Annual Report 2014–15 - krishi icar

Annual Report2014–15

ALL INDIA CO-ORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT ONINTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS

ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research(Indian Council of Agricultural Research)Modipuram, Meerut- 250 110, India

AICRP on IFS Annual Report 2014-15

ii All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems

Printed at: M/s Yugantar Prakashan Pvt. Ltd., WH-23 Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi-110 064Phones: 011-28115949, 28116018; Mobile: 09811349619, 09953134595

Correct Citation: AICRP on IFS. 2015. Annual Report 2014-15. ICAR-Indian Institute of FarmingSystems Research (Indian Council of Agricultural Research), Modipuram,Meerut-250 110, pp. 1-258.

© reserved with the Director, ICAR-IIFSR

Compiled and Edited by: Dr N. Ravisankar, PI (OFR) & Programme Facilitator (Coordination Unit)Dr J.P. Singh, Programme Facilitator (Int. Farming Systems Management)Dr M.P.S. Arya, Programme Facilitator (Organic Agriculture Systems)Dr Prem Singh, Programme Facilitator (Cropping Systems & Resource Mgt.)Dr Mohammad Shamim, Scientist (Coordination Unit)Mr Raghuveer Singh, Scientist (Coordination Unit)Mr D. Tripathi, Chief Tech. Officer (Coordination Unit)Dr Brij Mohan Garg, Asstt. Chief Tech. Officer (Coordination Unit)Mr Avinash Kansal, Res. Associate (Coordination Unit)

Data Processing at Dr Anil Kumar, Principal Scientist & PI, AICRP-IFSIASRI, New Delhi by: Dr (Mrs) Cini Varghese, Principal Scientist, OFR, AICRP-IFS

Mr Naresh Kumar, Asstt. Chief Tech. OfficerMr Gyan Singh, Asstt. Chief Tech. OfficerMr Devender Kumar, Asstt. Chief Tech. Officer

Published by: Dr A.S. Panwar, DirectorICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research,Modipuram, Meerut-250 110, India

Important Notes:

• This compilation is a joint contribution of all the associated scientists and technical staff of 74 AICRP-IFS centers (data generation), ICAR-IASRI New Delhi (statistical analysis) and ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram(report writing, compilation, editing and printing).

• The report is based on experimental data generated during kharif, rabi and summer seasons of 2013-14 (period ending June 2014), under ‘on-station’ and ‘on-farm’ research programmes of AICRP onIntegrated Farming Systems. The other details are relevant to 31st March 2015.

• The report includes both processed and semi-processed data, generated in different sub-projectsunder AICRP on Integrated Farming Systems, and as such no material/ data should be reproducedin any form without prior written permission of the Director, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming SystemsResearch and due credit to the concerned scientists.


All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems (AICRP-IFS) initiated in 2010-11 is operating with 25 main, 12 sub, 6 voluntary and 32 on-farm centres in 23 states and 2 unionterritories. The results of the experiments conducted during 2013-14 by all the co-operating centres areprocessed and compiled in the Annual Report 2014-15 of the scheme. I take this opportunity to recordmy sincere thanks to Dr. T. Mohapatra, Secretary, Department of Agricultural Research and Educationand Director General, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi for offering critical commentsand guidance. I extend my gratitude to Dr. K. Alagusundaram, Acting Deputy Director General (NaturalResource Management) for his constant support extended to the scheme. The time to time guidancereceived from Dr. S. Bhaskar, Assistant Director General (Agronomy, Agroforestry and Climate Change)for improving the performance and output of the scheme is duly acknowledged. My sincere thanks alsoextended to Dr. S. Ayyappan, Former Secretary, Department of Agricultural Research and Educationand Director General, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, Dr. A.K. Sikka, Former DeputyDirector General (Natural Resource Management) and Dr. B. Mohankumar, Former Assistant DirectorGeneral (Agronomy, Agroforestry and Climate Change) for their critical comments, reviews andsuggestions on the performance and improvement of scheme over the years. Scientific inputs receivedfrom Quinquennial Review Team (QRT), Research Advisory Committee (RAC) and InstituteManagement Committee (IMC) are thankfully acknowledged as those inputs provided immense helpin taking new initiatives, shaping and improvement of the programme for practical utility.

I am highly thankful to each and every one of the scientists and research fellows involved in the schemeat 13 centres for putting the meticulous effort to conduct the field experiments, lab analysis and generatingdata. The sincere efforts put forth by Dr. N. Ravisankar, Principal Scientist deserves appreciation forcompilation and editing of the report. I also extend my appreciation to Dr. M. Shamim, Scientist, Dr.Raghuveer Singh, Scientist, Mr. D. Tripathi, Chief Technical Officer, Dr. Brij Mohan Garg, AssistantChief Technical Officer and Mrs. Jailata Sharma, PA for their cooperation in compilation of the data, itsstatistical analysis, drafting and proof corrections. Thanks and appreciations are also due to Dr. KamtaPrasad, Former Programme Facilitator (Co-ordination Unit) and Dr. J.P. Singh, Former Director (Acting)for extending the cooperation in preparation of report.

The contributions of all the other scientific, technical, administrative and skilled supporting staff eitherdirectly or indirectly at various levels during preparation of this report are also acknowledged. I am sure;the significant findings obtained from the experiments especially region specific Integrated Farming Systemmodels, need based alternative cropping systems, resource management packages and refined farmingsystem in farmer partcipatory mode are of practical in nature and can be adopted by small and marginalfarmers for improving their livelihood.

(A.S. Panwar)Director


All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems v

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. OBJECTIVES 3

3. LOCATION 4

4. SOIL AND CLIMATE 10

5. STAFF POSITION 16

6. BUDGET 17

7. RESEARCH RESULTS 21

7.1 Integrated Farming Systems 23

7.2 Cropping Systems Management 43

7.3 Sustainable Resource Management 86

7.4 On-Farm Research 101

8. GENERAL/ MISCELLANEOUS 183

8.1 List of Publications 185

8.2 Paper Presented in Seminar/Symposia 192

8.3 Group Meetings/Workshops Organized 205

8.4 Radio and Television Talks Delivered by Project Staff 208

9. APPENDICES 211

I. Initial Soil Parameters for On-Station Experimental Sites 213

II. Weather Parameters at Different Cropping System Centres 215

III. Centre-Wise Staff Position 217

IV. Soil Fertility Status and Nutrient Uptake 226

10. ANNEXURES 247

I. Current Contact Addresses 249

II. Botanical and Hindi Names of Different Crops 257


All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems 1

The Genesis of the “All India CoordinatedResearch Project on Integrated FarmingSystems” may be traced back to the visit of DrA.B. Stewart of Macaulay Institute of SoilResearch, Aberdeen U.K., somewhere in mid-forties. He was invited by the then ‘Imperial Councilof Agricultural Research’ to (i) review the positionin respect of soil fertility investigations, in generaland manuring in particular, and (ii) suggest stepswhich might be taken in order to obtain, in shortestpossible time, adequate information under differentconditions of soil and climate to enable agriculturaldepartments to give some advice to cultivators forincreasing crop yields. His review reports,published in 1947, significantly affected philosophyand practices of fertilizers experimentation in thecountry, He stressed upon the need of conductingsimple fertilizer trials on cultivators’ fields andcomplex experiments at selected researchcentres. Prompted by these suggestions, a“Simple Fertilizer Trials at cultivators’ Fields”scheme was initiated in 1953 under the Indo-American Technology Cooperation Agreementunder “Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Use Project” withthe following objectives:

i. To study crop responses to nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium when appliedseparately and in different combinations underthe cultivators’ field conditions.

ii. To investigate the relative response of differentfertilizers in various broad soil groups and towork out the optimum fertilizer combinationsfor different agro-climatic regions.

iii. To study the relative performance of differentnitrogen and phosphatic fertil izers forindigenous production.

iv. To demonstrate to the farmers the value offertilizer use for the production of crops

Subsequently in 1956, experiments on carefullyselected centers called ‘Model AgronomicExperiments’ were added to the project and startedas all India Coordinated Agronomic ExperimentsScheme (AICAES). The objectives of ModelAgronomic Experiments were:

i. To study the interaction of amounts of fertilizerapplication with intensity and frequency ofirrigation, sowing date and plant density.

ii. To work out the manure requirement ofimportant crop rotations and their effect on soilfertility.

iii. To evaluate the relative efficiency of varioussources of nitrogen and phosphorus fordifferent crops and areas, and of differentmethods of application of nitrogenous andphosphatic fertilizers.

As knowledge progressed, new technologydeveloped and the rate of growth in agricultureincreased, the scheme went through variousstages of evolution during which its scopeexpanded and its focus sharpened in accordancewith newly acquired scientific knowledge. Thescope of experimentation was, therefore, expandedto include agronomic research, embracing culturalpractices, irrigation and nutritional requirements,chemical weed control and multiple cropping. Butthe emphasis continued on soil fertility and fertilizeruse as influenced by soil and climatic factors andmanagement,

In 1968-69, the scheme was sanctioned as AllIndia Coordinated Agronomic Research Project(AICARP) with two components, viz.; ’ModelAgronomic Experiments’ and ‘Simple FertilizerTrials’. The main objectives of the experimentsconducted at the research centres under thescheme were:

1. INTRODUCTION


2 All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Systems

i. To obtain information of the response of highyielding varieties of cereal to different agronomicfactors such as fertil izer (includingmicronutrients), irrigation ,weed control ,limingetc.;

ii. To study the manure requirements of importantcrop rotations and their effect on soil fertility;

iii. To evaluate various sources of nitrogen andphosphorus for different crops and areas;

iv. To work out the production potential per unitarea, per unit time for different agro-climatecondition of the country; and

v. To determine the most suitable croppingpatterns and fertilizer responses under rainfedcondition.

Under the revised scheme, the main objectivesof the simple fertilizer trial were:

i. To study the responses of introduced highyielding and locally improved varieties tonitrogen and phosphorus applied alone and incombination and to potassium in the presenceof nitrogen and phosphorus under irrigated aswell as dry land condition;

ii. To compare different methods of applicationof nitrogen on cereals under dry-farmingconditions;

iii. To study the contribution of package of soil andmoisture conservation practices to increasecrop production in dry farming areas;

iv. To study the relationship between cropresponse to fertilizer and soil test values; and

v. To formulate fertilizer recommendations fordifferent soils and agro-climatic regions of thecountry.

But, during 1979 aforementioned objectiveswere further reviewed and redefined as under:

i. To develop, continuously update and test oncultivators’ fields the technology for various cropbased farming systems. For this patterns bestsuited for different agro-climatic zones may beidentified, evolved for various emerging farming

situations and package of practices developedto realize their production potential.

ii. To define/delineate all aspects of the use offertilizers (recognizing that fertilizer is animportant component of modern agriculturaltechnology), including choice of materialsmaximize its use through recycling ofagricultural wastes or employment of microbialaids,

iii. To provide facilities foe testing new varieties attheir pre-release stage.

In mid-eighties, the policy planners dulyrecognized the importance of cropping systemsapproach of research to enhance resource useefficiencies for improved and sustainable cropproductivity. Therefore, to strengthen all aspectsof cropping systems research the ‘ProjectDirectorate for Cropping Systems Research’ wasestablished at Modipuram (Meerut) with effect fromMarch 1989, with ‘AICRP on Cropping Systems’as one of the constituent schemes of theDirectorate with both the components, namely;‘On–Station Research’ and ‘On-Farm Research’remaining intact.

However, within two decades of existence ofPDCSR, the mandate of the Directorate wasbroadened during 2009-10 to undertake researchin integrated farming system mode and theDirectorate was renamed as ‘Project Directoratefor Farming Systems Research (PDFSR)’ andmandate redefined as:

i. To characterize existing farming systems toknow the productivity, viability and constraints.

ii. To develop resource efficient, economicallyviable and sustainable integrated farmingsystem modules and models for differentfarming situations.

iii. To undertake basic and strategic research onproduction technologies for improvingagricultural resource use efficiencies in farmingsystem mode.

iv. To develop and standardize package ofproduction practices for emerging cropping/



farming concepts and evaluate their long-termsustainability.

v. To act as repository of information on allaspects of farming systems by creatingappropriate databases.

vi. To develop on-farm agro-processing and valueaddition techniques to enhance farm incomeand quality of finished products.

vii. To undertake on-farm testing, verification andrefinement of system-based farm productiontechnologies.

viii. To develop capacity building of stakeholders inIntegrated Farming Systems through training.

The name and mandate of AICRP on CroppingSystems were also changed accordingly, withmajor emphasis on farming systems research andobjectives modified as hereunder.

The Project Directorate for Farming SystemsResearch was renamed as ICAR-Indian Instituteof Farming Systems Research (IIFSR) during

November 2014 and the mandate was redefinedfurther as given below.

● Research in integrated farming systems onproduction technologies for improvingproductivity and resource use efficiencies.

● Develop efficient, economically viable andenvironmentally sustainable integrated farmingsystem models for different farming situations.

● On-farm testing, verification and refinement ofsystem-based farm production technologies.

● Coordinate and monitor integrated farmingsystems research in the country.

All India Coordinated Research project onIntegrated Farming Systems (AICRP on IFS) is anintegral part of IIFSR with 75 centres to undertakeon-station and on-farm research across length andbreadth of the country. The institute is also leadinga Network Project on Organic Farming (NPOF)with 20 centres.

On-Station Research

— To undertake applied and adaptive research inintegrated farming systems (IFS), especiallyon production technologies for improvingsystem productivity and resource useefficiencies.

— To develop efficient, economically viable andenvironmentally sustainable IFS models fordifferent zones.

— To undertake capacity building and humanresource development in IFS.

On-Farm Research

— To undertake characterization of existingfarming systems for identification of productionconstraints and problem prioritization.

— To undertake on-farm testing and refinementof system-based farm productiontechnologies.

— To optimize on-farm integration of farmenterprises for enhanced farm incomes,resource/ input use efficiencies, andemployment opportunities.

2. OBJECTIVES



3. LOCATION

Under the aegis of AICRP-IFS there are 25 maincenters, 12 sub centers, 32 on-farm researchcentres and 6 voluntary centres. All main and subcentres are engaged in basic and applied researchand are necessarily located at SAUs or theirRegional Research Stations or Agriculturalcolleges of those general universities, where strongagricultural research base is available. Whereas,on-farm research centers (earlier known asExperiments on Cultivators’ Fields/ ECF Centers)

are engaged in farmers’ participatory research andare located in different agro-climatic zones. TheseOFR centers remain shifted from one zone /farming situation to another, every 5 years. Thevoluntary centres are situated in ICAR institutesand are taking up only IFS model developmentactivity. The location of different AICRP-IFS centersduring the year under report (2013-14) is depictedin Map-1& 2, and details are given in Table-3/1.

Map 1. Locations of on-station research centres of AICRP-IFS during 2013-14

Map 2. Locations of on-farm research centres of AICRP-IFS during 2013-14



Tab

le-3

/1: L

oca

tio

n o

f Dif

fere

nt A

ICR

P-I

FS

cen

tres

du

rin

g th

e ye

ar u

nd

er r

epo

rt (2

013-

14)

S.

Sta

teC

entr

eS

tatu

sE

cosy

stem

Ag

ro-c

limat

ic R

egio

ns/

NA

RP

Zo

ne

No.

Su

b-R

egio

n o

f P

lan

nin

g

1.A

&N

ICA

R-C

IAR

I, P

ortb

lair

Vol

unta

ryIs

land

Isla

nd re

gion

Nor

ther

n Z

one

AN

-1

2.A

ndhr

aM

arut

eru

(Dis

t. W

.S

ub C

entr

eC

oast

alE

ast C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/K

rishn

a G

odav

ari D

elta

Zon

e (A

P-1

)P

rade

shG

odav

ari)

Sou

th C

oast

al A

ndhr

a S

ub-R

egio

n

3.S

rikak

ulam

OF

R C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Eas

t Coa

st P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Reg

ion

Nor

th C

oast

al z

one

(AP

-2)

4.A

ssam

Jorh

atM

ain

Cen

tre

Hum

idE

aste

rn H

imal

ayan

Reg

ion/

Upp

erU

pper

Bra

hmap

utra

Val

ley

Zon

eB

rahm

aput

ra V

alle

y S

ub-R

egio

n(A

S-2

)

5.K

amru

pO

FR

Cen

tre

Hum

idE

aste

rn H

imal

ayan

Reg

ion

Cen

tral

Bra

hmap

utra

Val

ley

(AS

-3)

6.B

ihar

Sab

our (

Dis

t.M

ain

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idM

iddl

e G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

n/S

outh

Bih

ar A

lluvi

al P

lain

Zon

e (B

1-3)

Bha

galp

ur)

Sou

th B

ihar

Pla

ins

Sub

-Reg

ion

7.P

urne

aO

FR

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idM

iddl

e G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

nN

orth

-eas

t Allu

vial

Pla

in (B

1-2)

8.P

atna

Vol

. Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idM

iddl

e G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

nS

outh

Bih

ar A

lluvi

al P

lain

Zon

e (B

1-3)

9.C

hhat

ti-R

aipu

rM

ain

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idE

aste

rn P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

n/C

hhat

tisga

rh P

lain

Zon

e (C

G-1

)sg

arh

Wai

ngan

ga S

ub-R

egio

n

10.

Kab

irdha

mO

FR

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idE

aste

rn P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

nC

hhat

tisga

rh P

lain

Zon

e (C

G-1

)

11.

Del

hiN

ew D

elhi

Vol

. Cen

tre

Sub

-Arid

Tra

ns G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

nW

este

rn S

emi A

rid (N

D-1

)

12.

Goa

Old

Goa

Vol

. Cen

tre

Coa

stal

Wes

t Coa

st P

lain

s &

Hill

s R

egio

nS

outh

Kon

kan

Coa

stal

13.

Guj

arat

S.K

. Nag

ar (

Dis

t.M

ain

Cen

tre

Arid

Guj

arat

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/N

orth

Guj

arat

Zon

e (G

J-4)

Ban

aska

ntha

)N

orth

Guj

arat

Sub

-Reg

ion

14.

Juna

gadh

Sub

-Cen

treS

emi-A

ridG

ujar

at P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Reg

ion/

Sou

th S

aura

shtr

a Z

one

(GJ-

7)S

outh

Sau

rash

tra

Sub

-Reg

ion

15.

Nav

sari

Sub

-Cen

treC

oast

alG

ujar

at P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Reg

ion/

Sou

th G

ujar

at H

eavy

Rai

nfal

l Zon

eS

outh

ern

Hill

s S

ub-R

egio

n(G

J-1)

16.

Meh

sana

OF

R C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridG

ujar

at P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Reg

ion/

Nor

th G

ujar

at Z

one

(GJ-

4)N

orth

Guj

arat

Sub

-Reg

ion

Con

td...

./-



S.

Sta

teC

entr

eS

tatu

sE

cosy

stem

Ag

ro-c

limat

ic R

egio

ns/

NA

RP

Zo

ne

No.

Su

b-R

egio

n o

f P

lan

nin

g

17.

Der

olO

FR

Cen

tre

Arid

Guj

arat

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/M

iddl

e G

ujar

at Z

one

(GJ-

3)N

orth

wes

t Sub

-Reg

ion

18.

Har

yana

His

arM

ain

Cen

tre

Arid

Tra

ns –

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion/

Wes

tern

Zon

e (H

R-2

)A

rid S

ub-R

egio

n

19.

Sirs

aO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Tra

ns –

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion

Wes

tern

(HR

-2)

20.

Him

acha

lP

alam

pur

Mai

n C

entr

eH

umid

Wes

tern

Him

alay

an R

egio

n/H

igh

Mid

-Hill

Sub

-Hum

id Z

one

(HP

-2)

Pra

desh

(Dis

t. K

angr

a)A

ltitu

de T

empe

ratu

re S

ub-R

egio

n

21.

Kan

gra

OF

R C

entr

eH

umid

Wes

tern

Him

alay

an R

egio

nS

ub-M

onta

ne a

nd L

ow H

ills

Sub

-T

ropi

cal (

HP

-1)

22.

J &

KC

hath

a (J

amm

u)M

ain

Cen

tre

Hum

idW

este

rn H

imal

ayan

Reg

ion/

Hig

hM

id to

Hig

h A

ltitu

de P

lain

Zon

eA

ltitu

de T

empe

ratu

re S

ub-R

egio

n

23.

Sam

baO

FR

Cen

tre

Hum

idW

este

rn H

imal

ayan

Reg

ion

Low

alti

tude

Sub

-Tro

pica

l Zon

e (J

K-1

)

24.

Jhar

khan

dK

anke

(Ran

chi)

Mai

n C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Eas

tern

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion/

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

Zon

e (B

1-5)

Chh

ota

Nag

pur,

Sou

th a

nd W

est

Ben

gal H

ills

& P

late

au S

ub-R

egio

n

25.

Pak

urO

FR

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idE

aste

rn P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

nC

entr

al a

nd N

orth

Eas

tern

Pla

teau

Zon

e (J

H-1

)

26.

Kar

nata

kaK

atha

lger

eM

ain

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Reg

ion

Sou

ther

n T

rans

ition

Zon

e (K

A-7

)(D

ist.

Dav

ange

re)

27.

Kol

arO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Reg

ion

Eas

tern

Dry

Zon

e (K

A-5

)

28.

Siru

gupp

a (D

ist.

Mai

n C

entr

eA

ridS

outh

ern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/N

orth

ern

Dry

Zon

e (K

A-3

)B

ella

ry)

Nor

ther

n D

ry R

egio

n of

Kar

nata

ka

29.

Gad

agO

FR

Cen

tre

Arid

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Reg

ion

Nor

ther

n dr

y Z

one

(KA

-3)

30.

Ker

ala

Kar

aman

a (D

ist.

Mai

n C

entr

eC

oast

alW

est C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Gha

ts /

Coa

stal

Sou

ther

n Z

one

(KE

-2)

Thi

ruva

ntha

pura

m)

Mid

land

Sub

-Reg

ion

31.

Pat

hina

mth

itta

OF

R C

entr

eC

oast

alW

est C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Gha

tsP

robl

em A

reas

Zon

e (K

E-5

) Con

td...

./-



S.

Sta

teC

entr

eS

tatu

sE

cosy

stem

Ag

ro-c

limat

ic R

egio

ns/

NA

RP

Zo

ne

No.

Su

b-R

egio

n o

f P

lan

nin

g

32.

Mad

hya

Jaba

lpur

Mai

n C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Cen

tral

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion/

Kym

ore

Pla

teau

and

Sat

pura

Hill

sP

rade

shK

ymor

e P

late

au a

nd S

atpu

ra H

ills

Zon

e (M

P-4

)S

ub-R

egio

n

33.

Indo

reS

ub-C

entre

Sem

i-Arid

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

&H

ills

Reg

ion/

Mal

wa

Pla

teau

Zon

e (M

P-1

0)C

entr

al P

late

au S

ub-R

egio

n

34.

Pow

arkh

eda

Sub

-Cen

treS

ub-H

umid

Cen

tral

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion/

Cen

tral

Nar

mad

a Va

lley

Zon

e (M

P-6

)(D

ist.

Hos

hang

abad

)C

entr

al N

arm

ada

Val

ley

Sub

-Reg

ion

35.

Rew

aS

ub-C

entre

Sub

-Hum

idC

entr

al P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

n/K

ymor

e P

late

au a

nd S

atpu

ra H

ills

Kym

ore

Pla

teau

and

Sat

pura

Hill

sZ

one

(MP

-4)

Sub

-Reg

ion

36.

Din

dori

OF

R C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridE

aste

rn P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Nor

ther

n hi

ll zo

ne o

f Cha

ttisg

arh

(CG

-3)

37.

Kat

niO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Cen

tral

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion

Kym

ore

Pla

teau

and

Sat

pura

Hill

s(M

P-1

)

38.

Mah

ar-

Ako

laM

ain

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

&H

ills

Reg

ion/

Wes

tern

Vid

arbh

a Z

one(

MH

-8)

asht

raC

entr

al P

late

au S

ub-R

egio

n

39.

Am

rava

tiO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Wes

t Coa

st P

lain

s an

d G

hats

Cen

tral

Mah

aras

thra

Pla

teau

(MH

-7)

40.

Kar

jat (

Dis

t. R

aiga

d)M

ain

Cen

tre

Coa

stal

Wes

tern

Pla

ins

& G

hat R

egio

ns/

Nor

th K

onka

n C

oast

al Z

one

(MH

-2)

Coa

stal

Hill

y S

ub-R

egio

n

41.

Rai

gad

OF

R C

entr

eC

oast

alW

est C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Gha

tsN

orth

Kon

kan

Coa

stal

Zon

e (M

H-2

)

42.

Par

bhan

iM

ain

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

&H

ills

Reg

ion/

Cen

tral

Mah

aras

htra

Pla

teau

Zon

eC

entr

al P

late

au S

ub-R

egio

n(M

H-7

)

43.

Aur

anga

bad

OF

R C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridW

este

rn P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

nC

entr

al M

ahar

asht

ra P

late

au Z

one

(MH

-7)

44.

Rah

uri (

Dis

t.M

ain

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion/

Sca

rcity

Zon

e (M

H-6

)A

hem

adna

gar)

Sca

rcity

Sub

-Reg

ion

Con

td...

./-



S.

Sta

teC

entr

eS

tatu

sE

cosy

stem

Ag

ro-c

limat

ic R

egio

ns/

NA

RP

Zo

ne

No.

Su

b-R

egio

n o

f P

lan

nin

g

45.

Meg

ha-

Um

iam

Vol

. Cen

tre

Hum

idE

aste

rn H

imal

aya

Reg

ion

Sub

Him

alay

an R

egio

nla

ya

46.

Pun

eO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion

Wes

tern

Mah

aras

htra

Pla

in Z

one

Gan

eshk

hind

(MH

-5)

47.

Odi

sha

Bhu

bane

swar

Mai

n C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Eas

t Coa

st P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Reg

ion/

Eas

t and

Sou

th –

Eas

tern

Coa

stal

Oris

sa C

oast

al S

ub-R

egio

nP

lain

Zon

e (O

R-4

)

48.

Chi

plim

aS

ub-C

entre

Sub

-Hum

idE

aste

rn P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

n/W

est-

Cen

tral

Tab

le L

and

Zon

e (O

R-9

)(D

ist.

Sam

balp

ur)

Wai

ngan

ga S

ub-R

egio

n

49.

Ang

ulO

FR

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idE

aste

rn P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

nM

id-C

entr

al T

able

Lan

d (O

R-1

0)

50.

Ken

drap

ara

OF

R C

entr

eC

oast

alE

ast C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/E

ast a

nd S

outh

–E

aste

rn C

oast

alO

rissa

Coa

stal

Sub

-Reg

ion

Pla

in Z

one

(OR

-4)

51.

Pun

jab

Ludh

iana

Mai

n C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridT

rans

-Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion/

Cen

tral

Pla

in Z

one

(PB

-3)

Pla

ins

Sub

-Reg

ion

52.

Am

ritsa

rO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Tra

ns-G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

n/C

entr

al P

lain

Zon

e (P

B-3

)P

lain

s S

ub-R

egio

n

53.

Raj

asth

anD

urga

pura

(Jai

pur)

Mai

n C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridC

entr

al P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

n/S

emi-A

rid E

aste

rn P

lain

Zon

e (R

J-5)

Eas

tern

Pla

ins

of R

ajas

than

54.

Fat

ehpu

rO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Cen

tral

Pla

teau

& H

ills

Reg

ion/

Tra

nsiti

onal

Pla

in Z

one

of In

land

Eas

tern

Pla

ins

of R

ajas

than

Dra

inag

e (R

J-3)

55.

Kot

aS

ub C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridC

entr

al P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

n/H

umid

Sou

th –

Eas

tern

Pla

in Z

one

Eas

tern

Pla

ins

of R

ajas

than

(Sou

th-E

aste

rn H

umid

Pla

in Z

one

(RJ-

9)

56.

Uda

ipur

OF

R c

entr

eS

emi-A

ridC

entr

al P

late

au &

Hill

s R

egio

n/S

ub-H

umid

Sou

ther

n P

lain

& A

rava

liS

outh

ern

Pla

ins

of R

ajas

than

Hill

s Z

one

(RJ-

7)

57.

Tam

ilC

oim

bato

reM

ain

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Reg

ion/

Wes

tern

Zon

e (T

N-3

)N

adu

Cen

tral

Pla

teau

of T

amil

Nad

u S

ub-

Reg

ion

Con

td...

./-



S.

Sta

teC

entr

eS

tatu

sE

cosy

stem

Ag

ro-c

limat

ic R

egio

ns/

NA

RP

Zo

ne

No.

Su

b-R

egio

n o

f P

lan

nin

g

58.

Than

javu

rS

ub C

entr

eC

oast

alE

ast C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/C

auve

ry D

elta

Zon

e (T

N-4

)T

hanj

avur

Sub

-Reg

ion

59.

Pai

yur

OF

R C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridS

outh

ern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s R

egio

nN

orth

wes

tern

Zon

e (T

N-2

)

60.

Che

ttina

dO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Eas

t Coa

st P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Reg

ion

Sot

hern

Zon

e (T

N-5

)

61.

Tela

ngan

aR

ajen

dran

agar

Mai

n ce

ntre

Sem

i-Arid

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Reg

ion/

Sou

ther

n Te

lang

ana

Zon

e (A

P-5

)(D

ist.

Ran

gare

ddy)

Sou

th T

elan

gana

Sub

-Reg

ion

62.

Rud

rur (

Dis

t.S

ub C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridS

outh

ern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s R

egio

n/N

orth

ern

Tel

anga

na Z

one

(AP

-4)

Niz

amab

ad)

Nor

th T

elan

gana

Sub

-Reg

ion

63.

War

anga

lO

FR

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

Reg

ion

Sou

ther

n Te

lang

ana

(AP

-5)

64.

Utta

rK

anpu

rM

ain

Cen

tre

Sem

i-Arid

Upp

er G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

n/C

entr

al P

lain

Zon

e (U

P-6

)P

rade

shS

outh

Wes

tern

Pla

ins

Sub

-Reg

ion

65.

Kan

pur D

ehat

OF

R C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridU

pper

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion/

Cen

tral

Pla

in Z

one

(UP

-4)

Sou

th W

este

rn P

lain

s S

ub-R

egio

n

66.

Fai

zaba

dM

ain

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idM

iddl

e G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

n/E

aste

rn P

lain

Zon

e (U

P-9

)E

aste

rn P

lain

s S

ub-R

egio

n

67.

Am

bedk

arna

gar

OF

R C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Eas

tern

Him

alay

as R

egio

n/E

aste

rn P

lain

Zon

e (U

P-7

)E

aste

rn P

lain

s S

ub-R

egio

n

68.

Bic

hpur

i (D

ist.

Agr

a)S

ub C

entr

eS

emi-A

ridU

pper

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion/

Sou

th-W

este

rn S

emi-A

rid Z

one

Wes

tern

Pla

ins

Sub

-Reg

ion

(UP

-5)

69.

Vara

nasi

Sub

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idM

iddl

e G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

n/E

aste

rn P

lain

Zon

e (U

P-9

)E

aste

rn P

lain

s

70.

Mod

ipur

amV

ol. C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Upp

er G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

nW

este

rn P

lain

(UP

-3)

71.

Mod

ipur

amO

FR

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idU

pper

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion

Wes

tern

Pla

in (U

P-3

)

72.

Utta

ra-

Pan

tnag

ar (D

ist.

Mai

n C

entr

eS

ub-H

umid

Wes

tern

Him

alay

an R

egio

n/B

haw

ar a

nd T

arai

Zon

e (U

P-2

)

khan

dU

S N

agar

)V

alle

y Te

mpe

rate

Sub

-Reg

ion

73.

Nai

nita

lO

FR

Cen

tre

Sub

-Hum

idW

este

rn H

imal

ayan

Reg

ion/

Hill

Zon

e (U

K-1

)H

igh

hill

Tem

pera

te S

ub-R

egio

n

74.

Wes

tK

alya

ni (D

ist.

Nad

ia)

Mai

n C

entr

eH

umid

Low

er G

ange

tic P

lain

s R

egio

n/N

ew A

lluvi

al Z

one

(WB

-3)

Ben

gal

Cen

tral

Allu

vial

Pla

ins

Sub

-Reg

ion

75.

24-P

arga

nas

Sou

thO

FR

Cen

tre

Hum

idLo

wer

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Reg

ion

Coa

stal

Slin

e Z

one

(WB

-6)



Table-4/1: Soil type and geographical coordinates of different on-station CSR centres

S.No. Centre Soil Type Latitude Longitude

1. Rajendranagar Udic Ustochrepts, black soils 180 59’ N 78

0 55’ E

2. Maruteru Chromusterts clayey, medium black soils 160 38’ N 81

0 44’ E

3. Rudrur Chromusterts clayey, deep (90 cm depth), deep 180 30’ N 77

0 51’ E

black soils

4. Jorhat Fluaquents/ Udicaquents association, very deep 260 47’ N 94

0 12’ E

(90 cm depth), alluvial sandy clay loam soils

5. Sabour Eutrochrepts (Very deep), low and clay soils 250 23’ N 87

0 07’ E

6. Raipur Ochraquals association, deep black soils 210 16’ N 81

0 36’ E

7. S.K. Nagar Haplaquals, deep medium black soils 240 19’ N 72

0 19’ E

8. Junagadh Ustochrepts deep medium black soils 210 30’ N 70

0 30’ E

9. Navsari Vertic Ustochrepts deep black soils 200 57’ N 72

0 54’ E

10. Hisar Ustochrepts, very deep silty alluvial soils 290 08’ 55"N 74

0 41’16" E

11. Palampur Udic Haplustalfs, red soils 320

06’ N 760 03’ E

12. Chatha (Jammu) Eutrochrepts very deep clay soils 320 05’ N 74

0 04’ E

13. Ranchi Ultic Palustalfs, very deep (90 cm) red soils 230 17’ N 85

0 19’ E

14. Kathalagere Alfisols, dark reddish brown sandy clay loam 130 02’ N 76

0 15’ E

15. Siruguppa Type Chromusterts, very deep (90 cm) black soils 150 38’ N 76

0 54’ E

16. Karamana Typic Tropofluvents, very deep (90 cm depth) 110 N 77

0 E

17. Jabalpur Chromusterts, very deep (90 cm depth), 230 10’ N 79

0 57’ E

medium to deep black soils

18. Indore - 220 04’ N 79

0 57’ E

19. Powarkheda - 230 25’ N 73

0 98’ E

20. Rewa Ustochrepts-Vertic Ustochrepts association, 240 41’ N 81

0 15’ E

fine loamy soils

21. Akola Medium deep black clayey soil 200 42’ N 77

0 02’ E

22. Karjat Haplustults Udic-Fluvents, red soils 180 33’ N 75

0 03’ E

23. Parbhani Chromusterts, deep (90 cm depth), deep black soils 190 08’ N 76

0 05’ E

24. Rahuri Chromusterts, fine clayey soils 190 47’ N 74

0 18’ E

25. Bhubaneswar Haplustalfs, very deep (90 cm depth), medium 200 15’ N 85

0 52’ E

textured lateritic soils

26. Chiplima Haplaquents, very deep (90 cm depth) 200 21’ N 80

0 55’ E

clay, ill-drained soilsContd..../-

4. SOIL AND CLIMATE

The major group of soils (centre-wise), onwhich on-station experiments of CSR wereconducted during the year 2013-14, andgeographical coordinates (Latitude and Longitude)

of the different research locations are given intable-4/1. The general climatic conditions for theexperimental locations are described below inbrief.



period where about 1/3rd of total rainfall wasprecipitated. Among other months February andMarch were found to be the wet months and restof other months was remained dry. The highest(34.4oC) and lowest (29.3oC) monthly averagemaximum temperature were recorded duringMarch and December respectively whereas,December was observed as coldest (10.9oC)month of the year.

Bhubaneswar: Fairly higher total rainfall (1581.0mm) received during the reporting year over theprevious year. 95 per cent of total rainfall wasprecipitated during the kharif season. Distributionof rain was fairly good during kharif season

Weather conditions at different farmingsystems research centres during 2013-14

The annual conditions of important weatherparameters e.g., rainfall, monthly averagemaximum temperature and minimum temperatureprevailed during the reporting period (2013-14) atthe various Integrated Farming Systems ResearchCenters of the AICRP on IFS are depicted in figures1-3 and described below.

Akola: During the reporting period, 694.0 mmrainfall was received out of this 92% rainfall wasprecipitated during the kharif season. Rainfall wasevenly distributed in the kharif season and July wasfound to be the wettest month during the reporting

S.No. Centre Soil Type Latitude Longitude

27. Ludhiana Ustochrepts-Ustic Psamments Association, 300 56’ N 75

0 52’ E

very deep (90 cm depth), alluvial sandy andsandy-loam soils

28. Durgapura Torrid-Psamments/ Torrid-Fluvents Association, 260 55’ N 75

0 49’ E

(Jaipur) sandy loam soils

29. Kota Chromsterts-Paleusterts Association, very deep 250 26’ N 75

0 30’ E

(90 cm depth) clay loam soils

30. Coimbatore Udic Rhodustalfs, fine loamy red sandy soils 110 59’ N 78

0 55’ E

31. Thanjavur Typic Pellusterts, clayey very deep (90 cm depth)/ 100 47’ N 79

0 10’ E

deep black soils of deltaic origin

32. Kanpur Udic Ustochrepts, alluvial soils 260 28’ N 80

0 21’ E

33. Faizabad Udic Fluvents-Fluaquents Association, lowland 260 47’ N 82

0 12’ E

clayey soils

34. Bichpuri Ustochrepts, very deep (90 cm depth) alluvial soils 270 02’ N 77

0 09’ E

35. Varanasi Aeric Chroquals very deep (90 cm depth) 250 18’ N 83

0 03’ E

alluvial clayey soils

36. Pantnagar Hapludolls, very deep (90 cm depth) 290 08’ N 79

0 05’ E

alluvium coarse loamy soils

37. Kalyani Fluventic Eutrochrepts, very deep (90 cm depth) 230 40’ N 88

0 52’ E

alluvial soils

38. ICAR-IIFSR, Sandy loam 290 4’36’’ N 77

0 42’22’’ E

Modipuram

39. ICAR-RC, Patna Old Alluviam, Sandy loam to clay 250 50’ N 84

0 45’ E

40. ICAR-RC, Umiam Silty clay loam 250 41’21’’ N 91

0 55’85’’ E

41. ICAR-RC, Goa Laterite, sandy loam 150 29’22’’ N 73

0 55’10’’ E

42. ICAR-CIARI, Port Blair Sandy clay loam 60 29’11’’ N 92

0 55’10’’ E



however terminal heavy rain (734.0 mm) wasrecorded in the month of October. February, Marchand April were found to be other wet monthsbetween November to June. The monthly averagemaximum temperature ranged between 28.9-38.7oC. The monthly average minimumtemperature dropped to 14.0oc in the month ofDecember.

Bichpuri: Comparatively good rain (643.0 mm)was received during the reporting period over thelast crop season. About 90 per cent of the totalrainfall was precipitated during the kharif season.With 371.0 mm rainfall, July was found to be thewettest month however, distribution of the rain wasfairly good in the season. The highest monthlyaverage maximum temperature (41.1oC) wasrecorded during the May whereas; lowest monthlyaverage maximum temperature (18.3oC) wasrecorded in January. December was found to bethe coldest months where mercury dropped downto 7.9oC.

Chiplima: During the reporting period a 1019.0 mmrainfall was recorded at the centre where 96 percent of total rain was received during kharif season.Though the total rainfall precipitated during theperiod was lesser than the previous season butdistribution was excellent in the whole kharifseason. With 454.6 mm rain July was found to be

the wettest month of the season. Only two monthsbetween November to June namely February andMay were found to be wet and rest other monthswere dry. May was observed as hottest (40.0oC)during the year whereas, December was very cooland dry with 8.6 oC monthly minimum temperature.

Coimbatore: The total rainfall (464 mm) receivedduring the reporting year, out of which only 57 percent of total rain was down poured during the kharifseason. Distribution of rainfall was quite goodthroughout the whole season however, January,February, March and June were found to be drymonths. The summer season i.e., March, April andMay were hot and monthly average maximumtemperature was reported highest (36.3oC) duringApril whereas it was lowest in December. Thewinter season was also remained moderatelywarm where monthly average minimumtemperature remained above 19.6oC.

Hisar: In comparison to last crop season higherrainfall (810.0 mm) was received at the centreduring the reporting period. Kharif season receivedabout 73 per cent of total rainfall with gooddistribution. Among all the months of reportingperiod, only December month was found to be dry.A good amount of rain received from the recedingmonsoon during September. As usual summerwas very hot and monthly maximum temperature

Fig. 1. Annual rainfall (mm) and percentage rainfall precipitated during kharif season during the reporting year (2013-14) at various centers of the AICRP on IFS



(41.0oc) was reported highest during the June andwinter was severe during which average monthlyminimum temperature dropped below 5.6oC inJanuary.

Indore: The centre received 1214.0 mm rainfallduring the reporting period. 92 per cent of the totalrainfall with god distribution was precipitated duringthe kharif season. With 737.6 mm rain July wasfound to be the wettest month during the period.Rainfall was recorded in all the months from Juneto February except November. The range of themonthly maximum temperature was 23.4 to32.9oC. With 7.1oC minimum temperature,January was recorded as coldest month duringthe period.

Jabalpur: More than double rainfall occurred duringthe last season was recorded under the reportingperiod (2067.0 mm). Out of which 94 per cent wasreceived during season. Rainfall was fairlydistributed in kharif season however, July with568.0 mm rain was found to be the wettest monthunder the report period. Rainfall was also recordedduring January to March. Summer season washot and the range of monthly average maximumtemperature was 22.8 to 31.9oC. The mercuryreached up to dropped up to 8.5oC duringDecember.

Jammu: The centre received 1206.0 mm totalrainfall.77 per cent of total rainfall precipitated duringthe kharif season. Not a single month of thereporting period was found to be dry. With 496.7mm rain, August was recorded as wettest month.The range of monthly average maximumtemperature was 18.9 39.7oC. January month wasfond to be coldest where night temperature wasdropped to 4.9oC.

Junagarh: The rainfall received during reportingperiod was 1081.0 mm and these were July,August, September and October which poured allthe rain at the centre. Rest other eight months ofthe reporting period was found to be dry. The highestmonthly average maximum temperature (39.9oC)was observed during May whereas, lowestminimum temperature (12.1oC) was recordedduring January.

Kanpur: The total rainfall of 929.0 mm wasrecorded during the reporting season which wasabout 30% higher over the previous season. 80per cent of total rainfall was precipitated during thekharif season. Good distribution of rain fall wasobserved during the year where only two monthsviz., November and May were found to be dry duringthe reporting period. S-W monsoon contributedabout 90% rain to the total annual rainfall at thecentre. With 41.4oC monthly average maximum

Fig. 2. Highest and lowest monthly average maximum (oC) temperature during the reporting year (2013-14) at variouscenters of the AICRP on IFS



temperature, April was recorded the hottest monthwhereas day temperature remained above 18.0oCeven in January where mercury dropped to 7.2oCduring night time.

Karjat: The rainfall received during reporting periodwas 2921.0 mm. 99.6 per cent of total rainfall wasprecipitated during July to October, howeverNovember and December months also receivedvery less amount of rain. Rest six months fromJanuary to June was found to be dry. The range ofmonthly average maximum temperature 28.1 to40.0oC. The night temperature was moderate inJanuary where mercury dropped to 15.5oC.

Karmana: During the reporting period, the totalrainfall (1519.0 mm) was received at this center.The distribution of rain was good throughout theyear and only it was the June which was deprivedof the rain. 57 per cent of total rainfall wasprecipitated during N-E monsoon. With 333.3 mmrainfall, April was fund to be the wettest monthduring the reporting period. The range of monthlyaverage maximum temperature was 28.2 to32.6oC. Night temperature remained above 22.0oCduring the reporting period.

Kathalagere: Total rainfall received during thereporting period was only 434.0 mm which wasonly much higher than the previous season. 94

per cent of the total rainfall with good distributionwas received during kharif season. The range ofmonthly average maximum temperature was 24.6to 35.5oC. Lowest monthly average minimumtemperature was recorded during December.

Navsari: The reporting period received 1105.0 mmrainfall where 95 per cent of total rain was receivedduring July to September. The highest monthlymean maximum temperature (35.4oC) wasobserved during March whereas, lowest monthlymean minimum temperature (14.2oC) wasrecorded during January.

Palampur: Total rainfall received during thereporting was 2548.0 mm out of which 2061.0 mmrain was precipitated during the kharif season withsmooth distribution. No any month except Junewas found to be dry. With 846.9 mm rain, Augustmonth was recorded as the wettest month in entireseason. The range of average monthly maximumtemperature was 15.9 to 32.1oC. Mercury wasdropped to 3.7oC in during the night of January.

Pant Nagar: The rainfall received during reportingperiod was 1383.0 mm. With 74 per cent to thetotal rainfall, well distributed was received duringthe kharif season. Except November and June allthe months were found to be wet whereas, with429.6 mm rain July month was recorded as wettest

Fig. 3. Highest and lowest monthly average minimum (oC) temperature during the reporting year (2013-14) at variouscenters of the AICRP on IFS



in the entire season. The highest monthly averagemaximum temperature (37.4oC) was recorded inthe month of May however, average minimumtemperature (7.3oC) was observed during themonth of December.

Portblair: The total rainfall recorded during thereporting period was 2622.0 mm where 61 per centof the total was poured down in the kharif season.Three continuous months February, March and Aprilwere found to be dry. With 624.4 mm rain, Julywas the wettest month of the season. The highestaverage monthly maximum temperature (34.2oC)was recorded during April whereas lowestminimum temperature (22.2oC) was recordedduring February.

Powarkheda: Total rainfall recorded during thereporting year was 1142.0 mm which about 10 percent higher than the previous season. About 97per cent rain was occurred during kharif seasonand it was highly distributed in the entire season.July was found to be wettest of the season and588.9 mm rain was precipitated during this month.The range of monthly average maximumtemperature was 25.7 to 36.6oC whereas,December was observed as coldest month andmonthly mean minimum temperature was 10.1oC.

Rahuri: Total annual rainfall precipitated during thereporting period was 472.0 mm that was lower thanthe preceding year whereas 83 per cent of totalrain was precipitated during the kharif season. Itwas fairly distributed in the season. The highestaverage monthly maximum temperature (38.5oC)was recorded during May whereas lowestminimum temperature (11.1oC) was recordedduring December.

Raipur: The total annual rainfall received duringthe reporting period was 1474.0 mm which wasabout 17 per cent higher than the previous cropseason. Distribution of rainfall was good during thekharif season but July was observed as very wetand 606.5 mm rain was precipitated in this month.The highest monthly mean maximum temperature(40.9oC) was observed during May whereas,lowest minimum temperature (11.5oC) wasrecorded during December.

Rajendra Nagar: Nearly 100 mm lower rainfall tothe preceding year was recorded during thereporting period i.e., 912.0 mm out of which 711mm (78 %) rain was received during kharifmonsoon. The distribution of rain was fairly goodduring the kharif season. December, January,February and April months were found to be drywhere no rainy days was observed.

Rewa: Total rainfall recorded during the reportingperiod was 1417.0 mm and 88 percent rainfall withvery good distribution was poured down during thekharif season. December, April, May and June weredeprived of the rain while rest other monthsreceived rain. The range of average monthlymaximum temperature was 21.1 to 32.7oCwhereas December was recorded as the coldestmonth with 8.2oC night temperature.

Sabour: During the reporting year, the total rainfallreceived was 1261.0 which was about 25 per centhigher rain in the previous crop season. Kharifseason received very good amount of rain (891.0mm) with smooth distribution in the entire season.May was observed as hottest (37.8oC) during theyear whereas, December was very cool and drywith 10.1 oC monthly minimum temperature.

Thanjavur: The total rainfall received during thereporting period was lower than the preceding yearand it was 599.0 mm. About 59 per cent rain falloccurred during the kharif season. With 127.0 mmrain May was recorded as the wettest month inentire reporting period. The lowest monthly averagemaximum and minimum temperature recordedduring the year was 37.4oC and 21.3oCrespectively.

Varanasi: A higher rainfall than the preceding yearwas observed during the reporting year i.e., 808.0mm. 81 per cent of the total rainfall was precipitatedduring the kharif season and it was highlydistributed. November, December, March andJune months were deprived of the rain and no rainydays was observed in these months. With 248.6mm rain, August was recorded as the wettestmonth in the entire period. The highest averagemonthly maximum temperature (39.3oC) wasobserved during May whereas; lowest minimumtemperature (10.8oC) was recorded duringJanuary.



5. STAFF POSITION

Out of 618 total staff sanctioned for differentcenters, 459 staff were actually in position as on 31st

March 2015, suggesting that 25.7 per cent of totalposts were vacant (Table-5/1 and Appendix-III).

Table-5/1: Staff position under AICRP-IFS (university-wise) as on 31.3.2015

S.No. Name of the University Scientific Technical Administrative SupportingSanctioned Filled Sanctioned Filled Sanctioned Filled Sanctioned Filled

1. ANGRAU, Hyderabad 8 8 23 16 5 3 3 1

2. AAU, Jorhat 5 3 11 10 2 2 2 2

3. BAU, Sabour 4 4 11 5 2 1 2 2

4. IG KV, Raipur 5 4 11 7 2 2 2 2

5. SDAU, S.K. Nagar 5 5 11 8 2 2 2 2

6. JAU, Junagadh 1 1 3 3 1 1 - -

7. NAU, Navsari 1 1 3 2 1 0 - -

8. AAU, Anand 1 1 8 6 1 0 1 0

9. CCS HAU, Hisar 5 5 11 7 2 2 2 0

10. CSK HPKVV, Palampur 4 4 11 11 2 2 2 1

11. SKUAST, Jammu 4 4 11 11 2 1 2 2

12. BAU, Ranchi 4 4 11 11 2 2 2 2

13. UAS, Bangalore 5 4 11 2 2 0 2 1

14. UAS, Dharwad 1 1 8 7 1 0 1 0

15. UAS, Raichur 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1

16. KAU, Thrissur 5 5 11 10 2 2 2 2

17. JNKVV, Jabalpur 8 7 23 11 5 2 3 1

18. RVS KVV, Gwalior 1 1 3 1 1 1 - -

19. MPKV, Rahuri 5 5 11 9 2 2 2 1

20. MAU, Parbhani 4 3 11 7 2 0 2 0

21. DPD KV, Akola 4 3 11 6 2 0 2 2

22. DBS KKV, Dapoli 4 3 11 10 2 0 2 1

23. OUAT, Bhubaneswar 7 7 22 21 4 4 3 3

24. PAU, Ludhiana 4 4 11 8 2 2 2 2

25. SK RAU, Bikaner 4 2 11 7 2 0 2 2

26. MP UAT, Udaipur 3 3 8 7 2 1 1 1

27. TNAU, Coimbatore 7 7 22 16 4 4 3 3

28. CSA UAT, Kanpur 4 4 11 8 2 1 2 2

29. ND UAT, Faizabad 4 3 11 9 2 2 2 1

30. ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram 1 0 8 0 1 0 1 0

31. BHU, Varanasi 1 1 3 0 1 1 - -

32. RBS College, Bichpuri 1 1 3 2 1 1 - -

33. GBP UAT, Pantnagar 5 4 11 7 2 0 2 1

34. BC KVV, Kalyani 4 3 11 11 2 1 2 2

TOTAL 132 117 360 259 69 42 57 41



6. BUDGET

Pay &allow.

TOTAL 24.75 469.80 214.48 24.55 1.00 2694.00

T.A.Other

continge-ncies

Contr.Services

POL/Veh.Hiring

NRC Total

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

ANGRAU, Hyderabad

HPKVV, Palampur

GBPUA&T, Pantnagar

CSAU&T, Kanpur

NDUA&T, Faizabad

BHU, Varanasi

BAU, Ranchi

BAU, Sabour

BCKVV, Kalyani

AAU, Jorhat

PAU, Ludhiana

HAU, Hisar

RAU, Bikaner

SDAU, S.K. Nagar

NAU, Navsari

JAU, Junagadh

AAU, Anand

JNKVV,Jabalpur

RVSKVV, Gwalior

IGKV, Raipur

OUAT, Bhubaneswar

PDKV, Akola `

MAU, Parbhani

MPKV, Rahuri

KKV, Dapoli

UAS, Raichur

UAS, Dharwad

UAS, Bangalore

UAHS, Shimoga

TNAU, Coimbatore

SKUAST, Jammu

KAU, Thrissur

MPUAT, Udaipur

RBS College, Bichpuri

PDFSR, Modipuram

ICAR Res. Comp., Patna

ICAR Res. Comp., Umiam

ICAR Res. Comp., Old Goa

CARI, Port Blair

S.No.

Name of University/ICAR Institute

Fin. Year 2013-14

148.57

91.50

61.42

49.00

6.72

30.00

29.00

34.65

65.00

52.00

106.62

65.00

52.50

70.00

15.00

25.20

13.00

89.00

22.00

31.00

134.00

30.85

34.00

80.91

68.48

12.00

12.00

57.00

13.00

140.00

1000.10

97.90

51.00

15.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1959.42

1.25

0.50

0.50

1.00

0.50

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.80

0.50

1.00

0.70

0.70

0.20

0.20

0.25

1.00

0.20

0.65

1.00

.050

0.50

1.00

1.50

0.20

0.30

0.25

0.20

2.40

0.50

0.50

0.80

0.20

0.40

0.25

1.80

0.25

0.50

39.50

10.00

10.00

9.70

10.00

5.00

15.83

8.00

19.00

7.50

10.00

9.50

10.00

16.05

5.00

5.00

10.25

26.25

5.00

22.47

12.50

10.00

10.00

10.00

22.75

5.00

5.00

19.55

1.50

25.60

10.00

7.00

13.80

3.00

7.00

8.50

19.50

11.50

13.55

8.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

5.33

9.10

3.25

6.00

5.00

5.00

6.50

1.00

1.00

2.00

8.00

1.00

4.50

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

7.00

6.00

1.00

4.20

2.00

7.20

6.00

6.00

8.50

1.00

9.00

6.95

12.75

4.25

6.95

2.00

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.10

0.70

0.20

0.95

0.50

0.40

0.20

0.20

0.95

0.10

0.10

0.60

1.00

0.00

1.

1.45

0.50

0.20

0.20

0.70

0.20

0.10

0.85

0.10

1.25

0.20

0.20

1.45

0.10

0.20

0.95

5.75

0.20

0.95

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0..00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

199.32

108.20

78.12

65.90

79.42

41.35

53.03

48.68

94.55

64.05

123.52

80.70

68.40

94.20

21.30

31.50

26.10

125.25

28.20

60.07

154.00

47.55

50.70

98.11

100.43

23.40

18.40

81.85

16.80

176.45

116.80

111.60

75.55

19.30

16.60

16.65

39.80

16.20

21.95



Funds (Rs. In Lakhs) released during financial year 2014-15 under AICRP on integrated farming systems(ICAR share only)

S. Name of University/ Pay & T.A. Other Contr. POL/Veh. NRC TSP (inclu- TotalNo. ICAR Institute Allow. Contingencies Services Hiring ding all NRC)

1 ANGRAU, Hyderabad 121.00 1.63 10.08 5.42 0.12 3.00 25.02 166.27

2 HPKVV, Palampur 114.00 0.78 5.44 3.42 0.08 1.50 0.00 125.22

3 GBPUA&T, Pantnagar 66.00 0.79 5.44 5.42 0.08 1.25 0.00 78.98

4 CSAU&T, Kanpur 65.00 0.78 5.44 4.42 0.08 2.00 0.00 77.72

5 NDUA&T, Faizabad 71.00 0.78 5.44 3.42 0.08 2.50 0.00 83.22

6 BHU, Varanasi 25.40 0.44 3.98 3.42 0.05 1.00 0.00 34.29

7 BAU, Ranchi 26.50 0.28 0.72 1.42 0.05 1.00 15.58 45.55

8 BAU, Sabour 43.00 0.68 3.52 4.42 0.08 1.00 0.00 52.70

9 BCKVV, Kalyani 50.00 0.48 3.14 1.95 0.05 1.00 21.50 78.12

10 AAU, Jorhat 18.00 0.28 2.23 2.50 0.05 1.50 0.00 24.56

11 PAU, Ludhiana 82.00 0.94 5.44 3.00 0.08 1.00 0.40 92.86

12 HAU, Hisar 75.00 0.94 5.44 5.42 0.08 1.00 0.00 87.88

13 SKNAU, Jobner 62.00 0.78 5.44 4.42 0.08 1.00 0.00 73.72

14 SDAU, S.K. Nagar 70.00 0.91 5.00 4.42 0.08 2.00 14.51 96.92

15 NAU, Navsari 9.61 0.23 2.73 0.58 0.05 1.00 0.00 14.20

16 JAU, Junagadh 20.00 0.28 3.00 1.08 0.05 1.00 0.00 25.41

17 AAU, Anand 10.17 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 9.50 21.10

18 JNKVV,Jabalpur 74.00 0.80 6.13 4.42 0.15 2.00 17.98 105.48

19 RVSKVV, Gwalior 32.00 0.58 4.25 1.58 0.05 1.00 0.00 39.46

20 IGKV, Raipur 61.00 0.68 3.73 3.42 0.05 1.50 17.98 88.36

21 OUAT, Bhubaneswar 125.00 1.17 8.92 6.00 0.11 3.00 0.00 144.20

22 PDKV, Akola 51.00 0.78 5.20 4.92 0.08 2.25 0.00 64.23

23 MAU, Parbhani 51.00 0.78 5.20 5.42 0.08 1.00 0.00 63.48

24 MPKV, Rahuri 64.00 0.78 5.40 6.00 0.08 1.00 0.00 77.26

25 KKV, Dapoli 56.00 0.78 4.23 6.00 0.08 1.00 12.23 80.32

26 UAS, Raichur 30.00 0.55 3.73 6.00 0.08 1.00 0.00 41.36

27 UAS, Dharwad 25.00 0.43 3.98 1.08 0.05 1.00 0.00 31.54

28 UAS, Bangalore 16.50 0.23 2.53 1.00 0.03 1.00 13.52 34.81

29 UAHS, Shimoga 23.50 0.59 3.73 5.00 0.08 1.00 0.20 34.10

30 TNAU, Coimbatore 120.00 1.17 9.42 6.00 0.12 3.00 17.53 157.24

31 SKUAST, Jammu 83.50 0.83 5.40 5.00 0.08 1.50 0.00 96.31

32 KAU, Thrissur 88.00 0.83 5.40 5.00 0.08 1.50 0.00 100.81

33 MPUAT, Udaipur 28.00 0.36 0.70 0.00 0.00 1.00 23.98 54.04

34 AU, Kota 9.50 0.28 2.25 1.08 0.05 1.00 0.00 14.16



S. Name of University/ Pay & T.A. Other Contr. POL/Veh. NRC TSP (inclu- TotalNo. ICAR Institute Allow. Contingencies Services Hiring ding all NRC)

35 RBS College, Bichpuri 6.00 0.13 0.75 0.58 0.03 1.50 0.00 8.99

36 ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram 0.00 0.34 4.25 9.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 13.69

37 ICAR-IIFSR (Coord.Unit.) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

38 ICAR Res. Comp., Patna 0.00 0.34 1.50 3.39 0.08 0.00 10.09 15.40

39 ICAR Res. Comp., Umiam0.00 0.24 2.08 4.25 0.20 0.00 16.41 23.18

40 ICAR Res. Comp., Old Goa0.00 0.34 4.25 3.39 0.08 0.00 0.00 8.06

41 ICAR-CIARI, Port Blair 0.00 0.34 2.42 3.39 0.08 0.00 18.57 24.80

Total 1872.68 24.78 167.93 146.65 2.96 50.00 235.00 2500.00

Rearing of catfish and fishery unit in IFS model at Kalyani centre (West Bengal)

On farm intervention of vermicompost preparation and application in betalvine atSouth 24-Paragnas district (West Bengal)

7. RESEARCH RESULTS



7.1 INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS

7.1.1 DEVELOPMENT OF REGION-SPECIFIC ON-STATION IFS MODELS

Network project on “Development of RegionSpecific Integrated Farming Systems ResearchModels” was initiated in the year 2010-11 at 32AICRP-IFS centres representing all the 15 agro-climatic regions of the country. However, becauseof several technical and administrative formalities,field execution in real sense was started during2011-12. The compiled annual progress report2015-16 for all the 32 AICRP-IFS centres containsthe data and results/findings on various aspectsof the study mainly on the composition of IFSmodels at respective AICRP-IFS centres (Table-7.1 and table-7.2) ) , observations on importantaspects viz; total farm production , cost on variableinputs, net returns IFS V/S prevailing farmerpractice, saving in market inputs through on farmrecycling, employment generation and familysavings (Table-3) calculated after meetinghousehold domestic food/fodder/feed/fuel needs(Table-4) and trend in variable cost of productionduring the year 2014-15 and also last four fouryears (2011-12 to 2015-16) of the study .

1. Western Himalayan Region

AICRP-IFS programme running in WesternHimalayan Region is spread in three statesincluding Uttrakhand, Himachal Pradesh and J&Kand are stationed at three independent centers ati) HNB, Garhwal Univ. Pantnagar (Uttrakhand), ii)CSKHP, KVV,Palampur and iii) SKUAS&T, Jammu

at Chhata. The data given in table below andpredicted in figures 1 revealed that diversificationin prevailing farming system through integration ofcost effective interventions brought out significantchange in production, profits and besidesgenerating more employment opportunitieseconomized cost of production through recyclingof farm wastes, crop residues, GM and adoptingseveral resource conservational practices. This allreduced use of inorganic fertilizers and promotedorganic farming thus improvement in soilconditions. During the year under report averagefarm production (t/ha) was considerably higher33.17 t/ha at Pantnagar followed by 21.52 at Chhataand low at Palampur (15.15 t/ha) . However, netreturns were considerably higher (Rs.3,06,202) atChhata followed by Pantnagar (Rs.2,37,777) andlowest at Palampur (Rs.1,77,896) . The data showstwo to three times more returns compared to farmerpractice. The role of diversification and residuerecycling was reflected in resource saving (%) ,increased employment opportunities and ultimatelyfamily savings (After meeting family consumptionand production cost). Saving in farm inputs rangingfrom 7.50% at Palampur, 14.82% at Chhata andas much as 33.20 % at Pantnagar was reported.Similarly, family savings were Rs.1,15,826 atPantnagar, Rs.1,09,614 at Chhata and Rs. 7,189at Palampur. Not only this but diversification offarming system enabled to generate moreemployment (527 to 586 Man Days/ha/year).

Center/State Component of IFS Model Total Production CC Man(REY) t/ha Days

14-15 Mean 14-15 Mean Mean

Chhata (J&K) Crops+Dairy+Horti.+Veg.+ Apiary + Fish.+ 21.52 22.42 297365 243576 527Poult.+VC

Palampur, (H.P.) Crops+Dairy+ Horti+ Fodder + Agroforestry 15.15 16.57 230324 212505 579

Pantnagar (U.K.) Crop+dairy+Hort.+ Plantation crops+ Vermico- 33.17 24.25 217486 177563 586mpost



2. Eastern Himalayan Region

AICRP-IFS programme running in EasternHimalayan Region is located at two AICRP-IFScenters ICAR Research Complex, Umaim(Meghalaya) and AAU,Jorhat (Assam) The dataon farm production, profits, employmentgeneration, recycling of farm resources, familysavings after meeting household consumption andproduction costs given in table below and predictedin figures 2 revealed that diversification of existingfarming system and adopting scientific approachof farming brought out significant change in totalfarm production, profits and besides generating

more employment opportunities economized costof production and thus making farming moreprofitable and sustainable. During the year underreport average farm production (t/ha) wasconsiderably higher 27.3 t/ha at Jorhat closelyfollowed by Umiam (25.3 t/ha). Similar trend wasof net returns Rs.160262 at Jorhat and Rs.139334at Umiam showing 168.64 and 231.74 % increasein profits compared to farmer practice. Familysavings were Rs.27,875 at Jorhat and Rs.77576at Umiam. Diversification of farming systemenabled to generate more employment (274 atUmiam to 414 Man Days/ha/year at Jorhat).

Fig. 1. Family savings (GR-CC- FC) and savings in market inputs through on – farm recycling

Location Total Farm Production Net Returns Cost of Cultivation Man Days/(REY) t/ha (Rs/ha) (Rs/ha) Year

14-15 Mean 14-15 Mean FP 14-15 Mean Mean

Jorhat (Assam) 27.3 22.05 160262 180306 59656 124364 154408 414

Umiam (Meghalaya) 25.3 20.65 139334 155820 42000 305235 240969 274



3. Trans Gangetic Plains Region

In Trans Gangetic Plains Region, IFS Modelshave been developed at two most representativeAICRP-IFS centers namely PAU, Ludhiana(Punjab) and CCHAU, Hisar . Results and impactof the IFS approach on farm production, profits andlivelihood improvement during last four years isdescribed below;

Crop + Dairy is the dominate farming systemof the region with an average annual net returns ofRs.1,63,938 and Rs.61855/ha/year in Ludhianaand Hisar districts. The data given in table belowand predicted in figures 3 revealed thatdiversification in prevailing farming system could

produced total farm production in the reported yearas high as 52.4 t at Ludhiana and 40.44 t/ha/yearat Hisar with two to three times more net returns (Rs.3,80,308 and Rs. 2,15,905 /ha/year ,respectively) as compared to prevailing system offarming. Besides generating more employmentopportunities (224 to 328 Man Days/year) recyclingof farm wastes, crop residues, GM and adoptingseveral resource conservational practiceseconomized cost of production by 16% at Ludhianaand 21% at Hisar. This all reflected in significantlyhigher family saving ranging from Rs.2,47,573 atLudhiana and Rs.1,28,599 at Hisar thus confirmingthe significance of the IFS approach in livelihoodsecurity as well as improvement.

Fig. 2. Saving in farm resources along with family saving (GR-CC-FC)

Location Total Farm Production Net Returns Cost of Cultivation Man Days/(REY) t/ha (Rs/ha) (Rs/ha) year

14-15 Mean 14-15 Mean 14-15 Mean Mean

Ludhiana Punjab) 52.4 35.54 380308 268106 368103 235024 328

Hissar (Haryana) 40.44 30.07 215905 152555 87306 86315 224



4. Upper Gangetic Plains Region

Two AICRP-IFS centers one at PDFSR,Modipuram, Meerut (U.P.) a voluntary ICAR instituteand another one CSAUA&T, Kanpur (U.P.) arerepresentative centers in the region for the studyon “Development of Region specific IFS Models”.Based on benchmark survey, Crop + Dairy is thedominate farming system of the region with anaverage annual net returns of Rs.64,300 andRs.67754/ha/year in Modipuram and Kanpurdistricts, respectively. The data given in table belowand predicted in figures 4 revealed thatdiversification in prevailing farming system couldbrought considerably higher increase in farmproduction and profitability at Modipuram center withtotal farm production of 36.2t and net returns of

Rs.2,67,447, four times more than prevailingfarming system, however results were not similarat Kanpur center wherein production as well asprofits both were below average because of croplosees due to adverse climatic conditions (heavyrains and hailstorms in rabi season) and no cropin summer because of paucity of funds . Besidesgenerating more employment opportunities (439and 379Man Days/year) recycling of farm wastes,crop residues, GM and adopting several resourceconservational practices economized cost ofproduction by 32.82% at Modipuram and 39% atKanpur. This all reflected in significantly higherfamily saving ranging from Rs.97,376 at Modipuramand Rs.66,654 at Kanpur thus confirming thesignificance of the IFS approach in livelihoodsecurity as well as improvement.

Fig. 3. Saving in farm resources alongwith family saving (GR-CC-FC)



Modipuram (U.P.) 36.26 31.93 267447 192839 64300 291161 256470 439

Kanpur (U.P.) 8.68 16.09 67307 97833 67754 156619 135126 379



5. Middle Gangetic Plains Region

Four AICRP –IFS Centers, two in eastern partof Uttar Pradesh namely IAS,BHU, Varanasi andNDUA&T, Kumarganj, Faizabad and two in Biharone ICAR Research Complex for eastern region,Patna and another one BAU, Sabour-Bhagalpur(Bihar) are the centers representing MGPR. Impactof IFS approach towards production, profitabilityand livelihood of small land holders alongwithcontribution of the approach towards cost reductionand family savings after meeting householdconsumption of farm commodities and meetingproduction cost is reflected in the results of fourthyear of the study. The total farm production t/ha(RYE) and net returns Rs./ha/year weresignificantly higher at Sabour (62.60t & Rs.3,52,243) and Varanasi (49.90t & Rs. 2,50,465)

followed by Kumarganj (26.60t & Rs. 1,58,916) andPatana (17.60t & Rs. 86,521). The net returns weretwo to six time higher than prevailing system offarming in the respective regions. In regard tosaving in market inputs, as a result of propermanagement of farm resources and recycling offarm wastes, all type of crop residues, GM anduse of bio-fertilizers etc., the saving was reportedas much as 41.30% at Sabour and 21 to 25% atother centers of the region. Diversification throughadding additional enterprises in existing systemcould create demand of farm labour as high as848 Man Days at Patna closely followed by Sabour(659 Man Days). In regard to family savings aftermeeting household consumption of farmcommodities and meeting production cost, thehighest saving was reported at Sabour (Rs.2,77863) closely followed by Varansi ( Rs. 1,04169).




Kumarganj (U.P.) 26.6 18.07 158916 128493 59240 186979 145246 450

Varanasi (U.P.) 49.9 47.05 250465 218500 44450 460166 457978 -

Sabour (Bihar) 62.6 46.45 352243 242383 74350 335852 264268 659

Patna (Bihar) 17.6 33.44 86521 217697 65270 153201 271185 848



Location Total Farm Net Returns (Rs/ha) Cost of Man Days/ Saving inProduction Cultivation Year market(REY) t/ha (Rs/ha) inputs

14-15 Mean 14-15 Mean FP 14-15 Mean Mean 14-15

Kalyani (W.B.) 21.5 26.25 108832 80128 67370 145454 112566 289 28.5%

6. Lower Gangetic Plains Region

AICRP-IFS Center at Kalyani (WB)representing Lower Gangetic Plains Region havedominate system of farming with i) Crop + dairy(70 %) followed by ii) Crop + Vegetable (20%).Integration of fishery in to existing farming systemalongwith on farm processing & value addition offarm produces and proper land distribution amongthe farm enterprises could realized total farm

production (RYE) of 21.5 t /ha/year with net returnsof Rs. 1,08,832/ha/year in fourth year of the studymuch higher than Rs.67,370 in prevailing farmerpractices. Further recycling of farm wastes, cropresidues, G.M and use of bio fertilisers etc. couldcurtail 28.5% in cost of market inputs thus reducingcost of production (Rs.1,45,454/ha/year) to a greatextent and promoting organic farmingsimultaneously.


Fig. 6. Net profits in IFS approach V/S Prevailing system of farming

Lower Gangetic Plain, Kalyani (WB)

Net

Pro

fit

(Rs.

) 150000

100000

50000

0

67370

108832

Existing Improved



7. Eastern Plateau and Hills

IGKV, Raipur (Chhatisgarh) and BAU, KankeRanchi (Jharkhand), the two AICRP-IFS centersrepresenting Eastern Plateau and Hills Region aregiven responsibilities to develop IFS models forlivelihood improvement of small and marginalfarmers of the region. Crop + dairy (cow andbuffaloes) is the most dominate farming systemof Chhatisgarh state with 90% farm familiesadopting it. Similarly major farming systemsprevailing in Jharkhand state is Crops + Goat/Poultry (60%) and or Crops +Dairy + Poultry (20%)with an average land holding of less than 1.45ha.The farming is mostly of subsistent nature with

low profit margins of less than Rs.33,250/ha/annumat Raipur and Rs.62,500 at Ranchi. Compositionof IFS model at Raipur and Ranchi centers is givenin table-1&2. The results of IFS studies made atboth the centers during last four years revealedthat total farm production and net returns inreported year were 17.4 t & Rs.1,44,126 at Raipurand 12.5 t & Rs.90,073 at Ranchi. Net returns wereconsiderably higher than farmer level of farming.As far as saving in market inputs through recyclingis concerned it was 39.30% at Ranchi but low(8.00%) at Raipur need attention towards this.Family savings ranged from Rs.12,944 at Raipurto Rs.27,000 at Ranchi.



Raipur, Chhatisgarh 17.4 16.55 144126 130200 33250 131959 143293 276

Ranchi (Jharkhand) 12.5 14.25 90073 107909 62500 156676 92272 239

Fig. 7. Family savings (Rs./ha/year) and percent saving in market inputs through on farm recycling



8. Central Plateau and Hills

AICRP-IFS Centre at Jabalpur(MP), representsCentral Plateau and hill Region of the country. Majorfarming system of the region is Crop+Dairy withadoption by 80% farmers followed byCrop+Dairy+Horticuture/Fishery. Family size of 6members having average holding of less than1.45ha. For livelihood improvement of small landholders of the region an IFS model (1.0 ha)established at the center comprises crops(0.90ha), Dairy animals (3cows), nutritional garden(24 m2), fishery (0.06ha) and other supplementary/complementary farm components viz; mushroom,K.G. and boundary plantations. IFS model

developed and related studies conducted duringlast four years revealed that scientific managementof resources and integration of cost effectiveenterprises brought about a radical change in farmproduction and profitability with 23.6t/ha/year of totalfarm production and Rs.1,02,096 as net profit muchmore than existing system of farming (Rs.60,141).Further, a saving of 19.34% of total cost on marketinputs could also be made possible throughrecycling of farm wastes, crop residues, GM anduse of other organic means available at farmmaking farming more economic ( reduced costRs.1,76,251 as against average cost of last fouryears Rs.1,82,839) and profitable.

Location Total Farm Net Returns (Rs/ha) Cost of Man Days/ Saving inProduction Cultivation Year market(REY) t/ha (Rs/ha) inputs

14-15 Mean 14-15 Mean FP 14-15 Mean Mean 14-15

Jabalpur (M.P.) 23.6 16.05 102096 113219 60141 176251 182839 576 19.34

Fig. 8. Net returns in Ifs approach and prevailing system of farming

9. Western Plateau and Hills

Three AICRP-IFS centers including i)Parbhani, ii) Akola and iii) Rahuri, all in state ofMaharashtra falling under Western Plateau and HillRegion initiated IFS studies during 2011-12 .

Region specific on station IFS models have beenestablished at all the three respective centers.Composition of IFS models and production &economic trends under scientific management andprevailing farming practices are given in table-1and described below;

Central Plateau and Hills, Jabalpur (MP)

Net

Pro

fit (

Rs.

)

120000

100000

80000

60000

60141

102096

Existing Improved

40000

20000

0



After four years of start of the study the totalfarm production (RYE) reached to the level of25.00t,30.00t,29.80t/ha/year with net returns ofRs.104855,Rs.241462,Rs.84065/ha/year at Akola,Rahuri and Parbhani, respectively. The net returnsin prevailing farming system (F.P.) were, howeverfar behind of IFS approach ranging from Rs.34,000at Akola, Rs.65,248 and Rs.1,05,000 at Rahurishowing the economic viability of the approach. Inway of reducing the cost of cultivation (variablecosts), efforts were made to maximize recyclingof all farm wastes, residues and adopting G.M &organic farming practices including biofertilizers.Saving in market inputs to the level of23.43%,30.00% and 21.00% at Akola, Rahuri and

Parbhani centers could achieved resulting inreduced variable cost and bringing sustainabilityin production through reduced chemical load inagriculture. Besides meeting all household food,fuel , feed and fodder commodities and cost onproduction, a net saving ranging from Rs.37,973at Akola to as high as Rs.1,76,074/annum at Rahuriis reported. This saving will further help in meetingfamily expenditures other than household food, fuel, feed and fodder requirements. Further, thediversified nature of the approach could createmore on farm employment opportunities rangingfrom 320 Man Days at Rahuri to as much as 493at Akola.



Akola (Maharashtra) 25 25.15 104858 97800 34000 106586 109894 493

Rahuri (Maharashtra) 30 28.63 241462 184417 105000 148316 201706 320

Parbhani (Maharashtra) 29.8 20.83 84065 86236 65248 150053 141955 357




10. Southern Plateau and Hills

Four AICRP-IFS centers namely, ANGRAU,Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad (A.P.), TNAU,Coimbatore (Tamilnadu), ARS, Kathalgare(Karnataka) and ARS, Sirriguppa (Karnataka) arelocated in different NARP zones of SouthernPlateau and Hill Agro Climatic Zone of the country.All the centers are engaged in developing regionspecific IFS models at their respective centerssince 2010-11 and now have reached to itsmaximum production stage at most of the centers.The results of 2015-16 and overall performanceduring last 4 years is given below;

In fourth year of establishment of the IFSmodels at respective centers the results revealed

that this IFS model could meet out the householdfood demand for a five to seven member familiesand could also provide year round green fodderfor milch animals. The system could produceconsiderably higher total farm production (RYE)(26.67t, 32.31t, 12.64, 17.00t/ha/year) and netreturns (Rs.1,06,805, Rs.2,67,444, Rs.1,70,058,Rs.1,60,578/ha/year) at Rajendra Nagar,Coimbatore, Kathalgare and Sirriguppa,respectively. Net returns were 50.5% higher atRajendernagar to as much as 206 % at Siruguppawhen compared to prevailing farming system ofthe regions. Conservation and scientificmanagement practices including recycling of farmwastes and residues, cowdung in to vermicompostand adopting towards organic could curtailedexpenditure on market inputs to the level of 15.17



Rajendernagar, A.P. 26.67 26.58 106805 97341 67484 333236 272406 714

Coimbatore (T.N.) 32.31 27.22 267447 241728 109350 361599 276897 720

Kathalgere,Karnatak 12.64 60.23 170058 188608 134076 160500 125759 663

Sirugappa,Karnatak 17.00 14.39 160578 148091 52354 217322 145909 439




% at Kathalgere to as high as 34.10% at Siruguppa.The direct or indirect benefit of the IFS approachis visualized in creating more and moreemployment opportunities ranging from 439 atSiruguppa to as high as 720 Man days atCoimbatore. Family savings after meetinghousehold consumption of farm produces andvariable costs were as high as Rs.2,02,724 atCoimabatore followed by Rs.77,623 atRajendernagar,Rs.61,397 at Kathelgere andRs.48,631 at Siruguppa.

11. East Coast Plain & Hills

In East Coast Plain & Hill region one AICRP-IFS center at Bhubneshwar (Odisha) hasdeveloped IFS model at 1.25ha area consistingcrops(0.38ha), dairy animal(2cows), Poultry(80birds), Duckery(20 ducks), Hort.(0.09ha),Fishery(0.33 ha) and other supplementaryenterprises like mushroom, K.G.,B.P. Averageholding size in the region ranges between 0.5ha to1.39 ha of land with average family size of 7members. Crop +Dairy (80%) and Crop + Dairy +

Fishery (20%) with average annual profits ofRs.43138/ha are the major farming system . Theresults of current year 2014-15 and first four yearsaveraged upon revealed that the total farmproduction in term of rice equivalent yield (REY)was 29.05 t/ha/year with an average of 22.84 t/ha/year. Net returns of Rs. 1,14,686 was much morethan farmer level of farming (Rs.56,327). Besidesfulfil l ing household food, fodder and feedconsumption, the IFS approach improved thenutritional status of family members by way ofproducing sufficient amount of milk , fruits &vegetables, mushroom, meet in form of fish/poultry/duckry birds and also through K.G./B.P. andthereby reduced market dependency forhousehold domestic needs. The total variable costof different farm components/enterprises was Rs.160369, of which more than 18.83 % was met outon the farm itself through recycling of farm wastes,residues and proper composting/vermicompostingof available cowdung & urine. Man days perhectare of land was 440 and family savingRs.76,526/annum.



Bhubneswar 29.05 22.84 114686 75129 56327 181513 160369 440

Thanjavur 18.38 16.89 166564 138325 68490 143788 147982 294




During 2013-14, one more center at Thanjavur(Tamilnadu) also initiated IFS studies. The resultsof the study given in table below and predicted infig. show encouraging and linear growth inproduction and profitability alongwith reduction invariable costs. Saving in market inputs though wasat lower side (6.80%) but family savings (GR-CC-FC) was considerably high (Rs.80,936/ha/year).

12. Western Coast Plains & Hills

In this particular Agro Climatic Region threeAICRP-IFS centers one each in the states ofMaharashtra (Karjat), Kerala (Karmana) and Goa(ICAR Research Complex, Goa), are given theresponsibilities of developing region specific IFSModels for respective states . The composition ofIFS models at respective centers and related data

have been given in table. The data on total farmproduction in term of rice yield equivalent (RYE),net returns (Rs./ha/year) given in table below andreduction in market input cost (%) throughrecycling of farm wastes, crop residues and propermanagement of cow dung and urine etc . predictedin fig. revealed that besides meeting all householdfood, feed and fodder farm commodities, the IFSapproach is an viable approach for improvingnutritional status not only family members but farmanimals too (Table- 3). Further, by reducing coston variable expenditures to the level of 12.76% atKarjat to 24% at Goa through on far recycling (Fig.12) of farm wastes, crop residues, cow dung& urine, use of G.M. and other organic sources,the farming can be made more economic andsustainable.



Karjat 20.91 23.66 102636 99000 76965 188982 230979 824

Karmana 22.1 26.78 60555 69070 53442 122157 183817 214

Goa 36.7 22.07 101228 89411 50000 108236 106207 328

Fig. 12. Percent saving in market inputs through on farm recycling



13. Gujarat Plains & Hills

AICRP-IFS Center at S. K. Nagar (Gujarat) isconducting IFS studies for the ACR Gujarat Plains& Hills. The economy of the region is based onanimals and mainly dairy based farming systemwith crops as necessary components representingmore than 95% farm families with an annual netreturns of Rs.68758/ha/year. Average holding sizeof the region ranges from 0.53 ha (marginalfarmers) to 1.46 ha (Small farmers) with 6 memberfamily. The composition of the IFS model constitutecrops(0.70 ha), dairy animal (2B), Horticulturalcrops (0.25 ha). Based on the data of reportingperiod 2014-15 and the data averaged upon lastfour years revealed that the total farm productionand net returns at the center during reporting periodwas 31.07t/ha/year with net returns of Rs.3,61,416much more ( four times higher) than prevailingfarming system ( Rs.87,743) of the district.Similarly, reduction in cost through scientificmanagement of farm resources and properrecycling of farm wastes, crop residues and cowdung etc. could save in market inputs to the extentof 65% and resulted in family savings of

Rs.1,37,096/ha/year. This all shows the viability ofIFS approach above and over prevailing farmingsystem of the region.

14. Western Dry Region

The dominate farming system of districtDurgapura (Rajasthan) representing ACR WesternDry Region is Crop+ Dairy ( 90% farm familiesadopting the system) with annual net returns ofRs.72,904/ha/annum. Average land holding of theregion ranges in between 0.48 ha (MF) to 1.44 ha(SF) with a family size of 7 members. To improvethe livelihood of small land holders of the region anIFS model (1.45ha) with diversified nature of farmcomponents including crops(1.0 ha), dairy animals(2 cows), goatary (11 goats), Hort.(0.25ha) andother supporting activities includingvermicomposting, kitchen gardening and boundaryplantations etc. were initiated at SKRAU,Durgapura -Jaipur (Rajasthan) during 2011-12.During reported year 2014-15 and based on lastfour years results, the total production of the farmconverted in to rice yield equivalent (REY) was 25.7t and 19.38 t/ha/year, respectively. The net returns



S.K.Nagar (Gujarat) 31.07 36.93 361416 237607 87743 223984 181403 286




in IFS model in current year was Rs.2,92,238 morethan 300% than prevailing system of farming. Outof total variable cost (Rs.2,27,420) more than 24%of market inputs were met out at farm itself throughrecycling of farm wastes, crop residues, scientificcomposting of cowdung & urine mixed with otherfarm products and by products and using othermeans of organic farming. Besides, meeting allessential food and fodder/feed requirement of thefamily, the approach could improve the nutritionalstatus of family members as well as livestock ofthe family. In addition to this after deducting variablecost of production and family needs, the total familysaving was reported Rs.91,920/annum to meetother miscellaneous liabilities.

15. Island

AICRP-IFS Center at Port Blair (AN) is arepresentative center for Island Agro-ClimaticRegion. Plantation crops + Pig (50 %) followed byCrop + Dairy animal cows + Fish (45 %) are twoequally important and prevalent farming systemsof the region. Pigs are important animal of the



Durgapura (Rajasthan) 25.7 19.38 292238 177839 72904 227420 224626 455


region and symbol of social status too. The holdingsize ranged in between 0.39ha (MF) to 1.38 (S.F.)with an average of 7 members in a family. IFSmodel of 1.0 ha area developed at the centrecomprise of crops (0.61ha), Dairy (2 cows),horticulture (0.20 ha) and piggery. The results onproduction and profitability along with otherassociated benefits during reporting period and lastfour years compiled data revealed that IFSapproach is a viable approach because of itsdiversified nature and a mix of all the essential farmcommodities required to meet not only householdfood and fodder need but upgrade the nutritionalstatus of meal of family members and feed oflivestock. Total farm production during 14-15 wassignificantly higher (48.78t/ha/year) than averageproduction of last four years which show the stabilityand sustainability of the system. The same trendwas observed for net profits. Net profit duringcurrent year and also averaged upon last fouryears (Rs.1,64,522 and Rs.1,26,085,respectively)was 3 to 4 times more than prevailing system offarming in the region. Further, conservationagricultural and organic farming practices adopted





Port Blair (A&N) 48.78 27.07 164522 126085 41431 206029 88050 174


and recycling of all the farm wastes and cropresidues resulted in saving on market inputs to the

extent of 29.9% and ultimate family saving (GR-CC-FC) Rs.25,083 (Fig.15).

