6
Journal of Luminescence 38(1987) 289—294 289 North-Holland, Amsterdam Section 11. Organic Molecules EXCITON DYNAMICS IN THIN WIRES * Raoul KOPELMAN, Li LI, Stephan J. PARUS and Jagdish PRASAD Department of Chemistry, Universitt’ of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, US4 When are molecular wires thin enough to show one-dimensional exciton kinetics? What are the characteristics of one-dimen- sional kinetics? What applications are there? Cylindrical naphthalene wires (5 5000 nanometer radius) show a definite one- to three-dimensional transition (about 25 nm for triplet excitons at 4 K; 40 nm at 77 K). Nuclear channel pore membranes (poly- carbonate) serve as templates and calibrators. Monte Carlo simulations on finite-width wires are consistent with the experiments. Vycor glass pores are effectively one-dimensional. A new experimental criterion is based on excitation pulse width. It gives both topological and stochastic information (i.e. dimensionality and hopping rate) Its applicahilit~ to ultrathin wires and porous glass is demonstrated via simulations and experiments. The triplet exciton migration (multiple hopping) length is 50 100 molecules for all samples. 1. Introduction viously studied quasi-one-dimensional systems 117—20]. The latter are essentially two or three-dimensional sys- Solid-state and stochastic problems in one dimension tems with highly anisotropic exciton-exchange interac- have been of long-standing theoretical interest [1—5]. tions. Thus, for a short time the exciton is confined in Currently, electronics in thin wires is of much theoretical one-dimension. However, there is always a finite proba- and practical interest [6—9].The theoretical enigmas (lo- bility of moving along other directions (interchain hop- calization, mesoscopic phenomena, boundary effects) are ping), resulting in a two- or three-dimensional behavior compounded by experimental difficulties: minute cur- over longer times (this usually confines the measure- rents, heat dissipation, shorts, non-uniformity and sus- ments to ultra-short times). Moreover, the phonons and pect testing procedures. Many of these difficulties are not exciton—phonon interactions in these systems are seldom present with Frenkel excitons. There are no Coulomb re- one-dimensional. In contrast, our systems are truly one- pulsions and for triplet excitons the interactions are cx- dimensional over long times and there is no escape or tremely short-ranged and the surface effects are minimal tunneling out of the thin, one-dimensional systems. (Our [4,10]. Moreover, triplet excitons are already localized ultrathin wires are obviously three-dimensional on ex- in the bulk [11] and thus there is no localiza- tremely short time scales.) tion delocalization transition or cross-over. Experimen- Exciton transport ts usually monitored via the kinetics tally one can rely on optical measurements which are as of trapping or annihilation [11, 15, 18]. The kinetic pro- simple for thin wires as for the bulk. Furthermore, sample cess may be unary, pseudo-unary or binary (monomole- uniformity or continuity is not a crucial factor. One can cular, pseudo-monomolecular or bimolecular in chemical thus concentrate on the mesoscopic properties of interest, language), e.g. trapping, hetei ofusion or homofusion, re- stemming from the confinement of the excitons inside a spectively [4,15,21]. In all these cases the “rate-con- thin “wire”. stant” (instantaneous reactive collision probability per Recently, porous materials and “fractal” networks have unit density) is given by [21] also been of much interest [12—151. The difference be- k dS/d tween a fractal network and a quasi-one-dimensional net- (1) work is often not very clear [12—16]. Energy transfer where S is the mean number of distinct lattice sites vis- [13,14] and exciton kinetics [15] have been used for the ited by a single exciton (in the absence of reactive pro- characterization of such networks (e.g. pore networks of cesses). We note that eq. (1) is valid for all topologies, in porous media). Understanding the characteristics of truly contrast to the expression k -~D ( D = diffusion constant) one-dimensional networks and the effects of sample di- which is valid only for 3-dimensional (homogeneous) ameter is thus of practical interest. Furthermore, molec- lattices. To a very good approximation one has [21]: ular of polymeric chains, fibers, filaments and networks exist in most synthetic, natural and biological organic sys- ~ t~ 1/2 <f5 1: (2) tems, from organic conductors to neuron transmitters. k~t l/2<h— 1 _f< 1 (3) Molecular exciton kinetics in thin filaments are of rele- vance to all these systems. At long times h = 0 for three-dimensional lattices and We note that our system differs significantly from pre- h= 1/2 for one-dimensional lattices. We note that for fractal lattices h = 1 d,/2 where ci, is the spectral dimen- Supported by NSF Grant No. DMR-83-039 19. sion [21—23].The pragmatic questions we pose are: How 0022-231 3/87/$03.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)

