FEDERAL REGISTER - U.S. Government Publishing Office

FEDERALREGISTERV O L U M E 31 • N U M B E R 38

Friday, February 25, 1966 • Washington, D.C.

Pages 3107-3170

Agencies in this issue—The PresidentAgricultural Research Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Coast GuardConsumer and Marketing Service Emergency Planning Office Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interior Department International Commerce Bureau Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Post Office Department Securities and Exchange Commission

Detailed list o f Contents appears inside.

/934

Just Released

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS(As of January 1, 1966) .

Title 7—Agriculture (Parts 46-51)(Revised)

$1.00

Title 46—Shipping (Parts 146-149)(Revised)

$2.50

A Cumulative Checklist of CFR issuances for 1966 appears in the first issue of each month under Title 1.

Order from Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office,

Washington, D.O. 20402

Area Code 202FERERALWREGISTER

Phone 963-3261

Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Archives BuUding, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B ), under regulations prescribed by the Admin-

Distribution is made only by the SuperintendentFederal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I ) . of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

The Federal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per m onth or $15.00 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages and 5 cents for each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first Federal Register issue of each m onth.

There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal R egister or the Code of Federal Regulations.

ContentsTHE PRESIDENT

EXECUTIVE ORDERTo exempt employees of the Postal

Field Service from certain provisions of Executive Order 10358, as amended by Executive Order No. 11226, relating to the observance of holidays by government agencies__________ ___ 3111

EXECUTIVE AGENCIESAGRICULTURAL RESEARCH

SERVICEProposed Rule MakingForeign quarantine notices; im

portation of nursery stocks, plants and seeds____________ 3124

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENTSee Agricultural Research Serv

ice; Consigner and Marketing Service; Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIONNoticesArmed Forces Radiobiology Re

search Institute; issuance of facility amendment_____ ______ 3142

General Dynamics Corp.; issuance of facility license___________ _ 3141

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARDNoticesD e t r o i t-Toronto, Erie-Toronto

Route case; postponement of prehearing conference________ 3141

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONRules and RegulationsHealth, Education, and Welfare

Department; excepted service_3113

COAST GUARDProposed Rule MakingNavigation and vessel inspection_3122

COMMERCE DEPARTMENTSee International Commerce Bu

reau.

CONSUMER AND MARKETING SERVICE

Rules and RegulationsCelery grown in Florida; expenses

and rate of assessment___ __3115Proposed Rule Making Milk in certain marketing areas:

Greater Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfleld, Ohio; decision__ 3126

Tampa Bay; notice of hearing_3125

NoticesHumanely slaughtered livestock;

identification of c a r c a s s e s ; changes in list of establish- ments___________ _________ 3138

EMERGENCY PLANNING OFFICE Rules and Regulations Federal disaster assistance; grant

in lieu of temporary housing orother emergency shelter______ 3121

NoticesAmerican Samoa; notice of major

disaster___. . . ______________ 3144

FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION

Rules and RegulationsCounties designated:

Barley crop insurance________ 3113Wheat crop insurance________ 3113

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD

NoticesFederal savings and loan associa

tions ; change in office locations. 3142

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

NoticesFarrell Lines Inc., and Delta

Steamship Lines Inc.; agreement filed for approval__ .____ 3142

Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc.; order to show cause____ _____ 3143

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSIONNotices Hearings, etc.:

Algonquin Gas TransmissionCo., and Tennessee GasTransmission Co__________ 3143

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America_______________ 3143

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICERules and Regulations Sport fishing:

Choctaw National Wildlife Refuge, Alabama_____________ 3117

Washita National Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma____ _______ 3118

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

Rules and Regulations Canned artichokes; confirmation

of effective date__ __________ 3116Food additives:

Carrageenan with polysorbate8 0 ----- 3116

Nickel sulfate_______________ 3116

Hazardous substances; exemption from labeling requirements:

Cigarette lighters containingbutane and/or isobutane___ 3116

Felt pads impregnated withethylene glycol________ 3117

Propylene glycol and glycerin;exem ption_________________ 3115

NoticesExtension of temporary toler

ances:Fungicide dodine___________ 3140Nickel sulfate and maneb_____ 3141

Petitions filed:International Minerals and

Chemical Corp______ 3141Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. 3141

HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT

See Food and Drug Administration.

INTERIOR DEPARTMENTSee aJso Fish and Wildlife Service ;

Land Management Bureau.NoticesStatement of changes in financial

interests:Carpenter, Hubbell____ ____ 3137Eppard, Clyde M____________ 3137Hall, Glenn J__ _______ _____ 3137Lengnick, Lewis W___________ 3137McMealey, John Lawrence___ 3137McNeer, Charles S______ 3137Negroni, Julio A____________ 3137Neubauer, John P______ ¿Í_____ 3137Ramirez, Rafael R_____ ______ 3138Schultz, LeRoy J __ ____ 3138Watson, Charles W__________ 3138Williams, Carl H____________ 3138

INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE BUREAU

NoticesPetuch, Boleslaw and Hydraulics

A.G.; order denying export privileges --------------------------------- 3138

Rad. Reps.; Factors Ltd., et al; order temporarily denying export privileges______________ 3140

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

Notices Motor carrier:

Broker, water c a r r i e r andfreight forwarder applications___ i_____:________ __3146

Temporary authority applications_____________________ 3165

Transfer proceedings. ____ _ 3166(Continued on next page)

3109

3110 CONTENTS

LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAUNoticesAlaska; filing of plat of survey___ 3136Idaho:

Filing of protraction diagram.- 3136Special rules for grazing dis

tricts_____________________ 3137Nevada; filing of plat of survey

and order providing for opening of lands____________________ 3136

POST OFFICE DEPARTMENTRules and Regulations Miscellaneous amendments to

chapter (2 documents)___ 3119, 3120

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Notices Hearings, etc.:

Atchison, Topeka & Santa FeRailway Co______________ 3144

Continental Vending MachineCorp_____ _______________ 3144

International Utilities OverseasCapital Corp_____________ 3145

Pinal County Development Association_____________ _— 3146

TREASURY DEPARTMENTSee Coast Guard.

List of CFR Parts Affected(Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month.

A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since lanuary 1, 1966, and specifies how they are affected.

3 CFREXECUTIVE ORDER11272__________ 3111

5 CFR213_____________ ____ ____ —— 3113

7 CFR401 (2 documents)_____________ 3113967_________ 3115P roposed R u l e s :319_________________ 31241012__________ 31251033 _______________________ 31261034 _ 3126

21 CFR1____________________ 311551_______________________________ 3116121 (2 documents)__ 1__ 3116191 (2 documents)____ .____ 3116, 3117

32 CFR1710________________________ I.— 3121

33 CFRP roposed R ules :80_______________ 312290_:_____________________________ 312295_________ 3122

39 CFR33______ 31193 4 ..._______________________ 311948___________________________ 311951 _________________ 312052 (2 documents)_________ 3119, 312053 .......__.......... —— _______ — 312058___ ________ — ____________ 312061___________________ 3120132 _ 3120133 ___________ —___________ 312146 CFRP roposed R ules :10.____ 312250 CFR33 (2 documents)__________3117, 3118

Presidential Documents

Title 3— THE PRESIDENTExecutive Order 11272

TO EXCEPT EMPLOYEES OF THE POSTAL FIELD SERVICE FROM CERTAINPROVISIONS OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10358, AS AMENDED BYEXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 11226, RELATING TO THE OBSERVANCE OFHOLIDAYS BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIESBy virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United

States, it is hereby ordered as follows:Section 1. Executive Order No. 103581 of June 9,1952, as amended

by Executive Order No. 11226 2 of May 27,1965, entitled “Observance of Holidays by Government Agencies,” is hereby further amended

(1) by changing section 1 to read as follows:“Section 1. Except as provided in section 10, this Order shall apply

to all executive departments, independent agencies, and Government- owned or Government-controlled corporations, including their field services.”

(2) by adding a new section 10 as follows:“Sec. 10. The provisions of sections 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 of this Order

shall not apply to the postal field service, and the Postmaster General shall provide by regulation for equivalent benefits for all employees of the postal field service.”

Sec. 2. The amendments to Executive Order No. 10358, as amended, ordered by section 1 of this Order shall be effective upon issuance of this Order.

L yndon B. J ohnsonT h e W h ite H ouse,

February 23,1966.[F.R. Doc. 66-2088; Filed, Feb. 24,1966; 11: 28 a.m.]

13 CFR, 1949-1953 Comp., p. 875; 17 F.R. 5269.a 30 F.R. 7213.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3113

Rules and RegulationsTitle 5— ADMINISTRATIVE

PERSONNELChapter I-—Civil Service Commission

PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICEDepartment of Health, Education, and

WelfareSection 213.3316 is amended to show

that two positions of Confidential Secretary to the Assistant Secretary for Individual and Family Services are excepted under Schedule C. Effective on publication in the F ederal R egister, paragraph (n) and subparagraph (1) thereunder are added to § 213.3316 as set out below.§ 213 .3316 Department o f Health, Edu

cation, and W elfare.* * .* * *

(n) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Individual and Family Services. (1) Two Confidential Secretaries to the Assistant Secretary for Individual and Family Services.(R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218)

U nited S tates Civil S ervice Co m m issio n ,

[ seal] M ary V. W enzel,Executive Assistant to

the Commissioners.

Bannock.Benewah.Bingham.Bonneville.Camas.Canyon.Caribou.Cassia.Franklin.Fremont.Gooding.Idaho.Jefferson.

Kent.

Becker.Chippewa.Clay.Grant.Kandiyohi.Kittson.Mahnomen.Marshall.Norman.Otter Tail.

Big Horn.Blaine.Cascade.Chouteau.Daniels.Fallon.Fergus.Glacier.Hill.Judith Basin.

Idaho

Jerome.Kootenai.Latah.Lewis.Lincoln.Madison.Minidoka.Nez Perce.Oneida.Owyhee.Power.Teton.Twin Falls.

Maryland

Queen Annes. M innesota

Pennington.Polk.Pope.Bed Lake.Roseau.Stearns.Stevens.Swift. 'Traverse.Wilkin.

Montana

Liberty.Pondera.Richland.Roosevelt.Sheridan.Stillwater.Teton.Toole.Valley.Yellowstone.

[FJt. Doc. 66-1964; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:45 a.m.]

Title 7— AGRICULTUREChapter IV— Federal Crop Insurance

Corporation, Department of Agriculture

PART 401— FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE

Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 and Succeeding Crop Years

A ppend ix— Cou n ties D esignated for B arley Crop Insurance

Pursuant to authority contained in § 401.1 of the above-identified regulations, the following counties have been designated for barley crop insurance for the 1967 crop year.

California

Kern. San Luis Obispo.Modoc. Tulare.

Colorado

Boulder. Sedgwick.Larimer. Washington.Logan. Weld.Morgan.

North D akota

Barnes. McLean.Benson. Mercer.Bottineau. Mountrail.Burke. Nelson.Burleigh. Oliver.Cass. Pembina.Cavalier. Ramsey.Dickey. Ransom.Divide. Renville.Dunn. Richland.Eddy. Rolette.Emmons. Sargent.Foster. Sheridan.Golden Valley. Stark.Grand Forks. Steele.Grant. Stutsm an.Griggs. Towner.Hettinger. ' Traill.Kidder. Walsh.La Moure. Ward.Logan. Wells.McKenzie. Williams.McHenry.

Oregon

Gilliam. Sherman.Jefferson. Umatilla.Klamath. Union.Linn. Wallowa.Malheur. Wasco.Morrow.

Pennsylvania

Adams. Franklin.Chester. Lebanon.Cumberland. York.Dauphin.

Beadle.Brookings.Brown.Clark.Codington,Day.Deuel.Edmunds.Faulk.

Cache. Salt Lake.

South D akota

Grant.Hamlin.Kingsbury.McPherson.MarshaU.Miner.Roberts.Spink.

Utah

Utah.

Washington

Adams.Asotin.Benton.Columbia.Douglas.Franklin.Garfield.

Dodge.

Goshen.

Grant.Klickitat.Lincoln.Spokane.Walla Walla.Whitman.Yakima.

Wisconsin

Fond du Lac. Wyoming

(Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516)

[ seal] J oh n N . Lu ft ,Manager,

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.[F.R. Doc. 66-1990; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:47 a.m.]

PART 401— FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE

Subpart— Regulations for the 1961 and Succeeding Crop Years

A ppend ix— Co u n ties D esignated for W heat Crop I nsurance

Pursuant to authority contained- in §401.1 of the above-identified regulations, the following counties have been designated for wheat crop insurance for the 1967 crop year.

Kern.Modoc.

Adams.Arapahoe.Boulder.Cheyenne.Elbert.Kit Carson.Larimer.Lincoln.

Bannock.Benewah.Bingham.Bonneville.Camas.Canyon.Caribou.Cassia.Franklin.Fremont.

California

San Luis Obispo. Tulare.

Colorado

Logan.Morgan.Phillips.Sedgwick.Washington.Weld.Yuma.

Idaho

Gooding.Idaho.Jefferson.Jerome.Kootenai.Latah.Lewis.Lincoln.Madison.Minidoka.


3114Idaho—Continued

Nez Perce. Power.Oneida. Teton.Owyhee. Twin Falls.

I llinois

Adams. McDonough.Bond. McLean.Cass. . Macon.Champaign. Macoupin.Christian. Madison.Clark. Mason.Clinton. Menard.Coles. Monroe.Crawford. Montgomery.Cumberland. Morgan.De Witt. Moultrie.Douglas. Piatt.Edgar. Pike.Effingham. St. Clair.Payette. Sangamon.Fulton. Schuyler.Greene. , Scott.Hancock. Shelby.Iroquois. Tazewell.Jasper. Vermilion.Jefferson. W ashington.Jersey.Logan.

Wayne.

I ndiana

Adams. Kosciusko.Allen. Madison.Benton. Marshall.Blackford. Miami.Boone. Montgomery.Oarrolì. Morgan.Cass. Noble.Clay. Pulaski.Clinton. Putnam.Decatur. Randolph.De Kalb. Ripley.Delaware. Rush.Fountain. Shelby.Fulton. Sullivan.Grant. Tippecanoe.Hancock. Tipton.Henry. Vigo.Howard. Wabash.Huntington. Warren.Jackson. Wayne.Jasper. Wells.Jay. White.Johnson. Whitley.

K ansas

Allen. Grant.Anderson. Gray.Atchison. Greeley.Barber. Greenwood.Barton. Hamilton.Bourbon. Harper.Brown. Harvey.Butler. Haskell.Chase. Hodgeman.Chautauqua. Jackson.Cherokee. Jefferson.Cheyenne. Jewell.Clark. Johnson.Clay. Kearny.Cloud. Kingman.Coffey. Kiowa.Cowley. Labette.Crawford. Lane.Decatur. Lincoln.Dickinson. Linn.Doniphan. Logan.Douglas. Lyon.Edwards. McPherson.Elk. N M arion.,Ellis. Marshall.Ellsworth. Meade.Finney. Miami;Ford. Mitchell.Franklin. Montgomery.Geary. Morris.Gove. Nemaha.Graham. Neosho.

RULES AND REGULATIONSK ansas— Co n tin u ed

Ness. Sedgwick.Norton. Seward.Osage. Shawnee,Osborne. Sheridan.Ottawa. Sherman.Pawnee. Smith.Phillips. Stafford.Pottawatomie. Stanton.Pratt. Stevens.Rawlins. Sumner.Reno. Thomas.Republic. Trego.Rice, i Wabaunsee.Riley. Wallace.Rooks. Washington.Rush. Wichita.Russell. Wilson.Saline. Woodson,Scott.

K entuckyChristian.

Maryland

Kent. Queen Annes.Michigan

Bay. Kalamazoo.Branch. Lenawee. —Calhoun. Monroe,Clinton. Saginaw.Eaton. St. Clair.Gratiot. St. Joseph.Hillsdale. Sanilac.Huron. Shiawassee.Ingham. Tuscola.Ionia. Washtenaw.Jackson.

M innesota

Becker. Norman.Big Stone. Otter Tail.Blue Earth. Pennington.Chippewa. Polk.Clay. Red Lake.Dakota. Redwood.Faribault. Renville.Freeborn. Roseau.Grant. Stevens.Kandiyohi. Swift.Kittson. Traverse.Lac Qui Parle. Waseca.Le Sueur. Wilkin.Mahnoman. Yellow MedicineMarshall.

Missouri

Adair. Johnson.Andrew. Knox.Audrain. Lafayette.Barton. Lawrence.Bates. Lewis.Buchanan. Lincoln.Caldwell. Linn.Callaway. Livingston.Carroll. Macon.Cass. Marion.Chariton. Monroe.Clark. Montgomery.Cooper. Nodaway.Daviess. Pettis.De Kalb. Pike.Franklin. Ralls.Gentry. Ray.Grundy. St. Charles.Harrison. Saline.Henry. Scotland.Holt. Shelby.Howard. Sullivan.Jackson. Vernon.Jasper.

Montana

Blaine. Dawson.Big Horn. Fallon.Carbon. Fergus.Cascade. Glacier.Chouteau. Golden-Valley.Daniels. Hill.

Montana—ContinuedJudith Basin. Roosevelt.Liberty. Sheridan.McCone. Stillwater.Musselshell. Teton.Petroleum. Toole.Phillips. Valley.Pondera. Wibaux.Richland. Yellowstone.

N ebraska

Adams. Kearney.Banner. Keith.Box Butte. Kimball.Butler. Lancaster.Cass. Morrill.Chase. Nemaha.Cheyenne. Nuckolls.Clay. Otoe.Dawes. Pawnee.Deuel. Perkins.Dodge. Phelps.Fillmore. Polk.Franklin. Red Willow.Frontier. Richardson.Furnas. Saline.Gage. Saunders.Garden. Scotts Bluff.Gosper. Seward.Hamilton. Sheridan.Harlan. Thayer.Hayes. Washington.Hitchcock. Webster.Jefferson. York.Johnson.

N ew MexicoCurry.

North Dakota

Adams. McLean.Barnes. Mercer.Benson. Morton.Bottineau. Mountrail. *.Bowman. Nelson.Burke. Oliver.Burleigh. Pembina.Cass. Pierce.Cavalier. Ramsey.Dickey. Ransom.Divide. Renville.Dunn. Richland.Eddy. Rolette.Emmons. Sargent.Foster. Sheridan.Golden Valley. Sioux.Grand Forks. Slope.Grant. Stark.Griggs. Steele.Hettinger. Stutsm an.Kidder. Towner.La Moure. Traill.Logan. Walsh.McHenry. Ward.McIntosh. Wells.McKenzie. Williams.

Ohio

Allen. Logan.Ashland. Lucas.Auglaize. Madison.Champaign. Marion.Clark. Medina.Clinton. Mercer.Crawford. Miami.Darke. MontgomeryDefiance. Morrow.Delaware. Paulding.Erie. Pickaway.Fayette. Preble.Fulton. Putnam .Greene. Richland.Hancock. Sandusky. .Hardin. Seneca.Henry. Shelby.Highland. Stark.Huron. Tuscarawas.Knox. Union.Licking. Van Wert.


RULES AND REGULATIONS 3115Ohio—Continued

Wayne. Wood.Williams. Wyandot.

Oklahoma

Alfalfa. Kay.Beckham. Kingfisher.Blaine. Kiowa.Caddo. Logan.Canadian. Major.Comanche, Mayes.Cotton, Noble.Craig. Nowata.Custer. Osage.'Delaware. Ottawa.Dewey. Pawnee.Ellis. Payne.Garfield. Texas.Grady. Tillman.Grant. Washington.Greer. Washita.Harmon. Woods.Harper.Jackson.

Woodward.

Oregon

Baker. Morrow.Gilliam. Sherman.Jefferson. Umatilla.Klamath. Union.Linn. Wallowa.Malheur. Wasco.

P ennsylvania

Adams. Franklin.Chester. Lancaster.Cumberland. Lebanon.Dauphin. York.

South Dakota

Aurora. Hughes.Beadle. Hutchinson.Bennett. Hyde.Bon Homme Jones.Brown. Kingsbury.Campbell. Lyman.Clark. McPherson.Codington. Marshall.Corson. M ellette.Day. Miner.Deuel. Perkins.Dewey. Potter.Douglas. Roberts.Edmunds. Spink.Faulk. Stanley.Grant. Sully.Haakon. Tripp.Hamlin.Hand.

Walworth.

T ennessee

Obion. Robertson.T exas

Baylor. Gray.Castro. Grayson.CoUin. Hale.Cooke. Jones.Denton. Knox.Floyd. Lipscomb.Foard.' Wilbarger.

U tah

Box Elder. Salt Lake.Cache. Utah.

Washington

Adams. Grant.Asotin. iT Klickitat.Benton. Lincoln.Columbia. Spokane.Douglas. Walla Walla.Franklin. Whitman.Garfield. Yakima.

Wyoming

Goshen.Laramie.

Platte.

(Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516)

[seal] J o h n N . Ltjft,Manager,

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.[F.R. Doc. 66-1903; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:47 a.m.]

Chapter IX— Consumer and Marketing Service (Marketing Agreementsand O rd ers; Fruits, Vegetables,Nuts), Department of AgriculturePART 967— CELERY GROWN IN

FLORIDAExpenses and Rate of AssessmentNotice of rule making regarding pro

posed expenses and a proposed rate of assessment, to be effective under Marketing Agreement No. 149 and Order No. -967 (7 CFR Part 967; 30 F.R. 14266), regulating the handling of celery grown in Florida was published in the F ederal R egister February 3,1966 (31 F.R. 1304). This regulatory program is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The notice afforded interested persons an _ opportunity to submit written data, views, or arguments pertaining thereto not later than 10 days following publication in the F ederal R egister . None was filed.

After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including the proposals set forth in the aforesaid notice which were recommended by the Florida Celery Committee, established pursuant to said marketing agreement and order, it is hereby found and determined that:§ 967.201 Expenses and rate o f assess

ment.(a) The expenses that are reasonable

and likely to be incurred during the initial fiscal year November 15, 1965, through July 31, 1966, by the Florida Celery Committee for its maintenance and functioning and for such purposes as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate, will amount to $19,405.81.

(b) The rate of assessment to be paid by each handler in accordance with the marketing agreement and this part shall be one-fourth of 1 cent ($0.0025) per crate of celery handled by him as the first handler thereof during said fiscal year.

(c) Terms used in this section have the same meaning as when used in the marketing agreement and this part.

I t is hereby found that good cause exists for not postponing the effective time of this section until 30 days after publication in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. 1003) in that: (1) The relevant provisions of said marketing agreement and this part require that rates of assessment fixed for a particular fiscal year shall be applicable to all assessable celery from the beginning of such fiscal year, and (2) the initial fiscal year began on November 15, 1965, and the rate of assessment herein fixed will automatically

apply to all assessable celery beginning with such date.(Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 US.C. 601-674)

Dated: February 21,1966.P aul A. N icholson ,

Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Consumer and Marketing Service.

[F.R. Doc. 66-2015; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;8:49 a.m.]

Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGSChapter I— Food and Drug Adminis

tration, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

SUBCHAPTiR A— GENERALpa rt 1— REGULATIONS FOR THE EN

FORCEMENT OF THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT

Propylene Glycol and Glycerin as Carriers for Food-Grade Stabilizers and Emulsifiers; Exemption From Declaration of Presence in Quiescently Frozen Confections

There was published in the F ederal R egister of December 18, 1965 (30 F.R. 15666), a proposal of American Food Laboratories, Inc., 1000 Stanley Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y., 11208, that § 1.10 be amended to exempt propylene glycol and glycerin from the requirements of section 403 (i) (2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, when used as a carrier for food-grade stabilizers in quiescently frozen confections. Comments on the proposal were invited.

One comment received favored adoption of the proposal, and another, from the sponsor of the proposal, American Food Laboratories, Inc., stated that the proposal as submitted inadvertently omitted reference to “emulsifiers,” although the rationale advanced in the petition included references to the use of propylene glycol and glycerin as carriers for both emulsifiers and stabilizers.

The Commissioner of Food and Drugs has considered the comments received, and other relevant information, and concluded that the amendment proposed should be adopted incorporating the reference to “emulsifiers.” Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (secs. 403(i), 701(a), 52 Stat. 1048, 1055; 21 U.S.C. 343 (i), 371(a)), and in accordance with the authority delegated to the Commissioner by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (21 CFR 2.90): It is ordered, That § 1.10 be amended by adding a new paragraph (g), as follows:§ 1.10 F ood; labeling; designation of in

gredients.* * * * *

(g) Propylene glycol or glycerin present in quiescently frozen confections because of use as a carrier for food-grade emulsifiers and stabilizers is exempt from the requirements of section 403 (i)

No. 38---- 2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3116 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(2) of the act (requiring a declaration on the label of the common or usual name of each ingredient when the food is fabricated from two or more ingredients) .

Effective date. This order shall become effective on the date of its publication in the F ederal R egister.(Secs. 403(1). 701(a), 52 Stat. 1048, 1055; 21 U.S.C. 343(1), 371(a) )

Dated: February 17, 1966.J . K . K irk ,

Assistant Commissioner, for Operations.

[F.R. Doc. 66-1998; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:48 a.m.]

SUBCHAPTER B— FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTSPART 51— CANNED VEGETABLES

Canned Artichokes; Confirmation of Effective Date of Order Amending Standard of Identity

In the matter of amending the definition and standard of identity for canned vegetables other than those specifically regulated (§ 51.990) to provide for the use of ascorbic- acid as an optional ingredient in canned artichokes packed in glass;

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (secs. 401, 701, 52 Stat. 1046, 1055 as amended; 70 Stat. 919; 72 Stat. 948; 21 U.S.C. 341, 371), and in accordance with the authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (21 CFR 2.90), notice is given that no objections were filed to the order in the above- identified matter published in the F ederal R egister of January 4, 1966 (31 F.R. 9). Accordingly, the amendments promulgated by that order will become effective March 5, 1966.(Secs. 401, 701, 52 Stat. 1046, 1055 as amended; 70 Stat. 919; 72 Stat. 948; 21 U.S.C. 341, 371)

Dated: February 17, 1966. *J. K. K i r k,

Assistant Commissionerfor Operations.


PART 121— FOOD ADDITIVESSubpart C— Food Additives Permitted

in Feed and Drinking Water of Animals or for the Treatment of Food- Producing Animals

Subpart D— Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human Consumption

N ickel S ulfate

Effective on the date of signature of this order, the food additive regulations (21 CFR Part 121) are amended as follows:

1. Section 121.242 Nickel sulfate is amended by changing the expiration

date of the experimental permit issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to read “February 15, 1967.”

2. Section 121.1122 Nickel sulfate is amended by changing the expiration date of the experimental permit issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to read “February 15, 1967.”

Notice and public procedure and delayed effective date are not necessary prerequisites to the promulgation of this order since the amendments are in the nature of editorial changes.(Secs. 409.701(a), 52 Stat. 1055, 72 Stat. 1785; 21 U.S.C. 348.371(a))

Dated: February 17, 1966.J. K. K i r k,



PART 121— FOOD ADDITIVESSubpart D-—Food Additives Permitted

in Food for Human ConsumptionCarrageenan W it h P olysorbate 80The Commissioner of Food and Drugs,

having evaluated the data in a petition (FAP 5A1695) filed by Drew Chemical Corp., 416 Division Street, Boonton, N.J., 07005, and other relevant material, has concluded that a regulation should be issued to prescribe the safe use of the food additive polysorbate 80 in the production of the food additive carrageenan. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 409(c)(1), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(c) (1) ), and under the authority delegated to the Commissioner by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (21 CFR 2.90), Part 121 is amended by adding to Subpart D a new section, as follows:§ 121.1193 Carrageenan with polysor

bate 80.Carrageenan otherwise meeting the

definition and specifications of § 121.1066(a) and (b) and salts of carrageenan otherwise meeting the definition of § 121.1067(a) may be safely produced with the use of polysorbate 80 meeting the specifications and requirements of § 121.1009 (a) and (b) in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:

(a) The polysorbate 80 is used only to facilitate separation of sheeted carrageenan and salts of carrageenan from drying rolls.

(b) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan contain not more than 5 percent by weight of polysorbate 80, and the final food containing the additives contains polysorbate 80 in an amount not to exceed 500 parts per million.

(c) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan so produced are used only in producing foods in gel form and only for the purposes defined in § 121.1066(c) and § 121.1067(b), respectively.

(d) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan so produced are not used in foods for which standards of identity

exist unless the standards provide for the use of carrageenan, or salts of carrageenan, combined with polysorbate 80.

(e) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan produced in accordance with this section, and foods containing the same, in addition to the other requirements of the act, are labeled to show the presence of polysorbate 80, and the label or labeling of the carrageenan and salts of carrageenan so produced bear adequate directions for use.

Any person who will be adversely affected by the foregoing order may at any time within 30 days from the date of its publication in the F ederal R egister file with the Hearing Clerk, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Room 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, D.C., 20201, written objections thereto, preferably in quintupli- cate. Objections sjxall show wherein the person filing will he adversely affected by the order and specify with particularity the provisions of the order deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections. If a hearing is requested, the objections must state the issues for the hearing. A hearing will be granted if the objections are supported by grounds legally sufficient to justify the relief sought. Objections may be accompanied by a memorandum or brief in support thereof.

Effective date. This order shall become effective on the date of its publication in the F ederal R egister.(Sec. 4 0 9 (c )(1 ), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 3 4 8 (c )(1 ))

Dated: February 17, 1966.J. K. K i r k,


[F.R. Doc. 66-2001; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;8:48 axa.]

SUBCHAPTER D— HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCESPART 191— HAZARDOUS SUB

STANCES; DEFINITIONS AND PROCEDURAL AND INTERPRETATIVE REGULATIONS

Cigarette Lighters Containing Butane Fuel and/or Isobutane; Exemption From Labeling Requirements

There has been submitted to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, pursuant to section 3(c) of the Federal Hazardous Substances Labeling Act and § 191.62 of the regulations thereunder, a request to exempt from the labeling requirements of section 2.(p) (1) of the act certain cigarette lighters that contain butane and/or isobutane fuel at the time of sale.

Because of common knowledge of their intended use to produce flame, and because the construction of the lighters is such that they present no other substantial hazard under reasonably foreseeable conditions of use, the Commissioner concludes that full compliance with the labeling requirements of section 2(p) (1) of the act is not necessary for the adequate protection of the


RULES AND REGULATIONS 3117public health and safety. Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Hazardous Substances Labeling Act (sec. 3(c), 74 Stat. 375; 15 U.S.C. 1262) and under the authority vested in the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and delegated to the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.90), § 191.63(a) is amended by adding a new subparagraph (29), as follows:§ 191.63 Exemptions for small pack

ages, minor hazards, and special circumstances.* * * * *

(a) * * *(29) Cigarette lighters containing bu

tane and/or isobutane fuel are exempt from the labeling requirements of section 2(p) (1) of the act, insofar as such requirements would otherwise be necessary because the fuel therein is extremely flammable and under pressure; provided that:

(i) The lighters contain not more than 12 grams of fuel at the time of sale.

(ii) The fuel reservoir is designed to withstand a pressure of at least 1%. times the maximum pressure which will be developed in the container at 120° F.

Notice and public procedure and delayed effective date are not necessary prerequisites to the promulgation of this order, and I so find, since the Federal Hazardous Substances Labeling Act contemplates such modification of the labeling requirements under certain conditions. -

Effective date. This order shall become effective on the date of its publication in the F ederal R egister.(Sec. 3 (c ), 74 Stat. 375; 15 U.S.C. 1262)

Dated: February 17, 1966.J. K . K ir k ,

Assistant Commissioner for Operations.

[F.R. Doc. 66-2002; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;8:48 ajn.]

The Commissioner has concluded that because of the small quantity of ethylene glycol present in the pads and because the package contains no free liquid, a minor hazard is presented and compliance with § 191.7(b) (4) of the regulations is not necessary for the adequate protection of the public health and safety. Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Hazardous Substances Labeling Act (sec. 3 (c), 74 Stat. 374; 15 U.S.C. 1262) and under the authority vested in the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and delegated to the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.90), § 191.63(a) is amended by adding thereto a new subparagraph (28), as follows:§ 191.63 Exemptions for small pack

ages, minor hazards, and special circumstances.* * * * *

(a) *- * *(28) Packages containing felt pads im

pregnated with ethylene glycol are exempt from the labeling requirements of § 191.7(b)(4) provided that:

(i) The total amount of ethylene glycol in each pad does not exceed 1 gram; and

(ii) The liquid is held by the felt pad so that there is no free ethylene glycol within the package.

Notice and public procedure and delayed effective date are not necessary prerequisites to the promulgation of this order, and I so find, since the Federal Hazardous Substances Labeling Act contemplates such modification of the labeling requirements under certain conditions.

Effective date. This order shall become effective on the date of its publication in the F ederal R egister.(Sec. 3 (c ) , 74 Stat; 374; 15 TJ.S.C. 1262)

Dated: February 17,1966.J. K . K irk ,


mitted on all refuge waters except those closed by signs. The open area is shown on a map that is available a t the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from February 15, 1966, through November 30, 1966, on all refuge waters not closed by signs.

(2) Fishing permitted during daylight hours only.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 59, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

A rkansas

BIG LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Big Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Manila, Ark., is permitted only on the areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 4,000 acres, are delineated on a map available at the refuge; headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from March 1,1966, through October 31, 1966.

(2) Fishing permitted during daylight hours only.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

F lorida

ST. MARKS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, St. Marks, Fla., is permitted only on the areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 44,000 acres, ore delineated on a map available at the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from April 1, 1966, through October 15, 1966, on the St. Marks and Wakulla Units, and from March 1, 1966, through October 15, 1966, on certain designated areas of the Panacea Unit north of Highway No. 372. The area south of Highway No. 372 on the Panacea Unit will remain open through December 31, 1966.

(2) Fishing permitted one-half hour before sunrise until one-half hour after sunset 7 days a week.

(3) Boats with motors prohibited.

PART 191— HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; DEFINITIONS AND PROCEDURAL AND INTERPRETATIVE REGULATIONS

Felt Pads Impregnated With Ethylene Glycol; Exemption From Labeling Requirements

There has been submitted to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, pursuant to section 3(c) of the Federal Hazardous Substances Labeling Act and § 191.62 of the regulations thereunder, a request to exempt packages of certain small felt pads impregnated with ethylene glycol from the special labeling required because of their ethylene glycol content. Although these articles contain more than 10 percent of ethylene glycol by weight and, therefore, under § 191.7 (a)(3), (b)(4) of the hazardous substances regulations would require special labeling, the petitioner represents that special labeling is not necessary because of the small quantity of the chemical actually present in the pads.


Title 50— WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES

Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior

PART 33— SPORT FISHINGWildlife Refuges in Alabama and

Certain Other StatesThe following special regulations are

issued and are effective on date of publication in the F ederal R egister.

§ 33.5 Special regulations; sport fishing; for individual wildlife refuge areas.

A labama

CHOCTAW NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Choctaw National Wildlife Refuge, Jackson, Ala., is per


RULES AND REGULATIONS3118

(4) Trotlines as permitted by State regulations are allowed except that lines shall be taken up prior to closing hour of fishing daily.

(5) Pole and line; rod and reel; artificial baits permitted.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

Louisiana

SABINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Sabine National Wildlife Refuge, Sulphur, La., is permitted only on the areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 40,000 acres, are delineated on a map available at the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from March 15, 1966, through October 15, 1966.

(2) Fishermen must not enter refuge waters earlier than 45 minutes before sunrise and shall leave refuge waters by 45 minutes after sunset.

(3) Boats may be moored only at designated areas in Pool lb or Pool 3. Boats left at these mooring sites must bear owner’s name and address. Boats found moored outside designated areas or without required identification will be removed to refuge headquarters. All boats must be removed from the refuge prior to the close of the fishing season.

(4) Boats may not be dragged across levees for access to pool areas. Travel over the refuge is restricted to waterways. Fishermen are not to walk canal banks or levees except in Pool lb. Boat access into Pool lb is restricted to bridge sites on Road Canal.

(5) Boats with outboard motors no larger than 10 horsepower permitted in refuge lakes and impoundments. No size restriction on boats and motors in the canals and bayous.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

M is s is s ip p i

NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge, Brooksville, Miss., is permitted only on the areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 1,892 acres, are delineated on a map available at the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Peachtree- Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from March 1 through October 31, 1966, on Ross Branch Reservoir, Bluff and Loakfoma Lakes, Keaton Tower Pond, Parker and Pete Sloughs, Cypress, Jones, and Oktoc Creeks, and Noxubee River.

(2) Road borrow pits and Betts Pond, no closed season.

(3) A daily permit (50 cents) is required by the Mississippi State Game and Fish Commission to fish in Bluff and Loakfoma Lakes, and tailwaters of the spillways.

(4) No permit is required to fish in the balance of the refuge that is open and a Federal permit is not required to enter the public fishing area.

(5) Fishing permitted during daylight hours only.

(6) Boats and motors permitted.(7) Snag lines prohibited.

The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

N orth Carolina

MACKAY ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Mackay Island National Wildlife Refuge, Knotts Island, N.C., is permitted only on the areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 720 acres, are delineated on a map available at the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from March 16, 1966, through October 14, 1966. .Fishing is permitted in Corey’s Ditch and in the canal adjacent to the Knotts Island Causeway, on a year-round basis, for bank fishing only.

(2) Fishing permitted during daylight hours only.

(3) No limitations on motors used on boats.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

T ennessee

LAKE ISOM NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Lake Isom National Wildlife Refuge, Tenn., is permitted only on the areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 750 acres, are delineated on a map' available at the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

Cl) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from March 16, 1966,

through September 30, 1966. Sunrise to sunset.

(2) Boats with outboard motors and inboard motors of not more than 6 horsepower may be used.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

R eelfoot N ational W ildlife R efuge

Sport fishing on the Reelfoot National Wildlife Refuge, Tenn., is permitted only on the area designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 9,092 acres, are delineated on a map available at the refuge headquarters and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30323. Sport fishing shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The sport fishing season on the refuge extends from February 23, 1966, through October 23, 1966.

(2) Boats with outboard motors and inboard motors of not more than 10 horsepower may be used.The provisions of this special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33.

L ester E. S cherer, Acting Regional Director, Bu

reau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife.

F ebruary .15,1966.[F.R. Doc. 66-1970; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:47 a.m.]

PART 33— SPORT FISHINGWashita National Wildlife Refuge,

Okla.The following special regulation is is

sued and is effective on date of publication in the F ederal R egister.§ 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish

ing; for individual wildlife refuge areas.

Oklahoma

WASHITA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Sport fishing on the Washita National Wildlife Refuge, Okla., is permitted only on areas designated by signs as open to fishing. These open areas, comprising 3,367 acres, are delineated on maps available at refuge headquarters, Butler, Okla., and from the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Post Office Box 1306, Albuquerque, N. Mex., 87103. Sport fishing" shall be in accordance with all applicable State regulations subject to the following special conditions:

(1) The open season for sport fishing on the refuge extends from April 1 through October 15, 1966, inclusive.

(2) Seining is prohibited in all refuge waters.

(3) The use of boats and motors is permitted only south of State Highway


RULES AND REGULATIONS 311933, provided, that boats may not exceed speeds of 10 miles per hour.

The provisions of this, special regulation supplement the regulations which govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally which are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, and are effective through October 15, 1966.

B layne D. G raves, Refuge Manager, Washita Na

tional Wildlife Refuge, Butler, Okla.

F ebruary 16,1966.[F.R. Doc. 66-1971; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:47 a.m.]

Title 39— POSTAL SERVICEChapter I— Post Office Department

PART 33— METERED STAMPSPART 34— PERMIT IMPRINTS

PART 48— UNDELIVERABLE MAILPART 52— INSURANCE

Miscellaneous AmendmentsThe regulations of the Post Office De

partment are amended as follows:I. In Part 33 make the following

changes:A. In § 33.5, the first sentence in para

graph (a) is revised for clarification to read as follows:§ 33.5 Metered reply postage.

(a) Meter stamps may be. used to prepay reply postage on letters and post cards under the following conditions: * * *

Note: The corresponding Postal Manual section is 143.5.

B. In § 33.6, paragraph (a) is revised to include a cross-reference to new § 34.5(f) (2) of this chapter.§ 33.6 Mailings.

(a) Preparation. The mailer must face metered mail, except packages or irregular overweight mail, and secure it well in bundles. This prevents its becoming mixed with other mail which has to be faced, canceled, and postmarked in the post office. Each class and denomination must be bundled together if possible. Special delivery and airmail should always be bundled separately or located on the top of a bundle. (See part 24 of this chapter for mailing of third-class bulk mail and see § 34.5(f) (2) of this chapter regarding payment of fractional postage in cash when the meter stamp does not fully pay the minimum per piece charge.) Properly prepared metered mail can go direct to the distribution cases in post offices and thereby be expedited in dispatch.

* * * * *Note: T he corresponding Postal Manual

section is 143.61.n . In Part 34, make the following

changes:A. The forms of permits illustrated in

§ 34.4 have been updated and illustra

tions of imprints for use on fourth-class catalogs and third-class matter by nonprofit organizations mailed at bulk rates have been added. As so revised, § 34.4 reads as follows:§ 34.4 Form o f permit imprints.

