Click here to load reader
Upload
khangminh22
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
‘UT'I'I'V' fl ("1‘ '17 1 I u 1
'1'1'1':'1‘1'1".:1 ':11”z";1.1;1’1'1‘1if15,1 11::1491.““MN"1:::‘i 1'35:..jz‘:‘z':’::'.:.‘:‘:':‘1'1‘1'1‘1:‘ ':H;':':':::l:’1'1’:':‘:':f1':.:' 5:13
1111-1111111:11:1”11 1"1111 1.11111111.11%”!11111111111111H'1111 11111 111111 1111.
11I111'1111 ’1V'111111411'111u1W111111I11111111-11111111111111; 1111 r" 11'.
.1’1-11 1 g1;.:'11(..:111?1m1111.11 I’Iz11111111113 111111111111111111111 I ('1 I'
II 1111111I‘111!11,'111"11M-11'I11111111111111111111'11111111'1 . 11191Jz-11‘1
11W'1111W11111111 1:: 1N!111111 1H111111111111111111111 11111111 :41 1 111 1 1
1 H1II-l'9I"II'III‘IIV:"I H1111) 111111{11'1151111'1M11III‘III1’I1QIII1 11I19’os‘1
1.:“11 1.111 I 1111101111114’11zp111111 MII'IIIII‘II IIII'IIII-11111I IIII’III."
III.) 1111‘111111111H111'11 1H11!III:1.'01H11.—IIIII\11 1'..II111111111.111 1.1:”? 111111 I
11111a111111 11311111 1 11 1
.1'1.:~1 1“'11 1'1 a::.11:1:1:1;1’1 1.1‘1‘1’1’19.':‘."'.‘,’,'.'1.1:1:::1'::,:.‘.:::’:,:,:,:,:':'I.:,;.:1:1:,:,I. ’1':':.%I ’.‘1t.::¢:'.104 1 1‘1: '1'
1 1 H1121 1 1 ! 1’1 1 1 I 1 111 1 I 1W1“; 1 1 111 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 11 1 1 1'1‘1'1A1'1M19 ‘11'I’1 ”1‘'1.
'I’I':': ':'1 91’1'1'1‘11‘1'1‘1‘101.:::%‘1‘w 1:1’:’3.1:1°1:1‘1'1'1'.'.'1'1.1:1:1'1‘1‘1‘.‘.‘1‘.‘.I‘V‘1'1'1’1'1:1.1'I‘1:1 1.:'. :.:.II. I I:1:£:;
11'1WI1H1111111111H11111 11111111111-1111111.111111111111p111151 1
111.1V'II1”:‘ 11111 I1I111111 1 11 1 "1 1
1’1'11.,1'13:"11W”11‘ 1.1“ “I ”1'15’i11:11’11:11...)‘1:9:1:1:1'1‘“1.1.1.13...I11:1.1:1:1:I:1:1:1:1:1"’I.1.I£112,111II(1:1:;:11“? o:
4110;;9111‘11’1'n11~1m111'.13 1m11.m11011111111111"“111111111111’IIWI11'1I’1'I:1’1 ‘1‘ 1:1
1.1.1.”. ‘ :-?I’I.%::z-{'11 11”£;:‘I,I:I.r 1.I'I,1.!’1'1‘1‘1.1.1 . .1.1.1:11.1.1.11.1..1fin‘11:”1.1‘1.11.1.”.'1.1.1.111.1. 1:::::11
1111-. I 111 II I1 II III 11
.111z1 “‘1‘1"(1'Q.J I -1 . .1111’1'11111'.{11’111‘1’1'1'111'11"1‘1'1
I'I:I.1’I’11II:I:I. "II'I':‘I zazzlfi
11161H4 1’113. 111 11W111111111111I 111111.1‘1.1111..111g1'1 1)
'1‘1'1n1fl11h‘HI 1 ' ' 1 'I'I‘'HI‘1.1%1'101'1':’ .111‘1'1‘1'1‘1'1'1.1‘1’1.1.1.1.1'1:1:1‘t'uqo 1'1‘11‘1'1'u. 1.1..1‘1'1 ' 1.4.1"1 1
111 1111111111; (I.I:."‘IVIIIIIO;I:1‘III'III'I‘IIIIII1.111 .11111mu11111111HI1I‘IHIIIIIII“(.
111111111 11W11111WI11111 1111111111111111111111W1: 11111111 II 1111
II'11111.I“”11N1I1 II111 '11..11 1 11.1111111011111111111111:11 11".11'110111 IIII V115
11111111 111011111W11111 1m1111111111111W11111111111111111111111111111 ‘1111311
11111 1'1H11111111 11W11111111111111111111 111111111111111111,111111111111.1f
Jtl!':11111111!IIIH1!1 19301-111H1I111I1111.1“11111111111111141111 111W111u1‘111111.1
..... 1.1M11111111111111111~11. 1W1111111111111111 1111111!1111111111111,11:
111.1111 1111 11111111w111(11111311111111111111111'1111111 1111111111W11111111 11
111111 11H11111I )1111w111111 IIIQWIOIIIJIIIIIIVIIIIIICIII 11111111111 1.11
1‘1v11191111111":HMI1111111111 1111H11IIII 111111I1I11111,”1111111 111141IIIllo1III11-.11II
1 111-111‘I1111 11I1WI111011.1111111111111111111 1111111.1%1111!111111111111
-111111111111111111111111111 'H'." 1111191111.11111111111111.111 1111111011 111-1
11111 11111111111111H11“1111111111111111111111-111111111 1111111 '11”11I '1111
1’1.1.1'1.1:n.1.1‘11M1.!1 I”11M111 1 11 1 1 1H1.1.1.1)1 1.1.1.1.1‘,'1'1'1‘1.1'1‘1.1‘-‘1'1':'1'1.1°.'1':. 1.1 11.1.1.1 1.!”11.1':: 1;1‘1.1.1
‘1111111 11”,.11I1H11;’I1.111”11".)111111111111‘111111111111:.0111.I;')Hq.1'111
1”9n1 0‘1111
11111111 1 111m111 11131111 111111Iwo11111111111I11111.111HI111111‘H1110I11:1111
1111111volu11111 P111111 111”11111111111111 11-11W111111111 1111111111W111.311
.‘.‘.'.':1'1'11'31'1'31'1’ 1"111’1'1'1' '1'1'1'1’1'1‘1'1'1’1'1'1'1 1'1.'11:1'1'1'1'w‘ '1'1' ' ‘1 1'1'1‘1' 1’1'1'1‘1'1’131.1.1. 8W1 1'1.'1'1'1‘
1 ! 1 1'1.1 v1 1»1 1 11'1 1 1 1“. 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-1.1 1 1 1’111 1 a 1 1”11 1:1'!11 1 1 1’1 1 v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1‘ 1‘1‘71 1 4 1 1 1
"v111111 '01; 111 1111 111111111111II 11111H11 11111 III '11 11111:11III111111I:1.;:'1’IIIIII
111111“1I1 11111011.;11111111111111111111111110 1311.11111de 1‘11'111111'5” e .111
. 1111111111 1 11. 1.111-111.H111111“11111(1111111111111111111191111.
. 1111111 1;r1 1111111111111 11111111W11111'1f111111111M111113%"..11111
lW-11111111:11.11W1111m1111114v11 1M11 1141h111111 1'1111111 1W1111 1! a2111:1111
- II.- '11 ~11W1111I H11111191111:3-Ii191 111111”: ”111111111111110“:1:11111111 1141I1111
" 1‘ JUI ’W‘IIIMI‘I I’III1111111I1111111111111IW11111I1111 11111111.11- 14 1.1
L «I1W1111v 11 11111111m111 1111111111111111':q11111111- 111' 11'1911III1' 1455111111...
211,111.11111111111111111311H13."1'11111‘:'I1,1.IIIIII11
11111111111111.11.1111
1 111111 1w1 11111H191111111H11 11111111311W1-1.11111W11111”111111 11!
1111111111w11 1111,-_ 111 .20.:911.". .L'J‘I:P,.U 1.11101 1|I£M££
1.1111111111111 H1111 . ~ . .1 111m1-r1 *1W111111
1111.1 1.; 1‘1‘1 '1‘1'1'1'1'1"‘1'1‘1' . . .-1~ 11 1519 11:1 '1“? 1111.1. 11 {‘1‘}
'hil’.:1.l.11'l'm IIJ"‘II.Q‘*" _ 1:,"qi.1~‘1'1““3‘”:'“t.‘;"w.‘.
‘1
1:118'11111111I111 1‘1
I
1 1 111111H11111!11 1:
1111.91 11111111111”
’.
‘W91.1“!1”:1:1.1.1131.1, :z'xu. 1.1.1:“J 0
g R:::::1H1‘1J<1; ‘1‘1’1‘1’1”1 1‘1‘1‘ 31:11:1‘IIII 1.
HKIhIIf11ognuoI.
;I 1
a I o" ’ I
1 .1111111111111-m11111 11 -11
1 1 11»1:1:
I‘ ~1.1 I.I’I.I'!"I’I:1'1.ITII‘ .I‘ ‘ 13E , .0. -E@g''T.. :1!“:3“’ .1&1, H 19.3.1 I :3"".L.1'..'-
\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n11 1 1 11 . 1 ‘ ._5 “‘ . _ 1'1.1 ’ :13: 1 .1'1'1‘11.)1‘111 1.1 . 1 11'11 1
z ’ ' 1 1 1 1'1 1 . ':’11' 1 1 1 1 .: 1 11 1'1:1 1 o 1 1:11’1‘1110111) 11 '1 111:1"0'4'1
“W 71.1. C“. 65
t I'IW'III'11111111
E's.111'11'1‘11121111113’ 11’“ I:
:11‘1,.1'1.1’1.11'1’1..1"""1’1‘1‘f1’1111’111m'11111111.:11HI11111111711H11111111
l'
t
1
I" 1|lIIQ' C s"
2'":
, 1a..
1.1} .312~\ ~ ~'.- ‘f'.‘ '0 , ,
.: £11m T3 1
. s .
1 111 111 1 111 g -_1 1 111 1111111 11111111 111
1"11HI1'11'1 1" 11‘1‘!:19'1111‘1’1’1‘1.1”’::,‘111111’1‘1' '11.! 11¢)”1.'11.111.1‘I‘I.IIIIII!I;I.I~I1III1‘1’111II
. .1*I.I‘I.I‘1 T:|.:':,I;IR1_'I1.I1.?I.I‘I:1.1.1‘1l I31“”. 8.1.1.03 1 I,!‘1‘1 'I‘I.I.1. 1,I Ii::1;:.I‘1'1'111.:“II‘ch.I‘1‘.,IJI.I1:1.I‘Q’I,I'I‘I'1.
I'1.I‘.1g
A 1 1
11111.1111H11111’!'11 1:1'H.1111'11.a11111 1" 11.11'11'!)11111111211.11111‘1111
C I
1‘1 " 1
“A c
1' '
1111111 1:11
1 111 1 1 1 111 111 I11 1 1 1131 11 I Im1111- 11110111111 111111 ' 1O I11
‘1.11.."1..’. I|’Il:1,11‘11'}11'1'111*1‘111191:1:11:1.1“311'II'O' 9131.111 ”'1011' {111”192 II.IIIIOII'.II"91.11
II'I'I'IIIIII"-1111 111 1MI\)111 1w11111W11111119151!111111111111111111111:Iwi
'11111'111111111".“111111.1111211‘J1 r1)
1' ‘111111I1‘1111111911’11
‘P Ht..9'~1:‘.’ 11.1 1316 I
-- 11-”,1111111113311111
,:‘1z.a{.110 11111-14. IIIIIII.
1111111511111 1"111‘1111111.I 1; ..11111 1 3111111191
111111 1’1111111 111111.111Afl' 7*
.11111_~11m111~'1311111111: , I
31111.1:1911111....1.1.v
~1111II1I7:'4 J1IMIIIJI'IH91 . I
1911!.1111_1.1°1,J.111 11 1'11I20;”-COIN-’1 IoI 1‘1'1'9.
1"”11'111111111II 1111111111111.
IVMVI1,11111114131LII-IIIIIII1N'”}1..I.“., ‘3-" IIIIIJIIXIIoQIIII IIIJIIIIIIII .“1
--r. v ’210‘ .. -"1 OQ”'I'11A_’1111 3111111‘111
111111:1.11111111.'1.'.111111‘1111:.311-"a11,1 '5 181.111I1?1., 11.111011111418111:
1111I111111111IIII 3111111I "I; 1,. ‘I 1 1I9II!.11IeIIIIIIII1441AIIIIIV
1-11111111111.:1111II 111111111111 ‘ I :1 1 111131IIII '33....600I9 I
:9111111111IMI1-1.1111111111111.401111 -. ’:IH.W1.11”?" 1);...1:I’:“101.11 11101
‘1 I? II‘III91
~1-I
\
.
§?:M1.13‘.‘..11‘1o111111111111 0.111.,1-11 $1.1‘I‘1‘91.2'1I111”1¢'.111
11I011I-1111I01
' ‘.". If... .-. 5‘}:,- ..
iy’to1.1,1‘1.1.r'1'1.1‘1’1‘19’11.1'1.1'1.1.1.1$WJf?11‘th9 ‘33:kg?:1“::1“!
11:”11101H11 4"”11I111;11111
A“.'QGLL'EfiE’'.':$::I'1'1‘I.13I'1:I”‘P I|:6‘1.I:1‘1":";9.
1'1 ’II‘I'S..‘..I1.-.,H' 1.1.1
.:'.‘CCI “9111;113:4101
211111111111. 1111111111111I ‘
9.911,-,'.1o.-1:1 1J$1191I111118IIII 'H.-0“.ld.¢ ..“'_‘I' ‘.‘.I
31 1 111111 1 1 1111111111111111 1"1
1‘3'11":111111'1111.1.5191111111'111311,1111
11'f1911111111111H11.1-11.H1111111I;.131111- , - -_
.' 111111171!.11_1111 «m3111 111‘;11111';11'.1111 wr121114I90QIflflula 11J.‘.1111111:1;111I
11111111110 131111311 1H1411 1111H-11'1111f1-11111~ .111111 IHI : 1.11I11 l‘ial
1‘11111=).11111119101.H1. 111.1111111”91.....'1113111111I1.11111111111111111111111:
5"....'1!i'1”'.1.11‘..’1 9.631;..‘1'111111°1'=1111 11x118.1111:111111r 1111111110 111
I ' I ‘ 1n11111111m1111111aaflt£11111"11:.1111111111..311111111111)
1 113 .1111111 1:11..“ 111'11 111111‘111.1011!1111111 1111111! 1:1I11mo‘11 1
-.11111131I7531;H11009'I1-1111111;111H91111111,111H11114usaoc1'1101 1:11.41111111‘1131 :1111.
~1?!111111I"”!: J11. 1199011‘1.”11111zl-111W‘I.111113:1‘1.1111 1"1111111111 I111011'q
1111.-1 1I1 I:I‘11W1411I1I111318111“IIIVIEMI’VIIJJII1'de 111.011: I'W‘cb0.010
11111-!~1111H11'1311'3: 1:..1111111 -W111111111111.2 1.11191-3111 11111911111 11.11
III!‘\J11111111?11~1.111111-IslaI111111111as aaIIIII:I91'233131111111111‘
"12 .1111111191 1;111111'1111).11111IIII!13'11111111917211.111IIIII111111.111I11
.111111-.:1:1.1111111. 14 111110'114. ”1111111111331111111111‘o:..1111111711:_!111:
'111111119'\'1JJW1111111319111111111!”.111131,111111!¢W4JI.11111,11II‘L
43:..11,1_11119'I|
1-1)_]:-_1..I111111 12.1010111911:33.W1.1JI143‘3W131.ICI'I_°?H99!1 iaLIIIOIIII 17'5611566I1
1111:1-'11!“'I:1111_1111171.111111111‘1 ':)Sé1r11-”1191.-3 1 II 11111111111111111191I 11,11
-.111-11v='2.a.1111111 411ma.111111‘111fl111 1111113-.1111111-1-111111.1 1111
11123.:‘11111111 11111‘N111'353131'I11I911?”.11 11111111111r1113111-111011
11”,!1111111
“7-1) ‘1 13111H111‘19 a: ‘11‘111113111311111 11111183151111'61111.1".1i‘I‘a."."-.'-""',
117.11 ’1‘); N111111310 1'11.11 41.1:swataolyqn1111:1113i110011Q 11:131.}... 11:
1Wo111.1.1111~11131.31111'1'121'v1‘1111m1111511 1 I: 1.11311111111111311111'1-11-I?..12:1‘113
1111111-I.11111J11I1=1W3:1.111111193'311m111111111121111111I11111:.:1..11,I111.110w
1111
111111111~r;: 411111111917 141119111811!)111111119911:Hid.-1111_1_1.II11!?1‘1.136 1‘411
111.11111I11I“.1)-11111'111I111113111_1I19111231‘1t11w111 1-:91..11111111‘11
?11111!:.111 111111 11.111151111114'11111311I 4-99. 132".)111011111'111111-11 1.II;I’III_III
11.111110.'.1' 511111-11v1311M13111111211331111a1111.1191.11.11111111IIIIE.I .31.1
1-12 1 1111 1.9-21113111 I111--.i111111w110. 31.11.1111 1 '11::1
1|1)::111111s-I1111.1IonIIII1"11111111‘111ifi911vzm 11111 9111111111.. 31.11.11.133.
11130,“ ‘xvl 1‘111‘41‘9"‘\EMA-1111111011331iIlJotdlsI‘sl1‘3.2§1413'311‘;100I_I99;?I3311':'1361i:
211.11111111'):'1111'111I1111111141161131611‘313.:11|1111319131.;:J1IN13131151-119I‘P9
. - “1.1.1.111111111 132.,“1111 1191111':1116111111111191.13:1:11111111911
11-11-11H11:111.1111111IO1111-.11111111°1-'214.21.311111919121z!:11.111‘11.2_1,11111-:I::7‘881‘
1:1.11I 11'111311: 111 1111??”13w1'1111111I1111 z:3111111112111:1I;:1.1.111,1111~1_11.III,I
11111..1"'.:.I1.111111111I1'14111‘ 93134.1.19111113‘119 I.s‘-::.w11111r11111_181393.‘
13.11.311-
1iW0091'V'-.3‘113101910:118.33-1‘23365II19'I{iIsJIJNIQIQ1f4I§l.S
{I SJIJVIIIQII’. QI?I3_-12§
. III"W.IQII 11m1!~n~: i IIWIIIIQTIISI Mé‘tingIIQ‘EI ‘1'1'113313 IIIQU.-II_?!." ,-
£1191M1111111r1911.111 1"1I1’3';19: 311 11.111131‘; .11111H11111011 1‘111115111..11
II 'WHJ'IIIQIQU° 1:13w}.11111191‘!!9!15.18 QIWII 21.2913WI'111161111“ B“
2:31 111111_ 13111111.I.1“111”111I 11:: 1111111 1.11!I§: ’11" . ‘ _
1:11)} 1_v 11113111.)..17'91111.3:1111H11'11SIII114.J,11111_'011II9.19131I112:11.:
0"
1M11111zv.“ 1.11111111- :1111111111g19‘m1111131191111 12'1 3mm. ‘Y' I
IHIJ 1I~-1 11111 IIIfIRIIJ.~)3SI 21111 1111:11m11-13111I?I§::1.
1111111..111-1I11I113 31111111121‘31m1111111111I"‘~1 13H1111111111111
371 \I I 1 IIIIIIIJ:‘1.’11I.1'1II,91!?1£’“:51I11'IIMIIIIIYII:1.11111.11IBIIIOQIIIIJI-II
I.MSII1'IIIIIJI l‘1.1.1011059'115311.1'MIII‘M)“311110II:III_-19'3!?flf‘
'-
fl: 11.7.111:1!1;:1a11111111~1°1:11.111;1“111fi1111113111M111I1‘ 129
«.H'",7;:"I3‘IIIII'H ~11¢J11A_I;1‘1»111191‘.g11?;11‘I11 11 1113’5‘13 -5f.j¢1111III¢I.II
131-1311 112.11111 121111 ”5.”...qu 1123:3113 1111f111,15“111'1 : 1 131;}: 111111
"1131 31111111-:1H111111119‘!.1311911931131111,111‘U11'1_11’-In
11111611.: 1:11!
111 1'H'111.1!111111 111.111 1::1111 111.111 1 11111111111-3281V11313 MW‘i_I.‘_
'MIOC$111 IIA1J13W1111'1I1.;.:‘1IWIIIIIIIIG“ “I“IIIIBIII1! 1811’1‘8°-X1dl{11§oi
11WIIIII1131 .1 111I11°IIV 1 '13. I'am Ifz} “HI: .-J: 1‘.13 .DOI(.Q‘Q_!_ IleI-b924fl9
1111111114.11111101‘1121I'111N11111111!1111319111115193...” 113.1431.1.1i1 sitcuim III
1101I11V1W111311J11=Hmex3112511”11I_1.:1'Ia312 .13514151‘110 11111111111, :safizt 91
$1. 2W31311111 2:11.11 o1lv1711 , a _ 11H1111025111'J 1‘1W111-111111HIIII’ IIUII II
VI9-1 IIIWIIIIIIII II'it. 1IIII1'III'I.:‘.913“23H311iQIuIIE‘IIIIS‘I‘Jf‘IV!.;:31:1111111.1_11111111‘1
‘- I ‘ . £4..131111! "511153 ”3111-21111I!"I;IIIQI‘IJ'1‘3-Sl'iii
"11-1 ‘11111;11:. 1111-1111131'::,"11111111.111;.215: 11,:‘11M111111311 1191.1.
1111":M1!1111111 "";3*u1\*'°“''11 “111111111111111‘*1 "2§-11-1 ! % ”II-IW1IIIIII
111N1191-vno1yloowoop 111W111111111hIH11713(1111111111111—I11 1W 1 it 1115
w I 1119.21 '5’1'..1'”.9 '1:11‘ 131 1:9‘1agvil " a..‘2 .. 1.131 tag:11:1‘11.12131”. .. .1‘1'.‘1.1‘11,1115.1.1311.1fi1:1:11“1‘11 1;1:1‘1“11d1b1‘1;1:1
I . I
11111111I.v.11_111111 ..°.--.111.11111111I‘I:JJJ113I£IWnII111‘IJI‘I’I IIHIIQIVI 11...!”1:x:j43|
1 111 9 311111:11111;11 11.11111111111131 3:. 311.1111gfi 111
11111113111111.1111 L111 10111‘1'1 11111111 11%‘11119'II 311W 41‘ ,
‘.1’?a.'.'11~1‘111.11‘)~ 1.91.1.1? I'III'.‘3 1-! 1333311",11‘13311111a1‘11”113131!“09:11:“:2I...‘
O ":Q' ‘3 1’ ‘ 4.“
' 131111111M11113 1‘1m13 111
." :1:1 11':::4:m‘1.1 314131.1esjzgsen‘u‘. l‘3‘1‘3‘1fl1.1’1’1.3.'‘114’1I"Ii0‘.’1i::1u:“5.1:
“:131 :Ifi J 1 1.: 1‘1111 11 1 1 1 1 a“a1 1 1 9 1 I 1 1 111 1:11h11 I
I
1
'1.
.1
§ 8 I
o O
1)1111°:1:22‘0
‘I'!!mIa
WSJIIIZIWIooIN11111IHII’.
1‘;1 :31’2'1'11” ”.118111.1111:1:1;1:::1:1:1:1§1'1:1:~:1:I.?‘f11:1:§::'.:1:11:1;<:r''
111;‘1° ‘5 ' 1.131r.‘ P111.
1: .. v..1...1 '11 2 Q1... .
'1’1"“"*i’35%;; ::':~:::;:.::.'& :eizt‘f‘lfj 111111111111 1‘1':
1-am11112 1mm111111111111'11glv1§z§$15gfi
1 3' i1
:.1
11
L
:‘00
“m1!3&1 “II31 nfi'“ “taf‘m‘ ' 1131111 1111111111
11 1”1.111:1 9 ‘ .I I
'52:..21.:3:34:91? :W’mhiiaid‘i't'91'1'2'.‘ 32332511334193?1'35”“.5‘1 1, ! ::\:::1'1 I:.1". I Ink-‘3:7":‘1‘.:1: 31:1:1:1.1.1.131‘901'1.3.I‘}:1: :3 A1. .szgI é.I;..;.:‘1.1: :I:51
:11.13:.': .1‘1111“..1. 31;...z1:311;1‘1,\”1§;II.‘M:::15H114131.1¢g1‘1.fi‘.161iz..._.3;?:1.15161'h
1‘1‘111.1 1*1'1'1‘1‘1' ‘1’6‘1‘1‘1‘ 1‘1“1 1 1.13“.”1‘134.‘ 111113:1111“1:“1'13“. 1 '1“Q
11 '31.:111111'.‘11.111%”
' ‘11WI?
I
I:I .
1111. 11 1 11111111! . 1.
“1‘ 11'11:1“:1:1 1:1:1‘I.I:.'1::' 1‘1‘3‘1.13111:1;1.1:IHWI%.3£.:.‘¢‘ir‘:k .1gg‘:.LE.“;t§1§‘$EI:Iah
GENE? CS AND CYTOLOGY OF SOLE InPORTANT
mmuuoor True mam 1x§£UfIVE OF T1412 UIIITSD S'l‘ATIflS
by
Scott Eguley
A ThES 8
Submitted to the Graduate School of Richigan
State College of Agriculture and Applied
Science in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of
1‘.‘;A13'l‘ER OF SC MICE
Department of BO”A?Y
1942
ILTRODUCTIOH
Foresters during recent years have become increasingly
aware that the forest practices of 1900 are in some instan-
ces no longer sound. The changing concepts are evidence of
rational and normal develOpment for they have paralleled the
rapid accumulation of facts collected by numerous workers in
the related bioloaical and physical sciences.
Of all concepts and techniques which have been altered
or revised none is more important than the changing attitude
with regard to the fundamental unit with which the forester
works. Gradually the concept that the species is the unit
of forest practice is being destroyed. The revolutionary
work in genetics of the past forfiy years has demonstrated
beyond any reasonable question of doubt that foresters, no
more than growers of annual crOps, can any longer well af-
ford to ignore the genetically superior members of a species.
Although the study of the genetics and cytogenetics of
forest trees is of comparatively recent origin, an extensive
and valuable literature has develOped. In addition, the
older as well as contemporary work in related fields con-
tains much valuable information and technique which is of
value to the forest tree breeder.
This paper represents a preliminary effort to collect
and evaluate in some degree of unity the contributions of
numerous workers to the end that their inferences and con-
clusions may be made more readili available to the genetic-
..4 45‘“); '.3
Jink \5 a t
-11-
ist and cytologist interested in the improvement of our for-
est trees. The critical review, as a means of systematizing,
evaluating, and preserving the rapidly accumulating data in
all fields of science, is receiving reCOgnition as a highly
desirable research technique.1
The genetic and cytogenetic aspects of eight of our im-
portant har‘wood forest tree genera have been treated in this
review. Each genus has been discussed as a unit with empha-
sis upon the following principle tOpics: (l) artificial se-
lection from wild stock; (2) controlled breeding and selec-
tion; and (3) cytology. The "literature cited” for each
genus follows the discussion of that genus. In addition a
list of "literature not cited" has also been indicated. In
the latter list are noted publications which were not avail-
able to the author or they represent pOpular articles review-
ing scienctific papers which have been consulted. This
arrangement has been adopted for the purpose of broadening
the scope and usefulness of the review.
Sec: Bradford, F. C. (1942) Conserving our harvests.
Science 95 (2471): 465-469.
-iii-
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction .................................. ii
ForULUS ....................................... 1
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 4
Controlled breeding and selection............ 8
Cytology .................................... 52
Literature cited ............................ 55
SI'XLIX 000......IOIOOOQOOOOQOOOOOOOO00......O... 6]—
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 61
Controlled breeding and selection ........... 65
CEItOJ-OsrIO...0....OOOOOOOOOOOO.00.00.0000... 69
Literature cited ............................ 75
JUGLANS ....................................... 79
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ SO
Controlled breeding and selection ........... S2
Cytology .................................... 88
Literature cited ............................ 9O
CARYA ......................................... 95
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 95
Controlled breeding and selection ........... 94
Cytology .................................... 97
Literature cited ............................ 99
BETULA ........................................ 101
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 102
Controlled breeding and selection ........... 104
Cytology .................................... 107
Literature cited ............................ 112
QUERCUS coco-ooooooooooooooococo-0.000.000.0000 115
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 118
Controlled breeding and selection ........... 119
Cytology .................................... 125
Literature cited ............................ 125
UIAUS ......................................... 129
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 150
Controlled breeding and selection ........... 150
Cytology .................................... 156
Literature cited ............................ 158
ACER .......................................... 141
Artificial selection from wild stock ........ 142
Controlled breeding and selection ........... 145
Cytology .................................... 148
Literature cited ............................ 151
-iv-
SALICACEAE Lindley
Killow or Peplar Family
The Salicaceae, with more than 200 species, includes 5
1, 1genera -, Populus L., Salix L., and 0110967118. I‘Iaka
Ho
. The lat-
ter, a monotypic genus, is restricted to northeastern Asia
(Rehder, 1940).
Salix and Ponulgs have been reported in the upper Cre-
taceous of North America, Greenland, western EurOpe, Japan,
and Russia and the Cenozoic history of the family is rich in
variety (Larrah, 1959). They are at present most abundant in
the temperate regions of the northern hemiSphere.
Although a timber contributing family of minor importance,
a number of species are valued members of pioneer types which
play significant roles in soil and water conservation. Since
many species are easily reproduced vegetatively and produce a
network of fast-growing roots they are used for erosion con-
trol. Some of the distinctive forms are widely used as orna-
mentals (Harlow a harrar, 1941).
POPULUS L. (pOplar)
POpulus L., represented by about 50 tree species is, for
the most part, confined to the temperate regions of the north-
ern hemisphere. Fifteen species are native to North America
1 According to harlow a harrar (1941), five genera are now
recoanized due to the recent work of Japanese taxonomists.
Toisusu, previously included under Salix, has been raised
to generic rank. The genus Turanra_EEE—been added. Both
are exclusively Asiatic in d-s ribution.
but only about five1 of these occur in commercial size and
quantity in the United States (Harlow L harrar, 1941).
Tte 3enus is diVided into five e etiors: (1) Lance Duby
(white pOplars, aspens); (2) Leucoides Spach; (5) Tacamahaca
Spach (balsam poplars); (4) Aeneiros Luby (cottonwoods, black
neplars); and (5) Turanra Bun3e (Petder, 1940).
The wood of the American and EurOpean species is employed
in considerable quantities for pulp, excelSior, veneer, lumber
for boxes and various other small articles of woodenware (Brown
& Panshin, 1940; Sargent, 1922). The high orn11ental value of
many of the species has resulted in their wide use as street
and shade trees. The white peplar (E. 3123 L.) and its several
varieties, the Chinese peplar (2. sinonii Carriere), and the
\4
lomhardy peplar (P. hi ra ita lica Luenchausen) have been ex-
tensively planted in the United States.
Unfortunate}.v considerable taxonomic difficulty has arisend
.‘
at various times amon3 systematic workers and forest tree bree‘-
ers With regard to the proper nomenclature to be used for cer-
tain species, varieties, forms or hybrids of the several poly-
morphic and easily hybridized species of this 3enus. A number
of workers have striven to bring some order out of this chaos.
piLn Great Uritrin Elwes and Henry (1915), henry (1910, 1914a
1914b, 1950) and Cansdale (1959) have contributed to taxonomic
clarification of the especially difficult and confused section
1P. trenilojdeg Licnaux, P. gparcideniaia fichaux, P. ta camahaea
Filler, P. trlsiocahpa 'nstata henry, var., P. delto ioes LarSuall.
Aejeiros Duby (cottonwoods and alach peplars). Houtzagers (1957)
in Holland, Quairiére (1956) in Bel3°um, and Sargent (1896,
192?) and dehder (1940) in the United States have also proviCed
valuable revisions and revaluations in nonenclature for the
whole genus. Loutzagers' work, especially, will prove an in-
valuable aid to breeders in ibis genus.I
In accord tith the olicv practiced in other sections of’3
this review, an attempt has been made in most cases to indicate
the probable identity of the many meaningless common or scien-
tific names (1ackin3 authority names) which have been used with
such promiscuity by some authors. rhe work of Rehder (1940)
has been used as reference and autLority on taxonomic questions.
It is also a matter of some taxonomic importance to rec03-
nize, as pointed out by Stout (1929) and Stout and Schreiner
(1955), that certain of the natural, or early described, hybrids
in this genus have been exclusively prepagated as clones.._,.
these clones have masqueraded as species undefi such names as
"P. serotina Hartig" (= X E. canadersis serotinc (Hartig) Fehder),
. T ‘ - o
VET. and "P. rc3enerata henry‘ (- X P. canadenSis regenerate
(Sc?.n1eider) Rehder, var.).
Most members of the genus are characterized by rapid
growth, ease of prepagation by twi3 or root cuttin3s, and winter
hardiness. All are wind pcllinatedl, essentially dioecious,
hybridize with case (at least within and between most sections),
and are capable of successfully maturing immediately viable
seed on cut twigs in the greenhouse. Many Species however5 ’
1The genus Salix L. is entomOphilous.
-5-
are hosts to a number of fungus diseases and insect pests.
With this general set of conditions it is not remarkable that
considerable interest has been directed to this genus by for-
est genet1c ists, both in tno United States and abroad.
is”:1’1':
ICIAL SELECTICI FRO; XILD STOCK
Considerable eiWioiShas been directed in EurOpe, especially
in France (Stout, 1950; Ackers, 1958), to the sele etion of na-
turally occurring hybrids, varieties, or forms of peplars supe-
rior for use in forest plantations. The business of growing
these trees in France as a timber crop to meet local demands
of wood using industries is claimed by these authors to be highly
successful.
In France as well as in Germany, however, according to
Cansdale (1938), the nomenclature in the genus is more than or-
dinarily confused. This condition, of course, has not materi-
ally advanced selection efLor ts or the ac chulation of reliable
data. Stout reported t‘ne three clones which are said to be the
most extensively used for forestry purposes in France as:
Eégénéré , "Angulata" and Peuplier a Ecorce Noire". we
probably 2 g. regenerata Henry 3 X 3. cnnwnrnis regenerate
(Schneider) Rehder but to suggest synonyms for the others re-
quires departure from the field of probability.2
Increasing interest in the possible use of peplars for
lRe;3nier (1934) has reportedly provided classification and de-
scription of many peplarsgrown in France as a preliminary step
in a breeding research program desilgned to isolate diseaase re-
sistant forms.
2Stout stated these names were best he was able to obtain from
French growers.
forestry purposes h5+s been manifest in inl_”nd in recent years.
Lotbiniere (l9?”5)and AC’ers (l 58) believe the growing of pep-
lars under forest management to be ncorowicoliv sound provided
de rable stom1 is used. Such ideas have encouraged search for
the most desirable wild forms best suited to the pla of manage-
ment and utilizati_on. ,
An initial and most fundamental step in that direction has
been accomplished by Cansdale (19 ’b) in his "”1 ey to t}.1e species
and hybrids of Poyulus cultivated in Britain". An assemblage
5:
of other 3 .nple.entary evaluating information on individual mem-a
bers of the genus has also been made by this author.
Cansdale and AcLers believe that X P. re enerata Henrv. _ w J
(3 X P. canadensis rege.erata (Schneider) Rehder) may well prove
to be a valuable timber producer in the British Isles as, sup-
posedly, it has in France. This clone has been grown in forest
plantations in Ensland for a full rotation (40 - 60 years) in
several localitie swith high yiield.
According to Ac :ers other native clones or introductions,
'1
including eugenii", ”robusta" and "3 I H "O .Y'N, I
generosa are pPOMlSlJb for
forestry use. The Species P. vunnanensis Dode of China and P.
trichocarpa Hooker of the Pacific coast region of North.America
are being tested in forest plantations on various sites in the
British Isles.
Interest in pOplar cultivation and breeding in Germany is
reportedby .'e1;tstein (19'65-a) and the resulting demand for
superior Wild stock for breedinak)
or direct use has greatly stim-
ulated wild selection.
Wettstein (1954) indicated that studies of climatic races
in various species of Poonlus and other 5enera have been carried
on by the German Association for the Breedin; of Forest Treesl.
The further refinement of progeny tests and seed certification
of isolated true breeding strains has also been instituted as
an aid to the work.
Isolation of at least two climatic strains of E. tremula L.
was later reported by Wettstein (1957-a) and reports of pr05eny
studies, showin5 variation amonr the seedlings of P. tremuloides“‘0
Michaux and P. tremula L. were made Ly the sane author (1957-0).
Vill (1930) reported that the hybrid X P. charkowiensis
Schroder (probably X P. canadens is Eu5enei (bixron-Louis ) Schelle)
is bein5 51rown extensively in the Fhineland. Althou5h the tree,
under plantation conditions, is said to make very 500d 5rowth
and to show considerable promise as a timber producer, it is,
nevertheless,subject to canker.
The discovery in Sweden of 9 clones of natural triploid
P. tremula L. (Nilsson-Ehle, 1936; Blomqvist, 1957; Tomator
'd
1957; Johnsnon, 1940) gives promise of supplying valuable Wild
material for direct forestry use in that country. According to
Nilsson—Ehle (1956, 958-b) the first triploid clone (discovered
near Lille, Skgne, South Sweden) grows more rapidly, produces
more wood per year, and is believed to be more resis ant to at-A
tack by Polyporns so. than the normal diploid European aspen.L
Also, because of its ”stronger growth", it is reported as able
to succeed in competition with lime, maple, elm and other hard-
woods. The native diploid on the other hand is said to be found
1Formed by Erwin Baur in 1932.
-5-
o 'I 1 '-. a ‘ .‘I +r
onlv on the outerr11.115in of such mixed 1-31.rd-.10od standS 15‘- 0014? ern
Swede.. Tests of the triploid or "515as" form have revealed its
value for use in the match and paper pulp industrie.. The form
is reputedly easy to reproduce by root cuttings and since a di-
-loid X trinloid cross has already croduced tetraoloid forms itp ‘ 4- L
is probable that triploid seed can be produced at will in the
future by diploid‘-
f"!
tet acloid crosses.1V4
b
In the United States the various wild species and hybrids
of Penulus, both native and exotic, are claimed by Stout and
Schr iner (1955) to be incapable of fully satisfyin5 the demands
for direct use in reforestation project. In Cznada, presumaoly,
the same situation is believed to exist. Peto (1958), however,
reported ,hat the natural hybrids found by Eeimburger (1956)
near Ottawa show considerable promise for use in forestry. Of
these natural c11os s<s, involvir5 the e::otic P. Elba L. and the
two native aspens (P. tremuloides hichaux and P. crandidentata
Michavx), the alba X 5randidentata hybrids are especially pro-
mising.
Stout and Schreir1er criticised the slow 5rowth and poor
rooting ability of the native P. tremuloides and P. crandidentata
and pointed out that many of the imported species and tytrids
are not hardy in the severe climate of the northeastern United
States. It is also claimed that althou5h some of the natural
hybrids, which are successfully 51oun in EurOpe, are 115hly de-
sirable from the standpoint of growth, reproducti-on, and physi-
cal characters of the wood they cannot survive the fun5us dis-
eases to which they are subjected in the new world (Schreiner,
-7-
Stout,
Artificial selectiow
been particularly fruitful
dantly demonstrated by the
wideely used as ornawentals
of the northern hemisphere.
CL]
With the
ments of Klotzscb, kegs,
of Van Fleet and
project was
Oxford Paper Company, Rumford,
Hew York Botanical Garden.
by Stout
(1957). R. H. ILCI’LQC,
ary report,
ject.
The preliminary 0bM3
evaluate and test the
the basis of their value for pulp\!ood re forestaiion
duce tbrou5h hybridiz
existence.
Stout and
th a t the c 01711:} on
from
for the
THU" 19 I" 017. S
.\| -. -L .3?) . 1.| \4.. I
;.Tr:T.(JJ‘l—JLD 12.1 '
exception of
)
Henry”,
started in
and Schreiner (lCR7, 1933, 1954-a,
a c 0- author
is credited with conception
active 0: tie
WHOM)“.
gation more valuable
Schreiner (1935), as
wild material in this genus has
hortimtuLz1risst as; s abunr
named varieties and forms
irl the: te'w1e1" te re .ic>nsJ
especially
‘1‘:Tv ‘ T: i '7‘an INK-
L "U U4._.Ja‘_4._j _L \.’i_'\-1
H L"
‘1‘
V"
the early tree hybridization eXpepi-
I
and the chestnut breedine work
Graves, the first comprehensive tree breeding
the 5enus Pepulus L. in 1924 by the
Raine in ollaboration with the
was conducted and pepOPtOd
1934b) and Schrei 1183’."
of the fir t (1927)C0
of tLe idea
breedin5 pro5ram was to
soecies and hybrids of Ponulus on.. U ‘
and to pro-
types than those in
previously noted, concluded
of the northeast (P. tremuloides and
a nd ca nk’e r-
lEspecially nelaflnsora medusae Thfim” a rust fun5us,
jlulthlLUV “ sa
nr1inatur1(lghotsohe) Che., :Juilflect'ii-vlli_
forming soecics
13331.
“Tel?" (1914) artificially
and P. anerlata auth9 3 P—Al‘_ —
Lybridized P. tricbocarba
1‘11 srvu~5d0 Iij;., E1anrflon‘1 Q3
5ena Ewes. (Boyce,
Hooker
erer’osii Henry.
i..)o
P. 91'15'1'r‘w‘iu‘1'e1t9t9) were too slow; :1 9.111132. too 110(1' in root-- -._-—. —.._.—_..
f
inn ability to be desirable f0“ reforest9tion 1M1ntin9s. ForT
0
one reeson or another 911 of the other M?CLVCP 9nd exot ios were
rejected by t1ese authors. There in, loweve , little evidence
to indieeto tbht extensive field t1i9l under forest conditions
in the n01‘1t1’1e23t of all species and Englrfids in the genus were
undertaken by these workers or otlers. Sueh.9 trial would hrve
been tbs logiefl first stej snfi in necord with both tne osigirel
objeeti es of the prijct annd -95 Tererel farcst trre treading
reeownendetions made by the junior antler (Schrgifier, 1037),
Hybridizction work Wes eerried on du3i n3 the 1925, 1926,
and 1027 seasons. About 15,000 hverid seedlings from about
100 different cross com
forent pOQlfTfi were involved es nerents: three white pop 91rs
and five aspens (Section Leuee Duty);s eventeen bleok poylars
and cottonwoods (Section Re eiros Duty); and nine balsam 50p-
j
lars (oeetion Taeqrersoe Sgaoh)‘. Sections Leuooideg Spgch
and Wuran9a Bunge were not involved.
Stout and So lu'einer (1953), with reference to the nomen-
L.Jo
Cleture they used, stete: "Consider9ble study \i9s d-reoted by
the writers to the identity of the various trees involved in
the breeding and to the wstter of the proee9 nomenolaM1J19 for
them but no attewpt will here be made to revise or critically
to evaluate the names already in use or to survey the litera-
ture relating to pOplers."
It would appear that the authors Were probably justified
in avoidir9 9n QtiflC‘fit to "U
revise or to critieelly evaluate the
1In this group were included some "old bbride Stronwl, oelsmn
~ 9 v v
in onaraeter.
(l
J9mes already in use" but it is to be particularly regretted
thst they did not indicate authorities for the scientific names
they did use. Althouh,in most cases it way be possible to es-
sume the pronerauthority and thus the prOper plant, the use of
such synonvms es "P. envuleta" and "P. canescens" mskes accurate.1 . _ é” ~
Initial selection of the hybrid population of 15,000
plants, b9ased primarily on vigor of growth, was made during the
second yesr. Six hundred seefllirgs were thus sele ctJed. The
remainder, and also those needed out by subsequent selections,
basis of 'tteir performance in the iorestetion planting.
Interspecific hybrids were obtained within and between
representatives of the sections Leuce, Aegoiros 9nd Tacemahaca.
Kore hybridizations, however, were wade within and between the
last two sections and sirnifical 3r ll of the 69 plants in the
second or pre-finel selection were from these crosses. Also,
59 of these selected individuals were talzen from the progeny of
17 different combinations-between the sections Aeeeiros and
Tacamshaca.
In most cases 2 or more sister hybrids were represented
among the 69 selected individusls. From the cross
P. laurifolia", a total of 377 hybrid seedlings were
of t.qis num1>er 10 were mnong the 69 slants in the gre—fjnal
selection.
Kany of the hybrids showed remsrksble hybrid vigor.
-10-
*1
Various hybrids, planted as 14 inch cuttings on ordinary farm
land near New York city, attained a height of eight 9Ld one-half
feet during; the first {growing season. bc?xr<~;>iner (193:7) reported
that the "Strath;lass” clone after 7 years of growth in the
13
’x4
‘1‘
”D
U)
H :3
Q;
.J 3
‘21
0field was apnroxinately 7 i “er 9t breast height
and 57 feet tall.
The ability to root from stem cuttings was an important
character selected for among the hybrid HO)Ul”IlO“. Differences
in rooting ability varieC from ttose which could not be rooted
under nursery conditions to those which rooted almost 100 per
cent. It was ouser»rd that many hybrids rooted wore rendil
(A
from stem cuttinys than either of their parents.
Hardiness was also weas an object of selection, and covered
scu h cha 'scierj 813-4.) 93 {Miity to start ;r()\-'~.th early, grow
*3apidly all summer, and to ripen wood and buds early enough to
avoid autumn or winter injury. host of the new hybrids have
proved to be fuli_y Ewa'd;9 in Laine.
Fesistance or immunity to disease, especially the rust
caused by helampsora medusae Thflm. and the various cankers
caused by the renus Velsa was made an important criterion for
selection. Jhe authors reports-d th<m many of the finest plants
with respecct to visor of growth had to be discarded because of
their lack of resistance to disease.
Selection for tree shape and branching to meet the demands
of the pulpwood industry was attempted. It was concluded that
the most desirable form was the pyramidal or columnar type having
a well-develOped main trunk and few laterals. On the basis of
-11-
fl
observations 01
cluded that it was
but could not be s
\
th
n.,.. e pyramidal habit, Stout and Schreiner con-
9 character decidedly hereditary in peplars
elected with accuracy in your? plants.
Schreiner and Stout (1954 ) described their finally se-
lected hybrids on the basis of Vigor of arenth, ability to
root fron stem CthtanS, ardiness, and reelst 1cc to oisen .