Exciton Dynamics in thin wires

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Journalof Luminescence38(1987) 289—294 289North-Holland,Amsterdam

Section11. OrganicMolecules

EXCITON DYNAMICS IN THIN WIRES *

Raoul KOPELMAN, Li LI, StephanJ. PARUS and JagdishPRASADDepartmentof Chemistry,Universitt’ ofMichigan,AnnArbor, MI 48109, US4

Whenaremolecularwires thin enoughto showone-dimensionalexcitonkinetics?Whatarethecharacteristicsof one-dimen-sional kinetics?What applicationsarethere?Cylindrical naphthalenewires (5 5000nanometerradius) showa definite one- tothree-dimensionaltransition (about25 nm for triplet excitonsat 4 K; 40 nm at 77 K). Nuclearchannelporemembranes(poly-carbonate)serveastemplatesandcalibrators.MonteCarlosimulationson finite-widthwiresareconsistentwith theexperiments.Vycorglassporesareeffectively one-dimensional.A newexperimentalcriterion is basedon excitationpulsewidth. It givesbothtopologicalandstochasticinformation (i.e.dimensionalityandhoppingrate) Its applicahilit~to ultrathin wiresandporousglassis demonstratedvia simulationsandexperiments.The triplet exciton migration (multiplehopping)length is 50 100 moleculesfor all samples.

1. Introduction viously studiedquasi-one-dimensionalsystems117—20].The latterareessentiallytwo or three-dimensionalsys-

Solid-stateandstochasticproblemsin onedimension tems with highly anisotropicexciton-exchangeinterac-havebeenof long-standingtheoretical interest [1—5]. tions. Thus, for a short time the exciton is confinedinCurrently,electronicsin thin wires is of muchtheoretical one-dimension.However, thereis alwaysa finite proba-andpracticalinterest[6—9].Thetheoreticalenigmas(lo- bility of moving alongother directions(interchainhop-calization,mesoscopicphenomena,boundaryeffects)are ping), resultingin a two- or three-dimensionalbehaviorcompoundedby experimentaldifficulties: minute cur- over longer times (this usually confines the measure-rents,heatdissipation,shorts,non-uniformityand sus- mentsto ultra-shorttimes).Moreover,the phononsandpecttestingprocedures.Manyofthesedifficultiesarenot exciton—phononinteractionsin thesesystemsareseldompresentwith Frenkelexcitons.Thereareno Coulombre- one-dimensional.In contrast,oursystemsaretruly one-pulsionsand for triplet excitonsthe interactionsarecx- dimensionalover long timesand thereis no escapeortremelyshort-rangedandthesurfaceeffectsareminimal tunnelingout of thethin, one-dimensionalsystems.(Our[4,10]. Moreover, triplet excitonsarealreadylocalized ultrathin wires areobviously three-dimensionalon ex-in the bulk [11] and thus there is no localiza- tremelyshort time scales.)tion delocalizationtransition or cross-over.Experimen- Excitontransportts usually monitoredvia thekineticstally onecan rely on optical measurementswhich areas of trappingor annihilation [11,15, 18]. The kinetic pro-simplefor thin wiresasfor thebulk. Furthermore,sample cessmaybeunary,pseudo-unaryor binary (monomole-uniformity or continuity is not a crucial factor. Onecan cular,pseudo-monomolecularorbimolecularin chemicalthusconcentrateonthemesoscopicpropertiesof interest, language),e.g.trapping,heteiofusionor homofusion,re-stemmingfrom the confinementof the excitonsinsidea spectively [4,15,21]. In all thesecasesthe “rate-con-thin “wire”. stant” (instantaneousreactive collision probability per