IFS model at S.K. Nagar (Gujarat) Visit of board members of SDAU, S.K. Nagar (Gujarat)to IFS model



Table 7.1.1. Composition of IFS models at different AICRP-IFS centers - Lead enterprises

Centers Size of Crop Dairy Hort. Fish Centers Size of Crop Dairy Hort. Fishmodel (m2) Animal (m2) Pond model (m2) Animal (m2) Pond(m2) (m2) (m2) (m2)

Akola 10000 7000 - 2500 400 Palampur 10000 7500 2C 1750 -

Bhubneshwar 12500 3787 2 C 895 3300 Pantnagar 10000 5200 1C 1900 -

Chhata 15000 4500 1C+1B 3050 1000 Parbhani 10000 7100 1C+1B 2000 -

Coimbatore 12000 10200 2 C 1600 - Patna M1 4000 2000 NA 900 -

Durgapura 14500 10000 2C 2500 - Patna M2 8000 5000 2C 1000 1000

Hisar 10000 9000 2 B 600 - Portblair 10000 6100 2C 2000 -

Jabalpur 10000 9000 3C 240 600 Rahuri 10000 7200 2 C 2000 -

Jorhat 10000 6643 2C 950 920 Raipur 10000 5980 2C 2220 725

Kalyani 6600 4100 2 C 1100 900 Rajendrnagar 10000 7000 2 B 2000 -

Kanpur 10000 7200 1C+1B 1920 - Ranchi 10000 8000 2C NA 1000

Karjat 10000 5000 3C 4000 - Sabour 10000 7014 2 C 1412 800

Karmana 10000 8000 1C+1B - 700 S.K. Nagar 10000 7000 2B 2500 -

Kathalgere 10000 9000 2C+1B 1000 100 Siruguppa 10000 7200 2C+2B 2000 300

Kumarganj 10000 7000 2 C 2000 1000 Umaim 10000 7000 Nil 2000 500

Ludhiana 10000 6400 2C 2000 1000 Varanasi 10000 8100 6C 600 1000

Modipuram 7000 3800 2C+1B 3000 -

Table 7.1.2. Additional (supplementary/complementary) farm enterprises integrated at different centers

Goatary Akola (12), Coimbatore (10+1), Durgapura (5+1), Karjat (6), Parbhani (5+1), Patna (20+1), Rajendernagar(5+1), Sabour (10+1), Siruguppa (10)

Poultry Chhata (50), Karjat (90), Karmana (50), Kathelgere, Palampur (25), Parbhani 300), Patna (100), Rahuri(400), Varanasi (200x6batch), Rajendernagar (30), Bhubneshwar (80), Umaim (600Broiler+50 Layer), Raipur

Duckery Patna (30+5), Sabour (25), Bhubneshwar (20), Karmana (50)

Piggery Umaim (3) and Port Blair

Agro-forestry Pantnagar (2300m2), Ludhiana (300m2), Bhubaneswar

Apiary Modipuram, Jorhat, Kanpur and Ranchi (5 Bee boxes each center)

Mushroom Modipuram (120 bags), Patna (90 bags), Karmana (100m2), Ranchi (145m2), Varanasi (20m2), Raipur(30m2)

B.P. and KG Most of the centers



Tab

le 7

.1.3

. Im

pac

t of I

nte

gra

ted

Far

min

g S

yste

m A

pp

roac

h o

n th

e p

rod

uct

ion

, pro

fita

bili

ty, e

con

om

izin

g p

rod

uct

ion

co

st, f

amily

sav

ing

s an

dem

plo

ymen

t gen

erat

ion

.

S.N

Cen

tre

Nam

eIm

pac

t of I

nte

gra

ted

Far

min

g S

yste

m A

pp

roac

h o

n th

e p

rod

uct

ion

, pro

fita

bili

ty, e

con

om

izin

g o

fp

rod

uct

ion

co

st, f

amily

sav

ing

s an

d e

mp

loym

ent g

ener

atio

n

Tota

l Pro

du

ctio

nN

et R

etu

rns

(Rs.

/ha)

Var

iab

le c

ost

(V

C)

Sav

ing

Sav

ing

Man

(RE

Y) t

/ha

(Rs.

/ha/

year

)th

rou

gh

afte

r m

eeti

ng

Day

sre

cycl

ing

fam

ily d

eman

d(%

)an

d V

C

14-1

5M

ean

14-1

5M

ean

F.P.

14-1

5M

ean

15.0

014

-15

Mea

n

1C

hhat

a (J

&K

)9.

5012

.42

30

62

02

18

95

02

83

14

82

97

36

52

43

57

614

.82

10

96

14

52

7

2P

alam

pur,

(H

.P.)

15.1

516

.57

70

27

47

87

38

70

75

22

30

32

42

12

50

57.

507

18

95

79

3P

antn

agar

(U

.K.)

33.1

724

.25

23

77

77

14

79

89

10

00

00

21

74

86

17

75

63

33

.20

115

82

65

86

4Jo

rhat

(A

ssam

)27

.30

22.0

51

60

26

21

80

30

65

96

56

12

43

64

15

44

08

7.30

27

87

54

14

5U

mia

m (

Mgh

.)25

.30

20.6

51

39

33

41

55

82

04

20

00

30

52

35

24

09

69

3.15

77

57

62

74

6Lu

dhia

na (

Pb.

)52

.40

35.5

43

80

30

82

68

10

61

04

57

53

68

10

32

35

02

416

.00

24

75

23

32

8

7H

issa

r (H

arya

na)

40.4

430

.07

21

59

05

15

25

55

91

85

58

73

06

86

31

521

.00

19

81

52

24

8M

odip

uram

(U

P)

36.2

631

.93

26

74

47

19

28

39

64

30

02

911

61

25

64

70

32.8

29

73

76

43

9

9K

anpu

r (U

P)

8.68

016

.09

67

30

79

78

33

67

75

41

56

61

91

35

12

639

.00

66

65

43

79

10

Kum

arga

nj (

UP

)26

.60

18.0

71

58

91

61

28

49

35

92

40

18

69

79

14

52

46

24.7

4N

A4

50

11V

aran

asi

(UP

)49

.90

47.0

52

50

46

52

18

50

04

44

50

46

01

66

45

79

78

25.0

01

04

16

9N

A

12

Sab

our

(Bih

ar)

62.6

046

.45

35

22

43

24

23

83

74

35

03

35

85

22

64

26

84

1.3

02

,77

,86

36

59

13

Pat

na (

Bih

ar)

17.6

033

.44

86

52

12

17

69

76

52

70

15

32

01

27

118

521

.00

72

45

68

48

14

Kal

yani

(W

B)

21.5

026

.25

10

88

32

80

12

86

73

70

14

54

54

112

56

628

.50

NA

28

9

15

Rai

pur

(Cha

tisga

rh)

17.4

016

.55

14

41

26

13

02

00

33

25

01

31

95

91

43

29

38.

001

29

44

27

6

16

Ran

chi

(Jh)

12.5

014

.25

90

07

31

07

90

96

25

00

15

66

76

92

27

239

.30

27

00

02

39

17

Jaba

lpur

(M

P)

23.6

016

.05

10

20

96

113

21

96

01

41

17

62

51

18

28

39

19.3

4N

A5

76

18

Ako

la (M

H)

25.0

025

.15

10

48

58

97

80

03

40

00

10

65

86

10

98

94

23.4

33

79

73

49

3

19

Rah

uri (

MH

)30

.00

28.6

32

41

46

21

84

41

71

05

00

01

48

31

62

01

70

630

.00

17

60

74

32

0

20

Par

bhan

i (M

H)

29.8

020

.83

84

06

58

62

36

65

24

81

50

05

31

41

95

521

.00

43

60

33

57

21

Raj

endr

a N

agar

(AP

)26

.67

26.5

81

06

80

59

73

41

67

48

43

33

23

62

72

40

626

.51

77

62

37

14

22

Coi

mba

tore

(T

N)

32.3

127

.22

26

74

47

24

17

28

10

93

50

36

15

99

27

68

97

21.0

02

02

72

47

20

23

Kat

hele

gere

(K

T)

11.8

060

.23

17

00

58

18

86

08

13

40

76

16

05

00

12

57

59

15.1

76

13

97

66

3



S.N

Cen

tre

Nam

eIm

pac

t of I

nte

gra

ted

Far

min

g S

yste

m A

pp

roac

h o

n th

e p

rod

uct

ion

, pro

fita

bili

ty, e

con

om

izin

g o

fp

rod

uct

ion

co

st, f

amily

sav

ing

s an

d e

mp

loym

ent g

ener

atio

n

Tota

l Pro

du

ctio

nN

et R

etu

rns

(Rs.

/ha)

Var

iab

le c

ost

(V

C)

Sav

ing

Sav

ing

Man

(RE

Y) t

/ha

(Rs.

/ha/

year

)th

rou

gh

afte

r m

eeti

ng

Day

sre

cycl

ing

fam

ily d

eman

d(%

)an

d V

C

14-1

5M

ean

14-1

5M

ean

F.P.

14-1

5M

ean

15.0

014

-15

Mea

n

24

Siru

gapp

a (K

t)17

.00

14.3

91

60

57

81

48

09

15

23

54

21

73

22

14

59

09

34.1

04

86

31

43

9

25

Bh

ub

an

esw

ar(

OD

)29

.05

22.8

411

46

86

75

12

95

63

27

18

15

13

16

03

69

18.8

37

65

26

44

0

26

Tha

njav

ur (

TN

)18

.38

16.8

91

66

56

41

38

32

56

84

90

14

37

88

14

79

82

6.80

80

93

62

94

27

Kar

jat (

MH

)20

.91

23.6

61

02

63

69

90

00

76

96

51

88

98

22

30

97

912

.76

91

80

82

4

28

Kar

man

a (K

eral

a)22

.10

26.7

86

05

55

69

07

05

34

42

12

21

57

18

38

17

19.0

02

69

62

14

29

Goa

36.7

022

.07

10

12

28

89

411

50

00

01

08

23

61

06

20

724

.00

NA

32

8

30

Dur

gapu

ra (

Raj

.)25

.70

19.3

82

92

23

81

77

83

97

29

04

22

74

20

22

46

26

24.0

09

19

20

45

5

31

S. K

. Nag

ar(G

j.)31

.07

36.9

33

61

41

62

37

60

78

77

43

22

39

84

18

14

03

65.0

01

37

09

62

86

32

Por

t B

lair

(Isl

and)

48.7

827

.07

16

45

22

12

60

85

41

43

12

06

02

98

80

50

29.9

02

50

83

17

4

RE

Y:

Ric

e eq

uiva

lent

yie

ld;

VC

: V

aria

ble

cost

; M

ean

(11-

12 t

o 14

-15)

; F

C:

Fam

ily s

avin

gs a

fter

dedu

ctin

g va

riabl

e co

st a

nd f

amily

con

sum

ptio

n of

far

mpr

oduc

es f

rom

tot

al f

arm

val

ue (

gros

s re

turn

s)



Tab

le 7

.1.4

. Liv

elih

oo

d A

nal

ysis

– H

ou

seh

old

Dem

and

an

d F

arm

Pro

du

ctio

n o

f ess

enti

al fa

rm c

om

mo

dit

ies.

Cen

tres

IFS

Mo

del

Dem

and

an

d P

rod

uct

ion

of D

iffe

ren

t Far

m C

om

mo

dit

ies

(Kg

/ L

itre

/ No

. etc

.)

Are

a (h

a)C

erea

lsP

uls

esO

il-se

eds

Milk

Frui

tsV

egt.

Egg

sG

.F.

D.F

.M

ush

roo

mF

uel

Wo

od

Oth

ers

(Kg)

(Kg)

(Kg)

(Lit

re)

(Kg)

(Kg)

(no

s.)

(Kg)

(kg

)(K

g)(K

g)

An

nu

al D

eman

d o

f ess

enti

al fo

od

an

d fo

dd

er c

om

mo

dit

ies

for

a fa

rm fa

mily

wit

h 6

fam

ily m

emb

ers

1550

200

130

1120

200

900

-27

000

5500

--

-

Act

ual

an

nu

al p

rod

uct

ion

of d

iffe

ren

t far

m c

om

mo

dit

ies

at fa

rm

Chh

ata

1.00

13

32

17

59

533

91.5

56

62

01

43

61

05

00

20

91

23

54

00

5203

.5

Pa

lam

pu

r1.

002

79

0-

13

03

08

6-

41

5-

21

37

74

62

04

6-

-

Pa

ntn

ag

ar

1.00

37

40

22

54

80

54

52

22

00

19

34

-3

17

00

51

96

-5

00

54

7

Jorh

at1.

002

36

81

00

36

33

60

02

70

17

58

45

01

21

80

30

00

60

22

0V

C =

108

8 K

gLM

= 4

800

lt.

Um

iam

1.00

1532

.616

0.2

526.

7-

73

05

10

31

82

9-

-1

59

7-

-

Lu

dh

ian

a1.

003

51

31

27

13

81

26

35

48

75

51

62

50

01

97

80

49

66

38

—-

Co

mp

ost

1800

0 kg

His

sar

1.00

33

92

14

05

10

13

80

-1

06

4—

16

88

65

59

42

26

6V

C=

350K

g

Mo

dip

ura

m0.

703

24

52

28

19

021

96.5

77

90

81

00

—2

07

70

29

90

55

011

00

VC

=21

000k

g

Kan

pur

1.00

24

20

30

24

17

65

38

13

09

—6

21

02

10

8—

--

Ku

ma

rga

nj

1.00

36

42

48

81

92

38

54

41

50

30

03

05

14

32

05

Va

ran

asi

1.00

Sab

our

1.00

52

20

13

51

40

34

72

47

52

06

511

25

27

80

07

14

01

48

6.75

VC

+ M

anur

e31

50kg

+14

00 k

g

Pat

na1.

201

05

01

00

90

-1

50

62

57

20

04

00

10

80

0P

M-2

120,

GM

-18

30,

VC

- 25

00P

&G

mea

t 10

0kg

Kal

yani

0.66

78

46

97

93

95

51

20

95

17

32

00

00

59

3—

——

Ra

ipu

r1.

001

92

06

20

27

02

43

2-

16

00

30

0-

--

13 k

g fis

h, 1

73.4

5kg

mea

t

Ra

nch

i1.

003

31

43

21

44

825

97.5

45

34

5-

19

55

05

57

39

311

76

Fis

h- 2

0 kg

,V

C-2

424K

g.

Jab

alp

ur

1.00

33

41

80

40

13

00

38

08

80

8—

80

69

32

02

20

-V

C 3

200

kg

Ako

la1.

0050

3.33

78

09

32

--

201.

252

51

30

33

3-

39

1—

Ra

hu

ri1.

002

22

82

60

73

25

47

011

00

311

4—

15

45

02

99

5—

—V

C=

4000

kg



Cen

tres

IFS

Mo

del

Dem

and

an

d P

rod

uct

ion

of D

iffe

ren

t Far

m C

om

mo

dit

ies

(Kg

/ L

itre

/ No

. etc

.)

Are

a (h

a)C

erea

lsP

uls

esO

il-se

eds

Milk

Frui

tsV

egt.

Egg

sG

.F.

D.F

.M

ush

roo

mF

uel

Wo

od

Oth

ers

(Kg)

(Kg)

(Kg)

(Lit

re)

(Kg)

(Kg)

(no

s.)

(Kg)

(kg

)(K

g)(K

g)

An

nu

al D

eman

d o

f ess

enti

al fo

od

an

d fo

dd

er c

om

mo

dit

ies

for

a fa

rm fa

mily

wit

h 6

fam

ily m

emb

ers

1550

200

130

1120

200

900

-27

000

5500

--

-

Act

ual

an

nu

al p

rod

uct

ion

of d

iffe

ren

t far

m c

om

mo

dit

ies

at fa

rm

Pa

rbh

an

i1.

008

00

30

01

00

01

02

5-

54

50

—1

28

05

62

67

--

VC

=12

000

kg &

Api

ary-

28 k

g

Ra

jen

dra

Na

ga

r1.

002

54

221

3.5

36

02

58

04

01

25

4-

25

52

54

26

6-

-F

YM

=12

512

kgV

C=

157

2 kg

Co

imb

ato

re1.

203

27

02

25

25

73

08

011

27

62

0-

24

80

07

85

0-

-V

C=

1453

0 kg

Ka

tha

lag

ere

1.00

71

00

--

1851

.49

50

26

82

-2

55

51

42

20

--

-

Sir

ug

up

pa

0.74

57

36

109.

50

15

15

24

52

50

50

50

00

74

56

--

Ve

rmic

om

po

st46

70 k

g

Bh

ub

an

esw

ar

1.2

51

30

03

73

72

01

63

kg5

58

20

00

01

52

03

64

00

VC

=40

0 kg

.C

ocon

ut-2

344N

o.

Tha

njav

ur0.

806

14

32

47

47

5-

89

71

90

92

48

116

50

81

96

42

0-

VC

=22

05 k

g

Kar

jat

1.00

10

75

10

03

50

435

lt..

46

03

50

0-

46

00

18

60

—V

C=

400

Kg

(Dry

sta

rte

dS

. co

rn-

Dai

ry S

tart

edp

od

s)M

arch

,G

. co

bsfr

om J

anua

ry,

20

13

12

50

20

13

Ka

rma

na

0.80

ha

78

4-

86

34

15

01

28

42

27

86

01

25

81

75

15

0V

C.

2667

Nut

s 9

0Ye

t to

Gre

en M

an.

6000

kg o

illa

y

Goa

0.50

17

10

21

01

50

60

811

00

-1

50

00

83

36

--

3500

kg

– m

anur

e

Du

rga

pu

r1.

451

73

82

39

28

35

90

21

62

15

81

67

52

65

60

37

61

-8

10

com

post

233

06 k

g

S.K

.Nag

ar1.

001

52

02

66

62

31

36

24

52

57

6-

15

52

64

32

8-

15

15

VC

= 6

500K

g.

Por

t B

lair

0.75

15

87

20

31

622

88.5

-2

90

4-

17

46

04

09

2-

-7

62

5

No

te: V

C =

Ver

mic

om

po

st, L

M =

Liq

uid

Man

ure

, PM

= P

ou

ltry

Man

ure

, GM

=Go

at M

anu

re P

=Po

ult

ry G

=Go

at G

F=G

reen

fod

der

DF

=Dry

fod

der



7.2 CROPPING SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT

7.2.1 CROPPING SYSTEMS DIVERSIFICATION/INTENSIFICATION

Title of the Experiment: Identification of needbased cropping systems for different agro-ecosystems (Expt. No. 1a).

Objectives: To identify suitable cropping systemswith high productivity and profitability for differentagro- ecosystems.

Year of start: 1990-91

Treatments: No common treatments are for allthe centers; they vary from location to location. Thenumber of cropping systems tested at eachlocation also varies from 6 to 15. The treatmentsare modified after every 3-4 year. The details oftreatments are given in table-7.2.1 along withexperimental results.

Locations:

Results:

Data were recorded on yields, annual grossreturns and annual energy output at each of thecenters which have been presented in table 7.2/1.A brief description of Centre-wise results is givenbelow.

Arid Ecosystem

Hisar: Seven cropping systems were evaluatedat Hisar. Out of those, cotton-wheat-fallow systemwas found better than others and recorded thehighest gross return of Rs. 1,77,871/ha/yearfollowed by pearl millet+greengram-wheat+mustard-fallow system with gross returnsof Rs.1,16,303 /ha/year. In terms of energyproduction, existing pearl millet-wheat-fallow

Ecosystem Centre(State)

Arid Hissar (Haryana) S.K.Nagar (Gujarat) and Siruguppa (Karnataka),

Semi-arid Bichpuri (U.P.), Junagadh (Gujarat), Durgapura (Rajasthan), Rajendranagar (A.P.),Indore (M.P.), Rudrur (A.P.), Parbhani (Maharashtra), Coimbatore (T.N.), Kanpur (U.P.),Kota (Rajasthan), Akola (Maharashtra) and Ludhiana (Punjab).

Sub-humid Faizabad (U.P.), Pantnagar (Uttarakhand), Sabour (Bihar), Ranchi (Jharkhand),Jabalpur (M.P.), Rewa (M.P.),Powarkheda (M.P.), Raipur (M.P.), Kathalgere (Karnataka),Chiplima (Orissa) and Varanasi (U.P.)

Humid R.S. Pura (J & K), Jorhat(Assam),Kalyani(W.B.) and Palampur (HP)

Coastal Bhubaneshwar (Odisha), Maruteru (A.P.), Thanjavur (T.N.), Karamana (Kerala), Navsari(Gujarat) andKarjat (Maharashtra)



Table 7.2.1. Evaluation of alternate efficient cropping systems in various ecosystems.

Cropping system (variety; duration in days)/ Yield (kg/ha) Annual gross Energy yieldFertilizer (N:P2O5:K2O, kg/ha) returns (Rs/ha) (x106, K Cal)

Kharif Rabi Summer Kharif Rabi Summer

A. ARID ECOSYSTEM

HISAR (HARYANA)

Pearl millet Wheat Fallow 2758 5487 - 111301 28.9HHB-197 :74 WH-711 :147125-62.5-0 150-60-60

Cotton Wheat Fallow 2484 5606 - 177871 27.6H-1226 :173 WH-711 :147175-60-0 150-60-60

Pearl millet Barley Green gram 3138 3068 320 87384 22.7HHB-197 :74 BG-393 :130 Satya :80125-62.5-0 60-30-0 20-40-0

Cluster bean Broccoli Onion 947 1654 4310 93021 32.3HG-365 :79 CBH-1 :66 Hisar-1:97 20-40-0 100-50-0 20-40-0

Green gram Mustard Fallow 885 2180 - 109606 14.8Satya :80 RH-30:13220-40-0 80-30-0 + +

Kasni 145NA:164 60-30-0

Pearl millet Wheat Cowpea 3273 3002 362 86936 22.3HHB-197 :74 C-306 :129 Pusa komal:7125-62.5-0 150-60-0 120-40-0

Pearl millet Wheat Fallow 2554 5004 - 116303 28.2HHB-197 :74 WH-711 :149125-62.5-0 150-60-0

Green gram Mustard 190 188Satya :80 RH-30:13220-40-0 80-30-0

SE± 3972 1.1

CD at 5% 8655 2.2

SK NAGAR( GUJARAT)

Pearl millet Mustard Fallow 1782 1932 - 81229 16.8GHB-558 :87 GM-2 :126 NR NR

Green gram Castor Green gram 438 3426 738 143883 20.2GM-4 :78 GCH-7 :203 GM-4 :78 NR NR NR

Sunhemp Fodder + 7510 null:0 NR





Green gram Castor Fallow 389 3053 - 81494 14.7GM-4 :78 GCH-7 :203 NR NR

Green gram Castor Bottle gourd 405 2955 3004 99239 14.7GM-4 :78 GCH-7 :203 Pusa :133 NR NR NR

Bt Cotton Castor Bottle gourd 2527 2889 2637 173580 21.4Hy-8 :225 GCH-7 :203 Pusa :123 NR NR NR

Green gram Cauliflower Fannel 656 19547 1461 262455 15.5GM-4 :78 Snowball_1 :116 GF-11 :179 NR NR NR

Green gram Mustard Lucerne 600 1724 512 80918 11.4GM-4 :78 GM-2 :126 Anand-2:193 NR NR NR

Bt Cotton Green gram Castor 773 2467 2571 194335 22.2Hy-8 :225 GM-4 :78 GCH-7 :203 NR NR NR

SE± 16443 1.7

CD at 5% 35271 3.7

SIRUGUPPA (KARNATAKA)

Rice Rice Fallow 7338 - - 98696 25.3null:NA BPT-5204 :NA 150-75-75 NR

Rice Fallow Fallow 8096 - - 108900 28.1SIRI-1253 :NA 150-75-75





Rice Spinach Fallow 7255 - - 97588 25.1RASI :NA null:NA 150-75-75 NR

Rice Fallow Fallow 7242 - - 97413 25.1RASI :NA 150-75-75





Rice Fallow Fallow 6934 - - 93266 23.9RASI :NA 150-75-75

Rice Sesbania Fallow 6538 - - 87936 22.6RASI :NA null:NA 150-75-75 NR

SE± 4513 1.2

CD at 5% 9483 2.5

B. SEMIARID ECOSYSTEM

BICHPURI (UTTAR PRADESH )

Pearl millet Wheat Fallow 2740 4412 - 96032 25.2Shakti-7173 :0 HD-2687 :146 80-40-40 120-60-40

Pearl millet Wheat Green gram 2630 4508 1570 166679 30.3Shakti-7173 :0 HD-2733 :146 K-851 :0 80-40-40 120-60-40 25-50-0

Pearl millet Lentil Fallow 2710 1590 - 80804 15240Shakti-7173 :0 DPL-15 :120 80-40-40 25-50-0

Soyabean Wheat Fallow 1220 3809 - 99817 21.1PK-1092 :0 HD-2687 :146 20-80-40 120-60-40 + +

Mustard 500Rohini :155 120-60-40

Pigeon Pea Wheat Fallow 1910 4117 - 139786 20.6UPAS-120 :0 HD-2687 :146 30-60-30 80-40-40

Green gram Mustard Fallow 1620 2490 - 148882 18.9K-851 :0 Rohini :155 25-50-0 150-80-60

Daincha Potato Ladys finger - 31902 6597 209528 33.2Local :0 E-3797 :130 Arca Anamica :0 NA 150-80-60 120-60-60

Pearl millet Potato Cluster bean 2640 28409 6100 216992 39.3Shakti-7173 :0 E-3797 :130 Amul-51 :0 80-40-40 150-80-60 20-40-0

Sesamum Barley Green gram 950 3905 1390 148305 23.1Guj-1 :0 PL-172 :140 K-851 :0 30-15-15 60-30-20 25-50-0

Jowar fodder Oat fodder Cowpea fodder 16296 24125 14702 119382 88.2Samrat :0 Local :138 Local :0 30-30-0 60-30-20 20-40-0





SE± 4490 0.6

CD at 5% 9213 1.3

DURGAPUR ( RAJASTHAN)

Pearl millet Wheat — 1281 3113 — 59604 15.3Raj-171 :96 Raj-4037 :125 90-30-0 120-40-0

Cluster bean Barley — 1279 3900 — 56462 13.5RGC-1003 :106 RD-2715 :121 20-40-0 60-30-0

Green gram Pea veg — 621 1863 — 46884 38.1RMG-492 :67 Local :122 15-40-0 30-40-0

Pearl millet Lentil — 1319 1464 — 59678 9.7Raj-171 :96 Sahbaghi :121 90-30-0 20-40-0

Cluster bean Onion — 1348 1435 — 27924 11.9RGC-1003 :106 Rohini :138 20-40-0 100-50-100

Green gram Isabgol — 583 358 — 53356 2.4RMG-492 :67 Local :141 15-40-0 45-45-0

Cluster bean Barley — 1209 3935 — 56108 1.4RGC-1003 :106 null:121 20-40-0 60-30-0

Pearl millet Garlic — 1296 3171 — 128953 9.3Raj-171 :96 NA:161 90-30-0 120-40-100

Pearl millet Lentil — 1175 1539 — 60102 9.5Raj-171 :96 NA:120 90-30-0 20-40-0

SE± 3430 0.34

CD at 5% 7080 0.78

JUNAGADH (GUJARAT)

Groundnut Wheat Fallow 6458 4070 - 315326 50.7GG-20 :118 GW-366 :109 12.5-25-0 120-60-0

Groundnut Onion Sorghum(F) 1416 23713 24407 312455 23.8GG-20 :118 Pili patti:122 Gundari :53 12.5-25-0 75-60-50 80-40-0

Groundnut Potato Sesamum 1433 8004 1022 136943 21.6GG-20 :118 K.Badshah :102 GT-2 :82 12.5-25-0 220-110-120 50-25-0





Sorghum Cumin Green gram 1654 850.00 796.33 93370.90 11.6Gundari :113 GC-4 :99 GG-2 :64 80-40-0 30-15-0 20-40-0

Sorghum(F) Castor Castor 26728.33 2950 - 95219 17.3Gundari :55 GCH-7 :133 continue80-40-0 75-50-0

Onion Wheat Green gram 12057 3658 722 198274 21.1Pusa bold :71 GW-366 :109 GG-2 :64 75-60-50 120-60-0 20-40-0

Onion Chick Pea Maize fodder 12798 1874 28189 214939 17.7null:71 GF-11 :104 Elephant tall:57 75-60-50 25-50-0 80-40-0

Sesamum Potato Maize fodder 786 7280 27304 100076 15.8GT-2 :108 K.Badshah :102 Elephant tall:57 50-25-0 220-110-220 80-40-0

Bt Cotton Bt Cotton Groundnut - 2227 1342 138554 15.1Bt. cotton 6:198 Bt. cotton 6:0 G-40 :104 160-0-0 0-null-null 25-50-0

Pigeon Pea Pigeon Pea Pearl millet - 1945 2456 114335 15.4BDN-2 :201 BDN-2 :0 GF-11 :95 25-50-0 0-0-0 80-40-0

SE± 90087 12.7

CD at 5% 189273 26.6

RAJENDRANAGAR (TELANGANA)

Maize Groundnut — 4496 1178 — 106053 22.1DHM-117 :95 K-6 :105 180-60-40 30-40-50

Maize Sunflower — 4167 1061 — 93869 20.8DHM-117 :95 Agsun :95 180-60-40 90-60-30

Maize Castor — 4340 2025 — 99286 23.7DHM-117 :95 PCH-111 :135 180-60-40 90-40-30

Maize Wheat — 4514 1496 — 80091 20.6DHM-117 :95 Local :105 180-60-40 120-60-40

Soyabean Maize — 1747 4335 — 101520 22.4JS-335 :95 DHM-117 :105 180-60-40 180-60-40

Soyabean Wheat — 1683 1566 — 65013 12.7JS-335 :95 Local :105 180-60-40 120-60-40

Soyabean Castor — 1818 1952 — 87449 16.5JS-335 :95 PCH-111 :135 180-60-40 90-40-30





Soyabean Sunflower — 1587 1105 — 81536 13.7JS-335 :95 Agsun :95 180-60-40 90-60-30

SE± 4983 1.1

CD at 5% 10689 2.5

RUDRUR (TELANGANA)

Rice Rice — 5610 6180 — 158575 40.7MTU-1010 :135 MTU-1010 :135 120-60-40 120-60-40

Rice Maize fodder — 5570 6217 — 82687 20.3MTU-1010 :135 DHM-117 :120 100-50-40 200-80-40

Rice Sunflower — 5880 2008 — 153382 32.8MTU-1010 :135 DRSH-2 :110 100-50-40 80-60-30

Rice Mustard — 5520 993 — 104530 24.4MTU-1010 :135 Kranthi :95 100-50-40 80-50-30

Soyabean Sunflower — 2350 1920 — 131200 22.1JS-335 :95 DRSH-2 :110 60-60-40 80-60-30

Soyabean Sesamum — 2500 910 — 115270 16.7JS-335 :95 SwethaTil :90 20-60-40 40-20-20

Pigeonpea + 240ICPL 87-119 :15520-60-40

Maize(Cob) Sunflower — 3490 1958 — 82148 16.5DHM-117 :120 DRSH-2 :110 180-60-50 80-60-30

Soyabean Maize fodder — 2480 6078 — 71085 11.7JS-335 :120 DHM-117 :120 60-60-40 200-80-30

Maize(Cob) Bengal gram — 3560 1910 — 69106 11.3DHM-117 :95 Annegiri :110 180-60-50 20-50-30

Sunflower Maize(Cob) — 1600 6083 — 76110 17.4DRSH-2 :120 DHM-117 :120 80-60-30 200-80-80

SE± 341 0.54

CD at 5% 716 0.21

INDORE (MADHYPRADESH)

Soyabean Wheat Fallow 177 4629 - 69346 16.7NA:0 NA:0 NA NA





Soyabean Chick Pea Fallow 161 584 - 22254 2.8NA:0 NA:0 NA NA

Soyabean Wheat Fallow 59 3963 - 90017 22.5NA:0 NA:0 NA NA+ Maize 2519NA:0 NA

Soyabean Chick Pea Green gram 30 787 29 147677 33.1NA:0 NA:0 NA:0 NA NA NA + + +Maize Wheat 449 8235NA:0 NA:0 NA NA

Soyabean Chick Pea Cowpea 48 471 33 31084 4.6NA:0 NA:0 NA:0 NA NA NA

Sorghum + Mustard + Ladys finger + 417 + 217 + 166NA:0 NA:0 NA:0 NA NA NA

Soyabean Wheat Cowpea 38 5185 27 193581 28.5NA:0 NA:0 NA:0 NA NA NA

Amaranthus + Cauliflower + Maize(Green cob) + 417 + 15090 + 186NA:0 NA:0 NA:0 NA NA NA

Soyabean Pea veg Green gram 43 694 27 24160 4.8NA:0 NA:0 NA:0 NA NA NA+ +Maize 1127.00NA:0 NA

Soyabean Wheat Green gram 43 5257 26 124180 25.9null:0 null:0 null:0 NA NA NA

+ + +Maize(Green cob) Chick Pea 2041 1374null:0 null:0 NA NA

Soyabean Wheat Green gram 44 7735 15 140459 30.7null:0 null:0 null:0 NA NA NA

+ + +Maize French bean 1030 815null:0 null:0 NA NA





SE± 11324 24.2

CD at 5% 24007 5.1

PARBHANI (MAHARASHTRA)

Soyabean Sorghum Fallow 2586 3055 - 112665 21.8MAUS-71 :0 NA :0 NA NA

Cotton Fallow Groundnut 2667 - 2048 188650 20.5NCS-207 :0 TAG-24 :0 NA NA

Soyabean Wheat Cowpea 2679 3404 6378 186433 26.5MAUS-71 :0 NA :0 NA :0 NA NA NA

Cotton Cotton Amaranthus 2804 - 443 183955 17.5NCS-207 :0 continue BPMR-145 :0 NA NA

+ + +Soyabean Green gram 1250 777MAUS-71 :0 Pusa :0 NA NA

Pigeon Pea Pigeon Pea Cluster bean 1931 - 2238 169295 13.8NA:0 continue null:0 NA NA

+ + +Soyabean Green gram 859 652MAUS-71 :0 Pusa :0 NA NA

+Sesbania 4378Local :0 NA

Maize Wheat Ladys finger 4306 1488 3019 267612 34.2NA :0 NA :0 Parbhani Kranti :0NA NA NA

+ + + + +Soyabean Chick Pea Cowpea 896 1476 6882MAUS-71 :0 BDNG-797:0 NA :0 NA NA NA

+Sesbania 4453Local :0 NA

Pearl millet Mustard Cowpea 1537 900 4599 181493 24461NA :0 NA :0 NA :0 NA NA NA

+ + +Soyabean Chick Pea 1524 1458MAUS-71 :0 BDNG-797:0 NA NA





Maize Sorghum Ladys finger 4431 1891 3250 197654 32.9NA :0 Local :0 Parbhani Kranti :0NA NA NA

+ + +

Soyabean Chick Pea 1071 1490MAUS-71 :0 BDNG-797:0 NA NA

SE± 5017 0.66

CD at 5% 10761 1.43

COIMBATURE (TAMILNAIDU)

Green gram Cotton Bunny Sunflower 1005 2883 1985 228537 25.2Vamban-2 :80 Bt. hybrid :152 Sunbreed :9025-50-25 150-75-75 60-90-60

Sorghum(F) Cotton Bunny Lublub 28984 2872 7752 295661 18.1CO-26 :55 Bt. hybrid :152 NA :NA60-40-20 150-75-75 NA + + Onion 912Local:NA150-75-75

OnionCotton Bunny Maize 5000 2666 6907 239556 34.9Local :80 Bt. hybrid :152 NK-6240 :11030-60-30 150-75-75 150-62.5-50

Maize Cowpea(S) Tomato 6648 894 9786 193542 27.8NK-6240 :110 CO(CP)-7 :85 NA :NA150-62.5-50 25-50-25 NA

Maize Sunflower Cowpea 6484 1900 1050 175547 34.8NK-6240 :110 Sunbreed :90 Co-2 :90150-62.5-50 60-90-60 25-50-25+ +Cowpea 795Co-2 :90150-62.5-50

Beet root Green gram Maize 9142 817 6933 271908 30.7Ruby queen :120 Vamban-2 :75 NK-6240 :11060-160-100 25-50-25 150-62.5-50 + +

Cowpea fodder 1912Co-2 :60

150-62.5-50

Cowpea Maize Sunflower 2801 6774 1843 192369 36.2Co-2 :90 NK-6240 :110 Sunbreed :9025-50-25 150-62.5-50 60-90-60

+ +Cowpea fodder 1815

Co-2 :60150-62.5-50





Sunflower Pigeonpea Snake gourd 2010 1077 10302 251528 17.8Sunbreed :100 VBN(Rg)-3 :110 NA :060-90-60 25-50-25 25-50-25

Green chillies Maize Sunhemp Fodder 9921 6989 8463 302131 28.2K-2 :135 NK-6240 :110 NA :NA120-60-30 150-62.5-50 150-62.5-50

SE± 4473 0.94

CD at 5% 9484 1.9

LUDHIANA (PUNJAB)

Rice Wheat Fallow 6170 5035 - 153476 38.7PR-121:119 HD 2967:157 NR NR

Basmati Rice Hayola Summer squash 3944 1760 1125 144162 23.3PB Basmati-2:110 PAC-401 :130 null:0 NR NR NR

Basmati Rice Radish Maize 3880 21650 6460 250405 39.2PB Basmati-2:110 JG-315 :96 null:0 NR NR NR

Maize Potato Maize 4975 22730 6489 245657 61.3PMH-1 :92 KufriJyoti :106 null:0 NR NR NR

Maize Barley Fallow 3870 3470 - 543410 87.7PMH-1 :92 Early composite :140 NR NR

+ + +Turmeric Linseed 17480 328Pb haldi1:103 Mahamaya :140 NR NR

Maize Wheat Fallow 3925 3750 - 576318 91.7PMH-1 :92 HD 2967:157 NR NR

+ + +Turmeric Linseed 18155 350Pb haldi1:103 null:140 NR NR

Maize Wheat Green gram 3825 3685 1060 188679 32.7PMH-1 :92 HD 2967:157 null:0 NR NR NR

+ + +Radish Linseed 8745 365PusaChetki :92 null:140 NR NR

Groundnut Wheat Fallow 1575 4890 - 154151 28.6SG-99 :155 HD 2967:157 NR NR

+ + +Arhar Gobi sarson 460 224AL-15:165 null:140 NR NR





Cotton Radish Fallow 1260 1675 - 342535 85.9LH-2076:181 null:0 NR NR+ +Hayola 15058null:148 NR

Cotton Wheat Fallow 1315 3770 - 116857 19.3LH-2076:181 HD 2967:157 NR NR+ +Linseed 357null:140 NR

Maize(Green cob) Chick Pea Green gram 21080 328 1044 193811 40.6PMH-1 :92 Guj-1 :0 null:0 NR NR NR

+ + +Cowpea Mustard 2865 1525CO-4 :46 null:157 NR NR

Sorghum(F) Wheat Fallow 57760 4924 4060 148466 27.5SL-44:96 HD 2967:0 NR NR+ +Mustard 240null:157 NR

SE± CDat 5% 7257 1.3

KANPUR (UTTARPRADESH)

Rice Wheat Fallow 4904 4284 - 125948 31.7Pantdhan-12 :97 PBW-343 :0 120-60-60 120-60-60

Rice Wheat Fallow 8024 4550 - 171622 43.5PHB-71 :97 PBW-343 :0 120-75-120 120-60-60

Rice Wheat Green gram 8214 4670 765 210309 47.2PHB-71 :97 PBW-343 :0 null:0 120-75-60 120-60-60 NR

Maize Wheat Fallow 2857 4695 - 103156 26.1Azad Uttam :80 PBW-343 :0 120-60-60 120-60-60

Maize Mustard Onion 2880 1740 12320 207875 25.4Azad Uttam :80 Kanti :0 null:0 120-60-60 120-60-60 NR

Maize Mustard Green gram 3050 2080 859 142087 24.5Azad Uttam :80 Kanti :0 null:0 120-60-60 120-60-60 NR





Maize Potato Fallow 2928 21280 - 190082 43.3Azad Uttam :80 NA :0 120-60-60 200-100-200

+ + +Green gram Wheat 357 3304K-851 :85 K-7903 :0 120-60-60 200-100-200

Maize Potato Onion 3452 22650 12729 309920 44.1Azad Uttam :80 null:0 null:0 120-60-60 200-100-200 NR+ +Black gram 1131NA :82 120-60-60

Maize Garlic Green gram 3097 7684 980 357852 25.1Azad Uttam :80 Local :0 null:0 120-60-60 120-60-60 NR

Rice Wheat Ladys finger 4714 4415 4034 171418 33.2Sugandha :80 null:0 null:0 120-60-60 120-60-60 NR

SE± 14818 15.2

CD at 5% 30406 3.1

KOTA (RAJASTHAN)

Soyabean Wheat Fallow - 4546 - 63653 15.7RKS-24 :0 Raj-171 :124 NR 120-40-0

Maize Garlic Fallow - 5301 - 202170 11.1PEHM-2 :0 Local :137 NR 120-40-100+ + Wheat 978 Raj-171 :124 120-40-100

Maize Mustard Green gram - 1998 556 85999 12.7PEHM-2 :0 Pusa bold :118 AKM-8802 :75 NR 80-40-0 20-40-0

Maize Chick Pea Green gram - 933 545 71961 8.5PEHM-2 :0 Samrat :118 AKM-8802 :75 NR 20-40-0 20-20-0 + + Mustard 606Pusa bold :118 20-40-0

Maize Chick Pea Cowpea - 1449 5520 118412 9.9PEHM-2 :0 Samrat :118 Local :70 NR 20-40-0 20-20-0





+ +Linseed 396 Meera :137 20-40-0

Maize Garlic Fallow - 6136 - 218158 8.9PEHM-2 :0 Local :137 NR 120-40-100

Cotton Fallow Green gram - - 820 36900 2.7H-8 :0 AKM-8802 :75 NR 20-20-0

Cotton Fallow Green gram - - 931 41925 3.2H-8 :0 AKM-8802 :75 NR 20-20-0

SE± 55325 2.3

CD at 5% 118674 5.1

AKOLA(MAHARASHTRA)

Groundnut Linseed Green gram 1270 939 165 104888 14.3TAG-24 :101 Local :110 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 60-30-0 20-40-0

Niger + Carrot + 126 + 1894NPS-6:118 Kesar:90 25-50-30 60-30-0

Groundnut Lentil Fallow 1175 - - 51890 7.4TAG-24 :101 Local :140 25-50-30 20-40-0

Niger + Carrot + 139 -NPS-6:118 Kesar:90 25-50-30 20-40-0

Groundnut Pea Green gram 1198 615 170 83991 10.8TAG-24 :101 Local :90 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 20-40-0 20-40-0


Groundnut Frenchbean Green gram 1233 1394 121 105470 14.3TAG-24 :101 Local :90 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 90-60-0 20-40-0


Groundnut Frenchbean Green gram 1145 68 189 63231 8.4TAG-24 :101 Local :90 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 20-40-0 20-40-0






Groundnut Green gram Green gram 1389 704 136 107291 12.1TAG-24 :101 TAMS-38 :98 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 20-40-0 20-40-0


Groundnut Black gram Green gram 1291 505 254 93876 10.9TAG-24 :101 TAG-24 :98 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 20-40-0 20-40-0


Groundnut Wheat Green gram 1287 3621 212 139399 22.9TAG-24 :101 null:66 AKM-4:66 25-50-30 120-60-60 20-40-0


SE± 8831 1.3

CD at 5% 18942 2.7

C. SUBHUMID ECOSYSTEM

FAIZABAD (UTTAR PRADESH)

Rice Wheat Fallow 4701 4072 - 120245 30.3NDR-359 :141 HUW-468 :143 NA NA

Rice Potato Green gram 4983 19060 1038 193814 39.2NDR-359 :141 K.Ashoka :101 NDM-1 :79 NA NA NA

Rice French bean Ladys finger 4785 2376 7373 197861 19.7NDR-359 :141 Meera :129 NA :76 NA NA NA

Rice Mustard Black gram 4925 1680 911 156682 29.3NDR-359 :141 NDR-8501 :108 NDU-1 :82 NA NA NA

Rice Berseem Berseem seed 4816 0.0 151 80158 17.3NDR-359 :141 Vardan :156 Vardan :180 NA NA NA

Rice Chick Pea Maize fodder 4830 1930 - 124802 23.7NDR-359 :141 Awarodhi :151 NA :53 NA NA NA

Rice Lentil Green Fodder 4718 1725 - 114344 22.2NDR-359 :141 NDL-1 :134 Sudanchari :68 NA NA NA





Rice Cauliflower Cowpea fodder 4865 9608 7235 156906 24.3NDR-359 :141 Hybrid :90 NDL-1 :93 NA NA NA

SE± 4622 0.75

CD at 5% 9915 1.6

PANTNAGAR (UTTARAKHAND)

Rice Wheat Fallow 4233 3900 - 111538 28.1HKR-47:105 PBW-343 :155 120-60-40 120-60-40

Rice Pea veg Rice 4266 10933 7116 264079 49.5HKR-47:105 Arkel :80 HKR-47:109 120-60-40 20-60-40 150-60-40

Rice Pea veg Fallow 4266 9666 - 155503 23.7HKR-47:126 Arkel :77 120-60-40 20-60-40

Rice Potato Cowpea 4233 28533 8123 266135 46.3HKR-47:126 KufriJyoti :107 Pusa Komal :92 120-60-40 150-60-80 20-60-40

Rice Pea veg Maize 4466 10266 9350 286768 56.9HKR-47:126 Arkel :90 Suvarna:90 120-60-40 20-60-40 80-60-40

Rice Mustard Cowpea 4200 1500 8050 190790 26.5HKR-47:126 PBW-343 :116 Pusa Komal :90 120-60-40 90-60-40 20-60-40

Rice Pea Maize 3400 9066 5123 285589 55.9HKR-47:126 veg null:90 Suvarna:101 120-60-40 20-60-40 80-60-40

+ + + + Toria Mentha 583 21033

Utkala Manika :95 NA:116 20-60-40 80-60-40

Soyabean Wheat Fallow 2066 4400 - 193688 43.4PS-1024:135 PBW-343 :151 20-60-40 120-60-40

Rice + Mentha + 2366 + 15783HKR-47:126 NA :121 20-60-40 120-60-40

Maize Pea veg Green gram 8533 8250 996 315307 53.2Suvarna:100 Arka :91 PM-2 :77 80-60-40 20-60-40 20-60-40

Cowpea + Toria + Mentha + 1766 + 500 + 13466PusaKomal :100 Utkala Manika :96 NA:121 80-60-40 20-60-40 20-60-40

SE± 8621 2.2

CD at 5% 18277 4.5





SABOUR (BIHAR)

Rice Wheat Fallow 5392 4678 - 138023 34.9Sita :138 HD-2733 :113 NA NA

Rice Maize Maize fodder 5299 6405 - 217426 54.6Sita :132 Shaktiman-3 :153 Suwan :39 NA NA NA

+ +Potato 14821

K.Ashoka :69 NA

Rice Wheat Green gram 4481 4491 566 152100 33.1Rajendra HD-2733 :113 SML-668 :76 suwasini :135 NA NANA

+ +Febugreek Leaves 300

NA :113 NA

Rice Potato Onion 4212 18098 8386 233351 44.4Rajendra K.Ashoka :76 Nasik Red :68 suwasini :135 NA NANA

+ + + +Radish Maize(Cob) 5078 5893

Pusa Chetki :56 Suwan :81 NA NA

Rice Cabbage Ladys finger 4347 37035 12911 473522 31.5Rajendra Pusa Mukta :101 null:0 suwasini :135 NA NANA

+ + + + Radish Green gram 6544 254

Pusa Chetki :56 null:0 NA NA

Rice Maize Sorghum(F) 6541 6352 - 231329 58.3JKRH-401 :128 Shaktiman-3 :148 Local :0 NA NA NA

+ +Potato 14318

K.Ashoka :69 NA

Rice Maize Maize Fodder 6665 7874 - 203728 51.8JKRH-401 :128 Shaktiman-3 :148 Local :0 NA NA NA

+ +Frenchbean 529

PDR-14 :108 NA





Rice Garlic Maize 6520 4522 2924 344678 53.7JKRH-401 :128 Yamuna Safed :128 null:0 NA NA NA

+ +Coriander 5058

Pant Haritima :64NA

Rice Wheat Green gram 6293 4554 623 176446 39.6Rajendra HD-2733 :133 null:0 mahsuri :156 NA NANA

Rice Maize Clusterbean fodder 6231 7569 - 182969 47.5Rajendra Shaktiman-3 :158 null:0 mahsuri :156 NA NANA

Rice Oat fodder Fodder 6055 - - 81439 20.9Rajendra JHO-822 :110 null:0 mahsuri :156 NA NANA

Rice Chick Pea Maize 6168 1667 2810 176475 38.2Rajendra Baibhav :121 null:0 mahsuri :156 NA NANA

+ + Coriander 436

Rajendra Swati :109

NA

SE± 9981 2.1

CD at 5% 20702 4.2

RANCHI (JHARKHAND)

Rice Wheat Fallow 2946 3471 - 88227 22.2Shahbhagi:121 K-9107 :140 80-40-20 100-50-25

Rice Mustard Green gram 3426 1088 7 79584 17.7Shahbhagi:121 Pusa bold :127 Pusa Vishal :71 80-40-20 80-null-20 20-40-20

Rice Linseed Green gram 3733 761 9 75110 16.9Shahbhagi:121 Sweta:134 Pusa Vishal :71 80-40-20 30-20-20 20-40-20

Rice Potato Green gram 3830 21231 13 141287 33.9Shahbhagi:121 K.Ashoka :93 Pusa Vishal :71 80-40-20 120-80-100 20-40-20

Rice Wheat Green gram 3254 2458 7 85110 20.9Shahbhagi:121 K-9107 :140 Pusa Vishal :71 80-40-20 100-50-25 20-40-20





+ +Mustard 216

Pusa bold :127 100-50-25

Rice Wheat Green gram 3542 2565 7 88335 21.9Shahbhagi:121 K-9107 :140 Pusa Vishal :71 80-40-20 100-50-25 20-40-20 + +

Linseed 137Sweta:134 100-50-25

Rice Potato Green gram 4254 20117 11 165014 39.9Shahbhagi:121 K.Ashoka :93 Pusa Vishal :71 80-40-20 120-80-100 20-40-20 + +

Wheat 1626K-9107 :130 120-80-100

SE± 3507 0.80

CD at 5% 7642 1.7

JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

Rice Wheat Fallow 3432 3669 - 97536 24.5MR-219 :143 GW-273 :130 120-60-40 120-60-40

Rice Chick Pea Fallow 3581 - - 48174 12.4MR-219 :143 JG-322 :125 120-60-40 20-60-20

Rice Onion Fallow 3637 5881 - 104798 15.5Danteshwari :112 Pusa red :120 120-60-40 120-60-40

Rice Berseem seed Fallow 3030 4 - 41260 10.5Pusa Bahar :124 JB-5 :169 120-60-40 20-60-40

Rice Potato Sorghum (F) 3244 2664 48863 115909 21.7JRH-5 :119 Kufri Jyoti :115 MP-chari :70 150-75-50 120-100-100 75-50-30

Rice Gobi sarson Black gram 3189 947 677 90057 18.5JRH-5 :119 Terriuttam :113 CU-19 :77 150-75-50 75-50-30 20-60-20

Rice Pea veg Sorghum(F) 3237 3540 47771 139197 22.3JRH-5 :119 Arkel :105 MP-chari :70 150-75-50 20-60-20 75-50-30

Rice Potato Groundnut 3111 7675 1762 144601 28.2JRH-5 :119 Kufri Jyoti :115 Jyoti :70 150-75-50 120-100-100 20-60-20





Rice Gobi sarson Sorghum(F) 3124 884 46632 117156 23.1JRH-5 :119 Terriuttam :113 MP-chari :70 150-75-50 75-50-30 75-50-30

Rice Gobi sarson Ladys finger 3140 901 3698 101747 17.1JRH-5 :119 Terriuttam :113 ParbhaniKranti :70 150-75-50 75-50-30 120-60-40

Rice French bean Sorghum(F) 3596 - 27008 90829 17.3JRH-5 :119 Arkakomal :100 MP-chari :70 150-75-50 120-50-40 75-50-30 + +

Cowpea fodder 3411Ankur :70 75-50-30

Rice Merigold Sorghum(F) 3197 4337 47228 184668 18.8Danteshwari :112 African Giant :115 MP-chari :70 120-60-40 120-60-40 75-50-30

SE± 9593 2.3

CD at 5% 19531 7.3

REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)

Rice Wheat Fallow 3848 4900 - 120369 30.2Danteshwari :98 GW-273 :120 120-60-40 120-60-40

Rice Chick Pea Fallow 4017 514 - 69983 15.7Danteshwari :98 JG-322 :133 120-60-40 20-60-20

Rice Berseem Berseem seed 4826 65203 229 254465 27.9Danteshwari :98 NA :150 NA :95 120-60-40 20-60-20 NA

Rice Potato Wheat 4290 9675 3533 147806 36.5Danteshwari :98 Kufri Sinduri :95 HD-2864 :110 120-60-40 120-60-40 100-60-40

Rice Garlic Fallow 4170 7613 - 326756 25.5Danteshwari :98 NA :165 NA :0 120-60-40 10-75-50 NA

Rice Toria Onion 4355 1440 5236 151825 25.6Danteshwari :98 T9 :85 AFLR :135 120-60-40 60-30-20 120-60-40

Rice Lentil Sunhemp Fodder 4996 466 9465 105093 20.4Danteshwari :98 NA :150 GM-2 :65 120-60-40 20-60-20 20-60-20

Rice Pea veg Wheat 4777 3648 3722 153401 32.8Danteshwari :98 Arkel :90 HD-2864 :110 120-60-40 20-60-20 120-60-40

Rice Chick Pea Fallow 4027 189 - 88415 19294Danteshwari :98 JG-322 :130 120-60-40 20-60-20





+ +Linseed 883

JM-12 :133 20-60-20

Rice Mustard Sunhemp Fodder 4668 1777 8657 139067 27.2Danteshwari :98 Pusa bold :155 GM-2 :65 120-60-40 120-60-40 20-60-20

SE± 8985 1.3

CD at 5% 18877 2.6

POWERKHEDA (MADHYA PRADESH)

Soyabean Wheat Fallow 0.0 4978 - 69701 17.2JS 95-60 :95 GW-273 :120 20-60-20 120-60-40

Soyabean Pigeon Pea Fallow 0.0 1527 - 65687 5.2JS 95-60 :95 JG-130 :110 20-60-20 20-60-20

Soyabean Sugarcane Fallow 0.0 0.0 - - -JS 95-60 :95 Co 86032 :0 20-60-20 300-80-60

Soyabean Sugarcane Fallow 0.0 105545 - 221644 35.9JS 95-60 :95 Co 86032 :0 20-60-20 300-80-60

Rice Wheat Green gram 0.0 5318 687 105399 20.7Pusa sugandha-5 :120 GW-273 :120 PDM-54 :68 100-40-25 120-60-40 20-60-20

Soyabean Potato Ladys finger 0.0 33052 12221 278749 36.4JS 95-60 :95 Chip Sona :95 Parbhani Kranti :150 20-60-20 120-100-75 80-60-20

Soyabean Maize fodder Fallow 0.0 40968 - 51210 65.5JS 95-60 :95 African Tall :95 20-60-20 120-60-40

Rice Linseed Green gram 0.0 1291 729 74332 9280Pusa sugandha-5 :120 Kiran :120 PDM-54 :68 100-40-25 50-30-20 20-60-20

Rice Linseed Sesamum 0.0 1458 604 74065 11129Pusa sugandha-5 :120 Kiran :120 TKG-55 :80 100-40-25 50-30-20 50-30-20

Soyabean Potato Sesamum 0.0 33468 624 168691 35.9JS 95-60 :95 Chip Sona :95 TKG-55 :80 20-60-20 120-100-75 50-30-20

SE± 7684 1.5

CD at 5% 15768 3.1





CHIPLIMA (ODISHA)

Rice Groundnut Fallow 3500 1915 - 123706 22973Naveen :135 Smruti :120 80-40-40 null-40-40

Rice Groundnut Bottle gourd 3663 1410 12797 206564 24.5Naveen :135 Smruti :120 US-15 :65 80-40-40 null-40-40 50-30-50 + + + +

Sunflower Amaranthus 313 742Mahamaya :0 White Vienna :50

null-40-40 50-30-50

Rice Groundnut Cowpea 4153 1864 3109 183759 27.7ARISE-6444:135 Smruti :120 NA :60 80-40-40 null-40-40 25-50-50 + + + +

Kosala Amaranthus 1909 888R-059 :0 White Vienna :50

null-40-40 25-50-50

Rice Maize(Cob) Ladys finger 3692 35691 3146 160789 60.8Naveen :135 Kamal :90 NA :65 80-40-40 80-40-40 80-40-40 + + + +

Radish Amaranthus 11606 760NA :0 White Vienna :50

80-40-40 80-40-40

Rice Maize(Cob) Cowpea 4257 41909 3309 142301 70.2ARISE-6444:135 Kamal :90 NA :60 80-40-40 80-40-40 25-50-50

+ + + + Coriander Amaranthus 377 805

NA :0 White Vienna :5080-40-40 25-50-50

Rice Tomato Water melon 3570 9090 8982 234314 19.6Naveen :135 BT-10 :100 Sugar-75 :75 80-40-40 80-40-40 100-50-50

+ + + + Kosala Amaranthus 1475 758

NA :0 White Vienna :5080-40-40 100-50-50

Rice Tomato Cowpea 4067 9689 2992 212418 19.4ARISE-6444:135 BT-10 :100 null:60 80-40-40 80-40-40 25-50-50

+ + + + Febugreek Amaranthus 2543 874

Leaves NA :0 White Vienna :5080-40-40 25-50-50

Rice Potato Pumpkin 3672 7468 10027 197527 24.5Naveen :135 Kufri chandermukhi:100 null:75 80-40-40 100-200-100 100-50-50





+ + + + Radish Amaranthus 9705 924

NA :0 White Vienna :50100-200-100 100-50-50

Rice Potato Green gram 4280 8481 744 143118 26.5ARISE-6444:135 Kufri chandermukhi:100 K-851 :66 80-40-40 100-200-100 20-40-40


NA :0 White Vienna :50100-200-100 20-40-40

Rice KnolKhol Ridge gourd 3624 6002 2853 142243 16.5Naveen :135 Virat :85 Salem :95 80-40-40 80-40-40 80-40-40

+ + + + Spinach Amaranthus 843 879

NA :0 White Vienna :5080-40-40 80-40-40

SE± 12114 14.8

CD at 5% 25453 3.1

KATHALGERA (KARNATAKA)

Rice - Rice 5762 - 5175 147107 37.8MTU-1010 :135 MTU-1010 :125 100-60-50 120-60-60

Maize - Rice 3991 - 5049 131090 31.9Hybrid :110 MTU-1010 :125 150-75-40 120-60-60

Green gram + 242KKM-3 :0 150-75-40

Rice - Rice 5392 - 5554 147228 37.8MTU-1010 :135 MTU-1010 :125 100-50-50 120-60-60

Rice - Rice 5774 - 5479 151361 38.9MTU-1010 :135 MTU-1010 :125 100-50-50 120-60-60

Rice - Tomato 6023 - 19901 258134 25.4MTU-1010 :135 NA :90 100-50-50 120-50-30

Rice - Ladys finger 5109 - 13608 224531 22.4MTU-1010 :135 Arca Anamica :85100-50-50 120-75-60

Rice - Rice 3963 - 5903 132706 34.2MTU-1010 :135 MTU-1010 :125 100-50-50 120-75-60





Rice - Rice 6145 - 5850 161350 41.5MTU-1010 :135 MTU-1010 :125100-50-50 120-75-60

Maize - Rice 4023 - 5163 122152 31.6Hybrid :110 MTU-1010 :125 100-75-50 120-60-60

Rice - Maize 5162 - 4227 124811 32.4MTU-1010 :135 Hybrid :100 100-50-50 150-75-60

Rice - Groundnut 5294 - 2502 171311 32.5MTU-1010 :135 NA :125 100-50-50 25-50-60

Maize - Green gram 4462 - 1282 116172 19.5Hybrid :110 KKM-3 :65 150-75-40 25-50-0

SE± 14737 3.5

CD at 5% 30566 7.3

RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH)

Rice Wheat Cowpea(S) 4927 2748 986 126094 29.7MTU-1010 :115 GW-273 :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

Rice Castor Cowpea 5281 94 5704 161354 24.4MTU-1010 :115 DCH-9 :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

+ + Lentil 867

K-75:NA NR

Rice Mustard Cowpea fodder 4937 1175 27844 195730 30.5MTU-1010 :115 Pusa bold :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

+ + Lentil 762

K-75:NA NR

Rice Wheat Green gram 5187 2931 1063 158652 31.6MTU-1010 :115 GW-273 :NA null:NA NR NR NR

Rice Sunflower Cowpea 5802 1066 4602 192099 31.7Mahamaya :128 K-7903 :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

+ + Lentil 812

K-75:NA NR





Rice Wheat Cowpea fodder 6083 2139 32475 225380 36.4Mahamaya :128 GW-273 :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

+ + Fenugreek(S) 808

Hy-8 :NA NR

Rice Wheat Cowpea 6323 2039 5258 188619 33.5Mahamaya :128 GW-273 :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

+ + Lentil 582

K-75:NA NR

Rice Onion Cowpea(S) 6385 10685 878 214950 32.4Mahamaya :128 Nasik Red :NA Gomti:NA NR NR NR

+ + Coriander 745

null:NA NR

SE± 9121 17.1

CD at 5% 19564 36.5

VARANASI (UTTAR PRADESH)

Rice Wheat Fallow 3178 3831 - 96378 24.2Pusa sugandha-4 :135 HUW-468 :120 150-75-75 120-60-60

Rice Wheat Green gram 3551 3935 1169 155469 29.9Pusa sugandha-4 :135 HUW-468 :120 ICPL 87-119 :68 150-75-75 120-60-60 0-50-30

Rice Wheat Sesbania 3811 4375 - 112516 28.3Pusa sugandha-4 :135 HUW-468 :120 Local :68 150-75-75 120-60-60 NA

Rice Wheat Black gram 3266 3178 1030 143027 27.7Pusa sugandha-4 :135 HUW-468 :120 Pant Urd -1:68 150-75-75 120-60-60 0-50-30

+ + Mustard 337

PRO-4001 :85 120-60-60

Rice Wheat Cowpea 3623 3235 3240 141419 27.4Pusa sugandha-4 :135 HUW-468 :120 CP-4 :68 150-75-75 120-60-60 0-50-30

+ + Mustard 385

PRO-4001 :85 120-60-60





Rice Mustard Green gram 3615 1325 1308 147919 24.5Pusa sugandha-4 :135 PRO-4001 :85 HUM-16:68 150-75-75 75-50-50 0-50-30

Rice Rapeseed Ladys finger 3583 960 10763 200744 21.3Pusa sugandha-4 :135 Sanjucta Asesh :68 Mahyco-10 :68 150-75-75 75-50-50 120-100-60

Rice Pea veg Ladys finger 3488 3738 11435 215796 19.5Pusa sugandha-4 :135 AP- 3:68 Mahyco-10 :68 150-75-75 0-50-30 120-100-60

Rice Maize(Green cob) Cowpea fodder 3582 11012 18321 160346 32.2Pusa sugandha-4 :135 Bio-9681 :90 CP-4 :68 150-75-75 150-75-75 0-50-30

+ + Pea veg 3432

AP- 3:68 150-75-75

Rice Potato Green gram 3627 13812 1447 171914 30.7Pusa sugandha-4 :135 Kufri Sinduri :90 HUM-16:68 150-75-75 120-60-60 0-50-30

SE± 5868 0.90

CD at 5% 12328 1.85

D. HUMID ECOSYSTEM

R S PURA (JAMMU & KASHMIR)

Rice Wheat Fallow 4979 3270 - 112758 28.5Jaya :113 DBW-17 :148 120-60-30 100-50-25

Rice Berseem Fallow 3645 58229 - 197519 21.9IET-1410 :93 Muscavi :186 50-30-20 50-50-0

Rice Potato Onion 3833 15208 14062 249030 35.1IET-1410 :93 K.Badshah :90 N-53 :112 50-30-20 120-60-120 100-50-50

Rice KnolKhol Tomato 4270 12875 9083 220038 22.4PC-19 :102 G-40 :64 Sonia :118 120-60-25 NA NA

Rice Garlic Cowpea 3479 5708 0.00 249720 20.3IET-1410 :93 Local :197 Pusa Komal :51 50-30-20 100-50-50 50-60-0

Rice Marigold French bean 3904 5083 7020 294326 15.5PC-19 :103 Pusa Narangi :104 Contender :100 120-60-25 120-100-100 50-100-100

Rice Spinach Ladys finger 4000 13958 8416 309993 23.6PC-19 :102 Local :106 NA :137 120-30-20 NA 60-30-30





Rice Broccoli Green gram 3583 8291 1041 305677 19.7IET-1410 :93 Evergreen :91 NA :80 50-30-20 NA NA

Rice Cabbage Onion 3541 14062 13666 266765 22.9IET-1410 :93 Golden Acre :85 N-53 :112 50-30-20 120-60-60 100-50-50

Rice Potato Maize(Cob) 4083 19916 41957 174233 85894PC-19 :102 K.Badshah :93 ICPL 87-119 :91 120-60-25 120-60-60 90-60-30

SE± 11814 7.1

CD at 5% 24244 14.6

JORHAT(ASSOM)

Rice Fallow Rice 3300 - 2840 82583 21.2Suwasini :129 Disang :96 80-40-40 40-20-20

Rice Toria Fallow 3633 663 - 68901 16.2Suwasini :129 TS-67:82 80-40-40 60-40-40

Rice Cabbage Green gram 3466 9900 390 127041 15.9Suwasini :129 Golden Acre :129 Pratap :89 80-40-40 120-60-60 10-35-10

Rice Cauliflower Black gram 2800 3250 560 86440 13.7Suwasini :129 Snowball_1 :110 PU-31 :91 80-40-40 80-60-60 10-35-10

Rice Knol Khol Cowpea fodder 3566 2586 4733 76467 14.2Suwasini :129 White Vienna :90 EC-4216 :55 80-40-40 80-60-60 15-35-10

Rice Capsicum Cowpea fodder 3166 906 5833 74738 12.1Suwasini :129 California Wonder :129 EC-4216 :53 80-40-40 120-60-60 20-40-20

Rice Green chillies Black gram 3133 1203 513 87140 12.9Suwasini :129 Tejaswini:121 PU-31 :91 80-40-40 120-60-60 10-35-10

Rice Radish Green gram 3133 3346 350 68435 12.6Suwasini :129 Pusa Chetki :62 Pratap :89 80-40-40 50-100-100 10-35-10

SE± 7838 1.4

CD at 5% 16813 3.1

KALYANI (WEST BENGAL)

Rice Rice Fallow 3027 3561 - 88617 22.7IET-4786 :116 IET-4786 :150 60-30-60 NA

Rice Rice Fallow 1513 3847 - 72101 18.5BCKV-1 :90 BCKV-1 :150 60-30-60 70-35-35





Rice Potato Jute 3541 15861 2185 164503 35.3BCKV-1 :109 Kufri Jyoti :99 JRO-524 :122 60-30-60 200-150-150 80-40-40

Rice Wheat Maize 3499 2562 1630 148265 32.8BCKV-1 :109 UP-262 :122 Datta:95 60-30-60 100-50-50 80-40-40

+ + Groundnut 1099TAG-24 :95 80-40-40

Rice Mustard Green gram 3027 1414 721 116340 20.5IET-4786 :116 B-9 :90 Bajaura Makka :92 60-30-60 80-40-40 20-60-40

Rice Lentil Sesamum 3694 550 939 117166 21.6BCKV-1 :116 B-67 :88 B-76 :96 60-30-60 80-40-40 80-40-40

+ + Mustard 294

B-9 :98 80-40-40

Amaranthus Brinjal Bitter gourd 6500 8775 2139 209011 61.3Jabakusam :72 Muktakeshi :176 Meghna-2 :90 80-40-40 150-75-75 80-40-40

+ + Cluster bean 858

Hybrid :60 150-75-75

Cauliflower Radish Ladys finger 10058 20652 5094 203602 12.1Radha :80 Kalpin :48 Mahyco-10 :102 120-60-60 100-50-50 150-75-75

+ + Amaranthus 349

Jabakusam :60 100-50-50

EFY Dolichos bean Ginger 24322 2383 520 605276 43.9Bidhankusam :170 Hytech :157 Bidhankusam :170 150-120-150 60-80-40 150-120-150

+ + Turmeric 6659

Suranjana :322 150-120-150

Rice Wheat Green gram 3749 2604 330 101743 23.1BCKV-1 :116 HP-1731:122 BDN-2 :75 60-30-60 100-50-50 20-60-40

SE± 19758 2.2

CD at 5% 41512 4.7





PALAMPUR (HIMANCHALPRADESH)

Maize Wheat Fallow 2462 3680 - 83782 21.2Early composite :112 HPW-155 :178 120-30-40 120-45-30

Maize(Green cob) Pea Summer squash 4782 947 16637 209670 11.7Early composite :112 Palampriya :152 Australian Green :69 120-30-40 25-45-60 100-37.5-35

French bean + 284Pole type :94 120-30-40

Maize Garlic Fallow 2462 2376 - 120363 12.5Early composite :112 GHC-1 :210 120-30-40 125-56.25-60

Soyabean + 142Harit Soya :112 120-30-40

Maize(Green cob) Broccoli Potato 4876 4640 12045 182004 19.8Early composite :112 PalamSamridhi :132 Kufri Jyoti :89 120-30-40 150-75-55 120-60-60

Maize Radish Onion 2462 19081 19697 281794 21.5Early composite :112 Early menu long white :99 Patna Red :133 120-30-40 100-37.5-35 125-56.25-60

Asparagus beans + 151DP ASB-1 :112 120-30-40

Maize(Green cob) Cauliflower French bean 4877 4734 2220 98147 10.2Early composite :112 Palam Uphar :132 Pole type :112 120-30-40 125-56.25-70 50-75-50

Frenchbean + 133BRS-II :120 120-30-40

Maize(Green cob) Cauliflower Buck wheat 4829 4734 5066 217258 27.3Early composite :112 Palam Uphar :132 Sangla B1 :67 120-30-40 125-56.25-70 40-30-20

Green gram + 161BRS-II :120 120-30-40

Maize(Green cob) Broccoli Radish Early menu 4924 4735 1515 140759 8.6Early composite :112Palam Samridhi :132 Long white :95 120-30-40 150-56.25-50 100-37.5-35

Asparagus beans + 133DP ASB-1 :112 120-30-40

SE± 29172 1.2

CD at 5% 60678 2.4





E. COASTAL ECOSYSTEM

BHUBANESWAR (ODISHA)

Rice Groundnut Fallow 3467 1764 - 117226 22.1Hiranmayee:128 Smruti :125 80-40-40 20-40-40

Rice Groundnut Bottle gourd 3385 1348 6560 159713 22.4Hiranmayee:128 Smruti :125 GT-2 :0 80-40-40 20-40-40 50-30-50

+ + + + Toria Amaranthus 349 742

Parbati :60 NA :0 20-40-40 50-30-50

Rice Groundnut Cowpea 3785 1476 3463 164421 24.1ARISE-6444:118 Smruti :125 Utkala Manika :89 120-60-60 20-40-40 25-50-50


Local :30 NA :0 20-40-40 25-50-50

Rice Maize(Cob) Ladys finger 3234 38961 4770 159913 63.9Hiranmayee:128 Navjyot :88 NA :0 80-40-40 120-60-60 80-40-40


Chetki long :60 NA :0 120-60-60 80-40-40

Rice Maize(Cob) Cowpea 3563 42291 2930 133183 67.7ARISE-6444:118 Navjyot :88 Utkala Manika :89 120-60-60 120-60-60 25-50-50


Local :30 NA :0 120-60-60 25-50-50

Rice Tomato Bitter gourd 3408 8979 3448 219079 16.2Hiranmayee:128 BT-10 :98 Nakhara local :8480-40-40 120-75-100 75-25-50

+ + + + Radish Amaranthus 6228.00 758.00

Chetki long :60 NA :0 120-75-100 75-25-50

Rice Tomato Cowpea 4232 12421 3510 222571 20.3ARISE-6444:118 BT-10 :98 Utkala Manika :89 120-60-60 120-75-100 25-50-50


Local :30 NA :0 120-75-100 25-50-50





Rice Broccoli Pumpkin 3098 3907 6604 215676 15.4Hiranmayee:128 NA :112 NA :72 80-40-40 120-60-60 65-30-75


Chetki long :60 NA :0 120-60-60 65-30-75

Rice Broccoli Cowpea 3977 4773 3618 231062 18.7ARISE-6444:118 NA :112 Utkala Manika :89 120-60-60 120-60-60 25-50-50


Local :30 NA :0 120-60-60 25-50-50

Rice Knol Khol Cowpea 3419 6027 3762 144180 17.1Hiranmayee:128 Samrat :101 Utkala Manika :89 80-40-40 80-40-40 25-50-50

+ + + + Spinach Amaranthus 788 879

NA :30 NA :0 80-40-40 25-50-50

SE± 10701 1.9

CD at 5% 22483 4.1

MARUTERU (ANDHRA PRADESH)

Rice Maize(Cob) — 6100 6048 — 98859 28666MTU-1075 :150 DHM-117 :93 90-60-60 120-50-60

Rice Sorghum — 6281 4220 — 148642 36.5MTU-1075 :150 Local :117 90-60-60 120-40-40

Rice Soyabean — 6172 927 — 106770 25.4MTU-1075 :150 JS-335 :89 90-60-60 50-50-40

Rice Black gram — 5991 967 — 122188 24.1MTU-1075 :150 PU-31 :90 90-60-60 20-50-40

Rice Maize(Cob) — 5592 5511 — 90533 26.3MTU-1075 :150 DHM-117 :93 90-60-60 120-60-50

Rice Sorghum — 5954 932 — 94266 23.9MTU-1075 :150 Local :117 90-60-60 120-40-40

Rice Soyabean — 5773 981 — 102760 24.2MTU-1075 :150 JS-335 :89 90-60-60 50-50-40





Rice Black gram — 6100 968 — 123669 24.5MTU-1075 :150 PU-31 :90 90-60-60 20-50-40

Rice Rice — 5991 1425 — 99745 25.6MTU-1075 :150 MTU-1010 :117 90-60-60 180-90-60

SE± 22074 5.1

CD at 5% 46798 10.7

NAVSARI (GUJARAT)

Rice Chick Pea Fallow 2640 460 - 49797 10.7Jaya :98 GG-2 :90 100-30-0 20-40-0

Rice Sorghum Sorghum 2309 1783 1829 85963 20.5Gurjari :92 G-40 :130 G-40 :95 100-30-0 80-40-0 80-40-0

Rice Maize Sweet corn Green gram 2800 3200 794 127952 17.3Gurjari :92 Madhur :80 Meghna-2 :75 100-30-0 120-40-0 20-40-0

+ + Green gram 308

Meghna-2 :0 120-40-0

Rice Febugreek Leaves Cluster bean 2926 6035 6287 175105 15.3Gurjari :92 Guj-1 :45 Pusa Bahar :115 100-30-0 40-40-0 25-40-0

Rice Castor Castor 2652 2183 - 81417 18.7Gurjari :92 GCH-7 :150 continue100-30-0 120-30-0

Rice Brinjal Brinjal 2629 9775 - 154380 12.5Gurjari :92 Suranjana :160 continue100-30-0 100-50-50

+ + Radish 6287

Jaipur long :58 100-50-50

Rice Sunhemp Fodder Groundnut 3052 - 1297 92947 17.9Jaya :98 Local :50 GG-2 :115 100-30-0 20-40-0 25-50-0

Rice Cabbage Green gram 2869 14975 1017 179463 17.4Jaya :98 Golden Acre :72 Meghna-2 :75 100-30-0 220-110-220 20-40-0

Rice Maize Sweet corn Groundnut 2937 6310 1086 163092 24209Jaya :98 Madhur :80 GG-2 :115 100-30-0 120-40-0 25-50-0





Rice Lucerne Lucerne seed 3063 33550 210 163200 16.1Jaya :98 Anand-2:100 null:80 100-30-0 20-40-0 0-0-0

SE± 4239 0.65

CD at 5% 8907 1.4

KARAMANA (KERALA)

Rice Rice Fallow 1804 2314 - 55403 14.2Aiswaria :120 Aiswaria :120 90-45-45 90-45-45

Rice Rice Amaranthus 6517 4540 8850 244306 42.6Aiswaria :120 Aiswaria :120 Arun :60 90-45-45 90-45-45 100-50-50

Rice Rice Amaranthus 3466 2849 4500 133540 24.1Aiswaria :120 Aiswaria :120 Arun :60 90-45-45 90-45-45 10-50-50

Rice Rice Cucumber 7371 5341 11713 289894 45.5Aiswaria :120 Aiswaria :120 Vellayani culture :85 90-45-45 90-45-45 70-25-25

Rice Rice Cucumber 3846 3086 4838 142357 24.6Aiswaria :0 Aiswaria :120 Vellayani culture :85 90-45-45 90-45-45 70-25-25

Rice Rice Cowpea fodder 5769 4273 19166 183949 37.8Aiswaria :120 Aiswaria :120 KBC-2:55 90-45-45 90-45-45 40-30-30

Rice Rice Cowpea fodder 3371 2849 18564 131003 24.5Aiswaria :120 Aiswaria :120 KBC-2:55 90-45-45 90-45-45 50-30-40

SE± 30191 3.8

CD at 5% 65786 8.4

THANJAVOUR (TAMILNAIDU)

Rice Rice Brinjal 5516 5772 5969 212417 40.5ADT-43 :110 ADT-49:125 Local :152 150-50-50 150-50-50 100-50-30

Rice Rice Maize 4866 5634 5634 222148 56.2ADT-43 :110 ADT-49:125 NK-6240 :105 150-50-50 150-50-50 135-62.5-50

+ + Black gram 165

ADT-5 :62 135-62.5-50

Rice Rice Groundnut 5614 5693 1211 209875 46.7ADT-43 :110 ADT-49:125 VRI-3 :100 150-50-50 150-50-50 17-34-54

+ +





Pigeonpea 216VBN(Rg)-3 :105

17-34-54

Maize Rice Black gram 5418 5733 965 206851 43082NK-6240 :170 ADT-49:125 ADT-5 :72 135-62.5-50 150-50-50 25-50-25+ + + +Black gram Pigeonpea 185 216ADT-5 :70 VBN(Rg)-3 :105 135-62.5-50 25-50-25

Sunflower Rice Green gram 1586 5989 761 182739 33.8Sungold :95 ADT-49:125 KM-2 :95 60-90-60 150-50-50 25-50-25

+ + Pigeonpea 214

VBN(Rg)-3 :105 25-50-25

Black gram Rice Pigeonpea 811 6166 1221 181808 29.1ADT-5 :70 ADT-49:125 VBN(Rg)-3 :105 25-50-25 150-50-50 25-50-25+ +Pigeonpea 266VBN(Rg)-3 :105 25-50-25

Green gram Rice Sesamum 817 6225 808 167392 29.6KM-2 :70 ADT-49:125 TMV-4 :91 25-50-25 150-50-50 35-23-23+ +Pigeonpea 244.33VBN(Rg)-3 :105 25-50-25

Pigeonpea Rice Onion 1125 6186 3113 161150 26.7VBN(Rg)-3 :105 ADT-49:125 Local :90 25-50-25 150-50-50 60-60-30

Green Manure Rice Sunflower 8470 6619 1714 174048 34.8Local :45 ADT-49:125 Sungold :92 0-0-0 150-50-50 60-90-60

SE± 10918 2.1

CD at 5% 23147 4.2

KARJAT (MAHARASHTRA)

Rice Groundnut — 5833 2467 — 177138 34.1Palghar-1 :107 SB-XI :109 100-50-50 25-50-0

Rice Mustard — 5902 953 — 108467 25.6Palghar-1 :107 Varuna :87 100-50-50 90-50-0





Rice Sunflower — 5595 1002 — 112355 25.6Palghar-1 :107 NA :104 100-50-50 60-30-30

Rice Brinjal — 5565 28805 — 367227 26.2Palghar-1 :107 NA :138 100-50-50 150-50-50

Rice Cabbage — 5595 14825 — 169396 23.4Palghar-1 :107 G-1 :84 100-50-50 120-60-60

Rice Maize fodder — 5178 62409 — 147659 27.9Palghar-1 :107 African Tall :75 100-50-50 120-50-50

Rice Cowpea — 6309 867 — 94409 22.3Palghar-1 :107 Konkan Bhushan :73 100-50-50 25-50-0

Rice Dolichos bean — 5992 6336 — 201297 23.8Palghar-1 :107 KonkanBhushan :99 100-50-50 90-60-30

Rice Ladys finger — 5674 5586 — 140287 21.5Palghar-1 :107 Hybrid :81 100-50-50 100-50-50

Rice Green chillies — 5277 4771 — 161878 19644Palghar-1 :107 Sita :117 100-50-50 150-50-50

Rice Rice — 5258 4566 — 132137 33992Palghar-1 :107 JRH-5 :93 100-50-50 120-50-50

SE± 2798 0.57

CD at 5% 5837 1.2

system was better which gave highest energyproduction of 28.9 K*106/ha/year followed by pearlmillet+greengram-wheat+mustard-fallow(28.2K*106/ha/year)cropping system.

S.K. Nagar: Out of eight cropping systemsevaluated, the cropping system involving greengram-cauliflower–fennel recorded the highestgross returns of Rs.2, 62,455/ha/year followed byBt-cotton-green gram–castor (Rs 1, 94,336/ha/year). In terms of energy production, Bt-cotton-green gram–castor sequence was better withhighest energy production of 22.1 K*106/ha/year.

Siruguppa: Ten cropping systems were evaluatedat Siruguppa. Among those, rice-fallow-fallow wasidentified to be the most profitable with grossreturns of Rs. 1,14,711/ha/year, Energy productionwas also recorded highest (29.5 K*106/ha/year) inthe same cropping sequence.

Semi-Arid Ecosystem

Bichpuri: Ten cropping systems were evaluatedat Bichpuricentre, out of which pearlmillet-potato-clusterbean recorded the highest gross return ofRs. 2,16,992/ha/year closely followed by daincha-potato-Ladys finger(Rs 2,09,528/ha/year). The



highest energy value of 88.2K*106/ha/year wasalso recorded under sorghum (fodder)-oat(fodder)-cowpea (fodder) cropping system followedby pearlmillet-potato-clusterbean.

Junagarh: Among ten cropping systems evaluatedat Junagarh, groundnut-wheat system found to bethe best with gross return of Rs. 3,15,326/ha/yearas well as energy output (50.7 K*106/ha/year)followed by groundnut-onion-sorghum (F).

Durgapura: Among nine cropping systemsevaluated pearlmillet-garlic cropping systemrecorded the highest gross return of Rs. 1, 28,953/ha/year followed by pearlmillet-wheat croppingsystem(Rs. 59,604/ha/year. The highest energyvalue of Rs. 15.3 K 106/ha/Year was also recordedfrom pearlmillet-wheat system.

Rajendranagar: Out of eight cropping systemsevaluated at Rajendranagar, maize-groundnutcropping system recorded the highest gross returnof Rs. 1,06,053/ha/year closely followed bysoybean-maize (Rs.1,01,520/ha/year). As regardthe energy production, maize-castor was found tobe the best (23.7 K 106/ha/year).

Rudrur: Among ten cropping systems evaluatedat Rudrur, rice-rice cropping system was foundbetter in terms of gross return (Rs. 1,58,575/ha/year) and energy production of 40.8 K*106/ha/year)closely followed by rice-sunflower in terms of grossreturns (Rs.1,53,382/ha/year) and energyproduction (32.8 K*106/ha/year).

Indore: Out of nine cropping systems evaluatedat Rahuri (Indore), soybean+amaranthus-wheat+cauliflower-cowpea+maize (cob) recordedthe highest gross return of Rs. 1,93,581/ha/yearclosely followed by soybean+maize-chickpea+wheat-green gram (Rs. 1,47,677/ha/year). However in terms of energy productionsoybean+maize-chickpea+wheat-green gram andsoybean+maize-wheat+french bean-green gramproved better and produced 33.0K*106 and 30.7K*106 energy/ha/year, respectively.

Parbhani: Among eight cropping systemsevaluated maize+soybean+sesbania-wheat+

chickpea-Ladys finger+cow pea found to be thebest both in term of gross return (Rs. 2, 67, 612/ha/year) and energy production (34.1 K*106/ha/year). Maize+soybean-sorghum+chick pea-Ladysfinger found to be the next best in terms of grossreturn (Rs. 1, 97,654/ha/year) and energyproduction (32.9 K*106/ha/year).

Coimbatore: Nine cropping systems wereevaluated at Coimbatore, out of which greenchillies-maize-sunhemp(fodder) recorded highestgross return of Rs. 3,02,131/ha/year followed bysorghum (F)-cotton+onion-lablab (Rs. 2,95,661/ha/year). With regard to energy productioncowpea-maize+cowpea (fodder)-sunflower foundthe best (36.2 K*106/ha/year) closely followed byonion-cotton-maize (34.9 K*106/ha/year) and maize+ cowpea-sunflower-cowpea (34.8K*106/ha/year).

Ludhiana: Among the twelve cropping sequencesevaluated at Ludhiana, maize + turmeric – wheat+ linseed -fallow sequence was identified mostsuitable with highest gross returns of Rs. 5,76,318/ha/year with highest energy production of 91.6K*106/ha/year. Maize + turmeric – barley + linseed- fallow sequence was, however, statisticallyproved at par with respect to both gross return andenergy production.

Kanpur: Out of ten cropping systems, maize-garlic-green gram system recordedhighest grossreturns of Rs.3, 57,852/ha/year followedbymaize+black gram–potato–onion (Rs. 3,09,920/ha/year). However, in terms of energy production,maize+black gram–potato–onion(44.1 K*106/ha/year) system proved better than others.

Kota: Eighth cropping systems were evaluated atKota out of which maize-garlic-fallow recorded thehighest gross return of Rs. 2, 18,159/ha/yearfollowed by Maize-garlic+wheat-fallow(Rs. 2,02,171/ha/year). From energy production point ofview soybean-wheat-fallow (15.7 K*106/ha/ year)followed by maize-mustard-green gram(12.7K*106/ha/ year) cropping systems were foundbetter than others.

Akola: Out of eight cropping systemsevaluated atAkola, groundnut+niger-wheat+carrot-green gram



recorded highest both gross return (Rs. 1,39,399/ha/year) as well as energy value (23.0K106/ha/year) followed by groundnut+niger-greengram+carrot-green gram(Rs. 1,07,291/ha/year).

Sub-Humid Ecosystem

Faizabad: Eight cropping systems were evaluatedat Kumarganj; out of which rice-french bean-Ladysfinger recorded highest gross return of Rs.1,97,861/ha/year followed by rice-potato-greengram( Rs. 1,93,814/ha/year), which also recordedthe highest energy value (39.2 K*106/ha/year).

Pantnagar: Among eight cropping systemsevaluated at pantnagar, maize-pea (veg)-greengram recorded the highest gross return of Rs.3,15,307/ha/year closely followed by rice-pea(veg)-maize (2,86,768/ha/year). However from energyproduction point of view, rice-pea (veg)-maizefound to be the best (56.9K*106/ha/year) closelyfollowed by rice-pea (veg.) +toria-maize+mentha(55.6 K*106/ha/year).

Sabour: Twelve cropping systems were evaluatedat Sabour. Out of those rice-cabbage-Ladys fingerfound the best in terms of gross return (4, 73,522/ha/year) followed by rice-garlic-maize (Rs.3,44,678/ha/year). Whereas with regard energyvalue, rice-maize-sorghum (fodder) proved to bethe best (58.2 K*106/ha/year) closely followed byrice-maize-maize for fodder (54.6K*106/ha/year).