Permit imprints must be prepared in one of the forms illustrated. The addition of extraneous matter is not permitted.

posits may be made by mail. When the deposit becomes less than enough to pay for an entire mailing, an additional amount must -be deposited before any mailings are made. The postmaster will furnish a receipt for each payment on Form 3544. Credit for postage is not allowed. Postage on a mailing must be paid by only one method; that is, postage may not be paid partly in money and partly by postage stamps, except as pro-

FttSTCUSSMAIl U.S. POSTACE

PAID 5{PERMIT No. 1

U.S. POSTAGEBulk Catalog Rate U.S. POSTAGE

4 C PAID PAIDN ew Y ork , N .Y . New York, N.Y.

Perm it N o . L Permit No. 1

BULK RATEUS. POSTAGE

PAIDPERMIT No. 1

BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE2%C PAID

N ew Y ork , N .Y Perm it N o . I

Nonprofit Org. Nonprofit Organizationi s / \ o i U.S. POSTAGE U.S. POSTAGEi \ /P i IV* C PAID 1/4 C PAID\ y / N ew Y ork , N .Y

V ' a ì l i ì Fv ' Perm it N o. 1

Nonprofit Org. U S . POSTACE

PAIDPERMIT No. 1

No t e : The corresponding Postal Manual section is 144.4

B. In § 34.5, the material in present paragraph (f) is redesignated new paragraph (f) (1) and is revised to add instructions prescribing that whenever computation of postage results in a fraction of a cent in the total, the next higher even cent must be paid. In addition, a new paragraph (f) (2) is added to give instructions governing the payment of fractional postage by meter users whose meters are incapable of fully prepaying the minimum per piece charge on bulk third-class mailings. As amended and revised paragraph (f) reads as follows:§ 34.5 Mailings with permit imprints.

* * * * *(f) Payment of postage.—(1) Pre

payment in full required. The mailer must pay for each mailing when it is presented at the post office, or make an advance deposit of enough to cover more than one mailing. Payments for postage or deposits must be made at points designated by the postmaster. These payments will hot be accepted by employees handling the mail. Advance de-

vided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. Whenever the computation of postage results in a fraction of a cent in the total, the- next higher even cent must be paid.

(2) Fractional postage on meter mailings. The mailer must pay fractional postage in cash as provided in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph when the meter stamps do not fully pay the minimum per piece charge on bulk third- class mailings. The postmaster will issue a permit under which such payments shall be recorded separately from payments made for regular permit imprint mailings. A separate application fee (see § 34.1(a) of this chapter) must be paid for the permit to pay fractional postage payments in cash. A statement on Form 3602 for the cash portion (see paragraph (e) of this section) and a statement on Form 3602-PC for the meter payment portion (see § 24.4(b) (4) (ii) of this chapter) shall be filed by the mailer.

* * * * *No t e : The corresponding Postal Manual

section is 144.56.


3120 RULES AND REGULATIONS

m . In § 48.4, paragraph (b) (2) is amended to remove the provision that refused insured mail will be returned immediately. As so amended paragraph(b) (2) reads as follows:§ 48.4 Retention periods.

* * * * , #(b) Registered, insured, C.O.D., and

certified mail. * * *(2) Insured and certified mail is held

a maximum of 15 days. It is held a lesser number of days if the sender so specifies. (See also § 48.2(g)(1) of this chapter.)

* * * * *Note: The corresponding Postal Manual

section Is 158.422.

§ 52.5 [Amended]IV. In § 52.5 Delivery, paragraphs (a)

(3) and (4) are deleted to make renewed delivery attempts for insured parcels the same as those for ordinary parcels and to eliminate former requirements for payment of local rate postage.

N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual sections are 162.513 and 162.514.

(R.S. 161, as amended; 5 U.S.C. 22; 39 U.S.C. 501,505)

H arvey H . H annah ,Acting General Counsel.


Miscellaneous Amendments to Chapter

A notice of proposed revision in Parts 51, 52, 53, 58, 61, 132, and 133 of Title 39, Code of Federal Regulations, was published in the F ederal R egister of January 11, 1966 (31 F.R. 294-295), and, subsequently, typographical corrections appeared in the issues of January 13, 1966 (31 F.R. 434), January 15, 1966 (31 F.R. 538), and January 18, 1966 (31 F.R. 564). The proposed revisions would increase rates in registry, insurance, c.o.d., money orders, and certified mail, and would become effective on March 26, 1966. Interested persons were given 30 days in which to submit written comments with respect to the proposed increases.

A few written comments have been received by the Department. After most careful consideration, the Department has reached the conclusion to adopt the proposed fees as published, without amendment.

As so adopted, the amendments to be effective on March 26, 1966, are as follows:

PART 51— REGISTRYI. Section 51.2 paragraph (a) is

amended to read as follows:§ 51.2 Fees and liability.

(a) Fees.

Value

Fees (in addition to postage)

For articles not covered by commercial or other insurance

For articles also covered by commercial or other insurance

$0.00 to $100-------------- ----------------——$100.01 to $200......... - ..................... ...... .—$200.01 to $400---------------------------- ------$400.01 to $600----------------------------------$600.01 to $800-------- ---- ---------------------$800.01 to $1,000----- --------------------- ------

$0.751.001.251.501.75 2.002.25 .2.50 '2.753.003.253.503.754.004.25

$0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 ,

$1,000.01 to $2,000----- -------------------------$2,000.01 to $3,000-------------------------------$3,000.01 to $4,000......................----------- —$4,000.01 to $5.000-------------------------------$5,000.01 to $6,000------------------- -----------$6,000.01 to $7,000— ---------------------------$7,000.01 to $8,000------------------ — —$8.000.01 to $9,000-------------------------------$9,000.01 to $10,000-------------- ---------------

$2.00 plus handling charge of 15 cents per $1,000 or fraction over first $1,000.

$10,000.01 to $1,000,000................................ $4.25 plus handling charge of 15 cents per $1,000 or fraction over first $io,000.

$1 000 000 01 to $15,000,000.____________ $152.75 plus handling charge of $151.85 plus handling charge of10 cents pot $1,000 or fraction 10 cents per $1,000 or fractionover first $1,000,000. over first $1,000,000.

Over $15.000,000..................... — - ............... Additional charges may be made based on considerations of weight, space, and value.

ADDITIONAL SERVICESExtra fee

(cents)COD (Maximum am ount collectible is

$200) __________________________________ 60RESTRICTED DELIVERY------------ 50RETURN RECEIPTS:

R equested at tim e o f m ailing:Show ing to w hom and w hen de

livered --------------- 10Show ing to w hom , w hen, and ad

dress where delivered--------------- 35R equested after m ailing:

Showing to whom and when delivered ______________________ - 25

Note : The corresponding Postal Manual section is 161.21

PART 52— INSURANCEH. Section 52.2 paragraph (a) is

amended to read as follows : %§ 52.2 Fees.

(a) Fees (in addition to postage).Liability: Fee

$0.01 to $15---------- - - --------- ------------ $0.20$15.01 to $50______________________ .30$50.01 to $100----------------------------- — .40$100.01 to $150,____________________ .50$150.01 to $200____ .60

Liability for insured mail is lim ited to $200.(b) Restricted delivery.

(Not available for mail insured for $15 or le ss)___ - _______________________$0.50

(c) Return receipts.(Not available for mail insured for $15

or less)(1) Requested at tim e of mailing:

Showing to whom and when delivered _l_________------------------- . 25

Showing to whom, when, and address where delivered__________ . 35

( 2) Requested after m ailing:Showing to whom and when de

livered ___ .25N ote: The corresponding Post Manual section is 162.21

PART 53— CODin . Section 53.1 is amended to read

as follows:§ 53.1 Fees (in addition to postage).Amount to be collected or insur- COD

ance coverage desired: fee$0.01 to $10------- -------------------------------$0.60$10.01 to $25__.------------- .70$25.01 to $50— _------------- .80$50.01 to $100_______________________ .90$100.01 to $200—„ __________________ 1.00Restricted delivery------------,--------------- . 50Notice of nondelivery------------------------ .05Alteration of charges or delivery------- . 10N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual section is 163.1

PART 58— CERTIFIED MAILIV. Section 58.3 is amended to read as

follows:§ 58.3 Fees.

CentsFee in addition to postage----------------- 30Restricted delivery---------------------------- 50Return receipts:

Requested at tim e of m ailing:Showing to whom and when de

livered _______________________ 10Showing to whom, when, and ad

dress where delivered-------------- 35Requested after mailing:

Showing to whom and when delivered------------------------------------ 25

N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual section is 168.3

PART 61— MONEY ORDERSV. Section 61.1, paragraph (b) (2) is

amended to read as follows:§ 61.1 Issuance o f domestic money or

ders.* * * * *

(b) Amounts, fees, payments. * * *(2) Money order fees.

Amount of money orderAmount of fee

Domestic International

T$0.01 to $10....... .............. $0.25 $0.45$10.01 to $50-------------- .35 . 65$50.01 to $100..............— .40 .75

N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual section is 171.122.

PART 132— REGISTRATIONVI. Section 132.3 is amended to read

as follows:


RULES AND REGULATIONS 3121§ 132.3 Fees.

For Postal Union mail the fee is 75 cents. The same fee applies to registered parcel post. See country items in § 168.5 of this chapter. (See § 162.2 of this chapter for indemnity provisions.)Note: The corresponding Postal Manual section is 242.3.

PART 133— INSURANCEVII. Section 133.3 is amended to read

as follows:§ 133.3 Fees.

L im it ofin dem n ity Fee

Not over $15---------- .__ _________ ____ _ $0.35$15.01 to $50__ .'___ .45$50.01 to $100_____________________ .55$100.01 to $150-_____________________ . 65$150.01 to $200__ ...__________________ . 75$200.01 to $300__________________ .95$300.01 to $400______________________ l . 15$400.01 to $500__________.__ j_________ i . 35$500.01 to $600_____________ 1 . 55$600.01 to $700________________ 1. 75$700.01 to $800______________________ l . 95$800.01 to $900________ 2. 15$900.01 to $1,000_____________„ .„ I : . . 2. 35N ote: The adoption of these international insurance and registry fees will necessitate changes in the individual country item s in § 168.5 of th is chapter. This section will he revised as soon as practicable to reflect these changes. There will be no change in the lim its of insurance as presently set forth in the individual country item s in § 168.5 of th is chapter.(R.S. 161, as amended; 5 U.S.O. 22, 39 U.S.C. 501, 505, 506 and 507)

H arvey H . H annah , Acting General Counsel.


8:49 a.m.]

Title 32— NATIONAL DEFENSEChapter XVII— Office of Emergency

PlanningPART 1710— FEDERAL DISASTER

ASSISTANCEGrant in Lieu of Temporary Housing or

Other Emergency ShelterSection 1710.10(d) is amended by add

ing the following subparagraph (3):§ 1710.10 Criteria o f eligibility for finan

cial assistance.* * * * *

(d) * * *(3) A Federal financial contribution

toward the permanent replacement of housing, for persons requiring such housing as a result of the disaster, in lieu of and in an amount no greater than that estimated to be required for temporary housing or other emergency shelter, inay be authorized where such permanent replacement will expeditiously provide essential housing: Provided, however, That this subparagraph (3) shall apply only in remote areas where satisfactory temporary housing or other emergency shelter cannot be made readily available.

Dated: February 18, i966.F ranklin B . D ryden ,

Acting Director, Office of Emergency Planning.



3122

Proposed Rule MakingDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Coast GuardE 33 CFR Parts 80f 90, 95 ]

[ 46 CFR Part 10 1[CGFR 66—5]

NAVIGATION AND VESSELINSPECTION

Public Hearing on Proposed Changes1. The Merchant Marine Council will

hold a public hearing on Monday, March 21,1966, commencing at 9:30 a.m., in the Departmental Auditorium, between 12th and 14th Streets on Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., for the purpose of receiving comments, views, and data on the proposed changes in the navigation and vessel inspection rules and regulations. The first 12 items containing those proposals are described in detail in the Merchant Marine Council Public Hearing Agenda (CG-249), dated March 21, 1966, and are generally described in a notice of proposed rule making (CGFR 65-65) published in the F ed e r a l R e g is t e r of February 10,1966 (31 F.R. 2602—2614).

2. This document contains additional proposed regulations, together with appropriate references to statutory authorities, which will be considered by the Merchant Marine Council at the public hearing on March 21, 1966. The complete text of the proposed regulations is set forth herein under the appropriate headings for each topic. Printed copies of this document will be mailed to persons and organizations who have expressed a continued interest in the subjects under consideration and have requested that copies be furnished them. Copies will be also furnished upon request to the Commandant (CMC), U.S. Coast Guard, Washington, D.C., 20226, so long as they are available. After the supply of extra printed copies is exhausted, copies will be available for reading purposes only in Room 4211, Coast Guard Headquarters, or a t the offices of the various Coast Guard District Commanders.

3. Comments on the proposed regulat i o n s set forth herein are invited. Written comments containing constructive criticism, suggestions or views are welcome. However, acknowledgement of the comments received or reasons why the suggested changes were or were not adopted cannot be furnished since personnel are not available to handle the necessary correspondence involved. Each oral or written comment is considered and evaluated. If it is believed the comment, view or suggestion clarifies or improves the proposed regulation or amendment, such proposal is changed

accordingly, and after adoption by the Commandant, the regulations as revised are published in the F ed e r a l R e g is t e r .

4. Each person or organization who desires to submit comments, suggestions or views in connection with the proposed regulations set forth in the Merchant Marine Council Public Hearing Agenda, including changes proposed in this document, should submit them in triplicate so that they will be received by the Commandant (CMC), U.S. ,Coast Guard Headquarters, Washington, D.C., 20226, prior to March 18, 1966. In order to insure consideration of written comments and to facilitate checking and recording, it is very helpful if each comment regarding a section or paragraph of the proposed regulations in this document would show the section number (if any), the subject, the proposed change, the reason or basis, and the name, business firm or organization (if any) and the address of the submitter. I t is also very helpful if comments are submitted on Form CG-3287, and a small quantity of this form is attached to the printed copies which are being mailed direct to interested parties. Additional copies of the forms may be reproduced by typewriter or otherwise. ;

5. Each item of the Agenda has been given a general title, intended to encompass the Specific proposals presented. It is urged that each item be read completely because the application of proposals to the specific employment òr types of vessels may be found in more than one item. Proposals are added to Item IX and Item XI.

I t e m IX.—R u l e s o f t h e R oad

ixe.—DISTINCTIVE BLUE LIGHTS AUTHORIZEDFOR USE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT VESSELS

7. Difficulties have been experienced by law enforcement vessels engaged in direct law enforcement action because there is not available a distinctive identification that other vessels may easily recognize. Spotlights are effective in communicating a desire for vessels to stop only at a very short range and even when spotlights are used they often do not indicate a definite law enforcement mission. Furthermore, the flashing of a spotlight on another vessel so as to blind the navigator or operator is prohibited by law. Sirens and loud hailers frequently cannot be heard above the wind, sea and engine noises, and, at even a short distance, are often not directionally identifiable.-

8. A trial program was conducted by thè Coast Guard to test the effective-, ness of identification of law enforcement vessels by the use of a distinctive blue colored light. In the trial program no adverse effects were noted. The night vision Of law enforcement personnel on the Coast Guard vessels, or the night

vision of personnel on other vessels being boarded or in the immediate area were not adversely affected. In all reported cases, the use of the blue light was effective in communicating the identity of the law enforcement vessel with the boats and vessels desired to be boarded coming to an immediate stop. The proposed distinctive blue light would be for additional identification purposes and would be used by law enforcement vessels only when approaching another vessel for the purpose of boarding, warning or other valid law enforcement action. This distinctive blue light when used by law enforcement vessels would be in addition to the prescribed lights and day signals required by law or regulation. The use of a distinctive light as proposed either during daytime or nighttime should promote safety at sea because patrol craft would be readily identified and vessels observing such a light would recognize their law enforcement missions.

9. The proposed distinctive light consists of a blue light of low intensity with a short effective range. When turned on, the blue light is continually visible but pulsates by means of a rotating reflector which gives a flashing or periodic peak intensity effect. All a'round visibility is not a requirement; in fact, a shield or fixed screen designed to restrict the arc of visibility may be used, particularly in congested areas.

10. The Advisory Panel of State Officials to the Merchant Marine Council, U.S. Coast Guard, at a meeting held November 10, 1965, recommended that a rotating blue light be authorized as optional additional equipment for use by all law enforcement vessels and that such authorization be incorporated into the rules of the road. This distinctive uniform light would be limited to marine law enforcement patrol craft of the United States, and the various States or political subdivisions thereof.PART 80— PILOT RULES FOR INLAND

WATERS11. I t is proposed to add as § 80.45 to

Part 80 the following:§ 80.45 Distinctive blue light authorized

for use by law enforcem ent vessels.(a) The use of a distinctive light de

scribed in paragraph (b) of this section is authorized for law enforcement vessels, and may be displayed during the day or night, whenever the vessel may be engaged in direct law enforcement activities where identification of the law enforcement vessel is desirable or where necessary for safety reasons. This light when used would be in addition to prescribed lights and day signals required by law or regulations in this part.

(b) The distinctive light prescribed is a blue colored, revolving horizontal


beam, low intensity light, rotating or appearing to rotate because of a pulsating effect gained by means of a rotating reflector which causes a flashing or periodic peak intensity effect. The light shall be located at any effective point on the forward exterior of the vessel. A shield or other device, fixed or movable, to restrict the arc of visibility may be used if desired.

(c) The distinctive blue light described in this section may be displayed by law enforcement vessels of the United States, a State, or its political subdivisions, including municipalities, having administrative control over use of navigable waters, duly authorized by a controlling Federal or State governmental agency.

12. The authority to prescribe regulations regarding navigation requirements for Inland Waters is in section 157 in Title 33, U.S. Code; The applicable authorities are also cited with the present regulations in 33 CFR Part 80. The delegation of authority for the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe regulations is in Treasury Department Order 107-33, September 23, 1958, 23F.R. 7592.

PART 90— PILOT RULES FOR THE GREAT LAKES

13. I t is proposed to add as § 90.30 to Part 90 the following:§ 90 .30 Distinctive blue light authorized

for use by law enforcem ent vessels.N ote: The text of § 90.30 shall be the

same as the text of § 80.45 in paragraph 11 of th is document, and all changes in § 80.45 will be included in th is section.

14. The authority to prescribe regulations regarding navigation requirements for the Great Lakes is in section 243 in Title 33, U.S. Code. The applicable authorities are also cited with the present regulations in 33 CFR Part 90. The delegation of authority for the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe regulations is in Treasury Department Order 120, July 31, 1950,15 F.R. 6521.

PART 95— PILOT RULES FOR WESTERN RIVERS

15. I t is proposed to add as § 95.80 to Part 95 the following:§ 95.80 Distinctive blue light authorized

for use by law enforcem ent vessels.N ote: The text of § 95.80 shall be the same

as the text of § 80.45 in paragraph 11 of th is document, and all changes in § 80.45 will be included in th is section.

16. The authority to prescribe regulations regarding navigation requirements for Western Rivers is in section 353 in Title 33, U.S. Code. The applicable authorities are also cited with the present regulations in 33 CFR Part 95. The delegation of authority for the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe regulations is in Treasury Department Order 167-33, September 23, 1958, 23 F.R. 7592.

PROPOSED RULE MAKINGI tem X I .— M erchant M arine O fficers

and M erchant S eamen

X lb .— DECK LICENSES AS MASTER AND PILOT AND AS MATE AND PILOT OF FREIGHT AND TOWING VESSELS OF NOT MORE THAN 1 ,0 0 0 GROSS TONS

17. In manning small i n s p e c t e d freight or towing vessels, which do not exceed 1,000 gross tons in size and operate on United States’ waters requiring their navigation to be performed by pilots, the Coast Guard has allowed persons to serve in a dual capacity as “master and first class pilot” or “mate and first class pilot.” The law provides that a person’s pilotage qualifications may be endorsed on licenses of masters and mates. The present requirements to obtain a license or endorsement as First Class Pilot for such small vessels now appear to be unnecessarily restrictive. The establishment of qualifications and issuance of licenses as “master and pilot” or “mate and pilot” for manning of such vessels appears appropriate at this time. It is also proposed to allow masters and mates who qualify for service as pilot in those areas in which they have had experience to be licensed to serve as “master and pilot” or “mate and pilot,” when meeting certain qualifications deemed necessary for pilots of such small vessels.

18. I t is proposed to add requirements to present regulations governing deck licenses which will allow the issuance of deck licenses to qualified persons as “master and pilot” or as “mate and pilot” of small freight and towing vessels only and subject to other limitations based on the holders’ qualifications and experience. Under the proposed concept the holder of the license as “master and pilot” may only act as pilot on those vessels on which he is serving as a “master” or “mate.” The holder of a license as “mate and pilot” may only act as pilot on those vessels on which he is serving as a “mate.” The proposed regulations for experience and examination as “master” or “mate” are essentially the same as existing requirements. However, the experience and examination requirements for pilotage are less stringent than those now applicable for First Class Pilots. The proposed pilotage endorsement on the licenses of “master” or “mate” will bear geographical limitations which will be determined on overall experience in a general area rather than specific experience in a specific area as now used for First Class Pilots. This will authorize service in a much broader sense.Subpart 10.05— Professional Require

ments for Officer's Licenses (Inspected Vessels)19. It is proposed to insert § 10.05-6

reading aafollows:§ 1 0 .0 5 -6 Master and pilot, freight and

towing vessels not more than 1,000 gross tons.

(a) General. (1) This section shall apply to every applicant for a license as

3123

“master of freight and towing vessels of not more than 1,000 gross tons” who also applies for endorsement as "pilot”; such endorsement as “pilot” is not separable from that as master and is valid only while the holder is serving in the capacity as master or mate.

(2) At least one-third of the experience required must have been acquired on vessels of more than 100 gross tons. Experience on vessels of less than 15 gross tons will not be considered as qualifying.

(3) Six months of the experience required shall have been acquired in the area for which application is made; 3 months of which must have been acquired within the year preceding the application.

(4) Any holder of a deck license of equal or superior grade may be considered eligible for license as master and pilot upon presentation of evidence of service required by subparagraph (3) in this paragraph and satisfactory completion of examination on subjects in § 10.05-52(a) (1), (a) (14), and (b).

(5) Tonnage limitations commensurate with the experience of the applicant will be established by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. To be eligible for the maximum limitation of 1,000 gross tons, the applicant must have acquired at least 50 percent of his qualifying experience on vessels of more than 200 gross tons.

(6) The Officer in Charge, Marine In spection, will determine the geographical limitations of each license commensurate with the experience and qualifications of the applicant.

(b) Experience requirements. T h e minimum service required to qualify an applicant for license as master and pilot of freight and towing vessels of not more than 1,000 gross tons is 4 years on deck including:

(1) One year’s service as licensed mate and pilot; or,

(2) Two years’ service as unlicensed master; or,

(3) Two years’ service as quartermaster or wheelsman while holding a license as mate and pilot or first class pilot; or,

(4) Two years’ service as unlicensed mate while holding a license as operator of small passenger vessels valid within the area for which application is made; or,

(5) Three years’ service as unlicensed mate.

20. I t is proposed to insert § 10.05-36 reading as follows:§ 10.05—36 Mate and pilot, freight and

towing vessels not more than 1,000 gross tons.

(a) General. (1) This section shall apply to every applicant for a license as “mate of freight and towing vessels of not more than 1,000 gross tons” who also applies for endorsement as “pilot”; such endorsement as “pilot” is not separable from that as mate and is valid only while the holder is serving in the capacity as mate.

No. 38- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3124 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

(2) At least one-third of the experience required must have been acquired on vessels of more than 100 gross tons. Experience on vessels of less than 15 gross tons will not be considered as qualifying.

(3) Six months of the experience required shall have been acquired in the area for which application is made, 3 months of which must have been acquired within 1 year preceding the application.

(4) Any holder of a deck license of equal or superior grade may be considered eligible for license as mate and pilot upon presentation of evidence of service required by subparagraph (3) herein and satisfactory completion of examination on subjects in § 10.05-58 (a) (1), (a) (11), and (b).

(5) Tonnage limitations commensurate with the experience of the applicant will be established by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. To be eligible for the maximum limitation of 1,000 gross tons, the applicant must have acquired a t least 50 percent of his qualifying experience on vessels of more than 200 gross tons.

(6) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, will determine the geographical limitations of each license commensurate with the experience and qualifications of the applicant.

(b) Experience requirements. The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for license as mate and pilot of freight and towing vessels of not more than 1,000 gross tons is 2 years on deck including:

(1) One year’s service in a watchstanding capacity while holding a license as operator of small passenger vessels valid within the area for which application is made; or,

(2) One year’s service as unlicensed mate; or,

(3) Eighteen months’ service as quartermaster or wheelsman.

21. I t is proposed to insert a new § 10.05-52 reading as follows:§ 10.05—52 Examination as master and

pilot, freight and towing vessels not more than 1,000 gross tons.

(а) An applicant for license as master and pilot shall pass a satisfactory written examination as to his knowledge of the subjects listed in this paragraph.

(1) Rules of the road.(2) Practical use of the magnetic com

pass.(3) Instruments and accessories.(4) Chart navigation.(5) Aids to navigation.(б) Special signals.(7) Stability and ship construction.(8) Cargo handling and stowage.(9) Seamanship.(10) Lifesaving and firefighting.(11) Ship sanitation.

(12) Rules and regulations.(13) Ship’s business.(14) Such further examination as the

Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may consider necessary to establish the applicant’s proficiency.

(b) The applicant shall demonstrate by oral examination a practical knowledge of the area for which he has made application as pilot, using local charts, including:

(1) General geographical description of the area, indicating location of ports and harbors, general configuration of waterways, and the general tidal effects within the area.. (2) General traffic patterns in the area

and general type of traffic to be encountered.

(3) • More apparent hazards to navigation with their general descriptions and locations.

(4) General description of major aids to navigation including topographical aids.

(5) General description of winds and currents in the area, especially those of peculiar force or effect.

(6) Special and peculiar hazards to navigation.

(7) Special rules, signals, and customs of the area.

(8) Methods of determining courses, distances, and positions using the chart.

(c) The applicant shall demonstrate a satisfactory ability to navigate a vessel within the area for which he has made application using such methods as are commonly used.

(d) An applicant for extension of route shall be examined in subjects in subparagraphs (1) and (14) of paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) of this section.

22. I t is proposed to insert § 10.05-58 reading as follows:§ 10.05—58 Examination as mate and pi

lot, freight and towing vessels not more than 1,000 gross tons.

(a) An applicant for license as mate and pilot shall pass a satisfactory written examination as to his knowledge of the subjects listed in this paragraph:

(1) Rules of the road.(2) Practical use of the magnetic

compass.(3) Instruments and accessories.(4) Chart navigation.(5) Aids to navigation.(6) Special signals.(7) Cargo stowage and handling.(8) Seamanship.(9) Lifesaving and firefighting.(10) Rules and regulations.(11) Such other examination as the

Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may consider necessary to establish the applicant’s proficiency.

(b) The applicant shall demonstrate by oral examination a practical knowl

edge of the area for which he has made application as pilot, using local charts, including those subjects described in § 10.05—52(b).

(c) The applicant shall demonstrate a satisfactory ability to navigate a vessel within the area for which he has made application using such methods as are commonly used.

(d) An applicant for extension of route shall be examined in subjects in subparagraphs (1) and (11) in paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) of this section.

23. The authority to prescribe regulations governing the issuance of licenses is in sections 214, 224, 224a, 225, 226, 228, 230, 231, 233, 237, 367, 391a, 404, and 405 in Title 46, U.S. Code, and section 198 in Title 50, U.S. Code. The applicable au-' thorities are also cited with the present regulations in 46 CFR Part 10. The delegations of authority for the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, to prescribe regulations are in Treasury Department Orders 120, July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 6521; 167-14, November 26, 1954,19 F.R. 8026; and 167-20, June 18, 1956, 21 P.R. 4894.

Dated: February 23,1966.[ s e a l ] E. J. R o l a n d ,

Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant.


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREAgricultural Research Service

17 CFR Part 3191FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES

Importation of Nursery Stock, Plants, and Seeds

Notice is hereby given under section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 1003) that, pursuant to the provisions of sections 7 and 9 of the Plant Quarantine Act of August 20, 1912 (7 U.S.C. 160, 162), it is proposed to amend §§ 319.37(b) and 319.37-19(c) of the regulations relating to the importation of nursery stock, plants, and seeds (7 CFR 319.37(b), 319.37-19(0) in the following respects:

(a) Amend § 319.37(b) as follows:(1) Delete therefrom the following

items now appearing in the “Plant material”, “Foreign country or countries from which prohibited”, and “Injurious insect or plant disease determined as existing in the country or countries named and capable of being transported in the prohibited plant material” tabular columns, respectively :


PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3125

Malus spp. (except vegetatively- produced understocks).

Malus spp.

Prunus spp_ .______ __________Prunus spp. (except vegetatlvely-

produced understocks).

Prunus spp_______;___ _______

Pyrus spp. (except vegetatlvely- produced understocks).

Austria. ____ _______________China__________________*___Europe_________________Japan______________________

Korea____ ;_________ ________

Manchuria_________________South Africa.._______ . . . . ___

Germany______ .___________Switzerland_____ ___ ________Europe, Asia, Africa. Oceania

(including Australia and New Zealand).

All foreign countries, except Canada, when destined to California.

Europe, Japan, Manchuria, and South Africa.

Japan and China____________Korea____ ________________

Diaporthe mail Bres. (Leaf, branch and fruit fungus).

Valsa mali Miyabe and Yamada ex M.Miura (Branch canker fungus).

Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.)Honey (Brown rot of fruit).


Valsa mali Miyabe and Yamada ex M.Miura (Branch canker fungus).

Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and fruit fungus).



Mottle leaf or mosaic chlorosis of apple (Virus).

Pox-disease virus of sweet cherry.Bigi cherry disease virus.A diversity of plant diseases.

A diversity of plant diseases.


Gymnosporangium haraeanum Syd. (Bust).' Gymnosporangium japonicum Syd. (Bust). Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and

fruit disease). .

(2) In lieu of the deleted items, substitute in the respective tabular columns and in alphabetical order, the following:

Malus spp.

P runusspp.

Pyrus spp...

All foreign countries____

All foreign countries.

All foreign countries..

A diversity of plant diseases, including but hot limited to:

Diaporthe mali Bres. (Leaf, branch and fruit fungus).

Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.) Honey (Brown rot of fruit).

Mottle leaf or mosaic chlorosis of apple (Virus).

Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and fruit fungus).

“ Proliferation” (Virus).“ King spot” (Virus).“Bosette” (Virus).Valsa mali Miyabe and Yamada ex M. Miura

(Branch canker fungus).A diversity of plant diseases, including but

not limited to:Pox-disease virus of sweet cherry.Bigi cherry disease virus.A diversity of plant diseases, including but

not limited to:Gymnosporangium haraeanum Syd. (Bust).Gymnosporangium japonicum Syd. (Bust).Monilinia fructigena (Aderh. and Buhl.)

Honey (Brown rot of fruit).Physalospora piricola Nose (Leaf, branch and

fruit disease).“Proliferation” (Virus).

<b) Amend § 319.37-19 (c) by deleting therefrom the following items now appearing in the “Plants to be grown under postentry quarantine” and “Where imported from” tabular columns, respectively:Malus spp., including A11 foreign coun

stocks, when not pro- tries e x c e p thibited entry. Canada.

Prunus spp., including All foreign counstocks, when not pro- tries e x c e p thibited entry. C a n a d a , and

from C a n a d a when destined to California.

Pyrus spp., including All foreign counstocks, when not pro- tries, hibited entry.

(Secs. 7 and 9, 37 Stat. 317, 318; 7 U.S.C. 160, 162)

Information made available to the Department indicates that:

a. In respect to Malus spp., that viruses of apple causing “ring spot”, “proliferation”, and “rosette” occur in various parts of the world.

b. Numerous serious diseases of the stone fruit (Prunus spp.), not known to occur in the United States but now reported from numerous foreign countries,

are caused by a diversity of bacteria, fungi, and viruses.

c. In Europe, pears (Pyrus spp.) are also subject to infection by the “proliferation” virus mentioned as infecting the genus Malus.

The proposed action would prohibit the importation into the United States from any country of all vegetative propagating material of the three genera named in order to prevent the introduction into the United States of the above mentioned diseases which are new to or not heretofore widely prevalent or distributed within and throughout the United States. Plant material of the three genera move rather indiscriminately throughout the world and infections of the diseases listed are sometimes present without having been reported in scientific literature.

All persons who desire to submit written data, views, or arguments in connection with this matter should file the same with the Director of the Plant Quarantine Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Hyattsville, Md., 20781, within 120 days after the date of publication of this notice in the F ederal R egister. All writ

ten submissions made pursuant to this notice wil be made available for public inspection at such times and places and in a manner convenient to the public business (7 CFR 1.27(b)).

Done at Washington, D.C., this 18th day of February 1966.

[ seal] R. J. A nderson ,Deputy Administrator,

Agricultural Research Service.[F.R. Doc. 66-2014; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:49 ajn .]

Consumer and Marketing Service 17 CFR Part 1012][Docket No. AO-347-A1]

MILK IN TAMPA BAY MARKETING AREA

Notice of H earing on Proposed Amendments to Tentative Marketing Agreement and Order

Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR Part 900), notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held at the Sheraton Tampa Motor Inn, 515 East Cass Street, Tampa, Fla., beginning at 10 a.m., e.s.t., on March 7,1966, with respect to proposed amendments to the tentative marketing agreement and to the order, regulating the handling of milk in the Tampa Bay marketing area.

The public hearing is for the purpose of receiving evidence with respect to the economic and marketing conditions which relate to the proposed amendments, hereinafter set forth, and any appropriate modifications thereof, to the tentative marketing agreement and to the order.

The proposed amendments, set forth below, have not received the approval of the Secretary of Agriculture.

Proposed by Yogurt Master, Inc.: Proposal No. 1. Delete paragraph (c)

in § 1012.14 of the Tampa Bay order. Proposed by the Borden Co.:Proposal No. 2. Amend the Tampa

Bay Federal Milk Order, to provide the appropriate language to assure Class III classification of “Milk Shake Mix,” in the preparation of which food substances other than Milk products have been added in the amount of 10 percent, or more, on the basis of the finished product.

Proposed by the Dairy Division, Consumer and Marketing Service:

Proposal No. 3. Make such changes as may be necessary to make the entire marketing agreement and the order conform with any amendments thereto that may result from this hearing.

Copies of this notice of hearing and the order may be procured from the Market Administrator, Post Office Box 4886, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 33304, or from the Hearing Clerk, Room 112-A, Administration Building, U.S. Department of



Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 20250. or may be there inspected.

Signed at Washington, D.C., on February 18, 1966.

C l a r e n c e H. G ir a r d , Deputy Administrator,

Regulatory Programs.[F.R. Doc. 66-2016; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:49 a.m.]

[ 7 CFR Parts 1033, 1034 1[Docket Nos. AO—166—A30 and AO-175-A21]

MILK IN GREATER CINCINNATI ANDDAYTON-SPRINGFIELD, OH IO ,MARKETING AREAS

Decision on Proposed Amendments toTentative Marketing Agreementsand to OrdersPursuant to the provisions of the Agri

cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of ¡marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR Part 900), a joint public hearing was held at Cincinnati, Ohio, on October 20-21, 1965, pursuant to notice thereof issued October 5, 1965 (30 F.R. 12846).

Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at the hearing and the record thereof, the Deputy Administrator on February 1,1966 (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. DoC. 66-1252), filed with the Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, his recommended decision containing notice of the opportunity to file written exceptions thereto.

The material issues, findings and conclusions, rulings, and general findings of the recommended decision (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. Doc. 66-1252) are hereby approved and adopted and are set forth in full herein subject to the following modifications:

Under subheading la. Reclassification of Class III milk products, etc., the following changes are made:

1. The 10th paragraph is revised and the first sentence of the 11th paragraph is deleted.

2. In the last sentence of the 17th paragraph, a phrase is deleted.

3. Editorial changes are made in the first sentence of the 19th paragraph.

4. In the 21st paragraph, a phrase is changed in the first sentence, and in the last sentence, the word “proposals” and the figure “7.8” are changed to “provisions” and “6.8”, respectively.

5. The 22d paragraph is deleted and three new paragraphs are added.

Under subheading 3. Revision of supply-demand adjustor, the following changes are made:

6. The eighth paragraph is revised slightly.

7. The ninth paragraph is deleted and a revised text of this paragraph is contained in two new paragraphs relocated to follow immediately after the 35th paragraph.

8. The 19th and 20th paragraphs are deleted.

9. All the text beginning with the 21st paragraph to and including the 29th paragraph (beginning with the words “ I t was not shown on the record * * *” and ending with the phrase “the proposal is denied.”) are relocated to immediately precede subheading 4. Incidental and conforming changes. Further, certain editorial changes were made in the first sentence of the 21st paragraph.

The material issues on the record of the hearing relating to the Greater Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, milk orders are:

1. Various modifications of the Class I, II, and III milk definitions and ClassII and Class III pricing formulas (including butterfat differentials) of the Greater Cincinnati order, as follows:

a. Reclassification of certain or all Class i n milk products into Class n and revision of Class n and Class III pricing formulas;

b. Revision of Class II and Class III butterfat differentials;

c. Reclassification to Class II or Class HI of certain milk products now classified as Class I.

2. Revision of location adjustments applicable to class and uniform prices under the Greater Cincinnati order;

3. Revision of the maximum adjustment permitted under the supply- demand adjustor to the Class I prices under both orders; and

4. Incidental and conforming changes in order provisions.

Findings and conclusions. The following findings and conclusions on the material issues are based on evidence presented at the hearing and the record thereof:

la. Reclassification of Class III milk products and revision of Class II and Class III pricing formulas. Present ClassIII milk, priced below Class n milk during the months of March through August, should be eliminated. A new formula, based upon the Minnesota-Wisconsin manufacturing price series, for pricing the revised Class II milk should be adopted.

A large producer organization proposed a merger of present Class H milk and Class i n milk into one class to be designated Class II milk. This proposal was supported by another large association.

A handler proposed the reclassification to Class H milk of all milk in present Class i n other than that used to produce evaporated and condensed milk (or skim milk) in hermetically sealed cans. Classification of milk for the latter uses in Class i n at a price lower than Class H milk would be extended from the March- August period to the entire year.

Another handler proposed the reclassification to Class II milk of condensed skim milk or other Class n i product ultimately utilized in cottage cheese or ice cream processed in any nonpool plant serving the Cincinnati marketing area. Only Class HI milk so used in a Cincinnati pool plant is reclassified to Class n at the present time.

Each of such proponents would revise the formulas for pricing milk pres

ently in Class H and Class III uses generally to increase prices for producer milk used in products other than fluid milk products. The various pricing proposals are described in more detail below.

Producer proponents stated the following reasons for their classification and pricing proposals: (1) To assure that all producer milk used to produce cottage cheese and ice cream will be priced as Class II milk irrespective of the plant (pool or nonpool) in which such products are processed; (2) To establish prices for milk used in nonfluid products at a competitive level but yet not sufficiently attractive to encourage their production at the expense of higher valued use in fluid form; and (3) To minimize the opportunity for use of producer milk for nonfluid products in any pool plant while other pool plants may be short of producer milk for fluid requirements.

In support of such proposals producers pointed to (1) the rapid Class I sales growth in the Cincinnati market in recent months, increasing the opportunities for producer milk to be sold in Class I; (2) the relatively low price applicable to Class m milk (primarily milk and skim milk for condensing and evaporating) especially in the months of March through August, which has encouraged the use of producer milk in such class while outside sources were relied upon for fluid purposes; (3) the difficulty of attracting sufficient producer milk to the market to meet growing Class I needs with the Cincinnati blend price lower than blend prices of markets procuring milk in competition with Cincinnati; and (4) the opportunity for nonpool cottage cheese and ice cream processors in the Cincinnati market to purchase their ingredients from pool plants at a lower price under the order than pool handlers who process these products.

The special Class m classification during March through August should be eliminated. At the present time'the primary uses of producer milk in Class i n (priced below Class II during the months of March through August) are condensed skim milk and butterfat for ultimate processing into cottage cheese, ice cream mix, and ice cream. Relatively smaller quantities of Class III are disposed of, however, as canned evaporated or condensed milk, butter, and cheese. Much of the condensed < skim milk and cream for later conversion into cottage cheese or ice cream is moved to plants in the Cincinnati marketing area for actual processing. When the cottage cheese or ice cream processor in the market operates a nonpool plant the condensed skim milk or butterfat so utilized is accounted for as a Class III item, but if the receiving processor is a pool handler such skim milk or butterfat must be reclassified to Class II milk. In both instances, however, the processor must purchase ingredients of similar inspected quality under prevailing health regulations.

Similar classification for milk utilized at both types of plants (pool and nonpool) throughout the year will insure


similar pricing on all producer milk utilized for cottage cheese and ice cream manufacture in the market and tend to equalize raw ingredient costs between pool handlers engaged in cottage cheese and ice cream manufacture and their unregulated competitors.

The conclusion to include present Class III milk together with present Class II milk in a new Class H requires consideration of an appropriate year-round pricing formula for the new classification. Producer proponents of the combined classification proposed that the Class II price formula be established at the level of the “basic formula price for the current month.” Certain Cincinnati handlers favored this basis of pricing provided that an alternative Class n price become effective whenever the basic formula price exceeds by more than 10 cents the value of milk for manufacturing into butter and powder. This basis of pricing, including the butter- powder formula limitation, should be adopted.

The order currently provides that for the months of September through February the Class m price shall be the same as the Class n price. The Class n price is determined by a “butter-nonfat dry milk solids” formula which for 1964 averaged $3.16 per hundredweight. For each of the months of March through August Class HI milk is priced separately by a formula under which the market administrator averages the monthly basic, or “field,” prices paid by five milk manufacturing plants in or near the Cincinnati milkshed without reflection of any bonuses for volume, quality, or bulk tank which may be paid by such plants. For the months of March through August 1965 the Class i n price averaged approximately $2.76 per hundredweight. During the same 6-month period the Class n price averaged $3.16 per hundredweight.

The basic formula price. (Minnesota- Wisconsin manufacturing milk price series) on a “current month” basis averaged $3.18 for the year 1964 and $3.22 for the 6 months March-August 1965.