-Since the descriptions were be ed on nursery stock no younx
trees, it was impossible to record the sex, form or t11ee, and
character of the trunk. Ten of the clones were assignad hor-
ticultural names as indicated below (Table 1.).
Avermgya “verage
Clonal flame Parentage D. B. H. L'e1_;._jt
Frye 3.
Rumford g.
Strathglass P.
Poxbury ?,
Andover 3.
Geneva 3.
Oxford P.
Rochester P.
Androscoggin P.
Maine 2.0
J!
Duby.
TA.BLE l.
clonal name
Schreiner
of the Sec.
3‘1U:
after 7 seasons
sylvania on
Schreiner
group of
and
several t
9 (inches) (feet)
riwrc 3. laurifolisf .... 6.7 57.0
nisra X E. laurifoliaf .... 5.2 27.0
Livra X P. laurifolia” .... 5.0 84.0
nirra X _P. tridhocar33*... 2.9 90.5
nizra betulifolia X 3.
Lrl(”007“a“ ......... 1.7
b9V]M011caiiX P. berolin-
0....
ensis"..................... 5.6 29.0
naxizoricz-i"X P. t relin-
ensis ..................... 2.9 27.0
In. axir10111ic231.’:X P. niqra
il9nt1e~ensis .Tfl.......... 4.3 3 .5
L~91w091csiL”X P. tricho-
carpa" ........Tfl..... .... 5.1 25.0
’2: l 5"l10-0999X P. bero Linensis
all other of Ae;irosSec. HTacamahaca Spach;
List of finally selected hybrids showing
and nomenclature of parents according to
Stout, 1934 Average diameter and height
growth «t hont Alto Arboretum, Penn-9
well-drained sandy loam (Anonymous, 1940).
Stout pointed out that selection among the
hous and origi_ral hybrids was carried out 1n
I . - ,. . _ To ‘ A . . .
clnxejlzriinéber rHLrS€JHT recrrtueiiwsn. ‘FN€“T Fglflj evrfllnsfp<=d(' o .L - u u - ,
therefore, tnet final jud :cwent of individual PCTlt must be based
inviour in forest plantations. To this end the ten-L finellv
selected Ivorids have been riven wide distribution for field
trial under forest conditions. Diemeter and lei ht growth as
. 2 . 1 _
recorded in a plélfl‘ in Eennsylvania are shown in leols 1.
Of Special intenest, as shown by the above Toole, is the
fact thst P. nifre or it Cf‘
A
i
3
{w J
t‘J.
m r—f-
,les is involved 9s one of the
parents in SiL of tte ten finally selected inforids. In all,
nine different plents are iqvolveo as parents. Three are black
poplars (Sec. leeeiros puby) and six are balsam peplsrs (“e0.
1rTncemm_.eca Snach)o
Pulping tests of tbe Pytrid clones iSOlatec by Stout and
Schreiner have not, as yet, been reported.
Scbreiner (1985), however, indicated that fiber length and
density of wood of the finally selected b7briis have been at
}_J
east preliminarily investig9ted. This author reported that
H.
d 138 been oboe erve i in Pemnlns, as well as in other genera
which have been studied, that fiber length increases With age
up to a masxiznum. The maximum is believed to be rather constant
and well defined for each Species. On the basis of everaee
fiber length of one-yeer-old wood of the hybrids (0.5 - 0.85 NW.)
as compared with fiber length in one-yedr-old vood of Pepulis
treml‘ lWlGS IleCl’lSUX (O . :55 " O 0 57 711117 . ) , tile 1'} L'JDTOidS a‘npea r: to be
definitely superior. As Scbreiner has pointed out, however,
2 additional clones have also been distributed for field trial.
ee Gruschow (1930) for results in Indi na.
53H
Mrb
-15-
Jbrids' fiber length is longer thanT
Uthis is no evilence that the h
their parents ( . trewuloides was not used as a parent) but it
[*0
does indie‘Mt that fiber length of the hybrids is markedly
greater than one of the principle native sources of pulp.
Further DPLllwanPy studies (S(:h - H119 r, 1935) indicated
that wood of the new, faster growing hybrids was somewhat den-
ser than aspen wood grown in western Raine. This is believed
to be due primarily to the prOportionately larger vessel
volume (i.e., rreater per cent of air Space per unit volume)
in wood of the slower :rowing aspen. This concurs with the
observations as reported by Paul (1950) in the case of other
diffuse porous hardwoods grown under extremely adverse condi-
tions. The resultant narrow rings contain abnormally large
percentages of porous tissue, with corresponding decrease in
Specific gravitv and hardness of wood.
Accordinn to Brown and Panshin (1941) there is no very
“10e relationshie in diffiiuse-porous hard'oods between speci-
Jfic nravity, and hence so
V
rength, and the rate of arowth dueQ.)
to (“De (13.1.fo 0)
ed arrangement of pores of proximate size. The
exception, in the case of extremely narrow rings as reported
by Paul, and as cited above, is mentioned by these authors.
Johnson's (1942) conclusions from studies of the re-
lation of growth rate to wood quality in peplar hybridsl ap-
pears significant. This worker found that although fibre
length in individual fast and slow rrowth arrua 1 rings from
frardidenate and P. aoa X P. tremuloidesHi _.__
arents studied.
the same tree showed a marked tendencv for fast growth ring
to produce longer fibres, data from individual fast grown and
slow grown trees did not show significant relation between
fibre length and growth rate.
In general the author concluded that nothing was found
thnt would support a content-on that abnormally rapid growth
is seriously detrimental to wood quality and that breeding
work designed to produce rapid growing forest trees can pro-
pid gronth and good woodceed with some assurance that ra
quality are not incompatible.
Stout and Scrreiner (1934) reported a description of
hybrids between P. balsamifera Virginians Sarg. (= P. deltoides
barshall) of the Sec. Aereiros Duby and P. grandidentata
Michaux of the Sec. Leuce Duby. From this cross, made in
\
1926 176 sister hybrids were obtained. All of these hvbridsIt
were very uniform in respect to the general character of
1e 0.:
.ves, buds, and stems-—tbere being a decided dominance for
nearly all the characters of the pollen parent.
There was, however, much variation in vigor of growth
noted. Vigor of all the rybrids fell below that of either of
the parents as compared with both cuttings and wild seedlings
of the parents.
It is pointed out that ability to root from stem cut-
tings varies greatly in the paren s. The cottonwood roots
fairly well, but the largetooth aspen roots very poorly, us-
ually much less than one per cent, under identical nursery
conditiont. Unfortunately the rooting ability of the hybrids
-15-
was not reported by the authors.
It was concluded that none of the hybrids of this cross
merited use for reforestation purposes.
Valuable hybridization studies in the genus Penulus
1'
I
CD
(‘1'
Cl"
0)
cf
{"3
|.Jo
I3
(lQSfi-a, 1933—“have been reported veriodically by I M,-_
1933-0, l957-a, 1957-b) of the Kaiser fiilhelm Institute for
o A
Genetic Research in e rmanv.0Of a large number of intra-and intersectional crosses
made, progeny of the following crosses were reported as show-
inv exceptional l1eterosis as compared to parental vigor:
(l) P. alta x treiula
(2) P. alts X C‘PGLCTQiS
(3) P. eucaljpntr s X canadel’: sis
(4) P. alba x nigra pv“911JquS
(5) :E. tren«loi'03 X LLtHlla
The reciprocal of cross number (1) above reportedly
yielded progeny of markedly less vigor than when P. alba was
used as the female parent. Wettstein concluded that geneti-
cal differences in the parents were reaponsible. Because of
their dioecious character differert individuals were neces-
sarily employed as parents in the reciprocal cross.
The crosses P. nirra x lasiocarpa and P. resumowskvana— A.— v
x lasiocarpa were successfully made by Hettstein and the
hybrids are believed to be promising for horticultural use.
Intraspecific crosses involving two climatic strains
of E. tremula were reported by Wettstein (1937-a, l957-b).
Hybrid vigor of the progeny fror this cross, as indicated by
the first season‘s height groowth was well maa1ked.
The breeding work ofettstein has not been directed
-15-
U
primarily to the synthesis of rapidlv growing forms but the
development of new forms less exacting in their site require-
ments. POplar culture in EurOpe has so develOped that the
species 3. alba and P. tremulfl have been almost entirely elim-
inated due to their slow growth, crooked stem form, and normally
small dimensions on poor soils in western EurOpe. In utiliz-
ing these spnecies as parer1tsTett in has heped to obtain
hybrids showing heterosis and improved form but still making
the low site demands characteristic of the parents.
heimburger (1950, 1940) of the Canadian Forest Service
has carried on extensive bre din. Sthdj in the genus POpulus.
The ObjeCPt Of the work has been to produce hardy and disease
resistant material of vigorous growth for the produciion of
wood of high quality to meet the demands of the match, veneer
and pulp industries of CansMd . In addition some attention
has been dir cted to the develo;1ment of material suitable
for sLelterbelt plaantings in the 12rairie provinces.
In 193d uci1burer reported the successful crossing1 of
$.21
VL‘
P. alba L. L P. carescens Sm. (probably P. canescens (Ait.)
Smn)2 with P. tremuloides Lichx. and P. grandidentata richx.
The cross P. tremuloides x irandidentata was also successful.
All of the above parents are included in the Section Leuce Duby.
Good seed from the crosses P. aloe x tremuloides and
P. canescens X trewuloides were obtained and plaitcd but soona-..
after germination the seedlings perished thru dampirs off.j\J
1"'etts tein's "grenhouse teecunie_u_e" ofusing cut twigs as de-
scribed p. 67 has been used exclusively by Heimburger.
Rehder, 1940. This plant is considered by Neimburger, wett-
stein and othersto be of hybrid origin (P. Elba X trefiula)
but is not so considered by Rehder. —
Seeds from other crOSS:S were planted in ric1 sterilized
(formaldehyde) garden soil covered with a thin layer of med-
ium fine 1.’1'*1sl‘1ed sand without iurt‘rler loss.
23
5
l
PI‘O 5VJ“;T of E, “JAN1:X 5rsndiderimfiyi, and E} tnnymiloides
x grandidentatal uniformly displayed characters 1n|o°mcdiqte
between the two parents involved. Pro5eny of 3. canescens x
grandidentata, however, showed great variation in vegetative
characters. It was concluded by leiW¥1r5er that this would
be a normally antic
character of P. cane
ioated result due to the presumed hybrid
scens. This appears to be contributory
c oncl lsive eJOvut not
BGWMHUWzBP lat
ity of root-cuttin5 s
brids.
made in the spring
hybrids and planted
at this time because
aspens indicated that
insure
tte unique idea of t
by this method.
author to be a 500d
climate.
Interesting
All theof 1957. g.
XL
At the end of the first
of
establishment.
Survival of the cuttin5s
survival results
.randidentata clones
vidence of hybrid origin for P. canescens.
er (1940) reported tests abil-
Of h“\f a-
U
1- ' J- A L ‘
a ”8F51h the aboven6 3
5rowin5 season (crosses were
1956 were made of the)
in the nursery.
root cuttin5s30
The cuttings were made
previous investi5stion with the native
the cuttings must be fully dormant to
Of (rests: “nificanoce, however, was
estin over-winter hardiness of the hybrids
is believed by the
test of its 5eneralaslaptation to the
shown in the summerwere
tremuloides X grandidentata and P. alba
survived but a number of the P. canescens
1Victorin (1930, 935) reported rstuial kybrids of these
crosses in Quebec. qUnder normal conditions in Canada, how-
trWIlo.d flowers about 10 days before P. srandi-
but at aDCiT the same time as P. alba (E1eimourjer,
Natural hybrids of tre let t6? havebeen onunorc
with the Ortificial and found to be identical (Heineu; 5er
1940). Tubeuf (1(351) reportsd natural hybrids between P.
alba and P. tre~ula in Canada.
X {unnsdidrn1vvts ne:drfi<yi. Suclllml“"lOLC)l'“1l vaTq_Ition W98
antic pated on tne ‘asis of the wrest morpiolo5ical vari_stiq1
‘5
(I:
H O C U)
H
’3
‘i
'J.
{3
Q4
H.
O «N1
rr
(3
0..
w 3
'5 JJ
"D
Followinr this natural Selection, resistance to poor
07‘) {Mid cinx3-1)a(fi: (BQLESGKl tvw Twiifi leldjllfll SI).
were artificially selected for durinn tke lHSe-R? seasons.
x *rnr’midet9 1‘8 1:3'LPE In. T‘LGSE) l'v’. r‘ifis '3' Owew vrec'; ; 10 "~00?"
5roztr and great "‘sceptibilitv to die-buck tut, on the other
Lap“ gio'ed a qur dsugct L: lasistrn e to u819TPSOPa op.
rust. Heimburser su55ested that such extreme SWHSCEDUibilitv
‘
of some hyhrgcs to disease may be added to the mecrenisms
of isolation which reintain syncies differentiniior as de—
Ir‘ I" - '0 N. '3 "“"
Snitcsecgierit Iiexue
clones 5ave pronise of valuable varieties available directly
. r- 2 ° v -.". » ---" ' W» - ".~ x- ° , w
for reioreststion 3l_w21158. ”ell-marked :Jtrid V1003, easy
prepsgstion by root cuttings and Hell~ defn‘o. resistance to
Helempsora rust and r-;_
About two—thi: OJ
L]
O W C‘?‘
:3”
W}
O p-
LJO ’
'Jo
:3
f.)
l...’
Po0 O T)
U)
’3
C‘
d)
N
1
1‘
J 4 .J
(3
LJ.
I
dentata progeny were eiscarded by :t; end of the 1939 season
but the selected plants are sail to represent some of the
?8Rd. Some were superior in the
various selected claract rs to the P. alba x 5randident9ta
hybrids. It is planned to reneat the ori5inal P. canescens
X :ranlioentota cross on a lar5er scale, using the best P.
Additional hybridization nor? ctrried on nnring the 1957 and
1(38 seasons .ws reoorted Ly1e1m01ror (1940). bince 2;
91‘ o I, an? its ‘r13‘b13‘63 ,1 176-1 I’Qiufltedlj,’ 1OO'C‘361 a
marked de5ree of drought-resistance (Hettstein, 1939) being
used in shelterbelts in southeastJrn
*ubbard, 1956),
trewuloidesc_ba x P.
ori5in was from native stOci
prairies, taxonomieslly undifferentiated,
(Moss, 1932)
and.i_n erodimywi‘rOPlslss. AJtTTV115h_ ttua cro
it was ncluded that this was not die to
poor technique.
The following crosses were,
P. canescens x P. trrwulo1dps (”egte in")
alba_\ntr. Bollesrrtlxn1che (0‘
(UV, ()8Ste-1,171"
however,
the
P. trewuloides). 1“n---‘-J
northern
b1 1t reunited 11* more
other native
Wes uniucce sful
iroowr‘tibility but,
reported MUGcessful:
Rehder, 1940); P.
nranoi03ntata)l X P.
O
‘13
1...:
OJ
’33
>4
aniels f. (rt—
A. i 7‘ . \‘~ J- (1 1‘ (1 T‘ v
5rsn(ident ca) X 5, 011080cens
x grandidentata)l X E, nutenei (or: P.
sures;
(triploid)2; (g. alba
canadensis Eugenei
(§imon-Louis) Schelle, the "Caroliz1a Popla
P. trenuloides x P. adenOpoda Paxim.; P.
. . 2 . w
(trip101d) ; P. ocuminata Rydo. X P.
Rehder, 1940);
tremuloides X P.
canedensis
alba
T
r3u5enei;
X P. berolinersis Dipp. (i.e., 3. laurifois x P. nisra var.
italics, Rebder, 1940) x x "NorthWas t Poplar" (sirilar to P.
Jackii Sarg. whic}1 is a h
a. deltoides, Hgimluu'iger, 1940).
ybrid of the cros
iA natural hybrid, exem1ned oft faogically by Pete, 1958.
“A triploid form, examined crtoloinCally by Peto, 1955.
-oo-
Of special genetic interest in the above cres, s is the
nrelininary ana1331s of the mode of inheritanoes of branching
habit and leaf form indicated by the crosses: P. canescens X
P. alba Bolleana Lauche and X P. bero1irensis Dipp. x X "Iort11-
west P0p1ar"
Only two YNotional nroesnr of the former cross were
early selected and prepa5atsd. Jhese two plants late", however,
proved to be of considerable interes . Loth_slowed the ”ex-
. O 1 ‘. _ 1- - -‘. V -
cess1ve Juveaiile drenchineSs' craracter but ne of the seed-
habit of P. alba Bolieana,
CD
d (D
3 3 I) s; to
O (73
H U)
0 1.4.,
Wcombined with the leaf and o C3HQSC€FS¢
bThe other seeclina had the normal, divergent branching stem
character of P. alba L. combined with leaves more closely
res embling those of P. Cine cens. Althou15h scanty evidence,
it does at least indicate that inheritanc of certain branch-
1
ins and leaf characters (lobin5) does not involve linkage.
Since both parents in the ,ross X P. berolinensis Dipp.
X X "Iorthwest POplar" are themselves hybrids of a Section
Tacamaraca x Section Ae5~circa cr as, their progenv siowed a
wide variation in Vigor and leaf and stem characters. Of the
26 plants selected after discarding some duarf seedlin5s, 12
showed the "exces ive juvenile branchiness" character, charac-
teristic of X 2° berolinensis, while the remainin5 14 had the
H
"clean stem” character. Heimburger concluded that excessive
juvenile branchiness" of X P. berolinensis was dominant to
"clear stem" :no way be transmitted to about one-half of the
progeny in this cross.
1The cross probably represented a back-er ss as far as this
reticular factor is concerned.
-01-
O 0‘ _ ._’O K ' -"..\P (I. O '3 F'.‘I‘; y t"
Excessive Jivenile branc;1ne s is an uLueclfaJlC charac-(,0
tor for the production of clear wood for various industrial
purposes but for shelterbelt material it is exceedingly de-
sirable. For this reason the shove cross has been repeated
on a larger scale by this worker and other "Korthwest Peplar"
material, more resistant to Septoria canker and Melanpsora
rust has been employed. Results of this work have not been
published.
The two crosses involving triploids (as listed on p. 30)
were reported as producing few seeds but the hybrids have not
been studied cytolosically. The cross involving the canescens
triploid produced progen¢ of promisinr appearance which have
shown reasonable vigor and freedom from disease. All of the
crosses noted on page 20 were aralvzed in considerable detail
by Feimburger, with particular attention to disease resistance,
and form a valuable contribution to the genetics of tiis im-
portant enus.(1'‘_
V
Bogdanov (1954) concluded that it is only possible to
graft pOplars success.ully according to the series: aspens--
U) ilver pOplars—-cottorwoods-—halsam peplars. Reimburger (lQAO)
ointed out that this sequence agrees With the series of suc-
’53
cessful crosses made by Yettstein (1933-2) and Stout & Schrciner
(1955) and concluded that this strongly indicates a similar
series in genetic affinity of the different poplars.
Since BOgdanov (1954) reported a successful graft of 3,
nivra L. on Salix viminalis L., Heinburger (1940) attempted
the cross Salix virinnlis x P. canadcnsis EuQenei (Simon-Louis)
Schelle. The resultS, however, were negative.
(U- ‘1‘,-
Swith and Nichols (1941) have repor,ed what they tenta—
tively believe to be successful crosses in this genus. Of the
26 cross combinations reported, the authors indica'ed that the(—h
4 crosses involving P. raX1Hoticii Henry seemed most prowis-
ing. Comparison of vigor With the parents or expression of
other characters in the hybrids have not as yet been tested
or reported by these workers.
”ilssor-Ehle (lQBE-a, lgde-b) and Bergstrom (lE40) re-
ported genetical and cytoloaical studies of successful diploid
x triploidl crosses of E. tremula L. The crosses were made
prrimarily to determ 1ne thepossibility of obtaining a tetra-
ploid since hfintzing (1956) reported some giant pollen grains
(with possibly the complete 3n complement of 57 chromosomes)
produced by the triploid from Shane. Interest in securing a
tetraploid was prompted by the presmted feasibility of produc-
ing triploid seed at will by diploid x tetraploid crosses.
Of the approximately 100 plants obtained from one of
the crosses2 (involving the Shane tTJImlid clone as male parent)
the majority were aneuploid (mostly hypotriploid), several
were exactly diploid, l exactly triploid, and l exactly tetra-
ploid. The other cross involving the Medelpad triploid (i.e.,
from the province of Ledelpad, Sweden) as male parent pro-
duced about 20 plants,practically all of which Were of poor
develOpment.
All of the prooeny of the first cross proved to be
healthy vigorous plants. The triploid and near-triploids,
however, were distinguishable frori the others by their ex-
1 Triploids were of 2 sources: 1 from province of 51Wape, south
Sweden; first reported by Nilsson-Lhle (lgbo); the other from
MedelPad, northern Sweden («icmnnl t, 1937 . ,Tettstein's greenhouse tec'qicre we3 ’used fiettstein, 1929,
10-212 1«\ “'2
tremely rapid hei ht growth. The tet*aploid fell somewhat
below the triploid in vigor but had tie largest leaves of
all the pregeny. Tue intermediate neuploids showed poor
development and were 1ihly leCPWSAU in appearance. iMaILy
died at an early age.
,0;
Further work with the trioloids an tetraploids is re-
.
ported in pregress at the Institute for Breeding Forest Trees
at Svaldf, Sweden but no further reports have as yet been pub-
lished.
Jornsson (1940) reported 01038 3 of diploid x triploid
and triploid X diploid E. trewula L.1 and their cyt0105rical
analysis. A totil of 29 crosses fielded about 600 plants...
\
0
The cytoloeical results were for the most In:rt similar to0
those recorded by Eergstrom as noted above, but triploids and
tetraploids in the pro rny fell far below the diploids and
even some of the aneuploids in hei ht romvt The author,
however, concluded that the cause of these differences may
be traceable to the occurrence of photoperiodic races within
3. tremula vmlich may be critically adapted to the special
light climate of their habitats. Since the tetraploids were
chiefly offspring of one parent not native in the area where
they were grown (Svalbf, Sane, South Sweden) it is believed
that their absolute vigor could not be accurately judged.
Several workers have reported miscellaneous hybridiza-
tion experi1ents with various members of the genus. Gambocz
(1926) in Hungary and Albensky & Delitsina (1954) in Russia
reported successful crosses between P. alba L. and F. tremula L.
l hale triploid from Shane & pedelpad (used also bv Barbotpom
1940); female triploid from-. orbotten.
-24-
n _,,QThe latter workers, using the reeLhouse technique”, obtained
of 62 plants which demonstrated a
very marked variation in morphological characters among the
individuals. Visor of growth also showed a nuraer of grada-
tions. The pOpulation could be rather definiely divided inn)
a so-called dwarf group and another group of very luxuriant
growers.
A
Re"nier (1934) reported an csscntiall* taxonomic study
.1
of a large number of peplars collected in France for breeding
research in diseas» resistance. A few preliuinary notes on
the reaction of various species and hybrids were cited by the
author.
Vloten (1958) made a first report on investigations into
1
the susceptibility of peplars to Jothicniza pepulea Sacc. et
Briard in Holland and other countries. From.comparative ex-
periments made at various centers in Holland, but especially
at Hoog-Keppel, it was observed that peplars of the section
Tacamahaca (Balsam peplars) and the hybrids of Stout and
Scb'einer were more susceptible than peplars of the Aegeiros
(black pOplars, cottonwoods) section. On the basis of these
obserVations the author sugvested that Ae*eiros ionlars shouldV \d A ‘.
receive preference as parents.
Vlotcn noted that P. marilandica Bose.1 and P. recenerata
Henry (or: X P. canadensis regenerata (Schneid.) Rerd.) ex-
hibited a high degree of resistance to both Lothichiza and
\T
i: e O ,D
tri- canker. P. brabantica Houtzagersl also dewonstrated
high resistance to Dothichiza bu d-
.Jo
was found susceptible to
lxot listed by Rehder, 1940.
.3
\J
Nectria and "bacterial canker". The author concluded, however,
‘
that no peplar is completely immune t Dothicniza populea.
Hvbridization in the "enus Populpfi is consiedrably fa,-
1itated Ly the usual dioecious condition of the individuals.
:eater impeltance, however, is the fact that success-
ful breeding work may be carried on in the greenhouse usins
cut tWiSS accordinr to the method orioginally described byr
U
Yancnevs‘i (1904) and later perfected by Wettstein (1929,
1953-b) for Salix and Pooulus. The method has been reported
PU...“
successfully used by Al'bensfiy & Delits na (1954), “eimiurer
(1936, 1940), Berstrom (19‘0), Johnsson (1940) and Smith and
Nichols (1941). Jablofikov (1940), a .uss ian vor|er claimed
that the type of hybrid pro:luced by crossing trees growing
in the open differed from those produced from crosses be rformed‘—
on cut branches in the laboratory. ]t is probable, powevr~’
.1
that the variation observed oy this worker is of a simple
genetic nature since the Species of this genus seem to be
characterized by noticeable hetesrozy0:;i'3. The wide varia-
describedfltion between individuals in groups of hybrid fro ena
A. \J ((4
by Schreiner, Heimburger and othe33'would favour this conclusion.
Heimburger (1936) reported the successful use of cut
twigs sent from considerable distances and sugyested that
this nethod Opens up almost limitleSu pos mililities for the
q
tree breccer regurdless of
7
is location.
Heimburger (1940) in OOWTT ent in; on the “reenhouse method
of hvtridiz Miin reported difficulty in getting seeds to nature
-26-
on {watle P. “"endirientsittlric heiu.. tun: s. Thyttstedgl (1997$J))" '_ I- :- .84_
also resorted marked differences be,wern vcrjous specigs in
~ 0 0 0 _ -‘ ° ‘», - .. _‘nr’
their atiljty to set setu in tun 'e~ ousw 0*( lttc: (1931-b)
- .. - - 4 v - :° -,describrd inFIV1drfl ffe">zces tithln tie 31~c species Xiii
,_ o _a v. 'I ‘V f’\ a, ~ ~ ' .1.. J_'I‘ J...” «‘7 ‘ _ ‘
gri fl,& Licnois (lJil) had success city tge «reenLOLSQ\a'
w_ '1 o Q _ . > O - . . .> h 0 J_ ‘1. _‘ V. r J_ '
refinOQ only in tne see 10H Leuce. Crosses in ObJUP seenions
of the genus were more successtl when nede on the tress.
Forcing of pollen however w~s used to sdvaute;e by these
workers With $180198 from all sections With wricn they worked.
(Vi-1‘ " "\.""-" ‘ 1 ‘u (71-:- ‘\
on}: in: kb'lb ICA; 1U
" O "‘ ’3 ‘1 .. F» 2'. r '3‘. ‘ ‘. .. C . w
as iL-s (1910), nrisnson . Le mans (1997),:loensrr
(1940), Peso (1956), and, doubtless, others have reported
members of the genus showing a monoecious or polygemo-monoecjous
condition. Hestings Observed a peeimen of repulus grandi-
denteta Micheux for two successive veers Which showed abnormal
flower develOpment. The tree was essrntisllv pistfllste but
several branches bore cetiins whicn Were nude up of male, f9—
msle and per set flowers.
The abnorrnel I‘. tremuloides Licheux reorted by Erlerson
& Hermann had about 82 percent perfect flowers. Ore percent
of the flowers were e3: lusivel.;r stsmirete and 17 percent were
pistfllete.
' 0 1 0 a w 1 o
Albensky (leO) reported sn instance of ue‘mprrooite
flowers in the aspen which was not inherited by its In0Qeny.L O
In another instance, nine hybrids of a cross: aspen X wLitmJ
I" 7 J.
_Lpoplar were Ciro 'xllly stu(i ed as to their sex 8X res:ion. One
of the hybrids bore male flowers only,four bore only pistil-
te flowers, two failed to flower, and two had flowers of
02)
both sexes. In the latter cases, whole catkins were male or
female or scattered catkins had both male and female flowers.
erfect flowers were not observed. :nese monoecious trees
’1!
showed normal develOpment of pollen and fruits with sound seeds.
It is probable that sex modification in the genus occurs
more frequently than the literature would seem to indicate.
The transitory flowering period and inconspicuousness of in-
oividual flowers may mask more frequently than is int
a so-called abnormal sexual condition in this genus.
As pointed out in the case of Salix and other dioecious
plants, the occasional occurence of monoecious or perfect
0\
flowers may be of assistance in providing a UOSsib lity forJ.
true selfinv. Accordinr to East (1940 the occasional )er-0 u 1
feet flowers in this genus annear to be self-fertile. Such
a condition is obviously favorable to the breeder.
POLLEN LOEGEVITY
Studies of pollen longevity in POpulus, reported by
BOQGanov (1955), indicate that refrigeration at a tempera-
ture between +5 and -50 C. may be successfully used to store
pollen. Pollen germination tests of fresh pollen conducted
by this worker indicated that germination percentages varied
greatly from spec;es to species. For this reason it was dif-
ficult to predict exact lenghts of time for successful storage.
P. laurifolia pollen, having a high (QOfi) fresh pollen germi-
nating percentage, was successfully preserved for 15 days under
-2s-
the conditions described above. Pollen of P. sucveolens,
havin. a low (35;) fresh pallen germinating percentage, ger-(T
u
minated up to 19 percent even after 45 davs. Although tercent”I
of relative humidity is not mentioned in the abstractl of thisf—f—
article, i1 is assumed that it should probably be waintained
at or around 505 for successful results.
J- 1
It would appear that the pollen storage eecnnique used
by Reimburger (1936) should have certain distinct advantages
over the customary techniques which must be used in most of
the other forest tree ggnera. His method consists simply of
cut twigs bearing wale flower buds in a snow-bank,
or refrigerator, and forcing the pollen as needed. There are
probably time limitations to this method which might be ad-
V‘GETATIVE PEPEULUCTTON
There appears to be abundant evidence of a more or less
empirical nature that most members of the genus Ponulus may
be reproduced readily from root cuttings. Baker's (1918)
-n and‘._.lo
studies of P. tremuloides iichauxg in the Gpe TD
t Bas
the observations of Kittredge and Gevorhiantz (1929) in the
extensive aspen areas of the Lake States supply evidence
that both P. tremuloides and P. grandidentata apparently rely
more on their vegetative reproductive ability by root suckers
than on seed. The frequent fires that swept over the lovced
over areas in the Lake States are believed to have been the
chief contributinf factor to the denseness of the present as-\J
iSee literature cited.
“Probably the Focky Lountain form (P. tremuloides aurea
(Tidestr.) Daniels).
on.v 'a
pen stands. Althouh aspen is readily killed by fire, the
protected roots send up numerous suckers folloving each fire.
By this means sinulc trees Lava esta7lisEed large clones.
The rootin " abilitv of stem cuttings apparently shows
the various 5.
fr)
(3
K)
H.
C.)
C)
E .5 ‘4 C
4
.1
H 94
U)
H
considerable variation amen
varieties, and forms in the genus. host workers (Stout &
Schreiner, 1933; pe1MUur’eL, 1958, 1:.40; Sno , 1958; and others)
seem to concur in the belief that as a rule tne assens and
white poplars (Section Leuce Duby) may be grouped as ”dif-
ficult" or resistant" plants, wremns the black pOplars and
cottonwoods (Section Aeaeiros buby) are considered easy to
root from stem cuttings.
‘Eith respect to one of our native spens at least there
are, however, conflicting points of viex. Snow (1958) re-
H
ported that nder norm7l conditions dormant cuttirn;s of
either large—tooth aspen (P. ”rancident‘ta ulCJQUX) or
trembling aspen (P. tremuloides michaux) are difficult to
prepegate vegettatively,se1dom rooting more then about 1
percent under nursery conditions." Thimann & Delisle (1959),
however, state: "As is well known, cuttings of aspen (POwulus
tremuloides) and Lombardy poplar (P. niura italica) rooth
adily .
Such diametrically Opposed points of View with regard
to rooting ability of P. tremuloides discourages any specific
or even general conclusions with regard to the rooting charac-
ter among species or sections of the genus.
Snow (1958) was primarily concerned with determining
tie best tine during the dormant poliod to make cuttings, as
well as tie best concen13ration of auxin and Optimum period
of treatment to use. he concltded that (l) dornant cuttin5s
0f bOth P. tTJFUlOiflGS and P. 5rendideateta can be rooted to the
extent of at least 65 percent by treatins with a 10 m.5. perK.)
,ietlflh of 11roleb1tric acid for about 27 hours;
and (2) maximum rootin is secured when cerwawt c1”t7“s are0
Q rn
\u
U ‘Z$
L10
:3 l
‘made while the buds are swellin5 in th.
The work of Ihimenn & Delisle (1939) with P. tremuloides
was not .esigned to dcnonstrate that routing abilitv in this
species could be improved since they assumed it to be well
known that the species does root well. Significant, in sup-
Jort of their contention,was the fact that untreated controls
0'
ll produced roots within a 5 week period. Cuttir —— ("fl (7' ‘7 .3 ‘4
ID, h.O"’e'LI ,:13
With varyin5 concentrations of indole-E-acetic acidcf-
C1—
0)
Q1
res
were found to have an Optiw111l concentrai:ior of 100 he. per
I
liter jud5ed on the basis of number of roots .roduced. leis
.1
Optimum, however, would not i7rove Optimal in practice
pointed out by the investigators, since e?Htc1e inhibition of
buds was demonstrated by t}7e cuttizigs thus treated.
It is worth notin5 that Stout & Schreiner (1953) reported
thtt rooting ability of some hybrids showed great improvement
over rooting ability of eith1er parents. Specific cases were
1
not, however, cited by these workers. It is conceivable that
such obser'at:1ons may be greatly influenced by the a;e of
stock from which cuttings are made, the inportance of Which is
emphasized by Thimann & Delisle (1939).
lvical characters of the Various pOplars and cul-F10
The s
tural practices used in forest plantations in several coun—
tries have been descriLw-Jc “23v mrious authors.
0 - .‘ “ 0 ‘ - l r ‘. 0 _- . . -
Forestry Connissior Pulletin to. b (1923) 18 reported
by Cansdale (1939, to provide a usefil sum sry of cultivation
methods in Great Pritain. French practice is surp nrized by
Breton-Bonnard (1902, 1929) and interest in rcplar cultivation
in Germany and Switzerland is reeflected in the publications
\
by Leiber (1936), Zircber (1936), Bar1e3 (1936), and Hettste LJ.
*1
(19W7d, 1959). heeiLm (12)SO, 1931) has summarized Dutch
practice. fieigel and Frotringhcm (1911), Buttrich (1921),
Kittredge and GeVOIEiantz (1929) and others have described
CUDOKOSCFE RUNNER
From lists of *‘onosole nuxoers and other reports nub-
1ished by various authors (Blackburn & Harrison, 1924; Meurman,
1925; Gaiser, 1926, 1950-b; Tischler, 1927; Er arson and Her-
man, 1927; Blacl-zburn, 1929; Ifintzing, 192363; Ilakajima, 195 ;
Peto, 1959; and Kaude, 1939) it would apxesr thvt the basic
number in the genus Ponulus = 193 .
Lillewi jn (159-b,1940) believes that Populus (and pos-
sibly Salix) is a secondrry noluL101d vith an original basic
number of U. Four of the orismi91 8, according to his hypothesis,
have been triplicated, the other 4 duplicated, and the present
lGraf (1921) in an article consisting chieflv of a morphologi-
cal description of P. tremula L. and other specie s, first
reported chromosome_nunoers in the genus. Hias count of n = 4
for P. tremula L. does not agree with that of later workers
in this or other Species in the genus.
-52-
.J J
4
J -_J
\
r-‘ d
'_.J
L
_T, was t%e resil’ of s fisiow of tuO CVPowoso es Witn-r
-. "I_1 ‘ - ;_
one of the greats of ttree. his COHCLHSiOIS see uflSCd on secon-
GHPYd'""OCin+io1 of chromos mas Lt wetnnhwse I.L -
YVWIDTHTlV
31-13111; -UJ. --J\’.LJ-
‘lJ*ovx)Lrll(F ER}? 6. orx (1 M44) rtgyartnzd 21. l :lssuiifvgra QL.
(= E, CN3lf01588 fidxxmfzrieysis imxxry, V9?. ) emsza proheiflxg detr9_
PlOld (?0 i ') Dot “JHZ(1TSS ripoyted it as a normal
1 f‘0 O ‘ ' - _ I. I ‘. - r': "‘1 v7 0 4” 1r .5 ‘ x T I V“
d19101d (2n - so). As p01nteo out of allo. gnu “10M 0 H U)
A
H .g
H
v V
' M , 3 - ~_>_ ‘ ’ -___ 'a o :1
howevee, it Ki? elso CO”CGquUl€ OQRQF in tne tetpwnlOir form
-7 _, _._ . .o .. . -. .A ‘. _ p. I. 1
in nsture. In tge swno yVyeJ, lenruan recovlod toe reouoed
a _ ‘ -. . 7 s '7‘ N ._¢-" 0 o _ _ o 7‘ . 7(‘ 1‘ 1 - -
CILWYH0¢0W€ YUP”??? 01 17. bt:ofififi.fkm“rlere ass.)d eno t;xn;¢1 tetra-
--oid. Later counts of CEI‘I'IOI-I'Iomarne mmbe‘r‘ in tie-"7. species by
other worgers PQVe not cove to the author's attention.
Naturally oeourin; triploio or Approxiwntely triploid forms
Ol ix”“” "Peeiws in Lhe swvtion Lenoe Duuv lene r1 Femorteo
in recent years. Lilsson—Ehle (1930), Ploomqvist (l W), and
lelsnder (1933) all reported finding strains of e ”Qigws” trip-
loid (2n = + 57) form of P. trwnnls L. in the forestSof Swefen.
, Kilsson-Ehle (1935—2, lofib-b) and Fobnsson (1910)
'1 _ ’ . ‘ -'- - ~ A‘ -. . I' . .1 . 1 r‘ .I- -\ :1 . -‘ . f . '
rammieteo S’THAJQSlS (Hi tEDldeLOLQF, 'tlelCHflo wiml Vflfjxflxs JILLQP-
mediate aneuploids from artificial triploid X diploid crosses
of P. treale.
Peto (1958) has reported OPLH“l€PP' of triploid forms of
30 811351 1.1. 81’1d Po 091-9'71918 (fiiton) SII‘W introdilccxi in CQqng‘.
DillgI.jijn (1939-2, lUBD-b) also eeported a heturally occurrin"
Tr oid form of P. slbn in the Netherlinds. ”nthsbein (1973-0)
reymnfixfli'Peorooertqtnifios of P. elta.ln iirnsstithed i11ik3wnany—- \J
88 normal diploidy’ It 13 probable thfit bOth dlfilfili SUC tri
ploid forms of this Species exist in nature as has been con-
cliusivelfir(Manonsiauatci ill the (rise ol'E’. trerafiti L.
CYTULITUIXUL ETULIEL tfl’fEKhClht, lflfiiflETIES, AIHJEIVWPIDS
P. trewula L. diploid (2n 3 5b)
Blackburn and Harrison (lf24), in England, studied meiosisl
in pollen mother cells of the species (also 3. niera L.) and“I’—
first reported the haploid number of 19 and diploid nunber of
58 in the genus.2 fietustein (195m»- ) in Germany, and Rfintzing
(1936) and Johnsson (1940) in Sweden confirmed the chromosome
count for this species.
heiosis was reported without eppe rent abnormality by
Sleckburn and Harrison. Chromosome morphology, described and
illustrated ov these authors, is said to possess characteris—
tics sufficiently well-warked to enable individual identifica-
Qtion of the chromosomes. The diploi chromosome complement shaved
10 pairs of autosomes and what was belileved to be an unsoual
pair (heterocrromosomes) at metaphase I. The pairs of autosomes
ranged in size from one large or giant pa 1r thru two varying
sets of medium-sized small paris. With reference to the heter-
ochromosomes, the authors concluded that "some evidence exists
‘
oossioly sex-determining5.
A.
of the presence of heterochromosomes,
c, in the male of P. trenula."
5fintz'rw (1950) found meiosis for the most part regular
lFixation: Carnov's fluid; stain: Neidenhain‘s iron-alum-haema-
otoxylin, W1tUOdfi COUHteP Stfiin,
“Studies of Salix species as we 11 led them to the conclusion
7tth 19 WES—BEETC number for the fonil Saliceceae.
oChrome-acetic-formalin
fixation with short preparatopy treet-
meflt in C 1! P1103.
P;
in normal 3. trenula L. diploids and concurred with_the morpho-
ical description of ctromosomes riven by Elackburn and Har-
rison. This worker did, hovever, observe that occasionallv
txo univalents were observed at metapiase I in some specimeno
studied. In such cases there Were observed 18 bivalents + 2
univalents.
Johnsson's (1940) study of moi sis1 in si;teen 3. trewula
L diploid clones fror various provinces in Sweden sh Wed 12
which behaved quite norrelly. The other 4, however, showed
from 19LJo
iilarit*u (3dro»oscwwa'bodies rern it“J x.) &
bivalents to as many as 7 bivalents + 24 univslents at netaplase
I were observed. In the latter cases , the univalents were dis-
ributed irregularly in the cell and divided or did not divide
at the first division. The svlit or unsplit uniial nts were
either included in, or left outside of, the interphase nuclei.
At division II split univalents included in nuclei passed toA
one of the two nuclei without further diviSion. mhe split chro-
Insomes excluded free the interphase nuclei were able to finish
the second division separately.
Johnsson also studied pollen duality and found that theJ. l
12 diploids showing quite regular meiosis produced a mean aver-
Dage of 79.9 per cent food pollen. Percentage of good pollen
among the 4 clones with exceptionally irregular meiosis varied
betveen 38.9% and 80.5,A. The author concluded that variation in
pollen quality in the diploid form of this species can to some
extent be attributed to meiotic disturbances.
h short breparatory treat-A
10hrome—ace tic- fOIIn::lin fixation wit
ment in Carney.
"Titll'rezvird. to £3 c ()cczukrernge (3f LU"i\fiMleIHZS ill di.‘
1.
Johnsson sv“‘csied tlwt temoereture chsnves in early' .L ._ ' U
leztotene end oachytene In Gistgria trigona :f‘30tcd *hc chiesre
ne ”'Plly with ligl frwowoecy in *snv cjoloiis of His syosi,s
an”, in t‘erz, furnish ()LQL-L‘wt-mitlet: for U_ured‘-.‘»_ced (2n) gfl'rzietes.
This conclusion is suggortcd h; the foot ttst triploid 5. tre—
rile L. is lOt especially rave in nature.
2. tre ulq L. trijloid
'Irc flhfllnu of the fins; trijloid cloze of E, tremula L.,
rdcr LillB, Sigre, Qout: Liedtn, ‘s rejirttd ‘3 Yilsson~tule
the etude tine (1"‘331tzih tc- JOhIlSson
C)
”J
0 1’3
CL
Ho
:5 1
19301. By 1940, d.
(1940), eight wore clones had been found: 5 in middle Sweden,
5 in north S eden (Ploucvist, 1937; Tonetorp, 1937; islander,
'1 _ v
U930 triIn no cese hes tnc somatic number for C‘t
loids
Fa)
been ascertained to be exectly 57 chromosowes, but rather + 57.
)
nd especially
\1
Nilsson-Ehle (lSSd), Lelander (193$ , and Tometorp (193
-10
(Dfin
-Loreported thrt the apparent vigor of tlc triple
the larger and darker leaves were resr isihle For attention
being drawn to them. These chindcters were co seouentlv use.
as criteria in huntine them.
see also Spregue (1940).
Lititzixt; (heteivnirwni Tflue EUJeIWJCfialeThSE?! oi' stcwvata.:for"the
triploid from Shine as 10.76 + 0.13 units and 6.5d + 0.14 units
—‘
for the normal diploids in the vicinitg. Leiender reported the
averunje sixwuit; lullfth as lele + (?{13 urdflna for CHM? of tiwa tri-
oid clones from horrhotten and an avers e of 6.36 + 0.15 for
in oi ltifll stovete lxuwgths CL1 snail-lfirivvi(ti,loi€3 :ru, lar e-- \J \ L
leeved diploids and triploids and concluded tth, usfng sto ate
1 O ‘ _ I 3 1
lengtn as a messure of cell Size, 'the Size oi the leaves oe-
sends on the size of the cells. The size of the cells in turn
deoends on chromosome number (triiloids having lsrger cells than‘ A
most fiiploids) and on other prisuhnhly hereditary factors not
known (there are some diploifs hQVing es large cells as *he tri-
ploids and even larger)." Leaf side is, acoordiig to the author,
nevertheless of value in searctiwg fer triploid aspen since it
appears unlikely that small-lesved tr'ploids exist.
Ldntzitg (1956} and Tometorp (1937) reported thvt tri-
ploid forms of P. tTJHUJQ L. have larger pollen grains and poorer
.Jo
pollen than diploids. Lflntzing obtained a definite bimodel ris-
trihution of pollen but did not give absolute values, Tometopp
on the other hand, recorded poll 0n diameter from 2. microns to
42 microns. This is comparable to triploid pollen diameter
ranges recorded by Peto (lESo) fo: P. lbs L. which was not con-‘QD
sidered by Peto to be definitely bimodal.
Although egreein th t, on the average, triploids have
larcer pollen grains then the diploid, JOhnsson (1940) observedU U
no "bimodal curve for the pollen diateter of trinloids" as re-
ported by Fdntsing and concluded size alone could not be used as
-57...
a criterion of triploidy since tbere is a significa.nt overlap—
of size. Johnsson, however, concluded that pollen sco‘le U)
have a limited value in distinguishing between diploids and tri-
ploids if both diameter and quality are taken into account.
The author observed ttat triploid pollen, in addition, sometimes
shows "one or other elongated, sometimes constricted grain".
Peto (1958) suggested that environmental influences may
have been responsilbe in large de gree for the Wider Size dis-
1
tribution recorded by idntzig. Unreduced pollen grains may
have been produced with greater freouency under teemperature
and 111ght cornditions to which hdntzirng' s material was subjected.
Mfintzing (1956) studied meiosisl in the tri oid from
Skane and observed it to be characterized by great irregularity
and the presence of trivalents, bivalents, and univalents at
metaphase I. The frequency of tri-, bi-, and univalents varied
greatly. Five to fourteen trivalents were observed in various
0. m. c's. The probable association of chromosomes in one case
was recorded as: 15 trivalents + 7 bivalents + 4 up1VQlents,
On the assumption that this interpretatioxi was correct, the to-
tal number of chromosomes would be 57.
