44
1 Urban Agriculture: Community Gardening Practices By Ryan Sloan A Major Paper Submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Natural Resources Major: Natural Resources Committee Dr. David L. Trauger, Chair; Dr. David P. Robertson, Dr. Alan D. Thornhill November 7, 2009 Falls Church, VA Key Words: community gardens, urban Agriculture, sustainability, conservation

Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

Citation preview

Page 1: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

1

Urban Agriculture: Community Gardening Practices

By

Ryan Sloan

A Major Paper Submitted to the faculty of the

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Natural Resources

Major: Natural Resources

Committee

Dr. David L. Trauger, Chair; Dr. David P. Robertson, Dr. Alan D. Thornhill

November 7, 2009

Falls Church, VA

Key Words: community gardens, urban Agriculture, sustainability, conservation

David
Inserted Text
Theory and Practice of Community Gardening???
David
Note
Page 2: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

2

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 

Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 5 

URBAN AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................... 6 

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 

Defining Urban Agriculture ............................................................................................................ 6 

Historical Analysis of Urban Agriculture ....................................................................................... 8 

Urban Agriculture Practices ............................................................................................................ 9 

COMMUNITY GARDEN THEORY ....................................................................................... 10 

Defining Community Gardens ...................................................................................................... 10 

Social and Cultural Components .................................................................................................. 11 

Community Pride and Involvement ...................................................................................... 11 

Empowerment of the Growers .............................................................................................. 11 

Improved Health, Increased Recreation, Relaxation, Creativity Opportunities ................... 12 

Community Growth Opportunities ....................................................................................... 12 

Decreased Crime ................................................................................................................... 13 

Educational Opportunities .................................................................................................... 14 

Environmental and Ecological Components ................................................................................. 14 

More Green Space and Heat Sinks ....................................................................................... 14 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................... 14 

Natural Resource Sustainability ............................................................................................ 15 

Economic and Political Components ............................................................................................ 15 

Individual Economics ........................................................................................................... 15 

Page 3: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

3

Additional Food Sources and Choices .................................................................................. 16 

Employment Opportunities ................................................................................................... 16 

Helping the U.S. Become Healthier and Potentially Lower Health Costs............................ 16 

Local Community Food Security .......................................................................................... 17 

COMMUNITY GARDEN PRACTICE .................................................................................... 18 

Case Study: Nottoway Park Community Garden ......................................................................... 18 

Why is Community Gardening Good for Fairfax County, Virginia ............................................. 18 

Fairfax County Park System, Green Spring Gardens ........................................................... 19 

Fairfax County Parks, Nottoway Park in Fairfax, Virginia .................................................. 20 

Considerations for Nottoway Park’s Community Garden Plots ................................................... 21 

Assessment of Nottoway Park Garden Plots, Summer-Fall 2009 ........................................ 21 

Table 1. Composition of Plot Table and Percentages .......................................................... 24 

Photo Series for Nottoway Park ............................................................................................ 25 

Encouraging the Practice in Other Areas of Fairfax County ........................................................ 25 

Recommendations for Encouraging Community Gardens in Fairfax County .............................. 26 

Partnering with Schools ........................................................................................................ 26 

Involving Students ................................................................................................................ 27 

Non-profits ............................................................................................................................ 27 

Facilitated Volunteer Groups ................................................................................................ 27 

National or State Grants ........................................................................................................ 28 

Inventory and Analysis of Community Food Production ..................................................... 28 

DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 29 

Challenges of Community Gardens .............................................................................................. 29 

Benefits of Urban Agriculture ...................................................................................................... 32 

Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 33 

Page 4: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

4

Appendix A: Nottoway Park Assessment of Current Community Garden Practices .................. 35 

Appendix B: Photo Series for Nottoway Park ............................................................................. 36 

Set 1: Example Plots Growing Vegetables .......................................................................... 36 

Set 2: Example Plot Growing Only Ornamentals ................................................................ 37 

Set 3: Example Plots Growing Both Vegetables and Ornamentals ..................................... 38 

Set 4: Example of Poorly Maintained Plots ......................................................................... 39 

Set 5: Example of Bare or Overgrown Plots ........................................................................ 40 

Appendix C: Photo of Outreach Opportunity Location ............................................................... 41 

Works Cited .................................................................................................................................. 42 

Page 5: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

5

Abstract

Urban Agriculture is a commonly implemented concept throughout the United States (US) and

internationally. Urban Agriculture varies in form and function from place to place and person to

person. From the community that needs Urban Agriculture as a source of food security to the

person who views Urban Agriculture a recreational hobby, to the idealist who works toward a

reduced carbon footprint; Urban Agriculture is many things to many different people.

This paper is intended to provide the reader with an overview of the concept of Urban

Agriculture, and specifically discuss the utility of implementing the Urban Agriculture practice

of community gardening within Fairfax County, a major metropolitan area of Virginia. The

challenges and benefits of the type of Urban Agriculture called community gardens are laid out.

The object was to identify possible reasons for the success or failure of gardens and identify

steps that could enhance an already functioning community garden while ultimately encouraging

the practice. The main sections of this paper are: an introductory section providing the

background on the concept of Urban Agriculture; an analysis of the practice of community

gardening; a discussion of the utility of implementing community garden practices in Vienna,

Virginia; and concluding remarks for adopting the paper’s recommendations and implementation

strategies for the Nottoway Park community garden, that could be applied elsewhere.

Audience:

Northern Virginia residents, other public, parks or other open spaces potentially interested in

Urban Agriculture techniques.

Outlets and Major Paper Products:

Major paper, powerpoint presentation for Major Paper Exam

David
Note
Why is this capitalized?
David
Note
What exactly do you mean by utility? Utility for whom/what?
David
Note
Success or failure according to what criteria? Success looks different to different people?
David
Cross-Out
David
Inserted Text
how
David
Cross-Out
David
Cross-Out
Page 6: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

6

URBAN AGRICULTURE

Introduction

This section presents a synthesis of over-arching themes surrounding Urban Agriculture,

including: (1) an overview of the concept of Urban Agriculture; (2) an historical review of

Urban Agriculture, including where it is thought to originate; and (3) types of Urban Agriculture

practices found throughout the United States, with brief examples. The information in this

section is intended to provide a context and set the groundwork for a better understanding of the

components that make up Urban Agriculture. To fully understand the concept and the

subsequent Urban Agriculture practices, it is necessary to have knowledge of the terms,

techniques, policies that form Urban Agriculture.

Defining Urban Agriculture

Urban Agriculture in itself is a difficult term to define. It means different things to different

people. In defining ‘Urban Agriculture’, the term can be broken down first into two parts:

‘urban’ and ‘agriculture’. It is helpful to first look at how ‘urban’ is defined, as opposed to its

acronym ‘rural’. As the population increases, the ‘line’ that distinguishes urban from rural

becomes increasing blurred. There will undoubtedly be a continued expansion of our cities,

which will push the urban-boundary lines further out into lands that were historically farmland,

or considered rural. Areas that were once considered rural may become ‘urbanized’ in some

fashion or another, and the land previously used for farming and agriculture may become

developed. In these urban sprawl situations, the idea of planning for and/or implementing the

concept of Urban Agriculture may become more prevalent. One distinction used to set Urban

Agriculture apart from other agriculture is the term Urban and peri-urban Agriculture (UPA).

