This document is incomplete without the accompanying discussion;

it is confidential and intended solely for the information and benefit of the immediate recipient hereof.

Discussion Material

November 26, 2013

Improving Performance

thru. the engaged People

1

Talent Mgmt.

Agenda

I. About People Management

1. Paradigm Shift in People Mnagement

2. ?

3. Discussion : .. in People Management

II. To work with Right People

1. Disciplines

2.

3. Engagement

IV. Wrap Up

1. Gr. Discussion : How to solve ..

2. Comment

2

Talent Mgmt.

I. About People Management

,

,

,

?

21 (People Management)

Source : Hewitt Associates

, , .

Larry Bossidy, Allied Signal

3

Talent Mgmt.

1. Paradigm Shift

(Engagement).

( )

,

()

HR : ,

()

Leader :

! (Charisma?)

Living

( )

Engagement

( )

Commitment

( )

?

,

( )

HR :

,

(

)

Leader :

Controller

?

(Work Smart)

,

Energy/Idea,

HR :

(

)

Leader :

Motivator, Coordinator

IMF

4

Talent Mgmt.

2. ?

(Towers Perrin, Jobs Korea )

P Survey Result

vs. ? ?

Myth

Offer

Myth

Keeping

Myth

...

Myth

Reality

,

.

Reality

,

Commitment .

Reality

(

) .

Reality

me-too

. ,

,

Myth vs. Reality

5

Talent Mgmt.

/

,

~

( )

?

3. Discussion : .. in People Management

6

Talent Mgmt.

,

()

Global No. 1 Top Class Culture, Leadership, People

Soft Issue

Soft Issue? No!

III. To work with Right People _ 1. Disciplines

(Discipline)

!

,

(99.9% )

( )

(Spirit)

Source : J. Collins, Good to Great : Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others

Dont, HarperCollins Publishers, 2001.

7

Talent Mgmt.

Jumping

/

(Mgmt. by Culture)

(Mgmt. by Disciplines)

(Mgmt. by Man)

,

(Growing Pains) ?

/

Gap ()

.

8

Talent Mgmt.

2.

,

()

Global No. 1 Top Class Culture, Leadership, People

Soft Issue

Soft Issue? No!

9

Talent Mgmt.

3. Engagement

Engagement 100

(%, S&P 500 , Fortune)

100

Best

S&P

500

10 5 3 (06)

25

37

25

34

17 21

26

12.6

Engagement Score

70% ,

, LG ,

/HR

Cycle

Source: Barber, Hayday, Beven. Institute

For Employment Studies, 1999.

Leadership

Employee

Engagement

Service

26%

16%

52%

23% 75%

82%

Engagement Sales ( )

10

Talent Mgmt.

Google vs. S

, , , ,

, ,

()

( HR H )

A S/W ,

, ,

,

, ,

,

S

VS.

1 : ,

,

2 : ,

, ( ?)

11

Talent Mgmt.

/

(D., 50 Guru )

, 21 If, Then

( )

. /

, . ,

, , /

, ,

:

, Soft , ,

, Soft

/

70

57 40

38

45

52 48

31

44

55

27 25

22

42 40

72

56

35

48

28

,

10

10 (100 ,

Hewitt)

, ,

,

Soft,

, / ,

Hard

12

Talent Mgmt.

III. Wrap Up _ 1. Gr. Discussion : How to solve ..

Comment

.. .