First and seccond an.aphases were semetires observed to
be quite regular and other times rather abnormal. Lagging
univalents at anapbase I sometimes demonstrated a strong ten-
dency to divide. One p.m.c. at anspbase II showed 5 different
anaphase groups and a number of eliminated chronosomes. In
consequence of such irregularity tetrsds were often irregular
and polyspor g was common. Of special si gnificznc was the
observation that lagging and undisjoined chromosome pairs at
l l- , ”--~ \Chrome--aceet1:— formalin fi- idn Mltfl srort preparatory t*eat-
ment in CarnOv, -55—
anaihase I sowetimes connected the interphase nuclei, resulting
[,4-
in fusion of the second divis on spindles with consequent pro-
duction of dyads containing the full (5n 2 57) complement of
chromosomes.
Mdntzin; concluded that the triploid studied was auto-
triploid on the basis of the high frequency of trivalents at
meiosis. In some cases observed, 42 of the 57 chromosomes (74%)
occurred in trivalent associations. The autotriploidy conclusion
was also supported by the observation that one conspicuously
'large chromosome was present twice in the diploid and three times
in the triploid. he suggested that the clone probably originated
from the union of one reduced and one unreduced gamete from
diploid parents.
The author sugtested that diploid x triploid crosses might
conceivably yitld tetraploid (4n = 76) individuals. This cross
was later attempted (Kilsson-Ehle, lfiSb-a; Bergstrom, 1040;
Johnsson, 1940) with success. (See p. a .)
Study of meiosis in the original triplcid from Shane,
as tell as in several clones from other parts of Sweden, led
Johnsson (1940) to concur with the findings reported by hfintzing.
P. trenula L. diploid X P. tremila L. triploid
Cytological stulies of these hybrids, reported by both
Bergstrom (1940) and Johnsson (1940), were limited to root-
tip material since immediate interest was centered on chromosome.
numbers of the hybrids. In accord with the results'anticipsted
lSee pp. 25-24 for further amplification of this cross.
-59-
by Euli'tntzing the hybrids ranfled from the 2n n11.1Lcr of so to the
‘
.raploid number of 76. Tne rsjoritv were aneuploids but onewpvd
-
exactly tetraploid indiVidual was observed.
The difficulty of countingc10poover, 331ecially 1ar
numbers, in such material was mentioned by toth authors. It
was noted that counts were probably in erior on an average of
+ l chromosome. The Nile ipal difficulties involved were at-
tributed to crowding of small chromosomes or median corstric—
tion: of some chromosomes which may be ion:‘0
U
and uncolored,
resulting in 1 chromosome being counted as two.
Both worlmrs reported use of diluted chrome-acetic-forma-
lin for fixation of root tips. La Cour BEE proved to be un-
satisfactory.
Johnsgon stated that fixations made in early morning or
on cold, rainy days yielded few divisions but well-defined
metaphase plates which WJPS suitable for c0unting. Fixations
made at noon on sunny days yielded 1umerous divisions, but
they were unclear and without distinct metaphase plat.L
(D
S.
POpulus trcmuIOides Kichaux
First reports of cytolorical investigations in thisx)
f\
species were made by Erlanson and Hermann (1937). Studies
3 in p.m.c's. of both a strictly nonos exual Speccimen
and a bisexual individual were described.
Observation of metaphase I in the normal dioecious tree
revealed 18 pairs of autosom1s and one pair of heterochromo-
somes. Chromosome morphology was reported similar to that
‘00
ion: CQPHOV'S fluid or Flemming's; sectioned 12-15 u
: ironalum-haeuatorvlii.
-40-
described in 2. trernla n. diploid by Blackburn a Har~ison
(|924). The assumed sex pair were claimed to be easily and
readily distinguishable by theass authors. Both divisions
were observed to function regularly, except that sometimes
one or two pairs of autosomes lagged behind the others at
both anaphases. Normal tetr (i of pollen rains were noted.is.)
C)
‘
Studies of meiosis in tea n.m.c'3. of perfect flower
of the berMannrolite plant revealed striking and interes tin“
abnormalitiees of c1 ’3
Omosome behaviour. In the first place,
3 W93 TBCOPGGd in the order with which
the different anthers underwent reduction as contrasted with
the order and sm1m1roniza1fon in no mal male catkins.
Anaphase I showed, in some cases, very Ureat irret'w1la ’S itv
a
The KY pair (appa.rentlv undifferentiated morph0101ioally fromU
normal plants) sometimes behaved normally, With one member
going to each pole. Sometimes, however, the entire pair was
observed at one of the poles while the autosomes were on the
equator in early anaphase. In some instances, at this phase,
one or two pai°s of crromosores were to be found in the cyto-
plasm, having failed to reach the spindle. Lagging of the sex
chromosomes was not observed altho this, according to 1 e1n1nan
(1925) and Erlanson & hermann, is characteristic of thy dioe-
cious plants.
Counts made in interkinesis nuclei by Erlanson & Hermann
demonstrated the irrepularity of distribution of the chromo-
somes in division I. These nuclei contained anywhere from 7
to 21 chromosomees with occasional chrOFOsores lying outside
the nuclear membrane.
Division II in some cases on‘ccccad re'wl~rlv but sone
Ff”
Ho
('3
U)
’—
93
i
P 9 ,0
3
3
(I?H F
.3
-a-
:5 I)
3‘
-CD
CD
0 O 3 0)
:..J.
O 11'
.J
r.l
H
:1
§ 1 H
. ._ 3 ., . .. .w 1, ‘. ._.-- ,‘, °
ertra soincles were 909% 01 V'ipu tue c:~<*oso “s Wuic
(’1'
"1 a: (7)
\AJ
,3
U]
’L
U)
2":
CO
3 h)
:1"
S
}_Jc
) (a
._'J.
1D
‘4
Ho
.’4
C]
:,.
O H l~—1
H:
)0
1—Jo
H
D
24
.3 ...J
(at.
O
I
'3
l-_|
Th. chrowosomcs in t};se crses became distorted ani clnwoed
e O (D
‘3‘
(D
"S
L—a
OJ .J
4
'I
v-4
5-
'_Jo
l l-x’
U .1 J
H TD
H
d
1-»
(.0
{'1
("'1
L')
1’1
1...
C)
".
{—4.
l‘J 1
r 31
:c,
(NJ
1J
O "c
O 1"" A Q‘
I
srrniv iris r 01:orflv (W scrfivefi.- U .
A U)
’24
,4
p.10
1;:
1t be anticipated, the pollen studies made by tn
“*3
VIC? ers from perfectL \J
averaged about 37.5u in diswetcr. Out of a render sawp e of
50 grains, the sizes TPWQOG from 72.5g to $2.5p. The
from norr-ial 111.219 a span w- s rarltedl :7 {smaller 1 o di T‘l’flt‘f}1 av-
eraging elucit 97.ep. I arf QFQlHS ” re recorrled rarely if a
all in this pallen.
Peto (193b) 9130 rcnorted stn‘ies of feicsisl in p. m.c
of normal dioecious ralc flowers of P. tronulc fies hicrsux,
l _, 1‘ .1 q, _ _ -_. g _‘ _ o a, ‘-
_Lomrams exxiueu; '0‘0‘1. unziir1jLorl. szCé Lia
( '2‘!)
k) \I
1".“.1——A
'0L).
De mlfiT‘ZIOPMQtlJIl of lfll:iv‘lxn.ts st rmat:otssa:1 1w.s rerxnited
‘was rtd;(fliserved.
p-
f
.- .- .‘. ._ “- ,._ 2., v. r V. D I. V'- - .. " ,_ '1 , _.‘_ ,1,
11 1! gOW‘JJHLd»€3 Oi wifarwn:nlj‘£ oor,,3011111 HWC iuitcn
-* w #4» » 2- ~ ~.: -1 . fir. . ,
both Of tic c (c1 ens stucied hr 32,0 11; one ._ovc€ a very
Wide range in collar diameter as 00““vrcd to the Grier. One
- ... _ " J '7‘: _ ‘l ‘. ‘1 _ .. ._ - . : _"_ _ , - -’.r:y
Kwarie1111ctx£wsi 19.Lh1 QHCL1M3.FW’ (Hclxfiftek ”ffnl 0:11 QLLI*- Q0,
~." 3 ‘t r" _' ' 1, ', I () r' a _
ocpc: hwy LL oesween no.4n “SC
“'7" / ‘ — ‘ v 0 H '1
i;ixatior- czl kawrvt tn alcOIOi, gihcial acetic nniq) and
- .. r7 , . 2 .- L ,° - - 1-. 1 - ,.storave 1? (CW filDOio], sue ‘ 111 Iludw; C ”in: acgto—
O
:ic bivalert reported bv Erlsns On 3 Hernann
18
. ‘ "“ t r s '\ ' . n ' ‘ ‘ '
VCVGVVJ mitN iw‘ 37.5U “‘pfl°tflfl J E l” “A” 3 ‘KJ Hun, Peto
" -" "— ~ J a L 1 u " f ‘H .1 V F‘0 3 . :‘V . ' o I " \
Sjluv'fger‘ 1‘ frp L‘ QC V 1 - .Iq ‘ 13-1 L‘ 1 . ‘ T 0 “081-3988
fiJ‘ l P n” Ju“ 41": 11/3 ru‘b’.71f\‘n(‘c‘ “If“ YW‘W'hpy- r. 11p n'3*f“v'~()‘n r.) lor‘ 0‘1:1. L. 0’” C) 4 K’J C K‘ - 1C . u - .. " )|)(. i v‘ --’--—"'. ’ J O - .. V ';.‘4.-‘_ U...‘ a . L - k.' VI ;)L_'L)-
-. .9 V} . J ‘ w r79" r15: '3 _‘_ - u 7 , v .
tested tsws (Uorw1 tLvu9niL 6:8 01 :£-;s coprsus E. pUsVUil-
i v‘ I“ 4. Yl +""l(—\ 1:k‘OT1'1-5_O 14*“ VJ} .LJI rig}, v.‘,r_3Li \3njm 1’ 0(313-01 .7 (a. (3 ( 3. w If.“ (3‘. C‘ V, n) (‘IYW
L‘v —'<“ ml" —t -‘ » ~ U - . _ ,. » -. . _. .__ _._n V v. _, 1‘ .. _.. s I- N _. ._ -N
v-° . . ~ .. ‘7 -V ‘ . . -- -"- ~ -' , ,, ~ . 1- -~ J. ' .91 '
CU t 1V“) wag Lflvc Dewn U CU.{RlbL{lHJ fswtor to 5N1? UtLoi-
.1 .- . .A‘ .. -- -l, ,. "‘ - V,
A £4W’99M: 1 Kris 1:o:wnsl iji timeunntx3Ui91_ 51w:¢ivséizlui.1zne
suthor belie v.9d th:t dUads are likely formed thru fsiluve of
'...'0
CXtOfihes's 9rd micros, no: - 3911 formation 3
W911 formation did not 'lrnvn mommy 5w'1
-1
.aJ
( ,.tzat CEtOJlNBSlS 9
- n ‘ _ .L. .. . “a. I“ j ‘- «- r‘ E 'V
the interphaso between 6ivi31's I ans II. Tnegu oncesses Hose
frequefif317(fl3S€PV6d.41317; 6619*9d rwflfljieafter telxnw9se of the
second divi. Hiir. Peto cor:chLc<d tht t WQY, under cert9in
1.1-. ‘ .4 ;I+_ _o ‘ ‘0 ‘a 1 '1
PCWWIlLlflflqsy I»:r~JJJ 33:1,1t . Jon r11019i. to Lye anfineo.‘
If this tonooioy to produce diploid grwwns ozn be indnoed
it su rests an excellent prortunity to produce triploid or
tetrsylcid plants. Tls Untursl occurrence of auto1iloid
olents of P. trenula in Sweden 1d P. slbn 9nd P. Qfifi‘QOCPS
in Canada provides ovidefise ,F9t diploid pollen of o‘be“ species
in the gynnis is not IHKMTW“0K 3111M3tUPO.
POffifibJS Tflfi._d.’-CU<ITtnta hfiichawu;
POtO (19:75) PCPOT'tCC; )5?!“sz 1'", cytolokjicgl 811111163 in tfiis
elded 9lwont id9nti391 results 9s {?Cse observed in:13
J (D
K)
*JO
'3 :9
M
"Petxa ditixiot, ?vvno\mmé, 991Kt9t 9(fln191117 seeixyj 639173 Wifiiti
p.w.c's.
| g.
-44-
tre tvo P *“o*Wloir€s Cfvciwcns inve ti flied. POllen nnfily‘. -_,.
3318, however, showed c Wider Variation in foiled dia*eter, i.c.,
17-5“ to 49.7r (weiLfilxriirwwn fiewoter 2 93.01),
Porn 11': ol‘no L,
’fiottstein (l?S?-s) reported :, alts u. a” o ndcw l diploi
wit? 19 pairs of chro oso es but Peto ( T3£) studied tfio speci—
rcns and founc tram totn triglo C. Lil?nwijn (lEZ§-s, 1939-b
10/0) 2150 reported stud; of a specimen and rego ted it as the
first triploid POuulus found in the Eetberlsrds. Feto (1938)
used ? trird representsiiye of th’s sLecies in a cross (P. 9153 L.
X P. i2"flfliid9flt9fflluiChQUY) BJAlZPepOPtEIiiflTlt all of’tlx:1»fbrids
exeminec were exactly diploid. he concluded therefore thwt this
particular individual was diploid. From the cooperatively meagre
information availsolc it would 9930 r tint the diwloid form does
exist in nature, and protatly in greater number than the triploid.
The two specimens studied by Peto were leveled Al enr A
Al 3 P. elbaz A2 3 P. Elba var. nives snreo-intertcyte ?. Tne
mean frequency of bivalents enc trivalents at we sphese I,
based on a study of several nuclei of each specimen, s:owcd
the maximum (i.e., lei-J, the haploid nmiflf'er ) configirations
present. A9 however, snowed a: everoce of 13.85 trivalents,
whereas in Al only an avers e of 5.8 trivalents were observed.
Peto concluded thst A2 was an autotriploid and that Al may be
Percentage of apparently good pollen was hirh in both
Al and A9, vein” )3 and van. Furthermore, dis fiibution of
pollen sizes was narrow, with no evidence of urrcroceo pollen
grains oein; pron100d.- Actual size dis
cided quite (310331 with those resorCeC
fcw' irdgjloici f} thfififlllfl 14.:
F. 91,0.” 3 5301' to 711411.
E. tre wig :‘esg 10'421
logically ant1c H.
B
tins CCH18:71 otcnis rmsuo+th 3;?P6k:l__dfiitjxfis
end trernld trigloids 1.ler1 snow lov 1n
pollen and a amnvvfil siZe distribution.
exrflxnwl tiCfil fov'ifl is e11uireot jJUZOHSlfio
bslsnced pollen grmirzs prob-“11.1131 111:; >111
to such an extent th.t it i ir1os1:itle
fiverflieirzy'fiwt Ivoliler I sir I'Lt".COILseC1.Le
that degenerate 1.1101; slow 1 and could L
e. h‘lfitfl‘i‘T‘JClWB lJlCllLdEll 111 "(Nird's 1)? 17
Fermi 1 slim L. di1‘iloid x 1:. (Lucident
ordjnititfli linfiqts Cffirr-
by Tonetorp (1957)
O
t3 't plrnwts 1” owdjx
5:10:31rqiC1 1y alts
icean_ of good
re.o s1;;~sted an
1 e. n . ~encg. Genetically un-
ate vcrv rdnidly and
to determine their
ntly onl~ pollm
e recoQnized
oor pollen."
eta icne 1,1}:
- 1
Peto (1956) detETHl eo the someti
end S t1;died meiotic behavior of l2 of t
discovered near Ottawa, Cens1e, fi 1t r
r, r‘
C (“’01ILCSOZTK)\/ 3113311”)e r ( 5C5 )
hese natural hybrids
>>orted by Feiu1ur3er
(1930, 1940). An avereée of J bivsle were observed et
metephase I in 10 of the trees. 111sr~ta fre"uenc ies tore
not determined but the proyortion of ring to rod bivalents in
thes lO hybrids similar
grandidentata h Peto titereiore
degree of homology meteen elk 0(.1.
‘1‘":3
4s).C::Z"OI:‘OS
demonstrated in
In one, lo. 2 unimv
- A. I?
to tnst noted in P.
concluded that a high
the other two hybrids
lClrtS l().9 1)_slui
Vere observed, while tlv other Slowed 54.4 univelents and onl
1.8 bivalen 3. Some nuclei in the latter showed complete asynup-
sis. Peto believed that the asynapsis oew‘mstrsted by these
two plants was not due to low homolorv betvern tn1:?
parental
crromosoJmes or to unfavorable environment, but was an example
of genetic factors limiting pairing.
Only‘iwna triV’alxxits werwa<fi3servemi in alflL the all“? x
n
crandideutota nuclei examined and Peto therefore concluded.LL
tb’t structirsl char; 1s have slaved an imoortant role in the.L L' J.
evolutionary differentiation of tbese species.
Of special interes1 is file observation that tie plant
showine highest degree of aSjrapsis nevertheless produced not
tie standard devietionr—«J
apparently normal pollen. In ed<ition,
of pollen diameter was relatively low. But amen r the hybrids\J
'I
whicn exbitited normal meiotic pairing, wide variations were
observed in the perccentage 01 good pollen, mean diemveter, and
standard deviation.
Eleven of the trees studied by Peto were typically male
but one was apnarently oolrvtmo-ronoeCWQus with both steminate,
oistillate, and, presumably, perfect flowers.
P. elba L. diploid x P. tremuloides Kicbauxl
Three natural bybrids of this cross were studied by Peto
(1978). The somatic number of 5% chromosomes was observed.
Similar results with reerd to meiotic behavior at meta ptase I
were observed for the three trees: 16.4 to 15.8 bivalents beiro
observed. lean size of pollen corresponded quite closely with
1These ryirids were also discovered near Ot1amva and reported
by Iieir‘rfourger (123:40) .
some of the al‘na x Jmcdidentata l'ybrids. One of He trees
has nonoecious.
On the whole, these Tvtrids exhibited less vigor than
the alba x nrandidentata hybrids and Old not Lave as promisingA.)
UOSSibilitieS.I.I
Popnlns cwvrescens (Rita) inn.
This snecies, occurring in both the dicloid and triploid
forn, is believed by Peimburrer (1950), Wettstein (1937-C),
1 a 1 O 'Vw *" v' 1
and others to we a ratursl hybrid: P. sins L. X P. tremUla n.
Peto (1956) reported ciromosome numbers in 4 specinens, find-
ing two to be diploid and two triploid. studies of reiosis
were reported only for the triploids.
In one triploid 18 Divalent and trivalent associations
..
were observed, whici approaches the theoretical maximum of 19.;
1
The trivalent associations were in use minority and the author
G)
concluded this to be evidence of hybridity. The 0th r triploid
cerescens exhibited on the average only 2.7 bivalents per nu—
cleus with a range of O to 7 and no trivalents. Univalents
were observed which divided at the first division. The author
concluded that lack of homolosy among the three sets was an
unlikely cause for this high degree of asynapsis and that gene-
tic factors limiting pairing might be present.
Abnormalities of meiotic behavior are reflected in the
wide variation of pollen diameter reported (19.nt to 41.8u)
which appears to be bimodal. The author suspected the presence
of unreduced or triploid pollen grain . Percentage of presumably03
lPeto (1938) stfltEG that 7. canescens is very similar in appear-
ance to the natural hybrii
differir°
as of the cross alba X grandidentsta,
U only in leaf shape.
- A k“; -
good pollen, on the other hand, was found to be surprisingly
higdl (9htf). ’Thixa cormriticr1zis pumflmnblg'eytrlaijnible (M1 the inureA.
basis as that su55ested by Pete for P. alts L. trinloids, 1.9.,
that non-viable pollen dis 1rterates rapidly and is not reco<5niz-
1‘3
ble as mnfliat maturity.
o -. o ’ -. I q- . ~, 1 - 1
X Populus canadenSis huipnei (bimon-nouis) acnelle
Studies of p.m.c's. in this hybrid were reported by Peto
(1958). The somatic number of crromosomes was found to be 58.
neiosis was extremely irregular with urivalents vauying from
O to 10 at netaPhase I. The irweui'rjtic of meiosis were re-
flected in the pollen characters. There was found to be only
I
1 1
GW good pollen and the sca1dard aetixiion of pollen diameter
was the larest oi any of the several species reported by Pete.
The author concluded that the hybrid constitution of this-
plant accounts for its irregularity.
Popplus nigra L.
Blackburn & Harrison (1924) indicated that their descrip-
tion of clromosome number and morphOIOgy in P. tremula applied
as well to 3. Lifira (see p. 54).
Dillewijn (1940) on the basis of secondary association
observed at metaphase I in this species and especially in the
variety it-lica concluded the 5enus Populus was a secondary
A -(‘
l—Jo
+ {.7
9.3
S O W H
3
3
I...)
C D (D
H
mly‘loii nurber of 8. Of these, 4'
chromosomes have presunably been cz=ipljc atgd and 4 duplicated.
lConsidered b? Telder (1940) a variety (o01
from the cross P. deltoides x nipra = X P.
but believed by_Menry(lul4),'EFfiHEider Tlffid , and houtzag-
ers (1957) to be a hybrid from the cross: P. re:Heiepgta
Henry x P. nimra var. italics. 11_ue:1..chh.'- _. _...._.\.-’.._.__ _..___..-__._..
form) of a hybrid
con-ec ensis Inloench.
-ao-
‘1
f.)
F-
e prescrt number (1%) is believed by tlis worker to
n 1 . . :- ‘ ‘ " ‘ "I1 "" . i . 'r” n. J‘.’ " :"‘ ’ ‘ ’ '
l tusior oi d CLIOWOSO es hltdln one o; tLG .P\LPS of"3
d)
U)
)2:
}_J
C—f.
0
three. Division I and II were resorted normal for this Species
as well as trxa‘yflrieir italicaq Ixillewiin obseiunxi thtt the
rrzclfiwdlus iii P. rd_rra :fi:owcm1i3 or'rnore trids c
3 q u ‘ 1 _ _ ' . .‘ . ' A , . . v
Pcnrilils (39117031193 'VHI‘. 1L1;r;odqfiwetnris 1.8Di‘fW
(W ,‘
Accord5ng to Rehder (qu0) this is tn: 3. be
bslsomiferfiL." and also of 3. tricronqrgg Hook. Fe reportedly
concurred with the 5eneral morphological descriptioq of cnromo-
somes for the genus as noted by Vlnctflurn & Harnison as a result
of toeir invesliqeticn of E. trvfinlw L. and E. niyra L. T~"e did
\ J
I' - — ." .—-.~. ~ —. -- . ‘-‘ "“‘\ rv "\ 1" ')‘,' ’ I - - ‘ '1" " 1! ..‘ ,‘
ncdl, ledBVffl”, alfree .ritzr tne;»» scu -GIT3' I¥?PQIW, oi tyma so; {tic
u.
Crrowosone number of 76. leurman reported this species and m
trichocaroa Hook. as rormal diploids, 2n = 55 Heterociromosomes
were observed ir both spooles, so that in
or 15 § V, and presumabl;'ranloid fewrle 3 lb + X.
~,v— .,- 7...- ”fir: 1: n .,° .0 . . .
Lille iyn's (I940) studies 0; mulTSiS in this spa01es
: 1" -‘ _. 1‘ ‘ W” r~ ‘ ‘ _' _: . .0 _: . ‘7 ““1 _ O __O '1 _ .. O
(variety) reVealed flu'eflnkfl «gictic ir:05nlarltigs. MOD-pulp—
ing and lQfiTIW" of ctrowoso es resulted in tne nresenco of extre~
nuclear clromatin ard swindle fusion st division II. Pollen
.1
dicru tor SEWrmxi Hide vnrdx“tion asscmfixvted riftvruwrv cases Cd‘
triad, ékyui, and worsd forwaiio-. lfl:\wss concluded that the
IQNTBTWNIG id??? fillfildjtifm3 CCnifiIand 11§e \fiier/lielxi hit seine swig: ad- _. .
U
‘n (l?iu) consisted of: fixation in
i 7 hieroform) or CCPNOV s PE
‘.-. an.‘ ‘. ' 1
(31.1 IJH‘E) .1-.“ 1,0" ”POI/€10 t0
I L.
"‘
_
j1';
QA
5D
‘4
Cf
-.-J
(D
r1
'
:i-J'
H°3
.V"
’8
~I”.
er
.0
H_
1::A
'_;.
_.
:J'H
')
l"\
CL."‘
.A‘
h.
_-l
-D
Z‘V
D.-
:4-
:5
>- J
_"| *5
“'3
,3
(u
'LL'
«J
':<
.10
'—
O *3
0 Co‘-
0 O Q
Ma
O
that this variety is s hy’orid. Jillev-Iiin found the Theoloi Ll.
number to be 19.
(l) X P. brsbentics HOUtZUSGPS (n = 19)
__i-
nlnnteriens‘s
(2) X P. Nelrics houtzn ers (n = l?)—- 1‘ . J
(5) X P. PODlst? Scrneid. ( = P. ijVlatg flit- X 3- H1C“97‘- --fl (“4? V . fl ‘ 'Iv“’v‘| "T— 7 T "' x(s wkuninisT so -+ Ll., Val.) (. _ l.)
' -\r‘-¢‘ >1)1Hrw°n m '1 ‘1‘. ("r J".-
LL L; A 11’1(4(<-'C3j--T n)?’ 0 11.119; 1 '1 Jr. -1-‘.. ‘ U
. ' if) J~" — .r'Y- , ~ “"71101*tef1 l“. {is elm: l'QLdlgf%fl INITJJD51 of?
.J
(F
L O 1")
e {Jo
O U)
l.Jo
Ts generolly 3330-
. - '1 --_I _v_1_ a, "-11.. _ : ,3 .0 -.. 1.. 1‘ .5 _2 _ _ __ 1 _ _‘
ciatet hl-U tuuULULLJ were nOLed in these plants. BuldinQ
of the nucleolus at prepnsse was observed in all. Pairing
was good in (3) but poor in the others. Polysoory was cnarsc~
tEITiS+i'3 of‘ all {N“d 11h"”l*" cbrwr oscw cs pinns euvtraryuzleais.. , ~)’
rrotcin was ooserveo in (l) and (4).
5H
Dilletijn (1339~b) concluded that tte constart broloida.
~ .- \ (N . L ‘ 1 -\ - ’w ‘ ' ’ ‘* 1 1 ‘ I" "‘ ‘ ' ‘ \ .. r— - ' ‘
Inniben? (14%) 1.. th 1Jenru: P.1'hl_m. arul KIN? frmwiuern. fornmatitm:
3‘ ° . ... . .. . 9 ,~ _ -.. . 1—. , - '
of dyads in many species are factors favor ole for brewd1n5
work. He concluded, also, trot tEis probably eXplains the
-1 o .. . -~. - _ ., ,\ _ a -1 _ ._
polyxor.nism #11 in the terns an: tne occqronce of naturulr «
triploids.
CYTOLOQY CF SEX IN RNPVLUS
"e presence of
bet nociromosores in use various species reported here but no
effort has been made to emobasize this aspect of the cytolo-
o ,,_. __1__ _ '1 _ , V .r_ f _- . 0 l __ -0 ‘I .,, ._ .11 r.‘ .
rfiLcal_ moiha. I11 at..it AN; cc) t_M3 CiLm4fil‘d‘S nu‘evjxdusiuy rewie 419v A
.
£1-L‘\v
,-
/
7A
.
ya
I‘
.fl .V .
NJ \_/
‘1
‘ffi
F‘
v‘
Ԥ
D
A
‘—
i
(J
V
f”
b...
1
v
C
{5+'u 1.
V
1’ o
.
q
.L
.K
‘-.
F)
Ac ‘4
31
J
l
.,
x F
w"
J .L J. .
—1
__'_ C} ».
L
L.,
(-4
\f
A
K.
O
O
O
(‘1
,4:
O
rfi
,
f‘
-L
O
3
'\
3
£
.1.
.‘
.V
J
r‘
-~.-~*_—_-—-‘
r‘,.
V
J.
. L1
_
.
-.
¢
'_
0
hr
v
A.-.
O
7..
_' J.
5.)
H5'
C-
o,.\-3:
'lr—q‘r.)
:-:t“
O..:J
.‘5'A
1Ar\
._J
'5}
I
>.
.3
In
.L-J
Kx]
(“3
r—J
k4
‘4.)
;(7+
(‘1‘
,1.
;
I:J‘JA‘:
’D
L.”
)(f
1')
r)
pxw
(1(0
.1’)
\.1\/‘_;
..J0
It'("\)J“I“
"."('
..L -
A
v
0
f‘
.2
[N
A.
(N
.1
v‘
u
C
O_.
(s
,14
.LL.
‘.
‘-
-———--u—.—‘—u-—~—-
—--—~--—~————-——u
~ r.
-
m
be
--—--—-———-——--—
'7
J.
‘V
I
T
\.
or}
Cu.)
“no
'1‘
1
v
A
C
./
‘V
.J
.L—-
I
'7
J \J
o0
LL
)/\
_;V.
\.
m4
on.
up-
v-w
1fQ
Li)
5‘;
L."
C"
"‘3
(D
C)A
(‘1'\
\J
r.
..
s)
.
\‘1’
To
\4
~—'k-‘
U)
L.
'5(Fa/U)
11-(C‘.'J’5)
r4
o333
’«I
"7H
J:
(I;
‘1)
k.)k)
U.)\z
(/
1 r‘. on
Ff“
,(JJ
\.,~
.[Jo
r—f‘
-./
‘’0
(J
‘.”J
t.
I:
‘J
I“:
1.")
.<“I
b,
’.
’1;
L'ib
(D
EI:
IJa
.|(i
i5
‘1.
L“I
kj
C)
I“)
.-
<":1
:3
1:0
0-
*K
r+
.-Z
\_,
’u‘
J
J"
;...-\,“'1
2:)
J.C:mm
\J
r.(‘~<
J
x
J
5.
/
\
.‘
\
I
\
I
" x
2
O¢‘O-L
o
I
L
O
3‘
1.
J J-
V . .
3
1
J
r7
A.
’.)
14-!»U.
C":
4
If
"(4
4.1.
\‘3‘.
Jk'J.
+
,.\-.3.
n‘ 8J- b
>.
1
—~
’2‘
f"
.3
.4
C
L .
O
'1
J'
\
I
,-.
L,
O
J
'W
k,
3.
L.
0
K4
t“
r—v
I
C
'x
.5
.‘
I.4.4-
t
O
+v- u
M .‘I
'7.
.1
‘V‘
1
’,'77T‘T
U
I
.1
J.
7
r,’
f‘
To we r:.,1-.
131;].
\ o ’3j. _.
'_ .47
A: ,7 C‘D
~n ".‘4 No.4. .-
‘W
LJ
1’
J
F
.)J
2
U
4.
.LJ
'1 "j
,.
_L
.,
.1
V
e
5‘ ‘r‘.
‘ ‘5
Kg
"i
I
C»
W
A
q
i
C
‘
v A; O
1‘ 'T
.L .-
P7
3 - .
1. .Li
". ‘v
I
,3
J
'2:
/'\
ux”,-
J.- -
k
+
l:
A Q
-
1
\J
r:
L.
.1
O
4.
,—
u/
L4
0
d
J
(.
1
C
1‘)
/
:1 M.
'1 ,7
+wan" I1
1.21
0
1
IP‘ "
-
"\ \ 1 I"
u‘.‘
.‘
V
‘
. o
b
O.
.
uso
(4-
F.)d-
’7?
CLi“)
..
.l
l
t . . “ v . . I. . .I u D . ( . I . I V‘ In P. t I ll\ I 7.: I r (\ .l I ( . . II ‘ .4\ I.
.
A {I I J J . . I It ' \. . .h I. L. I I: . I .I .. LI Id ...1 1. L J 0‘. If. I \I a. .1. 1:4 . .\J C \J I.
. . f .
1.. . a l\ t r ’ I, I\ . r‘ I . I. t . V K ' L... ‘I I\ .1 .' Ix . U u\ I t I! O |.. I.
/I\I I1 .
.--.z I. J -... . ...). . . - - .. .l v .
. )i .. Dl‘ I I\ O - l\ . a .. I9 . I) ..r r . I I O
J
\ lo
J
.1
l\ \ Y
J.‘
z 1
) L ‘0
\ I o-
I I
J
A
J
I
O
. .. _. . . ..J . _ .
-I (r. 1. , u .r 0 .II o -. . . . . I- r rI. . - r. . III .. y. .
2 .. I? ... 4) ....-. . I- .. .. I..- . I 3 I. .. .. .1 . 1.3.] .JI
I .r .-. .. L--. ..I . I.-. II .0 .I I o ,. o .- . . I. or
s34 I. In \I .1 .
.-.) . J.) J .....I ,3 .I, .. ... 1-.-..-.-r ..... . b O ‘ I r x ' . I k . I. . . . . .... I u
I —.
'\ 5 . ' I|
3. x \. Ih J J 1.... o h .. . .. .. . J \llua . / .l1~ I.J I. .u J . . . . ..I . . .. .. I. I
.. l . . .
lxk--.( lu.. u (0 . r I... II. \ .r\i, . I ( . .. I I.I I.
J I. I . l a I.. . \ .L. ... .- .H. L- J 2 - -... / I. «w .I .1 u
I U I | . . I . ,\ f . . .\ .I . l\ I ll
Ill _( f. I I .
JI . l1.J\ II. \...) ‘fl )3: I .41 J 4. \I) IJ
.. o - .. O ..l .. > o l\ I O
.~J\.IIJ\. 1.! 1.1». J. n\ .. . [II n .-'I"'llllllllllllnlall'l .I '. I\ J . “J v . .
. I ~ . .. . I , .
y
x I .:....J.. ..I.. -J .. 7.. ... a- “J-.. -.. 3 I .. 1 a?
' . \ .I l\ . I. I ’ . .. I.» .
ll‘. ll I I t . x .
- ... .. . « -..J .1. .....II. J . I. J l 1- an. 4. - W) “I. J I. . ‘1) ‘m...
'l'l"l‘i"l"4""l I
.\ . \ IL . I? .\ ( ... . \
| o a . I
LIL... .I 2... .. 4...... 4...: ) J 1%..-. I. .1. . .J ....) .-.)
' ! . I .1.. ll. . 1 ¢ 1. II II
t l I\ ll
. . II. .. . _ , x - 1. .
ifmw .. .J .-...-z...” I. f) ... . us
Ir... .1». .0. ‘. PI .v... ..(\:| (Ink/k ( “I O .. ‘II . O "x.’ \(P . .... o ho(|I. Ill
J1 .. . J . I. l
I - .I \ I .1 O. I- I I . \
l
1 I I., I. .,. r“. .J 2.3 -.t).....r abum .9 . .. . .
(\c O . I I | O\ - \ Ll I x I ’l I. I .r f I I \l .I. .v\ t II I, .. .'.t
.
. -- . . \zu ..I J n I I . . a lh. . f . J1. , u . . o I.
lr .\ I l . I! II»! I ..OOLIK . ll \ . Er I . .I iIII. l\ I. . . O -\
D. {II.II .
‘\..III\ C .
.. I. x 4 ,.
......J) .. I 11 ......I 3 ... ....-.,
51......(rxv 3.. C 0 .0». 0;. .-.--.e I}: Ks ...-I. (.I .I k L \ I... - . II | I z -
1 .l a J I! A II. ; . . l \ .. o F I IJ . 1\l t . . . ‘ . .
‘ I f t
J I 4 . \- v) |. MI .1.} . ~ I. I. l . I . . I I l c I In
(’1‘... rI . ’ \.I , .I \ .| .. (\.f L .... ' .. .4... (r..\ (L .\... ..r . Ir- II I I.||'(r.lv .
Q (t ' I.‘ «I...
. n . I o \I. . J J l x. . I 4 . u. . . I. I a .
.' ( 0.: ' .4. . . II .\ It- I\ . r\ .\ .or . Q . . .I
. o \ .I/ . \ I J o J . a . a
1.. . . . . u . . . . .. .b .
(I. .III RIM I... (0 fr\ I\\ r. -In..(\( {.I (..v. I. ..-vl. ... l./Ir-.( .» i; 2... I... -I(
y (
\I, Io . \l A . o
. . . . . A . I
. .. ta . o .. .0. C It rt D! {k t I. l O . I. . . n Q
.‘ J I; II I. / I; Q \4 1 . o I
h I I u
i «I. III II .ll.‘ I‘ll III I: II (L l \ Ia. .|II. ( .. I .l l f . .1‘ I\.>.t\ lslkryv‘t\bI L LII} II.. 1".
l .\ (II \t
o a I J J} . \I. .J . J - . . . .r . .. . 'I
{I . ’ >’I\ . l‘ (r l v I, .l . ( I\ . |\ . 0 II C ' _ .. . (K .l d.
I . \ J \. . \ - I I . . J I. J
\I . Id 1 . v‘ .. 1 . . I \0- II . . . I. . a .|.
( I....v\ .. .I. M .IL 0 I I .II \ o r\ . I . .\ r l .. v I . . I: 9\ I Db * ( vr /
ll lv‘r I- ‘IIV‘II I’ll
I: I II I I A o 4 II D . J I. J I
.-; F I. . . . . ... . .. I. . .. . I . \J. . _ .
. .I O P .1. O l.. . I... 0. pylf. I If >.. Iklxlr .I .. 0 V I II II I O
I III" / I r. co Lt II
I. ‘1 A A I . 4 . a o J _-\ .I IfiJ .... . f L . .. . \n . . I . . .4 I. .I . n . . . \, I
e x A s v .. l
(t . I? H P.\ ..I. . ‘ I I . .I . 1‘ 1 I? I. :\ Inrvr I. ..> C IKI \ .> ..l. fs (\ I» I? I
I \ {I .II. IIIILII
. . I 1 A I. \J . I. .
I. ..J... ....I -. .. ..-... L... .r I. . ._ . . . I
I ll. 0 VII .I If . .I r I\ .I .u 1 II I L! r I \ . I I I L . I I I l. 1.. I D l\. ( rL II. .[ l. O . I \ .. O . ‘I
. .. .
..
. . . o
.4 n n I \ J '1 \l I ) I. I o I: J . .. n
[if , ul. .\ I . V II 0 P . I tf\ \. \ \ , \L. I I u . 1‘ I\ I r IIC .... . I): . I I ’. I I..... ( I r\ I'v
. . | . a n I I.. I \1 I o I !I I . I J\ I ‘ . .a. .1 . I. . I1. .. 1. .Jnu . .I .J .I I. .I ,.
. u . . _ ~ .
|1 I. ll: p . 6: v. . ( (k l I n. I! . . .' vl. I H - l.I . I r. 0 In La ‘ Fl: l\ IDI.|(Db.I)L . l\ . ( . k .
. (
Id)
\ . '
. K 0
~ I.... I I .. .1 II J 1 ; \J I l .J.1 .‘I .n . . . II ....I . . . _ .1 ..4. I v I. . . ... ..r, _ .1 . .
.Iu. .. . M .. . Dyl . (I... ll . 1‘ U D). . l ’ Ir|I\ “LI \ II !\ I‘ll I r» ... I (\II\||.IPt rt!» .t\ 1
‘. i ' F
J. I :I . I . J v . J
. J _. I. I . . .
If. I\ 0 b. .. .. f I .. I II I I . \ O
I. L o \J 11. \ ... )II 1 a . .J J J! .
.w \J I. I I. I II. . . . I I . i .. ...
OD (Ill). {U .5. P. I‘. II .\ ( ...I\ .>.-Lr(.f .r... r ( \III I. l I _\P»I.. tr.y)
II‘ V
.J ) I: \ I \J
O
L 0 3| 3| v C
O I I \ I In \I I I\ It. . o I v o I“ II
I . . I . . . A I. . . I .
.vs.\ (II ..x I. (I t. V k 0 c I l. u\ . . n .\0 v r\ . 'I 1 I. ’ . I C . II . . I. II( t t. I! If 0 l .
II. I. a] I: I. \0 t \l \ ‘1 \J ) )
. I
t ' I L Ir.I\ I I. P O |\ I I. .I C
\J \J . \nl I . .. v I I] . 1 o I o p .0 I A II! ....
'1' II In. . II ..II . . . . .. . . . .
I ll I I a... (I \ . K. I ri\ ( I. y r .1 7| . I Ir It- ..\.nl\l.l;l'9 I'Qr. ’
' ' ' t
I. I \
.;. ... . In .J . I. \s o a. ‘
(.IL. ’3 art‘s t. \ |r| . I?! _\ 1‘ Irl '- .
I x ). z . - J 1 l.. IJII .J )J J .. IL . J. I I. .. b J _ L _ PU. . .1 . ... ..
. D .
v:\ ..r U ??0 ft. .rI. L-Jlr..r\ ..,\.. Iv.» . . I.) (.1. (Irkulx. nlrl(.’. I.
t 1 \ {I ’ ..-
xI 4. . I] \/ \I/ \ ulc\|/\
. 7.. 0 ..~ #1.. I \J _ . b. J . I x . J
. .l
(V. I r: I..III .. |IVL ( f I I It I! l I x .I 0 vi r . . O
J . / . o o a I o o .
II \J J y . I. .3 I ..r .. I J I I. _ J “a 4 . . ...: _. . -, ..v . . .
III'IIIII'I '0 ill r .’I\ I I. \ ..Im (..rr l..l\1'.kII . I 1‘ . . I. If. I” ( .v ( lr. IL. .I I,.1. IL:
\ . V II.
II . n l ..A 0 I. I r a I 3 II . J I... *1
....) . no 1.. , . ... ... _ .J .\1 4 l . . .I. .u . ... . .
”I. I I.I . (J. I.t\. ’0 L: O I . I» IIII\I\II..5!(.\ I . I'..... 1., (.4. (lot..l. f...- I'\, (*L‘LOI} IIII\I
IJ _ .l I
. .; . I
O\ I\..
nenry, A. (l”l4-b) ihe black poplars. ard. Chron. (lon-
don) (Ser. 3) 56: 1-2, 46-47, 66- 67. (Also pub. in Soy.
soot. Arbor. Soc. Trans. 30: 14-27. 1516.) (Jited from
6a sial , 1933-)
--------- (lCl4-c) A new ‘yorii poplar (foculus nenerosa).
Gard. Shron. (3) 56: 2" ~58. (Cited from eh.er, L940.)
-------- - (1930) 4ote oniogulus verniIuCens. She card.
Chron. 67: p. ” (Cited from Cansdale, 1938).dJ4.
Houtzagers, G. (1937) Het deslacht iggulus in Verband met
zijn ;eteekenis voor ie houtteelt. (fhe genus roaulus
and its sienificance in silviculture.) lst Ad., 266 99.,
62 haftone and 2 text figs., 1 map. A. Veenman & Zonin,
Laneningen ( etherlands).
Hubbard, C. S. (1926) A revie" of the species of gooulus
introduced into south Africa. S. Afr. Jour. bci. 23: 340-
365. (Cited from heimcurger, 1940.)
Jatlohov, A. 3. (1940) (Differences in the F1 interspecif-
ic hyerils of w0013r forest trees.) Jarovizacija Lo. 4
(31): 33- 40 (3 ited from Plant creed. A;str., Vol. XI,
1941.
Johnson, L. f. V. (1939) A descriptive list of natural and
artificial interspecific hytri.j s in north American forest-
tree genera Sanad. Jour. Res. 17: 411-444.
----------------- (1942) Studies on the relation of growth1
rate to woo: quality in logulus hybrids. Canad. Jour.
.esearch C, 20: 28-40.
Johnsson, Helge (1940) Cytological studies of dioloid and
triploid Populus tremula and of crosses between them.
Hereditas 26: 321-352.
Kihara, H. (1924) Gytolo;ische und smenetische Studien bei
Wichtigen Getreidearten. Rem. Cell. Sci. hyoto ;. l, p. l.
(Cited from Lillewijn, 194C.)
Kittreige, J. i S. P. Sevorkiantz (
ies of as:en lrnis in the Lake St
Teen. gull. 60. 8499.
Leiher, (1936) Zur Iavnlucnu von Laopeln in der badischen
Fheinniederung. Atlge seine :orst-unl Jagd-Leitung, pp.
327-335. (Cited from Sansdale,1938).
Lindsay, E. H. (1930) The chromosomes of some dioecious
angiosoerms. Amer. Jour. got. 17: 152—174. 1930.
Lotbiniere, H. G. J. de (1935) Asgen poolar (Pogulus tremula).
uarterly Jour. For. 29: 19-25.
haude, P. F. (1939) The Lerton cata10"ue. A list of he
chrom some numerals of species of critisEi floweringElan ts
Jew Phytol. 38: 1-31.
Keeiker, 5. (1930-31) De ropulier in ederland. 'Iijdschrift
der federlandscne neiie.aatschaopij Jahrg. 42-43: 161- 106
and 195-217.
Lelander, Yngve (1938) A new giant Bopulus tremula in Nor-
botten. hereditas 24: 189-194.
keurman, C. (1925) Cn the chromosome behavior of some dioe-
cious plants and their relatives With soecial reference to
sex chromosomes. Soc. Sci. Fennica, 0 ti. iiol. 2: Ho. 3.
(Cited from Gaiser, 1926 and irlanson & hermann, 1927.)
929) Forest poss hillt-
tes. .01“. per. UODODQAO
— 5‘)-
Hoes, E. h. (1932) The vegetation of Alberta IJ. The pop-
lar association and related vegetation of central alberta.
Joun of Ecology 20: 380—415.
Luntzing, A. (1:36) '?he chromosomes of a giant rOpulus trem-
ula. Hereditas, Lund 21: 383-93.
Hakajima, G. (1937) Cytological studies in some dioecious
plants. Cytolofl Tokyo: Fujii Jubilee Vol. : 282- 92.
Nilsson-Ehle, H. (1936) Uber eine in der Natur Gefundene
Cipasform von Populus Tremula. (Cn a gigas form of" 5.
tremula found in nature.) hereditas 21: 379-333.
--------------- (1938-a) Framethllning av skOgstrAd med
kat kromosomtal och bkad virkesproduktion. (rroduction of
forest trees With increased chromosome number and increased
timber production.) Svensk rapotidn. No. 2: Pp. 5. (Cited
from Plant Ereed. Abstr. fol. 10,1940.)
""""""""' (1938-13) (The glant L30{D)-Ei‘f"--tile recent swed—
ish discoyery in forest improvement.) lord. bamiljeboks
1anadsrr5nixa 1: No. 2: Pp. 6. (Cited from rlant :reed.
Abstr. vol. 10, 1940.)
Paul, ienson H. (1930) The application mf silviculture in
controlling the specific gravity of wood. U.S.D .A. Tech.
:ul. 168.
Peto, F. E. (1938) CytoloEy of poplar species and natural
hyorids. Canai. Jour. Fes. l6: Sect. 0: 445-55.
