Upload
independent
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS GREEN PRACTICES IN THE LODGING
INDUSTRY IN INDIA-2013
ABSTRACT
Purpose - The study explores the consumer attitude towards green
practices in the context of lodging industry and also assesses
their willingness to pay more for green hotels. The study also
assesses if there has been a change in consumer behavior towards
green practices since 2007 in India. The study also assesses
relationship between demographic variables and willingness to
pay for green practices. The study explores practices adopted
by hotels which influence consumers to stay in green hotels.
Design/methodology/approach- The study is an empirical work which
involves data collection from 131 consumers across India on green
practices in the context of lodging industry. The study builds
upon the earlier study conducted by the authors in 2007.
Findings- The study reveals that there is a shift in the consumer
mindset on paying for green practices in India. It has been found
that visible efforts undertaken by lodging firms in communicating
about green practices and also demonstrating tangible green
actions influences consumers willingness to pay more for green
practices.
Practical Implications- The findings imply that there is a
distinct segment of consumers who care for environment and also
seek to find more information. There is a substantial percentage
of consumers in India who are willing to pay for the green
practices. The lodging industry can take concrete steps which
would enable to attract more environmental conscious consumers
and also can adopt innovative strategies to communicate
information about green practices.
Originality/value-The paper brings in insights into consumer
behavior in the context of green practices adopted by the lodging
industry in India. It also traces the change in the consumer
behavior and willingness to pay for green practices since 2007.
The study shows shifts in the attitude and behavior in the
context of adoption of green practices and expectations from
industry as well.
Key words Green marketing, consumer behavior, environment,
lodging industry, India
Paper Type Research Paper
Introduction
As economies grow around the world, environment will become a key
concern globally for the businesses, society and governments. The
adoption of green practices across various businesses will become
increasingly important. Tourism sector specially lodging sector
is important as it is one of the largest employer as well as
million tourists travel on a yearly basis. According to an ILO
report, international tourism was affected by the global economic
and social crisis but is projected to grow significantly over the
coming decade (ILO Report, 2013). The United Nations World
Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) is expecting the sector‘s global
economy to provide 296 million jobs by 2019(ILO 2013). Long term
growth forecasts of 4.2% per annum growth over the ten years to
2023 are retained as demand from and within emerging markets will
continue to rise in significance. Travel & Tourism will continue
to grow, outpace growth of the wider economy and remain a leading
generator of jobs. (WTTC, 2013). Encouraging the development of
the Travel & Tourism (T&T) sector is all the more important today
given its important role in job creation, at a time when many
countries are suffering from high unemployment. The sector
already accounts for 9 percent of GDP, a total of US$6 trillion,
and it provides 120 million direct jobs and another 125 million
indirect jobs in related industries. This means that the industry
now accounts for one in eleven jobs on the planet, a number that
could even rise to one in ten jobs by 2022, according to the
World Travel & Tourism Council (Blanke and Chiesa,2013). Over the
past six decades, tourism has continued to expand and diversify;
it is now one of the largest and fastest-growing economic sectors
in the world. Many new tourist destinations have emerged
alongside the traditional ones of Europe and North America. From
1980 to 2011, international tourist arrivals (i.e., overnight
visitors) more than tripled worldwide, leaping from 279 million
in 1980 to 996 million in 2011, corresponding to an average
growth of 4.2 percent a year (Blanke and Chiesa, 2013).
Any initiative in this sector can have huge ramifications on the
environment and adoption of green practices as a way of life.
Green or eco friendly hotels refer to lodging establishments that
have made commitment to various ecologically sound practices such
as saving water, saving energy and reducing
waste(www.hometravelagaency.com).
By 2050, Earth’s population is expected to increase from 7
billion to over 9 billion and the world economy is projected to
quadruple with growing demand for energy and natural resources as
a result(OECD, 2012). It is estimated that a world four times
larger than today is projected to use 80% more energy in
2050(OECD, 2012). Also 70% of the population is projected to live
in urban areas by 2050 exacerbating challenges such as air
pollution, transport congestion and waste management.
Awareness of green practices can have an impact on the behavior
of consumers in choosing green hotels. Each consumer is impacted
with the broader changes in environment and is concerned. The
quality of life deteriorates with the environmental degradation.