The term UPA is used to describe agriculture that takes place in suburban areas of cities. (25) In

some instances, it the differences between UPA and large-scale agricultural production are clear,

although this may not always be the case. For example, when cities are planned with large plots

of land to serve as agricultural centers to feed a portion of its population, whether or not this

practice is considered an application of the concept of UPA is debatable. In these instances, the

David
Cross-Out
Page 7: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

7

definition becomes blurred. In other UPA scenarios, such as community gardens located in

urban areas, the distinction is better understood. For the purposes of this paper we will refer to

UPA as simply, Urban Agriculture.

The second and most critical part of Urban Agriculture is the term ‘agriculture’. Throughout the

world the term agriculture conjures up images of large swaths of land used for both growing

vegetables and fruits or for raising livestock. As the human population increases over time, it is

necessary for countries to dedicate land, human-power, and money to feed their people. Yet as

societies progress, it is fundamental that more inventive and effective methods of producing food

become available. Urban Agriculture also becomes “a modern-day system for combating hunger

and related food security issues, as well as an effective framework for creating and implementing

community development practices; demonstrated by the successful urban agricultural endeavors

found throughout the world.” (25)

So what exactly is the combination of ‘urban’ and ‘agriculture’? A defining aspect of Urban

Agriculture is that it evolves to address the conditions and needs of the implementers at that

time. A portion of the success and benefits of Urban Agriculture is contributed because the

concept and application is not static. As technology progresses, so do the efforts that allow for

better implementation of Urban Agriculture and its practices. As humans strive to develop more

sustainable environments in which to live, they also continue to stretch the boundaries of where,

how, to what extent, and in which ways the Urban Agriculture concept can be applied.

This paper will narrow the scope of the definition of Urban Agriculture to that which is directly

associated with producing food for individual use on private property or in community garden

plots. It should be noted that most researchers define Urban Agriculture in broader terms that

include production facilities. For example Urban Agriculture was defined “as the growing,

processing, and distribution of food and other products through intensive plant cultivation and

animal husbandry in and around cities.” (3) While this definition is certainly relevant to the

more specific topic presented in this paper, considering Urban Agriculture at this much larger

scale of operation is too broad for addressing the specific research statement in the context of this

paper. For this reason, an encompassing yet limited definition of Urban Agriculture is offered

David
Note
This section seems a little weak and does not include a single citation and yet the relevance of your entire paper may hang on the various dimensions urbanization and its impact on agriculture and food production.
David
Note
Actually, "throughout the world" the term agriculture might more readily refer to small holders. Also, agriculture refers to more than just food production. Like "urban", I'm sure there is a broad and deep literature that looks at the meaning of these terms from popular, legal, philosophical and practical dimensions. Should you cite some of these studies and have a more sophisticated discussion of the meaning and relevance of these terms?
David
Note
It is good that you are defining the term narrowly but why are you doing so and why in this way?
David
Note
defined by whom? If you are going to phrase your sentence in this way then I should not have to go to the footnotes to find out who did the defining. This is particular the case here since you've put much effort into making the case that who does the defining is important.
Page 8: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

8

for the purpose of this paper:

Urban Agriculture: a potentially “complex system encompassing a spectrum of

interests, from a traditional core of activities associated with the production,

processing, marketing, distribution, and consumption, to a multiplicity of other

benefits and services that are less widely acknowledged and documented

[including]… recreation and leisure; economic vitality and business

entrepreneurship, individual health and well-being; community health and well-

being; landscape beautification; and environmental restoration and remediation.”

(4)

Historical Analysis of Urban Agriculture

It is beneficial to society to understand the concept and application of Urban Agriculture, it is

also important to have knowledge of the history of Urban Agriculture globally and within the

United States. Jac Smit describes a comprehensive history of Urban Agriculture in his

presentation to the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) in 2002. He states,

“The history of Urban Agriculture can be told beginning at any time and place in human

history.” (20) In his presentation, he referred to two well-known examples of Urban Agriculture

in human history, the first being Machu Picchu in 16th century Peru and the second being Paris in

19th century France.

Smit notes, that the application of Urban Agriculture in the city of Machu Picchu reveals a high

level of sophistication with regard to it use of Urban Agriculture. It is accepted that the remote

city enjoyed relative food security with advanced methods of producing agricultural products on

the steep mountainsides of its environment. In reference to the city’s self-reliance, he comments,

“recent studies document rather precise irrigation, terracing, waste management, microclimate

management and storage systems.” (20) The Urban Agriculture techniques and practices of

Machu Picchu were successful enough that even today their crop production systems are studied

and in some cases replicated.

David
Note
This definition says nothing about food and yet your narrow definition above does focus on food. I don't understand. Which definition are you using for this paper?
David
Inserted Text
s
David
Note
citation regarding replication? Certainly you got this information from some source, unless know this from personal experience.
Page 9: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

9

In the second example, evidence is presented that shows the influence Parisian Urban

Agriculture has had throughout the world. Post-industrial revolution Paris “generated explosive

growth in the 19th century, [as] the wetlands community or Marais reinvented agriculture to feed

the city.” (20) There is evidence of Parisian methods being used by Vietnamese immigrants

fleeing the war in their home country to West Africa, where the Vietnamese practices were

considered improvements to the Urban Agriculture model framed by colonization. The Parisian

influence is apparent when agricultural practices in places like California, Havana and Tanzania

are referred to as French biointensive agriculture.

According to Smit, in the United States, planned communities that have included or addressed

the concept of Urban Agriculture go back to the 17th and 18th centuries. To some extent,

Americans have always been in favor of implementing some form of Urban Agriculture

techniques and practices, although these have been implemented widely with little regulation.

Throughout American history, gardens used to produce food for the family have been prevalent

sources of food and recreation opportunities (ie. gardening). In fact, there was a time in

American history when it was considered patriotic to grow your own food. (24) For example,

during the wars years of World War II, the government asked many things of its citizens. The

government asked people to recycle materials, reduce waste, purchase bonds and plant what was

known as “Gardens for Victory” in a combined effort to allow more supplies to be sent to our

troops. Government and corporations promoted the use of victory gardens in all shapes and sizes.

Nearly 20 million Americans planted Victory Gardens, which produced up to 40 percent of all

the food that was consumed. (24) It was not until America’s dependence on automobiles and the

advent of the grocery store was there a marked changed in how Americans obtained their food,

including the ceasing of getting food from the backyard or barnyard.

Urban Agriculture Practices

Application of the concept of Urban Agriculture depends on many factors, such as the time,

place, as well as the individual or collective need. The types of individuals and needs for Urban

Agriculture may range from individual hobbyists to small community food production and

efforts.

There are many Urban Agriculture practices for food production, and each seems to have its own

David
Note
Citation is necessary? How do you know this information? What is the source?
David
Note
If, as you've indicated above, urban agriculture does not necessarily connote food production, then how is urban agriculture any different from other forms of urban landscaping? Is production of goods critical? What about production of services? How does urban agriculture related to other forms of urban land management? Is it different? Is it the same?
David
Note
Here again, I need to see some citation.
Page 10: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

10

unique utility and benefits depending on circumstance. According to some literature, including

the city of Vancouver’s Southeast False Creek Urban Agriculture Strategy, urban agriculture

encompasses a broad diversity of agricultural practices in urban environments that include

Community Gardens, School Gardens, Backyard and other such Private Gardens, Public (State-

or Federally-managed) Land with Edible Landscaping, Commercial Greenhouses and some of

the more innovative techniques are Rooftop Gardens, Micro Livestock Operations, including

bees and insects, Aquaculture Operations and Greenhouses and/or Facilities Co-located within

Existing Buildings. The theories that this paper will focus on are the possible outcomes of the

implementation of a community garden.

