Upload
karen-martin
View
2.015
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Company
LOGO
Strategy Deployment: Accelerating Improvement Through
Focus and Alignment
January 26, 2012 (Webinar)
Your experience with
Strategy Deployment
2
Haven't heard of
Heard of, but don'tunderstand
Understand, but haven'tdeployed
Beginning to deploy
Seasoned
47%
16% 16%
16%
5%
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Your Instructor
Early career as a scientist; migrated to quality &
operations design in the mid-80’s.
Launched Karen Martin & Associates in 1993.
Provide business performance improvement and
Lean transformation support in office, service &
knowledge work environments.
Co-author of The Kaizen Event Planner; co-
developer of Metrics-Based Process Mapping:
An Excel-Based Solution; author of forthcoming
The Outstanding Organization (McGraw-Hill,
May 2012).
Instructor in University of California, San Diego’s
Lean Enterprise program.
To subscribe to our list:
www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
3
Karen Martin, Principal
Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Webinar Schedule
Content
11:00 am -12:00 pm PT
Q&A
12:00-12:30 pm PT
4
Recorded webinars are available on our Vimeo site:
www.vimeo.com/karenmartinassoc
Materials are available on our SlideShare site:
www.slideshare.com/karenmartin2
To register for our newsletter to learn about future webinars:
www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
The Problem
1. Leaders are frustrated by the “little” measurable improvement they’ve seen.
2. Improvement professionals are not held in as high regard as they need to be.
3. Too much to do; too few resources; too little time.
4. Juggling multiple balls is: o Is inefficient
o Produces lower quality
o Produces chaos
o Slows results
5
To what degree are your organization's improvement priorities:
Always Frequently Sometimes Never
Well-defined? 11% 38% 46% 5%
Well-communicated? 9% 32% 53% 6%
Stable? (i.e., priorities only
change when absolutely
necessary)
7% 33% 47% 13%
Aligned across the organization?
(i.e., departments do not work at
cross-purposes)
7% 22% 59% 12%
Poll – 760 newsletter subscribers
Booz & Company study findings
• 49% - company has no clearly stated list of priorities • 64% - biggest frustration is having too many conflicting priorities • 82% - functional departments get competing demands from different business units
The Evidence
6
The Myth of Multi-tasking
• Not possible to do two conscious activities at once.
• You are “switch-tasking.”
• David Meyer – University of Michigan – Engineers switched between projects 5-8 times per
day
– Each switch added 20 minutes of process time
– If switch only 5x per day (1.7 hrs), adds 1.7 hrs per day = 407 hours (10 weeks) of process time per engineer
– In company w/ 15 engineers = 3 FTEs worth of labor.
7
8
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
The Role of Focus in Achievement
9
“The difference between successful people
and very successful people is that very
successful people say ‘no’ to almost
everything.”
— Commonly attributed to Warren Buffett
Apple’s Success
10
“…saying no to 1,000 things to
make sure we don’t get on the
wrong track or try to do too
much. We’re always thinking
about new markets we could
enter, but it’s only by saying
no that you can concentrate
on the things that are really
important.”
— Steve Jobs
Project Results Due to Focus
1. Sporting goods manufacturer 1. Pre-SD = 24 new product launches a year
2. Post-SD = 73 new product launches a year
3. No additional resources; higher quality
2. Rockwell Automation
0
5
10
15
20
25
Pre-Focus Post-Focus
ProjectsStarted
ProjectsCompleted
3
12 12
20
11
The Reality…
You CAN’T Do It All – and do it well.
12
Avoiding the Shiny Ball Syndrome (Organizational ADD) Requires…
13
• Clarity – about what really matters.
• Consensus – about what really matters.
• Courage – to actively choose to “not do” or “not do now.”
The Countermeasure: Strategy Deployment
Aka Hoshin kanri; policy deployment
Hoshin – Direction; compass; shining needle
Kanri – Management
Developed in the 50’s; core element of
TQM movement
Integral part of Lean
Establishes “true north”
Two key parts: Creating the plan itself &
and fanatic management to that plan.
