24

台灣手語的比較句結構(Comparative constructions in Taiwan Sign Language)

  • Upload
    ntnu

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Language and Cognition: Festschrift in Honor of James H-Y. Tai on His 70th Birthday.Jung-hsing Chang (ed.) 2011, Taipei: The Crane Publishing.

1.

19601960 Stokoe

Kilma & Bellugi 1979 Liddell 1980, 2003 Emmory 1995, 2002 Sutton-Spence & Woll 1999Sandler & Lillo-Martin 2006 Tai 2008 & 2009

gestural-visualoral-aural Lillo-Martin 1999, 2002 Tai 2005, 2008 Tai & Chen

2010 2009 & 2009

linear order

simultaneous signing spaceFrideman 1975 Liddell 1990, 2003 Winston

1991 van Hoek 1992, 1996 2008

236

plain verbs agreement verbs

spatial verbs Padden 1983 Meir 1998, 2002 Smith 1989 Sutton-Spence & Woll

1999 Chang, Su & Tai 2005 & 2006 2008, 2009

& 2009

referential function

Liddell 1990 Emmorey 1999

spatial reference Liddell 1990, 2003 Winston1995, 1991 van Hoek

1992, 1996

2.

237

1

1

“ ”

a. b.

c. d.

1

1

neutral space

1b

1c

2

238

2 i- j- - + -

“ ”

a. i- b. j- c. - + -

2

2

dominant hand

non-dominant hand 2a

2b

“ ” 2c

“ ”

239

3 k- l- - + -

“ ”

a. k-

b. l- c. - + -

3

3

3a

3b

“ ” 3c

4

240

4 m- - n- -

“ ”

a. b. c.

d. m- e. -

f. n- g. -

4

4

“ ” 4d 4e

4f

“ ” 2 3

241

Engberg-Pedersen 1993

semantic affinity

Winston 1991, 1995

2 3

2a 3a

2b 3b

5

5 - - o- - p-

“ ”

a. b. -

c. - d. o-

242

e. - f. p-

5

5

2

5b

5c 5d

3.

Friedman 1975 Kilma & Bellugi 1979 Taub 2001 Emmorey 2002

Sutton-Spence & Woll 1999 Engberg-Pedersen 1993, 1999

Sutton-Spence & Woll 1999:116

243

Winston 1991 Engberg-Pedersen

1993

temporal frame

conceptual setting

Van Hoek 1992, 1996

6

6

“ ”

a. b.

c. d.

244

e. f.

6

6

6b - 6f

7

7 i - j- - -

“ ”

a. b. c.

d. i e.

245

f. - g. j- h. -

i. j. k. -

7

7

sub-temporal frame

7d 7e

7f

7g

246

7k

8

8 k- l- -

“ ”

a. k- b. l- c.

d. e. -

8

8

8a

247

8b

8d

9

9 m- - - m- -

“ ”

a. b. c. m- d. -

e. - f. g. m- h. -

9

9

9a

9b

9e

9c

9d

9g

248

9h

8 9 8

9

“ ”

10

10 - n- -

“ ”

a. b. -

c. n- d. -

10

10b

10c

10d

249

“ ”

8

10

4.

place frame

11

11

“ ”

a. b. i c.

250

d.

11

11

11c 11d

12

12 - j- - k- - + -

“ ”

a. b. -

c. i-

251

d. -

e. j- f. - + -

12

12

12b

12c

12d

12e

12f

252

13

13 - j-

“ ”

a. - b. j-

c. d.

13

13

13a

13b

13c

“ ”

12

13

253

12

14

14 i

“ ”

a. i b. c.

14

14

14a - 14c

15

15 - j-

“ ”

a. b. -

254

c. j-

15

15

15b

15c

12

13 15

5.

255

. 2008.

5.1:87-112.

. 2009.

90 53-76.

. 2009.

125-176

. 2006.