Uuairiére, A. (19-35) Etude sur la distance‘a adogter pour la
plantation du reulier, en vue de son utilisation dans
1' Industrie Allumettiere. Annalee .Be GemblouJC Namur, AoGt.
Eegnier, F. (1934) Les recherches sur 12s peupliers. (Ee-
searches on poplars.) 5ull. 30m. Eor. raris 9: 42-61.
(Cited from Plant breed. Atstr. Vol. v1, 1936.)
Eehder, A. (1940) Kanual of cultivated trees and shrubs.
2nd Ed., XXX + 996 pp. Lachillan 00., Eew York.
Rost, H. Snabvaxande poppelhybrider. (Rapidly growing poplar
hybrids.) :oeen 24: 455-57. (Cited fr Plant breed.
Abstr. Vol. IX, 1939.)
Sargent, C. S. (1896) The silva of North America. Vol. 9.
------------- (1922) Aanual of trees of North America,
9nd Ed., Few Eork.
Schneider, 0. K. (1904) Handbuch der Lauoholzkunde. Jena.
(Cited from Cansdale, 1938.)
Schreiner, E. J. (1931-a) Two species of :alea causing dis-
ease in Populus. Am. Jour. got. 18: l- 28.
- .............. (1931- b) The role of disease in the growinlg
of poplar. Jour. Hor. 29: 79-82.
-...... - ......- (1935) Possibilities of improving pulping
characteristics of pulpwoods by controlled hybridization of
forest trees. Paper Trade Jour. 100 (2): 105-109.
------------ (1937) Improvement 0f fOrest trees, U.5.D.A.
Yearbook. pp. 1241-12-79.
""""""""" & Stout, A. So (1934) Descriptions of ten
new hybrid poplars. dull. Torrey pot. Club 61: 449-460.
Snow, A. G. (1938) Use of indolebutyric acid to stimulate
the rooting of dormant aspen cuttings. Jour. For. 36: 582-
587 o '
Sprague, T. A. (1940) A triploid aspen-~Eopu1us tremula--
from Sweden. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 152: 111-113. (Abst.)
-55-
stout, A. e. (192)) The clon in plant life. Jour. N. r.
bot. :ari. 30: 25-37.
----------- - (193C) Borestation with poplars in France.
Jour. ‘. I. JOt Card. 31: 285-292
----------- -, IcKee, 5. H., and Sciireiner, 8. J. The breed-
in: of fore st trees for pulp .001. N. 1. got. Car. Jour.
28: 49-63. (1927)
-------------& Scareiner, E. J. (1933) Feeults Of a prOject
in hybridizing poplars. Jour. :,re1ity 24: 217-229.
——————————————————————--------— (1934) hybriis between theW 1
necklace cottonwood and the large-leave: aspen. Jour. a.
Y. 501. Card. 35: 140-143.
Straub, J. (1937) Die nirhung von Len eraturstbzen aui die
Peduktionsteiluny. 5er. d. deutech. :ot. Ces.
Thimann, I. V. and Delisle, A. L. (1939) The vegetative
propagation of difficult plants. Jour. Arnold Are. 20:
116-136.
Tometorp, G. The chromosome numbers of ;n.o new giant Booulus
tremula. iot. Iotiser: 285- 90. (1937
Tubeuf, 3. 2. von (1931) Unert nschte rastardvildung (Un-
desired hv
Verids.) z. rflirankh. 41: 333-37.
Victorin, Fr re Aarie (1935) glore Laurentienne. hontreal.
--- ------------------ (1930) Les variations laurentiennes
1U Populus trenuloiies et du i. ,rentilentta. Contrib.
Lab. :ot. Univ. .ont real No. 16. (Cited from heimburger,
1936)
Vill, C. (193C) Denirclogische Ctudien fiber Bappel-iastarde
aus den pfhlzischen Pneidaue iitteilungen der Deutschen
“endrologischen Cesellscraft (Jahrbuch) 42: 285-298.(Cited
from Cannsdale, 1938.)
Vloten, H. von (1938) Eet onder7oek naar de vatbaarheid van
populieren voor aantasting door iotrichiza :opulea Sacc.
et sriard. (Aarste verslag).(1nvesti “1;ion into the sus-{fa
ceptibility of poplars to 2- :o3ulea Sacc. et :riard. (Eirst
report.) Tijdschr. Ned. heidemaatasch. 50: 77-92. (Cited
from Plant breed. Abstr. Vol. IX, 1939.)
Beigle, n. C. 6 Fro thingham, a. n. (1911) The aSpens: their
growth and "anetement. U. 6. 5 A. borest service cull. 3.
Lettstein-uestershenn, u. von (19 9) Zur iechnik der kfinst-
lichen Kreuzung bei maiden (balix). Zuchter 1: 125- 126.
- ---------------------------- 1933-a) Lie LUcntun: von
Pooulus, II. (The breeding of po lars, 11. ) HUchter 5:
230-81. (Cited from flant breed. Abstr. Vol. IV, 1934.)
- --------------------------- - ( 933-b) Aficntun sversuche
mit Forstpflanzen. (5r inf experiments with forest
plants.) Eorstarcniv 9 127-29. (Cited from Plant greed.
(1
Aostr. Vol. IV, 1934.
1933 0) Die Kreuzungsmethode
und die beschreibung von F westarden bei rooulus. Pflan-
en fichtung ( eihe A) 8: 5997-626. (Cited from flan;
breed. Abstr. Vol. IV, 1934. )
- ---------------------------- (1934) Fragen zur Forstpflan-
zunpSZUChstung. (buestions :ertaininp to the breeding of
forest trees.) Naturtissenschaften 22: 490-491. (Cited
from Elant Breed. Abstr. Vol. VI, 1936.)
-.‘37-
nettstein-Aestcrsheim, A. von (
durch Herhunftskreuzung bei §*~ t;
;1erforrhance Ly crossii: trees 01 difife
g. treuula.) AAtur‘issensedafter 25:
from rlant creed. V01. V111,1938.)
- ----------------------------- (1937 o) rors+;311anzliche
Luhtdn sveroucte--Hesonlers mit Poeulgs. (Forestry breed-
in;:r excerimed+s--esueCWa11y With 5939133.) Aot. fotiser:
272- 84. (3 ite d from rlant ;reed. Aestr. Vol. VIII, 1938.)
--------------—--------------- (1937-c) Individuelle Enter-
sclziede tei 4s:ensémlingen. (1ndividda1 differences in
aspen seedlings.) rorstarchiv A. wiss. tecd. Eoztsch .
13: 149—51. (Cited from flant sreed. Vol. $111,1958.)
stungss tei:gerung
1a. (lncreasinL
t “Oenance in
34-43 (Cited
Chin
----------------------------- - (1937-d) iie Vermehrung and
Kultur der fagpel. (The Ldropafation an1 A1t1VAt1on of
the poplar.) J. D. au r13n:1ers, Erar:kfurt am Aain, 31
9?.
------------------------------ (1939) Die Jermehrung und
Kultur 1er r‘ap peln. (The ra51ng and c1tivation of oop-
1ars.) Ecrs tar3iv 15: l6’-68. (Jited irom 111nt Breed.
Acstr. 701. X, 1940 )
1colvar1F. N. (1907) The fermination of 0091ars. Jour.
01 30t. 45: 417.
Yanchevsky, K. (1904) (On the peculiarities of the germin-
ation of the seeds of Asoen and of some species of willow.)
(’n Russian. rroc. Imperial Forest Inst. 11: 269-274.
Zircher (193) has Paoyelholz. hllgemeine Forst-und Jagd-
Zeitung, 33. 335-41.
()\:_/
Anonymous (1941) Improvement of forest trees in Sweden.
Anglo-owedlsn Rev. 93-94. 1941.
Baker, 1. S. (1921) Two races of spen. Jour. Forestry 19
412-413.
Day, A. R. 8 Peace, T. R. (1934) roplar ca
ary note. guarterly Jour. of Forestry 28
Eetmers, F. Dotnichiza disease on Eopulus g
path. 13: 245-46. 1923.
her; a prelimin-
enei. Phyto-
. /
Dode, L. A. (1905) ixtra its d'une monograghie inedite du
genre Pooulus. raris.
----------- (1912) Sur la production par hybridisation des
deux sexes d'une csdéce dioique exotique.
1isher, A. J. (1928) horohology and anatomy of flowers of
Salicaceae. Amer. Jour. jot. 15: 372- .
3itzpatrick, H. A. (1933) The trees of lreland--native and
introduced. Sci. froc. R. Dublin Soc. 20 (N.S.): 597-
65:5.
uértner, (1849) Versuche fiber die :astarderzeugung im
Pflanzenreich. Stuttgart.
(Germany) sericht fiber die sieoenundvierzigste Cenera1ver-
saimlung der Qeut301en iotanischen Gesellschaft in Lres-
den, Efingsten 1935. Aer. deuts. :ot. see. 51: 1- 23.
1933<
Unnlmr J. H. (1377565110) rro‘ft11-r'3,_tnlatin3 sues tances in;-.;».L._ J'J ,
forest research and practice. Univ. ofJas1L Forestr
Club (irrcter13, ébrqe Press, Lhruttle, “Eufiz. ‘01. 15:
1:0. 2: 5-90
Hartleg, C. P. (
erence to disease resistance. Jour. Forestryz
688.
1937) Pores t 3eneties with particular ref-
(2r'
1: 667-
Helms, A. D. (1940) A visit to the Danish arboretum and for-
est botanical ;ar(ens, June, 1959. Aust. For. 5; 16-20,
Henrv, A. (1950 ) T“e artificial production of vigorous
trees Qv hybrimliation. Quart. Jour. Forestry 14: 255-
157.
Hoffmann, H ( 58) Die Verrenrunw der Pappeln durch Seat.
3 Xeftlieben 09_H1"iUflitt 58: 28—54.Forstwis sen
mJtza3ers, 3.
races of r011
Al3eneen lieu113sdienst (H.A.n.) Pp; 20.
Jablokov, A. S. (1949) (Pro Darwinissm in breeding woody
forest trees.) 11esnoe Khozjaistvo (Forestry) Ho. 4: 75-
77.
Kauffman, Erle (1927) Speeding up the peplar: interest-
ing experiments in selective breeding and hybridization.
Amer. Forests and Forest Life 55: 269-271. 1927.
Lamb, w. H. (1918) Hybrid trees....a review. Jour. Hered-
ity 7 (7): 511-519.
Lindquist, B. (1940) Tallens roll 1 svensk skogstrfldsffir—
Adlinc. (Tl-e role of the pire in Swedish forest tree-
1933.) PQ_Qlis hed oy tre 1M8erlandsch
1 V
1
Editor) (1958) (1i;st dezwmitive list for
a s
i
breedin3). Tidsskr. Skogtr. 48 : 10-17, 40-46.
Lotbiniere, H. G. J. de (1952) POplar plantations. Quart-
erly Jour. of For. 90: 212~2l8.
McKee, R. H. ( l950) Pei cing tle tine fa “to in tree grow-
th. Canad_. .oodlands Pev. 2 (9:): ~10, 50, 54.
Moss, E. H. (1922 ) Observations on two pOplaP canAers.
Ph3t0p3t110101 lo: 495_27
Y
Murdock, H. R. (1954) Rapid snowing trecs. P; r Trade03
*3
CD
Jour. 99 (288 29-50.
Hakajima, G. ( ) Chromosome numbers in some an3iosperms
Jap. Jour. G n: .
r 7) Om vekstfozedli-r3 av sk03s
Danrnark. (8reedin3 and selection of forest trees
wa:k.) Tidsskr. 8k03bruk 47 (6): 209-2?1.
Paschal, G. W. (1920) A bi33er tree. Sci. Amer. 122: 61.
Reim, P. (1950 ) Lie Vermehrun3sbi0103ie der Aspe auf Grund-
1a3e des in Estland und Finnland 3esammelten Untersuchung-
smaterials. Mitt D. Forstwiss. Abt. L. Univ. Tartu No.
Schreiner, E. J. (1958) Cree.tive forestry. The Paper In-
dus try and Paper World, June 1958.
Sconce, H. J. (1958) Breedin3trees for pulp. Conserva-
tion 4 (5): 15-15.
Sugiura, T. (1940) A list of chromosome numbers in angio-
spermeus plants. Proo. Imy. Acad. Japan 16: 15-16.
Su3iura, T. (1958) A list of chromosome numbers in an3io-
spermous plants. Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan 14: 591-92.
----—----—- (1956) A list of chrOmosome numbers in angio-
spermous plants. Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan 12; 144-45.
~59-
16.
Tischler G. (1027) Pflnnz liche CFromosomes—Lahlen. Tab-
ulae £310101099e 4: 1-03.
----------- (1951) Pilanzliehe Chromosomes-thlen. Tab-
ulae £1010Sicee 7: 109-226.
------—---- (1370) Pflanzliche Cheomosomes-Zuhlen Tab-
ulae 31010icae 12: 57-115.
----------- (1930) P11sqzliche Chromosomes-Zahlen. Tab-
ulae ”1010.;10e 16: 162—213. /
Tortorelli, L. A. (1940) Viaje Ce estudios sllvieoles en
Eur0pa del In5. A“P. Lucas n. Tortorelli. (Study tour on
forestry in Eu_v0f)e by Lucas 3. Tortorelli). Rev. A15ent.
Agron. 7: 141- 43.
U. 8. Forest berv10e(19539) A fast-growing and winter-hardy
poplfl" hybrid st111 to be found for the LakeSt.ates. Lake
States Forest Exp. Sta, bt. Psn1,inn. Tec . note 155.
V111, (1934) Die Luchtung Von 191ole1nhholern. (The
breedin; of soft wood trees.) Iitt. dtseh. dendrol. fies.
NO. 45: 105-106.
Uettstein, N. V. ( ECU) Transgression und beterosjs bei
POnulnS-KCVZURCBH. (Transgression and heterosis in cross-
breedin5 of pOplaP species.) Forstwisss. Centol. 60: 555—
558.
Wettstein-Kestershe m, . von 1950) Die Lflchtun; von Pap-
peln (Pohmle). Lop ”ther 2: 219-220.
Woodward, C. M. (1355) IJew 1v011d poplars for reforestation.
Jour. N. Y. Rot. Gdn. 34:
Yamszski, R. (19.56) 011011os 01-e
Jap. Jour. Genet. 12 (2):
-50-
f‘r)()’— 7(_; ,
numbers in some An5iosperms.
101—103.
SALIX L. (Willow)
The willows, because of numerous and often polymorphic
species, are, taxonomically, one of the most difficult of
tree genera. In addition, many of the species apparently
hybridize freely in nature, thus contributing to the general
confusion. About 165 Species are recognized. More than 65
species are native to North America but only about one-third
of these attain tree size (Rehder; Harlow & Harrar).
Salix nigra Marsh. of North America and §, glbg_L. and
Ԥ. fragilis L. of EurOpe produce the bulk of commercial willow
timber which is largely used for artificial limbs, boxes, crates,
woodenware and novelties (Brown and Panshin, 1940). A number
of others, both trees and shrubs, are extensively used in the
basket industry or as ornamentals.
As a group, the willows require considerable moisture
and in consequence characteristically inhabit stream and river-
banks. It has been said (Holman & Robbins, 1954) that in
this genus the guard cells have lost their power of regulat-
ing the stomata and the latter remain permanently Open. It
may be assumed that this feature restricts the willows to
habitats where there is abundant soil moisture. Investigation
into the cause of this phenomenon might prove of genetic
interest.
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION FROM WILD STOCK
Record of conscientious effort to select superior indi-
viduals from wild tree members of this genus have not come to
the author's attention. There is, however, abundant evidence
that empirical selection methods have been in vogue for many
years. It should not be overlooked in this connection that
forests and stands under forest management may be subject to
a silvicultural sort of "mass selection" which may, depending
upon intensity and preper judgement, result in some improve-
ment. Individual selection, especially in EurOpe, has undoubt-
edly been carried on among the various tree and shrub Species
with their various varieties and natural hybrids which are now
cultivated for the basket industry and ornamental use.
Of special interest in this respect is the white willow
(Salix alba L.) of EurOpe and its several varieties. §, alba L.
is widely planted as a timber tree; §. alba calva G. F. W. Mey.
(in the literature usually: Ԥ. alba var. coerulea Koch), the
so-called "cricketbat willow"1, is reportedly superior for the
use which its name implies; §, alba vitellina (L.) Stokes, a
variety used for basket making;Ԥ. alba tristis Gaud., var. is
valued as an ornamental. Still other varieties and forms of
this species have been described. In addition, the following
natural hybrids, presumed on a morphological basis by taxon-
omists, appear in the literature (Rehder, 1940). Since def-
inite experimental evidence is lacking as to parentage it is
impossible to indicate whether §ali§_glbg L. was involved as
the male or female parent.
1
Henry (1914) recognized the cricketbat willow as a hybrid
between §. alba L. and E, fragilis L. Schreiner (1957) indi-
cated it as a hybrid (X §. coerulea) betweenl§. alba L. and
S. gracilis. On the bas s of cytological examination, Wilkin-
Ebn concluded it was a variety of §. alba L. and not a
hybrid.
Parents1 Name 2£_hybrid
S. nigra Marsh. x §, alba L. X'S. Hackensonii Dode.
S. fragilis L. x §, alba L. X'S. rubens Schrank.
>4
S. Ehrhartiana Sm.S. pentandra L. x §, alba L.
S. babylonica L. x S. alba L. X.§. sepulcralis Simonk.
Numerous subspecies, varieties, forms and natural hybrids,
involving other species of Sglix are described in the litera-
ture. The more important and more widely cultivated of these
are enumerated and described in the work of Rehder (1940).
Johnson (1959) lists 42 natural and artifical hybrids in the
genus.
CONTROLLED BREEDING AND HYBRIDIZATION
The first controlled breeding experiments in the willows
were conducted by Max Ernest Wichura between 1852 and 1858 in
Germany (Wichura, 1865). A n accurate and precise worker,
Wichura's interests were not disconcerted by the "practical
possibilities" but were directed toward a contribution to the
rapidly accumulating genetic data of his day.
According to the theory of the time, a "species" was con-
sidered to be an integral whole. In Wichura's concept, there-
fore, a species crossed in its entirety and not as a number of
characters taken as units. In all Wichura made thirty-five
successful "binary" (interspecific) crosses between twenty-
one different species of willows. He reported a much larger
number as unsuccessful (Roberts, 1929).
l
Cytological studies (Harrison, 1922; Blackburn & Harrison, 1924)
indicated all parents except S . babylonica L. (which has not
been studied) to be tetraploid'(4n =f76).
-6 5...
Wichura noted in his willow hybrids, as indeed others1
had in other plants, that hybrids demonstrated greater vegeta-
tive vigor and were less fertile if derived from crosses be-
tween species of distant specific relationships. He also veri-
fied GHrtner's observation of the identity of reciprocal crosses,
and, according to Roberts (1929), the following is the first
recorded, complete categorical statement in the literature of
plant breeding with regard to the function of the sex cells
in amphimixis:
"From this (identity of reciprocal crosses) 1t.EE§E
follow,however, with mathematical necessity, that
the ppllen 0611 must have exactly the same share in
the conformation of the fertiliZation product as the
egg." (Wichura 1865, p. 86. )
Wichura's concept that species crossed in their entirety
undoubtedly confused his analysis of F2 generations. Perhaps
he did not grow sufficiently large F2 pepulations. In any
event his general conclusions indicated that segregation did
not take place and as might be anticipated the post-Mendelian
workers made haste to disprove him, at least with regard to
special characters (Sirks, 1915; Ikeno, 1916, 1918, 1922;
Nilsson, 1918; Lotsy, 1920).
It is worth noting that a pre-Mendelian American sali-
cologist, Glatfelter (1894, 1895, 1896), recognized in wild
populations of Salix nigra Marsh. and‘S. amygdaloides Anders.,
intermediate forms of great complexity ranging from one parental
extreme to the other. These variations he attributed to hybri-
dization between the two species, crosses between the hybrids,
and between hybrids and the parental forms.
I»
Kblreuter, Gartner
-54-
Some directed effort in breeding willows has been stimu-
lated by demands of the basket willow growers. Schmidt (1957)
attributed the unsatisfactory state of the product in Germany
to the impurity of the material available to the grower. This
condition has been brought about through natural crossing
among the cultivated forms. He recommended that the initial
step in breeding basket willows, as with other economic crops,
should be the production of pure lines.
Wettstein (1951) reported initial breeding steps with
Salix americana Hort. (possibly S. pgrpurea pendulg Dipp.).
This form, valued for fine basket-work and as an ornamental,
is characterized also by a bark which peels with ease. By
cross-breeding it is hoped to increase the tannin in the bark
which, in turn, would not only act as a protection against
animal pests, but also provide another product. The Fl's from
crosses with S. caprea viminalis (?) and S. purpurea L. are
said to be promising and will be bred further.
Barnes (1951) reported insect resistance breeding work
with several willow species. In addition to the hybrid
‘S. viminali§_x purpurea (S. rubra Huds.), formerly found to be
immune to button gall (Rhabdophaga heterobia), 4 other va-
rieties were isolated. In addition, immunity to attack of this
insect was found inl§. viminalis L.,‘§. purpurea L., and.§.
.ElEE L. Further breeding work is planned to produce new va-
rieties resistant to other insect pests. The physical or chemi-
cal property possessed by immune or resistant forms has not been
defined.
-65...
HYBRIDIZING TECHNIQUE
Members of the genus Salix are normally dioecious. It
has, however, been known for many years that monoecious plants
do occur among individuals of certain Species (Shimek, 1895;
Chamberlain, 1897; Burkill, 1898; Engler & Gilg, 1924). Some
idea of the frequency with which this condition may find ex-
pression is indicated in the observations onԤ. amygdaloides
Anders. reported by Schaffner (1919). Of 100 Specimens of this
species which were carefully checked, 9 intermediates were found.
It is of Special interest to note that aments with staminate
flowers had these flowers limited to the lower part of the
axis, while the carpellate flowers were found at the tip. In
addition there was a transition zone between these two areas
which seemed to be neutral in regard to sex. Bisporangiate
flowers were frequently present as were also abnormal flowers,
i.e., flowers with structures develOped which were partly stami-
nate and partly carpellate. Schaffner believed sexuality in
this Species to be traceable to physiological conditions.
The occurrence of monoecious (or even polygamo-monoecious)
individuals in this genus is a point of some technical import-
ance to breeders. Aside from the apparent advantage of effect-
ing artificial cross-pollination in dioecious and monoecious
plants, the monoecious condition permits of true selfing. The
only drawback in such instances is the possibility that self-
incompatibility may exist. According to East (1940), however,
the monoecious plants of this genus appear to be self-fertile.
Sex and its modification in this genus is discussed in
more detail under "cytological studies," p.‘10.
Yanchevsky (1904) is reportedly the first worker to
demonstrate the method of using cut flowering branches of
.§El$§ which produced mature seed in the greenhouse. Wettstein
(1929) reported a number of successful crosses between various
willow Species using this method. He emphasized that the flower-
ing branches Should be cut when the first swelling of the buds
occurs in early spring and placed in water in the greenhouse.
Following the appearance of the adventitious roots the branches
should be transferred to a nutrient solution. The cuttings
should never be placed directly into soil or a nutrient solu-
tion as vegetative activity is emphasized and the catkins
usually fall.
This technique may be successfully used for crosses in
the open with species which do not mature their flowers at the
Same time. By controlling the temperature, cut branches of the
male parent may be induced to produce mature pollen coincident
with the receptivity of the female flowers.
POLLEN LONGEVITY
Nohara (1924), a Japanese worker, reported longevity
studies of the pollen of a number of species and hybrids in
Pollen storage was conducted under various combinations
of conditions but most successfully (i.e., for 70 days) in a
desiccator in a dark room at a temperature varying between
80 - 14° C. The exact percent of relative humidity was not
determined but he indicates this as the most critical factor and
that it should be low.
For germination studies pollen was germinated in a film of
2% cane sugar solution on micrOSCOpe slides. The slides, after
sowing with pollen, were tht in a moist chamber at room temper-
ature. Pollen was also successfully germinated in water and in
solutions of grape sugar. 'gglix pollen apparently germinates
very rapidly. In some cases pollen tubes of considerable length
became visible after 50 minutes when sown under favorable con-
ditions.
Nohara's studies led him to conclude.that there was no
difference in germinating or fertilizing power of forced or
naturally matured pollen. In his work with preserved pollen
he found that as long as pollen was capable of germinating it
was also capable of fertilization.
Bogdanov1 (1955), a Russian, has also described experiments
on pollen storage in Sglgg. He first worked with fresh pollen,
determining for each Species under investigation the best condi-
tions for artificial germination. Following this, he determined
the normal germination percentage of the fresh pollen for each
Species. There was considerable variation observed between
species.
Pollen.was stored in a refrigerator at -5° to+5O C. He
reported that both excessive moisture and dessication reduced
germination and preservation in a dessicator was definitely un-
favorable. The percent of relative humidity in the refrigerator,
however, was not indicated. It may be assumed that storage was
in the dark.
‘1‘
Original work not consulted. Data from abstract in Imperial
Bureau 2: Plant Breeding and Genetics -- Plant Breedipg Abstracts;
VoI. 6, entry #651.
Pollen of g. viminalis, §, acutifolia, S. dasyclada,'§.
caprea, and the hybridԤ.,phylicifolia x S, viminalis, stored
for a period of 20 days under these conditions, left normal
germination unimpaired. A certain percentage of the pollen in
each case germinated up to the fiftieth day.
In Bogdanov's original article the most suitable germi-
nating media and the duration of viability of the pollen are
tabulated for the above mentioned and a number of other forest
Species.
SEED TREATMENT
éfllli seeds are known (Holman & Robbins, 1954) to lose
their vitality rapidly and should therefore be planted immediatea
1y after they are discharged from the capsule. Wettstein (1929)
emphasized that they should be planted on the surface with suffi-
cient light and moisture available. Even the slightest covering
of the seeds should be avoided Since lack of adequate light in-
hibits germination. Willow seeds planted under proper conditions
were observed by Wettstein to have their cotyledons visible in
3 hours 0
VEGETATIVE REPRODUCTION
The willows are readily prepagated by cuttings or root
Sprouts. Various species readily strike root from wood several
years old (Toumey, 1916).
CYTOLOGICAL STUDIES
The monoploid or basic number of chromosomes in the genus
§21i§ appears to be 19. A polyploid series, based on a number
of lists of chromosome numbers and other reports (Harrison, 1922,
1926; Blackburn and Harrison, 1924; Meurman, 1925; Sinote, 192a;
Gaiser, 1926, 1930; Tischler, 1927; Maude, 1939) is suggested.
Diploid (19 pair, as'§. purpurea L.), tetraploid (58 pair, as
§, alba L.), and hexaploid (57 pair, as g. Andersoniana Sm.)
species have been reported. The reduced numbers 22 and 44 were
also observed by Blackburn and Harrison (1924) and Hakannsson
(1929) in some species and ca. 24 by SinotG (1929).
HETEROPLOIDY AND SEX
Blackburn (1926), Harrison (1924), Sinote (1929), and
Nakajima (1957) have reported a large number of diploid species
with an unequal pair of chromosomes. Several tetraploids and
at least one hexaploid (§, Andersoniana Sm.) show only one pair
of heterochromosomes. Harrison (1926) has, therefore, logically
concluded that simple chromosome doubling could not account for
the origin of polyploidy in these species, since in that event
one would expect to find the heterochromosomes doubled also.
Lindsay (1950) observed that the evidence of the presence
of only one unequal pair of chromosomes in tetraploid and hexa-
ploid willows conflicted with.similar observations in other
dioecious plants. Hagerup (1927), for instance, reported the
presence of an XY pair in the staminate plant of Empetrum
nigrum, a dioecious:3pecies, and two XY pairs in E, hermaphro-
ditum, a tetraploid hermaphroditic species. Lindsay concluded
that in Salix it appears that dioecism is not interfered with by
polyploidy, even though the XY pair remains unduplicated and the
-70-
balance between the sex chromosomes and autosomes is obviously
upset.
Blackburn and Harrison (1924) state with regard to their
observations:.."some evidence exists of heterochromosomes, pro-
bably sex-determining in their import." Nakajima (1957) con-
cluded: .."the unequal pair is assumed to be a sex chromosome
complex of the XY type."
From the literature at present available it does not appear
possible to define with any degree of certainty the means of
sex determination in the genus §gli§. The work of Schaffner
(1919, 1955) and Harrison (1924) indicate that sex reversal or
modification in this genus may operate apparently independent
of the assumed sex chromosomes. The basic fact, however, that
a consistent differentiation of sex among individuals of the vari-
ous species does occur would seem to indicate that an hereditary
mechanism is involved. That this mechanism, under the influence
of physiological or ecological conditions, can be changed does
not invalidate it.1
Hybrid Analysis
Nilsson's (1918) genetic study in Salix has previously been
cited as part of the post—Mendelian work criticizing Wichura's
earlier (1865) conclusions regarding F2 generations in the genus.
Eleven years later Hgkansson (1929) reported an extensive cyto-
logical study of the F1 and F2 generations of the principle
cross which Nilsson reported: Salix yiminalis L. x §, caprea L.
T
See also Yampolsky (1922), s1not6 (1929), and Smith (1940).
-71-
Hakansson found both parents to be normal diploids with 19
pair of chromosomes. This verifies the work of Harrison (1922),
Blackburn & Harrison (1922, 1924), and Meurman (1925). Harrison,
however, noted that while §. caprea L. is in the main a diploid
form, a tetraploid race indistinguishable in the field from the
commoner diploid type was found.
Meiosis in the F1 hybrids studied by Hakansson was found to
be regular, except that at metaphase II irregularities sometimes
occurred which resulted in formation of diploid pollen grains.
Most of the F2 individuals had the diploid number of chromo-
somes and showed more or less regular meiosis. There were, how-
ever, two polyploids. One of these, a male shrub with giant
leaves was triploid (5n = 57). The other was hypertetraploid
(4n 8 82 - a4). *
In the triploid at metaphase I, 17 to 19 trivalents were.
observed. When less than 19 trivalents were observed, the others
were each represented by a bivalent and univalent. Some pollen
grains with the unreduced number were found. The pollen was
rather good, about 40% being normal in appearance, though their
size varied. Hgkansson suggested that the plant arose from the.
fusion of an haploid F1 egg cell and a diploid F1 sperm, the
latter being the result of a chromosome doubling in division II
as previously observed.
In the hypertetraploid at metaphase I of the embryosac
mother cell there were observed some univalents (6 - 8) and about
58 bivalents. Quadrivalents, and more often trivalents, were
sometimes present. Anaphase I was extremely irregular and the
plant was completely sterile. This plant was believed by Nilsson
..."70-
(1918, 1955) and Hgkansson (1929) to represent a synthesized
.§° laurina (?). Rehder (1940) indicated the parentage of §.
laurina Sm. as: §, caprea L. x'§. phylicifolia L.
Nilsson (1951) reported later duplication of his original
cross.§. viminalis x §, caprea L. and in the F2 found what he
described as an undoubtedԤ. cinerea L. plant. This Species is
reported a tetraploid (4n ' 76) by Harrison (1926). The
cinerea-like plant's chromosome complement was not definitely
ascertained by Nilsson, but it is said to be at least triploid
and in all probability tetraploid (amphidiploid). It crosses
readily with é. cinerea and is completely sterile with both its
diploid parents. It is regarded as an experimental synthesis
of.§. cinerea L. by Nilsson.
Hakansson (1955) reported cytological analysis of several
other species and hybrids between them, including: '§. nigricans (?),
(§. myrsinifolia Salisb.), §, phylicifolia L., E, viminalis L.
and §, caprea L.
A considerable amount of cytological investigation in this
genus has been carried on by the English worker Wilkinson (1954,
1941). His 1954 work is a preliminary account of the cytological
method of distinguishing Salix alba var coerulea Koch (§. alba
var. 23133 G. F. W. Mey.), the cricket bat willow, from closely
related Species, varieties, and hybrids. The work was based on
studies of root tips.
It was found that all §, 212E L. varieties and the hybrids
involvinglfi. fragilis L. showed a somatic complement of 76
chromosomes (i.e., tetraploid) and that it was therefore im-
possible to segregate the cricket bat willow on the basis of
;75-
chromosome number alone. Evidence, however, derived from the
examination of a large number of somatic metaphase plates of
the £123 varieties suggested that their differences might to
some extent be correlated with the number of satellited chromo-
somes.
The cricket bat willow showed only two chromosomes wifii
satellites, while the other 2122 complements examined showed
at least four. Wilkinson further suggested that there are
some indications that the nature of the cytOplasmic background
might be helpful in verifying the results arrived at on the
grounds of morphology alone. He found in this group, due to
the presence of tannin and like substances, the protoplasmic
background, with any combination of fixing and staining, is
troublesome. Langlet's modification of Navashin's fixative
gave best results. Heidenhain's iron-alum-haematoxylin was
used for staining. Drastic variations in mordanting and stain—
ing periods were needed to avoid over-staining of the background.
Further work on the cytology of the cricket bat willow,
which further verified his original work, was reported by
Wilkinson (1941). Individuals of the cricket bat willow from
a wide geographical range were studied. The satellited chromo-
some hypothesis was supported in all cases but Pratt's (1954)
suggestion that strains of this willow exist was correlated with
the existence of types with abnormal somatic chromosome comple-
ments. Wilkinson concluded that the cricket bat willow was a
variety and not a hybrid as described by some authors (see foot-
note p.62).
"74.;-
LITERATURE CITED
(Salix)
Barnes, H. F. (1951) Further results of an investigation
into the resistance of basket willows to button gall for-
mation. Bull. Applied Biol. 18: 75-82.
Blackburn, K. B. and J. W. H. Harrison. (1922) The meiotic
phase in the Salicaceae. Rept. Brit. Ass. for the Adv.
Sci. (Cited from Gaiser, 1950.)
-------------------- (1924) A preliminary account of the
chromosomes and chromosome behavior in the Salicaceae.
Ann. Bot. 58: 561-578.
Bogdanov, P. L. (1955) Methods of preserving pollen of
forest trees in connection with breeding. (Russian) Sovet-
skaja Botanika No. 1: 98-107. (Plant Breed. Kbstr. 6:
entry no. 651. 1956.)
Brown, H. P. and A. J. Panshin (1940) Commercial timbers of
the United States. lst Ed.; XXI + 554 pp., 512 figs.
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and London.
Burkill, I. H. (1898) Changes in the sex of willows. Ann.
Bot. (London) 12: (557)-558.
Chamberlain, C. J. (1897) Contribution to the life history
of Salix. Bot. Gaz. 25: 147-179.
Darrah, W. C. (1959) Textbook of paleobotany. XII + 441 pp.,
180 figs., D. Appleton-Century Co., Inc., New York & London.
East, E. M. (1940) The distribution of self-sterility in the
flowering plants. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 82: 449-518.
Engler, A. and Gilg, E. (1924) Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien.
Neunte and Z ehnte Auflage.
Gaiser, L. O. (1926) A list of chromosome numbers in Angio-
sperms. Genetica 8: 401-484.
.................... (1950-a) A list of chromosome numbers in
Angiosperms. Genetica 12: 161-260.
--.................. (1950-b) A list of chromosome numbers in
Angiosperms. Bibliogr. Genet. 6: 171-466.
Glatfelter, N. M. (1894) A study of the relations of Salix
nigra and Salix amygdaloides tOgether with the hybrids arising
from them as these Species exhibit themselves in the vicinity
of St. Louis. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, Trans. 6: 427-451, illus.
-------------------- (1895) Relations of Salix missouriensis,
Bebb, to S. cordata, muhl. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, Trans. 7:
157-150.
-------------------- (1896) Salix cordata x sericea. Bot.
Gaz. 22: 592-400.
Hagerup, 0. (1927) Empetrum hermaphroditum. A new tetra-
oploid, bisexual species. Dansk. Bot. Arkiv. 5: 1-17.
Hakansson, A.. (1929) Die Chromosomen in der Kreuzung Salix
viminalis x caprea von Heribert Nilsson. Hereditas 15: 1-52.
-------------------- (1955) Die Konjugation der Chromosomen bei
einigen Salix-Bastarden. Hereditas 18: 199-214.
Harlow, W. M. and E. S. Harrar (1941) Textbook of dendrology.
2nd Ed. XV + 542 pp., 254 figs. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.,
New York & London.
-75-
Harrison, J. W. H. (1922) Interspecific sterility. Nature
110: 512. (Cited from Gaiser, 1950.)
.................... (1924) Sex in the Salicaceae and its
modification by eriOphyid mites and other influences. Brit.
Jour. Expt. Biol. 1: 445-472, illus.
................... (1926) Heterochromosomes and polyploidy.
Nature 117: 50. (Cited from Maude, 1959; Lindsay, 1950).
Henry, A. (1914) The artificial production of vigorous trees.
Jour. Dept. Agric. and Tech. Inst. Ireland 15: 2-20.
Holman, R. M. and W. W. Robbins (1954) A textbook of general
botany. 5rd Ed., XV-+ 626 pp., 465 figs. John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York.
Ikeno, S. (1916) Notes sur les resultats de l'hybridation
artificialle de quelques especes du genre Salix. Bot. Mag.
(Tokyo) 50: 516-520.
-------------------- (1918) On hybridization of some Species
of Salix. I. Jour. Genetics 8: 55-58. (Bot. Abstr. 2:
entry $680. 19 )
-------------------- (1922) On hybridization of some species
of Salix. II. Ann. Bot. (London) 56: (175)-191.
Johnson, L. P. V. (1959) A descriptive list of natural and
artificial interspecific hybrids in North American forest-
tree genera. Canad. Jour. Res. 17: 411-444.
Lindsay, R. H. (1950) The chromosomes of some dioecious
angiosperms. A mer. Journ. Bot. 17: 152-174.
Lotsy, J. P. (1920) Heribert Nilsson's Onderzoikingen over
Soortsvorming Bij Salix met 0pmerkingen Mijnerzijds omtrent
de Daarin en in Publicaties van anderen Uitgeoefende Kritiek
aan mijn Soorts-definitie. Genetica (The Hague) 2: (162)-
188. (In Dutch. English review pp. 187-188.)
Maude, P. F. (1959) The Merton catalogue. A list of the
chromosome numerals of Species of British flowering plants.
New Phytol. 58: 1-51.
Meurman, O. (1925) On the chromosome behavior of some dioe-
cious plants and their relatives with special reference to
sex chromosomes. Soc. Sci. Fennica, Comm. Biol. 2: No. 5.
(Cited from Gaiser, 1926.)
Nakajima, G. (1957) Cytological studies in some dioecious
plants. Cytologia (Tokyo): Fujii Jubilee Vol: 282-292.
Nilsson, N. Heribert (1918) EXperimentelle Studien fiber
Variabilitfit, Spaltung, Artbildung und Evolution in der Gat-
tung Salix. (Experimental studies in variability, Splitting,
Species formation, and evolution in the genus Salix.) Lunds.
Univ. Arsskr. 14: 145 p. (Bot. Abstr. 12: 670. 1925. See
also abstract in Genetica 1: 555-557. 1919. Reviewed by
Nordstedt, C. T. 0., Bot. Notiser 1919: 59-40. 1919.)
-------------------- (1951) Uber das Entstehen eines ganz
Cinerea-ahnlichen Typus aus dem Bastard Salix viminalis x
caprea. Hereditas 15 (5): 509-519.
-------------------- (1955) Die Analyse der synthetisch
hergestellten Salix laurina. Hereditas 20: 559-55. (Plant
Breed. Abstr. Vol. 5: entry #1055.)
Nohara, S. (1924) Experimental studies on pollen of some
Salix. Japan. Jour. Bot. 2: 1-55, illus.
Pratt, E. R. (1954) Factors affecting the prepagation and growth
of Selig coerulea (cricket bat willow). Quart. Journ. Forest-
. ry 28: 12-20.
Rehder, A. (1940) Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs.
2nd Ed., XXX 4 996 pp. MacMillan Co., New York.
Roberts, H. F. (1929) Plant hybridization before Mendel.
XIV e 574 pp., 48 figs. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Schaffner, J. H. (1919) The nature of the dioecious condition
in Morus alba and Salix amygdaloides. Ohio Jour. Sci. 19:
409—416.
-------------------- (1955) Observations and experiments on sex
in plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Cl. 62: 587-401.
Schmidt, H. (1957) Zucht und Anbau von Korbweiden. (Breeding
and cultivation of basket willows.) Reichsnfihrstand Verlags-
Ges. m.)b. H. Berlin. RM. 1.20, pp. 50. (Plant Breed. Abstr.
8: 202.
Schreiner, E. J. (1957) Improvement of forest trees. U. S. D.
A. Yearbook 1957: 1241-79. 14 figs.
Shimek, B. (1895) Perfect flowers of Salix amygdaloides.
Pro . Ia. Acad. Sci. 5: 89-90.
Sinot , Y. (1928) On the chromosome number and the unequal pair
of chromosomes in some dioecious plants. Proc. Imp. Acad.
Japan 4: 175-177. (Cited from Gaiser, 1950.)
-------------------- (1929)* Chromosome studies in some
dioecious plants, with Special reference to the allosomes.
Cytologia 1. (Cited from Nakajima, 1957.)
Sirks, M. J. (1915) Waren die Salix-Hybriden Wichuras konstant?
Zeitschrift Induktive Abstammungs u. Vererbungslehre 15: 164-
166. (Cited from Ikeno, 1916.)
Smith, E. C. and C. Nichols, Jr. (1941) Species hybrids in
forest trees. Journ. of the Arn. Arb. 22: 445-454.
Tischler, G. (1927) Pflanzliche Chromosomes-Zahlen. Tabulae
Biologicae 4: 1-85.
Toumey, J. W. (1916) Seeding and planting in the practice of
forestry. xxxvi + 455 pp., 140 figs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York.
Wettstein-Westersheim, W. von‘ (1929) Zur Technik der kfinstlichen
Kreuzung bei Weiden (Salix). Zfichter 1: 125-126, illus.
-------------------- (1951) Zur Verbesserung der Schalweide
Salix americana Hort. Der Zfichter 5: 569-570. (Plant Breed.
Abstr. 2: 140. 1952.)
Wichura, M. E. (1865) Die Bastard befruchtung im Pflanzenreich
erlfiutert an den Bastarden der Weiden. Breslau. (Cited from
Roberts, 1929.)
Wilkinson, J. (1954)- A preliminary report on a cytological
method of distinguishing Salix alba var. coerulea from closely
related species, varieties, and hybrids. Forestry 8: 64-66.
-------------------- (1941) The cytology of the Cricket Bat
Willow. Ann. Bot. (N.S.) 5: 149-167.
Yanchevsky, K. (1904) On the peculiarities of the germination
of the seeds of aSpen and of some species of willow. (Russian)
Proc. Imperial Forest. Inst. 11: 269-274. (Cited from Smith
& Nichols, 1941.)
-77-
vy, J. B. (1955) hale trees of Salix alba var. coerulea.
FOLCStI‘J (3: (IS-EV.
Fournier, P. (1922) Un Novel Hybrids do Sol ix (S9lix neQata
P. Pournier, S. fra"ilis x cinerea P. r01r4191) Bull.
Soc. Botanioue 1‘ru1aoe c9: WS-olc. I I
--- ------ --- (1925) Le characiere tire de la Eragilite dos
Ramoaux dans la genie Salix. r‘euille Eat. (n. s.) 47: 74-
75.
OGiessler, A. (1927) Gesohlechtswe hsel bei Salix. Witt.
out. Wendrol. Gesoll. 58: 57-59.
x}
9 1
GBr" R ( 92o) Salix copusiensisOlosz cz'M und lore Eltern,
b
.
S. Litalbeliaha ‘..illd. und S. (31311110119. L. leagyar Bot.
LapOk 25: 95-201. _ ‘—
-------- (1928) Salix silosis ca "illd. und ihre dyer
Hepertorium Spec. hovardm R gr11 V05. Beiheft 52:149pp.
Eakajima, G. (1955) ChPOWOSOIEC nimbers in some an3iosperms.
Jap. Jour. Genet. 9.
Eilsson, E. Heribert (1908) Vinteerknopparna hos slHktet Salix
och deras betrdel:o iBr artbes taruningen. Pot. Notiser, p.
197.
---------------——--- (1928) .911x laurina. Die Entwicklung
und die LBsung einer mehr als :1undert .Hhrien Phlegonet-
ischen Streitfrage. Lunés Univ. Arsskr. (n. f. ) avd. 2, Ed.
24, E0. 6: 99pp.
-- ----- - -------- ---- (1950) Salix cinereax Utbredning och
Ekologiska Detingels er 1 Sydestra SVcrle. Botaniska Eot-
iser 1950:129-145
------- ------------- (19C50) Dis trinution and 900103y of S.
cinere in sodt1ern SNe den. Bot. Eotiser 1950 : 129-145.
Nohara, S geroku (1915) On the germination of pollen of
some DdllXo (in Japanese) Pot. La ". Tokyo 27: 185-195.
Eainio, A. J. (1927) Uber die intersexnlitit bei der Gattung
Salix. Suomalaisen Elainja Kasvit. Seuran Vanamon Julk-
alsiya Ann. Soc. 2001. Hot. Fenn Vanamo 5: 155-275.
Smith, E. C. (1940) Sex SXpression in willows. Bot. Gaz.
101: 851-861.
sprott, W. A. P. (1953) New light on Pentandra hybrid wil-
low. Jour. of 15 ot. 74: 250-55.
Stein, E. (1924) Lu? Genetik und Phylogenetik der Gattung
5_‘alix. Leitschrift Induktive Abstsmmungs u. Verbungslehre
5/. O49_OR
qr
'thm
'(
CC) 0
Sugiura, T. (1:53) A list of chromosome numbers in angio-
Spermous plants. 11. Pros. Imp. Acad. Japan 12: 144- 46.
- ------ ~--- (1958) A list of chro~osome numbers in 93:10-
Spermous plants. V, Proc. Imp. Acad. Jgpqn 14 (10); 591_
592.
---------- - (1940) A list of olromosone nlmirs in 21io-
spermous plants. Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan 16:15-1g
Sukaohev, V. 1;. (1959) Selection Glipel 17116911119 ith Willow.
(Russian) snoe Ehoziaistvo 5: 24-54.
Vamazaki, R. (191') Chromosome numbers in some angiosperms.
J‘J‘i‘. JOUJ’. \ICI’lCTt. 12 (5:5): 101-1037.
Yampolsky, Cecil 4 Helene (1922 ) Distributions of sex formsv
in the biomeHO‘iii flora. Pibliotheca Senotica 5: 1-52.