Purpose: Organizational focus & alignment
Aligns everyone toward a few high impact
objectives while also keeping them accountable
for their commitments through visual
management and review.
14
15
Supply Chain - 2007 FG Lbs Sold/Total Hours Worked
84.8
86.3
90.6
93.0
95.2
105.9
80.0
87.0
94.0
101.0
108.0
115.0
FY '06 FY '07 FY '08 FY '09 FY '10 YTD '11
Productivity (Pounds / Hr Worked)
Pactiv
Implements
Strategy
Deployment
ThedaCare Implements
Strategy Deployment
Recession deepens 2.5x more
Medicaid patients
16
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Strategy Deployment Requirements
1. Executive buy-in.
2. Clarity about market needs and current performance.
Strong “go and see” practices.
Clear key performance indicators.
3. Clear, relevant, and well-communicated annual business
goals.
4. Strong consensus-building skills.
5. Strong accountability culture (project and task ownership).
6. Deep experience with establishing and managing to
measurable objectives.
7. Strong commitment to and experience with PDSA (plan-do-
study-adjust)—aka PDCA (plan-do-check-act).
17
Key Feature: Catchball
18
Exec
Team
Sr. Mgmt
Middle
Mgmt
Frontlines
What?
How?
Who?
When?
What?
How?
Who?
When?
What?
How?
Who?
When?
What?
How?
Who?
When?
© 2011 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Strategy Deployment Requirements
1. Executive buy-in.
2. Clarity about market needs and current performance.
Strong “go and see” practices.
Clear key performance indicators.
3. Clear, relevant, and well-communicated annual business
goals.
4. Strong consensus-building skills.
5. Strong accountability culture (project and task
ownership).
6. Deep experience with establishing and managing to
measurable objectives.
7. Strong commitment to and experience with PDSA (plan-do-
study-adjust)—aka PDCA (plan-do-check-act). 19
= Original Plan x = Complete
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Deliverable Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
1 - Identify top 10 products to be mapped Jim Top 10 identif ied and communicated 01/31/06 X
2 - Assign leaders to each product to be mapped Jim Leaders aw are of their products 02/03/06
3 - Lean training to all VSM Leaders Frank Consultant delivers training 02/15/06
4a - VSM kaizen for product A Jill Mapped and on the w all 02/22/06
4b - Complete actions to achieve 30% reduction in overall leadtime Jill Validated results 04/02/06
5a - VSM kaizen for product B Cindy Mapped and on the w all 03/15/06
5b - Complete actions to achieve 10% reduction in overall leadtime Cindy Validated results 05/12/06
6a - VSM kaizent for product C Wendy Mapped and on the w all 06/02/06
6b - Complete actions toachieve 28% reduction in overall leadtime Wendy Validated results 10/14/06
7a - VSM kaizen for product D Bill Mapped and on the w all 07/14/06
7b - Complete actions to achieve 12% reduction in overall leadtime Bill Validated results 07/30/06
8a - VSM kaizen for product E Jim Mapped and on the w all 08/16/06
8b - Complete actions to achieve 8% reduction in overall leadtime Jim Validated results 12/12/06
Background: Being new to Value Stream Mapping, we expect there to be many new things learned as we map the processes and make the
improvements. We will utilize the experience of a Consultant during our first year of mapping our processes.
Relation to Annual Objective: By mapping the processes and taking action to
improve the processes, we will reduced the time it takes from reciept of order to the
delivery of product. This will in turn result in increased sales when the customers
become increasingly satisfied with our quick response times.
Timeline
Planned
Complete
Date
2011
Action Plan
Status Red, Yellow, Green
(Actual and Predicted)
Date Created:
Dec. 12, 2005
Next Review:
Feb. 13, 2006
Improvement Priority:
3 - Value Stream Map 10 Processes
Management Owner:
Bob the Boss
Team: Jim, Bill, Jill, Cindy, Wendy
20
© 2011 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Strategy Deployment Requirements
1. Executive buy-in.
2. Clarity about market needs and current performance.
Strong “go and see” practices.
Clear key performance indicators.