Ranchi: Out of seven cropping systems evaluatedat Ranchi, rice-potato+wheat-green gram foundthe best in terms of both, gross return (Rs.1,65,015/ha/year) and energy production(39.9K*106/ha/year) followed by rice-potato-greengram both in terms of gross returns (Rs. 1,41,287/ha/year) and energy production(33.8K*106/ha/year).

Jabalpur: Out of twelve cropping systemevaluated, rice (basmati)-merigold-sorghum(fodder) recorded the highest gross return of Rs.1, 84,668/ha/year followed by rice-potato-groundnut (Rs. 1, 44,601/ha/year). Regarding energy

production rice-potato-ground nut recorded thehighest calorific value (28.3 K*106/ha/year).

Rewa: Out of ten cropping systems evaluated atRewa, rice-garlic-fallow recorded the highest grossreturn of Rs. 3,26,756/ha/year followed by rice-berseem-berseem seed (Rs. 2,54,465/ha/year).Rice-potato-wheat followed by rice-pea (veg)-wheat recorded the highest respective calorificvalues (36.4 and 32.8 K*106/ha/year).

Powerkheda: Out of ten cropping systemsevaluated at Powerkheda, soybean-potato-Ladysfinger provided the highest gross return of Rs.2,78,749/ha/year followed by soybean-sugarcane(Rs. 2,21,644/ha/year). Whereas,energy production was maximum with soybean-pigeon pea cropping system (51.1K*106/ha/year)followed by soybean-potato-Ladys finger(36.31K*106/ha/year).

Chiplima: Among ten cropping system evaluatedat Chiplima,paddy-tomato+kosala-watermelon+amarantusrecorded the maximum gross return(Rs. 2,34,314/ha/year) followed by rice-tomato+fenugreek-cowpea+amaranthus (Rs. 2,12,418/ha/year).Rice-maize(cob)+coriander-cowpea+amaranthus recorded the highest energy value of70.2 K*106/ha/year.

Kathalgere: Out oftwelve cropping systemevaluated at Kathalgere,rice-tomato found the bestwith gross return of Rs.2, 58,134/ha/year followedby rice-Ladys finger (Rs. 2, 24,532/ha/year). Withregard to energy production rice-rice(41.5 K*106/ha/year) proved better than others.

Raipur: Eight cropping systems were evaluatedat Raipur. Among them rice-wheat+fenugreek-cowpea (F) recorded the highest gross return ofRs. 2, 25,380/ha/year as well as the higest energyvalue (36.4 K*106/ha/year) followed by rice-onion+coriander-cowpea for seed (Rs 2, 14,950/ha/year).

Varanasi: Out of ten cropping systems evaluated,paddy-pea (veg)-Ladys finger was found best interms of gross return(Rs2, 15,797/ha/year)



followed by paddy-rape seed-Ladys finger(Rs2,005,745/ha/year). Paddy-maize (cob) +Pea(veg)-cow pea (F) recorded the highest energyvalue of 33.3 K*106/ha/year.

Humid Ecosystem

R.S.Pura: Out of ten cropping systems evaluatedrice-spinach-Ladys finger recorded the highestgross return of Rs. 3, 09,993/ha/year closelyfollowed by rice-broccoli-green gram (Rs. 3,05,677/ha/year).From energy view point, rice-potato-maize(Cob) recorded the highest calories of 85.8K*106/ha/year followed by rice-potato-onion (35.1K*106/ha/year).

Jorhat: Eight cropping system were evaluated atJorhat. Out of those, rice-cabbage-green gramrecorded the highest gross return of Rs. 1, 27,041/ha/year followed by rice-green chillies-black gram(Rs. 87,140/ha/year). Rice-fallow rice, howeverrecorded the highest energy value 21.2K*106/ha/year.

Kalyani: Out of ten cropping systems evaluatedat Kalyani, elephant foot yam-dolichos bean-ginger+ turmeric recorded the highest gross returnof Rs. 6,05,276/ha/year followed by amaranthus-brinjal+cluster bean-bitter gourd (Rs 2,09,011/ha/year). Highest energy value (43.9 K*106/ha/year)was recorded from elephant foot yam-dolichosbean-ginger+ turmeric followed by rice-potato-jute(35.3 K*106/ha/year) cropping system.

Palampur: Among eight cropping systemsevaluated at Palampur, maize(cob)+asparagusbeans-radish-onion recorded the highest grossreturn of Rs. 2, 81,795/ha/year followed by maize(cob)+green gram-cauliflower- buck wheat (Rs.2,17,259/ha/year) with highest energy productionof 27.2 K*106/ha/year.

Coastal Ecosystem

Bhubaneshwar: Ten cropping system wereevaluated at Bhubaneshwar. Out of those rice-broccoli+kosala-cowpea+amaranthus recorded

the highest gross return of Rs. 2, 31,062/ha/yearclosely followed by rice-tomato+kosala-cowpea+amaranthus (Rs.2, 22,571/ha/year). Withregard to energy production, rice-maize(cob)+kosala-cowpea+amaranthus found the bestwith calorific value of 67.7 K*106/ha/year.

Maruteru: Out of nine cropping system evaluated,rice-sorghum recorded the highest gross returnof Rs. 1, 48,642/ha/year followed by rice- blackgram (Rs 1, 23,669/ha/year). Rice-sorghumfollowed by rice-maize produced maximum energyvalues of 36.5 and 28.7K*106/ha/year, respectively.

Navsari: Ten cropping systems were evaluatedat Navsari. Rice-cabbage-green gram provided themaximum gross returns of Rs. 1, 79,463/ha/yearclosely followed by rice-fenugreek-clusterbean(Rs. 1, 75,105/ha/year). Rice-maize (sweet corn)-groundnut recorded the highest calorific value of24.2 K*106/ha/year.

Karamana: Among seven cropping systemsevaluated, rice-rice-cucumber recorded themaximum gross returns (Rs 2, 89,894/ha/year) aswell as calorific value (45.5 K*106/ha/year) closelyfollowed by rice-rice-amaranthus in terms of grossreturn (Rs 2, 44,306/ha/year) and energy (42.6K*106/ha/year).

Thanjavur: Out of nine cropping systemevaluated, rice-rice-maize+black gram recordedthe highest gross return (Rs. 2, 22,148/ha/year)as well as energy production (56.2 K*106/ha/year).Rice-rice-brinjal and rice-rice-groundnut+Pigeonpearecorded the second best croppingsystem from gross return (Rs 2, 12,417/ha/year)and energy production (46.7 K*106/ha/year) pointof view.

Karjat: Among the eleven cropping systemsevaluated at Karjat, rice-brinjalrecorded the highestgross return of Rs. 3, 67,228/ha/year followed byRice-dolichos bean (Rs.2,01,298/ha/year). Withregard to energy production rice-groundnut (34.2K*106/ha/year)followed by rice-rice (34.0 K*106/ha/year)proved better than other cropping systems.



7.2.2 CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Title of the experiment : Development ofinnovative farming practices to mitigate the effectsof climate change

Objective:

1. To design and identify economically viable andefficient farming practices for resourceconservation and counteracting adverse effectsof climate change.

2. To study the effects of resource conservationtechnologies on photosynthetic efficiency,biomass production, economic yield, soilthermal regimes and soil health.

Year of start : 2011-12

Treatments

A. Main plots (Crop establishment methods xCropping Systems) - 8

I. Crop establishment method - 2

T1 = No tillage/minimum tillage/bed planting/andother suitable seed drill/planter

T2 = Conventional tillage

II. Cropping systems (location specific) - 4

CS1 = Predominant cropping system of the region

CS2 = Best identified cropping system from expt.1(a)

CS3 and CS4 = New cropping systems designedby involving C4 plants (as they are known toperform better under enhanced CO2 and higherambient temperatures), low water requiring andphysiologically more efficient crops.

B. Sub-Plots (Mulch x Fertilizer) - 4

I. Mulch - 2

M1 = No mulch

M2 = Crop residue mulch (crop residue - straw orstover - to be recycled in situ, especially in rabiseason crops, and to be applied uniformly on inter- row space after crop seeding establishment

II. Fertilizer rates - 2

F1 = Recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)

F2 = 75% RDF + 25 % N through organic manure

Experimental Design : Split Plot with threereplications

Results: Centre-wise results are given in tables7.2/2 (a-g) and discussed below:

Jabalpur

An experiment has been initiated on climatechange through tillage, cropping systems, mulchesand fertility levels. There were 2 tillage levels(minimum, conventional), 4 cropping systems(rice-wheat, rice-berseem, maize-wheat andsorghum-wheat) were kept in main-plot and twomulches (without mulch and with mulch) and twofertility levels (recommended dose of fertilizer and25% higher to RDF) in sub-plot. The experimentwas laid out in split plot design with threereplications. Treatments comprises of 32combinations which include rice cvkranti, maizecv JM-12 and sorghum cv. JJ-2020 in kharif andwheat cv GW-273 and berseem cv JB-5 in rabi.Recommended dose of fertilizers for rice, wheat,maize and sorghum was 120:60:40 and berseem20:60:20 kg N, P2O5, K2O/ha, respectively.



In kharif season, rice yield varied from 56.92to 60.56 q/ha. The maximum yield of rice (60.56 q/ha) was recorded under conventional tillage, rice-berseem cropping system without mulch and 25%higher RDF. The maximum yield of maize (29.42q/ha) and sorghum (29.89q/ha) was recordedunder conventional tillage with mulch and 125% ofrecommended dose of fertilizer. The minimum yieldof maize and sorghum was recorded underminimum tillage, maize – wheat cropping system+ without mulching + recommended dose offertilizers and minimum tillage, sorghum – wheat,cropping system without mulch and recommendeddose of fertilizer 26.89 and 24.08 q/ha respectively.During rabi, the wheat yield varies from 23.33 to35.56 q/ha under all the cropping systems. Themaximum yield was recorded 30.00 q/ha in rice-wheat, 34.08 q/ha in maize-wheat and 35.56 q/hain sorghum-wheat under conventional tillage withmulch and 125% recommended dose of fertilizer.The maximum berseem fodder (3 53.42q/ha) andseed yield (2.36 q/ha) was recorded underconventional tillage with mulch and 125%recommended dose of fertilizer. The minimum yieldof wheat under rice-wheat, maize-wheat andsorghum-wheat systems was obtained fromminimum tillage without mulch with recommendeddose of fertilizer and similar trend of minimum yieldwas observed in rice-berseem cropping systemalso.

Under different tillage practices, conventionaltillage recorded maximum REY, NMR and B: Cratio of 95.35 q/ha/year, 65744 Rs/ha/year and2.66followed by minimum tillage. Under differentcropping system rice-berseem (F+S) croppingsystem gave the maximum REY, NMR and B:Cratio of 124.96 q/ha/yr, 91890 Rs/ha/yr and 3.02followed by rice-wheat and sorghum-wheatcropping system. The minimum REY, NMR andB: C ratio obtained from the maize-wheat croppingsystem. As regard the mulches, maximum REY,

NMR and B:C ratio was recorded with mulch ascompare to without mulch whereas under fertilitylevels 125% RDF gave maximum REY, NMR andB:C ratio followed by 100% RDF.

Navsari

An experiment on Management of croppingsystems for Resource Conservation and ClimateChange to design agronomical efficient andeconomically viable new cropping systems forresource conservation and counteracting adverseeffects of climate change and to study the effectof resource conservation technologies, such aszero tillage, bed planting, crop residue mulcheson photosynthetic efficiency, biomass production,economics yield, soil thermal regimes and soilhealth was conducted in 2013-14 keeping thetillage and cropping systems in main plots andfertility level as well as mulch load in sub plot with3 replications. Three cropping systems viz., Rice–Green manuring -Summer Groundnut, Rice –Rabi Castor – Green manuring and Rice - Sorghum– Summer Green gram were taken.

Results indicated that the conventional tillagerecorded significantly the highest rice equivalentyield (64.46 q/ha) along with gross return of Rs. 1,95,816/ ha and net return of Rs. 1, 03,532/ ha overminimum tillage treatment. Significantly the highestrice equivalent yield was recorded from Rice -Sorghum – Summer Green gram croppingsystem(72.00 q/ha) over others. The highest gross returnof Rs. 2, 18,735/ha were also observedin the samecropping system with net return of Rs. 1, 27,221/ha. Significantly the highest rice equivalent yield(64.56 q/ha), grass return (Rs. 1, 96,141/ha) andnet return (Rs. 1, 07,487/ha) were recorded undertreatment M

2 (mulch incorporation). 25% higher

dose of recommended fertil izer recordedsignificantly the highest rice equivalent yield (64.02q/ha) and gross return (Rs. 1, 94,488/ha) amongdifferent fertilizer treatments. The same trend was



observed in net return (Rs. 1, 06,267/ha). Nitrogen,phosphorus and potash uptake were higher inconventional tillage (153.85 kg ha-1, 22.17 kgha-1 and 112.80 kg ha-1, respectively) as comparedto conventional tillage. Among the croppingsystems nitrogen uptake was higher in Rice –Green manuring -Summer Groundnut (175.38 kgha-1), while phosphorus and potash were higher inthe cropping system Rice - Sorghum – SummerGreen gram(26.03 kg ha-1 and130.68 kg ha-1,respectively). N, P and K uptake were higher inthe treatment of M

2 (158.76kg ha-1, 21.67 kg ha-1

and 112.62 kg ha-1), respectively than no mulch.N, P and K uptake were higher in the treatment of25% higher of RDF (157.21 kg ha-1, 21.78 kg ha-

1and 112.41kg ha-1), respectively as compared toRDF. Available nitrogen and potash status werehigher in the treatment having mulch(271.92 kg ha-

1and 229.00 kg ha-1, respectively), whereasavailable phosphorus was higher in the treatmenthaving no mulch(34.32 kg ha-1) as compared toconventional tillage. Available nitrogen andPhosphorus status were higher in the treatmentRice –green manuring -summer groundnut(273.75, 34.02 kg ha-1), while available potash washigher under treatment Rice - Sorghum – SummerGreen gram(218.88 kg ha-1). N and K status werehigher in the treatment having mulch load(271.08kg ha-1 and 218.08 kg ha-1, respectively) ascompared to no mulch, whereas availablephosphorus was higher under without mulch

(32.36

kg ha-1). N, P and K status were higher in thetreatment of 25% higher RDF(271.50 kg ha-1, 33.90kg ha-1and 218.67 kg ha-1, respectively) ascompared to RDF. Organic carbon content washigher in the treatment of conventional method(0.70%), Rice – Rabi Castor – Green manuring (0.73%), with mulch load(0.71 %) and25% higherRDF(0.70 %) as compared to others. Slightdecrease in pH was recorded due to conventionaltillage, under Rice – Rabi Castor – Green manuring

cropping system, no mulch and fewer than 100per cent RDF over no tillage, Rice - Sorghum –Summer Green gram and Rice –Green manuring-Summer Groundnut cropping system with mulchand 25 per cent higher dose of RDF, respectively.

Bhubaneswar and Chiplima

An experiment was initiated on climate changethrough tillage, cropping systems, mulches andfertility levels at two locations viz.,, Bhubaneswar[East Coast Plains] and Chiplima [Eastern Plateauand Hills] (Odisha) having different set of soil andclimate. There were 2 tillage levels (minimum andconventional) and 4 rice based cropping systemswere kept in main-plot with two mulches (zeromulch and with mulch) and two fertility levels(recommended dose of fertilizer and 25% higherto RDF) in sub-plot. The experiment was laid outin split plot design with three replications.

Higher net return of Rs 82180/ha and B: C ratiowas recorded under minimum tillage atBhubaneswar. At Chiplima, higher net return andhigher BC ratio was recorded from conventionalmethod of crop establishment (table 1).

At Bhubaneswar, among the croppingsystems, higher net return of Rs 63983/ha/ yearwas recorded from Rice-maize-okra with 0.52 BCratio. At Chiplima, maximum net return of Rs.98555/ha/year was also recorded from the similarcropping system i.e. Rice-maize-okra. Higher BCratio (1.04) was recorded from the same croppingsystem and lowest BC ratio (065) was recordedfrom Rice-toria-greengram (table 2). Organiccarbon and available nitrogen status of soil wereimproved due to cropping systems involving alegume component with mulching and INMpractices as compared to other systems with nomulching and RDF practices at both the centers.



Table: 7.2/2(a). Effect of crop establishment methods on net return (Rs/ha/year) and BC ratio at differentlocation

Locations Tillage

Minimum tillage Conventional tillage

Net Return BC Ratio Net Return BC Ratio

Bhubaneswar 82180 0.52 59182 0.52

Chiplima 60654 0.71 70277 0.77

Table: 7.2./2(b). Net return (Rs/ha/year) and BC ratio from various cropping systems at two different locations

Locations CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4

Net BC Net BC Net BC Net BCReturn Ratio Return Ratio Return Ratio Return Ratio

Bhubhneswar 61817 0.52 46921 0.52 63983 0.52 59182 0.52

Chiplima 56239 0.71 74880 0.67 98555 1.04 51432 0.65

Bhubaneswar: CS1: Rice-groundnut-fallow; CS2: Rice-tomato-cowpea; CS3: Rice-maize-okra, CS4: Rice-toria-greengramChiplima: CS1: Rice-groundnut-fallow; CS2: Rice-groundnut-cowpea; CS3: Rice-maize-okra, CS4: Rice-toria-greengram

Pantnagar

An experiment on management of croppingsystems for resource conservation and climatechange with twin objective to design agronomicallyefficient and economically viable new croppingsystems for resource conservation andcounteracting adverse effect of climate change andto study the effect of conservation tillage such aszero tillage, reduced tillage and direct seeding andcrop residue mulches on biomass production,economic yield, soil thermal regimes and its healthwas conducted during 2013-14. To achieve theobjective total 24 treatments with two tillagepractices (RCT and conventional) with threecropping systems i.e. Rice-wheat, Rice-vegetablepea-maize and Rice- potato-moon and two mulchload and fertility level were laid out in 3 replication.

Average grain/tuber/seed/pod yield of cropswas found maximum in reduced tillage ascompared to conventional tillage during kharif, rabiand summer season except potato tuber yield.

Among the mulching treatments, significantlyhigher yields were obtained in paddy strawmulched plot than without mulch plots. Betweenfertility levels, application of 75% RDF throughinorganic and 25% through organic sourcerecorded higher yield of crops over 100% throughinorganic sources.

System yield (REY) was found significantlyhigher in in reduced tillage over conventional tillagemethods. Similarly higher REY was recorded withmulching over the without mulch. Among croppingsystems, rice-potato-moong gave the highest yieldover other cropping systems. Effect of fertilizerdose over system productivity was found higher inINM provided 75% RDF through inorganic and 25%through organic source. Net return per year wasalso recorded higher with the same treatment.

Soils of plots under reduced tillage showedhigher organic carbon over plots underconventional tillage. Higher organic carbon wasalso associated with the treatments having rice-



potato-moong grown under reduced tillage withmulch and INM (75% RDF and 25% throughorganic).

Parbhani

An experiment on “Development of InnovativeFarming Practices to Mitigate the Effects ofClimate change” with two objective to design andidentify economically viable farming practices forresource conservation and counteracting adverseeffects of climate change and to study the effectof resource conservation technologies onphotosynthetic efficiency, biomass production,economic yield, soil hydro-thermal regimes andsoil health with 4 cropping systems (Soybean-rabi

sorghum, soybean-wheat, maize-gram and maize-wheat) and two tillage practices with two mulchload and fertility level was laid out in split plot design.The conventional tillage recorded significantlyhigherSoybean equivalent yield (39.30 q/ha) withnet return of Rs.110560/ha year than the minimumtillage(35.04 q/ha SEY and net return of Rs.88713/ha/year). Among the cropping systems, Soybeanequivalent yield (39.96 q/ha) and higher net returnof Rs.115322.8/ha/year over all other croppingsystem.Significantly higher net return ofRs.107913.7/ha/year was recorded in 100 % RDFtreatment than 75 % RDF .The treatment of mulchwith 5 t/ha recorded significantly higher net returnof Rs.97472.6/ha/year over no mulch treatment.

Lay out of climate change experiment at Bhubaneswar(Odisha)

Monitoring and discussion with scientists on climatechange experiment at Bhubneswar (Odisha)



7.3 SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

7.3.1. INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (INM)

Title of the Experiment: permanent plotexperiment on integrated nutrient management incereal based cropping systems (Expt. No.2a).

Objectives: 1. To develop suitable integratednutrient supply and management system.

2. To study the long –term effect of conjunctiveuse of fertilizers and organic manures on theproductivity of cereal based crop sequences andon soil health.

Treatments:

Results:

Rice-Rice Cropping System

At Rajendranagar, the highest yield of rice wasrecorded under T5(4324 kg/ha) during kharif, andin rabi(4531kg/ha) respectvely. It was statisticallyat par with T11and T10. Whereas, during rabi T5it was at par with T10 and T16.

At Chiplima, the highest grain yield of rice wasachieved underT10 during kharif (4437 kg/ha) and

Kharif Rabi

T1

No fertilizer, no organic manure( control ) No, fertilizer, no organic manure(control)T

250% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers 50% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers

T3

50% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers 100% rec. NPK dose through fertilizersT

475% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers 75% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers

T5 100% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers 100% rec. NPK dose through fertilizersT

650% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers+ 50% N through FYM 100% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers

T7

75% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers+ 25% N through FYM 75% rec. NPK dose through fertilizersT8 50% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers+ 50% N through straw 100% rec. NPK dose through fertilizersT

975% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers+ 25% N through straw 75% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers

T10

50% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers+ 50 N through GM 100% rec. NPK dose through fertilizesT11 75% rec. NPK dose through fertilizers+ 25% N through GM 75% rec. NPK dose through fertilizersT

12Farmer’s conservational practice Farmer’s conservational practice

(FYM=Farm Yard Manure and GM=Green manure)

Locations:

Cropping System Ecosystem/ Centre (State)

Rice-Rice Semi-arid: Rajendranagar (A.P.);Sub-humid: Chiplima(Odisha); Humid: Jorhat(Assam); Coastal: Maruteru (A.P.), Bhubaneswar( Odisha), Karjat(Maharashtra), Karamana(Kerala)

Rice-Wheat Semi-arid:Ludhiana (Punjab), Kanpur(U.P.);Sub-humid:Jabalpur (M.P.), R.S.Pura (J&K), Varanasi(U.P.) , Pantnagar(Uttarakhand), Faizabad(U.P.), Sabour (Bihar), Raipur(Chhattisgarh) ,Humid:Kalyani (W.B.), Coastal:Navsari( Gujarat)

Rice- Maize Semi-arid:Kathalgere (Karnataka )

Rice-Mustard Semi-arid:Rudrur (A.P.)

Maize- wheat Sub-humid:Ranchi (Jharkhand)

Pearl millet-wheat Arid: S.K.Nagar (Gujarat), Hisar( Haryana), Junagadh (Gujarat)

Sorghum - wheat Semi-arid: Akola (Maharashtra), Parbhani (Maharahstra), Rahuri (Maharashtra)

Year of start, crop varieties and fertilizers doses



The centre-wise details in respect of year of start, crop varieties and fertilizer doses are given hereunder

Crop variety Recommended fertilizer Farmers’ practicedose (N:P2O5:K2O, kg/ha) (N:P2O5:K2O, kg/ha) +

Centre Year FYM, t/ha

of start Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi

Rice-Rice Cropping System

Rajendranagar 1988 MTU-1010 MTU-1010 120:60:60 120:60:60 80:50:20 120:60:40Chiplima 1983 Swarna Khandagiri 80:40:40 100:50:50 40:20:20+4.5 50:25:25Jorhat 1987 Ranjit Disang 46:16:60 46:16:60 NR NRMaruteru 1989 MTU-1075 MTU-1010 60:40:40 120:60:40 90:60:0 180:90:0Bhubneswar 1983 Pratiksha Naveen 80:40:40 100:50:50 20:0:0+2.0 20:0:0+2.0Karjat 2007 Palghar Karjat-3 100:50:50 120:50:50 45:45:45 90:45:45Karamana 1985

Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Ludhiana 1983 PR-116 PBW-343 NR 120:60:30 NR NRKanpur 1983 Pant-12 PBW-343 120:60:60 120:60:60 80:30:0 80:30:0Jabalpur 1985 MR-219 GW-273 120:60:40 120:60:40 40:20:0 40:20:0R.S.Pura 1985 Jaya DBW-17 100:60:30 100:50:25 34:25:22 56:25:0Palampur 1985 Arize-6129 HPW-155 90:40:40 120:60:30 36:16:16+ 48:36:12+

5.0 5.0Varansi 1985 HUR-105 HUW-2387 120:60:60 120:60:60 50:0:0 60:0:0Pantnagar 1983Faizabad 1984 Sarju-52 PBW-343 120:60:60 120:60:60 90:40:0 90:40:0Sabour 1984 Sita PBW-343 80:40:20 80:40:20 60:30:15 68:33:0Raipur 1988 Mahamaya GW-273 80:60:40 100:50:30 60:40:20 90:40:20Kalyani 1986 IET-4094 UP-262 80:40:40 100:60:40 50:30:20 60:20:20Navsari 1987 Jaya GW-496 100:50:0 120:60:0 50:25:0+2.5 60:30:0

Rice-Maize Cropping System

Kathalegere 1988 JGL—1798 Kaveri 46:16:60 46:16:60 NR NR

Rice-Mustard Cropping System

Rudrur 1984 MTU-1010 GM-1 120:60:40 80:40:30 150:40:0 60:0:0

Maize-wheat Cropping System

Ranchi Suwan K-9107 100:50:25 100:50:25 23:0:0 23:0:0

Pearl millet-Wheat Cropping System

S.K.Nagar 1986 GHB-558 GW-496 80:40:0 120:60:0 40:0:0 80:0:0Hisar 1985 HHB-223 WH-711 125:62.5:0 150:60:0 NR NRJunangarh 1987 GHB-538 GW-366 0:0:25 0:0:25 40:0:0 80:0:0Bichpuri 1990 Bioseed-8510 UP-2338 80:40:40 120:60:40 40:0:0 40:0:0

Sorghum-Wheat Cropping System

Akola 1984 CSH-14 AKW3722 120:60:60 120:60:60 50:25:0 40:25:12.5Rahuri 1984 CSH-9 HD-2189 120:60:60 120:60:60 40:20:20 60:40:30Parbhani 1983 CSH-9 Lok-1 80:40:40 120:60:60 40:20:20 60:40:30



Tab

le7.

3.1(

a):

Gra

in y

ield

(kg

/ha)

of

rice

–ric

e cr

op

seq

uen

ce u

nd

er d

iffe

ren

t in

teg

rate

d n

utr

ien

t m

anag

emen

t tr

eatm

ents

Trea

tmen

tR

ajen

dra

nag

arC

hip

lima

Jorh

atM

aru

teru

Bh

ub

nes

war

Kar

jat

Kar

aman

a

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

i

T 119

4617

3022

6723

1525

0010

0037

8426

1321

0521

4835

7336

5727

1222

16

T 237

1234

9733

9542

0431

0012

5040

8245

3026

0528

5551

0451

6536

2134

43

T 336

2133

4332

9642

9032

0014

5045

3551

1026

6537

1052

0557

5538

3736

52

T 438

5642

0034

2645

4034

0018

5047

6255

4629

1535

0052

6252

5539

8137

77

T 543

2445

3139

0743

2139

0024

3852

4464

1734

3039

1364

6764

7042

7042

65

T 637

0243

0741

6744

0733

0020

0046

7765

0436

7039

6064

5466

0647

0344

88

T 738

0240

7740

9042

9936

0021

7550

4562

4335

2037

4356

8656

3147

6050

46

T 833

4442

3739

4444

0737

0020

1347

6262

7234

5039

1553

4064

9847

0345

30

T 935

8340

7342

2247

5045

7526

3849

6062

2433

3538

3354

8253

4747

4642

93

T 1040

7443

4344

3746

6034

0019

5043

3759

5236

6040

4363

2665

7444

2847

53

T 1142

5540

8743

4041

1330

0017

8847

3454

5933

8539

6554

8754

5346

1646

97

T 1238

0239

3736

1937

4429

0011

7547

2055

7526

4027

0850

4854

1240

3940

14

SE

m±

407

225

291

134

330

188

235

249

148

144

272

617

CD

at 5

%84

446

646

551

959

127

468

439

047

850

6

302

294

553

1256



during rabi T 10 (4750kg/ha). The increase in cropyield under highest yielding treatment over 100%RDF was 13.56 and 9.92 percent during kharifand rabi, respectively. It was statistically at par withT9 and , T11in kharif season and during rabi itwas statistically at par with T10, and T8.

At Jorhat, the highest yield of rice was recordedunder T9 (4575kg/ha) during kharif, and during rabi(2638 kg/ha). The increase in crop yield underhighest yielding treatment over 100% RDF was17.20 and 8.20 percent, during kharif and summer,respectively. During kharif T9 statistically at par withT8 and during rabi The highest yielding treatmentT5 was not found at par with all other treatments.

At Muruteru, the highest yield of rice wasrecorded under T5 (5244kg/ha) during kharif. Thehighest yielding treatment (i.e.T5) was at par withT12, T11, T10 and T9. During rabi T6 treatmentgave the maximum yield (6504kg/ha).The increasein crop yield under highest yielding treatment over100% RDF was 1.33 per cent. The highest yieldingtreatment T6 at par with T9, T10 and T11.

At Bhubaneswar, the highest yield of rice wasrecorded under T6 (3670 kg/ha) during kharif andT10 (4043 kg/ha). The corresponding highest yieldincrease in respective season was 6.99 and 3.32percent higher than 100% RDF. The highestyielding treatment (T6) was being at par was withT7,T8,T9, and T11 during kharif whereas in rabithe highest yielding treatment T10 was at par withT6,T7,T8, and T9, respectively.

At Karjat, the highest yield of rice (6467 kg/ha)was recorded under T5 treatment during kharifwhereas during rabi the highest yield of secondcrop of rice was recorded under T6 (6606 kg/ha).The highest yield treatment T5 was at par withT6and T8 during kharif whereas during rabi thehighest yielding treatment (T6) was at par with T8,and T9.

At Karamana the highest yield of rice wasrecorded under T

7 ( 4760 kg/ha) during kharif and

(5046 kg/ha) during rabi respectively. Thecorresponding highest yield increase in respective

season was 11.47and 18.31 percent higher than100% RDF. The highest yielding treatment (T7) wasbeing at par was with T6,T8,T9,T10, and T11 duringkharif .

Rice-Wheat Cropping System

At Ludhiana**, the highest yield of rice wasrecorded under T

11 (7180 kg/ha) during kharif, and

in wheat during rabi T12

gave the maximum yield(5417 kg/ha) which was 10.87 and 6.38 per centhigher over recommended dose of fertilizers (T

5).

The yield under highest yielding treatment (T11

)during kharif was at par with T

6 T

7 and T

12 T

13 and

T14

whereas during rabi T12

it was at par with T6,

T10

, T13

and T14

.

At Kanpur, the highest yield of rice and wheatwas recorded under T

6 (4546 kg/ha) and (4650

kg/ha) during both the season respectively. Slightlyhigher yield in rice and wheat(7.23 and 1.97percent) was recorded with T

6 treatment as

compared to recommended dose of fertilizer(T

5).The yield under highest yielding treatment

during kharif T6 was at par with T

5, T

7 and T

10

whereas during rabi T6 it was at par with T

5. and

T7.

At Jabalpur, the highest yield of rice wasrecorded under T

10 during both the seasons

(3080kg/ha) (4482 kg/ha).The increase in cropyield under highest yielding treatment (T

10) over

100% RDF during kharif was 7.26. The yield underhighest yielding treatment during kharif T

10 was at

par with T5, T

6, T

7 and T

8 whereas during rabi T

10 it

was at par with T5.

At Jammu, in rice-wheat system, the treatmentT

6 gave the maximum yield of rice (5096 kg/ha)

and wheat (3901kg/ha) which was 9.78 and18.67per cent higher over recommended dose offertilizer (T

5). The yield under highest yielding

treatment (T6) during kharif was at par with T7 but

during rabi various IPNS packages had significanteffect on crop yields.

At Varanasi, in rice –wheat cropping system,the treatment T

6 gave maximum yield of rice (4770



Tab

le7.

3.1(

b):

Gra

in y

ield

(kg

/ha)

of

rice

–wh

eat

cro

p s

equ

ence

un

der

dif

fere

nt

inte

gra

ted

nu

trie

nt

man

agem

ent

trea

tmen

ts

Trea

tmen

tL

ud

hia

na

Kan

pu

rJa

bal

pu

rJa

mm

uV

aran

siF

aiza

bad

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

T 115

6016

9592

560

574

410

5819

2310

8922

6010

8014

4057

4T 2

3393

3885

3188

3335

1644

2408

3741

3066

3760

2540

3344

2044

T 337

5647

9535

2535

1018

4924

1139

0831

9239

6032

5034

7533

80T 4

4529

4258

3413

3300

2334

3296

4152

2859

4120

3050

3756

2860

T 564

7650

9243

2545

6030

5244

4146

4232

8743

9033

9041

1334

31T 6

6685

5375

4638

4650

2764

3991

5096

3901

4770

3710

4859

3951

T 768

2552

2143

2544

1524

4535

3950

2331

4145

3034

5047

0838

10T 8

5635

4665

4113

4290

2672

3779

4168

2844

4070

3350

4117

3718

T 958

2045

7041

5042

1523

6335

0344

4929

4944

0031

8042

7036

51T 10

6985

5188

4425

4490

3080

4482

4157

2910

4490

3490

4753

3890

T 1171

8051

1042

8843

7024

4935

6445

7730

9444

7031

6046

1138

83T 12

7145

5417

2838

2835

1561

2222

3477

2670

3900

2840

3320

2133

T 1369

8553

95T 14

6525

5185

SE

m±

117

124

116

207

180

115

132

9914

417

5C

D a

t 5%

370

487

239

252

237

421

367

234

380

286

293

356

Trea

tmen

tS

abo

ur

Rai

pu

rK

alya

ni

Nav

sari

P

alam

pu

r

Pan

tnag

ar

Kha

rifR

abi

Kha

rifR

abi

Kha

rifR

abi

Kha

rifR

abi

Kha

rifR

abi

Kha

rifR

abi

T 194

223

0213

5453

722

2212

2215

6515

4640

3238

2223

2718

64T 2

2682

2008

4708

1417

3139

2194

2623

2119

4377

3856

2811

2602

T 327

2841

6950

3117

4335

5629

7228

1823

5045

3644

1036

2127

58T 4

3502

3373

5667

1599

3333

2694

2922

2533

4368

4116

3786

2913

T 547

7443

2159

9021

0636

3930

5632

7926

1850

4054

6041

1440

32T 6

5337

4795

5750

2015

3833

3361

3302

2798

5494

5612

3730

4406

T 749

3444

1756

0518

1534

1732

5031

9826

7751

6250

8751

8144

51T 8

5133

4578

5469

1877

3333

3139

3060

2279

4343

4477

5124

3406

T 948

4343

3755

0017

9734

4431

6731

9823

1443

2645

3649

3735

70T 10

5256

4747

6004

2134

3611

3056

3129

2426

4486

4335

5130

4134

T 1149

2744

0157

4018

9435

0030

8330

2624

0542

5941

4150

5641

81T 12

3234

2964

3210

1501

3583

2833

2749

2192

5439

5271

4081

3866

SE

m±

199

628

196

120

152

233

304

192

CD

at 5

%40

512

7840

724

831

047

461

839

064

390

6



kg/ha) and wheat (3710 kg/ha) which was 8.65 and9.43 per cent higher over recommended dose offertilizers (T5). The yield under highest yieldingtreatment during kharif T6 was at par with T7 andT10 whereas during rabi T6 treatment was at parwith T10.

At Faizabad , maximum yield of rice and wheat(4859kg/ha) (3951kg/ha )was recorded under T6

which was 18.13 and 15.15 per cent higher thanrecommended dose of fertilizer. During kharif T6

was statistically at par with T7, T10 and T11.

Whereas, during rabi T6 was statistically at par withT7, T10 and T11.

At Sabour, the rice yield was recordedmaximum (5337kg/ha) under T6 which was 15.98percent higher over recommended dose of fertilizerand maximum yield of wheat(4795 kg/ha) wasrecorded under T6 which was10.96 percent higherthan recommended dose of fertilizer. The yieldunder highest yielding treatment during kharif wasat par with T8 and T10 whereas during rabi T6 itwas at par with T10.

At Raipur, the highest yield of rice and wheatwas recorded under T10 (6004 kg/ha) and (2134kg/ha) during kharif and rabi. The increases in cropyield under highest yielding treatment over 100%RDF during both the seasons were meagre. Theyield under highest yielding treatment during kharifT10 was at par with T5,T6, T7, and T11 whereas duringrabiT10 treatment was at par with T5, and T6.

At Kalyani, the rice yield recorded maximum(3833 kg/ha) under T6 which was 5.33 per centhigher over recommended dose of fertilizer andmaximum yield of wheat (3361 kg/ha) was alsorecorded under T6 which was 9.98 per cent higherthan recommended dose of fertilizer. The yieldunder highest yielding treatment during kharif T6

was at par with T5,and T10.While in rabi seasonhighest yielding treatment (T6) was at par with T7.

At Navsari, the highest yield of rice and wheatwas recorded under T6 (3302 kg/ha) and (2798 kg/ha) during kharif and rabi seasons, respectively.The increases in crop yield under highest yielding

treatment over 100% RDF during both the seasonswere meagre. The yield under highest yieldingtreatment during kharif T6 was at par with T5,T7,T9,T10 and T11 whereas during rabi T6 it was atpar with T4,T5,T7 and T10.

At Palampur, the rice yield was maximum(5494 kg/ha) under T6 and 9.11 percent higher thanrecommended dose of fertilizer and the maximumyield of wheat (5612 kg/ha) was also under T6

during rabi season which was 2.78 percent higherthan recommended dose of fertilizer.

At Pant Nagar, the rice yield recorded maximum(5181 kg/ha) under T7 which was 25.93 per centhigher over recommended dose of fertilizer andmaximum yield of wheat (4451 kg/ha) was alsorecorded under T7which was 10.39 per cent higherthan recommended dose of fertilizer. The yieldunder highest yielding treatment during kharif T7

was at par with T8, While in rabi season highestyielding treatment (T7) was at par with T6.

Rice-Maize cropping system

At Kathalgere, in rice-maize cropping systemthe treatment T9 yielded maximum(7149kg/ha) and

Table 7.3.1(c). Grain yield (kg/ha) of rice-maizecrop sequence under different integrated

nutrient management treatments

Treatment Kathalgere

Kharif Rabi

T1 3642 2234T2 5811 4036T3 6149 4490T4 6419 4294T5 6422 4679T6 5942 4751T7 6356 4627T8 6642 4786T9 6742 5198T10 6523 4059T11 6127 3921T12 6070 3321SEm± 222 155CDat 5% 451 316



(5198 kg/ha)rice and maize yield respectivelywhich was 4.98 and 11.12 per cent higher thanrecommended dose of fertilizer. . The yield underhighest yielding treatment during kharif and rabiT

9 was at par with T

8 .

Rice-Mustard cropping system

At Rudrur, the rice-mustard system thetreatment T

11(75% recommended NPK dose

through fertilizer+ 25%N through GM) yieldedmaximum (5890 kg/ha) of rice during kharif, whichwas 10.92 per cent higher than RDF(T

5) while in

rabi the same treatment gave highest (958 kg/ha)yield of mustard, which was 8.86 per cent higherthan RDF.

Pearl millet-wheat cropping system

At S.K.Nagar, the highest grain yield of pearlmillet was recorded under T6 (1527 kg/ha) duringkharif season and wheat yield was also recordedhighest (3931 kg/ha) under the same treatment(T6) during rabi. The increase in pearl millet yieldunder highest yielding treatment(50%recommended NPK dose through fertilizer+ 50%N through FYM) over 100% RDF(T5) was 74.71per cent higher . Whereas, in wheat the highestyielding treatment had produced 51.36 per centhigher grain yield than RDF treatment. The yieldunder highest yielding treatment during kharif T6

was at par with T7, and T11, .Whereas, during rabiT6

was at par with T7.

At Junagadh (with Potash), the highest yield ofpearl millet and wheat crops were attended underT6 treatment (2477 and 4101 kg/ha).The increasein crop yield under highest yielding treatment (50%recommended NPK dose through fertilizers+ 50%N through FYM) over 100% RDF was 17.84 and18.12 per cent, during kharif and rabi seasons,respectively. The yield under highest yieldingtreatment during kharif was at par with T7 T10 and

Table 7.3.1(d). Grain yield (kg/ha) of rice-mustardcrop sequence under different integrated nutrient

management treatments

Treatment Rudrur

Kharif Rabi

T1 3010 504

T2 4000 556

T3 4020 662

T4 4820 630

T5 5310 880

T6 5120 834

T7 5870 902

T8 5100 933

T9 5780 857

T10 5120 893

T11 5890 958

T12 5020 703

SEm± 1.92 7.79

CDat 5% 3.98 16.15

Maize-wheat cropping system

At Kanke (Ranchi), the maize yield wasmaximum (4389 kg/ha) under T6 and 29.12percent higher than recommended dose of fertilizerand the maximum yield of wheat (4892 kg/ha) wasalso under T6 during rabi season which was 15.75percent higher than recommended dose offertilizer.

Table 7.3.1(e). Grain yield (kg/ha) of maize-wheatcrop sequence under different integrated nutrient

management treatments

Treatment Ranchi

Kharif Rabi

T1 1109 933

T2 1963 2887

T3 2160 3867

T4 2541 3375

T5 3399 4225

T6 4389 4892

T7 2401 4667

T8 2980 4250

T9 2749 3883

T10 2842 4050

T11 2726 3517

T12 1224 1108

SEm± 554 414

CDat 5% 1148 858



T11, Whereas, during rabi T6 it was at par with T7

and T8.

At Hisar, in pearl millet-wheat system, thetreatment T6 gave the maximum yield of pearl millet(3580 kg/ha) and wheat (5812 kg/ha).However,these yields were not increased significantly ascompared to 100% recommended dose of NPKthrough fertilizers. The yield under higher yieldingtreatment (T6) during kharif season was at par withT10, and T11. Whereas, in rabi T6 treatment was atpar with T5,T7 and T10.

At Bichpuri, in pearl millet –wheat croppingsystem, the treatment T6 gave the maximum yieldof pearl millet (2831 kg/ha) and wheat (5111 kg/ha) which were 9.94 and 2.40 per cent higher over100% recommended dose of NPK throughfertilizers (T5). The yield under highest yieldingtreatment during rabi was at par with T10. But duringkharif various IPNS packages had significant effecton crop yield.

Table7.3.1(f): Grain yield(kg/ha) of pearl millet –wheat crop sequence under different integrated nutrientmanagement treatments

Treatment S K Nagar Junagadh (P) Hisar Bichpuri

Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi

T1 48 110 886 1259 969 1090 1050 1280

T2 513 994 1472 3017 2246 3716 1506 3010

T3 538 1257 1528 3230 2412 5308 1620 4151

T4 633 1569 1908 3114 2874 4636 2000 3906

T5 874 2597 2102 3473 3342 5618 2575 4591

T6 1527 3931 2477 4101 3580 5812 2831 5111

T7 1509 3637 2227 3816 3218 4830 2490 4270

T8 1369 3543 2248 3626 2760 5481 2200 4450

T9 1282 3397 2131 3377 2928 4692 2101 4120

T10 1419 3817 2471 3556 3276 5668 2731 4921

T11 1382 3490 2075 3373 3312 4682 2460 4330

T12 531 1547 1747 3063 2898 5196 1420 2810

SEm± 71 147 236 284 170 141 79 73

CD at 5% 145 300 479 577 346 286 161 148

Sorghum-wheat cropping system

At Akola, the maximum grain yield ofsorghum(1760 kg/ha) was produced by T5

treatment which was having 100% recommendeddose of NPK fertilizer followed byT7 treatment(1635 kg/ha) whereas during rabi the highest yieldof wheat was recorded under T6 (2837 kg/ha).The highest yield treatment T5 was at par with T7

during kharif whereas during rabi the highestyielding treatment (T6) was at par with T5 100%NPK.

At Rahuri, in sorghum-wheat system, thetreatment T6 gave the maximum yield of pearl millet(4684 kg/ha) and wheat (4010 kg/ha) which was5.91 and 9.98 per cent higher than recommendeddose of fertilizer respectively both the season.. Theyield under higher yielding treatment (T6) duringkharif and rabi season was at par with T7, and T10.

At Parbhani, the grain yield of sorghum insorghum –wheat cropping system was recorded



Table 7.3.1(g). Grain yield (kg/ha) of sorghum-wheat crop sequence under different integrated nutrientmanagement treatments

Treatment Akola Rahuri Parbhani

Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi

T1

158 258 171 529 290 375

T2

721 1702 2281 2887 1771 1747

T3

873 2388 3898 3378 1804 1918

T4

1161 1832 3729 3060 2066 2061

T5

1760 2672 4423 3646 2488 2521

T6

1551 2837 4684 4010 2521 2583

T7

1635 2106 4533 3459 2227 2255

T8

1405 2442 3266 3280 2108 2132

T9

1451 1965 4261 3246 1828 1914

T10

1432 2229 4476 3552 2346 2436

T11

1546 1972 4353 3479 1762 1762

T12

637 1344 2438 2414 1572 1638

T13

2013 2175

T14

2369 2426

SEm± 238 185 336 174

CD at 5% 484 376 684 353

highest (2521 kg/ha) under T6 treatment (50%recommended NPK dose through fertilizers+50%Nthrough FYM) and closely followed by T5 treatment(100% recommended NPK dose through fertilizer),i.e.( 2488 kg/ha). Whereas, the maximum wheatgrain yield was recorded under same treatment(T6), i.e. (2583 kg/ha) and followed by T5 treatment

(2521 kg/ha). During kharif season, T2andT3,T5andT6, T7and T8 and T11 and T12 treatmentswere remained statistically at par with eachotherowing to sorghum grain yield. Similar trendwas also observed in case of wheat grain yieldduring rabi season.

Monitoring of rice crop at maturity stage in INMexperiment at Kalyani (West Bengal)

Discussion of Director, ICAR-IIFSR with ChiefAgronomist at Bhubaneswar (Odisha)



7.3.2 DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANIC FARMING PACKAGE

Title of the experiment: Development of organicfarming packages in system based high valuecrops

Objectives

i. To develop organic nutrient managementpackages for system-based high value crops

ii. To recycle farm waste to value added compost

iii. To monitor soil health and crop quality and alsoto develop holistic approach for nutrient, pestand disease management as well as moistureconservation


Treatments

T1: 50% recommended NPK + Zn + S as per soil

test + 50% N as FYM

T2: 100% organic nutrient sources as FYM,

vermicompost and neem oil cake each equivalentto 1/3 of recommended N dose of crops

T3: T2 + intercropping/trap cropping

T4: T2 + agronomic practices for weed and pest

control

T5: 50% N as FYM + seed treatment with

Azotobacter and PSB + Rock phosphate

T6: T2 + Azospirillum and phosphate solubilizing

bacteria (PSB)

T7: 100% NPK + Zn + S based on soil test

Results

The centre wise results are presented in tableand their brief description is given below.

Rice-Based cropping system

Bhubaneswar

At Bhuvneshwar, highest yield of rice (4.5 tha-1) and potato (147.4 t ha-1) was recorded undertreatment T6 which received 1/3 N each in the formof FYM, vermicompost (VC), neem oil cake (NOC)and bio-fertilizers containing N and P carriers. Thepresent increase in crop yield under this treatmentwas 16.1% and 17.65%, respectively for rice andpotato over RDF (T7). During summer season, thehighest yield of okra (7.49 t ha-1) was achievedunder T6 treatment which was 21.9% higher thanRDF (T7) in rice-potato-okra cropping system.

Chata

At Chata centre, in rice-potato-onion/frenchbean system, the highest yield of rice (2.65t ha-1) and potato (9.6 t ha-1) was recorded undertreatment T6 during kharif and rabi seasons,respectively. The yield increase in these crops was4.7% and 19.1%, respectively. During summerseason, onion was replaced by frenchbean andamong all the treatments highest yield offrenchbean was recorded under treatment T2

which received 1/3 N each in the form of FYM,vermicompost (VC), neem oil cake (NOC).

Jabalpur

At Jabalpur centre, in rice-potato-fallowsystem, the highest grain yield of rice (3.8 t ha-1)and potato (3.4 t ha-1) was recorded undertreatment T7 (RDF) during kharif and rabi season,respectively. Among organic treatments, T4 whichreceived FYM + VC + NOC each equivalent to 1/3N requirement of crops and agronomicmanagement packages for weed and pest control,recorded the highest crop yield (3.0 and 2.8 t ha-1)with yield reduction of 25.5 and 19.7%, respectively,compared to crop yields under RDF.



Jorhat

At Jorhat centre, in rice-toria-blackgramsystem, highest grain yield of rice (4.05 t ha-1) wasrecorded under treatment T

3. In rabi season wheat

was sown as intercrop with toria and in summerseason lady finger was sown as intercrop withblackgram. Both in rabi and summer seasontreatment T

3 recorded highest yield of toria (600

kg ha-1) and blackgram (400 kg ha-1) among all thetreatments. Treatments T

1, T

2, and T

4 were at par

with RDF.

Kalyani

At Kalyani Centre, in rice-potato-groundnutsystem, highest grain yield of rice (2.08 t ha-1) andpotato (13.93 t ha-1) was recorded under treatmentT

1, while in summer season higher yield of

groundnut was recorded under treatment T7. Under

treatment T3 coriander in rabi season and ladyfinger in summer season were grown as an intercrop with potato and groundnut respectively.

Raipur

At Raipur centre, in rice-potato-onion system,highest grain yield of rice (6.3 t ha-1) was recordedunder treatment T

3 during kharif season. Rice yield

under this treatment increased by .6% over RDF.During rabi season, the highest potato yield (12.99T ha-1) was recorded under treatment T

1, i.e.

integrated nutrient management package (IPNS).

Sabour

At Sabour, in rice-potato-onion system, highestrice yield (4.8 t ha-1) was recorded under treatmentT

7 (RDF) whereas during rabi and summer

seasons, highest tuber yield of potato (23.83 tha-1) and onion (12.6 t ha-1) were recorded undertreatment T

1 (IPNS). The increase under this

treatment was 3.9 and .8% respectively, comparedto crop yield under RDF.

Navsari

At Navsari, in rice-fallow-groundnut system,highest grain yield of rice (3.9 t ha-1) was recorded

under RDF during kharif season whereas duringsummer highest groundnut yield (1.82 t ha-1) wasrecorded under treatment T

2. The organic nutrient

management package receiving 1/3 N as FYM, VCand NOC each recorded highest yield amongorganic nutrient management packages.

Maize based cropping systems

Kanpur

At Kanpur, in maize (cob)–potato–onionsystem, highest maize cob yield (79.84 t ha-1) wasrecorded under 100% organic nutrient sources asFYM, VC and NEOC and intercropping/trapcropping (T

3). Yield of maize under T

3 was

increased to the tune of 17.85% over T7 (100%

NPK + Zn + S based on soil test). Whereas, potatoyield (25.10 t ha-1) was registered highest under100% organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC andNEOC with Azospirillum and PSB (T

6). Data for

onion was not available.

Kumarganj

At Kumarganj, in maize–potato–onion system,maize yield (2.95 t ha-1) was recorded highest intreatment T

4 (100% organic nutrient sources as

FYM, VC and NEOC + agronomic practices forweed control) followed by 100% NPK + Zn + Sbased on soil test (T

7). However, during rabi season,

yield (7.44 t ha-1) of potato was found highest undertreatment T

2 (100% organic nutrient sources as

FYM, VC and NEOC) which was 6.30% higher overT

7. Whereas yield of onion (3.90 t ha-1) was

recorded highest in treatment T4 during summer

season.

Thanjavur

At Thanjavur, in maize–rice–greengramsystem, highest yield of maize (5.28 t ha-1), rice(5.38 t ha-1) and greengram (1.0 t ha-1) wasregistered under treatment T

1 (50% recommended

NPK + Zn + S as per soil test + 50% N as FYM).Among different organic treatments, highest yield(4.75 t ha-1) of maize was recorded under treatmentT

3 (100% organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC

and NEOC and intercropping/trap cropping)



Tab

le 7

.3.2

(a).

Eff

ect

of

org

anic

nu

trie

nt

man

agem

ent

pac

kag

es o

n c

rop

yie

ld (

kg h

a-1)

in r

ice

bas

ed c

rop

pin

g s

yste

ms

2013

-14

Trea

tmen

tC

rop

Sea

son

Bh

ub

anes

hw

arC

hat

ha

Jab

alp

ur

Jorh

atK

alya

ni

Rai

pur

Sab

ou

rN

avsa

ri

Ric

e-R

ice-

Ric

e-R

ice-

Ric

e +

Ric

e-R

ice-

Ric

e-P

ota

to-

Po

tato

-On

ion

/P

ota

to-

Tori

a-P

ota

to -

Po

tato

/P

ota

to-

Fal

low

-O

kra

Fre

nch

bea

nFa

llow

Bla

ckg

ram

Gro

undn

utO

nion

Oni

onG

roun

dnut

T1

Kha

rif4

54

42

50

83

53

42

26

32

07

96

21

34

82

63

87

0R

ab

i1

311

67

69

73

13

537

4.5

13

93

61

29

81

23

83

1-

Su

mm

er

63

37

28

28

-33

1.83

16

04

-1

26

24

18

05

T2

Kha

rif4

32

32

64

52

90

02

26

71

66

75

83

94

59

43

65

3R

ab

i11

98

68

89

72

43

135

7.5

114

63

93

93

22

63

0-

Su

mm

er

62

20

29

25

-37

1.83

13

47

-11

57

01

82

0

T3

Kha

rif4

64

62

61

82

99

64

05

01

85

66

31

34

46

13

63

9R

ab

i1

24

79

88

44

25

76

60

0+

10

63

*3

38

0+

17

19

1*

1111

51

99

27

+3

84

7*

-S

um

me

r6

38

12

67

2-

40

0+

71

9**

13

80

+2

20

4**

-8

78

5+

58

16

**1

66

1

T4

Kha

rif4

43

02

60

23

04

22

25

21

61

35

98

44

69

83

41

9R

ab

i11

88

39

22

02

82

233

1.5

110

32

95

87

23

29

7-

Su

mm

er

62

69

26

66

-4

08

16

35

-11

84

41

57

5

T5

Kha

rif4

36

32

55

12

85

22

01

41

74

65

54

64

31

53

23

0R

ab

i1

27

04

81

24

23

89

280.

831

04

01

57

20

20

15

1-

Su

mm

er

65

66

24

63

-3

53

14

58

-1

01

82

14

69

T6

Kha

rif4

96

92

65

12

82

91

99

91

65

46

03

74

68

93

77

9R

ab

i1

47

39

95

90

22

60

31

311

27

59

69

02

25

34

-S

um

me

r7

48

62

72

6-

315.

331

58

2-

118

72

15

62

T7

Kha

rif4

28

02

53

13

82

02

07

81

68

16

27

64

85

43

95

8R

ab

i1

25

27

80

50

33

77

245.

831

70

50

12

119

22

94

0-

Su

mm

er

61

41

28

72

-3

72

16

82

-1

25

26

15

11



whereas yield of rice (4.85 t ha-1) and greengram(0.87 t ha-1) was found highest under T2 (100%organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC and NEOC).

Miscellaneous cropping systems

Hissar

At Hissar, in moongbean–wheat system,highest moongbean (0.27 t ha-1) and wheat yield(0.63 t ha-1) was recorded under T7 (100% NPK +Zn + S based on soil test). Yield of moongbeanwas 28.3% and 24.83% lower under T2 (100%organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC and NEOC)in comparison to T7, respectively-.

Kota

At Kota, in blackgram–coriander system,highest coriander yield (3.13t ha-1) during rabi

season was registered under treatment T3 (100%organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC and NEOCand intercropping/trap cropping). Yield of corianderwas increased 15.69% under T3 over T7 (RDF).

Palampur

At Palampur, in baby corn–Chinese cabbage–onion system, highest yield of baby corn (2.34 tha-1), Chinese cabbage (9.96 t ha-1) and onion(28.44 t ha-1) was recorded under 50%recommended NPK + Zn + S as per soil test +50% N as FYM (T1). As per yield performance oforganic nutrient management package isconcerned, the treatment T6, which receivedorganic sources of nutrients with Azospirillum andPSB produced highest baby corn yield (1.86 t ha-

1) whereas yield of Chinese cabbage and onionwas found under T-5- (50% n as FYM + seedtreatment with Azotobacter and PSB + rockphosphate).

Table 7.3.2(b). Effect of organic nutrient management packages on crop yield (kg ha-1) in maize based croppingsystems 2013-14

Treatment Crop Season Kanpur Kumarganj Thanjavur

Maize (cob) -Potato –Onion Maize-Potato-Onion Maize –Rice –Greengram

T1 Kharif 76702 2863 5281Rabi 24048 7287 5376Summer - 3533 999


T3 Kharif 79839+75156 2659 4754+164*Rabi 18666+18337 1241+320* 4795Summer - 631+11200** 826







Rudrur

At Rudrur, in turmeric–sesamum–fallowsystem, highest turmeric (18.10 t ha-1) andsesamum yield (0.67 t ha-1) was recorded undertreatment T

7 (100% recommended NPK + Zn + S

as per soil test). Among the different organic nutrientmanagement treatments highest yield of turmeric(15.70 t ha-1) was registered under treatment T

6

(organic sources of nutrients with Azospirillum andPSB), whereas sesamum yield was highest in T

2

(100% organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC andNEOC).

Coimbatore

At Coimbatore, in chillies–Bengal gram–babycorn system, yieldc(8.56 t ha-1) of chillywasrecorded highest under treatment T

3 (100%

organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC and NEOCwith intercropping/trap cropping), whereas, yieldof Bengal gram (1.30 t ha-1) and baby corn (6.50 tha-1) was found highest under treatment T

4 (100%

organic nutrient sources as FYM, VC and NEOCwith agronomic practices for weed control).

Durgapura

At Durgapura, in groundnut–onion–fellowsystem, highest yield of groundnut (1.24 t ha-1) andonion (16.21 t ha-1) was recorded under treatmentT

7 (100% NPK + Zn + S based on soil test). As per

yield performance of organic nutrient managementpackage is concerned,the treatment T

4, which

received organic sources of nutrients withagronomic practices for weed control producedhighest groundnut (1.17 t ha-1) and onion yield (15.0t ha-1).

S.K. Nagar

At S.K. Nagar, in green manure–potato–groundnut system, yield of potato was recordedhighest under treatment T

7 (100% NPK + Zn + S

based on soil test). However yield of groundnutwas registered highest under treatment T

1 (50%

NPK + Zn + S as per soil test + 50% N as FYM).Yield of potato under different organic treatmentsreduced to the tune of 16.15% to 31.16% incomparison to T

7 (RDF).

Representation of IFS crop components in Rangoli atKathelgere (Karnataka)

Green manure for organic farming



Tab

le 7

.3.2

(c).

Eff

ect

of

org

anic

far

min

g p

acka

ges

on

cro

p y

ield

(kg

ha-1

) in

mis

cella

neo

us

cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

s 20

13-1

4

Trea

tmen

tC

rop

Sea

son

His

arK

ota

Pal

amp

ur

Ru

dru

rC

oim

bat

ore

Du

rgap

ura

S.K

. Nag

ar

Mo

on

gb

ean

-B

lack

gra

m-

Bab

y co

rn-

Term

aric

-C

hill

ies-

Gro

undn

ut-

Gre

en M

anu

re-

Wh

eat

Co

rria

nd

erC

hin

ese

Cab

bag

e-S

esam

um

-B

eng

al g

ram

-O

nion

-P

ota

to-

Oni

onFa

llow

Bab

yco

rnFa

llow

Gro

undn

ut

T1

Kha

rif23

9.4

-2

34

11

67

48

84

78

10

71

-R

ab

i54

5.2

26

88

99

55

568.

899

6.1

14

05

72

54

82

Su

mm

er

--

28

44

2-

62

46

-2

10

7

T2

Kha

rif19

0.8

-1

76

81

54

29

84

81

10

62

-R

ab

i47

6.1

26

90

75

13

486.

297

1.7

13

14

12

22

86

Su

mm

er

--

23

66

8-

63

33

-2

06

0

T3

Kha

rif15

1.2

-1

75

02

81

7+

62

0*

85

60

117

1+

13

7*

-R

ab

i41

9.4

31

27

86

55

428.

091

7.3

14

01

72

22

94

Su

mm

er

--

22

73

9-

61

82

-2

02

0

T4

Kha

rif19

9.0

-1

45

01

41

60

80

61

117

2-

Ra

bi

478.

72

75

08

01

24

32

13

04

14

99

52

15

02

Su

mm

er

--

21

51

4-

64

98

-1

99

2

T5

Kha

rif11

0.0

-1

58

91

52

61

71

63

10

46

-R

ab

i32

7.3

25

07

87

28

446.

587

0.9

13

00

51

83

02

Su

mm

er

--

25

29

1-

56

71

-1

62

8

T6

Kha

rif16

8.0

-1

86

31

56

98

77

24

114

5-

Ra

bi

483.

52

59

07

90

144

1.9

907.

21

40

27

21

68

9S

um

me

r-

-2

36

71

-5

65

7-

21

01

T7

Kha

rif26

6.1

-1

88

11

81

01

76

58

12

37

-R

ab

i63

3.4

27

03

50

74

670.

699

2.9

16

20

62

65

87

Su

mm

er

--

23

39

-6

05

5-

17

53



7.4 ON-FARM RESEARCH

7.4.1 On-farm crop response to application of nutrients

Title of the experiment: On-farm crop responseto application of major plant nutrients inpredominant cropping system

Objective: To assess the response of major cropsto application of N, P and K at recommended ratesin predominate cropping systems in different agro-ecosystem under farmer’s field condition.

Year of start: 1999-2000, Treatments are modifiedin 2010-2011.

Treatments: There are five common treatmentsat various locations. They are (N

0P

0k

0), N, N+P,

N+K and N+P+K and all the nutrients are appliedas per the recommended rates of crops/cropping

systems evaluated at particular location. Twotreatments namely, N+P+K+ Supplement ofdeficient micronutrient based on soil test andfarmer’s practice were added during 2010-2011.

Locations:

Results: The centre-wise details of varieties,nutrients used, crop yield and crop response toNPK application in terms yield difference, arepresented in table 7.4.1. Brief descriptions ofcentre-wise result are given below.

Rice rice: A total 131 trial conducted at 6 locationscompromising of five NARP zones and it coversAndhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Kerala

Cropping system OFR district (State) No. of trials

Rice-rice Warangal (T.S.), Seethampeta (A.P.), Thiruvalla (Kerala), Chettinad 131& Paiyur (T.N.), Phalghar (Maharashtra)

Rice-wheat Pakur (Jharkhand), Katni&Dindori(M.P.), Amritsar (P.B.), Ambedkarnagar 176& Kanpur Dehat (U.P.), Jeolikote (U.K.), Samba (J.K.)

Rice-gram Kawardha (C.G.) 24

Rice-green gram Kendrapara (Orissa), Kakdwip (W.B.) 41

Rice-groundnut Angul (Orissa), Paiyur (T.N.) 36

Rice-maize Purnea (Bihar), Anand (Gujarat) 36

Maize-wheat Kangra (H.P.), Udaipur (R.J.), Samba (J.K.), Anand (Gujarat) 72

Maize-gram Gadag (Karnatka), Aurangabad (M.H.) 36

Soybean-wheat Amravati (Maharashtra) 12

Soybean-gram Amravati (Maharashtra) 12

Soybean-onion Pune (Maharashtra) 24

Cotton-wheat Sirsa (Haryana), Jagudan (Gujarat) 46

Cabbage-tomato Kolar (Karnatka) 11

Fingermillet-tomato Kolar (Karnatka) 12

Cluster bean-wheat Sikar (Rajasthan) 24

G’dnut-sorghum Gadag (Karnatka) 12



Tab

le7.

4.1.

Yie

ld o

f d

iffe

ren

t cr

op

pin

g s

yste

ms

un

der

res

earc

her

des

ign

ed f

arm

er m

anag

ed n

utr

ien

t re

spo

nse

exp

erim

ent

(201

3-14

)

Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Rice

-Ric

e

Kera

laSp

ecia

l Zon

e /

Coa

stal

Um

a/4.

30.

837

611

153

2155

2708

4343

4175

6020

6159

5825

119

8416

59.

1838

6513

919

5Th

iruva

lla-K

ER/

Allu

vial

90- 4

5 -4

5 /

24Zn

SO4(

25)

100-

50-

50

Kera

laSp

ecia

l Zon

e /

Coa

stal

Um

a/—

——

—-

1902

2408

4059

3941

5499

5563

5228

8963

123

7.54

3597

6427

1Th

iruva

lla-K

ER/

Allu

vial

90- 4

5 -4

5 /

24Zn

SO4(

25)

100-

50-

50

Tela

ngan

aCT

Zon

e /

Red

San

dyBP

T-52

04/

8.1

0.8

196

5829

935

2148

9652

3456

9659

7165

4255

0417

312

324

411

.324

5057

146

7W

aran

gal-

120-

60-

40/

Tela

ngan

a/Zn

SO4(

21%

)24

140-

80-

40

Tela

ngan

aCT

Zon

e /

Red

San

dyM

TU-1

010/

——

——

-24

7531

1537

8542

7449

7254

2347

3118

413

025

715

.524

9745

124

1W

aran

gal-

120-

60-

40/

Tela

ngan

a/Zn

SO4(

21%

)24

160-

57.

5-45

Andh

raHi

gh A

ltitud

eSa

ndy

MTU

1001

/6.

40.

715

726

217

2211

2415

2640

2613

3329

4402

6221

7251

100

7.22

1118

1073

-289

2Pr

ades

han

d Tr

ibal

Cla

y80

- 60-

50/

Zone

-Lo

amZn

SO4(

50)

Rast

akun

taba

i/13

0- 3

5 -2

5Ch

inta

palli/

Seet

ham

peta

-AP

/23

Andh

raHi

gh A

ltitud

eSa

ndy

MTU

-101

0/—

——

—-

3199

3162

3199

3274

3298

4403

6237

9466

129

8.3

9911

05-2

939

Prad

esh

and

Trib

alC

lay

80- 6

0-50

/Zo

ne -

Loam

ZnSO

4(50

)Ra

stak

unta

bai/

130-

35

-25

Chin

tapa

lli/Se

etha

mpe

ta-

AP/2

3



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Tam

ilSo

uth

TNSa

ndy

ADT-

39/

320.

522

610

239

2937

3804

4070

4310

4760

5068

4683

3927

533.

1518

2330

877

Nad

u5

& 6/

Cla

yZn

SO4(

25)

Chet

tinad

-Lo

am12

0- 5

0-25

TN/2

4

Tam

ilSo

uth

TNSa

ndy

ADT-

39/

——

——

-31

5340

3643

5245

9147

5750

4446

6931

2243

2.48

1604

287

88N

adu

5 &

6/C

lay

ZnSO

4(25

)Ch

ettin

ad-

Loam

120-

50-

25TN

/24

Tam

ilNo

rth W

este

rnC

lay

Sona

mus

sorie

/7.

80.

628

915

299

3337

5328

6453

6114

7154

7527

6407

8560

119

3.43

3817

373

747

Nad

uZo

ne -

Pai

yur/

Loam

150-

50-

50/

Paiy

ur-T

N/1

2Zn

SO4(

25)

130-

35

-40

Tam

ilNo

rth W

este

rnC

lay

ADT-

39/

——

——

-38

4348

8559

7859

6471

6376

2062

8113

998

194

5.71

3320

457

882

Nad

uZo

ne -

Pai

yur/

Loam

120-

40-

40/

Paiy

ur-T

N/1

2Zn

SO4(

25)

112.

5- 3

5 -3

9

Mah

ar-

North

Kon

kan

Not A

vaila

ble

Shya

dri/

00

00

027

1642

2450

6949

3958

5464

1845

8193

6612

96.

6931

3856

412

73as

htra

Coas

tal Z

one

-Zn

SO4(

21%

)Ka

rjat/P

algh

ar/2

480

- 22.

5-12

.5

Mah

ar-

North

Kon

kan

Not A

vaila

ble

Karja

t-3/

——

——

-26

6034

5141

3240

8845

3947

7536

5453

3874

4.72

1879

236

885

asht

raCo

asta

l Zon

e -

ZnSO

4(21

%)

Karja

t/Pal

ghar

/24

80- 2

2.5-

12.5

Rice

-Gra

m/B

enga

l Gra

m/C

hick

Pea

Chha

tt-CG

Pla

in Z

one

/Bl

ack

Karm

a m

ahsu

ri/0

00

00

1974

2777

4714

3256

5191

5322

3594

8560

118

7.7

3217

131

1597

isgar

hKa

war

dha-

CTG

/Co

tton

100-

60-

40/

24So

ilZn

SO4(

20)

60- 4

0-30

Chha

tt-CG

Pla

in Z

one

/Bl

ack

Vaib

hav/

——

——

-53

887

714

0810

7814

5215

8011

1315

1122

4.61

914

128

339

isgar

hKa

war

dha-

CTG

/Co

tton

20 -

50-2

0 /

24So

ilco

ntro

l15

- 46-

0



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Rice

-Gre

en G

ram

Wes

tCo

asta

l sal

ine

Coa

stal

Prat

iksh

ya/

5.6

0.9

190

4622

830

6735

3140

1141

1244

6446

1441

8441

2957

3.58

1397

150

280

Beng

alZo

ne W

.B./

Salin

e80

- 40-

40/

Kakd

wip

-WB/

24So

il0-

0-0

Wes

tCo

asta

l sal

ine

Coa

stal

Chai

t Moo

ng/

——

——

-52

861

474

971

584

287

674

613

918

6.33

314

3496

Beng

alZo

ne W

.B./

Salin

e20

- 40

-40/

Kakd

wip

-WB/

24So

il0-

0-0

Odi

sha

East

& So

uth

Not A

vaila

ble

Ran

idha

na/

5.8

0.6

285

1717

427

7933

2935

5836

4840

0641

3734

0559

4283

4.88

1227

131

601

East

ern

Coas

tal

80- 4

0-40

/Pl

ain

/Ken

drap

ara-

ZnSO

4(21

%)

OR

/17

40- 3

0 -2

0

Odi

sha

East

& So

uth

Not A

vaila

ble

Loca

l/—

——

—-

422

483

515

529

564

581

454

118

166.

5414

217

110

East

ern

Coas

tal

20 -

40-2

0 /

Plai

n /K

endr

apar

a-M

olyb

dnum

OR

/17

10-3

0-0

Ric

e-G

roun

dnut

Tam

ilNo

rth W

este

rnSa

ndy

ADT-

39/

7.8

0.5

263

1621

328

4636

0747

2743

6359

2563

8048

8212

185

168

6.32

3079

455

1043

Nad

uZo

ne -

Pai

yur/

Cla

y15

0- 5

0-50

/Pa

iyur

-TN

/Lo

amZn

SO4(

25)

1295

- 30

-30

Tam

ilNo

rth W

este

rnSa

ndy

TMV-

7/—

——

—-

943

1190

1446

1688

2017

2268

1840

3726

515.

5310

7425

117

7N

adu

Zone

- P

aiyu

r/C

lay

20 -

50-7

5/Pa

iyur

-TN

/Lo

amBo

rax(

10)

1257

.5- 2

0 -4

5

Odi

sha

Mid

-Cen

tral

Not A

vaila

ble

Nav

een/

60.

626

714

143

2567

3701

3781

3984

4282

4412

3616

4733

654.

3617

1513

066

6Ta

ble

Land

80- 4

0-40

/Zo

ne -

50- 2

0 -3

0M

ahisp

at/2

4

Odi

sha

Mid

-Cen

tral

Not A

vaila

ble

Kadi

ri6/

——

——

-12

9416

3117

9618

0920

1220

8517

2530

2141

5.89

718

7328

7Ta

ble

Land

20 -

40-4

0/Zo

ne -

20 -

20 -1

0M

ahisp

at/2

4



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Ric

e-M

aize

Guj

arat

Mid

dle

Guja

rat

Cla

y Lo

amG

R-9

/6.

51

234

2630

681

611

6713

9212

7014

0714

3411

5040

2856

7.94

591

2725

7Zo

ne -

Anan

d/80

- 50-

40/

DER

OL/

ZnSO

4(25

)12

75- 1

2.5-

0

Guj

arat

Mid

dle

Guja

rat

Cla

y Lo

amPA

C - 7

40/

——

——

-13

0220

2623

1720

4023

2223

5118

8281

5711

49.

7210

2029

440

Zone

- An

and/

210-

130

-100

/D

ERO

L/Zn

SO4(

25)

1212

6- 4

5 -0

Biha

rNo

rth E

ast

Allu

vial

R.M

ahsu

ri/6.

80.

422

316

206

1866

2762

3533

3229

4266

4532

3399

100

7113

910

.324

0026

686

7Al

luvia

l Pla

in10

0- 4

0-20

/Zo

ne -

Purn

ea-

Zinc

(25)

Kath

iaha

r/60

- 30

-10

Purn

ea-B

H/24

Biha

rNo

rth E

ast

Allu

vial

P-33

96/

——

——

-32

8049

6663

7058

6671

6676

3462

6617

612

524

510

.338

8646

890

0Al

luvia

l Pla

in12

0- 7

5-50

/Zo

ne -

Purn

ea-

cont

rol

Kath

iaha

r/80

- 30

-10

Purn

ea-B

H/24

Ric

e-W

heat

Mad

hya

Keym

ore

Not A

vaila

ble

JRH

-5/

00

00

028

0643

2352

1849

9454

8759

9348

7529

2039

2.08

2681

506

612

Prad

esh

Plat

ue S

atpo

ra12

0- 6

0-40

/hil

ls /K

atni-

ZnSO

4(21

%)

MP/

2480

- 40-

0

Mad

hya

Keym

ore

Not A

vaila

ble

JW 3

211/

——

——

-16

7533

3440

4337

2243

3046

0336

9732

2243

3.02

2655

273

633

Prad

esh

Plat

ue12

0- 6

0-40

/Sa

tpor

a hi

lls /

ZnSO

4(21

%)

Katn

i-MP/

2480

- 40-

0

Utta

rEa

stern

Plai

nAl

luvia

lN

DR

-359

/7.

60.

417

716

172

1639

2625

3758

2982

4060

4431

3407

6647

936.

3824

2137

165

3Pr

ades

hZo

ne -

Kum

arga

nj/

150-

60-

60/

Ambe

dkar

naga

r/Zn

SO4(

25)

2012

0- 3

0 -0



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Utta

rEa

stern

Plai

nAl

luvia

lHD

232

9/—

——

—-

1157

2038

2950

2346

3264

3484

2703

4028

554.

9721

0722

056

1Pr

ades

hZo

ne -

Kum

arga

nj/

150-

60-

40/

Ambe

dkar

naga

r/Zn

SO4(

25)

2010

0- 3

0 -0

Utta

ra-

Hill Z

one

-H

illyPH

B-71

/6.

40.

726

730

169

2793

3957

4818

4307

5790

6224

4136

7654

106

5.75

2997

434

1654

khan

dR

anich

auri/

150-

60-

60/

Jeol

ikote

-UK/

Sulp

har

2412

0- 5

5-0

Utta

ra-

Hill Z

one

-H

illyDB

W62

1-50

/—

——

—-

2533

3196

4117

3778

4633

4749

3420

7049

966.

4221

0011

612

13kh

and

Ran

ichau

ri/15

0- 6

0-40

/Je

oliko

te-U

K/Su

lpha

r24

110-

50-

0

Utta

rCe

ntra

l Plai

nNo

t Ava

ilabl

eHy

brid

Sud

ha/

7.9

0.4

013

147

2112

2962

4457

3552

5106

5622

4657

3424

472.

929

9451

644

9Pr

ades

hZo

ne -

Kanp

ur/

150-

60-

40/

Dale

ep N

agar

ZnSO

4(25

)(K

anpu

r Deh

at)/2

417

0- 6

5-0

Utta

rCe

ntra

l Plai

nNo

t Ava

ilabl

ePB

W-3

43/

——

——

-19

1626

6136

1029

6338

6243

6837

2753

3874

5.57

1946

506

135

Prad

esh

Zone

- Ka

npur

/12

0- 6

0-40

/Da

leep

Nag

arco

ntro

l(K

anpu

r Deh

at)/2

417

0- 6

5-0

Mad

hya

North

ern

hill

Not A

vaila

ble

MTU

-101

0/0

00

00

1939

2759

3698

3402

3947

4365

3057

2820

392.

9820

0841

889

0Pr

ades

hzo

ne o

f chh

ati-

120-

60-

40/

sgar

h-Di

ndor

i/Zn

SO4(

25)

Dind

ori-M

P/24

50- 2

0 -0

Mad

hya

North

ern

hill

Not A

vaila

ble

GW

366

/—

——

—-

1619

3280

3909

3611

4276

4460

3063

2417

332.

3726

5718

412

13Pr

ades

hzo

ne o

f chh

ati-

120-

60-

40/

sgar

h-Di

ndor

i/Zn

SO4(

25)

Dind

ori-M

P/24

60- 2

0 -0

Jhar

khan

dCe

ntra

l and

Not A

vaila

ble

Nav

een/

5.7

0.6

244

617

082

515

3624

5317

6030

9932

1922

0963

4588

10.2

2274

120

890

North

Eas

tern

100-

50-

25/

Plat

eau

Zone

-IV /

Zn 5

Paku

r/24

60- 3

0 -0



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Jhar

khan

dCe

ntra

l and

Not A

vaila

ble

K-91

07/

——

——

-64

214

0924

8116

9829

7430

5620

3158

4180

9.87

2332

8294

3No

rth E

aste

rn10

0- 5

0-25

/Pl

atea

u Zo

ne-IV

/Zn

5Pa

kur/2

460

- 30

-0

Punj

abCe

ntra

l Plai

nNo

t Ava

ilabl

ePR

115

/7.

80.

424

832

130

4832

5989

6426

6654

6992

7365

7286

5740

783.

0121

6037

3-2

94Zo

ne II

I/12

0- 3

0 -3

0 /

Amrit

sar-P

B/Zn

SO4(

21%

)24

150-

30

-0

Punj

abCe

ntra

l Plai

nNo

t Ava

ilabl

eHD

296

7/—

——

—-

2809

3591

4290

4521

5164

5498

5425

5841

804.

4623

5533

4-2

61Zo

ne II

I/12

0- 3

0 -3

0 /

Amrit

sar-P

B/M

nSO

4 (1

%)

2415

0- 6

0-0

J &

KSu

b-Tr

opica

lNo

t Ava

ilabl

eBa

smat

i- 37

0/7.

30.

523

914

129

1396

1826

2432

2204

2810

2892

2225

3524

703.

814

1482

585

Zone

/30

- 20

-10/

Dhai

nsar

-JK/

ZnSO

4(20

)12

40- 3

7.5

-0

J &

KSu

b-Tr

opica

lNo

t Ava

ilabl

ePB

W-5

50/

——

——

-14

8920

3126

0723

7830

0531

0223

6453

3710

65.

3715

1697

641

Zone

/10

0- 5

0-25

/D

hain

sar-J

K/co

ntro

l12

63- 4

6-0

Mai

ze-W

heat

Him

acha

lSu

b-m

ount

ain

Subm

onta

neou

sH

ybrid

;Kan

chan

/5.

60.

523

218

104

1629

1962

2439

2388

3000

3200

1838

3626

515.

3313

7120

011

62Pr

ades

han

d lo

w hi

lls90

- 45

-30

/su

b-tro

pica

lZi

nc(2

0)zo

ne /K

angr

a-70

- 0-0

HP/2

4

Him

acha

lSu

b-m

ount

ain

Subm

onta

neou

sHP

W-2

36/

——

——

-17

2521

6326

0726

2332

5334

1619

3860

4385

8.27

1528

163

1315

Prad

esh

and

low

hills

80- 4

0-40

/su

b-tro

pica

lZi

nc(2

0)zo

ne /K

angr

a-70

- 0-0

HP/2

4



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Raja

stha

nSu

b-Hu

mid

Not A

vaila

ble

NK -

30/

8.1

0.5

366

3337

295

020

7133

3524

7935

7737

7119

6349

3569

6.55

2627

194

1614

Sout

hern

Plai

n90

- 35

-30

/an

d Ar

aval

liZn

SO4(

25)

Hill Z

one

-60

- 15-

0Ud

aipu

r/Uda

ipur

-R

J/24

Raja

stha

nSu

b-Hu

mid

Not A

vaila

ble

RAJ

-403

7/—

——

—-

1404

2550

3440

3131

3990

4200

2490

4834

675.

4925

8621

015

00So

uthe

rn P

lain

120-

40-

30 /

and

Arav

alli

cont

rol

Hill Z

one

-90

- 20

-0Ud

aipu

r/Uda

ipur

-R

J/24

J &

KSu

b-Tr

opica

lNo

t Ava

ilabl

eKa

ncha

n/7.

60.

523

114

141

1351

1789

2336

2169

2793

2945

2285

4431

874.

7914

4215

250

8Zo

ne/

60- 4

0-20

/Dh

ains

ar-J

K/Zn

SO4(

10)

1226

.25-

38

-0

J &

KSu

b-Tr

opica

lNo

t Ava

ilabl

ePB

W17

5/—

——

—-

1462

1986

2500

2268

2980

3083

2428

4834

964.

9415

1810

355

2Zo

ne/

60- 3

0 -2

0 /

Dha

insa

r-JK/

cont

rol

1226

.25-

38

-0

Guj

arat

Mid

dle

Guja

rat

Sand

y Lo

amG

M-6

/6.

20.

925

831

318

767

1195

1375

1210

1392

1468

1115

5539

7811

625

7627

7Zo

ne -

Anan

d/17

4- 1

10-8

4/D

ERO

L/Zn

SO4(

25)

1211

0- 3

5 -0

Guj

arat

Mid

dle

Guja

rat

Sand

y Lo

amPA

C - 7

40/

——

——

-12

7936

0422

9420

1722

9923

2418

6085

660

512

1093

.610

2025

439

Zone

- An

and/

210-

130

-100

/D

ERO

L/Zn

SO4(

25)

1212

6- 4

5 -0

Mai

ze-G

ram

/Ben

gal g

ram

/Chi

ck p

ea

Karn

atak

aNo

rther

n dr

yDe

epM

900/

8.9

0.4

7116

433

1202

2699

3756

3276

5008

5498

2959

143

101

200

1038

0649

020

49zo

ne /

Blac

k15

0- 7

5-37

.5 /

ARS

Gad

ag/

soil

ZnSO

4(25

)12

90- 4

5 -0



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Karn

atak

aNo

rther

n dr

yDe

epJG

11/

——

——

-52

560

596

288

711

6613

3168

149

3569

13.7

641

165

485

zone

/Bl

ack

25- 5

0-0/

ARS

Gad

ag/

soil

Znso

4(15

)12

20-2

5-0

Mah

ar-

Cent

ral

Blac

kM

ahar

aja/

00

00

034

4938

0941

9342

5947

3248

3340

9512

085

167

9.89

1283

101

637

asht

raM

ahar

asht

raCo

tton

150-

75-

75/

Plat

eau

Zone

-So

ilZn

SO4(

25)

Aura

ngab

ad/

0- 0

-0Au

rang

abad

-M

H/24

Mah

ar-

Cent

ral

Blac

kBD

NG

-797

/—

——

—-

755

890

1081

1051

1263

1341

954

3122

4310

.450

878

309

asht

raM

ahar

asht

raCo

tton

25- 5

0-0/

Plat

eau

Zone

-So

ilZn

SO4(

25)

Aura

ngab

ad/

0- 0

-0Au

rang

abad

-M

H/24

Soya

bean

-Whe

at

Mah

ar-

Wes

tern

Not A

vaila

ble

JS-9

305/

00

00

010

4211

7513

7414

2417

1318

6012

2155

3978

9.6

671

147

492

asht

raVi

darb

ha30

- 75

-30

/Zo

ne/A

mra

vati-

NPK+

Sulp

hur

MH/

1225

- 25-

15

Mah

ar-

Wes

tern

Not A

vaila

ble

AKW

-372

2/—

——

—-

1016

1230

1574

1305

1910

2159

1322

6445

9010

.589

424

958

8as

htra

Vida

rbha

100-

50-

50/

Zone

/Am

rava

ti-NP

K+Su

lphu

rM

H/12

25- 2

5-15

Soya

bean

-Gra

m/B

enga

l gra

m/C

hick

pea

Mah

ar-

Wes

tern

Not A

vaila

ble

JS-9

305/

00

00

010

2112

2714

5514

7817

3019

2112

0775

5310

612

.770

919

152

3as

htra

Vida

rbha

30 -

75-3

0 /

Zone

/Am

rava

ti-NP

K+Su

lphu

rM

H/12

25- 5

7.5-

0

Mah

ar-

Wes

tern

Not A

vaila

ble

JAKI

921

8/—

——

—-

770

929

1198

1055

1456

1658

990

3626

527.

7268

620

246

6as

htra

Vida

rbha

20 -

40-2

0 /

Zone

/Am

rava

ti-NP

K+Su

lphu

rM

H/12

25- 5

7.5-

0



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Soya

bean

-Oni

on

Mah

ar-

Wes

tern

Sand

y C

lay

JS-3

35/

7.7

0.4

153

1029

010

1411

7412

5212

9913

9114

5910

8512

918

3.42

377

6830

6as

htra

Mah

aras

htra

50- 7

5-25

/Pl

ain Z

one

-Fe

(20)

+Zn(

20)

Pune

/PU

NE

40- 5

0-0

MH/

24

Mah

ar-

Wes

tern

Sand

y C

lay

N-2

-4-1

/—

——

—-

1141

413

455

1426

214

899

1657

617

814

1304

622

515

931

25.

3851

6212

3835

30as

htra

Mah

aras

htra

100-

50-

50/

Plain

Zon

e -

Fe(2

0)+Z

n(20

)Pu

ne/P

UN

E90

- 65-

0M

H/24

Cot

ton-

Whe

at

Har

yana

Wes

tern

Zon

e -

Allu

vial

Bio6

488/

8.5

0.2

122

1122

611

6316

1620

6517

7822

0223

8120

5950

3569

9.11

1039

179

143

Sirs

a/17

5- 6

0-60

/Si

rsa-

HR

/Zn

SO4(

21%

)24

150-

60-

30

Har

yana

Wes

tern

Zon

e -

Allu

vial

HD28

51/

——

——

-13

9837

6749

1742

1052

4954

8149

0311

782

161

9.44

3851

232

346

Sirs

a/15

0- 6

0-30

/Si

rsa-

HR

/Zn

SO4(

21%

)24

150-

60-

0

Guj

arat

North

Guja

rat

Allu

vial

Beej

dhan

8/

00

00

095

216

4619

5720

7322

4924

3520

6783

5811

414

.412

9718

618

2Zo

ne -

Dant

iwad

a/18

0- 4

0-40

/Ja

guda

n G

J/M

nSO

422

100-

40-

0

Guj

arat

North

Guja

rat

Allu

vial

GW

-496

/—

——

—-

2189

2992

3475

3235

3855

4207

3395

9466

129

9.31

1666

352

460

Zone

- Da

ntiw

ada/

120-

60-

30 /

Jagu

dan

GJ/

Zinc

(25)

2280

- 40-

0

Cabb

age-

Tom

ato

Karn

atak

aAE

Z 8.