COMMUNITY GARDEN THEORY

Defining Community Gardens

What are community gardens? The quick answer to this question may seem obvious.

Community gardens are a place where people can go to grow different plants, such as vegetables,

herbs, and flowers. While that statement is true, community gardens are much more. They are a

place where not only plants grow, but also a place where people and communities can grow

together.

The definition of ‘community gardens’ should not be one that restricts the endless possibilities of

utility. As stated earlier, community gardens can be many things and can have many different

meanings for many different people. While some people may be better at gardening than others,

in a community garden all the people can have something they can add. Likewise, the location

for a community garden also has almost endless possibilities. They can be found in abandoned

lots, old parking lots, parks, community centers, schools, and even shared rooftops.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service defined

community gardens as “any shared space where people come together to grow vegetables,

flowers, or plants.” (22) This paper will utilize that definition for the purpose of the further

discussion within this paper.

David
Note
Why are all these terms capitalized?
David
Note
"some literature"? Which literature? Be specific, be precise.
David
Note
Above, I thought you said you wanted to focus specifically on food production?
Page 11: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

11

Social and Cultural Components

Community Pride and Involvement

As a commuter county, where many of the residents commute to jobs located in the District of

Columbia (DC), Fairfax could benefit from the potential community cohesiveness and pride that

can result from community gardening practices. Although there are many ways in which a

community can be brought together, implementing community gardens can be one way to “offer

a focal point for neighborhood organizing, and can lead to community-based efforts to deal with

other social concerns.” (16) Community gardens give communities an actual sense of

community involvement that may otherwise never be possible. They allow people to work

together with their neighbors to achieve a common goal. In addition, they help facilitate and

provide community members opportunities to talk and share ideas.

Empowerment of the Growers

Community gardens can serve as a source of empowerment for many different individuals. In all

types of neighborhoods, there are people who may feel that they cannot accomplish or do things

independently or for themselves. These people may also rely entirely on another person or

government program for functions of basic livings needs, such as sustenance. It may be possible

for people with low self-esteem or little to no social capital to be assisted by community gardens

because these places may provide an outlet for achieving personal goals. Neighborhoods that

lack social connections or networks may also see no way of getting out of dangerous situations

with regards to blight and crime.

If people in these areas were able to use abandoned land to create community gardens, some

level of social capital may be attained. People in these areas may develop a better sense of self

worth through growing vegetables, herb or flowers in a community garden. A community

garden may allow people who have not felt that they have many personal successes or have not

had positive experiences in their lives to see that they are capable of being productive and that

they have something to offer and gain from society.

Page 12: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

12

Through community gardens, people may also have the opportunity to increase their access and

ability to communicate with their other neighbors. This communication is vital to strengthening

relationships that could serve to help an impoverished area gain a better self-identity. The new

neighborhood connections could also be a source of awareness, education, and knowledge. All

of which may help a community or an individual become more self-sustaining and independent.

This form of self-empowerment could lead to better overall citizenry in areas that are lacking.

Improved Health, Increased Recreation, Relaxation, Creativity Opportunities

Gardening could allow people to express themselves in how and what they decide to plant within

their plot. Since there is neither a right way, nor a wrong way to go about gardening, any method

respectful of others may be acceptable. Gardening in a sense then could be an activity that

actually encourages creativity, individuality, and different ways to approach things.

Some people in a community that have never had the opportunity to express a creative self could

be given the opportunity through individual decision making that comes with growing ones own

garden. The opportunity for stress relief is possible too. Gardening can give people an outlet to

take their minds off of the stresses of everyday life. Seeing the vegetables that they grow as an

outcome of their labor would be a very rewarding accomplishment for people who may feel that

they are not capable of accomplishing anything in life.

There also may be obvious reasons why community gardens can be beneficial to the overall

health of an individual i.e. getting exercise, but there are many more than just that. For example,

community gardening can become one of the reasons individuals in a community get up off of

the couch and go outdoors. The potential benefits stemming from this activity alone could be

huge. Getting out of the house and focusing energy on something creative like gardening could

be a potential outlet for stress as well. The health benefits including recreation and relaxation

opportunities surrounding gardening can apply to anyone.

Community Growth Opportunities

Community growth potential exists through community gardening in a couple of areas.

Community gardens can be strategically situated in communities as a central location or better

David
Note
There is not a single citation in this section and yet there is a huge body of relevant literature. Where did you get the ideas and info in the paragraphs below? Are they yours? Did you use any sources of info? If so, which ones?
Page 13: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

13

yet, a location that utilizes abandoned lots. Abandoned lots come with their own set of

environmental risks, but the ability to transform them into something pleasant to the eye can be

useful in growing a community. Through the community garden, neighbors can work together

towards a common goal and also identify other ways they could work together to enhance and

grow their community.

Networks may be established that could lead to neighborhood groups that help to clean up low-

income areas or lower the crime rates in the area. A cleaner, greener and safer community with

more self-empowered people can always be useful in attracting new residents or business to a

community. Attracting new potential residents and businesses to an area will cause increased

community growth because the community becomes a more desirable place to live and/or work.

Decreased Crime

Safety is important to individuals and members of a community alike, although safety may not

actually be a major issue for most areas in Fairfax County. Many sources in literature about

community gardens provide antidotal evidence that there is a relationship between community

gardens and crime rates and community safety. The article, Cultivating Community Gardens:

The Role of Local Government in Creating Healthy, Livable Neighborhoods, for instance, found

that community gardens increase safety in communities (16). There is at minimum the

perception that community gardens may increase safety within the community. This antidotal

benefit, however, has not yet been shown to be peer-reviewed evidence through specific studies

to be necessarily true. For example, although researchers Gorham et al recognized there was a

perceived reduced risk from crime felt by members of communities with community gardens,

their study actually “indicated that the presence of a community garden was not a predictor of a

lower crime rate…[and There] were no crime number differences between the community

garden areas and the randomly selected areas.” (10) This particular study did conclude by

stating that interviews with members of the community did however reveal a positive

receptiveness to community gardens. Residents of that community also reported a sense of

“neighborhood revitalization, perceived immunity from crime, and neighbors emulating

gardening practices they saw at the community gardens.” (10)

David
Note
This sentence needs to be rephrased in order to be clear.
David
Note
anecdotal?
Page 14: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

14

Educational Opportunities

Community gardens can be utilized as a teaching tool for children and adults, so they can better

understand where food comes from and even how to grow it on their own. They can be an

education and outreach tool for teaching children and adults the concept of natural resource

sustainability and how communities and individuals can be more self-sustainable in their actions

and practices. The opportunity for children to see that they are capable of contributing to a larger

goal, such as growing a vegetable for a classroom project, may also be a chance for a child who

may have low self-esteem to be boosted. Education programs can be developed or evolved as

community gardens are created, and each program may be tailored to meet the needs and type of

audience.

Environmental and Ecological Components

More Green Space and Heat Sinks

Community gardens can add natural beauty to an area by increasing the amount of green space.