3. Clear, relevant, and well-communicated annual business
goals.
4. Strong consensus-building skills.
5. Strong accountability culture (project and task ownership).
6. Deep experience with establishing and managing to
measurable objectives.
7. Strong commitment to and experience with PDSA (plan-
do-study-adjust)—aka PDCA (plan-do-check-act).
21
Common Components of the A3 Report
Theme: “What is our area of focus?” Owner: Person accountable for results.
Plan Do, Study, Adjust
Background
Current Condition
Countermeasures / Implementation Plan
Effect Confirmation
Follow-up Actions
• What?
• Who?
• When?
• Where? (if relevant)
Target Condition / Measurable Objectives
• Diagram of desired state
• Measurable targets – how will we know that
the improvement has been successful?
• Diagram of current situation or process
• What about it is not ideal?
• Extent of the problem (metrics)
• Problem statement
• Context - why is this a problem?
Root Cause & Gap Analysis
• Graphical depiction of the most likely direct
(root) causes
• What measurable results did the solution
achieve (or will be measured to verify
effectiveness)?
• Who’s responsible for ongoing
measurement?
• Where else in the organization can this
solution be applied?
• How will the improved state be standardized
and communicated?
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Strategy Deployment Requirements
Organizational commitment to and display
of key excellence-producing behaviors:
Clarity
Focus
Discipline
Engagement
23
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
What if you don’t have that?
Start wherever you are.
Develop an “annual improvement plan” for
your department, division, work team, etc.
Use the features of SD that enable success at
any level.
Clear goals.
Discipline to both “do” (say yes) and “stop doing”
(say no).
Consensus / alignment
Fanatic management to assure excellent
execution.
24
Current Condition
Point A
Target Condition
Point B
Environmental Factors
Problems Opportunities
Annual Improvement Plan: How to Get from Point A to Point B
25
Annual Improvement Plan
1. Gain clarity around overarching business needs.
2. List everything you could do (and that you are
doing).
3. Categorize into:
“Must-do, can’t fail”
Maybe
Eliminate
4. Decide what you will do – prioritize “maybe’s”
5. Create plan.
6. Manage plan via weekly updates (may be able to
reduce to monthly reviews – but be careful!)
26
PACE Prioritization Grid
High Low Anticipated Benefit
Ease o
f Im
ple
men
tati
on
Dif
fic
ult
E
as
y
20
7
5 13
4 23
1
22 8 9
2
10
16
11
6
12
14 19
15
17
3 21
18
Figure 3.1 - Prioritization Grid
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Ea
se
of
Imp
lem
en
tati
on
Potential Benefit
Evolving Prioritization Grid Third dimension: Urgency
Mathematical Formula
Highest
priority
Annual Improvement Plan
1. Gain clarity around overarching business
needs.
2. List everything you could do.
3. Categorize into:
“Must-do, can’t fail”
Maybe
Eliminate
4. Decide what you will do – prioritize “maybe’s”
5. Create plan.
6. Manage plan via weekly updates (may be able
to reduce to monthly reviews – but be careful!)