The consumer is becoming more sensitive to these concerns. The
younger generation is much more sensitive to environmental
concerns as compared to the older generation on account of
greater sensitization in their schools. Children do impact their
parents thinking and choices as well.
Manaktola and Jauhari (2007) have remarked that situations in
which two products are perceived equal on all aspects, except
that one is superior in its environmental performance,
environment benefits may determine consumer preference and choice
(Ottman, 1998). The products environmental performance may then
provide a distinct point of difference and influence consumer
choice (Manaktola and Jauhari, 2007).
There is a debate in literature on consumers willingness to pay
for environmental benefits (Reinhardt,1998).It may be 20 percent
or more (Roper Starch Worldwide, 1997). This may occur when
environment benefits the consumer exclusively rather than society
as a whole (Marcus, 2001).
Objective of the Study
This study builds upon the earlier work conducted by Manaktola
and Jauhari (2007) on consumer behavior towards green practices.
The study assesses the consumers attitude and behavior towards
green practices adopted by the lodging industry in India. It also
assesses consumers willingness to pay for green practices adopted
by the lodging industry. It also explores the variables which
impact consumers willingness to pay for green practices in India.
The study also studies if there is any change in attitude of
consumers towards green practices since the year 2007 in India.
It also tracks if willingness to pay for green practices has also
changed since 2007 in India.
The study assumes significance as environmental concerns are
becoming global concerns for well being of the society on the
whole. The green practices adopted by lodging industry could have
significant ramifications on environmental pollution. As the
tourism and hospitality industry grow in India and other emerging
economies, any interventions that can help mitigate environmental
impacts will be a big contribution to the society. The study
would have specific implications for the practitioners in the
lodging industry.
Hypotheses
Some of the following hypotheses were tested in the study:
The consumer attitude towards green practices in correlated with
behavior towards staying at green hotels
A positive attitude towards environment is correlated with
willingness to pay for green practices
Willingness to pay for green practices is linked with a
positive disposition towards green practices
Willingness to pay for green practices is linked with reward
points offered by the green hotels.
Willingness to pay has no relationship with demographic
factors such age, gender, income, family size.
Literature review
Many authors had earlier defined customer’s decision making as a
cognitive process but customers have a habit of baffling the
researchers. Empirical research indicates that, customers become
loyal to a single brand without going through a detailed decision
process suggested in formal models.
Social and environmental consequences of the unquestioning
pursuit of economic growth are also impacting customer’s choice.
As more customers are becoming aware of their impact on
environment, they prefer to do business with organizations that
deliver value in a responsible and resource-conscious manner.
Deloitte in a study found that green consumers in US are somewhat
older (Baby boomers) and have more average income and are likely
to engage in sustainable behavior while traveling, study also
found that Gen Y are most likely to pay extra to stay at a green
establishment (Deloitte, 2010).
Manaktola and Jauhari (2007) observed that in India, tangible
demonstration of an organization’s commitment towards the green
practices and visible actions can infuse higher degree of
confidence in consumers; they further found that consumer looks
for actual evidence of serious commitment to an environmental
cause before deciding to stay in the hotel.
HVS report 2008 cited in DW Akademie, 2012 states that LEED
certified hotels are becoming customer’s choice. LEED which
stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design is a
third party verification of green buildings. LEED certified
buildings are intended to use resources more efficiently when
compared to conventional buildings. LEED certification is awarded
in three categories - platinum, gold or silver building. In
India, Ecotel certification is becoming popular, initiated by
HVS, is the “Hallmark of Environmentally Sensitive Hotels.”
Indian hospitality industry caters to the needs of 350 million
tourists - international and domestic. Tourism industry in India
contributes around six percent of total gross domestic product
and the industry is projected to grow. India's ITC hotel chain
was accorded the leadership in energy and environmental design
(LEED) award for its "world-class green practices." However, this
award is not representative of the larger picture of India's
hospitality industry. HVS, 2012. Manaktola and Jauhari, 2007
observed that “ecotourism in the Indian context has significant
implications for nature and culture conservation and rural
livelihood. Increasing environmental responsibility stimulates
implementation of environmental management in hotel industry.