They can also benefit the environment by providing heat sinks for cities with high volumes of

paved areas. High volumes of paved areas are particularly present in urban areas and major

metropolises, including the metropolitan District of Columbia area. The theory exists which

suggests the more paved areas that a city has, the hotter the area is. These areas of with inflated

temperatures could have negative effects on a local or global environment. If some of the

unused or abandoned land could be turned into useful community gardens, the potential exists

for heat sinks to be created. Rooftops that could withstand a rooftop garden could be utilized as

well. The more green spaces that are located throughout the city, the greater the effect can be in

offsetting any temperature increases due to high volumes of paved areas.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Community gardens can reduce the need for out-of-town produce to be shipped in. Producing

local food resources for sale or distribution locally could create less of a carbon footprint for the

community overall because food has less travel distance from the farm or place of production to

the dinner plate. The community’s need to purchase foods, which have been shipped from

David
Highlight
David
Note
What do you mean by heat sinks? Is this the right term?
David
Note
Did you look at any of the scholarly literature that addresses this issue? I think Alan may have sent an article from Conservation Biology that problematizes this issue.
Page 15: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

15

numerous areas throughout the United States or the globe, could be lessened. This could also

reduce the community’s greenhouse gas emissions because of the transportation modes and

distances will be different for food grown locally in community gardens. Although the assertion

that by creating one community garden in a given area, there will be a resulting noticeable

reduction in the total amount of greenhouse gas is debatable, it would be difficult to argue

against the statement that avoiding even one trip to the grocery will reduce at least some

greenhouse gas emissions.

Natural Resource Sustainability

One of the most important to points in this paper is that it is through community gardening that

people can learn the value of sustainability. Individuals in the community can learn through

community gardening practices that if they can do something as simple as growing vegetables,

they can also do much more in an effort to becoming more self-sustainable. Although it was

mentioned previously, it is important to reiterate the importance of the general understanding that

a need to be more self-sustaining can be met through community gardening. If people learn to be

less reliant on grocery stores and fast food restaurants for their food, then they can take that

important first step into being more self-sustaining.

Being more dependent on one’s self and more responsible for our own individual actions could

have an overall effect on our ability to reduce our dependency on a number of outside resources.

Based on personal experiences, it doesn’t take a monumental life-changing event to dramatically

shift the way daily routines can be altered for the better. Growing food for use with family,

friends, and individual use can have the potential to change how decisions about other needs are

met and utilized.

Economic and Political Components

Individual Economics

In theory the practice of community gardening could have the potential to reduce the overall

amount of income that a person puts towards the amount of food they buy annually, if only

marginally. If individuals and families in a community are able to save a little money on overall

Page 16: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

16

food costs, than that money has the potential to be out to something else that is useful. Money

saved through utilizing food grown at community gardens, for example, may instead be applied

to expenses in addressing other basic human needs or even may be invested back into the

community.

Additional Food Sources and Choices

Community Gardens could not only reduce the amount of money that is spent on different foods,

but community gardening also has the potential to provide fresh vegetables and herbs to low-

income areas that may not have otherwise had that or any other option. A community garden

could also aid in making sure that adults and children in impoverished areas do not go to bed

hungry. The less hungry that people are, the better they will be able to contribute positively in

their communities and the more successful that children will be at school. Community gardens

can become a way in which access to fresh vegetables can be reasonable and equal for all

members of a community.

Employment Opportunities

There also exists the potential for a community to offer employment in one way or another at a

community center or community garden. While most of the people at a community garden will

most certainly be volunteers, there is an opportunity for employment in larger urban agriculture

and community garden operations. Even if the garden falls on public land operated by a local

government, the opportunity to employ people or a group of people to oversee the maintenance

of the gardens is reasonable. For example, the Fairfax County Park system has a Garden Plots

Coordinator who manages the Green Springs Gardens’ garden plots. Even if it is only one more

employed person in a community at a position that may not have existed before the introduction

of community garden, the community garden has still resulted in even a small employment

benefit.

Helping the U.S. Become Healthier and Potentially Lower Health Costs

The community garden has the potential to offer a better, more healthy selection of foods to

communities that have become dependent on fast food as a major source of nutrition. If more of

Page 17: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

17

the daily-recommended servings of fruits and vegetables can be met through the producing these

food resources in a community garden, then there is a possibility for lowering overall health

costs. If people are eating more fruits and vegetables, the theory is that over-time, they will

generally be more healthy and lower incidences of disease. This could potentially lower the

health care burden on a community health care facility. Healthier people in a community could

help the overall amount of money that a community can spend on other important service areas,

such as education.

Local Community Food Security

Localized Urban Agriculture efforts, such as community gardening practices, play an important

role in addressing and providing for local community food security. Community gardens can

increase the Fairfax County community’s local food security by producing food for the market

which is locally available and need not be imported. Community gardens represent just one

Urban Agriculture practice which aid food security specifically by “increasing the availability of

high-quality, affordable food within a community, offering farmers an opportunity to maintain

economic viability by supplying the local market with fresh foods, strengthening economic and

social ties between farms and urban residents, and channeling a larger share of residents’ food

spending back to the local economy.” (22) According to the United State Department of

Agriculture’s (USDA) Assessment of Community Food Production Resources, “strengthening

your community’s agricultural system can [also], over the long term, boost the effectiveness of

Federal food assistance and education programs.” (22)

Page 18: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

18

COMMUNITY GARDEN PRACTICE

Case Study: Nottoway Park Community Garden

There are many ways in which citizens, community

leaders, local governments, and individuals can

continue to utilize community gardens in Fairfax

County, such as the initiative already underway in

Nottoway Park. There are also opportunities to expand

the existing community garden systems in Fairfax

County. Expanding the application of community

gardens will allow more people to reap the benefits of

this practice. This section describes community

gardening in Fairfax County, including an evaluation of

one of the current community gardens in Nottoway

Park.

This section also includes a discussion of

potential opportunities to expand community

gardening in Fairfax County.

Why is Community Gardening Good

for Fairfax County, Virginia

Community gardens clearly have been shown to

have far-reaching benefits. In Northern

Virginia, and more specifically in Fairfax

County, there is much need and perhaps even a

large desire for community garden opportunities

so that residents can benefit from this Urban

Agriculture practice. One sector of Fairfax

Figure 2. Conceptual Development for Nottoway Park

Figure 1. Map of Fairfax County

David
Note
Should this last sentence come first in this paragraph and this section?
Page 19: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

19

County that was responsive to the practice of garden plots was within the Fairfax County Park

system. Park administrators, whether consciously aware or not of the multitude of benefits from

community gardens, planned for land use allotments in many of their county parks to provide the

opportunity for residents to rent garden plots.

The Fairfax County Park system, particularly the Nottoway Park, provides an excellent case to

understand in what way and why Fairfax County is utilizing community gardening practices.

Nottoway Park can even be used as a case to showcase how to improve and continue these

opportunities in the future.

The following subsections provide an overview of the Fairfax County Park system, as well as

specific details about the garden plots in Nottoway Park.

Fairfax County Park System, Green Spring Gardens

The Fairfax County Park system provides an

opportunity to rent a garden plot. The garden

plots are located throughout several of the

Fairfax County parks. The garden plots are

open to rent for residents within Fairfax

County. The Fairfax County Park system

refers to the program as Green Springs

Gardens. The rented plots are typically 30

feet by 20 feet, with some slight variations in

size between locations, such as in Grist Mill

Park the several plots are 10 feet by 20 feet.