Recently,porousmaterialsand“fractal” networkshave unit density)is givenby [21]also beenof muchinterest [12—151.The differencebe- k dS/dtweenafractalnetworkandaquasi-one-dimensionalnet- (1)work is often not very clear [12—16]. Energy transfer whereS is the meannumberof distinct latticesites vis-[13,14] andexcitonkinetics[15] havebeenusedfor the ited by a singleexciton (in the absenceof reactivepro-characterizationof suchnetworks(e.g. porenetworksof cesses).We notethateq. (1) is valid for all topologies,inporousmedia).Understandingthecharacteristicsoftruly contrastto theexpressionk-~D (D = diffusion constant)one-dimensionalnetworksandthe effectsof sampledi- which is valid only for 3-dimensional(homogeneous)ameteris thus of practicalinterest.Furthermore,molec- lattices.To averygoodapproximationonehas[21]:ular of polymeric chains,fibers,filamentsandnetworksexist in mostsynthetic,naturalandbiological organicsys- ~ t~ 1/2 <f5 1: (2)tems, from organicconductorsto neurontransmitters. k~t l/2<h— 1 _f< 1 (3)Molecularexciton kineticsin thin filamentsareof rele- —

vanceto all thesesystems. At long times h = 0 for three-dimensionallattices andWe notethatour systemdiffers significantly from pre- h= 1/2 for one-dimensionallattices. We note that for

fractallatticesh = 1 d,/2 whereci, is the spectraldimen-Supportedby NSFGrantNo. DMR-83-03919. sion [21—23].Thepragmaticquestionsweposeare:How

0022-2313/87/$03.50© ElsevierSciencePublishersB.V.(North-HollandPhysicsPublishingDivision)

290 R Aope/inanci ul. I v itch di na/nih S iii i/tin irs’s

thin hasa wire to be to giv e one-dimensionalbehavior methodmay alsoprov ide an absolutecalibration for thc(h 1/2)?What is thenatureof thecrossoserfromthree- hoppingtime.dimensionalto one-dimensionalbehavior?Whatdoesthiscrossoverdependon?Whatcanwe learnfrom it? What istheuseof thin excitonwires? 2. Experimental

We noteherethat in perfect cry stallinesamplesthecxcitonsmovefreely (at random,due to phonons),result- Experimentswere carried out on naphthaleneimpreging in binary(bimolecular)exeiton excitonannihilation nated porous glass (V~cor),porous polymeric mern-[21.24]: branes, naphthalenepowder [15,211, and perfcctl~

1+ 1 h crystalline isotopic alloys of naphthalene[21.24]. Thepurification, preparationand otherexperimentalproce

whereho designatesfluorescence(“delayed”). Thus the dureswerethesameasin previousstudies[15.21,24.30].annihilation rateR and thefluorescencerate I aregiven The random populationof triplet naphthaleneexcitonsby [24] wasproducedby “pulse” excitation:msecdurationpulses

producedvia mechanicallyshutteredxenon lamp e”.cita1’ R kp (D) tion [15.21.24.30].Thesteadystatepopulationwascrc-

wherep is thefreeexcitondensity. l-Iowev er. in mostreal atedvia excitationby thesamexenonlamp, hut thelampsamples[15,25], a fraction of the free excitons(.1) are was “on” till well after a steady state phosphorescencequickly trapped,giv ing a roughly constantdensity p ~, of signal wasestablished(several seconds).andthen shuttrapped excitons (.4 ). resulting in a pseudounary tered “off”. Neutral density filters insured equal phos-(pseudo-monomolecular)annihilationreactionandrate: phorescencesignalsat time “zero” (theclosing time of

the shuttersin both excitation modes).Both phospho-4 + ~hi’ . (6) rescenceanddelayedfluorescencedecaysarequite differ-