Nevertheless, it appears that environmental performance of Indian
hotel industry is well below international practice.”
There is an empirical evidence that visitors from developed
countries are more likely to make buying decisions based on
companies green policies as compared to visitors from less
developed countries (Ayuso, 2006; El Dief and Font, 2010; Miller,
2003). Tourism decisions made by travelers in particular are
significantly influenced by ‘green tourism’ (Fairweather et al.,
2005; Hjalager, 1999).
Chafe and Honey, 2004 states that travelers are likely to repeat
their experience with eco-friendly hotels after their first
exposure to such property and 69% of respondents (Danish
tourists) expressed willingness to pay a premium to stay in eco-
labeled hotels.
Consumers expect businesses to make money in more responsible way
(Lane, 2006), growing public concern for environmental impacts
has increased pressure on organizations to pursue sustainable
development principles (Banerjee, 2008). A “triple-bottom-line”
approach adds environmental and social elements to the economic
bottom-line (Maak, 2007; Doherty, 2007; Clark, 2006; Mathisen,
2006; Ashley & Haysom, 2006). Hospitality providers can
strengthen their brand identity and improve customer loyalty if
they provide an opportunity to their guests to remain true to
their environment friendly values. (Deloitte, 2010)
Most large hotels worldwide are implementing environmental
initiatives into their routine practices. (Bohdanowicz &
Zientara, 2008), one of the reason influencing this decision is
customer buying decisions. Hotels are getting involved in CSR
activities to gain competitive advantage (Bohdanowicz & Zientara,
2008). Manaktola and Jauhari, 2007 suggest that environmental
performance of a hospitality business may provide an opportunity
for product differentiation.
Hospitality organizations are looking for environmental friendly
products and processes, these initiatives are given a social face
but it is argued that economic considerations are the key drivers
of this action (Choi and Parsa, 2006 ). Impact of environment
friendly practices result in lower operational costs and less
harm to the environment (Claver-Cortes et al., 2007). Cost
savings is one of the most significant factors influencing
implementation of green practices in a hotel. (Brebbia and
Pineda, 2004). Puma Hotels UK is set to save £58,000 on water
consumption by switching over to new showerheads. As cost of non-
renewable energy is increasing, implementing green energy
practices will provide competitive advantage to the hotel, cost
saving can be passed on to the customers creating a win-win
situation. Green Hotelier 2012 August 29.
DW Akademie, 2012 reports that many hotels are getting the benefit of lower costs by
"going green". It states that The Hilton group, have saved $147
million worldwide by reducing its energy and water consumption by
an average of 15 percent in 2011. Indian hotel chains have for
starters, warmed up to the sustainability agenda in the marketing
rather than business sense (Manaktola and Jauhari, 2007).
Methodology
The study has been carried out across India. Convenience sampling
was adopted and consumers were tapped from various cities of
Northern Southern eastern and western India. The study deployed a
structured questionnaire which explored consumer expectations on
green practices form the lodging industry . The questionnaire
also mapped their behavior towards staying at these hotels if
hotels adopted green practices. The instrument also explored the
consumers disposition towards environmental practices and the
willingness of consumers to pay for the green practices. A sample
of 131 consumers were administered the questionnaire. Pilot
testing was done for about 15 consumers and minor modifications
were made based in initial testing. Demographic data was also
collected for the sample. The data was collected deploying
Likert’s scale. Correlation analysis, multiple regression and
factor regression was conducted to understand the factors which
contribute to consumers choice of staying at hotels investing in
green practices. The data analysis has also given insights on the
demographic factors which are correlated with consumers
willingness to pay.
