70
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EUROPEAN DIVISION CORPS OF ENGINEERS ENERGY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS PROGRAM EUROPE VILSECK MILITARY SUBCOMMUNITY SEVENTH ARMY TRAINING COMMAND WEST GERMANY Final Submittal VOLUME I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNITID STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS eUROPEAN DIVISION FEBRUARY 1982 PREPARED BY SYSKA & HENNESSY, INC. ENGINE EilS NEW YORK 1 *'.. .

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - DTIC

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYEUROPEAN DIVISION CORPS OF ENGINEERS

ENERGY ENGINEERING ANALYSIS PROGRAMEUROPE

VILSECK MILITARY SUBCOMMUNITYSEVENTH ARMY TRAINING COMMAND

WEST GERMANY

Final SubmittalVOLUME I

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

UNITID STATES ARMYCORPS OF ENGINEERSeUROPEAN DIVISION FEBRUARY 1982

PREPARED BYSYSKA & HENNESSY, INC.ENGINE EilS

NEW YORK

1 *'.. .

BestAvai-lable

Copy

FY so W:4JRGY LN11?KWNG NM~A4 515 PROC~RJm. "IL'A'O'K

FINAL SUKI.N17TAL

FEBRU.ARY 1983

THE. Sfl;A .f~1'TAL CCNS!STS OF~ ':W(' 3LPF#*ATL V'OLUME.S:

0 VX.'; I:~r I P Xe: r~MR

To V?..t"'a Sbi:tf looL!K to rreod1y

Albert letiv:hitz, SI.Fi.C1hatur AeivatV P.3.

Leonard Pritkin, P.P.Sen-pu Chino

Ilipn Shah:mje

Wan uirt 'lbort

Edward Kitdveny

V. '.~19971 016 183

IwrN F W% OF T111 %m%1%,

-11st:Lbutgj. A. Apprfived tior pulsile rolc~aaw..

K 1arl* V~iako ld

FY 80 ENERGY ENGINEERI!NG ANALYSIS PROGRAM, EUROPE

VILSECK

FINAL SUBMITTAL

VCLUME I

ECXCUTIVE SUMMARY

TASLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE

1. INTRODUCTION 1-1

2. INCREMF.NTS A AND G 2-1

3. INCREMENT B 3-1

4. INCREMENT ?' 4-1

5. ENERGY CONSUMPTION, AXCESS 5-1

O 6. INFORMATION FROM SUCOMMUNITIES 6-1

7. NEN'RGY CONSUMPTION, DATA AND GOALS 7-1

8. DATA COL',ECTED BY SURVEY,PR:ESENTATI VE BUILDINGS I-1

0

CXECUTIVE SUMMARY

VILStCK

1. INTRODUCTION

The fnergy Cngineerlng Analysis ProgIram for the threeU. S. Military Subcomrvunitles of Vilseck, Hohonfelsand Vilseck in West Ger•sany, has boeon authorized by theDepartment of the Army turopean DiviJlon, Corps of1ngineer3 under Contract No. DACA0O-80-C-0093 datedSopt*mbeor 29, I19SC, and subsequent Modifications:

POCO01 dated April 27, 1981,100002 dated Septembeor 20, 1981, andPOC003 dated September 30, 1981.

1.1I OCJBEC7VECS OP THE ZNCERGY STUDY

The objectives of this contract, as explained in detailin 3chedule of Title I Services for enargy ngineoringAnslysin Program, turope dated September 18, 1961# areas follows:

s. Develop a systematic plan of projects thit willresult in the reduction of energy consumption incomp1lince with the objectives set forth In theArmy Facilities tnerly Plan.

b. Use ond incorporate applicabl, data and results of

related studles, pest and current, as feasible.

c. Develop a coordinated basewide energy study.

d. Prepaire Program Development Brochures (PD8)p DDrorm•s 1391, and supporting documentatiorý forfeasible energy conservation projoets

a. Include all rethods of energy convervation whichere preactical (in so for as the tate-of-the-aErtis reatorably firm) and econoamcl~ly feasible inaccordance with .uidance given.

f. List and priorltize all rconmended energyconsirvation projects.

E0£XCC SUM i-i VI.S)ECK

1.2 INCRZMENTS OF WORKThe work to be performed under the contract has been

divided Into four Increments: A, b, P and G.

Zncrement A - Energy conservation investigations forbuL~dinqs and procegsts.

Increment I - Energy conservation investigations ofutilities and energy distributicisystems, Energy Monitoring and ControlSystems (IMCS), and existinq energy plantInvestigations.

!ncrement - Facillities tnginuer conservationmeasures.

Increment G - Projects identified i% Increments A and Athat do not meet the £CIP criteria of9/C> 13# but may qtualify as OMA or MMCAProjects.

1.3 PHASES OF WCRK

Increments A, 9, F end G have been divided into threephsoes of workt

Phase I Data gathering and field trips.

phase It Analysis of data, identflication ofpotential projects, performance offeasibility and economic studios, andpreparation of !irst page of DD !orM 1391.

During this ph.se, All potential p~oAeCtSwhich produce energy end/or dollar savingsshould be Identifieti and evaluated as totechnical and economic feasibilItye

Projects determined to be technically andeconomically feasib1e Shal1 be combined intoprojects and ronked according to highest C/Cratio.

For FY 04, the- Ainiftum --/C =13 Nt;k

phase t*7 yeparation of DD Frrm 1391 and ProjectDevelopment Brochures (PDLA) &Adpreparation of docun.ntn pre:#nting theresults and recommendations of the atudy.

SXEC sum 1-2

DD Forms 1391 and PDB's are nor required fortncrement F.

As a result of Modifications P00002 dated 29 September1981, and P00003 dated November 2, 1931, it wasnegotiated that the Interim Submittal would not containthe Phase 11 effort of th. Ems$ study, nor the Phase Iand Phase 11 efforts of Increment F. These wo%.Id XseIncluded In the Prefinal Submittal, after additionalrequired data Is obtained by surveying all threesubcomununitles in early 1962,

1.4 PRESENT STATUS OF TRZ MOJECT

1.4.1 SURVEY

Prior to the commencement of Phase I of the project, amoeeting was held between the A-Z and the Corps oftngizeerg, and out of the approximately 160 energyconsuming buildings at Vilseck, 61 buildings wereseleated to be surveyed In detail.

It was agreed that the sample selected wasrepresentative of the entire community; and that theresults of the survey and subsequent analysis of energyTonsumption and energy savings based on arepreoentative building per type at tech cormunitycould be extrapolated to obtain the vnergy consumption,eonrgy savings and Implementation cost for tho entirecomunity, based on the total square foot area of allbuildings of each given type.

By this extrapolation method, values of basevide energyconsumption, energy savings, and Iipsementation costacould be estimated; and basewide WIP prolactsdetermined.

1.4.2 PMLIMrNAY SUNIfTTAL

The wtrk listed below w.• s accomprp)hed and presented inthe Preliminary Submittals

a. Co.tpilation and analysis of the data endInformation receoved from each subcomun!ty;

b. Roview of the actual energy contumption of eachaubcommunity tased on the energy consumption datbcollected; *a well as a prenentatlon of theprojected energy consumption qonlr- for eachsubcommunlty based on the Army' Facilities EnergyPlan.

EXEC SUM. 1-3 VILSECK

; . Summarized tabulations of the Aurvey data,

d. Data of the surveyed buildings was Input onCamputer Program AXCESS.

e. As o "iample-pflotl CCIP analysis, one buildingtype was selected and analyzed for energyConservation In detail.

f. The feasibility of Central Boiler Plant Projectswas investigated.

The presentation of the Preli•inary S.ibmitta'I forVilseck was made on "0 Julyo 1981 at Crafenwoehr.

Review comments on the Preliminary Submittal wereforwarded to the AL by the Project M~anager in hisletter dated 15 Cctobar, )981#

1.4.3 INTIPIM SUZIT1'?AL

The work listed below was accomplished and presented inthe Interim Submittal:

a. The data received from the Subeommunity was

updated.

b. Review of the act-eal energy eonsumption of theSUbcomenu.ty based on the energy onsunlption datacollected; and a presentstion of t'he energyconsumption goals for tlie Svbcomiunity based onthe Army Facll.t.es Cnerqy Plan.

0, qe presented an updated l1ti of the representativebuildinqs of each type selected for detailedenergy conservat.ion analysis.

d. The Computer Program hXCESS was used to model. ando.nalyz. all the bulldings eurveyed at theSubcommunity, Cuantitativ* retults oa monthlyenergy :qnsumt.tion for spoce heating, domentic hotwater, 1ýghtinq ard Piacellaneous olctricityusage has been obtained for each type of bui ding,

0. Increment A: ZEch of the buildinga types wasanalyzed for ntergy i'onservation opportunities(tCOG) that Involved rodifying, linp•ovlnq orretrofLtting tho &tchitectural features, MVACsystems, pLunbing systnems and I.Lqhting.

WXC SO; 1-4 VLSECK

LCOa determined to be technically and economicallyfeasible cE/C>13, I/C0) were conbined Into EnergyConservation Pro~ects (ECP' s), and extrapolated toZtergy Conservation Investment Pro)ects EdCIP's)k

f. Increment Gi Projects considered In Increment Athat did not meet the B/C>13 criteria and yet hada B/C>1 were :econmended for implementation under

OA or MMCA funding.

A complete DD Form 1391 and complete PD8-I wet*presented for approvaL,

00 Form 1391s and PDBn are not required forIncrement F.

. Increment 51 Information obtained on Utilitl*Sand energy distribution systems, and existingenergy plants (boilers) was presented and possibleenergy conservation measures analyzed.

