal smiling reveals the entire clinical crowns & interdental papillae
! This relationship determines what therapeutic modalities will be needed to obtain an esthetic result
! A high esthetic result is crucial with significant gingival display
High Smile Line
Low lip line
Clinical Exam
! Most common display in
the population includes the second bicuspid
! Next common is equally divided between first molar & first bicuspid
! Clinical relevance: significant display of posterior dentition & gingival tissues expands the esthetic zone beyond the anterior region (sites #6-11)
Number of teeth visible during smiling
Clinical Exam Mucosal characteristics: ! Assess amount of keratinized mucosa ! Ideally ≥ 3 mm of keratinized mucosa
around implants ! Attached mucosa is preferable but
unattached has been successful when oral hygiene is adequate (Mericske-Stern 1990)
! Attached mucosa : 1. Provides a “prosthetic-friendly”
environment 2. Facilitates OH maintenance required for
long-term success 3. Resists recession 4. Maintains predictable levels over time 5. Enhances esthetic blending
Fully Edentulous
Partially Edentulous
Clinical Exam Gingival biotype: Thick blunted: ü Resists recession & reacts to
surgical & restorative insults with pocket formation
Thin scalloped: ü Attached soft tissue is minimal ü Bony dehiscence & fenestration
defects characterize the underlying osseous structure
ü Reacts to surgical or restorative interventions with ST recession, apical migration of attachment & loss of underlying alveolar volume
Thick Blunted
Thin Scalloped
Clinical Exam Gingival margin/outline: • Sinuous versus
straight gingival pattern
• Symmetry, asymmetry
distracts from the esthetic appearance of the patient’s smile
Straight pattern Sinuous pattern
Discrepancy in gingival margin positions
Clinical Exam
! Class I: Intact or slightly reduced papilla
! Class II: Limited loss of papilla
! Class III: Severe loss of papilla
! Class IV: Absence of papilla Papilla score (Ryser et al
2005): • 4=papilla fills the entire
interdental space • 3=>50% of the space filled • 2=<50% of the space filled • 1=no papilla present
I II
III IV
Palacci 2001
Interdental papilla evaluation: Palacci classification (Palacci 2001
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures
Timing ! Before dental implant placement ! At the time of dental implant placement ! At the time of second stage surgery ! After implant restoration (least desirable)
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
! Assess amount of keratinized mucosa and proceed accordingly
! Different techniques in different situations:
ü Tissue punch or Scalloping ü Midcrestal incision ü Crestal incision but more
palatal ü Full thickness flap ü Partial thickness flap with
apical repositioning ü Pedicle rotational flaps
(papilla regeneration)
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
Tissue Punch & Scalloping: ! Indicated only when the
volume & architecture of the peri-implant ST are ideal (i.e. wide thick band of keratinized ST)
! Orient the punch more palatally to preserve excess ST volume on the facial aspect
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
ST punch cannot be used with limited amount of keratinized mucosa
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
ST punch & scalloping techniques
Soft-tissue punch
Scalloping technique
Punch & scalloping technique
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
Full-thickness flap technique
Reverse soft-tissue architecture
Full-thickness flap technique
Full thickness flap technique
H incision (full thickness flap)
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
Palacci papilla regeneration technique
Palacci 2001
Palacci double pedicle flaps
Can be performed only when adequate amount of keratinized mucosa is available
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
Palacci papilla regeneration technique
Rotation of pedicle flaps
Semi-lunar bevel incision Pedicle flaps
Palacci, 2001
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures At Time of Second Stage Surgery
! Can be utilized to increase zone of attached tissue with limitations secondary to contracture
! Apical repositioned flaps are sutured to the periosteum (arrows)
! A soft lined CD is provided to protect site, improve patient comfort & minimize relapse
Sharp supra-periosteal
dissection
Narrow zone of keratinized
mucosa
Partial thickness flap Is apically repositioned
& sutured to periosteum
Partial thickness flap with apical repositioning:
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures Preparation of recipient site: ! Ensure adequate vascularity to
support the graft (initial survival is by plasmatic diffusion )
! Provide a means of rigid immobilization of the graft (mobility disrupts the newly forming circulatory support)
! Prepare uniform surface for intimate graft adaptation
! Obtain hemostasis ü hemorrhage prevents intimate
adaptation of the graft to underlying bed through fibrin layer
ü Fibrin attaches graft to bed & provides for the plasmatic diffusion
Management of donor tissue: ! Harvest graft of adequate size to
take advantage of peripheral circulation
! Ensure a uniform graft surface for adaptation of recipient site
! Ensure adequate thickness to obtain desired volume augmentation & for survival over avascular surfaces
Free palatal & CT grafts
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures
Indications of free palatal grafts:
! ST augmentations in non
esthetic areas ! To increases the zone of
keratinized tissue around implants
Note distinct margins & poor esthetic blending with surrounding tissue
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures Free palatal Grafts (free gingival
grafts): ! Donor tissue is sized to recipient-
site dimensions ! Anterior incision is beveled to
facilitate localization of appropriate plane of dissection
! A thick split-thickness graft approaching full thickness is preferred (1.25-1.75 mm) when abutment coverage is desired
! Primary contraction is negligible with palatal grafts
! Secondary contraction is rarely a problem with thick split thickness grafts.
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures Free palatal graft harvest: ! Apply gentle traction with tissue
forceps ! A uniform graft is harvested with
sharp dissection ! Hemostasis is achieved with
electrocautery ! The donor site is dressed with
absorbable collagen ! A palatal stent or a soft lined
maxillary CD is provided to protect site & improve patient comfort
Donor site 4 weeks after surgery Adequate hemostasis achieved
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures
Creation of a uniform periosteal recipient site
Immobilization of graft at recipient site
One-year postoperative view Note secondary contraction (arrow)
Atrophic MN with thin band of attached ST
Free palatal graft
One week postoperative: Superficial epithelial
sloughing & initial revascularization
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures
Indications of subepithelial CT grafts:
! ST augmentation in esthetic
areas due to superior color match & esthetic blending
! To provide a zone of attached non mobile ST around implants
! ? The underlying CT will determine the character of the overlying epithelium
! To enhance ST contours ! To reconstruct missing ST
volume defects
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures
CT graft harvest: ! Blade is oriented parallel to surface of
palatal tissue ! CT graft is harvested ! Absorbable collagen dressing is used
to obliterate dead space ! Donor site is closed primarily ! A palatal stent may be used to support
palatal tissue & prevent hematoma formation
Soft Tissue Surgical Procedures Subepithelial CT graft recipient site: ! Has dual blood supply to support
graft revascularization (from periosteum & partial thickness cover flap or periosteum & bone surface)
Tunneling technique
Partial thickness MP flap reflection CT graft sutured to underlying periosteum
Full thickness MP flap reflection CT graft sutured to the periosteal side of the flap
References: ! Sclar AG. Soft tissue and esthetic considerations in implant
therapy. Quintessence, 2003 ! Palacci P. Esthetic implant dentistry: Soft and hard tissue
management. Quintessence, 2001 ! Buser D, Martin W, & Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for
implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61