3779115311714"; C KAI-3 Lind 1 e ;r
Kalnut bamily
The walnut fawily includes about 40 saecies in 6 generr
distributed thruout the temperate regions of the northern
hemisphere and also, limitedly, in certain tropical montane
regions of botl hemispheres.
Of the 6 genera (Jua‘laus l1. (talrut); Carva lfuttall
...,
(hickory); Platjcarya Siebold and zuccakini; Pterocarga Kunth;
Engelbar tia, and Alfaroa) only the first two are native in
Eortb America and it is upon the valuable and useful timbers
and nuts of these two genera that the importance of the walnut,
family depends (Rehder, l94o; Pearson & Brown, 1952).
JU9LAES L. (walnut)
The walnut genus includes aoout 15 species of trees1
found in the forests of North and South America, the West In-
dies, southeastern EurOpe, and southern and eastern Asia. Of
t-i
. cincr (Dthese, 6 species (J. niara L., a
_+ I’M
., J. hindsii (Jep-
son) Jeoson J. californica S. Ratson J. runestris En elmann1 :_ :_ 1 L2 )
and J. major (Torrey) Heller) are native of the United States
but only J. rivra (black wa‘nut) and J. cinerea (butternut)———-M———_ —————-—-———
are important as producers of lumber.
Most important of the exotic members of the genus is the
cosmOpolite Juglans rewia L. (En lish or Persian Walnut) whichL4
Ho
8 the source of the French, furnish, Italian, Circassian ano
Indian walnut timbers.
l Rarely shrubby.
J
ialnut, esyecially black and English, is the lea i
C5"!
P
‘
wooi from hfliCfl gunstocks are made. The timbers are also
2).)
prized as fine cabinet an furniture woods.
The nuts from the various species of ualgns are
rich in oil and nutritious. Cf special importance are
the English walnuts of g. reria, black Walnuts from g.
nisra and butternuts from g. cinerea. It has been the
direction of man's interest to the edible part of the tree
Which has resulted in the considerable breeding work car-
ried on in the genus. (Harlow & Harrar, 1941; Brown &
Panshin, 19403.
ARIIPICTAP BafiaflTitn PRCH nILn 8T03K
With the possible exception of twe genus Carya, no
other strictly forest tree genus native of the United
States has been as carefully combed for superior wild forms
or varieties as the genus Juglans. The stimulus for this
selection effort has not, however, arisen from a desire to
isolate superior forms for forestry purposes but rather to
locate better nut producers for the more immediately prof-
itable nut growing industry.
For the most part, selection has been confined to J;
nipra and j. gingrga--fortunately the best nut and timber
producers native of the United States.
Early interest in the selection effort is traceable
to the "nut contests" sponsored for many years by the
Northern Nut Growers' Association% aided at times by the
1
*Established 1910.
,.
“5.".\De
--. 'u/
A
v
e
. “‘
‘v o"./
.,.,u
+‘.~
,-
(i)
ori3] ~23 ya:
VA ¥‘ .5 .
‘-
-J
‘J
y- r) ,1 + .f) ‘_/'
a‘
r— ‘
hdvv'
("Ir v
'7‘}
of
u)
L“:
r\.4
,—‘
I“ \a‘ La ’
.‘ 4.
- .. w L,
. 9:“ 1‘.. "A‘ ‘J
VPI
StfiYfivx,,
‘..
ilv
q
-
"J
l
DifiC'l-fi‘b
-/v
f'("'
«'i
')Z,“
+3
0.
i
as"P
vb
A .1»"'\ Hr_
J.
l3an
|
-.
J A--
’5") "‘0‘ ' "“"'
L‘>-./ dv’l; :-
YY4",L)
0'1
finvv‘ .at J_- k’
‘ A
\K L...
‘-"\
U
2L)
"tC)r1 1'.’?
4
3
C
u‘ .L
...-— u' u--
. N” (D""
kLL,"IJ..
k“;
C1'".
3
'7O
..b
F. 4-
».J u
v-x
[L (7
Up.a
1"
e _»
..' a;
f; 1.,» f? \" ,‘\ I‘r‘
L
i
J- A,“r...
f
.
UM-‘:1
(...
.4_,
O
.o
IVS.
(“TL
nn‘i
I' ”'1
j- _
A
(Ln.
if:#‘J
4" o,. a
("1‘1
.2. -L
.fi’nya‘~
I”-lL-
99,2}
.L «I
”‘31‘11‘
r‘ [W
1.4 J
0" aA.“
V a-
V4»:
r~‘-"—’~
A‘ ‘I‘_
.A.-4-
. -1 d
—\W. S
I
,1 .
<\
C‘I9.;
f.‘L.
C
‘.
fl
l
O
'Y‘.
J.
WC
-.bJ
V
4— 1
b.L~
1"
f‘
4 L3
‘ _
4
q
\f‘.‘
. Q
.,1
Av
0*y I
.7
I.
y‘yJ
m A
.
C.‘ ‘u.
..U
3C”._,,~
I
11‘
i
an _
O-
7"
--
o“
L
La
T7->-‘
(\
-L..
4.
x.
{3
‘1'-L
.1
C“?
L) L}.
q-—l
\A
...
4.
b’
7 Z"
9n,"
{1.4 I F.’
A" V?- W
v ‘ ‘
“A ’4'.
VL'I U
‘ J—
. 'U—]
P-
111 ‘
1' p .
‘. ~ 1 l
o. d ’n
gt? .-C
o-.
.
I
xv-
l
.{>—
I,,
'7'
:"v
"u
rt
(”
m9
'-
5:1
\49—.-.
C"
i L.)
J-
1..
an I ‘ 4-
L1 ‘
,—l
\
J—
{,3
J
I
1~
\
7."
1“
J-'
u
s ..—.1 n
"J
. r‘ 4bDLu
.
AI
O1
_.
.3J
. A]
.
x
,
,~ 1..
J
..
\.
21
c -‘I 1
‘r f) n
17.
. .I
e L
mp(‘d
L i
‘ l
‘
J‘- r
I'v K4
:r
.fii‘ r:\a‘l
""
L
L;
i _
"I .3
‘. J.
a, r
‘ -L
_0
A
I
In.
4 3
C
I
‘7‘”-
'
_‘
.A
i;
O
L
+
U
.1
L
1"!
\
...:
O
«I
I
L
+
U
;~. 2
—‘r,—_)“p"'
J‘.
rt
,_,.
H(1'
'fi
(:2
()1
C)
C‘?‘
+L
—
'20-}wk..—
l TI.)
.. “J
"V‘ x,1
i. 7‘1 L. L4
K,’V
n,” ,—
W
1"-
L
IN
IAJ
\"
I'
TI1~1 (N
L.
. ‘
x .
T.,i
U‘4
f)
..V
.b
Li
'v’
k.
1"
\‘
V
V.
,.
‘4
I‘
(J
(.
\')
"
f-\
r_‘
r,
>rI
v'
I
j
.(+4
0‘
L“,
I.
.
I»)
.-
(;
rr
’x)
r'
1“
«J
.I
.‘
I
I.\
O.
-l
f‘‘
(1
1
,I
n4'
Iw?
('
(ii
I.
o1
.l
‘
I
I
,
fly
I‘
II
«3
v..
'Iw
('
"
r,
g
r
A a
\
vvq
LL‘
—- fl
\— v '
7
7N7?
./
1\
"u/
I 1" 1r" " "
V?
v,wL
_v- vcv*o+5A.“... -
L‘v‘. .,
.Pb
,A. k.-
i.
r’
.4f
o
()
I'
I4
.‘1
L'1
.r'\
.4
I‘
x
..I
r
0.1
’ N
OI‘
r“
r_
(3
\’
«i
‘.
~A
4 1-
/
"k
.\1
I
I
I
“
A
.
~
A
I
II
I
I
,
.
v
I
I
.
x
.
r.r
(L
I
r
.
\J
-
III
.
A.
‘
‘u
n.
4
aI
1
TI
b
I
I
,
.ll.
r.
f
o
u
I./
.-.
I.
I
a..1
_
I
.Ii./
A
.Ir-
O
\a
f
7
I4
D
‘_
a
i
i
x
.
.I
o
4.
I
(V
I
r
.
.w
\.l
I
4
I
I
?
I
.
I.
I
I
r.
i
I
i
I.
I
I
I
o
I
.
v
f
4
\d
.
I
\
..
.1.-7'1
‘1
.r
H)
fropagat.!
.1 ”1’1 01
fl.3. a _,_‘
In “;~ . Luts C.Y
‘T
veget at 1V8V"‘
L;.
.3”.
L. LiC
I.)‘-
aocears to
H101sture VJ L“ S
93
y1.
Ci
I-“
g)
m
7 SD
C*‘
}__Jo
(1"
O SA.
U D _._31y
4V
Iec>I’C‘—~U. otO')
L
g.‘
$.14
it may be arti I
r) 3‘
l
.hcially-\
I
~
1’
-‘
f: SEI’VBO.
good few) ni t }_h
I)
l-.J
}_
_I
(T)
I"
l
p. O CO
c+ °+
lcS viabilit V
”’3 90/81"0
w
C,'8
jerminwv .‘l r
‘1 h‘.rioUS varie4-
biz“Vi
H
F}.
$51.]
5
oroiucticnJ-
1 . ‘ ’ y ‘
V - L, A - ‘4
VIC)
Bersian xValZNJt an -L I cani
,roiu'"o
-1 Lil’Lu. .IOU d (k
a'64)
.1_/ \in 2,1 -—.4 \J
r
T";Y
~
1'1 41" 0 L1 S 01’"
usel for L
"=17
-JUbridiz-
'C
.1
i";
,-0
U)
H.
W I—IJ
PJ-
0 C FJ
Ct
A
(D
(D
D H m UV
.- \ ~w V I ‘ ~ ' 'I' I . .1.. 1 —.
t;e genus. even tnis metaea
s 111 tile('13
Any reference to attempts to oropaeate speci
‘ V “' ' "‘ "1 ‘ “ 4' 7' r“; , ”‘ I‘ " -—‘ ,,' 't*1: 1" I"; V‘ '3 ' .
enus b~r root ~r sues cuttiz 3, treated u n auxin or un-
(V)
treated, have not sire to the aitaor's attention. This neg-
ative evidence thus supgorts tee general coneeution that
past root’ng methods at Least have been unsuc'es ful.
Investigation of rototing possibilities
cuttings (f the malnuts wouli a;pear to Le a most valuable
at 11']F}!
line of investieati n. For forestry purposes the Lul
(n
or grafting techniaues are, of course, orozibitively expen-
sive. Jith a rerfected method of insuring hih rooting per-
centage of cuttings many valuable Walnuts now in existence
could be immedia tely utf.lized for forestry pur;08's. I
particularly promising forestry breejing possibilities in
the genus til , for the present, probably be neglected in
favor of those cehera thich may be cheaply propagated asex-
uallg. It is to be hope; ciat more long-raige government-
financed forest tree breeding
tainéd at the Institute of porest genetics, may be fouajed
for work on such genera. The breeding and selection required
for pure line develrpment DI superior stock so that reproduct-
ion by seed is fossiole is avowedly a long-time project but
is certainly Worthy ot practical consideration.
A possible short-cut method for the synt-iesis of true
breeding forms capable of consistent reproduction by seedage
in this genus apoe 1rs gnwmnbsmyt‘uith perfection 3f the col-
chicine technique. The creation of auto- and aliopolyploid
forms may ”Ti ld totally dif ere nt aii superior varieties of
[.43
Q
i
(T
I
CW
r O *‘4
O
,- - .LL,
.5. ..L one
U
l‘J
(“I
n W IT
(T)
f“
y- . ' ‘1 P‘ i - .~. 1:) l m ‘1 1 e h .3 I \ - ,7 h l .‘N I r .1, .- ‘. v ‘. 4»
t - J.- - l M L 1:) V .A. '— L-i {.x w Cd L) .. 1;; VJ .. » .a L.) L- ..z
N” a H, a , -‘..‘JbruiQSOLWITfUKCSr
"r“- .- -.. , .9 .-. ,4. V- ,1. , .1. , .. ,.M.'-4. .1. ' '1, ....-. - ,, -' 2'1 ' 3 ..j
lfl‘ calllufie CIIUWUBUME CUJUU 13 du.laub lo ”nut YLCOIQ-
ed bv aaococr (1:15). This worker reportei tne unreduced num-
ber of J. californica S. “atson and J. c. cuercina babcoca to
be 34 which would imcly a haploid number of 17 chromosomes.
A study by aoodworth (1930), however, of meiosis in 5
_ ' .., . 'r 1-, ' — ‘ ,1 , H
. TJQCSlTla -Cictu., o. n_ r“ 1., J. Cinerea L., J. t~.1°hur:ca
Laxim., J. sieooliiara var. cor iformis (iaxim.) Lahino, 31d
J. not a Feni. (— J. sieboldiana X reeia)) revealed a reduced
number of 16 chromosomes. meteroaloidi has not been reported
(T)
('9'
('1)
r+
H 53.3
rL-‘
H O H.
U)
m W a >I
CJ
("I
C H F].
O m L.
U
k:for Jualans although tin
noodtorth (193?) in Sarva.
Cytological stuiieg
goodworth (1330) reported meiosis normal and regular in
1 hybrid listed above. goragoloyigalry ug—LHE 806016‘ 833
(D
,1}-
L4-
D D CI
R:
b I"
C‘L
m fi'
1...:
117
p U)
(“I
SO
r—l
i C *fi
iform microspores were arojuc
these soecies.
.0 - 1.. .,_',I ~,:.,:., -7».- ,.— . . ..., .2
J. notna 0; thumb nvsiii Ulafljfl ‘nouei arEut abnoraality
u
v
in KiCYOSQOTOE€?€‘J‘- Althougj pairing at diaainesis appeared
normal, metaphase I shoted great confusion. baby bivalents
separate; and passedAtneir poles without Iirst moving to the
1
mid-1e region of the spindle. retauhase I Was t US, in efiect,
”W
eliminated. Division II was also marked by irre:ularity.
IWTve_TfiE PI”TD
(AT _~lons)
Au_stin, L. (1933) Science sceas new trees for the foncsts
of the future. 24pp., illis. rltcerville, Calif.
Rabcock, E. P. (1910) 'Malnut-01k hybrid experiment.. Amer.
Freeders n39. l (5): QCTO-B 2.
------------- (1915) Jlflles in Juglans I. Stacy of a
new form of Ju9lnns califor ica Tatson. Calif. Univ.
Pubs. Agri. bci. 2: l~«£.nl915.
------- ----- - (1151 4) {Studies in 31191-9113 II . Furt‘r;or ob—
SGI‘VEthl’lS on 8. T1611 V:-11’ 1.31;"; of T11.T_:.ns (3: Tji form? C 1,3931901’].
and on certain supposed uwalnut ork "merits. 38111. UDlV-
Pubs. flgr. Sci. 2: 47-70.
---------—--- (1915-2) A new walnut mutant somewhat sim-
ilar to live oak apIPr 9 in California In four different
localities. Jour. credity 6: 4L-450
-—-—--------- (l9l5-b) Uslnut mutant investi99tions. Eatl.
Acad. Sci. Proc. 1: 535-537. .
-——-------—-- (1916) indics i Juglens I. (1) Further. II
evidence tht tie o'Lll‘e waln t oriaf‘ates by putation;
ii
(2) a f>erollel emu!tion in Ju9lsis bin 3 (Jepson) Sarg.
Calif. Univ. Pubs. A9r. Sci. P: Vl-QU.
Brown, it. P. & Pans?d11,fb.l. (1940) (Run Ierc101.iorr'ers of
the United States. 1st ed., X3I+-554 pp., 512 figs. RcGraw-
Hill Poo‘c COUppr, Inc., hew Yonh and 10ndo
Crane, H. L. (1937) Nut Breeding. U.S.D.A. Yearbook of
Agricilture, pp. E~V-L‘90.
est, E. b. (1940) The distribution of self-sterility in
the flowering Plants. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 52: 449-518.
Harlow, T. M. and Horror, E. F. (1941) ”TexWibook of dendrol-
05y. 9nd Ed...V+ 5”? pp., 534 1193. icGraw-Uill Pook Co.,
Inc., Lew Yerk & Londor.
Johnson, L. P. V. (1959) A Gas
artificial interspecific byh
m (o
riitive list of rttaral and
c in Northimerican forest
tree genera. Cancd. Jour. Re . l7: 4ll-~:44.
llotzsch, J. F. (l554 ) Ueber due Rutzantcndung der Pfanzen-
Bastards und his cilinge. Fer. Verload . K. Preuss. A{Qd.
Wise. Fcnlin lQSA; .“S-So
Pearson, R. S. 9 Brown, M. P. (1952) Commercial timbers of
India. ”alcu,t9 Government of India Central Publication
Franc“.
Reed, C. A. (1926) Nut-tree ocooa9ation. U.S.D.A. warmers'
Rul. Ho. 1501, Lash. T. 9..L/ J’
Rehder, A. (1940) hanual of cultivated tr es and shrubs.. _ f '-' u ». v C W ,9 . ... y
2nd Ed., 9~o pm. FQCullifin Co. low Yorl.
rees of torth “Movie§
(’1
CCD
—f-
b
L-
o
q
-4b"
o A
H
.(‘J
N)
v
5‘
..2
3 }.J
O ”'3
Ct
'0
Schus er 3. h. (19'?i) Lifferenccs in heterosis of walnut
" o r)].b {317.
010 C. (1941) boocies hybrid
" IQ -- , A -
SWitt. C. L. & OM8P3, L. Q. (1)0) b“"tlor stuCies on
pariods of recoutilityeand pollen vicbilit y in tbe pLC'L.
Proc. 17th finn. loot. fox. Pecan W1 £83.: 77—95.
(“x
'T‘Wgu'), F. p. 7k “OWT'WT!” 1,. 7:. ( Aft?) I; JET CWT" Clip 01 lTT‘Ul 113’;
rollinwiiov in tbe 1ecwr J. £9"ic. ?1s. ’". 9‘7-9;.
Toad . T. (1“‘TT NTJD’wi“. «0111H01ion es s Fee's of in«
-‘r:sin| neon tion i~ CO"”€H019T vvrrien 1'lnnt o'chfirds.
”0c. “'gfl. foo Port. Sci. 99: 104-66.
-----*-"'—- (1935} POTllMHtTOK ~10 Llooni= }”Lits of t“e
“cesiwn malnut is 3‘1f9r11i9. Cock. full. U. 3. Left. A9~.
To. TNT: ff. 53.
‘”cllfi-:9‘mn* E". (11531) ureevi1n_;stl111ts. P1T13. 919'. VIN; 3”.
Ass. 99; 15—21.
Toedro;t3, T. H. (17"9) Iciosic of mi910990309enesis in tUe
Ji‘ltr‘_-cf c. 1¥;r. Jon”. 9st. 17: 563-569.
‘f.bIo;OV, R. L. (3’76) Inte?—s;eciws Tyoridixet1or of walnuts.
Soviet 51 tr19ics KO. 5 (71): F5~99. (Cited fnhw Jobnson,
lotio.)
LIL“ LUJ”TT T133 GILL“)
(.N"l:rs)Mb-..-—
Anonymous (19lo) Lutet1ors in walnuts. Jonr. credit; 7:
1:517U. .
--~---—-- (1995) ”HlflUt-U‘i9‘ . Introdwction of iwm1ne ver—
ietj b‘ tie department. “CH 4691. Jonr. A93. 97: 25.
3.1731313) LlO"LT (1:127) [31. UCW’ erltET‘nPi Se in joce St tree breed—
in;. JCTIF. Eanssfrj'295: 92L»5-;Lm;.
--—--———--——- (1928) Vtecding pines for mone repii growth.
Jcn1r. “’ciwfitii'y it? ('7): Rani—3K1}.
-—--——---~-—- (1998‘ Bx1e”1tents it the Eddy tree breeding
stcticr. Ti‘Mergwr 99 (7): /9 34
—--—————~--—- (1999) Ike Eddy 'ree Prcgdin, Station. 19d-
rono 1 (l5): 05-.7".
--—-~—-~——-—- (1932) Pine CNO vzlnnt wrecri1* for timber
p?oJUo9502. PWOD. 6th Intesztl. COD . Genetics, Itfz;9,
1952, 2: 2-9.
---———-—-——-- (1977) TFO institute o? forest 9cnetich. finer
IForests, September, 1957, pp. 5.
~—--————---—- (1958) Forest ‘ oeti1.. .u1loson1D Report
1938: 435-49.
Peacocw, E. 9. ( 910) LT:tOLO09y in Jn9lnns cslifornics ”et-
son. Plart World 13: z.~31.
Vstctclor, L. D. ( 915) Tsriniio: 9rd Ili9tt resistincc
8111011.", :.'.'="1:',_,111'.9. Cilii‘. 13,".th 301.121.. Fort. "011t3113’ 711.11. 4'
4“b-450.
-—-——--—--—-—-—- (1916) B“ohlens in walnut orceding...usl—
nut blight and var19b111tr of the present Iroves. Jour.
1931edii“v 7: Gi-LIE.
Efisse , P. (1914) The James river 1191:1111.Priormlly crcss
igetwween TfllttCIThlt T‘UT 5‘291191‘1J.ljn1t. Jour. EiergM-t7 .g
01(1
Biibv 1. a. (1919)
Amer. Nut J01c.71W
.3; .’
jEurbank, thEcn. (19 o) Tzc tixdni
Trail}: royal 3.1""! {7 , a 1- ' TJZTJV‘TTC 1“
profit...8 $9., 111v.. iant. H
' e, 11t't<3:11111t
VU-Hr C
3
HBO"
'7
La
1190 {‘01) I
11f“,1
"TJ
‘ 7
IT 5: V. 1
1nut.
.1..
is r;; the
.L.‘ t. . __, ,. -
Lntbca1t; 9nd
P11! .1"...
P1J1Tw1nli, ILJtEuJF (lQlr ) f1<: LW1Il1erfl: *«119ZL 1 lYPlt I3icn1€<3r
jest. LHWUevmnn "l (P) : Pl.
CQfiTCT‘, IT. fl. (JLXMJ) Studies ijlivxzediay'1.,3ffib1strotefl 1;?
1iie trixfi<:xmes of‘:figecies 1111 vv1rdhls of JW;fl’”1°, an11tFCP3,
P°1oveW, 1nd (olsvvm o7 pp., 11143. .'sblgguon, L. 3.
"o1“?1‘f, l. 1.. Tlhl“) ~n1 flhefln°nt'.w,lTHL. llrr“ Visit 1%:
1’ ‘k‘f;
u“ 1..
I11vis, lfl. F. (liHNJ) 19x; toxfix: priruziplfa of JWM lots r1_‘vs
qs ideni;1jied with synthetic JHQlone, so" its toxic 3.lects
011 t‘on11:0 :1n <1ljkiliPI 311-11-11. 2u194r. J“11:‘. F701;. 153: Sill.
He: s.oe~5 J. I. 11757) StCWtfinv 1 jPClQPCQd str11¢ of tiWPcr
and c:mms tre es ir11fiw1 fOrestry"“wafirqm 0; tle WP” ”(s'ec
‘fs'llxajr ‘11‘11C1 i-'t31. 1111 11. C<Tr”v:nlf;. 1(31111'611 1511; 711'. 1-s:3. ‘ e11t
-P--15, ll pf
Frr~ki;;s, 11. 13. F- Smuiwcnfith, 1}. 1?. (17197) anno; b 01"the: cont-
1 ’ ’1h1 not 9nd otier e '
. ()Ofl...
O
». _ n '1’
,-" _ Q .. - . 6.4 A-.
Jepson, N. L. (1909) SPonteneous hybrifis Of native Cfillf-
01111911'trecw3 flung“. Eqn336<1°s' 1J39001 }?e;fi.. E: Rift-cl.
h1rdisti, 8. ( 93 (L lection of 1cluuts) Soviet Sub—
trOoics N ‘ 3
quek Hslnwts of Iowa. trans-
Ions St. Nov,. 5 0. 7c: 2 O-l23.
Rebel, J. R. (1911) CyiolongOl espoots of tro1lin3 nuts.
Broo. It?» Phlt ?v. $3.. 5&3: 22—24.
FEIFGP E. .. (1937) Toces on North American trees ang
.1» 9; '- '8 A _ VIII
814l'11133. J. .:-.111. 11111.). .LOZ 100-1110.
Pr,..'."1’3"1 ' 1 1.1. wHo h 1:1' 'V 3 o -1- o (191(3) A. Vq I i3 t _, 1n tne ulsc{—1.
O :3
walnut. Iowa Aefid. Sci. Proc. 25: 241-42.
----——--————---—- ————— ———-- (l9PC‘) A varistion in the blao
C;
walnut. Proc. Iona Rood Sci. Pfll-fe.
PlllCUOt, C}. (ngDQ) E?opo;%: of tire ccnmWitt 13 on Lawsodjjg;
forts t and nut trees. Amwr. Preeders' Ass. P01 3: 304
Ell.
Reed, 3. A. (1955) Turko"s, men and nuts. Jouy. Nered.
O
t o
0
7L- ".
2[L: L)L_)tJ-E'().
(— I7 ‘5 . '1. ..J. 7.. -l- - ’ " - ,.
-__———---—- (lflop) LQtQPQl Mflluho LZUPIJS in the Ofist.I
F) ,. 3.. ()r -‘1‘ 7" -1. 1171.11, 117... - #1-, A ‘ f ,
ref). l-'OCo “it. “Inc 11121. 1': LL. 1.1.14 -171). 1318300., me_1_3‘.'6,
159;) A tybrid walnut tree. Gard. & For.
Fuldhcnét , '3. 1 . (1&(Y7 I‘e11C1't CH” t313 Conunittxse CH1 bITN dirk;
ANT and OtHPP forest trees. Amer. Byeoders' ASSOC. Rept.
3: 224-25o.
-“"-'“’““-“-" (1909) Preliminary report of the Chairman
of the committee n treedin; not and forcet tree . Amer.
F)
Breeders' Assoc. Rept. 5: PBF-PS-
---------------- (1910) Report Of cowwitteo on breeding nut
and forest trees. arer. Freoders' L93. 1 (3): 105—193.
-——--—-------~~- (1911) (Same tith as above). moor Ryo;c-
ers' Ass. Peyt. 7: 250 959.
---——~—------——- (1919) (Sine title as above). Amer. Freed-
ers' Ass. Pe “t. a: 515-522.
VOlZ’ 9‘ 3' (1920) The Edd? tPOC breedins station. Calif.
Countrymsn 14 (6); 8-15.
,
K
k
Carve (= fiicoria Paiinesoue-Schmaltz) is a typicallv
American genus since 20 of ‘he 22 species are native in east-
ern North America, south to hexico. The other two are native
to China and Indo-Cbina respectively. The genus is divided
into two sections: (1) Aoocarva de Candolle (pecan bickeries)
and (2) Eucarva de Candolle (true tickories). Roth sections
contain a considerable number of Varieties and hybrids which
are sometimes difficult to identify.
The genus Carve is the source of the tough hickory Wood
of commerce which receives world-wide use as handles of "im-
pact" tools sucb_as hammers, axes, and picks. In addition,
the wood is extensively used for various sporting goods (skiis,
golf club handles, etc.), furniture, ladders and numerous
special products requiring strong, tough, elastic wood.
Most important of the commercial nut producers is g.
Eecan (Marshall) Engler & Graebner and its numerous named va-
rieties widely planted in nut groves thruout the southern
states.
As in the genus Juglans, the interested breeders in this
genus have been horticulturists intent upon isolating superior
nut—producers rather than forest tree improvement.
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION PR m WILD STOCK
Parallelirg the work in Jumlans, considerable selection
effort has been directed to the genus Carva by nut growers of
the United States. Interest for the most part has centered
’1 a / ,-_ ,. :" ‘ O ,. " °
(oarya p-311 (Lire-a11) Lflilcf‘). cele3t1~' for n:t 1uuiity
' . ‘\ T‘ . *- r \ .. v ‘ 'u ‘1‘ 7‘ r
nae als- 1eun 3afrl- on hicJ ouciess 1 on: natural loims
(Licnaux) Louf. (shellter: hickory), Q. tomentosu (nam.) Kutt.
kD
“i
£3
E)
(D
A
P..J
\r
J
-qv
H b...
U)
C“
(D
#44
.1:~
R D O :*
{...}.
L:
}__J
(~4-
C "i
50
f.)
r—fi
L H t C P")
L)
(D
O L‘
I.)
g 21 )
['0
1.4
C *‘i 3 '1
O I'-
1:)
C)
c..
p.
1)
w U)
’K)
a]
O H.
(-
U)
L. J J
...)
H (T
x *1
(D
U) 1) )
r?-
(I
31J
\V
(‘1
T
(A
(P
selections for nut gualitt up to tee time.
Letters of tne genus Carve a) are tly nyb-iiize with
ease in nat11e (orgne, .~37; Bender, 1343). Jennson (1)39)
listex 7 natural hroriis. The cpief source of 1nd.“Dati—
robesly traceable to variations
1n flowering time there tne ranges overlap.
The 11 teriture revels no account of artificial selec
tion fro1 Wild stocks designe; to isolate superior forms for
strictly forestry purposes.
1r 'T’xf
. _.r\r-- ,7-‘." .I ). _. V .‘ 3“ ‘ T r1 fi‘UT
\JV __vr\ ...-..ui/ 1, '-4.J¢J.. u {t ..1 1.4.4.414.) ....‘Uix .L !J.L..4
")1
1.4.
N to
c+
'r-.
(l
Jri(‘1
F. VAJ
Controled nyorridizatian stuiie s betueec:1 v1rieti es of
Decan nave teen carried on for a number of years by nut(-
+-
:3.
(D
rs titnout, however, the :roiuction of many outstanding(TI
H (O
( (..J
(T)
(1}-5]-
\J I 3 l1 J o 1 . . J4))” 4V‘_‘JMJ+ 1». ..J.) \ A\1\1.V).U _ .Q. r\,+J\1..}. .1)._1.\J b .\~L.IDHJO .J.\.U..1.k b1 u . . .II
.1... ..1 l./. . In I... r \» ...-..\ U . \ .. O .1. ..II -...1 . (.k CL‘ \urr II I 1‘ ’
1.....- ~...3_1J..1.4. 1.... 1-. . n.1,..1J11. n.) J..1... .1111 3..» ......J..- ..1. .-.. T..- 1..
III.. I.I c (I1 loI..1 I. (III? luIOII..II1r ( 1‘ 11‘.» 0'1. .1 0 IL (( LII (..Ilror. f)( ’v»
C r. C I
I ‘1“ J\ h .1“ NI! 5% - J h. .x . . 114.1. 1. \J .. , um I I. J. I.- .f * J .1! ..1 ho .1 1‘ .I .J . J 1o. I . . ., (.1. hr .0 .. \II J 11 4‘1 W11...
. | Or. '.. ..l\. .\P 1 (e I II ..1. (1 IL .1. I. 'I I!» II 11 IL }I\ ( I . I r I. ()lk - . I. I\I 1 ( I. C I I I .1....
r r f1\ Ix
o o a
.1..\ .u ..u..\ U .3 7.... .14 . vi,.+ .. H.111 u r 1. .0 ...)...1. +1541 ..«1; . J. .J. I: . .1 1 . 1 1.. «in .. 11 r. 7. . ID. I? ( ... .\ . I k. t. .1 1.. .. I .1). 1 In I‘ .
‘11. u I 1 A la a o4) I11 HI .< .11.: b \J h JI 11 J _ .1.. 1|“ 4. It .I 1..) .0. I. O. ‘J . $ b. l ..J. . \1 1 J «J 4, <1 J a f I. ‘1 ;
I11{\ ILIrI... 1x111( r1. .( L 11 71.. III..Lr11 .1.. I 1 If k I p . .1 IL r..1rr\r\P I
I .
.. ... I ... J1; . ..- 4 >574, ..- I 1.1. _1. 1-. .1. -. f x 1. 1.4 ... .1 1 1 J .1 1 .1, .1 1. _, .. ... 1 ... .. rp .1 1. I .. ~ 5 . . — . 1 I 1 I
. I! 1 1 r ( .11. 1 ..I |\ ‘. p\. f I t I I fix ’ \. I . \ H I I I I . 1‘ . . 1. C ( 1 (\ I II I F I» I .1.:
I .1 I 1.
n1. .1 III I. h +I h 1' \1. J1 .4 .J .4 .1.. .... a) ,J T19 L.. v.1 “a .\ . J J 1.... c 1 ..4. {IN}. «1. J‘ J .. 1 \I .‘ . 4. 41 . o 1.1 a I. 1..
.I I I I.I | Ir ( I F I. ( . I. 1 I: I. v 1 I. luv. I..'\ .1 1\ It » .. .v 1 In. \ v! .1 If. IrC ID! L I .
I (I. f '\
I: I; a . J 1 4 .. o J o O I o 1 . .. .1 1... WV .0 1. 4. A... I .. .. II N a ‘J J .. .1 11 ... ._ . , . J; 7...? J. .4) J. .11. J1 . .1 t F. J F. . he ...» .J .1....)
I III I II ,1 (II. {II I 1\ 1 I ( 1‘ I Ir II . (x or ..11. . I 1 1 I..1 1:1 I 1 I II I\ f. . 1.1\( F
... ‘1 I. 4 A ...l .1. n) J\. L. \I 4 Q J 1‘. ..I I 1 ‘1 1 . d 4%) I.» +1 14 .J. 1.. 0.. . + I. IA . A.) . .1. 1 \I. U J . I. aI. .‘1/ X1). 4 4 W4 ... «I 1
. . .... I 1... 1.1.1 I. I. I b s .I p\ .. I! C 1. . 1.I r1. . I). ( I 1 I. t I. . . .. (1 f . LI 1 I . Ir . 1 1.. 1... .L rt r n
O \I. II I . . . J
J ..J J J . . L.. I .1. 1. v. 1 ... 1. ..- F a 1. A. .. .. 1x1 L. J IN 5 L. . . .. . fl 1 . fie .. 1. .. 1 .. I. .x... 1‘
L1. L1 I. . I\ . It I I 1| 1 . k r. 1.1 .1\ I» f. 1' 1. (X. r1 .1 (3 rs 1r \ r. f. .\I .I Ix . . . F (x .1 1 I 1. (L .rll
\I 4“ 10 5 * ..l 5 LI 1. J 4 . l 1 1. 1+ m I ....U I. 14 4 .Fn 1” .I. I0. ‘1. L It. . I In J J1 . ...! Jx. .0 ,J. h J I. .. c 1 l1.
.1 .l I 1) .1 l\ > 4‘. .I (\ (.1 I I. II I . ..\ I: . rI . . I 11‘ (I. I». (\ I. J. I l. o b . r p .I r If} I .l (\I .l\ LI [\V 1
O 1 I I f t
. J, . )1. 1.3+... -1 1... .11." 11. ... 1-. 1....1. ,_ . . ... 1» 1. 5-.....) .h.. . . 1 I\ . It: ' x .
I\ b ..(I Y.\ 1 1 I I I. I' .I F rx .L I) x I. I C 1 . r rl . II. VI. I. u 1 . 19 .I II 1 t. r I\ I.'(\ ’U r\ F:
’u‘
”.1.. . ... .r . 1.1. p. I 0.. .I 1.. \J 1 . 1 . L. ..I J .1 1 . +. a. 1 4 .. I 1. . . u I. J I) 1.
.r I. r I 1 1 ( 71 I\ v! (1 IX. I .11.. .1 r 1 1.. 1 r./.\ -r 1. , (x 1 1 ll \. I it . . I I 1. r1. .../1‘
C
J. o . .. , .. - J o a a . J a 1
. . .) U. . .- ... 3 _ .1 . + u ...1. . ....-. .. . .). , ) 1) .. .1 3 .1....1 . ...) J o h . + .. , . \J . «JI-
f\ (:1 .. . .r I. L. 1 . 1.x. IL I r b I I ’1 71 . I I\ 1 I s 1 II I, 1.\ {I 1| in 1. I .1 111.! l P) ( . 1D
1 o 1 1 a I o J J «J J .
f 1. + h. .. ...: ; .. . 1 .. «A, .-. . ‘1 . . ... . 1 . ‘1 .. .. . I . .. . 1. -. 1. .3 ..- a. + .r 1.1.1?»
(.l I c I I ..t r I 1 o I .1 . r .. V 1 .» 1\ . . 1 .. In _, v I . I .1 1 .\ ,\ I l vl C (\ 7 k .I
J I ‘ . J
\I :v\ 11 ... . h) 1.\. . fl 0. 0 e 11 F. o .v‘ .1 . H1 J. .1.) I . . F1 4 1 .U H I J v... I]. . 1.1 1.; I) .11 4\ h... .I #3 ..\4 .1... 4.
I x. . l I... I . I. .11 .I. I- (1 . ....\ ¢\_ 1 . I 11 1 f 1 -1 1 . [\vll. (...l.) 1 .1.\ I . v ...I 1 I I I. I II. (1 IL
J J
A 1. 1. ..U . 41 4‘. «11/ b .H J. J 1,1 I... .1. J. ..4 .x.. ...I A I 1. .1 1 U . . L: ... WI. rII I . . .1. Wu .1. 41. ..J ... I. 1.1 .1.. . u .. .. 11. 4.1 1.. _JJ
.9 ,I .. (1 . r. .\ .... rlx .. u. .( r. . r . ...\ I. I. x. (.4 \ II. ( 1 1 ( 1 r v. . . . . .\ fl 5.. v11 1. 11 f. I LI {u I
a II '
..- . . r a- 1 1 .. .1,
I 1 g fl 7.! ( I 1 I 7" .
I.I I I J 4
. _\... . “J 1V1. .. . . . 1. .1}. L1 .11. .J I) J. . 414.1 1.- b \J. 1.. xv 1c .1 .1) 1+. \l . 4 I... Io. . 1 1 ‘1”.
I ,1... (1 11.. . I r _ I .. I » .1. 1.1» .\ 11 . .1
r} LI yr }
41: \J .1 t A a o I o o o J o
... NJ ... ... . n. e. ._ I. .. .. .. . 1. » HI. .. .1. 4‘1. 4 1 1*] . J. b_ 1‘: . ~d ‘12 *1 W) 2.4.1.1.} .. . 1. ~... \I1 .1 n. «Iv I J «1,.
L1 1 r 1\ It 111 I _ . 1 I 1' r . . 1 If I. r... 1 I, r 1 . 7.x . I. p 1,. .L LI . L ,1 , b 1 LI . r... ... vI .. 7; (\ .\.. l... 1 1
( f. (I. I
. 1. I 1 . 11 J . . , . | . . .0 .. J 1 I
+. haw ....) .1. 51.-.“. .J.) 7.4 L. “.1 ..— ..I . . 1 3.... 21v 1 1 L., ..-... ..+J . . 1.3 J...
Lr IYL f. 1I(..rU I. 1 . r1. 7L..1\11 (.1111). 1 r 1\ r1. Ir.11.1\ .1. 1. {1 r. L.\ .I. f) (... vark . .r (L-
r: P\
J- 11; a 1 4 o .. J J . 1 J
.1141... f 1.3%.... 1.. +..1....L.. ..U .1.. 1.1.. -..... $0.... 1.) 1. . .-...f...c (1} ..P 1. vI . L: >.(. u . . .l\ I... I... (I . I b y no. t. 1 .1 a. \ .1 .1. ..1 1 .1 t. (, Ix .\ 1) rt Pt .I\ r I r I L. II I
i
I. a o J . a 1 I 9 I. o I v.41 .. x. 1.. \ \1 II- I
.. 14 . 1...). .. -. 51.1.... 1. .. I .. - 1 .1 J. 1 .- ...». «.1. 1 _ «...: 11...... .1. _.-...- .1..oo\ . 1“ ... 1 d..D. (.1? I 1 I I L 1. 1 r (... .. I I.\ ll 1. I. .\ . 11’ _ Ks. I. C 1\.\ [1 r1 7( f 1' .1 11.1.1 I If. f .1 I 1.. r1 L P1 171 ‘\ \\ c\ ‘
...... .1 .. .._...\...1..11, . \u .34) .. 1.1).... 1. ...)_ . . . .v.
1 . . l\ . .I II .\(x I, I. > r 1\ I I \ \ I U I 1 \I\ M . . \ .
. 4 kl \ J _ .1. NJ 4 o .1.. LI 1 I . \I 1» . .1 .tiv
_. JO. . .... _ . £1.71. . 1 1.1110... 1 1... 311... 1 a. . ...... w. E.-. US r.\IL .... 1. rl ( .1 \. ... I. \ U .. . f v 1 . .... l .L.I (x ., t (a .,..1 .r 1 I. I . . (F (v s \ Iv. 1.\ 7L
.
J .1 I , .A.: 1. . 1 . . ‘11... o J
.... ..\..1.1. 31.1.... ..-.UL r. .... + 3....1« U<U .1. 13.1..u 3.3.1. 0......) «JI.C<+ ......1\ 1 . .11., \ .1..» 1 .. k r. ( .... t 1.1 (I .. I ,1. r1. . 1 7.1 k r . P I. l..(\ O
[I .
. ... 1 . J o .1 1. J 1 1 c .
. 44.0.1 1.1.1.)... ...r1. 3 ... ... ; .... 1.7.1.....' . . . I .v . . l .. . I 1.\ r1
} \ rf|L
. a o \J 1 1 1 .. .J 1. J . :1 . . h .1.
a 2.1.1....) ......e11 - 1. _ D .1 . .1. 1. ....-. .- .1 ,. 2 ..1. . o .....\ 3 7 .u... ...urrrk I /\ » ...1... 1 .1 ..I c L . n. l\ I P. . If I/\ .r) I.I 1\ k l\ 1.- ..1 I. 111 I. .. ... I n 1\. v . Ir 1 . l1 (\ '1. 0
IF
“.5 . -- -‘ .. '».- . . ‘3 1. -.~_* ”do
A la year ulz JEJ Q variety stu 1;; ex HbvhrOOl
r3} '. — -. 1".“ -' M _ - K . ; I'm: m-L .~ ‘ ‘ 4-.-
541 ELlUutS vu;iCL.(:Olc L¥r,3;5 cxzeains. 'Fue txlua
L)| ‘ " " ‘I '~ ~ " I' ‘ r 0" ’ ‘ .‘ u’“ “. " . A‘
_aac; antler Cufltkjfifl an tie aveiags 8,Lu4 dull
JUECET 01 pallen gra US proauce;
(”\l‘
tree tnus arounte; t3 aggroxiuately a;,394,llj,
u. v‘ rwl\I (’4 n . I‘
.. P
- ‘ — ‘ A F“in; at lC(3 efTiCfiTHCV: 106': lJ eacn H’LLCH Cr
":10$0
{5.
(.A..1. ‘. A
L; LA?[0
(—+
H g
l
m g:
H (~4~
p ('J
P4}
C)
w
1
C“‘
J.
\’
3..)
“‘3
H :3
C d-
V
c+‘ ‘3‘ ""1-" ‘~r‘ '\ r“ ‘ ' —'_ -.'*
t at tale collen MUJL- uaVe be m Sdl‘lCl‘l ad
%? ie‘ Ev Var101s “OrLeTS- 311 e (1957) In flea
tgat iability of fecan tollen varies greatly u
4‘ .
seasonal confitiajs a1: otler lactors. Neodroc
J
stored polleh of 20 varieties unfier various te; ..4
l
h‘midit coafiitions but osservei that 'no temps
kuxiiiity conditiLH1. LS founfi under VfiiiCJ pollen
storei for longer than 96 hours (4 days) wits c
germination." Smith & Bomberg (1932), however,
-men of she ;ecan varie
O N (O
r’.
C)
H;
(<1
0 C)
H.
(+-
;__1.
C
3
H)
(‘\
j H R)
W [D
CT
H C .3
v\
pollen of another variety remaimeu viable for :
,+- ‘4,» -m,.-.:..',.—,. . 41,, .\ .-,«."; -
vablons MlLu wu er Valltelco um has chdfl anl f
tainei for 10 flavs or more.
(l 30) had
l number of
ain were in-
J
r com3ute;
prOiuce 229,
has been invest-
itn varieties,
f (1328)
wii('0"' «‘4' ~
gerauur
rature and
ertainty of
resorted
t7 under lab-
11y 8 days.
tfieir Cheer-
canal that
ll be main-
H C)
C a (I
(3
&L
& Romberg
Y“ 07.1..(““7
“J
r.)
W1 1».
.L ‘
1" ‘.'L3n A;_ V
.0
"N o W.
< k“. -..
5.!
7 ‘T‘
‘ .14...
I.\
\u
VTf’\""-‘ (“x 2, v_"
' -‘ -
v-
'-u
"i
,- A
I.-
."- w o'u. v
,
”UNI. q.’
.4 ‘1. 1‘
A
'V, r.. (.
Jllvn.»
A 3’" .\'r
A.
"\
I\
r.
J
vri»
.| y-
'r'CCt 3u**’Lei;I
. U)
.—, .1- .-
C/. silk
.‘A t1"_)1_
&.a. 2);;
‘
U.,
J- 5‘.‘
;‘~‘
:‘F‘X'\‘.
..r.
U3
$._J
L1“: '_
q
I
L
>) W”:
1 v *. '.I’V\T'";T‘ 'f‘T 1‘1""
ollbxalu.s ullb'
(Pg-.170)an - . ..
fi
_ 1' r .' 1","’\\ .. .. 3-1 -
17301153“, I}. P. C: P91103111, .‘2. Jo (1.1.1-1 1 CO? ”CPO-19$ 1J1Chg Op
_ o -3 1 L ‘4 '7‘t(\ 10, .. ..
he I11ted States. lst eo.,KI+-EF1Q pp., dis iigs. Lo3r2d-
T v r T.‘ r 1 ' I A. ‘ru .‘ fl . . "t . -.1
11111U 1001 Cenfi1-n3, Inc., Lea ,Orfi awn LOnuOn.
v '~~— ‘ 7-. 1 *1 1 xx... 1 :1Crane, n. L. (lJo ) Lot bPCBLlLv. .S.D.m. ;earbooz oi
1.1r1calture, pp. oev-ee .
Fork1rt, C. (1914) Taelve years' experience in l1ybridizing
pecans. Natl. hat -}rouels' As soc. Proc. 13: .t-"O
Harlow, T. 1. and Larrar, E. S. (1341) Textnook of dendrol-
OfV. 2nd Ed. XV+—542 1p., 934 figs. chraw—ill Rook Co.,
Iris. , 1 e17 ‘KOIQ: f: llorui(12.
Pearson ET. 8. ,r_. Prown, H. P. (1932:) Cormorcia l tin1.1ers of
Indix.. Zolc1lixz,.rc1o1wmwx1t of lrxlia Cerfluflil l‘uol iCXFtiOU
Franco.
