Upload
john-phillips
View
114
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Notes from Gary Hamel @profhamelAmcham Conference, Melbourne 8 Dec 2014
CharterMason perspective by John Phillips au.linkedin.com/in/johnphillips11kps
What Matters Now?
core competenciesinternational cross-subsidization
strategic intentcollaborative competitionexpeditionary marketing
Hamel (with Prahalad) originated concepts such
as ...
He was Visiting Professor of International Business
at the University of Michigan and at Harvard
Business School.
Gary’s Books (as of Dec 2014)● The Core Competence of the Corporation - 1990
● Strategy as Revolution - 1996
● Competing for the future - 1996
● Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering - 1998
● Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Environment - 1999
● Leading the Revolution - 2000
● The Quest for Resilience - 2003
● The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation - 2006
● The Future of Management - 2007
● "Funding Growth in an Age of Austerity" - 2004
● "What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation" - 2011
Gary’s Books● The Core Competence of the Corporation - 1990
● Strategy as Revolution - 1996
● Competing for the future - 1996
● Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering - 1998
● Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Environment - 1999
● Leading the Revolution - 2000
● The Quest for Resilience - 2003
● The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation - 2006
● The Future of Management - 2007
● "Funding Growth in an Age of Austerity" - 2004
● "What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation" - 2011
Also many articles for publications like Harvard Business Review and McKinsey Quarterly
Gary’s Books● The Core Competence of the Corporation - 1990
● Strategy as Revolution - 1996
● Competing for the future - 1996
● Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering - 1998
● Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Environment - 1999
● Leading the Revolution - 2000
● The Quest for Resilience - 2003
● The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation - 2006
● The Future of Management - 2007
● "Funding Growth in an Age of Austerity" - 2004
● "What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation" - 2011
One of these books (and an animated movie) was an inspiration for the creation and design of the company that led to CharterMasonWe’ll talk about this later...
… unless we can reinvent management, every bit as
dramatically as we have reinvented our products or our operating
model, companies are not going to succeed in the years ahead.
Gary’s Agenda for the day
Facing the FutureWhat Really Matters Now
Escaping the pastWhy Bureaucracy Must Die
Hacking ManagementThe New DNA of Success
Making a DifferenceHow to Become a Champion of Change
The depressing state of engagement
Gallup survey of employee engagement: [ONLY!] 13% of employees across 142 countries worldwide are engaged in their jobs — that is, they are emotionally invested in and focused on creating value for their organizations every day.
The depressing state of engagement
In Australia and New Zealand we’re doing a little better, 24% of adults who work for an employer are engaged, while 60% are not engaged and 16% are actively disengaged.
So a quarter of your team want to play for you, most don’t really care and a sixth don’t even want to be on the pitch.
Who wants to be runner-up “least worst”?
[My] favourite Hamel’isms
“Change Management is an oxymoron”
“What matters now is not resources but resourcefulness”
“In 1987 60% of computing power was in hand held calculators”
“More of the same isn't
going to get us there”Management 1.0 was designed to excise irregularity
What matters now: personal “klout”Who has the highest “klout” score?Whose internal blogs are most read?Whose expertise is most widely recognised?Who responds the quickest to internal requests?Whose responses are most highly rated?Who are the “nodes” in internal social networks?Who has the most links across internal staff?Who do customers request most often?
The German sociologist Max Weber argued that bureaucracy constitutes the most efficient and rational way in which human activity can be organized, and that systematic processes and organized hierarchies were necessary to maintain order, maximize efficiency and eliminate favoritism. But even Weber saw unfettered bureaucracy as a threat to individual freedom, in which an increase in the bureaucratization of human life can trap individuals in an "iron cage" of rule-based, rational control - Wikipedia
Innovation is irregularity
What made us successful in the past will kill us in the future - Jeff Wareing (CharterMason)
Bureaucracy was designed to excise irregularity
What’s wrong with organisations
Inertia - too slow
Incremental - too short-sighted
Sterile - no (really different) ideas
“We are captives of a paradigm that places the pursuit of efficiency ahead of every other goal”
Hierarchy of needs for organisations
● Passion● Imagination● Initiative● Intellect● Diligence● Obedience
The bottom three are now commodities but remain the focus of most organisations.
What matters then and nowThenPlanning BudgetingAllocating MeasuringEvaluating OrganisingCoordinating SupervisingStructuringMotivatingRewardingTrainingHiring
NowWhat do you think?