I’ R— I, p /~ kp . ent for the pulsed vs. steady-stateexcitation mode.especiallyat ear/i times. Fig. 1 shows phosphorescence

In addition, the triplet excitonsundergonatural decay and fluorescencedecaysfor both pulsedandsteady-state(lifctimc r): excitationsof naphthaleneembeddedporousglass.Simi-

~ ~— ~ /) (8) lar resultsareobtainedfor naphtalenepowders,andforloss concentrationnaphthaleneisotopic alloys (“below’

Theoverall resultsarethus: percolation”).On theother hand,no suchdifferencesinI, I /P’ ii 1 ~ (9) decaycursescan be seenfor high concentrationalloys

(“above percolation”) or nearly perfect naphthalenewheren _2 is for perfect(trapless)samplesand n 1 is crystals [30].for real samples(with traps).We note thatfor three-di Significant is the use of channel-pore(“nuclepore”)mensionalsamplesk (andlog k) is expectedto be con- [31] poly’carbonatemembranes.These6 micron thickslant in timewhile for one-dimensionalsamplesh ‘~ t membranescomewith well isolated.crlindrical pores(fig.andlog!~-..Iog t (with aslopeof 1 2). 1 of ref. [32]). While agiv enmembranehasunifon’n pore

Excitonandelectron hole recombinationkineticsare diameters,membraneswith different pore diametersarc

believed [4.25 27] to dependonly on the initial density, availableandwe usedthem in the rangeof 10 nm (100for agiven sampleandgiventhermodynamicparameters A) to onemicron (10000 A). Sometypical resultsare(temperature).The samegoesfor surfaceandsolid state shownin fig. 2 (1 4 K). Vse notethatonly thepseudo-reactions [27,28], including defect aggregation [29]. unary model (ri_I) resultedin linearslopes.ThebinaryWhethertheensemblehasbeenpreparedundersteady- model (n_2) cannotbe fitted with straight lines and,stateconditions (e.g.cw excitation)or as a randomen- moreover,resultsin non-constant/~curveseven for thesemble(e.g.pulseexcitation)wasbelievednot to matter, thickestwires (1.2 pm). Thetotality of theh values(neg-aslong astheglobaldensiti’ is the sameat initiation time ative slopes),for all wires (eachat 4 and77 K). is given(t 0). We showthat theaboveassumptionworksquite in fig. 3.well for homogeneoussamples,but not for heterogeneousor low-dimensionalsamples.Specifically, for somefrac-tal-like. quasi-linearor dispersedsamplesthelocal densi 3. Monte Carlo simulationslies’ andpair-correlationfunctionsdeterminethe decayfunctions,especiallyatearlotunes.Suchexperimentscan A systemof randomwalkersis createdon variouslat-thus serveasprobesfor thedimensionalityaswell asthe tices. In onecase(I) thewalkerpopulationis createdviageometricand/orenergeticheterogeneityof the sample, arandomplacementof particleson thelattice. This mim-They’ can also serveas indicatorsof diffusivevs. disper ics thecreationof naphthaleneexcitonsvia “pulse” (thesive motion,of the degreeof motional coherenceandof weak optical absorptionof photons is presumedto bethedegreeofstirring andself-stirringof theensemble.This randomoverthethin sample).Whentwo walkerscollide

R. Kopelmanet al./Excitondynamicsin thin wires 291

>-

.0005 . 1004 .2003 .3002 .4001 .5000

TIME SEC)

Fig. 1. Delayed fluorescence decayfrom naphthalenein Vycorglassat 6 K following excitation (310 nm) durations of (A) 11 5; (B) 20ms. The excitation of (A) had a neutral densityfilter of 1.2 to equalizetheinitial phosphorescence intensityof (A) and(B).

they annihilate: A +A—~0.This mimics the exciton reac- tion is simulated via a steady rate of particle creation. Thetion: triplet+triplet-.hu,whereho is fluorescence (“de- particles move at random and annihilate (A+A—*0). Afterlayed”). (The“naturaldecay”(phosphorescence)of the a while a steadystatedensityof walkersis establishedwalkers hasbeenincorporatedin somesimulations,but [33,34]. Thecreationof particlesis stoppedat atime de-plays a minor role due to the relatively long triplet life- fined as “zero”. Therandomwalk andannihilationcon-time). For the secondcase (II), the steady state excita- tinue and are monitored. Case I (random creation)is

aii

(A)

(0)— .-“----.~ t~. A .-A ,‘~..