Herder, A. (1943) Lemuel of otltivotoo trees and strvbs.
2nd Ed., XXX+-996 pp., FacLillan Co., Fe York.
Pisien, E. 9. (1914) Tree breeding. Natl. hut GPOLOPS'
Ass. Proc . 13: 50-33.
Serg:er1t, C. S. (1922) Annual of trees of Eorth Arorica.
Sno Ed.,1.ew York.
Smith, C. L. 7: Pomberg, L. D. (19"?) P0llination control,
peTiOd oi receptivity and pollen vietility in the pecan.
Yatl. Pecan Assoc. Bull. 31: bo-Ul. ,
-----------*-----~----------- (19?3) Furthnr studies on
periods of roce1>tivity and pollen viability in tne pecan.
Proc. 15th Ann. 1 eet. 3ex. Pecan Gr. 38s.: Vo-e
---——-———--——----------—--—-- (lV40) Stigma iecept jtv
and pollen sheddinq in some pecan arieties. J.1Agric.
680 CO: 13‘7“"‘Vro
mnqhfi, {1. P. &;Emynmcr§, l“ 1). (-9">7) Duetbods Of'anrtrolling
pollination in the pecan. J. Agric. Fee. 47: 267—
Woodroof, H. C. & Pailey, J. E. (1928) Unfruitfulness of
the pecan. Ga. Exot. Eta. Bull. 143, 40 hp.
fioodroff, J. G. (lQEO) studies of the strul1ate inflores-
' genes and pollen of Eicoris :ecsn. Jour. Agr. Research
40: 1059-1104.
Woodworth, R. U. (1950) Meios318 Of miciro.po'
Jolendacex1e. 1mer. Jour. wot. 17: 865-8’
‘1ogenesis in the
C)
C)’
Lll‘RAEUVE NOT CITED
(0 m)“&
Stucke;¢, H. P. (1916) The two groups of varieties of the
Picoria fecan and their relation of self-3+;er111t7 Ga.
Agr. Expt. btfl. Bull. 124, 22 pp.
Woodroof, K. C. (lQBb) Develooment of the embryo sec and
young embryo of ricoria recan. Amer. Jour. Rot. 15: 416-
421. ‘—‘
1 For further references not cited for tlis 'enus consult the
literature lists at end of Jurlans ane ctio' __.aé_—_—
BETULACEAE Agardh
Birch Family
The birch family includes more than 100 species in 6 gen-
era: Betula L. (birch), Alnus B. Ebr1art (alder), Carpinus L.
(hornbeam), Ostrya Scepoli (bOp-hornbeam), Ostryopsis Decaisne,
and Coerus L. (hazel). For the most part the family is re-
stricted to the northern hemisphere. A few species of Alnus,
however, extend southward through the mountains of Kexico and
Central America to the Andes mountains of Peru (fiinkler, 1904;
Sargent, 1922; Fender, 1940; Harlow & Harrar, 1941).
tembers of the family are trees or shrubs with alternate
deciduous leaves and monoecious or rarely dioecious flowers.
Except for the members of the genus Petula, little breed-
ing or cytological investigation has been carried on among
the arborescent forms of tie other genera. Considerable
breeding and selection, however, has been carried on in the
non-arborescent genus Corylusl, designed to improve quality
of the filbert nut of commerce. Breeding work of this nature
does not fall within the scepe of this paper.
In tre attacred "literature not cited (Retule)" will be
found references to the cyt0105ical researches of Woodworth
(lQBQ-a, lQBQ-b, 1930) in the genus Alnus.
l Corglus avellana L. of EurOpe produces the filbert nut but
the United S'ates' supply is furnished largely by locally
selected forms, varieties and 3ybrids of this species.
-1C.'-O-
I l L—4
r":
J [—4
o
A
O 1.1.
W O 3‘
V
The genus Betula is made up of about 40 shruboy or
arbore scent SJeCiES wi ely distributed tlruout the northern
He:1s211ere. About 15 soecies are native *0 {he cooler re-
0
gions of North America. Cf this number 10 are trees. about
5 of these ma; be considered of corxercial imgortance:
;. luten licnaux (yellow birch), é nn‘vrifera Larshall
(paper birch), B. gooulifolia Karshalt (gray birch), g.
nirra L. (river birch), ani g. lenta L. (cherry birch).
Lost important of the native ejecies is the comraon
nort. astern hardtood g. lutea nhich, it is estimated,
supplies about three fourths of all the timber sold as
birch in this country. birch is one of the most important
furniture woods of the Uni ed States ani is also used for
a great variety of proiucts, including veneer, railroad
ties, cabinets, boxes, woodenmare, novelties, ani other
miscellaneous products (Brown & Panshin, 1941).
Cf some commercial importance in murope ani Russia
are the "European white birches" (g. oeniula Eoth, é. gubescens‘———_
Ehrh. and their intermediate forms). g. alnoides Hamilt
5..
and g. cyliniros;achvs Garble are timber trees of com-
mercial significance in India (Pearson & groan, 1932).
Laiy of the bircnes are used for decorative purposes
in the United States. The handsome foliage ani bark of
s :ake them com on ornamental(I)
the EurOpean white birch
1 ' . 1Cther native birches of local importance incluoe: b.
gapyrifera occienfalis (Hook. ) oarg., var. western
oaoer birch); B. oa2v ifera keiaica (Evans) Henry, var.
(Kenai birch) of the Alas {an coast region.
-101...
trees of the eastern states.
The tenus Let la is notably polVWUrhis due to the ease
witn which natura interspecific crosses a;.arently occur. In
ition, oolyoloid sgecies, varietie , and hybriis ranging
from trioloid to hexaoloid have been recognized cyt01051cally.
LE little evidence of conscious effort
in tne United States directed to the selection OF superior
individuals fir forestry purposes from wild populations of
he native birches. ExcepMins to this, eneral conclusion
may possibly be found in those few instances there controlled
breeding projects have been instituted. Eresnmably selection
of the bes t tild forms available tor use as oarental stocL
1" s- 1' "' 1‘ ‘ " ‘V ‘N .% —.‘ A
has LBt; given Some corsioer at on.
)
tt :t;',n has been reporteulv direct-(I)
In Europe some so
(
1
ed to the qu stion of seeea origin (groveenanc 8 studies) in
an effort to isolate climatic strains of the important é.
verrucosa Ehrhart (2 Q. pendula Roth and g. gubescens Ehrh.
ani their intermediate forms.1) Schreiner (1957) reported
German seed origin studies with a. verrucosa underway at
the Forstbotanisches Institut , Technischen Hochschule,
Dresden but any results of this work have not as yet been
reported.
l
The taxonomy of these two Species has been consideradly
contused in the cast. The natural more northerly range of
B. oubescens Ehrh. overlaps, in many districts, the more
sout~erly ren:e of §. verrucosa Lhrn. (Jensen l957). In
these area interteiir e firms showing a gradual transi-
tion between the two
0
sm»e ies led Linnaeus ani other early
taxonomists to gr the o suecies, JlUS the intermedi-
ate forms, into the one ecie s: g. alba L. (Congd p.lO53.
nettstein and Prooach I939) of he Kaiser nilwhelm-
Institut fur Luchtunisforscnung, drain baur-Institut,
lunchberg in an essentially cytotaxonomic report on g.
pubescens and g. verrucoca reported plans for the study of the
economic value of the natulal intr1e11te forms of these
species. R sults of this study have not been published.
Heiberg (1937-1939), in a report surveying the provenance
problem involving the important forest trees of Norway, em-
phasized the iaportence 0: select ng individual birch trees‘HJ
of good quality for further breeding, rather than attempting
to select clitatic r;ces Considering the natural occurenceLa
of large hybrid pregenies betwee1 . oendula anl é. augscensIt“)
such a suggestion appears sell-founded.
Sprangers (1937), wit; reference to the selection work
b lar invest gationsI...)
H O :‘XJ
(T
U)
H :3
(D)
‘1
{:3
:3
LA
EN
*1
(I)
O O
3‘
(I)
“1
(I)
}._lo
1.}
Fl-
1
to be conductea in Hollani.
In View of the ease with Which many of the species and
varieties of this genus hybridize in nature it may be pre-
sumed that there exists in the mild stete a wide variety of
segregates in F and later generations. It would seem ad-
2
visable, therefore, to conduct systematic surveys in regions
of range overla: of several species. Selections from such
wild stocks may yield valuable material for forestry pur-
poses which could be utilized immediately if vegetative
Ine work of Lorgentbaler (1915),
1:2 5), sinkle r & Anton (1933), and
Jentys-Szaferowa (l938)l1as proved the incorrectness of
this View ar 1 t*1e final se;yre 3 ation of the two species
and their in rnzediat.e forts. menier (I940) believed Q.
verrucosa Lhrh. shuld instead be csflled B. ‘endula Roth.
Footnote of p.|02con{'dd:
Helms and Jorgensen (1“
propagation tere feasible. In any case, the material might
grove useful for further breeding nork.
1'."I~hY-t\- ~7- 1. 5 :'1 ...,‘.,.‘.I(.‘ .“~ “ . .1' _,_""_‘.T ‘1’?
.JLVJLTKU 4.1.30 ..J_'£.a.v.1,1i'~.u 3.12 grudge/lieu
Although the incidence of natural interspecific hybrids
in this genus is quite highl, reports of breeding studies
beyond tde initial steps of provenance studies and individual
selection from wild stocks, as noted above, are reoresented
in the literature by only one preliminary hybridization re-
port.
Smith & Nichols (1941) reported nine crosses, the pro-
geny of which have been tentatively identified as hybrids.
The parents included: a. mandshurica (Reg.) Nakai var.
ienonica (Miq.) Fehd., a. kaximowicziana Reg., a. lenta L.,_A.K/
44" L
. niera L., g. populifolia Narsh., é. lutea kichx., E.
lm
apyrifera harsh. and its variety henaica (Evans) Henry.*6
Tests of vigor as compared With the parents have not as yet
been reported.
Flowering data
Schreiner (1938) reported that studies of the bloom-
ing habit in fistula was complicated by successive develop-
ment of flowers on individual aments and the aboarent abil-
ity of some species to mature parthenocarpic fruits. Smith
& Nichols (1941) reported species of Letula as extremely
protandrous, in some cases so much so that isolated trees
bore almost no fruit. There is, however, according to
these workers, no difficulty involved in getting selfed
(Johnson (1959) listed 13.
—104-
—. I- 0, Lb: :.- .\-.“ °. h :F. "7!: - ~~ : ‘ “
seed by artillCldl yblllflétluflo lfllS IS suuportei oi Last's
(1940) conclusions that the genus is self-fertile.
hybridizing technioue
The "greenhouse technique" as described by Yanchevsky
(1904) for Salix aid nettstein (1933) for figgulus, has been
successfully used in the betula crosses reported by Smith &
Nicnols (1941). These latter authors also noted that sausage
tubing may be more conveniently used in betula species(;n-
stead of paper or glassine bags) to cover a large numoer of
”‘1 ~
flowers on one branch. They recomtenle' plugging the end of
the tube hith cotton tool, thus insuring EOUd aeration.
(For details of the "greenhouse technique” see Salix section
of this report.)
Pollen longevity
Peoorts of pollen longevity studies in this genus have
not some to the author's attention.
It is probable that refrigerated storage of 2-3 degrees
C. and relative humidity of approximately 50% will Success-
fully preserve birch pollen for reasonable ser‘ods. In cases
where pollen is desired from remote sources it would seem ad—
visable to obtain cut twigs searing male catkins in the dor-
mant state and hold tnem in refrigeration. They may then be
forced as needed in the greenhouse. This method was resorted
l)
by Heimburger (1940) as successful witi speci s of Pooulus.
tenbers of the genus :etula are grouped among the
l_J
"difficult" o.ants to root from stem cuttings. In horti-h
-105-
cultural practice buiVing, g-aftins or layering is sat-
isfactorily used but such methods are obviously impractic-
able for forestry purposes.
The tort of Afansiev (1939) demonstrated that rooting
ability of stem cuttings in this genus may be significant-
ly increased by auxin treatment. Greenwood cuttings of g.
‘1 .C‘
populifolia Karshall treatet lor 6 hours in a 5 mg./ liter
solution of indolebutyric acid rooted 30% in sand after 68
.‘
days. Ten percent of the cuntr in this experiment rooted.
\
‘l [0
Greenwool cuttings of . uao'rifera treated by Afan-_4I_ II
U!
I
siev for 24 hours in a 20 mg./ liter solution of indole—
butyric acid rooted 50% in sand after 65 days. In this case
none of the controls rooted.
The results obtained in these experiments are indeed
promising but further work is needed to test possibilities_}
of improving these comdaratively low rooting gercentages.
Studies of tree ages from which cuttings are made, as well
as the rooting response of various parts of the tree, as
pointed out by Thimann & Delisle (1939) should prove to be
promising lines of investigation.
An interesting and unusual characteristic of birch
seeds has been described by Crocher (1930). The seeds,
(I)
when first collected, requir high temperatures (90 de-
grees F.) for germination. If, however, the seed is strat-
ified at 32 - 40 degrees F., the germinating temperature
gradually drops until at the end if several months the
seeds begin to germinate even at these low temperatures.
JYTeLCG
Chromosome number
(-+~
Li (D
s oi chromosome numbers and other reports by var-
go
Jorrensen, 1925; uoodworth, 1929, 1930,3
h
ious autlors (Helms
1931; detzel, 1929; Jaretzky, 1930; Gaiser, 1930-a, l930-b,
193 Stebtins, 1938; nettstein, 1939, adj bleier, 1954)
in
3;
ndicate that the basic genom in the genus Betula = 14.
C)
w c—f.
;)
(unoodmorth (1931) in View pclyploid series in
$13
,_J
this genus suggested an orifiin basic number of 7, altho
no species uitn this haploid number is believed to be extant.
Hanscher (1934) on the basis if interpretation of secondary
association at metaphase I in this and otder genera of the
Betulaceae also sue ested this ultimate basic number.v
Heteroploidy
The comprehensive researches of Joodworth as cited
above indicated an interesting auto- and allopolyploid
3.);
escribed species hybrids and varieties inseries of the
the genus. host cf the menbers are normal diploids (2n = 28,
as g. niera L. and g. lenta L.); two are triploidl (3n = 42,
as p. Jackii Schneider 2‘s. cunila L. x g. lenta L.); four
are tetraploid (4n = 56, as g. oumila 1.); two are pentaploid
(5n = 70, as g. papyrifera Larshall); and three are hexaploid
(6n = 84, as g. lutea hichaux).
0 H)
siecial interest to the tree breeder in this connec-
tion is recognition of the fact that the hexaploid, g. luteg
(yellow birch), is commercially the most important of our
Both are natural hybrids described by taxonomists.
_1nv-
native Species. The production of other polyploids by arti-
ficial meals Lithin t is genus as well as in other eneraf',
..lp—
\—
may thus lead dirictly to superior types for forestry pur-
A study of stomata frequency on leaves of the diploid
niera, pentaploid B. 03yrifera, and hexaoplo id B. lutea
ItD
(as well as Lolvploids in ozher' :enera) to ascertain the
fl:
reliability of such ata to be used as an index of chromo-
some number his reported bv bax, 1938. g. niera (2n) showed
an average of 82 stomata per square millimeter, é. pa;yrifera
h discrep-0(5n) snowed 37, and g. lutea (6n) showed 43. Su
ra and g. lutea(I)
ancies as here aspe r betneen B. oacyrif
were also observed in ether genera. It was concluded by the
author, however, that although such counts cannot be used as
an ab solute index of polyploidy, they may be useful in pre-
liminery srveys, especiNi V of herbarium material.}
Cytological studies of species, varieties, and hybrids.
O
The following summation of meiotic behavior as noted in
several of the species, varieties, and hybrids in this genus
is based entirely on the observations1 of .oodzorth (1929, 1930,
1931).
Di olo ids (2n =28)
Woodworth reported meiosis normal in B. lenta L., g.
nicra L., g. coerulea-(raiiiis Blanchard, é. fontinalis var.
1
Material fixed in Carnoy's fluid, imbedded in nitrocellulose
sectioned 10?N thickness, stained with hai1enhains' iron
haematOX"1in.
NCTQ: :etula, Alnus, and Zorvlus mature their pollen in “e
+1
fall; 0s trva, Cstrvosis, and Jaroinus mature pollen just
prior to shedding in the spring (Woodworth, 1931).
b., B. gendula Roth,CI
H- I)
~ g ,1 0 fl 0 r‘c ‘ ”I" '4‘ - r‘ ,‘\ 0 '
Jioeri (crit. ca 5., c. oaconiCi
é. gopclifolia garag., *. maximowicziana Eegel, and g. utilig l
l
var. oratti Eurk. but very abnormal in s. sedmiatii Hegel,
an oriental species. Asynacsis involving a variable number
of chroaosome pairs nés observed and resulted in frequent
polyspory. Normal gairing, however, has frequently observed
in this ssecics aid the aut:or concluded that a large per-
centage of morpholosically good ,ollen resulted. hybrid‘t‘le
. a“ - -- . V ‘N‘-,r\ J— —‘ A ‘ V A: (-1
origin has SUt355b€1 or b. scniii
Triploid hybrids (3n = 42)
The tricloid hybrid KB. jac:ii Schneiier, resulting fro m
fthe natural chSS‘of diploid 3. lenta L. x tetragloid s.
oumila L. revealed, as right be anticipated, extremely abnor-
mal meiosis. Variable numbers of univalents, bivalents, and
trivalents tere reported tr Iooduorth and in some cases there
was orserred no cairins at all in the ;rophase of division I.
n‘ g h 'y- I“ “mm, 3‘" (v Pr- . N '- 1 ,-. ,\ ' .—~ . . _ '3 .~ . ,‘ _ '1 . .. ‘ *1, .. .
uflfumus He lat,in5 on the soiniles ”as observed in bond leis-
’ons. Polysoory wgsobserved frequently r solting in great
variation in oollen size. Rosendahl (1916) reported the
oollen of this hybrid 25; sterile.
In a study of the comoarative anatomy of tne stems of
B. iackii and its rarents, Cousins (1933) reported an inter-
mediate size and tistribution of vessels, width in cells of
11
compound rays, and will characteristics of bith cells in the
4
set to various other characters tie hybrid
resembled either its oollen parent, g. linta L. or the mat-(T
subcoriata
>;:l
(D
PJ-
0 (D
H.
('3
.3
I(L
O u C. 3
Jo
1...
:
1o
0
v IL
l
O {G
'O
10
r<2
ks;
)I
(I)
“i
9:
<1
£0
b—fi
O
“I (WC)
N ‘1 : ‘ ~‘. I r“ v -~ 1, r? :5 a F‘ r (v - 7 .- « ,-. v ‘
a:rg., :- olxila Var. i;¢JJU1lftT3 Hegel, ifl; d. glgyrifera
var. ooruifolia (negel) Fernall mere Std ied oy noodwortn.
6 CV
'3. y-In all asses, o‘coeot the latter, meiosis v.2: normal. Co C.)
ionel rsynegsis of a few hooolo;ons CFromosomes at ii k’nesi:CU
l
was observed in tge oornifolia variety. Some p.m.o's. nere
. -..-4. . . ...:
, not occurrei. In
\ l___J
O H.
5.1.1
'0
O H *._l
(D
:5
on the US$18 0; its very apnormel meiosis, Wes oonoluie; by
Loeitorth to he of hybrid oridin. Parentaje, involving the
(D
F"
(D
(T
O (D
d"
F C.
O O (D
V
E
\‘l
U)
[0
J:
F1
(l
IO
(‘f
~I)
5.l)
C)
C‘
(D
93
S:
c+
C)
H O
T he only penteoloiis stoiiei :y woodworth has he white
or ,ager Circa (é. oaoyrifera larsball ) an? the variety
kensioa Henry. Leiosis was observed to be normal in the
variety but slig_tly ab.‘q1;fl hi tue s ecies. abnormality
(ing chromosomes in
’
It is of interest to note tbet the true soeoies, g.
anyrifera, an; only one of its varieties (kensioe) are
(oooifientalis is nexaoloid. in the tasis of such cytolog-
ical evifienoe jg woulo see: that some of the varieties are
fieserving of sjeoi:"
hexagloifi s_ecies (5n = 84)
btuiies o? meiosis in g: lutea Liiiaux revealei soae
abnormality. Ccaaslional univalents a;i trivale ts were
seen at diatinesis accompanied by latying of univalents on
the soinile. Some :efeneratei micricytee .ere poserve’ in
the gollen :roducei.
leiosis in th hexagloids ;. rrossa Sieb. a i Lucc.
anj g. uaovrifera var. iéciientglls (Hook.) barg. W08
reported as norxal.
The genus Petulo trsm tie stanflooint of the cytological
eviience so far accumulatei, aooears to he a group with con-
siierable :rooise of Vieldinp furtgcr valueble evidence as
a contribution to a solution of the questi n of species form-
ation. Prov the evijenze so far available, polyploifly,
especially altopo‘vp omiy seews to have be:n an ifiyortan
vehicle of species for ati‘n is tnis enus.
Jonsiiering fl; tealtn ‘f Iild waterial mnicn is proo-
ably in existence as first generatioo hybriis, segregates of
F2 an? later renerations, backcrosses, etc. it is sursrising
that little or no atte pt las be o TS“€ to select from CH3-
~111—
I-:71 J o
(petula)
Atfl:e*~s, 1?. E). (lfUia) i”rer:ticxi1 TTJthisli Etirefgtrgfi, XAfIIUI+
C 7 pp., 14 plates. b.1016 University Press, London:
Iu.plroj lilford.
Afansiev, Iicrel (1939) Effect of irooln»n+wman acid on
rooting of greonwood cuttings of some eecicwnw forest
BPOOS. JOUP. VUTustry 3 7: SV—Al,
F‘leima', ll. (19%34 Essato‘vnferfinolckyio. ([email protected].)
Tih110“r. Geret. 11: 393-459V
91““ '1, PI. 1’. 3‘ P '-siriri, . :1. (13345?) (39;”U*J101131 'tiifl1e1“s (3f
*le Unitoo FLHLC§. let ed., XXI+~334 oy., 312 tis. to-
3r21~4 ill 'Mxfii CQYQKMIJ, IEM:., Jea'lflvgk 9'”1 01C(“'-
'COusiiis, Cu 3.. (léfifii) EWM; corgwlratiJW3 shrtFW;T of inns stems
of‘ Pedrllez ::7111J“, 11913119 'lerita, 1anri trcz rLlfiritl 3<1t1§£1
1 clii. J. erold Arb. 15: ‘351—55.
Fwocceftql. (1930) Harvesti r , storage, and stratification
of seeds in relation to nursery preoiis,. hlor. Bev. 55;
Ees‘, E. K. (1910) Ibo distribution of self- fiertility in
the flowerin‘ slants. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. US: 449-
}aiser, L. 0. (1930-3) 9 lisu of chromosome numbers in
Angiosperms. i’}er...otice 1.9,: 1'11- ? o.O
-------—--—-— (1939-b) A list of chrorosomo numbers in
Angiosperms. Bibliou.. Genet. s: 171-466.
1933) A list of clomosome ru611rs in
nblmo. Bib iorr . reiet. 10: 1 ”-
Barlow, V. L. Fairer E. S. (1941) Textbook of oerdrol-
ogy. 2nd Es. XV-+F4r} no., £94 118. LCGrsw-Hill B 0k
Co., Inc. NeM' York ....
lkeiberxj, H. if. 11. (13;.37—:31) (ii slu‘e“ CM“ the Iiroverun1ce
problem of our 151.031; 11'117,.orte.n.1‘t‘ores t trees, pine, spruce
and birch.) Lcdd. florske Sho'forsoksvesen 6: Befte
20-2.7: 51"101: o
Heimbuwger, C. (1949) Report on Poyler Myoridisstion II.
Forestry Chronicle lo: 14?
1181918 4.1111. n
Dansk.
Jablokov,
10 V31”);
\
—-----—-‘----
nr O
L)
L.Jo
_O_
D-
it”
'71RIJLJ .
Wkere
Birkene pas iedlemose.
I
in the F Ginter-pocif-
* n
1‘r3
C.)
I
Q ‘0
(1
Bot 10: l“9-l 3
(DO)-
M m 1.1 J D
C+
NJ
1'!
A a
b
qr»es
eh
TU
(n
uiJn:
'J
3‘s
{,3
v
1
C‘-
JO
JP
10 o O; D 3
w
3 j
1...!
l)
"U
H u b (’1'
0
“is . s. . .
Jentys-Sze r>ws, J. (193U) (Biometric91 studies on the
col ect ve sgecies E. aloe. L. 11. The possibility of
hybrioi "tion between specie B. Verrucooe Ehrh. and R.
nuoesceos Lhrb.) Rosprssy i sgvsuosdanfa, Inst. Duos?—
czy as67 fans to'Tcn, V»rszswa No. 4 : Sor. A.: pp. 84.
(Cited from Plant Breed. 701. IX, 19.39).
Johnson, L. P. V. 193$) A descriptive list of nntursl sad
srtificial interspocif1c yorios in North American forest-
t~90 genera. 99996. JOUP. Res. 17: 411-444.
-ll2-
Larsen, C. S.. J ‘ 3
indijvioiulls -11 i()res1dT~
I113 Of snecjes firings; our”:
8
L a Q ,J
U O V .1 » 1‘ If. . ska [VSL'(‘L‘~I' ; E)g- L40:32.
‘ T ”'V‘ 1" '~ ‘ 1 - ‘o P‘ ‘H “VA." "3‘" ' ‘f ‘\
See also: A 5. vet. 1L-. Joil. 1e11o00L, CLtiliven,
1 ° _ ... fivr '- i . 1-. 1
Peprint yy. ., 13:7.) (Cited irom Plrnt Preev.
{11111 S t T! . 11701 17
.qn_oe, P. F. 19) The Kerton cetqlo118. A list of the
c romosoue n lerrls of species of British FloweringBantJ.
:1: 011v PilbrtOl . ()1sz 1-51 .
LorQen+PQlep, H' (1915) WeitrHQe ZN? Kenntnis des Fermen-
1iPej-Ses €99 SNTWCl9Pt ?Cffllfi 91h? L. ’qvicir], 12115. (Cf.
Lens: Skovf, Tidsgkp.‘fif“ggg, 19 7.)
Pearson, 3' 8° 9 3:0W3, H. P. (193?) Commercial timbers of
India. tsleutt Government of India Central Publication
Branch.
Pendel, A. (1940) kennel of cultivatei trees and shrubs.
2nd Ed., XXi-9 5 pp. LACvillon Co., Len York.
’osendah1,C. O. (191U) Mervtions on Petals in Kinneso-
ts nith soeciel reference to some nature uyorids. Linn.
Bot. Studies 4 (4): 443-459.
Sex, H. J. .(1938) ”Be relstion between stomate counts and
chromosome number. Jour. Arn. Art. 19: 437-441.
Schreiner, E. J. (1937) ImprOchent of forest trees. .8.
D.fi . Veerbook,193 : 241-1279.
Segreinej, E. J, (19.38) Lubit of forest trees.
Ciron. cotanicq 4: 495-494.
Smith, E. C. & Lie‘ools, 3. (1941
trees. JOUP . Alfl. Pad}. 32: :
SprenQe:s, (1937) Sen en ands
(Iotes on the cultivation of b
Heidemsat son. 49: 191—19U,
Stebbins, G. L. Jr. (19"U) CytOIO“ical crwarecteristics es-
socisted with the diffelent “rowtt stits in the dicoty-
ledons. Amer. Jour. Bot. 25 (3): 189-198.
Thirnsnn, K. V. & Delisle, A. L. (1939) The veQetAtive prep-
egetion of difflicult r1Isnts. UOHP. Arn. Arb. 20: 116-
106.
.snscer J. H. (1934) Pssic01110mosone number of the higher
plants. I.Iew Phytologgist 53: 101 f.
Wettstein, 9. Von (1929) Zur Technik der kunstlichen Kreu—
sung bei Veiden (Solis). Lfichter 1: 125~ BU.
----------------- (1930) Lie Lrenzu1Qsmetnode und die Pg-
scbreibunQ von Bl-festorden oei POpulus. Pflsnrenzucht-
EilOijllg
E>eeies hybrids in forest
A
over de teelt ven berken.
_rch trees.) Tijdschr. Leo.DJ
IUIS (I?eilu3 A) 1U: 5E”7— 6‘?, .
---------- ------- & PPOpacn, H. (193”) Sichtuni:sgrljeit Qur
BizY1nzicbtu1Q (Peconnaissance work in birch brreedinQ.)
Zflchter 11: 379-UO. (Cited from Ilsnt Breed. EAstr. ”01.
x, 1940.)
Wetzel, G. (1929) Chromosomenstudien bei den rstles. Bot.
Arch. 25: 25 ~2U3.
IPaiert (1904) Betulscese. Des Pflsnzenreich IV.
61: 94.
, H. end Anton, L. (1933)Fitudien13oer Petule alba L.
1m Ansc‘rvluss an Ia-‘lorQent‘rieler 11nd morqrsson. (studies on
B. aloe L. with reference to the torL of Iowzentnole“ and
iunnnrsson.) Beitr. ‘ 101. Pfl. 21: 255- 99.
-1;13_
floodwopth R. H. (1929) ytoloical studies in the Petu-
la eee I. Betuls. Wot. G-Z b7: 331-363.
------------ ~—- (1930) T1010ioa'il studies on the Betn—
lecgee IV. Retule, ngSinus, Metrva, OStPJOpSlS. _Eot.
G53. 90: lOb-IIS.
--------------- (1931) Polyploidy in the Retulscese. Jour.
Arn. Arb. 2: 205-217.
Yanchevsky, K. (1904) On the peculiazities of the germin-
ation of the seeds of Asoen and oi some species of YiIIOW.
(In Russian.) Proc. I“*e*1il r0orest. Inst. ll: 2”9-74.
LiszsirUas mos CITED
(Petula)
bianca, S. (1933) New principles in he collection and
4
.1.
b
preservation of forest seeds. Int. Rev. Agric. Ftome
508-17
Dena, S. T. (1909) Paper birch in the northeast. U.S. For.
‘erv.CiIc.163.
Fernald, I L. (1902) Relationships of some American and.
old morld birches. Amer. Jour. Sci. 14: 167-194
Ishikswa, m. ( €15) A list of the number of chromosomes.
Hot. Rag. Tokyo 30, No. Boo: 404-440.
Jack, F. G. (1895) Hybrid bircres. Tardb‘n & Forest 8:
243- 244.
’L tZ7el, G. (1927) ChW0uosoncn Lnlen bei den Ferles.
(VorlHufie Litteeilung.) Ber. Dent. Bot Gesell. 45: 251-
50 o
-—----—-- (.1./(3
(VOll'lgdfive 1::
l4.
‘Ioodworth, R. H. (I929—a) Eo‘to99039nesis snc nolyembrvony
”Inomosoverzablen bei den Fegeles.o) e
itteilnng.) Ber. Lent. Pot. Gesell. 46: 212—
\(t
LuRoi) Sureng. Science (n. s. ) 70:19p-in AJJNIS 1921939
193.
----_-----_-—-—- (1929-b0 Cytolo*ical stud-
wilece9£>. II. ICOTQThls91ml Alnusq 130t. tc.l. 85; (JbO-
39(5) .
--------------- - (1950) CytOlOSic9l studies in the Petnlac-
eee. III. Parthenogenesis and nolvemorvonr 1n Finns
rm )se. Bot. Gaz. 89: 402-409....—ALE;—
‘ I ,‘\ ' V'Y-I ‘.
I‘A.'_:.'."L!3lbh_4 A. PI‘QUH
Beech Family
‘he beech family includes over 600 species in 6 fenera:(
l
\—J
Quercus L. (oak), Facus L. (beech), Castanea giller (chestnut),
.3
CastanOpsis Spach (ctinquapin), Lithocarvus Blume (tantark),l
and NOthOfQLUS Blume (antarctic beech). The family is found
thruout the temperate and subtrOpical regions of both hemi-
spheres but is most characteristic of the forests in the north
temperate zone.
With the exception of Nothofagus, whose 17 species are
restricted to the southern hemisphere, all genera are repre-
sented in fiorth America.
The economic significance of the Fawaceae rests mainly
upon the production of valuable timbers, especially oak, which
enjoys a world-wide reputation for strength, durability, and
all around usefulness. The family in addition produces other
products of great importance to man including cork, tanin,
and nutritious nuts. It has been claimed that no other family
embracing dicotyledonous trees in the north temperate zone
I
p
rivals the Panaceee in their service to man. (Pearson 6 Brown,
1932; Rehder, 1940; Barlow & harrar, 1941).
Que rcu s 1;. (oak)
The oak genus includes about 200 arborescent, rarely shrub-
by, deciduous or evergreen species in the temperate regions of
the northern hemiSphere and in the trOpics at high altitudes
south to Colombia in America and to the Relay penninsula in
-115-
Asia.
_uercus is divided into three suogenera: (l) gyclobalan-
oasis Prantl; (2) Erythrobalanus Space (red or black aka);
asi (3) Lepiiobalanus Enilicher (White oaks). The latter is
divided into 6 sections: Zerris Loudo: éEEEE Eeichb., lléfi
Loud., Gallifera Spach, Pobur Feichenb., and Erinus Loud.
Cyclobalanopsis is not represented in the flora of the United
U)
tates but the red ani unite oaks are represented by 75 to 80
'ecies, about 60 of which reach tree size.(n
'O
The norli-siie reputation of oak timber has been previous-
ly noted; but it is also a matter of significance that the
genus is gregarious ii the north temperate zone, forming ex-
tensive forests in regions there civilization attains to a
(D
U)
C D (D
O {‘3
...H;
r‘
‘e of specialization. In the United Stat
furnish more native timber annually than any other related
group of troaileaved trees, being surpassed only by the coni-
fers, which occupy first place in this respect. The principle
native timber producers of the red oak group include: '3.
bor alis Lichaux (red oak) ani its variety 3. b. maxima (Kar-(D
shall) Ashe; g. velutina Lamarck (black oak); i. coccinea
iarshall (scarlet oak), ani several others. In the white
oak group, 3. alga L. ani i“s varieties are said to furnish
nearly three fourths of the timber narseted as "white oak".
Other important producers of this group include: ‘g. macrocarpa
Kichaux (bur oak) and 44 grlpug L. ( swamp‘chestnut oak).
The two white oaks 3. robur L. (English oak) anl J.
etraea (hatuschka) Lieblein (durmast oak) and their numerous
~116-
varieties are the important oak timber producers of ;Le sritish
Isles and southern Europe.
The cork industry, centerei in Sgain, southern France
and Algiers, is dependent upon its source of raw material
from the outer bark of 3. subs; and the variety 3. 8.
oc iientalis (Gay) Arcangeli.
Tannin, extracted from the bark and leaf galls Oi many
L):
native an. exotic oaks is used for tanning and medicinal
purposes. The acorns of certain species1 are used to a
certain extent as human food but more extensively as mast,
i.e., hOg food.
The genus is tf little importance in the orient although
small quantities of Jajinese oak have come into the world
market from time to time. Thirty-seven species of guercus
attain tree size in british India. Cf these only 6 are
classed as low-ranking commercial timber trees. (rearson &
Brown, 1932).
Because of their sturdiness, longevity, and the brilliant
autumn coloring of their leaves numerous species are widely
used as ornamentals.
The extreme variability exhibited by many species within
the cenus furnishes as yet unsolved taxonomic difficulties.
The description of many known or susgected natural hybrids as
well as numerous varieties and forms of doubtful rank has
abundantly contributed to the confusion.
l
Quercus cornea ? of China is reputedly an excellent quality
nut for human consumption, Fairchild (l959).
-117—
ARTIFIJIAL adiajTlOS F?;l ”l_D Sftjh
Natural intersgecific hybridization in us rcus, based
largely upon taxonomic evidenCe,.is aggarently qaite common
and explains in oart the characteristic variaoilitr and in u:-
gradat ion of various characters between species which has made
this genus the most complex of taxonomic puzzles. Natural
hybridization aogears to be limited to members of the same
subgenus. In the case of the white oak subgenus (Legidobal-
anus) intersectzcna1 crossing has been noted but for the
most part is limited to species of the section frinus (Tre-
lease, 1924; Johnson, 1939). Artificial inter sub-3enus
O
crosses (Hrytirocalanus x Leo iddobalanus) have, honever, been
reported by Pjatnitskii (1939). Johnson (1939) listed about
75 natural hybrids in the genus.
J
It is beyond the scope of this paper to review in detail
the abundant taxonomic literature relating to natural hybrid—
e of the sub-(D
ization in this genus. Eeferences to this pha
ed in the "literature not cited" list, p.|27;L.‘J
ject are inclu
As pointed out by Johnson (1939), it should be borne in mind
that C+
he majoritv of natural hybrids in the genus have been
presumed by taxonomists on a purely morphological basis with-
out experimental evidence as to parentage. Although such
hybrids must be treated tith some caution, the considerable
degree of intergradation between sgecies would favor the
supposition that hybridization does occur.
Selection of superior forms from wild stocks in the
genus has not, aJJarently, received attention in the UnitedL
States but considerable interest in race identification and
~118-
pro eny testing LES beei tarrie d on by zuropean workers.
poerman (1932) reported the testing of 90 samples of acorns
collected from various classes of mother trees in Denmark.
The material was collected and somn in 1911 and observations
were made periodically until 1929. Cf special interest was
his emchasis of the jenetic axiom expressed in his weneral
conclusion: "... bad formation in a mother tree does not
necessarily lead to inferior :roeny
oirner (1933) in Germany stu iiei inheritance of e;icormic
branch (tranches arising from dormant buds) formation in the
oaks. From data collected on the origin of oak seed sown
over a period of 50 years in various for=st plantations, he
concluded that epicormic branch for nati‘:n has a character
thich varied according to racial types or varieties of the
several oak s;ecies investigated. The author recommended
that future planting material for use in Germany saould be
obtained from the desiratle races and varieties he had
selected.
According to Staf and Teerink (1936) 3. robur has been
‘ation Wltfl regard to race iso-he subject of long inves
ins of this speciesmlation in murope and several distinct str
are aid to have been identif‘ ied. Sipkes (1938) in Holland
and various other juropean and British workers (hatthai, 1922;
Hauch, 1909; and Day, 1934) have contributed to the problem
of seed provenance and race isolation in the genus.
-3C§TFCLhD :E‘DI- %;J ELLEJTICN
Artificial hybridization studies in .uercus have been
-119-
.1
reported by a numzer of workers. Cf special interest to the
l)
forest a' neticist is the fact that hlotzsch (1854), first of
the tree h bridizers, success ully hybridized i° robur L. x
0
age ‘.“VI—J (
D
I.J
}._)
iJ- ‘3
[..J
O—
o:a Salish. and other species in the genus
'52; e 1 TL 0
In 1909, base (1918-3, 1918-b, 191;, 1;27) in the
States, success;ully crossed
J..1. _ \ A1 _ _ . _' ‘3' 7‘ 1 3‘ O f! I “ _ o ‘_‘ " .. _ I“. _ .
“alter and noted udrkbd hybrid Visor in the pr03eny.
( _
W
,_J
\0
1 rate
Yarnell
'33) measured diameter at breast height (4.5 ft.) of two
of the hybrids 24 years later and found them to be 13.4 and
S14.8 inches respectively. Eleven 3. virfiniala parentr
the hybrids thich tere 21 years old averaged only 5.8 inches
in dia:eter. Twenty 4. lvrata parents, also 21 years
averaged 5.97 inches. The author concluded that variations
in site or "he 3 year start of the hybrids could not account
for this marked differince in diameter and that it might
logically be attributed to heterosis in the hybrids.
Yaroell also studies seere ation of leaf edaracters as
to size, shape, nature of epidermis and several fruit char-
acters as expressed in the F generation of the above cross
2
and concluded that in most cases only 1 or 2 factors were
involved in the determination of each of the characters. he
pointed out that such a condition increased the chances
securing desirable combinations of characters in second
generation proEeny.
With reference to the s
Schmidt (1930) reported that the type of axis, certain
f...)
An intersectional cross (Erinus x 11ex)in the white
subgenus (Lepidobalanus).
~120—
tudy of heritable characters,
'I 7
0 a5;
1
crown ani 1e;f trees, and grocaely percentage of summer wood,
resista.ce to nrought, frost, disease, anl other characters
have tegn demonstrated as heritable characters among members
of the oak genus studied in Germany.
Following the controlled hybridization tor; of hlotzsch
ani Ness there has, a);arently, been no reported effort of
attempts to conduct furtfier hybridization nor: in the genus
' I'\ "\ l . 1 A, J.
until 1539. In that year Sonner (1939) reported successful
duplication of Ness' A. ”irniniana X lvrata cross and a suc-
cessful 3. virviniana x‘g. serrata (?) cross. rjatnitskii
(193)) in Russia successfuLly crossed 3° robur with 4-
. y. - - 2 o 1- ‘l
borealis Waxima (aarsn.) Ashe , 3. porealis :icnaux , J-
macranthera Fisch. and Jay. (and also the reciprocal), and
'I z r . .~ - . ' 5.1 ‘. [-1 ""1 .- . 4“<f‘ -:‘ ‘1‘ \ —‘l- o 2 *
macrocarya Michaux. lne cross macran.hera x corealis and
1
. 2 a
e lis raXima mere also successful.C)
Hmacrantuera x b' '\
The four hybrid or ogerles resulting; "rozn the inter sub-
genus crosses showed the most marked heterosis and of the
three, the most promising has sail to be the 3. mac ant era x
borea_is noxima eroup. The same worker (1934), as a result
of self-fertility studies in the oaks, concluded that self-
nollination studies gave great oronise of yielding new and
valuable forms from the apcarently heterozygous oak seecies.
1 , . ., ,Johnson (1939) listed only the artificial hybrids of hlotzsch
an_ Tess but there are doubtless numerous unreported cases ofI
w
artificial hybridization in the genus.
lntersuh-genus crosses (Lepidobalanus x zLJLsrcealanug, Hue
first reported in the genus.
-121-
. . 11 T , 1-. . . " , ,. , . 4.“: n r , f‘ . .« :. .
8105:.) {.0 31-13 .-. X g. 1"»)...‘tar L. Cell”; must; .1 J; C5188 OI LIthXCNlfi.
:1 3, r? ‘. r I‘ - \ -: ‘-_ g . I \ :: v ,I‘ r ,. ." .. , .C‘ . .- n, ;. - p;
as 134.catei t; the celayei 2atu1t, oi accrns on the iemale
, ..-‘.‘ y. _. , “ , - _ -4,” 4- ,. 4 ...A , - —. ‘ ,. _, ‘ fl . - - -. i 1
parent. 1t VHHJ.JLS note 1 unit the hyorio.2mnnn1s apg-arecz
‘ L "' r A. _ — 4- J ' ‘ ..
t0 e8 somehzlat .L'il Cf snail 211 St, -ka/(TCJ cu "L'ltl'OL-€u 11’]-
s ‘ u. ' ‘ -— \ \
trasr“01fic Jollcnat'-n on t_e feriLe JlEHt.
The benus is monoecious, te flower dichoiamous and
usuctly taruec ey such extreme grotaniry that isolat trees
.2 r" " L ‘ '. ‘ u ,. -‘ ~11 ' V V ’3 f‘ 8' .0 . _‘_ J_ :1 _ ' J— 1hr I ';-7
uU not eioiuce iruit. lnvescl;atiens by: jatni ts8.11 (1534),
nettstein (1935), an: east (1940) have estaolished self-
fertilitj for the genus as iar as known. ochreiner (1938),
A ‘I' '\ ’ 1‘ '! . _" "‘ 3 v '. “‘0' ‘ . “ ' ’ ; +.’ ' + ‘ " ':‘
Uh LaL/L’: b.1b18 0.1 \Jl CllLAlerff St«Ll-.l:S, TEQOI en Luau bk).-.e
Renters o: the genus ruercus have seen include: in the
”difficult group” of slants to root from stea cuttings. (The
recent usrk of Thimann and Delisle (1939), however, aspear
to contrioute to its grompt removal from that category. These
workers mere successful in obtaining 82% roo ing of auxin-
treated cuttings of tuercus hor alis and 22% rooting in un-\_.
treated controls. Cuttings were made by tLese horaers in
geLruary from 2-3 year old tooi from t-e -ssal parts of 4
year 011 trees. The Cases of phe cuttings tere immersed l-2
(\ A“
cm. does in a 400 mg./liter concentration or injOle-3-acetic
acid ftr 24 hours. Jontrols mere oLaced in tater tor a like
placed in ,rooagatin: ooxes fitted Lita a sic e
closed. The soL F (J
'-
¥1
(
3
(T)
(C
"1
H '_.l
‘<‘.
r It
(D
U (7*
pd
(h
S. *‘i
‘__J
A ‘0
These torlers e Dhasizei thai.t&n3:2ost imeortant single
-1
factor involved in rooting ,uercts an; other ciff
cuttinrs is are of the tree from hhléfl cuttines
T .‘ ‘ 'Z A 7‘31. *0 f q-v 1‘ 3 w-~( C1" 3;)C'yr,j-\_" Qfiwn
rEEb /- . ELQIL‘J (J Q,-"le CirL .I.\.-'UU ._l.vl.JlJ. LA-LLe U._.A‘\Je
cuttings are coscioie without ca ,letely aestro
re 313.518 0ST),A J- n .-2 . c, ', a; e -, 4. .O . -‘
slants lr‘Oul miijz.‘ L..k.' C‘tlb+ll’l~.b
\ r. x" -‘ ' a“\ I | ' ,
-.J .1.]. v1.1an
Chro; some numser
'\ 4 ~ ‘1‘, " ,n ‘ r ' ,' r' ‘~ V T v r" A
:esec on the chroiosome counts of joey, l9
‘-‘ _ ' P _ ,- r—V‘r ‘vafi --.!“ .
1929, 1930; sex, 1;3e; caietzny, 1:3»; flgflOll,
1940 the haoloii CSIOZOSOMB number in the genus
'orted in('2
Various other counts have teen re.
(2n = 8, Cosens, 1912; n = 11, netzel, 1920; 2n
1930; 2n = 12, Aufderheije, 1931) out sharp (19
Ho
finII
‘29;
34)
8; ti;
"1“,. a
bull
(33"!-
LA“;
mpu
Friesner,
Luf-
field (1940) concluded that the {enus was homooloii With a
r,
pI
C—f—
H.
< H.
L/.
t,
somatic number of 24.
F).
a basic number of 6 for the genus. he tel
number of 12 chromosomes osservei in to: variou
studied could be civideo into two groups of 6 oase’
L Eee also li t of chromosome numbers by Caiser,s s
and taude, 1939.