(6) Throughout the paper there are several

photos of garden plots in Fairfax County.

The garden plots can be used for a variety of

purposes, like growing vegetables and/or

ornamentals. Growing vegetables in the

garden plots is the most predominant

Figure 3. Google Maps Satellite View of Garden Plots

Source: Google Screen Shot Plots

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

Page 20: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

20

utilization of the space, as determined by an evaluation of the garden plots in Nottoway Park

conducted in the summer of 2009.

The plots within the county parks are rented to residents who apply on an annual basis and for a

minimal fee. The plots are also rented on a first come first serve basis. (6)

As is the case with many community garden areas, there are guidelines that govern the garden

plots in the Green Springs Gardens in Fairfax County Parks. However, these guidelines will

often act more as a rule than as a law. Violating any of the rules is not necessarily a criminal or

civic matter, but rather a Fairfax County Park system matter. The FCPA however does retain the

right to evict a person found in violation of the rules. (6) Establishment of rules for community

gardens is essential to the efficient functions of a community garden area.

The administrators establish the rules, which in this case is the Fairfax County Park Authority

(FCPA), in cooperation and coordination with the plot renters and other interested citizens who

have attended past working meetings. The Garden Plot Rules and Guidelines have been revised

for the 2010 season. A complete and final version of these rules and guidelines is included in

Appendix B.

Fairfax County Parks, Nottoway Park in Fairfax, Virginia

The specific plots that were part of the research leading to the development of this paper were

located within Nottoway Park in Vienna, Virginia. The location of Nottoway Park in relation to

the City of Fairfax and the Town of Vienna is found in Appendix A, Map of Fairfax County. A

map of the entire Nottoway Park is in Appendix C, including a Google Maps satellite view of the

park.

Nottoway Park has 148 garden plots available for rent to Fairfax County residents. All of the

plots are rented and there has been a waiting list to rent a plot in Nottoway Park for at least the

last two years. In Appendix D, the garden plot site map shows each of the plots available for

rent by number. Appendix D also contains a satellite view of the Nottoway Park garden plots

specifically, where it is possible to see the first glimpse of how the gardening varies from plot to

plot. Nottoway Park maintains three water-dispensing areas for the garden plot renters, as a

portion of the garden plot rental fee goes to pay for the water dispensed.

Page 21: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

21

Considerations for Nottoway Park’s Community Garden Plots

Nottoway Park represents a good example of how

community gardening practices can be

implemented. The Nottoway Park garden plots can

be a case study one approach to implementing

community gardens in Fairfax County, and perhaps

in other counties in Northern Virginia. The

Nottoway park garden plots can also be used to

provide recommendations and prescribed other

opportunities to improve current practices in the Fairfax County Park System. In Nottoway Park,

there is an opportunity to better utilize the existing garden plots and/or expand the number of

plots. Food production within the existing plots can also be expanded.

Assessment of Nottoway Park Garden Plots, Summer-Fall 2009

During the late summer of 2009, the garden plots in

Nottoway Park were evaluated. Each plot was

assessed based on a series of five questions (an

example data sheet/question form is found in Appendix

A.

The questions used to assess the current community garden practices in Nottoway Park were:

1. Has the plot been rented?

2. Does the plot appear to be maintained and/or tended for?

3. Does the tenant appear to be actively gardening in their plot?

4. Is the tenant utilizing the plot for growing vegetables?

5. Is the tenant growing vegetables and ornamentals in the plot?

6. Is the tenant utilizing the plot for gardening only ornamentals?

Figure 5. Example Plot Growing Both Vegetables and Ornamentals

Figure 4. Example Plots Growing Only Vegetables

David
Cross-Out
David
Note
Why are these questions important? What do they have to do with the larger research question posed at the beginning of your paper? I don't see the connection.
David
Note
How are questions 2 and 3 different? Isn't the answer to question 5 determined by the responses to questions 4 and 6? If so, why include question 5 in your data collection phase rather than answer it in your data analysis phase?
Page 22: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

22

Any additional notes about individual plots were

also captured at the closing of the data sheet.

This information was initially collected in August

2009. The information and data sheets from the

August 2009 assessment were reviewed again in

September 2009. A second assessment was

conducted in late-September where all of the plots

were revisited to determine if any information

collected in August had changed. There were no noticeable changes in the type of activity

conducted in the plots and no significantly identifiable change in the make-up of the garden plots

from August to late-September. Photos were also taken of each of the individual plots in

September.

A map of Nottoway Park’s garden plots with

color highlighting based in the assessment

conducted is found below, Map of Nottoway Park

Assessment Results. In this map, the garden plots

that were viably growing at least some edible

vegetable plants and no ornamentals are shaded in

green. Plots shaded in pink were determined to

only be growing ornamentals. Some plots were

growing both vegetables and ornamentals and have been shaded in yellow.

Several plots did not appear to be tended to,

or were poorly maintained. These poorly

maintained or bare plots are shaded in grey on

the map below.

Figure 6. Example Plot Growing Only Ornamentals

Figure 7. Example of Poorly Maintained Plot

Figure 8. Example of Bare or Overgrown Plot

David
Note
What was the purpose of this study? Why were two assessments done?
David
Note
How many plots are there and why did you take a photo of each one?
David
Note
What additional notes? What additional types of information did you collect? Why? For what purpose?
Page 23: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

23

Figure 9. Map of Nottoway Park Assessment Results

Page 24: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

24

Based on this walk-around, first-hand, but peripheral assessments of the Nottoway Park garden

plots, 117 out of 142 available plots were determined to be growing at least some edible plants.

The edibles were typically common garden vegetables, such as tomatoes, peppers, and lettuce.

Some gardens also were growing herbs though. Tomatoes were by far the most common

vegetable grown in the most amounts of garden plots.

The utilization of garden plots in Nottoway Park by type is graphically depicted in Figure10.

Table 1 also details the number of plots recorded in each of the four categories. The percentage

of plots growing at least some vegetable plants is 90% of the total plots available for rent at

Nottoway Park.

Table 1.  Composition of Plot Table and Percentages 

Composition of Plot 

Number  

of Plots 

Percentage of  

Total Plots 

Ornamentals  3  2% 

Vegetables  90  63% 

Both Vegetables & Ornamentals  27  19% 

Poorly Maintained or Bare  22  15% 

Total Number of Plots  142    

Figure 10. Pie Chart of Utilization of Plots in Nottoway Park

Page 25: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

25

Photo Series for Nottoway Park

Several series of photos are contained in Appendix B, Photo Series for Nottoway Park. These

photos were taken in the summer of 2009, mostly in August 2009. The first photo series depicts

some of the plots growing edible vegetables. The next photo series depicts plots that appear to

be only utilized for growing ornamentals. Some plots grew a mixture of both ornamentals as

well as vegetables, and photos of these types of plots are included also in Appendix B. Plots that

did not appear to be tended to or those that were poorly maintained are depicted in the fourth

photo series. The last photo series provides examples of plots that were bare or overgrown.

Although a photo was taken at each plot location as part of the assessment of gardening practices

in Nottoway Park, figure 9 only presents the type of utilization and plots in the park. All photos

were taken by Ryan Sloan, Virginia Polytechnic University.