— - ~‘ “.—~ ‘.—,‘-‘.‘ V ~“

it)1 I I I I I I

—4.5 —4.0 —3.5 —3.0 —2.5 —2.0 —1.5LN (TIME) SEC

Fig. 2. Annihilation rate coefficient R=F/Pvs. time on a In—In scale,for naphthalenefilled channel-porepolycarbonatemembranesatT_4 K. The pore diameters are (A) 150 A, (B) 300 A (C) 500 A and (D) 800 A. Note that the trapped (bound) exciton phosphores-cenceis excludedvia an interferencefilter (centeredat thefree excitonpeak).

292 R kopc/oicincia! / \c’iion di’Ocl/Oic’ iii iliiii il/hi

51~

ture dependenceis relatisely mild. The highei value at\\ highertemperaturesis consistentwith a somewhatfaster

4 ‘, ‘5 hoppingrate.‘N In our interpretationthe cross-oser i’adius is roughly

03 consistentwith theaseragecruisinglange) (endpoint toend-pointdistance)of theexciton,n’ithin its li/etinie. Anh >\ indirect.roughestimatefor thenaphthalenecruisingrange

32 ‘.“ in similarly preparedsampleswasgiv en [15] as/ 1000‘S A. This is in excellentagreementwith our piesentresult

‘S (i yOU A). Ohv iousls. for wires with radiuss >~/ the0 5

c’scitonsdo not “feel” theporeboundariesvs hOefort ~<,

— theexcitonsareseverelyconfinedalongtwo of thethree00 0 30 0 7 0 93 ‘ ~‘ directions.We notethatthepoly carbonateexcitationen

D(A) erg~valuesareso muchhigherthan thoseof naphthalenethat thereis a vanishingprobability for barriercrossing

F10 ~ L\puiicfli Ii s~.v, ii~ didnI~iLl / in ,iiig,irunl 5. ,it 4 K 5

or tunneling (.~L lOOk/ evenat 7 K).and ~ K 5 5 The 20 A point 5 5 is ni oorous ‘s coi 5 ret 01particularinterestis theresolutionof theporousglassI~I) Noie hreak in sralr -

(\ ycor) dilemma [I ~]. The natureof theporenetworknormalized by starting with the same global density hasbeenhighly’ controsersial [12 16]. It hasbeenargued(numberof particles) as Casc II (at time “zero”). We on one handthat it is a random (percolation-like) net-notethat whilethe initial globaldensities(monitoredcx- work with a fractaldimensionon theorderof two [13].perimentall~via phosphorescence)areequal in both Case On theotherhand it hasbeenarguedto benon-fractalbutI andII (for both simulationandexperiment),this does essentiallyonedimensional [12.15.16]. Using the cxci-notguaranteean equalannihilationrate (delayedfluores- ton kineticstechniqueit w’as argued[15] that theeffec-cence)at time “zero” (or at any other time). Theanni- tive spectral dimension is 1.05. i.e. effectively onehilation rate dependson the localdensities dimensional.Our presentstudy usesthe sameapproach

tor “calibrated”cylindrical poreswhichareohsiously non-fractal andone-dimensional.We haveincludedtheolder

4. Resultsand discussion [I ~] Vvcor glassmeasurementsasa datapoint in fig. 3.It essentiallyfallson thesamecurveasthe new. polycar-