2/Re

d So

ilU

nnat

i/6.

70.

415

014

113

2477

731

433

3842

942

882

4615

250

840

5142

522

2815

7531

5012

.821

375

4688

-527

3Ko

lar-K

AR/

150-

100

-125

/11

ZnSO

4(10

)25

0 - 2

50 -1

12.5



Stat

eN

AR

PS

oil

Vari

ety/

Initi

al S

oil

Stat

usYi

eld

(kg/

ha)

Zone

/Ty

peR

ecom

men

edC

entr

es/

Fert

ilize

r D

ose/

No.

of

Mic

ro.

Dos

e

tria

lsFP

(Fe

rt.

Dos

e)p

HO

CN

PK

Con

trol

NN

PN

KN

PK

NPK

+F.

SE(d

)SE

CD

CV

Yie

ldY

ield

Yie

ld(%

)(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/M

. N

ut.

Prac

t(M

)(5

%)

gap

1ga

p 2

gap

3ha

)ha

)ha

)---

-----

-----

--R

FR

F+R

Fvs

vsvs

Con

trol

RF

FP(k

g/(k

g/(k

g/ha

)ha

)ha

)

Karn

atak

aAE

Z 8.

2/Re

d So

ilU

S 44

0/—

——

—-

6755

1141

516

325

2102

225

085

2945

032

399

1830

1294

2588

21.1

1833

043

65-7

314

Kola

r-KAR

/25

0 - 2

50 -2

50 /

11Zn

SO4(

10)

180-

250

-220

Raja

stha

nTr

ansit

iona

lSa

ndy

Loam

RG

C-1

003/

00

00

080

796

411

4411

2113

0213

720

1712

245.

9949

570

—N

A—Pl

ain Z

one

of3.

75 -

26.2

5-3.

75 /

Inlan

d Dr

ainag

e -

ZnSO

4(20

)Fa

tehp

ur (S

ikar)/

0- 0

-0Fa

tehp

ur-R

J/24

Raja

stha

nTr

ansit

iona

lSa

ndy

Loam

RAJ

-403

7/—

——

—-

3217

3612

4008

4083

4474

4714

037

2651

3.67

1257

240

—N

A—Pl

ain Z

one

of35

- 25

-7.5

/In

land

Drain

age

-Zn

SO4(

20)

Fate

hpur

(Sika

r)/0-

0-0

Fate

hpur

-RJ/

24

Rag

i/Fin

germ

illet

-Pot

ato

Karn

atak

aAE

Z 8.

2/Re

d So

ilM

L-36

5/6.

60.

620

710

146

1164

2694

3847

3754

4332

4459

4501

114

8116

27.

9231

6812

7-1

69Ko

lar-K

AR/

100-

50-

50/

12Zn

SO4(

10)

80- 6

0-0

Karn

atak

aAE

Z 8.

2/Re

d So

ilN

A/—

——

—-

6536

9974

1656

114

479

1882

019

659

2166

116

6511

7823

5626

.512

284

839

-284

1Ko

lar-K

AR/

250

- 250

-250

/12

ZnSO

4(10

)20

0 - 2

50 -2

00

Gro

undn

ut-S

orgh

um

Karn

atak

aNo

rther

n dr

yM

ediu

mTM

V-2/

8.4

0.7

124

1937

160

682

813

2710

6914

8515

9794

860

4385

13.1

879

112

537

zone

/Bl

ack

Soil

25- 5

0-25

/AR

S G

adag

/Fe

so4_

2512

20 -

50-0

Karn

atak

aNo

rther

n dr

yM

ediu

mM

35-1

/—

——

—-

633

911

1087

1044

1300

1442

1193

7352

103

16.4

667

142

107

zone

/Bl

ack

Soil

50- 2

5-0/

ARS

Gad

ag/

Znso

4(15

)12

10-2

0-0



and Maharashtra state. Except Kerala (ProblemAreas Zone) In all location there is the significanthigher yield due to application of Zn in both seasonas micronutrient and highest percentage increasein yield over Recommended Fertilizer (NPK only)were recorded at Maharashtra (North KonkanCoastal Zone)in both kharif and rabi season whichis 27.8 & 24.2% higher followed by TamilNadu(North Western Zone) 14.1 and 11.7% in rabiand kharif season. Application of Zinc @ 20 kg ha-1 in both the crops resulted in additional yield of293 and 1088 kg ha-1 in kharif and rabi seasonover and above the recommended fertilizer atAndhra (High Altitude and Tribal Zone). However,application of recommended dose of fertilizerrecorded higher yield over the control at all thesixlocationsin both season within range of 50% to189% and highest yield gap 3865kg ha-1 recordedat Special Zone(Thiruvalla) of Keralain kharifseason and highest percentage increase in yield189.1 were recorded at Special Zone (Thiruvalla)of Kerala in rabi season. Except (North KonkanCoastal Zone) of Maharashtra and (North WesternZone) of Tamil Nadu there is no much significanceyield difference between recommended fertilizerdose and farmer practices, even at one or twolocation there was low yield recorded underrecommended fertil izer dose than farmerpractices likewise High Altitude and Tribal Zone(Seethampeta) of Andhra recorded -2939 and -2892kg ha-1 less yield recorded in rabi andkharifseason followed by South TN 5 & 6(Chettinand) of Tamilnadurecorded just 77 and88kg ha-1 higher yield over farmer practice in rabiand kharif season. Application of Zinc @ 20 kg ha-1 in kharif and rabi resulted in additional yield of1073 & 1105 kg ha-1 over and above recommendeddose of fertilizer at High Altitude and Tribal Zone(Seethampeta) of Andhra. At North Konkan CoastalZone of Maharashtra application of 120:50:50:6 kgNPK Zn ha-1 during kharif and 100:50:50:6kg NPKZn ha-1 during rabi gives 1273kg ha-1 and 885kgha-1 additional yield over the farmer practices whichwas 40% high in kharif and 30% high in rabithanfarmer practices. At all the centre application ofZinc along with Recommended dose of Fertilizer(NPK) gives significantly higher yield than farmerpractices on an average 10-15% higher yield

recorded. In rice-rice system, across Maharashtrastate there was huge mean system yield gap of2202kg ha-1 exists between farmers andrecommended nutrient practice.In rice-ricesystem, across the NARP zones, it was found thatmean yield gap of 387kg ha-1 exists betweenfarmers and recommended nutrient practice.Additional yield of 805kg ha-1 is possible throughapplication of required quantity of zinc to the systemin addition to recommended level of NPK nutrient.

Rice-wheat: A total 176 trial conducted at 8locations compromising of 7 NARP zones. Underthis total six states covered which are Jharkhand,Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand,Punjab and Jammu Kashmir. Except Jammu &Kashmir (Sub-Tropical Zone) and Jharkhand(Central and North Eastern Plateau Zone), In alllocation there is the significant higher yield due toapplication of Znin both crop as micronutrient andhighest percentage increase in yield overRecommended Fertilizer (NPK only) wererecorded at Central Plain Zone (Kanpur) of UPwhich is 10.1% higher in case of rice and 13.1% inwheat, followed by KeymorePlatueSatpora hills(Katni) of MP 9.2% in rice and 6.3% in wheat.However, application of recommended dose offertilizer recorded higher yield over the control atall the 8 locations within range of 44% to 363%and highest yield gap 2997 kg ha-1 in rice and 2657kg ha-1 in wheat were recorded at Hill Zone(Jeolikote) of Uttarakhand and Northern hill zone(Dindori) MP. Highest percentage increase in yield275.6 in case of rice and 363.2 in case of wheatwere recorded at Central and North Eastern PlateuZone (Pakur) of Jharkhand.Except Punjab, at alllocation there were huge yield gap recorded inrecommended NPK application and farmerpractices under both crops. Application of100:50:25 and 100:50:25 Kg NPK ha-1 in rice andwheat gave additional yield of 890 kg ha-1 and 943kg ha-1 over the farmer practice at Central andNorth Eastern Plateu Zone (Pakur). In Hill Zone(Jeolikote) of Uttarakhand 24 trials were conductedand it was found that significantly higher additionalyield of 2088 and 1329kg ha-1 can be obtained fromrice and wheat respectively through application of150:60:60: Kg NPK + 20 kg Sulphurha-1 to rice



and 150:60:40: Kg NPK + 20 kg Sulphurha-1 towheat, which were contribute 50.8 and 38.6% hikein yield over the farmers practice. At Central PlainZone (Amritsar) of Punjab it was observed that inthis zone famer already using high dose of NPKso there no significant additional yield recorded byrecommended NPK alone or with micronutrient. Itwas observed that in Uttar Pradesh at EasternPlain Zone (Ambedkarnagar) significantly higheryield recorded (653 kg and 561 kg ha-1) over famerpractices with application of recommended doseof NPK but in Central Plain Zone (Kanpur) onlymarginal additional yield were recorded byapplication of recommended dose of NPK over thefarmer practices. In rice-wheat system, Northernhill zone (Dindori) MP there was huge meansystem yield gap of 2402 kg ha-1 exists betweenfarmers and recommended nutrient practice.Inrice-wheat system, across the NARP zones, it wasfound that mean system yield gap of 1217 kg ha-1

exists between farmers and recommendednutrient practice. Additional yield of 786 kg ha-1 ispossible through application of required quantityof zinc to the system in addition to recommendedlevel of NPK nutrient.

Rice-green gram: A total 41 trials were conductedin two NARP zones. In Coastal saline Zone (WestBengal) and East & South Eastern Coastal Plainzone (Kendrapara) of Orissa, it was found thatsignificantly higher additional yield of 430 and 732kgha-1 respectively can be obtained from rice throughapplication of 80:40:40: Kg NPK + 25 kg zinc ha-1.In green gram, the additional yield over farmerpractice was found to be 110 kg ha-1 due toapplication of 20:40:20: Kg NPK ha-1 at Orissa.Application of zinc as micronutrient in rice andMolybdenum in green gram didnot gave significantlyhigher yield over NPK alone at both centres.

Rice-groundnut: A total 36 trials were conductedin two NARP zones.Significantly higher yield of riceand groundnut was observed due to addition ofzinc @ 25 and boron@ 10 kg ha-1 to these cropsrespectively in North Western Zone (Paiyur) of TN.The increase was observed to be 7.7 and 108.2%in rice and 12.4 and 113.9% in ground nut, overrecommended nutrient application and control

respectively. At Mid-Central Table Land Zone (Angul)Orissa in application of zinc @ 25in rice andGypsum @ 250 kg ha-1 in groundnut along withRDF recorded 20% higher yield over the farmerpractice.

Rice-gram: A total of 24 trials were conducted inCG Plain Zone (Kawardha) of Chhattisgarh, it wasfound that significantly higher additional yield of1728 kg ha-1 can be obtained from rice throughapplication of 100:60:40: Kg NPK + 20 kg zincha-1. In gram, the additional yield over farmerpractice was found to be 339 kg ha-1 due toapplication of 20:50:20: Kg NPK ha-1. It was 48.0and 30.4% higher yield than farmer practices inrice and gram respectively.

Rice-maize: Total 36 trials were conducted underrice-maize cropping system at two NARP zone. InNorth East Alluvial Plain Zone (Purnea) ofBiharhuge yield gap recorded in recommendedNPK application and farmer practices under bothcrop, In case of rice application of 100:40:20 KgNPK ha-1 gave additional yield of 2400 kg ha-1 and867 kg ha-1 over the control and farmer practicerespectively which were 128.6 and 25.5% higherover the control and farmer practice respectively.In case of maize application of 120:75:50 Kg NPKha-1 gave additional yield of 3886 kg ha-1 and 900kg ha-1 over the control and farmer practicerespectively which were 118.5 and 14.4% higherover the control and farmer practice respectively.At Gujarat (Middle Gujarat Zone-Anand) both cropsrice and maize not recorded any response toapplication of Zn as a micronutrient but RDFrecorded on an average 22% higher yield in bothcrops over the farmer practices.

Maize-wheat: A total 72 trial conducted at 4locations compromising of 4 NARP zones. Underthis total four states covered which are Rajasthan,Gujart, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu Kashmir.At all the four location application of RDF alongwith Zinc recorded significantly higher yield (24 to92%) over the farmer practices. At Sub-mountainand low hills sub-tropical zone (Kangra) ofHimachal Pradesh, application of 20 kg Zinc ha-1

recorded additional yield of 200 and 163 kg ha-1 in



maize and wheat. At Kangraapplication of 90:45:30:Kg NPK + 20 kg zinc ha-1 in maize and 80:40:40:Kg NPK + 20 kg zinc ha-1 in wheat gave significantlyhigher yield 74.1 and 76.3% respectively over thefarmer practices. At Rajasthan(Sub-HumidSouthern Plain and Aravalli Hill Zone-Udaipur)application of recommended dose of fertilizerinmaize and wheat recorded 2627 and 2586 kg ha-1

increase in yield over the control which was 276.5and 184.2% higher than control. It was observedthat farmer’s practices of nutrient managementresulted in lower yield (508 and 552 kg ha-1) ofmaize and wheat compared to application ofrecommended quantity of NPK at Sub-TropicalZone (Dhainser) of Jammu & Kashmir. In the MiddleGujarat Zone (Anand) of Gujarat applicationof 25kg zinc ha-1 in maize and wheat along with RDFgave significantly higher yield (31.6 and 24.9%) overthe farmer practices.

Maize-gram: A total 36 trials were conducted in 2NARP zones. In Northern dry zone (Gadag) ofKarnataka, yield difference between farmers andrecommended NPK practices were found to be2049 kg ha-1 in Maize and 485 kg ha-1 in green gram.Application of micronutrient zinc @ 25 kg ha-1 tomaize and @ 15 kg ha-1 in wheat resulted insignificantly higher yield (490 and 165 kg ha-1

respectively) than RDF. At Kangra application of150:75:75: Kg NPK ha-1 in maize and 25:50:0: KgNPK + in gram gave significantly higher yield 15.5and 32.4% respectively over the farmer practices.

Soybean-wheat: A total 12 trials were conductedin Western Vidarbha Zone (Amravati) ofMaharashtra, It was observed that farmer’spractices of nutrient management resulted in loweryield (492 and 588 kg ha-1) of soybean and wheatcompared to application of recommended quantityof nutrient. Application of sulphur in addition torecommended NPK resulted additional yield of147kg ha-1 in soybean.

Soybean-gram: A total 12 trials were conductedin Western Vidarbha Zone (Amravati) ofMaharashtra, It was observed that there was hugeyield gap between farmer ’s practices andrecommended nutrient application and which gave

(additional yield of 523 and 466 kg ha-1) in soybeanand bengal gram respectively as compared tofarmer practices. Which were 43.3 and 47.1%higher yield than farmer practices in soybeanbengal gram respectively.

Soybean-onion: A total 24 trials were conductedin Western Maharashtra Plain Zone (Pune) ofMaharashtra, It was observed that there was hugeyield gap between farmer ’s practices andrecommended nutrient application and which gave(additional yield of 306 and 3530 kg ha-1) in soybeanand onion respectively as compared to farmerpractices. Which were 28.2 and 27.1% higher yieldthan farmer practices in soybean onionrespectively.

Cotton-wheat: A total 46 trials were conducted in2 NARP zones. In Western Zone (Sirsa) of Haryanaapplication of recommended dose of fertilizer175:60:60 Kg NPK ha-1 cotton and 150:60:30: KgNPK ha-1 in wheat gave significantly higher yield(additional yield of 1039 and 3851 kg ha-1) over thecontrol and (143 and 346 kg ha-1) over farmerpractices. Micronutrient application had onlymarginal effect on cotton and wheat. North GujaratZone (Jagudan) of Gujarat application of RDF incotton and wheat gave significantly higher yield (8.8and 13.5%) over the farmer practices. In terms ofkg ha-1 it was 182 and 460 kg ha-1 over the farmerpractices respectively.

Cabbage-tomato: A total 12 trials were conductedat (Kolar) Karnatka, application of Zinc asmicronutrient resulted 10.1 and 17.4% increase inyield over the NPK alone in both cabbage andtomato, but farmer’s practices recorded higheryield than recommended dose of fertilizer aloneand applied with micronutrient.

Cluster bean-wheat: The yield differencebetween control and recommended NPKapplication was found to be 495 kg ha-1 in clusterbean and 1257 kg ha-1 in wheat atTransitional PlainZone of Inland Drainage (Sikar) of Rajasthan.Application of micronutrient recorded 5% yieldincrease in both cluster bean and wheat.



Finger millet tomato: A total 12 trials wereconducted at (Kolar) Karnatka, application of Zincas micronutrient resulted no significant increasein yield over the NPK alone in both cabbage andtomato, and farmer’s practices also recordedhigher yield than recommended dose of fertilizeralone and applied with micronutrient.

Groundnut-sorghum: Application of 25:50:25 KgNPK + 25 kg Fe ha-1 to groundnut and 50:25:0 KgNPK + 15 kg Zn ha-1 to Sorghum gave additionalyield of 649 and 249 kg ha-1 respectively over thefamer practices at Northern dry zone (Gadag) ofKarnataka. And micronutrient contribution in aboveyield was 112 and 142 kg ha-1 respectively.

Summary of results on response of prevalentcropping system to applied nutrient in various NARPzones are:

● Across the various NARP zones and croppingsystems, farmer’s package resulted in loweryield compared to recommended package

owing to the 29, 25, 71 and 100 % lowerapplication of N

P

2O

5 K

2O and micronutrients.

● On-farm system yield gap betweenrecommended dose of N P

2O

5 K

2O +

micronutrient and farmer’s package was foundto be 1192, 2059, 2636, 3575 and 1622 kgha-1 in rice- rice, rice- wheat, maize- wheat,soybean-onion and rice-greengram systemsrespectively.

● Application of micronutrients based on soil testresulted in additional yield of 805, 786, 341, 877and 246 kg ha-1 in rice-rice, rice- wheat, maize-wheat, soybean-onion and rice -green gramsystems respectively.

● In all the NARP zones and systems, applicationof recommended N P

2O

5 K

2O alone or

N P2O

5 K

2O + micronutrient resulted in higher

yield and use efficiency of nutrients. Suboptimalapplication in terms of number and quantityresulted in significantly lower yield anduse efficiency of nutrients especially nitrogen.

Rice at tillering stage in nutrient response experimentat Srikakulam district (Andhra Pradesh)

Wheat at maturity in Samba district (Jammu andKashmir)



7.4.2 Diversification of existing farming systems

Title of the experiment: Diversification of existingfarming systems under marginal householdconditions

Objectives

● To enhance the productivity and profitability ofmarginal farmers households through IFSapproach

● To improve the livelihood and nutritional securitythrough diversification approach

● To estimate the impact of capacity building indiversification of crop + livestock system


The OFR-2 experiment on “On-Farmevaluation of new diversified cropping systemsunder irrigated/rainfed conditions” was concludedin 2012-13. A new experiment in farming systemsperspective entitled “Diversification of existingfarming systems under marginal households” wasinitiated with the background that 63 % householdsin India are in marginal category with average landholding size of 0.38 ha. Due to their size of holding,marginal farm households do not have sufficient

marketable surplus for getting the decent livelihoodand are most vulnerable to climate related risks.The assumptions made are marginal householdsare having family members of 5 with crop +livestock as the dominant farming systems and ifthese system is diversified, sufficient marketablesurplus can be generated for sustainable livelihood.

Modules: The experiment was designed withinnovative approach in which changes arecompulsorily made in all components of farmingsystems by way of introducing new crops, livestockspecies and product or processing techniques inmarginal households aiming to increase themarketable surplus and income of the family froma less land resource. The major strength ofmarginal household is having sufficient manpower(due to family size) for farm operations. Afterbenchmarking, modules comprising of croppingsystem diversification (most efficient croppingsystems was synthesized keeping in view of thefarmers resources, perception, willingness, marketand requirement other components in the system),livestock diversification [(Mineral mixture +deworming+ round the year fodder supply forexisting components) + introduction of locationspecific low cost livestock components viz., BYP,

Farming Notation Module name DetailsSystem

Existing M0 Bench mark Recording of bench mark data on crop, livestock, other componentsand household as a whole

Improved M1 Cropping Most efficient cropping systems wasintroduced keeping in view ofsystem the farmers resources, perception, willingness, market anddiversification requirement of other components in the system besides improving

the practices of existing systems

M2 Livestock Mineral mixture + deworming+ round the year fodder production +diversification introduction of location specific low cost livestock components

viz.,Backyard poultry, duckery, piggery & goat

M3 Product Preparation of mineral mixture/value addition of market surplusdiversification products/kitchen /roof gardens

M4 Capacity Training of farm households on farming systems especially on newlybuilding added practices & components and assessing its impact



duckery, piggery, goat etc)], product diversification(Preparation of mineral mixture/value addition ofmarket surplus products/Kitchen /roof gardening)and capacity building (Training of farm householdson farming systems including post harvest andvalue addition and assessing its impact) wereimplemented in randomly selected 24marginal farmhouseholds in each district.The general guidelinesused for designing the modules are given below

Households: Twenty fourmarginalhouseholdswere selected for experiment in all the locations.The average holding size of in the study locationsranged from 0.20 to 1.00 ha in various farmingsystems. At very few locations, the size of holdingof farming system was marginally higher than 1ha.

Locations: In the first year of study, 28 centres in13 agro climatic regions covering 27 NARP zoneshave implemented the modulesin various farmingsystems. The details of locations, farmingsystems, size of holding, number of householdsin each farming system and module wiseinterventions made are given in Table 7.2.1. Threelocations namely Fathepur (Rajasthan), Kamrup(Assam) and Thiruvalla (Kerala) have partiallyimplemented the interventions and hence, the datais not included in this report.

Data analysis methodology: Based on thebenchmark data, farming systems practiced by thehouseholds were identified and grouped in todifferent farming system categories such as fieldcrops+ dairy, field crops + dairy+ goat etc as givenin Table 7.4.2. Five parameters namely production(on equivalent basis of base pre-dominant crop),marketable surplus (calculated by deducting thefamily consumption for food, feed, seed etc fromthe total production), cost (total cost of the systemincluding all components and diversification),returns (calculated by deducting the total cost fromgross returns of the system) and profit (calculatedby deducting the cost of the system from the grossincome obtained from marketable surplus) wereused for comparison of existing with improved(diversified) system and also different farmingsystems. Farming system with more than one

household was subjected to ANOVA and paired t-test analysis.Paired t-test has been carried out forcomparing existing and diversified systems withrespect to production, marketable surplus, cost,return and profit. Similarly, one-way ANOVA hasbeen carried out to identify the best farming systemwith respect to production, marketable surplus,cost, return and profit for the district.Standard errorof mean values is also presented in parenthesis inTable 7.4.3.

Results

The components of existing and diversified farmingsystems in marginal farm households are given inTable 7.4.2, while the production, marketablesurplus and economics of different farmingsystems are given in 7.4.3. Location wise andsummary of results is explained briefly below.

Western Himalaya

Kangra (Himachal Pradesh): Three majorfarming systems viz., field crops, field crops + dairyand field crops + dairy + goat were found amongwhich field crop + dairy is being practiced by 58%households having mean area of 0.70 ha.Diversification of crops in kharif and rabi along withintroduction of kitchen garden resulted inimprovement in production (57%), marketablesurplus (84 %), reduction in cost (43 %) andincrease in profit (176 %). Among the parameters,significant difference was observed betweenexisting and diversified system for production,marketable surplus, cost and profit for field crop +dairy and field crop + dairy + goat farming system.Among the different farming system, field crop +dairy registered significantly higher production(9675 kg), marketable surplus (3309 kg), and profit(Rs 12,315) from 0.70 ha area compared to fieldcrop + dairy +goat system.

Samba (Jammu and Kashmir): Only one farmingsystem viz; crop + dairy was found in the districtand practiced by 100 % householdshaving meanarea of 0.83 ha. Diversification and effectiverecycling resulted in significantlyhigher production(71 %), reduction in cost (27 % ), increased returns(34 % ) and profit (Rs. 69875) from 0.83 ha.



Tab

le 7

.4.2

. Co

mp

on

ents

of e

xist

ing

an

d d

iver

sifi

ed fa

rmin

g s

yste

ms

in m

arg

inal

farm

ho

use

ho

lds

at d

iffe

ren

t lo

cati

on

s

Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

I. W

este

rn H

imal

aya

Kan

gra

(Him

acha

lFi

eld

crop

s0.

261

Mai

ze/

Whe

at-

--

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

--

Kitc

hen

-P

rade

sh)/S

ubm

ont-

rice

rice

bers

eem

/G

arde

nan

ello

w h

illsoa

ts/p

otat

o/su

btro

pica

l /10

4on

ion

rain

y da

ys/2

336

mm

rain

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

7014

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1) +

-M

aize

/W

heat

/C

ow (

1) +

Kitc

hen

-da

iry (

1-2)

rice/

colo

mus

tard

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

rice/

bers

eem

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

Gar

den

cass

ia/

pota

to/

sorg

hum

/m

usta

rd/

sorg

hum

bers

eem

/bl

ackg

ram

gobh

i/oa

tspo

tato

/oat

/ch

ickp

ea/

onio

n

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

679

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1) +

-M

aize

/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+K

itche

nda

iry (

1-2)

+ric

e/m

usta

rd/

Buf

falo

(1)

+ric

e/be

rsee

m/

Buf

falo

(1)

Gar

den

goat

(2-

3)se

sam

um/

gobh

i/G

oat

(2-3

)so

rghu

m/

mus

tard

/so

rghu

m/

Ber

seem

blac

kgra

mgo

bhi/

blac

kgra

mpo

tato

/oat

/ch

ickp

ea/

onio

n

Sam

ba (J

&K

)/Fi

eld

crop

s +

0.83

24R

ice/

Ber

seem

-C

ow (

1-2)

+-

Ric

e/W

heat

-C

ow (

1) +

--

sub

tropi

cal

dairy

(2-

3)m

aize

Buf

falo

(1-

2)m

aize

/B

uffa

lo (

1)lo

w a

ltitu

de /

blac

kgra

m75

rai

ny d

ays/

1548

mm

rain

Nai

nita

l (U

ttara

-Fi

eld

crop

s0.

3315

Ric

e,-

Bul

lock

s (1

-2)

Ric

e,-

Cow

(1)

Cor

iand

erH

erbi

cide

khan

d)/H

ills o

f+d

airy

Whe

atC

ow (

1)To

mat

o, u

rd,

Buf

falo

(1)

Leav

es,

&pe

ctic

ide,

Utta

rakh

and/

Soy

bean

,C

alve

s (1

)M

aize

,P

oultr

y (1

1)S

eeds

of

Bac

kyar

dW

arm

Moi

stB

erse

em,

Buf

falo

(1)

Fren

ch B

ean,

Brin

jal.

poul

try

Sub

Hum

id/

urd,

Mus

tard

,S

oyab

ean,

Cou

liflo

wer

,pro

duct

ion,

90.5

rai

nyle

ntil,

gra

mC

oria

nder

,m

ethi

& p

alak

Goa

tda

ys/2

597

Jow

ar (

F)

Chi

lli/W

heat

,re

arin

g,m

m ra

inP

ea,O

nion

,Ve

rmic

ompo

stP

otat

o,Le

ntil,

Gra

m/M

aize

,C

oria

nder

,C

hilli



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

273

Ric

e ,

-B

ullo

cks

(1-2

)R

ice,

-B

uffa

lo (

2)C

oria

nder

-Do-

dairy

+ g

oat

Whe

at,

Cow

(1)

Fren

ch B

ean,

,G

oat

(4-5

),Le

aves

,m

aize

,C

alve

s (1

)C

oria

nder

,po

ultry

(20

)S

eeds

of

pea,

gram

,B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

Chi

lli,/W

heat

,B

rinja

l.le

ntil

Goa

t (4

-5)

Pea

,Gra

m,

Cou

liflo

wer

,Le

ntil/

Mai

zem

ethi

& p

alak

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

321

Ric

e,-

Bul

lock

s (2

)R

ice,

-B

uffa

lo (

2)C

oria

nder

-Do-

dairy

+ g

oat +

Whe

at,

Cal

ves

(1)

Mai

ze,

Leav

es,

poul

try

mai

ze,

Buf

falo

(2)

Cor

iand

er,

See

ds o

fpo

tato

,G

oat (

4)C

hilli/

Wea

t+B

rinja

l.oa

ts,

Pou

ltry

(11)

Pea

,Whe

at,

Cou

liflo

wer

,ba

rsee

m,

Pot

ato/

Mai

zem

ethi

& p

alak

urd,

Jow

ar (

F)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

293

Ric

e,-

Bul

lock

s (2

)R

ice,

-C

ow (

1)C

oria

nder

-Do-

dairy

+S

oyab

ean,

Cow

(1)

Tom

ato,

Buf

falo

(1)

Leav

es,

poul

try

Whe

at,

Cal

ves

(1-2

)C

oria

nder

,P

oultr

y (1

5)S

eeds

of

mai

ze,

Buf

falo

(1)

Chi

lli/W

heat

,B

rinja

l.po

tato

,P

ea,

Cou

liflo

wer

,ba

rsee

m,

Oni

on/M

aize

met

hi &

pal

akG

ram

,Jo

war

(F)

II. E

aste

rn H

imal

aya

Am

bedk

arna

gar

Fie

ld c

rops

0.30

1R

ice

Whe

at/

--

-R

ice

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

3)-

-(U

ttar

Pra

desh

)/m

usta

rd/

mus

tard

/E

aste

rn P

lain

bers

eem

chic

kpea

Zon

e/S

ub-h

umid

/54

.4

rain

y da

ys/

1426

mm

rain

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

3811

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+-

Ric

eW

heat

/G

reen

gram

/C

ow (

2-3)

+-

-da

iry (

1-2)

fodd

erm

usta

rd/

Buf

falo

(1-

2)ch

ickp

ea/

okra

Buf

falo

(1-

2)so

rghu

mbe

rsee

m/

pota

to/

pota

to/

bers

eem

/ch

ickp

ea/

mus

tard

/pe

ape

a

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

388

Ric

e/W

heat

/Sug

arca

ne/

Cow

(1)

+-

Ric

eC

hick

pea/

Bla

ckga

rm/

Cow

(2-

3) +

--

dairy

(1-

2) +

fodd

erm

usta

rd/

okra

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

pota

to /

gree

ngra

m/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+go

at (

5-6)

sorg

hum

pota

to/

blac

kgra

m/

mus

tard

/fo

dder

Goa

t (5

-6)

bers

eem

/m

enth

ape

a/so

rghu

m/

suga

rcan

ebe

rsee

mok

ra



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

III.

Low

er G

ange

tic P

lain

s

Sou

th 2

4 P

arag

nas

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.56

2R

ice

Tom

ato

Gre

engr

am/

--

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

Gre

enP

oultr

y (3

7)K

itche

nIm

prov

ed(W

est

Ben

gal)/

okra

gram

gard

enin

g,cu

ltiva

tion

low

er g

ange

ticda

lte

chni

ques

plai

ns/1

00.8

rai

nym

akin

gS

unflo

wer

,da

ys/1

789m

m ra

inof

Inte

grat

edpe

stm

anag

emen

tof

lady

’sfin

ger

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

398

Ric

eG

reen

gram

/ G

reen

Cow

(1-

2)R

ice

Tom

ato/

Gre

enC

ow (

2-3)

+K

itche

n-D

o-da

iry (

1-2)

sunf

low

er/

gram

/on

ion/

gram

/P

oultr

yga

rden

ing,

pota

to/

okra

/br

inja

l/ok

ra(1

5-16

)da

lbr

inja

lse

sam

umsu

nflo

wer

/m

akin

gpo

tato

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

461

Ric

eTo

mat

oG

reen

Cow

(2)

+R

ice

Sun

flow

erG

reen

Cow

(2)

+K

itche

n-D

o-da

iry (

2) +

gram

/P

ond

(1)

gram

Pou

ltry

(18)

gard

enin

g,fis

hok

rada

lm

akin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

453

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

/G

reen

Cow

(3)

+R

ice

Sun

flow

er/

Gre

enC

ow (

3-4)

+K

itche

n-D

o-da

iry (

3) +

gree

ngra

m/

gram

/G

oat

(5-6

)G

reen

onio

n/gr

am/

Pou

ltry

gard

enin

g,go

at (

5-6)

pota

took

ragr

am/

pota

to/

okra

(24-

25)

dal

Okr

afru

itm

akin

gcr

ops

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

261

Ric

eR

ice

Cow

(4)

+R

ice

Sun

flow

erG

reen

Cow

(4)

+K

itche

n-D

o-da

iry (

4) +

Goa

t (1

2)+

gram

Pou

ltry

(49)

gard

enin

g,go

at (

12)

+P

oultr

y (3

0)da

lpo

ultry

(30

)m

akin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

526

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

/O

kra/

Cow

(3-

4)+

Ric

eLa

thyr

us/

Gre

enC

ow (

3-4)

+K

itche

n-D

o-da

iry (

3-4)

+po

tato

/gr

een

Pou

ltry

okra

/gr

am/

Pou

ltry

gard

enin

g,po

ultry

(15

-16)

gree

ngra

m/

gram

(15-

16)

sunf

low

er/

okra

/(3

1-32

)da

lse

sam

umpo

tato

onio

nm

akin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

671

Ric

eTo

mat

oO

kra

Goa

t (2)

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

Gre

enP

oultr

y (1

7)K

itche

n-D

o-go

at (

2)gr

amga

rden

ing,

dal m

akin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops+

0.44

2R

ice

Sun

flow

erG

reen

Pou

ltry

(8)

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

Gre

enP

oultr

y (5

1)K

itche

n-D

o-po

ultry

(8)

gram

/okr

agr

am/o

kra

gard

enin

g,da

l mak

ing



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

IV.

Mid

dle

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Pur

nea

(Bih

ar)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.50

1R

ice

Whe

at/

--

-R

ice

Mai

ze-

-K

itche

nIF

Sno

rth e

ast

allu

vial

mai

zega

rden

,pl

ain

(BI-2

) /40

.5da

l mak

ing

rain

y da

ys/1

013

mm

rain

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

754

Ric

e/M

aize

/C

hilli/

Cow

(2)

-R

ice

Mai

zeG

reen

gram

Cow

(2)

Kitc

hen

Ver

mi-

dairy

(2-

3)ve

geta

ble

pota

tobr

inja

lgo

atga

rden

,co

mpo

stbe

r bud

ding

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

5819

Ric

e/M

aize

/-

Cow

(1-

2) +

-R

ice/

Mai

ze-

Cow

(1-

2)K

itche

nV

erm

i-da

iry (

2-3)

+ve

geta

ble

whe

at/

Buf

falo

(0-

1)+

vege

tabl

eG

oat

gard

en,

com

post

goat

(1-

2)po

tato

/G

oat

(1-2

)B

uffa

lo (

1)da

lV

eget

able

mak

ing,

ber b

uddi

ng

V. U

pper

Gan

getic

pla

ins

Kan

pur D

ehat

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.80

3R

ice

Whe

at-

--

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+-

Impr

oved

(Utta

r P

rade

sh)/

mai

ze/

pota

to/

Goa

t (4)

prac

tices

of

Cen

tral P

lain

Zon

e /

gree

nm

usta

rd-

rabi

, goa

tK

anpu

rgr

amm

enth

a/re

arin

g,gr

een

poul

try

gram

prod

uctio

n,ki

tche

nga

rden

ing

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

858

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+-

Ric

e/W

heat

/G

reen

Cow

(1)

+-

-Do-

dairy

(1-

2)m

aize

/ch

ickp

ea/

Buf

falo

(1)

mai

ze/

chic

kpea

/gr

amgo

at (

1)pe

gion

mus

tard

pegi

onpe

a /m

usta

rd/

pea

sorg

hum

pota

to

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

768

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Buf

falo

(2)

+-

Ric

e/W

heat

/G

reen

Cow

(1)

+-

-Do-

dairy

(2-

3) +

mai

ze/

mus

tard

/G

oat(2

-3)

mai

ze/

mus

tard

/gr

amG

oat (

1)+

goat

(2-3

)pe

arl

pota

tope

arl

Pot

ato/

Pou

ltry

(1-2

)m

illet

mille

t/ch

ickp

ea

sorg

hum

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

335

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Goa

t (2

-3)

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

Gre

enG

oat (

1)-

-Do-

goat

(2-

3)pe

gion

pea

Mus

tard

pige

onpe

a /m

usta

rd/

gram

gree

ngra

m/c

hick

pea

mai

ze



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

VI.

Tran

s G

ange

tic P

lain

s

Sirs

a (H

arya

na)

/Fi

eld

crop

s0

.40

1C

otto

nW

heat

--

NK

GC

otto

n/gu

arW

heat

--

--

Wes

tern

/ 29

rai

nyda

ys/2

92 m

m ra

in

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

58

22C

otto

n/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+G

hee

Cot

ton/

guar

Whe

at-

Cow

(1)

+ki

tche

n-

dairy

(1-

2)pe

arl

bars

eem

Buf

falo

(1)

mak

ing,

Buf

falo

(1)

+ga

rden

mille

t/da

l mak

ing,

Goa

t (1)

guar

NKG

Am

ritsa

r (P

unja

b)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

0824

Ric

eW

heat

-C

ow (

1) +

-R

ice

Whe

at-

Cow

(1)

+-

-C

entra

l Pla

in Z

one/

dairy

(3-

4)B

uffa

lo (

3-4)

Buf

falo

(3-

4)47

rai

ny d

ays/

936

mm

rain

VII.

Eas

tern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s

Kab

irdha

m (C

hhat

t-Fi

eld

crop

s0.

8412

Ric

eC

hick

pea

Veg

etab

le

-R

ice/

Veg

etab

leV

eget

able

Cow

(1-

2)+

--

isga

rh)/c

hhat

tisga

rhso

yabe

anP

oultr

y (3

-4)

Pla

in Z

one/

Sub

hum

idA

rea

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

779

Ric

e/W

heat

/V

eget

able

Cow

(1-

2)-

Ric

e/V

eget

able

Veg

etab

leC

ow (

1-2)

+-

-da

iry (

1-2)

soya

bean

chic

kpea

soya

bean

Goa

t (1)

+P

oultr

y (1

-2)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

601

Ric

e/C

hick

pea

Veg

etab

leC

ow(1

) +

-R

ice/

Veg

etab

leV

eget

able

Cow

(2)

--

dairy

(1)

+S

oybe

anG

oat (

1)so

ybea

ngo

at (

1)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

601

Ric

e/C

hick

pea

Veg

etab

leC

ow (

2)+

-R

ice/

Veg

etab

leV

eget

able

Cow

(1)

+-

-da

iry (

2) +

Soy

bean

Goa

t(9)+

soyb

ean

Goa

t (2)

+go

at (

9) +

Pou

ltry

(3)

poul

try (

6)po

ultry

(3)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

801

Ric

eC

hick

pea

Veg

etab

leC

ow (

2)+

-R

ice/

Veg

etab

leV

eget

able

Cow

(2)

--

dairy

(2)

+P

oultr

y (6

)so

ybea

npo

ultry

(6)

Pak

ur (J

hark

hand

)/Fi

eld

crop

s0

.76

22R

ice

Whe

at/

--

Ric

eW

heat

/-

Goa

t (2

-3)+

Kitc

hen

-ea

ster

n pl

atea

ule

ntil/

chic

kpea

Pig

(1) +

Gar

den,

and

hill-

VII/

cent

ral

chic

kpea

/P

oultr

y (4

-5)

Dal

and

north

eas

tern

pota

to/

Mak

ing

plat

eau

zone

/m

usta

rd86

rai

ny d

ays/

1228

mm

rain



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0

.72

2R

ice

Chi

ckpe

aC

ow (

3-4)

-R

ice

Whe

at/

-G

oat (

1)K

itche

n-

dai

ry (

3-4)

chic

kpea

Gar

den,

Dal

Mak

ing

Din

dori

(Mad

hya

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.72

3R

ice/

Whe

at/

-

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1-2)

+-

-P

rade

sh)/N

orth

ern

soyb

ean

chic

kpea

/so

ybea

n/le

ntil

Buf

falo

(1)

+H

ills Z

one

ofle

ntil

kodo

Pou

ltry

(2-3

)C

hhat

tisga

rh(C

G-3

)/72.

6ra

iny

days

/15

93m

m ra

in

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

7616

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1-

2)+

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1-2)

+-

-da

iry (

1-2)

soyb

ean/

chic

kpea

/B

uffa

lo (

1)so

ybea

n/ch

ickp

ea/

Buf

falo

(1)

kodo

lent

ilko

dole

ntil

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

732

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1-

2)+

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1)-

-da

iry (

1-2)

+so

ybea

nch

ickp

eaB

uffa

lo (

1)+

soyb

ean/

chic

kpea

/go

at (

8)G

oat (

8)ko

dole

ntil

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

692

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+-

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1-

2)+

--

dairy

(1)

+so

ybea

nch

ickp

ea/

Pou

ltry

(4-5

)so

ybea

n/ch

ickp

ea/

poul

try (

5-6)

poul

try (

4-5)

lent

ilko

dole

ntil

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

651

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Goa

t (2)

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

--

-go

at (

2)so

ybea

n/le

ntil

soyb

ean

lent

ilko

do

Ang

ul (

Odi

sha)

/F

ield

cro

ps.8

01

Ric

e/P

igio

nS

esam

um-

-R

ice/

Peg

ion

Ses

amum

/C

ow (

1) +

--

Mid

-Cen

tral T

able

brin

jal/

pea/

brin

jal/

pea/

mai

ze/

brin

jal/

Pou

ltry

(25)

Land

, /81

rai

nypo

inte

dm

aize

case

wnu

t/on

ion/

okra

days

/156

0 m

m ra

inG

uard

/m

ango

/co

wpe

a/m

ango

/ba

nana

/co

auli

bana

na/

poin

ted

flow

er/

cash

ew n

utgu

ard

cabb

age

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

8314

Ric

e/G

roun

dnut

/B

lack

Cow

(1-

2)-

Ric

e/G

roun

dnut

/B

lack

Cow

(1)

+C

ompo

st-

dairy

(1-

2)br

inja

l/m

aize

/gr

am/

brin

jal/

tom

ato/

gram

/P

oultr

yM

akin

gco

wpe

a/to

mat

o/ok

ra/

cow

pea/

cow

pea/

gree

n(4

0-41

)po

inte

dco

wpe

a/se

as-

okra

/ok

ra/

gram

/G

uard

/ok

ra/

amum

man

go/

brin

jal/

okra

/m

ango

/br

inja

l/bi

tterg

uard

/cuc

uber

/bi

tter

okra

/cu

cum

ber/

bana

na/

onio

n/gu

ard/

bitte

ron

ion/

cash

ewnu

tga

rden

sesa

mum

/G

uard

/po

tato

pea/

cucu

mbe

r/ba

nana

/ca

ulifl

ower

/br

inja

l/ca

shew

nut

mai

ze/

cow

pea/

pota

to/

poin

ted

bean

/gu

ard/

clus

terb

ean/

wa

ter

sunf

low

erm

elon

/rid

ge g

uard



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

898

Ric

e/B

rinja

l/B

rinja

l/C

ow (

2-3)

+-

Ric

e/B

rinja

l/B

rinja

l/C

ow (

2-3)

+-

-da

iry (

1-2)

+gi

nger

/co

wpe

a/cu

cum

ber

Pou

ltry

ging

er/

cow

pea/

cucu

mbe

r/P

oultr

yP

oultr

ym

ango

/to

mat

o/(2

5-30

)m

ango

/bi

tter

okra

/(6

5-70

)+ba

nana

caul

iflow

er/

bana

na/

guar

d/w

ater

mel

onFi

shpo

tato

/bi

tter

caul

iflow

er/

gard

enpe

a/gu

ard

pota

to/

okra

/ga

rden

pea/

cabb

age/

okra

/po

inte

dgua

rd/

cabb

age/

mai

zepo

inte

dgua

rd/

mai

ze/

onio

n/su

nflo

wer

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

801

Ric

e/B

rinja

l/S

easa

mum

Pou

ltry

(2)

-R

ice/

Mai

ze/

Ses

amum

/C

ow (

1) +

--

Pou

ltry

(2)

cash

ew

bitte

rca

shew

nut/

onio

n/br

inja

l/po

ultry

(34

)nu

tgu

ard/

bitte

rca

ulifl

ower

/ok

raco

wpe

a/go

urd/

cabb

age/

poin

tedg

uard

/co

wpe

a/ga

rden

pea

mai

zebr

inja

l/po

inte

d go

urd

VIII

. C

entr

al P

late

au a

nd h

ills

Kat

ni (M

adhy

aFi

eld

crop

s0.

703

Ric

eW

heat

--

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

--

--

Pra

desh

)/ K

ymor

eso

ybea

nch

ickp

eaP

leat

eau

and

Sat

pura

Hills

/70

rain

y da

ys/

1444

mm

rain

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

7120

Ric

e/W

heat

-C

ow (

2)-

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(2)

--

dairy

(2)

mar

igol

dso

ybea

nch

ickp

ea

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

001

Ric

eW

heat

-C

ow (

2) +

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

2) +

--

dairy

(1-

2) +

Buf

falo

(2)

+so

ybea

nch

ickp

eaB

uffa

lo (

1) +

goat

(14

)G

oat

(14)

Goa

t (2)

Uda

ipur

(R

ajas

than

)/Fi

eld

crop

s0.

702

Mai

zeW

heat

--

-M

aize

Whe

at/

-P

oultr

y (2

0)-

Cro

pS

ub-h

umid

Sou

ther

nto

mat

o/pr

oduc

tion,

plai

n an

d a

rava

ligr

eeng

ram

vege

tabl

ehi

lls/4

7 ra

iny

days

/pr

oduc

tion,

828

mm

rain

verm

icom

post

,re

arin

g of

Pou

ltry

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

607

Mai

zeW

heat

-C

ow (

1) +

-M

aize

Whe

at/

Cow

(1)

+ B

uffa

lo (

1)-

-do-

dairy

(1-

2)B

uffa

lo (

1)to

mat

o/gr

eeng

ram

/ba

rley/

tinda



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

6615

Mai

ze/

Whe

at—

Cow

(1)

+-

Mai

zeW

heat

/-

Cow

(2-

3) +

--d

o-da

iry (

1-2)

+gu

arB

uffa

lo (

1)+

tom

ato/

Buf

falo

(1)

+go

at (

8-9)

Goa

t (8

-9)

gree

ngra

m/

Pou

ltry

(9-1

0)pe

a/tin

da

IX.

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s

Aur

anga

bad

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.47

21M

aize

/W

heat

/Fo

dder

--

Cot

ton/

Cor

iend

ar/

Fod

der

Cow

(2-

3) +

Kitc

hen

Impo

rtanc

e(M

ahar

asht

ra)/C

MP

/co

tton/

chic

kpea

/m

aize

suga

rw

heat

/m

aize

Goa

t (1

-2)

gard

en,

of s

econ

dary

57.5

rai

ny d

ays/

suga

rco

riand

er/

cane

/ch

ickp

eaco

mpo

stan

d m

icro

666

mm

rain

cane

/fe

nugr

eek

pear

lnu

trien

tspe

arl

mille

t/in

cot

ton,

mille

tO

kra/

clea

n m

ilkhy

.nap

ier/

prod

uctio

nch

illi/

and

soya

bean

/im

porta

nce

coria

nder

of v

acci

natio

nan

dm

iner

alm

ixtu

re

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

753

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

Fodd

erC

ow (

6)-

Sug

arca

ne/C

orie

ndar

/F

odde

rC

ow (

4) +

-do-

-do-

dairy

(6)

cotto

n/co

riand

erm

aize

cotto

n/w

heat

/m

aize

Goa

t (1)

suga

rm

aize

/ch

ickp

eaca

nelu

cune

/hy

. Nap

ier/

ging

er/

okra

Pun

e (M

ahar

asht

ra)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

5324

G.N

ut/

Oni

on/

Pea

rlC

ow (

1-2)

+-

G.N

ut/

Oni

on/

Cuc

urbi

t’sC

ow (

1) +

Oni

on/

-de

ccan

Pla

teau

,da

iry (

1-2)

soyb

ean/

pota

to/

mille

t/B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

soya

bean

/w

heat

/cr

ops/

Buf

falo

whe

at/

hot s

emi-a

rid e

coric

e/m

aize

/chi

ckpe

a/gr

ound

mai

zepo

tato

/fo

dder

’ s

(0-1

)+po

tato

/su

b re

gion

(6.1

)/hy

.ne

piar

whe

at/

nut

chic

kpea

crop

sG

oat

(0-1

)ch

ickp

eaG

anes

hkhi

nd P

une-

fodd

erm

aize

/7/

48 r

ainy

day

s/ga

rlic/

606

mm

rain

fodd

er

Am

rava

ti (M

aha-

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

8720

Soy

bean

/C

hick

pea/

-C

ow (

1-2)

-S

oybe

an/

Chi

ckpe

a/G

roun

dnut

/C

ow (

1-2)

+K

itche

nS

oybe

anra

htra

/) C

entra

lda

iry (

1-2)

cotto

n/w

heat

cotto

n/w

heat

sesa

mum

Buf

falo

(1)+

Gar

den,

Bas

edM

ahar

astra

pige

onpe

a/ok

ra/

Goa

t (1)

Dal

Mul

ti-tie

r/P

late

aue

Zone

oran

geor

ange

/M

akin

g,In

ter

(IX)/

Wes

tern

mar

igol

d/C

ompo

st,

Cro

ppin

gV

idar

bha

Zon

e/so

rghu

m/

Min

eral

Sys

tem

,71

rai

nfal

l day

s/pi

geon

pea

Mix

ture

,G

oat

1198

mm

Bur

Bud

ding

,re

arin

gB

ound

ary

Pla

ntat

ion



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

83

Soy

abea

nC

hick

pea/

-G

oat

(2-3

)-

Soy

bean

/C

hick

pea/

Ses

amum

Goa

t (3

-4)+

-do-

-do

-go

at (

2-3)

whe

atpi

geon

pea

linse

edP

oultr

y (3

-4)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

81

Soy

abea

nC

hick

pea

-P

oultr

y (6

)-

Soy

bean

/C

hick

pea/

-P

oultr

y (6

-7)+

-do-

-d

o-po

ultry

(6)

pige

onpe

alin

seed

Goa

t (1)

X.

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

War

anga

l (Te

lan-

Fiel

d cr

ops

1.00

1R

ice

Mai

ze M

aize

-

Ric

eG

reen

gram

Pou

ltry

(5)

gana

)/C.T

.Zon

e/ric

e ec

o sy

stem

/67

.3 r

ainy

day

s/12

63 m

m ra

in

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

906

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

2) +

-R

ice

Ric

e/-

Cow

(1)

+C

ompo

stda

iry (

3-4)

cotto

n/m

aize

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

gree

ngra

m/

Buf

falo

(1-

2)+

Mak

ing,

mai

zegr

ound

nut

cow

pea/

Pou

ltry

(5-6

)M

iner

alsu

nhem

pM

ixtu

re

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

873

Ric

e/R

ice/

Cow

(1)

+R

ice

Ric

e/C

ow (

1) +

Kitc

hen

Com

post

dairy

(2)

+co

tton/

mai

zeB

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+su

nhem

p/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+ga

rden

ing,

Mak

ing,

goat

(41

-42)

mai

zego

at (

41-4

2)m

aize

Pou

ltry

(5)+

dal

Min

eral

Goa

t (5

1-52

)m

akin

gM

ixtu

re

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

926

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

1-2)

+-

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

2-3)

+K

itche

nC

ompo

stda

iry (

3-4)

+co

tton/

chill

y/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+co

wpe

a/B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

+ga

rden

ing,

Mak

ing,

goat

(25

-26)

+m

aize

mai

zeG

oat (

25-2

6)+

sunh

emp

Goa

t (45

-46)

+da

lM

iner

alpo

ultry

(7-

8)P

oultr

y (7

-8)

Pou

ltry

(9-1

0)m

akin

gM

ixtu

re

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

838

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow(0

-1)

+R

ice

Ric

e/C

ow (

1-2)

+C

ompo

stda

iry (

2-3)

+co

tton/

okra

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+gr

eeng

ram

/B

uffa

lo (

2-3)

+M

akin

gpo

ultry

(6-

7)m

aize

mai

zeP

oultr

y (6

-7)

cow

pea/

Pou

ltry

(7-8

)su

nhem

p

Kol

ar (

Kar

nata

ka)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

9112

Fing

erm

illet/

Rad

ish/

Tom

ato/

Cow

(1-

2)-

Fing

erm

illet/

Rad

ish/

Tom

ato/

Cow

(1-

2) +

Feed

ing

-A

EZ

8.2/

dairy

(1-

2)po

lebe

an/

carr

ot/

mul

lber

y/po

lebe

an/

carr

ot/

mul

berr

y/G

oat (

1) +

sche

dule

sE

aste

rn D

ry Z

one/

mai

ze/

tom

ato/

mai

ze/

avar

e/sw

ee

tm

aize

/P

oultr

y (1

)in

adv

erse

42 r

ainy

day

s/av

are/

swe

et

corie

nder

mai

ze/

corn

/co

riend

ercl

imat

ic61

2 m

m ra

inm

ulbe

rry/

corn

/m

ulbe

rry/

bitte

rco

nditi

ons,

caul

iflaw

er/

bitte

rca

ulifl

ower

/gu

ard

azol

la,

tom

ato/

guar

dto

mat

o/V

erm

i-rid

gegu

ard/

ridge

guar

d/co

mpo

stin

gsw

eetc

orn/

flatb

ean/

cabb

age/

carr

ot/

flatb

ean

redg

ram

/po

tato

/ok

ra



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

005

Fing

erm

illet/

--

Cow

(1)

+-

Fing

er/

Cor

iand

er/

Man

go/

Cow

(1-

2)+

Feed

ing

-da

iry (

1-2)

+m

ullb

erry

/B

uffa

lo (

1) +

mille

tto

mat

om

ulbe

rry

Buf

falo

(1)

+sc

hedu

les

goat

(5)

tom

ato

Goa

t (5)

mul

berr

y/G

oat

(8-9

)+in

adv

erse

tom

ato

Pou

ltry

(1)

clim

atic

cond

ition

s,az

olla

,V

erm

i-co

mpo

stin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

506

Fing

erm

illet/

Car

rot/

Tom

ato/

Cow

(2-

3) +

-Fi

nger

mille

t/C

arro

t/To

mat

o/C

ow (

2-3)

+Fe

edin

g -

dairy

(3-

4) +

rice/

corie

nder

/m

ango

/B

uffa

lo (

1) +

rice/

corie

nder

/m

ulbe

rry/

Buf

falo

(1)

+sc

hedu

les

goat

(2-

3) +

mul

berr

y/ra

dish

mul

berr

yG

oat (

2-3)

+to

mat

o/ra

dish

man

go/

Goa

tin

adv

erse

poul

try (

6)to

mat

o/P

oultr

y (5

)m

ulbe

rry/

pole

bean

(11-

12)+

clim

atic

ridge

guar

drid

gegu

ard/

Pou

ltry

(7-8

)co

nditi

ons,

pole

bean

/az

olla

,gr

ound

nut

Ver

mi-

com

post

ing

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

301

Fing

erm

illet

-To

mat

oC

ow (

1) +

-Fi

nger

mille

t-

Tom

ato

Cow

(1)

+Fe

edin

g -

dairy

(1-

2) +

Buf

falo

(1)

+B

uffa

lo (

1) +

sche

dule

spo

ultry

(20

)P

oultr

y (2

0)P

oultr

y (2

5)in

adv

erse

clim

atic

cond

ition

s,az

olla

,V

erm

i-co

mpo

stin

g

Gad

ag (

Kar

anat

aka)

/Fi

eld

crop

s1.

1424

Mai

ze/

Veg

etab

le/

-C

ow (

1) +

-G

reen

Sor

ghum

/-

Cow

(1)

+-

Inte

grat

edN

orth

ern

Dry

Zon

e/+

dairy

(1-

2)ve

geta

ble/

chic

kpea

/B

uffa

lo (

1)gr

am/

chic

k pe

aB

uffa

lo (

1)Fa

rmin

gA

rid/3

1.5

rain

fall

grou

ndnu

t/w

heat

/m

aize

/S

yste

mda

ys/3

25 m

mB

t.su

nflo

wer

/gr

ound

nut/

a no

ble

cotto

nB

t.cot

ton/

sunf

low

er/

appr

oach

for

sorg

hum

/B

t. co

tton

enha

ncin

ggr

ound

nut

farm

inco

me

Dha

rmap

uri &

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

6722

Ric

e/R

ice/

Coc

onut

Cow

(1)

-R

ice/

Ric

e/C

ow (

2)-

-K

rishn

agiri

dairy

(1)

turm

eric

/co

conu

t/tu

rmer

ic/

ragi

/(T

amilN

adu)

/gr

ound

nut/

tom

ato/

grou

ndnu

t/ra

ddis

h/N

WZ/

Bim

odal

butto

nra

gi/

butto

ngr

ound

nut/

rain

fall/

Sta

rt of

rose

/br

inja

l/ro

se/

blac

kgra

m/

decc

an p

late

au/

coco

nut/

cow

pea/

coco

nut/

fodd

er36

.5 r

ainy

day

s/fo

dder

fodd

erfo

dder

gras

s/65

6 m

m ra

ingr

ass/

sorg

hum

/gr

ass/

tom

ato/

okra

/fo

dder

okra

/co

tton

jasm

ine/

gras

s/ja

smin

e/co

tton/

G.N

utco

tton/

fodd

erfo

dder

mai

ze/

mai

ze/

redg

ram

/re

dgra

m/

topi

aca/

topi

aca/

fodd

erfo

dder

sorg

hum

/so

rghu

m/

hors

egra

m/

hors

egra

m/

blac

kgra

mbl

ackg

ram



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

802

Ric

e/R

ice

--

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

2)-

-da

iry +

jasm

ine/

jasm

ine/

ragi

poul

try

fodd

erfo

dder

gras

sgr

ass

XI.

Eas

t C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s

Srik

akul

am (A

ndhr

aFi

eld

crop

s0.

21

Ric

e/

R

ice-

Cow

-2,

Pra

desh

)/hig

h al

titud

eM

aize

-B

lack

gram

-P

oult-

5an

d tr

ibal

are

aM

aize

-(S

)(s

)zo

ne/5

7.5

rain

y da

ys/

1277

mm

rain

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

636

Ric

e/C

ow-1

0,

Ric

e-C

ow-3

,B

er

dairy

Mai

ze/

Buf

-9B

lack

gram

/P

oult-

59bu

ddin

gG

reen

gram

-R

ice/

Ric

e/P

iegi

onpe

a/G

roun

dnut

/G

reen

gram

/M

aize

-(s)

Mai

ze/

Fing

erm

illet-

sesa

me

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

733

Ric

e/C

ow-2

,

Ric

e-P

oul-2

6

da

iry +

Mai

ze/

Buf

-4,

Bla

ckgr

am/

goat

Gre

engr

am-

Goa

t-P

iegi

onpe

a/R

ice/

125

Fing

erm

illet/

Mai

ze-(

s)G

reen

gram

/M

aize

-S

esam

e

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

736

Ric

e/C

ow-3

,

Ric

e-C

ow-9

,

da

iry +

Mai

ze/

Buf

-6,

Bla

ckgr

am/

Goa

t-39,

goat

+G

reen

gram

-G

oat-

Ric

e/P

oul-4

7po

ultr

yR

ice/

156,

Gre

engr

am/

Chi

lli/P

oul-3

4Fi

nger

mille

t-M

aize

-(s)

sesa

me

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

628

Ric

e/C

ow-4

,R

ice-

Cow

-12,

da

iry +

Mai

ze/

Buf

-15,

Bla

ckgr

am/

Buf

-6,

poul

try

Gre

engr

am-

Pou

lt-S

ugar

cane

/P

oul-8

6,R

ice/

55M

aize

/P

ig-2

Mai

ze/

Gre

engr

am/

Okr

a-(s

)Fi

nger

mille

t-B

lack

gram



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Ken

drap

ara

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

888

Ric

e/G

reen

gram

/-

Cow

(2)

-R

ice/

Gre

engr

am/

-C

ow (

3-4)

+K

itche

n-

(Odi

sha)

/eas

t-da

iry (

2)ju

teric

e/ju

teric

eP

oultr

y (1

0)ga

rden

ing,

sout

h ea

ster

nbl

ackg

ram

/bl

ackg

ram

/co

mpo

stco

asta

l pla

inve

geta

ble

vege

tabl

e/m

akin

g,zo

ne/7

7 ra

iny

bitte

rgua

rdbe

rda

ys/2

002

mm

rain

budd

ing

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

025

Ric

e/G

reen

gram

/-

Cow

(2)

+-

Ric

e/G

reen

gram

/-

Cow

(2-

3)+

Kitc

hen

-da

iry (

1-2)

+ju

te/

blac

kgra

m/

Buf

falo

(1)

+ju

tem

usta

rd/

Pou

ltry

(10)

gard

enin

g,Fi

shve

geta

ble

vege

tabl

eFi

shbl

ackg

ram

/co

mpo

stve

geta

ble/

mak

ing,

bitte

rgua

rdbe

rbu

ddin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

097

Ric

e/G

reen

gram

/-

Cow

(2)

+-

Ric

eG

reen

gram

/-

Cow

(3-

4)+

Kitc

hen

-da

iry (

1-2)

+ve

geta

ble

rice/

Goa

t (2

3-24

)ric

e/P

oultr

y (8

-9)+

gard

enin

g,go

at (

23-2

4)bl

ackg

ram

/V

eget

able

/G

oat

(5-6

)co

mpo

stve

geta

ble

blac

kgra

m/

mak

ing,

grou

ndnu

t/be

rm

usta

rdbu

ddin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1

2R

ice/

Gre

engr

am/

Cow

(1)

+-

Ric

eG

reen

gram

/-

Cow

(2)

+K

itche

n-

dairy

(1)

+ve

geta

ble

blac

kgra

mG

oat

(36-

37)

blac

kgra

m/

Pou

ltry

(10)

+ga

rden

ing,

goat

(3-

4) +

Fish

Veg

etab

le/

Goa

t (3

-4)

com

post

Fish

grou

ndnu

t/m

akin

g,m

usta

rd/

ber

bitte

rgua

rdbu

ddin

g

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

892

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

3)+

-R

ice/

Ric

e/C

ow (

3-4)

+K

itche

n-

dairy

(3)

+gr

eeng

ram

/G

oat (

28-2

9)+

jute

blac

kgra

m/

Pou

ltry

(10)

+ga

rden

ing,

goat

(28

-29)

+bl

ackg

ram

/P

oultr

y (4

0-41

)gr

eeng

ram

/G

oat

(3-4

)co

mpo

stP

oultr

y (4

0-41

)V

eget

able

bitte

rgua

rd/

mak

ing,

grou

ndnu

tbe

rbu

ddin

g

Siv

agan

gai (

Tam

ilFi

eld

crop

s +

0.8

14R

ice-

Cow

(2)

,R

ice-

-C

ow (

2),

-N

adu

)/Sou

ther

n/da

iry +

Ric

e/P

oultr

y (4

)R

ice/

Pou

ltry

(4)

Sem

i Arid

Eco

-Sub

poul

try

BG

/G

.Nut

/R

egio

n 8.

1/S

outh

ern

Brin

jal/

BG

/Zo

ne T

N 5

& 6

/O

kra/

Brin

jal/

41 r

ainy

day

s/M

aize

/P

umpk

in/

563

mm

rain

Cuc

umbe

r-O

kra/

G.n

ut/

Mai

zeB

G/

Brin

jal/

Pum

pkin



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

810

Ric

e-C

ow (

2)R

ice-

-C

ow (

2)-

dairy

Ric

e/R

ice/

BG

/G

.Nut

/C

ucum

ber-

Pum

pkin

/G

.Nut

/C

ucum

ber/

Pum

pkin

/B

GB

lack

gram

XII.

Wes

t C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Gha

ts

Pal

ghar

(Mah

a-Fi

eld

crop

s +

0.39

24R

ice

Ric

e /

-C

ow (

1) +

-R

ice

Ric

e /

-C

ow (

2) +

Kitc

hen

-ra

shtra

)/Nor

thda

iry (

1-2)

cow

pea

Buf

falo

(1)

cow

pea/

Buf

falo

(1)

Gar

den,

konk

an c

oast

alch

illiC

ompo

stZo

ne/1

07 r

ainy

days

/295

4 m

m ra

in

XIII

. G

ujar

at P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Meh

sana

(G

ujar

at)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.95

2C

otto

n/W

heat

/Fo

dder

--

Cot

ton/

Cas

tor/

Fodd

erC

ow (

2) +

Kitc

hen

-no

rth G

ujar

at a

gro

fodd

erm

usta

rd/

sorg

hum

brin

jal/

whe

at/

sorg

hum

/B

uffa

loG

arde

ning

,cl

imat

e zo

ne /4

4.8

sorg

hum

luce

rne

sorg

hum

/lu

cern

e/pe

arlm

illet/

(3)

Com

post

rain

y da

ys/5

51 m

m ra

inch

illipe

arlm

illet

clus

ter

mak

ing

bean

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

9715

Cot

ton/

Whe

at/

Sor

ghum

/C

ow (

1)+

-C

otto

n/W

heat

/Fo

dder

Cow

(1)

+C

ompo

st-

dairy

(1-

2)ca

stor

/m

usta

rd/

pear

lB

uffa

lo (

2)cl

uste

rca

stor

/so

rghu

m/

Buf

falo

(2-

3)m

akin

gpe

arlm

illet/

luce

rne

mille

t/be

an/

mus

tard

/pe

arl

sorg

hum

/fo

dder

cast

or/

oat/

mille

tric

e/so

rghu

mso

rghu

m/

luce

rne/

clus

terb

ean/

luce

rn/

chic

ory

fodd

erpe

arl

sorg

hum

/m

illet/

luce

rnto

mat

o/fo

dder

mai

ze/

brin

jal/

cow

pea/

okra

/ch

ikor

i/gr

eeng

ram

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

077

Fodd

erW

heat

/S

orgh

um/

Cow

(1)

+-

Cot

ton/

Whe

at/

Fodd

erC

ow (

1) +

Com

post

-da

iry (

3-4)

+so

rghu

m/

luce

rne/

luce

rne/

Buf

falo

clus

ter

luce

rne/

sorg

hum

/B

uffa

lo (

2-3)

mak

ing

goat

(40

-41)

cotto

n/to

bacc

ope

arl

(2-3

) +

bean

/cu

min

/lu

cern

e/pe

ralm

illet/

mille

tG

oat

fodd

erm

usta

rd/

pear

lca

ster

/(4

0-41

)so

rghu

m/

fenn

el/

mille

tcl

uste

rca

stor

/ok

rai/

bean

/bo

ttle

chic

ory

rice/

guar

d/g

wa

rric

e



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

d /

div

ersi

fied

mo

del

NA

RP

zon

e/S

yste

m (

s)(h

a)F

arm

Cro

p (

s)/C

rop

pin

g s

yste

m (

s)C

rop

(s)

/Cro

pp

ing

sys

tem

(s)

soil

typ

e/K

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

/P

rod

uct

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ck /

Pro

du

ctC

apac

ityra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

ho

use

ho

ldd

iver

si-

bu

ildin

gra

iny

day

s(i

ncl

ud

ing

ficat

ion

(in

clu

din

gfic

atio

nfi

sher

ies

fish

erie

sif

any)

Pan

chm

ahal

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

907

Ric

e/M

aize

/P

earl

Cow

(0-

1) +

-R

ice/

Mai

ze/

Pea

rlC

ow (

0-1)

+-

Pac

kage

of

(Guj

arat

)/mid

dle

dairy

(2-

3)m

aize

/w

heat

mille

tB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

mai

ze/

Whe

at/

mille

tB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

prac

tices

for

guja

rat I

II/44

pige

onpi

geon

Gua

r/B

t. co

tton

rain

fall

days

/pe

ape

a/gu

ar/

Cot

ton

and

guar

,10

08m

m ra

inB

t.cot

ton

rear

ing

ofca

lves

,Im

porta

nce

ofgr

een

fodd

erin

ani

mal

nutri

tion,

man

agem

ent

of g

oatry

and

back

yard

poul

try

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

697

Ric

e/M

aize

/G

roun

dnut

/Cow

(1-

2) +

-R

ice/

Mai

ze/

Gro

undn

ut/

Cow

(1-

2)+

--d

o-da

iry (

1-2)

+m

aize

/w

heat

pear

lB

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+m

aize

/W

heat

/pe

arl

Buf

falo

(1-

2) +

goat

(3-

4)pi

geon

mille

tG

oat

(3-4

)pi

geon

Gua

r/m

illet

Goa

t (3

-4)

pea

pea/

Cot

ton/

guar

/ca

stor

Bt.c

otto

n/ca

stor

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

067

Ric

e/M

aize

Pea

rlC

ow (

0-1)

+R

ice/

Mai

ze/

Pea

rlC

ow (

0-1)

+-d

o-da

iry (

1-2)

+pi

geon

mille

tB

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+m

aize

/gu

ar/

mille

tB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

+go

at (

4-5)

+pe

a/G

oat (

4-5)

+pi

geon

cotto

nG

oat (

4-5)

+P

oultr

y (5

-6)

mai

zeP

oultr

y (5

-6)

pea/

Pou

ltry

(5-6

)gu

ar/

Bt.c

otto

n

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

841

Ric

e/M

aize

Gro

undn

utG

oat (

8) +

Ric

e/M

aize

/G

roun

dnut

Goa

t (8)

+-d

o-go

at (

8) +

mai

zeP

oultr

y (1

2)m

aize

/co

tton

Pou

ltry

(12)

Pou

ltry

(12)

cotto

n

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

841

Ric

e/M

aize

Buf

falo

(1)

+R

ice/

Mai

ze/

Buf

falo

(1)

+-d

o-da

iry (

1) +

mai

zeP

oultr

y (6

)m

aize

/co

tton

Pou

ltry

(6)

Pou

ltry

(6)

cotto

n

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

541

Ric

e/M

aize

-G

oat (

3)R

ice/

Mai

ze/

Goa

t (3)

-do-

goat

(3)

mai

zem

aize

/ca

stor

cast

or



Tab

le 7

.4.3

. Pro

du

ctio

n (

on

eq

uiv

alen

t b

asis

of

bas

e cr

op

), m

arke

tab

le s

urp

lus

and

eco

no

mic

s o

f ex

isti

ng

an

d im

pro

ved

far

min

gsy

stem

s in

mar

gin

al h

ou

seh

old

s

Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

Kan

gra

(Him

acha

l P

rade

sh)

FC0.

261

1417

079

5090

5079

5023

6510

866

4914

731

1319

9-

--

--

FC+D

0.70

1461

3217

8917

014

5657

344

5496

7533

0974

4781

613

1231

50.

001*

**0.

082*

<0.0

01**

*0.

204

<0.0

01**

*(5

98)

(429

)(1

838)

(616

8)(4

181)

(442

)(3

22)

(214

)(5

792)

(425

1)

FC+D

+G0.

679

5293

1754

1855

344

964

3249

792

1327

6970

3253

928

4165

0.00

7***

0.03

8**

<0.0

01**

*0.

749

0.11

6(7

47)

(535

)(2

293)

(769

3)(5

215)

(552

)(4

01)

(267

)(7

224)

(530

2)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

0.00

7***

<0.0

01**

*0.

175

<0.0

01**

*

CD

FS 2

1990

1426

6112

2050

613

901

1471

1070

711

1925

414

133

[P =

0.0

5]vs

FS

3

Sam

ba

(Jam

mu

an

d K

ash

mir

)

FC+D

0.83

2448

7226

9960

985

6081

464

8683

4529

9550

0781

813

6987

5<0

.001

***

0.22

8<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***

Am

bed

karn

agar

(U

ttar

Pra

des

h)

FC0.

31

2024

960

1458

056

60-4

980

4457

2208

2339

027

864

2001

--

--

-

FC+D

0.38

1168

8730

2637

865

4035

5-2

621

9200

3195

2897

876

820

7766

0.18

10.

803

0.00

1***

0.07

5*0.

124

(885

)(5

58)

(271

7)(6

915)

(474

2)(2

061)

(142

5)(1

747)

(230

06)

(154

96)

FC+D

+G0.

388

6608

3912

4136

836

397

6904

1026

264

7833

955

8405

540

540

0.28

80.

394

0.06

6*0.

202

0.31

0(1

038)

(655

)(3

186)

(810

9)(5

561)

(241

6)(1

671)

(204

8)(2

6977

)(1

8171

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

073*

0.32

50.

001*

**0.

024*

*0.

136

CD

FS2

2877

1815

8833

2248

515

419

6700

4633

5679

7480

250

385

[P =

0.0

5]vs

FS

3

Sou

th 2

4 P

arag

nas

(Wes

t B

enga

l)

FC0.

562

1112

385

3957

779

4633

322

534

1744

612

334

4823

985

109

2822

00.

211

0.18

30.

074*

0.26

60.

176

(200

6)(1

717)

(108

88)

(988

5)(9

086)

(231

7)(2

213)

(133

65)

(189

88)

(186

69)

FC+D

0.39

847

8522

0632

870

1346

211

238

7348

4419

5377

435

820

2220

00.

055*

0.09

2*0.

010*

*0.

083*

0.30

6(1

003)

(858

)(5

444)

(494

2)(4

543)

(115

8)(1

106)

(668

2)(9

494)

(933

4)

FC+D

+F0.

461

9068

6703

4878

036

351

1466

915

922

1072

460

369

5822

926

785

- -

- -

-

FC+D

+G0.

453

4497

1919

2958

920

018

-913

580

2649

5347

266

5110

012

907

0.09

9*0.

154

0.35

20.

020*

*0.

099*

(163

8)(1

402)

(889

0)(8

071)

(741

9)(1

892)

(180

7)(1

0912

)(1

5503

)(1

5243

)

FC+D

+G+P

0.26

176

2148

4035

934

3646

610

046

8855

4794

4296

064

668

1456

2 -

- -

- -

FC+D

+P0.

526

7880

4236

5123

723

743

-101

0498

9161

4666

910

5389

978

060.

160

0.22

90.

021*

*0.

035*

*0.

190

(115

8)(9

91)

(628

6)(5

707)

(524

6)(1

338)

(127

8)(7

716)

(109

6)(1

077)



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

FC+G

0.67

114

031

1163

785

576

4631

824

474

2115

116

300

6148

069

415

3030

2 -

- -

- -

FC+P

0.44

242

9016

78.

2711

712

413

1136

465

1529

5651

093

2709

115

620

0.02

7**

0.32

70.

013*

*0.

071*

0.72

3(2

006)

(171

7)(1

088)

(988

)(9

08)

(231

7)(2

213)

(133

65)

(189

8)(1

866)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

110

0.24

80.

001*

**0.

004*

**0.

268

CD

FS1

vs F

S2

4756

4071

2580

723

430

2153

754

9352

4731

678

4500

444

249

[P =

0.0

5]FS

1vs

FS4

5492

4701

2979

927

054

2486

963

4360

5936

579

5196

751

095

FS1

vs F

S6

4912

4205

2665

324

198

2224

356

7354

1932

717

4648

045

701

FS1

vs F

S8

6017

5150

3264

329

636

2724

269

4866

3740

070

5692

755

972

FS2

vs F

S4

4073

3486

2210

020

064

1844

347

0444

9327

128

3853

937

893

FS2

vs F

S6

3249

2781

1762

916

005

1471

337

5335

8421

640

3074

430

228

FS2

vs F

S8

4756

4071

2580

723

430

2153

754

9352

4731

678

4500

444

249

FS4

vs F

S6

4254

3641

2308

220

956

1926

349

1346

9328

334

4025

339

578

FS4

vs F

S8

5492

4701

2979

927

054

2486

963

4360

5936

579

5196

751

095

FS6

vs F

S8

4912

4205

2665

324

198

2224

356

7354

1932

717

4648

045

701

Pu

rnea

(B

ihar

)

FC+D

+G0.

5819

9908

7536

4711

149

793

2619

911

929

1023

111

9423

9529

164

738

0.23

50.

636

<0.0

01**

*0.

585

0.00

9***

(750

)(7

41)

(397

4)(4

526)

(476

9)(1

276)

(119

0)(1

3899

)(1

2636

)(1

2147

)

FC+D

0.75

414

777

1243

961

971

7102

449

983

2321

221

214

2435

7517

4240

1382

650.

009*

**0.

010*

*0.

031*

*0.

038*

*0.

801

(163

5)(1

614)

(866

1)(9

864)

(103

94)

(423

0)(3

946)

(460

97)

(419

09)

(402

86)

FC0.

501

4744

3144

1530

027

400

1300

079

6063

1085

0047

848

1999

8-

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

033*

*0.

803

<0.0

01**

*0.

948

0.01

0**

CD

FS1

3741

3694

1981

822

570

2378

368

4463

8474

581

6780

565

179

[P =

0.0

5]vs

FS

2

Kan

pur

Deh

at (

Utt

ar P

rade

sh)

FC0.

803

6617

5771

3393

338

850

2955

010

569

8608

5682

359

439

3785

80.

103

0.09

7*0.

160

0.07

5*0.

277

(177

7)(1

389)

(871

3)(1

2597

)(1

1873

)(2

321)

(185

8)(1

2259

)(1

4378

)(1

0706

)

FC+D

0.85

810

755

6647

5634

361

426

1677

812

988

9807

6557

176

869

4230

60.

003*

**0.

025*

*0.

085*

0.02

6**

0.06

9*(1

088)

(851

)(5

336)

(771

4)(7

270)

(142

1)(1

138)

(750

7)(8

805)

(655

6)

FC+D

+G0.

768

1064

979

6655

709

6196

531

916

1325

597

4968

946

7730

138

290

0.00

2***

0.00

6***

0.00

2***

0.00

6***

0.10

2(1

088)

(851

)(5

336)

(771

4)(7

270)

(142

1)(1

138)

(750

7)(8

805)

(655

6)

FC+G

0.33

558

6046

3629

760

3470

021

240

7944

5912

4056

046

820

2446

90.

085*

0.19

20.

048*

*0.

130

0.59

2(1

377)

(107

6)(6

749)

(975

8)(9

196)

(179

8)(1

439)

(949

5)(1

1137

)(8

293)



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

CD

[P =

FS1

4347

3397

2131

230

813

2904

056

7745

4529

984

3516

926

187

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

<0.0

01**

*0.0

13**

0.05

]vs

FS

2

CD

[P =

FS1

4347

3397

2131

230

813

2904

056

7745

4529

984

3516

926

187

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS1

4705

3677

2306

733

352

3143

261

4449

1932

454

3806

628

344

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS2

3211

2509

1574

022

757

2144

841

9333

5622

145

2597

419

341

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS2

3673

2870

1800

726

035

2453

747

9738

4025

335

2971

522

126

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS3

3673

2870

1800

726

035

2453

747

9738

4025

335

2971

522

126

0.05

]vs

FS

4

Sir

sa (

Har

yana

)

FC+D

0.58

2333

2526

3179

389

5823

529

518

5550

4107

6743

375

840

3767

1<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*0.

046*

*0.

050*

*0.

005*

**

FC0.

401

1061

732

2190

021

600

8100

1610

1031

1405

035

497

9257

--

--

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*0.

040*

*0.

044*

*0.

005*

**

Am

rits

ar (

Pu

nja

b)

FC+D

1.08

2414

136

1002

383

683

1555

8994

693

2526

019

034

7763

216

1640

1164

76<0

.001

***

0.05

3*0.

010*

*0.

010*

*<0.

001*

**

Kab

ird

ham

(C

hh

atis

gar

h)

FC0.

8412

5777

4617

1686

252

463

3854

511

115

9310

1478

355

146

4669

40.

495

0.89

80.

404

0.66

10.

184

(509

)(4

66)

(208

3)(4

594)

(427

0)(3

53)

(346

)(1

32)

(450

3)(4

408)

FC+D

0.77

969

1353

9822

267

6068

942

509

1325

911

082

1492

268

213

5953

50.

392

0.68

40.

003*

**0.

335

0.06

7*(5

88)

(538

)(2

405)

(530

5)(4

931)

(407

)(3

99)

(152

)(5

199)

(508

9)

FC+D

+G0.

601

5233

3283

1850

044

300

2090

056

2650

3115

010

5869

150

841

--

--

-

FC+D

+G+P

0.60

141

9233

4613

050

3725

027

100

7312

6716

1532

080

464

7266

4-

--

--

FC+D

+P0.

801

7800

6058

2039

073

200

5231

055

9249

7014

440

5881

750

667

--

--

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

374

0.44

90.

010*

*0.

186

0.00

6***

CD

[P =

FS 1

1629

1488

6660

1468

813

653

1128

105

2043

9540

920.

05]

vs F

S 2

Pak

ur

(Jh

arkh

and

)

FC0.

7622

1392

376

1095

519

6971

9926

2877

717

390

8890

7621

<0.0

01**

*0.

010*

*<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*0.0

44**

(111

)(1

42)

(810

)(4

05)

(118

9)(2

7)(1

6)(2

58)

(235

)(2

68)



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

FC+D

0.72

284

030

569

2514

7538

7522

1970

913

897

8294

6812

0.05

1*0.

089*

0.19

10.

097*

0.31

6(3

69)

(471

)(2

687)

(134

5)(3

945)

(90)

(52)

(855

)(7

79)

(889

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

0.00

5***

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***0

.026

**

CD

[P =

FS

179

810

1958

2129

1385

4519

511

418

5116

8719

270.

05]

vs F

S2

Din

do

ri (

Mad

hya

Pra

des

h)

FC0.

723

5538

3998

2656

754

831

3220

892

5069

0457

793

6707

635

412

0.22

30.

329

0.03

8**

0.63

00.

906

(139

5)(1

038)

(838

7)(1

2953

)(8

850)

(137

7)(1

156)

(726

9)(1

1319

)(9

077)

FC+D

0.76

1665

2743

9037

890

5806

226

644

1282

087

7943

549

1006

4043

310

0.92

10.

816

0.14

10.

055*

0.08

6*(6

04)

(450

)(3

632)

(560

9)(3

832)

(596

)(5

01)

(314

7)(4

901)

(393

0)

FC+D

+G0.

732

1147

191

5044

375

1242

5090

130

1734

713

333

4020

916

4459

1063

970.

394

0.34

50.

874

0.26

70.

196

(170

9)(1

271)

(102

72)

(158

64)

(108

39)

(168

7)(1

416)

(890

2)(1

3863

)(1

1117

)

FC+D

+P10

.69

261

4543

0727

100

6322

236

205

8326

5983

4576

766

629

3500

40.

094*

0.11

60.

167

0.03

7**

0.09

7*(1

709)

(127

1)(1

0272

)(1

5864

)(1

0839

)(1

687)

(141

6)(8

902)

(138

63)

(111

17)

FC+G

0.65

187

2970

4527

000

1013

2076

560

3819

3026

2916

422

386

1168

6-

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

924

0.98

90.

016*

*0.

031*

*0.

031*

*

CD

[P =

FS1

3183

2368

1912

929

543

2018

531

4126

3816

578

2581

720

703

0.05

]vs

FS

2

CD

[P =

FS1

4618

3436

2775

542

866

2928

845

5838

2724

054

3745

930

039

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS1

4618

3438

2775

542

866

2928

845

5838

2724

054

3745

930

039

0.05

]vs

FS4

CD

[P =

FS2

3794

2823

2280

335

218

2406

337

4431

4419

763

3077

524

679

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS2

3794

2823

2280

335

218

2406

337

4431

4419

763

3077

524

679

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS3

5059

3763

3040

446

957

3208

349

9341

9326

350

4103

432

906

0.05

]vs

FS

4

An

gu

l (O

dh

ish

a)

FC0.

801

4960

3160

2590

023

700

5700

9288

7120

4378

263

008

4538

3

FC+D

0.83

1460

0638

1133

116

2693

949

9373

9950

0042

073

4271

417

926

0.00

2***

0.00

4***

0.00

1***

0.00

2***

0.00

1***

(109

3)(5

37)

(302

1)(8

721)

(281

3)(7

54)

(678

)(3

613)

(623

7)(5

041)

FC+D

+P0.

898

1762

261

2750

385

1258

3110

879

1818

086

3659

587

1755

3844

149

0.00

4***

0.00

3***

0.02

4**

0.00

5***

0.00

1***

(144

5)(7

11)

(399

6)(1

1536

)(3

721)

(998

)(8

96)

(478

0)(8

250)

(666

8)

FC+P

0.80

162

4538

2527

300

3515

010

950

6930

4745

4195

244

408

1818

3



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

249

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**. 0

.502

<0.0

01**

*

CD

[P =

FS2

3768

1853

1041

730

074

9700

2601

2336

1246

121

508

1738

30.

05]

vs F

S3

Kat

ni

(Mad

hya

Pra

des

h)

FC0.

703

3720

2833

1696

720

233

1136

678

3845

9730

673

7513

531

385

0.13

60.

182

0.03

4**

0.14

50.

121

(151

1)(1

594)

(369

9)(1

5508

)(1

6712

)(1

059)

(868

)(2

06)

(142

03)

(117

13)

FC+D

0.71

2051

9533

6116

505

3544

317

100

5980

5445

2934

051

395

4416

80.

298

0.01

5**

<0.0

01**

*0.

071*

0.00

6***

(585

)(6

17)

(143

3)(6

006)

(647

2)(4

10)

(336

)(8

0)(5

501)

(453

7)

FC+D

+G1.

001

1392

010

350

1455

012

4650

8895

082

3568

0629

340

8183

562

535

--

--

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

216

0.01

6**

<0.0

01**

*0.

036*

*0.

005*

**

CD

[P =

FS1

3360

3545

8226

3448

937

166

2362

1935

459

3167

426

122

0.05

]vs

FS2

Uda

ipur

(R

ajas

than

)

FC0.

702

4020

2160

5900

4435

021

100

5889

3217

2644

645

929

3486

70.

402

0.05

6*0.

208

0.88

80.

426

(208

4)(1

988)

(345

5)(2

4870

)(2

3802

)(1

355)

(116

7)(9

249)

(131

75)

(116

68)

FC+D

0.60

749

4821

4313

014

4883

613

771

5635

3948

4996

1693

1127

404

0.40

60.

625

<0.0

01**

*0.

041*

*0.

003*

**(1

114)

(106

3)(1

847)

(132

94)

(127

23)

(724

)(6

24)

(494

4)(7

042)

(623

7)

FC+D

+G0.