341-363

Chang, Jung-hsing, and Xiu-ling Ke. 2009. The influence of Chinese on the formation

of place names in Taiwan Sign Language. Taiwan Sign Language and Beyond,

ed. by James H-Y Tai and Jane Tsay, 177-198.Chia-Yi, Taiwan: The Taiwan

Institute for the Humanities, National Chung Cheng University.

Chang, Jung-hsing, Shiou-fen Su, and James H-Y. Tai. 2005. Classifier predicates

reanalyzed, with special reference to Taiwan Sign Language. Language and

Linguistics 6.2:247-278.

Emmorey, Karen. 1995. Processing the dynamic visual-spatial morphology of signed

languages. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, ed. by Laurie Beth

Feldman, 29-54. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,

Publishers.

Emmorey, Karen. 1999. The confluence of space and language in signed languages.

Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M.S. Peterson, L. Nadel and M.F.

Garrett, 171-209. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Emmorey, Karen. 2002. Language, Cognition and the Brain: Insights from Sign

Language Research. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The Semantics

and Morphosyntx of the Use of Space in a Visual Language. Hamburg: Signum

Press.

Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1999. Space and time. Cognitive Semantics: Meaning

and Cognition, ed. by Jens Allwood and Peter Gärdenfors, 131–152.

Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Friedman, L. A. 1975. Space, time, and person reference in American Sign Language.

Language 51:940–961.

Klima, Edward, and Ursula, Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge,

Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language Syntax. New York: Mouton.

Liddell, Scott K. 1990. Four functions of a locus: Reexamining the structure of space

256

in ASL. Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. by Ceil Licas, 176-198.

Washington, District of Columbia: Gallaudet University Press.

Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language.

Cambridge: University Press.

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1999. Modality effects and modularity in language acquisition:

The acquisition of American Sign Language. Handbook of Child Language

Acquisition, ed. by Ritchie and Bhatia, 531-567. San Diego: Academic Press.

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2002. Where are all the modality effects? Paper on Modality and

Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, ed. by Richard P. Meier, Kearsy

Cormier and David Quinto-Pozos, 241-262. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Meir, Irit. 1998 Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The

case of backwards verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics 1:3-33.

Meir, Irit. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language

and Linguistic Theory 20:413-450.

Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign

Language. San Diego: University of California doctoral dissertation.

Sandler, W., and D. Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals.

Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Wayne H. 1989. The Morphological Characteristics of Verbs in Taiwan Sign

Language. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.

Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign language structure. Studies in Linguistics Occasional

Papers 8. Buffalo, New York: University of Buffalo Press.

Sutton-Spence, Rachel, and Bencie Woll. 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign

Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tai, James H.-Y. 2008. The nature of Chinese grammar: Perspective from sign

language. Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese

Linguistics, ed. by Marjorie K.M. Chan and Hana Kang, 21-40. Columbus, Ohio:

The Ohio State University.

Tai, James H-Y. 2005. Modality effects: Iconicity in Taiwan Sign Language. POLA

FOREVER: Festschrift in Celebration of Professor William S-Y. Wang's

Seventieth Birthday, ed. by Dah-an Ho and Ovid J. L. Tzeng, 19-36. Taipei,

Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.

Tai, James H-Y. and Yijun Chen. 2010. Modality and variation in sign languages. The

Joy of Research II : A Festschrift in Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang on his

Seventy-fifth Birthday, ed. by Wuyun Pan and Zhongwei Shen, 330-348.

Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.

Taub, Sarah. F. 2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in ASL. New

257

York: Cambridge University Press.

Van Hoek, Karen. 1992. Conceptual spaces and pronominal reference in American

Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15:183-199.

Van Hoek, Karen. 1996. Conceptual locations for reference in American Sign

Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15:183-199.

Winston, Elizabeth. 1991. Spatial referencing and cohesion in an American Sign

Language text. Sign Language Studies 73:397-410.

Winston, Elizabeth. 1995. Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames.

Language, Gesture and Space, ed. by Karen Emmorey and Hudy Reilly, 87-114.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.