MODITICATIONS P00002 AND P00003

These two modifications were negotiated and signed inSeptember 1981.

0It was agreed that the AB would perform a walk-throughsurvey of every building iii the community for IncrementF's requirement to Oprovtde reiommendatlons formodiflcations and changes In system operation which arewithin the Facilities tngineor funding authority andmanagement control*, as well aS for Incyovent t's •MCSaneaysis.

Only buildings larger than 5,000 GeS In area andconruming greater than 7SO0 gal/yr. of 1l1 or 45 m-tonof voel or having a a nimus 10 kw ronnected electricalload would be analysed fot VM¢C fe9sibility.

The survey effort wot•ld oe performed in early 1982,

1.4.5 PFIEV'INAL SUMBITTAL, INCREMENT F

157 sets of field curvet forms wore reviewed and fromthe*e a conputor Input sheet for each building surveyedwss prepared. A computer data library Vds c*45tdstoring all informstion, gathered In the field whichcould be r.Wsuent to recommendations underI1nvost Igot ion.

S0E XIC SJM :-5 VILSICK

lables 6-. and 6-2 of Volume 2, the Energy Raport, list

the relevant data.

Computer aided manual calculstions were used to obtainunescalated energy and cost ssvinmgs and Impeoemntationcosts. A computerized economic analysis program wasusod to produce S/C and A/C raelos.

Recent Aerlecn and German Manufeaturer's catalog datawas obtained and Included In the Appendices, Volume 7of the Prefinal Submittal.

. 4.5. 1 R£COMMUNDATIONS

All recomended energy conaterving modifications werepresented in Sections I and 8 of the Increvent ?Xorratlve, Prefinal Su mlttol. These sections or* newSections 8.7 and 8.8 of Volume 2, Energy Report.

A summary sheet for each Soctlon 7 recomfrendations(Moification to luilding Systemr,1 Includes thefollowing:

a. A brief description a! re•monz for themo4 i f Icat ion.

0 b. Instructions for accoplinhing the modificatlon.

e. An eptimate of labor and material costs.

d. An estimste of man-houru listed by trade, whete

relev ant.

e. •The estimated dollar and ,inergy savings.

f. The results of an ecoroil;c &nalysisi E/C AND B/Cratils.

The analyses of Section 0 recommendatlons(modiflciaions to ,,/O S0 .ens) are contained within theIncrement F Warretlve, Proftns'. Submittdi.

A Summary of all modification* for Incrraent F listingCosts, uan-hourse dollar and energy savings wasprepared and is presented In Tnble 2-1 of the IncremuntF Narrative, PrOfinal Sub.mtittal. A cۥpy can be foundin Section 4 of this Volume. 1he Table lists thesodficationi in order from highest to loweet C/C ratio.

CXrC SUW 1-4 V. iLSECK

eAll energy conserving projects from Increments A, a andQ and rewomondations from Increment F hsve beenconsolidated, priority ranked and presented In Table10-1 of the Increment ? Narrative. Order of priorityis from highest to lowest Z/C ratio. A copy can befound at the end of thIN section.

IKnergy related areas of operation for which additionaltraining of facilities Engineerlng personnel Is'ecomwlended has been listed in Section 12 of theincreoent F Narrative.

Zpandable equipment which should be changed to higherofficiency types when the next rePlacement occurs hasbeen Investigated. Recommoindations are included inSiection 13 of the Incremen% r Narrative. PretinalOubetittal.

1.4.6 tRETINAL SUBMITTAL, INCREMIENT 0

Vock listed below was accomplished and submitted for)ncreoment 3, excluding EMCSt

a. We h6ve obtained information on and studied insignificant detail the subcommunities electricalsystem, street lighting system, potable watersystem, sewage collection and treatment system,hoz water and steam dlitribution system; as vellas existing energy plants consisting of CentrolBoiler Plants and Local-Suilding boiler Plants.

b. We have recomnended several projects that requirethe modification of boiler plant controls such asinstallation of OA W reset control, nightset-bacik control and instd1lation of time-clock.Thtse pro5ects howevet, have been presented underIncrements A o*r G.

c. We have dovilcpod electric•ity and fuel consumptionload profl* for the past three years andpresoented the-,n In Section 3.

d. Craphical prof$lei of hourly KW demand occuring ona weekday, weekend and peak demand day have beendeveloped, presented and Jiscussed in Parogrpah"ý.2.4 for each month of FY 80. Wt have discussedexSeting peak dem~ftd limitinq systems, ani willinvesti.gate if the 2KPC• Is feasible for furtherdefend limiting.

@XFC SUM 1-7 VILSECK

. Sased on the AXCESS analysis of each buildingtype, we have estimated the annual energyconsumption ond cost per square foot of eachbuilding type for Electricity, Fuel, SpaceHeoting, Domestic Not Water, Lighting endMitcellaneous Equipment. We have also projectedthese FY 80 to FY 84. ?abulated cost data hasbeen presented In Section S.

Work lited below was accomplished and submitted forIncrement 0, CMCS:

a. Supplement the site investigation with *as built'drawings, as well as sound engineering judgment.

b. Interview administrative personnel to determineoperating hours and proceduren relative to thesurvtyed buildings.

c. Identify EfCS energy consrving programs andstrategies which might be appropriate for each ofthe buildings, listing the points required.

d. Evaluate by computer analysis, energy conserved bythese programs as well as their implementationcosts in accordance with Energy ConservationInvettrent Program (ECIP) requirements.

. �Make recommendations which may include in the EMCSlame systems, points and/or programe which, whilenot directly related to energy savings, wouldprovide manameeent Information and centralizedcontfol, making for mort efficient facilityoperation.

.47 MFINAL SU'M¶STTAL

During the period lanuary 13, 1963 through February 12,1983, the Preliminary, interim and Prefinal Submittalshave been compiled Into a Final Submittal. A8ss=:rlption of the compilation Is as toliows:

o. For Sections I through I of the Final SLbmittal,the rnterim Narrative wae used as the basic text.Relevant materiel from the Preliminary wasIncluded.

b. Section 8 incorporates Section I thsouvt1 8 ard 12through 14 of the Increrient I Narrative.

EXEC SUM 1-8 VaLSEC9

c. Sections 9 through 11 Inco:porates Sections 9through 11 of the Increment I Narrative.

d. Section 12 incorporates the Increment B, EMCSYeasibility Stidy of the Prefinal Submittal.

The Final Submittal Executive ,ummary Is made up of theIntorim and the Prtf nal Executive Sumarios. Thesesummaries have been adapted and brought up to datewhere necessary. The Final Submlt|•al Executive Simmaryhas been compiled as followst

A. ,or Sections 1 through 4, the Profinal txScutivwSummary Sections I through 4 have been used.

b. For Sections $ through 8, the Interim txtcutiveSummary Sections 2 through 5 havo been used.

1.5 CONCLUSIONS

1.5.1 SAVINGS RESULTING FROM IMPLEMEN•ED ECOIS

The effects, in energy and cost savings, ofImplesenting all Increment A, 9, C, & G projects .treswmarited in 'Table 10-1, a copy of which Is Includedhereafter. The percent savi.ngs for these projeti.,reobtained using the known consumpt-ion for FY 75 fromTable 3.3-2. This tible is presented In Section 7.The total consi•aption for that year Is 358,834 Motu.

Increment A projects save 10,346 Mbtu/yr, or 5% of theFY 75 total consumption. Increment B projects save29,265 Mbtu/yr, or 1% of the FY 75 total comsusnption.Increment F projects Save 54,643 MRtu/yr, or 151 of theFY 75 total cons.m•ption. Increment C projectR save19e243 MStu/yr, .c 54 ot the FY 75 total cons'imption.The total savings for all projects Is 121,500 Mbtu/yr,

or 34% of the total PY 75 consumption.

1Te effect of Incrimonts A, B, G & F in terms of FY 04dollars io an flolows. In.rement A projects will gave$215,420 per year and) will cost $597,061. Increment 0project* will ave $333,202 per year and will costS1,9C4,448. Increment F projects will save $570,194per yes? and will cost 5535,S56. Increment C projec:towill save $223,156 per year and will cost $549,094.The projected cost of onorgy In 1984 in itemized instale 3.3-1. tscalstion rates Wnr conversion factors

are given In the Attachmient to Table 1.3-1. Th4 taslt,aRd attachment can be found In Section '

0tX£c SUM 1-9 VILSICK

'9� �i&�j j� �I - � :�

a 0

I--, 1 1'iv-i I� 'V . . -�

�I - - -

* - 6 a* � - . a a

Si.)dI *�1� I 'I

ii i I� � ' .5�V III j

is i.e ,� .Dit, , e - -�- 0

a I- � - -

.7 i t� � I *�K - * Ii �. -,

- i -

i* *.. 4'a'- I K

ji I ii'- �

- - - 0 -P a

Iii K�� II� �;I Jji(j � j;, �

I I

I - II -

'�. �j?. L

AIs

Ir

I

Oili

*. : ] . . .o ,

%i '

i {3.4

1 J -

* .I*

S. .... i •

SX " g !

ii ii4i- ,,0

'a p.

(-a,

' AlI *

I

I. 4

°°

, K, -

I , +.,- A L.

. -".+

I I "

0 -4 =, .. l. * '

o i-i*

11~ I

.4!

a!a

'ii I a

I

3*

:

4.~~ I, ~

I I!

I '

* I-I :*.