There is an obvious need in the Cincinnati market to induce greater utilization of producer milk in Class I. One handler last spring completed a large fluid milk and ice cream plant in the Cincinnati market which is designed to serve not only its own outlets in the Cincinnati market but also outlets in other markets including Dayton. At the time this plant was opened its Dayton plant was closed and the milk supply of the Dayton plant moved to the Cincinnati location.

It is the expressed intention of this handler to increase fluid sales from this Cincinnati plant to already established outlets in several other markets as rapidly as a supply buildup will permit. The handler is currently requesting producer organizations to furnish additional supplies and testified to the difficulty of procuring additional supplies at current blend prices. Certain other" handlers also have experienced expanded sales in recent months and similarly have requested additional milk supplies for fluid

PROPOSED RULE MAKINGuse. Much of the hearing discussion related to the problems of handlers needing Class I milk in obtaining the required supplies*

Under the condition that there is a growing market for producer milk in the highest valued Class I use, little incentive should be given under order pricing to the manufacture of local producer milk into manufactured dairy products. Use in these products should be limited as nearly as practicable to the daily and weekend reserve supplies resulting from an uneven bottling pattern during the week. Pricing policy under the order should encourage reliance on outside sources for such nonfluid uses when producer milk is in relatively short supply for bottling requirements.

It is significant that the Cincinnati utilization in Class I has tended to be lower than in surrounding markets even though for several months handlers have requested the associations to supply more milk for Class I use. For the first nine months of 1965 Cincinnati Glass I use averaged 67 percent of producer receipts compared to 79 percent in Dayton- Springfield, 74 percent in Louisville-Lex- ington-Evansville, 77 percent in Columbus, and 75 percent in Indianapolis. During the period March-August 1965 when the lower Class HI price was available monthly quantities ranging from 7.8 million to 19.2 million pounds of producer milk were disposed of in Class III while monthly quantities of fluid milk- products imported from outside regulated and unregulated plants ranged from 2.4 million to 5.0 million pounds. The major proportion of the latter quantities was allocated to Class I and Class II while the above producer milk quantities were priced in Class III.

Order pricing should not permit one handler to purchase producer milk at less than the general level of prices for manufacturing milk to utilize in nonfluid products while other handlers are seeking additional supplies for fluid purposes. Only through an increase in the percentage of producer milk in Class I can lasting improvement of producer blend prices result. The proposed increase in price applicable to milk for nonfluid uses is an appropriate step to encourage the allocation or flow of available producer milk to its optimum utilization in the market.

While the highest practicable utilization of available supplies in Class I is an immediate objective, the allocation of presently available supplies to this use may not be sufficient to satisfy future Class I requirements. It is likewise important, therefore, that the Cincinnati market be in position to procure milk competitively with other nearby markets.

The requirements for fluid use are increasing. However, the Cincinnati market is unfavorably situated a t this time from the standpoint of procurement of additional supplies or even of holding the current level of supplies. Blend prices in markets competing for milk have generally been higher than for Cincinnati in 1965. For the first 8 months the Cincinnati blend price averaged $4.03 per hundredweight f.o.b. market. This com-

3127

pares with $4.19 for Dayton-Springfield, $4.18 for Columbus, $4.09 for Louisville- Lexington-Evansville and $4.14 for Nortwestern Ohio.

These price relationships tend to encourage producers away from the Cincinnati market rather than toward it. Moreover, nearly all milk in the milkshed is already associated with one or another of such fluid markets, and there is diminishing opportunity to obtain any substantial amount of Grade A milk for the fluid market by conversion of nearby dairy farmers producing ungraded milk. At the present time, premiums or hauling subsidies are being paid on approximately one-third of the milk supply as certain handlers attempt to satisfy their needs for fluid uses.

The increase in the return for milk for Class III uses through the reclassification and pricing provisions hereby proposed for adoption not only will encourage a higher utilization of producer milk in Class I but also will improve the blended prices so as to be somewhat more favorable in relation to competing markets. I t is estimated that for the first 8 months of 1965 adoption of these provisions would have improved the Cincinnati blend by an average of 6.8 cents per hundredweight.

The recommended decision concluded that the price of milk in all lower valued uses should be increased to the level of the basic formula price. At such price level, which is representative of the general level of manufacturing milk prices, there would be significantly greater inducement to the handler with excesses over fluid needs to release producer milk to other pool plants where the milk may be used for fluid purposes since the price of producer milk in nonfluid uses would not be less than alternative sources of milk, or ingredients, for such uses. The importance of price alignment with nearby competing markets for milk put to nonfluid uses, such as cottage cheese and ice cream, also was indicated. The latter is a highly significant factor in arriving at an appropriate level of price for this market.

While adoption of the basic formula price as the means of pricing Class H milk would result in substantial improvement insofar as intermarket price alignment is concerned, it would not necessarily produce precise alignment with nearby markets for this class of milk in all months of the year. The exceptions point out the importance of attaining the most precise alignment possible in light of the intermarket competition present. Use of an alternative Class n price formula, as proposed at the hearing, to apply whenever the basic formula price exceeds the price produced by the alternative formula would provide the same Class II price as prevails in the Columbus, Northwestern Ohio, Northeastern Ohio, and Indianapolis markets which are competitors with Cincinnati in supply or sales, or both. Taking into account the pricing of all Class H milk, including milk to butter, in the Dayton-Springfield market, a very close alignment with the latter market also may be achieved.


3128 PROPOSED RULE MAKINGIt is concluded that the alternative

formula proposed (identical to that used in the Columbus market) should be adopted. Such alternative formula will permit intermarket handler competition within the region on substantially equal terms insofar as procurement cost is concerned. While on a yearly average basis the alternative formula would have moderated a Class II (basic formula) price by 2 cents per hundredweight in1964 and for the first 10 months of 1965 by 5 cents per hundredweight, individual monthly variations between the basic formula price and the alternative formula price in such period ranged from 0 to 12 cents per hundredweight. For example, in the absence of the alternative formula, a difference of as much as 12 cents could have prevailed in January1965 between the Columbus and Cincinnati Class n prices. We may not conclude on this record that such a difference is appropriate or desirable. Also, the cooperatives, which assume substantial responsibility for filling the milk supply needs of Cincinnati handlers, will be in better position to dispose of any temporary surpluses left in their hands without incurring an undue price burden.

Since there are outlets for available producer milk supplies at higher prices, the handler proposal to retain producer milk utilized for canned evaported or condensed milk in Class III at a price which averages about 15 cents per hundredweight lower than the basic formula price is denied.

The handler proposal to reclassify and price as Class n milk (at a proposed level approximating the present Class II price) only that condensed skim milk or other Class III product when it is utilized for cottage cheese or ice cream in a pool or nonpool plant serving the Cincinnati marketing area would have the effect of pricing Class HI milk sold to nonpool plants not so serving the marketing area at a level approximately 10 cents above the present Class m price level during the months of March through August. I t was contended that some seasonal reduction in price on such milk is necessary to guarantee that the market surplus will be handled in the months of increased seasonal production.

Although the offered price would be 10 cents higher than the Class III price now prevailing, it would remain substantially below the general level of prices being paid for surplus milk in manufactured uses. If additional quantities of milk are allowed to flow to fluid use in accordance with current market requirements, the market should have no difficulty in clearing its normal, temporary surpluses at the basic formula price. The proposal therefore is denied.

lb. Class II and Class III butterfat differentials. Producers also proposed a change in the butterfat differential to be applicable to butterfat included in Class II milk and Class III milk as presently defined which are combined into a new Class II milk. The butterfat differential which would be applicable to butterfat in the revised Class II milk category would be the Chicago 92 score butter price times 0.115. The present Class II

butterfat differential is the Chicago 92 score butter times 0.118 less a minor adjustment for skim milk replaced as the fat content of milk changes.

In support of this proposal proponents cited the trend toward lower butterfat content in milk and certain milk products and the increasing need for solids- not-fat relative to butterfat in the Cincinnati market. Producers believe a better utilization of the milk supply will be encouraged by this action as well as by an increase in the price for nonfluid uses.

The proposed butterfat differential of 11.5 percent of the Chicago butter price is reasonably related to the level of the revised Class II price and will reflect the same value of butterfat as that provided for in the Columbus, Northeastern Ohio and Northwestern Ohio markets. A reasonable alignment of butterfat values will be maintained also with the Day- ton-Springfield market.

lc. Reclassification of certain fluid milk products. Pancake mix now classified as Class I when processed by a handler should be reclassified to Class n milk. Milk used for sterilized cream packaged in hermetically sealed metal or glass containers which is received and disposed of without repackaging should be made exempt from classification by modifying the “Class I milk” and “other source milk” definitions. In addition, a change should be made in defining those sour cream mixtures which are designated as Class II items. Milk used for sour cream and eggnog should remain Class I milk.

Reclassification of milk for pancake mix. Milk for pancake mix processed in a handler’s plant should be reclassified to Class II since it is not, in its disposed form, comparable with the fluid uses of milk and skim milk which are the highest valued uses of producer milk.

The order presently provides that milk, skim milk or cream disposed of in bulk to any commercial food processing establishment where food products are prepared only for consumption off the premises shall be classified in the lowest valued manufacturing use classification (Class i n ) . This classification is provided so as to permit milk not required for fluid purposes to be disposed of competitively with alternative supplies, such as nonfat dry milk and condensed milk, which are available for the processing of nondairy food products.

Under the terms of the present order, bulk skim milk disposed of to a commercial establishment for the manufacture of pancake mix would be classified as Class III. Although there is no evidence that disposition of milk or skim milk is, in fact, being made by handlers in the market to commercial processors for use in this particular purpose, a surplus classification is permitted when disposed of to bakeries and certain other food processing establishments. I t was not shown that skim milk and butterfat used in the processing of pancake mix is required by local health authorities to be made from Grade A milk. We see no justification in the record for classifying milk used in processing pan-

cake mix in Class I simply because of its manufacture in a regulated milk plant.

I t is concluded therefore that the “fluid milk product” definition should be modified to exclude pancake mix, thus effecting the reclassification of any skim milk and butterfat used therein to the revised Class II milk. This change is consistent with the proponent handler’s request that the Class II category for this product be permitted in the event a two-class system evolved from the hearing. There was no opposition to the reclassification requested.

Accounting for milk in sterilized cream. Sterilized cream received and disposed of in the same glass or metal hermetically sealed container should be excluded from the definitions of “Class I milk” and “other source milk.” This will have the effect of exempting this product (when received and disposed of without repackaging) from the reporting, classification and pricing provisions of the order and require only that records be maintained of its receipt and disposition, similar to records currently required of handlers with respect to packaged butter and cheese received and disposed of without repackaging.

Certain handlers proposed that “sterilized products packaged in hermetically sealed containers” either be reclassified from Class I to the lowest-priced use class or be made exempt from classification. Testimony of proponents was concerned, however, only with sterilized cream in such containers and therefore consideration is limited to the latter product.

It was pointed out that at least one brand of sterilized cream for whipping is being distributed in the Cincinnati market. The product referred to is manufactured and packaged in hermetically sealed glass containers by a processing plant located a t Gustine, Calif. The product is received and disposed of by handlers in the Greater Cincinnati market in the original container under the handler’s own label.

A representative of the manufacturer testified that such sterilized cream may be derived from either Grade A or ungraded milk, but is usually made from ungraded milk. The product is distributed to some 49 States and for all but a

. few (such as North Carolina and Louisiana where specifically required to be made from Grade A and so labeled) it may be made from ungraded milk. The product being distributed in the Cincinnati market is manufactured from ungraded milk.

This sterilized cream product contains 30 percent butterfat and certain stabilizers. I t is not subject to the pasteurization and other health standards applicable to fresh fluid cream and may not be labeled as “cream” in this market. It need not be distributed through the usual marketing channels through which fresh fluid cream is distributed. The product, because of its long keeping qualities, may be disposed of directly to grocery store chains and can be held in warehouses from which it may be distributed over wide areas.


PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3129

Under present terms of the order, this product is classified as other source milk in Class I. By excluding the product (when received and disposed of without repackaging) from the “Class I milk” and “other source milk” definitions it will be accounted for in the plant but will not be subject to pricing under the order.

I t was not shown on the record that the sterilized cream product has any competitive advantage based upon the cost of milk ingredients and transportation charges of moving the finished product to this market when compared to the costs of producer milk disposed of in the form of regular, or unsterlized, cream. The exemption of this product from price regulation therefore is not expected to affect the orderly marketing of producer milk in the form of fluid milk products in the area. In this connection it may be noted that for each of the years 1963 and 1964, the amount of producer milk in this market sold in the form of “double cream” (cream items containing 27 percent or more butterfat) amounted to about one-tenth of 1 percent.

Classification of sour cream items, sour cream and eggnog. Three handlers proposed that certain sour cream items, sour cream, and eggnog be removed from the fluid milk products presently designated as Class I and be classified as Class n milk. Principal reasons for proposing these changes were sales competition in these items with handlers regulated in other order markets where such products are classified and priced at a lower use value, and growing competition with imitation sour cream products made with vegetable fat.

For example, proponent handlers cited several brands of sour cream and sour cream mixtures which are being sold in stores in the Cincinnati area. Of seven brands of sour cream (real and imitation) cited, four are “sour cream” items sold and distributed by Cincinnati regulated handlers. The remaining three consist of a sour cream product from a Chicago area, an imitation sour cream item from a Marietta, Ohio, plant and a sour cream item from a New Bremen, Ohio, plant.

Sour cream dips, either cultured or not cultured, should be included in the revised Class II milk category.

The order presently provides for the classification as Class n milk of cultured mixtures of skim milk and butterfat to which cheese or any food substance other than a milk product has been added in an amount equal to a t least 3 percent of the finished product and which contains not more than 15 percent butterfat. This designation is intended to cover products commonly referred to as “dip specialty products.” These dip specialty items are semisolid, coagulated cream products and are distributed in the form of dips, dressings and toppings. Under present provisions of the order any similar specialty product which does not meet these percentage requirements, unless specifically designated in another classification, would be classified as a “fluid milk (Class I) product.”

Proponent handlers proposed that sour cream dips, whether cultured or not cultured, be classified as Class n and any percentage requirements with respect to

butterfat and cheese or nonmilk product additives as presently called for in the order be eliminated.

This proposal should be adopted. The Class II provisions defining the specialty products commonly known as sour dips or dressings should not arbitrarily exclude such a product solely because the ingredient composition fails to meet the currently prescribed standards. There are no distinguishing differences based on form or use.

Although the current definition of Class n actually includes most of such products disposed of in the market, the possibility remains under present class definitions th a t similar products intended for similar use would be classified as Class I. The record did not show that there were any distinguishing features involving their use which justify a different (Class I) classification of certain of such products on the basis of the amount of butterfat and food additives content. We conclude that logically all products of this type should be in a single class.

Also, the limiting of Class II dips to “cultured” mixtures should be eliminated. This is appropriate in light of recent technical innovations in the processing of such mixtures and also because of new products on the market which are very similar to those being sold at present but which are not clearly defined under the present classification provisions of the order. Proponent handlers pointed out that dip specialties may now be derived from cream coagulated by organic or inorganic acids rather than by the traditional lactic culture. Since this is a matter of manufacturing technique and does not materially alter the general form or use of the final product, the particular manufacturing process used should not be a determining factor in classification.

Inasmuch as sour cream should remain a Class I product, for reasons to be discussed later in these findings, it is necessary to revise the definition of Class n milk to distinguish the classification of sour cream from the classification of sour cream dips and dressings.

The proposal to reclassify sour cream from Class I to Class II should not be adopted.

The skim milk and butterfat used to produce sour cream for sale in the Cincinnati market is required by local health authorities to be made from Grade A milk. Under the general scheme of classified pricing in Federal order markets, the level of price for milk and milk products which require an approved supply is established at a level higher than than the price level of manufacturing milk unless there are compelling reasons for a lower classification. This is appropriate in order to compensate for the extra cost incurred by producers to produce quality milk and provide sufficient incentive to the producers, through the blended price returns, to encourage the production of those quantities of milk needed for all uses requiring inspected milk.

The sour cream market is a year- round market requiring regularity in the supply of producer milk to meet the mar

ket need. In view of the expressed desire of handlers and producers to improve the utilization and level of blend returns to producers in this market, it is not apparent how encouragement to an adequate supply for all uses requiring producer milk, including sour cream, would result from lowering the price of producer milk used in sour cream. In this connection, it is noteworthy that even the proponent of a lower use value for sour cream, sour cream mixtures and eggnog likewise complained of the need for a higher blend price and, correspondingly, the need to direct more of the market’s supply of producer milk to fill the bottling needs of the market. The proposal to classify sour cream as Class n was not supported by producers or by other handlers in the market.

In view of these considerations, the proposal should not be adopted.

Proponent handlers requesting the reclassification of eggnog testified to competition in the local market with eggnog made with vegetable fat and with canned eggnog. They stated that they sell fresh eggnog in competition with eggnog sold by handlers regulated under the Fort Wayne, Ind., Louisville-Lexington- Evansville, Dayton-Springfield, Northeastern Ohio, Columbus and Northwestern Ohio Federal milk orders. Eggnog is classified as Class II in these markets, except Columbus and Northwestern Ohio where such products are classified as Class I.

Producer milk used to produce eggnog should continue, however, to be classified as Class I as presently required under the order.

Essentially the same reasons for continuing sour cream as Class I apply also to eggnog. Although market demand for this product is seasonal, it is primarily designed for the fluid market. Also, milk not approved by local health authorities may not be used for eggnog.

2. Location Adjustments. The area within which no location differential is applicable should not be revised at this time. Zone differential rates should remain unchanged.

A handler proposed revision of the location adjustment provisions in a manner that no adjustment to the Class I and blend prices would be made with respect to producer milk received a t pool plants within a radius of 90 miles of Cincinnati. At the present time the “no differential” area is limited to a radius of 30 miles from Cincinnati. A corollary proposal would revise the application of zone rates beyond the proposed no differential area. No supporting testimony was given, however, with respect to the latter proposal.

The proponent handler’s pool supply plant maintains manufacturing facilities. This plant is located approximately 88 miles from Cincinnati a t Covington, Ohio. It is subject to a location adjustment of 14.5 cents under the terms of the present order. Proponent stated that application of the location adjustment to the blended price results in a uniform price at the plant well below the uniform price of the Dayton-Springfield market (f.o.b. market), making it virtually im-



possible for the plant to hold its bulk tank milk supply without payment of premiums to producers.

Currently, the premiums being paid by this handler exceed the 14.5 cents represented by the location adjustment. I t is contended that elimination of the adjustment by including the Covington plant within the “no differential” area would remove the problem of supply procurement and make it possible for the plant to hold its producer milk supply.

The location differential provisions as proposed should not be adopted on the basis of the rather limited consideration given the matter at this hearing. As pointed out in opposition testimony, the proposal made would provide a higher Class I price a t Covington than the Day- ton-Springfield Class I price which bears a definite location relationship to the Cincinnati Class I price. Covington, like Dayton-Springfield, is north of Cincinnati but somewhat more distant than Dayton-Springfield. Thus, the effect of the proposal on Class I price relationships would not comport with the currently established pattern of prices in the region. Official notice is taken of the November 5,1964, decision of the Assistant Secretary on amendments to the Cincinnati order for the basis of such price relationship between the markets.

Moreover, according to exhibits introduced by proponent, the prevailing hauling rates on bulk tank milk produced on farms in several counties for delivery to Covington as compared with delivery from the same counties to Cincinnati do not differ materially. On these data, adoption of the proposed plan of location adjustments would tend to encourage delivery of bulk tank milk to proponent’s supply plant when it could be delivered directly to Cincinnati at no significantly greater cost to the producer and be immediately available for higher valued utilization.

The order should not encourage receipt of bulk tank milk a t outlying plants when it is produced within the radius from which delivery may be made directly from the farm to a city plant without the cost (and charges) involved in intermediate handling. Covington is within such a distance from Cincinnati. When the milk is delivered directly to Cincinnati the location differential is automatically eliminated, of course, since the milk then is eligible for pricing f.o.b. market. Also, as pointed out previously in this decision, the market needs increased supplies for expanding fluid requirements and only that milk available as part of the incidental, but necessary, reserve should be held for processing into nonfluid products.

As to can milk, it is obvious that there would be signficantly greater cost involved in the delivery of such milk directly from farms to Cincinnati than to this country supply plant. Proponent did not show that the present location differential no longer reasonably relates the value of can milk a t the country location and its value a t the city processing plant. Thus, it must be presumed that the differential continues to reflect the

respective costs borne by producer and handler in moving can milk to the market from the country supply plant.

3. Revision of supply-demand adjustor. The maximum amount per hundredweight by which the supply-demand adjustor may adjust the Class I prices in both the Cincinnati and the Dayton- Springfield markets for any one month should be reduced from 50 cents to 39 cents.

A common supply-demand “adjustor” to Class I prices was adopted for both markets effective December 1, 1964. In the decision of the Assistant Secretary, issued November 5, 1964, concerning this matter (29 F.R. 15147), it was determined that the Class I sales and producer receipts of both markets should be combined in computing a common supply- demand adjustment for the two markets and that their respective Class I prices should be specifically related. It was determined also that the maximum plus or minus adjustment for any one month should be set at 56 cents per hundredweight. Prior to these amendments to the two orders, the adjustors in the Greater Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield orders were limited to 50 cents and 38 cents per hundredweight, respectively.

Five handlers proposed to modify the Class I pricing provision of the Greater Cincinnati order by reducing from 50 cents to 20 cents, the maximum amount by which the adjustor may adjust the Greater Cincinnati Class I milk price. In light of this proposal, the Department placed interested parties on notice that the intermarket relationship between Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield Federal order markets, adopted in the November 5, 1964, decision, could be altered by the handlers’ proposal. In order that all aspects of such price alignment might be given full consideration the Dayton- Springfield order therefore was opened for review of the corresponding provision in such order.

At the hearing, proponent handlers modified their original proposal to apply the same 20-cent limitation to the Dayton-Springfield Class I price adjustor. A Dayton handler supported the 20-cent limitation for the two orders and also proposed that there be a limit of 4 cents change in any adjustment one month to the next. Another Cincinnati handler proposed a 24-cent limit (plus or minus) to the supply-demand adjustment, likewise to apply to both markets.

Cincinnati handlers cited as their principal reason for proposing the reduced limit on the supply-demand adjustment, the recent increase in competition with handlers in certain other nearby markets for both milk supplies and sales. This competition for milk sales and supply has come about, in part, from the development of modem highways and expressways and the availability of improved transportation and refrigeration facilities and equipment.

Graded milk from markets under health jurisdictions other than that of Cincinnati market also may now move more freely into the Cincinnati market, if the shippers of such milk are on the

approved Interstate Milk Shippers list and the milk has an IMS rating of 90 or better.

Principal markets in competition with Cincinnati handlers for both sales and Grade A milk supply are Dayton-Springfield, Louisville-Lexington-Evansville,jand Columbus. Further, certain Cincinnati handlers have expanded their sales in recent years to include the Dayton-Springfield and Columbus markets as well as other nearby Ohio markets such as Tri-States, and have indicated also plans for expansion into other additional sales areas. These developments, they say, have created additional needs for fluid milk and further emphasizes the need for close alignment of Class I and producer blend prices with other Ohio markets.

The matter of intermarket alignment of prices was cited by handlers as an important problem. Because of the plus adjustments to the Cincinnati Class I price brought about by the action of the supply-demand adjustor in recent months, it was contended that the Cincinnati Class I price reached a level too high in relation to nearby competing markets. In this connection, handlers stated that their proposed limit on plus supply-demand adjustments would tend to increase the incentive to handlers to draw upon sources of milk already under the order to the greatest possible extent for Class I purposes before adding additional producer milk.

The supply-demand adjustment was at its highest level in recent years for the month of October 1965 (36 cents per hundred-weight), 6 cents higher than the largest adjustment in 1964, which occurred in September. This 36-cent adjustment was based upon the trend of the markets’ relationship of supply to demand indicated by the departure, or deviation, of the “mover” (e.g., the mover for the October pricing month is based upon the preceding 3 months of June, July, and August) from the predetermined “norm,” or standard utilization percentage. The percentage of producer milk classified as Class I averaged (simple) 68 percent for the period of such mover (June, July, and August) 1965, or about 6 percentage points higher than for the same period in 1964. This indication of a shorter supply relationship to sales for the pricing month of October resulted in the 36-cent supply-demand adjustment.

In the November 1964 decision supporting the adoption of this formula it was pointed out that in reestablishing of standard utilization percentages (reflecting the “normal” monthly supply- demand relationship of the two markets in combination) some modification was made for the purpose of lessening the possibility of contraseasonal supply- demand adjustments which might occur as a result of random seasonal shifting in the relationship of production and Class I disposition in the two markets, one year to the next. As a consequence, it could be expected that, all things being equal, monthly price adjustments would be somewhat more sensitive to a trend


PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3131toward a shortening of supply during the low production months than would be the case if such a trend were indicated during the generally flush production months of the year.

At least a portion of this advance in the fall as compared to a year ago may be attributed, however, to the slight modification of the norms. To an equal extent, an offsetting contraseasonal effect might be expected in the coming spring months of generally flush production since an offsetting adjustment was made in the norms which determine flush period price levels.

As stated previously, handlers directed their objections to the amount by which the current supply-demand formula has contributed to an escalation of the Cincinnati Class I price and resulting misalignment with other markets. Nevertheless, for the 10-month period of January through October 1965, the current supply-demand formula resulted in plus adjustments to the Class I price averaging two cents lower than during the same period 1964. While the Class I price averaged $4.78 during the 1965 period as compared to $4.71 for the same period 1964, the 7-cent average increase in the Class I price in 1965 may be accounted for by a 9-cent average increase in the basic formula price offset by the 2-cent average decrease in the supply-demand adjustment. This increase in the Cincinnati basic formula price is similar to that reflected in several other Federal order markets where the basic price formulas are similar. They reflect competitive conditions in the manufacturing segment of the industry rather than intermarket competition in fluid milk.

The Cincinnati Class X price has, in fact, increased less in recent years than Class I prices in other nearby markets. The Cincinnati price averaged $4.73 per hundredweight for 1963 and remained at that average level in 1964. For the Dayton, Columbus, Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, and Louisville markets the 1964 Class I prices averaged 5, 13, 6, 7, and 8 cents higher, respectively, over those of the preceding year.

Also, over a 2-year period there has been a trend toward a closer alignment of Class I prices between the Cincinnati market and the five other markets cited. A comparison of Class I prices for the 10-month period January through October 1965 with the same period for 1963 shows the Cincinnati Class I price to have increased on the average only 6 cents per hundredweight, whereas the five neighboring markets increased as follows:

CentsDayton-Springfield__________________ 22C olum b us_________________________ 13iIndianapolis _______________________ 16Port Wayne_________________________ - 17Louisville-Lexington-Evansville_____ 16

1 Not including 14 cents added to Class I differential by amendment of May 1,1964.

The general trend toward a closer alignment of the Cincinnati Class I price with prices in the nearby markets is further demonstrated by the following table:

Amount by Which C incinnati Order Class I P rice on the Average E xceeded Class I P rices in the F ollowing Markets

First 10 months of—

1963 1964 1965

Cent» Cents CentsD ayton-Springñeld________ 26 23 10Columbus________________ 48 »36 1 9Indianapolis______________ 35 29 25Fort Wayne______________Louisville-Lexington-Evans-

43 36 32ville___________________ 15 7 5

1 Including the 14 cents added to Class I differential by amendment of May 1, 1964.

A similar comparison with the more distant market of Chicago also shows the same trend. The Cincinnati Class I price exceeded the Chicago 70-mile zone price on the average by 99, 92, and 86 cents per hundredweight, respectively, for the comparable 10-month periods during 1963, 1964, and 1965.

In light of the above we may not reasonably conclude that the current supply-demand formula has adversely affected the orderly marketing of fluid milk. The proposals for a 20-cent or 24-

/ cent limit are therefore denied. For the same reasons, a counter proposal made by producers to apply both a ceiling and floor on the supply-demand adjustment should not be adopted. The latter proposal would have the effect of fixing at a single level of plus 22 cents the amount the adjustor could affect price in any month. The supply-demand formula is designed as a supplement to other price determinants as a means of bringing about timely responses in price to changes in the market in the relationship between receipts of milk from producers and Class I sales. In the present dynamic market situation, more flexibility in pricing is needed than would be provided by the producers’ proposal.

That the two markets are in a period of supply and sales transition there can be little doubt. A large milk and ice cream plant was established in the Cincinnati market during 1964 to process milk to be distributed in several market areas. This and other market changes relating to the movement of milk through channels from farm to consumer, brought about in part by improved roads and transportation systems, improved technological developments in milk storage and processing, expansion of plant facilities to effect economies of scale make it evident that the marketing of fluid milk and milk products in the two-market area is going through a period of rapid change.

It is desirable, therefore, that the limit (both maximum and minimum) on the supply-demand adjustment be set at a level less than the 50-cent per hundredweight now provided, and more nearly in line with prevailing limits provided for in other nearby order markets.

A limit of 39 cents per hundredweight is deemed to be appropriate in view of the circumstances herein discussed which indicate a growing interplay of competition for Class I sales between these markets and other Ohio markets.

A maximum limit of plus 39 cents is 3 cents higher than the highest level of supply-demand adjustment reached during 1965. This limit is expected to encourage the maximum use of producer milk in Class I during the rapid adjustment in supplies and sales.

Provision should also be made that any negative supply-demand adjustment to Class I price shall not exceed 39 cents per hundredweight. The ceiling of plus 39 cents and a corresponding floor of minus 39 cents adjustment will provide assurance that a close Class I price alignment will be maintained between the Dayton-Springfield and Columbus markets, which compete both in sales and procurement. The Columbus order provides a limit of 38 Gents plus or minus.

The appropriateness of a similar alignment between Cincinnati and Dayton- Springfield is evident by the close competition for sales and supply by Dayton and Cincinnati handlers. I t is noted further that handlers regulated under the Tri-State order have common sales areas with handlers in the Cincinnati, Dayton-Springfield,-and Columbus m arkets as found in a decision of the Assistant Secretary issued April 23, 1965 (30 F.R. 5904), official notice of which is taken herewith, concerning amendments to the Tri-State order. The order for this market also has a limit of 38 cents plus or minus on its supply-demand adjustor.

Although not presenting a formal proposal one Cincinnati handler testified in support of a similar level of Class I prices for all fluid markets within a 300-mile radius of Cincinnati. Since orders for markets other than Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield were not under consideration at this hearing, the testimony may not appropriately be considered. As to the relationship of prices between Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield, this matter is discussed elsewhere in this decision.

A Dayton handler proposed to establish a 4-cent “dampener” on the month- to-month changes in supply-demand adjustments as a corollary change to a proposal by certain other handlers to provide for a 20-cent limit to the supply-demand adjustment (discussed elsewhere in these findings).

It was the contention of this handler that: (1) The supply-demand formula presently used in the two orders is obsolete; and (2) there is no justification for a plus supply-demand adjustment for the Cincinnati market based upon the current relationship of Class I to producer milk. This handler, however, offered no proposal to change other factor components of the supply-demand formula.

It was not shown on the record how the 4-cent “dampener” might improve the effectiveness of the supply-demand formula. Further, the appropriateness of the use of the 4-cent figure, in lieu of some other amount was not made clear. The current formula is designed to adjust Class I prices in multiples of three cents.

The proponent handler cited as one reason for the 4-cent dampener, its use in a number of other orders. It was not

No. 38------ 4 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966


shown, however, whether the conditions which justified such a device in the Class I pricing formula of another order also prevail in the Cincinnati and Dayton markets. The proposal was not supported by other handlers or producers in either market.

Such a device is employed in the supply-demand formulas of some orders principally as a means of minimizing the possibility of marked variations in Class I prices which otherwise might occur from unusual short-run conditions in the relationship of supply to demand.

Several components of the current supply-demand formula for the two markets, however, are designed to act as a “dampener” to such short term abnormal conditions and thus provide reasonable stability in adjustments to Class I prices. One such component is the provision for a bracket of 3 percentage points in the standard utilization percentage (norm) for each month. This bracketing, together with provisions for “rounding” the computed utilization percentage, provides a “corridor” of 4 percentage points within which the current utilization percentage may move without effecting a price adjustment.

Stability in adjustments also is achieved, to some extent, by the provision in the formula for a 3-month “mover” rather than a 2-month mover as in some other markets. That is, the use of utilization and receipts in the two markets for the 3 preceding months in calculating the current Class I utilization percentage tends to smooth out the adjustments, one month to the next. A further dampening influence is effected from the slight modification recently made in the “norms” to offset contraseasonal price effects, as discussed earlier.

The effectiveness of these devices as a means of stabilizing adjustments is evidenced by the history of adjustments since the inception of the formula in the two orders effective December 1964.

Except for 1 month (March 1965) when the amount of “change” in adjustment (one month to the next) was 9 cents, such change has ranged from 3 to 6 cents, averaging 4.75 cents on a monthly basis during the period December 1964 through December 1965.

During this 13-month period, the month-to-month change in supply- demand adjustments only twice reversed direction, once in April and again in November 1965. To illustrate, the supply-demand adjustment trended downward from a plus 24 cents in December 1964 to a plus 6 cents for March 1965. An upward trend in the adjustment began in April 1965 (plus 9 cents) and continued to increase thereafter (in plus increments of change each month amounting to 3 or 6 cents) to an October 1965 high of plus 36 cents. November 1965 again marked the beginning of a trend downward from a plus 33 cents to plus 27 cents for December 1965, with the addition of significant amounts of new supplies of producer milk to the market. (Official notice is taken of the Greater Cincinnati and Dayton-Springfield market administrator’s announcements of Class I price for December 1965.)

Since widely fluctuating changes in the supply-demand adjustments are not evidenced by these data and no evidence was introduced to show how the proposed dampener would improve the formula, the proposal is denied.

4. Incidental and conforming changes. There are no incidental or conforming changes necessary to the Dayton-Springfield order provisions. Certain corollary changes in the Greater Cincinnati order, however, are appropriate.

a. The transportation allowance from the pool provided by the Cincinnati order on certain condensed milk and frozen cream should be eliminated.

The present order allows a transportation adjustment on the actual weight of condensed milk or frozen cream when moved from a pool supply plant to a fluid milk (pool) plant where it is processed into a Class n product such as ice cream. Thus, pool handlers purchasing condensed milk or frozen cream from a pool supply 'plant are allowed "the adjustment on the amount used in Class n while an unregulated competitor in the market making a similar product does not receive the allowance even though the source of his condensed milk or frozen cream may be the same pool supply plant.

The new Class II price is applicable to condensed milk, frozen cream, cottage cheese, ice cream and other nonfluid milk products whether sold in the market or outside. The level of such price is in line with the general level of manufacturing milk prices even though the Cincinnati market does have restriction on sources of ingredients for ice cream and cottage cheese in that the ingredients must be derived from Grade A milk.

The processor in the Cincinnati market, whether regulated or unregulated, relying on outside, or nonproducer, sources of milk for his ice cream or cottage cheese ingredients is allowed nothing from the pool for the transportation of such ingredients to the market. Payment for transportation, as well as price, is a matter of private arrangement between buyer and seller. Similarly, since producer milk for condensed milk and frozen cream as well as other nonfluid products is priced at the manufacturing level, it should not be subject to special consideration as to transportation simply because it is producer milk.

Purchasers of condensed milk and frozen cream in the Cincinnati market therefore will be on equal footing with respect to transportation cost on such products. The pool supply plant making such indgredients at least has the natural advantage of proximity to the Cincinnati market. Consequently, neither it nor the pool processor of such products should be disadvantaged by this change in competing with outside sources for those ice cream and cottage cheese outlets within the local market which at present are benefited by the transportation adjustment.

b. A slight modification to the “other source milk” definition is appropriate in view of the proposed consolidation of the two manufacturing classifications of milk (Class n and Class HE) into the the new Class n classification.

Among the items included under the “other source milk” definition of the Greater Cincinnati order are plant receipts, from any source, of manufactured dairy products, principally Class III, which are reprocessed, repackaged or converted to another product during the month. This provision in the various orders is designed generally to require handlers to keep records and to account for the nonfluid products from other sources under the circumstances described so that to the extent that they are converted in the handler’s plant to a higher valued use, the increment of increased value will be reflected in the total value of all producer milk in the pool. Without such a requirement, for example, a handler by failing to keep records of the nonfat dry milk and similar products which can.be reconstituted into skim milk or other fluid milk products would gain a competitive advantage over other handlers in the market.

The Cincinnati order provision is similar to that provided for in many other orders but differs somewhat in that it specifically excludes those nonfluid dairy products received from other pool plants which currently are designated under the order as Class n products (principally ice cream, ice cream mix and cottage cheese) rather than Class III milk products. This exclusionary provision no longer appears necessary under present accounting procedures.

c. Provisions which were pertinent to “Class III” are modified or revised in the Cincinnati order by deleting language no longer applicable. Also, the numerous references to “Class III” are either deleted or changed to “Class II.”

d. Other changes in Cincinnati order provisions not specifically discussed are merely conforming changes necessary to implement the conclusions previously set fourth herein.

Rulings on proposed findings and conclusions. Briefs and proposed findings and conclusions were filed on behalf of certain interested parties. These briefs, proposed findings and conclusions and the evidence in the record were considered in making the findings and conclusions set forth above. To the extent that the suggested findings and conclusions filed by interested parties are inconsistent with the findings and conclusions set forth herein, the requests to make such findings or reach such conclusions are denied for the reasons previously stated in this decision.

General findings. The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are supplementary and in addition to the findings and determinations previously made in connection with the issuance of the aforesaid orders and of the previously issued amendments thereto; and all of said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.

(a) The tentative marketing agreements and the orders, as hereby proposed

- to be amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act;


PROPOSED RULE MAKING(b) The parity prices of milk as de

termined pursuant to section 2 of the Act are not reasonable in view of the price of feeds, available supplies of feeds, and other economic conditions which affect market supply and demand for milk in the marketing areas, and the minimum prices specified in the proposed marketing agreements and the orders, as hereby proposed to be amended, are such prices as will reflect the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure and wholesome milk, and be in the public interest; and

(c) The tentative marketing agreements and the orders, as hereby proposed to be amended, will regulate the handling of milk in the same manner as, and will be applicable only to persons in the respective classes of industrial and commercial activity specified in, marketing agreements upon which hearings have been held.

Rulings on exceptions. In arriving at the findings and conclusions, and the regulatory provisions of this decision, each of the exceptions received was carefully and fully considered in conjunction with the record evidence pertaining thereto. To the extent that the findings and conclusions, and the regulatory provisions of this decision are at variance with any of the exceptions, such exceptions are hereby overruled for the reasons previously stated in this decision.

Marketing agreements and orders. Annexed hereto and made a part hereof are four documents entitled respectively, “Marketing Agreement Regulating the Handling of Milk in the Greater Cincinnati Marketing Area,” and “Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Milk in the Greater Cincinnati M ark e tin g Area” ; “Marketing Agreement Regulating the Handling of Milk in the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, Marketing Area” and “Order Amending , the Order Regulating the Handling of Milk in the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, Marketing Area” which have been decided upon as the detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing conclusions.

I t is hereby ordered, That all of this decision, except the attached marketing agreements, be published in the F ederal R egister. The regulatory provisions of said marketing agreements are identical with those contained in the orders as hereby proposed to be amended by the attached orders which will be published with this decision.

Determination of representative period. The month of December 1965 is hereby determined to be the representative period for the purpose of ascertaining whether the issuance of the a ttached orders, as amended and as hereby proposed ter be amended, regulating the handling of milk in the Greater Cincinnati marketing area and the Dayton- Springfield, Ohio, marketing area, respectively, are approved or favored by producers, as defined under the terms of the respective orders, as amended and as hereby proposed to be amended, and who, during such representative period, were engaged in the production of milk

for sale within the respective aforesaid marketing areas.

Signed at Washington, D.C., on February 21,1966.

G eorge L. M ehren , Assistant Secretary.

Order1 Amending the Order Regulatingthe Handling of Milk in the GreaterCincinnati Marketing Area

§ 1033.0 Findings and determinations.The findings and determinations here

inafter sét forth are supplementary and in addition to the findings and determinations previously made in connection with the issuance of the aforesaid order and of the previously issued amendments thereto; and all of said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.

(a) Findings upon the basis of the hearing record. Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR Part 900), a public hearing was held upon certain proposed amendments to the tentative marketing agreement and to the order regulating the handling of milk in the Greater Cincinnati marketing area. Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at such hearing and the record thereof, it is found that:

(1) The said order as hereby amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act;

(2) The parity prices of milk, as determined pursuant to section 2 of the Act, are not reasonable in view of the price of feeds, available supplies of feeds, and other economic conditions which affect market supply and demand for milk in the said marketing area, and the minimum prices specified in the order as hereby amended, are such prices as will reflect the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure and wholesome milk, and be in the public interest;

(3) The said order as hereby amended, regualtes the handling of milk in the same manner as, and is applicable only to persons in the respective classes of industrial or commercial activity specified in, a marketing agreement upon which a hearing has been held.

ORDER RELATIVE TO HANDLING

It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date hereof, the handling of milk in the Greater Cincinnati marketing area shall be in conformity to and in compliance with the terms and conditions of the aforesaid order, as

1 This order shall not become effective un less and until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and marketing orders have been met.

3133

amended and as hereby amended, as follows:

The provisions of the proposed m arketing agreement and order amending the order contained in the recommended decision issued by the Deputy Administrator, on February 1, 1966, and published in the F ederal R egister on February 4, 1966 (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. Doc. 66- 1252), shall be and are the terms and provisions of this order, and are set forth in full herein subject to a revision of § 1033.51(b).

