Upload
hua
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
URBAN AUSTERITY Impacts of the global financial crisis on
cities in EuropeWeimar, 4-5 December, 2014
Resisting austerity at multiple scales in
Greece1
Costis Hadjimichalis
Most of you know well the devastating effects of ultra
neoliberal austerity and authoritarianism in Greece
during the last five years, we heard some aspects from
Dimitra and Maria, and you will hear more in tomorrow’s
papers. However, the Greek case is by no means unique;
so-called recovery plans imposed by Troika are in
operation across Southern Europe with similar negative
outcomes while austerity policies are nowadays globally
implemented and they will continue to re-emerge as long
as we don’t confront its real causes, i.e. capitalism
itself and the political and economic elites who profit
from it. Although neoliberal austerity policies follow
similar paths they must be contested for their particular
social, temporal and spatial specificities.
Greek society after five years of deep crisis
presents today a contradictory situation. On the one
hand, while there is a great potential for counter
hegemonic reaction, popular resistance and massive
protest, as during 2011 and 2012, with mass
1 Invited paper, Conference Resisting Urban Austerity, Weimar, 4-5 December, 2014.
1
demonstrations and violent reactions seems to be slowed
down. Occupying Syntagma Sq for 4 months in 2011 was the
pick of a series of large demonstrations and brutal
confrontations with riot police. Since then only sporadic
and less massive social reaction took place with the
exception of the occupation for seven months in 2013 of
the National Radio and TV network and perhaps last
month’s large demonstrations. On the other hand, there
are hundreds of bottom-up resistance and solidarity
social movements all over Greece, including social health
clinics, time banks, food distribution, struggles against
extractivism, monthly-long strikes and occupations in few
factories, movements protecting public assets including
land and many more, which either help people in need, or
protect the commons and resist privatizations.
These movements take place at different scales some
are local and independent while others are networked
nationally and internationally building strong political
and social alliances. Despite major differences in terms
of target, organization and methods, they have two common
characteristics; first, they highlight the fact that many
people in Greece are active radical agents in social movements of
resistance and solidarity, not passive victims of crude ultra
neoliberal policies applied across Southern Europe.
Second, they highlight that the prime field of struggle against
neoliberal austerity is everyday life in particular socio-spatial
settings, demanding social, spatial and environmental
2
justice and defending public space and the commons, both
materially and symbolically.
Political economy has reflected on several aspects
that are important for our understanding of social
movements in anti-austerity mobilizations. In particular
it helped in signing out three spatio-temporalities in
capitalist development: first, a long-term spatio-
temporality refers to general forms of capitalism and its
reproduction through periodic crises; second, a middle-
range spatio-temporality singles out cyclical shifts of
growth and crisis in particular social formations, as the
case of dept crisis in Greece; and third, there is a
contingent spatio-temporality that affects particular
social classes, different genders, ethnic groups and
places. These three spatio-temporalities operate
simultaneously in a multi-scalar framework; they are
dependent on the interplay of endogenous and exogenous
factors and finally they form particular crisis regimes.
During deepening financial and social crisis in
Greece, we can identify a major qualitative turn in
movements resisting austerity with important political
implications. Pre-crisis social movements followed
basically two well known categorisations: along class or
occupation bases focusing more on defensive struggles and
others which were issue oriented. Analysis of
mobilisations at that time focused on the structural
characteristics of the Greek social formation as the
fundamental condition for the emergence of its opposition
3
and the main concern was how social exploitation was
translated into protest. In the decades of 1990 and 2000
new political subjects entered the arena of mobilisations
extending the pool of potential members of social
movements. These include people with long involvement in
global anti-systemic networks such as the European Social
Forum, the anti-war movement, the anti-Olympic games in
Athens movement and many more environmental and anarchist
movements. During the same period the massive influx of
migrants from Asia and Africa generated, apart from
xenophobia and racism, strong support and solidarity in
many cities and islands and several constant anti-racist
movements supporting migrants emerged. Finally, high
unemployment among the younger generation with
generalised higher education, including many graduates,
formed the “new precarious class” with informal and
constantly changing low paid jobs. Studies of these new
political subjects avoided determinism pointing the
dynamic and unpredictable way in which structural
positions might nurture the development of a social group
which could then become mobilized.