6615

7814

5876

1476

082

913

6042

890

1381

0851

493

1202

0287

428

0.43

30.

081*

<0.0

01**

*0.0

02**

*<0.

001*

**(7

61)

(726

)(1

262)

(908

1)(8

691)

(495

)(4

26)

(337

7)(4

811)

(426

1)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

833

0

.093

*<0.

001*

**<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

CD

[P =

FS

149

1346

8881

4758

645

61

2631

9627

5321

810

3106

627

514

0.05

]vs

FS

2

CD

[P =

FS1

4613

4401

7649

5506

152

695

3000

2584

2047

729

167

2583

20.

05]

vs F

S3

CD

[P =

FS2

2805

2676

4651

233

481

3204

218

2415

7112

451

1773

615

708

0.05

]vs

FS

3

Au

ran

gab

ad (

Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC0.

4721

1665

1413

2274

552

170

4084

236

7731

8185

189

8029

157

936

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

0.15

20.

381

(360

)(3

64)

(246

8)(1

6254

)(1

6619

)(2

09)

(164

)(5

730)

(742

0)(6

073)

FC+D

0.75

312

6480

021

405

3545

914

615

3594

3058

8809

673

641

4952

10.

142

0.08

4*0.

081*

0.34

00.

270

(952

)(9

64)

(652

9)(4

3004

)(4

3971

)(5

53)

(434

)(1

5160

)(1

9632

)(1

6070

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**0.

093*

0.26

3

CD

[P =

FS 1

2110

2136

1447

695

342

9748

512

2596

133

610

4352

535

629

0.05

]vs

FS

2



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

Pu

ne

(Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC+D

0.53

2475

2162

8885

567

4980

527

612

1312

711

111

1048

1881

664

6755

70.

008*

**0.

039*

*<0

.001

***

0.00

4***

0.00

1***

Am

rava

ti (

Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC+D

0.87

2327

2525

7925

328

5137

7.75

3336

153

3747

6733

226

9652

365

763

0.74

20.

214

0.03

9**

0.47

00.

893

(269

)(2

61)

(452

)(7

423)

(583

0)(2

66)

(233

)(3

397)

(503

9)(4

183)

FC+G

0.80

320

4920

4922

700

3706

737

06 7

3980

3841

2340

871

523

6740

30.

763

0.60

10.

808

0.76

80.

561

(695

)(6

74)

(374

8)(1

9165

)(1

5053

)(6

86)

(602

)(8

770)

(130

11)

(108

01)

FC+P

0.80

161

4758

6029

000

5425

044

300

7391

7007

4385

576

725

6384

5-

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

374

0.09

0*.

0.06

4*0.

233

0.6

60

CD

[P =

FS1

1550

1504

8358

4274

133

571

1529

1343

1955

929

017

2408

70.

05]

vs F

S2

War

ang

al (

Tela

ng

ana)

FC1.

001

6300

5100

6150

014

100

-300

8024

6149

7052

527

145

4399

--

--

-

FC+D

0.90

611

094

9708

6976

363

362

4672

815

707

1347

526

699

9570

568

243

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***

.001

***

0.00

4***

0.00

6***

(350

8)(3

453)

(100

68)

(376

98)

(371

74)

(430

2)(2

093)

(103

81)

(459

26)

(181

84)

FC+D

+G0.

873

2917

227

189

1215

0022

8567

2047

6753

115

3741

919

5264

2827

0925

7192

0.06

4*0.

091*

0.04

2**

0.78

90.

185

(496

1)(4

883)

(142

39)

(533

13)

(525

73)

(608

4)(2

961)

(146

80)

(649

49)

(257

16)

FC+D

+G+P

0.92

630

477

2808

112

2983

2432

7121

3987

5313

938

923

1801

1428

2938

2163

90.

035*

*0.

002*

**0.

003*

**0.

731

0.02

1**

(350

8)(3

453)

(100

68)

(376

98)

(371

74)

(430

2)(2

093)

(103

81)

(459

26)

(181

84)

FC+D

+P0.

838

1212

910

258

7758

468

523

4551

617

644

1482

711

1557

1051

4570

023

0.00

1***

0.00

3***

0.00

1***

0.00

9***

0.04

2**

(303

8)(2

990)

(871

9)(3

2647

)(3

2194

)(3

725)

(181

3)(8

990)

(397

73)

(157

48)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**0.

018*

*0.

001*

**

CD

[P =

FS2

1271

712

517

3650

013

6663

1347

6615

596

7589

3763

216

6490

6592

10.

05]

vs F

S3

CD

[P =

FS2

1038

310

220

2980

211

1585

1100

3612

733

6196

3072

613

5939

5382

40.

05]

vs F

S4

CD

[P =

FS2

9713

9560

2787

710

4378

1029

2911

911

5796

2874

212

7159

5034

80.

05]

vs F

S5

CD

[P =

FS3

1271

712

517

3650

013

6663

1347

6615

596

7589

3763

216

6490

6592

10.

05]

vs F

S4

CD

[P =

FS3

1217

511

985

3494

613

0845

1290

2814

931

7266

3603

015

9402

6311

50.

05]

vs F

S5

CD

[P =

FS4

9713

9560

2787

710

4378

1029

2926

9622

6414

230

2216

117

771

0.05

]vs

FS

5



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

Kol

ar (

Kar

nata

ka)

FC+D

0.91

1222

608

2142

412

6705

1445

8713

0379

4879

438

219

1907

6439

4991

2680

870.

001*

**0.

013*

*0.

006*

**0.

001*

**0.

024*

*(3

760)

(371

3)(1

9368

)(3

1527

)(3

0879

)(1

1889

)(1

2703

)(3

8988

)(1

3190

0)(1

4354

0)

FC+D

+G1.

005

2741

926

399

1665

7317

6679

1644

4298

855

8354

127

8467

9092

8172

5222

0.07

4*0.

150

0.18

90.

121

0.24

8(5

825)

(575

2)(3

0005

)(4

8841

)(4

7837

)(1

8418

)(1

9679

)(6

0400

)(2

0434

0)(2

2237

2)

FC+D

+G+P

1.50

636

445

3411

215

2346

2707

6224

2771

7481

253

538

2855

4061

3039

3577

53<0

.001

***

0.02

3**

0.00

1***

<0.0

01**

*0.

112

(531

8)(5

251)

(273

91)

(445

85)

(436

69)

(168

13)

(179

65)

(551

38)

(186

536)

(202

997)

FC+D

+P0.

301

1780

615

676

5214

016

1528

1359

6826

856

2612

186

600

2396

6823

0844

-

-

-

-

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

0.00

3***

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***0

.026

**

CD

[P =

FS1

1446

314

282

4496

1212

6111

8770

4572

848

859

1499

6150

7332

5521

030.

05]

vs F

S2

CD

[P =

FS1

1358

613

416

6997

711

3905

1115

6542

954

4589

514

0864

4765

5551

8610

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS2

1645

316

247

8474

713

7946

1351

1152

020

5558

217

0595

5771

3762

8067

0.05

]vs

FS

3

Gad

ag (

Kar

nata

ka)

FC+D

1.14

2493

2

89

315

169

4729

144

670

3230

3078

1008

711

5589

1054

07<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

<0.0

01**

*

Dha

rmap

uri

& K

rish

nagi

ri (

Tam

il N

adu)

FC+D

0.67

2258

9745

0687

934

8835

421

571

1192

910

231

1194

2395

291

6473

8<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*0.

011*

*0.

628

0.00

5***

(651

)(6

36)

(775

2)(1

2728

)(7

165)

(127

6)(1

190)

(138

99)

(126

36)

(121

47)

FC+D

+P0.

802

1284

310

960

1411

2914

0458

6022

423

212

2121

424

3575

1742

4013

8265

0.08

0*0.

093*

0.02

3**

0.23

10.

088*

**(2

158)

(210

9)(2

5711

)(4

2215

)(2

3762

)(4

230)

(394

6)(4

6097

)(4

1909

)(4

0286

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*0.

003*

**0.

489

0.00

2***

CD

[P =

FS1

4675

4569

5569

391

442

5147

291

6385

4799

850

9077

987

263

0.05

]vs

FS

2

Sri

kaku

lam

(A

nd

hra

Pra

des

h)

FC0.

201

6300

5100

6150

014

100

-300

8282

6294

6765

018

625

8770

FC+D

0.63

611

756

1037

069

763

7131

254

678

1340

411

673

8152

372

511

5920

0<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*0.

001*

**<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

(349

7)(3

444)

(101

03)

(381

57)

(376

22)

(734

)(6

43)

(425

9)(5

988)

(490

7)

FC+D

+G0.

733

2917

227

189

1215

0022

8567

2047

6730

224

2768

113

1430

2319

1220

8542

0.07

4*0.

084*

0.01

3**

0.11

50.

137

(494

6)(4

870)

(142

88)

(539

62)

(532

06)

(103

9)(9

09)

(602

4)(8

468)

(694

0)

FC+D

+G+P

0.73

630

463

2816

512

0983

2445

7721

7002

3241

729

668

1338

1525

9669

2229

590.

003*

**0.

003*

**<0

.001

***

0.01

2**

0.01

6***

(349

7)(3

444)

(101

03)

(381

57)

(376

22)

(734

)(6

43)

(425

9)(5

988)

(490

7)



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

FC+D

+P

0.62

8

1214

610

359

7758

468

161

4672

714

663

1238

796

654

8378

553

012

.002

***

0.00

4***

0.00

1***

0.01

2**

0.02

0**

(302

9)(2

982)

(875

0)(3

3045

)(3

2582

)(6

36)

(557

)(3

689)

(518

6)(4

250)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

CD

[P =

FS2

1267

912

485

3662

613

8326

1363

8826

6223

3015

441

2170

717

790

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS2

1035

210

194

2990

511

2943

1113

6021

7419

0312

608

1772

414

526

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS2

9684

9535

2797

410

5648

1041

6820

3317

8011

793

1657

913

587

0.05

]vs

FS

5

CD

[P =

FS3

1267

912

485

3662

613

8326

1363

8826

6223

3015

441

2170

717

790

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS3

1213

9 1

1953

3506

713

2437

1305

8225

4922

3114

784

2078

317

033

0.05

]vs

FS

5

CD

[P =

FS4

9684

9535

2797

410

5648

1041

6820

3317

8011

793

1657

913

587

0.05

]vs

FS5

Ken

dra

par

a (O

dh

ish

a)

FC+D

0.88

862

2534

7828

950

3952

093

1490

7957

9037

058

7257

432

548

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***

0.00

1***

<0.0

01**

<0.0

01**

*(5

82)

(556

)(3

606)

(469

8)(4

616)

(722

)(6

68)

(280

3)(6

620)

(565

1)

FC+D

+F1.

025

5607

2928

2533

136

343

6876

6985

3974

3132

563

124

1791

50.

005*

**0.

014*

*0.

190

0.00

4***

0.07

5*(7

36)

(704

)(4

561)

(594

2)(5

839)

(913

)(8

46)

(354

6)(8

373)

(714

8)

FC+D

+G1.

097

7081

4182

3363

344

407

1251

780

7846

1634

034

6434

821

708

0.05

8*0.

300

0.89

00.

019*

*0.

196

(622

)(5

95)

(385

5)(5

022)

(493

4)(7

72)

(715

)(2

997)

(707

7)(6

041)

FC+D

+G+F

1.00

258

5423

0935

194

2927

2-9

730

6477

3127

2866

973

069

1145

70.

408

0.43

30.

010*

*0.

329

0.26

5(1

164)

(111

3)(7

211)

(939

6)(9

232)

(144

4)(1

337)

(560

7)(1

3239

)(1

1302

)

FC+D

+G+P

0.89

297

8051

0155

381

5224

877

912

571

7469

5901

991

838

3060

70.

040*

*0.

041*

*0.

493

0.02

6**

0.02

2**

(116

4)(1

113)

(721

1)(9

396)

(923

2)(1

444)

(133

7)(5

607)

(132

39)

(113

02)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

* 0

.017

**<0

.001

***<

0.00

1***

CD

[P =

FS1

1964

1878

1216

915

855

1557

924

3722

5694

6122

340

1907

10.

05]

vs F

S2

CD

[P =

FS1

1783

1705

1104

714

394

1414

317

8317

0511

047

1439

414

143

0.05

]vs

FS3

CD

[P =

FS1

3380

3129

1312

030

980

2644

733

8031

2913

120

3098

026

447

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS1

3380

3129

1312

030

980

2644

733

8031

2913

120

3098

026

447

0.05

]vs

FS

5



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

CD

[P =

FS2

2017

1929

1249

816

285

1600

120

1719

2912

498

1628

516

001

0.05

]vs

FS

3

CD

[P =

FS2

2882

2756

1785

923

269

2286

335

7733

1113

885

3278

727

989

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS2

2882

2756

1785

923

269

2286

335

7733

1113

885

3278

727

989

0.05

]vs

FS

5

CD

[P =

FS3

2762

2641

1711

422

299

2191

034

2831

7313

306

3142

026

822

0.05

]vs

FS

4

CD

[P =

FS3

2762

2641

1711

422

299

2191

034

2831

7313

306

3142

026

822

0.05

]vs

FS

5

CD

[P =

FS4

3445

3294

2134

527

812

2732

742

7539

5716

596

3918

733

453

0.05

]vs

FS

5

Siv

agan

gai

(Tam

il N

adu)

FC+D

0.80

10]7

988

6612

6087

774

951

1796

499

1078

8242

836

9370

765

419

0.13

30.

336

<0.0

01**

*0.

297

0.01

4**

(131

9)(1

329)

(410

3)(3

8121

)(1

4943

)(1

685)

(166

7)(5

128)

(182

63)

(180

69)

FC+D

+P0.

8014

1169

210

051

7174

614

4270

4753

114

792

1251

560

427

1413

7410

9947

0.06

8*0.

163

0.00

7***

0.92

00.

009*

**(1

115)

(112

4)(3

468)

(322

18)

(126

29)

(142

4)(1

409)

(433

4)(1

5435

)(1

5271

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

017*

*0.

084*

<0.0

01**

*0.

734

<0.0

01**

*

CD

[P =

FS1

3581

3610

1114

110

3511

4057

745

7645

2813

925

4959

149

062

0.05

]vs

FS

2

Pal

gh

ar (

Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC+D

0.39

2449

3131

1344

267

1490

0-6

915

1189

297

2180

814

6783

940

697

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**<0

.001

***

Meh

san

a (G

uja

rat)

FC0.

952

4041

2271

6010

010

1550

3075

078

8370

9818

8700

1660

6713

0741

0.48

70.

430

0.31

80.

624

0.50

9(2

488)

(228

1)(2

8186

)(9

0455

)(8

2058

)(4

626)

(200

6)(4

3052

)(2

0442

6)(6

1658

)

FC+D

0.97

1572

2556

0610

3270

1857

4012

0980

1425

110

014

1280

5619

2629

1524

560.

967

0.28

40.

189

0.94

80.

224

(908

)(8

33)

(102

92)

(330

29)

(299

63)

(168

9)(7

32)

(157

20)

(746

45)

(225

14)

FC+D

+G1.

077

4728

3292

7014

111

8988

6156

590

1067

5811

9330

1923

6798

240

0.11

60.

505

0.08

6*0.

130

0.24

4(1

330)

(121

9)(1

5066

)(4

8350

)(4

3861

)(2

472)

(107

2)(2

3012

)(1

0927

0)(3

2957

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

932

0.71

00.

012*

0.95

60.

273

CD

[P =

FS1

vs F

S2

5510

5051

6240

320

0234

1816

8910

242

4443

9531

445

2582

1365

06

0.05

]FS

1 vs

FS

358

6853

8066

466

2132

7119

3519

1090

947

3210

1520

4820

4814

5394

FS2

vs F

S3

3350

3071

3794

612

1756

1104

8062

2827

0257

958

2752

0183

005



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Ret

urn

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)S

urp

lus

(kg

)

Pan

chm

ahal

(G

uja

rat)

FC+D

0.90

785

4765

6169

764

3280

489

7612

906

1111

582

572

9811

873

036

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***

0.00

2***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**(1

227)

(119

4)(7

727)

(801

5)(7

795)

(189

4)(1

830)

(757

5)(2

1500

)(2

0690

)

FC+D

+G0.

697

9488

7034

7317

840

684

1122

816

421

1439

089

764

1401

4311

1701

0.03

2**

0.02

1**

0.00

5***

0.02

1**

0.01

6**

(122

7)(1

194)

(772

7)(8

015)

(779

5)(1

894)

(183

0)(7

575)

(215

00)

(206

90)

FC+D

+G

+P

1.06

711

035

8673

7620

056

225

2787

515

264

1274

890

500

1232

0887

978

0.00

1**

0.00

4***

0.00

7***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**(1

227)

(119

4)(7

727)

(801

5)(7

795)

(189

4)(1

830)

(757

5)(2

1500

)(2

0690

)

FC+D

+P

0.84

146

3331

8335

400

2020

028

0011

766

1042

360

450

1042

8085

465

--

--

-

FC+G

0.54

132

3326

7516

900

2190

015

200

5962

5023

3320

050

270

3712

0-

--

--

FC+G

+P

0.84

181

4966

8240

200

5759

239

988

1353

511

090

6006

012

9425

9520

1-

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0

.001

***

<0.0

01**

*<0.

001*

**

CD

[P =

0.0

5]36

4835

4922

959

2381

623

161

5630

5438

2250

863

881

6147

6

Not

e: F

C: F

ield

cro

ps, D

: Dai

ry, P

: Pou

ltry,

G:G

oat,

F: F

ish

* in

dica

tes

sign

ifica

nce

at 1

0% le

vel

* in

dica

tes

sign

ifica

nce

at 5

% le

vel

***

indi

cate

s si

gnifi

canc

e at

1%

leve

l-

Valu

es in

( )

indi

cate

s st

anda

rd e

rror

of m

ean

valu

es-

The

farm

ing

syst

em w

ith o

nly

one

hous

ehol

d w

ere

not c

onsi

dere

d fo

r AN

OVA

as

wel

l as

for

paire

d t t

est.



Nainital (Uttarakhand): Four farming systems viz;field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy + goat, fieldcrops + dairy + goat + poultry and field crops +dairy + poultry were found among which field crops+ dairy system is practiced by 68 % householdshaving mean area of 0.33 ha. Diversification ofcropping systems, livestock and products alongwith suitable capacity building programmes wereundertaken during the year.

Eastern Himalaya

Ambedkarnagar (Uttar Pradesh): Three farmingsystems viz; field, crops, field crops + dairy andfield crops + dairy + goat was found among whichfield crops + dairy was practiced by 55 % farmhouseholds having mean area of 0.38 ha while fieldcrops + dairy + goat system was found in 40 %households having mean area of 0.38 ha.Diversification of cropping and livestockcomponents resulted in significantly higher returnin field crop + dairy system and reduction in costin both field crop + dairy and field crop +dairy +goatsystems.Among the systems, significantly higherproduction (10262 kg) and return (Rs 84,055) wasobserved in field crops +dairy + goat system whilethe cost was lesser in field crop + dairy system(Rs 28,978) due to diversification of existingsystems. Diversification of cropping systems aloneresulted in improvement in production (33 %),marketable surplus (5.5 %), reduction in cost(24%), increased return (90%) and profit in fieldcrop + dairy system.

Lower Gangetic Plains

South 24 Paragnas (West Bengal): Eight farmingsystems viz; , field crops, field crops + dairy, fieldcrops + dairy + fish, field crops + dairy + goat, fieldcrops + dairy + goat + poultry, field crops + dairy +poultry, field crops + goat and field crops + poultrywere found among which field crops + dairysystem is practiced by 33 % households havingmean area of 0.39 ha followed by field crops +dairy +poultry by 25 % households having meanarea of 0.52 ha. Significantly higher production(7348 kg), marketable surplus (4419 kg), cost (Rs53,774), and return (Rs 35,820) was observed with

diversification in field crops + dairy compared toexisting system. However, the profit due todiversification was not significant. Similarly, in caseof field crop + dairy + poultry, cost, return and profitwere significantly higher due to diversification.Among the farming systems, it was observed thatcost and returns were significant with field crop +dairy + goat +poultry recording lower cost (Rs42,960/ households) and field crop systemrecoding higher returns (Rs 85,109/ households).

Middle Gangetic Plains

Purnea (Bihar): Three farming systems viz;, fieldcrops, field crops + dairy and field crops + dairy +goat was found among which 79% householdswere having the field crops + dairy + goat system.Diversification of existing farming systemsrecorded significantly higher cost (Rs 1,19,423)and profit (Rs 64,738) in field crops + dairy + goatcompared to existing system. Similarly,diversification of field crop + dairy system resultedin significantly higher production (23212 kg),marketable surplus (21214 kg), cost (Rs 2, 43,575)and net returns (Rs 1, 74,240). Among the farmingsystems, significantly higher production and profitwas observed with diversification of field crops +dairy while lower cost was with field crops + dairy+ goat.

Upper Gangetic Plain

Kanpur Dehat (Uttar Pradesh): Four farmingsystems viz;, field crops, field crops + dairy, fieldcrops + dairy + goat and field crops + goat werefound among which field crops + dairy and fieldcrops + dairy + goat were practiced by 66 %households. Diversification of existing systemsresulted in significantly higher production,marketable surplus, returns and profit in both thedominant farming systems. The improvement wasfound to be 21, 47,25 and 1.5 times respectivelyfor field crop + dairy and 24, 22, 24, 19%respectively for field crops + dairy + goat system.Among the farming systems, significantly higherproduction, (12988 kg), marketable surplus (9807kg) and profit (Rs 42,306) was observed withdiversification of field crop + dairy system from 0.85



ha. However, higher return was observed in fieldcrops + dairy + goat (Rs 77301 from 0.76 ha).Lower cost was found to be in field crop + goatsystem (Rs 40560 from 0.33 ha).

Trans Gangetic Plains

Sirsa (Haryana): Two farming systems viz; fieldcrops and field crops + dairy was found amongwhich 95 % households were having field crops +dairy system having mean area of 0.58 ha.Diversification of field crops + dairy system withcropping systems resulted in improvement inproduction (66 %), marketable surplus (56 %) ,reduction in cost (16%) , return (30 %) and profit(27 %) for the households. Among the farmingsystems, higher production, marketable surplus,returns and profit were observed in field crops +dairy system.

Amritsar (Punjab): Only one farming system viz;,field crops + dairy was observed in all thehouseholds having mean area of 1.08 ha.Improvement of existing system with improvedpractices of crops and livestock resulted insignificantly higher production (78%), increasedreturn (3 %) and profit (23 %).

Eastern plateau and hills

Kabirdham (Chhatisgarh): Five farming systemsnamely field crops, field crops + dairy, field crops+ dairy + goat, field crops + dairy + goat + poultryand field crops + dairy + poultry were found amongwhich field crops alone was practiced by 50%households having mean area of 0.84 ha followedby field crops + dairy by 37.5 % households havingmean area 0.77 ha. Significantly lower cost (32%) and higher profit (40%) was observed in fieldcrops + dairy system. Improvement in productionand marketable surplus in the same system wasobserved by 91 and 105 % due to diversification ofexisting cropping systems. Among the farmingsystems, performance of field crops + dairy systemwas found to be significantly higher in terms ofproduction, marketable surplus, lower cost, returnsand profit compared to field crops alone.

Pakur (Jharkhand): Two farming systems namelyfield crops and field crops + dairy were foundamong which 91% households were having thefield crops + dairy system with mean area of 0.76ha. Diversification of cropping systems in fieldcrops alone system resulted in significantly higherproduction, marketable surplus, cost, return andprofit. Among the farming systems higherimprovement in production (164 %), marketablesurplus (132 %) returns (4 times) and profit (75%)was observed in field crops + dairy system.

Dindori (Madhya Pradesh): Five farmingsystems namely field crops, field crops + dairy,field crops + dairy + goat, field crops + dairy +poultry and field crops + goat were found amongwhich 66% farm households were having fieldcrops + dairy system with mean area 0.76 ha.Diversification resulted in significantly higher returnand profit in field crops + dairy and field crops +dairy + poultry farming systems. The improvementin production (96%), marketable surplus (99 %)and profit (62 %) was observed in field crops +dairy system. Among the farming systems, thoughproduction and marketable surplus was non-significant, cost, return and profit was significant.Lower cost (Rs 40,209), higher returns (Rs1,64,459) and profit (Rs 1,06,397) was observedin field crops + dairy + goat system in 0.73 ha.

Angul (Odisha): Four farming systems namelyfield crop, field crop + dairy, field crops + dairy +poultry and field crops + poultry were found amongwhich 58% households were having field crops +dairy with mean area 0.83 ha followed by 33 %households having field crops + dairy + poultrysystem with 0.89 ha as mean area. Diversificationof field crops + dairy system resulted inimprovement in production (23 %), marketablesurplus (31%), cost (27%), returns (58 %) andprofit (3.5 times). The same was observed to be3,40, 18, 39 and 4 times in case of field crops +dairy + poultry system. Among these two systems,significantly higher marketable surplus, cost andreturns was observed in field crops +dairy + poultrysystem compared to field crop + dairy system.



Central Plateau and hills

Katni (Madhya Pradesh): Three farming systemsviz;, field crops, field crops + dairy and field crops+ dairy + goat were found among which 83 %households were having field crops + dairy farmingsystem. Diversification resulted in significantlyhigher marketable surplus, cost, return and profitin field crops + dairy system. The improvementwas found to be 15, 62,77,45 and 2.5 times inproduction, marketable surplus, cost, returns andprofit respectively. In case of field crops alonesystem, only cost was significantly differingbetween existing and improved system while otherparameters were non-significant. Among thefarming systems, significantly higher marketablesurplus (5445 kg), lower cost (Rs 29,340) andhigher profit (Rs 44,168) was observed withdiversification approach in field crops + dairysystem while significant higher returns (Rs 75,135)was observed in field crop alone due todiversification.

Udaipur (Rajasthan): Three farming systems viz;field crops, field crops + dairy and field crops +dairy + goat were found among which 62.5 %households were having the field crops + dairy +poultry system with mean area of 0.66 ha followedby 29% households having field crops + dairy withmean area of 0.60 ha. Significantly highermarketable surplus, cost, return and profit wereobserved under diversification of field crops + dairy+ goat system. The improvement was found to be15,37, 3 times, 44 and 44% in production,marketable surplus, cost, returns and profitrespectively. Among the farming systems,significantly higher marketable surplus, returns andprofit were observed in field crops + dairy + goatsystem while lower cost was observed in fieldcrops (Rs 26,446 in 0.70 ha).

Western Plateau and hills

Aurangabad (Maharashtra): Two farmingsystems namely field crops and field crops + dairywere found among which 87.5 % households werehaving field crops alone with mean area of 0.47ha. Significantly higher production, marketable

surplus, and cost was observed in field crops alonesystem due to diversification. The improvementwas found to be 120 %, 225 % and 3 timesrespectively. Field crops + dairy record significantlyhigher marketable surplus (3.8 times), and cost (4times). Among the farming systems, field cropsalone was found to be better compared to field crop+ dairy in terms of production, marketable surplus,cost and returnsdue to diversification.

Pune (Maharashtra): All the households werehaving field crops + dairy farming system withmean area of 0.53 ha. Significantly higherproduction (74 %), marketable surplus (76 %) ,cost ( 22 %), return (63 %) and profit (2.5 times)was recorded due to diversification of croppingsystems and livestock component in field crops +dairy system.

Amravati (Maharashtra): Three farming systemsviz;, field crops + dairy, field crops + goat and fieldcrops + poultry were foundamong which 83%households were having field crops + dairy systemwith mean area of 0.87 ha followed by 12.5 %households with field crops + goat having meanarea of 0.80 ha. Only cost was significantly differentbetween existing and improved farming system forfield crops + dairy while all other parameters werenon-significant. Among the farming systems,significantlyhigher marketable surplus wasrecorded in field crops + poultry, while lower costwas observed in field crops + goat system.

Southern Plateau and hills

Warnagal (Telangana): Five farming systems viz;,field crops, field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +goat, field crops + dairy + goat + poultry andfieldcrops + dairy + poultry were found among which33 % households were having field crops + dairy+ poultry having mean area of 0.83 ha followed by25% households each of field crops + dairy (meanarea 0.90 ha) and field crops + dairy + goat + poultry(mean area 0.92 ha). Significantly higherproduction (45 %), marketable surplus (44 %), cost(43 %), returns (53 %) and profit (53 %) due todiversification approach were observed in fieldcrops + dairy + poultry system. Similar trend was



also observed in field crops + dairy and field crops+ dairy + goat + poultry systems. Among thefarming systems, after diversification, higherproduction (53139 kg) marketable surplus (38923kg) returns (Rs 2,82,938) and profit (Rs 2,18,639)was observed in field crops + dairy + goat + poultry.Lower cost was observed field crops + dairysystem.

Kolar (Karnataka): Four farming systems namelyfield crops + dairy, field crops + dairy + goat, fieldcrops + dairy +goat + poultry and field crops +dairy + poultry were observed among which 50%households were having field crops + dairy systemwith mean area of 0.91 ha. Significantly higherproduction (2 times), marketable surplus (1.7times), cost (1.5 times), returns (2.7 times) andprofit (2 times) was observed due to diversificationof field crops + dairy system. The higher returnsand profit are due to growing of vegetables andmulberry in the farming system. Similar resultswere also observed in other farming systems suchas field crops + dairy + goat and field crops + dairy+ goat + poultry. Among the farming systems fieldcrops + dairy + goat system recorded higherproduction (98 855 kg), marketable surplus (83541kg), returns (Rs 9,09,281) and profit (Rs 7,25,222)with diversification. Lower cost was observed inthe field crops + dairy + poultry system (Rs 86,600).

Gadag (Karnataka): Only one farming system offield crops + dairy was observed with mean areaof 1.14 ha. Significantly higher production (3.4times), marketable surplus (3.4 times), cost (6times), return (2.4 times) and profit (2.3 times) wasobserved with diversification of field crops + dairysystem compared to existing system.

Dharmapuri / Krishnagiri (Tamil Nadu): Twofarming systems namely field crops + dairy andfield crops + dairy + poultry were found amongwhich 92% households were having field crops +dairy system with mean area of 0.67 ha.Significantly higher production (11929 kg),marketable surplus (10231 kg), return (Rs 95,291)and profit (Rs 64,738) were recorded withdiversification than existing system in field crops+ dairy system. The cost also increased by 35 %.

Similarly, under field crops + dairy + poultry system,significant improvement in production, marketablesurplus, cost and profit was observed. Among thetwo farming systems, diversification approachresulted in higher production, marketable surplusand profit in field crops + dairy + poultry. However,the cost was lower in field crops + dairy system(Rs 1,19,423).

East cost plains and hills

Srikakulam (Andhra Pradesh): Five farmingsystems namely field crops, field crops + dairy,field crops + dairy + goat, field crops + dairy +goat + poultry and field crops + dairy + poultry werefound among which 33 % households were havingfield crops + dairy + poultry having mean area of0.62 ha followed by 25 % each of field crops +dairy and field crops + dairy + goat + poultry havingmean area of 0.63 and 0.73 ha respectively.Significantly higher production (20 %), marketablesurplus (19 %), cost (24 %), returns (22 %) andprofit (13 %) were observed due to diversificationof field crops + dairy + poultry system. Similar trendwas also observed in field crops + dairy and fieldcrops + dairy + goat + poultry systems. Amongthe different farming systems, due to diversificationof existing systems, significantly higher production(32417 kg), marketable surplus (29668 kg), return(Rs 2,59,669) and profit (Rs 2,22,959) wasobtained from 0.73 ha area of field crops + dairy +goat + poultry system. Lower cost was recordedin field crop alone system (Rs 67,650 from 0.20ha area).

Kendrapara (Odisha): Five farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +fish, field crops + dairy + goat, field crops + dairy +goat + fish and field crops + dairy + goat + poultrywere found among which 33 % households werehaving field crops + dairy (mean area 0.88 ha)followed by field crops + dairy + goat having meanarea of 1.09 ha. Diversification of existing systemsresulted in significantly higher production (45 %),marketable surplus (66 %), cost (28 %), returns (83 %) and profit (3.5 times) in field crops + dairysystem. Similar trend was also observed in allother systems with varying degree of improvement.



Higher gain in profit due to diversification wasobserved in field crops + dairy + goat + poultrysystem. Among the various faming systems,higher production, marketable surplus, return andprofit was observed in field crops + dairy + goat +poultry system due to diversification of existingsystems. Lower cost was observed in field crops+ dairy + goat + fishery system (Rs 28,669 in 1ha).

Sivagangai& Pudukottai (Tamil Nadu): Twofarming systems namely field crops + dairy +poultry and field crops + dairy were found amongwhich 58 % households were having field crops +dairy + poultry with mean area of 0.80 ha.Diversification of existing systems, resulted insignificantly higher production and profit in fieldcrops + dairy + poultry system while only profitwas significant in field crops + dairy system.However, in both the systems, the improvementof existing system through diversification resultedin significant reduction in cost (30 and 16 %respectively in field crops + dairy and field crops +dairy + poultry). Among the systems, diversificationresulted in significantly higher production,marketable surplus, reduction in cost and profit infield crops + dairy + poultry system compared tofield crops + dairy system.

West coast plains and ghats

Palghar (Maharashtra): Only one farming systemof field crops + dairy was observed with mean areaof 0.39 ha. Improvement of existing farmingsystems with critical interventions anddiversification approach resulted in significantimprovement in production (14 %) , marketablesurplus (3 times), cost (82 %), returns (4.5 times)and from loss to profit (Rs 40,697) in field crops +dairy system.

Gujarat plains and hills

Mehsana (Gujarat): Three farming systemsnamely field crops, field crops + dairy and fieldcrops + dairy + goat were found among which 62.5% households were having field crops + dairy with

mean area of 0.97 ha followed by field crops +dairy + goat in 29% households having area of 1.07ha. The interventions and diversification were notsignificant in all the farming systems exceptsignificant cost increase in field crops + dairy +goat system. Among the different farming systems,diversification resulted in higher production,marketable surplus, return and profit in field crops+ dairy system compared to other systems. Lowercost of the system was observed in field crops +dairy + goat.

Panchmahal: Six farming systems viz;, field crops+ dairy, field crops + dairy + goat, field crops +dairy + goat + poultry, field crops + goat +poultry,field crops + dairy + poultry and field crops+ goat were found among which the first threefarming systems were found in each 29% ofhouseholds having mean area of 0.90, 0.69 and1.06 ha respectively significantly higher production,marketable surplus, cost, returns and profit wasobserved in all the 3 dominant farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +goat and field crops + dairy + goat + poultry. Thehigher improvement in production (73 %),marketable surplus (104%), returns (244 %) andprofit (8-10 times) was observed in field crops +dairy + goat due to diversification. Among thefarming systems, performance of field crops +dairy + goat was found to be significantly better interms of production, marketable surplus, return andprofit. The cost of diversification was onlymarginally (4 %) higher in field crops + dairy + goatthan field crops + dairy and field crops + dairy +goat + poultry system.

The results across the locations aresummarized below

● The number of farming systems in differentdistricts varied from 1 to 8. Presence ofmaximum of 8 farming systems was observedin South 24 Paragnas district (West Bengal)and minimum of one farming systems in 5districts namely Samba (Jammu & Kashmir) ,Amritsar (Punjab), Palghar and Pune(Maharashtra) and Gadag (Karnataka).



● Existence of six farming systems atPanchmahal (Gujarat) and 5 farming systemsat Kabirdham (Chhatisgarh), Dindori (MadhyaPradesh), Srikakulam (Andhra Pradesh),Warangal (Telangana), Kendrapara (Odisha)districts were also observed.

● Field crops + dairy was found to be thecommon farming system at all locations inmarginal households and it is the dominantsystem practiced in 17 districts based onnumber of households adopting the system.

● Field crops + dairy + poultry is found to be thedominant farming system in Udaipur(Rajasthan), Warangal (Telangana),Srikakulam (Andhra Pradesh) and Sivagangai(Tamil Nadu). Similarly, field crops + dairy +goat were found to be pre-dominant system inPurnea (Bihar) district. At Kanpur Dehat (UttarPradesh), both field crops + dairy and filedcrops + dairy + goat were found as dominantsystems. In case of South 24 Paragnas (West

Bengal) and Panchmahal (Gujarat), highlydiversified system was noticed.

● Field crop alone was found to be dominantpractice adopted by large number ofhouseholds in Kabirdham (Chhatisgarh) andAurangabad (Maharashtra) districts.

● Across the locations and farming systems,improvement of existing farming systems withdiversification approach in cropping system,livestock, product diversification and capacitybuilding module resulted in considerableimprovement in production (up to 2 times),marketable surplus (1-2 time), reduction in cost(20 %) due to recycling, returns (2 times) andprofit (cash flow for family by 1-2 times).

● Based on the statistical analysis, bestperforming farming system has been identifiedfor each district which needs to be up-scaledalong with all possible interventions anddiversification approach for improving thelivelihood of marginal farm households.

Farming system interventions of yellow sticky trap and kitchen garden in the adapted villages of Kendrapara district(Odisha)



7.4.3 On-Farm evaluation of farming system modules

Title of the experiment: On-Farm evaluation offarming system modules for improving profitabilityand livelihood of small and marginal farmers

Objectives

• To address critical constraints of small andmarginal farm holders for overall improvementof productivity

• To increase the profitability of small andmarginal households and ensure livelihood


Modules: The experiment was designed withholistic approach where in improvement ofproductivity of existing components of the farmingsystem was concentrated by appropriateinterventions besides farmer opinion basedintroduction of new components in optionalmodule. Benchmarking of all components wasdone before making interventions in differentmodules. Four modules comprising of crop (lowcost interventions in existing cropping systemsbased constraint analysis), Livestock (low costinterventions in existing livestock componentsbased on constraint analysis), On farmprocessing & value addition (on farm agroprocessing and value addition of marketablesurplus produces) and optional (Introduction of

additional components based on householdsperception) were implemented in 2 farmhouseholds in each village comprising of 1marginal and small household. The experiment wasimplemented in randomly selected 12marginal farmhouseholds in each district.The general guidelinesused for designing the modules are given below

Households: Twelve households consisting of 6each in small and marginal categories wasselected for experiment in all the locations exceptKangra (Himachal Pradesh) and South 24Paragnas (West Bengal) where in all the selected12 households belong to marginal. The averageholding size of households in the study locationsranged from 0.27 to 1.44 ha for small households.

Locations: 29 centres in 13 agro climatic regionscovering 28 NARP zones have implemented theinterventions in different modules while others havepartially made the interventions. The details oflocations, number of households covered andfarming systems are given in Table 7.4.4. Twolocations namely Fathepur (Rajasthan) andKamrup (Assam) have partially implemented theinterventions and hence, the data is not includedin this report.

Data analysis methodology: Based on thebenchmark data, farming systems practiced bythe households were identified and grouped in to

Farming Notation Module name DetailsSystem

Existing M0 Bench mark Recording of bench mark data on crop, livestock, other componentsand household as a whole

Improved M1 Crop Low cost interventions in existing cropping systems basedcononstraint analysis

M2 Livestock Low cost interventions in existing livestock components based onconstraint analysis

M3 On farm On farm agro processing and value addition for marketable surplusprocessing &value addition

M4 Optional Introduction of additional components based on householdsperception



different farming system categories such as fieldcrops+ dairy, field crops + dairy+ goat etc as givenin Table 7.3.1. Four parameters namely production(on equivalent basis of base pre-dominant crop),marketable surplus (calculated by deducting thefamily consumption for food, feed, seed etc fromthe total production), cost (total cost of the systemincluding all components and diversification) andprofit (calculated by deducting the cost of thesystem from the gross income obtained frommarketable surplus) were used for comparison ofexisting with improved system and also differentfarming systems. Farming system with more thanone household was subjected to ANOVA and pairedt-test analysis. Paired t-test has been carried outfor comparing existing and diversified systems withrespect to production, marketable surplus, costand profit. Similarly, one-way ANOVA has beencarried out to identify the best farming system withrespect to production, marketable surplus, costandprofit for the district.Standard error of mean valuesis also presented in parenthesis in Table 7.4.5.

Results

The interventions made in different modulesare given in Table 7.4.4, while the production,marketable surplus and economics of differentfarming systems are given in 7.4.5. Location wiseand summary of results is explained briefly below.

Western Himalaya

Kangra (Himachal Pradesh): Two farmingsystems namely field crops + dairy and field crops+ dairy + goat were found among which 75%households were having field crops + dairy systemwith mean area of 0.78 ha. Interventions made incrop, livestock, processing and optional moduleresulted in improvement in production and profitby 72 and 29 % in field crops + dairy and 65 and15 % in field crops + dairy + goat systemrespectively. Among the two systems, field crop +dairy recorded higher production and profit. In boththe systems total cost was found to be lesser withinterventions due to better recycling of wastes.

Samba (Jammu and Kashmir): Only one farmingsystem of field crops+ dairy was observed with

mean area of 1.14 ha. Interventions in crop module(introduction of pea in rabi), livestock and optionalmodule (nutritional kitchen garden) resulted insignificant improvement in production (61 %),marketable surplus (54%) and profit (53 %). Thecost also reduced to the extent of 33% due to betterrecycling of output of one component as input forother component.

Nainital (Uttarakhand): Five farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +apiary, field crops + dairy + poultry, field crops +dairy + fish and field crops + dairy + poultry + goatwere found among which 58% households werehaving field crops + dairy with mean area of 0.70ha followed by 16% households practicing fieldcrops + dairy + poultry having mean area of 1.05ha. Interventions in crop, livestock, processing(grading, packing) and optional (kitchen garden andboundary plantation) modules were undertaken.

Eastern Himalaya

Ambedkarnagar (Uttar Pradesh): Field crops +dairy farming system were found in all thehouseholds with mean area of 0.72 ha.Interventions made in crop, livestock and optional(kitchen garden) modules resulted in significantimprovement in production (66 %), marketablesurplus (55 %), reduction in cost (23 %) and profit(58 %) in the field crops + dairy system.

Lower Gangeticplains

South 24 Paragnas (West Bengal): Threefarming systems namely field crops, field crops +dairy and field crops + dairy + poultry were foundamong which 66% households were having fieldcrops + dairy with mean area of 0.44 ha followedby field crops in 25% households having area of0.77 ha. Interventions made in crop, livestock,processing (sunflower oil, vermicompost) andoptional (nutritional kitchen garden) resulted insignificant improvement in production, marketablesurplus, cost and profit in field crops while the samewas not influenced in field crops + dairy system.The improvement in field crops due to interventionswas found to be 83, 99 and 141 % in production,marketable surplus and profit respectively. Among



Tab

le 7

.4.4

. Det

ails

of i

nte

rven

tio

ns

mad

e in

cro

p, l

ives

tock

, pro

cess

ing

an

d o

pti

on

al m

od

ule

s at

dif

fere

nt l

oca

tio

ns

Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

I. W

este

rn H

imal

aya

Kan

gra

(Him

acha

lFi

eld

crop

s +

0.78

9

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

0-1)

+-

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1)+

Gra

ded

Nut

ritio

nal

Pra

desh

) /S

ubm

onda

iry (

1-2)

sorg

hum

/m

usta

rd/

Buf

falo

(1-

2)so

rghu

m/

mus

tard

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

seed

kitc

hen

tane

llow

hills

rice/

bers

eem

rice

bers

eem

/ga

rden

subt

ropi

cal /

104

rain

yco

loca

sia

gobh

i/da

ys/2

336

mm

rain

oats

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0

.57

3M

aize

/W

heat

/-

Cow

(0-

1)+

-M

aize

/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1)

+G

rade

d-d

o-da

iry (

1-2)

+so

rghu

m/

barle

y/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+so

rghu

m/

mus

tard

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

seed

goat

(2)

rice

mus

tard

/G

oat (

2)ric

ebe

rsee

m/

bers

eem

/go

bhi/

gobh

i/oa

tsoa

ts

Sam

ba (J

&K

)/Fi

eld

crop

s +

1.14

12R

ice/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

1-2)

+R

ice

Whe

at/

Bla

ckgr

amC

ow (

1-2)

+-

-do-

sub

tropi

cal l

owda

iry (

1-2)

fodd

erbe

rsee

mB

uffa

lo (

0-1)

pea/

Buf

falo

(0-

1)al

titud

e /7

5 ra

iny

crop

s/be

rsee

mda

ys/1

548

mm

rain

mes

h

Nai

nita

l (U

ttara

-Fi

eld

crop

s +

0.70

7R

ice

Whe

atC

ow (

1-2)

Ric

e,W

heat

,C

ow (

1-2)

Tom

ato,

Nut

ritio

nal

khan

d)/H

ills o

fda

iryS

oybe

an,

Ber

seem

,C

alf

(1-2

)U

rd,

Pea

,C

alf

(1-2

)on

ion,

kitc

hen

Utta

rakh

and/

War

mm

aize

,P

otat

o,B

uffa

lo (

1)To

mat

o,B

erse

em/

Buf

falo

(1)

Okr

a,ga

rden

,M

oist

Sub

Hum

id/

Gah

at,

Oni

on,

Soy

abea

n/M

aize

,P

acki

ngfru

its &

90.5

rai

ny d

ays/

Gra

m,

Pea

,O

nion

Bhe

ndi,

boun

dary

2597

mm

rain

Tom

ato,

Lent

ilC

oria

nder

plan

tatio

nsC

hari,

Man

go,

Cor

iand

er,

Anw

la,

Okr

a

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

381

Ric

eW

heat

Cow

(3)

Ric

e,W

heat

,C

ow (

3)P

acki

ng-d

o-da

iry +

Pin

alu

Ber

seem

,C

alf (

2)U

rd,

Ber

seem

,C

alf (

2)of

Bhi

ndi

apia

ryH

aldi

,P

ea,

Buf

falo

(1)

Bhi

ndi,

Pea

/B

uffa

lo (

1)N

aipe

ar,

Oni

on,

Hon

ey B

eeC

oria

nder

Mai

zeH

oney

Bee

Mai

zeP

otat

o(2

box

es)

(2 b

oxes

)fo

dder

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

052

Ric

e,W

heat

,C

ow (

3)R

ice,

Whe

at,

Cow

(3)

Pac

king

-do-

dairy

+S

oybe

an,

Ber

seem

,B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

Soy

bean

,P

otat

o,B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

of P

otat

opo

ultr

yM

aize

,Le

ntil,

Pou

ltry

(25)

Urd

,O

nion

,P

oultr

y (2

5)U

rd,

Gra

m,

Bul

lock

(2)

Mai

zeP

ea/

Bul

lock

(2)

Gah

atM

aize

,M

aize

(F)

Cor

inde

r,C

oria

nder

Gin

ger,

Oni

on,

oat



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

001

Ric

e, T

urm

eric

,W

heat

,C

ow (

3)R

ice,

Whe

at,

Cow

(3)

Gra

ding

-do-

dairy

+ f

ish

Mai

zegi

nger

Mai

ze C

ob,

Cal

f (1)

Mai

ze,

Pea

,C

alf (

1)of

bhi

ndi,

Pea

,B

uffa

lo (

1)B

hend

i,O

nion

,B

uffa

lo (

1)C

oria

nder

Oni

on,

fish

pond

(1)

Cor

iand

erB

erse

emfis

h po

nd (

1)G

arlic

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

501

Ric

e,W

heat

,C

alf (

3)R

ice,

Whe

at,

Cal

f (3)

Gra

ding

-do-

dairy

+ p

oultr

ygi

nger

,M

aize

,B

uffa

lo (

1)C

oloc

asia

,O

nion

,B

uffa

lo (

1)+

goat

Fre

nch

Chi

lli,G

oat

(15)

Bhi

ndi,

Pea

Goa

t (1

5)be

an,

Oni

onP

oultr

y (1

5)M

aize

(F),

Pou

ltry

(15)

Col

ocas

iaB

ullo

ck (2

)C

oria

nder

Bul

lock

(2)

II. E

aste

rn H

imal

aya

Am

bedk

arna

gar

Fie

ld c

rops

0.73

10R

ice/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

0-1)

-R

ice

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

0-1)

-N

utrit

iona

l(U

ttar

Pra

desh

)/+

dairy

(1-

2)pi

geon

bers

eem

/+B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

pea/

+Buf

falo

(1-

2)ki

tche

nE

aste

rn P

lain

pea/

pea/

mus

tard

/ga

rden

ing

Zon

e/S

ub-h

umid

/so

rghu

mch

ickp

ea/

pota

to/

54.4

ra

iny

days

/m

usta

rd/

Chi

ckpe

a14

26 m

m ra

into

mat

o/po

tato

III.

Low

er G

ange

tic P

lain

s

Sou

th 2

4 P

arag

nas

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.71

3R

ice

Okr

a/G

reen

--

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

Gre

enC

ow (

1-2)

+S

unflo

wer

Nut

ritio

nal

(Wes

t B

enga

l)/su

nflo

wer

gram

/gr

am/

Pou

ltry

oil/

kitc

hen

low

er g

ange

tic p

lain

s/ok

ra/

okra

/(1

6-17

)+V

erm

i-ga

rden

100.

8 ra

iny

days

/su

nflo

wer

sunf

low

er/

Fish

pon

dco

mpo

st17

89m

m ra

into

mat

o

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

448

Ric

eO

kra/

Gre

en-

Cow

(2-

3)-

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

/G

reen

-C

ow (

2-3)

+-d

o--d

o-da

iry (

2-3)

sunf

low

ergr

am/

tom

ato/

gram

/G

oat

(1-2

)+ok

ra/

pota

to/

okra

/P

oultr

yric

epo

inte

dsu

nflo

wer

(24-

25)+

guar

dFi

sh p

ond

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

401

Ric

eO

kra/

-C

ow (

2)+

-R

ice

Okr

a/-

Cow

(1)

+-d

o--d

o-da

iry (

3)+

cucu

mbe

r/P

oultr

y (1

5)su

nflo

wer

/P

oultr

y (2

2) +

poul

try (

15)

sunf

low

ercu

cum

ber

Fish

pon

d

IV.

Mid

dle

Gan

getic

Pla

ins

Pur

nea

(Bih

ar)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.95

1R

ice

Whe

at/

-R

ice

Whe

at/

Chi

ckpe

a-

-N

utrit

iona

lno

rth e

ast

allu

vial

mai

ze/

mai

zeki

tche

npl

ain

(BI-2

) /40

.5br

inja

lga

rden

rain

y da

ys/1

013

mm

rain



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

306

Ric

e/M

aize

/-

Cow

(1-

2)R

ice

Whe

at/

Chi

ckpe

aC

ow (

4-5)

+P

otat

o-d

o-da

iry (

1-2)

brin

jal/

whe

at/

mai

zeG

oat

(0-1

)ch

illi/

vege

atbl

e/ve

geta

ble/

pota

to/

mai

zele

ntil

fodd

er

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

133

Ric

e/M

aize

/-

Cow

(1-

2) +

Ric

eW

heat

/C

hick

pea

Cow

(1-

2)+

Brin

jal,

-do-

dairy

(1-

2)+

brin

jal/

whe

at/

Goa

t (4

-5)

mai

zeG

oat (

3)m

aize

goat

(4-

5)ok

racu

cum

ber

Fiel

d cr

ops+

0.7

2R

ice/

Mai

ze/

-G

oat

(2-3

)R

ice

Whe

at/

Chi

ckpe

aC

ow (

2-3)

+-

-do-

goat

(2-

3)ve

geta

ble

whe

at/

mai

zeG

oat (

2)cu

cum

ber

V. U

pper

Gan

getic

pla

ins

Kan

pur D

ehat

Fiel

d cr

ops

1.00

1R

ice

Whe

at-

--

Ric

eW

heat

-C

ow (

1)R

ice

Nut

ritio

nal

(Utta

r P

rade

sh)/

kitc

hen

Cen

tral P

lain

gard

enZo

ne /

Kan

pur

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

1010

Ric

e/W

heat

/G

reen

-C

ow (

0-1)

+-

Ric

e/W

heat

/G

reen

-C

ow (

0-1)

+R

ice,

-do-

dairy

(1-

2)pi

geon

pota

to/

gram

Buf

falo

(1-

2)pi

geon

pota

to/

gram

Buf

falo

whe

at,

pea

/m

usta

rdpe

a/m

usta

rd/

(1-2

)+bu

ffalo

mai

ze/

mai

ze/

bers

eem

Goa

t (0

-1)

pear

lpe

arl

mille

tm

illet

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

601

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

Gre

en-

Buf

falo

(2)

+-

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

Gre

en-

Buf

falo

(2)

Pot

ato,

-do-

dairy

(2)

+pi

geon

pota

togr

amG

oat (

2)pi

geon

pota

togr

am+G

oat (

2)w

heat

goat

(2)

pea/

pea/

pear

lpe

arl

mille

tm

illet

VI.

Tran

s G

ange

tic P

lain

s

Sirs

a (H

arya

na)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

8512

Cot

ton/

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

0-1)

+G

hee

Cot

ton

Whe

at-

Cow

(0-

1)+

Ghe

eN

utrit

iona

lW

este

rn/

29da

iry (

2-3)

guar

/be

rsee

mB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

Buf

falo

(2-

3)ki

tche

nra

iny

days

/ric

e/ga

rden

292

mm

rain

sorg

hum

Am

ritsa

r (P

unja

b)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

9612

Ric

eW

heat

-C

ow (

0-1)

+-

Ric

eW

heat

-C

ow (

0-1)

+-

-do-

Cen

tral P

lain

dairy

(3-

4)B

uffa

lo (

3-4)

Buf

falo

(3-

4)Zo

ne/4

7 ra

iny

days

/ 936

mm

rain



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

VII.

Eas

tern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s

Kab

irdha

m (C

hhat

t-Fi

eld

crop

s +

1.20

7R

ice

Chi

ckpe

a/-

Cow

(1)

+-

Ric

e/C

hick

pea/

-B

uffa

lo (

1) +

Gra

mN

utrit

iona

lis

garh

)/chh

attis

garh

dairy

(1)

+w

heat

/P

oultr

y (6

-7)

soyb

ean

whe

atG

oat

(1-2

)+da

l.ki

tche

nP

lain

Zon

e/S

ub h

umid

poul

try

veg.

Pou

ltry

(5-6

)+be

san,

gard

enA

rea

(6-7

)P

ig (0

-1)

Ghe

e

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

024

Ric

eC

hick

pea/

-C

ow (

1)+

-R

ice/

Chi

ckpe

a/-

Cow

(1-

2)+

-do-

-do-

dairy

(1)

+w

heat

/P

oultr

y (7

-8)+

soyb

ean

whe

atG

oat (

1)+

poul

try (

7-8)

+ve

g.G

oat

(2-3

)P

oultr

y (5

-6)+

goat

(2-

3)P

ig (0

-1)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

901

Ric

eC

hick

pea/

Pou

ltry

(5)

-R

ice/

Chi

ckpe

a/C

ow (

1)+

-do-

-do-

poul

try (

5)w

heat

/so

ybea

nw

heat

Pou

ltry

(5)

veg.

Pak

ur (J

hark

hand

)/Fi

eld

crop

s1.

1412

Ric

eW

heat

/-

-R

ice

Whe

at/

--

Whe

at,

Nut

ritio

nal

east

ern

plat

eau

and

chic

kpea

chic

kpea

gram

kitc

hen

hill-

VII/

cent

ral a

ndpr

oces

sing

gard

enno

rth e

aste

rn p

late

auzo

ne /

86 r

ainy

day

s/12

28 m

m ra

in

Din

dori

(Mad

hya

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

258

Ric

eW

heat

/C

ow (

1-2)

+-

Ric

eW

heat

/C

ow (

1-2)

+-

-P

rade

sh)/N

orth

ern

dairy

(1-

2)ch

ickp

eaB

uffa

lo (

1)+

chic

kpea

Buf

falo

(1)

Hills

Zon

e of

Chh

att-

Bul

lock

(2)

isga

rh (

CG

-3)/7

2.6

rain

y da

ys/1

593

mm

rai

n

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

902

Ric

eW

heat

/C

ow (

2)+

Ric

eW

heat

/-

Cow

(2)

+-

-da

iry (

4-5)

+ch

ickp

eaB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

+ch

ickp

eaB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

+go

at (

3)B

ullo

ck (

2)+

Goa

t (3)

Goa

t (3)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

801

Ric

eW

heat

/C

ow (

6)+

Ric

eW

heat

/C

ow (

6)+

--

dairy

(6)

+ch

ickp

eaB

ullo

ck (

2)+

chic

kpea

Goa

t (4)

+go

at (

4)+

Goa

t (4)

+P

oultr

y (3

)po

ultry

(3)

Pou

ltry

(3)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

751

Ric

eW

heat

/-

Cow

(2)

+R

ice

Whe

at/

-C

ow (

6)+

--

dairy

(2)

+ch

ickp

eaB

ullo

ck (

2)+

chic

kpea

Pou

ltry

(6)

poul

try (

6)P

oultr

y (6

)



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Ang

ul (

Odi

sha)

/Fi

eld

crop

s +

1.18

4R

ice/

Gro

undn

ut/

Bitt

erC

ow (

0-1)

+-

Ric

e/G

roun

dnut

/B

itter

Cow

(0-

1)+

-Fr

uits

,M

id-C

entra

l Tab

leda

iry (

1-2)

ging

er/

brin

jal

guar

d/B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

cow

pea/

mai

ze/

guar

d/B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

+bo

unda

ryLa

nd, /

81 r

ainy

snak

eok

rabr

inja

l/on

ion/

pum

pkin

/P

oultr

ypl

anta

tions

,da

ys/1

560

mm

rain

guar

d/bi

tter

gard

enw

ate

r(8

0-81

)fis

herie

srid

gegu

ard/

pea/

mel

on/

guar

dok

ra/

okra

/ok

racu

cum

ber/

tom

ato/

colo

casi

aca

ulifl

ower

/su

nflo

wer

/cl

uste

rbea

n

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

228

Ric

e/G

roun

dnut

/G

reen

-C

ow (

3-4)

+B

itter

-G

roun

dnut

/B

itter

-C

ow (

3-4)

+G

hee

-do-

dairy

(3-

4) +

brin

jal/

sunf

low

er/

gram

/P

oultr

ygu

ard/

mai

ze/

guar

d/P

oultr

ym

akin

gpo

ultr

yco

wpe

apo

inte

dco

wpe

a/(6

5-66

)co

wpe

a/on

ion/

pum

pkin

/(1

38-1

40)

(65-

66)

guar

d/bI

tterg

uard

brin

jal/

gard

enok

ra/

onio

n/ok

ra/

pea/

cucu

mbe

r/co

wpe

a/co

loca

sia

okra

/gr

een-

brin

jal/

tom

ato/

gram

/ga

rden

pea/

caul

iflow

er/

blac

k-po

tato

cabb

age/

gram

/su

nflo

wer

/cl

uste

rcl

uste

rbea

n/be

anra

dish

VIII

. C

entr

al P

late

au a

nd h

ills

Kat

ni (M

adhy

aFi

eld

crop

s0.

802

Ric

eW

heat

--

-R

ice/

Whe

at/

--

--

Pra

desh

)/ K

ymor

eso

ybea

nch

ickp

eaP

leat

eau

and

Sat

pura

Hills

/70

rain

y da

ys/

1444

mm

rain

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

7110

Ric

e/W

heat

/G

reen

-C

ow (

1-2)

+-

Ric

e/W

heat

/-

Cow

(1-

2)+B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

--

dairy

(1-

2)gi

nger

/ch

ickp

ea/

gram

Buf

falo

(0-

1)so

ybea

nch

ickp

eam

arig

old

chilli

Uda

ipur

(R

ajas

than

)/Fi

eld

crop

s +

0.75

2M

aize

Whe

at-

Cow

(0-

1)+

Mai

ze/

Whe

at /

Gre

en-

Cow

(0-

1)+

Ver

mi-

Fru

its,

Sub

-hum

id S

outh

ern

dairy

(0-

1)B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

brin

jal

tom

ato

gram

/ pea

Buf

falo

(0-

1)co

mpo

stbo

unda

rypl

ain

and

ara

vali

plan

tatio

nshi

lls/4

7 ra

iny

days

/82

8 m

m ra

in

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

7510

Mai

zeW

heat

-C

ow (

2)+

Mai

ze/

Whe

at/

Moo

ng/

Cow

(2)

-do-

-do-

dairy

(2)

+G

oat

(4-5

)br

inja

l/to

mat

o/on

ion/

goat

(4-

5)rid

gebo

ttle

bottl

ega

urd/

gour

d/go

urd

tinda

ridge

gaur

d/ca

ulifl

ower



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

IX.

Wes

tern

Pla

teau

and

Hill

s

Aur

anga

bad

Fiel

d cr

ops

0.58

8C

otto

n/C

hick

pea/

--

Sug

arca

ne/G

roun

dnut

/O

kra/

Cow

(1-

2)+

Sug

arca

ne-

(Mah

aras

htra

)/CM

P/

suga

rcan

e/w

heat

/co

tton/

mai

ze/

whe

at/

Buf

falo

(1)

+ju

ice,

57.5

rai

ny d

ays/

666

mai

ze/

Okr

a/m

aize

/on

ion/

chic

kpea

/G

oat (

1)gh

eem

m ra

inpe

arl

mai

zepe

arl

gard

en-

Sor

ghum

/m

illet/

fodd

erm

illet/

pea/

luce

rne/

mai

zem

aize

okra

/fo

dder

fodd

er/

fodd

er/

tom

ato/

mai

ze/

Hy.

napa

ir/co

riand

er/c

aulif

low

er/

feen

uco

riand

er/

napi

er/

sunf

low

er/

gree

kok

rafe

enu

clus

ter

gree

kbe

an

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

574

--

Cot

ton/

Luce

rne/

Fodd

erC

ow (

1-2)

+-

-da

irysu

garc

ane/

chic

kpea

mai

zeB

uffa

lo (

1-2)

mai

ze/

pear

lm

illet/

mai

zefo

dder

Pun

e (M

ahar

-Fi

eld

crop

s +

0.76

5C

ow (

1-2)

+S

oybe

an/

Oni

on/

Pea

rlC

ow (

1-2)

+S

oybe

anN

utrit

iona

las

htra

)/de

ccan

dairy

(1-

2)B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

rice/

whe

at/

mille

t/P

oultr

y(2)

flour

kitc

hen

Pla

teau

, hot

sem

i-m

aize

/br

inja

l/H

ynep

iar/

gard

enar

id e

co s

ubH

y.ne

piar

/Hy.

nepi

er/

smoo

th-

regi

on(6

.1)/

mai

zem

arig

old/

gaur

d/G

anes

hkhi

ndfo

dder

garli

c/lu

cern

Pun

e-7/

48 r

ainy

luce

rngr

ass/

days

/606

mm

rain

gras

sbi

tter-

gaur

d/bo

ttle-

gaur

d

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

72 7

Gro

undn

ut/

--

Cow

(1-

2)+

Soy

bean

/O

nion

/P

earl

Cow

(1-

2)+

Soy

bean

-do-

dairy

+so

ybea

n/B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

grou

ndnu

t/w

heat

/m

illet/

Pou

ltry(

7-8)

flour

poul

try (

1-2)

rice

rice/

chic

kH

y. n

apia

r/m

aize

pea/

luce

rnfo

dder

/lu

cern

gras

s/m

aize

/gr

ass/

grou

ndlu

cern

Hy.

nap

ier/

nut

gras

s/so

rghu

m/

Hy.

nap

ier

garli

c

Am

rava

ti (M

ahar

-Fi

eld

crop

s +

1.08

8S

oybe

an/

Whe

at/

Cow

(1-

2)-

Soy

bean

/W

heat

/C

ow (

1-2)

For

tifie

dN

utrit

iona

las

htra

/)Cen

tral

dairy

(1-

2)co

tton/

chic

kpea

pige

onch

ickp

ea/

whe

at a

tta,

kitc

hen

Mah

aras

trapi

geon

pea/

linse

edm

iner

alga

rden

,P

late

aue

Zone

pea/

sorg

hum

/m

ixtu

refr

uit/

(IX)/

Wes

tern

oran

geco

tton

boun

dary

Vid

arbh

a Z

one/

plan

tatio

ns,

71 r

ainf

all d

ays/

com

post

1198

mm



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

302

Soy

bean

/W

heat

Buf

falo

(1)

+S

orgh

um/

Whe

at/

Ses

amum

Cow

(1)

+-d

o--d

o-da

iry (

1) +

oran

geG

oat (

3)pi

geon

pea/

chic

kpea

Goa

t (3)

goat

(3)

soya

bean

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

401

Soy

bean

/C

otto

nC

ow (

1) +

Soy

abea

nW

heat

Ses

amum

Cow

(1)

Min

eral

-do-

dairy

(1)

+pi

geon

pea

Pou

ltry

(4)

mix

ture

poul

try (

4)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

201

Soy

bean

/-

-G

oat (

3)S

oybe

anS

orgh

umC

hick

pea/

Goa

t (3)

-do-

-do-

goat

(3)

sorg

hum

linse

ed

X.

Sou

ther

n P

late

au a

nd H

ills

War

anga

l (Te

lan-

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

325

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

0-1)

+R

ice

Ric

e-

Cow

(0-

1)+

Ghe

eN

utrit

iona

lga

na)/C

.T.Z

one/

dairy

(1-

2)co

tton/

grou

nd-

Buf

falo

(1-

2)B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+ki

tche

nric

e e

cosy

stem

/gr

ound

-nu

t/P

oultr

y (8

)ga

rden

,67

.3 r

ainy

day

s/nu

t/m

aize

Azo

lla12

63 m

m ra

inm

aize

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

001

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

1)+

Ric

eR

ice

-C

ow (

2)+

-do-

-do-

dairy

(4)

+co

tton

mai

zeB

uffa

lo (

3)+

Goa

t(8)+

goat

(10

)G

oat

(10)

Pou

ltry

(15)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

443

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

1)+

Ric

eR

ice

-C

ow (

1)+

-do-

-do-

dairy

(2-

3)+

cotto

n/m

aize

/B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+B

uffa

lo (

2)+

goat

(24

-25)

+m

aize

/ve

geta

bles

Goa

t (24

-25)

+G

oat (

39-4

0)+

poul

try (

5-6)

chilli

Pou

ltry

(5-6

)P

oultr

y (7

-8)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

133

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

0-1)

+R

ice

Ric

e-

Cow

(0-

1)+

-do-

-do-

dairy

(1-

2)+

cotto

n/gr

ound

nut/

Buf

falo

(1)

+B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+po

ultry

(7-

8)m

aize

mai

ze/

Pou

ltry

(7-8

)P

oultr

y (8

-9)

vege

tabl

es

Kol

ar (

Kar

nata

ka)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

886

Fing

erP

otat

o/Fo

dder

Cow

(1-

2)+

-Fi

nger

Rad

ish/

Fodd

erC

ow (

2-3)

AE

Z 8.

2/E

aste

rnda

iry (

1-2)

mille

t/ra

dish

/m

aize

/B

uffa

lo (

0-1)

mille

t+co

riand

er/

mai

ze/

Dry

Zon

e/42

seric

ultu

re/

ridge

tom

ato

field

finge

r-ok

rara

iny

days

/ric

e/gu

ard

bean

+m

illet/

612

mm

rain

cabb

age/

redg

ram

/fo

dder

grou

ndnu

t/se

ricul

ture

/m

aize

tom

ato

tom

ato/

rice/

cabb

age/

fodd

erm

aize

/po

lebe

ans/

chilli



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

501

Fin

ger-

Gra

ssC

abba

ge/

Cow

(2)

+-

Fing

erco

riand

erTo

mat

oC

ow (

2)da

iry (

3) +

mille

t/m

aize

/B

uffa

lo (

1)+

mille

tgo

at(1

)to

mat

o/gr

ass

Goa

t (1)

gras

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

843

Ser

icul

ture

/R

abi

Kno

l-C

ow (

2-3)

+-

Ser

icul

ture

/R

adis

h/B

rinja

l/C

ow

(1-2

)+da

iry (

3-4)

+br

inja

l/gr

ass

khol

/B

uffa

lo (

1)+

knol

-kho

l/se

ricul

-se

ricul

-B

uffa

lo (

1-2)

+go

at (

5-6)

+fin

ger

fodd

erG

oat

(5-6

)+fin

ger

ture

ture

Goa

t (3)

+po

ultry

(6-

7)m

illet+

mai

ze/

Pou

ltry

(6-7

)m

illet +

Pou

ltry

(3-4

)re

dgra

m/

gras

sfie

ldfo

dder

bean

+m

aize

/re

dgra

m/

gras

sFo

dder

mai

ze

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

271

Fing

er-

-C

ow

(2)+

Fin

ger-

--

Cow

(2

)+da

iry (

4)+

Mille

t/B

uffa

lo (

2)+

mille

t/B

uffa

lo (

1)pi

g (2

)Fo

dder

Pig

(2)

field

bean

/m

aize

redg

ram

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

51

Tom

ato/

Cor

iand

erB

eetro

otC

ow (

5) +

Mar

igol

d/Fo

dder

Car

rot/

Cow

(5)

dairy

(5)

+fo

dder

Rab

bit (

8)fin

ger-

mai

zepo

lera

bbit

(8)

mai

zem

illet

bean

s

Gad

ag (

Kar

ana-

Fiel

d cr

ops

+12

Gro

undn

ut/

Sor

ghum

/-

Cow

(1-

2) +

-B

t.cot

ton/

Sor

ghum

/-

Cow

(1-

2) +

But

ter,

Nut

ritio

nal

taka

)/Nor

ther

nda

iry (

1-2)

Bt.

cotto

n/ch

ickp

ea/

Buf

falo

(0-

1)gr

ound

nut/

chic

kpea

Buf

falo

(0-

1)ve

rmi-

kitc

hen

Dry

Zon

e /A

rid/

Hy.

mai

ze/

whe

atH

y. m

aize

/co

mpo

stga

rden

31.5

rai

nfal

l day

s/on

ion/

gree

n32

5 m

mch

illigr

am/

sunf

low

er

Dha

rmap

uri &

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

0210

Ric

e/R

ice/

Lem

onC

ow (

2-3)

-R

ice/

Ric

e/Fo

dder

Cow

(2-

3)K

rishn

agiri

(Tam

ilda

iry (

2-3)

coco

nut/

coco

nut/

tube

rose

/co

conu

t/so

rghu

mN

adu)

/NW

Z/fo

dder

okra

/co

tton/

fodd

erB

imod

al ra

infa

ll/gr

ass/

fodd

ertu

rmer

ic/

gras

s/S

tart

of d

ecca

nsu

gar-

sorg

hum

/su

gar-

ragi

/pl

atea

u/36

.5ca

ne/

grou

nd-

cane

/gr

ound

-ra

iny

days

/656

gree

n-nu

t/co

conu

t/nu

t/m

m ra

ingr

am/

man

gofo

dder

chic

kgr

ound

-gr

ass/

pea/

nut/

Fod

der

whe

attu

rmer

ic/

sorg

hum

/re

dgra

m/

chilli

/fo

dder

sorg

hum

sorg

hum

/ch

ick

pea



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

362

Ric

e/R

ice

-C

ow (

2-3)

+-

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow (

2)da

iry (

2-3)

+co

conu

t/G

oat

(3-4

)fo

dder

ragi

goat

(3-

4)ja

smin

e/gr

ass/

fodd

erja

smin

e/gr

ass

grou

ndnu

t/co

conu

t

XI.

Eas

t C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Hill

s

Srik

akul

am (A

ndhr

aFi

eld

crop

s0.

902

Ric

eB

lack

gram

/-

Ric

eR

agi

-B

uffa

lo (

1) +

-A

zolla

Pra

desh

)/hig

hra

giP

oultr

y (7

-8)

altit

ude

and

trib

alar

ea

zone

/57.

5ra

iny

days

/127

7m

m ra

in

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

302

Ric

eS

esam

um/

-C

ow (

1-2)

+R

ice

--

Cow

(1)

+-

-do-

dairy

(1-

2)bl

ackg

ram

Buf

falo

(0-

1)B

uffa

lo (

2) +

Goa

t (4)

+P

oultr

y (8

-9)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

001

Ric

eR

ice

-C

ow (

1) +

Ric

eR

ice

/-

Cow

(2)

+-

-do-

dairy

(4)

+B

uffa

lo (

3) +

mai

zeG

oat (

15) +

goat

(10

)G

oat

(10)

Pou

ltry

(8)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

521

Ric

eR

ice

-C

ow (

1)+

Ric

eG

reen

-G

reen

-B

uffa

lo (

4) +

--d

o-da

iry (

1)+

Goa

t (35

) +gr

amgr

am/

Pou

ltry

(10)

goat

(35

) +

Pou

ltry

(5)

sesa

mum

poul

try (

5)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

702

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

0-1)

+R

ice

Rag

i/-

Buf

falo

(1-

2) +

-do-

dairy

(1-

2)+

ragi

Buf

falo

(1-

2) +

finge

r-P

oultr

y (9

-10)

poul

try (

10)

Pou

ltry

(10)

mille

t

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

201

Ric

eS

esam

um-

Goa

t (4)

Ric

e-

-B

uffa

lo (

3) +

-do-

goat

(4)

Pou

ltry

(8)

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

001

Ric

eB

lack

gram

-G

oat (

1) +

Ric

e-

-B

uffa

lo (

1) +

-do-

goat

(1)

+P

oultr

y (1

)P

oultr

y (9

)po

ultry

(1)

Fiel

d cr

ops+

0.70

2R

ice

Ric

e-

Pou

ltry

(12)

-M

esta

-P

oultr

y (1

6)-d

o-po

ultry

(12

)

Ken

drap

ara

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

662

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

2-3)

-R

ice

Ric

e/Ju

teC

ow (

4-5)

+G

reen

-N

utrit

iona

l(O

dish

a)/e

ast-

dairy

(2-

3)gr

een-

gree

n-P

oultr

y (9

)gr

am,

kitc

hen

sout

h ea

ster

ngr

am/

gram

/bl

ack-

gard

en,

coas

tal p

lain

blac

k-bl

ack-

gram

,m

ushr

oom

,zo

ne/7

7 ra

iny

gram

/gr

am/

ghee

,fis

hda

ys/2

002

mm

rain

Veg

Veg

coco

nut

oil



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

642

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

5)+

-R

ice

Ric

e/-

Cow

(7-

8)+

Ric

e,-d

o-da

iry (

5) +

gree

n-Fi

sh p

ond

gree

n-P

oultr

y (1

5)gh

ee,

fish

gram

/gr

am/

Coc

onut

blac

k-bl

ack-

oil

gram

/gr

am/

Veg

Veg

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

101

Ric

e/R

ice/

-C

ow

(2)+

-R

ice

Ric

e/Ju

teC

ow

(4)+

Ric

e,-d

o-da

iry (

2) +

jute

gree

n-G

oat (

3)gr

een-

Goa

t (2)

+gh

eego

at (

3)gr

am/

gram

/P

oultr

y (1

5)bl

ack-

blac

k-gr

am/

gram

/V

egV

eg

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

003

Ric

e/R

ice/

-R

ice

Ric

e/Ju

teC

ow

(2-3

)+G

reen

--d

o-da

iry (

1) +

jute

gree

n-gr

een-

Goa

t (3

-4)+

gram

,go

at (

2-3)

+gr

am/

gram

/P

oultr

ybl

ack-

poul

try

blac

k-bl

ack-

(18-

19)

gram

,(1

4-15

)gr

am/

gram

/gh

ee,

Veg

Veg

tom

ato

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

061

Ric

eG

reen

gram

-C

ow (

2) +

Ric

eG

reen

gram

-C

ow (

3)+

Ric

e,-d

o-da

iry (

2) +

Goa

t (1)

+G

oat (

1) +

ghee

,go

at (

1) +

Pou

ltry

(10)

+P

oultr

y (1

8)C

ocon

utpo

ultry

(10

) +

Fish

pon

doi

lfis

h

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

892

Ric

e/B

lack

--

Cow

(2)

+R

ice

Bla

ckgr

amJu

teC

ow (

3-4)

+B

lack

--d

o-da

iry (

2) +

jute

gram

/P

oultr

y (1

0)P

oultr

y (2

0)gr

am,

poul

try (

10)

veg

jute

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

21

Ric

e/B

lack

--

Cow

(1)

+R

ice

Bla

ckgr

am/

-C

ow (

2) +

Ghe

e-d

o-da

iry (

1) +

jute

gram

/P

oultr

y (1

0) +

rice

Pou

ltry

(8)

poul

try (

10 )

+ve

gFi

sh p

ond

fish

Siv

agan

gai (

Tam

ilFi

eld

crop

s +

1.05

12R

ice/

Ric

e/B

lack

Cow

(3-

4) +

-R

ice/

Gin

gelly

/B

lack

-C

ow (

3-4)

+G

rain

sN

utrit

iona

lN

adu

)/Sou

ther

n/da

iry (

3-4)

suga

r-gr

ound

gram

Pou

ltry

suga

r-bl

ack-

gram

/P

oultr

yw

ith o

utki

tche

nS

emi A

rid E

co-

cane

/nu

t/(1

5-16

)ca

negr

am/

suga

r-(1

0-11

)ch

aff

y,ga

rden

ing,

Sub

Reg

ion

8.1/

blac

k-gi

ngel

ly/

grou

nd-

cane

/pl

ump

poul

try

Sou

ther

n Zo

negr

am/

pum

pkin

/nu

t/pu

mpk

in/

pods

,TN

5 &

6/ 4

1pu

mpk

inm

aize

/ric

egr

ound

nut

verm

i-ra

iny

days

/bl

ack-

com

post

563

mm

rain

gram



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

XII.

Wes

t C

oast

Pla

ins

and

Gha

ts

Pal

ghar

(Mah

ar-

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

5611

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

1)+

Kitc

hen

Ric

eR

ice/

-C

ow (

1)+

Nut

ritio

nal

asht

ra)/N

orth

dai

ry (

2-3)

cow

pea/

Buf

falo

(1-

2)ga

rden

cow

pea/

Buf

falo

(1-

2)ki

tche

nko

nkan

coa

stal

cucu

mbe

rcu

cum

ber

gard

enZo

ne/1

07 r

ainy

days

/295

4 m

mra

in

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

401

Ric

eR

ice

-G

oat (

6)K

itche

nR

ice

Ric

e-

Goa

t (6)

-do-

goat

(6)

gard

en

Pat

hina

mth

itta

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

311

Rub

ber/

--

Cow

(1)

+C

ocon

ut/

Ric

e/V

eget

able

Cow

(3-

4)+

Cur

edF

ishe

ries,

(Ker

ala)

/Hot

horti

cultu

re +

coco

nut/

Buf

falo

(0-

1)nu

tmeg

/ba

nana

Buf

falo

garc

inia

,te

rrac

eH

umid

per

dairy

(1-

2)pe

pper

/pe

pper

/(0

-1)+

coco

nuto

il,ga

rden

ing,

Hum

id e

conu

tmeg

/ric

eP

oultr

ygr

aded

apia

ry,

regi

on/S

outh

ern

bana

na/

(9-1

0)co

conu

t,V

erm

i-Zo

ne/9

5 r

ainy

Ric

e/ga

rble

dco

mpo

stda

ys/3

679

mm

rain

Veg

etab

le/

pepp

er,

tapi

oca

drym

ace,

pack

edm

ilkaf

ter

filtra

tion

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

961

Coc

onut

Ric

e-

Cow

(2)

+-

Coc

onut

Ric

e-

Cow

(2)

Pac

ked

Terr

ace

horti

cultu

reP

oultr

y (8

)m

ilkga

rden

ing

dairy

(2)

+af

ter

Pou

ltry

(8)

filtra

tion

XIII

. G

ujar

at P

lain

s an

d H

ills

Meh

sana

(G

ujar

at)/

Fiel

d cr

ops

1.10

2P

earl

mille

t/W

heat

/Fo

dder

-C

otto

n/Lu

cern

e/Fo

dder

Cow

-8no

rth G

ujar

at a

gro

clim

ate

cotto

n/m

usta

rd/

sorg

hum

cast

or/

whe

at/

sorg

hum

zone

/44

.8 r

ainy

day

s/so

rghu

mlu

cern

egr

een-

mus

tard

551

mm

rain

gram

/so

rghu

m/

clus

terb

ean

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

1610

Sor

ghum

/C

umin

/S

orgh

um/

Cow

(0-

1)+

-C

otto

n/W

heat

/Fo

dder

Cow

(0-

1)+

dairy

(1-

2)ric

e/lu

cern

e/pe

arl

Buf

falo

(1-

2)so

rghu

m/

luce

rne/

sorg

hum

/co

tton/

tobb

aco/

mille

t /cl

uste

r-ch

ikor

y/pe

arl-

pear

lm

usta

rdcl

uste

r-be

an/

cast

or/

mille

t/m

illet/

bean

/br

inja

l/fo

dder

clus

ter-

cast

or/

fodd

erfo

dder

mai

ze/

bean

clus

terb

ean

sorg

hum

sorg

hum

/m

usta

rdG

reen

-gr

am/

pear

lm

illet /

rice/

cast

or



Dis

tric

t (s

tate

)/F

arm

ing

Are

aN

o. o

fE

xist

ing

co

mp

on

ents

(A

s p

er b

ench

mar

k, 2

013)

Imp

rove

dN

AR

P z

one/

Sys

tem

(s)

(ha)

Farm

C

rop

mod

ule

C

rop

mod

ule

soil

typ

e/h

ou

se-

Kh

arif

Ra

bi

Su

mm

er

Liv

esto

ckP

roce

ssin

gK

har

ifR

ab

iS

um

me

rL

ives

tock

Pro

cess

ing

Opt

iona

lra

infa

ll (m

m)/

ho

lds

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lem

od

ule

mo

du

lera

iny

day

s

Pan

chm

ahal

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

401

Ric

eM

aize

-C

ow (

1)+

Mai

ze,

Ric

e/M

aize

Cow

(1)

+-

Nut

ritio

nal

(Guj

arat

)/mid

dle

dairy

(3)

Buf

falo

(2)

chaf

fm

aize

Buf

falo

(2)

kitc

hen

guja

rat I

II/44

rain

fall

cutti

ngga

rden

,da

ys/1

008m

m ra

infr

uits

,bo

unda

rypl

anta

tions

,st

ubbl

es o

ffo

dder

crop

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

723

Ric

e/M

aize

Gro

und-

Buf

falo

(3)

+M

aize

,R

ice/

Mai

zeG

roun

d-B

uffa

lo (

3)+

--d

o-da

iry (

3) +

mai

zenu

tG

oat

(4-5

)ch

aff

mai

zenu

tG

oat

(4-5

)go

at (

4-5)

cutti

ng

Fiel

d cr

ops

+1.

046

Ric

e/M

aize

Pea

rlB

uffa

lo (

2-3)

+M

aize

,R

ice/

Mai

zeP

earl-

Buf

falo

(2-

3) +

--d

o-da

iry (

2-3)

+m

aize

/m

illet

Goa

t (5-

6) +

chaf

fm

aize

/m

illet

Goa

t (5-

6) +

goat

(5-

6)+

pige

onP

oultr

y (6

-7)

cutti

ng,

pige

onP

oultr

y (6

-7)

poul

try (

6-7)

pea

pear

l-pe

am

illet

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

901

Ric

eM

aize

-B

uffa

lo (

1)+

Mai

ze,

Ric

e/M

aize

-B

uffa

lo (

1)+

-do-

dairy

(1)

+P

oultr

y (5

)ch

aff

mai

zeP

oultr

y (5

)po

ultry

(5)

cutti

ng

Fiel

d cr

ops

+0.

841

Ric

eM

aize

Gro

undn

utP

oultr

y (5

)M

aize

,R

ice/

Mai

zeG

roun

dnut

Pou

ltry

(5)

--d

o-po

ultry

(5)

chaf

fm

aize

cutti

ng



Tab

le 7

.4.5

. Im

pro

vem

ent

of

pro

du

ctio

n (

on

eq

uiv

alen

t b

asis

of

bas

e cr

op

), m

arke

tab

le s

urp

lus

and

eco

no

mic

s o

f in

dif

fere

nt

farm

ing

syst

ems

in in

var

iou

s lo

cati

on

s

Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

Kan

gra

(Him

acha

l P

rade

sh)

FC+D

0.78

974

32-

1855

055

125

1284

8-

8703

7149

00.

2683

-0.

0945

*0.

6801

(140

3)(4

484)

(102

41)

(511

)(5

84)

(495

2)

FC+D

+G0.

573

7494

-16

216

5882

512

389

-73

8267

897

--

--

(243

1)(7

768)

(177

38)

(885

)(1

012)

(857

7)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

1120

-0.

0320

**0.

4138

CD

[P =

FS1

2808

-89

7020

482

1023

-10

2310

230.

05]

Vs

FS2

Sam

ba

(Jam

mu

an

d K

ash

mir

)

FC+D

1.14

1246

9231

1781

367

1037

8375

5548

2254

683

1596

350.

0039

***

0.01

29**

0.00

36**

*0.

0090

***

Am

bed

karn

agar

(U

ttar

Pra

des

h)

FC+D

0.73

1010

122

5553

4111

860

108

1680

386

2431

905

9502

20.

0090

***

0.06

02*

0.04

84**

0.02

62**

Sou

th 2

4 P

arag

nas

(Wes

t B

enga

l)

FC0.

713

6544

4734

3320

326

063

1198

894

4282

637

6298

40.

019*

*0.

029*

*0.

067*

0.02

1**

(502

5)(4

719)

(796

4)(4

1506

)(2

653)

(246

0)(1

5596

)(1

8407

)

FC+D

0.44

892

2364

6039

408

4465

394

7265

8168

203

4753

40.

921

0.96

10.

0003

***

0.89

3(3

077)

(288

9)(1

1661

)(2

5417

)(1

624)

(150

6)(9

550)

(112

72)

FC+D

+P0.

401

5753

4197

4928

013

010

8735

6757

6398

140

836

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

245

0.52

60.

126

0.15

9

CD

[P =

FS1

5893

5534

9339

4867

131

1128

8518

289

2158

50.

05]

Vs

FS2

Pu

rnea

(B

ihar

)

FC+D

1.30

612

758

8302

6693

447

887

1093

195

5826

863

7152

00.

3805

0.56

670.

0017

***

0.09

76*

(181

4)(1

841)

(738

5)(1

0816

)(1

490)

(137

2)(2

731)

(110

78)

FC+D

+G1.

133

1175

975

6279

622

2620

811

482

9967

25

233

7810

60.

8295

0.05

63*

0.01

31**

0.06

89*

(256

5)(2

603)

(104

45)

(152

96)

(210

8)(1

941)

(386

3)(1

5668

)

FC+G

0.70

270

6358

3625

564

3800

010

599

8924

2587

569

522

0.38

640.

4019

0.97

950.

5022

(314

2)(3

189)

(127

92)

(187

34)

(258

2)(2

378)

(473

1)(1

9189

)

FC0.

951

7609

5198

3537

133

109

4788

4204

1510

027

995

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

5978

0.15

000.

0002

***

0.00

63**

*

CD

[P =

FS1

3143

3189

1279

318

734

2582

2378

4731

1918

90.

05]

Vs

FS2



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

CD

[P =

FS1

3629

3682

1477

221

633

2982

2746

5463

2215

80.