Profile of the Sample in the study
The sample consists of 63 male and 68 female respondents. The
respondents hail from various cities across various cities of
India such as Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Varanasi, Lucknow, Bhopal,
Lucknow The average of the respondents is 34 years and average
qualification is post graduation, The age of respondents varies
from 22 to 64 years.42 percent of the respondents are in the age
group of 22 to 30 years while as 58 percent of respondents are in
the gae group of 31 to 64 years. The sample has a capacity to pay
and majority of the respondents travel at least 1-2 nights every
month and work in the private sector. Average size of the family
3.6. The average income of the consumer in the sample if Rs
120000-Rs 150000 per month. (1USD =60INR in Nov 2013). 25% of the
respondents stay at luxury hotels while as 22 percent of
respondents stay in budget hotels. 42 percent of respondents
spend 1-2 nights per month in a hotel. 61 percent of the
respondents live independently while as 39 percent live in joint
families. 55 percent of respondents have a post graduate or a
higher qualification.
Findings and Analysis
The statistical analysis was conducted on STATA 7.0. Different
variables were summarized. The correlation, multiple regression
and factor analysis was carried out to have a better insight on
the consumer behavior.
There are distinct changes in consumer behavior since the year
2007. The study explores the consumer behavior and their attitude
towards green practices in the context of lodging industry.
Consumer attitude towards expectations on use of green practices in the lodging
industry
A number of factors were used to assess the expectations of the
consumers on the use of green practices in the lodging industry.
It was found that the 12 variables were reduced to a single
factor (eigen value) which explained ninetly nine percent of the
variance.
(principal component factors; 1 factor retained)
Factor Eigenvalue Difference Proportion Cumulative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
1 7.45425 6.49813 0.6212 0.6212
2 0.95612 0.17684 0.0797 0.7009
3 0.77928 0.17214 0.0649 0.7658
4 0.60714 0.07984 0.0506 0.8164
5 0.52729 0.10506 0.0439 0.8603
6 0.42224 0.11299 0.0352 0.8955
7 0.30925 0.02924 0.0258 0.9213
8 0.28001 0.02495 0.0233 0.9446
9 0.25507 0.06371 0.0213 0.9659
10 0.19136 0.06167 0.0159 0.9818
11 0.12969 0.04139 0.0108 0.9926
12 0.08831 . 0.0074 1.0000
Factor Loadings
Variable | 1 Uniqueness
-------------+---------------------
h1 | 0.84395 0.28775
h2 | 0.76617 0.41298
h3 | 0.72930 0.46812
h4 | 0.88069 0.22438
h5 | 0.85299 0.27241
h6 | 0.84270 0.28985
h7 | 0.83868 0.29662
h8 | 0.82417 0.32075
h9 | 0.54396 0.70411
h10 | 0.70019 0.50973
h11 | 0.82800 0.31441
h12 | 0.74524 0.44462
The following variables are more significant contributors to the
consumer’s expectations from the lodging industry towards green
practices. Using sensors or timers to save electricity; have
active recycling program; training of all employees for better
environmental performance; prompt disposal of packaging to reduce
waste; utilizing environment friendly cleaners; deploying energy
saving lamps; provide environmentally friendly products; have
visible communication about green practices and participation in
an environmental partnership program such as ISO 14000. This
clearly points out that the consumers are looking at very visible
efforts on green practices by the lodging firms.
The implication is that the consumers look for very visible cues
on caring for environment by the lodging firms. These should be
communicated very clearly to the market.
Consumer behavior towards green practices in the lodging industry
The factor analysis was conducted for 12 variables which
influence a consumers willingness to stay in the hotel. There are
two factors which emerge out as important as their eigen value is
more than one. The two factors explain 69 percent of the
variance. These are as follows:
(principal component factors; 2 factors retained)
Factor Eigenvalue Difference Proportion
Cumulative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
1 7.23260 6.20561 0.6027 0.6027
2 1.02700 0.17090 0.0856 0.6883
3 0.85610 0.12956 0.0713 0.7596
4 0.72654 0.09122 0.0605 0.8202
5 0.63532 0.22921 0.0529 0.8731
6 0.40611 0.07944 0.0338 0.9070
7 0.32668 0.08559 0.0272 0.9342
8 0.24109 0.04727 0.0201 0.9543
9 0.19381 0.04188 0.0162 0.9704
10 0.15193 0.03395 0.0127 0.9831
11 0.11798 0.03314 0.0098 0.9929
12 0.08484 . 0.0071 1.0000
Factor Loadings
Variable | 1 2 Uniqueness
------------------
+--------------------------------------------------
c1 | 0.85858 -0.05428 0.25989
c2 | 0.78770 0.14048 0.35979
c3 | 0.79253 -0.16265 0.34545
c4 | 0.88485 -0.09844 0.20735
c5 | 0.83212 0.09103 0.29930
c6 | 0.88464 -0.15145 0.19448
c7 | 0.79842 0.21113 0.31795
c8 | 0.62772 0.60248 0.24298
c9 | 0.58511 0.48758 0.41991
c10 | 0.71350 -0.28827 0.40781
c11 | 0.70763 -0.43487 0.31015
c12 | 0.77795 -0.13942 0.37535
There are two sets of factors in the context of green practices
adopted by the lodging industry which matter to the consumer. The
first factor is a very clearly visible initiative towards green
initiatives. Using sensors for saving electricity, Training of
all employees for a better environmental performance, active
recycling and prompt disposal of waste , clear communication of
the green program to all employees are key aspects which matter
to precipitate the decision to stay at a green hotel.