1. Section 1033.14 is revised to read as follows:§ 1033.14 Other source m ilk.

“Other source milk” means all skim milk and butterfat contained in or represented by :

(a) Receipts during the month in the form of fluid milk products, except:

(1) Fluid milk products received from other pool plants ;

(2) Sterilized cream received and disposed of in the same glass or metal hermetically sealed container;

(3) Inventory of fluid milk products at the beginning of the month; and

( 4 ) Producer milk ; and(b) Products other than fluid milk

products from any source (including those produced at the pool plant) that are reprocessed, repackaged, or converted to another product during the month or for which other utilization or disposition is not established pursuant to § 1033.33.

2. Section 1033.15 is revised to read as follows :§ 1033.15 Fluid m ilk product.

“Fluid milk product” means the fluid form of :

(a) Milk, skim milk, buttermilk, flavored milk, milk drink, eggnog, concentrated milk, whipped cream, cream (sweet or sour) ; and

(b) Any mixture of milk, skim milk or cream including fluid, frozen or semi- frozen malted milk and milk shake mixtures containing less than 15 percent tdtal milk solids.

(c) Excluded from this definition are: Frozen storage cream, aerated cream in dispensers, ice cream and frozen dessert mixes, pancake mix, evaporated and condensed milk, and any sour mixture of skim milk and butterfat in nonfluid form to which cheese or any food substance other than a milk product has been added and which is disposed of as other than sour cream.

3. Section 1033.41 is revised to read as follows:§ 1033.41 Classes o f utilization.

Subject to the conditions set forth in §§ 1033.43 and 1033.44, the classes of utilization shall be as follows:

(a) Class I milk. Class I milk shall be all skim milk and butterfat:

(1) Disposed of in the form of a fluid milk product except:

(i) Fluid milk products classified as Class II pursuant to paragraph (b) (2), (3), and (4) of this section;


3134^

(ii) Sterilized cream disposed of in the same glass or metal hermetically sealed container in which received ;

(iii) Fluid milk products which are fortified with the addition of milk solids shall be Class I in an amount equal only to the weight of an equal volume of an unmodified fluid milk product of the same nature and butterf at content.

(2) Not accounted for as Class II milk;(b) Class II milk. Class II milk shall

be all skim milk and butterf at:(1) Used to produce:(1) Ice cream, frozen desserts, frozen

cream, cheese, butter, and pancake mix;(ii) Ice cream and frozen dessert

mixes, excluding malted milk or milk shake mixtures containing less than 15 percent total milk solids;

(iii) Milk or skipi milk and cream mixtures disposed of in containers or dispensers under pressure for the purpose of dispensing a whipped or aerated product;

(iv) Any sour mixture of skim milk and butterfat in nonfluid form to which cheese or any food substance other than a milk product has been added and which is disposed of as other than sour cream;

(v) Spray and roller process nonfat dry milk solids;

(vi) Evaporated and condensed milk (or skim milk) either in bulk or in hermetically sealed cans; and

(2) Skim milk contained in that portion of fortified fluid milk products not classified as Class I milk pursuant to paragraph (a) (1) (iii) of this section;

(3) Disposed of in bulk as milk, skim milk or cream to any commercial food processing establishment where food products are prepared only for consumption off the premises;

(4) Specifically, accounted for as dumped, spilled or disposed of for animal feed;

(5) Contained in inventories of fluid milk products;

(6) In shrinkage of skim milk and butterfat, respectively, assigned pursuant to § 1033.42(b) (1), but not in excess of 2 percent of such milk; and

(7) In shrinkage of skim milk and butterfat, respectively, assigned pursuant to § 1033.42(b) (2).§ 1033.42 [Amended]

4. In § 1033.42(b), the words “or Class i n ”, where they appear in two places, are deleted.§ 1033.43 [Amended]

5. In § 1033.43, paragraph (c) (3) (iv) is revised by deleting the proviso and by certain other changes so that paragraph(c) (3) (iv) now reads “To the extent that Class I utilization is not so assigned to it, the skim milk and butterfat so transferred shall be classified as Class II milk and;”

6. In § 1033.43(d) (3), the words “or Class m ”, where they appear in two places, are deleted.

7. In § 1033.43(d) (5), the phrase “or Class III, whichever is more nearly similar to the class to which allocated in the other order” is deleted.

PROPOSED RULE MAKING§ 1033.45 [Amended]

8. In § 1033.45, the phrase immediately preceding the proviso “Class I milk, Class II milk, and Class HE milk for such handler” is changed to read “Class I milk and Class II milk for such handler”.§ 1033.46 [Amended]

9. In § 1033.46, the following changes are made:

A. In paragraph (a)(1), the words “Class III”, where they appear in two places, are changed to “Class »II”, and the reference “§ 1033.41(c) (5) ” is changed to “§ 1033.41(b)(6)”.

B. In paragraph (a)(2)(i) , the words “Class III” are changed to “Class n ”.

C. In the introductory text of paragraph (a)(3), the phrase “the lowest- priced use available” is deleted and the words “Class II” are substituted thereof.

D. In paragraph (a) (4), the text which reads as follows is deleted: “or Class m , according to the classification claimed by the handler; except that skim milk allocated pursuant to subparagraph(4) (ii) of this paragraph shall be subtracted as specified in that subparagraph”.

E. In paragraph (a)(4) (i), the words “or Class m ,” where they appear in two places, are deleted.

F. In the introductory text of paragraph (a) (4) (ii), the text enclosed in parenthesis is deleted.

G. In paragraph (a) (4) (ii) (c) (2), the first sentence is revised to read “Should such computation result in a quantity to be subtracted from Class n which is in excess of the pounds of skim milk remaining in Class H, the pounds of skim milk in Class II shall be increased to the quantity to be subtracted and the pounds of skim milk in Class I shall be decreased a like amount.”

H. In paragraph (a) (4) (iii), the phrase “and Class i n milk” and the phrase “or Class HI” are deleted.

I. In paragraph (a) (6), the words “Class i n ” are changed to “Class H”.

J. In the introductory text of paragraph (a) (8) (i), the phrase “of all Class n milk and Class m milk” is changed to read “of all Class II milk”.

K. In paragraph (a) (8) (ii), the words “and Class i n ”, where they appear in two places, are deleted.

L. In paragraph (a) (10), the word “all” is deleted and the word “both” is substituted thereof; also the phrase “the lowest-priced use available” is deleted and the words “Class n ” are substituted thereof.§ 1033.51 [Amended]

10. Section 1033.51 is revised as follows:

A. In the introductory text of paragraph (a ), the figure “50” is changed to “39”.

B. Paragraph (c) is revoked and the text of paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:

(b) Class II milk. The Class II milk price shall be the basic formula price for the month except that in no event shall

such price exceed an amount computed from the sum of subparagraphs (1) and (2) of this paragraph rounded to the nearest cent, plus 10 cents:

(1) From the Chicago butter price, subtract 3.0 cents, add 20 percent of the resulting amount and then multiply 3.5; and

(2) From the weighted average of car- lot prices per pound of spray process nonfat dry milk for human consumption, f.o.b. Chicago area manufacturing plants, as published for the month by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, subtract 5.5 cents, multiply by 8.5 and then multiply by 0.965.§ 1033.52 [Amended]

11. In § 1033.52, paragraph (c) is revoked and paragraph (b) is revised to read: “Class II milk. Multiply the Chicago butter price for the month by 0.115.”§ 1033.53 [Amended]

12. Section 1033.53 is amended as follows:

A. In paragraph (a)(1), the phrase “or as condensed skim milk or frozen cream” is deleted.

B. In paragraph (a) (2), the words, “or Class II”, where they appear in two places, are deleted.

C. In paragraph (b), the phrase “and Class II milk” is deleted.§ 1033.60 [Amended]

13. In § 1033.60, paragraph (d) is revised by deleting the words “Class III" and substituting the words “Class II” thereof, and by deleting the parenthetical phrase “for other than butter”.§ 1033.61 [Amended]

14. In § 1033.61, paragraph (a )(l)(i) is revised by deleting the words “Class III” and substituting “Class II” thereof;

15. In § 1033.61, paragraph (b) (4) is revised by deleting the phrase “or the Class III price (for other than butter), whichever is higher” and substituting the parenthetical phrase “(not to be less than the Class II price)”.§ 1033.72 [Amended]

16. In § 1033.72, paragraph (b) is revised by deleting the words “Class III” and substituting “Class I i” thereof, and by deleting the phrase “for other than butter.”Order1 Amending the Order Regulating

the Handling of Milk in the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, Marketing Area

4P§ 1034.0 Findings and determinations.

The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are supplementary and in addition to the findings and determinations previously made in connection with the issuance of the aforesaid order and of the previously issued amendments

1 This order shall not become effective unless and until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and marketing orders have been met.


PROPOSED RULE MAKING 3135thereto; and all of said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.

(a) Findings upon the basis of the hearing record. Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR Part 900), a public hearing was held upon certain proposed amendments to the tentative marketing agreement and to the order regulating the handling of milk in the Dayton-Springfield, O h io , marketing area. Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at such hearing and the record thereof, it is found that:

(1) The said order as hereby amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act:

(2) The parity prices of milk, as determined pursuant to. section 2 of the Act, are not reasonable in view of the price of feeds, available supplies of feeds, and other economic conditions which affect market supply and demand for milk in the said marketing area, and the minimum prices specified in the order as hereby amended, are such prices as will reflect

the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient quantity of pure and wholesome milk, and be in the public interest;

(3) The said order as hereby amended, regulates the handling of milk in the same manner as, and is applicable only to persons in the respective classes of industrial or commercial activity specified in, a marketing agreement upon which a hearing has been held.

ORDER RELATIVE TO HANDLING

It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date hereof, the handling of milk in the Dayton-Springfield, Ohio, marketing area shall be in conformity to and in compliance with the terms and conditions of the aforesaid order, as amended and as hereby amended, as follows:

The provisions of the proposed marketing agreement and order amending the order contained in the recommended decision issued by the Deputy Administrator, on February 1,1966, and published in the F ederal R egister on February 4, 1966 (31 F.R. 2384; F.R. Doc. 66-1252), shall be and are the terms and provisions of this order, and are set forth in full herein:§ 1034.51 [Amended]

1. In § 1034.51, paragraph (a) is revised by changing the figure “50” to “39”.[F .R . D oc . 66-2018; F iled , F eb . 24, 1966;

8 :4 9 a .m .]


3136

NoticesDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management NEVADA

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey andOrder Providing for Opening ofLands

F ebruary 17, 1966.1. The plat of survey of lands de

scribed below will be officially filed at the Nevada Land Office, Reno, Nev., effective 10 a.m., on March 28, 1966.

Mount D iablo Meridian

T. 8 N., R. 41 E. (Group 412).T. 8 N., R. 42 E. (Group 412).

2. The resurveyed and surveyed area described above aggregates 5,059.91 acres. The plat was accepted September 10, 1965. Available data indicates the land surveyed ranges from 5,700 to 7,500 feet above sea level. The soil is a mixture of sand and clay and a t higher elevations is somewhat stony. There are a number of improved and unimproved roads throughout the township. There is a small stream that flow3 all year in sections 4, 9, and 16. There is scattered juniper and pinion in the northern portion, with scrub sage and salt brush throughout the township.

3. Subject to any existing valid rights and the requirements of applicable law, the above-described lands are hereby opened to filing applications, selections, and location, except for applications under the small tract and desert land laws, in accordance with the following:

Applications and selections under the nonmineral public land laws may be presented to the manager mentioned below, beginning on the date of the order. Such applications, selections, and offers will be considered as filed on the hour and respective dates shown for the various classes enumerated in the following paragraphs: Applications by persons having prior existing valid settlement rights, preference rights conferred by existing laws, or equitable claims subject to allowance and confirmation will be adjudicated on the facts presented in support of such claim or right. All applications presented by persons other than those referred to in this paragraph will be subject to the applications and claims mentioned in this paragraph. All valid applications and selections under the nonmineral public land laws presented prior to 10 a.m., March 28, 1966, will be considered as simultaneously filed at that hour. Rights under such applications and selections filed after that hour will be governed by the time of filing.

4. Persons claiming preference rights based upon valid settlement, statutory preference, or equitable claims must enclose properly corroborated statements in support of their application?, setting

FEDERAL

forth all facts relevant to their claims. Detailed rules and regulations governing applications, which may be filed pursuant to this notice can be foundin Title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Inquiries concerning these lands shall be addressed to the Manager, Land Office, Bureau of Land Management, Post Office Box 1551, Reno, Nev.

A. J oh n H illsamer,Acting Manager,

Nevada Land Office.[P.R. Doc. 66-1973; Piled, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:47 a.m.]

ALASKANotice of Filing of Plat of Survey

F ebruary 16, 1966.1. Plat of survey of omitted island de

scribed below will be officially filed in the Anchorage District and Land Office, Anchorage, Alaska, effective at 10 a.m., March 1,1966.

Seward Meridian T. 17 N., R. 1 W.,

Sec. 9: Lot 9.Containing 0.04 acres.2. This is an island located in Lucille

Lake containing spruce and birch timber. The top soil is sandy loam and the subsoil is very rocky.

3. Subject to any existing valid rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, and the requirements of applicable law, the above-described land is hereby opened to filing applications, selections and locations in accordance with the fo llowing:

a. Applications and selections under the nonmineral public land laws may be presented to the Manager, Anchorage District and Land Office, beginning on the date of this order. Such applications, selections and offers will be considered as filed on the hour and respective dates shown for the various classes enumerated in the following paragraphs:

(1) Applications by persons having prior existing valid settlement rights, preference rights conferred by existing laws, or equitable claims subject to allowance and confirmation will be adjudicated on the facts presented in support of each claim or right. All applications presented by persons other than those referred to in this paragraph will be subject to the applications and claims, mentioned in this paragraph:

(2) All valid applications and selections under the nonmineral public land laws presented prior to 10 a.m., on March 1, 1966, will be considered as simultaneously filed at that hour. Rights under such applications and selections filed after that hour will be governed by the time of filing. The lands will also be open to mining location at that date and hour.

REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRipAY, FEBRUARY

4. Persons claiming preference rights based upon valid settlement, statutory preference or equitable claims must enclose properly corroborated statements in support of their applications, setting forth all facts relevant to their claims. Detailed rules and regulations governing applications which may be filed pursuant to this notice can be found in Title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

5. Applications for these lands, which shall be filed in the Land Office at Anchorage, Alaska, shall be acted upon in accordance with the regulations contained in § 1821.2-3 of Title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations to the extent such regulations are applicable. Applications under the homestead and homesite laws shall be governed by the regulations contained in §§ 2233.9-1 (a), 2211.9-1 (a), and 2211.0-6<a), of Title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

6. Inquiries concerning these lands shall be addressed to the Manager, Anchorage District and Land Office, 555 Cordova Street, Anchorage, Alaska.

J ames W. S cott, Manager,

Anchorage District and Land Office.[P.R. Doc. 66-2010; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966j

8:49 a.m.]

IDAHONotice of Filing of Idaho Protraction

DiagramF ebruary 17,1966.

Notice is hereby given that effective at and after 10 a.m., on March 24, 1966, the following protraction diagram is officially filed of record in the Idaho Land Office, Room 327, Federal Building, Boise, Idaho, 83701, and is available to the public as a matter of information only. In accordance with Title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, this protraction will become the basic record for describing the land for all authorized uses. Until this date and time the diagram has been placed in open file and is available to the public for information only.

Idaho P rotraction D iagram No . 66BOISE MERIDIAN

Approved December 13, 1965

T. 14 N., Rs. 23 and 24 E.T. 15 N., Rs. 22,23 and 24 E.

Copies of this diagram are for sale at one dollar ($1.00) each by the Cadastral Engineering Office, Bureau of Land Management, Post Office Box 2237, Boise, Idaho, 83701.

Orval G. H adley,Manager,

Land Office, Boise, Idaho.[F.R. Doc. 66-2011; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:49 a.m.]

25, 1966

NOTICES 3137

IDAHOSpecial Rules for Grazing DistrictsPursuant to the provisions of 43 CFR

4115.2- 4, the following special rule is adopted for the Dry Creek Allotment, Shoshone, Idaho, District No. 5. Such rule will permit the attachment of grazing privileges to the Dry Creek Association lands in accordance with 43 CFR4115.2- 2 and satisfy the base property requirements under 4111.2.1.

The Dry Creek Grazing Association holding grazing privileges in the Dry Creek Allotment of the Bureau of Land Management, Shoshone, Idaho, District No. 5, may use the forage production of its individual members’ base property in excess of that pledged in support of privileges on individual base properties to satisfy the minimum base property requirement not possessed on Association owned or controlled land.

The Association members shall provide the District Manager with evidence that there is excess forage production on their privately owned or controlled property. The excess, together with the members’ share of the forage production on the Association owned or controlled lands shall be committed in support of and adequate to meet the minimum base property requirement of Association grazing privileges. All Association grazing privileges will remain attached to Association owned or controlled lands.

Charles H . S toddard,Director.


8:47 am .]

Office of the Secretary HUBBELL CARPENTER

Statement of Changes in Financial Interests

In accordance with the requirements of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:

(1) No change.(2) No change.(3) No change.(4) No change.This statement is made as of Feb

ruary 7, 1966.Dated: February 7, 1966.

H ubbell Carpenter. [F.R. Doc. 66-1974; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:45 am .]

CLYDE M. EPPARD Statement of Changes in Financial

InterestsIn accordance with the requirements

of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken

place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:



Clyde M . E ppard.[F.R. Doc. 66-1975; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:45 a.m.]

GLENN J. HALLStatement of Changes in Financial

InterestsIn accordance with the requirements of

section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months :

(1) None.(2) FMC Corp., Howe Metals Corp., Mor-

rison-Knudsen Co., General Electric Co., Amalgamated Sugar Co., Idaho Power Có., First Security Bank Corp., Union Carbide Corp., West Coast Airlines, Pacific Power & Light Co., Utah Power & Light Co., Portland General Electric Co., W ashington Water Power Co., Montana Power Co., W estinghouse Electric Co.

(3) None.. (4) None.

This statement is made as of February 9,1966.

Dated: February 9,1966.G lenn J . H all.

IF.R. Doc. 66-1976; Filed Feb. 24, 1966; 8:45 am .]

LEWIS W. LENGNICKStatement of Changes in Financial


of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28,1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:

(1) No change.(2) Sold American Photocopy.(3) No change.(4) No change.

This statement is made as of February9,1966.

Dated: February 9,1966.Le w is W . Lengnick .


JOHN LAWRENCE McNEALEYStatement of Changes in Financial


of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Pro

duction Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:

(1) No change.(2) No change.(3) No change.(4) No change.This statement is made as of Febru

ary 7,1966.Dated: February 7,1966.

J . L. M cN ealey .[F.R. Doc. 66-1978; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:45 a.m.]

CHARLES S. McNEERStatement of Changes in Financial


of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 1064T of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:

(1) No change.(2) No change.(3) No change.(4) No change.

This statement is made as of February 8,1966.

Dated : February 8,1966.C. S. M cN e e r.

[F.R. Doc. 66-1979; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:46 am .]

JULIO A. NEGRONIStatement of Changes in Financial


of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:

(1) No change.(2) No change.(.3) No change.(4) No change.This statement is made as of Febru

ary 1966;-Dated: February 9,1966.

J ulio A. N egroni.[F A Doc. 66-1980; FUed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:46 am .]

JOHN P. NEUBAUERStatement of Changes in Financial

InterestsIn accordance with the reqidrements

of section 710(b) (6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken


3138 NOTICESplace In my financial interests during the past6months:

(1) No change.(2) No change.(3) No change.(4) No change.This statement is made as of Febru

ary 11, 1966.Dated: February 11, 1966.

J . P . N eubauer.[F.R. Doc. 66-1981; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:46 am .]

RAFAEL R. RAMÍREZStafement of Changes in Financial



(1) No change.(2) No change.(3) No change.(4) No change.Dated: February 10,1966.

R afael R . R amírez.[F.R. Doc. 66-1982; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:46 a.m.]

LEROY J. SCHULTZStatement of Changes in Financial



(1) None.(2) None.(3) None.(4) None.This statement is made as of February

8,1966.Dated: February 8,1966.

LeR oy J . S chultz.[F.R. Doc. 66-1983; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:46 a.m.]

CHARLES W. WATSONStatement of Changes in Financial



(1) None.(2) None.(3) None.(4) None.This statement is made as of Feb

ruary 7,1966.

Dated: February 7, 1966.C. W . W atson .

[F.R. Doc. 66-1984; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:46 am .]

CARL H. WILLIAMS Statement of Changes in Financial


of section 710(b)(6) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order 10647 of November 28, 1955, the following changes have taken place in my financial interests during the past 6 months:



Carl H . W il l ia m s .[F.R. Doc. 66-1985; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:46 am .]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEBureau of International Commerce

[Case No. 351]

BOLESLAW PETUCH AND HYDRAULICS A.G.

Order Denying Export PrivilegesIn the matter of Mr. Boleslaw Petuch

and Hydraulics A. G. (a.k.a. HydraulicsS.A.), 1 Wawragasse, Vienna XVI, Austria, respondents; case No 351.

By letter dated November 19,1964, the above respondents were charged with violations of the Export Control Act of 1949, as amended, and regulations thereunder. It is alleged that during April 1964 Hydraulics and its then owner, Petuch, caused a shipment of U.S.-origin petroleum and natural gas field equipment, valued at approximately $7,334, to

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREConsumer and Marketing Service

HUMANELY SLAUGHTERED LIVESTOCK

Identification of Carcasses; Changes in List of Establishments

Pursuant to section 4 of the Act of August 27, 1958 (7 U.S.C. 1904), and the statement of policy thereunder in 9 CFR 381.1, the list (31 F.R. 1208) of establishments which are operated under Federal inspection pursuant to the Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 71 et seq.) and which use humane methods of slaughter and incidental handling of livestock is hereby amended as follows:

The reference to sheep and swine with respect to Auburn Univérsity, establishment 71, is deleted.

The following table lists species at additional establishments and additional species a t previously listed establishments that have been reported as being slaughtered and handled humanely.

be reexported from Austria to Rumania and that Petuch knew that the equipment was of U.S. origin and that U.S. law prohibited such reexportation without first obtaining authorization from the U.S. Government. The charging letter was duly served on respondents.

The respondents, who were represented by counsel, filed an answer, but did not file a demand for an oral hearing. An informal hearing was held before the Compliance Commissioner on December 21, 1965, at which time evidence in support of the charges was presented on behalf of the Investigations Division. The Compliance Commissioner has considered the record in the case and has submitted to the undersigned a written report including findings of fact and findings that violations have occurred, and he has recommended that the remedial action hereinafter set forth be taken against the respondents. On con-

E stablishments Slaughtering H umanely

Name of establishment Est. No. Cattle Calves Sheep Qoats Swine Horses

12VW n(*)281 ......' _____

R w , (ialls Hnn 73« (*) (*)New establishments reporting: 3.

2TJA _ ______ nn1711

2« (*)117 ........ . .... (*)12fi <*)Q(*)

1A2171 .224R _r ............ (*)

(*)«4«........................«01 o

(*)«8« <*>7477«fi A (*)800 n

Mn

800018

Species added: 16.

Done at Washington, D.C., this 21st day of February 1966.R . K . S omers,

Deputy Administrator, Consumer Protection, i Consumer and Marketing Service.

[F.R. Doc. 66-2017; Filed, Feb. 24,1966; 8:49 am .]


NOTICES 3139sidération of the record, I hereby adopt the Compliance Commissioner’s:

Findings of fact. 1. The respondent Boleslaw Petuch was a resident of Vienna, Austria, and was the owner and operator of the respondent Hydraulics A.G. (also known as Hydraulics SA .), a firm which he organized in Vaduz, Liechtenstein. Hydraulics A.G. was the European distributor for a U.S. manufacturer of oil field equipment.

2. On May 3, 1963, Hydraulics submitted a quotation to Masinimport, of Bucharest, Rumania, for approximately $7,000 worth of oil field equipment manufactured by the above-mentioned U.S. manufacturer. On July 10,1963, Masinimport accepted the quotation and placed an order for the equipment at a price of $7,334 with freight paid to the Austria-Czechoslovakia b o r d e r . This was later changed to Austria-Hungary border.

3. By application dated May 3, 1963, the U.S. manufacturer applied for license to export $50,000 worth of oil field equipment to its distributor, Hydraulics, in Vienna. A license was granted on May 16, 1963, and permitted resale in specified European countries, not including Rumania.

4. The items covered in Masinimport’s order of July 10, 1963, were éxported by the U.S. manufacturer to Hydraulics in Vienna sometime prior to August 23, 1963, but the manufacturer did not know at the time of exportation that Hydraulics had an order for the goods from a Rumanian customer.

5. On August 23, 1963, the U.S. manufacturer requested, on behalf of Hydraulics, permission from the Office of Export Control, Bureau of International Commerce, to reexport to Masinimport, Bucharest, Rumania, the equipment

.covered in Masinimport’s order of July10,1963. Permission for such reexportation was denied by the Office of Export Control on November 1, 1963, and due notification was issued.

6. While the request for permission to reexport was pending, Petuch, on behalf of Hydraulics proceeded with arrangements for the sale of the equipment to Masinimport. On O ctober 29, 1963, Masinimport opened a letter of credit in favor of Hydraulics at a Swiss bank in the amount of $7,334 to cover the goods in Masinimport’s order of July 10, 1963.

7. In October 1963 the freight forwarding company which had been holding the goods for Hydraulics, at the request of Masinimport, turned the goods over to a second forwarding firm in Vienna; namely, Express Internationale Spedition. Petuch instructed his freight forwarder that the goods were not to be released for onshipment except on his written instructions, and his freight forwarder, in turn, gave the same instructions to Express.

8. In January 1964, Masinimport made the funds available to pay for the goods on the letter of credit which it had opened at the Swiss bank and thereafter Petuch, on behalf of Hydraulics, received payment on the letter of credit.

9. On April 6, 1964, Hydraulics’ forwarder wrote to Petuch stating that it

had received a telephone call from Express reporting that it (Express) had received a telegram from Masinimport asking when the equipment in question had been shipped and by what route. The forwarder requested written disposal instructions as to whether it could release the shipment being held for export a t Express.

10. Sometime between April 6, 1964, and April 16, 1964, Petuch gave instructions that the goods could be released for shipment to Masinimport in Rumania. Pursuant to said instructions, Express took the goods in question (identified as those covered by Masinimport’s order of July 10, 1963) for further shipment for export to Rumania and delivered them to a Rumanian forwarding firm at the irrevocable disposition of Masinimport. By letter dated April 20, 1964, Express notified Hydraulics of the action it had taken in onforwarding the goods.

11. Petuch knew that it was in contravention of tliè U.S. export regulations to reexport the goods in question to Rumania without first obtaining permission from the Office of Export Control, and he also knew at the time he authorized release of the goods for shipment to Masinimport that OEC had denied the request for such permission.

Prom the foregoing, I have concluded that the respondents violated §§381.2 and 381.6 of the U.S. export regulations in that without specific authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce they knowingly caused U.S.-origin com-

. modities to be reexported from Austria to Rumania contrary to the provisions of the U.S. export regulations.

In commenting on Petuch’s conduct in the matter and in recommending the sanction that should be imposed on the respondents, the Compliance Commissioner said:

The conduct of Petuch in releasing the goods for reexportation to Rumania was a deliberate violation of the U.S. export regulations. The release was given with knowledge that the Office of Export Control had denied the request for permission to reexport the goods in question to Rumania. As above pointed out, Petuch’s difficulties stemmed from the fact that he agreed to sell the goods in question to a customer in Rumania without first finding out if the goods could be delivered to that country in conformity w ith the U.S. export regulations. As a distributor of U.S. goods, it was in cum bent upon him, before entering into an obligation to deliver goods in a foreign country, to ascertain whether such delivery could be made in conformity w ith U.S. law. This he failed to do, but on the contrary he obligated him self to deliver the goods before permission was requested to reexport them to Rumania. It would appear that Petuch had decided before entering in to the contract w ith the foreign purchaser that he would make delivery irrespective of the requirements of the U S . export regulations.

To achieve the remedial purpose of sanctions in a case of th is type, I recommend that the respondents be denied export privileges for the duration of export controls with the privilege of applying a fter . three years to have their export privileges restored ¡conditionally while they remain bn probation. Such applications should be supported by evidence showing compliance w ith the terms of the order and such disclosure

of their import-export transactions as may be deemed appropriate. Such applications will be considered on their merits and in the light of conditions and policies existing at that tim e. Export privileges may be restored under such terms and conditions as appear to be appropriate.

I have considered the record in the case and also thè report and recommendation of the Compliance Commissioner and am of the opinion that his recommendation as to the sanction that should be imposed is fair and just and calculated to achieve effective enforcement of the laVr. Accordingly, it is hereby

Ordered. I. All outstanding validated export licenses in which respondents appear or participate in any manner or capacity are hereby revoked and shall be returned forthwith to the Bureau of International Commerce for cancellation.

II. Except as qualified in Part IV hereof, the respondents for the duration of export controls are hereby denied all privileges of participating, directly or indirectly, in any manner or capacity, in any transaction involving commodities or technical data exported from the United States in whole or in part, or to be exported, or which are otherwise subject to the export regulations. Without limitation of the generality of the foregoing, participation prohibited in any such transaction, either in the United States or abroad, shall include participation: (a) As a party or as a representative of a party to any validated export license application; (b) in the preparation or filing of any export license application or reexportation authorization, or document to be submitted therewith; (c) in the obtaining or using of any validated or general export license or other export control documents;(d) in the carrying on of negotiations with respect to, or in the receiving, ordering, buying, selling, delivering, storing, using, or disposing of any commodities or technical data; (e) in the financing, forwarding, transporting, or other servicing of such commodities or technical data.

HI. Such denial of export privileges shall extend not only to the respondents, but also to their successors, representatives, agents, and employees, and also to any person, firm, corporation, or other business organization with which they now or hereafter may be related by affiliation, ownership, control, position of responsibility, or other connection in the conduct of trade or services connected therewith.

IV. Three years after the effective date of this order the respondents may apply to have the effective denial of their export privileges held in abeyance while they remain on probation. Such applications as may be filed by said respondents shall be supported by evidence showing compliance with the terms of this order and such disclosure of details of their activities as may be necessary to determine their compliance with this order. Such applications will be considered on their merits and in the light of conditions and policies existing at that time. The respondents’ export privi-

No.34 -5 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3140 NOTICESleges may be restored under such terms and conditions as appear to be appropriate.

V. During the time when any respondent or other person within the scope of this order is prohibited from engaging in any activity within the scope of Part II hereof, no person, firm, corporation, partnership, or other business organization, whether in the United States or elsewhere, without prior disclosure to and specific authorization from the Bureau of International Commerce, shall do any of the following acts, directly or indirectly, in any manner or capacity, on behalf of or in any association with any respondent or other person denied export privileges within the scope of this order, or whereby any such respondent or such other person may obtain any benefit therefrom or have any interest or participation therein, directly or indirectly: (a) Apply for, obtain, transfer, or use any license, shipper’s export declaration, bill of lading, or other export control document relating to any exportation, reexportation, transshipment, or diversion of any commodity or technical data exported or to be exported from the United States, by, to, or for any such respondent or other person denied export privileges within the scope of this order; or (b) order, buy, receive, use, sell, deliver, store, dispose of, forward, transport, finance, or otherwise service or participate in any exportation, reexportation, transshipment, or diversion of any commodity or technical data exported or to be exported from the United States.

This order shall become effective on February 25, 1966.

Dated: February 16, 1966.R auer H . M eyer ,

Director,Office of Export Control.


[F ile 23 (6 5 )-5 5 ]

RAD REPS (FACTORS) LTD., ET AL.Order Temporarily Denying Export

PrivilegesIn the matter of Rad Reps (Factors)

Ltd., and Anthony G. Hopkinson, Lawrence Estates, Green Lane Hounslow, Middlesex, England, respondents; File 23 (65)-55.

The Director, Investigations Division, Office of Export Control, Bureau of International Commerce, U.S. Department of Commerce, pursuant to the provisions of § 382.11 of the Export Regulations (Title 15, Chapter m , Sub-chapter B, Code of Federal Regulations), has applied to the Compliance Commissioner for an order temporarily denying all export privileges to the above-named respondents. The Compliance Commissioner has reviewed the application and the evidence presented in support thereof and has submitted his report, together with his recommendation that the application be granted and that a temporary denial order be issued for 60 days.

The evidence and recommendation of the Compliance Commissioner have been considered. On the evidence presented, there is reasonable basis to believe that the respondent Rad Reps (Factors) Ltd,, is a dealer in automotive spare parts and has a place of business in Hounslow, Middlesex, England; that the respondent Anthony G. Hopkinson is a director in said firm and one of its principal officials; that the respondent Hopkinson acted on behalf of the firm in the transactions in question; that the respondent firm has purchased substantial quantities of automotive spare parts from the United States; that after delivery of said spare parts to the United Kingdom, the respondents reexported them to Cuba with knowledge that the reexportations were in violation of the U.S. Export Regulations. Further, there is reasonable basis to believe that said respondents will continue such conduct in contravention of the Export Control Act and Regulations unless U.S. export privileges are temporarily denied. Formal charges have been brought against the respondents charging them with the said violations. I find that an order temporarily denying export privileges to the respondents is reasonably necessary for the protection of the public interest and national security.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:I. All outstanding validated export li

censes in which respondents appear or participate in any manner or capacity are hereby revoked and shall be returned forthwith to the Bureau of International Commerce for cancellation.

n . The respondents, their successors, assigns, partners, representatives, agents, and employees hereby are denied all privileges of participating, directly or indirectly, in any manner or capacity, in any transaction involving commodities or technical data exported from the United States in whole or in part, or to be exported, or which are otherwise subject to the Export Regulations. Without limitation of the generality of the foregoing, participation prohibited in any such transaction, either in the United States or abroad, shall include participation, directly or indirectly, in any manner or capacity: (a) As a party or as a representative of a party to any validated export license application; (b) in the preparation or filing of any export license application or reexportation authorization, or any document to be submitted therewith; (c) in the obtaining or using of any validated or general export license or other export control document; (d) in the carrying on of negotiations with respect to, or in the receiving, ordering, buying, selling, delivering, storing, using, or disposing of any commodities or technical data in whole or in part exported or to be exported from the United States; and (e) in the financing, forwarding, transporting, or other servicing of such commodities or technical data.

HI. Such denial of export privileges shall extend not only to the respondents, but also to their agents and employees and to any successor and to any person, firm, corporation, or business organization with which they now or hereafter may be related by affiliation,

ownership, control, position of responsibility, or other connection in the conduct of trade or services connected therewith.

IV. This order shall take effect forthwith and shall remain in effect for a period of 60 days from the date hereof, unless it is hereafter extended, amended, modified, or vacated in accordance with the provisions of the U.S. Export Regulations.

V. No person, firm, corporation, partnership or other business organization, whether in the United States or elsewhere, without prior disclosure to and specific authorization from the Bureau of International Commerce, shall do any of the following acts, directly or indirectly, or carry on negotiations with respect thereto, in any manner or capacity, on behalf of or in any association with respondents or any related party, or whereby the respondents or related party may obtain any benefit therefrom or have any interest or participation therein, directly or indirectly: (a) Apply for, obtain, transfer, or use any license, Shipper’s Export Declaration, bill of lading, or other export control document relating to any exportation, reexportation, transshipment, or diversion of any commodity or technical data exported or to be exported from the United States, by, to, or for any such respondent or related party denied export privileges; or (b) order, buy, receive, use, sell, deliver, store, dispose of, forward, transport, finance, or otherwise service or participate in any exportation, reexportation, transshipment, or diversion of any commodity or technical data exported or to be exported from the United States.

VI. A copy of this order shall be served upon the respondents.

VII. In accordance with the provisions of § 382.11(c) of the Export Regulations, the respondents or any related party may move at any time to vacate or modify this temporary denial order by filing an appropriate motion therefor, supported by evidence, with the Compliance Commissioner and may request an oral hearing thereon which, if requested, shall be held before the Compliance Commissioner in Washington, D.C., at the earliest convenient date.

This order shall become effective forthwith.

Dated: February 18,1966.R atter H. M eyer ,

^ Director, Office of Export Control. [F.R. Doc. 66-2043; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:49 ajn.]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

Food and Drug Administration FUNGICIDE DODINE

Notice of Extension of Temporary Tolerance

American Cyanamid Co., Post Office Box 400, Princeton, N.J., 08540, was granted an extension of a temporary tolerance of 5 parts per million for residues


NOTICES 3141

of the fungicide dodine in or on the raw agricultural commodity peaches. This temporary tolerance will expire February26,1966.

Because of the very dry growing season in the experimental use areas during 1965, extension of the temporary tolerance has been requested again to permit additional tests. The Commissioner of Food and Drugs has determined that such extension of the temporary tolerance will protect the public health. Conditions under which the temporary tolerance is extended are as follows:

1. The total amount of the finished product containing 65 percent dodine to be used under the experimental permit issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture will not exceed 91,800 pounds. Distribution will be under the American Cyanamid Co. name.

2. The fungicide will not be marketed for general use on peaches but will be supplied to qualified persons, as indicated in the experimental permit, for bona fide experimental use.

3. The American Cyanamid Co. will comply with the requirements of § 120.31(e) (3) and (4) of the pesticide chemical regulations (21 CFR Part 120).

This temporary tolerance expires February 26,1967.

This action is taken pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 408(j), 68 Stat. 516; 21 U.S.C. 346a (j)) and delegated by him to the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.90).

Dated: February 17, 1966.J . K . K irk ,



INTERNATIONAL MINERALS AND CHEMICAL CORP.

Notice of Filing of Petition Regarding a Pesticide Chemical

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 408(d)(1), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a (d) (1) ), notice is given that a petition (PP 6F0471) has been filed by Markel and Hill, Munsey Building, Washington, D.C., 20004, on behalf of International Minerals and Chemical Corp., Wasco, Calif., 93280, proposing the establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the insecticide containing viable spores of the micro-organism Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner in or on collards, grapes, kale, mustard greens, strawberries, sweet corn, and turnip greens.

The analytical method proposed in the petition for determining residues of viable spores of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner is a spore-count assay that consists of a standard plate count procedure using a heat-treated suspension (60° C. for 60 minutes) of the material to be tested.

Dated: February 17,1966.J .K .K ir k ,


[F.R. Doc. 66-2005; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966; 8:48 ajn .]

NICKEL SULFATE AND MANEBNotice of Extension of Temporary

Tolerances for Pesticide ChemicalsRohm & Haas Co., 22 West Washing

ton Square, Philadelphia, Pa., 19105, was granted a temporary tolerance of 45 parts per million for residues of the fungicide nickel sulfate (calculated as Ni) and a temporary tolerance of 2 parts per million for residues of the fungicide maneb in or on the raw agricultural commodities grain and straw of oats and wheat. These temporary tolerances will expire February 15,1966.

Because of the low incidence of rust disease in oats and wheat on which these fungicides were tested, further extension of the temporary tolerances has been requested to permit additional tests during the coming year. The Commissioner of Food and Drugs has determined that such additional extension of the temporary tolerances will not adversely affect the public health. Conditions under which these temporary tolerances are extended are as follows:

1. The total amount of the finished product containing 19 percent anhydrous nickel sulfate and 53 percent maneb to be used under the experimental permit issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture will not exceed 25,000 pounds. Distribution will be under the Rohm & Haas Co. name.

2. The fungicides will not be marketed for general use but will be supplied to qualified persons for bona fide experimental use.

3. The Rohm & Haas Co. Will comply with the requirements of § 120.31(e) (3) and (4) of the pesticide chemical regulations (21 CFR Part 120).

These temporary tolerances expire February 15,1967.

This action is taken pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 408(j), 68 Stat. 516; 21 UJS.C. 346a (j )) and delegated by him to the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.90).

Dated: February 17,1966.J . K . K irk ,


[F.R. Doc. 66-2006; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;8:48 a.m .]

OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORP.Notice of Filing of Petition for Food

Additive Cellophane. Pursuant to the provisions of the

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 409(b)(5), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a peti

tion (FAP 6B1927> has been filed by Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., Post Office Box 200, Pisgah Forest, N.C., 28768, proposing an amendment to § 121.2507 Cellophane to provide for the safe use of additional optional substances in the manufacture of foodpackaging cellophane, as follows:Dialkyl ketones:

Behenone.Laurone.Stearone.

Defoaming agents identified in § 121.2557. D i(2-ethylbutyl) phthalate.Dihydfoabietyl phthalate.Glyoxal.Polyethylene glycol (400) monolaurate. Polyethyleneglycol (600) monolaurate. Polyethylene glycol (400) monooleate. Polyethylene glycol (600) monooleate. Polyethylene glycol (400) monostearate. Polyethyleneglycol (600) monostearate. Sodium lauroyl sarcosinate.Stannous oleate.

Dated: February 17,1966.J. K . K irk ,



CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD[Docket 16928]

DETROIT-TORONTO, ERIE-TORONTO ROUTE CASE

Notice of Postponement of Prehearing Conference

Notice hereby is given that the prehearing conference in the above-indicated proceeding, now assigned to be held March 1, 1966, is postponed until 2 p.m. (local time), March 2, 1966, in Room 726, Universal Building, 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW„ Washington, D.C.

Dated at Washington, D.C., February18,1966.

[ seal] H erbert K. B ryan ,Hearing Examiner.


ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION[Docket No. 50-246]

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION Notice of Issuance of Facility License

Please take notice that, no request for a hearing or petition to intervene having been filed following publication of the notice of proposed action in the F ederal R egister, the Atomic Energy Commission has issued, effective as of the date of issuance, Facility License No. CX-24 to the Gefteral Dynamics Corp. authorizing operation of the Annular Core Reactor Experiment nuclear reactor facility on the corporation’s laboratory site at Torrey Pines Mesa, Calif.