Encouraging the Practice in Other Areas of Fairfax County

There are many ways to encourage the development of additional community gardens and/or

garden plots in other vacant and/or open space within Fairfax County. Areas “where neighbors

can gather to cultivate plants, vegetables and fruit” do not need to be limited to the Fairfax

County Park system. (16)

Many of the barriers to creating viable and

successful community gardens “can be overcome

with local government engagement.” (16) The

involvement of local government can be critical

in the planning and initiation of a new

community garden. Local governments can

provide many of the resources that are needed to

start a community garden, at the small, medium

or large-scale. When local governments get

involved, they can often help to lessen the start-up costs and other barriers to success, “such as

liability expenses, code restrictions and lack of resources.” (16)

Figure 11. Photo of one existing outreach opportunity to promote urban agriculture

Page 26: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

26

The residents in the community will have a multitude of benefits from new opportunities to

participate in community gardens, and the community at large as well as the local government

can also benefit in addition to the individual growers. For example, many urbanized areas have a

lack of open space. Community gardens can provide that open space, particularly in minority

and low income areas which may have a disproportionately lower amount of open space per

capita. This can be a social equality issue where local government can step in to mitigate the

disparity in an inexpensive way by utilizing unused land by creating community gardens and

beautifying the area. (16)

Recommendations for Encouraging Community Gardens in Fairfax County

Some recommendations on ways to reduce or eliminate the common barriers to implementing

new community gardens are provided below.

Partnering with Schools

The opportunity to partner with the Fairfax County Public School should also be pursued for

additional opportunities to expand community gardening practices in Fairfax County. School

systems can be an excellent place to start community gardens. There have been many benefits

found for students and schools who participate in the practice of community gardens. (19)

Schools also can be partnered with to provide education and outreach opportunities to the

students. For example, “hands-on exposure to community gardens can teach students about the

source of fresh produce, demonstrate community stewardship and introduce the importance of

environmental sustainability.” (16) An environmental science and ecosystem sustainability

curriculum or aspect of a current curriculum can be developed to educate students and provide a

unique outlet for learning.

Education can extend beyond the traditional classroom as well, such as hosting after-school,

storytelling, and even adult-learning sessions in the community gardens. In Fairfax County,

expanded community garden opportunities could provide additional opportunities for residents to

David
Note
This section could be very interesting. However, I don't understand how it relates to the previous section. Have you learned or told us anything about the barriers that existed to implementing the Nottoway Park gardens and how those barriers were reduced or eliminated? Again, I don't see the connection between the different parts of your paper.
Page 27: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

27

participate in a wide range of activities and community projects such as “after-school programs

for children, activities for the elderly and a resource for food banks and shelters.” (16)

Involving Students

Fairfax County can begin planning for potential places for start new community gardens by

surveying available resources to work on the initiative. For example, local high school students

and college students could be used potentially to perform some preliminary planning work. In a

Portland, Oregon community garden initiative, college students from Portland State University

were used to inventory “all city-owned land that could be used for community gardens and other

urban-agriculture initiatives.” (16)

Non-profits

Fairfax County could encourage a municipality-funded non-profit organization to support

development and maintenance of community gardens. This was done in Chicago with the

nonprofit NeighborSpace and was successful. NeighborSpace “acts as a land-trust for

community gardens.” (16) NeighborSpace is funded by the city of Chicago, District of Chicago,

and the Cook County Forest Preserve District who then accept liability for the garden sites,

which now is over 50 sites. In this example, the local government has reduced the start-up costs

and liability burdens that can be barriers to the development of community gardens. Fairfax

County’s local government could employ a similar strategy in Virginia.

Facilitated Volunteer Groups

Local government can help to facilitate the organization of volunteers groups to create

community gardens in Fairfax County. Volunteer groups can be very helpful in community

garden efforts. Volunteers can be organized during the initial planning and setting up of new

community gardens, which can be a rewarding experience for the volunteers as well as a benefit

to the community. Volunteers can also be used to help maintain the gardens once they are

established. For example, volunteers help to maintain the structure and order in the community

gardens in Nottoway Park, such as through their participation in creating new Garden Plots Rules

for 2010 (refer to Appendix B).

Page 28: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

28

National or State Grants

Taking advantage of any national or state grants, which may be available, is also an opportunity

for Fairfax County to expand on community gardening opportunities. Grant funding can be

applied to defray the start-up costs and get community gardening projects off-the-ground. The

Portland/Multnomah Food Policy Council (FPC) utilized available grants, for example, to fund

the creation of gardens in Oregon. (16)

Inventory and Analysis of Community Food Production

An inventory and analysis could be conducted in Fairfax County to assess and analyze the food

production resources generated locally. The inventory and analysis could be particularly focused

on the food production resources that are generated from local community gardening practices.

The Fairfax County could use a methodology for the assessment, which is similar to the

assessment that was completed for by the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)

Community Food Security Assessment Toolkit. (22) The assessment could be conducted with

the assistance of an educational institution, like Virginia Polytechnic University’s National

Capital Region or another university within close proximity or access to Fairfax County. The

assessment could inform the community about the food production resource currently generated

in the county. The assessment may also reveal gaps and opportunities for producing more local

food resources in Fairfax County. These gaps may also provide the citizens, community

members, and local government with direction on addressing the potential opportunities for

producing more food resources locally. The assessment could be focused on the following

questions:

1. Does the county have any community gardens? 2. Do any of the schooled have school gardens? 3. Are there any school-based garden programs producing food resources which are in-turn

consumed by the students of a school? 4. Do to the local schools purchase food from local producers and suppliers? 5. Are locally produced/grown foods available at local distributors and suppliers; retailers;

and/or restaurants? 6. Are local food resources used at other institutional facilities or food service outlets? (ie.

colleges, hospitals, prisons) 7. Are there low-income areas in the county, and do low-income households have a

reasonable opportunity to participate in community gardens or other local food production practices?

Page 29: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

29

These questions are derived from the questions analyzed by the USDA as part of the Community

Food Security Assessment Toolkit. (22) Researching and responding to these questions through

an inventory, assessment, analysis, and results-based approach could produce findings for

Fairfax County to then focus future efforts on encourage locally produced food resources in the

County.

DISCUSSION

Challenges of Community Gardens

There are a number of challenges that some Urban Agriculture practices are faced with, and in

some instances these challenges may outweigh the benefits. The challenges range from conflicts

with neighbors and soil contamination concerns to overcoming legal restraints. Many of the

main hurdles for most people who decide to grow their own food, whether it is vegetables can be

the restrictions placed on them through municipal codes and state laws. If the urban farmer

chooses to sell their food they will certainly face challenges from Federal food and drug

regulations as well. “Agricultural activity in urban areas almost always contravenes some zoning

regulation or by-law. Parks were never intended as grazing grounds for livestock, and the owners

of vacant land are rarely pleased to see it sprouting corn and beans.” (17)

Aside from legal challenges, there exist unknown variables that can come into account as well.

In an urban setting there is usually a person or persons in the area that has an idea of how an area

should look. These concerned citizens may elevate concerns on what types of activities are

acceptable. Tensions may be heightened between individuals in the community if the concept

and application of urban agriculture is frowned upon. It is easy to see how growing vegetables in

an otherwise well-groomed and manicured neighborhood may draw the ire of neighbors. In fact,

it may not only offend neighbors.