What matters then and nowThenPlanning BudgetingAllocating MeasuringEvaluating OrganisingCoordinating SupervisingStructuringMotivatingRewardingTrainingHiring
Now according to GaryBlogs HacksPodcasts FolksonomiesSocial Networks Opinion MarketsCrowd Sourcing Social curationOnline forums Peer ratingsMash-ups WikisTags
The New DNA of Success
Management 1.0● Formalisation● Standarisation● Specialisation● Hierarchy● Unity of command● Conformance● Extrinsic rewards
The New DNA of Success
Management 1.0● Formalisation● Standarisation● Specialisation● Hierarchy● Unity of command● Conformance● Extrinsic rewards
Management 2.0What do you think?
Management 1.0 vs 2.0
Management 1.0FormalisationStandardisationSpecialisationHierarchyUnity of commandConformanceExtrinsic rewards
Management 2.0ExperimentationDisaggregationMeritocracyCommunitiesMarketsOpennessFreedom
Atlassian
12 Year Old Australian Software Company2010 USD 60m Investment by Accel Partners valued the company at ~ USD 3.5bn2014 revenues ~ USD150m800+ employeesMakes software tools to plan, collaborate, code and serviceOffices in Australia, US, Netherlands
Open Company, No Bullshit
Atlassian embraces transparency wherever practical, and sometimes where impractical. All information, both internal and external, is public by default. We are not afraid of being honest with ourselves, our staff, and our customers.
Build with Heart and Balance
Every day we try to build useful products that people lust after. Building with heart means really caring about what we're making and doing–it's a mission, not just a job. When we build with balance we take into account how initiatives and decisions will affect our colleagues, customers, and stakeholders.
Don't #@!% the Customer
When we make decisions we ask ourselves, "How will this affect our customers?" If the answer is that it would screw them over, or make life more difficult, then we need to find a better way. We want the customer to respect us in the morning.
Play as a team
We want all Atlassians to feel like they work with Atlassian, not for Atlassian. We think it's important to have fun with your workmates while working and contributing to the Atlassian team.
Be the change you seek
We think Gandhi had it right when he said, "We need to be the change we wish to see in the world". At Atlassian we encourage everyone to create positive change. We're constantly looking for ways to improve our company, our products, and our environment.
Atlassian Structure
Based on an extended Agile model where all offices in all locations are organised as small teams.Performance Reviews turned into weekly coaching sessions with a simple 2 dimensional scale (no grid) with assessment of performance every 6 months.
“The coolest company in Australia”? BRW
Morning Star is serious company
Largest US Grower and Processor of tomatoes (40% of US market in paste and diced tomatoes).Processes 1100 tons+ of tomatoes per hour.Several processing plants and farms400 full-time plus 2400 harvest time employees
Operating in an industry renowned for poor industrial relations and worker conditions
Yet this is a company where...
● No one has a boss● Employees negotiate responsibilities with their
peers● Everyone can spend the company’s money
without limits● Each individual is responsible for acquiring the
tools needed to do his or her work● There are no titles and no promotions● Compensation decisions are peer-based
Morning Star – a libertarian mission
All professionals will be self-managing professionals, initiating communications and coordination of their activities with colleagues, customers, suppliers and fellow industry participants absent directives from others
The Morning Star Model• Make the mission the boss - at a personal level
• Let employees forge agreementsColleague Letter Of Understanding (CLOU). Every Year. Also between Units (processing plants, logistics, farms etc)
• Empower Everyone - Truly. Not trickled down but built in
• Don’t force people into boxes
• Encourage competition for impact, not promotions
• Freedom to succeed [this is libertarianism, not communism]
• Conflict resolution and due process
• Peer review and the challenge process
Gore is significant global force
Makes innovative, technology-driven solutions, from medical devices that treat aneurysms to high-performance GORE‑TEX® fabrics. Privately held, annual USD 3 billion+ annual sales.10,000 employees, called associates, with manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan and China, and sales offices around the world.
Four principles for Associates1. Fairness to each other and everyone with whom we
come in contact2. Freedom to encourage, help, and allow other associates
to grow in knowledge, skill, and scope of responsibility3. The ability to make one's own commitments and keep
them4. Consultation with other associates before undertaking
actions that could impact the reputation of the company
How does Gore make it work
Associates are hired for general work areas. With the guidance of their sponsors (not bosses) and a growing understanding of opportunities and team objectives, Associates commit to projects that match their skills.
All of this takes place in an environment that combines freedom with cooperation and autonomy with synergy.
How does leadership work?
Everyone can earn the credibility to define and drive projects. Leaders may be appointed, but are defined by 'followership.' More often, leaders emerge naturally by demonstrating special knowledge, skill, or experience that advances a business objective.