Vve havesimulateddiffusion-limited reactionson true honatedata.The Vvcor dataarethus totally consistentone dimensionalsystemsandalso on quasi-one-dinien- with a onedimensionalpore topology. Furtherproof issionalsystemssuchastvv o-andthree-dimensional“wires” givenbelow.(see fig. I of ref. [35]). For instance,(‘or the reaction The naphthalcne-emheddedporous\ vcoi dataof fig.1+ l—+0 we find an initial classicalbehavior,followed I arenow replotted(fig. 4 in a ratio plot ot theannihila

quickly by a one dimensionalbehavior(for pulsedreac- lion hates (pulse-generatedover steady-state-generatedtions). For long lonc s we find /i 0.5. for both geminate de/ai’edlluorc’sccnce).Vsenotethehigh initial (shorttime)andnon-geminategenerationof 1. Thesearethesamere- value of this ratio (about seven).It turns out that onlysuIts as for a strictly one-dimensionalchain [33]. We with one-dimensionaltopologiescan one achievesuchconcludethat the typical one-dimensionalbehavior for high initial ratios. For comparison,fig. 4 givesthe si//ill

annihilation reactionsis preservedfor one-dimensional lation resultsfor a numberof topologies.A cubic topolwires with finite thickness,for both “flat” and“round” ogy resultsin an effective ratio of uniti, the classicallyvvires. This is trueaslong asthelength of thewire is large expectedvalue. Ihrc’e-dimensionaltopologiesof percola-

comparedto its cross-sectionandprovided that the oh- tion clusters(including the wholeensembleof percola-servation time is long comparedwith thetime it takesa tion islands’) andmonodispersecubic islands 1 3 x 3 x 3)particleto reachtheedgeof the wire [35]. give ratioshigherthanunity but lowerthanfive. Thesame

For the naphthalenewires in the cylindrical polscar- is true for two dimensional topologies(including frachonatemembranes(figs. 2. 3) we observedthat thethin- tals. e.g.Sierpinskicarpets,critical percolationclustersandnest wiresyield a value h 0.5, while thethickestwires the monodispersesquareislands). Only’ the one-din1en-give /i 0. for both temperatures,Actually, cst,’apolatin,g sionaltopologies(continuousanddisperse)give cursesto :uo diameter.h_,0.49+0.02.On the other hand, for resemblingtheexperimentaldata(fig. 4).micion sized wires Ii +0.02+ 0.02. Thesetwo limiting Theaboveexperimentaldataappearto requirea ssuevaluesarein excellentagreementw’ith the theoretically like topology, with at leastpartial breaks(an assemblyofexpectedvaluesof li_I 2 and h—0, respectively.The nor//is is agoodpicture). Independentknowledgeof thecrossover (between/i~0andh~I 2) occursat diame exciton hoppingtime would narrow downthe topologytersof about500 to 800 A at 4 and 77 K. respectively. (giving aneffective “worm length”). On theotherhand.The cross-oscry are relatively sharp and their tempera the presentinformation sufficesto constrainthe average

R.Kopelinaneta! Excitondynamicsin thin ii ipi’s 293

01

o‘ii

(5

>+‘1000)

~0in

0-Do l\

o IC’,

STEP # ~ ~IME (msoc)Fig. 4. Ratioofannihilation rates (pulsed oversteady-stategeneration)vs. ti/nc: (A) Vycor glass (see fig. 1) with time in ms. (B) One-dimensionalislands (20 siteseach).(C) One-dimensionalchain. (D) Three-dimensionalpercolationclusters(cubic. 40°uoccupation.all clusters).(E) Three-dimensionallattice (cubic). (F) Three-dimensionalislands (3xix 3 siteseach). \‘olc’: I. Eachsimulatedensembleincludesabout30000sites. 2. Simulationtime in numberof steps.

individual hoppingtime to about 1 ms (certainlywithin A coherenttransportwould giv’e different results. Ob-anorderof magnitude).This translatesinto an effective viously thereis no mixing (stirring) mechanismavail-cruisinglength ofabout50 moleculesor about250to 400 ablefor our excitonensembles.HomogeneouschemicalA. This is in good agreementwith the polycarbonate- kineticsimplies efficientstirring (convection)andthusembedded wires (seeabove) andour prev’iousestimate no local density effects. However, it is interestingto see[15]. that the diffusion-caused “self-stirring” [371is sufficient