29
Simple Project Plan
Task Type Accountable Implementation Schedule (weeks)
Progress Date
Complete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Create visual board to track KPIs. KE Mary W. 100 25
75 50
Clearn up data base. Proj George S. 100 25
75 50
Create self-quality checklist. KE Sally R. 100 25
75 50
Create standard template. KE Sally R. 100 25
75 50
Modify weekly report. JDI Bruce M. 100 25
9/22/2011 75 50
100 25
75 50
100 25
75 50
100 25
75 50
100 25
75 50
100 25
75 50
Type: JDI = Just do it; KE = Kaizen Event; Proj = Project
30
31
X
# Action Item Owner Deliverable Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Status
(Red,
Yellow,
Green)
Core work team: Input/Review needed by:
Annual Improvement Plan
TimelineRelationship to Annual Business Goal(s):
Due
Date2012
= Original Plan = Complete
Tier 1 Priority:
Tier 2 Priority:
Measurable Objective(s):
%
Complete
Date Created:
Next Review:
Executive Owner:
Tactical Owner:
Background/Scope:
Annual Improvement Plan Timeline
32
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Integrate DHR BeginMS-1
Ops
MS-2
Acct
Complete
Brad P
Complete New
Travel Program
Roll-out
Begin Complete Scott R Fred S
Roll-out Tablets to
Installation
Begin &
CompleteBrad P
Complete 360
Roll-outBegin Complete Justin C Steve R
Lisa D,
Marina,
SM, Tech,
Hal, Doug
Create Line-item
P.O.sBegin Complete Lisa B Mark C
Refinance credit
facil ityBegin Scott R
Complete ADP
Roll-outBegin Complete Gary O
Develop & Roll-out
Handheld 2.2Begin
MS-1
Clean Code
MS-2
Pilot
MS-3
Go live
Not
complete
until 2013
Steve C TBD
Complete GPS
Roll-outBegin Complete Steve C
RDs Cons.,
HR, Fleet
Complete "River"
(One Soft)
Roll-out
Begin Complete Lisa B
Develop Safety
ProgramBegin Complete Gary O
Tactical
OwnerOthers
Company ABC
Priorities
FY 2012 FY 2013Priority
Exec
Owner
Annual Improvement Plan
1. Gain clarity around overarching business needs.
2. List everything you could do.
3. Categorize into:
“Must-do, can’t fail”
Maybe
Eliminate
4. Decide what you will do – prioritize “maybe’s”
5. Create plan.
6. Manage plan via weekly updates (may be able
to reduce to monthly reviews – but be
careful!)
33
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Weekly Updates: Purpose
Check progress.
Challenge thinking.
Remove obstacles to success.
Consider new and truly urgent needs.
Maintain alignment / consensus.
Demonstrate disciplined focus.
Success with new behaviors/habits embeds those new
behaviors/habits.
34
© 2012 Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Caution
Be sure you prioritize problems versus “solutions.”
Understand that consensus doesn’t mean 100%
agreement, but it does mean that 100% of the
people had an opportunity to provide input and
were heard.
Be sure you use the PDSA (PDCA) scientific
method for solving problems and capturing
opportunities.
35
Phase Detailed Steps
1. Define the problem or opportunity.
2. Set a target condition.
3. Grasp the current condition.
4. Conduct root cause analysis.
5. Identify potential countermeasure(s).
6. Develop & test countermeasure(s).
7. Refine and finalize
countermeasure(s).
8. Implement countermeasure(s).
Study 9. Measure; evaluate results.
10. Refine and standardize.
11. Monitor performance.
12. Set a new target condition.
Adjust
Do
Clarifying the PDSA Cycle
Plan
To achieve focused improvement, you need…
• Resignation – Acceptance re: how much is humanly possible.
• Courage
– To seek the truth about current performance
– To make tough choices • Select only “must-do, can’t fail” initiatives
• Must choose to “not do”
• Convert from what you could do to what you will do
• Emphasis on needs versus wants
• Discipline – to stick with a plan.
37
For Further Study
2012 Webinars
Month Topic
February A Factory of One – Dan Markovitz
March The Outstanding Organization: Achieving Clarity
April The Outstanding Organization: Achieving Focus
May The Outstanding Organization: Achieving Discipline
June The Outstanding Organization: Achieving Engagement
39
The Outstanding
Organization by Karen Martin
Book launch – May 18, 2012
Available for preorder on
www.Amazon.com
Your Questions
1. How do you use SD to keep participants focused on achieving their goals in a Kaizen Event?
2. How to hold managers accountable for goals & keeping them from getting side tracked on side jobs that arise.
3. How I can assist my org with SD from a non-supervisory position? (How on earth can I accomplish this???)
4. How it can be implemented in a hospital environment.
5. How strategy & actions are linked and deployed in bigger organizations.
6. How to engage management and gain total commitment to Lean.
40
41
Karen Martin, Principal
7770 Regents Road #635
San Diego, CA 92122
858.677.6799
For Further Questions
Connect, learn, and thought-share
Monthly newsletter: www.ksmartin.com/subscribe