-123-
C:ie (1937), however, suggested
eved the reduced
3
morohtloer. Iie also resort e; seconiary association of mem-
bers of the the groups at metaphase I and 11.
K)CytolOnical studies of s ecies anl hybriis
The majority of cytological work conducted thus far in\
the genus has been executed primarily for c roxosome number
'7 ‘L "’ ° '3 v" P“ 1 :3 7' ~ ' '1 '1‘; "1 r~ '3 ‘r‘ I" v~'~ r1 '5} ,- fl : ~ ,-' in. 3 r') ' r‘
38 Ltrmlne~t .LLJD, Ll-1JCL’1 C‘l "LJ._L'J&1 L-C;..|:I LCC.1 ‘-_L'~_‘Ile if] SOLILCZt-LD tlSDueO
The majority of the workers, however, have noted that size,
shape anl number of chromosomes is remarxatly cons ant from-..-
seecies to soecies. Chromosome studies based on counts at
$0
meiosis save ls o revealed exceptional regularity in the
meiotic divisions.
Sax (1930) estimated pollen grain sterility in 25 species
and hybrids of the genus ani found it to vary from 3 - 10%,
except in one excegtional specimen of 3. dentaia Thunb. which
snowed 80w sterility. Another individual of the same sgecies
showerl' only Sfl. The five hybrids included in the study nowed
no significant difference in sterility from that found in the
e pollen ,rain size has also computed for
eacn soeCies, and this Character also showed remarkable uni-
}—+J
formity (except in the case the exceptional 3. dentata
mentioned above) Wlich had notably larger pollen grains.
The genus guercus, in view of the dearth of experimental
q
genetic and cytological data so far collected in it, appears
to be a fertile field for basic cytogenetic research. fiith an
increasing perfection of vegetative erooag atitn, hybridization,
and chromosome doubling technLuse this already too-ranliing
forest tree ::nus may make even more desirable contributionsk.
to the constantly increasing debands of modern culture.
~124-
ll‘"?xfb"
siev/31.13)(
m7""
(JI .LJ-‘A
llifderreide, .1. (1931) CE-nowro OzW‘YUULDGPS in.PVfijxs gn~nl-
ifolia and ,rsrcns Virginianc. Antler Univ Lot. Stud.
2: Eager LO. L‘: 45-52.
9 rner, 9. (1953) erer lesser‘eiserhildung, his} ;wnassen
11ml E1036}nx/Hlfnolz zucita (Q3 tlcthnFMJtiOn 0i e;pjicormi
*ranches, Oil laces and the production of large oak tim-
ber.) Ltscb. Forstw. 5: 541—544.
Conrer, A. B (1939) 52nd Annual repart of tie Boxes Agric
Station.D‘p-
304
C
Cosens, A. (1913) A COHtPifigtion to the wohyVolOJy and bi-
OlOJY 0f ins Got 63118- PPans. 31nd. Inst. 9: 297-5sl.
Day, fi’ 9. (193') T99 Pel'LiUB 1Det‘rfeen disease and the con-
Stit”tion and “““ironmeHt 09 t'6 tree. J. a. i;ric. Soc.
95: 54-72.
Ullffield, Jo .1. (ll—440) C:'I'O:::OSOT:’.O 001131133 111 ”9190118. 53.11191“
'3 301:. 2'7 (s): 7:27-53.-—
East, E- 5- (1990) The distributior of self—st rilitj in
the flOWBPin; plant”. Proc. finer. Phil. Soc. 62: 449-
51s.
st_rchild, David (1539 The world was my SGPdGn. XIVfi-
494 IM?- 33953. Sorfisni r's. lien Ytnfli.
Fouarre, J. (1939) Note su_r 1a cntyocinESe crez 1ees cliones
pedoncule et TOJVPGo (3 note on keryokine-is in pedun-
culate oak and sessile 0k.) Hull. Inst. awror. sembloux
8: 111-113.
Friesner, R. C. (1930) Chromosome numbers in ten species of
"iuercus, wit- some rem r1:s on tie contrilmtions of cytol-
05y to ta monogy. Lutler Univ. Bot. Studies 1 (Papers 6-7):
77—105.
Gaiser, L. 0. (l950-a) A list of chromosome numbers in
‘ioene““s. 11. Si liegr. Genet. o: 171-4oo.
-----------—- (l93x-b) A list Of chromosome numbers in
Angiosperms. III. ienetica 12:101-200.
------------- (l953) A list of crnomo"ome numbers in Angio-
sperms. IV. Biblicar. venet. 10: 105-236.
Ghimpu, V. (1529) Eur les Chrome some 3 de ouelque ctenes.
Pev. de Bot. Ancl. et d'A3ric. Colon. pp. 176-179.
---------- ( 950) Vecherches CthlOgicues sur leg genres;
HOPGGQEL_A?H019, ice'ce o, Vitls 6t 3ncrcus, APCP. Angt,
Ticros. 20: 9135—2 30
Farlow, 3. N. “ Harrar, OE. b. (1941-1)lextaook of dendrol-
2y. 2n} hd., XV1'542 pp., 254 Ill Icfiraw-hill Rook
00., Inc. 13w Yor & London.
Hauch, L. A. (l999) Evblichkeit bei buche und eicLe. Cont-
bl. fiesam. lorstw. 35: 355-343,
H063” 15. (1929) (fillflellerlTV‘TWWNDTnCllenlfjnnwvis robnp I”
o; J. sessiliflora iartyn. “op. Tide. 9038H~1;6n 40:
[11:409’
Jeret"'“' Tl. (1930) Jar mytolo;ie der Fagales. Plants.
Arch. Kiss. Bot. 10; 120-157.
-125-
181, 0
1.01141“
17:
WMBIM
Eelwi
’i Y“
nscni, A. V.
srtifici:
1h
1]](1.L .
J.
C U
.,—o ‘
.15;
sPGC
a
I). J-FCQ.
Che HuinfunQ de
es. iSthLCL. Q
Vein tr. 12:
Lerton ostsloQue.
species of fiIitis
d 01. 3s; 1—51._Q
(1257) I: LIQ“~)e
hioridos do Qencr0
5ndh;L
I?“:ukflf‘0638 (.19. 1).]
Ilow i
Forstwi
A '\
I 9
A23
UL
rv ,-' r".‘ ‘_ )o I]
K. I - I 1 '9; .
M
f1
Po
\-
,
qM
5““;
p
S 1
s.)
ervieos
(1,16-9
Jon_n
"C)
{—9 V) '
_Uerou
C108 {3
Oak.
1" ...
rJ OLLI‘ 0
ed“or
hybrid
f “stl01 .3 __
x {Inf-1 dfs‘rl
,
mflmiir.-.-q
r
;\J
O
J
fi J
.__1
f.
..-)
E
P."U
0
Htlmh
U)
(T)
1L
f‘netursl
411—444
Q do?
Preuss
O
148. o
' \1
I u
I23.)
list 0? tbs
onerir=I...)
ices INEl-
American
P frin-
{43 1'1 (3.11 391‘ OV-
5—419,
f‘
(CytoloQ-
tbu(JV!
(J¢‘ 11.8
r. a 0 I‘m 1‘"; 1
7A
en 1 mes
. kOMfliSSi
P:ports wi
p.
e1 timbers
1 Putlioet
Lesnoe
Plant
11.
-.
1):).
A..~
“rsnoh.
Pjs.nitkkii, b. 9. (1934) 'E‘Yeerinents in Sglf-pollinst
of'iJ pit, xuzor srni‘QICrous. :kcta Irmfis. Rot. fxyui. go
1I.S.u4??. 4—'_~§97'— 510.
--------~---—-—--- (1939) (oviniczs.ion in oaks.)
1107 aistvo (borestrV) No. 7: 36-45. (Cited from
greed. Abstr. J01. X, 1940.)
Behror, A. (1949) Assisi of cultivstsfi trees and shrubs.
Bud Ed,, .735 so. T*(fiiillsn Co., INII'YOIK.
Sex, 9. J. (193C) CTICIO omo nurters in Qn_ercns. Jour.
Arn. Arb. 11: 29’—295.
Schmidt, V. (1939) Forstlioto Ffils nzenzfichturg (B_oedi
forest plants.) be? ”ontel 2: 189-199. '
Qarreirer, E. J. (1939) Besesrch in forest 1venetin it
oetresstorn borest Exp. its1ion. Ber. Proc. 29th.m1n
th. horthern not 9r. Ass., Isss.: 12-14 Septowher;
59-58.
-~--—---------- & Lquisli, J. a. (1942) Metsxenia in an
osk species cross. Jon» Eerefi. 33 3): 97-98.
Sherp, L. H. (19"') Introduction to oytolon 3rd Fd.,
XIV 567 pp. 233 ii 8. ECErww-Ulll WOOL 30., Ito. N
‘for” E: ififlldffl1.
Siqflces, 1?. (l?"b‘) 'Ri‘ien. (”WA s.) TiQyflsol “. lkyi. Ihxi’
E 9307?. FT): JJJL—l.4.
~126—
J..-P :" ' 7"" «.3 W- ‘ ":7 ' - -—- - ."I, ~~
S‘ L: l.’ ’ \J o i‘wf'JA J. , I a (l- '_)'V) 11%} h t" {'9'} ”(21] (C: T“): 111311.63!
~‘ {-“l . '3‘. “ 3. ". \ rv—w _ , P V ._ "1 " ‘3 ~ - n .
9'62L1* flora H.¢ u_.,. (;,e Puffiilu 0” a. Pghfi il'loffl
( .' > "‘ ' g x- ‘, .’_ ‘ .. {r .9 '1. 1- ~ "‘ ,«_-'"‘~"}‘T‘,;:’ “77f,
- .. _!_ LSM 0 - lU-«SZJ; . lthf-n . . '\ -'-"'-1.(‘fl.'J?z . o if :J: .1.. 'I “'l ;
1 “.r’ (if (x
121‘ 'l-\_I'\’; L‘,\)l~l‘..
("~ ": ‘ ‘ l‘ H (1’: . " . r- ‘ ' " ‘ ‘ I H " " I ‘ ‘ "‘ n ‘ .
LJ'_,_U_L]:L‘£1’ .. 0 (-1.. J-) '5 _'.l.)t )- C}".’(’) 'C) ,(J‘ ,1) r'. ' “‘ .“P .1.-‘ ,4: ‘4]-0"
cm, .~-.( ‘2 .1.»; a Van-'- ”‘ ‘- n .z‘ t \ EF‘C‘ t‘ ‘u’\... r) u; A. I ‘u kl. 'u. . Q. __‘~’ ‘1’. ’ (1. (La), -.(’. g.:H—t 1.»).
r1 7- r' flr'r’
1 \. .‘ ..-. : :'..L A " ‘ ‘ "
/ 1” (I . \ v_ :0 r‘ J ~ *3 a
.__........_..-..._..._. \_‘._, , ;) E;TJ.]_I‘_‘LVC g‘._'_ L:L.C -’_f 3);) u)f‘(_"'v' I.".’IL .m:.o *1”:
fl 0 'V I‘ n
' lgii‘tf‘ "lff‘f‘tfi, mi 7 ” W30??? l "C'?{,‘“"' "“l‘ "h r1 ”1.10 "‘ ‘ r‘xnw' c; .L $ 4 _V U -~.— L-\_. I_..-_l
’1_--, '1 ‘ {,1 '1‘ C‘fl 5‘")?
J U 1.27.1.OKJ - I : LXIi‘i-kJ't ka’.
’;1‘,’. I‘ ' ‘ I. .' n‘j ‘ \ r“‘ r'\ ‘ ) ~ . y ‘l ' _ '. fl
.' "3-- ‘( FC) ~ 0 ( " ' I I .4 -4 I ”7.091“ (‘3? ’18. . 1.-.. T ”.12. .chqrrlo
C.“ ()r\ (571? 4‘ ‘3“!
. 01. av: l—UL . ¢. 1—(r0..f} ... , a 7‘ ,‘1 I‘ll: (‘J-- ‘3 _ o ‘. '1 3 n ‘_ ‘1 ... . __ r _ ‘ _
1Vnw}1, y. (1..u) w-dCLU C1L0L0H¢JU 2.4 QGQH“G UEPOVS.
\ 1 rJ- u.‘ "' . .1 'F-I‘QW 17' +1 ~ ~ \‘r'r1 -~r~ i ' ~ L
(‘- (Iv "'~._LC’\J.-J-r?jm C“; 1".u7 (\. U, (1‘ ‘J(' A.S '5‘, 7.('I"Co) La. ~ o 4.31;.
.r‘ “:_ Q.) '1' .' ... _ A ")( rrl-l‘l ~——————.-——
. r) '.' . ‘ _ *1)! _ _(\ 1‘ : .-J‘}—,)' .
'7, z- - J — ‘ ' “1-.. P .. I - ’ "v"'.'!': ." - ‘- ‘‘3 butt — cgbc'fi h- , .. V03 \J.Ag,) Le;hnihefru0rt‘fl‘ 701
fi. ~ I ‘ . ’. “ O -L I r \l
N ,) V » .~ ~ ;~ A . L.“ ° 1chx‘c. \ (fir-'wXL11-vJU1Cu 1;; 021.8.) :f‘ "nig'c.117 Ll:
" '7 "‘
6’1’- (.J.
v.' L . ’V TH" '. ‘, M. , _ . .‘ "\ _ ' ,- 1 .
,ebzel, r. (lwfik) unvmuosoncnstncieu hwl new ~~f01u9.V .
n x . j r' r- r rr' . .v
Ot’ 0 .i_fl(\-\. .30: .‘31F/‘L/J.
«(7,‘_ *1 0 +1 (“(xr-'7\ -:1 . ' ‘‘ -) n W \' . ‘ v "‘ I " i ' I ‘ -'.‘ "-7 ‘ " ’ ‘ I" . -"
L.-“Q¢m’ L” ‘H -J . , I“ ,_; 1L8 l”.5f1(fiii s «0103 “IuPlC.
v‘ I ., '4 ”1. r1 r:
J. " r1r1()j_(‘ ."_ H \. _ ': (I, _ { g'.
'T'Wf."': ‘ ' 'TI'T\‘W ‘f r“ n. 'w "‘.‘r1"
1J¢.;Ad ; “I r n, 1. _ .2 *;J1/
(' 1r»”*r_',‘tls)
1X (J‘c‘ 15‘0” T) I (1 (itflfj "11* ". ‘u‘ 71+"! xv.“ flnjf ’ . — ’ 1r FH’W
LL'-_ . I)»..—’ . 0 Q ——' ‘ “1 ‘2; UL l,’).‘i -T.J’A. 501. ‘Lj..€:-‘ -../flfj:
n
3wl.
fl - V. "‘ C '1.) ' ’-' 7"? ‘ H' "‘I. q
I‘lla£fii: 3- ”\o (7-)V' F~ ‘”OU“FL 7L (5: CI 'ne :NW-PGEJ %1 0”?
.-. ‘ ’ ‘._ . ‘ '1 ' ' L‘, \ J I . , J-‘ _
ngCl*S . annlo ynxLWl, niuv L0 as ea 0 ref hgnb“b7§ h"-_ u
1N . f r“ '1‘ '7 ‘r. 'x‘ ,»“ — --. . v - q ~-‘ :
urllu ?~.UU J“ u; ugly Loo QlfitPl“ of JOLTUOi9. Vvll.
rt) .y}.nC.,.- I"). I , “‘1 1.. Fr‘ . (;"Y‘1 Y7”
_._ "4. A. 1) !. \ '. ,'-L- .'L L, \.' . r‘J I — I I .
1“.“ 1. -:r-:w '- ( .:— 4- w .. .. -
-\:-OIU1 0 IS (l'V‘L‘ch) ‘9 ’1 r‘ (3‘: ’(:‘ (j. LIL/1r} {1611 I :3qu L) ’ in O x/ "/4 TV,“
11 ‘1.v 7‘ -' I‘l‘ m- ~
‘.€.l' J 4' ivrlttl-1.
-—-- — “)—" ’fl ‘ r‘ " l' ‘I” 1". ’ V‘ 1 K‘ ’. ‘ . H" . '—~— - (1”42) '21‘3u 0“; ;Ol"flVV¥H??R _. a;uq-yxls). Jour.
TP- — 7‘ r- (I. \r‘.
— \-
I "1.56:. CI: 4OLJ”4(« ” o
- .T T «.1.-t '\ ‘ . .'r' ~‘.— - '- "
FrittOL, L. 1J. (1&9 ) UN 2 rfimnyui 093 QU?I‘}A3'”CPt, ;. J.
T“ " r70*
.N -1 ‘- r *3 ~ 1\ '7 -
all. ;0~'o; 'Ot. Cllw 9: 19-15.7.“ f h '1 ' :‘Nf‘\ r- ‘ _ 1 W '
.-\ a. _. - _ r 1 p --Q . ._
.JlS”, :. P (lg\.v; jJewwv:s ELTLLlOS 3x ”UMIEE 1n ij3sou16_.
f“ 1 "7 —,‘ - (7- "7”"
rPPC). Orwi ycr'egi a: fir.'.'1 " r‘ \ TT‘,,,"
'- '- J ,
--~--—-—--- (La»«; uuvrid oaks 1: resgvrn Li~qnu~w, nquf“ -. 7‘1 -- 7‘“ (9(1)
'JT‘C‘ E OI'CL)11 U: ng-J.
~1nn1nu a ( <n7\ nm-uw wan -m in. a~ - r .V +LL, A. 4‘ u; unh;_suunvlven {per Clo mlvtscrnftllnrn
I‘pf’r‘114‘l Y 1' “I" '5 ‘v' 17- ? J‘ l] , (I. ' 'rw 7 ("- 3 ' ‘,-
»v:vu‘1»v 0.1 gQIKUJfU LCS \fiutoutes oer u Jelelcne.r1 V ‘ V . 1 -y .1.... ‘1'} f ‘
pentul. mosar. f033ua. 4,; (fl7)-149.'V\ O .‘I' '1 \. "'\ 1 1.. 0 1
en 7 ' (I ’3‘) "”"\l‘- I1]? Y1 r; - - 7' - " °
-~‘1S, u. T. ~b~fi 3.» 1“ 0v.S 0“ st.tey isl~nd. Hut. 501.A. I' J -. _ - .,. ‘1‘ . - m I: “H " r r‘
333 c. _u* ex 'slanu rgnc, i; g-7§_
wry. 1 ,‘ - - - 4 ‘
---——---—-—_ (1_:.(,(') :1 R'JprIEC‘} "JjJ9.Q l-l\' 15(‘.T-‘ ("T'—:1’)j-d ()r‘li‘f‘ ‘1er 4:1“)
U 4 --'—$ ‘
11:53:" I hr; '37. 1, 3'0 ("-g, ‘. ' Q n '1 " A J- 1 —- - 3‘ '1' - A -. --. V.) J J- . (J- (..L J4. l Lv‘ L’CIL 1..ng .' . k)t.; (4;) Ifulz,.;-k1 $1131). ‘\,I,LS
.- q < 0 1m r‘ r;-
32“ ~01. 1’1’00. (lra‘lo) l: on.
_, “I'm-d A ‘~~-‘ -' ,1! ‘ -' "" - -_’ '-———c————~—u—— (L..L" ) :4; ‘ dl- r.:'L(\' C'{‘1‘,/ .71” f‘er,‘\;-’1J_Eji'}: :‘Jvi' {;,\11
I film) 3 I“. 3'1?) ) rr~ (3,3. "U ’
C) -\ _ .. -L . __ L t '. v', . ’.)- : .
~127-
«rs .- ' f ' \ (\Ij' ( . . ‘, 5.
law» , In"7 (lu.7 L; ? To” 0:. Viv ‘ - 4- ’1 ' ‘1' u '1 .. \ . g 1_ . —‘ .
asuern (iOMvhlu ?1H “P twe VHPIRUlJFt
:1' ~,‘ ,, °*nr >.r.. ..v ___‘1 3 T4, ‘! . J.‘-3..:l(3-_ - 1 I‘d ~11: ‘ .
l
Fixx i, .\, (17177) LI 8 rvlnc \w‘ric4x‘ e ’"hv- _ iEwirifii 0 hurt?-
301 01 ” ‘KHWNIS r0w~*”' (imwc X“K¢i€ii€8 CdTEjflxrids of
f, anw‘.) (jlteJ—THHW Pl€“u ‘rasd. VUl. V, 193%.)
”1n1, ?. {*"“d) ”b;? 616 I=C-Eo:nw“sa?nft plhfi? Weiss-
iru11“czx lifivw} c k ‘1:'101'“ *4\"3A ‘ 13r7_-*rip'iriiJEL'WKIiss) . (Cm: tE1e‘ o L o . ~. T \
progelj of “ gycgl “c u 1.2 vJa .ueu 0'» \_. TOU“”
ql“i-Ii?ifii"evviso) 791*. ‘ot. :\1. 55: x15I-bfi.
ficJIS, 3?. (1513477 ‘Vii+““” "e (“31"fiesv3‘5-v*n C (30Y*' UFJ‘P V3 SL39-
q1¢ifln~¢ Lvlwsbnry “Vnmfica (EFe nr‘vc) c: 4p4-ZZU.
'qu{57~, 1,. .1. (l JKQ i”'e <)"' ill IIWNWH1%1:. “1’1ficy d «193:0
*‘Ochauqel .usrisirl*orln;jii ”erkmwni 1‘74; $33 ”To
TT¢ENL, 1n. (1‘”‘9) Crl *3 e .7nfl'“""v‘ri" “01“18 r ctnxeaxl ”;19""v F
IWfi*¢? 7}. Pr( —. SV“U‘ilijthPfi.Li%Pt:“l. 1C)t. “WK3QGI£:TKZ?S__
217:??7. (Ififis; & hngfisl swmwrry.)
¥ollfck, &. (109%) A recent Cinnm\crg 6? Ed.rid 0¢ks on
ctnten Islfind. “all. infirej wt. Club 1?; 303-399.
---------—- (131$) Tbo (tovy Cf t=0 antrnn 03k. Sci.
; gw‘ 7’0. 4vfi9, f‘“-/33, ‘432.
}”CL, J. C. (195:) ”9rd“ 0? Eylrid 09k extcbdec. Jon”.
forestry 3”: 701.
Kline, .. R. (171*) ‘ rare :‘fixrid 0" *Ylllrn1871VOniq.
FOPCSt Leeves 16: 120—91.
Iachngal, L. 1. (1307) L,.11(129tion of tke oaks. Sci.
«MGP. Q‘p. 03 ( 69L): ZulCE—leed.
-—-—---—--————-— (-997) Tybridififlfion Of the oaks. Sci.
AnsP. ..g;. ;3 (lCBQ); 2LfHTS—Quloo.
.oe‘zy, I. U. (lJWW) chbril.twnL f) the 11?: listory of
:1]_F=r7t S ; t? (3 'Tr21‘1;1“01*1 (Jai‘: i-*' (3C)“‘(;(?t3j.()11 j_a=t;‘1 ' F 3°: q Tri()1w '1rlci
hybriiisn. nerd. Lit. Mei. 31119. Prom. 53° 33-24
Nueller, C. V. (1936) Studies in t}e O“V9 of t*e monztfiirs
o.“ 3:03"+}20°s1:.r‘1m EOJUQO. me .‘1'-.. EXT‘E‘J. 1'7: 100—179.
P9Pk<_, “. Y. (193V) r9'0 nwtwru hymrifis. Indlan ‘Orostcr
CS: fibE-Lfi‘.
PCFGer, A. (1“01) Fo+gs on Pybrids of "~~nts ilic’foli:.
?*Od0ra 5: 137-140.
.cuer, L. T. (1909) fibrous L093“ L L;%_id 0%“ Plant
'0316 l&: 190—20].
Schentz, 0. L. (1335) AH odd yurlfl 09%. RP. Potflv 40:
3—5.
861%“ (liQS) ”raga d1) Lie en, .13 sie farhqen. Ztsvhr.
Focst 1. Jr ow. US. 39 —531.
{Fidvx)”t}1 }. ‘2. (lCVLZ) Ngilrjxi 091(8. “Imyn. Ifi01u33trfiz 27}
d r‘fll»
I
C“m“
6 - 'J.
Treleuse ”. (1017) 39min; 3wn~iflfih Ly“
[1.1; . :2 '14: Q
-__—---—---- (1935) An unusual Chimacre
Soc. 7%: 241-44.
'Yarnell. 55. H. (lfldfi;) Oak bfeélfilfld in T
~128-
rn . ;"
4176(48 Lg {WK-J
r.‘
ULZ; "1. C 133,51. E 1.1 i 1111 e l
ElJn btnnilbr
{TE-.19 £3111”: fHTHilzr inClLlC188 fillflllt 1F) genera \fi_th 11301.8 tlign
150 species of trgos, shrubs, and herbs. Peprensentstives
J.
are found for the most part thruout the temperate reg one of
(Ho
both hemispheres. A few soccies are limited to the trepics.
U.
y.these is herbaceous. 0f the remain four, two (Ulnus L.
H.
and Celtis L.) are u1f1o1en-;v common and mportsnt to be
considered of interest to the forester. The other two, Trrema
o.
Loureiro, a tropical genus found in southern Florida, and the
monotypic Planers Gmelin, restiicted to swamplsnds of t1e
southern coastal plmein are considered, at present at least,
of no commerccisl importance (Harlo' e Harrar, 1941).
The economic inhortsnce of toe Ultmseee primsrily depends
upon the valt1able timbers prod1ced by speecies of several dif—
ferent genera (especially UlWUs, Celtis, and HolOpteles Plan-
l nchon ) and the high ornamental value or many‘others (Pearson
% Rrown, 1932).
UlLUS L. (elm)
1
Ulmus includes about 18 srborescent species scattered
thruout e1stern North America, EurOpe, and Asia. In many
regions, as in parts of the eastern United States, the genus
is en importont constituent of the he rd11ood forests.
The genus is divided into 5 section, all of which are
H :5
03
CL
1‘)
[.10
d-
H.
O f3
('1'
O (‘1
}_.J
1 3
m :3
Si
O fD
,_J
r1'
H.
J)
, also of importance in India.
asentsi 3y toe six native soecies of north America: (1)
' -"\~"~ h h - r‘ ‘ .- o ’- 1' F‘ V news ‘r ' ~- 0 f .l‘ f“ -
3163L8T04dlfius Dunn lnClU;cS g. a c11cgna L., (2) Cnaetoptelea
Schnei er 1 cluies U. than; .m U)
11.
U W a
‘\
CD 3
(7+.
'1
IC
0 i1.
31.!
‘—L
(0
y-
L).
O [5
S13
C N
((3) Kaiocargus Dun. incluies 7. fulva nicneux; (4) nicrootelea
(‘1 ‘- —= “P ,3 A 1' 1—1-‘— - r l . 7 " _ “pacn cciu :s e. crass11olla uttall, 11- (5) Fr)? uptelca
es ‘ f ,‘ ' ,_ ,r .,- rm 4— 4 ‘ r“ a
ocnnei er inalu c_ U se1u11na arrte t.——— -—________-_-____'.______. .,
‘ 1 r~ \ -.\ ‘A q ’ '7'? ‘fi "“ "‘ "‘ - '_ ' ' ‘I H 1‘ ' 'Tne 1 /-” lelUQGS Sufie or fine most uSeful as; “811— rd.
t3? six s,ecies nitive to 1 : UchEl btates, t. awericsna, U.
to0“2si, 311 U. tslv” "re of ‘rvetest iaportllce as forest
JG ‘tim-
bers of all the species since they are all usei for essenti-
llly the same ourcoses whic1 incluie slack cooperaee, boxes,
ness of elm wood is adagted (Brown & Pansnin, 1940).
(u
tne elms are UNSdeaS"[1"
the Unitei Statis, the List 1 oortant are Lse nycn elm (g.
(glabra Hudson) aifi Enclish elm (g. orocera Salisbury) ofz’
1‘
Europe and their numerous varieties. The Juinesc elm (g.
cs 11‘ ~1
..-.W (D
U)
rJo
U)
(+
$1)
:5
r?“
:1 r—‘
{'3
'L,
I_J.
s.)
.
H
Cn4 q
r‘
‘t
R (3
}_J
C)
10
U)
a)
(J
H.
(D
(D
‘
numila L.), a dreuiht
has been wijely a“ sue essfcllv plartei in the plains re-
Cion of the UD“CC‘ Stites fur 1113 breaks an1 ornamental
puraoses.
AETIF"?1E 3:1;1TICN 9?C1 MILD 5103K A.b TL?T“CL-§D 3>C5338
Selection ani breeding stuiiis in 1:3 genus Ulmus have
been greatly stimulated in r ce1t wears, especially in nurses,
L
O L-+‘
c—Ir
F)
ft)
.C.
(_+.
O S (D
H {:5
DJ
fJo
(D
(D
gm
U)
(D
\.following tne epi pmic outoreaL;
'Z
,2-1 1-
n. c33v-b,
K11
/ 59).
\r)
\)1
\O
Azzaroli, 1938, }_._J
\1'1
KN
\C'
.0
1 1.
{r1 3121~, 1 \f"\
‘38, 1 \F‘‘1
f‘
X)
; Krijtzie & Went,
11 ch and
exotic elms nave a
_ [‘1 I, w
pvearei in n'urocean‘
journfals
l
..Ttfl In
W
‘T
LUKE~8FOU U)
m (T)
1...:
[.10
C.
H.
(D
(D
:1):
(.0
’_Jo
;'1.
(D
:-)4 0
117-
1
mune form
(2*I ‘. L\
‘4' J. DJ
1' 1. r}
u
k.3.
H.
(1’)
far 1.37111. 61‘8".31icatioz13.1
13 impos-
(f)
1.Jo
U)
(C
(‘1'
11.
1.
k1,,
'I‘Y
(T.
S".
(D
(D
l J. the
1+:
0]1r easteYD
‘
,3
_Ihariwoo_
but of L-(o3" ’1
688 SGT
:-
4
trees
(1‘)
[I
m (T1
(T)
I‘
re-
$I
.L. _ any thouC2011:U%-4_k
C'
u;
C.
H)
J7 iemO .nstrat
'\
r- ’v i by v
.
r—J
>——’
U)
U)
mseriousl<
r~‘
..--
(1)
Ho
$.13
U“
(D
4.
€38 1. 8TH Unite
H ...!
11;),
V1
5.):
’Jo
L“;
(7;
CD
m (D
u U H)
}.
1.
,JJ
...]-
2-}:
('3
(D
(’3
‘ (C
h 5
greatH C1
(D
H;
m U‘
S:
H (.4.
U)
C‘
H:
4.
(T)
U" '4
0‘
Ct
£51
5J4
}_J
(T
U1
}.J
D SJ
I
1J
k4
5.
J
C"
(I)
(.1.
1,.)
E (“9*
(+
F., I)
W 11‘
H U)
(U
deal 0” variation CEtnEcn sseciss as sell as varietal vari-
I
-L ' -. _v 3| - : 0 ~ J- .~ P1 »- . . ," .2 v-\ ,"\ w.-. , - r" . . '—\ ... IA -. 1! . v
8111URS 11_t-ir uLc b.i33158 111 re an - to stwnaeotln.111t1r‘t0\ ~ ll
‘1‘ _ >gV ... ‘ — _‘ . _o .-.. ‘ " . ‘ fl 0 I“ '_ -\ -. r" “ 1 p .’ \ . ’ x . I I
tie oisesse. .o SivaC 5 60108 u: AmEIlCd, surOge or seia
:as been founi to be inxune but some, as ecially tne Shinest
or Siberian 811 (Q. Jumila L.), are usually very res stan .
Kany varieties or ferns of some species hhicb are sonsiiersd
on tn: uncle to be extremely susceptible have, however, been
proven to be resistant.
host promising 2f tne highly resis ant clones isolated
to date is the Dutch variety designatei as no. 24" or
”Christine Buisman", a variety of Ulmus foliaceae Gilibert
(Buisman, 1956). Cf soecial interest is tne fact that this
species, on the basis of nany other tests by various workers,
Was consiiered one of the ”very susceptible" species. TheOI
”Christine Buisma " variety gas been tested by several work-
wjg; sent, 1938—a; and-./
l—J
ers (Goidanicn & Azzaroli, 1938,
belch & Collins, 1940) ani Has been recom.enied for culti-
vation.
1
Presum (I‘1 natural hybriis in tie genus are few. Johnson
(1939) listed three. Of these, the most important is g.
elabra Huds. x g. carpinifolia Gladitscn = X E. Hollaqdica
kill. Under the latter name, Rehder (1940) included as var-
q
ieties a number of long-describe1 plants of variable taxonomic
rank, such as ;ne "Dutch elm", "Huntingion elm”, "selgian
elm", and others. Taxonomically, in View of tie present dearth
According to Bender (1940) this is a synonym for the smooth-
leavei elm (g. carginifolia Gleditsch).
-132-
of cyt genetic eviience, such a metnsd of grouging is perhaps
justified. rr«SuraLly such grouing metgads are n:t designed
to indicate tit: fiiality that the classification is correct
or to infer that each cf the varieties re;res=nt members of
F1 generations. Sax (1933) concluied twat the numerous var-
ieties of X g. hollaniica are presumeoly sereg tee of sub-
sequent ge:ier ations. Two of the varieti 8(E. h. ritteursii
(Kirchn.) ehi.sni g. h. sneerba (Aorr.) send.) tere studied
cytulqtljaiiy and revealed Wnly sligat meiotic irregularity
‘ ‘ ‘.- — A “-~ \
other issuers Of$.)4
an; hiya ,ol‘en fertility. Sax also stuiie
P“)
,0?“A.the genus an: concluded tnat a number 0 tiIiCial sgeCies
hybrids could, in all erobabilit , be easily made.L
Henry (1910) studied progeny of flflat he believed to
represent the F generation Hf the g. elagr x cargirifolia
2
cross, i.e., offspring of two g. h. veeeta (Loud. )_
_1
(led.
individuals. He reportedly observed three characters
(oooosite vs. altern11+e leaves, leaf size, anzi lensth of
petiole) each of which segregated on a 3 : 1 basis.
Artificial hy.riiizeton in the genus was first reported
by Klotzsch (1854), the ”first tree hybridizer”, who succes-
ffusal. The parentage of(D
sfully crossed g. camoestris x g.
ctional(I)
ate an inters(3
this cross, if correct, wou d iriii
cross: 'eloceri“s x sleinaroowrous.
Sax (1933 resorted a possible cro s involving g.
americana L. x Q. la vie Ball. The forner is tetraploid
(4n = 56) and the latter diploid (2n = 23). The ofspring
would ha e pre wesc‘ly been trioloid. A cytolosical report
Probably Ho slztra L. x g. laevis Pall., see Rehder, 1940.
-133-
on the of rin has not come to tne sutior's attention.
a lieite d amount of intra- an interspecific hybrid-
k‘:
C ,3
_J
F C p.‘
O
J
(D
FJ.
:3 h (D
(B
i H O D ...—b
C H
O
"a“ 1')» r 1::-
Cu sarr-b~ization tork has 0 (D
a disease resist1mt form of elm. Uoorznbos (1933) reported
W D U)
C CD
(.1 u
U‘
U ’_
X.’
r—
C9'
T)
O W C)
U)
U)
( 0 -.Jo
S'J
k)
0
J
l_Jo
(D
W X In0 51)
H
_J
is:
(a
H’
‘U
g o
"\ I _‘ I a / _ 1 Q
DimCl‘V: x .al ic1iana, T. laevis x 10113“18a, d“l U. Jumila
Smith & Nichols (1341) reported tne probably successful
crosses: Kg. hollandica hill. x g. iaeonica (Rehd.) Sara.
aid g. Hilsoniana Schneid. x g. *BDORiCa (Rehd.) Barg. A
resort of tie eomuarisen 7f vigor of the eresunei hybrids
with their carents nae not yet been made. These torhers,
hutever, stated that hybrids of the Mtter cross at least
apoeared more vigorous and more realistant to iLS€Ct attack
than the isle parent (g. auonica).
interAtterois {o obtai involving Ulmus3
W ’_.;0
O O "3’
O U1
U)
(U
(D
azi Jeltis have not been restrted. Both _enera have the
same basic chromosome number (14) an; if comsatible should
yield interesting hybrids.
Flowering habits and I§Vfl“’izlng1technique
The exceedingly small aid delicate perfect floners of
Ulmus are borne in dense fascicles or racemes which maies
emasculation by forceps an extremely hazardous undertaaing.
(-‘I
{—1
C)
U}
I...
(. 9)
HO
O O |,l
(O
H
\_
\
#-H
V \-
'(‘
F1
('3
fl”
0
\B
‘t 3
Q
Fortunately, accorii‘r
l V O Q I
Aut orities not cited.
-134-
x 5,. 1. “- ° . o A..- A RA , .- , -. _... .1. n ._ , 15 - ‘
is so tar cu in sun; s —cies at least tnat ejasculatiin is
not necessary. Last (1940) also noted marked protogyny and
V. A‘- ‘ p ‘r r ‘\ v ‘
b duff." . Y-:2’S 3.0. ut- :l’ ole/l u 11“. sci-o .‘3- OUL. l".
l. . v " ~ ‘ T p - ... _-‘ , j ._ _ . .‘ f_' v I' . ..‘ .‘ -‘ If
tiis genus. 11 mass emaSJULaLl n 91 eln -louers coul i be
w. . ‘\”‘\»'q ‘ ' ‘- . ‘—~ “01" . r r ‘ " . .-
aCCOQQlIS'ci Mituout injury to tne resale organs it would
e oossicle to avoid undue worry for the hgbridizer (i.e.,C,
.L
worry over the existence or not of effective protegyny in
the sarticular female parent beinc used) and incidentally
give a more reliable ani imtediate indicatifn of results.
The hybridizing techniques used :y Loorenoos (1238)
H.
d d C)
H _J.
'J
5N
r4
SD
5*
(+-
’J.
(J
r...—
(L
('1
0 <1
(4-
a (n
(U
W [U
t1
(A
o 53
f)
(.
(r
(“L
S‘I
kg
6*
I...
O l—‘
(T)
(I)
\O
unfortuzwate My ha e not been a ailable to the author.
Smitr & Nichols (1941) resorted successful use of the
"greenhouse techniiue” in their elm nybriliz7ation more. This
method, first recorted for Salix by Yanchevsky (1904) and
for Pooulus by nettstein (1933) employs use of flamer-bearing
I
cut twigs on which Iruits are successfully matured in the
1
escrioe Q.»
by5.:42 . r .
greenhouse. The metgo; Ul 3ollen storage a
Heirwur""r (194C) i.e., storage of ocular flower bud-bearin5
dormant twigs in refrigeration, maytwesumably be used suc-
K)
U)
UllBSOH,
on techni;ue, dalix section c: this re sort
“i
-135-
A
11*\],r
tonu
a
" ‘ 1
t¢-\4“g1¥{--:4 ,
—u
'4
p4. cordina
”l 61:LA.Gn'f0j
.L601’. (WULJ.
1
929)1L
~
ass (61”I
Ss._‘
,1lture tool
7“ a
,,, nu~.;.A4ti
ESa
lf‘
w
,
pu_‘
'I
h .and u‘
~-\ate
‘
--~‘l,.1
ho“(u
~J> v“'
3. DJ.tIET1
- ...
. an): 11
._p
J.\ .
8
Lb
”k
\J
AC
r
\
n:
21...
«.C
A:
Qg
after0 i'u'lx' nC‘
u
CA.
.. .
fruits
], we,"C
tie i1“
‘
,.\ .‘7'. '
Vto lease
1.a
.1
a
are,
, 1
>23.){‘
.‘rn
J an.
1‘ 7"
O
V
A
stoopl/
ath
O
'\ f;
-L.tin
V
drv storane
,
year 0y
I:
O 1’ an Vy f
for 1
q
”.1. 1'
S
4
I”L
11
re lists by var-x
.- -
m
chromssm
_
.‘s.A. .
0'
l""N
x;H
V
a.“ ,5.
.1-‘p1"7’11
.
(3
LVWm " r.- .
ILA [-1] L) O n' L
ious torLers (hrsuse, 1S50; Sax, K., 1333; GdiS°T, 1933;
T A . , .7 {\7-v - , "‘. , - “" ’2 ‘3 n - 5" "7n : .",_‘lellvelu, 1),), 1955; 01k, H. d., lJJU; 281 nauie, 1259)
T‘L f‘ 1ffil"'(" . ‘$ ‘v"' A -'
LL18 5.5.013 1 LA-ACL:I- .Ln
r. 5 .N
neterUQIOiog
CL:
*1
'(z
1,..1
C-
H CJ
Cf the 15 soeoies tgus fer counted al; are
(2n = 28) but one, he Ameriovn e1: (3. a erieina L.), WhiCd
'J.
U)
('4‘
(D
(L
H S'3
k)
,__1
0 }Jo
Li,
A L-
5
l
U1
°A~ «0 .»-, 3 , .' ',..,... ,. —.- . Z:».‘ 12..., ',.. -_— Na
tlun u; seco aary 3a1f14» concluiea tue s3e31~s has grop-
(a:
:1
m
. .V". 47 J .1 . A , .. '1‘ 7““. 'p ‘1 IN 7
tion, is ettrioi.e; .o litites Zulab - ircoqenog.
Sex (1335) reported only sliggt irregularity during
meiosis in p.m.c's. tf varieties 'itteu:sii (Kircnu.) Bend.
" —" 1_. ‘, : -'~ 1‘ ~‘ ...\ n‘ ‘ 1 . “ . l‘ , .‘ -.
uo-rba (Lorr.) semi. ml A T. pollennios e111. uni con-
OY‘» C
’AL.’ v
_ _
‘v : -.,. .L‘- A- v. ..A ~ -. i . J. .. . .. .- i. - w - x-c‘ ‘ ‘ r .T' i- A
CLUlta -Jey msy zeoresent later SEfIZtALCS U1 nyoriis oe-
‘v Q
olia aleditseh. Leli-
H 9 C.)
£3
(L
VBli (1933) Uts=rved regula- :eiosis in tge rari t; oe
J- “ \'\ a“ -\ - - AA ‘7 " ‘-\ - ,3. " ~
HOD S‘p;urt \.: .ucurt a- “yell“ UL
v-fi.‘ -. \ . ‘ ‘ . o o -- I. [3 o A _ A“ ‘ ‘37 K 3‘
lee aogarent Sterlllty o1 LAlS fozm has Conclaiei sy th.s
;.
SJ
E E.
Q
author ( 955) to be loe .0 its extregely marxei
rat*er t;an infertility of its 9; etes.-A‘J
nalher (1952) resortei ine relucej number of 15 for g.
oumila ani U. fulva an; 28—30 for g. a erioeua based on
stufiies of EicrosoorOVenesis. The sine “or; r (1958) re—
oorfied 15 bivalen s ajoesriog at meiosis in to: ovule of
9 g. fulva.
‘ The variet" Q. g. oen€u1a Aitufl has also sol iej b‘ Sex
(1933) oil f oil to Le tetraploii.
' Truv 7~ 'I’T‘Z'J’f 3" air“J1--.- .11)-"-qu 'JI...-A-L)
(77141; C: )
Crown, 3. P. ' Pefisbin, A. J. (1940) COflfiercial timbers
of the (wired :Istes. st Ed., AKI+ 554 oi., 312 fiQs
LPT‘Ww-'il: Rook Co., Inc., flew for 9 London.
uismin C. (1”36) Le resistente lea Er. 24. (The resis-
tant elm LC. 24.) Tijdsobr. fied. Heiflow:stsoh. 46:
:3—76, (Cited frow Elsth Treed. Abstr. 01. V , 936 )
r3 -= n.'ixzk, l. '3. (Laidtrteci) lflfik:eiz oi‘ s;iitle:ti<: Qrwy t?‘ sin)-
stsnees on tfie rooti{Q of cuttiIQs of Wood" orruNIouql
plants (“IINLllbefi).
-------—----——— E K1311EVOP,L. C. lffig) The efiget of
synthetic Qrowtb :;u:stniees on the rootin' wno subseoue-
nt igvxrth of cmqv“wgnizfil plants. CNTlO 5X55 .flra. ‘Fimorfl‘u-
1y 5H1”. 24: No. 199.301unhus, Ohio.
DeerenMos, S. 1. A. KemiserSfNoev01 met iegen te ‘s-Creven-
hege. (GrossinQ QITCIl‘.110ItS Ni‘h elws fit the Hague.)
Tijéschr. Pl"iekt. 44' lol-o4. 1935. (Cited from
Plant Treed. Abstr. WI1 IA, 193?.
Gaiser, L. C. (1955) A list of ehfiowOSOme nnnbevs in An-
Qiosperms. 17. 5i} ier. lenet. 10: 135-258.
Goidnnien, }. (1956) (i‘he -GICiViORP of "U. pvwila" L. in
greetieel F Hricolttne 0rd its Pesfstenee to Greyrin_m )
13011. ~+s" lfit }%~’ LTW“) 1C: (I1 3.) 11% ~2CfifTEET7CEE1
from Plant Rreed. vol 7, 1237 .)
-----—------- (193s) (Notes on r'searehes 1L the selec-
tion of elms resistant to elm disease.) Itsl. A“r e.
75: 69-74. Cfter" from Plant Tweed. A s'r. ”cl. e, 1938
——---——-----—- a £2 eroli, l. (lQSU) Pelszioqe sulle esye
lens di selezioe di olni res tenti slls Qrsfiosi e di
inoedlsziohi nrtfliii inli di "Craphium ulmi" es eQ11-e nel
1957. (deport on ihe ox_reriwents of selection oi elms
resitfimwnt tun elniciiseese=rw C of‘rirtiiiwiwl incwyllsticwu3
01- r}. ”3“."1 izwne in 1337.) 01].. fist???” Pot, V33, Young
1L Tn.s.):149—7e. ‘
--—--—-------—-—----—-------- (l 3”) (”eport on experi-
outs on selectinQ eles resistan to
srtili Cisl inoculations with G. Ulmi—--—.
Plant Freed. Abstr. Vol. 10, 1945.)
1;?) Plow, , V; 0 iv. o ._ 113.71 'C l1 , I}. o L) 0 (19/1'. 1)
05y. 2nd Ed., X\i-+F4 pp., 234 fiQs.
Co., Inc. Lew York & LOPGOH.
.imburQwe , C. (1?4 ) Report on Peplsrl
CrorestryCironie1e 16: 149—60.
(‘
seedlin«;s
(lmn:dcn2)
tnel
O i' .9 1’1
elm
SOC.
ru)te (n1
oy means
(191C) On :‘10.
Jou r . Linn .
(1027) A.
iloxens
ITE‘nrjf’ PIA-0
sults.
Hill, A. G.
g. 71‘)
11‘) 4'”
x'v Kl;
Sly-U371— as
ilQri/Wilturwe,'lrfl11. 14: rye.