The license was issued as set forth in the notice of proposed issuance pub-


3142 NOTICESllshed in the F ederal R egister, January19,1966, 31 F.R. 719, except that the staff requested and obtained from General Dynamics Corp. a clarifying amendment to its application (which constitutes the technical specifications to the license) to assure that the end reflectors or plugs of the experiment tube are in place during core loading.

Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 17th day of February 1966.

For the Atomic Energy Commission.E. G. Case,

Director,Division of Reactor Licensing.


[Docket No. 50-170]

ARMED FORCES RADIOBIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Notice of Issuance of Facility License Amendment

Please take notice that the Atomic Energy Commission has issued, effective as of the date of issuance, Amendment No. 9, set forth below, to Facility License No. Rr-84. The license authorized Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) to operate its DASA- TRIGA Mark F nuclear reactor located on the National Naval Medical Center site in Bethesda, Md. The amendment(1) authorizes AFRRI to change the physical structure of the fast neutron exposure room to permit entry of an underground beamport extending from the new positive ion accelerator building, (2) authorizes AFRRI to discharge all reactor building effluents to a new stack, and (3) changes the amount of contained uranium 235 that may be received, possessed and used under the license from 8.2 kilograms to 5.0 kilograms, as described in the application amendment dated October 12, 1965.

Within 15 days from the date of publication of this notice in the F ederal R egister, the applicant may file a request for a hearing, and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding may file a petition for leave to intervene. Requests for a hearing and petitions to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of the Commission’s regulations (10 CFR Part 2). If a request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene is filed within the time prescribed in this notice, the Commission will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.

For further details with respect to this amendment, see (1) the licensee’s application for license amendment dated October 12,1965, and (2) a related Safety Evaluation prepared by the Test and Power Reactor Safety Branch of the Division of Reactor Licensing, both of which are available for public inspection at the Commission’s Public Document Room, 1717 H Street NW., Washington, D.C. A copy of item (2) above may be obtained at the Commission’s Public Document Room or upon request addressed to the Atomic Energy Com

mission, Washington, D.C., 20545, Attention: Director, Division of Reactor Licensing.

Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 16th day of February 1966.

For the Atomic Energy Commission.R . L . D o a n ,


[License No. R-84; Arndt. No. 9] Am endm ent to Facility License

The Atomic Energy Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”) having found that:

a. The application for amendment dated October 12, 1965, complies w ith the requirem ents of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission’s regulations set forth in Title 10, Chapter 1, CFR;

b. Operation of the reactor in accordance w ith the license, as amended, will not present undue hazard to the health and safety of the public and will not be inim ical to the common defense and security;

c. Prior public notice of proposed issuance of the amendment is not required since the amendment does not involve significant hazards considerations different from those previously evaluated.

License No. R-84, issued to Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, is hereby amended in the following respects:

(1) Paragraph 3.B. is revised in its entirety to read as follows:

“3.B. Pursuant to the Act and Title 10, CFR, Chapter 1, Part 70, ‘Special Nuclear Material,’ to receive, possess and use up to 5.0 kilograms of contained uranium-235 for use in connection w ith operation of the reactor.”

(2) In addition to the activities previously authorized by the Commission in License No. R-84, as amended, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute is authorized:

(a) To change the physical structure of the fast neutron exposure room to permit the entry of an underground beamport extending from the new positive ion accelerator building, and

(b) To discharge all reactor building effluents to a new stack, as described in the application for license amendment dated October 12, 1965.

This amendment is effective as of the date of issuance.

For the Atomic Energy Commission.Date of issuance: February 16, 1966.



FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD[No. 19,728]

FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS

Approvals of Change of Office Location

F ebruary 17, 1966.Resolved, that the Presidents of the

Federal Home Loan Banks, as Supervisory Agents of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, are hereby authorized to give final approval to applications, by Federal savings and loan associations lo

cated within their respective districts, for a change of office location not more than one-half mile from the existing location provided that such authorization shall not extend to cases wherein the proposed change of location would necessitate an amendment to the Charter of the applicant association.

Resolved further, that said Presidents are hereby authorized to give final approval to such applications for a change of office location beyond one-half mile but not more than 1 mile from the existing location provided that such authorization shall not extend to cases wherein the proposed change of location would necessitate an amendment to the Charter of the applicant association: Provided, further, That, with respect to each such application, the Bank President shall first give notice of the proposed move to all institutions considered by him to have a legitimate competitive interest in the proposal, that he shall give due weight to all views expressed in response to such notice, and, in the event he receives any objection, he shall refer the application to the Board for its consideration and formal action.

Resolved further, that, with respect to all applications for a change of office location by associations, other than Federal associations, incorporated, organized, or doing business in the District of Columbia, the President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Greensboro is hereby authorized to give final approval to the same extent, and subject to the same limitations, as the Presidents of the several Federal Home Loan Banks are authorized by this resolution with respect to applications by Federal savings and loan associations.

Resolved further, that the Secretary to the Board is directed to transmit the foregoing to the Office of the Federal Register for publication.

By the Federal Home Loan Bank Board.

[seal] H arry W. Caulsen ,Secretary.


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSIONFARRELL LINES, INC., AND DELTA

STEAMSHIP LINES, INC.Notice of Agreement Filed for

Approval-Notice is hereby given that the follow

ing agreement has been filed with the Commission for approval pursuant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 U.S.C. 814).

Interested parties may inspect and obtain a copy of the agreement at the Washington office .of the Federal Maritime Commission, 1321 H Street NW., Room 609; or may inspect agreements at the offices of the District Managers, New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San Francisco, Calif. Comments with reference to an agreement including a re-


NOTICES 3143

quest for hearing, if desired, may be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., 20573, within 20 days after publication of this notice in the F ederal R egister. A copy of any such statement should also be forwarded to the party filing the agreement (as indicated hereinafter) and the comments should indicate that this has been done.

Notice of agreement filed for approval by:Mr. J. Gerald Shea, Traffic Manager-Operations, Farrell Lines, Inc., 1 W hitehall Street, New York, N.Y., 10004.

Agreement 9526, between Farrell Lines, Inc., and Delta Steamship Lines, Inc., establishes a through billing arrangement for movement of cargo between U.S. Gulf ports and the Liberian ports of Harbel, Buchanan, Sinoe, and Cape Palmas with transshipment at Monrovia, Liberia, in accordance with terms and conditions set forth in the agreement. This agreement upon approval will supersede and. cancel F.M.C. Agreement 8426 between the same parties and in the same trade.

Dated: February 21, 1966.By order of the Federal Maritime

Commission.T homas Li s i ,

Secretary.[F.R. Doc. 66-1997; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:48 a.m.]

[Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder License 703]

INTERSTATE AUTO SHIPPERS, INC.Order To Show Cause

On February 1, 1966, the NewHampshire Insurance Co. (Eimieke & Loren, Inc., agents), notified the Commission that the surety bond filed pursuant to section 44(c), Shipping Act, 1916 (46 U.S.C. 1245) by Interstate Auto Shippers, Inc., 205 West 34th Street, New York, N.Y., would be canceled effective 12:01 a.m., March 4, 1966.

Section 44(c) of the Shipping Act, 1816 (46 U.S.C. 841b) and § 510.5(f) of General Order 4 (46 CFR) provide that no license shall remain in force unless such forwarder shall have furnished a bond.

Section 44(d) of the Shipping Act, 1916 (46 U.S.C. 841b) provides that licenses may, after notice and hearing, be suspended or revoked for willful failure to comply with any provision of the Act, or with any lawful rule of the Commission promulgated thereunder. *

Therefore, it is ordered, That Interstate Auto Shippers, me., on or before February 28, 1966, either (1) submit a valid bond effective on or before March 4, 1966, or (2) show cause in writing or request a hearing to be held at 10 a.m., on March 2, 1966, in Room 505, Federal Maritime Commission, 1321 H Street NW.t Washington, D.C., 20573, to show cause why its license should not be suspended or revoked pursuant to section 44 (d), Shipping Act, 1916.

I t is further ordered, That the Director, Bureau of Domestic Regulation forthwith revoke license No. 703 if the licensee fails to comply with this order.

I t is further ordered, That a copy of this order to show cause and all subsequent orders in this matter be served upon the licensee and be published in the F ederal R egister.

[seal] T homas L i s i ,Secretary.


FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION[Docket Nos. CP65-340, CP66-263]

ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION CO. AND TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION CO.

Order To Show Cause, Consolidating and Setting Date of Hearing

F ebruary 16,1966.On September 29, 1965, we issued a

notice of “Petition To Amend” filed by Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. (Algonquin) in Docket No. CP65-340. In said filing Algonquin seeks amendment of the authorization granted by the Commission on August 24, 1965, in Docket No. CP65-340, so as to now construct an additional 23.6-mile, 16-inch lateral pipeline from its existing facilities in Connecticut to the vicinity of North Bloomfield, Conn., at an estimated cost of $2,887,000. These facilities are proposed to be used essentially to deliver to the Hartford Gas Co. (Hartford), an existing customer of Algonquin, volumes of gas previously authorized to be delivered through other facilities authorized in our above-mentioned order of August 24,1965. However, the capacity of the proposed new line appears to be considerably greatly in excess of Hartford’s needs as projected over the next 3-year period for the area involved.

The new area proposed to be served by Hartford, through use of the volumes to be delivered off of the proposed Algonquin lateral, is presently traversed by Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. (Tennessee). Thus the proposed Algonquin lateral would, if constructed, parallel and duplicate the existing 16- inch pipeline of Tennessee. Although it appears that Tennessee could deliver to Hartford, at the very least, the requisite volumes of gas necessary for the immediate institution of service to the new area at a comparatively minor expenditure, no petition to intervene or a competitive proposal was submitted by Tennessee.

In view of (1) the necessity of accurately determining the market requirements of the new area and (2) the related impact on the economic feasibility of the proposed lateral when viewed, particularly, in juxtaposition to our previous authorization herein for the construction of other facilities requested by Algonquin so as to enable it to deliver to Hartford the very volumes it now seeks to utilize

to prove up the economics of the proposed lateral construction, we conclude that the public convenience and necessity requires a formal hearing in these matters and shall so order. Additionally, in view of the possibility that Tennessee could provide any required additional service to Hartford in the North Bloomfield area, without detriment to the present or foreseeable demands of its existing customers, through use of its existing facilities traversing the area, we will now issue and consolidate in such hearing an order to show cause why Tennessee should not be required, under section 7 (a) of the Natural Gas Act, to establish a physical connection of its facilities with those of Hartford and to sell to Hartford volumes of gas necessary for the rendition of service to the new area. This show cause proceeding will, of course, not be limited solely to the question of whether Tennessee could provide the service directly to Hartford consistent with the standards of section 7(a), but should also include the comparative benefits, if any, if such service were to be rendered by Algonquin either by exchange agreement with Tennessee or by transportation by Tennessee for the account of Algonquin.

The Commission orders:(A) An order to show cause is hereby

issued against Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. why it should not be required, under section 7(a) of the Natural Gas Act, to establish a physical connection of its facilities with those of Hartford Gas Co. and to sell to said company volumes of gas necessary for the rendition of service to the above-mentioned new area.

(B) Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. shall within 15 days of the issuance of this order respond to the “Order To Show Cause” and shall, further, be prepared, upon the hearing date set herein, to present witnesses to testify in regard to matters set forth in said response.

(C) Pursuant to the authority conferred on the Federal Power Commission by the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules of practice and procedure, a consolidated hearing will be held on March 21, 1966, at 10 a.m., e.s.t., in a hearing room of the Federal Power Commission, 441 G Street NW., Washington, D.C., respecting the matters set forth in the instant application filed by Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. and the order to show cause directed to Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.

By the Commission.[ seal] G ordon M. G rant,

Acting Secretary.[F.R. Doc. 66-1967; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:45 a.m.]

[Docket No. CP66-264]

NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO. OF AMERICA

Notice of ApplicationF ebruary 17,1966.

Take notice that on February 11, 1966, Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America


3144 NOTICES(Applicant), 122 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, 111., 60603, filed in Docket No. CP66-264 an application pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the sale and delivery of an additional 2,000 Mcf of gas per day to Interstate Power Co. (Interstate), an existing customer of Applicant, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.

Applicant states that it has been informed by letter dated February 2, 1966, that Interstate requires an additional firm service of 2,000 Mcf of gas per day due to a depletion in its storage service, the addition of a number of new firm customers, a shortage of propane for use in its peak shaving facilities and an extended period of extreme temperature. The proposed additional service will increase Applicant’s deliveries to Interstate to a total of 27,934 Mcf of gas per day.

The application states that the proposed sale volumes will be obtained through the utilization of Applicant’s existing unallocated capacity of 26,962 Mcf of gas per day. The application further states that upon the grant of authorization requested by the instant application, together with the receipt of authorization to sell 1,000 Mcf of gas per day out of unallocated capacity, which authorization was applied for by Applicant on February 9, 1966, in Docket No. CP66-262, Applicant’s unallocated capacity will be 23,962 Mcf.

Applicant states that no additional facilities will be required to implement the proposed additional service.

Protests or petitions to intervene may be filed with the Federal Power Commission, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regulations under the Natural Gas Act (157.10) on or before March 10, 1966.

Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Power Commission by sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules of practice and procedure, a hearing will be held without further notice before the Commission on this application if no protest or petition to intervene is filed within the time required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public convenience and necessity. If a protest or petition for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will be unnecessary for Applicant to appear or be represented at the hearing.

J oseph H. G utride, Secretary.


OFFICE OF EMERGENCY PLANNING

AMERICAN SAMOA Notice of Major Disaster

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the President under Executive Order 10427 of January 16, 1953, Executive Order 10737 of October 29, 1957, and Executive Order 11051 of September 27, 1962 (18 F.R. 407, 22 F.R. 8799, 27 F.R. 9683); Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1958, Public Law 85-763, and Public Law 87-206; by virtue of the Act of September 30, 1950, entitled “An Act to authorize Federal assistance to States and local governments in major disasters, and for other purposes” (42 U.S.C. 1855- 1855g), as amended; notice is hereby given of a declaration of “major disaster” by the President in his letter dated February 10, 1966, reading in part as follows:

I have determined that the damage in various areas of the Territory of American Samoa adversely affected by a typhoon and extreme tidal conditions beginning on or about January 29, 1966, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant Federal assistance to supplem ent Territorial and local efforts.

I do hereby determine the entire Territory of American Samoa to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of February 10, 1966.

Dated: February 18, 1966.F ranklin B . D ryden ,

Acting Director, Office of Emergency Planning.

[F.R. Doc. 66-1966; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;8:45 a .m.]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File 7-2515]

ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.

Application for Unlisted TradingPrivi leges and Opportunity forHearing

F ebruary 18, 1966.In the matter of application of the

Boston Stock Exchange for unlisted trading privileges in a certain security.

The above named national securities exchange has filed an application with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 12f—1 thereunder, for unlisted trading privileges in the 5 percent noncumu- lative preferred stock of the following company, which security is listed and registered on one or more other national

securities exchanges: Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., File 7-2515.

Upon receipt of a request, on or before March 7, 1966, from any interested person, the Commission will determine whether the application shall be set down for hearing. Any such request should state briefly the nature of the interest of the person making the request and the position he proposes to take at the hearing, if ordered. In addition, any interested person may submit his views or any additional facts bearing on the said application by means of a letter addressed to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., 20549, not later than the date specified. If no one requests a hearing, this application will be determined by order of the Commission on the basis of the facts stated therein and other information contained in the official files of the Commission pertaining thereto.

For the Commission (pursuant to delegated authority).

[ seal] Orval L. D uB o is ,Secretary.


[File No. 1-3421]

CONTINENTAL VENDING MACHINE CORP.

Order Suspending TradingF ebruary 18, 1966.

The common stock, 10 cents par value, of Continental Vending Machine Corp., being listed and registered on the American Stock Exchange and having unlisted trading privileges on the Philadel- phia-Baltimore-Washington Stock Exchange; and the 6 percent convertible subordinated debentures due September 1,1976, being listed and registered on the American Stock Exchange, pursuant to provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

It appearing to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the summary suspension of trading in such securities on such Exchanges and otherwise than on a national securities exchange is required in the public interest and for the protection of investors;

It is ordered, pursuant to sections 15(c)(5) and 19(a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in such securities on the American Stock Exchange, the Philadelphia-Baltimore- Washington Stock Exchange and otherwise than on a national securities exchange be summarily suspended, this order to be effective for the period February 21, 1966, through March 2, 1966, both dates inclusive.

By the Commission.[seal] Orval L. DuBors,


8:46 a.m.]


NOTICES 3145

[812—1919]

INTERNATIONAL UTILITIES OVERSEAS CAPITAL CORP.

Filing of Application for Order Exempting Company

F ebruary 18,1966. \Notice is hereby given that Interna

tional Utilities Overseas Capital Corp. (“applicant”), 3219 Philadelphia Pike, Claymont, Del., 19703, has filed an application pursuant to section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Act”) for an order exempting it from all provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. All interested persons are referred to the application on file with the Commission for a statement of the representations therein, which are summarized below.

The applicant was organized by In ternational Utilities Corp. (“International”) under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 16, 1966. International will subscribe for all of the capital stock of the applicant to be issued, consisting of 300 shares of common stock with a par value of $100 per share. In ternational will pay an aggregate amount of $300,000 in cash, securities, or other property for such stock on or before March 1, 1966. International will, not later than September 1, 1966, make a capital contribution to the applicant consisting of additional cash, securities or other property so that the capital of applicant will not be less than $1,500,- 000 at that date. Any additional securities which the applicant may issue, other than debt securities, will be issued only to International. International will continue to own all shares of the applicant’s common stock and any additional securities of the applicant so acquired and will not dispose of the securities of applicant except to the applicant itself or to another wholly owned subsidiary of International.

International, a Maryland corporation, operates public utility companies in Western Canada, shipping companies engaged in foreign trade, a trucking company operating throughout the United States, bus companies with routes in Western Canada, several industrial companies in the United States and overseas, and a company which holds a diversified portfolio of securities.

A principal purpose for organizing the applicant was to provide assistance in improving the balance-of-paymentsposition of the United States, in compliance with the voluntary cooperation program instituted by the President in February, 1965, while at the same time continuing the expansion and development of International’s operations outside the United States. Applicant intends to issue and sell an aggregate of $15,000,000 principal amount of its Guaranteed Convertible Bonds (“Bonds”). International will guarantee the payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and sinking fund payments on the Bonds. The Bonds will be convertible at any time on and after August 1, 1967,

and on or prior to March 15, 1986, into common stock of International. Any additional debt securities of applicant which may be issued to or held by the public will be guaranteed by International in a manner similar to the guarantee of the Bonds.

I t is intended that at least 85 percent of all the assets of the applicant will be invested in or loaned to foreign subsidiaries of International or other foreign companies (including U.S. companies all or substantially all of whose business is carried on abroad) in which International directly or indirectly has, or will acquire, an equity interest of 10 percent or more. Not more than 15 percent of applicant’s assets may be invested in or loaned to unrelated foreign companies. Applicant will proceed as expeditiously as practicable with the investment of its assets in the manner described above. Pending the development of final investment plans, and from time to time thereafter in connection with changes in long-term investments, the assets of applicant may be invested on a short-term basis outside the United States or in time deposits in banks abroad.

The Bonds are to be sold to underwriters under conditions which are intended to assure that the Bonds will not be sold to nationals or residents of the United States or its territories or possessions. The managing underwriter will agree to sell the Bonds (i) only to foreign underwriters who will agree not to directly or indirectly sell, offer to sell, buy, offer to buy or otherwise effect any transaction in the United States or its territories or possessions or offer to sell the Bonds to any person who is a resident or national of the United States or its territories or possessions; and (ii) only to United States underwriters who will agree not to directly or indirectly sell or offer to sell the Bonds to any person who is a resident or national of the U.S. or its territories or possessions. In addition, the managing underwriter will agree to sell or allow the sale of the Bonds only to dealers who agree not to sell or offer to sell, directly or indirectly, the Bonds to any person who is a resident or national of the United States or its territories or possessions.

Counsel has advised the applicant that U.S. persons will be required to report and pay interest equalization tax with respect to acquisitions of the Bonds, except where a specific statutory exemption is available. Thus, by financing its foreign operations through the applicant rather than through sale of its own debt obligations, International will utilize an instrumentality the acquisition of whose debt obligations by U.S. persons would, generally, subject such persons to interest equalization tax, thereby tending to discourage them from purchasing such debt securities.

Upon conversion of the Bonds into shares of common stock of International, the applicant will register such shares under the Securities Act of 1933.

Applicant submits that it is appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policies and provisions of the Act for the Commission to enter an order exempting applicant from each and every provision of the Act for the following reasons: (1) A significant purpose of the applicant is to assist in improving the balance-of-payments program of the United States by obtaining funds for foreign operations in foreign countries;(2) the payment of the Bonds, which is guaranteed by International, and the value of the right to convert the Bonds by exchanging them for shares of International common stock, do not depend on the operation or investment policy of the applicant, for Bond holders may ultimately look to the business enterprise of International; (3) none of the securities of the applicant, other than debt securities, will be held by any person other than International or a wholly owned subsidiary of International; (4) applicant will not deal or trade in securities; (5) applicant’s security holders will have the benefit of the disclosure and reporting provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and of the New York Stock Exchange because of the fact that the common stock of International is listed; (6) the Bonds will be sold only to foreign nationals and the burden of the interest equalization tax will discourage resale to any U.S. national or resident.

Notice is further given that any interested person may, not later than March7,1966, a t 12:30 p.m., submit to the Commission in writing a request for a hearing on the matter accompanied by a statement as to the nature of his interest, the reason for such request and the issues, if any, of fact or of law proposed to be controverted, or he may request that he be notified if the Commission should order a hearing thereon. Any such communication should be addressed: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., 20549. A copy of such request shall be served personally or by mail (airmail if the person being served is located more than 500 miles from the point of mailing) upon applicant at the address stated above. Proof of such service (by affidavit or in case of an attorney at law by certificate) shall be filed contemporaneously with the request. At any time after said date, as provided by Rule 0-5 of the rules and regulations promulgated under the Act, an order disposing of the application herein may be issued by the Commission upon the basis of the information stated in said application, unless an order for hearing upon said application shall be issued upon request or upon the Commission’s own motion.

For the Commission (pursuant to delegated authority).

[ seal] O rval L. DuBois,Secretary.



3146 NOTICESPINAL COUNTY DEVELOPMENT

ASSOCIATIONOrder Suspending Trading

F ebruary 17,1966.It appearing to the Securities and Ex

change Commission that the summary suspension of trading in the 5% percent Industrial Development Revenue Bonds of Pinal County Development Association due April 15, 1989, otherwise than on a national securities exchange is required in the public interest and for the protection of investors;

It is ordered, Pursuant to section 15 (c)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that trading in such bonds be summarily suspended, this order to be effective for the period February 18, 1966, through February 27, 1966, both dates inclusive.

By the Commission.[SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS,


8:47 a.m.]

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

[Notice 883]

MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATERCARRIER AND FREIGHT FORWARDER APPLICATIONS

F ebruary 18,1966.The following applications are gov

erned by Special Rule 1.2471 of the Commission’s general rules of practice (49 CFR 1.247), published in the F ederal R egister, issue of December 3, 1963, effective January 1,1964. These rules provide, among other things, that a protest to the granting of an application must be filed with the Commission within 30 days after date of notice of filing of the application is published in the F ederal R egister . Failure seasonably to file a protest will be construed as a waiver of opposition and participation in the proceeding. A protest under these rules should comply with § 1.40 of the general rules of practice which requires that it set forth specifically the grounds upon which it is made and specify with particularity the facts, matters, and things relied upon, but shall not include issues or allegations phrased generally. Protests not in reasonable compliance with the requirements of the rules may be rejected. The original and six (6) copies of the protest shall be filed with the Commission, and a copy shall be served concurrently upon applicant’s representative, or applicant if no representative is named. If the protest includes a request for oral hearing, such request shall meet the requirements of § 1.247(d) (4) of the special rule. Subsequent assignment of

1 Copies of Special Rule 1.247 can be obtained by writing to the Secretary, Interstate Commerce Commission, W ashington, D.C., 20423.

these proceedings for oral hearing, if any, will be by Commission order which will be served on each party of record.

The publications hereinafter set forth reflect the scope of the applications as filed by applicants, and may include descriptions, restrictions, or limitations which are not in a form acceptable to the Commission. Authority which ultimately may be granted as a result of the applications here noticed will not necessarily reflect the phraseology set forth in the application as filed, but also will eliminate any restrictions which are not acceptable to the Commission.

No. MC 1630 (Sub-No. 8) , filed February 7, 1966. Applicant; D. D. JONES TRANSFER & WAREHOUSE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, 225 West Main Street, Norfolk, Va. Applicant’s representative: Morton E. Kiel, 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y., 10006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Such commodities, as are dealt in by gasoline service stations (except commodities in bulk), between Chesapeake and Norfolk, Va., on the one hand, and, on the other, points on the Delmarva Peninsula in Delaware and Maryland, south of the Intracoastal waterway of C & D Canal. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Norfolk, Va.

No. MC 2392 (Sub-No. 48), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: WHEELER TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC., Post Office Box 432, Genoa, Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Fertilizer solutions, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plantsite of the Phillips Petroleum Co., liquid fertilizer plant .at or near Aurora, Nebr., to points in Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and South Dakota. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr.

No. MC 2567 (Sub-No. 10), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BELBEY TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, 520 Belleville Turnpike, Kearny, N.J. Applicant’s representative: Morton E. Kiel, 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y., 10006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Such commodities, new or used, which because of size or weight require the use of special equipment, (2) such commodities, new or used, which do not require special equipment because of size or weight, when moving in the same shipment or the same vehicle with commodities, new or used, requiring the use of special equipment, (a) between New York, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, Newark and Harilson, N.J., and points within three (3) miles of Harrison, N.J., ancTTb) between points in New Jersey, on the one hand, and, on the other, Fall River, New Bedford, and Taunton, Mass., points in Connecticut, and Rhode Island, points in that part of New York, on and east of New York Highway 14, and points in that part of Pennsylvania east of the Susquehanna River. N o te: Applicant states it presently holds au

thority in MC 2567 to transport commodities which because of size or weight require special equipment. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C., or New York, N.Y.

No. MC 2900 (Sub-No. 124), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: RYDERTRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office Box 8418, Greensboro, N.C., 27410. Applicant’s representative: Reagan Sayers, Century Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., 76102. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Aluminum sulphate, in bhlk, in tank vehicles, from Naheola, Ala., to points in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant -requests it be held at New Orleans, La.

No. MC 3252 (Sub-No. 38), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: PAUL E. MERRILL, doing business as MERRILL TRANSPORT CO., 1037 Forest Avenue, Portland, Maine. Applicant’s representative: Francis E. Barrett, Jr., 536 Granite Street, Braintree, Mass., 02184. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Petroleum products, in bulk, in tank vehicles (except those which are classified as acids and chemicals in Appendix XV in Description in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209), (2) liquified petroleum gas, and (3) liquid petroleum base asphalt, from Albany, and Rensselaer, N.Y., to points in New Hampshire, south and west of a line beginning at the Vermont-New Hampshire State line, and extending along U.S. Highway 4 to junction U.S. Highway 3, and thence along U.S. Highway 3 to the New Hampshire- Massachusetts State line including points on the indicated portions of the highways specified. N ote: Applicant states any duplicating authority to be eliminated. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Albany, N.Y.

No. MC 3560 (Sub-No. 27), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: GENERAL EXPRESSWAYS, INC., 1205 South Platte River Drive, Denver, Colo., 80223. Applicant’s representative: O. Russell Jones, 207 Bokum Building, 142 West Palace Avenue, Santa Fe, N. Mex., 87501. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: Commodities of unusual value (except those which shipper requires carrier to furnish armed guards or armored equipment), (1) serving Chicago Heights, 111., and points in Illinois within 5 miles of Chicago Heights, as off- route points in connection with carrier’s authorized regular route operations to and from Chicago, 111.; (2) between Boston, Mass., and Washington, D.C.: From Boston over U.S. Highway 1 to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 1 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 1), near'Wickford, R.I., thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 1 to junction U.S. Highway 1, near Wakefield, R.I., thence over U.S. Highway 1 to Poquonock Bridge, Conn., thence over unnumbered highway via Groton, Conn., to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 1, at


NOTICES 3147

or near New London, Conn., thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 1 to junction U.S. Highway 1. at or near East Lyme, Conn.

Thence over U.S. Highway 1 via Philadelphia, Pa., to Washington (also from Philadelphia over U.S. Highway 13 to junction U.S. Highway 40, thence over U.S. Highway 40 to Baltimore, Md., thence over U.S. Highway 1 to Washington), and return over the same routes;(3) between Boston, Mass., and junction Massachusetts Highway 12 and U.S. Highway 20: From Boston over Massachusetts Highway 2 to junction Massachusetts Highway 2A, near East Acton, Mass., thence over Massachusetts Highway 2A via Littleton Common, Littleton, Ayer, and Lunenburg, Mass., to Fitchburg, Mass., thence over Massachusetts Highway 12 to junction U.S. Highway 20, and return over the same route; (4) between Westfield, Mass., and Albany, N.Y.: From Westfield over U.S. Highway 20 to Albany, and return over the same route; (5) between Norwalk, Conn., and Lenox, Mass.: From Norwalk over U.S. Highway 7 to Lenox, and return over the same route; (6) between Milldale, Conn., and Waterbury, Conn.: From Milldale over Alternate U.S. Highway 6 to Waterbury, and return over the same route; (7) between Hartford, Conn., and Winsted, Conn.: From Hartford over U.S. Highway 44 to Winsted, and return over the same route; (8) between Albany, N.Y., and Camillus, N.Y.: From Albany over New York Highway 5 to Camillus, and return over the same route; (9) between Boston, Mass., and New Haven, Conn.: From Boston over U.S. Highway 20 to Spring- field, Mass.

Thence over U.S. Highway 5 to Hartford, Conn., thence over unnumbered highway to junction U.S. Highway 5, thence over UJ5. Highway 5 to New Haven, and return over the same route; (10) between Providence, R.I., and Peekskill, N.Y.: Prom Providence over U.S. Highway 6 to Willimantic, Conn., thence over Connecticut Highway 32 to junction Connecticut Highway 31, thence over Connecticut Highway 31 via South Coventry, Conn., to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 44, a t or near Coventry, Conn., thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 44 to junction U.S. Highway 44, thence over U.S. Highway 44 to Hartford, Conn., thence over Connecticut Highway 4 to junction Connecticut Highway 10, thence over Connecticut Highway 10 to junction Connecticut Highway 72, thence over Connecticut Highway 72 to junction U.S. Highway 6, thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Peekskill, and return over the same route; (11) between Springfield, Mass., and New Haven, Conn.: From Springfield over U.S. Highway 20 to Westfield, Mass., thence over Massachusetts Highway 10 to Massachusetts-Connecticut State line, thence over Connecticut Highway 10 to New Haven, and return over the same route; (12) between New York, N.Y., and Albany, N.Y.: (a) From New York over U.S. Highway 9 to Albany, and return over the same route; (b) from New York across the Hudson River

to Jersey City, N.J., thence over U.S. Highway 9 to junction U.S. Highway 9W.

Thence over U.S. Highway 9W to Albany, and return over the same route; (13) between Stratford, Conn., and Canaan, Conn.; From Stratford over Connecticut Highway 110 to Shelton, Conn., thence over Connecticut Highway 8 to Winsted, Conn., thence over U.S. Highway 44 to Canaan, and return over the same route; (14) between Boston, Mass., and Worcester, Mass.: From Boston over Massachusetts Highway 9 to Worcester, and return over the same route; (15) between Providence, R.I., and Groton, Conn.: From Providence over Rhode Island Highway 3 (portion formerly unnumbered highway) via Wyoming, Hope Valley, and Hopkinton, R.I., to junction Interstate Highway 95 (formerly portion Rhode Island Highway 3), thence over Interstate Highway 95 to the Rhode Island-Connecticut State line, thence over Connecticut Highway 95 (formerly Connecticut Highway 84) to Groton, and return over the same route; (16) between Great Barrington, Mass., and Valatie, N.Y.: From Great Barrington over Massachusetts Highway 23 to junction Massachusetts Highway 71, thence over Massachusetts Highway 71 to the Massachusetts-New York State line, thence over New York Highway 71 to Green River, N.Y., thence over New York Highway 22 to Austerlitz, N.Y.

Thence over New York Highway 203 to Valatie, and return over the same route; serving intermediate and off-route points in connection with the above-specified regular route operations as follows: In termediate points of Chester, Marlboro, North Attleboro, Palmer, Pittsfield, Russell, Springfield, Westfield, and Woro- noco, Mass.; Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, and Waterbury, Conn.; Trenton, N.J.; Philadelphia and Marcus Hook, Pa.; Wilmington, Del.; Baltimore, Elkton, Laurel, and Hyattsville, Md.; Albany, Amsterdam, Fayetteville, Frankfort, Little Falls, Rensselaer, Schenectady, Scotia, Sherrill, Solvay, Syracuse, and Utica, N.Y.; those on that portion of the route between Boston, Mass., and Washington, D.C., extending from Westerly, R.I., over U.S. Highway 1 to unnumbered highway, thence over unnumbered highway to Alternate U.S. Highway 1, thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 1 to U.S. Highway 1, and thence over U.S. Highway 1 to Penns Neck, N.J.; those on that portion of the route between Boston, Mass., and New Haven, Conn., extending from Springfield, Mass., over U.S. Highway 5 to Hartford, Conn.

Thence over unnumbered highway to U.S. Highway 5, and thence over U.S. Highway 5 to New Haven, Conn.; those on that portion of the route between Providence, R.I., and Peekskill, N.Y., extending from junction Connecticut Highway 31 (formerly portion Alternate U.S. Highway 6) and Alternate U.S. Highway 44 over Alternate U.S. Highway 44 to junction U.S. Highway 44; and those on thé authorized portions of U.S. Highways 6, 7, 9, 9W, 44, and 202, Massachusetts Highways 2, 2A, and 12, and Connecticut Highways 4, 8,10, 72, and 110, unrestric

ted; and Pawtucket, Providence, East Providence, Narragansett, and Westerly, R.I., for traffic other than that moving to or from points in that part of Massachusetts on and east of Massachusetts Highway 12; and the intermediate and off- route points within 15 miles of Boston, Mass., those within 5 miles of Spring- field, Mass., those within 10 miles of Hartford, Waterbury, New Haven, and Bridgeport, Conn., those on Long Island, N.Y., those in New York and New Jersey within 25 miles of New York, N.Y., those in Pennsylvania and New Jersey within 15 miles of Philadelphia, Pa., and those within 5 miles of Baltimore, Md. Service in connection with the above-specified regular route operations (in 1-16 above) is not authorized between New York, N.Y., and points in New York within 25 miles of New York, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, authorized New Jersey points, Wilmington, Del., and Philadelphia, Pa., and points within 15 miles of Philadelphia; or between Wilmington, Del., on the one hand, and, on the other, Philadelphia, Pa., and points within 15 miles of Philadelphia; (17) between Chicago, 111., and Niagara Falls, N.Y.: (a) From Chicago over U.S. Highway 20 to junction Ohio Highway 120, thence over Ohio Highway 120 to Toledo, Ohio.

Thence over Ohio Highway 2 to Lorain, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 57 to junction Ohio Highway 254, thence over Ohio Highway 254 to Cleveland, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to junction U.S. Highway 62, thence over U.S. Highway 62 to Buffalo, N.Y., thence over New York Highway 384 to Niagara Falls, and return over the same route; (b) from Chicago to Buffalo as specified above, thence over New York Highway 266 to Niagara Falls, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and the off-route points of Ross- ford, Ohio, in (a) and (b) above; (18) between Lorain, Ohio, and Akron, Ohio: From Lorain over Ohio Highway 57 to Elyria, Ohio, thence over unnumbered highway (formerly portion Ohio Highway 57) to junction Ohio Highway 57, a t or near Laporte, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 57 to Medina, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 18 to Akron, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (19) between Cleveland, Ohio, and Akron, Ohio: (a) From Cleveland over Ohio Highway 176 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 21) to junction unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 21), at or near Ghent, Ohio, thence over unnumbered highway to Montrose, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 18 to Akron, and return over the same route; (b) from Cleveland to Ghent, Ohio, as specified above.

Thence over Ohio Highway 176 to junction Ohio Highway 18, thence over Ohio Highway 18 to Akron, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points in (a) and (b) above; (20) between Buffalo, N.Y., and Jamestown, N.Y.; from Buffalo over U.S. Highway 62 to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to Silver Creek, N.Y., thence over New York Highway 5 to Dunkirk, N.Y., thence over New

No. 38- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3148 NOTICESYork Highway 60 to Jamestown, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (21) between Marshalltown, Iowa, and Cedar Rapids, Iowa: From Marshalltown over unnumbered highway to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Iowa Highway 146, thence over Iowa Highway 146 to junction unnumbered highway, thence over unnumbered highway via Montour, Iowa, to Tama, Iowa, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Iowa Highway 212, thence over Iowa Highway 212 to Belle Plaine, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 131 to junction unnumbered highway, thence over unnumbered highway to Luzerne, Iowa, thence over unnumbered highway to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Iowa Highway 200, thence over Iowa Highway 200 to junction Iowa Highway 199, thence over Iowa Highway 199 to Van Horne, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 82 to Blairstown, Iowa, thence over unnumbered highway via Watkins, Iowa, to Norway, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 201 to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Iowa Highway 280.

Thence over Iowa Highway 280 to New- hall, Iowa, thence over unnumbered highways via Atkins, Iowa, to Cedar Rapids, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (22) between Marshalltown, Iowa, and Moline* 111.; From Marshalltown over route specified immediately above to Tama, Iowa, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, thence over unnumbered highway to junction Iowa Highway 150 (formerly Iowa Highway 94), thence over Iowa Highway 150 to junction U.S. Highway 30 at or near Mount Vernon, Iowa, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Stan- wood, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 38 to Tipton, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 150 to Davenport, Iowa, thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Moline, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and off-route points in the Davenport-Rock Island and Moline commercial zone, as defined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557; (23) between Marshalltown, Iowa and Des Moines, Iowa: From Marshalltown over Iowa highway 330 to junction unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 30), thence over unnumbered highway via State Center, Iowa, to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Ames, Iowa, thence over U.S. Highway 69 to Des Moines, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and all off-route points within twelve (12) miles of the Central Post Office, Des Moines, Iowa, except Altoona, Ankeny, Carlisle, and Norwalk, Iowa; (24) between Davenport, Iowa, and Bettendorf, Iowa: From Davenport over U.S. Highway 67 to Bettendorf, and return over the same route, serving from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, over loop route to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, all intermediate points; (25) from Cedar Rapids over U.S. Highway 151 via Marion, Iowa, to junction Iowa Highway 13.

Thence over Iowa Highway 13 via Cog- gon, Iowa, to junction County Highway

A, thence over County Highway A to Hopkinton, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 38 via Delaware, Iowa, to Greeley, Iowa, thence over County Highway E to Edgewood, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 3 via Strawberry Point, Iowa, to junction Iowa Highway 154, thence over Iowa Highway 154 to junction Iowa Highway 150, thence over Iowa Highway 150 via Maynard, Iowa, to Cedar Rapids, and thence return over the same route* serving all intermediate points and the off-route point of Rowley, Iowa; (26) between Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and junction Iowa Highway 21 and U.S. Highway 30: From Cedar Rapids over County Highway M via Palo, Iowa to Shellsburg, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 202 to junction U.S. Highway 218, thence over U.S. Highway 218 to Vinton, Iowa, thence over County Highway K to Garrison, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 198 to junction U.S. Highway 218, thence over U.S. Highway 218 to junction Iowa Highway 8, thence west over Iowa Highway 8 to Traer, Iowa, thence return over Iowa Highway 8 to junction County Highway C, thence over County Highway C to Vining, Iowa, thence over unnumbered highway to Elberon, Iowa, thence over Iowa Highway 171 to junction Iowa Highway 21, thence over Iowa Highway 21 to junction U.S. Highway 30, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (27) between Stan- wood, Iowa, and Clinton, Iowa: From Stanwood over U.S. Highway 30 to Clinton, and return over the same route* serving no intermediate points; (28) between Cleveland, Ohio, and Canton, Ohio: From Cleveland over U.S. Highway 422 to junction Ohio Highway 8.

Thence over Ohio Highway 8 to Canton* and return over the same route, serving the intermediate points of Shaker Heights, Warrensville, Bedford, Northfield, Boston Heights, Uniontown, Greentown, and North Canton, Ohio, and the off-route points of Louisville and Alliance, Ohio; (29) between Cleveland, Ohio, and Edinburg, Ohio: From Cleveland over Ohio Highway 14 to Edinburg, and return over the same route, serving the intermediate points of Maple Heights, Bedford, and Ravenna, Ohio; (30) between Cleveland, Ohio, and junction U.S. Highway 422 and Ohio Highway 91: From Cleveland over U.S. Highway 422 to junction Ohio Highway 91, and return over the same route, serving the intermediate point of Shaker Heights, Ohio; (31) between Akron, Ohio, and junction Ohio Highway 91 and U.S. Highway 20 near Willoughby, Ohio: From Akron over Ohio Highway 91 to junction U.S. Highway 322, thence over U.S. Highway 322 to South Euclid, Ohio, thence return over U.S. Highway 322 to junction Ohio Highway 91, thence over Ohio Highway 91, to junction U.S. Highway 20 near Willoughby, Ohio, and return over the same route, serving the intermediate p o in ts of T allm ad g e , Twinsburg, and South Euclid, Ohio; (32) between Massillon, Ohio, and Canton, Ohio: From Massillon over U.S. Highway 30 to Canton, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (3) between Canton, Ohio, and

junction New Jersey Highway 28 and U.S. Highway 1 near Elizabeth, N.J.: From Canton over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Pennsylvania Turnpike near Irwin, Pa., thence over Pennsylvania Turnpike to junction U.S. Highway 11, thence over U.S. Highway 11 to Harrisburg, Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 22 to junction unnumbered highway near Paxtonia, Pa.