I: i:}I * V4*:

i•I I Ni:i :

:1• -

*fP. - .• -

c I

I; iij, 1I I

II

°"i~ I'

0 I• 1.52 PROJECTED CCNSUrTON

Table 1.5 shows the known FY 75 total energyconsumption. The proected energy consumption afterenergy conservation projects is identified in the tableunder the column heading, 1985 MbTU (PnoiSC7ED). Itassumes that .1l the pro3ects In Table 10-1 arecompleted by 1985. Th!s pro.ect•d energy consumptionis Lhe known TY 75 consumption times (I - % reduction).IL is the amount of energy that the buildlnqs westudied will conhu.-e In 1985 after the er.rvconservation pro~ects have been implementdC"

The kr.own consumption and the projected consumption arealso given on a square toot basis. The quantity underthe column heading, 1975 X3TU/SF (XNtWM4), uses the 1975gross floor area, from Table 3.2-1 and the quantityunder the column heading, 1985 KRTU/s$ (PROJECTED) usesthe 1985 gross floor atre.

New construction is *c,:ountoed for in Table 1.5 ouderthe column heading, 1987 MHTU MUURE CCNSTRUCTION; anestimate for the energy that will be consumed byVilseck In 1987 Is obtnired by adding the expectedenergy consumption of neow construction lbased on DesignEnergy budgets which are based on AR 415-28) to the19t5 MITU (PROJECTED). A detailed treatment of fututeenergy use resultin3 from facilities changes can befound In sectlcn

1.5.3 GOALS

The goal of the U. S. Army Is a 20% reduction of energyconsumption for building are* constructed before fY 18.The goals have been calcu•lnted for the Vlls#ck ATC andpresented in Table 3.2-1. A copy of which is Includedhereafter.

Table I.S presents the proecttd consumption forVilseck. It will be compared to Table 3.2-1 and Itwill be shown that the goals are met. from line 3 ofTaibloe 3.2-1 a PY SS consixmption of 296,S92 118tu hasbeen Set for Building Area In Use Constructed Wefore FY7t. This is the building area that wts studied for theEnergy Report. From Table 1.5. the FY $5 consumption

,v1l" be 236,31 •B•tu if all of the rIconendet',c-e InTable 10-1 have been Implemented by %ht tin#e. T'•egoal.Is ••t by a merglo of 61,761 Moto. Theconsumption goals on a square foot basis are met by acorrespondinqly large marqgin. The goal is 176 k8tu/f!In FY 85. From Tab!4 1.5, the proActed 1955consumption Is 140 kft/aif, a margin of 36 kttu/af.

Exec Sl11.iM -10 V IL.11 *K

I ZF: �

M

iIjiT�-. --

-

M

-4

�I �'-

I £

M

�ne -

1�'�

-4

-- a- --

L

'If! �I 6"

II I I

IIIII

!1. . i. .4 -

* . . . A-A1" S ' I " 4

S. .. • .. ..___ _

- ": __ __ .___-_.* +.- , - -. 4 1t -

a?...: • 4. + e • I

"I+... . S

- --- - ,,n *

"j--: =, ." -

- . + .i . -•' +' " L =

,, , ° w a

,, . .. 4

•l I •, I• '

*,11ira II+I l " I . +,I , •,I • il +

-,r,.,.,; p,, 77, TjT;•:iT, 2 , Ii

Whe*: accounting for future construetion end demolitlon,the goal for FY 65 Is 374,167 MB•tu. Thqe esti•iate offuture constumption, takinq Into &ccount newcnst.zuction, Is 300,775 mltu in ry $7. (Re"e• toTable 1.5). The goal is met by 73,394 hgtu/yr. This!iguro Is conservative beciuse the additiona1canstruction between 19895 nd 1987 Increases t.hetstimot4d corsumption.

£XEC S'M l-11 V:LSECX

. 2. rNCRM.ENTS A AND G

2.1 REQUIREMENTS

Zncr•ment A deals with energy conservationinveotigationS for buildlngS and processes. It dealswith the InvWstigation of ECIP projects which involvemodifying, Improving or re,rotitting existingbuildings, (including family housing), to Includearchitectural and structural featu.res, IVAC systems,plumbing eystems, lnttrior or exterior building andparking f•allities lighting.

Incroment C deals with proýects developed in IncremantA which reeult in energy savings but do not qualityund*er IIP criteria.

A list of netrgy onservatjon Opportunities (tCO's)that. we Investigated is presented In Table 2.1.

2.2 SJMMAAY OF PCSULTS

For a project to quality as an FY 84 9CIP project, itmust have an S/C > 13, Is/C > 1, ain.i a Project Cost >$100,00. In Table 6.1p Interim Submittal ve havesumorited all feasible CCIP projects. A copy Isincluded hereafter.

tnergy conservation projects wvtt V/C" < 13 or ProjectCost , $100,000 which cannot qualify as FY 84 RCIPpr.oecI.s,. but w-hiv we feel are suitable forImplemenction from non-edtP funding sources such as0KA or $MCA Prograom, have also been Included In Table4.1 as OA projects.

As Indicated In lbl. 6.1, we have recommended 3 CCIPProjects and It cMA Pro.4jets for Implerentation.

The original Interim Stibmittal version of Table 6.1listed the pto5ects by btilding tyro. As a result of asuggestion by the Subcommunity, to consider thecodb1r. ing of smaller 0HA projects, the present versionof Table 6.1 groups pr•j.ects by typo (€CIP or DA) andWithin each group lists projects by C/C ratio, highestto lovest.

The combining of project3 *il inetes the considerationof projeets by building type. What. is gained is On#dditional ECIP projeet. A Copy of revised Table 6.1to used in this volume.

LxtC SUS .l-i VLSICK

Table 2.1

24406OWL~I

4..... WIAL Sm I3U4

t....DI MJ.WA? Alt 'e9A

LS,..WP It I.iL...Is CIM SwAmi

M1...WIL1L Wt Impt414 ... AK IUISV LION WIN Nw4 RMN UOI0

~&.*.WL . $IWW

~~JI6a" V)FMFOR OT UW"19.0.0INMJ m rokhS~m

240tm F~m U WWARo!

M...dmutP o0Th OUM omNI%..,jWIt Mf RLIWL sm OR 0 n

04..o

a

.. K0 2' I

�. . . p1.' *� - - . .4. - p *SI� �

a - I

. . . -

I; S I ii I!'ij S � S�$

0

S S S S

Sl�

N 1 d-�. I . I

� a 'a - Al

I!��Ii I'� I' *�1�

* � .r K '.4. 1

jF'jIg gI �

SI S

I 'S

ii I IIi Oil

- Jr *sIIi�l1 J j ! I '

I j � 41

� i I

I- I Ii;' I I

o °o

S! III

0 f t

H -'

fl II~ I,, I I I 4- . - .

,i t i • •

-.I

131%4 a.---- - ruz~-- Mi - -h-iS

9~ ~~~t n-'-- min---e&1 imp -v - . - - .r

onow -va t -- I-

~OKI 0J4 h Z= utXVWUT!I Ma~.~WAU b

&,saat"UM 0 sW A;TfSOO

---- V ;I wztS uwn0 f

swp5 eso -rx - ---

%otsvsx *,S w&]~ fe -- -a --)- -

2~WA~i "U 21WU 0 m* *0

o f-Iaa

T*0van;:~ ~~ :w adl 1Ia

WGIxV WIM IULYM

un 112MIS 141 '*OM

mimlavio-aw- w-w- -u-

nslvQ A~m V0 WW

M%0 -.W a a"Um"a

*1i&*I 4L __ IAsmis I m- -

wta,. -v tui- Yna

L A Ixv M-J~

A new sumwary, Table 6.IA, Interim Submlttal wascreated to Indicate thve types of ECOs included in eachproject. A copy of Table C.IA Is Included hereafter.

If all these projects are implemented at a CW£ IV 64 of$1,146,175, the subcormunity will save 37,590.1 MBtu Ofenergy, wtich Is approximately 11% of its total energyconsumption. The annual dollar savings will be$458,516.

2.3 PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

A complete set of Proqra- Documents, DD Form 1391s andPD&-ls, plus attachments, for each ECIP and OMA projectare Included In the Interim Submittal, Volume S, bOOkSI and 2.

0

O3. INCRE•iNT B

3. 1 ftCUIREMETS

Increment I requires the fol3owini,

s. Study the existing utilities and energydtstribution SySterlt and existin9 energy plants;identify and analyze possible energy conservationprojects.

b. Determine the feasibility of an LMCS for buildingelectrical, nad 1echanical systems and utilitydlstribut• Ion.

C. Develop a load profile for the past. three yearsIndicating ths quantities of each eneegy sourceprocured (heating oil, coal, olectrlclty, etc.)fand the peak demand loads, and esntin ) loads.

d. Develop graphic presentation of hourly XW demandfor peak load/demand days. Develop procedures toreduce peak demand by load shedding.

e. Project energy coasts three years from the date ofContract award, and estimate the heoting, lightingand other costs per square foot per year,

3.2 SUMMARY OFt RESULTS

Out investigation of potential Increment I projectsresulted in tuvo recommendationsa Street Lighting OMAproýect and an MCS ECIF project. The combineel energysavings mounts to 31,019 MBtu/yr with an equivalentdollar savings of S$337,239/yr. This represents a 45%reduction of FY 1O basevide energy contumption.

The umajor savings come from the CKCS recommendation.The Street Lg hting project is documented in thePrefinal Submittal, Volume S, ONA SL1. The £EMCS isdescribed in Volume I of this Pre-Final Submittal. Asummary of the £MCS study is preiaented in Section 3.1of this narrative.