KlotZscon, J. E. (lcb4) Ueber die latte
zen- strwoe one iischlinQe. Her.
Pal-Led. 5. ss . lfierl in 1:. 54: 53-5- .,:62? .
-138—
fextbook of de
)’?10t.
ed for
nirstor
1.701)} lglld l o
(T:el disease and on
in 192’“. ) (Cited from
ndrol-
Lofirsw~flill 500k
‘Vbl‘1.61
in; mendeliqn re—
59; BOO-SOC.
sculeting
from.
em 9
Cor Pfen-vrehour" -
Meme.
1."
LL 0
Krause, O. (lQEO) LtoloQische Ltndien bei den Urticsles.
Ber. dent. botsn. Ces 4’
“e
. 0: ~11.
Krijt}(, Ii. (”771) (neport cul'tiie tiviti iVHJ the elm
61385188 curm‘ittwee cs W‘zied.cmxt at. t}ex ene:1i.rrs Ernie/'r‘niry
in 1937.) Tijdscnr. PlLiekt. 44: lFC—CO.
-- -------- - (1793’?) (iegort on tz'e activities of tie elm
diseose conmittee carried on? 't the rcmetics L«oorxiorv
19L8.) Tijdseir Plgiekt. 45: jS-VO.
'Lelivgld, J. f. (14313) TCytcloQicsl stuCHfins in the venue
Ijlmns 1;. I. The ingjposcd Tnfiggid rwflnxre CH“ tre (x) vuon
Eaten elm. Genetics (Etc VSQUC) 1F: 4h5—15s. (Cit -d
Iron Plan: trees. Abst‘. TVol. 5, 1355).
-------- ------- (1‘35) C tOIOQlCfll studies in the genus
Ulmus L. II. The entryosqc and seed devolOpment in the
COquH IDUtch elm. Rec. TrsV. Bot. Leerlsnd. 32: 545-
573. (Cited from Plsnt Freed. Abstr. Vol. 6, 1936.)
19y, Curtis (lCS4) outbreaks of tie Dutch elm T'_csse 1r
the Uniied :tetes U.C.D.A. Cir. 382.
----------~ F 2°“Vrtt, E. B. (15"1) th L to: eln di . se.
U.S.I.A. Ci". l"C.
Peersor, R. S. A Hronm, A. P]. (1932) Corrercial tivbers
of InCis. Calcutta, Cove TFWL of Ineie Central IAiclicst-
ion Brenct.
Render, A. (19/10) IT.LFT._T:U.91._ of“ clii‘migd trees 916 ghr’u‘os,
2nd Ad., 996 pp. tscLillsn Co., Aew work.
Seste, D. A. (1955) A field aspiiatoi for p.33 culstinQ
sweet clover flowers. J. Aner. Soc. Agron. 27: 774-
75.
Sex, M. J. (1038) The relation between stomsts counts
and chromosome number. Tour. .Arn. Aro. 19: 437-441.
83? Karl (1%?35) Cowomosome rumoers in Ulmns and related
genera. Jour. Arn. Aro. 14: 8/— 84] ‘_’“"
gchggrz, E. ( 737) Ist die Ml tterulme res
Ulmus lsevi s reis tent?). kite. dtscr. dendrol. Ges.
49: 185-86.
Snith, E. C. A Nichols, C. Jr. (1941) Soecies hybrids in
forest rees. Jour. Arn. Arb. 22: u4Q—454.
Stephens, J. C. & Ouinby, J. R. (1955) Bulk elasculetionC (
Of 801231113"! llOWeP. . TOTlI‘. Amn SO . 5" 51mm. (35: 2.5.73-54,
Cuneson, C. A. (1937) rquculfltion of hnnit by cnilling.
J. Inner. iflDC. ingror. r39: 2347-4<T.
Tuheuf, C. F. von (1935) .crae"sn, der Erfors chun.Q den
sog. Ulmenkraankheit in Barons. (The deveIOpment of re-
search on tne so— called elm discese in EurOpe.) Z.
Pflflrankh. 45: 49-78, 161-89,
alker, C. I. (1953) Chromosome numbers in UImus. Science
(n.s.) 75 (1E34): CV.
-—---—----—- (l 58) ~TCPOSWOIO‘:nesis and embryo develop-
ment in Ulnus Tlvs. Bot. Gaz. 99; 592—95,
l
‘cu
Went, J. C. (1958) C AnilsLion of
Aelch, L. A. A Collins, D. L. (1940) Luten_elm disease
end its control. Cornell Ext . Eu.ll. A0. 437: Pp. 19.
th investigations on
14%) mjsceotioiljjiy o1 diiien‘wlt elms t1)(yuu9tostowe11
nlni Biismen in tie Netherlands. Pfiwto) tn. Z. 11:
Iel-BOI . (Cited fr Pl. Breed. AASLr. Vol. 9, 19:1.)
'00
““C
‘_J
Cf)
:VHw
1 3 r
C00
‘1
O”
!‘J
CL“
(“'1'
a .I
-s ,0)
I":PC
DJ
(47
IL)
(“1‘
p—L
g:
(I)
.J
(1-
L’)
(.301.
(I)
J1.).
1'
‘.
a.
1|:
14‘3-
C
SCnr.
‘7-111 (31' 631/ Sky ,
ntion of
(Russian..‘ - n
(C 1113.9 S , k: .
[Jo-(3.10110
‘31. T1011:TII‘ ()1)~.--
(1
)'F‘fi
.a_J 0
FT:
(\r?!
I)(’\U
‘0
VOL (1
B1
ilfinuofi
On two
1_7()YI
1?»? in
illie
9t
01101 9'
Fe elm
LCJIQC.
.—\ (1 ( ‘3 1"
. \ . _‘ _ _ ’
VI.-
6
Comflelin
stijations on elm
13011019 en
1936.)
'F.'I
(1111‘11’11’. 4- ”u
(dited1?. from Plant 3096.
EJ";66) 1310 IICrWIzuI ,snwatluJie
T95+C :Cde -Ci P0pI1n_s lei”-
M1rtun; a: 597-026.
Cecilinrities Of the Servin-
n i of some 8000568 of ”illow.
afiest Just. 11: 209- 274
10L of ‘reon and shzuus.
1FI'7. {3 pl).
?”"CI-”ED
., '1 1’
J. 9361:. 530: .7341.
Quart. Jouv. For.
29' 102- ”.
Funk, 3. (1351) "oer Cie ?’”‘9tifln CC? chbkorren Lweier
vanaschierten UlwI;n. hitt. lent. Lcnflvol. @939911. 42:
525-528.
I‘fr'ijtbe, N. 3: 911.2, J. C. (12759) (II‘OC1JT1—a1'.i()1’ls of elm
Enfl391ds, CP“"ried curt in 13%?3.) TWduisChr. IfLI”€1ft.
’5: 1-74.
Navasbin, S. (18TC) ”he? d9: Terh51ten des POL1ensch19u-
01%28 Ewefi CI>P IVH'e. PUJ 1. Jlflfic. I If. F*t. IVsteIwfljvlfg 8:
545-n58.
"ent, 11. C. (1”"') Vermilsg 'Inl Jo Cumierrcmfl:1n¥p11 OVCI‘Cie
:_e:‘=s",:1".7i€$ 12,6 VGI'I‘1_I:J'“17 Op 119,13 EV’IUJCOJ'YJLE'C‘lOJJ'jJBF/‘h Lt"I1“IC\:I9-
Cerium ” ilJie Covmelin dOhOlLCL” te fianrfl, (~019nvde
1977. (RCport on the investi;9tions on the Ele 618 539
C5PTin out fit the {11119 Comwelin tcholten P‘;o095tho-
1 109 L5bor5tory 9t R99rn, durim; 1937.) Tijdschr.
6NC
;:40
930
44:
-140-
‘ W Va . o-v
I\ (A .1 1- e r 3. . 11~ I),
m1 , r '1 n :5 ‘ h 0 «,- 7 _ 7 ‘ ‘_ _ w _ P ‘I\ __O ‘ 0
J33 lglv -, 111 neluICs Cut i.o :2:13: 'J;LFYU“13
('f'
(I)
DIit 1:1 this IzuLwitrgrC H. 3
(D
’)
1J.
U)
(“x
.r__,
g. ‘4
(D
H
V
{.1.
(0
SD
5 'L
m 13.
C+
C)
(F)
(v
(T)
(.
- ., J.
as -W‘ orw- IniCal.
[11:47 .... “11016)
rrfifl .. -. I. ‘1 A -1 .4. 1‘7 ; A r ----.1-
-Lu TCHUb ACEI lAJJJ.Cb :QOLC ll 3f“bfpc3;tl, ur fblc y
q
1 ‘ 1 " "‘ " . ‘ ‘1 ' . : " vv 1 I x 1'- " .1.’ ‘ -‘ ‘ ‘ '1’“ 9 ' ‘ \ " ‘ -.
snrutoy, speCles u1.C1w alsbrrsutel t ruout tJ: neltnern Lem-
fl
1
' — 1 C , ‘- .--. —. . . .A. ,. C ‘ . .1 .A .1. '- .— v 4 ., 1- -.. , - ,. w r .. . . ’ .
1sgue1e but must NULCY 1&1.CIIH;:;JJItJ ,eu3erste ZunCs o:
*3
D"
(D
II;
1'5
#4
CO
'_}0
CD 31
v;'
"l
H.
Ill 3
J
lJ.
.5 +
Q l.J
N.
'1'"
U)
(D
(D
('1‘
}.Jo
C)
.5
U)
C
1*
3
r—I‘J
H.
H fi (D
(I 1.5
U)
CI
(J
I-7-
'1
U)
H.)
a:
l-
t._1
(T
p H (.
-v
,1
S1...
(‘1‘
1-1.
«7‘;
(I)
(—+
C)
(+-
kT)
(A
p.—
|J
_J
(«J-
(1
C CL
C;
(‘1'
('I
It". 4. ;,~ 4; - .-‘ .‘ . " I‘v : >. F, ‘ . n ... (... 1 .3. ‘. _ x ,- — . -5 t ' x J .‘ ~) .3‘“ --.. < r J. A . . n a '
Cf LULgC, 51A are L; Celllly ngul 5“ 5 Cse _CrC;Cer. Jeer
‘ V — ~ v ~ 0 (S I I ' '1f“ "" 1". ‘ j ff '— r- ‘ .— 14 . - -s .u ‘ _«,- ’3 ‘v ——~ .‘ _ . - (I 3 ‘1 {A‘ -_ C; n f (T _
S;3_CCLL;_.TI_III1 L. arm“ :12-.. -1. '1; f— 7 .. .4. 1,1,;le L'J. YMMV obbtlvn VJCvJulr-.C mh—w —.—.—-—-—
13.8 .L‘P.Xo; 3. 17113171131... 31.1-1 :1. SLJJ 31151113111111 1.. L31 LUIS. StCtlUl’l
taS1)
" '_ ’_"} __ ‘r _. (VEKD
um furs“. u: CJe Scdtlwl allc
—-— .V I ‘ f ‘ . ‘1‘ " .. ’_'r V. r ‘ _ ' . C ‘ ' \ V. I” fl v' ‘ ’
:ax.; e~1 A. SELEflJO L. u tue Ceetlun E’UZJO (:oeJmel)_ ___ __.____
r—J
1‘:H
uo ‘1
(1)
D.
'_
'J
(U
H
u
H
'I
f)
V
o
7' .../- 1 ’. I: ".-'\r r‘
A. “can (sarlom & flilrsr,
r-"Q'1 , ‘-— -\ r‘ 1: Y'. .— ~r\ ,: y‘ 4“ In ,\ NH.
198 Celt-anoun euJ must valuJC(II
genus is fpe sumar figple (4. sacchsrum) which, togetner with
;~ ni¢rum, is tIe ,rincinle source Ml "harm Leple” woud 951
maple sues? of th= America: trade. Hood of hue Carl :9; es
is fevoreu for a multitu.e u; usss, lfllvf 95035 LdiCh are
l . . , . . l_ .Cne spe01es, noaever, 15 the mountalns Cf Java.
‘H ‘ . v! n fl T _o a If _C
LchHOCQ i'bLJ1L3t
W . r. _. “ V‘ o r‘ _
__'.,1 -141" .11.) - -i. V'Tj';
‘
“
wooeents'e, HLVCJ
(ETCMI? i réifshiri,
The "soft 1
utilize 1 Car-Ce L3,"
except Lnere stre
reason soft “Hole
Cregon ra-
veneer a: l m:—
Vslue :u. Lu wn~
maples.
"A .1- ., 4. fl
,L.L.ISL, (J- uL;C
Hum er of exotic
as ornatentcls,
sycauore us:le (
A ‘ ~ ‘ - f T "
cclucstre L.) J
D - ' -I
0; exotics in tn
'$
future Cree
1- 0 ~__ ”A
stocts in tee t—
ies are ;n ,ro V
Station (:ohrein
:C
.1 .
.- LL , ul ,
“ : .V 4. -. D . -._ .. . , 41"] ,-
; v-:eu LCJ“JJLu1€, JULUO
. ~ . ~ ‘ «\
12p, Q‘ Nd ~rous otgc
"‘1: l \ ‘2 , . . - __-~ ,.
1:40; £83150 6 glam“,
.. ll - x “ - _.- A
~_L‘ .1 (Ti-PIWrI‘Y'I.‘11nt);
v L.) -. . Ugr.\/ .JLL A ‘. .1._A v\ k -4
"I 4' ‘ r 3 _ ‘1 w y- ‘) CI .2 C.‘ 1‘.U L}...ka UMALL /L(_‘ :It uyu g‘.
[-4- ~r‘ r) "1 7 ‘ I“ a, 7"" r~ h r- /\ -~
.__ L... .:.. - .. ...;L .c ‘ :. all C t.
I .u‘ a A - ‘fi ’_ _’ 4") .
l S 1— -L t 1 1 C U E, L; g l L} '. 1V1 1,
N . «xv-1'11 ... 1 ° F.
ii 0 (it ‘4. ~13 C' [.1 . ’Lv ] l. 1.1:)
‘ ‘ 1 '13 ~° c‘ 9 - "1 + I" a WI [l4‘u..1 .LS llue.e .1--1 U-Av L;.
g2) 18 O? .ZUB
(74.1
LLAVNative of
tritution.
1"; G.A.-
L:C
LJ
the
-. 7,) K,“
"' ' ‘1“.ACCOI’
others,12')
~142-
to bcnreiner,
K J
C. ' ,
1;
r)
S'ioneole
14.5
me
boxes, crates,
oil" ar+’cles
).
{lgeruxfi 'Ire
asd fflfiliE
I \O
_J.
1‘3
1.4
O
‘4
lf-
or floor.(1)
rimarily for
snufacture of furni-
1~— r— —‘ , ..
C 01.1.-LC 1 C .l- E.
f“t¢e CCMR Crx:st, a..1 Cesat Laiowrl of 'tse
ative ,e Cars of is; enus, a3 well as a
;;ci;s 97? varieties are tiiely plants;
,Coicllv [orwav La‘le(A. olctanoiies L.),. . _ l.
pseuioglatahuv L.), beige maple (é.
ficngr:uther£3. Sucrlei no CILMJS o”d_t=ct‘CXI
country shoslfi fireatly fascilitcte
r.; in ixie gxyius.
l
ZIJL iglfJTI H F-C- u: ~ cICJE
le regortei evijence of selection from w’l’
3 other than tse indication that such stuc-
northeastern Forest fixperiment
studies
7 ‘r.‘ C V
A v La ... .
\ ~ A
“.»“’\":: . 1f-1a'x . ‘ .'-§r - ~ »4\*‘ v-xw" -7 -.-. .. a)»- . A.
1:- to isolate suierior loros oi so-.r $1218 is: su ar
grofiuetion have bees initiated.
lO tattra tuftr14s in the .eous n.12n gave be;n recognized
by taxonfisists, out some of trege, apgarently, have shown
special value for forestrv use.
CL, f'l'3§,l._i.i.;:; g‘.?.:...'31:3 ALL. pal; If- ..N
Only one artificial hybrifl has been reorted in tle
genus (Freeman, 1541). This cross, Aoer saccharioum L. x
Joer rutrum L., yieliei 41 byerifls ngCh shonei consider-
able variation in leaf form, habit of growth, and hybrid
vigor. All of the hy.riis s:osei markei heterosis as
comoared with the male parent (i. rytrum) but none equalei
tLe raoii grouth of the silver ragle (E. sacs...r1UJEIM)
fiourteen of fine hytriis flowered iq toeir 6th year, 10
H)
s [—1
\J
L)
GI
(D
m ('+
03 .3
}Jo
'5
U)
(_._
(D
rI
(4
(L)
H (I
U)
C+
,3
U‘
C’*‘
l.Jo
H i.)
{D
('I"
(D
C U'
C C0
(D
(D
u.
’ 1’
feeuliarities in tuC flowe;'1rH Habit of tee maples ago
the lack of hybriiizing technigue is ,rcbatly responsiele in
lar 6 measure for tne aos=noe oi artificial hybrids.
Sohreiner (le3-a, 1933-o) has re'or.ed stulies of Ith-
eriqg natit is t e Cu-”v i . rej Ha.-e tutor is of sotoial
maple revealed a tyoe of elea -eut iiohoEamy. an tvpes of
flowers are born by unis tree: (1) Jerfect floners anj (C)
imperf=ct flowers. She .2err1:ct flox. ers oere ooserv=a to lif-
fer fro: most bisexual floners in that only tJG male or fe-
Individual .rees mere also note; so be eitner :arkedly pro-
tandrous pr frotogynous. In the case of grota dry, for in-
stance, some gerfect flouers nature; t eir anthers coinci-
dent titn the imoerfect male flowers. lhese oerfect flowers
did not function as feaales later, houever, but other per-
fect flowers 31th functional oiatils did. The periods of
n.l\
\-
LJ.
I1..)
polien shelning an; stigma receptivity in a s e tree were
not observei to overlap ani thus cross-pollination resulted.
rr'v‘
1ne flowering habit of the re; maple (é. ruorum) was
reported by Schreiner to oe more comolex. ’hree tyges of
treLs were ob s erved: (1) all flowers functionally male
only; (2) all flowers functionally fe dale only; aid (5)
flowers functimvnally ferale or male.
U3
ome trees in the latter csteHory snowed predominately
ma-e flowers in the upoer part of the croun; an approximately
... w
lequal proportion of male and Iena e in the midile portion of
.1
the crown; an: predominately ferale flowers in the lower part
1 a
of the crown. host of the Ilooers on all types o trees hereto.
oerfect, but the non-functional parrts were
silmlaly smaller or aborted. In s;me instances, however, func-
J."
tional .ale leters vere observed Which had no evidence 01
1 Trees (1) anl (2) were tnus furct;onal ly dioecious; (3)
“as fvnctitnally uoroecious.
-l44-
L) I" x J’ r‘ “- :v . (’fi-V ‘I‘ I" 4‘ _. -" " ' “I ' I P ‘\ ' “ “ .1 fl '1 -‘ - 3' l‘
.11.; 1’_l:,o;.ll (1:3) 3.." _, .-.-:4}. (if-4Q) tjtlirjlul'} tLlL [8.11.1.8
a n, 4' ’ ~r- c (3 .2] f 5' "3v * ’1 1 t: r: .-‘ P.“ ~ ’~ -‘ "- "~t' -- 7-3 .‘ 1v ‘_~ ' w .-—- 4’- ]. I)": r: l.“. -1 v. LO wk. .1., .. -- L- 1...._'\: LAC. Lat]. cab -.-T1uh.l. ..Jbllj. L11; ‘ D’JKJ“L/ ,
‘ r —. A '1‘ a ‘_ n -\ s . _ . x _ w u _' 1 . - s.
f L“, I /- -‘ I r T .-. q‘" _ R "- — ~ - r W .' " u "' ,
.lOno‘Je‘i', u??- L_.C L. L3..S [" TL.) “Iffliglflf CYCLE- -33. ‘HUI:. H.LL.L1 :LoI —
— ~. ’ 7 ' «J- " 3. -2 , J- ‘ J. - — .‘1 “ fl. n ‘ r‘ ’1 -\ - ‘ r‘ 3 *-
IL] br‘] , 1“ -11 J" ‘JC ‘1 + S L) k, L; _ S , :- .. .. A; t, , 1):) yr L’U --|.L‘7 U24; i.-
.«.—.I,‘. . ‘ 4-i—l \ ,. - ‘ '. ‘ * A ‘f‘.“‘ ‘R.,—.‘~‘< .\ 3 ' . 1' ~ A
.e--ers L1 1.: lenus aler are use; ly .ronpel Wltfl the
ill icult” g"a11s to root from untreatci stew or root out-
c+
.JO
3'
(’3
u
(I
(.1
ci-
('1‘-
D C.)
h‘:
('3
zI.
(D
to s '“i
(T)
y-
...)
(+
L.,;
< C.1
Q B‘_l
(W
H K ( ()
(-4
w
)
H E'l
cf
I.)-
(J
H H H S
1 [fir-s —C‘
1n (5:) SKI—L4“.
T'«~. w-J .v“~-rwJ-' ‘ ’ « «— .-.- m v‘ ~ -'~ 2 av -,c’oeflt l i/t;;l.i"‘-tl'?"S u wallet: -u;-'v- 1-1 53th 1L
n I")
\) _J
(I)
if
(--
O 1)-
CO
,3 ‘C
(1)
a:J
(.
3'
O .J
U)
Ll
w to
(“f
(T)
Lb
(‘f‘
9‘
(J
H 5 (‘f‘
*‘x’
(I
Lf-
"s
(I)
:5
(+-
}..J
0’)
MJ
4 (I H .<
(T)
’-
... .....L ,. ,\
Litre-.4; Jm L“)
’3
A
}._J
kfl
lr
\_}
l
V
a (T,
L)
O 5...: l
r?-
l
,u
m 0 \a C
[0
CD L
93
f“,
><
Ho
c+
’1C‘
J-
‘- 4;). gaximun root-C)
I“?
('1‘"
l-..
5
(\
"I
“*3
F}
[I
C.
(J
‘1
p
.1
(D
A
b“,
C (D
K. .J
'.J
W '3
'3
in: (55.35 is lCB i vs) was ob aiiel with greenwood cuttings,
. 2 . .-- .made frno young trees tee miqnle of June. The cuttinfs,
4 inches in length w’th all out up er leaves removefi, were
maersei to a teeth of 1 inch in a Later solution of indole-
tutyri acii (concentration: 50 mn./liter) for 3 hours.L— I
To ‘° . -... ---. .Lg ... y. , .. -, , .~ ..-s - .—‘v.,~ .J- 1..
rollOWing triatmtflt L.€ cuttln_s were glanoei to aoouo LWO-
thiris tneir len tn in a oeat-SAn' mixture in an outdoor
} See also SHOL (ljbl).
8 anct are not s.ecifie* aLt10u"s, aCCor in t Thimann &
Lolisle (1939), this is most critical or in~ “actors which
influerce rortine resoonse.
ior 24 hours rooted well (65; in lC8 days). Suttin
after the mi.ille of July failed to root.
5
P
.!
7
c—+.
(+—
(D
L d.
c+
. . -1 z\-1r\ -. ‘ _‘I_ - fi fi _
Afan31ev (433:) reyorteu an UUSUCCCSbLL_ 0
root SHEET 23916 Cuttinws lolloming au"iu treatment. Cf a
.2 .-, h r -- . ....~ -. r -‘r , f - :... m 11‘ .- _ -‘ ..-
tUbel Jr O=C Mari d—d SuftMUUi cuttih s, ugly one formed
r004 C‘ . t" : ‘7 T. " o (‘ ' ’3 - r s '3 C.‘ ‘04— , . , a 1 r1 ' .711, cu 1n 05 Jena 8. .LLilo URL y.;._b {A VOL LLVOOJ. htti'1; Vin/112,11
hai been treatei for 47 sours in a 10 n3./liter cincentra-
_ ,. ,-. 1
t ‘ 7 i \J I f '.I I. V
L- .A. ,1 x 0
CF
[.1.
O :5
O ...)
lJ.
3 {31
C)
r._|
(D
«T
C (.1..
4 'Jo
0 K3
0 FJ.
i),
O
é93
'3
m P (A ‘1
O C)
(0
Q "i
<1 .)
L-
J
J." 1,. -‘ .1. °., 1,“... - L ‘ .. W,‘ ‘ if .. f 5,. r ...?! x.
01 the CUtLlflfib tere sourd at .-e era ;f 03 Jays dun coh-
‘vwr: 6,1 ' n " -' a - \ . - » -4- ' w . r~ ' ‘- " '2‘
cl lei tlat thh a lonrer {Ioniht season the cuttih
have rooted. Afahsie v' s cutti _s here is} in tie latter
I 1 ~ 1 fi‘ 4- f' \ ... 4.1.-‘,—\
r account in cart Lei the failure.
0*
C)
H.
:5
r+
(I)
’1
.3
m ...—J
k :34
(x.
CO
H.
C)
‘_1
C)
rr‘
H.
O o;
r...‘
{3
f3
{O
.3
(O)
O '3
"1
(T;
‘4‘.
(T;
f-J
<<:
C"
'1
93
E34
C)
W (*-
U)
:5
(D
C94
Afaniiev gave no ihiicatien of the ate of the trees from
'.- .1 , ‘ .- h, . - 1 .. ,.. - -. ,1 p-13 - ‘ , a
HMLCH hi: c Lbiflfib were haue uni it therefore agoears pro-
aole that rooting failure is this case uight be traceaole to
Show (1939-b) founi optimum auxin treatment for scer
rubrug, pasei on 50 ramidmly selec tei clones, to be 6 hours
in a 200 rag ./liter solution of irloleoutvri acid. Untreated
cuttings are saii to seldom root more that 102. Of greatest
ion(1+
significance tere the results regortei of an investiga
into the variation in the rooting re-oonse of seveeral dif-
ferent clones :F rei raole, :ll of which were auxin-treatedw
in ‘he same manner, i.e., 6 hours in a 200mg./liter concentra-
tion of indolebutyric acid. Variation in rooting ability
~ 4“ a A l:- fr v": r} .-. ~ g“ fl _“ .4 —-. A r" 11' . .
Jiflt; irom l{.§ to >7.§s along the seVeral clones. upon the
L’0
:3
{‘a
(I
in...
,._J
H ff-
\0 C W (
w
9 :3
}-
H:
>—
:3
(T3
*“1
(T 3
CL
C)
tJ
H
I
t
C‘)
r:
(I)
S O (L
{3.
H
(I.
U)
V O "I
U"
(D
(-
P-
O U)
kI
(D
Lu
P"
H)
I.) 3 D
X .1.
S m k)
k ...J
H.
0 $0
(+—
H.
C)
:3
[D
0 LL
(I)
H.
CI
(D
'5 ‘ " 1 ’. ‘V‘ ' . ' r~ ‘ "‘ J 4* ‘ ' ‘ . \ ‘ r a ' .‘ “ A ‘ , l' . I-
from the filafllfljiflce of this ooseivatlon to the -ractica
‘ J— , A ‘\ ‘—-, f\ — : ~, ‘A .3 ‘,-. 1 v 2 x «:x -.. ~- -‘ "q ‘ n 3 . f‘ - 1"
fOYEEt art: ereeaer it urbwaplb TereSugub an: lirot kaif-
‘v ' 4- r w r: "\ ~‘ " ¢ '2 " ‘ " ," " ‘ V, ‘ (x a 'V ' ~ 2 .1 -~ .
1 ental EVlaenCc recoricl in suugurt uf the assumei renetic
founia ion :f the "rooting ability chaLacter amonn furest
;ians1ev (1339) also reuor el auxin treatment studies
1“ " 0 ""1 “V ‘2 :v \ 'T‘ ‘ " ‘ " ’ -. vfi r ‘ "‘ 1 4' \ \fl'l . ‘
of rea v&y_: CUtL n_s. lflc test root .2 results (6Le in~-
iays) were obtained Lith greentooi cattings tale in early
W O Q J O (D
D c+
'1
$3 IJuly anm treatei for 24 hours in a 2C mg./lite;
t_on .f inQOLehutTIic acid.
Thimann & Delisle (1939) investigated routing ability
of seer glataioiies anl the results ostainea lidicate the
e (J' the tfljart from.wtfixx1 cut-
tin s are mane in jeterminatian of rooting aercentage. gn-
treatij cuttings from seealic s l/2 year old gave 67% root-
ing, 2 vear ola plants gave 4Cfi, plants 3-5 years old yave
”“1, 4., .Afitfl: .“
;1ares root—u only oc-
o ' y 7’
cassaonally (less t‘an ls).
m m (D
11.
F—a
H.
IS
(0
Although untreatej cuttin s of 1/2 year old - .3
ouslU‘
m }.10
‘s, such cuttiu s are obv
'<
FJ.
3 lrooted in 67% of toe caI
(D
are-.2 L“ —. . L-, f ,, f1, , 1 4.-.,“ ,
Qractical f«r fUtEstr; use. Jutt 1 a from trees 2-5 x'-
old, ~uwever, saowej 44% rooting “gen treated with a 100 mg./
-147-
liter co centrat on of iniole—Bacetic acid. Cther invest-
1'} :
‘
‘ . 1* ,‘N w; J- : .'~ J. . - .,. ‘ "\ n! J- ‘a .— f -. ‘1 - - -~ ‘4“,
.11Cateu that cuttin s Iron the basal aarts of the}-Jo
ifiations
tree were best.
Chadwick (uniated ani uuoublishej manuscript) obtained
2Cfi rootin: in are 42 days of cuttings of Acer galmatum
Thunb. treate tith a 5 mg./170 cc. concentration of indole-
butyrin ac1d. Control cuttin; of this soecies groducei noU)
‘
roots. Acer camgestre L. cuttings all lied without root
proiuction when oiven tie same treatment, as well as sev-
eral variations of it.
”ffCuQGY(J
Chromosome number
From resorts of cytological stu
by various norkers (Darling, 1909, l§l2, 1323;p
U)
K
I)
(‘3
F”
(0
93
’u
C;
(l
p1
W (O
(...
$0
Ct
Ct
(E;
Cl
90
[0
Ho
O ._)
C.
C")
(I)
"Sa:i Leurman, 1933, 1934) it
in the yenus Ave" 2 13.
an interpretation of\\
\JJ
U»!
V
O :3
(+
S.
(T)
(. [0
(J.
U)
C)
mleurman (l
L. suggested an ulti—\J
r...J
S13
r!-
w .4
...)
O H (...;J
(l
(f
seconiary pairing in '7
I»)
0
some 1 wer number forC,
U)
U)
H O
(.5:
mate basic number of l” or o
the genus. ‘bservation of seconlary oairiu: has also re-
coried by Foster (lggi) in 5. nepunio var. interius (orit.)
3,.
'r-C‘;
O H <<
i(
5!
H O H.
I-)1
U‘
C H;
H.
( U)
Q C]
(‘1
(D
(U
13
H)
I ;_J
L‘4
C*‘
\fl.
(D
>4
}.1
(n
C H.
:3
C.
’ ’L
I) ~—, ‘\ A 4., i (‘x _> _‘ . N _ - ', K. 4 w w I“ r“ :r“, >“ O 1 n f“ _ ' ’3
ous ac . of trze l; s ecies ML1ch naVe been investiaateu—-—.
to.
It)
. _ "\ f r‘ ‘1 ‘ 1* z | {‘A ~ ‘
011 (2n — 20, as a. saccharum bwéytOlOgists, 14 are dizl
Mar 3;. .hi “. olatonoiies L.); 4 ar= tetraploid (4n = 52,W
'- .’. .‘ »‘ vx - ‘ /\ . 1 .' ‘ D I" Q A . -~ ,‘ . .... ‘ - . ‘ ," ,‘ 1 r.“ “‘ -| “I . ' .1 7“ _‘
or a. 'Uifmif‘llCE‘lkflflii a tar .a;.roug ti -lOrmal QIEUAJiQ
c+
H.
U}
[I
C (D
O (T)
(0
C (T
U}
(- (T)
p-
H.
c'F
c+
O I"
(U
C. r*3
$0
( 47*
O (+-
H l-
rc)
|...]
Cl
[—1.
L O SJ
71‘
(ti.
..J
O H (‘0
chromosomes in the
H $11
C‘*‘
I (I)
H (7‘
‘2
C (“
'55
(0
<1
(E
(D
c+
‘1
FI.
(.J
[r‘
l
'1
C0
(0
d H L}
soiia ticH).-‘1 f. w: ,. ..Lf r...., '1 4.7-1,. 3'” ‘ ’ ...
gequs at- both rearrteo "QC regula occurrenc o
chromosoie icu l1.¥ in regions of the root_tjps, In the
case of the triploid seedling notei abore, Jeurman obser-
73 number.<1
(D
)1:
U)
9 b R O O c+
:10
'O
O (T)
H r.)
U)
£1.
rt
:3
('9'
L (D
I (T)
74
to
k)
}_I
O }J
L
Chromosomes of the octaoloii, é. 5ubram, have been
studied by sev ral workers (Darlin 191“; Lottier, 1914;
Iaylor, 1920; and roster, 1933). The reduced number of 40
‘ _ ‘ A“ V ..f“ ‘ .‘ f "‘w t. “.’\r. c ‘_ l‘ 2' :0
Was re}orten oy Darllflf; 50 by rottiel, o, a 90, all oo-
75 by T aylor; aul 52 by Foster. 13ylor' s j 50 agioroxi-
. V - ..C‘ ’:’ .. I 4* "w '3 ’- 4' ‘rfi ." "~ 3,“ o“. 7
mates roster 8 count 01 p2 agl onus 1avoxs the oroeaole
Tooter concurred Lith Taylor's suggesti n tgat other
forms of the red resis, having jifferent chromosome num-
S-b) Work with the
(T
("J
H (D
:3
(o
‘4.
O O O C.
N lJ
L3
.3
S13
cl"
C W (T)
O U)
O (D
A
H KC,
KN
he 10 of the 14 secti ns ani about 1/6 of theN ‘,’- J‘ .
anotn svecies.
U)
U)
(T
(I:
F}.
G!
U)
" I ‘r .’-'/ . "3 Li“! ( ’4‘ fl. .0, Q ~ ‘9‘ .m.
Vgrl&tlbd o: to: rowtlnt 'cility oneracter in tul
may conceivaolv be corollatei tits coroxosomr number.
“‘4. . . 7‘ " ,V. ' .. , 4- \
Lg er citolotici motes
Liloto (1529), Leurman (1333), all Foster (1935) cote
!
.24
(+
._\
(I
(D i
O (D
otiocally regular on, complete
{I)
3
(“+-
C0
5.J
.0. s 4 , .A '7' h n A '3 , .- ,1 V . - ,7; .. " \ , .2 V. ‘
1‘] 13 _L‘- L. .L UI :11 L. Sa,--‘JC l'.‘ E) {ELK/1.1483. c 34175.] 4.11 A.
...,
-un seq other polyoloiis, no univelent or multivelentH c (‘1
w p
SD 0 (U‘
(J,.‘
O iations were observed. Foster coxcluiei teat bfliS w;
, \.~ ,5. i. -. nusm. 4 .v. v :1.” '~ 7- w‘probably uue to tUe low Cflldcmd freooescy uni)“ is grooably
" r‘ ‘ ‘ 1" 'fi " ~ r- "L ‘n . v u I" ‘ 7" . x -‘ . \ .p \ '3“. - ‘.
has OoberEQ by tLis tors—r afl; also 1...eurulen.
Foster (1933) reoortei collen sterility counts for 53
soecies an: varieties of ragles. LOSt o them (45) showed
more tgai 83% goo: pollen and the otuer 8 veriei from 100%
sterility (é. teggentosun Laxim.) to 257 sterility.
-150-
1'1'“7_" 711’ 77317“ ’1 ”11 Y
JJIR'] 'lz'f-Q YJI-.L'.‘on J_J
ffcnsicv, Iichcl (1939) Effect of iuflol~211ygiv s-id on
rootjflg3 of ijywrvo‘o v7'133133 Ol'Pm)W3 decid ants fores+'
trees. Jouv. For. 37: 57-41.
Brown, 1i. P. F FHWislin, Q“ (T. (1940) (meaercis]_1xtrbers
of tic Fnited Stotes. 1st Ed., XXI-fFfié 39., 312 fi3s.
:JZGTRJ-Vill thflc 30. 14M; , Jew \Tuflrf London.
Cblclrick, 1;. C. (-Axuxtccfl 'Ffitxyt of :311thotfix: :romtfi: sub-
stnizxtes; Fri if c yrm tmQ 01‘ cpitixink3s (if r.o<ml;7 ornio7norfi s].
glopts. (unpubliswed)
Lsrlinj, C. h. (1996) Sex 1L dioecious plorts. Full.
.ocpe” B 7. Club 33: 177-199.
---——~------—- (131?) Litosis in liviv3 03112. “W17
TOfirey Pot. Club 39: 407-409.
--———------——- (1923) Cbxomosome DGFQVIOP in Acev3§le+.r-
(“lilos L. g"fiéfl!‘.Cf”. JFUL". 39073. 10: 4.50-5.37.
first, K. L. (194L) 8 9 distribution OF "elf-Ltevilitg {r
the £10et'iJ'; {71-311111}. 17:70". 71917. “Lil. L-joc. 8?: (”/9-
519.
Foster, R. C. (1933) ChPOWOSOWS DHWFBP in A33? end Steph—
flec. Jour. 1:2: 1:“ . 14: Sit-393.
Freemqn, O. T. (1941) A red Tople, Silver maple Fybrid.
Jour. ERHWHilt; 32: ll—lf.
3 isor, L. G. (19?0) 9 list of clnomosome numbers in Au—
1 TQFWS. Geieiica U: (”l-464.
——--—----—--— (1939-0) A list of chromosome numbers in
3““i()s perwns. 13ib33<93r. ficovfi;. O: lVlmwfioo.
—------————-- (1930-9) A lisu Of cbfiowosome numbers in
KH,10~7c7ms. G ' 2 61—260.CD
:31
.DGD
“WCT‘
H C)
..D
H
7“ V" Ir 1:
1111131“. , 3.. o If”. Q "7! 1‘81‘P\ . - 1941) mcxtbook of dendrol-
7.777 57.136 Pd XV+ 5A9 foo €1.24.03- fies. McGraw-Hill Rock
00-, InC. Y W York & LO]
mes of some dioecious
Lindssv, R. H. (1950) The stroloso
2nii.osoerrxs Amer. Jknu7.'?ot. 17: ILm2-174.
Ksude, P. r. (1959) The h,rtou cata103ue. A list of tte
chromosome nU7c:919 of species of Priti31 flowering
plent . New 9*"tol. 39: l-S .
Laugmfln’ 0. Chronocowo moepholovy, constic doublibg “no
seconflnr" assCC1ctnon in Ate~ waiencifies L. Ho7editss
15: 145-175. 1933.
-----~--—~- (1933) nowc fiddltlhn”l rewewk" to tbc question
of‘ uolxrnlcixi acin“ filminnpvfix"os Triotsflfles. Lzrnor. 1%0c.
”WJLr ~10“. HHJA. _<: V2477? Citel f~om Plant Breed.
ulfl) Kitosis in the n.11en mother cells
1 " l
, o
of floor Pegundo J. eno “‘nobylco lVl in L. Ann. Hot.
("fi\ vs; ll,*- 1 :7 . A “““’”“‘“"'
:4”7s7“, '?. S. 5 Prwwvi ‘H. P. (1932) ’ 0" JWllfil till ers
0? Indie. filk-urttw, GOVerWHWn7t of Iz‘is Ceilfi7“l 3tjlic-
onion “hinca.
ijtrfiflxizii, E. 5;. ( $34) (Eilwlifitfi7t8 111 self-{<fllins—
. 13:10“. Oj‘a I ‘3, .2, iv -: {13(3‘373 t: ,13. ‘1p )0ijQ . jfi‘ (1qu :1 1:11.81). (no t . ;\(.‘{ (3 .
Sci. 9.9.9.”. 4: Q9”- )lo. (Cited f“0u Plsrt Domed.
Abstr. Vol 5, 19C5. )
-151-
Q ", \ ' x
fie"‘\-‘:("h L: . (12.11?) T r fi“.‘ 1 (‘1‘ ‘~l‘11!/~.j~l(l{_" ‘ + «1“ ‘n ‘A‘VWr' (“ "'l 3‘; P .- h- 1.. , - ‘ “‘ - - ‘ - F ’ d — h l
(\_ ~ 1 . (x ‘ ____ I ‘ ‘1 ’ 7‘ 71 1'!
Lra'l( Em. '(‘fi'l'I—l (’7’). ’ n .1 l ‘ 'f ’1 1,0. l I! \.\r"..
' ’ a. .5 V ’ T
(a _- ‘ 1 ‘17 1‘ . ° 3 ' 0 L L) ' _ __
-e:x"°‘“x~ , . . W. (1. 73-1) ~an7‘1 . '~;Ig, 01 fr\eesn tTCL/i.\a
"‘.. .- l- ’ _‘ er I, q —./.
Id:jll0!-. 3 ’1‘, .(1‘1 1,: L- . , \_ 1‘ ._I .
’ W I'. r] .‘ 1 r 3, ~ 3 y 7 3 O _ f3 ‘ J_ ‘ ' _‘ L j _
—--——~-——~—~~~-— {AMmq-w) CRO“RH' 1* LCVGRH rebflulCS Qt\/
t {) I F) i 1‘! f" ”J" F137? l‘k ) (11'1" "I." 4' ’ (-I a L ' §.(\ 1" ‘_ f .7 (V ’7 .jfi ti'('1(\(»
)U 7 J. .- - V x.‘ u ".1 A .I .. , I. Q _ . Q .L .. 72/ .
\r‘; w ‘ ., fl 4- .. 1‘7 - J-‘ . n ".. ' '1 , n r. h ”1.7) 73 3 ’1 L. ‘ U33. ”(J .: _ 1 . O “...-‘33., «3183)., _-‘_.___z-,
C ’X‘w‘gb L) '1- ('7'? [-5LJL, . 'KJ‘ . l,/'_ i \i .
1 '7’.("‘ f‘!‘_-.~- . ~ , J—~ " 3... ~,- 53' - -1. .-
£21-:if,cw, f. ( l; (.97) 's.:m'f~n7)53va€3 s L [CII‘JCB -a'- 37». c: LJJ)‘)L3JJ‘l'"
- - V ' 1“ -3 J— T ' .- ’1 . -?
l~nis ”1.9 s gelel v~fpn31 3 L0 WilOCUwCS. uLlOlOJJB
IL 'o 1 0
l. 10 - 3.
(w .‘ I J_1 1‘ f‘ 3. ‘1" g [I -- 1 ...1 *7. " AVG-1 (“fl ‘ V O 3‘” ‘I--r‘ 3‘): '3 O N
0‘ lift, I“. |J. '3... 1'1“), 0 S, J O ' 4 O —LLL 4“ L) ‘(x (:j-‘;~: .Lu\'_. 7-5.8 :1};
p -. -- - . ~ T ‘1 n 13. "I‘. :3“) . 1:4 77 "
lusest trees. ~Ou.. 3-3. nr~. an: 47 —4nc.
(3‘ .. .- 1“ f‘ (\‘r’ (_ 7" 1r . j (- fl .1 '7' ~ 7: 7.3. 7:. ~ ~ . ~ -\ 7 . ‘
.2.ud, A. 4r. (lead—a) LL“NL-C§L*J_.HJ'1383 IWK7121M3 (W? Wiper‘45
. - - Y" (t ‘\ A. m? . 4‘ .' . . " ‘- — (‘J‘ h ~ .3 ‘ ’1‘ '3 | I ff
7'1“ 7318 gut-41:11. “Q ‘ gtagdo ‘ . , . C». L 1 Qt) _,c.'_. _.[)V . 7‘;...33l. \Ju.’ .
r‘“. 1 or? cp
r7? 1'3d.riwr,le ’Tfii‘ 7L1» ‘37 133:0-“t ‘. 'uflflfi I'PV’ F‘K’qfl, 3(1M1.
’-O?“7‘ecsaterw1 ch7. ‘:'p. "30, {jocfi , Taste ? n, ;)9,
-"""“'“~ (1351) 'svirales nffeetin; vegetatiVC fHOgb-
3stion of‘1mxi:nml sugey VG'JJ‘ .Tmlr. Forertrgrffllz 595—
40;.
Tflffllor, '.. 3. (lifiVj f.r;o:gfimslo\jxua erui egtxilO'iCxil sfuuiv
Of 'PFWTY“‘PtiOD ill the ;finn13 Ame . f33ntrib. ()5. Lab.
UfiiV. PM. 5: 111-139.
miiirnu: K. V. 1 Lelislw A. L. (1939) T19 ve;etstiwe
7317c3r‘vi'37 t:i.c>r; (>57 #3i_i"f'i (:111 1; 7‘ilt -u 2,: . gfax1xgw, ; ._.. -3rw1) 737);
llJ—lxfi.
Siskesleo A. P. (1‘1!) A possible habit mutent of tbn'1
SU*3P m7nle. 'Feva 1A: 20~1A4.\J .,
.3...
Cnréiff, J. D. (l90b) A study of synwpsis and Iweduciiorl.7L 1 r _ _ w ‘ .. '7 "F., (‘rj—l (1"! '2
_,T;lll_:- . 30;“ ('93! EOL . 4413.1 ._) )2 i, 4 _;.-v,:\)u .
_ TV- . “I' \ , -.. . ° _ I 3 ‘n "
Detmeps, fired? (1919; TWO new varieties of Ace? rqurdn L.
l... __ 1 4' (“'2 (‘7
0110 ITOl.]._Ho 3101. 3-1-: LjLJQI-a-fsjk)
w-x n‘ r (\( i‘, 3
peu;r3“, C. '}. (l;m:7) :uveakjll
- -M n 7- .- . -.‘ — - -. ’3 T”
by Lye use 01 ewemicsls. Lc'ence, Juld We, 1‘92.\ V‘ ,A‘W ‘ _‘ 0 J ‘ '\ ‘
-—--—~----——~ & i‘ohe“, r. I. u Luicsl brestme7* to ero't-
en the restperfofi of 9139‘ w7nle trees. Selenne 701
ifsrw:ar', E. S. (1}?4C
726—728.
) lhe Kimball msple. Jour. For, 59:
Letter, J. (1951) Schizocotyly and geHetic vcler-jon in
-“0317 Jen? Pixftol. »0: ge-gx;I E ,
Siv“”Offlih, G. 7?. (IU‘QG) llniéiaz exemqile cnl'the 777ons'Wflfinn
01 SUfiH“!flflpl€ fWKmlzl cuttinzq in or. Eknnzs P '
-152...