The second factor is related with deploying energy saving light
bulbs in the rooms. This is one of the visible demonstrations of
green practices adopted by hotel.
Environmental Orientation
Orientation towards environment was also assessed through factor
analysis. The ten variables deployed for measuring environmental
orientation got reduced to two factors. Please see the results
for factor analysis.
(principal component factors; 2 factors retained)
Factor Eigenvalue Difference Proportion
Cumulative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
1 4.70734 3.55784 0.4707 0.4707
2 1.14950 0.17539 0.1149 0.5857
3 0.97411 0.19060 0.0974 0.6831
4 0.78351 0.14350 0.0784 0.7614
5 0.64001 0.03840 0.0640 0.8254
6 0.60161 0.15237 0.0602 0.8856
7 0.44924 0.13820 0.0449 0.9305
8 0.31104 0.09209 0.0311 0.9616
9 0.21895 0.05424 0.0219 0.9835
10 0.16470 . 0.0165 1.0000
Factor Loadings
Variable | 1 2 Uniqueness
----------------
+-------------------------------------------------------
e1 | 0.80071 -0.31101 0.26214
e2 | 0.62207 -0.36727 0.47813
e3 | 0.47764 0.71168 0.26537
e4 | 0.73708 0.26597 0.38598
e5 | 0.79218 -0.36405 0.23992
e6 | 0.79824 -0.25377 0.29842
e7 | 0.74696 0.17201 0.41247
e8 | 0.73076 0.16814 0.43772
e9 | 0.60626 0.29291 0.54666
e10 | 0.42846 0.00831 0.81636
The two factors explain 98% of the variance in consumer
orientation towards environment. The first factor is about an
understanding that environment is to be valued. The factor
explains that consumers feel that environment will be damaged
beyond recovery if it is not protected. They are also willing to
accept some inconvenience in order to protect the environment.
However, they also feel that seeking information about hotel’s
environmental responsibility is inconvenient. This has
implications for the lodging industry. Hotels would have to take
steps to clearly communicate about the efforts that they are
championing so that the consumers can take that into
consideration for making their choices for staying there.
Who should pay for green practices?
The table 1 given below compares consumer behavior in India
towards green practices in 2007 and 2013.
INSERT TABLE 1 HERE
There is a distinct change in consumer behavior in terms of who
should pay for the green practices. In the year 2007, there were
33 percent of consumers who felt that the costs for green
practices should be shared between consumers and the hotels.
However, in the year 2013, nearly 43 percent of the consumers
feel that costs should be shared between consumers and hotels. 17
percent of consumers in 2013 feel that they should pay for green
practices as against 15 percent in the year 2007. 52 percent of
consumers felt that hotels should absorb the costs for green
practices in 2007 . This declined to 40 percent in the year 2013.
There is a clear trend on consumers willingness to pay for green
practices. Also they are willing to stay at hotels which engage
in green practices.
How much more should consumers/hotels pay for the green
practices?
It is an interesting question to explore that how much more are
consumers willing to pay towards green practices. The findings
are listed in the table 2 below.