Economic challenges are nearly always present as well. Many of the community garden

techniques require sizable amount money to start the process. While it may not cost much to

plant tomatoes in your own backyard, larger operations that could require water access, drainage

Page 30: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

30

and specialized tools can easily become costly. In contrast to the economic limitations that may

be present for larger community projects, even smaller operations could face similar limitations

given the economic climate of the community.

The potential for pollution and soil contamination issues are often present as well when

implementing gardens in urban areas. Many people are not aware of their vulnerability to such

issues at the on-set. There is always a possibility the soil that is now being used for growing

vegetables, at another point in time may have been used as a place to dump harmful chemicals.

People should always send soil samples to laboratories to have them tested for the possibility of

potentially hazardous pollutants present in their soils. If soils are contaminated there is always

the possibility of addressing and/or circumventing the issue by building boxes on top of the soil

for gardening or trucking in local topsoil. Employing these strategies can reduce or eliminate the

contamination threat. Unfortunately, many people may not be educated on this issue and even if

they are, it may not be possible to raise the funds to cover the costs.

While it may not be widely known, some gardening and composting practices could produce foul

smelling odors. Odor issues could become classified as a public nuisance if severe enough.

Composting garden trimmings in backyards or shared composting in community areas can also

be controversial. The issue of odor is always present in compost operations that may cause

tension between neighbors. Health concerns are present as well in composting operations.

Composting bins can produce molds and fungus that can contribute or cause allergic reactions in

some people. (5) There is also an ever-present worry stemming from pathogens related to

decaying compost and it’s recommended that some waste materials, such as food wastes from

people who may be sick not be used. (5) The issue of waste disposal from gardening is also a

concern that raises issues within the law in regards to human health. Recently, there have been a

few outbreaks of disease that has been transmitted from animals to human, such as swine flu or

avian flu, which may draw questions about disease if the gardens were to start attracting wildlife

that is not normally present.

While the benefits from reusing wastewater or grey water to irrigate crops may be a benefit in

some aspects, it also raises health concerns. Mwale notes that the World Health Organization

David
Note
Certainly many sources exist that you can use to support the statements and assertions in this paragraph.
Page 31: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

31

(WHO) has indentified reused water as the single largest environmental pollutant killer in the

world. (17)

In any agricultural setting there is a risk of losing crops to wildlife. Many of the threats can be

combated with fences and traps, which in turn will consume time and money. For some food

raiders, pesticides and other chemicals are needed to mitigate the problem. Pesticides can be

dangerous in an urban setting, due to the amount of people and pets that are in the area. The

chances of an individual misusing or someone accidentally getting into the pesticides are serious

concerns, which are often raised. It is also plausible that urban areas could potentially have an

incident that an endangered species comes into contact with a pesticide, fence, or a trap. The

outcome of killing an Endangered Species that is raiding an gardening area could involve a

violation of the Endangered Species Act, a major Federal offense. (1) While it may be unlikely

that a conflict with a Federal statute could arise from small gardening operations, it remains a

possibility that there is a greater likelihood that a state of local regulation could be violated

resulting in some penalty.

It remained that the main hurdle for most individuals and communities is the lack of

infrastructure components needed to produce good results from applying techniques and

practices of community gardening. Aside from the labor needed for Urban Agriculture, there are

also structural and economic needs. Using the Urban Agriculture practice of community gardens

as an example, there will be many needs and challenges to implementation, which must be

overcome for the effort to be successful. In the case of community gardening, for instance, some

of the needs that must be met are where and how to acquire materials needed for gardens, such as

gardening tools, wood and other building materials to create either permanent or temporary areas

and structures for food production. There are also needs for topsoil and fertilizer, both of which

can be found local or trucked in. Composting food waste into fertilizer is one way of gain a

more sustainable source of fertilizer, as is the use of grey water and rainwater. Other materials

that may be needed include fencing or traps to keep out animals that may take food. The

availability of utilities such as electricity could also be a concern for many community gardening

operations. If the needs for materials and utilization are met in a sustainable manner, community

gardens can provide many benefits.

Page 32: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

32

Benefits of Urban Agriculture

The list of potential benefits of community gardens are not confined to individuals, but can

include entire sections of a city or even an entire nation can reap the benefits. The benefits (and

costs for that matter) are often characterized as part of one of three categories: economic, social,

and ecological. (18) Although some general and also some more specific benefits are described

here, all of these benefits are part of a larger effort to provide food security, better nutrition, and

relieve some economic stress, while adding to the overall health of individual and communities.

Some of the benefits of a sustainable gardening system include the ability to “incorporate social-

justice issues into a more localized system; Alleviate constraints on people’s access to adequate,

nutritious food; Develop the economic capacity of local people to purchase food; Train people to

grow, process, and distribute this food; Maintain adequate land to produce a high proportion of

locally required food; Educate people, who have been increasingly removed from food

production, to participate in, and respect, its generation; and Integrate environmental stewardship

into this process.” (12)

Community gardening can be beneficial to families and communities by bringing them together

to work towards raising food for each other. (13) Community gardening helps people realize a

direct connection to where their food originates. Communities are creating a better environment

for themselves, by increasing productive green space. Community gardening can also work as a

catalyst for individuals and communities to become more stable with a greater sense of

entitlement by controlling their own food security and combating hunger. Community gardening

also offers skills that teach people how to be more self reliant and ending dependency on others

for basic life needs. (13)

Community gardening can contribute to increasing the biodiversity of urban areas impacting the

overall urban ecosystem. With more plants growing in the urban areas, there is a possibility of

helping to remove pollutants in air and water system. In addition, community gardening is also a

way for people to reduce their overall carbon footprint. It can also contribute to the reduction of

Page 33: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

33

soil loss and siltation of waterways. Urban Agriculture has the ability for individuals to decrease

the amount of waste they produce through composting and reuse of wastewater. (13)

In some cases around the country, an economic benefit of tax incentives can be found for Urban

Agriculture techniques. Legislation in New York City provides a tax incentive for owners and

developers of green roof systems in the form of a tax credit. The intent of the credit is to assist

the individuals who install such systems with the associated costs. The legislation is called the

Green Roof Tax Abatement. According to the legislation, owners who install green roofs that

cover a minimum of half of the roof space are entitled to a one-year credit of up to $100,000

dollars. (11 )

The benefits and challenges that surround community gardens can be overwhelming. I suggest

that these should not be hindrances, but rather unending opportunities for individuals to become

more sustainable. The example of Fairfax County’s community gardens is just one small

instance of the range of possibilities that exist and are increasing daily.

Conclusion

One of the exciting aspects of becoming more sustainable through community gardening is that

the techniques are being improved upon constantly. While getting a project started or

designating a piece of land for a garden may be the hardest step, the potential benefits are eye

opening. In community gardens such as Nottoway Park, citizens must not simply be content to

know that there is a space available if necessary. Citizens must be proactive in making sure that

all of the space is being utilized to it’s fullest. As long as there is enough space it is crucial for

the success of the garden that the public be aware that if they want a garden plot it is available.

Keeping the public interested in the community garden will be necessary to make sure the land

designation stays and that the land remains safe and productive.

While the Nottoway Park community garden is fairly self sufficient and appears to be running

smoothly there are a few issues that could be addressed to increase the productivity and exposure

of the garden.

