13

Click here to load reader

Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Andrew Katz's presentation of legal issues surrounding mobile technologies. Presented at Transfer Summit on 8th September 2011

Citation preview

Page 1: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Licensing and Mobile Technologies

Andrew KatzMoorcrofts LLP

[email protected]: @andrewjskatz

Page 2: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

About me

• Former programmer• Have released code under GPL• Technology enthusiast

• My firm provides legal advice for:– Corporate, fundraisings etc. (F/OSS DD)– Employment (including GPL friendly

employment contracts)– Commercial property– IP/regulatory/licensing

Page 3: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Hot issues

• Patent madness• API protection• GPL enforcement

• App stores

Page 4: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

“Patents seem to work pretty well in the mobile space.

There's plenty of innovation there, and the system runs

very smoothly.”Anonymous patent agent to me at a cocktail party, c. 2003

Page 5: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Patent Madness

• Patents don't work• Oligopoly supporting• Jurisdictional in nature

• Contributory infringement and source code.

Page 6: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Do patents work?

• Are they necessary for innovation?– No - many reasons e.g.:

http://endsoftpatents.org/resources-for-economists

– “software patents...are associated with lower R&D intensity” - Federal Reserve Board report, 2004

• Potential barrier to entry for small businesses

Page 7: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Oligopolistic

• Incumbents can afford expensive patent application/acquisition fees.

• Incumbents amass a defensive patent portfolio– Patents should only protect stuff which would NOT

have been invented otherwise.

– Defensive patent portfolios are aimed at stuff which is being invented anyway.

– Therefore the existence of defensive patenting proves that the system is broken.

Page 8: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Jurisdictional Only• Reports almost always omit the jurisdiction

where the patent exists.

• Usually US

• Historically, it's been easier to obtain software related and business method patents in the US than in the UK (and the rest of Europe)

• Some inventions may not be released in jurisdictions with the strongest patents

• Will the US change its tune if China becomes a net exporter of IP?

Page 9: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Contributory infringement

• Providing an essential element for the infringement of a patent

• Could this apply to source code?

• The patent itself could contain source code

Page 10: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

API Protection

• Is copy or recreate still the binary option?

• JVM vs. Dalvik

• (Oracle vs. Google)

• In EU (inc UK) – Computer Programs Directive

• SAS -v- World Programming

Page 11: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

GPL enforcement

• GPLViolations.org• Software Freedom Law Center• “Pay for an exception”

• Oracle

• Search and seizure

Page 12: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

App Stores

• GNU go• Incompatibility with GPL• FSF says

– Apple is in violation of GPL – Upstream provider violates

http://www.fsf.org/news/2010-05-app-store-compliance

• Android terms of service ok: carve out GPL

Page 13: Transfer summit presentation (mobile) 06 09 11

Licensing and Mobile Technologies

Andrew KatzMoorcrofts LLP

[email protected]: @andrewjskatz