The Interim Submittal describe# our investigation ofIncrement B projects, excluding the £MCS study, and issum•arized as follOWS:

WltC Sum )-I VILSECK

at We have obtained Informatien on and studied in

significant detail the subcommun!tles electricalsystem, street lihting rystem, potable watersystem, sewaqe collect ion and trectment system,hot water and Steam distribution System; as wellas exiating energy plants consisting of Contral

oileor Plants and Local-luilding Boiler Plants.

5. We have recommended xeveral projects that requirethe modlfication of boiler plant controls such asInstallation of OA MW r*set control, nightset-back control and Installation of time-cock.These protects however, have been presentied underIncrements A or G.

c. We have developed electricity and fuel consumptionload profiles for the past three years andpresented them in Section 3 of the InterimSutaittal.

d. Graphical profiles of hourly kw denand occuring ona ,tokday, weekend end peak demand day have beendeveloped, presented and discussed in Paraqrpah1.2.4 of the Interim Submittal# for each month oflY 10. We have discussed eoistinq epeak demandlimiting systems, and will investigate If the £MCSIs feasible for further demand limiting.

e. lased on the AXC95S analysis at each buildingtype, we have estimated the annual energyconsumption and cost poe s~uare toot of eachbuilding type for electricity, Puel, SpaceReMstin, tomemtic hot Water, Lighting andMiscel aneous Equipment. We have also projectedthese FY 80 to TY 04, tabulated cost data hanbeen presented In Section S of the InterliSubmittal.

3.3 INCREMENT I - 1?IC9 YEASIBILTY STU•DY

3,3.1 PURPOSE

The purposa of this study is to determthe the technicaland economic feasibility of utiliting Cnerqy 1%nitoringand Control system (MCS) techniques at the VilseckSubeosiylunity, Vilsock, West Ciersany.

This effort Is to develop A nystemfftic plan to reduceenergy consumption in compliance with the objectivesput forth in tnh Army facilities tnerqy Plan. Withinthe scope of this study, rtecminendations for thepostible Implementation of these objectives w!ll beinvestigated.

CXEC SUP 3-2 VILSCXK

3.3 PARAMETERS OF rHt FASISILIZTY STUDY

Of the 160 buildings in the subcommunityt 104 areconsidored. Inclusloa Is based on engineering judgnenttor potential econouic payback.

3.3.3 SCOPE Or WORN

A. Supplement the site Investigation with 'as built*draVings, as well as sound engineering judgment.

b. interview administrative personnel to determineoperating hours and procedures relative to thesurveyed buildings.

C. Identity LMCS energr conserving programs andstrategies which might be appropriate for each ofthe buildings, listing the points required.

d. Evaluate by computer analysis, energy conserved by•ttese programs as well as their Implementationcosts in accordance with tnerqy ConservationInvestment Program (tCIP) requirement*.

t. Make recommendations which may include In the MICSsome systems, points and/or programs which, vhilenot directly related to energy savings, wouldprovide manaqment information and centralizedcontrol, making for more efficient facilityoperation.

3.3.4 SUMMARY

It was determined that 96 of the buildings in theVilseck Subcommuntty are technically feasible vhilaftete•ng the ICIP guideilnes for EPCS installation.Total cost estimate for lmplementation to $1,$4s,596.

The estimated energy savings with thu tecommended M.¢Sare 780 MHtu of electricty (lighting) and 30,239 MHtuof heatirnq fuel. This represents a 81 redgction of FY10 basewide energy consumption.

£CIP summary

0•£ $ 1,686,723

DOvign Cost $ 51,873Total 1,945,556

EX•C SUM 3-3 V! SZCX

Total lenefits $ 4,604,iesDiscounted benefit/Cost Ratio (>I) 2.4?otal Annual Energqy Savinqs 31,019 99tuV/C Ratlo 16.4Annual $ Savings 3 WS7,239Payback Period S.Z yr

The proposed new EMCI equipment Is to be designed tomeet the requirexents of the Inter-Agency G416eSpecification, a document deVeloped to standardhitgovernment procurement of strategqes for centralizedcomputer control for energy conservation. To meet thisobjectiv, a small sized IICS, accordinq toSpecification CIGS-13949, Is r*wowiondtd.

luildings not recommended either did not mest initialcriteris or were determined to be an ineffectiveapplication upon physical Inspection.

.31,5 MXCLUDMD rROM SCOPE Or :NVCS7IGATION

The scope of the analysis and site Investigation Islimited only to those considerations which Impact onenergy. 9xcluded from consideration are all process,sanufacturing or laboratory equipment and systems, aswell as fire alorms and security.

S 3.3.6 CONCLUSIONS

Mn anolyting the 96 applicable buildings in the VilseckSubcowunity, the installation reflects a totalBenefit/Cost ratio of 2.4, 4n Anergy/Cost ratio of 16.4and payback period of 5.3 years.

Results ore in accordence with CCIP I/C >1 and I/C )13prerequisites for ECO Implementation and payback periodof less then 1S years.

Strategl.s in order of cost effectivenesst

a. Reducinq fuel consumption during the heatingseason by meens oa tempernture setback duringunoccupied hours.

b. Optimized control of boilrs.

c. Lighting reduction/shutdown durinq unoccupiedperiods.

0

* 3.3.7 RIZCOPMENDA'??OIS

a. linplemeont the installation of an anergy monitoringand Control system in the Vilseck Subcomunity,Vilaeck, West Germany.

b. The system will consist of one control room toaccommo6ate the facility.

c. Install the •MCS at 'he estimated constructioncost of $1,94S,596.

d. Provide a system configuration, procjramns, andstrat~etes as deacribed In this study.

e. Note that. possible further savings can be reali~edby the use of NMCS to provide remote controlledspace tomperatures during normal occupancyperiods. Additional savi•is may be achieved whenthe LMCS is used to its full oreentia1 to providemanngtment reports and maintenance infornmtion.7t-esa hove not been included in the tCIPcalculations since thty imply future changes Inoperating procedures which may not be realized.

0t•XJZ S;U1' 3-S YLSECK

4. INCREMENT F

4.1 OBJECTIVES

The objectioes of Increment F are summarized asfollows:

A. To recorr,end rodifications and c,.anges in systemoperation whlcb are within tho Facilities Engineerfunding authority and management control.

Recomrmendations shall bo ;n the !orm of specific,ractical instructions for the use of Facilitiesnginer •personnel.

b. To sun.mari2e an.d establ•sh the priority of allrnergy r.nservation Pn.anJret and projects frontncrements A, t, F an. G for use of the CnrounityCo-.-.nder and Facilities Enjinper in duve'opilngtheir energy ron.m..-ent. plant.

The Sccpe of Work (Schedule of Title Service:t. Ruv)is included in AFpendix I-A, Volunt 7 of thePrefinal Slibmittal.

4.2 MQ0IFICATICOS INVESTIGATED

A total of 32 potentia: modificaions were investigatedfrom which we developed twenty-seven recommendation forluilding and MaInter.ance/Cperations systems.

Sixteen of the twenty-seven r•conmmendatons relate tobuilding equipment Systems and are baned on an analysisof building field survey data.

Eleven recomnendationx relatn to the Mraintenance andOperation (M/O) procedures in use by the Facilitiesf'ngineer Division of the Vilseck Subcommunity. Theanalysis of existing M/O procedures is batwed on fielddate conhitting of answers to questions put to theFacilities Engineer and members of his staff.

4.2.2 Two Investigatlons were developed into recomeondationsconcerning expendable equiptent.

4.2.3 Two inveotiqations developed Into non-recommendations.

4.2.4 One InvestLqation did not fill under the Pacitltiestngineer management control but because it has aneasily understandable effect on energy conanrvatlot, wehave Included It as a mIseel)aneous recommtndation.

.xrc .uv (-i VILSECK

O 4.3 SUMKARY

Th.•4 projects Investigated are listed, as followst

4.3.1 MODIFICATIONS TO BUILDING SYSTEMS

8& N

DESCR PTIOe4

r 'I Correct the Instaliation of the ExistlnqMeet Recovery Wheel.

f V2 Reduce Space Temperatures in UnoccupiedDining Room$.

1 V3 Install Automeatc-Vent Damper Controls OnOil-Flrqd Boilers.

r V4 Boiler Ater Treatment.

F Vs Zmprov\ Kitchen %aed Exhaust System.

F V6 Install Vehicle Exhaust system,

r v1 Use Cold Water Cleaning Chemical InDishwasher wash Cycle.

F V• Use Cold water Detergent For WashingClothes.

r v9 Install Waste He&. Recovery forRefrigeration tquipmetnt.

r VlO Insulate Heated *6 Oil Storago Tank.

r VIl Reduce the Amount of Heated Spec* byBuilding A Partition,

r V12 Replace Oamiged Vehicle Coors vith InsulatesdTypes.

F V13 Retrofit Interior Fluorescent Lighting WithLow Enerqy Lamps and Sallas-se.

r V14 :nstall Time Clock Control on LaundryZquipment to Allow Only Might ?ariffOperation.

P Vis Lower rosestic Hot Witer 'emperture.o

0£XIC SUM 4-2 VIL$ECK

F i Ch~angq Survner Nolzes for Off-PeakOperati on.

4.3.2 1iOO!1CAThO•S TO MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS SYSTEMS

r V17 Pteveootve Maintenance Program.

F Via Temperature Control Technician.

F V19 Reduction of Space Heating Temptrsttres.

7 V20 Intferior Li.;hting Contrnl.

F V21 Window Operation.

r V22 Door Operation.

F V23 Cookinq Equipment Warmup.