Thence over unnumbered highway via Paxtonia, Manadahill, Grantville, East Hanover, Jonestown, and Fredericksburg, Pa., to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence over U.S. Highway 22 to junction unnumbered highway near Bethel, Pa., thence over unnumbered highway via Bethel and Strausstown, Pa., to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence over U.S. Highway 22 to junction unnumbered highway near Walbert, Pa., thence over unnumbered highway via Allentown, Bethlehem, Butztown, and Wilson, Pa., to Easton, Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 22 to junction unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 22), thence over unnumbered highway to Clinton, N.J., thence over unnumbered highway via Annandale, Lebanon, Pot- terstown, and Whitehouse, N.J., to junction U.S. Highway 22, thence over U.S. Highway 22 to junction New Jersey Highway 28, thence over New Jersey Highway 28 to junction U.S. Highway 1 near Elizabeth, N.J., and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (34) between Canton, Ohio, and junction U.S. Highways 322 and 1 near Chadds Ford, Pa.: From Canton to Harrisburg as specified in (33) above, thence over U.S. Highway 230 to Lancaster, Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Business Route U.S. Highway 30 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 30).

Thence over Business Route U.S. Highway 30 to Downingtown, Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 322 to junction U.S. Highway 1 near Chadds Ford, Pa., and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; Restriction: Routes (33) and (34) above shall be subject to restrictions as follows: (1) That carrier in operating over the Pennsylvania Turnpike shall handle only traffic which is moving between points in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and the metropolitan area of New York, N.Y., including Jersey City, Newark, and Elizabeth, N.J.,. on the one hand, and, on the other, points west of the Ohio- Iridiana State line and points in Ohio north of U.S. Highway 30 and Lima, Ohio, on U.S. Highway 30; or that which is moving between points south of Elizabeth, N.J., on the one hand, and, on the other, points west of the Illinois-Indiana State line, including Gary, Ind., and (2) that authority applicable to the two said routes shall continue only so long as carrier shall, by reason of other authority granted, be entitled or authorized to operate over other routes between the termini of the said above specified two routes; (35) between Chicago, 111., and Fort Wayne, Ind.: (a) from Chicago over U.S. Highway 12 to Michigan City, Ind., thence over U.S. Highway 35 to La Porte, Ind., thence over Indiana Highway 2 to South Bend, Ind., thence over


NOTICES 3149

U.S. Highway 33 to Fort Wayne, and return over the same route, (b) from Chicago over U.S. Highway 20 to junction U.S. Highway 421, thence over U.S. Highway 421 to Michigan City, Ind.

Thence to Fort Wayne as specified above, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points in (a) and (b) above; (36) between Fort Wayne, Ind., and Toledo, Ohio: (a) From Fort Wayne over Indiana Highway 37 to the Indiana-Ohio State line, thence over Ohio Highway 2 via .Hicksville, Ohio, to junction U.S. Highway 127 (formerly portion Ohio Highway 2), at or near Bryan, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 127 to junction unnumbered highway (formerly portion Ohio Highway 2) near Pulaski, Ohio, thence over unnumbered highway to junction Ohio Highway 2, at or near Stryker, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 2 to Toledo, and return over the same route; (b) from Fort Wayne to Hicksville, Ohio, as specified in (a) above, thence over Ohio Highway 18 to junction U.S. Highway 127, thence over U.S. Highway 127 to West Unity, Ohio, thence over unnumbered highway to Alvordton, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to junction Ohio Highway 120, thence over Ohio Highway 120 to Toledo, and return over the same route, (c) from Fort Wayne over U.S. Highway 27 to Waterloo, Ind., thence over U.S. Highway 6 to junction Ohio Highway 192, thence over Ohio Highway 192 to Bryan, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 127 to junction U.S. Highway 20, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to junction Ohio Highway 120, thence over Ohio Highway 120 to Toledo, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and the off-route points of Pioneer and Kunkle, Ohio; (37) between Chicago, 111., and Fort Wayne, Ind.: From Chicago over U.S. Highway 41 to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junction unnumbered highway, near Winona Lake, Ind., thence over unnumbered highway via Lorane, Ind., to Columbia City, Ind.

Thence over unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 30) to junction U.S. Highway 30, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Fort Wayne, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (38) between Chicago, 111., and Moline, 111.: From Chicago over U.S. Highway 34 to junction Illinois Highway 65, thence over Illinois Highway 65 to Aurora, 111., thence over Illinois Highway 31 to Oswego, 111., thence over U.S. Highway 34 to Princeton, 111., thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Briarbluff, 111., thence over Illinois Highway 84 to Silvis,111., thence over Illinois Highway 92 to Moline, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and the off-route points in the Davenport-Rock Island and Moline commercial zone as defined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557; (39) between Chicago, 111., and Bloomington, 111.: From Chicago over U.S.. Highway 66 to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 66, thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 66 to Gardner, 111., thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction unnumbered highway, near Dwight, 111.,

thence over unnumbered highway via Dwight, 111., to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction unnumbered highway, near Odell, 111., thence over unnumbered highway via Odell, 111., to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction unnumbered highway, near Pontiac, 111., thence over unnumbered highway to Junction U.S. Highway 66, thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction unnumbered highway, near Chenoa, 111., thence over unnumbered highway via Chenoa,111., to junction U.S. Highway 66.

Thence over U.S. Highway 66 to junction unnumbered highway, near Lexington, 111., thence over unnumbered highway to junction U.S. Highway 66, thence over U.S. Highway 66 to Bloomington, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (40) between Moline, 111., and Bloomington, 111., from Moline over U.S. Highway 150 to Bloomington, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and off- route points in the Davenport-Rock Island and Moline, commercial zone as defined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557; (41) between Sterling, 111., and Fulton, 111.: From Sterling over U.S. Highway 30 to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 30 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 30), thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 30 to Fulton, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (42) between Peoria, 111., and South Pekin, 111.: From Peoria over Illinois Highway 29 to South Pekin, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (43) between Chicago, 111., and Muscatine, Iowa: From Chicago over Alternate U.S. Highway 30 to Dixon, 111., thence over unnumbered highway via Prairieville, 111., to junction Alternate U.S. Highway 30, thence over Alternate U.S. Highway 30 to Sterling, 111., thence over Illinois Highway 2 to Silvis, 111., thence over Illinois Highway 92 to junction U.S. Highway 6, thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Davenport, Iowa.

Thence over U.S. Highway 67 to junction Illinois Highway 92, thence over Illinois Highway 92 to junction Illinois Highway 192, thence over Illinois Highway 192 via Taylor Ridge and Edgington,111., to junction Illinois Highway 92, thence over Illinois Highway 92 to the Mississippi River, thence across the Mississippi River to Muscatine, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, the off-route point of Grandview, Iowa, and those in the Davenport-Rock Island and Moline commercial zone, as defined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557; (44) between Milwaukee, Wis., and Buda, 111.: From Milwaukee over unnumbered highway to junction Wisconsin Highway 100, thence over Wisconsin Highway 100 to junction Wisconsin Highway 32, thence over Wisconsin Highway 32 to the Wisconsin- Illinois State line, thence over Illinois Highway 42 to junction Illinois Highway 173, thence over Illinois Highway 173 to junction U.S. Highway 41, thence over U.S. Highway 41 to Chicago, 111., thence over Illinois Highway 4A to Joliet, 111., thence over U.S. Highway 6 to junction

Illinois Highway 29 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 6), near Spring Valley, 111., thence over Illinois Highway 29 via Depue, 111., to junction unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 6), thence over unnumbered highway to junction U.S. Highway 6.

Thence over U.S. Highway 6 to Sheffield. HI., thence over unnumbered highway to Buda, and return over the same route, serving the intermediate points of Chicago and Zion, 111., Racine and Kenosha, Wis., and those between Chicago and Buda, 111., and the off-route points of Cudahy, Fox Point, Greendale, West Milwaukee, Shorewood, Wauwatosa, West Allis, and Whitefish Bay, Wis.; (45) between Moline, 111., and Des Moines, Iowa: From Moline over U.S. Highway 6 to junction Iowa Highway 90 (formerly portion U.S. Highway 6), thence over Iowa Highway 90 to Des Moines, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points and off- route points in the Davenport-Rock Island and Moline commercial zone as defined by the Commission in 41 M.C.C. 557, and those within twelve (12) miles of the Central Post Office, Des Moines, Iowa, except Altoona, Ankeny, Carlisle, and Norwalk, Iowa; (46) between Chicago, 111., and Milwaukee, Wis.: From Chicago over Illinois Highway 21 to junction Illinois Highway 83 (formerly portion Illinois Highway 21), thence over Illinois Highway 83 to the Illinois-Wisconsin State line, thence over Wisconsin Highway 83 to junction ‘Wisconsin Highway 75, thence over Wisconsin Highway 75 to junction Wisconsin Highway 20 near Beaumont, Wis., thence over Wisconsin Highway 20 to junction U.S. Highway 45, thence over U.S. Highway 45 to Durham, Wis., thence over Wisconsin Highway 36 to Milwaukee, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and the off-route points of Cudahy, Fox Point, Greendale, West Milwaukee, S h o r e w o o d , Wauwatosa, West Allis, and Whitefish Bay, Wis.; (47) between points in New York as follows: (a) From Buffalo over New York Highway 5 to Albany, and return over the same route; (b) from Batavia over New York Highway 33 to Rochester.

Thence over New York Highway 31 to Weedsport, and thence over New York Highway 3IB to junction New York Highway 5, and return over the same route; (c) from Herkimer over New York Highway 28 to Middleville, thence over New York Highway 29 to Johnstown, thence over New York Highway 30A (formerly New York Highway 148) to Fonda, and return over the same route; (d) from Oswego over New York Highway 57 to Syracuse, and return over the same route; (e) from junction New York Highways 5 and 78 over New York Highway 78 to Lockport, and return over the same route; (f) from Batavia over New York Highway 63 to Pavilion, and return over the same route; (g) from Utica over New York Highway 49 to Rome, and return over the same route; (h) from Albany over New York Highway 32 to junction New York Highway 7, thence over New York Highway 7 to


3150 NOTICESTroy, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points in (a) through (h) above; (48) between Buffalo, N.Y., and Batavia, N.Y.: Prom Buffalo over New York Highway 33 to Batavia, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (49) be* tween junction New York Highway 5 and New York Highway 365A, and Schenectady, N.Y..\ Prom junction New York Highway 5 and New York Highway 365A, near Oneida, N.Y., over New York Highway 365A to Oneida, N.Y.

Thence over New York Highway 365 to Rome, N.Y., thence over New York Highway 69 to Utica, N.Y., and thence over New York Highway 5S to Schenectady, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (50) between Toledo, Ohio, and Perrysburg, Ohio: Prom Toledo over U.S. Highway 25 to Perrysburg, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points;(51) between Kendallville, Ind., and Lagrange, Ind.: From Kendallville over U.S. Highway 6 to junction Indiana Highway 9, thence over Indiana Highway 9 to Lagrange, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points. Alternate routes for operating convenience only: (A) Between Chicago,111., and La Porte, Ind.: From Chicago over Illinois Highway 1A (formerly Illinois Highway 1) to junction U.S. Highway 6, thence over U.S. Highway 6 to junction Indiana Highway 2, thence over Indiana Highway 2 to La Porte, and return over the same route; serving no intermediate points, as an alternate route for operating convenience only;(B) between Des Moines, Iowa, and junction Iowa Highway 64 and U.S. Highway 30: Prom Des Moines over Iowa Highway 64 to junction U.S. Highway 30, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points as an alternate route, for operating convenience only;(C) between Vining, Iowa, and junction U.S. Highway 30 and unnumbered highway about 2 miles south of Vining:

From Vining over unnumbered highway to junction U.S. Highway 30, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points, as an alternate route, for operating convenience only;(52) between junction U.S. Highway 11 and Interstate Highway 83, located near Harrisburg, Pa., and Baltimore, Md.: Prom junction U.S. Highway 11 and Interstate Highway 83, located near Harrisburg, over Interstate Highway 83 to Baltimore, and return over the same route in connection with carrier’s regular route operations, serving no intermediate points, and serving junction U.S. Highway 11 and Interstate Highway 83 for purpose of joinder only; (53) between Chicago, 111., and junction Eden’s Expressway and U.S. Highway 41 somewhat north of Lake Avenue: From Chicago over Eden’s Expressway to junction U.S. Highway 41 and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points, but carrier may join or tack said authority over Expressway to authority held over U.S. Highway 41, but it is not to be construed as authorizing service a t any point not already authorized; (54) between Milwaukee, Wis., and junction

Illinois Highway 173 and U.S. Highway 41: From Milwaukee over U.S. Highway 41 to junction Illinois Highway 173, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points or termini except as otherwise authorized; (55) between Toledo, Ohio, and Cleveland, Ohio: From Toledo over Ohio Highway 120 to junction Ohio Highway 51, thence over Ohio Highway 51 to junction U.S. Highway 20 near Gibsonburg Junction, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 20 to Cleveland, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (56) between Sandusky, Ohio, and Medina, Ohio:

From Sandusky over U.S. Highway 250 to Norwalk, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 18 to Medina, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (57) between Bellevue, Ohio, and Elyria, Ohio: From Bellevue over Ohio Highway 113 to Elyria, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (58) between Cleveland, Ohio, and junction Ohio Highway 176 and unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 21), near Richfield, Ohio: From Cleveland over U.S. Highway 21 to junction unnumbered highway (formerly portion U.S. Highway 21), thence over unnumbered highway to junction Ohio Highway 176 near Richfield, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (59) between Akron, over Ohio Highway 18 to Edinburg, Ohio, thence over Ohio Highway 14 to the Ohio-Pennsylvania State line, near East Palestine, Ohio, thence over Pennsylvania Highway 51 to Pittsburgh, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; Alternate routes for operating convenience only: (A) Between St. Louis, Mo., and junction Interstate Highway 70 and the Pennsylvania Turnpike, near Irwin, Pa.:

From St. Louis over Interstate Highway 70 (also U.S. Highway 40) via Indianapolis, Ind., to junction Interstate Highway 70 and U.S. Highway 40 a t or near Washington, Pa., thence over Interstate Highway 70 to junction Pennsylvania Turnpike, and return over the same route, in connection with carrier’s authorized regular route operations over the Pennsylvania Turnpike, serving no intermediate points and serving the junction of Interstate Highway 70 to junction Pennsylvania Turnpike for purpose of joinder only, as an alternate route, for operating convenience only; (B) between Springfield, 111., and junction Interstate Highway 70 and the Pennsylvania Turnpike near Irwin, Pa.: From Springfield over U.S. Highway 36 tc Indianapolis, Ind., thence over Interstate Highway 70 (also U.S. Highway 40) to junction Interstate Highway 70 and U.S. Highway 40 at or near Washington, Pa., thence over Interstate Highway 70 to junction Pennsylvania Turnpike, and return over the same route, in connection with carrier’s regular route operations over the Pennsylvania Turnpike, serving no intermediate points and serving the junction of Interstate Highway 70 and the Pennsylvania Turnpike for purpose of joinder only, as an alternate route for operating convenience only. Restric

tion: Routes (A) and (B) above shall be subject to restrictions as follows:

(1) That carrier in operating over the Pennsylvania Turnpike shall handle only traffic which is moving between points in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and the metropolitan area of New York, N.Y., including Jersey City, Newark, and Elizabeth, N.J., on the one hand, and, on the other, points west of the Ohio-Indiana State line and points in Ohio north of U.S. Highway 30 and Lima, Ohio, on U.S. Highway 30; or that which is moving between points south of Elizabeth, N.J., on the one hand, and, on the other, points west of the Ulinois-Indiana State line, including Gary, Ind., (2) that authority applicable to the said routes shall continue only so long as carrier or its company affiliates shall, by reason of other authority granted, jointly be entitled or authorized to operate over other routes between the termini of the said above specified routes, and (3) that the authority granted herein is restricted to the movement of traffic which originates at or is destined to points west of Kansas City, Mo. N o te: Applicant states that he intends to tack the authority sought in this application to its presently held authority and also intends to interline with other carriers. Applicant also states that he seeks authority, in the above proposed operation, to delete from all of the operating authorities granted up to the present time, the exception which reads “those (commodities) of unusual value” and to add the following exception to those certificates which presently have the “commodities of unusual value” exception: “authority to transport such commodities except those which shipper requires carrier to furnish armed guards or armored equipment.” If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Denver, Colo., or Salt Lake City, Utah.

No. MC 4966 (Sub-No. 15), filed February^, 1966. Applicant: JONES TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, 111 Jones Avenue, Monroe, Mich. Applicant’s representative: Frank J. Kerwin, Jr., 1800 Buhl Building, Detroit, Mich., 48226. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, and except dangerous explosives, household goods as defined in Practices of Motor Common Carriers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in bulk, • commodities requiring special equipment and those injurious or contaminating to other lading), (1) between Fayette, Ohio, and Morenci, Mich., as follows: From Fayette, over U.S. Highway 20 to junction Ohio Highway 108, thence over Ohio Highway 108 to Morenci, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; and (2) between Fayette, Ohio, and Adrian, Mich., as follows: From Fayette, over U.S. Highway 20 to junction Ohio Highway 109, thence over Ohio Highway 109 to the Michigan-Ohio State line, thence over Michigan Highway 52 to Adrian, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points. N o te: If a hearing


NOTICES 3151

is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Detroit or Lansing, Mich.

No. MC 18088 (Sub-No. 43), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER COMPANY, INC., Post Office Drawer 8, Sycamore, Ala. Applicant’s representative: John W. Cooper, 805 Title Building, Birmingham, Ala. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, livestock, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment) , between the plantsite of Revere Copper & Brass, Inc., at or near Scotts- boro, Ala., on the one hand, and, one the other, points in Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and South Carolina. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Birmingham JU a.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 164), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Canned and preserved foodstuff, from Delphos and Van Wert, Ohio, and Hop- peston, HI., to points in Nebraska and Kansas. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, Minn.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 165), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOSLINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Dry animal and poultry feed and dry animal and poultry feed ingredients (except canned animal feeds) and insecticides in mixed loads with the commodities specified above, from Mount Vernon, Ind., to points in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee, and rejected shipments, on return. Note : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Nashville, Tenn.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 166), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOSLINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from points in Michigan, north of Michigan Highway 21, to points in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 167), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Lumber, millwork, roofing and materials and supplies used by roofing, building, and paving contractors, from points in Jackson County, Iowa, and points within ten (10) miles thereof, to points in Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Note : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

FEDERAL

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 168), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOSLINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from St. James and Madelia, Minn., to points in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, Minn.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 169), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOSLINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meat, and meat products, meat byproducts, dairy products and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A, B, and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Decatur, Detroit, and Plainwell, Mich., to points in Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Detroit, Mich.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 170), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOS LINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from Cleveland, Ohio, to points in Illinois (except Chicago and points in its commercial zone), Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Cleveland, Ohio.

No. MC 21170 (Sub-No. 171), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: BOSLINES, INC., 408 South 12th Avenue, Marshalltown, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Canned or preserved foodstuff, from Delphos and Van Wert, Ohio, to Hoopeston, 111. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Minneapolis, Minn.

No. MC 22229 (Sub-No. 39) (Amendment), filed August 30, 1965, published F ederal R egister issue of September 15, 1965, amended January 27, 1966, and republished as amended this issue. Applicant: TERMINAL TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC., 248 Chester Avenue SE., Atlanta, Ga. Applicant’s representative: Guy H. Postell, Suite 693, 1375 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Ga., 30309. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, livestock, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk and those requiring special equipment), (1) between Atlanta, Ga., and Detroit, Mich.; from Atlanta over U.S. Highway 41 (also over Interstate Highway 75) to Chattanooga, Tenn., thence over U.S. Highway 27 to junction Interstate Highway 75 at or near Lexington, Ky., thence over Interstate Highway 75 to Cincinnati,

REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY

Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 25 (also over Interstate Highway 75) through Dayton, Lima, Findley, and Toledo, Ohio, to Detroit and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points except Cincinnati, Ohio, for the purpose of interchange with applicant’s wholly owned affiliate Johnson Freight Lines Co., Inc., only: (2) Between Indianapolis, Ind., and Detroit, Mich.; from Indianapolis over Indiana Highway 37 to Fort Wayne, Ind., thence over U.S. Highway 24 to Toledo, Ohio, thence over Interstate Highway 75 (also over U.S. Highway 25) to Detroit and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points and serving Indianapolis, Ind., as a point of joinder with applicant’s presently held authority, only; (3) between junction U.S. Highways 127 and 24 (approximately 12 miles east of Antwerp, Ohio), and Jackson, Mich., over U.S. Highway 127, serving no intermediate points and serving the junction of U.S. Highways 127 and 24 for joinder only;(4) between junction U.S. Highway 30S and Interstate Highway 75 (at or near Lima, Ohio), and junction U.S. Highways 127 and 24 (approximately 12 miles east of Antwerp, Ohio); from junction Interstate Highway 75 and U.S. Highway 30S (at or near Lima, Ohio), over U.S. Highway 30S to Delphos, Ohio, thence over U.S. Highway 30 to Van Wert, Ohio.

Thence over U.S. Highway 127 to junction U.S. Highway 24 (approximately 12 miles east of Antwerp, Ohio) and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points and serving all junctions for the purpose of joinder only; (5) between Jackson, Mich., and Detroit, Mich., over Interstate Highway 94, serving the ^intermediate points of Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, Romulus, and Inkster, Mich., and the off-route points of Willow Run and Wayne, Mich.; (6) between Lansing, Mich., and Detroit, Mich.; from Lansing over U.S. Highway 127 to junction Interstate Highway 96 south of Lansing, thence over Interstate Highway 96 to Detroit and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (7) between Lansing, Mich., and Flint, Mich., over Michigan Highway 78, serving the intermediate points of East Lansing and Swartz Creek, Mich.; (8) between Detroit, Mich., and Bay City, Mich.; from Detroit over Interstate Highway 75 to junction Michigan Highway 13 (near Saginaw, Mich.), thence over Michigan Highway 13 to Bay City and return over the same route, serving the intermediate points of Troy, Pontiac, Flint, and Saginaw, Mich.; (9) between Midland, Mich., and Saginaw, Mich.; from Midland over Michigan Highway 47 to junction Michigan Highway 46 (west of Saginaw).

Thence over Michigan Highway 46 to Saginaw and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points; (10) between Midland, Mich., and Bay City, Mich., over U.S. Highway 10, serving no intermediate points; (11) between junction Michigan Highway 13 and Interstate Highway 75 (near Saginaw, Mich.) and junction interstate Highway 75 and U.S. Highway 10 (approximately 2 miles west of Bay City, Mich.), over

25, 1966

3152 NOTICESInterstate Highway 75, serving no intermediate points; and (12) between Jack- son, Mich., and Lansing, Mich., over U.S. Highway 127, serving no intermediate points. N ote; Applicant states that it intends to tack the above proposed authority with that authority previously granted in Certificate No. MC 22229, wherein applicant is authorized to serve points in the States of Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama. Applicant proposes to serve every point it is presently authorized to serve in MC 22229 and all subs thereto, except it does not propose to operate between the proposed territory, on the one hand, and, on the other, Chicago, HI., Indianapolis, Ind., and Cincinnati, Ohio. Applicant also proposes to serve any additional territory over and above that it is authorized to serve direct in the south through interchange with other carriers, and the same applies as to points beyond its proposed authority in Michigan by interchange with other carriers a t points in Michigan. The purpose of this republication is to add the above note. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Jacksonville, Fla., or Detroit, Mich.

No. MC 25869 (Sub-No. 59), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: NOLTEBROS. TRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office Box 7184, South Omaha-, Nebr. Applicant’s representative: Duane W. Ack- lie, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from the plantsite of American Home Foods, Inc., at or near La Porte, Ind., to points in Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Colorado. N o te: Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a place of hearing.

No. MC 30061 (Sub-No. 4), filed February 8, 1966. Applicant: JOSEPHBEDNER, doing business as JOSEPH BEDNER TRANSFER LINE, Sun Prairie, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Claude J. Jasper, 111 South Fairchild Street, Madison, Wis., 53703. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Water conditioners and materials, equipment and supplies used and useful in the production of water conditioners, between Madison, and Deerfield, Wis. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Madison, Wis.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 209), filed February 3,1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from Vineland, N.J., to points in Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. N ote : If a hearing is deemed neces

sary, applicant does not specify a location.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 210), filed February 3,1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 5000, 2125 Commercial Street, Waterloo, I o w a . Applicant’s representative: Truman A. Stockton, The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from Detroit, Mich., to points in Missouri, Tennessee, Iowa, and Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held a t New York, N.Y.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 211), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., 2125 Commercial Street, Post Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa, 50702. Applicant’s representative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Candy and confectionery, from Pewaukee, Wis., to points in Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Milwaukee, Wis.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 212), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., 2125 Commercial Street, Post Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa, 50702. Applicant’s representative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Tile, floor and wall, mastic, tools, equipment, and supplies, used in the installation of tile, floor or wall, from points in Carroll, Cuyahoga, Franklin, Muskingum, Stark, and Summit Counties, Ohio, and Cook (except points north of U.S. Highway 6), Grundy, and Kankakee Counties, 111., to points in Nebraska, South Dakota, and Iowa. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 213), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa. Applicant's representative: Truman A. Stock- ton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from Chickasha, Okla., to points in Indiana and Ohio. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held a t Dallas, Tex.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 214), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: Truman A. Stock- ton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting; Meats, meat products, meat "byprod

ucts and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix 1 to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except hides and commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles), from Salina, Kans., to points in Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hli- nois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia, restricted to traffic originating a t the plantsite of the Beverly Packing Co., at or near Salina, Kans. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Washington, D.C., or Kansas City, Mo.

No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 215), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: KROBLIN REFRIGERATED XPRESS, INC., 2125 Commercial Street, Post Office Box 5000, Waterloo, Iowa, 50702. Applicant’s representative: Truman A. Stockton, Jr., The 1650 Grant Street Building, Denver 3, Colo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Novelties, decorations, and party goods, from Shippensburg, Pa., to points in Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Colorado. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 49304 (Sub-No. 14), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: BOWMAN TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Post Office Box 6, Stephens City, Va. Applicant’s representative: Eston H. Alt, Post Office Box 81, Winchester, Va., 22601. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Lime and limestone products (except open hearth limestone), from points in Stonewall Magisterial District, Frederick County, Va., to points in Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey (except transportation of such commodities in bulk to points in Cumberland, Salem, Gloucester, Cape May, Atlantic, Camden, and Burlington Counties, N.J.), North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and points in New York, N.Y., commercial zone as defined by the Commission. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 50069 (Sub-No. 341), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: REFINERS TRANSPORT & TERMINAL CORPORATION, 930 North York Road, Hinsdale, HI., 60521. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Liquid chemicals, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Weston, Mich., and points in Raisin Township, Lenawee County, Mich., to points in niinois, Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 51146 (Sub-No. 32), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: SCHNEIDER TRANSPORT & STORAGE, INC., 817 McDonald Street, Green Bay, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Charles W.


NOTICES 3153

Singer, 33 North La Salle Street, Chicago, HI., 60602. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Cellulose materials, and products; cellulose materials and products joined to or combined with paper, plastics, synthetics, or cloth; sanitary paper and paper products; sanitary paper and paper products joined to or combined with paper, plastics, synthetics or cloth; materials, equipment and supplies used in the manufacture and distribution of the above described commodities; and related premiums and advertising materials when shipped with such products, between Cheboygan, Mich., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Boone, Cook, De Kalb, Du Page, Grundy, Iroquois, Kane, Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, La Salle, McHenry, Will, and Winnebago Counties, 111.; Adams, Allen, Benton, Blackford, Boone, Carroll, Cass, Clinton, De Kalb, Delaware, Elkhart, Payette, Franklin, Fulton, Grant, Hamilton, Hancock, Henry, Howard, Huntington, Jasper, Jay, Kosciusko, Lagrange, Lake, La Porte, Madison, Marion, Marshall, Miami, Newton, Noble, Porter, Pulaski, Randolph, Rush, St. Joseph, Starke, Steuben, Tippecanoe, Tipton, Union, Wabash, Wayne, Wells, White, and Whitley Counties, Ind.; Allen, Ashland, Ashtabula, Auglaize, Butler, Champaign, Clark, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Darke, Defiance, Delaware, Erie, Franklin, Fulton, Geauga, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry, Huron, Lake, Logan, Lorain, Lucas, Madison, Marion, Medina, Mercer, Miami, Montgomery, Morrow, Ottawa, Paulding, Preble, Putnam, Richland, Sandusky, Seneca, Shelby, Summit, Union, Van Wert, Wayne, Williams, Wood, and Wyandot Counties, Ohio; points in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Kentucky (in the Cincinnati, Ohio commercial zone). N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Washington, D.C.

No. MC 52110 (Sub-No. 92) filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: BRADYMOTORFRATE, INC., 1223 Sixth Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: Homer E. Bradshaw, 5th Floor Central National Building, Des Moines, Iowa, 50309. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from the plantsite and warehouse facilities of American Home Foods a t or near La Porte, Ind., to points in Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Minnesota. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 53965 (Sub-No. 49), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: GRAVES TRUCK LINE, INC., Salina, Kans. Applicant’s representative: John E. Jan- dera, 641 Harrison Street, Topeka, Kans., 66603. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61

M.C.C. 209 and 766, from points in Morgan and Logan Counties, Colo., to points in Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Missouri. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Denver, Colo.

No. MC 55236 (Sub-No. 124), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: OLSONTRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation, 1970 South Broadway, Post Office Box 1187, Green Bay, Wis. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except classes A and B explosives and household goods, as defined by the Commission), (1) between junction U.S. Highway 45 (formerly Wisconsin Highway 55) and Fond du Lac County Highway V, located at Eden, Wis., and junction U.S. Highway 45 (formerly Wisconsin Highway 55), located near Kewas- kum, Wis., over Fond du Lac County Highway V, serving the intermediate point of Campbellsport, Wis.; and (2) between junction U.S. Highway 45 (formerly Wisconsin Highway 55) and Wisconsin Highway 67, and Campbellsport, Wis., over Wisconsin Highway 67, serving no intermediate points. N ote : Applicant states that he is presently authorized to traverse the above outlined routes and to serve the intermediate point of Campbellsport, Wis., as sought in the above proposed operation, restricted, however, to the transportation of “Cheese, materials, supplies and equipment used or useful in the production of cheese.” If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Milwaukee, Wis.

No. MC 71743 (Sub-No. 9), filed Feb- bruary 2, 1966. Applicant: BELLM FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1819 North 17th Street, St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and those requiring special equipment), serving Beardstown, 111., as an off-route point in connection with applicant’s regular route operations. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., or Springfield, 111.

No. MC 72243 (Sub-No. 17), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: THE AETNA FREIGHT LINES, INCORPORATED, 2507 Youngstown Road SE., Post Office Box 350, Warren, Ohio. Applicant’s representative: James M. Burtch, Columbus Center; 100 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Heavy machinery, contractors’ equipment, and steel articles, fabricated beyond the primary stage and requiring specialized handling or rigging because of size or weight, between points in that part of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, and Wisconsin within 300 miles of Chicago, HI., including Chicago, except that service to and from Kenosha, Milwaukee, and Racine, Wis.,

is restricted against the transportation of steel articles; and (2) machinery, contractors’ equipment, and steel articles, fabricated beyond the primary state, which do not require special handling or rigging when moving in the same shipment or in the same vehicle with heavy machinery, contractors’ equipment, or steel articles which require specialized handling or rigging, between points in that part of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, and Wisconsin within 300 miles of Chicago, 111., including Chicago, except that service to and from Kenosha, Milwaukee, and Racine, Wis., is restricted against the transportation of steel articles. Note: Applicant states that it presently holds the authority in (1) above and is not requesting any extension of territory. Applicant states that it is seeking only an extension of authority in (2) above. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 75330 (Sub-No. 12) (Amendment), filed September 24, 1965, published F ederal R egister issue of December 23, 1965, amended January 21, 1966, and republished, as amended, this issue. Applicant: MORRIS DRAYING COMPANY, a corporation, 190 98th Avenue, Oakland, Calif. Applicant’s representative: Daniel W. Baker, 405 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities, (1) between San Francisco and Salinas, Calif.: From San Francisco over U.S. Highway 101 (also from junction U.S. Highway 101 and California Highway 82 at San Francisco, over California Highway 82 to junction U.S. Highway 101 at San Jose) to Salinas, (2) between Salinas and Monterey, Calif., over California Highway 68, (3) between Watsonville and Monterey, Calif., over California Highway 1, (4) between Redding and Kingsburg, Calif., from Redding over Interstate Highway 5 to junction with California Highway 16, over California Highway 16 to junction with U.S. Highway 99 a t Sacramento (also from junction Interstate Highway 5 and U.S. Highway 99E at Red Bluff, over U.S. Highway 99E to junction California Highway 20, thence over California Highway 20 to junction California Highway 65, over California Highway 65 to junction Interstate Highway 80, and thence over Interstate Highway 80 to junction U.S. Highway 99) and thence over U.S. Highway 99 to Kingsburg, (5) between Williams and Marysville, Calif., over California Highway 20, (6) between San Francisco and Sacramento, Calif., over Interstate Highway 80, (7) between Davis and Oroville, Calif., over California Highway 113 to junction California Highway 99.

Thence over California Highway 99 to junction California Highway 20, thence over California Highway 20 to junction California Highway 70, thence over California Highway 70 to Oroville, (8) between San Francisco and Stockton, Calif., over Interstate Highway 580 to junction Interstate Highway 205, thence over Interstate Highway 205 to junction


3154 NOTICESInterstate Highway 5, thence over Interstate Highway 5 to Stockton, (9) between junction U.S. Highway 40 near Fairfield, Calif., and junction U.S. Highway 99, near Lodi, Calif., over California Highway 12, (10) between Oakland and Oroville, Calif., from Oakland over California Highway 24 to junction Interstate Highway 680 a t Walnut Creek, thence over Interstate Highway 680 to junction California Highway 4, thence over California Highway 4 to junction California Highway 160, thence over California Highway 160 to Sacramento, and thence over California Highway 70 to Oroville, (11) between junction California Highway 4 and Interstate Highway 80, near Pinole, Calif., and Stockton, Calif., over California Highway 4, (12) between junction California Highway 33 and Interstate Highway 205, near Tracy, Calif., and junction California Highway 180, near Mendota, Calif., over California Highway 33, (13) between junction California Highways 33 and 180 and Fresno, Calif., over California Highway 180, (14) between Watsonville, Calif., and junction U.S. Highway 99, near Califa, Calif., over California Highway 152, (15) between Vernalis and Modesto, Calif., over California Highway 132, and (16) between Gustine and Merced, Calif., over California Highway 140, serving all intermediate points in (1) through (16) above, and points on and within twenty (20) miles of the described highways. N o te: Ap- licant states it does not propose to transport any shipments of the following:

(a) Used household goods and personal effects not packed in accordance with the crated property requirements, (b) automobiles, trucks, and buses, namely, new and used, finished or unfinished passenger automobiles (including jeeps), ambulances, hearses, and taxis, freight automobiles, automobile chassis, trucks, truck chassis, truck trailers, trucks and trailers combined, buses and bus chassis, (c) livestock, (d) commodities requiring the use of special refrigeration or temperature control in specially designed and constructed refrigerator equipment, (e) liquids, compressed gases, commodities in semiplastic form and commodities in suspension in liquids in bulk, in tank trucks, tank trailers, tank semitrailers or a combination of such highway vehicles, (f) commodities when transported in bulk' in dump trucks or in hopper type trucks, (g) commodities when transported in motor vehicles equipped for mechanical mixing in transit, (h) fruits, fresh or green (not cold pack or frozen) and vegetables, fresh or green (not cold pack or frozen), including mushrooms, fresh, when the point of destination is a cannery, accumulation station, cold storage plant, precooling plant or winery, and (i) metal cans or can tops, bottoms or ends.

The purpose of this republication is to more clearly set forth the proposed operations. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at San Francisco, Calif.

No. MC 84420 (Sub-No. 8) (Correction) (Amendment), filed January 10, 1966, published in F ederal R egister issue of February 3, 1966, amended and cor

rected February 9, 1966, and republished as corrected and amended this issue. Applicant: L & F GRANITE HAULING CO., INC., 42 Maywood Avenue, Hamburg, N.Y. Applicant’s representative: William J. Hirsch, 43 Niagara Street, Buffalo, N.Y., 14202. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Granite, g r a n i t e monuments, marble, marble monuments, stone, and stone monuments, from Buffalo and Hamburg, N.Y., to points in that part of Pennsylvania on and bounded by U.S. Highway 15 commencing at the New York-Pennsylvania State line, thence over U.S. Highway 15 to junction U.S. Highway 6, thence over U.S. Highway 6 to junction U.S. Highway 62, thence over U.S. Highway 62 to the Pennsylvania- Ohio State line, thence north to Lake Erie, and returned shipments of the above commodities on return. N ote: Applicant states that he intends to tack the above proposed operation with authority presently held. The purpose of this republication is to correctly identify the destination territory and to indicate applicant’s intention to tack the above proposed authority with that presently held. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Buffalo, N.Y.

No. MC 87720 (Sub-No. 48), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: HASS TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., Star Route A, Old Croton Road, Flemington,N.J. Applicant’s representative: B e r t Collins, 140 Cedar Street, New York 6, N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Poly vinyl chloride, dry, in bulk, in tank or hopper vehicle, from Pottstown, Pa., to Trenton, N.J. Restriction: Proposed service will be performed under contract with American Biltrite Rubber Co., Inc. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 92983 (Sub-No. 494), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: ELDON MILLER, INC., Post Office Drawer 617, Kansas City, Mo., 54141. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Acids and chemicals, in bulk, from points in Colorado, to points in Oklahoma and Texas. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Kansas City, Mo.

No. MC 103017 (Sub-No. 21), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: MERCURY MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., 954 Hersey Street, St. Paul, Minn. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, livestock, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and those requiring special equipment), serving the terminal site of Cooper-Jarrett, Inc., on Frontage Road (formerly old U.S. Highway 66) and now parallel to new U.S. Highway 66 and Interstate Highway 55, approximately one-half mile west of County Line Road, in an unincorporated portion of Du Page County, 111., as an

off-route point, in connection with applicant’s regular route operations, for purpose of interchanging of traffic at said terminal site. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, HI.

No. MC 103066 (Sub-No. 22), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: STONETRUCKING COMPANY, a corporation, Post Office Box 2014, Tulsa, Okla. Applicant’s representative: W. T. Brunson, 419 Northwest Sixth Street, Oklahoma City, Okla. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Plastic conduit, pipe or tubing, with or without valves or fittings, compound, joint sealer, bonding cement, primer, coating, thinner and accessories used in the installation of such conduit, pipe or tubing, from the Oklahoma Ordnance Works (Mayes County), Okla., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hlinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and South Dakota. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Oklahoma City or Tulsa, Okla., Dallas or Houston, Tex., or Kansas City, Mo.

No. MC 103191 (Sub-No. 19), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: THE GEO. A. RHEMAN CO., INC., Post Office Box 2095, Station A, Charleston, S.C. Applicant’s representative: Frank A. Graham, Jr., 707 Security Federal Building, Columbia, S.C. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Alum, in bulk, frpm points in York County, S.C., to points in Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Columbia, S.C.

No. MC 103435 (Sub-No. 173), (Amendment), filed December 13, 1965, published in F ederal R egister, issue of February 10, 1966, amended, and republished as amended this issue. Applicant : UNITED-BUCKINGHAM F R E I G H T LINES, a corporation, East 915 Spring- field Avenue, Spokane, Wash. Applicant’s representative: George R. LaBis- soniere, 533 Central Building, Seattle, Wash., 98104. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Commodities which, because of size or weight, require the use of special equipment, (1) between points in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana; and (2) between points in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in California, Nevada, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Colorado. N ote : Applicant states that it intends to tack authority as sought under the second part of the application with authority already existing and authorized in applicant’s existing certificates, the same being contained in Docket MC 103435 (Sub-Nos. 30, 32, 39, and 89), which authorities already authorize commodities which, because of size or weight, require the use of special equipment between points in Wyoming,


NOTICES 3155

North Dakota, South Dakota, and Montana, The purpose of the above amendment is restrictive in nature and is a reduction from the application as originally filed in that it seeks authority on a nonradial basis in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana; and, under the second part thereof, it seeks authority on a radial basis between the States named in the first part of (2) above on the one hand and the States names in the. second part of (2) above on the other hand. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Seattle, Wash.

No. MC 103880 (Sub-No. 354) (Amendment) , filed December 23,1965, published in F ederal R egister, issue of January 20, 1966, amended February 7, 1966, and republished as amended this issue. Applicant; PRODUCERS TRANSPORT, INC., 215 East Waterloo Road, Akron, Ohio. Applicant’s representative: Carl L. Steiner, 39 South La Salle Street, Chicago, 111., 60603. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Anhydrous ammonia, in bulk, from Joliet, 111., to points in Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, and Missouri. N ote : The purpose of this republication is to more clearly set forth the commodity description. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Chicago, 111.

No. MC 104523 (Sub-No. 36), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: WILLIAM HAROLD HUSTON, doing business as HUSTON TRUCK LINE, Friend, Nebr. Applicant’s representative: James E. Ryan,'214 Sharp Building, Lincoln, Nebr., 68508. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Mineral and high protein meals for livestock, from points in Brown County, Tex., to points in Kansas, Nebraska, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, M issouri, and Colorado. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr.