INSERT TABLE 2 HERE
It has been found that in 2007, 40% of the consumers were willing
to pay between 2 and 10 percent more of the costs for green
practices. In the year 2013, 81 percent of the consumers are
willing to pay between 2-10% more for green practices. This is a
very stark contrast between the year 2007 and 2013. Also almost
30 percent of consumers are willing to pay 30 percent more for
hotels engaging in green practices.
How many more reward points for the green practices?
It has been found that 71% of consumers in 2007 expected higher
reward points for engaging in green practices. In 2013, 75% of
the consumers expected to get higher reward points.
Attitude towards Environment
The findings suggest that different consumers have different
attitudes towards environment. There is just 5 percent of
consumers who actively seek environment related information and
deploy the same in making decisions about staying in green
hotels. This category can be labeled as active green consumers.
There is a large category of consumers who pay attention to
information when presented but don’t think otherwise about it.
This represents about 72% of the consumers.
There are also 23% of the consumers who do not look for
environment related information but feel that they should look
for such information.
Correlates of willingness to pay for green practices
The correlation analysis carried out between various variables
and willingness to pay yields the following results reflected in
table 3:
INSERT TABLE 3 HERE
The above table has important implications for the practitioners and
the policy makers. People who have a positive disposition or are
champions for environment are more likely to pay more for green
hotels. The knowledge of green practices also impacts the behavior of
consumers to engage in green practices. The evidence of a hotel
engaging with green suppliers and engaging in purchasing green
products and participating in environmental partnership programs are
positively related with willingness to pay more for green hotels.
These have clear implications for the hotel industry. If they want
consumers to choose them, they will have to take tangible efforts to
consciously engage in green practices and also clearly communicate
them to the consumers.
Correlates of Consumer Choice
The table 4 illustrates the variables which are linked with
consumers choosing to stay in green hotels.
INSERT TABLE 4
While choosing to stay in a hotel the following aspects are
considered important by the consumersin India. Linen reuse,
Installing active systems for detecting and repairing water
leakages. Participation in an environmental program sch as ISO
14000 and deploying environmentally friendly products are
considered as important factors in choosing to stay in green
hotels.
Demographic Variables and willingness to pay for green practices
To study the impact of demographic variables on willingness to
pay, multiple regression analysis was carried out. Willingness to
pay was treated as the dependent variable . Gender, age,
education and family size were considered as independent
variables. The results of the multiple regression are documented
in the table 5.
INSERT TABLE 5
It was found that age and average family size are predictors of
willingness to pay for green practices. Gender and average family
size were not seen as predictors of willingness to pay for green
practices in India. This means that there is more sensitivity to
environment with age and also a higher level of understanding of
consequences of environmental pollution. Also a smaller family
size would mean that the consumer is willing to pay more if the
hotel engages in green practices.
Conclusion and implications of the study
The study has several interesting findings.
There is a distinct difference in consumers behavior towards
choosing to stay in green hotels since 2007 in India. There is
also an increase in the proportion of consumers who are willing
to pay for green practices in India since 2007. As against 40% in
2007, there are 80% of consumers who are willing to pay 2-10%
more for green practices adopted by the hotels. This is indeed
very encouraging. The willingness to pay for green practices is
also influenced by age of the consumers and the family size. In
the study, it has been found out that the gender and education
profile of consumers do not impact the willingness to pay for
green practices. Education is a surprising factor as
theoretically consumers with higher education could be considered
more aware.
It can also be concluded through this study that the willingness
to stay at green hotels is influenced by investments that the
hotel makes in creating a tangible evidence towards green
practices. Linen reuse, dealing with suppliers and making
purchases for green products are all influencers towards choosing
those hotels. Enrolling in a green program such as ISO 14000 have
all positive influence in choosing a green hotel. Using sensors
or timers to save electricity; have active recycling program;
training of all employees for better environmental performance;
prompt disposal of packaging to reduce waste; utilizing
environment friendly cleaners; deploying energy saving lamps;
provide environmentally friendly products; have visible
communication about green practices and participation in an
environmental partnership program such as ISO 14000 . This
clearly points out that the consumers are looking at very visible
efforts on green practices by the lodging firms.