F v24 Upgr•de Centratherm Control System.

F V25 Steam Trap Replac'r."nt.

F V26 DfW Circulating Sy0tem.

F V21 Resize Primary Heating Equipeont.

S4 3.3 CXPENrABLI •QUUIPtNT

F V28 Energy Saving Ovens.

? V29 Energy Saving Motors.

4.3.4 PfOJECCTS NOT RCCO.MENOED

F V30 Installation of Low tnerqy Iluorfacent Lanp$and Sellasts to Replece Suired-Out InteriorLiqht Ing.

F V31 Vaet Warm Water Deterqent in Oishwoaher WashCycle.

The above projects are noot ecomnended besa•ue they arealteornbtive approaches to tC0'. that are recommended.The recoomended 9CO's have h.Aehr l/C tatios. For adetitled analysis iee the ne~rqy Aeocrt, VinalSbtbmitta•, Volume 2, Section •. .4. The reaeetandodprojeet for alternative P V30 to *Ret.Troit Rntertotflorescent Lighting With ,ov Znorqy LatnS andBAlietsw" F V13. The reeommended procjf-t foraltternatvye I V31 Is 'Use Cold Water Cleaning Chemicalin DinhwathIT Wnsh Cycle*, f V?.

CXEC SUM 4-3 V:LSECK

O 4.3.5 MODIFICAfON NOT UNtDR Ft MANA•G•CNT CCNTROL

F '12 Consolidate Partially Used Barracks.

4.4 INVESTIGATION CONCLUSIONS

The effects, in energy and coit savings, ofinplementing the above list•,.d zodificsatons aresumerized in Table 2-1 of %olume 6 of the PrefinalSubmittal, a copy of which Is Included hereafter.

4.4.1 sUILD:NG SYSTEMS

Suilding systems modifications would result in annualenergy savi.qs of 29,390 Mbtu/yr. and equivalent annualdollars savings of $294,037/yr (fY 84 escalated). Thisrepre' ,'.s a 9% re*ductloa of FY 80 basevide energyconsuv;t.Ion. Iaplemtntation costs would mount toS474,.62. The overall payback period is 1.61 years.

4.4.2 MAINTENANCE/OPZRATIONS SYSTIMS

Of the eleven M/O system: modifications five havecalculable energy and cost savings, and the remainingsix are rtcommendations withovt calculable savings.

The five modifications having calculable savin 8(0f V18, it V19, P V24, F V25 and F V27), if Implemented,would yield a total annual energy savings of 3040C0MStu/yr and equivalent annual dollar savings of5342,753/yr. This represents a 9.g% reduction in FY 10basevide energy consumption.

The energy and cost savings for the six reeommendatlonswithout calculable savings (7 '17, r V?70 F V21, r V22,F V23, F V26), are not easily doefined. Exact factualdAta such as hours of occurrence (e.g. how Many houTsare lights left on in unoccupied spacez or rollingdoors left open) could not bst determined during a threeweek survey period. Therefore, these recoimmendationsare general In nature an6 are made bec•use of theirobvious energy savings rtstlt.

Of the five modifications with calculable savings,1 V19 is a no-cost ipplementation, F Y24, F V25, F V26hmve. calculable implementatlon costs, and ? VS., r V27have no calculable implementation costs. Therefore, anoverall paybaeck period cannot bs calculated for thesethrov rtcommsndations.

MXC SUM 4-4 VILSKC(

Si ! I.-la I I .

4. . . I 2 ' II I

I:• l l i , ,

8

' J I

I ,

K II i , ~ - ~1i '

' I II >~ i

I.� ii'' � F�Lb0 -

�. K �.5

S � '�. I I� I-

� - ie'-4 I I V

-- - 4� II,-. e ) C

� I I Iii � i�j U U

0 III

I I I4i�I I I i�t 1 I.I I;� -I-

� dlii % � �j Ji�j I � � �!�) � a

F I j IS �k1� �

�*4qI b�9 bIl 'be.�. e�Iz �

I 3� .

0 � � A L�

ItS

~cII* Ii3,b. th 0

rho reeomlendation for a Temperature Control TechnicianIF V:6) was based on On AnVlysiS of 4 1nlqe type ofinorgretive control condition. Therefore, 6ince moretypes of inoperative controls at* ori•ally 6ncounterad,the calculated energy zovings are sininal. Theoncertainty of the type and amount of Inoperativecontrolz that could develop !rom year to year make ItImpossible to calculate oxact savings.

4.4.3 CXP? N:AIILE PQUlP~i!Wt

Mhe energy savinrg for expendable equli mnt (F V28,F V29) are ealuc ated for a single piece of equipmentsince flo one can predict how many pieces of equipmentwill fall at a givqn time. Implefiontation costs arealso on a pit- basis vnd are incremental costa sincethl-I is a £eplaeeoent recomendation, not a retrofit.

4.4.4 MISCULAREOUS

A practical approach to tnergy conservation requiringno ,equipment changes is suggested by the reaoammndationContwIdate Partially used arracka (F V32). Thisrecommendation can produce consldereble savings atpractically no coat ard for these reasons is includedin our liat of recommendations. Our analysis of fourbqildings Indicetes a potential annu3l energy savingsof 1,335 M•tu/yt and an equivAlent, annual dollarsavings of $1.1,33./y; (PY 84 sscalated).

4.5 C1ERCY CONSERVATION MOODFICATIONS SINCE 1975

A cimplete l$Stinq of onergy constrvation relatedprojec'ta is given. The listing waes updated In April1982 and is current as of this date.

many of the projects were not otabllshed as specificenergy cinservation projects, 'hey wore the result ofnorn1e repair projecto that l.corporated enorgy savingteaturen. Therefore they qualified as energycona3ervatlon modifiatio•r.

The list cont~ins two VCIP projects and f~ifty savor C*'iApro)ectr.

4.5.1 GZ)AL

A vixit wo nade #to the Ei'enttrint and PlannirqDivision at Gra1envoehr to obt3at data on energy

ErvC tJ1A 4-s VILVIu K

since "975. A roview of records uncovered some

additional projects. These changes have modified thel1st of previous energy related projects compiled forthe Interim Submittal, presented In Section 2.3.1,Voalra 1, of the Interim Submittal. 7he modifiedlisting ts presented In the following section.

4.5.2 PROJECT LISTING

CCIP PR OJECTS

7T-Q173-80" Attic insulation/installation ofthermostatic radiator velvet In FMfaciltties, 7ATC.

7T-OSS-84* Automatic Controls with sensors,motorized valves, wiring and small items.

04A PROJICTS

7T-105-73 Repair/replace Heating System, buildingNo. 333.

7T-034-74 Aepair/reploce Meating System, villdingNo. 309.

7T-363-74 Repa/r/replace Heatinq System, buildingNo. 344.

n-0161-76 Repair/replace Heating System, buildingNo. 343.

7•-0•62-76 Repair/replace H*ating System, SuildingNo. 338.

7T-0191-76 Repair/replace Heating System, buildingUo. 201.

7T-0199-76 Upgrade Central Neating and ElectricalSysteeis, building t4o. 432.

71-0265-76 Repair/repleee Meating System, Electrical

System ond Long Oistanee Lines, BuildlngsWo. 131, 132, 133.

7T-030•,-76 Replacement of Ridiator Valves, BuildingsNo., 475 through 478.

7T-003O8-76 Ropher/replece HMating Syst.em, Ivilding

No, 332.

rxi~c SUP' 4- VrLSECK

77T-0319-76 Replace Windows, Doors and tntranc*roors, Building No. 416.

7T-C041-77 Repair/replace Heoting System, BuildingsNo. 306, and 316.

77-0042-77 Repair/replace Heeting System, BuildingsNo. 307 and 317.

n-0043-77 Repair/replace Meeting System, BuildingsNo. 303 and 3"3.

77,-C044-77 Repair/replace Reating System, BuildingsNo. 304 and 314.

77-0136-77 Replace Windows, uIvldings No. 4.4, 424,425, 433 and 434.

7?-3406-77 Building No. 112. Add ceilinqinsulation. No documsntc available.

77-0080-78 Repair/replace Meating System, BuildingNo, 431.

71-0173-78 Ropair/replac' M$eetinq System, BuildingsNo. 2"130 274, *nd 27S.

77-0270-78 Rehab. heotinq 6ullding Mo. 256.Received speciflcatlons.

7?-0098-79 Roof repair of Suildings No. 252 tbrouqh256.

7T-0099-79 Received work request Ind npecification.

77-0130-79 Repair doors and insulate ceilinq inguiudinj No. 308. Recaived work requestand *Fpe(fication.

77-0138-79 Rehab. heoting Ivilding9 No. 224. Designin preparation. No docurmentsm availolae*.

77-0439-79 Rehab. of Building No. 427. Receivedwork request and specific:atlon.

77-0010-80 Rehab. h.,tnlg luilding No. 339. DesignIn preparation. No docutents ovoialeb¢.

77-0036-00 Repair leaky windows in Fit2thum Village.Aecalved work request.

£XEC SUM 4-7 VILSECK

7T-0103-80 Central heating of Suildings No. 103,104, 114 through 117 and 134. Receivedwork roquest. Design in preparation. Nodocuments available.

7T-0122-80 Rehab. heating system in luilding No. 322MLaundry). Receivad work request andspecif ication.

77-0150-80 Rehab. Zour mess halls in 01,000 soncalps. Seen specifliations.

77-0279-80 Replace air conditioning system luildingNo. 113. Received Work request.

77-0318-80 Replace front doors in SuIlding No. 354(Theatre). ReceIved work request.