05]

Vs

FS3

CD

[P =

FS2

4057

4117

1651

524

186

3334

3070

6108

2477

30.

05]

Vs

FS3

Kan

pur

Deh

at (

Utt

ar P

rade

sh)

FC+D

1.10

1013

286

1081

358

787

8525

613

891

1145

066

056

8674

60.

7013

0.67

510.

4421

0.89

98

FC+D

+G0.

601

1154

581

0058

550

4650

013

951

1124

371

875

8158

8-

--

-

FC1.

001

9327

8259

4700

051

000

1178

910

141

5950

070

180

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

4912

0.45

820.

2966

0.57

50

Sir

sa (

Har

yana

)

FC+D

0.85

1248

7038

3499

661

1002

8068

6353

1348

958

1396

840.

0052

***

0.00

85**

*0.

0052

***

0.01

38**

Am

rits

ar (

Pu

nja

b)

FC+D

0.96

1295

0970

4776

996

1367

9095

0976

4376

996

1367

90-

<.00

01**

*-

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed-

<0.0

001*

**-

-

Kab

ird

ham

(C

hh

atis

gar

h)

FC+D

+P1.

207

7775

7173

2415

077

237

1369

312

239

2088

813

5859

0.01

23**

0.00

21**

*0.

0048

***

0.03

99**

(394

)(3

93)

(990

)(4

328)

(286

)(1

36)

(517

)(4

843)

FC+D

+P+G

1.02

410

298

9746

2871

710

5673

1631

515

109

2189

316

9907

0.00

40**

*0.

0026

***

0.01

63**

0.01

74**

(521

)(5

20)

(131

0)(5

725)

(378

)(1

80)

(683

)(6

406)

FC+P

0.90

193

1488

2927

456

9412

413

942

1323

919

120

1352

95-

--

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

0001

***

.000

1***

0.00

01**

*0.

0006

***

Pak

ur

(Jh

arkh

and

)

FC1.

1412

1633

328

1373

726

0127

9857

882

7082

74<0

.000

1***

0.00

02**

*<0

.000

1***

<0.0

001*

**

Din

do

ri (

Mad

hya

Pra

des

h)

FC+D

1.25

964

3643

4622

836

6405

811

695

9125

3593

612

1964

0.15

780.

5765

<.00

01**

*0.

5389

(755

)(6

57)

(135

0)(9

100)

(718

)(5

65)

(254

)(9

453)

FC+D

+G0.

902

7819

4936

1896

086

600

9547

2742

514

750

1141

340.

2267

0.02

94**

0.08

57*

0.18

22(1

602)

(139

4)(2

865)

(193

04)

(152

4)(1

200)

(540

)(2

0054

)

FC+D

+P0.

751

4184

2636

1665

039

834

6496

6496

2915

075

190

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

5744

0.10

16.0

001*

**0.

7404

CD

[P =

FS1

1772

1541

3168

2134

216

8513

2759

822

171

0.05

]V

s FS

2



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

An

gu

l (O

dh

ish

a)

FC+D

+P1.

228

7144

4735

5483

516

606

1276

098

7582

957

7016

10.

0195

**0.

0229

**0.

0344

**0.

0054

***

(556

)(5

18)

(434

5)(5

833)

(174

8)(1

672)

(109

87)

(105

40)

FC+D

1.18

448

8528

94.

2937

519

482

8480

5926

4906

252

696

0.02

61**

0.04

23**

0.01

32**

0.03

11**

(787

)(7

33)

(614

4)(8

249)

(247

2)(2

365)

(155

39)

(149

06)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

0026

***

0.00

40**

*0.

0048

***

0.00

05**

*

CD

[P =

FS1

964

899

7526

1010

430

2828

9719

031

1825

60.

05]

Vs

FS2

Kat

ni

(Mad

hya

Pra

des

h)

FC+D

0.71

1060

9939

9119

755

4059

597

8568

4229

960

6899

80.

0703

*0.

2661

0.00

35**

*0.

1966

(131

2)(1

130)

(242

7)(9

991)

(586

)(4

45)

(223

)(5

674)

FC0.

802

3312

1587

2225

055

7551

6832

6831

240

1688

90.

2849

0.93

550.

0120

**0.

2394

(293

4)(2

528)

(542

8)(2

234)

(131

0)(9

97)

(499

)(1

2687

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

0422

**0.

2753

0.00

04**

*0.

2453

CD

[P =

FS1

3214

2770

5946

2447

514

3610

9254

713

898

0.05

]V

s FS

2

Uda

ipur

(R

ajas

than

)

FC+D

+G0.

7510

4839

2436

7510

5055

591

3250

5728

994

7307

70.

3806

0.71

11.0

001*

**0.

0066

***

(638

)(4

70)

(100

7)(7

895)

(401

)(3

28)

(175

8)(4

804)

FC+D

0.75

252

7632

0960

0057

312

9203

5519

2599

578

442

0.52

580.

5779

0.11

710.

3385

(142

7)(1

052)

(225

1)(1

7655

)(8

97)

(734

)(3

932)

(107

42)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

2249

0.99

330.

0001

***

0.00

17**

*

CD

[P =

FS1

1563

1153

2467

1934

198

380

443

0811

768

0.05

]V

s FS

2

Au

ran

gab

ad (

Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC0.

7412

3395

2907

4353

875

781

8122

6013

1008

1822

4089

0.01

63**

0.00

07**

*0.

0006

***

0.04

06**

Pu

ne

(Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC+D

+P0.

767

2227

1668

5344

2N

A79

5069

5293

367

NA

0.00

19**

*0.

0027

***

0.04

35**

-(4

13)

(389

)(7

093)

(161

3)(1

827)

(130

94)

FC+D

0.72

579

561

037

747

NA

9085

8456

6344

9N

A0.

0538

*0.

0957

*0.

0675

*-

(488

)(4

60)

(839

2)(1

909)

(216

2)(1

5493

)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

0002

***

0.00

10**

*0.

0058

***

-

CD

[P =

FS1

640

603

1098

9-

2500

2831

2028

5-

0.05

]V

s FS

2



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

Am

rava

ti (

Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC+D

1.08

826

5424

1435

962

4827

541

9335

7924

660

7134

40.

0320

**0.

0186

**0.

1876

0.01

38**

(381

)(3

52)

(602

2)(9

194)

(175

)(1

72)

(258

3)(4

003)

FC+D

+G1.

302

3593

3310

3320

078

200

4917

4251

1854

210

5214

0.24

280.

2351

0.31

360.

1910

(762

)(7

05)

(120

44)

(183

88)

(351

)(3

44)

(516

6)(8

006)

FC+D

+P1.

401

3229

3040

4900

051

100

5971

5105

3169

810

4412

--

--

FC+D

1.20

129

8126

8124

500

6790

038

4734

1035

010

8425

0-

--

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

0021

***

0.00

08**

*0.

0331

**0.

0014

***

CD

[P =

FS1

853

789

1346

620

559

393

385

5776

8952

0.05

]V

s FS

2

War

ang

al (

Tela

ng

ana)

FC+D

1.32

515

858

1469

610

5830

1023

7420

476

1772

912

6405

1424

330.

0062

***

0.00

53**

*0.

0022

***

0.10

40(2

617)

(266

9)(1

7549

)(3

0176

)(1

839)

(102

3)(7

636)

(189

02)

FC+D

+P1.

133

1987

518

029

1149

3314

5712

2686

322

655

1300

3422

2027

0.13

710.

1150

0.12

470.

1804

(337

9)(3

446)

(226

56)

(389

57)

(237

4)(1

320)

(985

8)(2

4402

)

FC+D

+G1.

002

2607

224

761

1476

0518

9794

3279

328

004

1805

9224

4754

0.05

14*

0.00

39**

*0.

1936

0.08

80*

(413

9)(4

220)

(277

48)

(477

12)

(290

7)(1

617)

(120

74)

(298

86)

FC+D

+G+P

1.44

239

862

3810

524

1175

2741

9154

168

4707

629

6930

4049

760.

0259

**0.

1109

0.06

20*

0.02

03**

(413

9)(4

220)

(277

48)

(477

12)

(290

7)(1

617)

(120

74)

(298

86)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed.0

001*

**.0

001*

**.0

001*

**0.

0003

***

CD

[P =

FS1

4275

4359

2865

849

277

3003

1671

1247

130

867

0.05

]V

s FS

2

CD

[P =

FS1

4897

4994

3283

256

454

3441

1914

1428

735

362

0.05

]V

s FS

3

CD

[P =

FS1

4897

4994

3283

256

454

3441

1914

1428

735

362

0.05

]V

s FS

4

CD

[P =

FS2

5344

5449

3582

361

597

3754

2088

1558

838

584

0.05

]V

s FS

3

CD

[P =

FS2

5344

5449

3582

361

597

3754

2088

1558

838

584

0.05

]V

s FS

4

CD

[P =

FS3

5854

5969

3924

267

476

4113

2288

1707

642

266

0.05

]V

s FS

4



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

Kol

ar (

Kar

nata

ka)

FC+D

0.88

619

577

1854

688

457

1349

3023

826

1947

195

399

1905

170.

3091

0.81

510.

7872

0.25

04(3

460)

(368

0)(1

4700

)(4

3495

)(4

846)

(442

0)(2

0220

)(4

5381

)

FC+D

+G+P

0.84

312

953

1107

367

656

7809

619

737

1842

375

592

1612

570.

2409

0.27

240.

6686

0.18

10(5

286)

(562

1)(2

2455

)(6

6441

)(7

403)

(675

2)(3

0887

)(6

9320

)

FC+D

+G0.

51

2075

214

627

9877

713

6423

1036

187

7161

722

6261

6-

--

-

FC+D

+Pig

0.27

197

8883

1862

200

3725

082

2968

6740

015

5873

5-

--

-

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

2656

0.51

50.

9426

0.11

87

CD

[P =

FS1

6318

6719

2683

979

412

8848

8071

3691

882

854

0.05

]V

s FS

2

Gad

ag (

Kar

nata

ka)

FC+D

1.30

1254

5948

5414

341

5116

911

673

1079

653

725

8636

0<.

0001

***

<.00

01**

*<.

0001

***

0.00

01**

*

Dha

rmap

uri

& K

rish

nagi

ri (

Tam

il N

adu)

FC+D

1.02

1011

011

8929

1109

7352

854

2887

716

627

1492

3228

2554

0.52

580.

5779

0.11

710.

3385

(184

6)(1

790)

(175

83)

(122

76)

(113

32)

(244

1)(1

8078

)(1

6139

5)

FC+D

+G1.

362

1758

715

404

1585

6198

012

2494

821

330

1494

3714

8131

0.17

880.

0290

**0.

1344

0.21

44(4

127)

(400

3)(3

9317

)(2

7450

)(2

5339

)(2

365)

(404

25)

(360

891)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

1420

0.01

06**

0.17

070.

1911

CD

[P =

FS1

4522

4386

4307

030

070

2775

859

7944

284

3953

370.

05]

Vs

FS2

Sri

kaku

lam

(A

nd

hra

Pra

des

h)

FC0.

902

1903

350

1000

013

340

4318

3451

1783

734

285

0.10

420.

1507

0.33

980.

2822

(154

4)(1

290)

(933

2)(1

9134

)(2

134)

(178

4)(9

422)

(192

83)

FC+D

+G1.

001

1691

715

292

9031

011

2690

2668

421

256

1218

4019

8683

--

--

FC+D

+G+P

0.52

120

869

1956

949

400

2070

2527

918

2209

766

075

2753

43-

--

-

FC+G

0.20

132

3819

4611

000

2909

062

0051

4546

605

5714

7-

--

-

FC+D

1.00

252

5335

2830

400

4194

659

0343

8622

052

4909

50.

9267

0.88

850.

7884

0.91

07(1

544)

(129

0)(9

332)

(191

34)

(213

4)(1

784)

(942

2)(1

9283

)

FC+G

+P1.

001

7604

5111

3003

364

484

1343

597

8414

792

1200

070.

6387

0.88

830.

3879

0.78

96(1

261)

(105

3)(7

619)

(156

23)

(174

2)(1

456)

(769

3)(1

5744

)

FC+P

0.70

266

3657

8638

300

5148

776

2565

8442

842

5911

10.

0118

**0.

0356

**0.

0007

***

0.11

33(1

544)

(129

0)(9

332)

(191

34)

(213

4)(1

784)

(942

2)(1

9283

)

FC+D

+P0.

702

9053

5883

3352

580

011

1347

093

7343

644

1232

37



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

1973

0.27

700.

1138

0.25

02

CD

[P =

FS1

2184

1825

1319

827

060

3018

2523

1332

527

271

0.05

]V

s FS

5

CD

[P =

FS1

1994

1666

1204

824

702

2755

2304

1216

424

895

0.05

]V

s FS

6

CD

[P =

FS1

2184

1825

1319

827

060

3018

2523

1332

527

271

0.05

]V

s FS

7

CD

[P =

FS5

1994

1666

1204

824

702

2755

2304

1216

424

895

0.05

]V

s FS

6

CD

[P =

FS5

2184

1825

1319

827

060

3018

2523

1332

527

271

0.05

]V

s FS

7

CD

[P =

FS6

1994

1666

1204

824

702

2755

2304

1216

424

895

0.05

]V

s FS

7

Ken

dra

par

a (O

dis

ha)

FC+D

0.66

283

1053

7047

452

2411

016

846

1140

948

058

1119

210.

2295

0.21

780.

9659

0.12

62(2

174)

(186

7)(1

1030

)(9

552)

(446

3)(4

162)

(938

1)(3

3311

)

FC+D

+P0.

892

8254

6118

5545

616

506

1636

011

962

4806

410

8201

0.23

160.

2871

0.00

48**

*0.

2057

(217

4)(1

867)

(110

30)

(955

2)(4

463.

)(4

162)

(938

1)(3

3311

)

FC+D

+G+P

1.00

382

9749

0649

186

2169

019

257

1419

153

541

1251

460.

0577

*0.

0863

*0.

7032

0.08

49*

(177

5)(1

525)

(900

6)(7

799)

(364

4)(3

398)

(765

9)(2

7198

)

FC+D

+F0.

642

5491

3279

3026

817

224

8347

5184

3264

450

286

0.10

660.

2055

0.29

730.

1510

(217

4)(1

867)

(110

30)

(955

2)(4

463)

(416

2)(9

381)

(333

11)

FC+D

+G1.

11

1791

413

587

7139

582

675

2749

721

826

6193

218

9033

--

--

FC+D

+G1.

061

4374

2618

2408

314

893

8057

5003

2388

459

240

--

--

+P+F

FC+D

+P+F

1.2

176

6140

1634

378

3326

211

190

7445

3790

971

687

--

--

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed.0

001*

**0.

0004

***

0.87

49.0

001*

**

CD

[P =

FS1

3075

2642

1559

913

510

6313

5886

1326

747

110

0.05

]V

s FS

2

CD

[P =

FS1

2807

2411

1424

012

332

5763

5373

1211

143

005

0.05

]V

s FS

3

CD

[P =

FS1

3075

2642

1559

913

510

6313

5886

1326

747

110

0.05

]V

s FS

4

CD

[P =

FS2

2807

2411

1424

012

332

5763

5373

1211

143

005

0.05

]V

s FS

3



Far

min

gA

rea

No.

of

Exi

stin

g S

yste

mIm

pro

ved

(D

iver

sifi

ed S

yste

m)

P v

alue

Sig

nific

ance

- E

xist

ing

vs I

mpr

oved

Sys

tem

(ha)

Ho

use

ho

lds

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

Pro

du

-M

ark

et-

Co

st

Pro

fit

ctio

nab

le(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)ct

ion

able

(R

s)(R

s)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

(kg

)S

urp

lus

(kg

)(k

g)

Su

rplu

s (k

g)

CD

[P =

FS2

3075

2642

1559

913

510

6313

5886

1326

747

110

0.05

]V

s FS

4

CD

[P =

FS3

2807

2411

1424

012

332

5763

5373

1211

143

005

0.05

]V

s FS

4

Siv

agan

gai

& P

uduk

otai

(Ta

mil

Nad

u)

FC+D

1.05

1212

017

1030

199

702

4419

023

147

2115

410

8599

1928

380.

0654

*0.

0663

*0.

5760

0.01

25**

Pal

gh

ar (

Mah

aras

htr

a)

FC+D

0.56

1178

7363

7263

680

3080

015

055

1167

649

008

3868

20.

0024

***

0.00

04**

*.0

001*

**0.

0002

***

FC+G

0.40

159

9454

9428

800

4312

811

671

8339

2443

051

628

Pat

hin

amth

itta

(Ker

ala)

FC+h

orti-

1.30

1114

640

1373

314

2597

1052

8726

947

2558

820

9132

2489

780.

0030

***

0.00

30**

*0.

0093

***

0.01

14**

cultu

re+D

(172

1)(1

716)

(190

78)

(183

07)

(307

7)(2

969)

(151

55)

(448

34)

FC+h

orti-

0.96

110

817

9892

8606

097

832

9515

8856

9579

065

970

--

--

cultu

re+D

+P

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

0042

***

0.00

41**

*0.

0089

***

0.01

50**

Meh

san

a (G

uja

rat)

FC1.

102

1305

275

1357

200

1124

7531

449

2921

420

3750

1584

650.

0196

**0.

0173

**0.

0434

**0.

0181

**(4

318)

(381

8)(3

8063

)(2

3529

)(2

822)

(166

2)(2

919)

(283

40)

FC+D

1.16

1016

215

1111

111

0236

1005

6930

734

2282

211

4206

1751

130.

4272

0.76

660.

8071

0.16

92(1

931)

(170

7)(1

7022

)(1

0522

)(1

262)

(130

5)(6

806)

(126

74)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

116

0.62

50.

519

0.05

7*

CD

[P =

FS1

6691

5916

5896

836

451

4373

4523

2357

743

905

0.05

]V

s FS

2

Pan

chm

ahal

(G

uja

rat)

FC+D

0.40

158

1845

2141

600

3985

072

2858

9955

200

4599

0-

--

-

FC+P

0.84

144

2133

3225

860

3460

057

1343

9516

985

6171

5-

--

-

FC+D

+P0.

901

5533

3795

4030

035

160

7071

5254

3892

558

265

--

--

FC+D

+G0.

723

9870

7297

4862

089

596

9619

7565

7706

676

323

0.86

610.

8824

0.08

820.

1830

(674

)(5

40)

(537

8)(7

130)

(109

0)(9

59)

(155

96)

(795

2)

FC+D

+P+G

1.04

610

823

8431

5655

395

196

1071

884

7479

915

1856

080.

8886

0.95

420.

0260

**0.

3765

(476

)(3

82)

(380

3)(5

042)

(771

)(6

78)

(529

6)(5

623)

Ove

rall

FSP

val

ue S

igni

fican

ce -

Exi

stin

g vs

Im

prov

ed0.

364

0.25

90.

665

0.34

5

CD

[P =

FS4

1430

1148

1141

015

127

2313

2036

1588

816

869

0.05

]V

s FS

5

Not

e: F

C: F

ield

cro

ps, D

: Dai

ry, P

: Pou

ltry,

G:G

oat,

F: F

ish;

* in

dica

tes

sign

ifica

nce

at 1

0% le

vel;

* in

dica

tes

sign

ifica

nce

at 5

% le

vel;

***

indi

cate

s si

gnifi

canc

e at

1%

leve

l; - V

alue

s in

( ) i

ndic

ates

stan

dard

err

or o

f m

ean

valu

es’ -

The

far

min

g sy

stem

with

onl

y on

e ho

useh

old

was

not

con

side

red

for A

NO

VA a

s w

ell a

s fo

r pa

ired

t tes

t.



the three systems also, performance of field cropssystems was found to be better owing to largerholding single compared to other systems.

Middle Gangetic plains

Purnea (Bihar): Four farming systems namelyfield crops, field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +goat and field crops + goat were found amongwhich 50% households were having field crops +dairy with mean area of 1.30 ha followed by fieldcrops + dairy + goat with 25 % householdspracticing with area of 1.13 ha. Interventions madein crop, livestock, processing and optional(nutritionalkitchen garden) modules resulted insignificant improvement in marketable surplus andprofit of field crops + dairy + goat system and profitof field crops + dairy system. In case of field crops+ dairy + goat system, the marketable surplus andprofit increased by 31 % and 2 times respectively.The profit of field crops + dairy system increasedby 49 % due to interventions in various modules.Among the differentsystem, higher production,marketable surplus and profit were recorded in fieldcrops + dairy + goat system. The cost of thesystem including cost of interventions was foundto be Rs 25,233 in 1.13 ha which is 4 % lessercompared to pre interventions.

Upper Gangetic plains

Kanpur Dehat (Uttar Pradesh): Three farmingsystems namely field crops , field crops + dairyand field crops + dairy + goat were found amongwhich 83 % households were having field crops +dairy system with mean area of 1.10 ha.Interventions made in crops, livestock, processingand optional (nutritional kitchen garden) resultedin marginal improvement in production, marketablesurplus and profit of all the systems. Among thethree farming systems, field crops + dairy + goatsystem recorded higher production (13951 kg),marketable surplus (11243 kg) and profit (Rs81588) from 0.60 ha area. The least cost increase(12%) due to interventions was observed in fieldcrops + dairy system.

Trans Gangetic plains

Sirsa (Haryana): All the households were havingonly one farming system of field crops + dairy (2-3animals) with mean area of 0.85 ha. Interventionsin crop, livestock, processing (ghee) and optional(kitchen garden) modules resulted in significantimprovement in production (40%), marketablesurplus (38.5 %), cost reduction (49 %) and profit(39 %) in the system.

Amritsar (Punjab): All the households were havingonly one farming system of field crops + dairy withmean area of 0.96 ha. Interventions in existingsystems in different modules such as crop,livestock, processing and optional could notinfluence significantly on production, cost and profit.However, the interventions resulted in highermarketable surplus (8.5 %) significantly.

Eastern plateau and hills

Kabirdham (Chhatisgarh): Three farmingsystems namely field crops + dairy + poultry, fieldcrops + dairy + poultry + goat and field crops +poultry were found among which 58% householdswere having field crops + dairy + poultry with meanarea of 1.20 ha area followed by 33 % householdshaving field crops + dairy + poultry + goat with areaof 1.02 ha. Interventions in crop, livestock,processing (pulse dal, besan and ghee) andoptional (nutritional kitchen garden) resulted insignificantly higher production (76,58 %),marketable surplus (70, 55 %) and profit (75,60%) in field crops + dairy + poultry and field crops +dairy + poultry + goat systems respectively. Amongthe farming systems, field crop + dairy + poultry +goat recorded higher production, marketablesurplus and profit.

Pakur (Jharkhand): All the households werehaving field crops only with mean area of 1.14 ha.The interventions in crop, livestock, processing(wheat gram processing) and optional (nutritionalkitchen garden) modules resulted in higherproduction (2798 kg), marketable surplus (578 kg)



and profit of Rs. 8,274 from 1.14 ha. The cost alsoreduced by 60 % due to interventions and effectiverecycling.

Dindori (Madhya Pradesh): Four farmingsystems namely field crops + dairy, field crops +dairy + goat, field crops + dairy + goat + poultryand field crops + dairy + poultry was found amongwhich 66 % households were having field crops +dairy system with mean area of 1.25 ha followedby 16% households with field crops + dairy + goatsystem having mean area of 0.90 ha. Interventionsmade in crop and livestock module resulted insignificant increase in marketable surplus of fieldcrops + dairy +goat system and cost of field crops+ dairy and field crops + dairy + goat systems.The other parameters were non-significant for allthe farming systems. Among the farming systems,field crops + dairy gave higher production and profit,while field crops + dairy + goat gave highermarketable surplus.

Angul (Odisha): Two farming systems namelyfield crops + dairy and field crops + dairy + poultrywere found among which one third householdswere having field crops + dairy and remaining withfield crops + dairy + poultry with mean area of 1.18and 1.22 ha respectively. Interventions made incrop, livestock, processing (ghee) and optional(fruits plantation, boundary plantation and fisheries)modules resulted in significantly higher production,marketable surplus, cost and profit in both thefarming systems. The improvement was found tobe 78, 108, 51 and 3 times respectively in fieldcrops + dairy + poultry and 73, 104, 67 and 1.7times respectively in field crops + dairy system.Among the two farming systems interventions infield crops + dairy + poultry system resulted inhigher production marketable surplus and profiteven though the cost increases by 51 % comparedto existing practices.

Central Plateau and hills

Katni (Madhya Pradesh): Two farming systemsnamely field crops and field crops + dairy werefound among which 83% households were havingfield crops + dairy system with mean area of 0.71

ha. Interventions made in crop and livestockmodule resulted in significant improvement inproduction (60 %) in field crops + dairy system.The cost increase due to interventions wassignificant in both the systems. The interventionsfailed to significantly influence on profit of both thesystems. Among the two systems, field crops +dairy gave higher production, marketable surplusand profit (Rs 68,998/- in 0.71 ha) with additionalcost of Rs 10,205/-due to interventions.

Udaipur (Rajasthan): Two farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy and field crops + dairy +goat were found among which 83% householdswere having field crops + dairy + goat system.Interventions made in crop, livestock, processing(vermicompost) and optional (fruits and boundaryplantations) resulted in significant improvement inprofit (Rs 73,077/- in 0.75 ha) of field crops + dairy+ goat. The cost of interventions were alsosignificantly increased (2.8 times) in this system.Among the two systems, even though field crops+ dairy recorded higher production marketablesurplus and profit, only profit is significantly highercompared to field crops + dairy + goat afterinterventions. The least cost increase of 2.8 timeswas observed in field crops + dairy + goatcompared to field crops + dairy (3.3 times).

Western Plateau and hills

Aurangabad (Maharashtra): Two farmingsystems namely field crops and field crops + dairywere found among which 66% households werehaving field crops systems with mean area of 0.58ha. The other system was present in 33 %households with mean area of 0.57 ha.Interventions made in crop, livestock andprocessing (sugarcane juice and ghee) resultedin significant improvement in production (139 %),marketable surplus (106 %) and profit (1.95 times)in field crops system. The cost of interventions wasfound to be 1.3 times higher.

Pune (Maharashtra): Two farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy and field crops + dairy +poultry were found among which 58% householdswere having field crops + dairy + poultry systems



with mean area of 0.72 ha. The interventions madein crop, livestock, processing and optional module(nutritional kitchen garden) resulted in significantlyhigher production (2.5 times) and marketablesurplus (3.1 times) in field crops + dairy + poultrysystem. The cost of interventions also increasedsignificantly. Among the two systems, higherproduction and marketable surplus was observedin field crops + dairy system.

Amravati (Maharashtra): Four farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +goat, field crops + dairy + poultry and field crops +goat were found among which 66 % householdswere practicing field crops + dairy system withmean area of 1.08 ha. Interventions made in crop,livestock, processing (fortified wheat atta andmineral mixture) and optional (nutritional plantation)resulted in significant improvement in production(57 %) marketable surplus (48 %) and profit (47%) in field crops + dairy system. The cost ofsystem was reduced by 49 % after interventionsmainly due to recycling. Among the systems, higherproduction, marketable surplus and profit wereobserved in field crops + dairy + poultry systemwhile the cost reduction due to interventions wasfound to be higher (49 %) in field crops + dairysystem.

Southern Plateau and hills

Warangal (Telangana): Four farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +goat, field crops + dairy + goat + poultry and fieldcrops + dairy + poultry were found among which41 % households were having field crops + dairywith mean area of 1.32 ha. Interventions made incrop, livestock, processing (ghee) and optional(nutritional kitchen garden and azolla) resulted insignificant improvement in production andmarketable surplus of field crops + dairy,production, marketable surplus and profit of fieldcrops + dairy + goat and production and profit offield crops + dairy + goat + poultry system. Amongthe systems, field crops + dairy, goat + poultryrecorded higher production (54168 kg), marketablesurplus (47076 kg) and profit (Rs 4.04 lakhs /year)compared to other systems due to interventions.

The cost increase due to interventions in thissystem was found to be only 23 %.

Kolar (Karnataka): Five farming systems namelyfield crops + dairy, field crops + dairy + goat, fieldcrops + dairy + goat + poultry, field crops + dairy +pig and field crops + dairy + rabbit were foundamong which 50 % households were having fieldcrops + dairy system with mean area of 0.88 ha.Interventions made in crop and livestock moduleresulted in minor improvement in production,marketable surplus and profit of field crops + dairyand field crops + dairy + goat + poultry system.Among the farming systems, higher production(23826 kg), marketable surplus (19471 kg) andprofit (Rs 1.90 lakhs) was recorded in field crops+ dairy system in 0.88 ha. In terms of cost, theleast total cost was found to be in field crops +dairy + pig (Rs 40,015 in 0.27 ha) system.

Gadag (Karnataka): All the households werehaving field crops + dairy system with mean areaof 1.30 ha. Interventions made in crop, livestock,processing (butter, vermicompost) and optional(nutritional kitchen garden) resulted in significantlyhigher production (113 %), marketable surplus(122 %) and profit (68 %) in the system. The costof the system also increased (2.7 times)significantly due to interventions made in differentmodules.

Dharmapuri and Krishnagiri (Tamil Nadu): Twofarming systems namely field crops + dairy andfield crops + dairy + goat was found among which83 % households were practicing field crops +dairy system with mean area of 1.02 ha.Interventions made in crop and livestock moduleresulted in significant improvement in marketablesurplus (38 %) of field crops + dairy + goat system.Among the two systems, higher production (28877kg) and profit (Rs 2, 82,554) was observed in fieldcrops + dairy in 1.02 ha. The cost of the systemafter intervention was found to be almost same inboth the systems.

East coast plains and hills

Srikakulam (Andhra Pradesh): Eight farmingsystems namely field crops, field crop + dairy +



goat, field crops + dairy + goat + poultry, field crops+ goat, field crops + dairy, field crops + goat +poultry, field crops + dairy + poultry and field crops+ poultry were found among which field crops, fieldcrops + dairy, field crops + poultry and field crops+ dairy, field crops + poultry were found in 16 %households each having area of 0.90, 0.30, 1.40and 1 ha respectively. Interventions made in crop,livestock and optional (azolla) modules resulted insignificant improvement in production andmarketable surplus of field crops + dairy + poultrysystem. Among the various farming systems, afterinterventions, the production (27918 kg),marketable surplus (22097 kg) and profit (Rs2,75,343) was higher in field crops + dairy + goat+ poultry system with the total cost of Rs 66,075/-in 0.52 ha.

Kendrapara (Odisha): Seven farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +poultry, field crops + dairy + goat + poultry, fieldcrops + dairy + goat, field crops + dairy + fish, fieldcrops + dairy + goat + poultry + fish were foundamong which 25% households were having areaof 1 ha. Field crops + dairy, field crops + dairy +poultry and field crops + dairy + fish were presentin 16 % households with mean area of 0.66, 0.89and 0.64 ha respectively. Interventions made incrop, livestock, processing and optional (nutritionalkitchen garden mushroom and fishery) modulesresulted in significant improvement in production(132 %), marketable surplus (189 %) and profit(4.7 times) in field crops + dairy + goat + poultrysystem. In case of field crops + dairy + poultry, thecost was reduced (13.3 %) significantly due tointerventions. Among the different farmingsystems, higher production, marketable surplusand profit was observed in field crops + dairy +goat system. The least cost was found to be infield crops + dairy + goat + poultry + fishery in 1.06ha area.

Sivagangaiand Pudukottai (Tamil Nadu): All thehouseholds were having the field crops + dairy +poultry system with mean area of 1.05 ha.Interventions in crop, livestock, processing andoptional modules resulted in significantimprovement in production (92 %), marketable

surplus (105 %) and profit (3.3 times). The costincrease due to interventions was not significant.

West Coast Plains and ghats

Palghar (Maharashtra): Two farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy and field crops + goatwere found among which 92 % households werehaving field crops + dairy system with mean areaof 0.56 ha. Interventions in crop, livestock andoptional (nutritional kitchen garden) modulesresulted in significant improvement in production(91 %), marketable surplus (83 %) and profit (25.5%) in field crops + dairy system. The cost alsodecreased (24 %) significantly implyingbetter inter-linkage among components due to interventions.

Pathinamthitta (Kerala): Two farming systemsnamely field crops + horticulture + dairy and fieldcrops + horticulture + dairy + poultry were foundamong which 92 % households were having fieldcrops + horticulture + dairy system with mean areaof 1.30 ha. The interventions made in crop,livestock, processing (curing of garcinia, coconutoil, dry mace, graded pepper and packed milk afterfiltration ) and optional (fisheries, terrace gardening,apiary and vermicompost) in field crops +horticulture + dairy system resulted in higherproduction (26947 kg), marketable surplus (25588kg) and profit (Rs 2.48 lakhs / year) from 1.30 ha.The cost of the system also increased (46 %)significantly due to interventions. Among the twofarming systems, higher production, marketablesurplus and profit were observed in field crops +horticulture + dairy due to interventions. The netreturns per rupee invested were also found to behigher (1.19) in the same system.

Gujarat plains and hills

Mehsana (Gujarat): Two farming systems namelyfield crops and field crops + dairy were foundamong which field crops + dairy was present in 83% households with mean area of 1.16 ha.Interventions made in crop and livestock modulesresulted in significant improvement in production(140 %), marketable surplus (2.8 times) and profit(40 %) in field crops system while the cost increase



due to interventions was found to be 2.5 times.Among the two systems, field crops + dairyrecorded higher profit of Rs 1,75,113/ -from 1.16ha due to interventions.

Panchmahal (Gujarat): Five farming systemsnamely field crops + dairy, field crops + poultry,field crops + dairy + poultry, field crops + dairy +goat and field crops + dairy + poultry + goat werefound among which field crops + dairy + poultry +goat were present in 50 % of households havingmean area of 1.04 ha. Interventions made in crop,livestock, processing and optional (nutritionalkitchen garden, fruit, boundary plantations andutilization of stubbles of fodder crop) resulted inhigher production, marketable surplus and profitfrom all the systems. Among the different farmingsystems, higher production (10718 kg), marketablesurplus (8474 kg), and profit (Rs 90,412) wasobserved in field crops + dairy + poultry + goatsystem in 1.04 ha due to interventions. The costincrease due to interventions in this systems wasfound to be Rs 23,362/ which resulted in additionalincome of Rs 90,412/-. Cost reduction to the extentof 35 and 3-5 % was observed in field crops +poultry and field crops + dairy + poultry systemsrespectively due to interventions, which impliesbetter recycling within the system.

The results across the locations are summarizedas below:

• The number of farming systems in differentdistricts ranged between 1 (Samba,Ambedkarnagar, Sirsa, Amritsar, Pakur and

Gadag) to 8 (Srikakulam). Nainital, Kolar andPanchmahal districts were having 5 farmingsystems while Kendraparahas 7 systems.

• Field crops + dairy was found to be thedominant farming system based on numberof households in 20 districts (68 % of totaldistricts studied).

• The dominant systems observed in otherdistricts are field crops (Pakur in Jharkhand),field crops + dairy + poultry (Kabirdham inChhatisgarh, Pune in Maharashtra andSivagangai & Pudukottai in Tamil Nadu), fieldcrops + dairy + goat (Udaipur in Rajasthan),field crops + dairy + goat + poultry (Kendraparain Odisha and Panchmahal in Gujarat ) andfield crops + horticulture (coconut / rubber) +dairy (Pathinamthitta in Kerala ).

• Highly diversified system was observed inSrikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh havingmany components of farming system namelyfield crop, dairy, goat, poultry in differentcombinations ranging from 1 to 4.

• In general, at all the locations, constraint basedinterventions in crop, livestock, processing andoptional modules resulted in improvement inproduction (1-2 times), marketable surplus (2-5 times) and profit (2-3 times). At manylocations, interventions also contributed forsignificant reduction in cost due to betterrecycling.

Monitoring of on-farm research experiments atKendrapara (Odisha)

Azolla production for feeding livestock (dairy andpoultry) by farmers at Kendrapara (Odisha)



7.4.4 Frontline demonstration on cropping systems involving oilseedsand training of extension officials and input dealers

The results of the FLD’s conducted in farmer’sfield’s by OFR units of AICRP on IFS during 2014-15 are given below.

Objective: To demonstrate the productionpotential and monetary advantages of well identifiedcropping and inter cropping systems under realfarm situation involving oilseed as one of thecomponent crops in various agro ecosystems.

Technical Programme: The FLD’s wereconducted at 10 OFR units of All India CoordinatedResearch Project on Integrated Farming Systems(AICRP on IFS) in five agro ecosystems viz., Arid,Semi-Arid, Sub Humid, Humid and Coastal;covering 10 states. Crops/cropping systems inwhich FLDs were conducted are given in Table7.4.6. In Arid ecosystem, at jagudan twelvedemonstrations conducted while in Semi-Aridecosystem, 32 demonstrations in total have wereconducted by Amritsar, Seethampeta and KanpurDehat centres. A total of 24 demonstrations wereconducted in Sub Humid ecosystem at Jeolikote,Kangra, Purnea&Pakur. In Humid & Coastal

ecosystem, 10 demonstrations at each centre wereconducted at Kakdwip and Tiruvalla. The majorcropping systems in which oilseed crops weretested are Hybrid castor in arid ecosystem,gobhisarson, sunflower and sesame in Semi-Arid,mustard,sunflower and gobhisarson in Sub Humid,sunflower in Humid and sesame in Coastalecosystems. A total of 22 demonstrations were onsystems involving sunflower, followed by 18demonstrations on gobhisarson. The systemsinvolving sesame was undertaken in 15demonstrations while hybrid castor and mustardcrops were taken in 12 and 21 demonstrationsrespectively. There were only two treatments takenfor comparison, i.e. farmers practice (FP) andimproved practice (IP). These treatments wereapplied on a time tested; well recognized oilseedbased cropping systems of the location.

Financial source: FLDs on oilseed basedcropping systems were 100% financed byDepartment of Agriculture and Cooperation,Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India throughDirectorate of Oilseeds Research, Hyderabad.

Table 7.4.6. List of centres of Front Line Demonstrations (FLD) on oilseed based cropping systems(2014-15)

Agro Ecosystem Name of Centre (State) Crop/cropping system (s) Number ofdemonstrations

1. Arid Jagudan (Gujarat) Hybrid castor 12

2. Semi-Arid Amritsar (Punjab) Gobhi-Sarson 12Seethampeta (Andhra Pradesh) Sunflower andSesame 10Kanpur Dehat Mustard 10

3. Sub humid Jeolikote (Uttarakhand) Mustard 3Kangra (Himachal Pradesh) Maize-GobhiSarson 6Purnea (Bihar) Sunflower and Mustard 10Pakur, (Jharkhand) Mustard 5

4. Humid Kakdwip (West Bengal) Rice-Sunflower 10

5. Coastal Thiruvalla (Kerala) Sesame 10

Total 88



During 2014-15, an amount of Rs 85,000/- hasbeen released to the different centres.Further Rs1,44,000/- was released to centres for organizing4 training programmes.

Salient findings

Out of 88 demonstrations on oilseed basedcropping systems, 22 were on cropping systeminvolving sunflower at 3 centres, 18 demonstrationson cropping system involving gobhisarsonat 3centres, The systems involving castor wasundertaken in 12 demonstrations while sesameand mustard crops were taken in 15 and 18demonstrations respectively.

Yield (Table 7.4.7)

During the year 2014-15 in Kharif & Rabiseason system base five demonstrations onHy.castor (K) +Lucerne as intercrop and twodemonstrations on Hy. Castor (sunhamp greenmanuring and without green manuring) wereconducted in operational area of OFR in Kadi andVisnagar blocks of Mehsana district.

1. The mean data of three demonstrationsrevealed that Hy. Castor + Lucerne (Fodderand then seed production) broad casting gave18.77% higher yield than only sole castor crop.

2. The mean data of two demonstrations viz.sunhamp as green manure than sowing ofhy.castor gave 18.01% higher yieldthan onlysowing of hybrid castor without greenmanuring.

3. The mean data of three demonstrationsrevealed that groundnut + Hybrid castor as relaycrop gave 168% higher yield than sole crop ofgroundnut, where as 44.13% higher yieldwasobtained in Bt cotton + Hybrid castor (relay)than only Bt cotton.

In the above four crop addition in main crop,the highest yield obtain in case of groundnut +Hybrid castor main reason behind this is thedifference in the height and nature of both crop so

less competition face from each other. At jeolikote15.35% increase in yield recorded over the farmerpractice in mustard due to introduction of improvedvariety like “Rohini” with optimum spacing 30 x 15and weed control through herbicides (Pendamethylene) instead of hand weeding. On anaverage, 51.0% and 47.7% increase in yield wasobserved in case of mustard and sunflower underimproved variety at Purnea centre.

In case of mustard 22.38 & 143.49% increasein yield over farmer practices were recorded dueto (improved variety + nutrient management) &(reduced seed rate + nutrient management) atKanpur Dehat and Pakur centre respectively. AtSeethampeta due to improved variety 149.0% and61.0% increase in yield was observed in case ofsunflower and sesame. Improved package ofpractices in Gobhisarson (45 X 10 spacing maintainby thinning) and (100-30-0 NPK through Urea andSSP)) at Amritsar 32.47% increase in yield wasobserved. An yield increase of 54.52% wasobserved in Gobhisarson with Improved varietyHPN-3, at Kangra (Himachal Pradesh). In case ofsunflower improved verity (KBSH-41 & KBSH-53)and balanced application of nutrient along with B& S recorded 9.0% increase in yield over the farmerpractices at Kakdwip, West Bengal. A significant34.86% yield increase was reported at Thiruvallain sesame due to introduction of Tilak variety withimproved practices in place of Kayamkulam1.Significant improvement in yield of other cropsgrown in the system such as rice and maize wasalso observed under improved package. Theincrease was found to be 8.34 and 54.74% in riceand maize respectively.

Gross and Net returns (Table 7.4.8)

Gross and Net returns were higher in improvedpackage for all the crops at all locations due toincrease in yield. During the year 2014-15 total 12demonstrations on Hybrid castor were conductedat Jagudancenter result revealed that

1. The mean data of three demonstrationsrevealed that hybrid castor + Lucerne (Fodderand then seed production) broad casting gave



FLD demonstration at Jagudan (Gujarat) (A) Groundnut Sole (B) Relay Cropping of Groundnut+Castor (C) Small Castorafter harvesting of groundnut (D) Young Hybrid Castor after harvesting of Groundnut

FLD demonstration at Jagudan (Gujarat) (A) Castor Sole (B) Inter Cropping of Castor+Lucerne (C) Sole Hybrid castor(D) relay Cropping BtCotton+HybridCastor



Tab

le 7

.4.7

. In

flu

ence

of

farm

ers

and

imp

rove

d p

ract

ices

on

gra

in o

r p

od

yie

ld (

kg/h

a) o

f va

rio

us

cro

ps u

nd

er F

LD

(20

14-1

5)

Ag

ro E

coC

rop

pin

g s

yste

mN

o. o

fF

arm

ers

Pra

ctic

e (F

P)

Imp

rove

d P

ract

ice

(IP

)%

incr

ease

ove

r F

P

syst

em /

Cen

tre

Kha

rif

Rab

id

emo

nst

ratio

ns

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

i

1. A

rid

Jagu

dan

(Guj

arat

)H

y ca

stor

-5

2652

-31

50-

18.7

7-

Hy

cast

or-

224

70-

2915

-18

.01

-H

y ca

stor

-3

2623

-60

72-

131.

50-

Hy

cast

or-

231

60-

4620

-46

.20

-

2. S

emi

Ari

d

Am

ritsa

r (P

unja

b)-

Gob

hi12

-10

86-

1252

-15

.35

Sar

son

See

tham

peta

-S

unflo

wer

5-

210

-52

5-

149.

00(A

ndhr

a P

rade

sh)

Ses

ame

-5

340

-48

5-

61.0

0-

Kan

pur D

ehat

(UP

)-

Mus

tard

10-

1002

-12

27-

22.3

8

3. S

ub

Hu

mid

Pur

nea

(Bih

ar)

-M

usta

rd7

-68

0-

1030

-51

.00

Sun

flow

er-

385

0-

1220

-47

.70

-Je

olik

ote

-M

usta

rd3

-25

00-

2770

-15

.35

(Utta

rakh

and)

Kan

gra

(HP

)M

aize

Gob

hiS

arso

n6

1888

785

2921

1213

54.7

454

.52

Pak

ur-

Mus

tard

5-

277

-67

4-

143.

49

4. H

um

id

Kak

dwip

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

4541

8615

4045

3516

758.

349.

00(W

est B

enga

l)

5. C

oas

tal

Thi

ruva

lla, (

kera

la)

Ses

ame*

(sum

mer

)10

-38

5-

519

-34

.86



Tab

le 7

.4.8

. In

flu

ence

of f

arm

ers

and

imp

rove

d p

ract

ices

on

gro

ss r

etu

rns

(Rs/

ha)

of v

ario

us

cro

ps u

nd

er F

LD

(201

4-15

)

Ag

ro E

coC

rop

pin

g s

yste

mN

o. o

fF

arm

ers

Pra

ctic

e (F

P)

Imp

rove

d P

ract

ice

(IP

)%

incr

ease

ove

r F

P

syst

em /

Cen

tre

Kha

rif

Rab

id

emo

nst

ratio

ns

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

i

1. A

rid

Jagu

dan

(Guj

arat

)H

y ca

stor

-5

1014

68-

1421

24-

40.0

7-

Hy

cast

or-

293

860

-11

0770

-18

.02

-H

y ca

stor

-3

1150

86-

2315

48-

101.

19-

Hy

cast

or-

215

2350

-19

5480

-28

.31

-

2. S

emi

Ari

d

Am

ritsa

r (P

unja

b)-

Gob

hi12

-34

747

-40

080

-15

.35

Sar

son

See

tham

peta

(-

Sun

flow

er5

-61

00-

1650

0-

170.

49A

ndhr

a P

rade

sh)

Ses

ame

-5

3740

0-

5335

0-

-42

.65

Kan

pur D

ehat

(UP

)-

Mus

tard

10-

3694

7-

4532

9.4

-22

.69

3. S

ub

Hu

mid

Pur

nea

(Bih

ar)

-M

usta

rd7

--

--

--

Sun

flow

er-

3-

--

--

-Je

olik

ote

-M

usta

rd3

-80

525

-89

017

-10

.54

(Utta

rakh

and)

Kan

gra

(HP

)M

aize

Gob

hiS

arso

n6

--

--

--

Pak

ur-

Mus

tard

5-

--

--

-

4. H

um

id

Kak

dwip

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

4561

268

6129

769

805

6667

413

.93

8.77

(Wes

t Ben

gal)

5. C

oas

tal

Thi

ruva

lla, (

kera

la)

Ses

ame*

(sum

mer

)10

-71

206

-95

978

-34

.79



Tab

le 7

.4.9

. In

flu

ence

of f

arm

ers

and

imp

rove

d p

ract

ices

on

net

ret

urn

s (R

s/h

a) o

f var

iou

s cr

op

s u

nd

er F

LD

(201

4-15

)

Ag

ro E

coC

rop

pin

g s

yste

mN

o. o

fF

arm

ers

Pra

ctic

e (F

P)

Imp

rove

d P

ract

ice

(IP

)%

incr

ease

ove

r F

P

syst

em /

Cen

tre

Kha

rif

Rab

id

emo

nst

ratio

ns

Kha

rif

Rab

iK

hari

fR

abi

Kha

rif

Rab

i

1. A

rid

Jagu

dan

(Guj

arat

)H

y ca

stor

-5

6146

4-

9240

4-

50.5

3-

Hy

cast

or-

260

175

-72

260

-20

.58

-H

y ca

stor

-3

6477

6-

1739

31-

168.

00-

Hy

cast

or-

290

120

-13

0280

-44

.56

-

2. S

emi

Ari

d

Am

ritsa

r (P

unja

b)-

Gob

hi12

-22

415

-28

337

-26

.42

Sar

son

See

tham

peta

-S

unflo

wer

5-

3240

-15

980

-39

3.20

(And

hra

Pra

desh

)S

esam

e-

528

800

-44

046

-52

.93

-K

anpu

r Deh

at (U

P)

-M

usta

rd10

-19

682

-26

129.

4-

32.6

7

3. S

ub

Hu

mid

Pur

nea

(Bih

ar)

-M

usta

rd7

--

--

--

Sun

flow

er-

3-

--

--

-Je

olik

ote

-M

usta

rd3

-45

658

-53

517

-17

.21

(Utta

rakh

and)

Kan

gra

(HP

)M

aize

Gob

hiS

arso

n6

--

--

--

Pak

ur-

Mus

tard

5-

--

--

-

4. H

um

id

Kak

dwip

Ric

eS

unflo

wer

4518

859

2076

027

951

2598

148

.21

25.0

0(W

est B

enga

l)

5. C

oas

tal

Thi

ruva

lla, (

kera

la)

Ses

ame*

(sum

mer

)10

-22

386

-44

550

-99

.01



40.07 and 50.34% higher gross and net returnthan only sole castor crop.

2. The mean data of two demonstrations viz.sunhamp as green manure than sowing ofhybrid castor gave 18.02 and 20.58% highergross and net monetary return than only sowingof hybrid castor without green manuring.

3. The mean data of three demonstrationsrevealed that groundnut + Hybrid castor as relaycrop gave 101.19 and 168%higher gross andnet return than sole crop of groundnut, whereas28.31 and 44.13% higher gross and netmonetary return was obtained in Bt cotton +hybrid castor (relay) than only Bt cotton.

In the above four crop addition in main crop,the highest monetary return obtain in case ofgroundnut + Hybrid castor main reason behind thisis the difference in the height and nature of bothcrop so less competition face from each other.Higher gross return of sunflower due improvedpractices was realized atSeethampeta (Rs 165000ha-1) followed by Kakdwip (Rs 66674 ha-1). AtJeolikote due to introduction of improved varietylike “Rohini” with optimum spacing 30 x 15 andweed control through herbicides (Pendamethylene) recorded gross return Rs 61950 ha-1.On an average, Gobhisarson recorded grossincome of Rs 40080 ha-1with improved packageof practices (45 X 10 spacing maintain by thinning)and (100-30-0 NPK through Urea and SSP) atAmritsar. At Kanpur Dehat in case of mustardreduced seed rate along with nutrient management

recorded gross return of Rs 45329 ha-1. Othercrops grown in the system such as rice was alsorecorded positively increase in gross return Rs69805 ha-1 respectively.

In terms of net returns, 26.42% increase wasobserved at Amritsar in Gobhisarson with improvedpackage. In mustard, improved package led to17.21 & 32.67% increase in net return at Jeolikoteand Kanpur Dehat centre over farmers practice.In case of sunflower improved practices recorded25.0% increase in net return over the farmerpractices at Kakdwip, West Bengal. On anaverage, 393.2and 52.93% increase in net returnwas observed in case of sunflower and sesameunder improved variety at Seethampeta centre.Incase of sesame improved practices recorded99.01% increase in net return over the farmerpractices at Thiruvalla, Kerala, which same patternwe getting in previous year trial also. The othercrops such as rice evaluated in the system gave48.21% increase in net returns with improvedpackage compared to farmers practice.

Results for large scale exploitation

The cropping systems involving oilseedspromise to increase the production of oilseeds onthe one hand and improve the profitability forfarmers on the other hand. In all the FLDs, it wasproved that yield and net returns can be increasedby adopting improved package in place of farmerspractice. The gist of the practices for various cropsis given below for large scale adoption.

Sl. Crop Location Improved Package Increase in Increase inNo. (ecosystem) yield (%) net returns (%)

1. Mustard Jeolikote (Uttara- Rohini variety with wider spacing 30 x 15 51.00 17.21khand) in place of 30 x 10 with weed control by

Penda methylene instead of hand weedingPurnia (Sub humid) Improved variety of “R-Sufalam” 51.00 -Kanpur Dehat Reduced seed rate + Nutrient management 22.38 32.67(Semi-arid)Pakur (Sub-humid) Improved variety with Nutrient management 143.49 -



Sl. Crop Location Improved Package Increase in Increase inNo. (ecosystem) yield (%) net returns (%)

2. Hybrid Junagadh Arid Intercropping with lucerne 18.77 50.53Castor Green manuring 18.01 20.58

Relay cropping with groundnut 131.50 168.00Relay cropping with Bt cotton 46.20 44.56

3. Sesame Thiruvalla (Coastal) Tilak variety 34.86 99.01Seethampeta (AP) YLM-66 variety 61.00 52.93

4. Sunflower Purnia (Sub-humid) Leader(SF) 47.70 -Seethampeta (AP) Improved variety with Nutrient management 149.00 393.20Kakdwip (West KBSH-41 & KBSH-53 variety, Balanced 9.00 25.00Bengal) application S & B

5. Gobhi Amritsar (Punjab) After germination 45 X 10 spacing maintained 15.35 26.42sarson by thinning, NPK 100-30-0 supplied by urea

& SSPKangra (HP) HPN-3 variety 54.52 -

6. Rice Kakdwip (WB) Improved variety 8.34 48.21

7. Maize Kangra (HP) Kanchan Hybrid 54.74 -

Training on new technologies anddevelopment in oilseeds cultivation

As per new guideline of NMOOP, all the fourOFR centre has to conducted training programmefor update the knowledge of extension/agriculturalofficers and inputs dealers who are directlyassociated with farmers and selling seeds/pesticides/agricultural machinery etc. Under this

total 90 participant are get benefited 28 fromThiruvalla, 22 from Mehsana and 20 participanteach from Kakdwip and Kanpur dehat centre.These training were successfully conducted andknowledge regarding new technologies of oilseedscultivation through improved package of practicesfor different oilseeds crops and basic principles inagriculture for higher crop production was impartedthrough lectures and practically by field visit.

Training on new technologies and development in oilseeds cultivation organised atThiruvalla (Kerala)

8. GENERAL/MISCELLANEOUS8.1 List of Publications

8.2 Paper Presenetd in Seminar/Symposia

8.3 Group Meetings/Workshops Organised

8.4 Radio and Television Talks Delivered by Project Staff



8. GENERAL/MISCELLANEOUS

8.1 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS

8.1.1 Research Papers

ANGRAU, Rajendranagar (AP)

Sridevi, S. and Venkata Ramana, M. 2014. Productivity, soil fertility and sustainability of continuous ricesystem under long-term substitution of through organics Research on Crops (An InternationalJournal) 15 (1) : 22-26

Sekhar, K., Venkata Ramana, M. and Sridevi, S. 2013. Response of Bt cotton to plant geometry andcanopy nanagement. The Andhra Agricultural Journal 60(2):245-249

Vani Anusha, S., Prabhu Prasadini, P., Sridevi, S. and Surya Prakasa Rao, K. 2013. Effect of Organicfertilizers on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopercicum esculentum).The Journal of ResearchANGRAU 41(2): 126-130

Sekhar, K., Venkata Ramana, M. and Sridevi, S. 2013. Enhancing the productivity of Bt cotton by plantinggeometry and chloro mepiquat chloride application. Green Farming International Journal 4(1): 40-42

Sekhar, K., Venkata Ramana, M. and Sridevi, S. 2013. Influence of growth regulator application on Btcotton under varying plant densities. Green farming International Journal 4(3): 355-357

BAU, Sabour (Bihar)

Sharma, R.P., Sushant, Dutta, S.K. and Ghosh, Mainak. 2014. Diversification of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat(Triticum aestivum) cropping system for sustainable production in south Bihar alluvial plain. IndianJournal of Agronomy Vol.59 (2):191-199.

Das Anupam, Sharma, R.P., Chattopadhyaya, N. and Rakshit, R. 2014.Yield trends and nutrient budgetingunder a long-term (28years) nutrient management in rice-wheat cropping system under subtropicalclimatic condition. Plant Soil Environment Vol.60, 2014, No.8:351-357.

IGKVV Raipur (Chatisgarh)

Chitale, S., Pali, G.P., Tiwari, A., Urkurkar, J.S., Kumar, Vinod and Singh, P. 2013. Effect of organic nutrientmanagement in high value rice (Oryza sativa L.)-onion (Allium cepa) cropping system inChhatishgarh.Journal of Farming System research and Development 19(1):12-19.

NAU, Navsari

Meena, S.K., Desai, L.J., Saukat, Ali, Shivran, A. and Bijarniya, A.L. 2013. Study on influence of weedcontrol methods on yield, quality, and economics in dill seed (Anethum graviolence L). Crop Research,46(1,2&3):234-237.



Meena, S.K., Desai, L.J., Saukat Ali, and Shivprakash, Nagar. 2013. Effect of weed management on yield,quality and weed parameters in dill seed (Anethum graviolence L).International Journal of AgriculturalScience, 9(2):723-727.

Desai, L.J., Patel, M.M.,Chaudhary, P.P., Saukat, Ali, and Patel, J.K. 2013. Influence of integrated nitrogenmanagement on nutrient content and uptake of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacusL.)Journal of Soil and Cerops, 231):53.

Desai, L.J., Thanki, J.D., Nitin, Gudadhe and Dugarani, R.A. 2014. Study on rice (Oryza sativa L.) basedcropping system under south Gujrat condition. Bioinfolet, 11(2C), 658-662, 2014.

Desai, L.J., Thanki, J.D., Nitin, Gudadhe and Dugarani, R.A. 2014. Effect of cropping systems on cropproductivity and profitability under South Gujrat condition. Indian J ecology 41(2):240-242:2014.

CCS HAU, Hisar (Haryana)

Jat, R.D. and Nanwal, R.K. 2013. Growth, nutrient uptake and profitability of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)influenced by spacing and nutrient levels. Crop Res. 45(1, 2 & 3):248-252.

Neelam, Nanwal, R.K. and Kumar, Pawan. 2013. Productivity and quality of mungbean-wheat croppingsystem as influenced by organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in semi arid environment. Res.on Crops 14(3): 786-791.

Neelam, Nanwal, R.K. and Kumar, Pawan. 2014. Nutrient management in pulse-wheat cropping system:A Review. Annals of Agri. Bio. Res. 19(1):61-66.

Kumar, Pawan, Yadav, S.K., Kumar, Manoj and Hasija, R.C. 2014. Cropping systems involving pulses,oilseeds and vegetable for livelihood improvement of farmers in semi-arid region. Annals of Biology30(1): 123-126

CSK HPKVV, Palampur (H.P.)

Negi, S.C., J., Shekhar, Mankotia, B.S. and Singh, Gurudev. 2013. Fertilizer schedule under limited irrigationwith zero tilled wheat (Triticum aestivum) after rice (Oryza sativa) in north-west Himalyas. IndianJournal of Agronomy. 58(2):187-191.

Ramesh, Rana, S.S., Negi, S.C., Suresh, Kumar and Subehia, S.K. 2014. Effect of resource-conservingand planting techniques on productivity of maize (Zea Mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) croppingsystem. Indian Journal of Agronomy.59 (1); 34-40.

Sharma, S.K., Negi, S.C., Subehia, S.K. and Rana, S.S. 2013. On-farm evaluation of management practicesof Rice and wheat in sub-mantane sub-tropical lowhills zone of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of KrishiVigyan 2(1):41-44.

Subehia, S.K., Swapana, Sepehya, Negi, S.C., Rana, S.S. and Sharma, S.K. 2013. Long term effects oforganic and inorganic fertizers on rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and



chemical properties of an acidic soil in the Western Himalayas.Exp.agri.49 (3):382-394, CanbridgeUniversity Press.

Sharma, S.K., Negi, S.C., Subehia, S.K. and Rana, SS. 2013. On farm evaluation of management practicesof rice and wheat in sub montane subtropical low hills Zone of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of KrishiVigyan 2(1):41-44.

Ramesh, Rana, S.S. and Kumar, Suresh. 2014. Weed dynamics and productivity of maize-wheat croppingsystem as influenced by tillage/planting techniques. International Journal of Science, environmentand Technology 3(3):1059-1070.

Sharma, Upender and Subehia, S.K. 2014. Effect of long-term integrated nutrient management on rice(Oryza sativaL.)-wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) Productivity and Soil Properties in North westernHimalaya. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science.62(3):248-254.

Sharma, Upender and Subehia, S.K. 2014. Chemical fractions of zinc and their contribution towards itsavailability under long-term integrated nutrient management in rice-wheat sequence in an acid alfisol.Communications in Soil Science and Plant analysis.45:2898-2910.

SKUAT, Jammu (J&K)

Sharma, Rohit, Kachroo, Dileep, Thakur, N.P., Gupta, A.K., Bharat, Rajeev, Sharma, Vishal and Arya,Vivek. 2013. Efect of puddling, irrigation and nutrient sources on yield nutrient uptake by rice and soilmoisture status under sub-tropical condition of Jammu.Annals of plant and soil research.15 (2):93-96.

Kachroo, Dileep, Thakur, N.P., Kour, Manpreet, Sharma, Rohit and Khajuria, Vijay. 2013. Diversification ofrice based cropping system.Indian Journal of agronomy 58(4): 58-62.

Kour, Manpreet, Singh, K.N., Singh, Mahendra, Thakur, N.P., Kachroo, Dileep and Sharma, Rohit. 2013.Assesment of climate change and its impact on growth and yield of wheat under temperate and sub-tropical condition through DSSAT 4.0. Journal of Agrometrology.15(2): 142-146.

JNKVV, Jabalpur (M.P.)

Verma, Nidhi, Vishwakarma, S.K., Shrivastava, Deepak and Shah, M.S. 2013. “Studies on weed flora andweed control efficiency under diversification and intensification of rice based cropping systems”Crop Res. 46 (12 &3): 16-21

Shrivastava, D. and Vishwakarma, S.K., Nidhi, Verma and Shah, M.S. 2013. “Bio-efficacy and phytotoxicityof clodinofop-propargyl (15%) on weed control in wheat crop.” Journal of Weed Science 47 (2:)305-307

Shukla, V.K., Jain, Vikas and Vishwakarma, S.K. 2013. “Growth, seed yield and seed quality of Chinesecabbage (Brassica napus L.) as affected by different fertility levels and row spacing.” J. Soils andCrops 23 (1) : 30-35.



RVSKVV, Indore

Joshi, Arun, Gupta, J.K., Choudhary, S.K. and Paliwal, D.K. Efficacy of different nitrogen sources dosesand split application on growth and yield of maize (Zeamays L.) in the malwa region of M.P. IOSRJournal of Agriculture and Veterinary science Volume-2 ver-1 page 39-42.

PAU, Ludhiana (Punjab)

Aulakh, C.S., Gill, M.S., Walia, S.S., Mahey, R.K. and Walia, U.S. 2014. Performance of diversified croppingsystems under organic, Integrated and chemical farming in Punjab. Indian J.Ecology 40(2): 258-263.

Aulakh, C.S., Gill, M.S.,Walia, S.S., Singh, Surjit and Kour, Kanwalpreet. 2013. Evaluation of croppingsystems for green fodder productivity at farmers, Field in Punjab.Current advances in AgriculturalScience 5(2):221-224.

Aulakh, C.S., Singh, Hargopal, Walia, S.S., Phutela, R.P. and Singh, Gurminder. 2013. Characterizationand evaluation of microbial culture for field crops. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(2):182-186.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2013. Effect of establishment methods and nitrogen levels on basmati rice(Oryza sativa L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(4):506-511.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Effect of foliar application of iron, zinc and manganese on direct seededaromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy 59(1):80-85.

Gill, J.S., Walia, S.S. and Gill, R.S. 2014. Effect of establishment methods and nitrogen levels on uptakeof micronutrients in basmati rice. J soils and Crops 24(1):1-12.

Walia, M.K., Walia, S.S. and Dhaliwal, S.S. 2014. Long term impact of chemical fertilizers and organicmanures on weed dynamics of rice in rice-wheat system. International J Science, Environment andTechnology 3(3):1260-1267.

Walia, S.S. and Kaur, N. 2013. Integrated farming system-An eco-friendly approach for sustainableagriculture environment-A review. Greener J of agroforestry and Horticulture 1(1):1-11.

Walia, S.S., Dhaliwal, S.S., Brar, A.S., Singh, Satpal, Singh, Roopinder, Aulakh,C.S. and Kaur, Navdeep.2013. Stability, efficiency and soil fertility parameters of different cropping systems in WesternHimalayan region J soils and Crops 23(2):253-258.

Walia, S.S., Singh, Satpal and Singh, Roopinder. 2013. Role of women in decision making in agriculturalactivities in Punjab. J Res PAU 50 (3&4):172-174.

Walia, S.S., Singh, Satpal, Dhaliwal, S.S., Singh, Roopinder, Aulakh, C.S. and Kaur, Navdeep. 2014.Yieldmaximization of rice-wheat cropping system through balanced nutrition in North-west India. IndianJournal of Fertilizers 10(2):52-55.

Walia, U.S., Walia, S.S., Sidhu, A.S. and Nayyar, S. 2014. Productivity of direct seeded rice in relation todifferent dates of sowing and varieties in Central Punjab. Journal of Crop and weed 10(1):126-129.



Walia, U.S., Walia, S.S., Sidhu, Amandeep, Singh and Nayyar, Shelly. 2012. Bio-efficacy of pre and postemergence herbicides in direct seeded rice in Central Punjab.Indian Journal of Weed Science 44(1):30-33.

PDKV, Akola

Ganvir, S.S., Ghanbhadhur, Mangla and Kharagkharate, V.K. 2014. Effect of high density planting, nutrientmanagement and land configuration on economics and nutrient uptake of hirsutum cotton. Greenfarming : 5(1):92-94.

SKNAU, Durgapura (Rajasthan)

Singh,Ranveer, Ram, T., Choudhary, G.L. and Gupta, A.K. 2013. Effect of integrated nitrogen managementon nutrient uptake. Quality, economics and soil fertility of peal millet under rainfed conditions. ElixirAgriculture, 54(2013): 12373-12375.

Singh, Ranveer, Gupta, A.K., Ram, T., Choudhary, G.L. and Sheoran, A.C. 2013. Effect of integrated nitrogenmanagement on transplanted pealmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)under rainfed condition. Indian Journalof Agronomy, 58(1):81-85.

Gothwal, D.K., Gupta, A.K. and Kumhar, B.L. 2013. Comparative performance of genotypes evaluated bycertain quantitative traits under heat stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.em.Thell). Environment& Ecology, 31 (2B):934-937.

OUA&T Bhubaneswar (Odisha)

Mishra, K.N., Jena, D. and Samanta, T.K. 2014. Soil moisture regime based land use in Knchinala micro-watershed of Odisha. Journal of Research, OUAT 31(1&2):5-7.

Panigrahi, T., Garnayak, L.M., Ghosh, M., Bastia, D.K. and Ghosh, D.C. 2014. Productivity and profitabilityof Basmati rice varieties under SRI. International Journnal of Bio-resource and Stress Management5(3):333-339.

Samanta, K. and Mishra, K.N. 2014. Efficacy of post-emergence herbicide quizalofop ethyl for controllinggrassy weeds in groundnut. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 48(6):488-492.

Mohanty, Ayesha and Mishra, K.N. 2014. Influence of conservation agriculture production system on availablesoil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and maize equivalent yield on a Fluventic Haplustepts in thenorth central plateau zone of Odisha. Trends in Biosciences7(23):3962-3967.

TNAU, Coimbatore (T.N.)

Sangeetha, S.P., Balakrishnan, A. and Devasenapathy. 2013. Influence of organic manure on yield andquality of rice (oryza sativa L.) and blackgram (vigna mungo L.) in rice-Blackgram cropping sequence.American Journal of Plant Science.4: 1151-1157.



CSAUAT, Kanpur (U.P.)

Singh, Sanjive Kumar, Khan, Naushad and Dutta, S.D. 2013. Standardization of package of practices forZamikand (Amorphallus campanulatus Blume.) cultivation HortFlora Research Spectrum, 2(2): 182-183 (April-June 2013).

GBPUAT, Pantnagar (UT)

Singh, D.K. and Kumar, P. 2014. Influence of diversification of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticumaestivum) system on productivity, energetic and profitability under on-farm conditions. Indian Journalof Agronomy. 59(2):24-27.

Singh, D.K., Kumar, P. and Bhardwaj, A.K. 2014. Evaluation of Agronomic management practices onfarmers’ fields under rice-wheat cropping system in Northern India. International Journal of Agronomy.Volume 2014. Article ID 740656, 5pages, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/740656.

Kumar, P. and Singh, D.K. 2013. Performance of promising urdbean genotypes under organic mode inGarhwal Himalayas. Pantnagar Journal of Research. 11(2):309-311.

Chandra, H., Aditay, J.P. and Singh, D.K. 2013. Evaluation of wheat genotypes for diffent morpho-physiological traits at different planting dates in Himalayan foothills.Progressive Research 8(special):64-68.

Kumar, A. and Singh, D.K. 2013. Studies on seed rate, row spacing and varieties in chickpea under lateplanting conditions. Progressive Research 8(special):215-216.

Kumar, A. and Singh, D.K. 2013. Effect of seed rate, row spacing and variety on growth, yield and nutrientuptake of late sown chickpea. Progressive Research 8(special):21-24.

Jaipaul, Singh, V.P., Kumar, P. and Singh, A.P. 2013. Effect of organic manure and inorganic fertilizersalong with biofertilizers on yield and economics of brinjal(Solanum melongena L.) under high hillconditions of Uttarakhand. Progressive Research journal, 8(2):232-236.

BHU, Varanasi

Pandey, Divya, Agrawal, Madhoolika and Bohra, J.S. 2013. Impact of four tillage permutations in rice-wheat system on GHG performance of wheat cultivation through carbon footprinting. EcologicalEngineering 60:261-270.

Rakesh, Kumar and Bohra, J.S. 2014. Effect of NPKS and Zn application on growth,yield,economics andquality of baby corn. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60(9):1193-1206.

Singh, Ravikant, Bohra, J.S., Nath, Triyugi and Srivastav, Rajeev Kumar. 2014. Effect of varying level ofdiversification and intensification of rice-wheat cropping system on the production potential and nutrientbalance of soil in Indo-Gangetic Plain of India. Agricultura 9: No 1-2, 9-16(2013).

Pandey, Divya, Agrawal, Madhoolika and Bohra, J.S. 2014. Effects of Conventional tillage and no tillagepermutations on extracellular soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass under rice cultivation.Soil and Tillage Research 136:51-60.



Singh, D.N., Bohra, J.S. and Singh, J.K. 2013. Influence of NPK, S and variety on grouth, yield and qualityof irrigated linseed (Linum usitatissimum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83 (4):456-8.

Meena, V.S., Maurya, B.R., Bohra, J.S., Verma, R. and Meena, M.D. 2013. Effect of concentrate manureand nutrient levels on enzymatic activities and microbial population under submerged rice in alluviumsoil of Varanasi. Crop Research 45(1,2&3):6-12 (2013).

DBSKV, Dapoli, Karjat

Pahiwale, P.H., Chavan, L.S., Jagtap, D.N., Mahadkar, U.V. and Gawade, M.B. 2013. Effect of establishmentmethods and nutrient management on yield attributes and yield of finger millet (Elusine coracanaG.).Crop res.45 (1, 2&3):141-145.

Nevse, G.P., Chavan, L.S. and Jagtap, D.N. 2013. Performance of finger-millets (Eleusine coracana L.) toage of seedlings. FYM and fertilizer levels. J. Indian Soc.Coastal agric.Res.31(2):64-70.

Gorade, V.N., Chavan, L.S., Jagtap, D.N. and Kolekar, A.B. 2014. Response of green gram (Vigna radiateL.) varieties to integrated nutrient management in summer season. Agric. Sci.Digest.34(1):36-40.

Patil, A.B., Chavan, L.S. and Jagtap, D.N. 2014. Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties tonutrient management in Rabi-hot weather season. Legume Res.37 (4): 395-401.

Patil, K.D., Vaidya, K.P., Borse, D.K., Gangan, S.G. and Chavan, L.S. 2014. Reclamation, managementand production potential of coastal saline soils of Maharastra. J.Indian Soc. Coastal agric.Res.32(1)7-10.

Sutar, V.K., Chavan, L.S. and Game, V.N. 2014. Response of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) varieties todifferent sowing dates and effect on yield,quality and soil fertility. J.Indian Soc.Coastalagric.Res.32(1)16-20.

Karamana

Jacob, J. 2013. Soil Fertility Management in the Homesteads of Kerala. In: Proceedings of the Workshopon Managing Soil for Food Security and Climate Change Adaption (Ed.P.N.Premachandran), pp.133-142.

Jacob, J. 2013. Tuber crops in homestead and periurban farming systems. In: Empowering VHSEAgripreneures (Eds.Anilkumar, A.S. Govindan, M., Nehru, S.M. and Anilkumar, A), pp.73-79. Collegeof Agriculture, Padannakkad, Kerala Agricultural University.

Jacob, J., Rajasekharan, P. and Rajasree, G. 2013. Yield gap and technology adoption in cassava inhomesteads under different agro ecological units of Kerala. In: Abstract of Papers, InternationalConference on Tropical Roots and Tubers for Sustainable Livelihood under Changing Agro-Climate,p.266, Indian Society of Root Crops and CTCRI, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Jacob, John, Rani, B., Varughese, K. and Babu, M. 2013. Performance of cassava (Manihot esculentaCrantz.), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) and Chinese potato (Plectranthus rotundifolius(Poir) J.K. Morton) in rice based cropping sequence of southern Kerala. In: Abstract of Papers,



International Conference on Tropical Roots and Tubers for Sustainable Livelihood under ChangingAgro-Climate, p.109-110, Indian Society of Root Crops and CTCRI, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Jinsy, V.S., Shalini, P. and Jacob, J. 2014. Aerobic rice: An option to improve the water productivity of rice.In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Integrated Water Resources Management Vol II(Eds.Prasad, N.B.N., Harikumar, P.S., Joseph, E.J., Gopinath, G., Surendran, U. and Ambili, G.K.),pp.976-981, CWRDM, Kozhikode, Kerala.

ICAR-CIARI, Andman & Nicobar Islands

Velmurugan, A. and Swarnam, T.P. 2013. Nitrogen release pattern from organic manures applied to anacid soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(6):174-184.

8.2 PAPER PRESENTED IN SEMINAR/SYMPOSIA


Rao, K., Upendra Rao, A., Sekhar, D. and Venugopal, Rao. 2014. Sustainable Farming systems for northcoastal Andra Pradesh. ISSP South Zonal Seminar on “Physiological and Molecular Interventions forImproving Crop productivity”, Agricultural College, Bapatla, pp.42.

Rajendra Prasad, V., Tejeswara Rao, K. and Chinnam Naidu, D. 2013. Identification of predominant farmingsystems in high altitude and (HAT) zone of Andhra Pradesh. National conference on agro biodiversitymanagement for sustainable Rural Development, NAARM, Hyd.pp.17.

Tejeswara Rao, K., Sagar, T.V. and Ethno, T.B. 2013. Medicinal Plants as natural remedies in vizianagaramdistrict of Andra Pradesh. National Seminar on biodiversity and conservation of medicinal plants,govt. degree college (men), Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, pp.41.

SDAU, SK Nagar (Gujarat)

Patel, P.K., Patel, B.S., Patel, S.M., Patel, J.K. and Ali, Shaukat. 2013. “Long-Term effect of integratednutrient management in pearlmillet-wheat sequence on soil fertility status and bulk density at differentdepth of soil profile in loamy sand soils.” Poster presented in National seminar on “Developments insoil science” held at CAZRI, Jodhpur organized by ISSS during October 23-26, 2013.

Patel, S.K., Patel, B.S., Patel, P.K., Patel, S.M., Patel, R.R., Ali, Shaukat and Singh, Jitendra. 2013.Intensification and / or diversification of the cropping system by fennel on farmer’s field. Posterpresented in National Seminar on Production, Productivity and Quality of spices held at PanchayatiRaj Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan) on February 02-03, and 2013.Pp128.

Patel, B.S., Patel, S.M., Patel, P.K., Ali, Shaukat, Bhatt, P.K. and Yadav, B.L. 2013. Development of organicfarming package for system based high value crops of green manuring-potato-summer groundnutsequence. Paper orally presented in National Seminar on Role of Organic Farming in Climate Resilientand Sustainable Agriculture held at NAU, Navsari (Gujrat) on January 09-10,2014 Pp 184.



Singh, Jitendra, Patel, B.S. and Rathore, B.S. 2014. Feasibility of inter/mixed cropping systems of mustardwith Lucerne.Poster presented in 2nd National Brassica Conference, held at PAU, Ludhiana (Punjab)on February 14-16,2014.Pp 105.

JAU, Junagarh (Gujarat)

Dabhi, A.B., Dabhi, B.M., Sagarka, B.K. and Mathukia, R.K. 2014. Organic farming package for high valuegroundnut (kharif)-onion (Rabi) cropping system for saurastra region. A paper presented inInternational Congress on “Agriculture, Food Engineering and environment Scence-SustainableApproaches” during 29-30 March, 2014 at New Delhi.

Dabhi, B.M., Mathukia, R.K. and Sagarka, B.K. 2014. Tillage and sowing method for Bt cotton. A paperpresented in International Congress on “Agriculture, Food Engineering and environment Scence-Sustainable Approaches” during 29-30 March, 2014 at New Delhi.

NAV, Navsari (Gujarat)

Desai, L.J., Thanki, J.D. and Gudadhe. 2014. “Development of organic farming package for high valuecrop sequence (kharif paddy-summer groundnut)” in national seminar on Role of organic farming inclimate resilient and sustainable farming organized by ASPEE college of Horticulture and Forestry,Navsari and Navsari Agricultural University Navsari on 9-10 January 2014.pp:189 at Navsari.

Gudadhe, N.N., Thanki, J.D., Patel, T.U., Pankhaniya, R.M. and Desai, L.J. 2013. Use of resourseconservation technology for global warming resilience in national training programme on cropmicrometeorology 4th to 24th December, 2013 sponsored by Indian council of Agricultural research,New delhi organized by CAFT in agricultural Meteorology, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth.


Kumar, Pawan, Nanwal, R.K. and Yadav, S.K. 2014. Integrated Cropping System Model for Small andMarginal Farming Situations of Haryana. Paper presented in National Seminar on Reorientation ofAgricultural Research to Ensure National Food Security, Jan., 6-7, 2014 at CCS HAU, Hisar.Pp.164.

Nanwal, R.K. and Pawan, Kumar. 2014. Integrated Farming System Model for irrigated as well as rainfedfarming situations for Haryana. Paper presented in National Seminar on Reorientation of AgriculturalResearch to Ensure National Food Security, Jan., 6-7, 2014 at CCS HAU, Hisar.Pp.167.

Sharma, Manoj, Kumar, Yadav, S.K., Pawan, Kumar and Nanwal, R.K. 2014. Integrated NutrientManagement for better soil fertility and nutrient uptake. Paper presented in National Seminar onReorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Security, Jan., 6-7, 2014 at CCSHAU, Hisar.Pp.142.

Kumar, Pawan, Manoj, Kumar, Yadav, S.K. and Nanwal, R.K. 2014. Integrated nutrient management inpearlmillet-wheat cropping system for sustained production. In: 101st Indian Science Congress Vol. IIpp. 69-79 held at Jammu University, Jammu (3-7 Feb, 2014.



SKUAT, Jammu (J&K)

Rohit, Sharma. 2014. Profitability, productivity and sustainability of organic farming practices in cropdiversification, Paper presented in 3rd J&K Science Congress “on organic research and technology”held on May,12-14,2014 at SKUAST-K,Srinagar,J&K.

JNKVV, Jabalpur (M.P.)

Vishwakarma, S.K., Shukla, V.K., Dubey, Lokesh and Khamparia, N.K. “Productivity, economic and soilfertility as affected by organic inorganic and integrated nutrient management in scented rice (Oryzasativa) – potato (Solanum tuberosum) high value cropping system in Kymore Plateau and SatpuraHills zone of Madhya Pradesh.” Paper presented in National Seminar on “Relevance of OrganicFarming Indian Agriculture” organized by National Institute of Advanced studies, Indian Institutes ofSciences Campus, Banglore held from February 3-4, 2014 at Banglore Karnataka.

Shukla, V.K., Vishwakarma, S.K., Dubey, Lokesh and Khamparia, N.K. “Production Potential, WaterProductivity and Economics of Rice Based Cropping System under Different Nutrient Managementat Kymore Plateau and Satpura Hill Zones of Madhya Pradesh.” Paper presented in National Seminaron “Relevance of Organic Farming Indian Agriculture” organized by National Institute of Advancedstudies, Indian Institutes of Sciences Campus, Banglore held from February 3-4, 2014 at BangloreKarnataka.

Shah, M.S., Kewat, M.L., Rai, R.K., Vishwakarma, S.K. and Verma, Nidhi. “Evaluation of Odyssey 70%Wg against weeds of soyabean in Niwar region”Paper presented in Biennial Conference of IndianSociety of Weed Science on “Emerging Challenges in Weed Management” February 15-17, 2014 atDirectorate of weed Science Research Jabalpur, Madhya.Pradesh.

Bhaghat, Shradha, Vishwakarma, S.K., Singh, Asha and Kewat, M.L. “Efficacy of Chlorimuron ethyl againstweeds in soyabean”. Paper presented in Biennial Conference of Indian Society of Weed Science on“Emerging Challenges in Weed Management” February 15-17, 2014 at Directorate of weed ScienceResearch Jabalpur, Madhya.Pradesh.

Akola

Paper presented in National seminar on ‘soil fertility, degradation and contaminants’. “Impact oftillage practices and cropping sequence on soil nutrient status in soybean based cropping sequence”Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli 8-9 May 2013

OUAT, Bhubaneswar (Odisha)

Garnayak, L.M., Swain, S.K., Mishra, K.N. and Patra, A.K. 2014. Fine tuning of integrated farming systemsfor livelihood security of small and marginal holders in Odisha- issues and strategies. Souvenir,National Symposium on management options for enhancing farm productivity and livelihood securityunder changing climate at OUAT, Bhubaneswar during October 29-31, 2014:80-86.



Patra, A.K. and Behra, B.B. 2014. Role of Agroforestry in adapting and mitigating climate change, Souvenir,Agroforestry options for climate resilient farming, Annual Group Meet of AICRP on Agroforestry July26-28,2014 at OUAT,Bhubaneswar.

PAU, Ludhiana (Punjab)

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Effect of different establishment methods on milling quality of aromaticrice. Proc. National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Securityorganized at CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp82-83.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Effect of different establishment methods and nitrogen levels on organiccarbon content in soil.International Conference on Crop productivity & sustainability shaping the Future.Organized by Baba Fard College, Bathainda during March 20-21.pp.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Effect of different establishment methods and nitrogen levels onmicronutrient uptake in aromatic rice. Proc.17th Punjab Science congress on Science and Technologyfor Sustainable Growth organized by Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp43-44.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Grain yield of aromatic rice as influence by different establishment methods,Proc. National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Securityorganized at CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp 78.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Micronutrient uptake in grains as influence by foliar application ofmicronutrients on direct seeded aromatic rice. Proc.17th Punjab Science congress on Science andTechnology for Sustainable Growth organized by Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 35-36.

Gill, J.S. and Walia, S.S. 2014. Milling quality of direct seeded aromatic as influenced foliar application ofmicronutrients.International Conference on Crop productivity & sustainability shaping the Future.Organized by Baba Fard College, Bathainda during March 20-21.pp.

Kumar, Navpreet and Walia, S.S. 2014. Influence of basmati rice cultivar and nitrogen levels under directseeding on quality parameters. National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to EnsureNational Food Security organized at CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp 101.

Kumar, Navpreet and Walia, S.S. 2014. Response of different basmati rice cultivars to nitrogen levelsunder direct seeding Proc.17th Punjab Science congress on Science and Technology for SustainableGrowth organized by Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 45.

Rajni and Walia, S.S. 2014. Economic impact of front line demonstrations on gobhi sarson in Amritsardistrict.2nd National Brassica Conference on Brassica for addressing edible oil and nutritional securityheld at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana During 14-16 February.pp 97.

Rajni and Walia, S.S. 2014. On-farm evaluation of farming system modules in Amritsar district of Punjab.Proc. National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Securityorganized at CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp 161-162.



Rani, Navita and Walia, S.S. 2014. Effect of cropping systems and fertilizer application on growth, yieldand yield attributes of potato. Proc. National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research toEnsure National Food Security organized at CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January6-7.Pp 199.

Rani, Navita and Walia, S.S. 2014. Effect of cropping systems and fertilizer application on soil propertiesof potato crop. Proc.17th Punjab Science congress on Science and Technology for Sustainable Growthorganized by Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 45-46.

Singh, Parmindar, Walia, S.S. and Chaudhary, A. 2014. Vegetable based integrated farming system-Aprofitable alternative. Proc.17th Punjab Science congress on Science and Technology for SustainableGrowth organized by Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 66-67.

Singh, Parmindar, Walia, S.S. and Chaudhary, A. 2014. Diversification-A golden alternative.Proc. NationalSeminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Security organized atCCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp198.

Walia, S.S., Aulakh, C.S. and Gill, R.S. 2014. Groundnut-kharif onion-onion-A Vegetable based croppingsystem. National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Securityorganized at CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp198.

Walia, S.S., Aulakh, C.S. and Gill, R.S. 2014. The economic sustainability of Maize-kharif onion-onioncropping system. Proc.17th Punjab Science congress on Science and Technology for SustainableGrowth organized by Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 43-44.

Walia, S.S., Gill, R.S. and Aulakh, C.S. 2014. Turmeric-onion: A profitable cropping system. Proc.17th

Punjab Science congress on Science and Technology for Sustainable Growth organized by PunjabTechnical University, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 44.

Walia, S.S., Gill, R.S. and Aulakh, C.S. 2014. Turmeric-wheat: A Turmeric based cropping system.National Seminar on Reorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Security organizedat CCS Harynana Agricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp164-165.

Walia, S.S., Saini, K.S. and Mahal, S.S. 2014. Practical crop production-learning by doing. Proc.17th PunjabScience congress on Science and Technology for Sustainable Growth organized by Punjab TechnicalUniversity, Jalandhar from 14-16February.pp 46.

Walia, S.S., Saini, K.S. and Mahal, S.S. 2014. Practical crop production by students. National Seminar onReorientation of Agricultural Research to Ensure National Food Security organized at CCS HarynanaAgricultural University, hisar from January 6-7.Pp 318.

Walia,S.S., Brar, A.S., Singh, Satpal, Gill, R.S., Aulakh, C.S. and Kaur, Navdeep. 2013. Feasibility of differentcropping systems under irrigated conditions of Punjab. Proc. 16th Punjab science Congress, BFUHS,Faridkot during 7-9 February.pp105-106.

Saini, K.S., Walia, S.S. and Mahal. 2013. Earn while you learn. Proc. 16th Punjab science Congress,BFUHS,Faridkot during 7-9 February.pp107-108.



Walia, S.S., Gill, M.S., Aulakh, C.S. and Sandhu, Parminder Singh. 2013. Yield maximization of rice-wheatsystem through site specific nutrient management approach. Proc. 16th Punjab science Congress,BFUHS,Faridkot during 7-9 February.pp108-109.