The study also reveals that though the consumers care for
environment it is only a very small fraction of consumers which
is 5 percent who actively seek information on environment. A
large percentage – nearly 75% look at environmental information
with interest but do not actively go looking for it. This does
have a strong implication for practitioners and policy makers.
A lot can be done to create greater awareness of ones actions on
environment. People are not even aware of consequences of their
actions. For every ton of paper, how many forests disappear. The
use of conventional sources of energy and pollution from using
substandard equipments all have a great bearing on environment.
Strong campaigns should be taken up across the globe to sensitise
and also exert pressure on the hotels to choose green vendors and
also for consumers to influence them positively so that they
start preferring green hotels over the others.
The study also reveals that consumers look for tangible evidence
of deploying green practices. So visible communication should be
communicated at various places in the hotel and also in the rooms
as well. A small film on green initiatives, in the restaurants,
menu cards and displays at various places could reinforce the
messaging and the care that the hotel demonstrates for the
environment. The advertising campaigns on the social media and
association with environmental initiatives could further help to
communicate with consumers that the hotel cares about green
practices.
The study demonstrates that consumers are willing to pay more for
the green practices. This should definitely be leveraged and the
ability to deploy green practices over the entire life cycle of
the stay of a consumer should be looked at. Right from checking
in, to products in the room, food items, waste disposal, water
management, energy management, billing, design of the hotel and
equipment deployed could all be looked at from a green
perspective. The training of employees, signing up for green
program and involving all stakeholders to subscribe to green
philosophy is all a part of the green strategy.
Age and family size impact the willingness to pay for the hotel
engaged in green practices. It has been found in the study that
the gender and education do not impact willingness to pay for
green practices in the context of lodging industry in India. This
is something that could be tested with bigger samples as well.
Different stakeholders can also influence the green strategy
adopted by the hotels. NGOs could create more sensitization with
the supplier network. Government can offer tax advantages to
firms that engage in green practices. The consumers could be
given more rewards or could be offered tax rebates for adopting
green practices and patronizing green brands.
Education at school and university level could have compulsory
courses on environment and green practices. In order for hotels
to adopt green practices, green orientation has to be a way of
life. The same must be shared as a common value within the
organization and must have a very strong support from the top.
Adopting green practices can truly become a great source of
competitive advantage. The current study demonstrates that
consumers are willing to pay more for hotels engaged in green
practices.
REFERENCES
Ashley, C. & Haysom, G. (2006). From philanthropy to a different
way of doing business: Strategies and challenges in integrating
pro-poor approaches into tourism business. Development Southern
Africa, 23(2), 265-280.
Ayuso, S. (2006) Adoption of voluntary environmental tools for
sustainable tourism: analyzing the experience of Spanish hotels.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13, 207-720
Banerjee, S.B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good,
the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51-79.
Blanke , Jennifer and Chiesa, Thiea (2013 ) The Travel and Tourism
Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum Geneva
Bohdanowicz, P., & Zientara, P. (2008). Corporate social
responsibility in hospitality: Issues and implications. A case
study of scandic, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 8(4),
271–293.
Brebbia, C. A. and Pineda, F.D. 2004, Sustainable Tourism. WIT
Press, Boston.
Chafe, Z., and Honey, M. (2004) Consumer Demand and Operator
Support for Socially and Environmentally Responsible Tourism.
CESD/TIES Working Paper No. 104a. Center for Ecotourism and
Sustainable Development (CESD) The International Ecotourism Society (TIES).
Choi , G . and Parsa , H . G . ( 2009 ) Consumers ’ environmental
concerns and behaviors in the lodging industry: A comparison
between Greece and the United States . Journal of Quality Assurance in
Hospitality & Tourism 10:93 – 112
Clark, S. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: A marketing
tool for major hotel brands. HSMAI Marketing Review, 23(1), 42-45.
Claver-Cortés, E., Molina-Azurín, J.F., Pereira-Moliner, J., and
López-Gamero, M.D. (2007) Environmental strategies and their
impact on hotel performance. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 15, 663-679.
Doherty, K. (2007). The wearing of the 'green.' Food Logistics,
(93), 4-4.
El Dief, M., and Font, X. (2010) The determinants of hotels’
marketing managers’ green marketing behaviour. Journal of Sustainable
Tourism 18, 157-174.