Page 34: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

34

From 2007 through 2009 the author has been on a waiting list to get a garden plot in Nottoway

park. It is clear from my visual survey that there is at least 22 plots that are either bare or poorly

maintained that could have been utilized. This speaks to a issue with proper management of the

space that is available in the garden. While there may be outside limitations restricting the

effective management of the individual plots, a better management and plot allocation is needed.

One of the limitations that could be restricting the efficiency of the garden could be public

awareness or interest. The park has built very large interpretive signs that could be used to

generate interest, while simultaneously educating the public about the community gardening. It

is not hard to see that with a few small management changes and the proper utilization of

existing signage, the park could drum up more support and interest in the community garden.

The garden area of the park may not be the main focus of the park management, but interest in

the park and visitorship surely is and both could benefit from the changes suggested above. The

key to success is to empower individuals to become more self sufficient.

Page 35: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

35

Appendix A: Nottoway Park Assessment of Current Community Garden

Practices

Example Data Sheet/Question Form

Plot Number: ______________

1. Has the plot been rented?

Yes No

2. Does the plot appear to be maintained and/or tended for?

Yes No

3. Does the tenant appear to be actively gardening in their plot?

Yes No

4. Is the tenant utilizing the plot for growing vegetables?

Yes No

5. Is the tenant growing vegetables and ornamentals in the plot?

Yes No

6. Is the tenant utilizing the plot for gardening only ornamentals?

Yes No

Notes About the Plot:

Page 36: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

36

Appendix B: Photo Series for Nottoway Park

Set 1: Example Plots Growing Vegetables

Photo 1.

Photo 2.

Page 37: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

37

Set 2: Example Plot Growing Only Ornamentals

Photo 1.

Page 38: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

38

Set 3: Example Plots Growing Both Vegetables and Ornamentals

Photo 1.

Photo 2.

Page 39: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

39

Set 4: Example of Poorly Maintained Plots

Photo 1.

Photo 2.

Page 40: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

40

Set 5: Example of Bare or Overgrown Plots

Photo 1.

Photo 2.

All photos were taken by Ryan Sloan, Virginia Polytechnic University, 2009.

Page 41: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

41

Appendix C: Photo of Outreach Opportunity Location

This is a photo of an information board located at the entrance to the Nottoway Park community

garden area. Information about Urban Agriculture and benefits of the practice of community

gardening for food production could be included in this informational kiosk. The information

could be a form of education and outreach for members of the community.

Photo was taken by Ryan Sloan, Virginia Polytechnic University, 2009.

Page 42: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

42

Works Cited

(1) 16 U.S.C. sect. 1532 (19) (1973).

(2) Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter Of Communities For A Great Oregon, 94-859 (515 U.S. 687

June 29, 1995).

(3) Bailkey, M., & Nasr, J. (2000). From Brownfields to Greenfields: Producing Food in North

American Cities. Community Food Security News. Fall 1999/Winter 2000 .

(4) Butler, L., & Maronek, D. (2002). "Urban Agricultural Communities: Opportunities for

Common Ground. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology News . Ames, Iowa.

(5) Cornell Waste Management Institute. (2006, April). Small Scale or Backyard Composting .

Retrieved March 20, 2009, from Cornell Waste Management Institute:

http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/smallscalecomposting.htm

(6) Fairfax County Park Authority. (2009, January 1). Green Spring Gardens. Retrieved March

20, 2009, from Fairfax County Virgina:

http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/gsgp/plots.htm

(7) Fairfax County Park Authority. (2009). Map of Nottoway Park. Retrieved on October 1,

2009, from www.fairfaxcounty.gov/PARKS/gsgp/plotmap-nottoway.pdf

(8) Fairfax County Park Authority. (N.D.). Conceptual Development Plan Map of Nottoway

Park. Retrieved on October 1, 2009, from

http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/providence/Images/Nttwy.cdp.jpg

(9) Google Maps. (N.D.) Satellite View of Nottoway Park Address. Retrieved October 2, 2009,

from http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

(10) Gorham et al. (2009). HortTechnology. “The Impact of Community Gardens on Numbers of

Property Crimes in Urban Houston”. v19: p 291-296. Retrieved on October 1, 2009,

from: http://horttech.ashspublications.org/cgi/content/full/19/2/291

(11) Green Roof Tax Abatement. NYC Real Property Tax Law, (f) sd.2 Sec. 467-a

(12) Hamm, M. W., & Baron, M. (1999). Developing an Integrated, Sustainable Urban Food

System: The Case of New Jersey, United States. In M. Koc, R. MacRae, Mougeot, & J.

Welsh (Eds.), For Hunger-proof Cities: Sustainable Urban Food Systems (pp. 54-59).

Ottawa, Onterio, Canada: International Development Research Centre .

Page 43: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

43

(13) Heimer, L. (2008, 12 1). Benefits of Urban Agriculture. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from

Sprouts in the Sidewalk: http://sidewalksprouts.wordpress.com/ua/benefits/

(14) Holland Barrs Planning Group. (2002, November). Southeast False Creek Urban

Agriculture Strategy. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: City Farmer, Canada's

Office of Urban Agriculture.

(15) Knowd, I., Mason, D., & Cocking, A. (2006). Urban Agriculture: The New Frontier.

Planning for Food Seminar (pp. 1-22). Vancouver: Planning for Food Seminar.

(16) Local Government Commission. (2008). “Cultivating Community Gardens: The Role of

Local Government in Creating Healthy, Livable Neighborhoods.” Retrieved on

September 20, 2009, from

http://www.lgc.org/freepub/docs/community_design/fact_sheets/community_gardens_cs.

pdf

(17) Mwale, F. P. (2006, January 18). Growing Better Cities: Urban Agriculture for Sustainable

Development. (I. U. Development, Producer) Retrieved April 10, 2009, from Working

with Urban Farmers for Food Security: http://www.idrc.ca/in_focus_cities/

(18) Nugent, R. A. (1999). Measuring the Sustainability of Urban Agriculture. In For Hunger-

proof Cities: Sustainable Urban Food Systems (pp. 95-102). Ottawa, Onterio, Canada:

International Development Research Centre .

(19) Ozer, E. (2007, December 1). Health Education & Behavior.“The Effects of School

Gardens on Students and Schools: Conceptualization and Considerations of Maximizing

Healthy Development.” Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 846-863. Retrieved on June 22, 2009, from:

http://heb.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/34/6/846

(20) Smit, J. (2002). Community-Based Urban Agriculture As History And Future. Washington,

DC.

(21) The Growing Power. (2009). Milwaukee Farms and Projects. Retrieved April 17 2009, from

The Growing Power: http://www.growingpower.org/milwaukee_projects.htm

(22) U.S.D.A. Economic Research Service. (2002, July). Community Food Security Assessment

Toolkit. Barbara Cohen. ERS Contacts: Margaret Andrews and Linda Scott Kantor. E-

FAN No. (02-013) 166 pp. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from

http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/EFAN02013/

Page 44: Urban Agriculture: Theory and Practice of Community Gardening

44

(23) U.S. Census Bureau. (2009, May 7). U.S. Population Clock. Retrieved May 7, 2009, from

U.S. Census Bureau: http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html

(24) Victory Seed Company. (2008, December 12). Victory Gardens. Retrieved May 2, 2009,

from Victory Seeds: http://www.victoryseeds.com/TheVictoryGarden/page2.html

(25) Wyndham, S. (2005, December 19). An Urban Farm for Jubilee Homes of Syracuse, Inc.

Syracuse, NY.