TNAU, Coimbatore

Siddeswaran, K., Sangeetha, S.P. and Shanmugam, P.M. 2013. Integrated farming system for smallfarmers of irrigated upland. Organic rice production. In: Agriculture. All India Tamil Conference 2013held at Perur, Coimbatore during 09.02.2013 to 10.02.2013.pp. 203-206.

Siddeswaran, K., Sangeetha, S.P., Shanmugam, P.M. and Thiyageswari, S. 2013. Integrated farmingsystem for small farmers of irrigated upland..In: Agriculture. All India Tamil Conference 2013 held atPerur, Coimbatore during 09.02.2013 to 10.02.2013.pp. 197-198.

Gangadharan, S., Ramamoorthy, K., Vaiyapuri, K. and Stalin, P. 2013. Role of micronutrient in silk production(Tamil) In: Agriculture. All India Tamil Conference 2013 held vat Perur, Coimbatore during 09.02.2013to 10.02.2013. pp. 266-267.

Jagathjothi, N. and K., Ramamoorthy. 2013. INM for rainfed ragi. (Tamil) In: Agriculture. All India TamilConference 2013 held at Perur, Coimbatore during 09-02-2013 to 10.02-2013.pp21-23.

Jagathjothi, N., Sathya Priya, R. and Ayyadurai, P. 2013. Medicinal plants are gifts to agriculture. (Tamil) In:Agriculture. All India Tamil Conference 2013 held at Perur, Coimbatore during 09.02.2013 to10.02.2013.pp. 120-121.

Kathirvelan, P., Balasubramaniyam, P. and Siddeswaran, K. Crop Diversification: Enhancing the systemproductivity and profitability through On farm Research. Extended Summaries Vol 2: 3rd InternationalAgronomy Congees on “Agriculture Diversification, Climate change, Management and Lively hoods”organized by Indian Society of Agronomy held at New Delhi from 26-30 November 2012.

NDUAT, Faizabad

Singh, N.B., Kumar, Alok and Yadav, R.A. 2013. Long term impact of organic management practices onhigh value crops. Souvenir cum compendium of Agriculture Science Congress, N.D.U.A.T., Kumarganj,Faizabad.17-19, August, 2013. Pp.115.

Kumar, Alok, Singh, N.B. and Yadav, R.A. 2013. Influence of organic management on basmati rice-mustard-greengram cropping system, Souvenir cum compendium of Agriculture Science Congress, N.D.U.A.T.,Kumarganj, Faizabad.17-19, August, 2013. Pp. 324.

Singh, Chandan and Kumar, Alok. 2013. Effect of long termfertilizer application on soil fertility andproductivity of rice under rice-wheat cropping system. Souvenir cum compendium of AgricultureScience Congress, N.D.U.A.T., Kumarganj, Faizabad.17-19, August, 2013. Pp. 324.

CSAUAT, Kanpur (UP)

Khan, N., Yadav, M.P., Tiwari, U.S. and Md. Aslam. 2013. “Intensification of different cropping systemunder irrigated condition in Central Plain Zone of U.P.”. National Seminar on “Social Dimensions of



Extension Education in Holistic Development of Rural Livelihood” organized at C. B. Gupta AgricultureP.G. College, Bakshai ka Talab, Lucknow, U.P., April 26-27, 2013, pp-11.

R.A., Yadav, Naushad, Khan, M.Z. Siddiqui and Rajveer, Singh. 2013. Bio-efficacy of pinoxaden 5EC incombination with broad leaf herbicides against complex weed flora in wheat, Highlights of wheat &Barley research 2013 pp 84-87. Published during All India Wheat and Barley Workshop held during 1-4 September, 2013 at CSAUA&T, Kanpur

RBS College, Bichpuri, Agra (U.P.)

S.B., Singh. 2013. Impact of Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) on agriculture and rural development forsmall and marginal farmers. National seminar on impact of population growth on agriculture and ruraldevelopment held at Balawant Vidyapeeth Rural institute Bichpuri, Agra (U.P.) on 09-10 Feb., 2013pp-31.


Yadav, Subhash, Singh, Rohitashav, Rampal, Singh, Virpal and Rawat, Anand Singh. 2013. Evaluation ofFenoxaprop-p-ethyl9EC for control of grassy weed in onion. In National seminar on “Technicalinterventions for sustainable hill development.June 17-19, 2013.28pp.

Singh, Rohitashav, Yadav, Subhash, Rampal, Singh, Virpal and Rawat, Anand Singh. 2013. Bio-efficacy ofEthoxysulfuron(Sunrise 15 WG) for the control of Cyperus rotundus in Sugarcane. In National seminaron “Technical interventions for sustainable hill development.June 17-19, 2013.29pp

KAU, Karmana (Kerla)

Anilkumar, A.S., Jacob, J. and Govindan, M. 2013. Watershed Development and Management forSustainable Utilization of Natural Resources. College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University,Padannakkad, Kasaragod.

Jacob, J., Veena V., Anju, C., Varughese, K. and Rani, B. 2012. Terrace gardens for food security in urbanhouseholds-an integrated, eco-friendly and sustainable model from Kerala, India. In: ExtendedSummaries Vol 2, Third International Agronomy Congress on “Agriculture Diversification, ClimateChange Management and Livelihoods”, pp.517-518, Indian Society of Agronomy, New Delhi.

Jacob, John. 2013. Tuber crops in homestead and periurban farming systems. In: Empowering VHSEAgripreneures (Eds.Anilkumar, A.S. Govindan, M., Nehru, S.M. and Anilkumar, A), pp.73-79. Collegeof Agriculture, Padannakkad, Kerala Agricultural University.

8.2.1 Popular Articles


Sridevi, S., Venkata Ramana, M. and M. Goverdhan, Aahara bhadratha mariyu aardhika susthirathakumargam Misrama vyavasayam. Vyavasayam, June 2013: 21-24.



Sridevi, S., Venkata Ramana, M. and M. Goverdhan, Aahara bhadratha mariyu aardhika susthirathakumargam Misrama vyavasayam Part 2. Vyavasayam, July 2013: 21-24.

BAU, Sabour

’kekZ] vkj-ih-] ikBd] ,l-ds- vkSj pkS/kjh] ,l-vkj- 2014- /kku ij vk/kkfjr Qly iz.kkyhA d̀"kd lans’k] ch-,-;w-] lkckSj] fcgkj 3¼4½% 3&5-

ikBd] ,l-ds-] ’kekZ] vkj-ih- vkSj pkS/kjh] ,l-vkj- 2014- jksikuh /kku ds mRiknu rduhdA d̀"kd lans’k] ch-,-;w-] lkckSj] fcgkj 3¼4½% 6&11-

lq’kkar vkSj ’kekZ] vkj-ih- 2014- t+hjks fVy rduhd fcuk tqrkbZ xsg¡w dh cqokbZA d̀"kd lans’k] ch-,-;w-] lkckSj]fcgkj 3¼4½% 17&18-

xqIrk] latho dqekj] gd] ,e-] lq’kkar vkSj ikBd] ,l-ds- 2014- cjlhe dh oSKkfud [ksrh&iks"kd gjk pkjkAd̀"kd lans’k] ch-,-;w-] lkckSj] fcgkj 3¼4½% 33&35-

xqIrk] latho dqekj] lq’kkar] iaokj] th-,l- vkSj ’kekZ] vkj-ih- 2014- [kjhQ ekSle eas pkjk mRiknu rduhdA

Sharma, R.P., Pathak, S.K. and Chaudhary, S.R. 2014. Dhan per aadharit phasal pranali. Krashak SandeshBAU, Sabour, Bihar 3(4) :3-5.

Pathak, S.K., Sharma, R.P. and Sushant. 2014. Ropani dhan ke utpadan takanike. Krashak SandeshBAU, Sabour, Bihar 3(4) :6-11.

Sushant and Sharma, R.P. 2014. Zero till taknik se bina jutai gaihu ki buvai. Krashak Sandesh BAU,Sabour, Bihar 3(4) :17-18.

Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar, M., Haque, Sushant and Pathak, S.K. 2014. Barseem ki vaigyanic kheti-Postikevam hara chara. Krashak Sandesh BAU, Sabour, Bihar 3(4) :33-35.

Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar, Sushant, Panwar, G.S. and Sharma, R.P. 2014.Kharif mausam mein chara utpadantakniki. Krashak Sandesh BAU, Sabour, Bihar 3(4) :18-22.

Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar, Sushant, Panwar, G.S., Chaudhary, S.R. and Mahdi, S. Sheraz. 2014. Jalvaaueparivartan ke peripechya mein chara faslo ki kheti. Smarika Kisan Mela-2014, BAU,Sabour, Bihar.pp36-40.

Tyagi, Shashank, Sharma, R.P. and Singh, M.K. Jalvaaue parivartan ke peripechya mein fhaslo meinvividhta. Smarika Kisan Mela-2014, BAU, Sabour, Bihar.pp12-17.

Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar, Mahdi, S.S., Chaudhary, S.R., Singh, M.K. and Sushant. 2013. Jalvaaue parivartanor Chara Sankakchhan. Krashak Sandesh BAU, Sabour, Bihar 3(2) :47-50.

CSK HPKVV, Palampur (H.P.)

dqekj] lqjs’k vkSj jk.kk] lqjsUnz flag- 2013- tyok;q ifjorZu dk [kjirokj ij izHkko izcU/kuA ioZrh; [ksrhckM+h32¼3½% 5&6-



IGKVV, Raipur (Chatisgarh)

Dubey, A., Sarawgi, S.K., Chitale, S., Tiwari, A., Manuel, S., Bhoi, S. and Dhurandhar, T. 2012. Javik ki jadPashudhan. Krishak Jagat weekly.2-8 April, 2012 pp7.

Bhoi, S., Chitale, S. and Tiwari, A. 2012. Javik Dhan ki Utpadan Taknik Chattisgarh kheti an IGKVV Publication19(2):10-13.

Dubey, A., Chitale, S., Tiwari, A., Dhurandhar, T. and Manuel, S. 2012. Samanwit Krishi Pranali meinMatsya palan ka Yogdaan. Chattisgarh kheti an IGKVV Publication 19(2):39.

Chitale, S., Savu, R.M., Tiwari, A. and Pali, G.P. 2013. Rabi Fasalon me Samanvit kharpatwar parbandhanChattisgarh kheti an IGKVV Publication 20(1):35-37.

HAU, Hisar (Haryana)

uhye] dqekj] iou vkSj uuoky] jktsanj dqekj- 2013- fVdkm mRiknu ds fy, dkjxj gS tSfod [ksrhAgfj;k.kk 45¼12½% 133&137-

uhye] uuoky] jktsanj dqekj] vkSj dqekj] iou- 2014- dspqvk¡ [kkn rS;kj djus dh fof/kA gfj;k.kk [ksrh fnl-2014% 27&28-

uhye] uuoky] jktsanj dqekj] vkSj dqekj] iou- 2014- dspqvk¡ [kkn dk d̀f"k eas egRoA gfj;k.kk [ksrh fnl-2014% 5-

dqekj] iou] uuoky] jktsanj dqekj] vkSj lR;thr- 2014- jch eas frygu mRiknuA [kkn if=dk 55¼9½%12&15-

RVSKVV, Indore

lo#i] banq] jkukMs] nhid gfj] pkS/kjh] ljn vkSj eaqtkys] larks"k- izekf.kd Qlyksa ls vf/kd mit- ljnpkS/kjh izdkf’kr d̀f"k ea=- ekfld if=dk fnl- 2013% 39&40-

OUA&T, Bhubaneswar (Odisha)

Patra, A.K. 2013. Agroforestry-a noval approach to climate change adaptation and mitigation in agriculture.Science Horizon 3(9):25-28.

Patra, A.K. 2013. Alley cropping. Science Horizon 3(11):6-10.

Patra, A.K. 2014. Agroforestry improves soil. 4(3):21-23.

Patra, A.K. and Behera, B.B. 2014. Role of agroforestry in adapting and mitigating climate change, Souvenir,Agroforestry options for climate resilient farming, Annual Group Meet of AICRP on Agroforestry july26-28,2014at OUAT,Bhubaneswar.

Misra, N., Pati, S.R. and Patra, A.K. 2014. Pakasala bagichare samannita krushi Padhati. Chasirasamsara,OUAT 49(2 & 3) August 2014.



Patra, A.K. 2014. Hopmegarden –a sustainable land use system, Science Horizon 4(11):17-21.

Mishra, N. and Garnayak, L.M. 2014. Byabasayika Bhitire salad matar chasa. In “Chasira Sansara”Directorate of Extn., OUAT.

Garnayak, L.M., Mishra, N. and Pati, S. 2014. Kharif ruture chinabadam chasa. In In “Chasira Sansara”Directorate of Extn., OUAT.

Garnayak, L.M. and Pati, S. 2014. Kukuda chianra udara phula roga. In In “Chasira Sansara” Directorateof Extn., OUAT.


flag] vkj-] dqekj] ts- vkSj dqekj] ih- 2012- [kjhQ o tk;n dh Qlyksa eas [kjirokj fu;U=.kA fdlku Hkkjrh43¼7½% 17&19-

jkeiky vkSj flag] vkj- 2012- eDdk dh Qly eas [kjirokj ij dSls ik;s dkcw\A fdlku Hkkjrh 43¼9½%25&26-

flag] vkj-] dqekj] ts-] jkeiky vkSj flag] Mh- 2012- xUus dh Qly eas [kjirokjksa dk fu;U=.kA [ksrh 65¼4½%28&29-

flag] vkj-] dqekj] ts-] jkeiky vkSj flag] ,e- 2012- /kku dh Qly eas [kjirokj fu;U=.kA fdlku Hkkjrh43¼11½% 17&18-

jkeiky] flag] vkj- vkSj dqekj] ts- 2012- vkyw dh Qly eas mfpr [kjirokj fu;U=.kA fdlku Hkkjrh 43¼12½%12&13-

jkeiky] flag] vkj-] flag] oh-ih- vkSj flag] ,l- 2012- xsg¡w dh Qly eas mfpr [kjirokj fu;U=.kA fdlkuHkkjrh 44¼1½% 12&13-

flag] vkj-] jkeiky] izrki] Vh-] dqekj] ih- vkSj flag] oh-ih- 2012- xUus dh Qly ds fy, [kjirokj izca/kuA[ksrh 44¼3½% 17&19-

flag] vkj-] dqekj] ts-] dqekj] ih- vkSj jkeiky- 2012- jch dh Qlyksa eas [kjirokj fu;U=.kA fdlku Hkkjrh44¼1½% 27&29-

jkeiky] flag] vkj- vkSj flag] oh-ih- 2013- xsg¡w dh Qly eas [kjirokj fu;U=.kA [ksrh 10&11-

jkeiky] flag] vkj-] flag] oh-ih- vkSj ;kno] ,l- 2013- mUur mRiknu rduhd ls tk;n ewax ,oa mnZ dhyckyc QlyA fdlku Hkkjrh 15&16-

KAU, Karmana (Kerala)

Purayida Krishi-Oru susthira krishi samprudhayam Kalpadhenu 33(3) p.20-25 (2012)

Theetapullu Krishi Purayidangalilum Mangofest Madhuram 2012 Souvenir p.104-105



NDUAT, Faizabad

Yadav, R.S., Singh, N.B. and Singh, C.P. 2014. Problem of Phalaris minor in Wheat and its remedy. KrishiAmrit 11:3.

Yadav, R.S., Singh, N.B. and Singh, C.P. 2014. Rabi maize-Double production. Krishi Amrit 6:7.

CSAUAT, Kanpur (UP)

Khan, Naushad, Yadav, M.P., Tiwari, U.S., A.P., Dubey and Dubey, Mayank. 2013. Ekikrat krishi pranalievam uski nirantarta, Krishak Bharti (Rabi Visheshank, 2013)

R.A., Yadav, Tarun, Gopal and Khan, Naushad. 2013. Moong ki Fasal me kharpatwar prabandhan, KrishakBharti (Kharif Visheshank) CSAUT, Kanpur, pp-37-38.

Khan, Naushad, Yadav, M.P. and Dubey, Mayank. 2014. Mrida surrikaran (Hindi) Krishak Bharti (ZaidVisheshank) CSAUT,Kanpur,pp-56-57.

BHU, Varanasi

Singh, R.P., Singh, R.K., Singh, S.P., Srivastava, Vartika and Bohra, J.S. 2014. Organic Farming: A needof sustainable agriculture. Indian Farming 63(10): 38-40.

Karjat

Chavan, S.A. and Chavan, L.S. “Bhat lagwadichya vividha paddhati” Agril.Research Station, shirgoan,Ratnagiri shatak mahostavi varsha smarnika (2013)45-50.

Kunkerkar, R.L. and Chavan, L.S. “Sudharit trantatun vadhel bhat utpadan”Agrowon 4th June,2014:11.

8.2.2 Books/Book chapter


Dr. M. Goverdhan, authored a book “Crop Production” published for first year vocational course of Boardof Intermediate, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh.


Question Bank on Agriculture by R.K. Nanwal, Published by Agri-Biovet Press, N. Delhi.

Text book on Farming Systems by R.K. Nanwal and Pawan Kumar (In press)

Book Chapter

Enhancing pulses production: Haryana, by Pawan Kumar, Manoj Kumar and S.K. Yadav. In: Enhancingpulses production, by Gangwar and Singh, pp 141-160.



RVSKVV, Indore

Thakur, S.S., Choudhary, S.K. and Jain, M.P. Krishi vikas Ka Adhar Krishi parnaliya.

Thakur, S.S. and Choudhary, S.K. Mosam Adharit aksimik krishi karye yojna

PAU, Ludhiana

Walia, S.S. and Gill, R.S. 2014. Farming system for improveing livelihood of Punjab farmers. In: researchin Farming(Ed Gangwar, B. Singh, J.P., Prusty, AK. and Kamta Prasad). Today and Tommorrow’sPriniers and Publishers, New Delhi.pp251-267

Walia, S.S. and Gill, R.S. 2014.Pulse production in Punjab Chapter 18.In: Enhancing Pulses productionTechnologies and Strategies. (Ed Gangwar, B.and Singh.A.K). New India Publishing Agency, NewDelhi.

SDAU, SK Nagar (Gujarat)

Patel, B.S. and Patel, P.M. 2013. Uttar Gujaratna Pakoni pak paddhatio ane tano krishi ma mahatv. Chapterin Uttar Gujaratna agatyana chomasu pakoni vaignanik kheti paddhati. Published by T&V Yojna,S.D.A.U., Sardarkrushinagar.pp58-65.

TNAU, Coimbatore (T.N.)

Gangwar, B., Ravisankar, N., Vijayabaskaran, S. and A.P., Viswanath. 2014. On farm nutrient response ofcrops and cropping systems. Project Directorate of Farming System Research,Modipuram,Meerut,India.

Kathirvelan, P., C., Swaminathan, E., Somasundaram, B., Ganwar and N., Ravisankar. 2013. Conservationagriculture and integrated farming system under changing climate (ISBN No.978-81-903355-9-1)

Kathirvelan, P., C., Swaminathan, K., Velayudam, P., Kannan and Parasivam. 2013. Technology packageof direct seeded rice (ISBN No.978-81-906168-7-4)

OUA&T, Bhubaneswar (Odisha)

A.K., Patra. 2013. Agroforestry: Principles and Practices. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi.pp.248.(ISBN 978-93-81450-76-5)

A.K., Patra. 2014. Agroforestry: A Sustainable Land-use System for Climate Change Adaptation, RuralLivelihood and Food Security. (In) “Sustainable agriculture in 21st century: Strategic Approaches andPractices’ (eds., N H Zaidi & MM Khan). Regal Publication, New Delhi. Pp.174-190. (ISBN978-81-8484-408-5)

KAU, Karmana (Kerala)

Books

Anilkumar, A.S., Jacob, J. and Govindan, M. 2013. Samrudhiyude Vilabhoomiyayi Marunna NammudeVeetuvalappukal. College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University. Padannakkad, Kasaragod. (AMalayalam book for farmers on Homestead Farming).



Anilkumar, A.S., Jacob, J. and Govindan, M. 2013. Watershed Development and Management for SustainableUtilization of Natural Resources. College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Padannakkad,Kasaragod.

Anilkumar, A.S., Jacob, J., Govindan, M., Ambika, P., Suchithra, B.S. and Anusha, A.N. 2013. Sustainabilitypathway to Higher Crop Productivity in Kasaragod District. College of Agriculture, Kerala AgriculturalUniversity, Padannakkad, Kasaragod.

Anusha, A.N., Anilkumar, A.S., Govindan, M. and Jacob, J. 2013. Multiple Cropping and Microsite Enrichmentin Vetiver. Kerala Agricultural University. Padannakkad, Kasaragod.

Jacob, J., Rajasree, G., Rajasekheran, P. and Bindu, P. 2013. Cropping systems in different agro ecologicalunits of Kerala. In: Integrated Farming System-Towards a Strategy for Agriculture Development inKerala, pp.26-116, Kerala State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

R.L., Kunkerkar, U.B., Apte, M.H., Keluskar and L.S., Chavan. 2013. Bhat pikanchaya jati ani tyanchivaishishetye in Dr. BSKKV book entitled “Bijotpadan Tantradynan” published by DBSKKV, Dapoli.

R.L., Kunkerkar, M.P., Gawai and L.S., Chavan. 2013. “Sankarit bhat bijotpadan” in Dr. BSKKV bookentitled “Bijotpadan Tantradynan” published by DBSKKV, Dapoli.

CSAU&T, Kanpur

Singh, Rajeev, Tripathi, A.K. and Khan, Naushad. 2013. “Wheat Agronomy”Chapter in book “Highlights ofwheat and Barley Research”Published by C.S.A. University and DWR (ICAR).pp-19-35.

Yadav, R.A., Siddiqi, M.Z. and Khan, Naushad. 2013. Advance weed management practices in Rice-Wheat Cropping system”chapter in book participatory approaches to enhance farm productivity ofsalt effected soil published by CSSRI,Regional Research station, Lucknow pp-136-152.

Yadav, R.A., Khan, Naushad, Siddiqi, M.Z. and Singh, Rajveer. 2013. Effect of “Bio-efficacy of pinoxaden5EC in combination with broad leaf herbicides againstcomplex weed flora in wheat”Chapter in book“Highlights of wheat and barley Research”Published during All India Wheat and Barley Workshopheld at CSAUA&T, Kanpur during September 1-4,2013.pp:84-87.

DBSKV, Dapoli, Karjat

September Bhat pikavaril kid va rog vyasthapa. 2014. Published by Vinayak Jalgaonkar,Mohan Dalvi,VaishaliSawant Laxman Chavan and Anand Narangalkr.

Book chapter for “Organic farming technologies and strategies”by L.S. Chavan, D.G. Jondhale, A.S. Dalviand U.V. Mahadkar submitted to the Diretor, IIFSR, Modipuram, Meerut.

ICAR-CIARI, Andman & Nicobar Islands

Swarnam, T.P. and Velmurugan, A. 2014. Integrated fish farming systems for higher income and production.In: compendium of aquacultute technologies for fish farmers of North East India. (Eds. Kiruba sankar,R., P.Krishnan, Grinson George, S.Monalisa Devi, Chandan Debnath, Benny Varghese,Bipul ChandraRay,T.Ravi kumar, and S.Dam Roy. Central Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair.



8.3 GROUP MEETING / WORKSHOPS ORGANIZED

XXXI Biennial Workshop of AICRP onIntegrated Farming Systems organized during22-24 December 2016 at Tamil NaduAgricultural University, Coimbatore (TamilNadu)

XXXI biennial workshop of AICRP on IntegratedFarming Systems was organized by ICAR-IIFSR,Modipuram in collaboration with Tamil NaduAgricultural University at Coimbatore during 22-24December 2014. The workshop was inauguratedby Dr K. Ramasami, Vice Chancellor as Chiefguest and presided over by Dr B. Gangwar,Director, ICAR-IIFSR. Dr K. Ramasami, ininaugural address highlighted that theachievements of agricultural research is veryimportant for development of the nation and calledfor transformation of agricultural scientists tospecialists in agri-business. He also informed thatone cow-one acre system will prevail but we needto make them profitable by way of integratingtradition and science. He also asked the ‘AICRPon IFS’ group to develop tools and techniques foragricultural disaster management as IFS givesscope for flexible management of resources withinthe farm.

station and on-farm IFS model development atvarious locations which could result in 82 successstories within the period of two years. He said, asour on-farm research reveals, 59% of marginalhouseholds are having two or less componentsfor integration in their system; they need to bediversified for augmenting the income. Further,though we have achieved net income up to Rs.3.75 lakhs/ha/annum, but we should target for Rs.6 lakhs/annum in the coming years by appropriatelymixing the profitable activities such as protectedcultivation of high value crops, boundary plantationsetc.

Address of Dr B. Gangwar, Director, ICAR-IIFSR,Modipuram

Dr B. Gangwar, Director, IIFSR in his openingremarks highlighted achievements of the projectduring last one year including the strengthening ofinter-institutional linkages and progress on on-

Address of K Ramaswami, Vice Chancellor,TNAU, Coimbatore

Dr M. Maheswaran, Director Research and DrK. Velayutham, Director Crop Managementhighlighted the achievements of the University in

Release of CD on Tribal Sub Plan programmeunder AICRP on IFS



farming systems. Dignitaries also released theseveral publications including a book on Researchin Farming Systems and CD on Tribal Sub Planactivities in farming systems perspective carriedout by TNAU under AICRP on IFS. Dr N. AsokaRaja, Head, Department of Agronomy welcomedthe delegates while Dr E. Somasundaram, ChiefAgronomist proposed the vote of thanks.

During the three days’ workshop, the on-goingactivities of 75 on-station and on-farm centers ofAICRP on IFS were reviewed and suggestionswere given for improvement. The newprogrammes were also discussed and finalized.Several recommendations of practical importancewere also brought out during the workshop.Synthesis of bankable IFS models, modelling andcapacity building of stake holders were identifiedas future thrust areas for the project.

The following recommendations were finalizedafter discussions

Recommendations

A. Strengthening inter-institutional linkage

1. All the centres should regularly interact withpartner institutions of ICAR and carryout thework plan as per the deliverables given in theproceedings of regional workshops.

2. A review meeting should be convened by ICAR-IIFSR with partner institutions and AICRP onIFS centres in the end of 2015 to appraise thestatus of partnership work plan deliverables andfixing the gaps.

3. The AICRP centres whosoever is indenting formaterials (seeds/livestock etc) from ICARinstitutions/AICRP centres should place theindent well in advance. The copy of the indentshould be sent to ICAR-IIFSR also to pursuethe case and avoid no supply/delay.

4. Newly appointed scientists at ICAR-IASRI forlooking after OFR data analysis should visitICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram to get the first handinformation on on-farm experiments.

5. In view of the approval of ICAR-IASRI as avoluntary centre of AICRP on IFS, scientists ofICAR-IASRI and ICAR-IIFSR should jointlydiscuss and formulate a strategy for developingthe user-friendly interactive data base for bothon-station and on-farm experiments of theproject.

B. On-station research

6. Permission /approval may be sought fromICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram for concluding anyexperiment and initiation of new study at on-station.

7. The number of dairy animals including youngones should not exceed 4 in the on-station IFSmodel of 1 ha area.

C. On-Farm Research

8. ICAR-IASRI should develop and providemethodology for analysis of unequal numberof samples (farm households) as gettinguniform number of samples for differentfarming systems in on-farm farming systemexperimentation is difficult.

9. For economic analysis of farming systems,either inflation of benchmark income ordeflation of income obtained during the yearmay be done to compare the values of incomeover the years.

10. The results of TSP clusters should also besynthesized as productivity, incomeenhancement and other benefits for the entirecluster of villages including non-adopted farmhouseholds.

11. All the TSP centres should make a movie ofTSP work incorporating photographs/videostaken before and after interventions similar toTNAU, Coimbatore. The videos should besubmitted to ICAR-IIFSR within six months.

12. All the TSP centres should facilitate and ensureopening of the bank accounts under PrandhanMantri Jan dahnyojana for all those tribal



households who are not having the bankaccounts.

13. Future course of action proposed for OFRprogramme which includes no repetition ofinterventions, undertaking impact assessmentof all interventions during 2016-17, identificationof new district, villages, households,benchmarking and technical programmepreparation in 2016-17 should be ensured byall the centres.

D. General

14. Separate group meet of agriculturaleconomists / OFR agronomists involved infarming systems characterization may beorganized at ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram in April /May, 2015 to discuss and finalize thecharacterization report.

15. OFR Agronomists should be suitably trainedby organizing a hands-on training programmeof 3 days duration to play, learn and interpretwith OFR data for generating qualitypublications.

16. The workshop/group meeting should not be ofless than four days duration keeping in view ofthe nature of research activities and largenumber centres and partners.

17. All the scientists working in the AICRP on IFSproject should be invited in the Biennialworkshops as is the practice in all otherAICRPs. This will also facilitate moreinteraction during review of results and makingrecommendations.

Farmer group discussion at Aurangabad (Maharashtra) Diversification of existing cropping systems atKrishnagiri district (Tamil Nadu)



8.4

RA

DIO

AN

D T

EL

EV

ISIO

N T

AL

KS

DE

LIV

ER

ED

BY

PR

OJE

CT

STA

FF

Cen

tre/

Dat

eT

itle

of

the

talk

Nam

e o

f D

oo

rdar

shan

/Aka

swan

iN

ame

of

Sta

ffK

end

ra

Raj

end

ran

agar

10

-12

-13

Var

i M

agan

ullo

aar

utha

di p

anta

luM

AH

A-T

VD

r. M

. Ven

kata

ram

ana

29

-01

-14

Pan

ta M

arpi

di a

avas

yaka

ta a

acha

riani

yam

aina

pan

tala

sar

alul

uM

AH

A-T

VD

r. M

. Gov

erdh

anP

rinci

pal S

cien

tist

(A

gro)

Jab

alp

ur

24

-03

-14

vylh dh mUur

d`f"k d

k;Z’kky

kA d

k;ZØe

d`f"k fo’

ofo|

ky;ksa l

s[ksrksa r

d

24

-03

-14

xzh"e d

kyhu e

wax o

mM+n

mUur

dh d`f"k d

k;Z’kky

kA d

k;ZØe

d`f"k

fo’o

fo|ky

;ksa l

s [ksrksa rd

Sab

ou

r

28

-06

-14

Dha

n ki

unn

at k

ism

eA

IR,

Bha

galp

urD

r. R

.P. S

harm

a

07

-08

-14

Kha

rif d

alha

ni f

asal

kee

dek

bhal

AIR

, B

haga

lpur

Dr.

Sus

hant

SK

Nag

ar

07

-05

-13

Cro

p r

otat

ion

and

its i

mpo

rtan

ceD

D,

Girn

arD

r. L.

J. D

asai

Lu

dh

ian

a

09

-02

-13

Cul

tivat

ion

of la

te s

own

whe

atA

IR,

Jala

ndha

rD

r. S

.S. W

alia

06

-03

-14

Incl

usio

n of

leg

umin

ous

crop

s in

cro

ppin

g sy

stem

sA

IR,

Jala

ndha

rD

r. S

.S. W

alia

20

-05

-14

Javi

c kh

eti

diya

n sa

mbh

anaw

aA

IR,

Jala

ndha

rD

r. S

.S. W

alia

21

-05

-14

Javi

c kh

eti

AIR

, Ja

land

har

Dr.

S.S

. Wal

ia

Kar

jat

10

-07

-13

Bha

t pi

kasa

thi

ekta

mik

ann

adra

vya

vyas

thap

anA

IR, M

umba

iD

r. L.

S. C

hava

n

12

-11

-13

Kon

kan

vibh

agat

jam

inic

hya

aang

olit

ivar

viv

idha

pik

anch

i la

gwad

AIR

, Mum

bai

Dr.

L.S

. Cha

van

06

-06

-14

Bha

t la

gwad

ichy

a vi

vidh

a pa

ddha

tA

IR, M

umba

iD

r. L.

S. C

hava

n

02

-12

-13

Rab

i-U

nhal

i B

huim

ug l

agw

adA

IR, M

umba

iD

r. A

.S. D

alvi

Con

td..

../-



Cen

tre/

Dat

eT

itle

of

the

talk

Nam

e o

f D

oo

rdar

shan

/Aka

swan

iN

ame

of

Sta

ffK

end

ra

22

-05

-14

Bha

t ro

pvat

ika

vyas

thap

anA

IR, M

umba

iD

r. A

.S. D

alvi

01

-07

-14

bhat

pik

rop

vatik

a vy

asth

apan

Do

ord

ha

rsh

an

Mu

mb

ai

Dr.

L.S

. Cha

van

Co

imb

ato

re

12

-06

-13

Cro

ppin

g pr

ogra

m f

or k

uruv

ai s

easo

nA

IR, T

richy

02

-08

-13

Foo

d gr

ain

prod

uctio

n m

issi

on p

rogr

amm

eD

irect

orat

e of

Hor

ticul

ture

, Ta

mil

Nad

u

02

-08

-13

Con

serv

atio

n A

gric

ultu

reA

IR,C

hann

ai

02

-08

-13

Inte

grat

ed f

arm

ing

syst

emA

IR,C

hann

ai

Sir

rug

up

pa

30

-06

-13

Impr

oved

Agr

onom

ic p

ract

ices

in

Bt.c

otto

nD

oor

Dar

shan

Ken

dra,

Gul

barg

a

02

-07

-13

Impo

rtan

ce o

f gr

een

man

urin

g in

pad

dy c

ultiv

atio

nD

oor

Dar

shan

Ken

dra,

Ban

galo

re

07

-12

-13

DS

R in

pad

dyD

oor

Dar

shan

Ken

dra,

Ban

galo

re

30

-07

-13

Impr

oved

Agr

onom

ic p

ract

ices

in

Bt.c

otto

nA

IR,

Hos

pet

30

-07

-13

Con

tact

far

min

g: I

s it

bene

ficia

l to

far

min

g co

mm

unity

for

AIR

, H

ospe

tK

SA

MB

spo

nsor

ed p

rogr

amm

e

26

-12

-13

DS

R in

pad

dyA

IR,

Hos

pet

Par

bh

ani

23

-10

-12

Rab

bi H

anga

mat

eel

Aan

terp

eek

Pat

heth

iA

IRD

r. W

.N.

Nar

khed

e

Ran

chi

11-1

2-1

2W

ater

man

agem

ent

in p

otat

o cr

ops

TV

Tal

kD

r. R

. Tha

kur

22

-02

-13

Cro

ppin

g sy

stem

in

Jhar

khan

dT

V T

alk

Dr.

R. T

haku

r

10

-08

-12

Far

min

g S

yste

mT

V T

alk

Dr.

R.P

. Man

jhi

08

-11

-13

Effe

ct o

f m

ulch

ing

in w

heat

cro

pR

ad

io P

rog

ram

me

Dr.

R. T

haku

r

07

-05

-12

fert

ilize

rs a

pplic

atio

n an

d w

eeds

con

trol

in

sum

mer

ric

eR

ad

io P

rog

ram

me

Dr.

R.P

. Man

jhi

04

-09

-12

Cul

tivat

ion

of e

arly

sow

ing

pota

toR

ad

io P

rog

ram

me

Dr.

R.P

. Man

jhi

04

-12

-12

wee

ds c

ontr

ol i

n w

heat

Ra

dio

Pro

gra

mm

eD

r. R

.P. M

anjh

i

Rai

pur

17

-01

-13

Aaj

ki S

alah

: F

asal

on m

e Ja

vik

Urv

arak

on k

i Aw

ashy

akta

.A

IR,R

aipu

rD

r. S

rikan

t C

hita

le

Con

td..

../-



Cen

tre/

Dat

eT

itle

of

the

talk

Nam

e o

f D

oo

rdar

shan

/Aka

swan

iN

ame

of

Sta

ffK

end

ra

Pal

amp

ur

16

-05

-12

Div

ersi

ficat

ion

of e

xist

ing

crop

ping

sys

tem

-A w

ay t

o ea

rnD

oo

rda

rsh

an

Ke

nd

ra,S

him

laD

r. S

.C. N

egi

high

er p

rofit

19

-12

-12

Live

Pho

ne-in

pro

gram

me

on a

gric

ultu

re u

nder

the

“H

allo

Jag

ran”

Dan

ik J

agra

n D

aily

New

sD

r. S

.C. N

egi

17

-06

-12

Fie

ld b

ased

pro

gram

me,

Kis

an k

i se

wa

mai

n ve

rmic

ompo

stin

gD

oo

rda

rsh

an

Ke

nd

ra,S

him

laD

r.S

.S.R

ana

Bic

hp

uri

Inte

grat

ed N

utrie

nt M

anag

emen

t in

pea

rlmile

t-w

heat

cro

ppin

gS

ea n

ews

chan

nel,

Agr

aD

r. S

.B.S

ingh

and

syst

em

Dr

Rah

ul P

undi

r

Kat

hal

ager

e

06

-02

-14

Inte

grat

ed f

arm

ing

syst

em (

IFS

) fo

r D

avan

gere

dis

tric

tA

IR, B

hadr

avat

hiP

rof.

H.

Cha

ndra

ppa

06

-02

-14

Inse

ct p

est

man

agem

ent

in v

ario

us c

rops

AIR

,Bha

drav

athi

Vija

y S

Dan

arad

di

9. APPENDICES



APPENDIX I: INITIAL SOIL PARAMETERS FOR ON-STATION EXPERIMENTAL SITES DURING 2013-14

Name of CSR Expernment PH EC O.C. Available nutrient (kg/ha)centre no (m mhos/cm) (%/g/kg) N P K

Rajendranagar 1(a) 7.72 0.27 0.51 210 32.0 2882(a) 8.5 0.24 0.54 - 34.0 224

Maruteru 1(a) - - 0.9 - 38.0 3142(a) 5.1 0.38 0.9 - 38.0 344

Rudrur 1(a) 6.68 0.55 0.46 - 39.6 3052(a) 7.99 0.36 0.56 - 17.5 304OF 7.3 0.48 0.46 - 41.0 425

Sabour 1(a) 7.5 0.13 0.63 213 23.6 2262(a) 7.4 0.23 0.46 246 23.6 155OF 8.1 0.50 153 26.9 122

Hisar 1(a) 7.8 0.21 0.46 170 12.7 2922(a) 7.8 0.23 0.43 191 16.4 291OF 7.8 0.21 0.49 162 15.5 238

Raipur 1(a) 0.49 248 18.6 2622(a) 0.51 234 11.5 232OF 0.58 169 17.4 270

Palampur 1(a) 5.6 0.99 293 63.1 112(a) 5.5 0.60 667 21.9 221OF 5.7 0.80 505 35.5 186

Jammu 1(a) 8.4 0.55 216 23.0 1192(a) 7.1 0.62 456 13.8 154OF 8.1 0.51 210 14.7 114

Ranchi 1(a) 6.0 0.38 225 20.0 1152(a) 6.5 0.42 260 19.5 195

S.K.Nagar 1(a) 0.33 195 15.9 1982(a) 0.30 190 38.0 230OF 0.26 195 23.9 261

Junagarh 1(a) 0.68 190 9.5 1402(a) 0.77 240 29.9 165

Navsari 1(a) 0.59 194 18.2 1532(a) 0.58 297 29.0 317CA 0.59 256 21.4 160 219OF 0.56 176 16.5 197

Kathalagere 1(a) 6.1 0.20 0.60 22.0 2112(a) 6.4 0.13 0.68 277 12.3 348

Siruguppa 1(a) 8.2 0.38 0.65 177 19.3 341OF 8.1 0.34 0.59 221 18.1 364

Jabalpur 1(a) 7.7 0.48 0.68 266 9.2 4482(a) 7.6 0.55 0.65 240 16.0 370OF 7.5 0.50 0.64 210 8.8 NR



Name of CSR Expernment PH EC O.C. Available nutrient (kg/ha)centre no (m mhos/cm) (%/g/kg) N P K

Powarkheda 1(a) 7.6 0.55 0.66 260 9.0 300

Rewa 1(a) 7.7 0.53 0.65 260 9.0 500

Indore 1(a) 7.5 0.45 0.34 150 8.0 480

Rahuri 1(a) 8.0 0.26 0.62 178 7.0 7052(a) 8.2 0.35 0.64 153 14.2 527

Akola 2(a) 7.4 0.20 0.40 209 11.0 306

Karjat 1(a) 7.0 0.30 0.97 217 18.4 2452(a) 7.6 0.30 1.25 213 13.0

Bhubaneswar 1(a) 6.7 0.27 0.69 212 15.7 2102(a) 5.1 0.36 0.43 254 20.0 165OF 5.8 0.13 0.62 245 18.5 130CA 5.5 0.29 0.65 260 14.6 210

Chiplima 1(a) 6.1 0.41 0.58 315 16.0 1852(a) 5.4 0.31 0.62 295 10.2 121OF 5.9 0.31 0.76 294 10.1 116CA 6.8 0.11 0.45 273 10.4 100

Ludhiana 1(a) 7.8 0.40 0.38 242 47.5 1012(a) 8.2 0.32 0.31 143 11.2 140OF 7.5 0.20 0.39 179 22.3 180

Durgapura 1(a) 8.2 0.28 0.22 NR 38.1 190OF 8.1 0.18 0.21 NR 21.9 482

Coimbatore 1(a) 0.60 252 23.9 398OF 0.59 249 19.2 528

Kanpur 1(a) 8.1 0.18 0.45 NR 11.5 1702(a) 8.1 0.18 0.24 NR 10.4 186OF 8.0 0.16 0.40 NR 14.4 203

Faizabad 1(a) 7.3 0.11 0.51 142 18.0 3552(a) 8.8 0.50 0.37 102 13.8 113OF 8.2 0.40 0.46 127 17.4 NR

Varanasi 1(a) NR NR NR NR NR 2162(a) 7.9 0.22 0.44 192 12.0 NR

Bichpuri 1(a) NR NR NR NR NR 2042(a) NR NR 0.31 124 10.6 284OF 7.8 1.80 0.31 123 10.6 NR

Pantnagar 1(a) 7.8 NR NR 122 5.6 1432(a) 5.5 NR 0.60 NR 20.0 125OF 7.8 NR NR NR 15.5 NR

Kalyani 1(a) 7.2 0.65 0.65 123.2 11.9 812(a) 7.4 0.59 0.92 110 12.1 93OF 7.1 0.46 0.62 129.8 11.9 NR



AP

PE

ND

IX II

A: W

EA

TH

ER

PA

RA

ME

TE

RS

(MO

NT

HLY

AV

ER

AG

ES

) AT

DIF

FE

RE

NT

CR

OP

PIN

G S

YS

TE

M C

EN

TE

RS

DU

RIN

G 2

013-

14

Nam

e o

f C

SR

cen

tre

July

Aug

ust

Sep

tO

ctN

ovD

ecJa

nF

ebM

arA

pri

lM

ayJu

ne

Raj

endr

anag

ar18

9.3

158.

111

0.6

253.

231

00

056

.872

.640

.1N

R

Sab

our

150.

825

1.4

197.

229

1.6

14.2

04.

336

.52.

80

187.

212

5.2

Rai

pur

606.

544

5.7

187.

686

.40.

00.

00.

084

.84.

426

.232

.2N

R

Juna

gadh

544.

611

2.0

335.

089

.80.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0

Nav

sari

367.

064

3.0

45.0

0.0

0.0

14.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

36.0

0.0

His

ar15

9.2

288.

214

0.4

6.5

9.4

0.0

2.0

12.5

47.0

16.4

56.5

71.6

Pal

ampu

r81

5.2

846.

937

6.8

22.2

4.0

34.2

75.4

165.

211

9.4

59.6

28.6

NR

Jam

mu

251.

249

6.7

111.

267

.212

.210

.860

.623

.510

4.6

42.5

15.9

10.0

Kat

hala

gere

250.

030

.010

4.0

22.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.0

22.0

0.0

0.0

NR

Kar

man

a27

8.4

25.1

187.

516

0.5

261.

917

.041

.780

.82.

833

3.3

129.

8N

R

Jaba

lpur

568.

011

39.3

139.

010

3.8

0.0

0.0

24.8

87.2

5.2

NR

NR

NR

Pow

arkh

eda

588.

938

4.9

72.4

66.4

0.0

0.0

27.2

2.0

0.0

NR

NR

NR

Rew

a53

7.6

460.

410

8.8

138.

00.

00.

072

.688

.411

.0N

RN

RN

R

Indo

re73

7.6

132.

713

6.2

107.

60.

02.

255

.642

.20.

0N

RN

RN

R

Rah

uri

129.

617

.014

6.4

99.2

41.8

0.0

0.0

0.6

33.6

3.6

0.0

NR

Bhu

bnes

war

263.

215

2.8

345.

673

4.3

0.0

0.5

0.0

49.0

26.0

9.4

0.0

NR

Chi

plim

a45

4.6

221.

316

2.4

143.

30.

00.

00.

06.

00.

00.

031

.0N

R

Ako

la22

8.0

174.

915

1.9

86.3

0.0

0.0

0.1

36.7

16.5

NR

NR

NR

Kar

jat

2125

423.

229

3.1

67.4

9.6

2.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Ludh

iana

159.

120

5.1

48.7

35.6

4.6

2.8

56.5

24.1

33.2

34.0

NR

NR

Coi

mba

tore

29.3

39.8

26.6

167.

634

.721

.60

0.2

017

.412

7.2

NR

Than

javu

r8.

411

7.4

109

117

4767

.40

5.8

00

127.

4N

R

Kan

pur

326.

117

9.3

95.8

143.

20.

02

105.

829

.817

.64.

40.

025

.3

Vara

nasi

238.

624

8.6

20.0

144.

90.

00.

059

.574

.40.

58.

313

.4N

R

Bic

hpur

i37

1.0

163.

022

.024

.00.

014

.138

.40.

04.

36.

00.

00.

0

Pan

tnag

ar42

9.6

419.

677

.893

.20.

010

.211

0.8

176.

615

.025

.224

.6N

R

Por

tBla

ir62

4.4

221.

447

8.1

271

151.

210

8.1

1.3

00

025

6.9

509.

4



Ap

pen

dix

II

B :

Max

imu

m a

nd

min

imu

m t

emp

erat

ure

(0 C

) (J

uly

201

3 to

Ju

ne

2014

)

Nam

e o

f C

SR

cen

tre

Tem

pera

ture

(0 C

)

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.

max

.m

in.m

ax.

min

.

Sab

our

33.5

26.9

34.6

26.1

32.3

26.1

28.8

22.6

26.9

15.3

23.4

10.1

20.2

10.4

22.6

10.8

30.1

15.3

37.0

20.1

37.8

24.3

34.2

24.5

Rai

pur

29.9

24.5

29.9

24.3

31.2

24.8

30.1

21.7

29.5

15.6

28.1

11.5

28.5

13.5

29.1

15.6

33.9

19.7

39.2

23.8

40.9

27.4

NR

NR

Juna

gadh

29.8

25.1

30.2

24.5

32.3

25.0

33.9

22.9

32.7

17.4

29.4

12.9

28.6

12.1

30.3

14.8

36.0

18.3

39.0

22.4

39.9

24.9

NR

NR

Nav

sari

29.1

26.0

30.4

26.3

32.7

25.3

33.7

22.6

33.0

22.3

28.3

14.2

28.7

14.2

34.1

18.4

35.4

22.2

32.7

24.6

32.3

26.8

NR

NR

His

ar36

.626

.933

.325

.934

.423

.931

.920

.126

.610

.421

.87.

018

.05.

620

.27.

626

.312

.234

.117

.138

.422

.241

.026

.3

Pal

ampu

r28

.020

.128

.019

.326

.417

.525

.312

.121

.18.

118

.56.

215

.93.

716

.46.

222

.410

.025

.713

.632

.118

.5N

RN

R

Jam

mu

33.9

25.2

31.8

24.6

32.8

22.8

30.6

18.9

25.3

9.0

19.8

5.6

18.9

4.9

24.1

11.5

30.3

14.7

30.3

14.7

34.6

20.2

39.7

23.4

Kat

hala

gere

24.6

22.4

26.3

21.8

28.3

21.8

28.6

22.0

26.8

16.8

25.5

16.8

29.0

18.8

31.3

20.0

34.0

21.5

35.5

23.3

NR

NR

NR

NR

Kar

man

a28

.823

.429

.523

.629

.124

.030

.523

.730

.623

.530

.822

.330

.522

.028

.222

.632

.623

.432

.324

.531

.925

.7N

RN

R

Jaba

lpur

30.0

23.9

28.6

23.3

30.6

22.6

29.8

19.5

27.7

10.0

25.7

8.5

22.8

10.0

25.6

11.4

31.9

13.9

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Pow

arkh

eda

31.1

22.1

30.3

22.7

35.2

22.9

33.8

19.4

31.5

12.9

29.4

10.1

25.7

10.5

30.4

10.9

36.6

15.8

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Rew

a31

.823

.831

.223

.732

.723

.630

.320

.527

.611

.025

.18.

221

.19.

023

.09.

930

.813

.6N

RN

RN

RN

RN

RN

R

Indo

re26

.622

.126

.822

.031

.122

.130

.318

.827

.611

.625

.48.

523

.47.

125

.77.

832

.913

.6N

RN

RN

RN

RN

RN

R

Rah

uri

29.1

22.4

30.2

21.5

31.0

21.1

31.5

19.5

31.5

13.4

29.1

11.1

29.1

12.8

30.4

12.6

34.0

17.8

38.1

20.3

38.5

22.9

NR

NR

Bhu

bnes

war

32.2

25.3

32.3

25.2

32.5

24.3

30.6

22.4

29.6

17.9

28.9

14.0

28.9

15.0

32.2

17.8

35.7

21.8

39.7

24.5

39.7

25.7

NR

NR

Chi

plim

a30

.623

.832

.323

.534

.223

.028

.919

.826

.311

.926

.58.

626

.210

.526

.711

.134

.314

.839

.818

.240

.018

.8N

RN

R

Ako

la30

.423

.429

.522

.832

.422

.632

.819

.331

.014

.229

.310

.929

.512

.531

.813

.134

.417

.4N

RN

RN

RN

RN

RN

R

Kar

jat

28.1

23.0

28.2

23.3

30.5

24.1

33.5

21.8

34.7

17.4

34.2

16.7

32.6

15.5

33.3

16.0

38.2

21.4

40.0

23.7

38.2

26.7

NR

NR

Ludh

iana

34.7

27.7

33.1

26.3

33.3

23.7

30.9

19.3

25.8

30.0

20.1

7.4

17.5

7.3

19.9

8.1

25.0

13.0

33.8

18.0

NR

NR

NR

NR

Coi

mba

tore

29.9

23.1

32.0

22.6

30.9

22.6

31.4

21.9

29.6

22.2

29.3

19.6

30.2

20.0

32.7

20.9

35.0

22.1

36.3

25.0

33.9

24.2

NR

NR

Than

javu

r36

.927

.635

.126

.835

.826

.434

.025

.529

.923

.329

.424

.429

.421

.331

.121

.835

.624

.636

.528

.737

.728

.8N

RN

R

Kan

pur

32.6

23.9

32.2

23.6

33.5

22.5

30.7

18.2

27.3

9.3

23.4

7.2

18.0

7.2

22.1

7.9

29.4

12.3

33.4

19.0

39.6

21.9

41.4

24.8

Vara

nasi

33.0

26.7

31.3

25.9

32.4

25.8

28.6

21.5

26.8

16.7

23.5

11.5

19.4

10.8

23.2

12.8

30.6

16.6

37.6

21.4

39.3

25.2

NR

NR

Bic

hpur

i33

.826

.733

.025

.634

.724

.431

.819

.827

.410

.223

.27.

918

.38.

522

.710

.630

.714

.537

.120

.641

.125

.140

.228

.2

Pan

tnag

ar32

.325

.732

.125

.232

.823

.830

.520

.226

.911

.222

.47.

317

.18.

322

.29.

428

.413

.434

.616

.837

.722

.7N

RN

R

Por

tBla

ir29

.123

.928

.022

.829

.323

.931

.224

.230

.625

.329

.923

.829

.923

.830

.622

.232

.324

.034

.225

.232

.025

.630

.625

.6



1. ANGRAU,HYDERABAD (A.P.)

Main Centre, Rajendranagar

Chief Agronomist Dr. M. Venkata RamanaJr. Agronomist Dr. M. GoverdhanJr. Soil Scientist Dr. S. SrideviTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. K. SugunanandamField assistant Mr. K. VenugopalanJr. Steno/UDC VacantMessenger Mr. G. Saibaba

Sub Centre, Maruteru

Agronomist Mr. K. Shyam SunderTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. K. ViswanadhamField assistant Mrs. M. NeelimaLDC/Typist Mr. Md. Khaja Babu

Sub Centre, Rudrur

Agronomist Dr. U. NagabhushanamTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. ShekarField assistant Mr. SailuLDC/Typist Mr. K. Sanker

On-Farm Centre, Seetampet

Agronomist Dr. K. Tejeswara RaoField assistant Mr. T. Ramjogi/

Mr. N. Murali Mohan RaoField assistant Mr. B.V.A.

SatyanarayanaField assistant Mr. A.V. RamanaField assistant Mr. K. GopiField assistant Mr. K. Jaganmohan RaoField assistant Mr. T.D.M. MurthyJr. Stenographer VacantDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

On-Farm Centre,Warangal

Agronomist Dr. M. Malla Reddy/Dr. P. Leela Rani/Dr. Lateef Pasha

Asst. Jr. Economist Mr. V. Rajendra PrasadField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. Md. Hafeiz/

Mr. Md. AfsarField assistant Mr. K.V. SubramanyamField assistant Mr. I. Babu Rao/

Mr. Y. VenkaiahField assistant Mr. P. YadagiriJr. Stenographer Mr. T. LaxmiDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

2. AAU JORHAT (ASSAM)

Main Centre, Jorhat

Chief Agronomist Dr. Ajit BaishyaJr. Soil Scientist Dr. B.K. MedhiAsst. Jr. Economist Dr. J.P. HazarikaTechnical Asstt. Mr. B. DuttaField assistant Mr. T. GogoiField assistant Mr. J.C. DuttaJr. Steno/UDC Mr. A.B. RajkonwarMessenger Mr. B. Kalita

On-Farm Centre, Karimganj

Agronomist Dr. M.C. KalitaAsst. Jr. Economist Dr. J.K. GogoiField assistant Mr. B. SaikiaField assistant Mr. S. PathakField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. N.N. KalitaField assistant Mr. H.K. GoswamiField assistant Mr. I. GogoiJr. Stenographer Mrs. Beauti DeviDriver Mr. B. BoruahWatchman Mr. D.P. Gohani

3. RAU, PUSA (BIHAR)

Main Centre, Sabour

Chief Agronomist Dr. R.P. SharmaJr. Soil Scientist Dr. N. Chattopadhyaya/

Mr. Anupam DasJr. Agronomist Dr. S. Tyagi

APPENDIX III: CENTRE-WISE STAFF POSITION



Technical Asstt. Mr. K.R. RamanField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. Rajeev KumarJr. Steno/UDC Mr. A.P. YadavWatchman Mr. Ganesh Ram

On-Farm Centre, Patna

Agronomist Dr. D.K. MahtoTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. Gautam PrasadField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC VacantDriver Mr. Surendra KumarWatchman Mr. Gajendra Mandal

4. IGKV, RAIPUR (CHHATISSGARH)

Main Centre, Raipur

Chief Agronomist Dr. G.P. PaliJr. Soil Scientist Dr. Alok Tiwari/

Mr. Anup Kumar SinghJr. Agronomist Dr. Shrikant ChitaleTechnical Asstt. Mr. B.K. ChandrakarField assistant Mr. Dilip Kumar VermaField assistant Mr. G.P. YadavJr. Steno/UDC Ms. Rubi MajumdarMessenger Mrs. S. Mishra

On-Farm Centre, Kawardha

Agronomist Mr. Sunil KumarTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. D.D. SinghField assistant Mr. Amit Ku.TondarField assistant Mr. S.S. MaliField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC Mr. Saiyyad Javed AliDriver Mr. Prasant Kumar

ChoureWatchman Mr. Gaindlal Nirmalkar

5. SDAU, S.K. NAGAR (GUJRAT)

Chief Agronomist Dr. B.S. PatelJr. Soil Scientist Mr. P.K. PatelJr. Agronomist Mr. S.M. PatelTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. B.R. PatelField assistant Mr. S.L. ParmarJr. Steno/UDC Mr. R.K. GadhaviWatchman Mr. R.A. Joshi

On-Farm Centre, Deesa

Agronomist Dr. S.K. PatelJr. Sci.(Eco) Dr. R.R. PatelTech. Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. L.S. ChaudharyField Assistant Mr. A.G. PatelField Assistant Mr. Tusar PatelField Assistant Mr. D.P. ParekhField Assistant Mr. J.H. ChaudharyField Assistant Mr. S.S. PatelJr. Stenographer Mr. P.B. JoshiDriver VacantWatchman Mr. G.K. Chaudhary

6. JAU, JUNAGADH (GUJARAT)

Sub Centre, Junagadh

Agronomist Dr. B.M. DabhiTechnical Asstt. Mr. K.M. JoshiField assistant Mr. C.T. DalwadiField assistant Mr. K.G. RabadiaJr. Steno/UDC Mr. J.B. Sodha

7. NAU, NAVSARI (GUJRAT)

Sub Centre, Navsari

Agronomist Dr. L.J. DesaiTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. B.V. PatelField assistant Mr. M.B. SolankiJr. Steno/UDC Vacant

8. AAU, ANAND (GUJRAT)

On-Farm Centre, Thasra

Agronomist Dr. V.V. Sonani



Field assistant Mr. R.S. RanaField assistant Mr. M.M. MoriField assistant Mr. S.S. RathavaField assistant Mr. K.B. RavalField assistant Mr. D.J. GohilField assistant Mr. V.H. RathvaJr. Stenographer VacantDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

9. CCS HAU, HISAR (HARYANA)

Main Centre, Hisar

Chief Agronomist Dr. R.K.NarwalJr. Soil Scientist Dr. Manoj Kumar

SharmaJr. Agronomist Dr. Pawan KumarTechnical Asstt. VacantTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. Tara ChandField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC Mrs. Veena KakkarWatchman Vacant

On-Farm Centre, Kurukshetra

Agronomist Dr. Anil MehtaJr. Agronomist VacantField assistant Mr. Sube SinghField assistant Mr. Santosh KumarField assistant Mr. Mohinder SinghField assistant Mr. HarikeshField assistant Mr. Sat NarainField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC Mrs. Meenu KumariDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

10. CSK HPKVV, PALAMPUR (H.P.)

Main Centre, Palampur

Chief Agronomist Dr. S.C. NegiJr. Soil Scientist Dr. S.K. SubehiaJr. Agronomist Dr. S.S. RanaTechnical Asstt. Mr. R.K. SharmaField assistant Mr. Pradeep KumarField assistant Mr. Vikram SinghJr. Steno/UDC Mr. Mehar ChandWatchman Mr. Surjeet Kumar

On-Farm Centre, Kangra

Agronomist Dr. S.K.SharmaTechnical Asstt. Mrs. AnuradhaField assistant Mr. Rakesh KumarField assistant Mr. Pratap ChandField assistant Mr. Bihari LalField assistant Mr. AnirudhField assistant Mr. Amarjit SinghField assistant Mr. Gyan ChandJr. Steno/UDC Mr. Saran DasDriver Mr. Santosh KumarMessenger Vacant

11. SKUAST, Jammu (J &K)

Main Centre, Chatta, Jammu

Chief Agronomist Prof. Dileep KachrooJr. Soil Scientist Dr. N.P. ThakurJr. Agronomist Dr. Vijay KhajuriaTechnical Asstt. Mr. Mahesh KumarTechnical Asstt. Mr. Parshotam KumarField assistant Mr. Bishan LalField assistant Mr. Romesh LalJr. Steno/UDC Mrs. Rajni BhartiMessenger Mr. Tarsem Singh

OFR Centre, Jammu

Agronomist Dr. A.K.GuptaField assistant Mr. Khazan SinghField assistant Mr. Babu RamField assistant Mr. A.W. KatochField assistant Mr. Ashwani SharmaField assistant Mr. Ghulam Mohd.Field assistant Mr. Jai KrishanJr. Steno/UDC Mrs. Pardeep KourDriver Mohd. SaleemWatchman Mohd. Yaqoob

12. BAU, RANCHI (JHARKHAND)

Main Centre,Ranchi

Chief Agronomist Dr. R. ThakurJr. Soil Scientist Mr. A.N. PuranJr. Agronomist Mr. R.P. ManjhiTechnical Asstt. Mr. Rakesh MitraField assistant Mr. M. MundaField assistant Mr. Raju Gari



Jr. Steno/UDC Mr. S.S. JhaMessenger Mrs. Deomani Devi

On-Farm Centre, Pakur

Agronomist Mr. W. AindTechnical Asstt. Mr. Rakesh Kumar

SinhaField assistant Mr. S.N. BaithaField assistant Mr. Rajesh KujurField assistant Mr. Anand Kumar MandalField assistant Mr. Arvind KumarField assistant Mr. Parwej AlamField assistant Mr. Jayant KumarJr. Stenographer Mr. Dinesh ToppoDriver Mr. Krishun KujurWatchman Mr. Sarif Ansari

13. UAS, Banglore (KARNATAKA)

Main Centre, Kathalelgere

Chief Agronomist Dr. H. ChandrappaJr. Soil Scientist Dr. P. ChandravanshiJr. Agronomist VacantTechnical Asstt. Mr. Nagaraja KusugurField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. P. MaheshwarappaJr. Steno/UDC VacantMessenger Mr. K.M. Chandrakala

On-Farm Centre, Banglore

Agronomist Dr. A.P. ViswanathJr. Soil Scientist Dr. M.N. VenkatamanaTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC VacantDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

14. UAS, Raichur (KARNATAKA)

Main Centre, Siruguppa

Chief Agronomist Dr. Basavarajappa M.A

Jr. Soil Scientist Dr. Ashok Kumar GaddiJr. Economist Dr. Prabhuling TewariTechnical Asstt. Mr. Erappa YankannvarTechnical Asstt. Mr. Bhimanna HugarField assistant Mr. Somanagouda HField assistant Mr. Gangadhar Swami S.Jr. Steno/UDC Vacant

15. UAS, Dharwad (KARNATAKA)

On-Farm Centre, Gadag

Agronomist Dr. M.H. HosmaniField assistant Mr. G.C. KallurField assistant Mr. V.H. JamadarField assistant Mr. S.A. SavalagiField assistant Mr. M.S. TalakeriField assistant Mr. V.D. KalawadField assistant Mr. R.S. RathodJr. Steno/UDC Mr. R.N. VagoleDriver Mr. S.R. KondaguliWatchman Mr. A.M. Harinath

16. KAU, THRISSUR (KERALA)

Main Centre, Karmana (Thiruvandrum)

Chief Agronomist Dr. P. SukumariJr. Soil Scientist Dr. B. RaniJr. Agronomist Dr. B. Jacob johnTechnical Asstt. Mr. Hirosh KumarTechnical Asstt. Mr. K. JayakumaranField assistant Mr. Tomy AbrahamField assistant Mrs. K.S.SujathaJr. Steno/UDC Mrs. P.S.SindhuMessenger Mr. K. Maniyan

On-Farm Centre, Thiruvella

Agronomist Dr. Thomas MathewJr. Soil Scientist Dr. D.JocobField assistant Mrs. S. NaseemaField assistant Mr. P.S. Sanal KumarField assistant Mr. K.O. Shahul HamedField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. A.R. VenuField assistant Mr. Mathew Thomas. CJr. Steno/UDC Mr. Aneesh Kumar. MDriver VacantMessenger Mr. K.G. Pushpakumari



17. JNKVV, Jabalpur (M.P.)

Main Centre, Jabalpur

Chief Agronomist Dr. V.K. ShuklaJr. Soil Scientist VacantJr. Soil Scientist Dr. N.K. KhampariaJr. Agronomist VacantTechnical Asstt. Dr. S.K. VishwakarmaField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. A.N. GoutamJr. Steno/UDC VacantMessenger Mr. N.L. Bhumiya

Sub Centre, Rewa

Agronomist Dr. B.M. MouyaTech.Assistant Mr. P.S. YadavField assistant VacantField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC Mr. S.K. Upadhyay

Sub Centre, Powerkheda

Agronomist Dr. R.S. LidderTech.Assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. Sudhir DubeyJr. Steno/UDC Mrs. Sushila Jhariya

On Farm Centre, Dindori

Agronomist Mr. D.N. ShriniwasJr. Economist VacantField assistant Mr. V.R. GhorkeField assistant Mrs. Jaya KoriField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC VacantDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

On Farm Centre, Katni

Agronomist Dr. R.P. SahuTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant VacantField assistant VacantField assistant Vacant

Field assistant Mr. R.D. MahorField assistant VacantField assistant VacantJr. Steno/UDC VacantDriver VacantWatchman Vacant

18. RMVR, SUA&T, GWALIOR

Sub Centre, Indore

Agronomist Dr. S.K. ChoudharyTech. Assistant Mr. N.K. SinhaField assistant Mr. R.K. TamereField assistant Mr. G.S. YadavJr. Steno/UDC Mr. N.K. Bangre

19. MPKV, RAHURI (MAHARASHTRA)

Main Centre, Rahuri

Chief Agronomist Dr. B.S. RaskarJr. Agronomist Dr. S.M. SheteJr. Soil Scientist Dr. V.S. PatilTech. Assistant Mr. A.B. DhageField Assistant Mr. B.K. JadhavField Assistant Mr. J.A. RajnurJr. Stenographer Mr. A.M. ChavanMessenger Mr. P.L. Dolas

On Farm Centre, Chas (Ahmednagar)

Agronomist Prof. M.M. DesaiJr. Economist Prof. Y.C. SaleTech. Assistant VacantField Assistant Mr. S.P. KaharField Assistant Mr. R.P. GangurdeField Assistant Mr. N.S. KudalField Assistant Mr. R.H. RathodField Assistant Mr. A.B. NikradField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mr. A.M. ChavanDriver Mr. E.R. JadhavWatchman Vacant

20. DPDKV, AKOLA (MAHARASHTRA)

Main Centre, Akola

Chief Agronomist Dr. (Mrs.) MangalaGhanbahadur



Jr. Agronomist Mr. B.S. MorwalJr. Soil Scientist Dr. O.S.RakhodeTech. Assistant Mr. M.G. DikkarField Assistant Mr. M.M. DeshmukhField Assistant Mr. T.L. PawarJr. Stenographer Mr. B.W. AhirMessenger Mrs. L.P. Ingle

Sub Centre, Hiwara

Agronomist Mr. B.S. Morwal/Dr. Varsha V. Tapre

Technical Assistant Mr. F.F. KhanField Assistant Mr. R.G. LangewarField Assistant Mr. S.D. KadamField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantDriver VacantJr. Stenographer VacantWatchman Mr. Y.S. Ghonmode

21. MAU, PARBHANI (MAHARASHTRA)

Main Centre, Parbhani

Chief Agronomist Dr. W.N. NarkhedeJr. Economist VacantJr. Soil Scientist Mr. R.N. KhandareJr. Stenographer VacantTech. Assistant VacantField Assistant Mr. G.Y. SonwaneField Assistant VacantMessenger Vacant

On Farm Centre, Aurangabad

Agronomist Prof. S. B. Pawar(Additional charge)

Tech. Assistant Dr. D.P. DeshpandeField Assistant VacantField Assistant Mr. S.K. ChoudhariField Assistant Mr. B.N. AmbadField Assistant Mr. R.P. KeraiField Assistant Mr. B.S. KakadeField Assistant Mr. S.S. MundheJr. Stenographer Vacant

22. DBS KKV, DAPOLI (MAHARASHTRA)

Main Centre, Karjat

Chief Agronomist Dr. L.S. ChavanJr. Soil Scientist Dr. D.G. JondhaleJr. Agronomist Mr. A.S. DalviTechnical Asstt. Mr. A.B. GaikwadTechnical Asstt. Mr. S.A. DiwateField assistant Mr. A.C. SarpotdarField assistant Mr. J.P. HambirJr. Steno/UDC Mr. R.L. Biwalkar/

Mrs. V.R. RewaleMessenger Mr. L.N. Hambir

On Farm Centre, Palghar

Agronomist Dr. S.B. BhagatField Assistant Mr. S.V. KambleField Assistant Mr. B.L. ShanwarField Assistant Mr. S.R. IwareField Assistant Mr. S.D. PhaleField Assistant Mr. V.S. DaphalField Assistant Mr. N.H. ParadhiJr. Stenographer Mr. K.P. MalcheDriver VacantMessenger Mr. V.D. Zagade

23. OUAT, BHUBNESWAR (ORISSA)

Main Centre, Bhubaneswar

Chief Agronomist Dr. L.M. GarnayakJr. Agronomist Mr. A.K. PatraJr. Soil Scientist Dr. Kshitiendra Narayan

MishraTech. Assistant Mrs. Somanath SahuTech. Assistant Mr. D.K. RautField Assistant Mr. Trinath RoutrayField Assistant Mr. B.BiswalJr. Stenographer Mr. Sameer Kumar

MallickMessenger Mr. G. Mahabhoi

Sub Centre, Chiplima

Agronomist Mr. J. HaldarTech. Assistant Mr. Prafulla Kumar

Mohanty



Field Assistant Mr. J.K. BeheraField Assistant Mr. Bhakta DantaJr. Stenographer Vacant

On Farm Centre, Angul

Agronomist VacantJr. Economist VacantField Assistant Mr. S. BaralField Assistant Mr. Kasinath MallickField Assistant Mr. Basanta Kumar

DashField Assistant Mr. Biranchi PradhanField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mr. Fulendu Kumar

BehraDriver Mr. B. BehraWatchman Vacant

On Farm Centre, Kendrapara

Agronomist Dr. Susant KumarSwain

Field Assistant Mr. T. SahooField Assistant Mr. Pravat Kumar

MohantyField Assistant Mr. Rama Chandra

SinghField Assistant Mr. Madhusudan NayakField Assistant Mr. Ananda Chandra

SahuField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mr. Basant Kumar

NayakDriver Mr. K.C. MallickWatchman Mr. S. Munda

24. PAU, LUDHIANA (PUNJAB)

Main Centre, Ludhiana

Chief Agronomist Dr. Sohan Singh WaliaAgronomist Dr. C.S. AulakhJr. Soil Scientist Dr. Roopinder SinghTech. Assistant Mr. Surender Kumar

SharmaField Assistant Mr. Balbir SinghField Assistant Mr. Baljit SinghField Assistant Mr. Prem Prakash

Jr. Stenographer Mr. Ram Ji DassWatchman Mr. Jagmohan Singh

On Farm Centre, Amritsar

Agronomist Dr. Harpreet SinghField Assistant Mr. Amrik SinghField assistant Mr. Tarseem DassField assistant Mr. Gurdip SinghField assistant Mr. Sukhdev SinghField assistant VacantField assistant Mr. Harjit SinghJr. Stenographer Mrs. Sukhdeep KaurDriver Mr. Avtar SinghWatchman Mr. Danial

25. MPUAT, Udaipur (RAJASTHAN)

Sub Centre, Kota

Agronomist Dr. G.S. BhatnagarTech. Assistant Dr. H.P. MeghwalField Assistant Mr. Bhagwan SinghField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Vacant

On Farm Centre, Udaipur

Agronomist Dr. S.K. SharmaJr. Economist Mr. Hari SinghField Assistant Mr. N.S. JhalaField Assistant Mr. Ramji LalField Assistant Mr. Madan LalField Assistant Mr. A.S. RathoreField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mr. Vishal AjmeraDriver Mr. Yogesh Chandra

DamamiWatchman Mr. Shanker Lal Nagda

26. RAU, Bikaner (RAJASTHAN)

Main Centre, Durgapura

Chief Agronomist Dr. Rakesh SummauriaJr. Soil Scientist VacantJr. Agronomist VacantTechnical Asstt. Mr. Mangal Ram

SharmaField assistant Mr. Nonand Singh



Field assistant Mr. M.L. KumawatJr. Steno/UDC VacantMessenger Mr. Kana Ram

On-Farm Centre, Hanumangarh

Agronomist Dr. Harphool SinghTechnical Asstt. VacantField assistant Mr. Banwari LalField assistant Mr. Chaju Ram JatField assistant Mr. Iswar SinghField assistant Mr. Hanuman LalField assistant VacantField assistant VacantDriver VacantJr. Steno/UDC VacantWatchman Mr. Panna Lal

27. TNAU, COIMBATORE (TN)

Main Centre, Coimbatore

Chief Agronomist Dr. K. Siddeswaran/Dr. E. Somasundaram

Jr. Soil Scientist Dr. K. Sathiya BamaJr. Agronomist Dr. P.M. ShanmugamJr. Economist Dr. V. SarvanakumarTech. Assistant VacantField Assistant Mr. A. GowthamanField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mrs. K. SugunaMessenger Mrs. M. Vijayalakshmi

Sub Centre,Thanjavur

Agronomist Dr. R. MarimuthuTech. Assistant VacantField Assistant Ms. S.Chitra DeviField Assistant M. PalanisamyJr. Stenographer Mr. Mahalingam

On farm, Chettinad

Agronomist Mr. P. KathirvelanTech. Assistant VacantField Assistant Mr. M. BaskarapandianField Assistant Mr. P. SakthivelField Assistant Mrs. M. PunithaField Assistant Mr. M. PeriyasamyField Assistant Mr. A.R. SivamaniField Assistant Mr. M.K. Rajendran

Jr. Stenographer Mr. S. NagarajanDriver Mr. M. RadhaMessenger Vacant

On Farm, Paiyur

Agronomist Dr. S. VijayabaskaranTech. Assistant VacantField Assistant Mr. A. MuruganField Assistant Mr. D. GnananduraiField Assistant Mr. K. MohandassField Assistant Mr. R. SolaiField Assistant Mr. A. RavichandranField Assistant Mr. G. MahalingamJr. Stenographer Mr. R. ChitraDriver Mr. K. MurugesanMessenger Mr. C. Murugesan

28. CSAUAT, KANPUR (U.P.)

Main Centre, Kanpur

Chief Agronomist Dr. M.P. YadavJr. Soil Scientist Dr. U.S. TiwariJr. Agronomist Dr. Naushad KhanTechnical Asstt. Mr. U.S. YadavField assistant Mr. R.P. DubeyField assistant Mr. Anil Kumar SinghJr. Steno/UDC Mr. S.T. SiddiquiMessenger Mr. Vijay Bahadur

On Farm Centre, Daleep Nagar

Agronomist VacantTechnical Asstt. VacantField Assistant Mr. Sudhir Pratap SinghField Assistant Mr. Jagdish ChandraField Assistant Mr. R.B. YadavField Assistant Mr. Virendra SinghField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer VacantDriver Mr. Mahendra SinghWatchman Mr. Ashok Kumar

29. NDUAT, FAIZABAD (UP)

Main Centre, Faizabad

Chief Agronomist Dr. N.B. SinghJr. Soil Scientist Dr. Alok Kumar



Jr. Agronomist Dr. R. A. YadavTechnical Asstt. Mr. Ishwar NathTechnical Asstt. Dr. R. P. DwivediField assistant Mr. A. P. SinghField assistant Mr. R. A. PandeyJr. Steno/UDC Mr. S. A.R. ZaidiMessenger Mr. Jag Jeevan

On Farm Centre, Ambedkar Nagar

Agronomist VacantField Assistant Mr. A.N. PandeyField Assistant Mr. P.C. TripathiField Assistant Mr. Tilak RamField Assistant Mr. V.B. SinghField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mr. Ram LalDriver Mr. J.P. YadavWatchman Mr. S.P. Singh

30. BHU, VARANASI (UP)

Sub Centre, Varanasi

Agronomist Dr. J.S. BohraTech. Assistant Mr. Manoj Kumar SinghField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer Mr. Mohan Ram

31. RBS COLLEGE, BICHPURI (AGRA)

Agronomist Dr. S.B. SinghTech. Assistant Dr. Rahul PundirField Assistant VacantField Assistant Dr. Susheel Kumar

SinghJr. Stenographer Dr. Bhumi Raj Singh

32. GBPUAT, PANTNAGAR (UTTARAKHAND)

Main Centre, Pantnagar

Chief Agronomist Dr. Rohitashav SinghJr. Soil Scientist Dr. Ajeet Pratap SinghJr. Agronomist Dr. Sumit Chaturvedi

Tech. Assistant Mr. Y.S. KhokarField Assistant Mr. A.K. TiwariField Assistant Mr. M.P. SinghJr. Stenographer VacantMessenger Mr. Lalloo Singh

On Farm Centre, Jeolikot (Nainital)

Agronomist Dr. D.K. SinghField Assistant Mr. Y.P. GangwarField Assistant Mr. S.K. VermaField Assistant Mr. Gulsher AhmedField Assistant Mr. Virendra SinghField Assistant VacantField Assistant VacantJr. Stenographer VacantDriver VacantMessenger Mr. Panjabi Mahato

33. BCKV, Kalyani

Main Centre, Kalyani

Chief Agronomist Dr. Mahadev PramanickJr. Soil Scientist VacantJr. Economist Dr. S.ChatterjeeTechnical Asstt. Dr. Dilip SahaTechnical Asstt. Mr. Basudev DattaField assistant Mr. Bipul Chandra PalField assistant Mr. Amar ChakrabartyJr. Steno/UDC VacantMessenger Vacant

On-Farm Centre, Kakdwip

Agronomist Dr. Manabendra RayField assistant Mr. A.K. BhaumikField assistant Mr. K. MaitiField assistant Mr. N. DasField assistant Mr. Samir Kumar

ChatterjeeField assistant Mr. Chiranjit MandalField assistant Mr. Uttam MandalJr. Steno/UDC Mr. Nilanjan MukherjeeDriver Mr. Laxman Chandra DasWatchman Vacant



AP

PE

ND

IX IV

: S

OIL

FE

RT

ILIT

Y S

TAT

US

AN

D N

UT

RIE

NT

UP

TAK

E

Tab

le A

: S

oil

fert

ility

Sta

tus-

Org

anic

car

bo

n (

%)

and

ava

ilab

le N

,P a

nd

K (

kg/h

a) a

fter

Kh

arif

/Rab

i/su

mm

er s

easo

n i

n E

xp.

No

. 1(

a)

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T

3T 4

T5

T6

T 7T 8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

CS

R C

entr

e

Ra

jen

dra

Kha

rifO

C%

0.51

0.60

0.56

0.56

0.57

0.57

0.59

0.59

na

ga

rN

21

01

86

.317

2.6

196.

31

81

192.

91

97

205.

9P

32

30.9

27.6

35.7

38

30.5

41

35.2

K2

88

322.

227

7.2

296.

42

08

333.

82

99

33

3

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

640.

590.

660.

630.

610.

530.

680.

61N

14

61

53

14

61

51

13

21

57

13

61

36

P3

334

.832

.438

.63

234

.63

535

.1K

34

43

45

29

63

59

31

73

72

36

73

66

Sab

our

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

570.

590.

610.

560.

60.

580.

590.

600.

620.

580.

570.

59N

20

31

97

21

71

90

19

91

85

19

22

06

21

82

04

18

92

01

P26

.927

.831

.527

.129

.727

.430

.831

.732

.33

129

.631

.1K

17

21

46

17

91

59

17

01

41

16

31

70

17

81

72

17

11

72

Ra

ipu

rS

um

me

rO

C%

0.53

0.56

0.52

0.57

0.56

0.54

0.57

0.54

N2

65

26

42

58

26

42

70

26

42

73

26

6P

21.0

22.4

21.4

21.8

21.7

20.3

21.9

20.0

K2

90

30

12

68

28

02

93

29

23

00

29

7

Na

vsa

riS

um

me

rO

C%

0.70

0.66

0.70

0.67

0.67

0.66

0.71

0.67

0.69

0.71

N2

58

25

92

64

25

72

55

25

32

76

25

22

55

27

3P

37.8

34.4

34.4

31.8

41.1

37.6

43.1

33.4

36.8

36.7

K2

33

22

22

09

19

32

13

23

82

78

22

82

03

28

1

His

ar

Kha

rifO

C%

0.47

0.44

0.46

0.48

0.43

0.45

0.42

N1

58

14

51

56

15

81

44

14

71

38

P18

.016

.517

.519

.316

.017

.013

.5K

21

92

35

23

52

90

25

72

28

23

2

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

450.

440.

460.

470.

460.

450.

45N

16

51

70

17

51

77

15

91

65

16

8P

13.0

14.5

13.0

15.0

14.0

15.0

14.0

K2

71

27

42

70

26

82

81

27

27

3

Su

mm

er

OC

%N

RN

R0.

50.

5N

R0.

5N

RN

NR

NR

17

31

79

NR

170.

3N

RP

NR

NR

11.3

14.0

NR

13.3

NR

KN

RN

R2

63

26

5N

R27

3.0

NR

Con

td..

../-



Con

td..

../-

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T 3

T4

T5

T 6T 7

T8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

CS

R C

entr

e

Pa

lam

pu

rK

harif

OC

%0.

991.

151.

001.

121.

111.

121.

141.

09N

29

82

92

32

63

06

32

73

09

31

63

12

P53

.081

.467

.979

.280

.672

.461

.267

.2K

92

10

31

00

115

98

13

41

24

99

Ra

bi

OC

%1.

031.

141.

011.

191.

181.

081.

131.

22N

29

52

88

32

83

97

41

54

27

35

53

83

P54

.572

.474

.779

.180

.669

.469

.466

.5K

96

10

81

06

119

111

13

01

35

10

6

Jam

mu

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

560.

620.

580.

610.

630.

560.

610.

630.

580.

64N

20

62

35

20

62

01

23

42

14

20

52

18

22

02

13

P20

.424

.220

.720

.121

.821

.520

.820

.321

.621

.2K

10

911

811

81

24

12

21

22

12

51

21

115

12

2

Ka

tha

lag

ere

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

570.

590.

590.

590.

550.

670.

640.

690.

60.

580.

610.

63P

20.9

21.1

20.1

18.7

18.6

20.0

17.2

18.5

18.9

18.1

17.7

18.8

K1

54

16

91

83

16

71

80

19

01

80

17

81

84

17

61

77

17

2

Sir

ug

up

pa

Kha

rifO

C%

0.65

0.62

0.71

0.65

0.65

0.67

0.73

0.73

0.68

0.62

N1

68

17

01

72

16

81

75

15

71

92

19

21

83

18

7P

23.0

24.0

23.0

23.0

19.0

22.0

25.0

25.0

25.0

22.0

K3

56

36

03

70

35

73

76

36

63

75

36

53

62

36

2S

25

24

28

25

26

27

30

29

25

24

Ka

rma

na

Kha

rifO

C%

0.71

0.74

0.94

0.68

0.63

0.36

0.60

N1

69

15

91

86

17

61

61

15

11

61

P14

.317

.411

.216

.215

.114

.116

.5K

114

111

112

94

90

12

08

9

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

410.

550.

380.

460.

680.

430.

64N

12

51

05

13

61

02

117

113

13

8P

20.5

18.4

15.4

19.1

22.5

18.0

17.5

K9

29

81

09

110

10

01

04

110

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

730.

911.

111.

230.

761.

131.

11N

23

02

24

24

52

45

24

92

59

28

2P

20.0

23.3

18.9

21.5

19.8

18.8

22.3

K8

91

00

96

93

12

79

91

03

Jab

alp

ur

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

660.

680.

690.

690.

710.

700.

690.

700.

700.

680.

660.

690.

68N

23

82

24

26

02

24

27

02

60

23

02

51

23

02

51

23

42

70

26

6P

8.5

8.5

98.

49.

28.

88.

59.

08.

58.

58.

69.

69.

2K

28

52

85

28

82

85

29

82

95

29

02

93

29

02

90

29

32

98

30

0



Con

td..

../-

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T 1

T 2T

3T

4T 5

T6

T7

T8

T 9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14T

15C

SR

Cen

tre

Indo

reR

ab

iO

C%

0.40

0.37

0.33

0.40

0.39

0.42

0.45

0.48

0.51

0.41

N1

80

17

41

76

18

01

78

18

41

90

19

62

02

18

2P

11.2

8.0

9.6

9.6

8.0

13.6

13.6

15.6

13.6

9.6

K4

80

36

04

40

40

04

40

56

05

20

64

06

00

44

0

Pow

arkh

eda

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

650.

670.

680.

670.

680.

670.

670.

670.

680.

68N

23

22

18

26

62

57

25

72

44

21

82

32

24

42

44

P8.

198.

199.

759.

368.

978.

978.

198.

978.

588.

58K

30

43

00

33

03

06

32

03

24

30

03

12

31

23

04

Re

wa

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

600.

650.

650.

650.

640.

640.

660.

650.

660.

65N

23

82

21

21

82

51

24

42

38

21

82

38

23

02

30

P8.

508.

508.

809.

109.

108.

908.

909.

009.

008.

70K

28

42

72

27

82

96

29

22

85

28

32

88

28

52

80

Ra

hu

riK

harif

OC

%0.

590.

580.

590.

580.

590.

620.

630.

630.

630.

630.

610.

620.

620.

610.

61N

18

81

96

19

31

95

19

02

05

20

02

02

19

92

01

19

81

98

19

51

96

19

5P

15.0

15.0

16.0

17.0

16.0

20.0

19.0

20.0

21.0

17.0

19.0

18.0

19.0

15.0

16.0

K5

87

59

05

89

59

25

91

60

35

96

60

26

00

59

85

90

59

65

91

59

35

95

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

590.

610.

610.

630.

600.

600.

620.

620.

640.

620.

600.

610.

620.

640.

62N

18

31

92

19

52

00

18

91

98

19

31

96

20

21

90

18

81

94

19

32

02

19

5P

17.0

16.0

17.0

19.0

18.0

19.0

19.0

19.0

20.0

18.0

19.0

19.0

19.0

16.0

17.0

K5

93

59

45

97

59

25

93

60

05

95

60

05

95

59

55

93

59

85

92

59

65

97

Ako

laK

harif

OC

%0.

480.

480.

470.

470.

480.

480.

480.

48N

15

41

56

15

21

56

15

31

56

15

31

54

P10

.610

.610

.510

.610

.610

.610

.510

.6K

28

42

82

28

52

87

28

72

87

28

62

85

Zn

0.48

0.48

0.47

0.47

0.48

0.47

0.46

0.47

Fe

5.59

5.58

5.58

5.57

5.57

5.59

5.59

5.58

Mn

11.4

411

.45

11.4

411

.45

11.4

511

.43

11.4

511

.43

Cu

2.62

2.60

2.61

2.63

2.61

2.63

2.60

2.60

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

470.

470.

470.

480.

470.

480.

480.

48N

15

91

56

15

41

65

15

61

57

15

71

63

P10

.911

.211

.312

.111

.611

.711

.713

.8K

28

32

81

28

32

81

28

32

87

28

42

95

Zn

0.48

0.50

0.51

0.53

0.51

0.53

0.52

0.54

Fe

5.66

5.68

5.70

5.82

5.60

5.64

5.62

5.88

Mn

11.4

511

.46

11.4

511

.47

11.4

611

.45

11.4

411

.50

Cu

2.62

2.64

2.63

2.65

2.63

2.64

2.64

2.68



Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T 3

T 4T

5T

6T 7

T8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

CS

R C

entr

e

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

470.