Fairweather, J.R., Maslin, C. and Simmons, D.G. (2005),
“Environmental values and response to ecolabels among
international visitors to New Zealand”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism,
Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 82-98.
Font, X. (2002) Environmental certification in tourism and
hospitality: Progress, process and prospects. Tourism Management
23, 197-205.
Deloitte, “Hospitality 2015: Tourism, hospitality and leisure trends” (October
2012) at www.deloitte.com accessed in November 6, 2013
Hjalager, A. (1999) Consumerism and sustainable tourism. Journal of
Travel and Tourism Marketing 8, 1-20.
http://www.dw.de/indian-hotels-struggle-to-balance-growth-with-
sustainability/a-16291412 accessed in November 6, 2013
Lane, G. (2006). Taking responsibility. Leisure Management, 26(6),
40-43.
Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement,
and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74,
329-343.
Manaktola, K and Jauhari, V.(2007)Exploring consumer attitude and
behavior towards green practices in the lodging industry in
India, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 19,
No 5, 2007, 364 – 377
Marcus, M.B.(2001) Organic foods offer peace of mind…at a
price,”US News and World Report, Vol. 130, p.130.
Mathisen, O. (2006). Profitability, environment, and social
equity. Cruise Industry News Quarterly, 17(67), 16-20.
Ottman, J.A. (1998) Green Marketing: Opportunity for Innovation, 2nd
edition, NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, IL.
Reinhardt, F.L.(1998) Environmental product
differentiation:implications for corporate strategy, California
Management Review, Vol. 40, No 4, pp.43-73.
WTTC(2013) Economic Impact Research, downloaded from
http://www.wttc.org/research/economic-impact-research/ on
November 9, 2013
ILO(2010)Employment in tourism industry to grow significantly
over the coming decade, says ILO report 19 November ,2010
downloaded on Nov 9 from
http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/media-centre/press-
releases/WCMS_146761/lang--en/index.htm
OECD (2012) OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences
of Inaction, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development, OECD, March 2013 Downloaded on Nov 9, 2013 from
http://www.oecd.org/emvironment/outlookto20150
Table 1: Consumer Behavior towards Green Practices in India
Variable 2007 2013No of consumers who feel that costs shouldbe shared between consumers and hotels
33% 43%
Percentage of consumers who feel that consumers should pay for the green practices
15 17
Percentage of consumers who feel that hotels should absorb the cost
52 40
Table 2: Willingness to pay for green practices in India in lodging industry
Variable 2013 2007Hotels should pay for50 to 100% of costs for green practices
5% 40%
Consumers are willing to pay for 2-10% of the costs while staying at a green hotel
81% 40%
Consumers willing to pay for 8-10% of the costs
30%
Table 3: Correlates of willingness to pay for green practices
Variable Correlation value(.05 level of significance)
Encourage business with environment friendly service providers
0.19
Knowledge about Environmental 0.20
friendly purchase practicesLike reading informative materialson environment
0.18
Important to save the environment 0.17Environmental activitist 0.23Hotel must participate in environmental partnership or certification program
0.18
Tables 4: Influencers for consumers for staying in green hotels
Variable Correlation coefficient(.05 level of significance)
Choice of a consumer for staying in a green hotel and Hotel participation in an environmental program and participation in ISO 14000 certification program
0.32
Choice of a consumer staying in ahotel and hotel offering linen for reuse
0.48
Choice of a hotel and active system for detecting and repairing water leakage
0.44
Choice of a hotel and providing environment friendly products
0.23
Table 5: Multiple Regression to study impact of demographic variables on willingness to pay for green practices
Equation Obs Parms RMSE "R-sq" F P---------------------------------------------------------------------- 132 5 2.21 0.13 4.93 0.001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- gender | -.45 .39 -1.16 0.250 -1.23 .32 age | .06 .024 2.53 0.013 .0133 .1087 ed | -.21 .190 -1.11 0.269 -.588 .1655avg fasz | -.22 .062 -3.61 0.000 -.351 -.102 _cons | 7.71 1.11 6.92 0.000 5.510 9.921