No. MC 106400 (Sub-No. 63), filed February 2,1966. Applicant: KAW TRANSPORT COMPANY, a corporation, 701 North Sterling, Sugar Creek, Mo., 64054. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Wood River, 111., and points within 5 miles thereof, to points in Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Illinois. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., or Chicago, 111.

No. MC 106674 (Sub-No. 54), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: SCHILLI MOTOR LINES, INC., Schilli Building, East St. Louis, HI., 62201. Applicant's representative: Thomas F. Kilroy, 1341 G Street NW., Colorado Building, Washington, D.C., 20005. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Sugar and blends, mixtures and

products thereof, from Louisville, Ky., to points in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, and damaged, returned, and rejected shipments o f the commodities specified above, on return. N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Atlanta, Ga.

No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 285), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: HEARIN- MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s representatives: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006, and H. D. Miller, Jr. (same address as applicant). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Chemical solvents, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Baton Rouge, La., to points in California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 286), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: HEARIN- MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s representatives: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006, and H. D. Miller, Jr. (same address as applicant). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Liquid alum, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Naheola, Ala., to points in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and, Tennessee. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Birmingham, Ala., or Washington, D.C.

No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 287), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: HEARIN- MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s representatives: Harry C. Ames, Jr., 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006, and H. D. Miller, Jr., Post Office Box 1250, Jackson, Miss., 39205. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Benzene, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Cheek, Tex, and points within ten (10) miles thereof, to points in Mississippi. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Jackson, Miss., or Baton Rouge, La.

No. MC 107286 (Sub-No. 18) (Amendment), filed January 5, 1966, published F ederal R egister issue of January 27, 1966, amended February 2, 1966, and republished as amended" this issue. Applicant: M. PASCALE TRUCKING, INC., 8-10 Rice Street, South Attleboro, Mass., 02774. Applicant’s representative: Russell B. Cumett, 36 Circuit Drive, Edge- wood Station, Providence, R.I., 02905. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Brick and tile, in vehicles equipped with mechanical loading and unloading devices, between Attleboro, Mass., and points in Massa

chusetts and Rhode Island. N ote: The purpose of this republication is to clearly set forth the authority sought. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Providence, R.I.

No. MC 108676 (Sub-No. 15), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: A. J. METLER HAULING AND RIGGING, INC., 117 Chicamauga Avenue NE., Knoxville, Tenn. Applicant’s representative: Robert M. Pearce, Central Building, 1033 State Street, Bowling Green, Ky. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Iron and steel, and iron and steel articles, between points in Tennessee on and east of U.S. Highway 127, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, West Virginia, and South Carolina. N o te: Applicant states it intends to tack the proposed authority with its present authority in MC 108676 and MC 108676 Subs 10 and 14 wherein it is authorized to operate in the States of Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 108676 (Sub-No. 16), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: A. J. METLER HAULING AND RIGGING, INC., 117 Chicamauga Avenue NE., Knoxville, Tenn. Applicant’s representative: Robert M. Pearce, 1033 State Street, Bowling Green, Ky. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Commodities which because of size or weight require the use of special equipment or handling, (2) commodities which because of size or weight do not require the use of special equipment or handling moving in the same shipment or same vehicle with commodities which because of size or weight require the use of special equipment or handling, between Knoxville, Tenn., and points within 75 miles of Knoxville, Tenn., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. N o te: Applicant states it intends to tack the above proposed authority with that authority previously granted in MC 108676 and Subs 10 and 14. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Knoxville, Tenn.

No. MC 108859 (Sub-No. 43) . filed February 11, 1966. Applicant: CLAIR- MONT TRANSFER CO., a corporation, 1803 Seventh Avenue North, Escanaba, Mich. Applicant’s representative: JohnL. Bruemmer, 121 West Doty Street, Madison, Wis., 53703. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by

No. 38------7FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3156 NOTICESthe Commission, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment, and those injurious or contaminating to other lading), serving the site of the Milwaukee County Council, Boy Scouts of America Camp, located approximately five (5) miles west of Wisconsin Highway 32 near Wabeno, Forest County, Wis., and the site of the Black- well Job Corps Conservation Center, Blackwell, Forest County, Wis., as off- route points in connection with applicant’s regular-route operations in Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Madison, Wis.

No. MC 109132 (Sub-No. 22), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: FREIGHT WAYS, INC., 1309 North Mosley, Wichita, Kans. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat "byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61M. C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk in tank vehicles), from Salina, Kans., and points within 5 miles thereof, to points in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, and Missouri, and points in Dane, Green, Jefferson, Kenosha, Rock, Walworth,, and Waukesha Counties* Wis. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Wichita, Kans.

No. MC 109136 (Sub-No. 28), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: ORIOLE C H E M I C A L CARRIERS, INC., 9722 Pulaski Highway, Baltimore, Md., 21220. Applicant’s representative: Maxwell A. Howell, 1511 K Street NW., Washington, D.C., 20005. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Liguid caustic potash, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plantsite of Diamond Alkali Co. at Delaware City, Del., to points in New Jersey, Maryland, that part of Pennsylvania on and east of U.S. Highway 220, that part of Virginia on and east of a line beginning at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extending along U.S. Highway 220 to and including Roanoke, Va., and thence along U.S. Highway 11 to the Virginia- West Virginia State line, that part of New York on, east, south and west of a line beginning at the New York-Pennsyl- vania State line and extending along New York Highway 34 to Waverly, N.Y., thence along New York Highway 17 to Binghamton, N.Y., thence along New York Highway 7 to and including Troy,N. Y., thence along U.S. Highway 4 to junction U.S. Highway 9, thence along U.S. Highway 9 to junction U.S. Highway 6, thence along U.S. Highway 6 to the New York-Connecticut State line, and the District of Columbia. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Washington, D.C.

No. MC 109475 (Sub-No. 4), filed J a n u a r y 17, 1966. A p p l i c a n t : CHARLES D. BRUCE, Jr., doing business as BRUCE CARTAGE COMPANY, 3460 East Washington Road, Saginaw,

Mich. Applicant’s representative: William D. Parsley, Union Savings and Loan Building, 117 West Allegan Street, Lansing, Mich., 48933. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: General commodities (except classes A and B explosives), (1) between Flint, Mich., and points in Bay, Saginaw, Tuscola, Huron, Sanilac, St. Clair, Lapeer, Genesee, Shiawassee, Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Livingston, Oakland, Macomb, Wayne, Washtenaw, Jackson, Gratiot, Ionia, Kent, and Calhoun Counties, Mich., (2) between Battle Creek, Mich., and points in Calhoun, Branch, St. Joseph, Cass, Kalamazoo, Eaton, Ingham, Jackson, Shiawassee, Clint, Ionia, Kent, Ottawa, Allegan, and Genesee Counties, Mich., and (3) between Grand Rapids, Mich., and points in Kent, Ottawa, Muskegon, Montcalm, Ionia, Gratiot, Clinton, Ingham, Eaton, Calhoun, Kalamazoo, Allegan, Shiawassee, and Genesee Counties, Mich. N ote : Applicant states the service by motor vehicle shall be limited to service which is auxiliary to or supplemental of rail service of Grand Truck Western Railroad and all shipments shall move on a through bill of lading involving an immediately prior or subsequent movement by rail. Carrier shall not serve any point not a station on the rail line of the railroad. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Lansing, Mich.

No. MC 110264 (Sub-No. 33), filed January 26, 1966. Applicant: ALBUQUERQUE PHOENIX EXPRESS, INC., 4500 McLeod Road, NE., Post Office Box 404, Albuquerque, N. Mex. Applicant’s representative: Paul F. Sullivan, 1341 G Street NW., Colorado Building, Suite 913, Washington, D.C., 20005. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment), (1) between El Paso, Tex., and Tularosa, N. Mex.: From El Paso over U.S. Highway 54 to Tularosa, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points and the off-route point of Ruidoso, N. Mex.; (2) serving points in New Mexico located east of U.S. Highway 285 within 30 miles of Carlsbad, N. Mex., as off-route points in connection with applicant’s presently authorized regular route operations; (3) between Tularosa, N. Mex., and Vaughn, N. Mex.: From Tularosa over U.S. Highway 54 to Vaughn, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points; (4) between Alamogordo, N. Mex., and Artesia, N. Mex.: From Alamogordo over U.S. Highway 54 to junction New Mexico Highway 83, thence over New Mexico Highway 83 to Artesia, and return over the same route, serving aH intermediate points, and the site of the U.S. Government Solar Furnace located approximately 3.5 miles north of Cloudcrouft, N. Mex., as an off-route point; and (5) between Oro Grande, N. Mex., and the

White Sands Missile Range, N. Mex., from Oro Grande over unnumbered highway to the White Sands Missile Range, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points. N o te: Applicant states no duplicating authority sought. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Roswell, N. Mex.

No. MC 110505 (Sub-No. 66), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: RINGLE TRANSPORT, INC., 405 South Grant Avenue, Fowler, Ind. Applicant’s representative: Robert C. Smith, 620 Illinois Building, Indianapolis, Ind., 46204. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs (except in bulk, in tank vehicles), from the plantsite of American Home Foods Corp., La Porte, Ind., to points in Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Missouri, and Kentucky. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 768), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. Applicant’s representative: Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street NW., Madison Building, Washington, D.C., and Edwin H. van Deusen, 520 East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Coal tar pitch, dry, in bulk, in tank or hopper type vehicles, from Ironton, and Cleveland, Ohio, to points in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Washington, D.C.

No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 769), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. Applicant’s representatives: Leonard A. Jaskiewicz, 1155 15th Street NW., Washington, D.C., 20005, and Edwin H. van Deusen, 506 East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foundry facing, in bulk, from West Elizabeth, Allegheny County, Pa., to Bridgeport, Conn. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 110541 (Sub-No. 7), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: MARK E. YODER, INC., 41 Parkway, Schuylkill Haven, Pa. Applicant’s representative: Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front Street, Har r i s bu r g , Pa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Anthracite coal, in bulk in dump vehicles, from points in Carbon and Schuylkill Counties, Pa., to the plantsite of Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co., at Spelter, Harrison County, W. Va., and (2) bituminous coal, in bulk in dump vehicles, from points in Monongalia, Marion, and Barbour Counties, W. Va., to the plantsite of the New Jersey Zinc Co. in Palmerton, Carbon County, Pa.


NOTICES 3157

N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MG 110988 (Sub-No. 168), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Dry fertilizers, in bulk, in tank or hopper type vehicles, from the warehouse or storage facilities of Consumers Cooperative Associations, at or near Council Bluffs, Iowa, to points in Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Colorado, and South Dakota. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 169), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Animal fats, animal oils and vegetable oils, including products and blends of such commodities, from Chicago, 111., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Chicago, 111.

No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 170), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Wilmer B. Hill, Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Dry plastics, in bulk, in tank vehicles, and plastic lines, in mixed loads from Detroit, Mich., to points in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Detroit, Mich.

No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 171), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Corn syrup, liquid sugar, and blends and mixtures thereof, products of corn, such as corn starch, corn gluten feed, and corn gluten meal, from Elk Grove Village, 111., to points in Arkansas, Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, In diana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennes

see, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 172), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Starch, in bulk, from Hammond, Ind., to points in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, and Kentucky. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Chicago, HI.

No. MC 110988 (Sub-No. 173), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: KAMPO TRANSIT, INC., 200 Cecil Street, Nee- nah, Wis. Applicant’s representative: E. Stephen Heisley, 529 Transportation Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Fertilizer and fertilizer ingredients, in bulk, from Joliet, 111., to points in Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, and Missouri. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 111231 (Sub-No. 132), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: JONES TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Lubricating oils, petroleum lubricating products, proprietary antifreeze, alcohol compounds, carbon gum and sludge removing compounds, greases, core oils and compounds, and automobile chemicals and compounds, from Danville, 111., to points in Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Minnesota, Tennessee, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and the District of Columbia. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a location.

No. MC 111231 (Sub-No. 133), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: JONES TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except classes A and B explosives, livestock, household goods, and commodities requiring special equipment), between Conway, Ark., and site of Lock and Dam No. 8 on the Arkansas River, as follows: From Conway, over Arkansas Highway 60 to junction unnumbered access road and thence over unnumbered access road to site of Lock and Dam No. 8 on the Arkansas River, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a location.

No. MC 111231 (Sub-No. 134), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: JONES TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes,

transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value and except dangerous explosives, corpses, household goods as defined in Practices of Motor Common Carriers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment and those injurious or contaminating to other lading), (1) between Little Rock, Ark., and St. Louis, Mo., over U.S. Highway 67, serving Hoxie and Coming, Ark., for purpose of joinder only; and (2) between Little Rock, Ark., and junction U.S. Highway 62 and Arkansas Highway 135, located near Coming, Ark., as follows: From Little Rock, over U.S. Highway 67 to junction Arkansas Highway 14, thence over Arkansas Highway 14 to junction Arkansas Highway 39, thence over Arkansas Highway 39 to junction Arkansas Highway 1, thence over Arkansas Highway 1 to junction Arkansas Highway 135, thence over Arkansas Highway 135 to junction U.S. Highway 62, located near Coming, Ark., serving Jonesboro, Ark., for purpose of joinder only, as an alternate route, for operating convenience only, to be used in conjuction with applicant’s regular route operations. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that i t be held at Little Rock, Ark.

No. MC 111729 (Sub-No. 135), filed February 4, 1966. A p p l i c a n t : ARMORED CARRIER CORPORATION, 222-17 Northern Boulevard, Bayside, N.Y. Applicant’s representative: Russell S. Bernhard, 1625 K Street NW., Washington, D.C., 20066. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Commercial papers, business papers, records, and audit and accounting media, between points in Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb Counties, Mich., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Ohio (except Cleveland). N o te: Applicant is authorized to conduct operations as a nontract carrier in permit MC 112750 and subs; therefore, dual operations may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Detroit, Mich.

No. MC 112520 (Sub-No. 137) (Amendment) , filed January 21, 1966, published in F ederal R egister, issue of February 10, 1966, amended, and republished as amended this issue. Applicant: MCKENZIE TANK LINES, INC., New Quincy Road, Post Office Box 1200, Tallahassee, Fla. Applicant’s representative: Sol H. Proctor, 1730 American Heritage Life Building, Jacksonville, Fla., 32202. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Sulfuric acid, from Pierce, Fla., to Valdosta and Adel, Ga. N ote : The purpose of this republication is to add Adel, Ga., as a destination point. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C., or Jacksonville, Fla.

No. MC 113255 (Sub-No. 48), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: MILK TRANSPORT, INC., Post Office Box 2698, New Brighton, Minn. Applicant’s representative: Val M. Higgins, 1000 First National Bank Building, Minne-


3158 NOTICESapolis, Minn., 55402. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting : Cleaning, scouring and washing compounds, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from St. Paul, Minn., to Pisgah Forest, N.C. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, Minn.

No. MC 113336 (Sub-No. 82), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: PETROLEUM TRANSIT COMPANY, INC., Post Office Box 921, Lumberton, N.C. Applicant’s representative: James E. Wilson, 1735 K Street NW., Washington, D.C., 20006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Petroleum products, in containers, from Tampa, Fla., to points in Georgia, South Carolina,_ Alabama, and Mississippi, and refused, damaged, and rejected shipments, on return. N ote : Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Tampa, Fla.

No. MC 113362 (Sub-No. 103), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: ELLSWORTH FREIGHT LINES, INC., 220 East Broadway, Eagle Grove, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: Donald L. Stem, 630 City National Bank Building, Omaha, Nebr., 68102. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, packinghouse products, and commodities used by packinghouses, as described in appendix I, Ex Parte MC- 45, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles), from the plantsite of Geo. A. Hormel & Co., at or near Bureau, 111., to points in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, Iowa, Minnesota, and the District of Columbia. Restriction: Traffic restricted to that originating at the above named plantsite. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 113387 (Sub-No. 2), filed January 26, 1966. Applicant: SECURITY STORAGE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, a corporation, 1701 Florida Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., 20009. Applicant’s representative: Irving Abrams, 1776 Broadway, New York, N.Y., 10019. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Household goods, as defined by the Commission (including unaccompanied baggage) having a prior or subsequent movement in interstate or foreign commerce, between Washington, D.C., Alexandria, Va., and points in Arlington, Fairfax, Prince William, and Loudoun Counties, Va., and Anne Arundel, Howard, Prince Georges, Charles, and Montgomery Counties, Md., on the one hand, and, on the other, New York, N.Y., and Baltimore, Md., and points in the commercial zones of New York, N.Y., and Baltimore, Md. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 113463 (Sub-No. 6) (Correction), filed November 1, 1965, published in F ederal R egister issue of November 18, 1965, and republished as corrected, this i s s u e . Applicant: CONTRACT CARRIERS, INC., 830 Broadway NE., Albuquerque, N. Mex., 87102. Applicant’s representative: V. L. Brown, 606 Bank of New M e x i c o Building, Albuquerque, N. Mex., 87101. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Malt beverages, from Golden, Colo., to Hobbs, N. Mex., and empty malt beverage containers, on return. N o te: The purpose of this republication is to correct the docket number which was assigned MC 34865 Sub-No. 40 in error. The docket number should be MC 113463 Sub- No. 6. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Albuquerque, N. Mex.

No. MC 113678 (Sub-No. 235), filed February 8, 1966. Applicant: CURTIS, INC., 770 East 51st Avenue, Denver, Colo., 80216. A p p l i c a n t ’s representative : Duane W. Acklie, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Aninj.al, poultry, and fish feed, and feed ingredients, and supplements thereof (except in bulk, in tank vehicles), between points in Wyoming, Montana, Nebraska, Iowa, and Kansas, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New York. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Lincoln, Nebr.

No. MC 114106 (Sub-No. 50), filed February 8, 1966. Applicant: MAY- BELLE TRANSPORT COMPANY, a corporation, Post Office Box 573, Lexington, N.C. Applicant’s representative: William P. Sullivan, 1825 Jefferson Place NW., Washington, D.C., 20036. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over -irregular routes, transporting: Corn products and blends of com products and sugar, in bulk, from Greer, S.C., and points within 5 miles thereof to points in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. N o te: Applicant is also authorized to conduct operations as a contract carrier in Permit No. MC 115176 and subs thereunder therefore, dual operations may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Raleigh, N.C.

No. MC 114194 (Sub-No. 121), filed February 7,1966. Applicant: KREIDER TRUCK SERVICE, INC., 8003 Collinsville Road, East St. Louis, 111. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Syrups, sweeteners, blende thereof and corn products, from Clinton, Cedar Rapids, Keokuk, and Muscatine, Iowa, to points in New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, California, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington, and rejected shipments, on return. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo..

No. MC 115594 (Sub-No. 12) (Amendment), filed September 3, 1965, published F ederal R egister issue of September 29, 1965, amended February 4, 1966, and republished as amended this issue. Applicant: HOLLOWAY MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., Piedmont Highway, East Gadsden, Ala. Applicant’s representative: John W. Cooper, 805 Title Building, Birmingham, Ala., 35203. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, (7) serving off-route points in Georgia enclosed by and including points or* the following boundaries: Beginning at the Alabama-Georgia State line, thence over U.S. Highway 78 to Atlanta, thence over U.S. Highway 41 to Marietta, thence over Georgia Highway 5 to the Georgia-Tennessee State line, thence in a westerly direction along the Georgia- Tennessee State line to junction Alabama-Georgia State line, thence in a southerly direction along the Alabama- Georgia State line to the point of beginning. N ote: The purpose of this republication is to add (7) above to the previous publication. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga., Birmingham, Ala., or Kansas City, Mo.

No. MC 115716 (Sub-No. 12), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: DENVER- LIMON-BURLINGTON TRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, 3650 Chestnut Place, Denver, Colo. Applicant’s representative: Edward C. Hastings, 330 Petroleum Club Building, Denver, Colo., 80202. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over a regular route, transporting: Classes A and B explosives, between Denver, Colo., and Colby, Kans., over U.S. Highway 24, serving all intermediate points. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Denver, Colo.

No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 128), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: W. J. DIG- BY, INC., Post Office Box 5088 Terminal Annex, Denver, Colo., 80217. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles) , from Billings, Mont., to points in Nevada, California, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Colorado. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Billings, Mont.

No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 129), filed February 1,1966. Applicant: W. J. DIG- BY, INC., Post Office Box 5088 Terminal Annex, 1960 31st Street, Denver, Colo., 80217. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Inedible packinghouse products, and packing^ house products unfit for human consumption (restricted against transportation of commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles), from Salt Lake City, Utah, to Crete, Nebr.; Lynn Center, 111.; Portland, Oreg.; and Los Angeles, Oakland,


NOTICES 3159

and San Francisco, Calif. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Salt Lake City, Utah.

No. MC 115876 (Sub-No. 8), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: ERWINHURNER, 2605 South Rivershore Drive, Moorhead, Minn. Applicant’s representative: Alan Foss, First National Bank Building, Fargo, N. Dak., 58102. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Dairy materials and supplies, (1) from Moorhead, Minn., to points in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Wisconsin; and (2) from Wyandotte, Mich., to points in Minnesota and Fargo, N. Dak. N o te: Applicant is also authorized to conduct operations as a common carrier in certificate No. MC 117148; therefore, dual operations may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Fargo, N. Dak.

No. MC 116014 (Sub-No. 24), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: OLIVERTRUCKING COMPANY, INC., North Bloomfield Road, Winchester, Ky. Applicant’s representative: Robert M. Pearce, 1033 State Street, Bowling Green, Ky., 42101. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Oil and greases, in drums and cases, from Bradford, Pa., and St. Mary’s, W. Va., to Paducah and Lexington, Ky. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 116073 (Sub-No. 57), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: BARRETT MOBILE HOME TRANSPORT, INC., 1825 Main Avenue, Moorhead, Minn. Applicant’s representative: Donald E. Cross, Munsey Building, Washington D.C. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Trailers designed to be drawn by passenger automobiles, in initial movements, in truck- away service, from Winchester, Va., to points in the United States, including Alaska, but excluding Hawaii. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a particular location.

No. MC 116628 (Sub-No. 7), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: SUBURBAN TRANSFER SERVICE, INC., Post Office Box 168, Rutherford, N.J., 07070. Applicant’s representative: Clarence D. Todd, 1825 Jefferson Place NW., Washington, D.C. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Such

•merchandise as is dealt in by retail department stores, and materials and supplies used in the operation of such stores, including packaging materials for such merchandise, between New York, N.Y., Stamford, and West Hartford, Conn., Carlstadt, Millbum, and Paramus, N.J., Philadelphia, Pa., points in Westchester County, and Long Island, N.Y., Boston, Mass., and the District of Columbia. Restriction: The operations authorized shall be limited to a transportation service to be performed under a continuing contract, or contracts, with Lord & Tay

lor of New York, N.Y. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Washington, D.C.

No. MC 116763 (Sub-No. 74), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: CARL SUB- LER TRUCKING, INC., North West Street, Versailles, Ohio. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from the plantsite and warehouse facilities of Ore- Ida Foods, Inc., near Greenville, Mich., to points in Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, and New Jersey. Restriction: The authority granted herein is restricted to the transportation of shipments originating at the said plantsite and warehouse facilities and destined to points in the States specified herein. N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Lansing, Mich. . ,

No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 339), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: WILLIS SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm Springs, Ark. Applicant’s representative: John H. Joyce, 26 North College, Fayetteville, Ark. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Foodstuffs, from Springdale, Ark., to points in Kansas, Missouri, Kentucky and to Alton, Cairo, Carbondale, Centralia, East Saint Louis, Eldorado, Granite City, Marion, Mount Vernon, Murphysboro, Staunton, Litchfield, Quincy, and Scott Air Force Base, HI.; and (2) foodstuffs and baby supplies, from Fort Smith, Ark., to points in Kansas, Missouri, Kentucky and to Alton, Cairo, Carbondale, Centralia, East Saint Louis, Eldorado, Granite City, Marion, Mount Vernon, Murphysboro, Staunton, Litchfield, Quincy, and Scott Air Force Base, 111. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Chicago, 111., or Little Rock, Ark.

No. MC 117165 (Sub-No. 22), filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: C. J. DAVIS, doing business as ST. LOUIS FREIGHT LINES, West Relief Highway US. 20, Michigan City, Ind. Applicant’s representative: Rex Eames, 1800 Buhl Building, Detroit, Mich., 48226. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Salt and salt mixtures and salt products with additives, from Midland, St. Louis, Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair and Manistee, Mich., to points in Kentucky. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Lansing or Detroit, Mich.

No. MC 118130 (Sub-No. 44), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEN HAMRICK, INC., 2000 Chelsea Drive West, Fort Worth, Tex. Applicant’s representative: M. Ward Bailey, 24th Floor, Continental Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., 76102. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meat, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk and tank vehicles), from

points in Adams County, Nebr., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas. N ote : Applicant states it proposes to transport exempt commodities, on return. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr.

No. MC 118130 (Sub-No. 45), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEN HAMRICK, INC., 2000 Chelsea Drive West, Fort Worth, Tex. Applicant’s, representative: M. Ward Bailey, 24th Floor, Continental Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., 76102. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meat, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses as described in Appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk and tank vehicles), from Schuyler, Nebr., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas. N ote : Applicant states it proposes to transport exempt commodities, on return. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr.

No. MC 118130 (Sub-No. 46) . filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEN HAMRICK, INC., 2000 Chelsea Drive West, Fort Worth, Tex. Applicant’s representative: M. Ward Bailey, 24th Floor Continental Life Building, Fort Worth, Tex., 76102. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from La Porte, Ind., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas. Note: Applicant states it proposes to transport exempt commodities, on return. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a location.

No. MC 118196 (Sub-No. 58), filed February 7,1966. Applicant: RAYE & COMPANY TRANSPORTERS, INC., Highway 71 North, Post Office Box 613, Carthage, Mo. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles), from points in Morgan and Logan Counties, Colo., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Denver, Colo.

No. MC 118288 (Sub-No. 8), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: STEPHEN F. FROST, 14750 Boyle Avenue, Fontana, Calif. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over


3160 NOTICESirregular routes, transporting: Bananas, and fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, and fresh berries, when moving in the same vehicle with bananas, from points in California, to points in Idaho north of a line running due east and west through Moscow, Idaho, and including Moscow, Idaho. N ote: Applicant states he proposes to transport exempt commodities, on return. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Los Angeles, Calif.

No. MC 118318 (Sub-No. . 11Y, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: EDA-CAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1798 Floral Avenue, Post Office Box 422, Twin Falls, Idaho. Applicant’s representative: Marvin Handler, 405 Montgomery Street, Suite 1401, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Such merchandises as is dealt in by wholesale, retail, and chain grocery and food business houses, and in connection therewith, equipment, materials, and supplies used in the conduct of such business, when moving to, from, or between such establishments, from points in California on and south of a line beginning at Fort Bragg, Calif., and extending along California Highway 20 to junction U.S. Highway 40, thence along U.S. Highway 40 to the California-Nevada State line, to Billings, and Great Falls, Mont. N o te: Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at San Francisco, -Calif.

No. MC 118318 (Sub-No. 12), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: IDA-CAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1798 Floral Avenue, Post Office Box 422, Twin Falls, Idaho. Applicant’s representative: Marvin Handler, 405 Montgomery Street, Suite 1401, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meat, meat products, and meat byproducts, as described in section A of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Billings, Mont., to points in California on and south of a line beginning at Fort Bragg, Calif., and extending along California Highway 20 to junction U.S. Highway 40, thence along U.S. Highway 40 to the California-Nevada State line. N ote : Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at San Francisco, Calif.

No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 152), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEAVER TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Fred H. Figge, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, Wis. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Animal and poultry feed, animal and poultry feed concentrates, and animal and poultry feed ingredients, between points in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Madison, Wis.

FEDERAL

No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 153), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BEAVER TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Fred H. Figge, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, Wis. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Food products, and materials, and supplies, and advertising matter, when moving in conjunction therewith, from Lancaster, Ohio, to Louisville, Ky., St. Louis, Mo., and points in Illinois, Indiana, and the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111.

No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 155), filed February 14, 1966. Applicant: BEAVER TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. Applicant’s representative: Fred H. Figge (same address as applicant). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, packinghouse products, and commodities used by packinghouses as described in Part A, B, C, and D of appendix I, in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, restricted against the transportation of hides, and commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles, from the plantsite of Geo. A. Hormel & Co., at or near Bureau, 111., to points in Minnesota and Wisconsin. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 119777 (Sub-No. 53), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: LIGON SPECIALIZED HAULER, INC., Post Office Box 31, Madisonville, Ky. Applicant’s representative: R o b e r t M. Pearce, Central Building, 1033 State Street, Bowling Green, Ky., 42101. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular r o u t e s , transporting : Ferro-chrome, ferro-chrome silicon, ferro-silicon, silico- manganese, ferro-manganese, s i l i c o n metal, and scrap iron, between Calvert City, Ky., and points in Delaware. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 119848 (Sub-No. 14), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: KENISON TRUCKING, INC., Post Office Box 324, 1975 South 1045 West, Salt Lake City, Utah. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Scrap iron, steel scrap metals and junk, and sewage sludge and sewage r sludge products, (1) between points in Utah and points in North Dakota; (2) between points in Utah and points in South Dakota; (3) between points in Utah and points in Minnesota; (4) between points in Utah and points in Montana; (5) between points in Utah and points in Idaho; (6) between points in Utah and points in Wyoming; (7) between points in Utah and points in Colorado; (8) between points in Utah and points in New Mexico; (9) between points in Utah and points in Nevada; (10) between points in Utah and points in Wisconsin; (11) between points in Utah and points in

ï, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY

Iowa; (12) between points in Utah and points in Illinois; (13) between points in Utah and points in Missouri; and (14) between points in Utah. N ote: Applicant is also authorized to conduct operations as a contract carrier in Permit No. MC 115504 and subs thereunder; therefore, dual operations may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Salt Lake City, Utah.

No. MC 120283 (Sub-No. 4), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: M A H RFREIGHT LINES, INC., 1439 Route Five, South Windsor, Conn. Applicant’s representative: Reubin Kaminsky, Suite 223, 410 Asylum Street, Hartford, Conn. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Brick, in flatbed equipment, equipped with mechanical loading and unloading devices, from the plantsite of Kelsey Ferguson Brick Co. a t Middleboro, Mass., to points in Connecticut, and refused, damaged, and rejected shipments on return. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Hartford, Conn.

No. MC 123048 (Sub-No. 81), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INC,, 1919 Hamilton Avenue, Racine, Wis. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Agricultural implements and farm machinery, from Verona, Wis., to points in Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee, and rejected shipments, on return. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Milwaukee or Madison, Wis., or Chicago, 111., respectively.

No. MC 123048 (Sub-No. 82), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, INC,, 1919 Hamilton Avenue, Post Office Box A, Racine, Wis. Applicant’s representatives Paul C. Gartzke, 121 West Doty Street, Madison, Wis., 53703. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Experimental and show display tractors, and farm and industrial machinery and equipment, which, at the time of movement, are being transported for purposes of display and experiment, and not for sale, and incidental paraphernalia, moving in the same vehicle and at the same time, and rejected shipments, between points in the United States (except Hawaii and Alaska). N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Madison, Wis., Chicago, 111., or Washington, D.C.

No. MC 123900 (Sub-No. 4), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: MARVIN SATENSTEIN and SAM PRAVDER, a partnership, doing business as WEST SIDE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, 75 Varick Street, New York, N.Y. Applicant’s representative: Bert Collins 140 Cedar Street, New York, N.Y., 10006. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Books, pamphlets, brochures, loose, in cartons, on skids and pallets; printed and unu printed paper, loose, on skids or pallets,

25, 1966

NOTICES 3161

(1) between Englewood Cliffs, N.J., on the one hand, and, on the other, West Nyack, N.Y., in an interplant or warehouse service for Prentice-Hall, Inc., (2) from West Nyack, N.Y., to New York, N.Y., points in Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties, N.Y., and points in Bergen, Passaic, Essex, Hudson, Union, Somerset, Middlesex, and Morris Counties, N.J., (3) from New York, N.Y. to Saddle Brook, N.J., and returned, rejected, and damaged shipments on return. Note: Applicant states the proposed operations will be under contract with Prentice-Hall, Inc., at a new location in West Nyack, N.Y. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at New York, N.Y. .

No. MC 123934 (Sub-No. 11), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: KREVDA BROS. EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 68, Gas City, Ind. Applicant’s representative: Donald W. Smith, Suite 511 Fidelity Building, Indianapolis, Ind., 46204. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Glass containers, from Knox, Parker, Marien- ville and points in Elk Township, Clarion County, Pa., to Des Moines, Iowa, and pallets and skids, on return. Note : Applicant has a pending common carrier application in MC 127705. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Indianapolis, Ind., Pittsburgh, Pa., or Chicago, HI.

No. MC 123934 (Sub-No. 12), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant:' KREVDA BROS. EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box 68, Gas City, Ind. Applicant’s representative: Donald W. Smith, Suite 511 Fidelity Building, Indianapolis, Ind., 46204. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motpr vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Glass containers, from points in Elk Township, Clarion County, Pa., to points in Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Kentucky, and St. Louis, Mo., and points in New York on and west of a line beginning at the New York-Pennsylvania State line and extending along U.S. Highway 11 to Binghamton, N.Y., thence along New York Highway 12 to Clayton, N.Y., and pallets and skids, on return. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Indianapolis, Ind., Pittsburgh, Pa., or Washington, D.C.

No. MC 124078 (Sub-No. 187), filed February 7,1966. Applicant: SCHWER- MAN TRUCKING CO., a corporation, 611 South 28th Street, Milwaukee, Wis., 53246. Applicant’s representative: James R. Ziperski (same address as applicant). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, from Memphis, Tenn., to points in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, m.

No. MC 124211 (Sub-No. 87), filed February 7,1966. Applicant: HILT TRUCK LINE, INC., 3751 Simmer Street, Post Office Box 824, Lincoln 1, Nebr. Au

thority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from points in Colfax County, Nebr., to points in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio. Note: Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held atfY in g Vi o W p h f

No. MC 124236 (Sub-No. 18), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL EXPRESS, INC., 3300 Republic National Bank Building, Dallas, Tex., 75201. Applicant’s representative: William D. White, Jr., 2505 Republic National Bank Tower, Dallas, Tex., 75201. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Cement, in bulk, from Douro (Ector County), Tex., to points in Oklahoma. Note : If a hearing is deemed necessary applicant requests it be held at DdllSiS Tex •

No. MC 124834 (Sub-No. 3), filed February 3, 1966. Appliant: COFFEETRANSPORT CORPORATION, 345 Butler Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. Applicant’s representative: George A. Olsen, 69 Ton- nele Avenue, Jersey City, N.J., 07306. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Frozen foods, and edible nuts (a) between Carl- stadt, N.J., and New York, N.Y., and (b) between New York, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey and (2) coffee, between New York, N.Y., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in New Jersey. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 125117 (Sub-No. 3), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: CLAUDE HAYES, doing business as BROWNING TRUCK LINE, Ohio and Washington Streets, Clinton, Mo. Applicant’s representative: Joseph R. Nacy, 117 West High Street, Jefferson City, Mo., 65101. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except classes A and B explosives, those of unusual value, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment, and those injurious or contaminating to other lading), (1) between points in the Kansas City, Mo.- Kansas City, Kans., commercial zone and Warsaw, Mo.; from points in the Kansas City, Mo.-Kansas City, Kans., commercial zone over U.S. Highway 50 to Sedalia, Mo., thence over U.S. Highway 65 to Warsaw, and return over the same route, serving aU intermediate points, and serving the off-route points of Ionia, Cole Camp, and Kaysinger Dam; and (2) between Clinton, Mo., and Lincoln, Mo., from Clinton over Missouri Highway 7 to junction Henry Comity Route C, thence over Henry County Route C and Benton County Route C to Lincoln, and return over the same route, serving no intermediate points. Note: If a hearing

is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Kansas City, Mo.

No. MC 125708 (Sub-No. 40), filed January 28, 1966. Applicant: HUGH MAJOR, 150 Sinclair, South Roxana, 111. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, hy motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Canned and processed foodstuffs, from Collinsville, HU to points in Iowa. Note: Applicant holds contract carrier authority in MC 116434 and subs thereunder, therefore dual operations may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Chicago, 111.

No. MC 125764 (Sub-No. 2), filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: LILAC CITY EXPRESS, INC., East 10222 4th Avenue, Spokane, Wash. Applicant’s representative: Donald A. Ericson, Suite 708, Old National Bank Building, Spokane 1, Wash. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Canned and bottled foodstuffs, from points in Solano and Santa Clara Counties, Calif., to points in Spokane County, Wash. Note: Applicant states it proposes to transport exempt commodities on return. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Spokane, Wash.

No. MC 125951 (Sub-No. 6), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: ERICKSON REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORPORATION, 6801L Street, Omaha, Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Frozen foods and potato products, not frozen, from Robbinsville, N.J., to points in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a location.

No. MC 125951 (Sub-No. 7), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: ERICKSON REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORP., 6801 L Street, Omaha, Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat byproducts, and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from Salina, Kans., to points in Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Ohio, Michigan, and Washington, D.C. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant did not specify a location.

No. MC 125951 (Sub-No. 8), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: ERICKSON REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORPORATION, 6801 L Street, Omaha, Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Foodstuffs, from Westfield, N.Y., and North East, Pa., to points in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and Wisconsin. Note: If a hearing is


3162 NOTICESdeemed necessary, applicant does not specify a particular location.

No. MC 126094 (Sub-No. 5), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: ARTHUR TROTZKE, Post Office Box 126, Farmers- burg, Ind. Applicant’s representative: Robert T. Lawley, 306-308 Reisch Building, Springfield, 111., 62701. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Unfinished lumber and scaled logs, for the account of National Lumber Co., between points in Kentucky, Michigan, and Indiana. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Springfield, 111.

No. MC 126724 (Sub-No. 6), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: DOBSON MILK TRANSIT, INC., Box 206, Orford- ville, Wis. Applicant’s representative: David J. MacDougall, One East Milwaukee, Suite 305, Janesville, Wis., "53545. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Dairy products, as described in section B of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, in shipper owned trailers, for the account of Bancroft Dairy, from Madison, Wis., to points in Florida. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Madison, Wis.

No. MC 127042 (Sub-No. 13), filed January 28, 1966. Applicant: HAGEN, INC., 4120 Floyd Street, Sioux City, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: J. Max Harding, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr., 68501. Authority sought ,to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meat, meat products, meat byproducts and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the Report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except hides and commodities in bulk in tank vehicles), from York, Nebr., to points in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. N o te: Applicant holds contract carrier authority in MC 115915, therefore dual operations may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, Nebr.

No. MC 127681 (Sub-No. 1), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: JOE JONES, JR., doing business as JOE JONES TRUCKING CO., 91/2 Ashby Street NW., Atlanta, Ga. Applicant’s representative: Glover McGhee, 1614 Fulton National Bank Building, Atlanta, Ga., 30303. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Candy, from Atlanta, Ga., to points in South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Washington, D.C., Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Ohio, Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, and Alabama; (2) defective, rejected and repossessed candy products, from points in the destination States specified in (1) above, to the plantsite of the Sophie Mae

Candy Corp., Atlanta, Ga.; (3) raw materials, necessary in the manufacture and shipping of candy (to include but not be limited to sugar, peanuts, coconut, corn syrup, packaging and shipping materials), from points in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Virginia, Arizona, and California, to Atlanta, Ga.; (4) dry chemicals, packaged in paper bags and drums, between the plantsites of Mayo Chemical Co., located in Smyrna and Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn.; (5) dry chemicals, packaged in paper bags and drums, from the plantsites of Mayo Chemical Co. in Smyrna and Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn., to customers of Mayo Chemical Co., located at points in the United States (excluding points in Alaska and Hawaii); (6) defective, rejected or repossessed chemical products, manufactured by Mayo Chemical Co., from customers of Mayo Chemical Co., located at points in the United States (excluding points in Alaska and Hawaii), to the plantsites of the Mayo Chemical Co. located in Smyrna and Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn.; (7) dry chemicals, manufactured, packaged in paper bags and drums, from suppliers of Mayo Chemical Co., located at points in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, and Texas, to customers of Mayo Chemical Co., located at points in the United States (excluding Alaska and Hawaii); and (8) dry chemicals, packaged in paper bags and drums, for reprocessing or manufacture of company chemical products, from suppliers of the Mayo Chemical Co. located in the origin States listed in (7) above, to the plantsites of Mayo Chemical Co., located in Smyrna and Dalton, Ga., and Chattanooga, Tenn. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Atlanta, Ga.

No. MC 127806 (Sub-No. 2), filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: BEERTRANSPORT, INC., 88 River Street, Bridgeport, Conn. Applicant’s representative: A. David Millner, 1060 Broad Street, Newark, N.J., 07102. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Malt beverages in containers (other than in bulk, in tank vehicles) and advertising materials and displays, from the plantsites of Rheingold Breweries, Inc., in New York, N.Y., and Orange, N.J., to West Hartford, Willimantic, Fairfield, Torrington, and Norwalk, Conn., and Medford, West Bridgewater, Framingham, Somerville, and Lawrence, Mass., and empty containers and pallets used for the transportation of such malt beverages, and returned and rejected shipments on return. N o te: Applicant states the proposed operations will be performed under a continuing contract with the Rheingold Breweries, Inc., Brooklyn, N.Y., and C. Carbone & Co., Somerville, Mass. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at New York, N.Y.

No. MC 127896 (Sub-No. 1), filed February 4,1966. Applicant: NEW JERSEY JEWELERS MESSENGER SERVICE,

INC., 1101 Kipling Road, Elizabeth, N.J. Applicant’s representative: Herpaan B. J Weckstein, 1060 Broad Street, Newark 2, N.J. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Jewelry, and materials and supplies used in the manufacture or repair of jewelry, sterling, and plated silverware, in packages or envelopes not exceeding 35 pounds, between points in New Jersey on and north of New Jersey Highway 526, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in the New York, N.Y., commercial zone as defined by the Commission in 1 M.C.C. 665. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Newark N.J.