7T-0361-80 Rehab. heating Building No. 324. Seenspec If icat Ion.

1T-03514-0 New lights In Building No. 323(Gymnasium). Received work request endspecification.

7T-0411-80 Rehab. of Heating sy3teo In Buildinqs No.""7-0144-eO 345 and 346; and connect to heating plant7T-0413-80 in suilding No. 355. Received work

request and specification.

77-0412-80 Rehab. hoating Buildinq No. 260 area. Nodocuvtents avalloble.

WO-315I-80 Building No. 336 Rehab. Ruilding andheaoing system, connect to Suildl;)9 No.355. No documents available.

Wo-3154-SC Building No. 224. Replac vindo*ws. Nodocusents &villable.

irO-3179-80 Building No. 264. Install ceiling andwall insulation. No documents avaIlable.

WO-3212-80 Building No. 202. Install ceilingInsulation, replace windows. Nodocuments available.

e(0-3294-SC buildir.q No. 341, 142. Replsce roof, addexternal toll lnt•uating cement. Nodocunents available.

0(XEC SUP 4-6 VILSECK

7T-0077-81 luilding No, 225 New Windows, vew .Jesting

System, Connect to Bailer in Suilding No.248. •ecetved Work request.

I7-0119-61 Replace ingle pane windows with double

7?-0120-11 pane thermal glass in the 16 billets and

7?-0121-61 4 meSS halls of "1,000 man camp", and

7?-0124-t1 replace old exterior plaster by

71-0129-01 Insulating plaster in the 16 billets.Received copy of work request.

77-0306-11 lulldinqs No. 233 and 234. Replace roof,

add external Wall insulating plaster. Nodocuments available.

7n-0315-31 Bulidings Mo. 231 and 232. Replace roof#add external vWal insulating plaster. No

documents Available.

7T-0316-0l Rehab. heating, tvildin v No. 243 and244. No decuments available.

7T-0O20-Sl Rehab. of luilding No. 221. No documantsavailable.

7?-0327-61 Buildings No. 273, 274 end 275. Replicowindowe. No documents available.

7T-0429-41 Building No. 301t Rahab. heating systam,

new vindsw', wall and ceiling Insulation,connect to Building No. 355. i601ing

0o. 354t Convert Steam heating system to

hot water, add bloears. No docusentsavaliable.

WO-3274-61 Building No. 431: Rahab building. Nodocuments available.

WO-3294-41 Buildinq No. 1211 Arhab building. Nodocuments available,

Ptgect Is unfunded or subject to available funds.

4.6 4CRAM1ENT PROZECTS BY £/C RATIO

tab:e 10-10 Volur.e 6 of th6 Pr~final Submittal, ranks

all the recommended Increlmnt A, 0, F Ind G projects by

X/C ratio. A copy Is Included in this Summary.

£XEC sUm 4-9 VIU.SCK

O ~ FutjURF~ ENr.RGY comvm1.P!nm

4.7?1 GENERAL

fn this •etion we have analyted the effect of futurefacility changes on the energy consumption of theVilseck Subcommanity. Tables 11-1, 11-2 and 11-3 listthe chanqes in construction In two categories: MewConstructions and Domolltions. These tables areincluded in Appendix 11-b, Volume 7, PrefinalSubmittal.

4.7.2 AVArLABLE DATA

V.lseck did not have a tormalized MKater Plan so wedeveloped our estimated future enerqy use from othetdata made available to us. ?he data consisted otf

A. 7ATC MCA Project Status Report, dated 10 February,

1982.

b. Building floor areas from 7ATC faster PlanningSeetlon, Grafenwoehr.

C. Design tnergy budgets listed in MTL 1110-3-295.

0 Since the average heating dgree days (NDD) 4tVllseck is sore then 7•000 pet year, ClimaticRegion No. 1 was selected and used to determinethe Design Energy budgets appropri ate to theproposed facility changes.

4.7.3 ANALYSIS

The estimated energy usage of 1,403,666 SF of newconstruction is 91,359 NStu/yr. Thin is *quivalent to28% of the total energy consumption of ty 0O.

The estimated energy reduction trom 13,904 SF ofdemolitlons Is 998 M4tu/yr. This is equivalent to 0.3%of the total energy consumption of ry 50.

Therefore, the not estimated future energy consumptionfor the Vilseck Subcommunity is 90,361 hbtu/yr andresults froo all facilLties changus planned up to andincludin; PY 38. This is equivalent to a 271 IncreaseIn total *nergy consumption of FI 8O.

It is arsumed that all new conatruction willIncorpoatet required *nerqy consorvat:ive features intheir desgns.

0EKI'.C SUM 4,*10 VILSLCK

O .8 TRAINING COURSES

We have presented in Section 12, Volu•e 6 of thePrefinal Submittal recommendations on Government andCommercial sponsored training courses. we recommendthese courses as additional training for the VjjseokracilLitis Engineer Division.

rt is not our Intent to suqgest that this additionaltraining be considered as basic training but rather ascrfresher oa familiarization courses. ?raining intequired to update current knowledge and to learn newtechnology.

The one course we strongly recmomend is the PreventiveMaintenance seminar.

CXEC sum 4-1,1 VILLSECK

ENERGY CONSUMPT ANALYSIS USINGQ AX(tS8 COMPUTER

PROGRAM (ICV11 A & C ONILY)

5.1 MODELING OF -VtYED BUILDINCS

Each of the surveed buildings has been mode)ed on theAXCESS Input Data Sheets, using filid survey data,veathae data suppllsd by EUD, occupancy schedul4s,building construction data, etc; and the model vtrifiledega9nat historical energy use (when available) andadjusted until riesonable agreement is obtained.

S.2 COMPUTER OUTPUT

Each Output consists of three parts:

a. Input data

b. beJIgn day space heat gain calculat1tn, (based on18 C outside air temperature).

0. Rerult of the hour-by-hour AXC9SS energy€onsviaption calculatLons. The Result conslets ofa two page output.

The first page shows the month-by-monthconsumption values oft

1. Total So.rce Inetgy I Matu

2. slectr city t kvh

3. Anthracite Coal I P-tons

4. Puel Oil No. 2 * gal

S. ?uel Oil No. 6 1 gal

6. Interior Lights t kwh

7. [quipment i kwh

8. Misc. Cquipment t kWh

g. Psn Power I kWh

:0. Domestic Hot Water I Attu (Sourceenergy)

0£X£C SUM, 5-1 VZLSICK

0 The Cecond pag#shows the month-by-sonthConsMBAPtion values of all the above 10 quantities!n kbtu/yr/sf of building atea.

rt &ISo indtictes the annual percent of totalenergy consumption by each of the above 10quantities.

5.3 UTILZA'TION 0F AXC:SS RESULTS

As a result of making an AXCCSS analysie of buildingsof qvery type, the average kltu/yr/af of each buld;Inqtypo has been determinod.

Knowing the square toot area of all buildings of eachtype, energy consuled by all buildings of a given typehis been calculated by extrapolation.

By 4nalyting all types of buildings, the energyconsumed by all the buildings in the Subcommunity hasbe#4 estimated.

5.4 AVERACE CNERGY CON514P?1ON PER BUILDING TiPt

Wede on f.he analysis of th3 surveyed buildings, theWeighted average values of mnnual source energyconaumption per square foot by each of the buil imntypes for space heating, domestic hot water, light Inand miscellaneous electric power, are thovn In TableS-lb In 'Table S-2, the above values have beenexpressed as percentage* of the total source energy perbuilding type.

5.4.1 GENERAL CONtILNTS

We observit that the average total s4urce energyConsumption is 1.0 kitu/yr/sf of which 34 units (10t)er* olectrical end lS units (82%) are fuel.

On an averajge, a building consuamer 134 units for spicehoeting, 20 for ONW, 16 for lightIng anrd 19 forascelllandous electrical equipment.

Three building types consume sore than 200 katu/yr/sftfor $Pace h..aling: and as a result of the recomendedenergy conservati.on proeocts, these values will besign 9 icantly lowered.

WX£C SUm1 5-2 VILM9

- KM KA SM.Y ,I PO YIN 9 -

MWit Tv w M•AL "L wJ[ got3 04 UPWt( 14I 019C WILD WAF

OwM 1,11405S A

IP6g7 hAT LfVt(W A P.E

-1 -2- -2 - -4- -3- . 4-7- 4- 49 -01. -I1- .12- -12 -

OM I TA7 129.2 114.3 .0 04.7 V.7 15.5 9.4 LI 0.3 151.2I, I WK. 114.2 113.S 2.7 IIIo3 0.0 2L7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.4

LDAMSfl 3 41099. V54.2 360.1 34.1 170.0 90.1 12.7 21.4 0.0 21. •"-2.FNI HC S Moll. 242.9 1t7 .95.0 154.4 %3.A 2.9 &A. X.6 i's. 1t•.4?rA 3M 4 27920. 04.9 97.4 49.3 7.5 X4.1 19.3 10.4 11,? 1.3 107.0I 1= 7 W41. 195.3 1•7.0 2•.3 143.7 2.3 21.9 4.4 0.0 .4 ,77.21OTi 9 IM. .9 MA52.3 41.4 321.5 0. 7.9 "W7 19.7 14. 3M2LAMOP it 111k. 21.1 203.1 37.4 175-60. *27S 4.2 2.2 42. 10.0 213.3PCh I It loft36. 294.4 U2R.? 31.7 N. f lo. 117 14.0 4.4 L.4 247.3W lSM 2 Q 1. 2=3.1 102.2 20.3 277.4 24.0 13.6 4.? 0.0 4,7 M 3.