480.

470.

480.

480.

480.

480.

48N

16

41

58

15

51

66

15

71

68

16

71

65

P11

.311

.411

.311

.711

.311

.811

.712

.0K

28

62

89

28

82

84

28

72

90

29

12

89

Zn

0.53

0.52

0.53

0.52

0.51

0.54

0.53

0.55

Fe

5.69

5.71

5.72

5.75

5.64

5.68

5.66

5.78

Mn

11.5

11.5

11.5

11.5

11.5

11.5

11.5

11.5

Cu

2.64

2.65

2.64

2.67

2.64

2.66

2.64

2.70

Kar

jat

Kha

rifO

C%

1.28

1.26

1.19

1.19

1.20

1.21

1.27

1.28

1.27

1.19

1.19

N2

17

21

22

13

20

82

09

19

42

17

21

42

10

21

22

05

P27

.025

.025

.423

.025

.523

.326

.626

.625

.126

.524

.8K

22

52

27

23

52

31

23

92

28

22

52

36

21

92

36

23

5

Ra

bi

OC

%1.

421.

341.

231.

191.

211.

151.

391.

361.

331.

211.

15N

27

52

51

23

82

24

23

52

25

27

32

52

24

92

28

22

3P

23.9

23.4

21.7

22.7

25.0

22.8

23.5

26.4

22.8

22.7

23.9

K2

30

24

02

52

25

12

77

25

12

28

26

12

26

25

52

53

Co

imb

ato

reS

um

me

rO

C%

0.61

0.64

0.6

0.65

0.62

0.61

0.66

0.62

0.64

N2

51

28

82

60

28

12

75

25

22

75

25

02

77

P20

.120

.819

.822

.019

.819

.320

.619

.120

.3K

53

16

02

57

55

39

59

05

08

53

65

33

52

5

Kan

pur

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

50.

510.

580.

520.

50.

560.

530.

550.

570.

51P

13

13.6

13.9

13.3

13.1

13.5

13.4

13.6

13.8

13.1

K2

10

21

32

17

20

92

112

15

21

22

14

21

62

11

Fai

zaba

dS

um

me

rO

C%

0.46

0.50

0.48

0.52

0.53

0.50

0.52

0.44

N1

58

16

61

53

16

91

73

16

91

64

17

0P

18.4

20.1

18.0

19.6

19.3

19.8

20.4

18.0

K2

52

25

82

50

26

12

48

25

42

58

24

8

Pa

ntn

ag

ar

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

820.

890.

830.

890.

920.

890.

930.

910.

99N

25

72

57

26

02

61

26

42

63

26

72

65

26

8P

17.9

16.6

17.3

18.5

17.9

19.0

18.6

19.1

19.2

K1

77

17

91

83

18

91

88

18

91

90

19

21

93

Lu

dh

ian

aR

ab

iO

C%

0.39

0.47

0.41

0.47

0.4

0.42

0.42

0.47

0.37

0.38

0.42

0.43

N2

31

24

02

45

21

82

36

24

52

52

25

52

24

23

72

42

23

9P

47.1

50.2

43.9

48.6

43.0

47.8

47.1

48.7

47.7

42.9

47.0

47.5

K8

91

04

95

96

90

93

10

21

04

92

94

10

29

8

Bh

ub

an

esw

ar

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

750.

770.

650.

640.

760.

700.

720.

730.

780.

78N

30

23

30

29

52

90

32

73

05

32

43

20

33

43

37

P14

.014

.414

.113

.715

.114

.514

.615

.014

.715

.0K

13

21

40

13

41

30

13

41

32

13

41

32

13

71

39

Ch

iplim

aR

ab

iO

C%

0.71

0.77

0.73

0.71

0.84

0.72

0.78

0.75

0.82

0.79

N2

89

33

32

99

30

43

13

30

33

18

31

03

17

32

1P

13.2

13.7

14.6

13.5

13.9

13.6

13.8

13.7

14.1

14.3

K1

45

13

71

56

14

21

34

13

61

43

13

91

47

14

8



Tab

le B

: N

utr

ien

t u

pta

ke N

P a

nd

K k

g/h

a in

exp

no

1(a)

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T

3T 4

T5

T6

T 7T 8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

CS

R C

entr

e

Raj

endr

aK

harif

N92

.79

292

.399

.310

810

5.8

110.

398

.2na

gar

P28

.929

.932

.732

.212

.912

.112

.811

.3K

103.

893

.196

.812

1.3

40.8

38.6

39.5

34.8

Rab

iN

154.

716

1.1

154.

813

7.04

278.

1821

3.26

221.

5320

9.8

P37

.242

.745

.239

.85

50.7

129

.89

27.4

28.5

2K

132.

214

7.0

136.

116

3.26

206.

0210

5.6

88.1

286

.91

Sab

our

Kha

rifN

95.3

93.5

81.1

76.4

78.6

117.

011

9.3

116.

811

1.4

110.

310

7.2

109.

3P

28.6

28.2

24.6

23.1

24.0

32.2

36.2

35.2

33.4

33.1

32.1

32.8

K11

0.3

108.

296

.590

.793

.314

0.2

143.

314

0.4

130.

312

8.7

125.

412

8.0

Rab

iN

105.

219

3.2

113.

013

6.9

185.

218

0.2

172.

760

.910

2.3

150.

313

3.0

71.8

P27

.861

.328

.448

.862

.659

.645

.528

.725

.140

.126

.011

.1K

114.

519

3.6

112.

714

3.7

163.

619

4.9

113.

660

0.4

109.

411

0.5

91.7

32.5

Sum

mer

NN

R62

.015

0.5

77.9

57.3

85.6

60.8

108.

811

9.2

32.4

117.

110

2.8

PN

R12

.048

.220

.119

.524

.913

.128

.831

.57.

627

.127

.7K

NR

43.1

75.8

114.

364

.571

.147

.582

.972

.220

.269

.578

.6

Juna

gadh

Kha

rifN

97.6

91.9

92.5

88.5

51.8

71.6

74.4

43.1

0.0

0.0

P12

6.3

68.0

70.1

27.9

0.0

116.

390

.766

.464

.365

.4K

0.0

70.5

46.0

19.3

80.7

41.4

73.7

69.6

50.9

83.4

Rab

iN

9.4

8.8

9.0

26.0

17.3

10.4

10.9

13.6

0.0

0.0

P23

.217

.27.

93.

50.

022

.37.

97.

19.

911

.3K

0.0

0.0

13.4

5.3

15.0

8.5

0.0

0.0

6.6

21.5

Sum

mer

N30

.029

.529

.978

.481

.432

.632

.534

.60.

00.

0P

107.

947

.670

.019

.20.

010

0.0

29.7

52.4

22.8

28.2

K0.

00.

034

.721

.254

.028

.20.

00.

026

.869

.7

Nav

sari

Kha

rifN

62.1

57.1

64.6

62.1

62.5

61.5

63.4

62.5

63.3

71.7

P13

.011

.212

.713

.813

.814

.312

.413

.014

.414

.4K

79.9

67.8

80.0

76.4

88.8

94.5

80.6

79.0

77.9

89.0

Rab

iN

13.6

58.3

64.0

48.2

64.6

61.4

0.0

32.0

32.6

67.8

P1.

412

.910

.84.

77.

420

.70.

05.

77.

710

.8K

3.1

106.

035

.07.

312

.983

.70.

044

.537

.578

.8

Sum

mer

N0.

035

.842

.331

.50.

00.

080

.751

.368

.114

.4P

0.0

6.0

5.5

4.2

0.0

0.0

10.1

6.8

7.9

2.3

K0.

026

.522

.241

.30.

00.

028

.027

.152

.211

.3

Con

td..

../-



Con

td..

../-

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T 1

T 2T

3T

4T 5

T6

T7

T 8T 9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

CS

R C

entr

e

Ako

laK

harif

N13

6.8

134.

114

0.2

138.

813

5.6

137.

514

1.7

133.

2P

13.5

11.8

12.9

12.8

12.8

11.7

13.1

13.8

K62

.665

.363

.963

.761

.062

.462

.265

.2

Sum

mer

N40

.941

.043

.345

.041

.045

.644

.442

.6P

5.88

5.88

5.92

5.94

5.94

5.15

6.08

6.06

K34

.234

.936

.136

.234

.536

.835

.338

.1

Kat

hala

gere

Kha

rifN

140

76

188

179

175

162

168

170

96

207

184

79

P26

.015

.937

.133

.834

.532

.423

.525

.331

.238

.721

.118

.8K

137

85

161

168

188

160

157

167

88

165

148

58

Sum

mer

N14

612

013

512

946

148

310

812

212

411

610

911

1P

33

23

29

21

149

188

18

22

23

26

23

16

K13

511

811

713

325

531

212

113

013

912

612

54

8

Siru

gupp

aK

harif

N11

7.0

134.

013

5.0

140.

012

8.0

114.

011

4.0

123.

012

4.0

120.

0P

26.0

29.0

30.0

30.0

27.0

26.0

27.0

32.0

31.0

29.0

K15

0.0

160.

016

4.0

165.

015

3.0

146.

014

0.0

153.

013

8.0

143

Kar

man

aK

harif

N26

.592

.048

.391

.843

.683

.046

.9P

15.1

41.1

22.3

44.5

25.4

37.3

19.6

K49

.413

6.5

76.0

121.

680

.312

9.5

66.4

Rab

iN

19.4

39.9

26.1

52.2

24.8

35.9

23.1

P10

.924

.014

.525

.414

.221

.514

.1K

24.9

50.2

30.3

57.3

31.2

39.0

28.3

Sum

mer

NN

R14

.58.

012

.73.

841

.539

.0P

NR

2.4

1.8

2.9

1.2

6.8

7.1

KN

R4.

42.

21.

80.

39.

38.

7

Jaba

lpur

KH

+R

bN

228

220

295

215

191

206

239

296

308

246

313

317

P34

.027

.948

.028

.327

.826

.032

.446

.044

.751

.549

.048

.7K

285

303

309

287

230

285

198

304

371

374

326

302

Pow

arkh

eda

KH

+R

bN

250

221

308

210

203

220

208

203

291

308

P26

.322

.340

.220

.521

.928

.419

.636

.847

.751

.2K

256

242

417

304

237

311

289

301

318

338

Rew

aK

H+

Rb

N24

521

834

130

731

630

426

429

625

626

4P

31.6

25.5

46.4

455

.647

.131

.642

.237

.731

.434

.8K

297

371

330

284

304

306

244

318

292

318

Pal

ampu

rR

abi

N16

7.4

121.

811

1.3

138.

414

796

.589

.773

.5P

37.7

24.4

22.1

23.9

46.7

15.9

17.3

17.3

K10

0.7

104.

972

.513

5.3

112.

597

.591

.376

.1



Con

td..

../-

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T 1

T 2T

3T

4T 5

T6

T7

T8

T 9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14T

15C

SR

Cen

tre

Rah

uri

Kha

rifN

123.

314

4.2

124.

111

3.4

132.

617

7.8

210.

520

6.0

192.

620

3.9

111.

413

4.2

117.

410

9.7

132.

1P

20.5

127

.08

20.6

118

.65

23.1

526

.13

31.0

828

.77

28.1

831

.11

19.4

922

.33

19.0

918

.522

.85

K22

1.0

270.

822

8.7

205.

924

4.9

61.9

76.5

72.3

67.8

71.4

160.

119

4.6

172.

017

8.1

201.

1

Rab

iN

65.6

54.3

159.

716

2.9

123.

270

.957

.320

1.5

192.

514

6.4

69.6

54.3

175.

217

0.6

142.

1P

14.7

20.4

34.5

24.6

32.7

14.9

22.8

41.7

29.5

38.6

15.1

22.2

35.2

25.9

35.5

K49

.565

.830

.510

0.3

131.

051

.074

.639

.011

5.2

146.

453

.468

.431

.910

4.8

146.

5

Vara

nasi

Kha

rifN

79.1

90.1

89.2

85

83.9

85.2

78.7

80.4

85.5

90.2

P15

.717

.119

.117

.817

.516

.915

.617

.116

.218

.4K

105

116.

811

1.1

118.

110

5.9

102.

910

1.2

99.8

99.6

114.

2

Rab

iN

90.0

93.3

103.

694

.096

.370

.446

.025

.886

.272

.3P

13.0

12.9

14.0

12.9

14.0

8.2

5.4

4.2

11.6

11.4

K80

.077

.080

.462

.970

.641

.823

.821

.598

.074

.0

Sum

mer

N0.

043

.80.

063

.918

.451

.534

.434

.760

.055

.2P

0.0

4.3

0.0

6.3

1.8

5.4

3.3

3.2

6.6

5.8

K13

.29.

60.

08.

57.

710

.725

.525

.733

.512

.6

Ludh

iana

Kha

rifN

142.

591

.896

.815

9.5

122.

612

4.7

120.

282

.175

.851

.719

1.4

P37

.69

27.9

728

.07

43.6

932

.89

31.3

937

.47

30.0

726

.64

16.2

345

.56

K12

5.49

93.2

498

.42

173.

1513

4.96

138.

4913

9.07

68.6

470

.27

41.0

711

9.69

Rab

iN

111.

68

810

528

0.96

77.0

283

.49

86.2

112.

775

.68

85.2

817

.18

103.

57P

33.3

36.5

23.5

28.3

27.7

29.0

28.3

36.1

25.0

32.5

7.5

42.6

K10

3.6

148.

629

5.3

334.

679

.193

.285

.610

5.1

89.8

94.5

21.0

87.7

Sum

mer

NN

R59

.77

156.

5116

1.78

NR

NR

55.1

4N

RN

RN

R35

.02

68.5

9P

NR

21.7

849

.16

51.6

7N

RN

R21

.13

NR

NR

NR

12.7

3N

RK

NR

47.5

118

4.89

202.

07N

RN

R55

.08

NR

NR

NR

40.7

918

.31

Coi

mba

tore

Kha

rifN

56.0

73.0

56.0

170.

017

2.0

134.

056

.091

.014

9.0

P19

.534

.331

.441

.241

.446

.231

.434

.654

.7K

61.0

101.

041

.014

9.0

145.

015

4.0

41.0

90.0

151.

0

Rab

iN

121.

012

6.0

125.

051

.080

.051

.015

0.0

72.0

158.

0P

49.0

49.0

47.1

25.1

30.7

17.1

40.6

25.3

45.5

K11

9.0

126.

012

2.0

50.0

77.0

51.0

136.

065

.014

5.0

Sum

mer

N90

.011

5.0

166.

011

1.0

54.0

166.

087

.013

2.0

87.0

P33

.046

.339

.619

.525

.739

.633

.031

.233

.0K

83.0

64.0

141.

011

8.0

50.0

141.

083

.077

.083

.0

His

arK

harif

N84

.595

.198

.864

.694

.310

5.5

94.3

P21

.717

.623

.110

.714

.824

.821

.7K

174.

916

5.3

183.

889

.167

.319

4.0

169.

0



Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T 1

T 2T

3T

4T 5

T6

T7

T 8T 9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

CS

R C

entr

e

Rab

iN

132.

214

2.3

79.6

127.

311

2.1

75.6

130.

9P

24.5

25.9

416

.42

15.8

927

.62

12.5

424

.05

K16

2.6

161.

815

1.9

196.

312

6.1

114.

816

3.8

Sum

mer

NN

RN

R25

.54

57.2

8N

R37

.91

NR

PN

RN

R4.

2513

.36

NR

3.91

NR

KN

RN

R33

.54

42.2

5N

R36

.81

NR

Bhu

bane

swar

KH

+R

bN

143.

718

4.8

325.

021

2.3

271.

913

1.1

298.

846

5.4

722.

729

6.4

P26

.734

.340

.448

.742

.331

.639

.061

.186

.937

.2K

90.3

110.

811

8.0

207.

420

7.0

146.

217

9.2

362.

443

5.7

129.

0

Chi

plim

aK

H+

Rb

N15

3.6

221.

732

8.9

559.

128

3.7

149.

126

1.8

411.

818

7.7

119.

1P

29.6

67.6

165.

814

9.2

60.5

47.1

152.

286

.766

.035

.4K

101.

916

6.1

194.

149

8.1

178.

514

8.5

220.

545

2.9

234.

712

5.2



Tab

le C

: S

oil

fert

ility

Sta

tus

(kg

/ha)

of

dif

fere

nt

cro

p s

equ

ence

in

Exp

. N

o 2

(a)

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T

3T

4T

5T

6T

7T

8T

9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14C

SR

Cen

tre

Ra

jen

dra

Kha

rifO

C%

0.51

0.6

0.56

0.56

0.57

0.57

0.59

0.59

0.56

na

ga

rN

21

01

86

.317

2.6

196.

318

0.5

192.

919

6.8

205.

918

9.6

P32

.030

.927

.635

.738

.430

.541

.135

.228

.9K

28

832

2.2

277.

229

6.4

208.

333

3.8

29

93

33

269.

5

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

640.

590.

660.

630.

610.

530.

680.

61N

14

61

53

14

61

51

13

21

57

13

61

36

P33

.034

.832

.438

.632

.134

.635

.435

.1K

34

43

45

29

63

59

31

73

72

36

73

66

Sab

our

Ra

bi

OC

%11

8.60

143.

3015

7.40

165.

8517

2.85

228.

4521

3.50

222.

0020

1.05

226.

1020

9.35

145.

40N

14.0

20.9

33.2

37.1

41.0

49.5

44.1

46.5

42.4

48.6

44.7

27.0

P10

8.8

116.

012

2.5

125.

813

1.6

168.

414

8.6

192.

217

2.8

170.

215

0.6

119.

8K

11.5

12.3

12.6

13.1

13.9

26.7

19.5

19.3

15.4

21.2

16.2

10.8

Ra

ipu

rR

ab

iO

C%

0.50

0.54

0.58

0.60

0.71

0.69

0.66

0.62

0.60

0.70

0.69

0.61

N17

3.0

218.

024

3.0

261.

027

7.0

275.

026

4.0

259.

025

7.0

283.

027

5.0

241.

0P

9.8

18.5

17.6

19.1

28.1

24.1

24.6

21.2

19.1

26.5

23.8

20.2

K17

6.0

248.

025

6.0

263.

029

1.0

299.

031

3.0

291.

027

7.0

311.

030

6.0

271.

0

Na

vsa

riS

um

me

rO

C%

0.52

0.60

0.60

0.59

0.59

0.71

0.65

0.71

0.65

0.70

0.63

0.62

N17

4.7

240.

023

6.0

242.

325

1.7

278.

026

4.7

273.

725

9.7

267.

326

0.0

234.

0P

18.7

19.7

19.4

19.6

19.2

29.4

24.0

25.8

19.7

23.4

20.8

21.1

K18

2.0

206.

021

0.3

210.

022

0.3

251.

322

5.0

260.

722

5.0

238.

721

1.0

237.

0

His

ar

Kha

rifO

C%

0.33

0.36

0.38

0.41

0.44

0.47

0.42

0.39

0.39

0.43

0.40

0.37

N12

7.8

145.

316

4.5

173.

319

0.8

196.

017

8.5

164.

516

9.8

180.

317

1.5

162.

8P

14.0

15.0

16.0

19.0

20.5

21.5

20.0

16.0

17.0

20.5

18.5

17.0

K23

1.5

241.

325

2.4

270.

629

9.7

306.

529

4.6

255.

725

7.9

295.

526

2.3

244.

2

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

340.

390.

400.

390.

480.

480.

490.

470.

440.

460.

440.

38N

136.

416

1.0

171.

518

5.5

206.

522

0.5

210.

019

6.0

195.

519

7.8

208.

319

0.8

P13

.515

.016

.017

.518

.519

.817

.018

.017

.018

.017

.018

.0K

205.

521

9.8

252.

725

8.4

295.

529

8.1

290.

229

1.8

294.

728

6.1

280.

428

4.0

Pa

lam

pu

rK

harif

OC

%0.

590.

580.

620.

590.

661.

240.

800.

720.

650.

730.

640.

66N

210.

723

0.8

232.

723

5.5

268.

129

2.3

231.

824

8.4

238.

325

0.9

243.

725

7.5

P15

.729

.750

.452

.656

.671

.759

.954

.950

.155

.453

.251

.5K

111.

612

0.7

120.

412

3.2

127.

513

5.0

123.

412

1.4

114.

913

0.2

122.

212

1.5

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

700.

740.

850.

820.

891.

010.

920.

930.

860.

910.

820.

74N

202.

621

9.5

235.

524

9.0

248.

729

4.5

279.

428

6.3

286.

328

2.6

272.

523

9.9

P17

.933

.658

.250

.461

.682

.959

.958

.849

.361

.657

.154

.9K

110.

811

5.8

119.

212

0.4

123.

013

6.2

122.

112

5.8

122.

313

0.9

124.

712

6.2

Con

td..

../-



Con

td..

../-

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T

3T

4T

5T

6T

7T

8T

9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14C

SR

Cen

tre

Jam

mu

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

540.

560.

640.

540.

590.

860.

670.

800.

660.

550.

560.

52N

144.

019

7.4

173.

820

8.4

200.

824

9.1

185.

120

0.5

228.

724

7.1

185.

219

4.3

P8.

212

.315

.817

.224

.536

.428

.222

.625

.423

.319

.213

.4K

90.2

105.

911

0.9

97.5

116.

512

3.5

117.

312

8.4

111.

310

8.2

105.

999

.7

Jab

alp

ur

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

600.

640.

630.

640.

660.

750.

730.

740.

730.

770.

760.

68N

23

42

47

26

02

64

26

72

82

27

72

79

27

42

87

28

42

64

P8.

79.

09.

410

.713

.515

.415

.915

.916

.517

.216

.61

5K

28

83

25

36

63

68

42

64

50

44

74

70

46

24

75

46

64

25

Ra

hu

riK

harif

OC

%0.

400.

600.

600.

620.

640.

700.

660.

640.

630.

680.

650.

58N

122.

016

8.0

178.

018

7.0

191.

019

8.0

186.

018

8.0

187.

019

8.0

193.

016

0.0

P7.

016

.017

.017

.018

.020

.018

.018

.017

.019

.018

.012

.0K

538.

064

1.0

644.

064

9.0

671.

068

0.0

668.

065

3.0

651.

067

2.0

650.

061

7.0

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

430.

600.

600.

640.

640.

680.

660.

660.

650.

680.

640.

57N

120.

016

4.0

188.

018

4.0

195.

020

0.0

188.

018

8.0

183.

019

4.0

191.

015

8.0

P7.

017

.018

.018

.020

.021

.019

.018

.019

.020

.019

.013

.0K

533.

062

1.0

643.

064

5.0

673.

068

4.0

672.

065

1.0

645.

067

3.0

651.

062

4.0

Ako

laK

harif

OC

%0.

380.

440.

450.

470.

460.

570.

510.

510.

480.

520.

520.

4N

17

42

10

22

02

13

22

82

44

22

42

41

21

62

34

21

62

01

P4.

412

.713

.314

.720

.024

.718

.420

.114

.318

.717

.412

.7K

24

22

65

28

42

78

30

43

81

36

33

42

29

73

14

29

12

68

Zn

0.44

0.51

0.57

0.58

0.61

0.75

0.66

0.71

0.68

0.68

0.64

0.49

Fe

6.50

9.96

10.1

310

.34

11.1

512

.10

10.6

411

.18

10.9

410

.70

10.3

88.

96M

n12

.34

14.7

214

.92

15.1

015

.99

20.3

517

.86

18.9

016

.80

18.1

317

.42

13.8

7C

u2.

653.

173.

213.

243.

333.

883.

523.

623.

463.

553.

373.

17

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

370.

450.

470.

470.

530.

610.

550.

580.

550.

570.

540.

44N

16

62

05

211

20

92

20

23

52

12

21

92

04

22

22

21

19

9P

4.2

13.1

13.8

14.7

17.2

22.1

19.4

16.0

17.5

16.9

16.4

10.8

K2

35

27

72

88

27

33

25

37

03

45

34

53

49

31

72

87

25

5Z

n0.

430.

480.

580.

590.

650.

820.

700.

760.

680.

720.

660.

46F

e7.

439.

8010

.08

10.1

410

.47

13.3

810

.96

12.5

112

.35

12.0

411

.45

8.79

Mn

14.3

816

.03

16.9

417

.12

17.5

520

.70

18.2

319

.51

18.0

719

.24

18.0

015

.80

Cu

2.56

3.25

3.27

3.30

3.48

3.90

3.56

3.70

3.60

3.63

3.52

3.20

Kar

jat

Kha

rifO

C%

1.10

1.33

1.35

1.35

1.36

1.41

1.38

1.45

1.39

1.37

1.36

1.30

N1

75

20

72

08

21

02

58

25

02

28

24

92

22

22

82

16

19

8P

19.0

28.9

30.0

29.0

30.6

30.4

30.0

30.4

29.5

30.2

29.2

29.3

K2

55

28

82

91

31

33

26

31

93

13

32

13

20

31

83

13

28

5



Con

td..

../-

Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T

3T

4T

5T

6T

7T

8T

9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14C

SR

Cen

tre

Ra

bi

OC

%1.

021.

251.

251.

291.

291.

371.

301.

311.

301.

311.

301.

23N

16

42

15

22

92

16

24

72

42

22

52

32

22

12

32

22

22

27

P19

.529

.829

.930

.133

.333

.031

.133

.030

.632

.730

.528

.6K

25

52

81

31

42

84

31

93

15

30

93

16

311

31

52

87

31

2

Lu

dh

ian

aR

ab

iO

C%

0.37

0.39

0.39

0.36

0.40

0.58

0.56

0.48

0.49

0.57

0.55

0.56

0.45

0.31

N1

46

163.

316

7.6

177.

218

5.0

230.

022

6.0

208.

021

5.0

242.

022

9.0

207.

020

0.0

143.

0P

11.6

16.5

18.4

20.5

30.4

43.3

36.6

25.9

27.2

31.7

29.5

34.7

33.6

11.2

K8

284

.089

.110

4.7

108.

216

0.2

153.

913

3.8

127.

114

1.6

139.

114

6.6

137.

210

1.0

Zn

1.36

1.32

1.33

1.38

1.38

1.85

1.67

1.52

1.40

1.70

1.65

1.70

1.50

1.40

Cu

0.56

0.62

0.65

0.71

0.74

0.80

0.88

0.76

0.72

0.78

0.71

0.82

0.70

0.71

Fe

15.2

18.2

16.1

18.2

20.1

28.2

23.1

20.5

19.5

27.5

28.0

22.1

21.0

22.4

Mn

6.10

6.55

6.70

7.10

8.30

8.56

8.78

8.66

8.10

9.12

8.82

8.66

7.42

7.50

Pa

ntn

ag

ar

Ra

bi

N1

97

22

32

53

25

22

75

28

92

81

27

42

65

32

53

07

22

0P

14.5

20.6

20.0

20.6

23.4

24.5

27.1

25.1

25.9

27.8

26.5

24.8

K17

0.1

173.

118

4.4

184.

418

4.1

191.

518

6.2

184.

618

1.2

186.

718

7.5

180.

2

Kan

pur

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

130.

370.

520.

510.

620.

720.

630.

530.

520.

670.

620.

42P

8.5

15.4

18.1

22.4

27.2

25.8

23.8

22.3

23.2

25.3

25.0

19.9

K91

.513

9.3

149.

315

7.6

176.

317

0.2

162.

416

6.1

164.

817

1.8

170.

213

4.0

Bic

hp

uri

Su

mm

er

OC

%0.

200.

240.

280.

280.

300.

510.

460.

430.

400.

450.

420.

22N

85.0

93.0

112.

011

5.0

176.

023

5.0

182.

018

5.0

177.

020

0.0

192.

091

.0P

6.0

9.1

11.8

11.8

13.5

18.3

13.6

15.2

13.4

18.0

17.5

6.2

K13

8.0

178.

020

7.0

192.

025

5.0

278.

024

0.0

227.

022

0.0

243.

023

1.0

158.

0F

e8.

39.

110

.210

.411

.012

.811

.011

.610

.912

.212

.29.

1M

n6.

56.

57.

28.

09.

210

.69.

59.

69.

09.

68.

76.

7C

u0.

750.

910.

960.

920.

931.

221.

000.

970.

970.

990.

930.

75Z

n1.

311.

581.

751.

711.

812.

201.

851.

841.

781.

911.

811.

30

Fai

zaba

dR

ab

iO

C%

0.24

0.36

0.39

0.41

0.44

0.52

0.48

0.46

0.45

0.50

0.47

0.38

N11

4.0

136.

015

9.0

146.

017

2.0

184.

017

8.0

167.

017

0.0

176.

018

1.0

156.

0P

6.1

14.8

18.2

17.1

25.1

27.2

24.6

23.4

19.1

26.5

25.2

17.6

K18

8.0

217.

023

4.0

229.

024

8.0

264.

025

6.0

272.

026

6.0

259.

025

2.0

225.

0

Va

ran

asi

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

330.

380.

410.

420.

480.

580.

520.

540.

500.

530.

510.

42N

147.

217

4.0

176.

818

2.7

192.

521

7.1

201.

120

8.4

193.

320

1.5

193.

418

3.0

P11

.715

.817

.117

.819

.120

.819

.319

.718

.720

.218

.417

.2K

157.

616

0.4

174.

316

6.6

186.

119

8.7

194.

020

4.4

192.

519

3.4

183.

516

7.8

Ka

rma

na

Ra

bi

OC

%1.

171.

261.

231.

261.

281.

291.

421.

381.

401.

421.

291.

35N

194.

426

9.7

288.

527

7.0

304.

230

1.1

312.

030

7.3

313.

630

5.8

319.

029

3.2

P29

.732

.632

.838

.824

.035

.826

.224

.625

.230

.130

.529

.3K

108.

611

7.6

114.

711

1.8

134.

213

1.3

129.

413

5.6

139.

213

4.2

158.

612

4.8



Nam

e o

fS

easo

nN

ut./

Trea

t.T

1T

2T

3T

4T

5T

6T

7T

8T

9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14C

SR

Cen

tre

Ka

tha

lge

reS

um

me

rO

C%

0.58

0.61

0.63

0.66

0.70

0.70

0.69

0.70

0.70

0.67

0.70

0.67

P12

.519

.521

.617

.323

.318

.721

.522

.323

.422

.218

.819

.7K

145.

821

1.0

192.

416

0.4

172.

020

8.5

193.

019

3.4

215.

018

5.5

168.

216

8.5

Bh

ub

an

esw

ar

Ra

bi

OC

%0.

550.

610.

640.

610.

660.

920.

740.

850.

830.

750.

840.

64N

190.

521

6.5

24

122

6.5

25

432

3.5

285.

83

02

29

435

3.8

31

223

7.3

P7.

49.

214

.814

.214

.120

.017

.020

.216

.922

.017

.211

.3K

72.1

92.2

95.7

96.5

100.

815

5.8

143.

518

3.4

161.

116

8.4

151.

195

.7

Ch

iplim

aR

ab

iO

C%

0.62

0.72

0.66

0.68

0.70

0.86

0.73

0.81

0.77

0.89

0.76

0.65

N24

0.7

268.

326

4.3

256.

726

9.3

302.

028

1.0

296.

028

6.7

335.

328

5.0

248.

3P

7.1

8.0

9.0

8.6

9.2

13.7

12.4

13.5

12.5

14.3

12.3

8.3

K79

.895

.997

.398

.110

1.5

147.

313

6.8

163.

914

9.7

154.

014

4.3

92.9



Tab

le D

: N

utr

ien

t u

pta

ke (

kg/h

a) o

f d

iffe

ren

t cr

op

seq

uen

ce i

n E

xp.

No

2 (

a)

Sea

son

Nu

t/tr

eat

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

Kha

rif R

ice

N38

.164

.264

.373

.080

.772

.967

.364

.262

.278

.485

.273

.5P

9.3

15.6

14.6

17.1

18.7

17.8

18.3

16.7

17.3

17.3

17.0

14.3

K44

.376

.972

.276

.679

.485

.781

.978

.272

.786

.592

.069

.7

Rab

i R

ice

N30

.154

.757

.488

.691

.681

.772

.674

.064

.885

.082

.378

.5P

7.1

10.9

12.7

16.7

16.7

18.7

18.9

19.7

20.0

17.4

17.5

16.2

K

Ric

eN

17

.549

.050

.163

.486

.297

.389

.893

.588

.595

.989

.659

.3P

5.2

14.4

15.0

18.7

25.6

28.9

26.6

27.8

26.2

28.6

26.6

17.5

K21

.959

.261

.075

.199

.911

3.4

104.

810

8.7

104.

311

2.1

104.

771

.6

Whe

atN

18.1

46.0

93.1

75.4

97.0

107.

898

.910

3.0

97.1

106.

598

.767

.3P

5.0

12.1

24.4

19.7

26.0

29.1

26.5

27.7

25.9

28.6

26.3

17.8

K20

.851

.799

.581

.810

3.6

114.

510

5.4

110.

410

3.6

113.

210

5.2

75.0

Pea

rlmill

et w

ith K

N27

.844

.045

.459

.166

.387

.378

.878

.470

.873

.672

.755

.9P

6.8

10.9

10.9

12.9

17.9

22.5

19.2

19.7

17.2

19.2

17.3

15.4

K31

.949

.050

.654

.664

.276

.669

.270

.161

.263

.958

.554

.7

Whe

atN

28.5

60.9

70.2

67.7

80.9

101.

693

.287

.481

.189

.885

.371

.3P

5.2

11.9

14.8

14.3

19.3

25.8

22.6

21.8

16.6

20.6

18.8

13.6

K39

.272

.287

.690

.010

9.9

135.

611

4.0

112.

411

5.6

121.

311

8.4

82.4

Pe

arl

mill

et

N19

.833

.732

.439

.145

.659

.453

.252

.249

.651

.045

.341

.3w

ithou

t K

P3.

55.

65.

47.

08.

312

.110

.610

.89.

810

.78.

96.

8K

25.1

39.5

38.4

42.5

49.9

62.7

55.9

56.3

53.7

53.3

48.7

44.8

Whe

atN

23.6

51.6

64.1

63.6

79.7

106.

494

.792

.388

.194

.879

.062

.7P

3.3

6.9

9.3

8.7

10.7

15.8

12.4

12.4

12.1

13.2

10.8

7.7

K26

.750

.463

.360

.972

.689

.580

.481

.979

.179

.774

.957

.3

Ric

eN

30

.642

.345

.650

.556

.065

.758

.258

.564

.158

.659

.845

.9P

4.2

7.7

8.9

8.0

10.2

12.1

11.7

9.2

9.6

10.8

11.0

8.7

K32

.760

.156

.860

.469

.374

.576

.672

.868

.082

.379

.466

.6

Whe

atN

35.5

53.1

61.8

61.3

68.9

71.6

70.0

61.2

59.9

69.8

61.2

57.9

P4.

68.

28.

710

.510

.312

.511

.59.

89.

79.

69.

07.

3K

25.5

42.6

51.5

45.0

43.6

54.0

53.1

46.9

46.0

47.9

43.5

40.0

Pe

arl

mill

et

N25

.243

.454

.269

.781

.892

.872

.862

.066

.373

.375

.863

.6P

4.4

10.2

11.7

15.1

19.6

21.9

16.5

15.4

16.7

18.1

18.1

14.1

K44

.710

6.0

116.

614

1.3

171.

217

2.6

158.

815

1.4

158.

417

0.0

175.

114

5.9

Whe

atN

23.1

77.0

114.

510

2.0

131.

914

2.8

109.

312

5.1

107.

313

0.9

108.

812

1.6

P3.

814

.320

.419

.124

.025

.619

.422

.319

.524

.020

.420

.4K

26.5

81.2

121.

611

0.9

133.

015

0.3

118.

712

5.1

114.

114

3.0

122.

112

6.1

Con

td..

../-



Con

td..

../-

Sea

son

Nu

t/tr

eat

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8

T9

T10

T11

T12

T13

T14

Ric

eN

10

.445

.952

.652

.975

.777

.770

.263

.763

.572

.967

.937

.8P

1.1

7.4

9.5

10.1

18.3

19.5

15.3

14.5

13.9

17.3

15.5

6.6

K11

.648

.654

.053

.277

.780

.274

.365

.166

.275

.569

.939

.6

Whe

atN

10.7

65.9

82.4

78.4

111.

411

7.4

106.

910

3.6

100.

711

0.5

106.

461

.3P

1.0

9.7

12.6

12.0

19.9

21.2

17.6

16.5

15.6

19.2

17.3

7.6

K11

.648

.654

.053

.277

.980

.474

.365

.166

.275

.569

.939

.6

Ric

eN

21

.158

.563

.475

.090

.310

9.1

103.

084

.189

.510

4.3

101.

9P

3.8

10.9

11.6

13.8

17.3

22.5

20.6

16.0

17.4

21.6

20.5

K30

.278

.683

.490

.510

3.9

121.

411

4.8

104.

310

8.4

116.

911

0.5

Whe

atN

9.3

38.1

74.2

58.4

80.9

94.9

84.4

85.2

79.8

95.3

88.4

P1.

87.

414

.711

.215

.919

.916

.717

.514

.919

.418

.1K

11.4

42.7

77.4

60.6

80.8

95.0

85.1

86.9

82.9

93.9

90.1

Ric

eN

35

.159

.963

.467

.374

.881

.578

.769

.575

.179

.378

.464

.6P

4.5

8.7

9.1

9.7

10.8

12.2

12.0

10.6

11.4

11.9

11.8

9.5

K44

.168

.171

.176

.383

.891

.392

.080

.581

.791

.288

.972

.4

Whe

atN

22.8

54.3

70.3

68.9

78.4

86.5

81.2

79.7

74.3

82.7

75.0

64.8

P4.

411

.115

.013

.716

.018

.116

.516

.814

.817

.315

.313

.0K

27.0

65.5

88.0

80.5

91.8

100.

494

.796

.285

.696

.087

.873

.3

Ric

eN

44

.649

.557

.255

.564

.772

.763

.649

.653

.551

.851

.669

.5P

19.5

19.0

21.7

21.3

24.5

27.2

23.5

21.5

21.3

21.9

20.1

25.6

K50

.645

.459

.752

.365

.268

.368

.664

.466

.656

.255

.161

.7

Whe

atN

25.8

48.4

73.1

60.3

75.9

82.4

69.5

68.5

62.5

68.9

59.0

55.5

P4.

47.

110

.19.

211

.612

.810

.510

.19.

911

.19.

08.

9K

11.9

18.4

26.7

22.3

26.1

38.4

25.7

24.2

22.8

24.9

23.2

20.5

Kha

rif R

ice

N14

0.4

76.1

188.

017

9.3

175.

316

2.1

168.

017

0.0

96.3

206.

118

4.3

79.0

P26

.115

.944

.734

.234

.632

.423

.625

.431

.238

.721

.218

.8K

136.

882

.316

1.0

166.

918

6.3

159.

915

6.8

167.

285

.616

4.4

146.

857

.7

Sum

mer

Mai

zeN

66.5

96.8

149.

311

9.0

152.

215

9.9

172.

320

0.0

163.

917

4.3

153.

485

.8P

21.4

29.0

36.7

30.0

37.2

43.2

34.0

49.9

54.3

54.0

39.1

20.6

K46

.263

.310

3.7

90.7

100.

011

1.8

121.

013

1.0

137.

811

0.0

98.9

58.7

Ric

eN

37

.263

.873

.591

.513

3.1

152.

515

1.6

113.

311

6.4

158.

515

7.7

153.

213

4.7

136.

5P

23.6

12.3

18.4

18.1

23.8

32.8

30.3

23.3

22.2

34.1

29.7

31.0

26.3

28.5

K40

.248

.566

.872

.411

1.0

124.

412

5.6

92.1

104.

011

8.4

141.

612

0.1

120.

212

5.9

Whe

atN

37.0

85.6

107.

510

4.3

122.

713

2.4

139.

212

0.4

111.

812

6.1

126.

713

6.2

146.

913

3.4

P42

.621

.127

.721

.021

.831

.831

.229

.024

.730

.828

.832

.726

.521

.7K

43.4

81.3

100.

210

0.1

110.

610

5.1

123.

110

6.8

114.

111

0.2

105.

113

5.1

116.

811

1.4



Sea

son

Nu

t/tr

eat

T 1T 2

T 3T 4

T 5T 6

T 7T 8

T 9T

10T

11T

12T

13T

14

So

rgh

um

N2.

355

.462

.872

.283

.195

.584

.375

.879

.688

.087

.538

.2P

0.4

9.2

11.5

12.8

16.9

17.6

15.4

12.3

14.2

14.3

14.0

5.6

K2.

559

.868

.175

.389

.298

.692

.778

.182

.584

.387

.134

.6

Whe

atN

6.7

60.8

70.1

63.0

79.6

86.8

76.4

66.0

72.2

74.7

73.0

42.3

P1.

514

.015

.313

.718

.319

.517

.214

.715

.815

.516

.49.

6K

5.7

46.7

54.2

49.6

63.5

68.6

58.5

48.4

55.1

56.4

55.7

32.9

So

rgh

um

N5.

854

.256

.761

.780

.478

.367

.563

.365

.371

.669

.447

.4P

2.6

15.6

16.5

17.7

23.0

23.2

20.3

19.3

18.8

21.1

20.5

12.7

K11

.249

.947

.362

.992

.391

.777

.271

.668

.183

.180

.872

.7

Whe

atN

8.7

42.2

59.5

58.6

76.9

90.3

68.5

75.2

66.3

76.7

68.6

32.7

P1.

49.

09.

58.

910

.811

.410

.110

.39.

310

.810

.26.

5K

11.4

33.2

38.9

44.7

56.7

61.7

51.4

54.7

50.5

55.5

49.5

27.6

Ric

eN

36

.647

.247

.246

.350

.756

.761

.756

.559

.154

.953

.551

.0P

33.9

42.2

44.9

44.5

40.6

51.6

52.6

57.1

49.6

49.7

54.3

40.2

K52

.666

.281

.161

.871

.575

.780

.980

.578

.585

.390

.265

.2

Ric

eN

31

.840

.553

.359

.353

.261

.482

.264

.456

.372

.784

.057

.4P

12.4

17.7

19.4

20.7

20.5

24.4

25.0

21.9

21.0

21.1

25.6

23.2

K33

.556

.456

.865

.161

.868

.077

.173

.165

.775

.975

.662

.1

Ric

eN

34

.042

.543

.047

.356

.961

.358

.657

.855

.461

.757

.544

.8P

10.4

12.9

13.5

14.8

18.3

19.9

18.6

18.5

17.5

20.2

18.8

14.2

K42

.452

.352

.957

.369

.974

.671

.373

.069

.676

.072

.157

.6

Ric

eN

34

.346

.559

.654

.963

.265

.060

.962

.160

.166

.663

.442

.8P

10.4

14.7

18.2

16.7

20.2

21.2

19.4

19.7

18.3

22.2

20.4

13.4

K38

.352

.765

.158

.068

.271

.866

.466

.763

.473

.267

.647

.2

Ric

eN

36

.253

.956

.461

.970

.174

.172

.271

.270

.378

.871

.655

.8P

11.4

16.3

17.6

18.9

21.5

23.4

22.0

21.7

21.3

25.0

22.4

17.3

K48

.666

.870

.875

.382

.387

.584

.884

.884

.194

.286

.370

.4

Ric

eN

38

.663

.371

.868

.375

.779

.575

.076

.373

.084

.772

.059

.0P

12.1

19.7

22.1

21.8

24.6

26.7

24.7

25.3

23.6

28.7

23.8

18.1

K45

.571

.079

.277

.085

.489

.683

.087

.284

.094

.779

.764

.6



Table E : Soil fertility Status (kg/ha) in Organic farming

Name of Season Nut./Treat. T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8CSR centre

Rajendra Kharif OC% 0.62 0.75 0.77 0.74 0.67 0.78 0.47 0.69nagar N 137.4 151.4 108.6 154.3 156.2 178.9 147.4 150.6

P 57.4 48.6 40.2 55.2 40.3 58.6 34.6 45.6K 377.0 374.0 272.0 246.0 383.0 404.0 390.0 380.0

Rabi OC% 0.62 0.68 0.65 0.64 0.65 0.65 0.44 0.68N 150.5 172.5 165.6 161.8 151.8 168.7 144.3 168.1P 59.9 57.2 31.4 62.5 55.8 59.1 43.2 58.9K 345.0 330.4 392.6 304.6 253.1 433.4 319.8 404.3

Sabour Summer OC% 0.69 0.76 0.78 0.75 0.70 0.76 0.61N 205.0 208.9 199.8 210.1 206.4 218.8 178.2P 44.9 47.2 45.8 48.6 47.4 51.2 41.6K 167.5 173.9 166.1 173.7 169.1 174.3 132.9

Raipur Rabi OC% 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.55 0.54N 258.0 245.0 267.0 251.0 247.0 264.0 281.0P 19.8 17.5 22.5 18.6 20.7 20.8 24.8K 279.0 273.0 278.0 272.0 265.0 272.0 309.0

Navsari Rabi OC% 0.67 0.68 0.67 0.70 0.63 0.60 0.63N 265.0 255.0 257.0 241.0 257.0 248.0 237.0P 28.1 27.5 28.4 26.8 32.5 24.7 26.3K 282.0 284.0 275.0 258.0 288.0 267.0 259.0

Hisar Kharif OC% 0.52 0.47 0.45 0.51 0.50 0.50 0.53N 152.6 127.4 135.8 145.6 145.6 142.8 156.8P 21.8 16.0 15.6 21.2 20.4 19.0 22.2K 248.5 244.6 231.4 237.2 238.8 236.0 253.3

Rabi OC% 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.46 0.46 0.47 0.49N 163.8 158.2 159.6 158.2 156.8 159.6 165.2P 14.4 13.6 15.2 15.2 16.4 16.4 16.4K 216.7 212.0 214.7 215.7 207.4 221.0 224.0

Palampur Kharif OC% 2.80 2.60 2.70 2.70 2.90 2.30 1.00 2.50N 342.5 318.6 363.8 360.0 381.3 324.9 260.9 316.1P 322.6 192.6 246.4 215.0 349.4 192.6 94.1 264.3K 704.7 552.6 715.0 614.2 702.0 674.9 282.6 558.4

Rabi OC% 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.2 0.9 2.4N 347.5 308.6 377.6 365.0 390.1 312.3 269.7 324.9P 291.2 215.0 255.4 215.0 304.6 219.5 107.5 197.1K 672.9 594.9 718.8 627.2 687.2 627.4 280.7 641.8

Summer OC% 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.7 2.1 0.8 2.1N 312.3 289.8 347.5 317.8 373.8 350.0 274.7 289.8P 255.4 197.1 237.4 215.0 268.8 237.4 107.5 197.1K 682.3 602.1 781.5 666.4 635.5 711.2 306.9 622.5

Contd..../-



Contd..../-


T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8CSR centre

Jammu Summer OC% 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.8N 257.7 194.9 314.3 201.2 314.3 220.0 276.6 238.6P 12.9 13.8 14.7 14.1 16.2 15.5 15.0 14.9K 116.2 122.0 118.0 120.0 110.0 117.0 116.0 113.0

Kathalagere Summer OC% 0.67 0.70 0.67 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.60P 22.7 17.7 21.0 26.4 28.4 26.4 20.8K 230.9 236.4 240.3 233.4 248.1 247.7 237.7

Siruguppa Kharif OC% 0.82 0.93 0.90 0.91 0.80 0.84 0.67N 218 224 224 235 242 212 196P 18.0 22.0 21.0 28.0 20.0 28.0 17.0K 374 354 359 375 365 369 355S 24 29 34 24 20 29 24

Karmana Summer OC% 1.43 1.55 1.18 1.54 1.03 1.60 1.19N 219 253 240 224 222 236 230P 18.9 15.0 21.1 15.3 20.5 21.5 18.9K 123.9 130.0 120.2 133.9 141.9 101.0 103.2

Jabalpur Rabi OC% 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.69 0.68 0.66N 228 225 215 218 215 215 220P 9.3 8.9 8.7 8.7 9.6 8.9 9.6K 342 330 323 323 331 328 362

Rewa Rabi OC% 0.60 0.63 0.61 0.61 0.64 0.61 0.58N 227 230 230 227 237 235 242P 8.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 9.2 8.6 8.6K 293 289 290 290 296 295 311

Powarkheda Rabi OC% 0.70 0.71 0.71 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.66N 268 256 256 256 260 258 263P 10.3 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.8 9.8 10.6K 296 286 286 286 288 288 297

Rahuri Kharif OC% 0.67 0.70 0.71 0.70 0.68 0.72 0.66N 197 196 197 195 181 198 192 158P 18.0 17.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 19.0 16.0 8.0K 563 561 561 558 551 563 564 433

Rabi OC% 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.67 0.71 0.66 0.49N 198 200 200 198 187 200 192 158P 18.0 17.0 18.0 17.0 18.0 20.0 18.0 8.0K 565 559 561 559 553 565 566 431

Akola Kharif OC% 0.46 0.45 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.37 0.36N 190 172 186 176 168 181 195 148P 16.2 15.1 15.4 15.2 16.1 15.8 16.2 10.2K 325 298 318 309 291 301 334 244

Rabi OC% 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.45 0.46 0.45 0.37 0.36N 194 174 193 178 171 184 199 141P 16.2 15.1 15.4 15.3 16.0 15.8 16.3 10.1K 319 293 315 305 288 297 327 240




T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8CSR centre

Summer OC% 0.47 0.45 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.37 0.36N 195 178 195 180 174 183 204 137P 16.3 15.2 15.5 15.3 16.2 15.8 16.3 10.2K 322 295 317 302 283 294 338 242

Ludhiana Summer OC% 0.52 0.56 0.54 0.56 0.54 0.52 0.46 0.58N 213 229 233 243 230 240 219 247P 24.8 26.4 28.2 31.2 25.8 31.6 28.2 32.4K 146 160 165 169 170 158 153 165Zn 1.46 1.52 1.42 1.42 1.48 1.36 1.40 1.41Cu 0.78 0.88 0.96 0.82 0.84 0.88 0.70 0.72Fe 20.10 22.80 24.80 22.20 19.60 25.60 18.20 28.60Mn 7.60 8.50 8.60 9.10 8.20 9.40 6.80 9.80

Faizabad Summer OC% 0.59 0.65 0.64 0.69 0.57 0.66 0.49N 204 189 186 183 153 191 198P 22.5 23.4 23.9 25.2 20.7 24.7 27.1K 269 273 276 270 242 274 263

Coimbatore Summer OC% 0.61 0.64 0.63 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.57 0.6N 280 273 272 257 245 265 268 263P 21.9 23.0 21.6 22.2 20.7 23.6 20.6 22.6K 459 470 423 429 408 413 427 436

Kanpur Summer OC% 0.55 0.64 0.62 0.58 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.62P 17.8 17.2 17.1 16.9 17.3 17.4 18.2 17.0K 137 133 131 132 133 133 137 130

Bichpuri Summer OC% 0.41 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.40 0.43 0.35N 155 150 150 151 126 153 157P 12.5 12.0 11.9 11.9 11.5 12.5 12.5K 299 291 291 285 278 287 300

Bhuban- Summer OC% 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.93 0.86 1.04 0.59 0.80ewswar N 302.4 241.6 366.4 334.6 320.2 352.6 224.4 290.6

P 21.0 21.9 20.6 20.2 20.8 22.3 14.1 18.8K 171.4 196.8 190.2 188.6 180.8 206.2 136.6 181.6

Chiplima Summer OC% 0.88 0.98 1.07 1.01 0.96 1.04 0.66 0.88N 329.6 364.4 372.6 366.6 336.6 363.4 272.2 327.4P 12.3 13.2 12.8 13.4 12.4 13.8 8.3 10.6K 141.6 153.4 157.4 152.2 144.8 151.8 110.8 149.6



Table F : Nutrient uptake (kg/ha) in Organic Farming

Name of Season Nut./ T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8CSR centre Treat.

Rajendra Kharif N 91.2 90.7 73.1 81.8 72.9 77.0 96.5 79.9nagar P 31.3 33.4 27.1 35.0 25.1 27.3 35.3 31.7

K 67.7 53.3 41.7 60.7 51.5 54.6 55.2 50.4

Rabi N 30.3 24.4 17.3 43.2 27.7 21.0 27.7 33.2P 6.1 6.8 4.3 5.3 5.2 3.9 4.4 7.2K 33.9 32.4 19.3 31.7 24.4 26.5 32.6 38.4

Junagadh Kharif N 94.8 78.1 84.3 85.5 102.9 85.9 82.4P 9.5 6.8 7.1 7.4 9.0 9.5 9.3K 34.3 28.6 29.7 29.7 34.4 29.9 29.7

Rabi N 147.1 124.1 138.4 132.8 141.1 141.4 139.4P 23.7 16.8 17.9 16.9 20.7 21.8 17.9K 73.7 64.7 60.4 57.1 65.5 65.2 66.6

Navsari Kharif N 47.2 40.6 40.2 38.9 31.7 40.9 39.9P 16.0 14.2 12.5 11.8 9.8 14.2 10.7K 83.6 73.7 79.0 70.7 59.3 69.8 74.1

Summer N 100.7 86.5 84.6 90.8 69.4 96.3 88.9

P 12.3 10.2 11.5 10.1 8.7 9.6 9.5

K 23.1 20.0 20.1 21.4 15.3 21.9 21.6

Hisar Kharif N 100.4 77.7 69.5 81.7 43.5 64.1 116.0P 18.0 13.9 12.3 14.8 8.4 11.6 21.2K 56.4 43.7 49.2 46.5 24.9 35.5 65.4

Rabi N 70.5 60.8 61.3 61.2 38.9 62.3 86.5P 13.7 11.8 13.6 12.4 9.4 12.2 17.6K 130.0 119.7 121.0 120.7 84.8 120.9 161.4

Sabour Kharif N 82.4 84.3 81.0 84.4 74.7 85.0 82.7P 24.8 25.0 23.9 25.0 21.9 25.0 24.9K 95.3 96.7 92.2 96.8 85.0 96.7 96.6

Rabi N 99.2 98.5 114.9 98.7 80.0 100.6 97.0P 38.8 38.7 43.4 38.8 31.0 39.6 38.2K 131.5 131.4 139.2 131.4 106.9 133.8 129.2

Summer N 41.0 41.7 91.9 41.4 31.8 43.4 45.4P 16.0 16.1 33.2 15.9 11.9 16.9 15.8K 58.0 59.0 103.9 58.8 45.1 61.6 56.8

Palampur Kharif N 29.6 23.5 41.9 31.8 31.2 29.6 28.8 25.1P 15.3 18.4 24.7 23.2 18.5 20.1 19.6 23.1K 44.4 48.4 44.7 39.9 51.2 42.3 42.7 50.6

Rabi N 68.7 37.4 41.0 56.6 47.7 57.8 55.0 52.5P 6.7 3.7 3.8 5.3 4.4 5.6 4.4 4.9K 59.9 28.2 33.4 46.4 35.2 55.1 40.6 48.3

Contd..../-



Contd..../-


T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8CSR centre Treat.

Summer N 33.0 16.1 27.9 24.4 37.6 21.8 6.8 23.2P 6.7 4.5 7.6 6.6 14.3 6.0 1.8 6.7K 40.3 26.3 37.8 39.0 55.7 25.5 7.0 32.4

Ludhiana Kharif N 179.0 179.1 173.3 170.3 165.8 176.9 176.4 175.3P 39.5 37.5 42.6 41.6 43.7 50.8 45.5 36.0K 175.1 170.7 165.2 165.9 156.9 177.5 181.1 147.0

Rabi N 87.5 86.5 82.6 88.3 65.6 91.2 75.5 80.9P 7.16 7.5 6.5 6.75 6.87 7.03 6.17 6.06K 87.5 91.6 93.3 89.1 64.8 87.9 77.1 89.3

Summer N 96.7 101.3 99.5 109.9 85.2 96.1 91.3 98.0P 27.5 25.9 30.2 27.5 25.7 39.4 24.7 27.0K 106.0 106.5 112.9 123.1 99.5 123.4 105.5 76.9

Karmana Kharif N 152.2 91.4 120.2 138.3 100.9 124.3 70.0P 87.2 75.2 52.8 42.1 47.2 57.4 27.8K 116.6 20.4 102.6 106.4 85.4 97.9 81.2

Rabi N 7.9 7.3 7.9 7.7 6.9 8.7 6.6P 4.3 4.0 3.1 4.6 3.2 3.9 2.4K 11.4 8.8 9.7 9.3 8.7 9.7 7.8

Summer N 4.8 4.5 4.8 3.9 4.7 7.1 3.6P 3.9 8.3 3.5 2.9 2.1 4.2 1.4K 10.2 8.3 8.4 8.1 5.1 8.0 4.0

Rahuri Kharif N 170.6 190.2 200.2 192.5 129.0 211.3 190.8 83.8P 26.2 29.6 30.9 31.3 20.7 33.7 30.6 13.4K 63.7 71.3 75.8 74.6 48.5 82.3 73.0 30.6

Rabi N 66.6 73.5 75.3 73.4 57.1 89.7 80.5 34.8P 23.7 26.0 27.0 28.1 20.9 30.0 30.2 12.1K 85.2 89.0 88.2 95.2 70.5 99.2 99.1 49.6

Akola Kharif N 172.2 150.3 166.2 154.8 148.5 162.3 180.1 105.3P 27.2 20.2 24.2 23.2 25.2 22.1 27.2 9.3K 14.1 11.1 13.2 12.6 10.8 11.2 15.3 8.1

Rabi N 77.8 65.2 73.1 68.1 62.8 70.7 80.2 36.8P 15.2 13.0 14.0 14.0 14.3 13.1 16.2 5.9K 38.8 34.9 36.1 36.0 34.1 35.5 40.6 20.1

Summer N 46.7 38.1 43.1 38.2 37.6 41.4 48.2 30.2P 11.2 10.6 11.0 10.8 11.0 10.7 11.7 8.2K 44.2 40.7 42.9 42.8 39.9 41.2 45.8 32.2

Kathalagere Kharif N 144.03 123.0 171.5 161.2 162.0 205.7 222.7 144.0P 19.6 21.1 27.7 16.8 24.0 26.1 29.2 19.6K 65.2 76.0 91.7 76.6 105.5 105.6 75.7 65.2

Coimbatore Kharif N 152.0 144.0 143.0 139.0 103.0 148.0 160.0 156.0P 56.0 52.0 48.0 46.0 44.0 54.0 61.0 59.0K 158.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 120.0 151.0 161.0 153.0




T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8CSR centre Treat.

Rabi N 61.0 53.0 52.0 52.0 43.0 58.0 68.0 64.0P 29.0 26.0 22.5 20.5 19.5 27.0 31.0 26.0K 64.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 40.0 61.0 72.0 61.0

Summer N 166.0 160.0 155.0 155.0 126.0 162.0 169.0 165.0P 54.0 52.0 49.0 49.0 39.0 53.0 55.0 56.0K 155.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 116.0 151.0 161.0 160.0

Jabalpur Rabi N 162.0 135.0 130.0 132.0 141.0 131.0 182.0P 25.8 18.9 18.0 20.0 21.1 22.0 27.0K 198.0 181.0 183.0 180.0 187.0 197.0 232.0

Rewa Rabi N 170.0 120.0 142.0 134.0 127.0 125.0 178.0P 24.8 19.5 21.8 20.6 19.5 20.4 27.2K 200.0 150.0 179.0 173.0 148.0 150.0 211.0

Powarkheda Rabi N 174.0 110.0 136.0 147.0 120.0 115.0 202.0P 18.5 12.3 14.6 13.9 13.6 12.5 18.8K 176.0 125.0 161.0 160.0 127.0 118.0 212.0

Siruguppa Kharif N 90.0 62.0 59.0 79.0 79.0 95.0 82.0P 21.0 19.0 17.0 21.0 19.0 25.0 27.0K 108.0 81.0 84.0 106.0 95.0 123.0 109.0

Rabi N 31.0 28.0 29.0 28.0 31.0 32.0 28.0P 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 3.0K 23.0 17.0 20.0 24.0 23.0 27.0 24.0

Bhuban- Kharif N 56.0 53.8 56.9 56.3 51.0 58.4 45.8 45.08eswar P 15.9 16.0 17.2 16.4 14.7 17.5 13.1 13.08

K 65.1 63.7 65.4 64.1 59.2 66.9 53.6 52.27

Rabi N 169.14 169.62 165.14 168.38 148.3 179.4 167 172.26P 14.3 14.8 18.0 15.0 12.7 16.5 14.4 15.08K 171.1 171.6 167.0 170.0 149.4 180.7 168.9 173.9

Summer N 128.3 131.4 133.2 132.9 118.5 150.7 121.7 124.9P 27.3 28.7 30.0 29.5 25.8 34.4 26.5 27.2K 173.7 177.6 178.9 179.3 161.1 202.2 164.8 169.4

Chiplima Kharif N 66.1 65.9 70.7 70.7 59.6 74.1 58.0 58.0P 20.1 20.5 22.1 21.8 17.7 23.0 17.4 17.0K 82.0 80.8 84.5 84.5 71.3 87.5 69.4 68.8

Rabi N 60.1 59.2 59.4 60.7 55.1 64.0 56.6 56.4P 6.04 6.31 6.84 6.55 5.81 7.37 5.71 5.74K 92.6 91.4 91.2 93.6 85.4 99.2 87.7 87.3

Summer N 121.3 119.6 120.8 123.4 118.8 131.9 119.4 127.0P 25.7 25.7 26.8 27.5 26.1 29.7 26.0 27.5K 163.7 160.9 161.9 166.1 160.9 177.0 161.2 170.6

ANNEXURES



Annexure I

CURRENT ADDRESSES OF CONTACT PERSONS

ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram

1. Dr A.S. Panwar, Director, ICAR-Indian Instituteof Farming Systems Research, Modipuram,Meerut-250 110, U.P.Tel: (Off.) 0121-288 8611; (Mob.) 09412078001;(Fax) 0121-288 8546Email: [email protected]

2. Dr N. Ravisankar, Pr. Scientist, PI (OFR) &In-charge PF(CU), ICAR-Indian Institute ofFarming Systems Research, Modipuram,Meerut-250 110, U.P.Tel: (Mob.) 08755195404, (Fax) 0121-288 8546Email: [email protected],[email protected], [email protected]

3. Dr J.P. Singh, Pr Scientist & ProgrammeFacilitator (IFS), ICAR-Indian Institute ofFarming Systems Research, Modipuram,Meerut-250 110, U.P.Tel: (Mob.) 09410034958, (Fax) 0121-288 8546Email: [email protected]

4. Dr M.P.S. Arya, Programme Facilitator (OAS),ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming SystemsResearch, Modipuram, Meerut-250 110, U.P.Tel: (Mob.) 09536849605; (Fax) 0121-288 8546Email: [email protected]

5. Dr Prem Singh, Programme Facilitator(CSRM), ICAR-Indian Institute of FarmingSystems Research, Modipuram, Meerut-250110, U.P.Tel: (Mob.) 09412628440; (Fax) 0121-288 8546Email: [email protected]

6. Dr Harbir Singh, Pr Scientist & PI (FSC),ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems

Research, Modipuram, Meerut-250 110, U.P.Tel: (Mob.) 09458403937,E mail: [email protected]

ICAR-IASRI, New Delhi

1. Dr Anil Kumar, Principal Scientist, Division ofDesign of Experiments, IASRI, Library Avenue,Pusa, New Delhi-110 012Tel: (Off.) 011-25847121 (Ext-4154); (Mob.)09868891600, (Fax) 011-25841564Email: [email protected],[email protected]

2. Dr (Mrs) Cini Varghese, Principal Scientist,Division of Design of Experiments, IASRI,Library Avenue, Pusa, New Delhi - 110012Tel: (Off.) 011-25847121 (Ext-4154)

Chief Agronomists at Main Centres

1. Dr M. Goverdhan, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Professor Jayashankar Telangana State,Agricultural University, Diamond Jubilee Block,College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar,Hyderabad-500 030 (A.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 040-24017463,(Mob 94404 67091, 99896 33306,(Fax) 040-24017463Email:[email protected]

2. Dr Ajit Baishya, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, AssamAgricultural University, Jorhat-785 013 (Assam)Tel.: (Off.) 0376-2311379, (Mob.) 09954451094,(Fax) 0376-2310831Email:[email protected]



3. Dr S.K. Pathak, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Bihar Agricultural, University, Sabour, Dist.Bhagalpur-813 210 (Bihar)Tel.: (Off.) 0641-2451263,(Mob.) 09431310417, (Fax) 0641-2451400Email: [email protected]

4. Dr G.P. Pali, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, KrishakNagar, Raipur-492 006 (Chhattisgarh)Tel: (Off.) 0771-2442177, (Mob.) 09425524749,(Fax) 0771-2442131Email:[email protected]

5. Dr A.M. Patel, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Sardar Krushinagar-Dantiwada AgriculturalUniversity, Sardar Krushinagar, Dist.Banaskantha –385 506 (Gujarat)Tel.: (Off.) 02748-278434,(Mob.) 09902287387, (Fax) 02748-278433Email:[email protected],[email protected]

6. Dr R.K. Nanwal, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, CCS HaryanaAgricultural University, Hisar-125 004 (Haryana)Tel.: (Off.) 01662-289151, (Mob.)099416435510, (Fax) 01662-289268Email: [email protected]

7. Dr S.C. Negi, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Department of Agronomy, CSK HimachalPradesh Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Palampur,Dist. Kangra-176 062 (H.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 01894-230392, (Mob.)09418253340, (Fax) 01894-230392Email: [email protected],[email protected]

8. Dr Dileep Kachroo, I/C Chief Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Sher-E-Kashmir University ofAgricultural Sciences & Technology, Chatha,Jammu-180 012 (J&K)

Tel.: (Off.) 0191-2262026,(Mob.) 09419332934, (Fax) 0191-2262026Email:[email protected],[email protected]

9. Dr M.S. Yadava, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, BirsaAgricultural University, Kanke, Ranchi-834 006(Jharkhand)Tel.: (Off.) 0651-2450608, (Mob.)09934313050, (Fax) 0651-2450850, 2450073Email: [email protected]

10. Dr Obanaik Kumar, Chief Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Agricultural Research Station,Kathalagere, (UAHS , Navile, Shimoga), Dist.Davanagere-577 219 (Karnataka)Tel.: (Off.) 08180-273555, (Mob.) 09740018935(Fax) 08180-273827Email: [email protected]

11. Dr M.A. Basavanneppa, Chief Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), UAS-R Agricultural ResearchStation, Siruguppa, Dist. Bellary-583 121(Karnataka)Tel.:(Off.) 08396-220249, (Mob.) 09480696333,(Fax) 08396-220249Email: [email protected],[email protected]

12. Dr Jacob John, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), CSRC, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram-695 002 (Kerala)Tel.: (Off.) 0471-2343586, (Mob.)(Fax) 0471-2343586Email:[email protected]

13. Dr V.K. Shukla, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, JNKVV,Adhartal, Jabalpur-482 004 (M.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 0761-2681771, (Mob.) 09424306503Email: [email protected]



14. Dr L.S. Chavan, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), DBSKKV Agricultural Research Station,Karjat, Dist. Raigad -410 201 (Maharashtra)Tel.: (Off.) 02148-222072, (Mob.)09850971545, (Fax) 02148-222035Email: [email protected]

15. Dr W.N. Narkhede, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Vasantrao Naik Marathwada KrishiVidyapeeth, Parbhani-431 402 (Maharashtra)Tel.: (Off.) 02452-230089, (Mob.)09822992864, (Fax) 02452-220121Email:[email protected],[email protected]

16. Dr B.V. Saoji, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Department of Agronomy, Dr PanjabraoDeshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Krishinagar,Akola-444 104 (Maharashtra)Tel.: (Off.) 0724-2800628 (Mob.)(Fax) 0724-2258218Email: [email protected],[email protected]

17. Dr M.B. Dhonde, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri,Dist. Ahmednagar-413 705 (Maharashtra)Tel.: (Off.) 02426-243106, (Mob.)(Fax) 02426-243223, 243216Email: [email protected]

18. Dr Rabindra Kumar Paikaray, ChiefAgronomist (AICRP-IFS), Odisha University ofAgriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar-751003 (Odisha)Tel.: (Off.) 0674-2397176, (Mob.) 09437301524(Fax) 0674-2397780, 2397692Email: [email protected],[email protected]

19. Dr S.S. Walia, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Department of Agronomy, Punjab AgriculturalUniversity, Ludhiana-141 004 (Punjab)Tel.: (Off.) 0161-2401960 (Ext.-308), (Mob.)09464760134, (Fax) 0161-2400945Email: [email protected]

20. Dr Rakesh Sammauria, Chief Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), SKNAU Rajasthan AgriculturalResearch Institute , Durgapura, Jaipur-303 329(Rajasthan)Tel.: (Off.) 0141-2720160, (Mob.)(Fax) 0141-2550229, 2550262Email: [email protected],[email protected]

21. Dr K.R. Latha, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Department of Agronomy, TNAU, Coimbatore-641 003 (T.N.)Tel.: (Off.) 0422-6611254, (Mob.) 09487507182,(Fax) 0422-6611246Email: [email protected]

22. Dr Rohitashav Singh, I/C Chief Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, GBPant University of Agriculture and Technology,Pantnagar-263 145, Dist. Udham Singh Nagar(Uttarakhand)Tel.: (Off.) 05944-233034; (Mob.) 09411088549;(Fax) 05944-233608, 233473Email: [email protected],[email protected]

23. Dr Karam Husain, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, CS AzadUniversity of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur-208 002 (U.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 0512-253456-62 (Ext.-218 & 193,(Mob.) 09795138237,8004839935,(Fax) 0512-253808Email:[email protected],[email protected]

24. Dr N.B. Singh, Chief Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, ND Universityof Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj,Faizabad-224 229 (U.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 05270-262053, (Mob.)09415720277, (Fax) 05270-262917Email:[email protected]



25. Dr Mahadev Pramanick, Chief Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Agri. Research ComplexBuilding, BCKVV, Kalyani, Nadia-741 235(W.B.)Tel.: (Mob.) 09433289720, (Fax) 033-25828407Email: [email protected]

Agronomists of CSR Sub-Centres

1. Dr M. Srinivas, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS)ANGRAU, A.P. Rice Research Station, RARS,Maruteru-534 122, Dist. W. Godavari (AP)Tel.: (Off.) 08819-246283,(Mob.) 09949599965, (Fax) 08819-247583Email: [email protected]

2. Dr Sahana, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), RegionalSugarcane & Rice Res. Stn., Rudrur-503188(AP)Tel.:(Off.) 08467-284024, (Mob.)(Fax) 08467-284333Email: [email protected]

3. Dr B.M. Dabhi, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Farming System research Centre, Departmentof Agronomy, Junagadh Agricultural University,Junagadh-362 001 (Gujarat).Tel.:(Off.) 0285-2670139, (Mob.) 09428189696,(Fax) 0285-2670139Email: [email protected]

4. Dr L.J. Desai, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), N.M.College of Agriculture, Navsari AgriculturalUniversity, Navsari-396 450 (Gujarat)Tel.: (Off.) 02637-282771-75, Ext. 1207, (Mob.)09429310273, (Fax) 02637- 282766Email: [email protected], [email protected]

5. Dr S.K. Choudhary, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),RVSKVV College of Agriculture, Indore-452001(M.P.).Tel.: (Off.) 0731-2702911, (Mob.) 09424083624;

(Fax) 0731-2496989Email: [email protected]

6. Dr Vinod Kumar, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Zonal Agricultural Research Station,Powarkheda, Dist. Hoshangabad-461 110(M.P.)Tel.:(Off.) 07547-227257, (Fax) 07547-227257

7. Dr B.M. Maurya, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Department of Agronomy, College ofAgriculture, Gwalior (M.P.) (Mob.)09425360189

8. Dr J.P. Tetarwal, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Agricultural Research Station, UmmedganjFarm, P.B. No. 7, GPO Nayapura, Kota-324001 ((Rajasthan)Tel.:(Off.) 0744-2844369, (Mob.) 09530091236,(Fax) 0744-2844306Email: [email protected]

9. Mr J. Haldar, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),RRTTS Campus Chiplima, Dist. Sambalpur-768 025 (Orissa)Tel.:(Off.) 0663-2460507, (Mob.) 09437535046,(Fax) 0663-2460523Email: [email protected]

10. Dr M. Marimuthu, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Soil & Water Management Research Institute,Kattuthottam, Thanjavur-613 501 (T.N.).Tel.:(Off.) 04362-267680, (Mob.) 09443807686,(Fax) 04362-267619Email: [email protected]

11. Dr S.B. Singh, I/C Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Department of Agronomy, RBS College,Bichpuri, Agra - 283 105 (U.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 0562-2636615, (Mob.) 09451113256,(Fax) 0562-2520075Email: [email protected], [email protected]



12. Dr J.S. Bohra, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Dept.of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Science,B.H.U., Varanasi-221 005 (U.P.)Tel.:(Off.) 0542-2368381, (Mob.) 09415396460,(Fax) 0542-2368993Email: [email protected]

Agronomists of On-Farm Research Centres

1. Dr K. Tejeswara Rao, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), ANGRAU Agricultural ResearchStation, Seethampeta-532 443, Dist.Srikakulam (A.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 08941-238628, (Mob.) 09493084826Email: [email protected]

2. Dr Md. Latheef Pasha, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Regional Agricultural ResearchStation, Mulugu Road, Warangal-506 007 (A.P.)Tel.:(Off.) 0870-2100236; (Mob.) 09951997861;(Fax) 0870-2424337Email: [email protected], [email protected]

3. Mr Ajoy Sankar Bora, Jr. Agronomist (OFR)AICRP on IFS, Livestock Research Station,Hekera, Mondira-781 127, Dist. Kamrup(Assam)Tel.: (Mob.) 09508408214Email: [email protected]

4. Dr D.K. Mahto, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy Bhola PaswanShatri Agriculturel College Purnea, Purnea CityFarm, Kasba Road, Purnea-854302 (Bihar)Tel.: (Mob.) 09431720807, (Fax) 06454-243114Email:

5. Dr Chandesh Kumar Chandrakar, OFRAgronomist (AICRP-IFS), Sant Kabir Collegeof Agriculture and Research Station,Kawardha, Dist. Kabirdham- 491 995(Chhattisgarh)

Tel.: (Mob.) (Fax) 07741-233500Email: [email protected]

6. Dr S.K. Patel, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),SDAU Centre for Research on Seed Spices,(Near Horticulture Polytechnic Hostel),Jagudan-382 710, Dist. Mehsana (Gujarat)Tel.: (Mob.) 09979275650Email: [email protected]

7. Dr. R.G. Machhar, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Agricultural Research Station, AnandAgricultural University, Derol-389 320. Dist.Panchmahal (Gujarat)Tel.: (Off.) 02676-235528; (Mob.)Email:[email protected]

8. Dr Anil Mehta, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),CCS HAU Cotton Research Centre, Sirsa-125055 (Haryana), Tel.: (Mob.) 09416310043Email:[email protected]

9. Dr S.K. Sharma, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Shivalik Agricultural Research andExtension Centre (CSK HPKV), Kangra-176002 (H.P.)Tel.: (Mob) 09418167556Email: [email protected]

10. Dr A.K. Gupta, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Farming Systems Research Centre, DLRSS,Dhiansar, Jammu-181 133 (J & K)Tel.:(Off.) 0191-2106409, (Mob.) 09419100401,(Fax) 0191-2106409Email: [email protected]

11. Prof. W. Aind, I/C OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), B.A.U. Zonal Research Station, Dumka-814 101 (Jharkhand)Tel.: (Off.) 06434-222052, (Mob.) 09470362975Email: [email protected]

12. Dr M.T.Sanjay, I/C OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), 1st Floor, Directorate of Extn. Office



Building, University of Agricultural Sciences,Hebbal Campus, Kolar, Bangalore-560 024(Karnataka)Tel.: (Off.) 080-65325146,(Mob.) 09449393273,(Fax) 080-23516836Email: [email protected]

13. Dr S.M. Hiremath, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), UAS-Dharwad, Agril. Research Station,Mundargi Road, Gadag-582 101, (Karnataka)Tel.: (Off.) 08372-231110, (Mob.) 09448292336Email: [email protected]

14. Dr Thomas Mathew, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), KAU On-Farm Research Centre,Thiruvalla, Kallingul P.O., Dist. Pathanamthitta-686 102 (Kerala)Tel.: (Off.) 0469-2700343, (Mob.)09447860936, (Fax) 0663-2460523Email: [email protected], [email protected]

15. Dr D.N. Shrivash, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), JNKVV Regional Agricultural ResearchStation (Near Collectorate), Dindori-481 880(M.P.)Tel.:(Off.) 07692-223765, (Mob.) 09424688898,(Fax) 07692-223765Email: [email protected]

16. Dr B.D. Ghode, Agronomist (OFR I/C), AICRPon IFS, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (JNKVV)Piprondh, Katni-483 442 (M.P.)Tel.: (Off): 07662-268515 (Mob) 094246

17. Dr Varsha Tapre, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Regional Research Centre, Amravati Dist.Amravati (Maharashtra)Tel.: (Mob.) 09890093610Email: [email protected], [email protected]

18. Dr S.B. Bhagat, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Agricultural Research Station, Nandishala,

Valan Naka, Palghar, Dist. Thane-401 404(Maharashtra)Tel.:(Off.) 02525-241048; (Mob.) 09423296139;Email: [email protected], [email protected]

19. Dr K.T. Jadhav, OFR I/C Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), National Agricultural Research Project,Paithan Road, Aurangabad- 431 005(Maharashtra)Tel.: (Off.) 0240-2377121, (Mob.)(Fax) 0240-2376236Email: [email protected],[email protected]

20. Dr M.M. Desai, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Regional Fruit Research Station (NARP),Ganeshkhind, Pune-411 007 (Maharashtra)Tel.:(Off.) 020-25693750, (Mob.) 09822295851,08275201107, (Fax) 020-25698734Email: [email protected]

21. Dr. Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), KVK Campus, Panchamahala,PO-Hulurisingha, Dist.-Angul-759 132 (Odisha)Tel.: (Mob.)Email:

22. Dr S.K. Swain, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS),Jute Research Station campus, Jajanga,Kapaleswar P.O., Dist. Kendrapara-754 250(Odisha)Tel.: (Mob.) 09437130933Email: [email protected],

23. Dr Harpreet Singh, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Farm Advisory Service, Kheti Bhavan, BBlock, SCO Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar-143 001(Punjab)Tel.: (Off.)0183-2501989, (Mob.) 09646220333Email: [email protected]

24. Dr Lala Ram Balai, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), SKRAU Agricultural Research Station,



Fatehpur Sikar- (Rajasthan) Tel.: (Off.) (Mob.)Email: [email protected],[email protected]

25. Dr L.N. Dashora, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, RajasthanCollege of Agriculture, MPUA&T, Udaipur- 313001 (Rajasthan)Tel.: (Off.) 294-2417374, (Mob.) 07568507410,(Fax) 0294-2420447Email: [email protected]

26. Dr N. Tamilselvan, OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Regional Research Station Paiyur,Kaveripattinum, Dist. Krishnagiri-635 112 (T.N.)Tel.: (Off.) 04343-290399,(Mob.) 09443509390, (Fax) 04343-290399Email: [email protected]

27. Dr N. Sathish Kumar, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Dryland Agricultural ResearchStation, Chettinad, Dist. Sivagangai-630 102(T.N.)Tel.: (Off.) 04565-283080, (Mob.) 098945 63397Email: [email protected]

28. Dr Dinesh Kumar Singh, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), GBPUAT Horticultural Researchand Extension Centre, Jeolikote-246 146, Dist.Nainital (Uttarakhand)Telefax.: (Off.) 05942-224547, (Mob.)09410187299Email: [email protected]

29. Dr R.A. Yadav, I/C OFR Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, ND Universityof Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj,Faizabad-224 229 (U.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 05270-262053, (Mob.) 09450502117,(Fax) 05270-262917Email:

30. Dr Yogendra Kumar Singh, OFR Agronomist(AICRP-IFS), Department of Agronomy, CS

Azad University of Agriculture & Technology,Kanpur-208 002 (U.P.)Tel.: (Off.) 0512-253456; (Mob.) 09670999941(Fax) 0512-253808Email: [email protected]

31. Dr. Manabendra Ray, Agronomist (AICRP-IFS), BCKVV, Regional Research Station,Akshayanagar, Kakdwip-743 347, Dist. 24-Parganas (South) (West Bengal)Tel.: (Mob.) 09432960882, (Fax) 033-25828460Email: [email protected]

32. Dr L.R. Meena, Principal Scientist &Agronomist (AICRP-IFS,OFR), ICAR-IndianInstitute of Farming Systems Research,Modipuram, Meerut-250 110, U.P.,Tel: (Mob.) 09410034958, (Fax) 0121-288 8546Email:

PIs at Voluntary Centres

1. Dr J.P. Singh, Pr Scientist & ProgrammeFacilitator (IFS), ICAR-Indian Institute ofFarming Systems Research, Modipuram,Meerut-250 110, U.P.Tel: (Mob.) 09410034958, (Fax) 0121-288 8546Email: [email protected]

2. Dr T.P. Swarnam, Pr. Investigator (AICRP-IFS), Natural Resource Management Division,Central Agricultural Research Institute, PB No.181, Port Blair-744 101 (A & N Islands)Tel.: (Off.) 03192-250341,(Mob.) 09679541781,(Fax) 03192-251068, 233281Email: [email protected]

3. Dr Sanjeev Kumar, Sr. Scientist & Pr.Investigator (AICRP-IFS), ICAR ResearchComplex for Eastern Region, ICAR Parisar,BVC Campus P.O., Patna-800 014 (Bihar)Tel.: (Off.) 0612-2223962,(Mob.) 09431840189, (Fax) 0612-2223956Email: [email protected]



4. Dr. Subhash Babu, Pr. Investigator, AICRP-IFS, Division of Crop Production,ICAR Res.Complex for NEH Region, Umroi Road,Umiam, Ri Bhoi-793 103 (Meghalaya)Tel.: (Off.) 0364-2570257, (Mob.) 08900527308(Fax) 0364-2570257, 2570355Email: [email protected]

5. Dr Paramesh V., Pr. Investigator (AICRP-IFS),ICAR ICAR-Central Coastal AgriculturalResearch Institute, Ela, Old Goa-403 402 (Goa)

Tel.: (Off.) 0832-2284678,(Mob.) 09172693349, (Fax) 0832-2285649Email: [email protected],[email protected]

6. Dr Anil Kumar, Pr. Investigator (AICRP-IFS),Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute,New Delhi-110 012Tel.: (Off.) 011-25847121 (Ext.-4154),(Mob.) 09868891600, (Fax) 011-25841564Email: [email protected]

Onion + turmeric intercropping system at Krishnagiridistrict (Tamil Nadu)

IFS components of poultry and goat in Udaipur district(Rajasthan)



Annexure-II

BOTANICAL AND HINDI NAMES OF DIFFERENT CROPS BEINGGROWN AT AICRP-IFS CENTRES IN DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTS

S.N. Common name Botanical name Hindi Name

1 Ajwain/ Ajowan/ caraway Trachyspermum copticum Ajwain

2 Ashwagandha/ Indian Ginseng Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal Ashwagandha

3 Barley Hordeum vulgare L. Jau

4 Black caraway/ Fennel flower Nigella sativa Sumac Kalongi

5 Black gram Phaseolus mungo L. Urd/ Urd bean

6 Bottle gourd Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.)/ L. vulgaris L. Lauki

7 Brinjal/ Egg plant Solanum melongenaL. Baigan

8 Broccoli Brassica oleracea (L.) var. italica Hari Phool Gobhi

9 Cabbage Brassica oleracea (L.) var. capitata Band gobhi/ Patta gobhi

10 Castor Ricinus communis L. Arandi

11 Cauliflower Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis Phool Gobhi

12 Chickpea Cicer arietinum L. Chana

13 Chickpea/ Bengal gram Cicer arietinum L. Chana

14 Chicory Cichorium intybus L. Kasni

15 Chilli Capsicum annum L. Mirch

16 Cluster bean Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.Taub. Guar/ Guar bean

17 Coriander Coriandrum sativum L. Dhania

18 Cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. Kapaas

19 Cowpea Vigna unguiculata(L) Walp. Lobia

20 Cumin Cuminum cyminum L. Jeera

21 Egyptian clover Trifolium alexandrinum L. Berseem

22 Fenugreek Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Methi

23 Finger millet Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. Ragi/ Mandua

24 Garden Cress/ Water Cress Lepidium sativum L. Chandrasur

25 Garlic Allivum sativum L. Lahsun

26 Garlic Allium sativum L. Lehsun

27 Green gram Phaseolus radiatus (L.) Wilczek. Moong/ Moong bean

28 Groundnut Arachis hypogea L. Moongfali

29 Hyacinth bean/ indian bean Dolichos lablab L./ D. purpureus/ SeimLablab purpureus



S.N. Common name Botanical name Hindi Name

30 Indian Mustard Brassica juncea Coss. Sarson/ Raya

31 Indian rape Brassica campestris L. var. Toria Toria

32 Lady’s finger/ Okra Abelmoschus esculantusMoench. Bhindi

33 Lentil Lens culinarisMedikus masoor

34 Linseed/ Flax/ Flax seed Linum usitatissinum L. Alsi

35 Maize/ Corn Zea mays L. Makka

36 Marigold Calendula officinalis L. Gainda

37 Mustard Brassica campestris L. var. Yellow sarson/ SarsonBrown sarson

38 Oat Avena sativa L. Jaee

39 Onion Allium cepa L. Pyaz

40 Pearl millet Pennisetum americanum L. Bajra

41 Pea/ Vegetable Pea Pisum sativum L. Matar

42 Pigeon pea Cajanus cajan (L) Milsp. Arhar/ Tuar

43 Potato Solonum tuberosum L. Aloo

44 Psyllium Plantago ovata Forssk. Isabgol

45 Pumpkin Cucurbita pepo Duch. Kaddu

46 Radish Raphanus sativus L. Mooli

47 Rape/ Oilseed rape Brassica napus var. napus Gobhi Sarson

48 Red/ Purple Amaranth Amaranthus cruentus L. Chaulai/ Ramdana/ Rajgira

49 Rice/ Paddy Oryza sativa L. Dhan

50 Ridge gourd/ Sponge gourd Lufa acutangula/ L. aegyptica/ L. cylindrica Torai

51 Sesame Sesamum indicum L. Til

52 Sorghum Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Jowar

53 Soybean Glycine max L. (Merr.) Soybean

54 Spinach Spinacia oleracea L. Palak

55 Sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. Chukander

56 Sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Ganna

57 Sunflower Helianthus annus L. Surajmukhi

58 Sunhemp Crotolaria juncea L. Sanai

59 Sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. Sakarkand

60 Tomato Solanum lycopersicum L./ Lycopersicon Tamataresculantum/ L. lycopersicum

61 Turmeric Curcuma longa L. Haldi

62 Wheat Triticum aestivum L.emend. Fiori & Paol. Gehun

Documents

Annual Report 2014–15 - krishi icar