No. MC 127899, filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: JAMES H. CHENEY, doing business as L. A. BOAT MOVERS, 1026 Cristobal Avenue, Wilmington, Calif., 90744. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Boats, between points in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties, Calif., the port of entry on the international boundary line between the United States and Mexico, located at Calexico, Calif., boat landings in Nevada, located on the shores of Lake Mead, boat landings on the- Arizona and Nevada shores of Lake Mojave, at or near Davis Dam, and Bullhead City, Ariz. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Los Angeles, Calif.

No. MC 127900, filed January 21, 1966. Applicant: GROOME TRANSPORTATION, INC., Richmond Byrd Airport, Sandston, Va. Applicant’s representative: M. B. Morgan, 201 Azar Building, Glen Burnie, Md., 21061. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: General commodities (except dangerous articles, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment, commodities contaminating to other lading, and household goods), between Friendship Airport, Glen Burnie, Md., Dulles Airport, Chantilly, Va., National Airport, Arlington, Va., Byrd Airport, Sandston, Va., Patrick Henry Airport, Warwick, Va., and Norfolk Municipal Airport, Norfolk, Va. N o te: Applicant states the proposed service to be restricted to freight having prior or subsequent movements by air, and to shipments received from or delivered to airlines or air freight forwarders at aforementioned airports, and further restricted to be applicable only on traffic moving on air bills of lading. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Richmond, Va.

No. MC 127901, filed January 24, 1966. Applicant: ELROY V. GRIFFIN, Highway 79 East, Paris, Tenn. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Clay and clay products, from points in Tennessee and Kentucky west of the Tennessee River to points in Virginia, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Kentucky, Missouri, Indiana, and Tennessee. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Paris, Tenn.


NOTICES 3163

No. MC 127902, filed January 26, 1966. Applicant: M. L. DIETZ, doing business as DIETZ MOTOR LINES, Post Office Box 757, Hickory, N.C. Applicant’s representative: H. Overton Hemp, Room 101, 327 North Tryon Street, Post Office Box 20202, Charlotte, N.C., 28202. Au-n. thority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: New furniture, from points in Alexander, Burke, Caldwell, Catawba, Lincoln, and Iredell Counties, N.C., to points in Alabama, and rejected, refused, and damaged shipments on retdrn. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Charlotte, N.C.

No. MC 127903, filed January 28, 1966. Applicant: H & M TRANSPORT CO., INC., Rudd, Iowa. Applicant’s representative: Clayton L. Wornson, 206 Brick and Tile Building, Mason City, Iowa. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Anhydrous ammonia, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Gamer, Iowa, and points within five (5) miles thereof, and Muscatine, Iowa, to points in Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant does not specify a location.

No. MC 127905, filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: LYNN H. SCOTT, 8533 Blossvale Road, Blossvale, N.Y., 13308. Applicant’s r e p r e s en t a t i ve : Herbert M. Canter, Mezzanine, Warren Parking Center, 345 South Warren Street, Syracuse, N.Y., 13202. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Sand, from the town of Annsville (Oneida County), N.Y. and the town of Fort Edward (Washington County), N.Y., to points in New York, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Syracuse, N.Y.

No. MC 127906, filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: HENRY A. BRUBAKER, 122 South Grant Street, Manheim, Pa. Applicant’s representative: John M. Mus- selman, 400 North Third Street, Post Office Box 46, Harrisburg, Pa., 17108. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Building materials, electrical and gas appliances, and equipment and parts, from points in Ephrata Township, Lancaster County, Pa., to points in Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey. N o te: Applicant states service will be performed under a continuing contract or contracts with the Wickes Lumber Co., Division of the Wickes Corp., Saginaw, Mich. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Harrisburg, Pa.

No. MC 127907, filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: RAYMOND CEARLEY, doing business as CEARLEY TRANSPORTATION CO., Kingsland, Ark. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,

transporting: Treated piling, treated ]bridge timbers, treated lumber and treated post, from Fordyce, Ark., to points in Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, Iowa, Illinois, Texas, and Arkansas. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Fordyce, Ark.

No. MC 127909, filed February 3, 1966. Applicant J. SUPOR TRUCKING CO., INC., 83 Charlton Avenue, Lodi, N.J. Applicant’s representative: George A. Olsen, 69 Tonnele Avenue, Jersey City, N.J., 07306. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Iron and steel bars, rods, sheejts, angles, plates, and structural steel, between Harrison, N.J., on the one.hand, and, on the other, Philadelphia, Pa., and points in New York. N ote : Applicant states the proposed operation will be performed under a continuing contract with Newark Steel Warehouse, Inc., Harrison, N.J. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C.

No. MC 127910, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: C.B.W. TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC., Post Office Box 48, Hedge Road, Wood River, 111. Applicant’s representative: Ernest A. Brooks II, 1301- 02 Ambassador Building, St. Louis, Mo., 63101. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes transporting: Petroleum products, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Wood River, 111., and points within five (5) miles thereof, to points in Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Georgia, Texas, and West Virginia. N ote: Applicant is also authorized to conduct operations as a contract carrier in Permit No. MC 115975, and subs thereunder; therefore, dual operations may be involved. Applicant states no duplicating authority is sought. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., or Chicago, HI.

No. MC 127912, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: RICHARDSON LUMBER CO., INC., Otter Creek, Maine. Applicant’s representative: V. Baker Smith, 2107 Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Building, Philadelphia, Pa., 19109. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: (1) Lumber, from Ellsworth, Rockwood, Wiscasset, and Ashland, Maine, and the port of entry on the international boundary line between the United States and Canada located at or near Champlain, N.Y., to points in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Long Island, N.Y., and (2) lumber, from the ports of entry on the international boundary line between the United States and Canada located a t or near Jack- man Station, Corburn Gore, and Calais, Maine, to points in Maine. N ote : Applicant states the proposed operations will be performed under a continuing contract or contracts with Philip Carchman, doing business as Salem Forest Products. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Washington, D.C. or Philadelphia, Pa.

No. MC 127913, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: BROADUS W. GOODE, doing business as GOODE MOTOR LINES, Route 3, Forest City, N.C. Applicant’s representative: Boyce A. Whitmire, Hendersonville, N.C. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Used automobiles, requiring special equipment, (1) from* Baltimore, Md., Philadelphia, Pa., and Washington, D.C., to points in Rutherford County, N.C., (2) from points in Rutherford County, N.C., to Bristol, Tenn., and (3) from Bristol, Tenn., to points in Rutherford County, N.C. N o te: If a hearing is. deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Charlotte, N.C.

No. MC 127918, filed February 2, 1966. Applicant; MARVIN R. SHOOP, doing business as ELMWOOD TRANSFER, 204 West Evergreen, Elmwood, 111., 61529. Applicant’s representative: John W. Murray, 1370 Frank Street, Galesburg, 111. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, and except classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined in Practices of Motor Common Carriers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment), (1) between Peoria and Gilson, 111.; from Peoria over Illinois Highway 8 to junction County Road (commonly called Gilson Corner), and thence over County Road approximately y* mile to Gilson, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and the off-route point of Peabody Coal Co., Edwards Mine, near Edwards, 111., (2) between Peoria and Victoria, 111.; from Peoria over U.S. Highway 150 to junction Illinois Highway 78, thence over Illinois Highway 78 to West Jersey, 111., thence over County Road to junction Illinois Highway 180, thence over Illinois Highway 180 to junction Illinois Highway 167, and thence over Illinois Highway 167 to Victoria, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, (3) between Peoria, 111., and junction Illinois Highways 180 and 167; from Peoria over U.S. Highway 150 to junction Illinois Highway 180, and thence over Illinois Highway 180 to junction Illinois Highway 167, and return over the same route, serving all intermediate points, and (4) between junction Illinois Highways 8 and 78 and junction U.S. Highway 150 and Illinois Highway 78, over Illinois Highway 78, serving no intermediate points, as an alternate route for operating convenience only, in connection with the proposed routes in (1), (2), and (3), above. N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Springfield, 111.

No. MC 127922, filed January 27, 1966. Applicant: NELLO PISTORESI & SON, INC., Hospital Road and Washington PSH 22 (Post Office Box 432), Toppenish, Wash. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Wood shavings, loose, or in bales or bags, and straw, loose, or in bales or bags, from points in Yakima and Kittitas Counties,

No. 38------8FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1966

3164 NOTICESWash., to points in Umatilla, Wallowa, Union, and Baker Counties, Oreg. N ote : Applicant states it proposes to transport ordinary livestock (exempt) , on return. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Yakima, Wash.

No. MC 127923, filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: CASE MOTOR CORP., 835 Lenox Avenue, Miami Beach, Fla. Applicant’s representative: Robert M. Mc- Closky, Suite 501, 350 Lincoln Road, Miami Beach, Fla. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Motor vehicles, with and without baggage, personal effects and pets in driveaway service, between points in Florida, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in the United States including Alaska but excluding Hawaii. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Miami, Fla.

No. MC 127924, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: EMIL BECKER, doing business as BECKER TRUCKING CO., 5482 Mill Creek Boulevard, Boardman, Ohio, 44512. Applicant’s representative: Richard H. Brandon, Hartman Building, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Slag, in bulk, in dump vehicles (1) from points in Lawrence County, Pa., to points in Columbiana, Mahoning, and Trumbull Counties, Ohio, and (2) from points in Mahoning and Trumbull Counties, Ohio, to points in Beaver, Butler, Crawford, Lawrence, Mercer and Venango Counties, Pa., and points in Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, and Onondaga Counties, N.Y. N o te: Applicant states that the operations will be conducted under contract with the Standard Slag Co., Youngstown, Ohio. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held a t Columbus, Ohio.

No. MC 127926, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: DEL VALLE EXPRESS CORP., 3133 Broadway, New York, N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: Household goods as defined by the Commission, (1) from New York, N.Y., to Hartford, Conn., as follows: From New York over Bruckner Boulevard to junction Interstate Highway 95, thence over Interstate Highway 95 to junction Interstate Highway 91, and thence over Interstate Highway 91 to Hartford, and return over the same route, serving the intermediate points of Stamford and Bridgeport, Conn.; and (2) between New York, N.Y., and Newark, N.J., as follows: Over city streets, through the Lincoln Tunnel to the New Jersey Turnpike, thence over the New Jersey Turnpike to Newark, N.J., serving the intermediate points of Jersey City and Union City, N.J. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at New York, N.Y.

No. MC 127927, filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: ROLAN D. FELLER, Zoar- ville, Ohio, 44698. Applicant’s representative: Richard H. Brandon, Hart

man Building, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Fertilizer, fertilizer materials, and agricultural insecticides, fungicides and herbicides, from Fostoria and Canton, Ohio, to points in that part of Pennsylvania on and west of a line beginning at the New York-Pennsylvania State line, thence along Pennsylvania Highway 46 to junction U.S. Highway 120, thence along U.S. Highway 120 to junction U.S. Highway 219, thence along U.S. Highway 219 to the Pennsylvania-West Virginia State line, including points on the specified highways. N ote: Applicant states that the above proposed operation is to be under a continuing contract or contracts with Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., of Oklahoma City, Okla. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests that it be held at Columbus, Ohio.

No. MC 127930, filed February 2, 1966. Applicant: WARRENVILLE CARTAGE CO., INC., Box 388, Warrenville, 111. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: General commodities (except livestock, household goods, appliances, explosives, and commodities of unusual value), between points in Winnebago, Boone, McHenry, Lake, Lee, Bureau, La Salle, De Kalb, Will, Du Page, Cook, Kankakee, Grundy, Livingston, Kendall, and Ogle Counties, HI., and Porter, and Lake Counties, Ind. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, HI.

M otor Carriers of P assengers

No. MC 1934 (Sub-No. 21), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: THE ARROW LINE, INC., 70 Florence Street, East Hartford, Conn. Applicant’s representative: Thomas W. Murrett, 410 Asylum Street, Hartford, Conn. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Passengers and their baggage when moved in the same vehicle therewith, in special round-trip operations, between New Haven and Water- bury, Conn., on the one hand, and, on the other, Suffolk Downs Race Track, Boston, Mass. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at New Haven, Conn.

No. MC 109148 (Sub-No. 20) (Amendment), filed October 5, 1965, published in F ederal R egister issue of October 21, 1965, as amended February 14, 1966, and republished as amended, this issue. Applicant: LAS VEGAS-TONOPAH-RENO STAGE LINE, INC., 917 Stewart Street, Las Vegas, Nev. Applicant’s representative: Richard R. Hanna, Post Office Box 648, Carson City, Nev. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting : Passengers and their baggage, in the same vehicle with passengers, in special operations, (1) between Las Vegas, Nev., and points within ten (10) air-line miles thereof, on the one hand, and, on the other, Hoover Dam, Ariz., and (2) between Las Vegas, Nev., and points within ten (10) air-line miles thereof, on the one hand, and, on the other, Grand

Canyon, Ariz. N o te: The purpose o f this republication is to more clearly set forth the territory description. I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Las Vegas, Nev.

No. MC 127822, filed December 13, 1965. Applicant: CHRIS T. DODSON AND DON LANDERS, doing business as MERCURY BUS LINE, a partnership, 1916 Oak Street, Lawton, Okla. Applicant’s representative: E. Mac Townsend, 121 North Ninth Street, Post Office Box 638, Frederick, Okla., 73542. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: Passengers and their baggage, and express, mail, and newspapers, in the same vehicle with passengers, from Lawton, Okla., to Frederick Okla.; from Lawton over Interstate Highway 277 to junction Oklahoma Highway 36, thence over Oklahoma Highway 36 to junction Oklahoma Highway 5, and thence over Oklahoma Highway 5 to Frederick, and return over the same route, serving the intermediate points of Faxon and Chattanooga, Okla., restricted against transportation of passengers and express between Lawton, Okla., and Chattanooga, Okla., and intermediate points, except traffic originating in Frederick, Okla. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Lawton or Oklahoma City, Okla.

A pplications for B rokerage L icenses

MOTOR CARRIER OF PASSENGERS

No. MC 12600 (Sub-No. 1), filed February 3, 1966. Applicant: HATTIE MAGDALENE KELVINGTON, doing business as KELVINGTON TOURS AND TRAVEL SERVICE, 108 South Walnut Street, East Palestine, Ohio. Applicant’s representative: Earl N. Merwin, 85 East Gay Street, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. For a license (BMC 5) to engage in operations as a broker at East Palestine, Ohio, in arranging for transportation by motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce of Passengers and their baggage, in special or charter operations, in round-trip tours, beginning and ending a t points in Columbiana, Mahoning, Jefferson, and Carroll Counties, Ohio, and extending to points in the United States west of the Mississippi River, including Alaska.

F reight F orwarder A pplications

No. FF—331 BEKINS MOVING & STORAGE CO. (Washington corporation) Freight Forwarder Application— filed January 14, 1966, amended February 9, 1966. Applicant: BEKINSMOVING & STORAGE CO., a Washington corporation, 9401 Aurora Avenue North, Seattle, Wash. Applicant’s representative: Floyd L. Newland, Suite 1210, 1411 4th Avenue Building, Seattle, Wash., 98101. Authority sought under section 410, Part IV of the Interstate Commerce Act to extend operations as a freight forwarder in interstate or foreign commerce, through use of the facilities of common carriers by railroad, express, water or motor vehicle in the transportation of used household goods only from points in Washington, Oregon, and


NOTICES 3165

Idaho, to points in the United States (including Alaska and Hawaii).A pplications in W h ic h H andling W it h out O ral H earing H as B een R equested

MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY

lio. MC 43421 (Sub-No. 32), filed February 4, 1966. Applicant: DOHRNTRANSFER COMPANY, a corporation, Post Office Box 1237, Rock Island, 111., 61202. A p p l i c a n t ’s representative: David Axelrod, 39 South La Salle Street, Chicago, 111. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting: General commodities (except those of unusual value, livestock, classes A and B explosives, household goods, as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment), serving the site of a terminal proposed to be constructed by Spector Freight System, Inc., located on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half (V2 ) mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, as an off-route point in connection with applicant’s regular route operations.

No. MC 5117 (Sub-No. 14), filed February 7, 1966. Applicant: VAN SOMER- EN TRANSFER, INC., Baldwin, Wis. Applicant’s representative: David Axelrod, 39 South La Salle Street, Chicago, 111., 60603. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular and irregular routes, transporting: Regular: (1) General commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, manufactured fertilizer, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and commodities requiring special equipment) , serving the site of a terminal proposed to be constructed by Spector Freight System, Inc., on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one- half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, as an off-route points in connection with applicant’s regular route operations. Irregular routes: (2) feed and grain, from the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, to Hammond, Woodville, and Spring Valley, Wis.; (3) farm machinery and twine, from the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, to points in the towns of Forest, Glenwood, Springfield, Cady, Eau Galle, Baldwin, Emerald, Cylon, Erin Prairie, Hammond, Rush River, Pleasant Valley, Kinnickinnic, Warren, Richmond, and Hudson, located in St. Croix County, Wis., not including the incorporated cities or villages of New Richmond, Glenwood, Wilson, Woodville, Deer Park, and Hudson.

(4) Empty containers, from Baldwin, Hammond, Woodville, and Roberts, Wis., to the site of the Spector Freight System,

FEDERAL

Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55; (5) manufactured fertilizer, from the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, to Baldwin, Wis., and points within 15 miles of Baldwin; (6) general commodities (except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment, and those injurious or contaminating to other lading), between points in the towns of Hammond, Rush River, Pleasant Valley, Warren, and Erin Prairrie, located in St. Croix County, Wis., on the one hand, and, on the other, the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55; (7) refrigerators, coolers, and cooling equipment, /rom River Falls and Roberts, Wis., to the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, and, (8) equipment, materials, and supplies used in the manufacture of the above specified commodities, from the site of the Spector Freight System, Inc., terminal on Minnesota Highway 49 in Egan Township, Dakota County, Minn., located approximately one-half mile south of junction Minnesota Highways 49 and 55, to River Falls and Roberts, Wis.

No. MC 127919, filed February 1, 1966. Applicant: ANDRE FISETTE, 405 St. Paul Street, Coaticook, Quebec, Canada. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Lumber, from the ports of entry on the international boundary line between the United States and Canada, at or near Norton and Derby, Vt., to points in Massachusetts and Vermont.

By the Commission.[seal] H . N eil G arson,


8:45 a.m.]

[Notice 135]

MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS

F e b r u a r y 21,1966.The following are notices of filing of

applications for temporary authority under section 210a(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act provided for under the new rules in Ex Parte No. MC 67, (49 CFR Part. 240), published in the F ederal R egister, issue of April 27,1965, effective July 1, 1965. These rules provide that protests to the granting of an application must be filed with the field official

REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 38— FRIDAY, FEBRUARY

named in the F ederal R egister publication, within 15 calendar days after the date notice of the filing of the application is published in the F ederal R egister. One copy of such protest must be served on the applicant, or its authorized representative, if any, and the protest must certify that such service has been made. The protest must be specific as to the service which such protestant can and will offer, and must consist of a signed original and six (6) copies.

A copy of the application is on file, and can be examined, at the Office of the Secretary, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., and also in the field office to which protests are to be transmitted.

M otor Carriers of P roperty

No. MC 61401 (Sub-No. 10 TA), filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: MARX TRUCK LINE, INC., Third and Plymouth Streets, Sioux City, Iowa, 51101. Applicant’s representative: R. W. Wigton, 710 Badgerow Building, Sioux City, Iowa, 51101. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Meats, meat products, meat byproducts and articles distributed by meat packinghouses, as described in sections A and C of appendix I to the report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61M. C.C. 209 and 766 (except commodities in bulk in tank vehicles), from Sioux City, Iowa, to points in Illinois (except Bushnell, Chicago, and Rochelle), Minnesota, and Wisconsin (except Madison and Milwaukee), for 180 days. Supporting shippers: Swift & Co., 115 West Jack- son Boulevard, Chicago, 111., 60604; Floyd Valley Packing Co., Sioux City, Iowa, 51107; Rasking Packing Co., Inc., Post Office Box 4, Stockyard Station, Sioux City, Iowa, 51106; Needham Packing Co., Inc., Sioux City Dressed Beef Division, 1911 Warrington Road, Sioux City, Iowa, 51107; Sioux Quality Packers, Inc., Post Office Box 25, Stockyards Station, Sioux City, Iowa, 51107. Send protests to: Carroll Russell, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, In terstate Commerce Commission, 304 Post Office Building, Sioux City, Iowa, 51101.

No. MC 100666 (Sub-No. 79 TA), filed February 16,1966. Applicant: MELTON TRUCK LINES, INC., Post Office Box 7295, Shreveport, La., 71107. Applicant’s representative: Max Morgan, 443 American Building, Oklahoma City, Okla. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Roofing and siding products, including materials and accessories incidental to the application thereof, from Camden, Ark., to points in Mississippi, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Allied Chemical Corp., Barrett Division, 40 Rector Street, New York,N. Y., 10006, F. A. Kwiatkowshi, traffic manager of Barrett Division of Allied Chemicals. Send protests to:. William R. Atkins, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, T-4009 Federal Office Building, New Orleans, La., 70113.

No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 357 TA), filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: ALTER-

25, 1966

3166 NOTICESMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., 2424 Northwest 46th Street, Post Office Box 458, Allapattah Station, Miami, Fla., 33142. Applicant’s representative: Ford W. Sewell (same address as above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Juices and drinks or "beverages (other than citrus), not requiring refrigeration, from Bradenton and Cocoa (Port Canaveral), Fla., to points in Ohio, Indiana, Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and Chicago, 111., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Tropicana Products, Inc., General Offices, Bradenton, Fla. Send protests to: Joseph B. Teichert, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, Room 1621, 51 Southwest First Avenue, Miami, Fla., 33130.

No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. 500 TA), filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: QUALITY CARRIERS, INC., 100 South Calumet Street, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, Wis., 53105. Applicant’s representative: Fred H. Figge (same address as applicant). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregulär routes, transporting: Textile softener, in bulk, in stainless steel insulated tank vehicles, from Clinton, Iowa, to Trion, Ga., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Clinton Com Processing Co., Clinton, Iowa, 52733, H. P. Hansen, assistant traffic manager. Send protests to: W. F. Sibbald, Jr., District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, 108 West Wells Street, Room 511, Milwaukee, Wis., 53203.

No. MC 126276 (Sub-No. 2 TA), filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: FAST MOTOR SERVICE, INC., 7521 West 62d Street, Summit, 111., 60608. Applicant’s representative: Robert H. Levy, 29 South La Salle Street, Chicago, HI., 60603. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting r (1) Metal containers, (a) from, the plantsite of Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., at St. Louis, Mo., to Chicago, 111., and Kenosha, Wis., (b) from the plantsite of Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., a t Chicago, 111., to St. Louis, Mo., and Berkeley, Mo., and (2) materials used in the manufacturing or shipping of metal containers, from Chicago, 111., to St. Louis and Berkeley, Mo., for 150 days. Supporting shipper: Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 9300 Ashton Road, Post Office Box 6208, Philadelphia, Pa.j 19136. Send protests to: Charles J. Kudelka, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, Room 1086, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 111., 60604.

No. MC 126480 (Sub-No. 3 TA), filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: EDWARD D. DUNN, Route 5, Salem, Ohio, 44460. Applicant’s representative: Jerome B. Greenbaum, 1836 Guardian Building, Detroit, Mich., 48226. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Vitreous enameling scrap iron, from Alliance, Salem, and Youngstown, Ohio, to De

troit, Mich., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: An a me t Corp. , 13460 Klinger Avenue, Detroit, Mich., Harold F. Moran, president. Send protests to: J. A. Niggemyer, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, 531 Hawley Building, Wheeling, W. Va., 26003.

No. MC 127935 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: ELIZABETH J. MOORE, doing business as AUTO DRIVEAWAY CO., 612 Americus Street, Gretna, La., 70053. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Automobiles (passenger), from New Orleans, La., to points in the United States (Excluding Alaska and Hawaii), for 180 days. Supporting shippers: United Detective Agency, Suite 371, Claiborne Towers, New Orleans, La., 70112; M. G. Maher & Co., Inc., Sanlin Building, 442 Canal Street, New Orleans, La., 70130. Send protests to: William R. Atkins, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, T-4009 Federal Office Building, New Orleans, La., 70113.

No. MC 127941 TA, filed February 16, 1966. Appl i can t : M. W. DALTON, ROBERT D. DALTON and MAURICE WAYNE DALTON, a partnership, doing business as M. W. DALTON & SONS, 709 E. Street, Hamburg, Iowa, 51640. Applicant’s representative: Martin & WCnger, Hamburg, Iowa, 51640. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over i r r e g u l a r routes, transporting: (A) Plastic pipe, plastic awnings and related plastic products manufactured in Hamburg, Iowa, from Ha mbur g , Iowa, to points in Illinois, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin, (B) dry fertilizer and dry feed (in bulk and in bags), from St. Joseph, Mo., to points within a 30-mile radius of Hamburg, Iowa, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: For (A) Crown-Line Plastics, ¡Inc., Hamburg, Iowa, for (B) Inter- State Nurseries, Hamburg, Iowa; Reid Grain Co., Hamburg, Iowa. Send protests to: Keith P. Kohrs, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, 705 Federal Offiee Building, Omaha, Nebr., 68102.

No. MC 127945 TA, filed February 16, 1966. Applicant: ROBERT JAMES MACHELL, doing business as MACHELL TRUCKING, Hargitt Road, Matsqui, British Columbia, Canada. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Lumber, from points in Washington to ports of entry on the international boundary line between the United States and Canada in the State of Washington, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Nicholson & Cates, Ltd., Post Office Box 160, North Vancouver, British Columbia. Send protests to: E. J. Casey, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, 6130 Arcade Building, Seattle, Wash., 98101.

No. MC 127946 TA, filed February 16 1966. Applicant: MARTIN ALAN, INC., Rural Route No. 4, Post Office Box 780, 13th and Ferguson Road, Fort Wayne’, Ind. Applicant’s representative: Robert W. Loser, 409 Chamber of Commerce Building, Indianapolis, Ind., 46204. Authority sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Film, flash lamps, photographic supplies, supplies used in the printing or reproduction industries, picture frames and similar decorative articles, and advertising literature and dealer aids moving therewith (excluding motion picture film used primarily for commercial theater and television exhibition), between the offices, laboratories, and facilities of Howard’s Photo Laboratories, Inc., and Howard Co., Inc., in or near Fort Wayne, Ind., Allen Comity, Ind., on the one hand, and on the other, points in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio, service to be limited to a continuing contract or contracts with Howard’s Photo Laboratories, Inc., and Howard Co., Inc., for 180 days. Supporting shippers: Howard Photo Laboratories, Inc., Ferguson Road, Baer Field, Fort Wayne, Ind.; Howard Co., Inc., 112 West Wayne Street, Fort Wayne, Ind. Representative: Charles W. Howard, president. Send protests to: Heber Dixon, District Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and Compliance, Interstate Commerce Commission, 308 Federal Building, Fort Wayne, Ind., 46802.

By the Commission.[ seal] H. N eil G arson,

Secretary,[F.R. Doc. 66-1995; Filed, Feb. 24, 1966;

8:47 a.m.]

[Notice 1304]MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER

PROCEEDINGSF ebruary 21, 1966.

Synopses of orders entered pursuant to section 212(b) of the Interstate Commerce Act, and rules and regulations prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179), appear below:

As provided in the Commission’s special rules of practice any interested person may file a petition seeking reconsideration of the following numbered proceedings within 20 days from the date of publication of this notice. Pursuant to section 17 (8) of the Interstate Commerce Act, the filing of such a petition will postpone the effective date of the order in that proceeding pending its disposition. The matters relied upon by petitioners must be specified in their petitions with particularity.

No. MC-FC-68349. By order of February 17, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to Robert Jeske, Glenwood City, Wis., of a portion of the certificate in No. MC-35113, issued October 4, 1965, to Harris M. Samb, Spring Valley, Wis., authorizing the transportation of: Agricultural commodities and livestock, from points in the towns of Glenwood and Springfield, St. Croix County, Wis., to South St. Paul, St. Paul,


NOTICES 3167

Minn., Hastings, Chaska, and Red Wing, Minn.; and general commodities, excluding household goods, commodities in bulk, and other specified commodities, from South St. Paul, St. Paul, Minn., Hastings, Chaska, and Red Wing, Minn., to points in the towns of Glenwood and Springfield, St. Croix County, Wis. A. R. Fowler, 2288 University Avenue, St. Paul, Minn., 55114, counsel for applicants.

No. MC-FC-68411. By order of February 17, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to Ricci Transportation Co., Inc., Pomona, N.J., of a portion of thfe certificate in No. MC-977, issued April 15, 1963, to Henry R. Tomkinson Associates, Inc., doing business as Henry’s Express, Egg Harbor City, N.J., authorizing the transportation of: Empty tin cans and equipment therefor, from Baltimore, Md., to Germania, and returned or rejected shipments, from Germania, N.J., to Baltimore, Md. Harry C. Maxwell, 200 Penn Square Building, Juniper and Filbert Streets, Philadelphia, Pa., 19107, counsel for applicants.

No. MC-FC-68416. Republication.1 By order of January 25, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to Orvan Tjeerdsma, Avon, S. Dak., of the operating rights in certificate Nos. MC- 4233 issued July 25, 1944, and MC-4233 (Sub-No. 1) issued February 4, 1960, to James A. Janssen, Avon, S. Dak., authorizing the transportation, over regular and irregular routes of: General commodities, except those of unusual value, classes A and B explosives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, commodities requiring special equipment, and those injurious or contaminating to other lading, between Avon, S. Dak., and Sioux City, Iowa, serving intermediate and off-route points in South Dakota within 20 miles of Avon. From Avon over South Dakota Highway 50 to junction U.S. Highway 77, thence over U.S. Highway 77 to Sioux City, and return over the same route. Household

1 Republished to include the operating rights in certificate No. MC-4233 inadvertently omitted from previous publication.

goods and emigrant movables, between Avon, S. Dak., and points in South Dakota within 20 miles of Avon, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Nebraska, Iowa, and North Dakota. Livestock and feed, between Avon, S. Dak., and Sioux City, Iowa, and points in Nebraska and South Dakota. Don A. Bierle, Law Building, Yankton, S. Dak., attorney for applicants.

No. MC-FC-68434. By order of February 17, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer - to Nello (Neil) Rocco, doing business as Rocco Trucking Co., Kearney, N.J., of the operating rights in certificate No. MC-34805, issued August 23, 1943, to Nello Rocco, Harrison, N.J., authorizing the transportation of : Steel building products, over irregular routes, from Harrison, N.J., to points and places in the New York, N.Y., commercial zone, as defined by the Commission in 1 M.C.C. 665, with no transportation for compensation on return. Frank P. Gelenitis, 205 Kearney Avenue, Kearney, N.J., 07032, attorney for applicants.

No. MC-FC-68456. By order of February 18, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to Marsh Motor Haulage, Inc., Elizabeth, N.J., of that portion of the operating rights of Display Movers & Storage, Inc., North Brunswick, N.J., in certificate No. MC- 48809, issued September 18, 1962, authorizing the transportation, over irregular routes, of household goods, from New York, N.Y., and points in Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania within 50 miles of New York, N.Y., to points in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, and from points in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, to Philadelphia, Pa., points in Connecticut, New Jersey, New York,

and those in a described portion of Delaware. Herman B. J. Weckstein, 1060 Broad Street, Newark, N.J., 07102, a ttorney for applicants.

No. MC-FC-68463. By order of February 17, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to Crossman’s Van & Storage Co., Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., of the operating rights in certificate No. MC-19806, issued October 4, 1960, to Lester A. Crossman, doing business as Crossman’s Storage, Philadelphia, Pa., authorizing the transportation, over irregular routes, of: Household goods as defined by the Commission, between Philadelphia, Pa., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Between points in that part of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland within 60 miles of Philadelphia, Pa., including Philadelphia. Between Philadelphia, Pa., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Maine, New Hampshire, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. Maurice Abrams, 1405 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pa., attorney for applicants.

No. MC-FC-68464. By order of February 18, 1966, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to George Deliantis, doing business as Deliantis Trucking Co., 40-12 25th Avenue, Long Island City, N.Y., of the operating rights in certificate No. MC-80727, issued August 2, 1957, to Deliantis Trucking Co., Inc., 40- 12 25th Avenue, Long Island City, N.Y., authorizing the transportation, over irregular routes, of: Household goods, between points in the New York, N.Y., commercial zone as defined by the Commission, on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island.

[seal] H. N eil G arson,Secretary.



3168 FEDERAL REGISTER

CUMULATIVE LIST OF CFR PARTS AFFECTED— FEBRUARYThe following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during February.

3 CFR PageP roclamation:

3212 (terminated by Proc.3703)---------------------------- 1295

3701 ------------- .--------------- 12313702 ___________________ 12653703 ----------------- 12953704 ------------------- 2811

E xecutive Orders :3406 (revoked In part by PLO

3924)-------------------------- 254810033 (amended by EO 11269) _ 2813 11269-------- 281311270- .---------------------------- 298911271— ----------------- 299111272-----------------------------__ 3111

P residential D ocuments O ther T han P roclamations and E xecutive O rders:

Letter of Jan. 29,1966_________ 2469Memorandum of February 16;

1966-------------------------------- 2993Statement of February 16, 1966_ 29955 CFR213—------ ------------------------------ 1233,

1270, 1271, 2373, 2471, 2583, 2645 2932,3069,3113.

338_______7136 CFR73________7 CFRili_______15________545556___ _____7081319_______401701709717 _718_______719 __722724

1237,728 1238, 1297, 2414, 2590, 2645730_775811_850________ _______ 2648851_ _905________906907_ 908 _910912 _913 __944 ....

970 _971 __

1068-------------------- --------- _____ 2696

7 CFR— C o n tin u e d PaseI486------------ 9.QRA1488____________Proposed Rules:

26 _319729__________813______ _905__________906_________967________991________992_________1003___________1012_________1013___________1016_______1033__________1034__ ______1063__________1067________1068_________1097_________1102________1106______1108________1138_________

8 CFR103________212______214________245____Proposed Rules :

214__________9 CFR51____________78_____________94__________304_____Proposed Rules:

312__________1 0 CFR

Proposed Rules:Ch. I________140___ ,____

1 2 CFR400 __________543________Proposed Rules:

581 ____582 ____

1 3 CFR107___ _112_____ _____ ----------2815113__________1 4 CFR 21_________39________

2422, 2649, 2650, 2681, 2887, 2927,’ 3015,3063,3064.

2002, 2422, 2423, 2650, 2651, 2717,

95___________

2473-2475, 2531,’ 2888, 3064, 3065 1269, 2002, 2583 2475, 2777, 2888

14 CFR— Continued page97-----------------------------2532, 2584, 2889157---------------------------------------- 1269221-----2-------------------------------- 2424225----------------------------------------- 2927295----------------------------------------- 2681370--------------------------------- 1298P roposed R u l e s :

I ---------------------------------- 2485I I ---------------------------------- 290321---------------------------------- - 248527------------------------------------- 248529---------------------- 248533------------------------------------- 248635---------------------------- 248739------------------------------------- 307867—----------------------------- 131271------------------------ 1312,

2436, 2437, 2488-2490, 2552, 2553, 2660, 2661, 2732, 2903, 2904 3078-3080.

73--------- ------------------- 2969, 308075------------------------------------- 2614

15 CFR8— --------------------------------------- 281716 CFR15_______________303 __________P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

301 _17 CFR231_________240__________241_______P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

240_249________259________274_________

18 CFR c 2________P r o p o s e d R u l e s : 2___________

14_________154_______

19 CFR 8_____________10___ _______13_____________'16___________24________25___________200__________ -------------- 2546P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

13____________20 CFR2 5 _______P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

405_________21 CFR

_________ 30032653, 3003, 3008

10---------------------------------------------- 300327----------------------------------------- 289651----------------------------------------- s u e

FEDERAL REGISTER 3169

21 CFR— Continued Page121_!_________________ - 1271,

2425, 2476, 2547, 2833, 2896, 2897,2960,3116.

130_____________________________ 2653146 _ 2653, 3003164_ _ _________________ 2653, 3003166_____________________________ 1239191___________________ 3003, 3116, 3117P roposed R u l e s :

45___ 3028130___________________ 2967

22 CFR502_______ 242624 CFR203___ _____________________ 2477, 2887213_____________________________ 2477234_____________________________ 247826 CFR1_____________31___ — ______251___________601____________P roposed R u l e s :

1__________28 CFRo_______________200__ _________29 CFR800____________1602-__________P roposed R u l e s:

60_________1508_______

30 CFR42____________400___________P roposed R u l e s :

221_____ —31 CFR203___________32 CFR41_________ __111___________553___________591 _______592 ______593 _______594 _______ _______ _______595 ______-599 ______600 ____ —602___________603___________606___________610___________1001__________1002____ ______1003_____ ____ _1004__________1006__________1007-1________1010__________1013__________1015 ______1016 ______1017 ______1018 ______1030__________1053__________,1054__________1057-_________1450__________1710__________

1271, 2427____ 2596____ 2377

2818

____ 3016

24273069

26572832

24363027

23782897

2614

2596

2887___ 2681___ 2834___ 2367___ 2368___ 2368___ 2369___ 2369___ 2370___ 2370___ 2370___ 2371___ 2371_ — 2371___ 2681____ 2684___ 2684___ 2685___ 2685___ 2686___ 2687____ 2687 ____ 2688___ 2688___ 2688___ 2688___ 26881303, 2688___ 2689___ 2689___ 2928___ 3121

32A CFR PageBDSA (Ch. V I):

BDSA Reg. 2, Amdt. 8_________ 3009M-11A _____ ________ 2657, 3009

33 CFR82__ —_______ ____ ____ —___ - 2427207__________________________ 2898303____________ 2898400________________________ 2778P roposed R u l e s :

1_______ ________________ 260266______________ __________ 260280____ — ____ — __ 2602, 312282 ____________ __________260290___________________ 2602, 312295___________________ 2602, 3122100___________ __________ 2602144_______________________ 2602

36 CFR501______ 259737 CFRP roposed R u l e s :

201_____________________— 261438 CFR3 278214 _ 2782, 305921____ ■;______________________ 301039 CFR17___________________________ 307333 ___________________ 311934 ______ - _____________ 311948 _____________________ 3074, 311951 312052 3119, 312053 ___ 312058___________________________ 312061___________________________ 3120112_____________ 2428114__________________________ 2428132 ____ 3120133 _____________________ 3121168__ 2428533___ 2429P roposed R u l e s :

46___ —__________________ 238461________ 2384

41 CFR5-3__________________________ 26895-6__________________________ 26895B-1______ 25975B-2_____ 25975B-16________________________ 260011-1__________ 2898101-25_______________________ 2471101-47_____ 265843 CFR19 ______ 301020 _________________ 25123320_________________________ 30133630_______________ 3013P ublic Land Orders:

509 (revoked by PLO 3932) ___ 2691 577 (revoked in part by PLO

3922)— — ______ — 2547684 (revoked in part by PLO

3922)___ 25471394 (revoked in part by PLO

3926)___________________ 25483263 (revoked in part by PLO

3934)___________________ 26923447 (revoked in part by PLO

3931)___________________ 26913485 (see PLO 3931)_____ 26913870______________________ 2380

43 CFR— Continued PageP ubl ic L a n d O rders— C ontinued

3875 (amended by P L O 3936) _ 26923921 ____________________ - 25473922 ______________ 25473923_._______________________ 25473924________________________ 25483925 ____________'.________ 25483926 ____________________ 25483927 ____________________ 25493928 ____________________ 25493929 ____________________ 25493930 ________ __________ 25493931 ____________________ 26913932 ____________________ 26913933 ________ ____________ 26923934 ____________________ 26923935 ____________________ 26923936 ____________________ 26923937 _;— _______________ 2692

45 CFR81______________________________ 130290_______________________________ 2900170______— ____________________ 2477801-_____________ 2657, 2693, 2902, 2928P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

85______________ ____________ 131246 CFR221___ __________________ — _____ 3015309___ __________________________ 1240P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

10________— ______ 2602, 2972, 312225______________________ — 260230__________________________ 260232 ________ ________ ________ — _____ ,________ 260233 ____ _______________ 260235__ _______________ — ______ 260238___________________________ 260240______________________ ____ 260270__________________________ 260272 ____________________ 260273 ____________________ 260275 ___________________ 260276 ____________________ 260277 ____________________ 260278 ____________________ 260290__________________________ 260292__________________ ________ 260294 ________ ________ _ 260295 _____ ^___________ 260296— _____________________ 260297 _________________ _ 260298 ____________________ 2602110____________________ ;____ 2602111____ ________ ____________ 2602113_________________________ 2602146_________________________ 2602157_________________________ 2602160_____________________ ____ 2602167__________________ _______ 2602173__________________ _______ 2602176_________________________ 2602181_________________________ 2602187_________________________ 2602

47 CFR0 ________________________ 30741 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 2549, 2600, 307419_______________________________ 272121_______________________________ 260073__ — __________________ 2932, 307591_______________________________ 255095— _______________________ 2551, 2600P r o p o s e d R u l e s :

1___ ________________________ 290473______ 2438, 2554, 2555, 2970, 308074— ______ ________________ 2904

3170 FEDERAL REGISTER

49 CFR0__7795_.136.205.

Page------2718___ 29501303, 2692___ 2380___ 3077

P roposed R u l e s :72 --- 301773 --------------------------- 301774 - 301777---------------------- 301795-97---------------------- 3081178------------_______ _ 2662, 2663191---------------------------------- 3081

50 CFR28------------- -------------------- 2383, 271732 --------- -------------------------------- 130333 ----------- 2383, 2551, 2583, 3014, 3117, 3118262_----------------------------------- - 2783P roposed R u l e s :

32________ 2784