21
Populism in Hungary: The False Promise of Re-politicisation 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Current Populism in Europe: Impact on the Political Landscape Conference 23-24 May 2016, Prague Attila Antal Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Law [email protected]

Populism in Hungary: The False Promise of Re-politicisation 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Current Populism in Europe: Impact on the Political Landscape Conference

  • Upload
    elte

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Populism in Hungary:The False Promise of Re-politicisation

2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

Current Populism in Europe: Impact on the Political Landscape

Conference

23-24 May 2016, Prague

Attila Antal

Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Law

[email protected]

Topics

I. Notions and Definitions of Populism

II. The Political Theories of the Orbán’s Regime

1. Theory of Carl Schmitt

2. Leader democracy

3. Political constitutionalism

III. The Elimination of Politics

I. Notions and Definitions of Populism

Political communication,

strategy

Logic

Ideology

Democracy

(de la Torre, 2000; Laclau, 2005; Mudde, 2004; Pappas, 2014)

II. The Political Theories of the Orbán’s Regime

De-politicisation and the crisis of representation

1. A Renaissance of Carl Schmitt

2. Leader Democracy

3. Political Constitutionalism

(Agamben, 2014)

II. The Political Theories of the Orbán’s Regime

1. A Renaissance of Carl Schmitt

• Dangers of depolitization

• Distinction of friend and enemy

• There is no consensus or it is undesirable

• Anti-political attitude after 1989

• Popular demands

(Schmitt, 2005 and 2007)

II. The Political Theories of the Orbán’s Regime

2. Leader Democracy

• Political leadership

• Not self-rule of the people

• The political leader as a representative

• Political representation is leadership

• Overrule the diversity of the political community

(Körösényi, 2005)

II. The Political Theories of the Orbán’s Regime

3. Political Constitutionalism

• Legal constitutionalism after 1989: the idea of constitutional rights and the rule of law

• Fundamental Law adopted in 2011 was based on political constitutionalism

• A constitutional concept which recognizes the core element of the concept of the Political

• Decision over what is legitimate activity or not can only be made politically

(Bellamy, 2007)

III. The Elimination of Politics

Anti-populism

Elitism

Populism

III. The Elimination of Politics

Populism as…

political

communication,

strategy

logic ideology democracy

Theory of Carl

Schmitt+ - - -

Leader Democracy - - - -

Political

Constitutionalism+ + - -

III. The Elimination of Politics

Populism as…

political

communication,

strategy

logic ideology democracy

Theory of Carl

Schmitt

Re-politicisationLeader Democracy

Political

Constitutionalism

III. The Elimination of Politics

Schmittian concept

Leader democracy

Leader exercises the

state sovereignty

III. The Elimination of Politics

Schmittian concept

Leader democracy

Leader exercises the

state sovereignty

Monopolizing the representation

Eliminating the political responsibility

III. The Elimination of Politics

Populist

Elitist

“Elitist populism”

Monopolizing the representation

Eliminating the political responsibility

(Enyedi, 2016)

III. The Elimination of Politics

1. Privatization of Politics

Re-politicisation

De-politicisation

III. The Elimination of Politics

2. Broken Political Representation

• Representation = leadership

• The parliament have become incapable for implementing accountability

• Triumph of political (Schmitt, leader democracy) over the law

III. The Elimination of Politics

3. Politics of Irresponsibility

• Responsibility has been changed to political loyalty

• Leadership – responsibility – representatives

III. The Elimination of Politics

4. Politics of Permanent State of Exception

• “A permanent technology of government”(Agamben)

• Governing the effects

(Agamben, 2014)

III. The Elimination of Politics

5. Politics without Moral

Moral politics (Schmitt, Weber)

Politics without moral (Orbán’s

practice)

References

Agamben, Giorgio (2014): From the State of Control to a Praxis of Destituent Power. ROAR Magazine, February 4, 2014

Bellamy, Richard (2007): Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defenceof the Constitutionality of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press

Canovan, Margaret (1999): Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47 (1), 2–16.

de la Torre, Carlos (2000): Populist seduction in Latin America. Athens: Ohio University Press

Enyedi Zsolt (2016): Paternalist populism and illiberal elitism in Central Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, Volume 21, Issue 1, 2016. 9–25.

Körösényi András (2005): Political Representation in Leader Democracy. Government and Opposition, Summer 2005, Volume 40, Issue 3. 358–378.

Laclau, Ernesto (2005): On populist reason. London: Verso

References

Mény, Yves–Surel, Yves (eds.) (2002): Democracies and the Populist Challenge. New York: Palgrave

Mouffe, Chantal (2005): On the Political. London: Routledge

Mudde, Cas (2004): The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39. 541–563.

Pappas, Takis S. (2014): Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary. Government and Opposition, 49. 1–23.

Schmitt, Carl (2005): Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press

Schmitt, Carl (2007): The Concept of the Political. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

antalattila.hu