Wehave argued above, based on a different kind of ki- to effectively quench the local densiti’ effectin the “ho-neticparameter(theheterogeneityexponentfor long time mogeneous” lattices (simple cubic — fig. 4, as well as

decays),that naphthalenechannelsin porousVycor are square lattice and others [36]). Thus, exciton hopping inquasi-one-dimensional. Our present kinetic data (based perfect (non-alloy) crystals is not expectedto show theon local densitiesat earlydecaytimes) appearto be con- local densityeffect. Indeed,it is not observed.

sistent with the above picture and with other work [12]. As mentioned above, this new effect may also enableMore importantly, the high value of the heterogeneity ex- one to calibratetheabsolutenumberof randomhoppingponent (h_OS) is characteristic of an effective one-di- eventswithin a given time period. The simulationsmdi-mensionaltopology.On the otherhand,our dataarenot cate that the delat’ed fluorescence ratio (fig. 4) reachesconsistentwith a percolation-networktopology for the unity after roughly 1 0~“steps”. Experimentally,this ratioVycor pore network [13], To test this we have tested the of unity is achieved after about 0.1 s. This again gives anpercolation clusters of isotopic mixed alloys [24]. Pre- average hopping time of about 1 ms (assuming effectivevious mixedcrystaldata[24] showed that the heteroge- one-dimensional topology).neity factorincreasesbelow 1 2% napthalene(C

55H5 in Weexpect similar local densityeffectsto appearin manyC1 D8) alloy concentrations(while above12°oh—U). At analogoussolid-stateand “physical” reactions: Elec-low concentrations we now observe initial rate ratios tron—hole recombination, defect annihilation or aggrega-higherthanunity but beloss’three,while at higher concen- tion. and soliton-antisoliton annihilation. The sametrations (39%) we obtain a ratio of unity [36]. This is should be true for diffusion-limited solid-stateand sur-consistentwith oursimulations[36] (see also fig. 4). face chemical reactions.

The local density (early decaytime) kinetic effect isthus a new criterion for the characterization of sample ~heterogeneity (we include low dimensionality as a specialcase of heterogeneity). Wefurther note that the exciton 1) Wehave produced cylindrical molecularcrystal wirestransport in these samples is incoherent(hopping) [II]. downto aradiusof 5 nm: The recombination process in-

294 R. Kopelinan eta! Fvciton dsna,nics in thin cores

volves free andbound exeitons(“heterofusion”). The [II] Ii. Even,K. Rademano.J. Jortner,N. ManorandR. Reis-triplet exciton kineticsfits a multiple-hopping model. The feld. Ph~s. Rev. Lett. a8 (1987) 285, ibid. 42 (1984)2164.overall migration rangeis about25 nm at 4 K and40 nm 1141 W.D. Dozier.J.M. DrakeandJ. KIaf’ter Phvs.Rev.Leit. 56at 77 K. The long-tune exciton transport is strictly one- (1986)197dimensionalin the ultra-thin wires.The fractal-likekinet- 115] R. Kopelman,S. ParusandJ. Prasad,Ph~s.Rev. Lett. y6

(1986) 1742.ics model works well in a low-dimensional non-fractal

116] CL. Yang, P. Evesqueand M.A El Saved 3 Ph~s.(hem.system.2) The porous-glass(Vycor) channelsare de- 89(1985)3442scribedwell by a non-fractal, quasi-one-dimensionalto- 117] R.M. f’IochstrasserandVvhiteman.J(hem.Ph~s.56(19721pology. The naphthaleneplugs in the Vycor poresare 5945,shown to be vi’o,’m-like. Thesenaphthalene-embedded [18] M.D Faver, in. Modern Problems in Solid State Physics.Vycor poresalsoshow atriplet excitonmigration length Vol. 4 eds. V.M. Agranovich and R.M. Hochstrasser (North

of about25 to 40 nm. TheVycor sampleexcitonhopping Holland, Amsterdam.1983) p. 158.

time (per molecule), along the pore, is on the order of 1 [19] M.J. Burns.‘AK. Liu andA.H. Zewail. ibid. ~. 101

ms. 3) The exciton annihilationmethodappearsto bea [201S.D.D.V. Rughooputh.D. Bloor. D. Phillip andB Mov-reliabletool for probing spectraldimensionsand low-di- aghar,Phys.Rev. B35 (1987) 8101.