Choosing the new Gore CEO
When Chuck Carroll retired in 2005, the board polled a wide cross-section of Gore employees asking who they’d be willing to follow, they could nominate anyone in the company. One of those employees was Terri Kelly, who had joined Gore as a graduate in Engineering in ‘83. To Terri’s surprise, the new CEO turned out to be her.
Followership in action.
Example: UK Health Service5th largest employer in the world (after the US DoD, Red Army, Walmart, and McDonalds)A million patients use its services every day.Not known for its agility
In mid 2012 a small group of trainee doctors started a conversation on twitter. By March 2013 189,000 people had pledged to projects to make a positive difference to patients.
The biggest ever collective action to improve healthcare (so far…) . Read more here
How to run an innovation marketThere are three markets: Spazdaq, Bow Jones and Savings Bonds.Any employee can “IPO” a new idea by preparing a “budge-it”.Every employee gets $10,000 in Mutual Fun money to invest in an internal stock marketA ‘market maker’ periodically values each security based on “compound interest”Ideas that make it into the top twenty by valuation get a formal allocation of funds.The IPO team gets a 25% dividend from the profits or savings of a successful idea
A call to arms
Past CEOs have often been narcissists, flattered and thrilled by their EVPs. Head office staffers are the leprosy of our organisation. A top down model ignores the world around it and I will do everything I can to change it.Gary Hamel(adapted from Pope Francis…)
! Warning ! This is a bureaucracy free zone
Pettifogging desk jockeys, butt kissing suck-ups, meddling head office stoolies, half-witted bean counters, self important staff weanies, sadistic bosses, and pencil pushing blowhards will be named, shamed and run off the property
Which book inspired the creation of CharterMason?● The Core Competence of the Corporation - 1990
● Strategy as Revolution - 1996
● Competing for the future - 1996
● Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering - 1998
● Strategic Flexibility: Managing in a Turbulent Environment - 1999
● Leading the Revolution - 2000
● The Quest for Resilience - 2003
● The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation - 2006
● The Future of Management - 2007
● "Funding Growth in an Age of Austerity" - 2004
● "What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation" - 2011
This is the book that was a key inspiration for CharterMason’s original creation and design
In the 1998 film by Dreamworks, Ant ‘Z’ voiced by Woody Allen was the freedom seeking individual who dared to challenge convention
The lead character ‘Z’ from Dreamworks’ “Antz”
Management Innovation Exchange “MIX”
http://www.managementexchange.com/Website designed to allow management “hackers” to share ideas, content, stories, and recognise award winning hacks.Lots of good content, including the stories told today, in full, from their original authors.Worth checking out.
What do you think?
Do you agree with Gary about what matters now?
Is CharterMason ready for what matters now?
Are our clients ready for what matters now?
Are you ready for what matters now?
Could we be a poster company for Gary?
What would Gary do?
What will you do?
The Hackathon ProcessPhase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
Why adaptability matters now
The enemies of adaptability
The design principles of adaptable organisations
Investing in mini hacks
Developing and initiating management hacks
What did we discover
Challenges of Management 2.0Tougher AdjustmentSelf-management doesn’t suit everyone. Employees who’ve worked all their lives in hierarchical organizations may not be able to cope.
Accountability ChallengesIf employees fail to deliver a strong message to colleagues who don’t meet expectations, self-management can become a conspiracy of mediocrity.
Longer InductionIt takes time to fit in. New employees may need a year or more to become fully functional in the system.
Growth IssuesWithout a corporate ladder to climb, employees find it difficult to evaluate their progress relative to peers. That can become a handicap when someone wants to switch companies.
Moonshots
Mend the SoulUnleash Capability Foster Renewal Expand Minds Distribute Power Seek Balance
Focus the work of management on a higher purpose
Increase trust, reduce fear
Make direction setting bottom-up and outside-in Enlarge the frame of
management education
Build “natural” flexible hierachies Develop holistic
performance measuresReinvent the means
of control
Experiment more often and more cheaply
Redfine the work of leadership
Embed the ethos of community and citizenship
Amplify imagination Create internal markets for ideas talent & resources
Retool management for an open and borderless world
Create a democracy of information Transcend
traditional management trade-offsEnable communities
of passion Expand the scope of employee autonomy
Humanize the language of business
Capture the advantages of diversity
De-politicise decision making Rethink the
philosophical foundations of management
Stretch management timeframes and perspectivesTake the work out of
workDisaggregate the organisation
Encourage the dissenters
What needs to be done to create organisations that are fit for the future?