13 O3c. 117.7 132.2 2as. 151.5 0.? "10.4 15.1 , .0 13.1 151.3I.NtD 14 11741. W.3 101.3 42.0 too.? 0.4 7.9 34.1 2?.? 4.4 171.1CMIS( Is W41~. 210.@ 114.2 10.0. 177J . 3 LI 4. 71.5 %J. 1410 1"0.1A•'47PA 11 04117. 04.1 127.% 31.2 !1.1, 12.J Ia; 12.# . 12.M 1•4.OM. I 17 2730MA. 179.2 140.2 19.0 IW.7 S .' 10.W3 V. 0.7 6. 141,.61" I W ,31. 144.0 14•.6 20.2 144.1 I.A 4.2 IS, 1.0 15.0 147.5Wv l M !9 3377?. 170.' 17S.7 92.2 15.. 22.6 72.7 Q2.! $., 9.1 '"07.fi'UM 2 20 3711, 11.44 W~t.? 549 IT,1 4.2 17.4 39VA 1.0 20.5 132.2WIVrAw 2,1 74¶. 114.3 00.7 P.0 All 2.2 17,2 14.9 0.0 3.1 lI.2NUM, 2 . 215.0 170 0 I0.0 I7,,0 0.0 12.0 f).,. 0.0 V.0 1I.9FV N R4 24121O. 140.4 N4., 51. 602 34.7 17,4 6.1 77,2 4.9 9f.1

ARM190.4 I .S 25.0 IN4 21.1 .5?7 19.3 50,.4 0. 160.5 k:

PMJE, LIM7

OOV M"TIN IPJMIg KIM O 41CM P'A ble 5-2

Fe OM~ cm~w-utr XM M 1~-

smw To ff TOTAL M. siCvi IN I T Plu Vt~ 30low A

4- -2 3. 4 - 4- *1- - 4f- -to- all- 012 13

IK61 2 I1O.0 97.7 2.3 ff7. 40 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IM4IN no 100.0 30.4 11.4 571 20.6, 4.3 7.3 0.0 7.2 ms.wMon 1 106.0 13.1 21.7 63.3 11.0 M. t2.3 10.9 m, 73.1F" or$ " 4 1t.CO. W44 33.4 50.0 W~ 13.1 20.4 1.0 12.5 W2

cm. 7 106.0 035 14.!. .0 1.7 11.2 .23 0.0 2.) '4.2M=p 9 1CM.0 15.A 14.2 0.4 0.3 2.7 11.3 4.7 4.0 ILI

LOSW 10 .0.0 73.0 2.0 47.4 10.4 1.4 '20.4 It.? .44.1ILNMI" it 11 10.0 0.2 14.3 07.3 LO0 5.3 &.4 1.$ 3.0 04.2

YAU12 10.0. W3 4.3 IL.I 7.? 4.2 2.1 0.0 2.1 101.2am. 13 300.0 6.4 14.4 0.3 M. 5.9 1.5 9.0 C.S 61.1PMLD 14 100.0 01.2 1ILI 0.0- 3.3 M. 15.3 12.4 2.9 14.4MamS~ is 10.0 b.0 $7.0 42.2 6.4 12.0 25.0 IM. S.2 44.7

oL 1@ 17 100.0 19.4 10.4 IM. Cs5 5.? 4.9 0.4 4.5 1. )toj~1 1M4.0 17. 1M.1 17.0 0.* 2.1 1.6 0.4 t.0 "-.1

W mIt 100. 64.4 75 I'.1 $4.5 3. 12.1 23.1 19. .3 V-377FIX NX N W00,0 74.0 14.0 72§.0~ 1. 0 1.o .1 0.0 W3.1 70.1PIVKM 21 1CO. 0 10.3 27.7 04. 1.1 15.0 14.7 0.0 14.7 M447MAX 12 1.0 41.0 1.41 41.9 0.0 6.0 30.2 22.2 k,0 40.5

M W 24 100.0 43.3 14. 7 40.4 24.7 11.7 me. 10.3 4.4 41.4

j*VLT 1"0 01.4 16.4 70.5 11.1 0.2 10.1 $4 4.7 M9.

_______________

Tables 5-1 and 5i-2

mm Itf~llPcw 4 ri FU.DI) TIP[

n? I W(11~TO rIYI KM FO CKFM 'A'

ft'U.t1M ZY raE PAR11DiM TIK

1131UlWM YtSM

(WII/t~ VW~C.UM (7) s WLJ3W II

(CU.'S (91 0 MOWS~ (10)

MM'~ (D)) .1*t CUPL(2

L '11EV MUM~.'S EITOI(I LiR4t"Wo M1W JI~LV4 4 S

0!W, WlAtL' F$6 at rkwCT PAI6.

W94~ at m 10.trm

~-uu~aa,~AT. Main OZtinsa.. ~ mia~

O .5 rTOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPT'ION PER NUILDING TYPZ AND BYENTIRE SUCCIMMUN11'Y

the annual values of total fuel (coal or oal)consumption (M~tut), electricity consumption (MWH andequivalent source (M4tut)) as well as total energy?fuel and electricity consumption (M14tuT)) by eac9 typeof building have been determined, as shown in Table5-3, using the average values per building type and theGSF area of the type.

The 'miscellaneous, consumption consistz of theconsewption by Items such as Street Lighting, SewageTreatment Plant and Water Pump Station.

Table 5-3 alo shows the percent of total fuel, totalelectricity and tot" energy, consumed by each of thebuilding types.

5.5S. 1 GCNZRAL CCOMENTS

5.5.1.1 7FUEL CONSUMPTION

We observe that the topmost consumers of fuel (coal andoil) are the following building typeos

F8aily Housing , 24.2%

SM &&tracks w/o Mess a 17.8%

Applied Instruction a 14.00

motor/Tank Repair * 1312%

Theze building types consume 70% of the total fuel.

5.5.1.2 ELECTRICITY CONSUM¶PTION

The leading consumers of electricty are the followingbuilding types:

family Housing a 35,51

CM barracks v/w/o Mesc , 16,t

Applied nAstruction a 6.9%

Commissary a 6,71

Motor/Tank Otpsir a 6.61

CXEC SUM 5-3 VT V; ECK

v1USM 5.mU iTf TablQ -

i- 1- .1 4* . 5 -$ 4-- -7. o.1 -I4 t i- -12- *11- *14"

1c 34 M.27. 114.3 25.0 179.3 4W$5. f*: N507. 17.j 15.7 17.2 23.7 EAVPQ

214. "~1 4. 112.5 2. 114.2 42t. 141. 4425. 2.4 0.2 2.0 2-2 14nW tIM

3 4. 46M~. 14.1 34.1 V4.2 121M1. 17". JI7M9 4.7 2.5 4.2 2.1 01 'MS

5 It. =321. 190.j 53. 241.1 m41? Ils44. RW34. 17.2 19.7 17.1 14.0 F

4 . 32%10. 147.0 41.3 144. 1721. fit. 040. 2.4 1.3 2.0 CM N

*1 1. 1001S 25.3 41.4 2W2. M445 434. X.A. 2.0 0,7 1.0 0.4 11CTE

t0 L. Ill"4. M8.1 57.4 24-5 W32. 042. 2114. 0,1 1.0 0., 0.7 Aw~R

It it. tem3. 242.7 2117 214.4 =?7. 33%. 3110. 10.7 5.2 1.7 4. WMh MP

12 2. Vo3. Y7.2 20.3 2M.5 113.A. 742. 12104. 4.4 1.2 1.1 2.2 tYM4Mi

13 1. 6441. 152.2 25.5 177.7 19W. W*. 1171. 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 041C.

1 1. 11741. 111.2 42.0 W2.1 2229. 412. 2UM. 0.8 0.$ 0.9 0.7 1W.11ce

15 4. 1M~. 190.2 1t.I 2S.4 7W4. 4m3. 11604. 2.1 4.8 3.4 2.' Cm1s~w

It to. IM1P. 1274.5 71.2 104.1 It":7. 3202. 137*4. 4.1 4.2 4.1 5.0 A?016'A

1? 23. 22342. 10.2 19.0 177.? V2U3. "44. 411M. 14.4 7.0 12.0 1-.9 Vt¶. ("5

"53. 44.00. IWO 4IN . 1744, 14362. 4.1 2.1 4-S M. M~I5

I 7. wV. 175. '5.2 int. WOi. W4-4. 104,10. :34 !3l 3.3 2.3 W W

all.4.7. 140. 94.1 .1.3.4 2031. 342. 1774. 0.4 M. 0.' 0.4 ME~ hWx

21 1. 7M5. W. VJ.0 114.2 1 ". N54. 152. 04 0.4 0.7 0.4 a I vytR

22 1. *232. 170.0 105.0 273.0 t'~? cN.57. 17.11. 0.4 2.0 t.5 0.4 M -C rl"

74 8. 2*0. I" $i 1 5 1. 241.4 164C7. 14 24113. 42 02.i 7.4 1.1 I'Ih i~)

5 0. 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0. M I. V5l. . V1 1.2 0.

I 2. -t'4 711, M!~~!'. lee.-O3') M, I ,m. A ~ .