WJ, Rndriguez. R.A. Auerbach and 0 L McPherson I.mensionaltopologies.A new method, basedon initial lo-

(hem. Phys,85(1986)6442.cal density’ effectsis described,The initial density method 1211 R Kopelman,J Stat.Ph~s 42 (1986) 185is very sensitiveto topology andhopping time. 1221 S. Alexanderand R. Orbach.J dePhys. Lett 41 (1982)

[625.

1211 R. Rammal and 0. Toulouse. 3 de Phys. Leit 44 (1981)References LI 1.

1241 PV~KlymkoandR. Kopelman.J Phys Chem 1)” (1981)

[I] K. Lakatos-LindenbergandK. E. Shuler J Math. Ph~s.12 4)65.(1971) 633 [251 ( Kittel. Introduction to Solid State Physics, 3rd, ed.

[2] S Alexander. J. Bernasconi.Vv.R, Schneider and R. Or- (Wiley. New \ork. 1967)

bach Rev Mod. Phys. 53(1981) 17. 126] A. Suna,Phys.Rev Bl4 (1970) 1716.[3] R. Zwanzig. 3. Stat Ph’,s 28(1982) 127. 1271 C

1.R. Freeman. ed. Kinetics of Nonhomogeneous Processes[4] V.M. .Agranovieh and M.D. Cialanin. ElectronicExcitation (Viilev, New ‘york (1987).

Energy Transfer in CondensedMatter (North-Holland, [28] T Van Kampen, StochasticProcessesin Physics and

Amsterdam,1982). Chemistry(North-Holland,Amsterdam,1981).[5] A. Blumen, J. Klafter and 0. Zumofen, in: Optical Spec. [29] V. Kuzoskos and E. Kotomin. Chem. Phys. Lett. 117 (I 98~i)

troscopyof Glasses ed. I. Zschokke (Reidel. Dordrecht, 113.1986)p. 199. [30] R. Kopelmanand S.J Parus,in Fractal Aspectsof Mate

[6] M. Buttiker, ‘t. lmrv, R Landauer andS. Pinhas,Phvs Rev. rials. II. eds.D.W Schaefer.R.B. Laibossitz,B B Mandel-B3 1 (1985) 6207. brot and S.H. Liu. Materials Research Societ~, Boston

[7] A. Benoit. C P Umbach.RB. Laibowitz andR.A. Webb, (1986)p 50Phys. Rev Lett 58 (1987) 2343. [II] NucteporeCnrp Plc’asanton.(A

[8] D. Lenstraand W van Hacringen. Phvs Rev Leti. )7 [32] J.PrasadandR. Kopelman.J. Lumin. tin press).(1986) 1623. [33] LW. AnackerandR. Kopelman,J (hem.Phys. 81)1984)

[9] D 3 Thouless,Phys.Rev.Leit. 39 t l9~7~II n~. 6402.110] J HoshenandR Kopelman,J. Chem.Phys 61(1974)330. [34] LW. Anacker, R.P. Parsonand R Kopelman. J. Phvs.[II] R. Kopelman in’ Modern Problemsin Solid State Physics, (hem.89 (1985)4758

Vol.4. eds.V.M. AgranovichandR.M.Hochstrasser(North- [35] L. Li andR. Kopelman,J. Lumin. tin press)Holland,Amsterdam,1983) p. 139. ]36] S.J ParusandR. Kopelman(unpublished).

[12] OW. Schaefer,B.C. BunkerandJ.P. Wilcoxon. Phys.Rev. [17] P. ArgyrakisandR. Kopelman,J. Chem. Phys.91 (1987)Lett. 58 (1987)284. 2699.