!Y) 0.. qi,, .;n a~' kVi 'It 7" \. ('' ~ ~

P0WPI IVD W0TPit IN OYUJ IITP100)

pa ag w pt 14 WV WNW.1~Q

FXWit IN G' iA1V410M)Cou 34) * cot (s)

7. trW 1TI. YWflY AC (MUfL.) WtLSP71Cw

mu, Noftt u3'.Inlty W"l)ftm W~) (M,6W14 M)

S32) 1 Mtn~ (5)

t.~ ~ m AART71g L1 JY M7MaTICNIN slu I.PIrov3MC'I." (P I V9(4

JO.~C InV.. ? cvM IN M.AIMC It lo'

M.. (1 t.a..mm C . -mc

IVXPI.vm 11L n1asvI A"'

0 Ooficers mess/Club 5 .,71

Advinistration 4 4.1t

These building types Consume 82t of the total

electricity consumption.

PRISLINT AND PROJECTD ENERGY COSTS

lased on the averagq ene#gy consumptton volqes obtainedwe have develope aend shown the present tY 10 as wellas projected FY 84 snergy costs (If no energyconservation actions ace inpltemnttd) foe spaceheatinq, tHW, lighting, miscellaneous, and to•tal energyfor each building typo In 'Tbles S-0A and 5-46.

.CE1RAL COMMENTS

Ne observe that on an avorage, the annual energy costis 93 cents per square foot, of which 65 cents Is forspace heating, 10 cents is for DW, I cents forlighting and 10 cents for miscellaneous electricalequipment such as boiler pumps, unit beater fens,washing oochines and stoves.

*etwoen IPY 1980 end FY 1984, the energy cost willIncrease by a factor of 1.6 if no energy conservationmeasures are Impleorenttd: i.e., the aninual energy costwill Increase trot, approxlmately 81.2 million to $1.9million.

EXEC Sulu V:USSC

PO"7~ UST4VXK i )., P:U[1y 'Table 5-4A

Mv CWSI'-:9 ~IOt CLS¶ FT

FI OM s 4,11I WRTC CM S 3h#. 10

I mu mm 41. M4 . 5 42 wfmfl~T sm24 m 0. 1. 0. %..3 in vs 4m.99 12. 42. 1. ti. 141.s FM ftN 22514. 14. 111. 12. 14. lit.4 A1 VR09 ~79, 75 r5M2. 10. 15. 727 !M r,441. it 2 1. $- 9LI NIATOR UA. lit. 0. 4. 17. 142.10 LAK"~ I 116. 04. M2 2. 27. 127.11I~tR NM0"W 2. 124. 1. 9. 6. 1212 0"40 M139 133. 12. 7. 2. 14

20 M11112 1 741. V. 2. . It. 109.

IT W ~ , 2 . Ia 2.A 47. I!4.

.2' FPS6~ ml Y~ d 7. 7.1,0.

22 MM =, f. 10.. 41. 9 3.

0 MA L)STbVIL24M sk~uim"Y Tabl* 5-411

Re. cm t 7.14fl "S CUMI~.Ca'VT I S 41I1m

VAQ

nit Mcf ev~ twe VMRie taTAL

I v M272.4.?1.6. 1.2 "Mm4 si.u 0.2.. i1 01 less " 123. 71. It. 14.3 A $= ?=14. 121. 2V. It. 2.4 19'.

SX 2OI 41. 121. 1. 11. S. 1..

TI I 'sP 1I94 ~ 19. 1. %? M..

AM I a1,4 A

14 MX I42 Wo 1 1 142. 2'. 15. d). 117.

0stim "I 3. 1 0

SE. Z�FORMATION 4RECEIVED FRAlM SUICOMMUNITY

We have pre•ented in Section 2 of the Energy Report

details of the fol2owing:

*6 Drawings

b. Utility and Fuel sills

c. Xnforamtion ot Previous Studies

d. Buildin~g Information Schedule

eo Basic Utility System maps

f. Facility ngineering 7schnical Data Report

q. Sub•omunity Fixed Facility Inergy Plan

h. Land Use Plan and Planned Physical Plant Expansionb at

i. Population Dot&

0tXC:C SUt•. •-1 VtLStCK<

CENERGY CONSUMPTION DATA AND SUBCOMIMUITY GOALS

Presented herein are the followvnq tables:

Table 3.3-1 fuel and 'lactrlcIty Prices

Table 1.3-2 Annual Lwerqy Consumption and Cost Profllefor FY 7S, 78, 79 and 80

Table 3.2-1 Znecqy Consumption Goals for rY 8S

Tiblv 3.4 Vils*ck 'Typica1 building £nergyConsumpti on

0IXEC SP' 7-1V1LS ECK

'/ZLSECK Tabl* 3.340-

fY £4 fUL PRICES, lXASED Ot FUE, PRICES IN fy 01,

rl 41 fY 14

FUEL UVIT

ELECTRICITY I'wK 0.08 6.016 0.12 9.950

COAL, Ik-,To 127 4.C71 169 5.419

NO. 2 OIL GAL 1.22 8.794 1.01 13.032

N0. 6 OIL ,AL 0.$7 5.810 1.29 1.612

EL.ECTRI,+C KVA 9.50 13• 0" -,

COA,,ERSIOtN rikCTORS: (10) 6 JT

0.0216 MBTU £LECT•MI¢TY

31.2 MSTV COAL

0.1307 t4BTU PC-. Z! O7 L

0.148• YF.l NO. L C:"

______________

0 .*ýTAC!)4N??? ?O AZLE 3.3-,-

AMMlAL ZICAATIN RALT2S P12 'tCZPN

MlL Fy 01 rY 2 FY 13 FY604

ILIC?2ICflTY is% 23% 13% 13%

COAL 101 lot 10% 101

-Ozz 14% 14% 14% 14%

COMS!2U0H FACTORS

I US DOLLAR to 2 ON

24.3 MbU/Stiozt ton at Ainthr~cite Coal

I short taft $17.1147 kg

1,*o' 1000.0000 kg

I gallon *3.715 literg

1 US DOL WR per gallon' a 0.5204 DH per liter

0-1

W , . ' I I * '

I A

W11

Nl -- . 3 1 o

0 v - , ,- 1" , It i . i l ! l li % 0• ' e , .I at, ..

IN

~~~~~ J]. * I_

;Iiii% 'I I : . i • .^,J,- , I ,, -_ ON

;pi i " ,

, .i1 1 ,

- .1 ~I *,l-s I, ll :{. I-' I

II! t.-!! l •: • • J •i Ia;1 , .

; ! •..:.i' F "' - [ I I~*• i ,, .j •' •i -'"

ft dIft iad 40 f

ft - .. f ~ ~ * - . f

'a * q

,. p.

ftIt- - - ---- ____ ____

* a ~ a ~ - S ~ - - ~ ~ -

9 zI'a'a'

TABLZ 3.4VILBECK TYPICAL BUILDING

ZNEXGY CONSUMPTION

143?UIYRTYPE P., s IgL QL ?UEL

1 252 •1 ARR• KS wo/ME38 237 2195

2 152 HUTN"'mTS 0 345

1 1.61. EHmESS 159 1285

5 433 FAtIZLY HOUSING 350 1025

4 429 FAMILY HOUSING (NEW) 423 1352

7 410 DIPZINCNT GRADE SCHOOL 442 2490

9 354 THEATER 436 2644

10 322 LAUNDRY 642, 2392

11 308 MOTMR/TANK REPAIR 975 9145

12 323 GYMNAS• I UM 4s5 7487

13 21$ CHAPEL 169 1003

14 215 DOWLING 493 2008

is 217 RETAIL STORE/COMMISARY 1215 236S

16 265 ADINISTRATION 45 1.2C9

17 34S APPLIED INSTAUCTION 170 1713

18 134 STOREPOUSE/WARMflOUSE 231 1615

19 133 OPENl HISS/tCO 1261 2976

20 201 TIRE STATION 363 977

21. 301 DISPENSARY 253 1403

22 422 TELEPXON- EXCHANGE 653 $64

24 840 rAMILY HOUSING (OFF BASE) 170 3009

O S. DATA COLI.ECrD BY BUILDING SURVEY AND SELECTION OFREPRESENTATIVE 6UILDINGS (INCRF.ENTS A 6 V ONLY)

The following data has been presented in detail In theKnerqy report and was orignally presented in thoPreliminary Submittals

Sutldinq Envelope Construct•ln Data.

Occupancy, Lq•.tirnq, tquSpment and DHW Data.

Torminal Heating Syse.nu and Control Data.

Primary Weatinq Systems Oata.

ftossLble Energy Conservatlon Opportunities.

We have presented in the following table an updatfdlist of representative buildings of each type selectedfor detailed Energy Corservation Analysis. In sometypes, we bave selected more than one building foranalyzis in order to obtain more realistic basewideextrapolated EIP or CMA projects.

0EXV' SU e-1 VILSICK

Tabl.e 4 .60

VI LStCX

1,01LPD:G "1'pt

TYPE DESCRIPIO SP?20to

1t WMMRACKS W/o Nzss, IOQ 252

2 HU?14CWS 152

5 ?TJ'ILY HOUSIN4G 433

6 MA&ULY HOUSING (NCW) 429

I DePt~4ot"' GRADE tCHool. 4$0

9 THtAThE 354

10 LAMMOR 322

11 MOTOR/TANK RtPA.IR SUOP 20Se 305

12 (ITMN&VIJM '323

13CHAME 218

14 BOWLIN~G CCU4TZA 215

RETAIL STORE/C0MM#*S$AAY 217

16 AD.'ANISTRAION 245

i7APPLIED INSTRIC?!ON )431 349

is ST0OECHUSE/wARCHOUSE 134

OPEN KiEss NCO/CLUS 13)

20 r:RE STATIOtN 20 1

llse8s~ 0

TLPHOI:z ExtHANG 422

2- ae,'L dýe L - -n., 940