At the political level I must notice the rapid de-
legitimacion of ruling political parties and the rise, on
the one hand, of SYRIZA, our radical left party, which
succeed to have the majority of votes in the last
European election and still leads the pools, and on the
other, the strong presence of neo-Nazi party, Golden
Down, for both of which I will speak in the end.
4
The 300 migrants’ hunger strike and the occupation of
Syntagma in 2011 have been major urban events, often
highly violent, which brought together thousands of
activists from the above different social and political
backgrounds. The first to mobilize were young people
between twenty-five and thirty year old, unemployed or
underemployed. Soon they have been joined by older
working class groups, public sector employees,
pensioners, anarchist groups, neighbourhood associations
and others targeting austerity policies. After the mass
demonstrations and the urban events of 2011 for many of
those involved as well as for others away from Athens,
this way of “doing politics” was not enough or it has
been heavily criticized in terms of “what we do after”.
The Syntagma occupation2 particularly, acted as a catalyst
for many activists in Athens, but this time in other
Greek cities as well, who started working in groups “at
the core of society”, as A. Gramsci says. That means to
organize more stable structures of solidarity and
resistance, supporting the many unemployed, pensioners
and others excluded from social services in various
neighbourhoods, including cities outside Athens. In these
initiatives we meet many of those involved in the
Syntagma occupation (but not the anarchists), those
supported the hunger strike, people with long involvement
in global networks such as the European Social Forum but
2 For the Syntagma occupation and the migrant’s hunger strike see my paper: “From streets and squares to radical political emancipation? Resistance lessons from Athens during the crisis”, Human Geography: a new radical journal, 2:6, 116-136, 2013.
5
also individuals without previous experience in social
actions, particularly middle age men, women and many
pensioners. Some of those initiatives have the support of
progressive municipalities but the majority are real
grassroots organizations. I focus to those post-Syntagma
grassroots initiatives, which are neither voluntary
organisations with external funding nor community
organisations or institutionalised third sector
initiatives of any sort. Among those I could mention the
following:
1. Centres which are organised as “social or community
medical centres and pharmacies” and others as “social groceries”.
These centres are either independent, or use facilities
offered by progressive or leftwing municipalities. People
in need, Greeks or migrants, are first registered and
then can have medical care, medicines and food for free.
2. Local and national exchange networks “From hand to hand”
via registration of members and particular products on a
website. The process is simple: one is giving a piano
(photo, description etc) asking for a refrigerator,
another is giving a piece of land for a small apartment
in a particular city and so on, while money transactions
are prohibited.
3. Local/regional Social currencies. By 2013 there were 59 social
currencies in Greece, 19 are Time Banks and 30 are social
currencies proper, where prices are set freely among
scheme members. Individuals are registered on a web site
and the value of the service or product is accounted in
6
hours and everything is exchanged with the same time-
unit, e.g. one hour of English teaching equals one hour
of electrical repairs or a certain quantity of products,
etc.
4. Education, migrants support and cultural activity centers in many
cities, (by 2013 more than 35 with different capacity)
provide free courses, teaching assistance to school
children, Greek language and legal support for migrants,
foreign languages, music, dancing and athletics, all for
free.
5. Buying or distributing food “without middlemen” and soup
kitchens started in March 2012 as the distribution of
potatoes at low cost directly from farmers to consumers
and soon expanded to include a large variety of food
products. This has shown how effective the direct
connection between producers and consumers without
middlemen can be, and also the importance of social
intervention outside the dominant value chain.
6. Struggles against extractivism, as the social movement in
Halkidiki against open pit cold mining, and other
movements protecting public land and the commons from real estate
projects such as against the dispossession of former
Helliniko airport and against the dispossession of 95
famous beaches across Greece.
6. Long strikes, occupied factories, production without bosses and other
co-operative initiatives. For seven months workers at the Coca-
Cola factory in Thessaloniki are on strike and demand
boycott for its products while 595 redundant women
7
cleaners over 50 years of age occupied the pavement in
frond the Ministry of Economics for 16 months demanding
their re-hiring. So far there is only one occupied
factory in operation by its workers, BIO.ME, a chemical
company in Thessaloniki, occupied and operated by 55
workers, but their experience has been influential for
others such as a textile factory in Veria and some of the
small shipyards in Perama, near Athens. After the brutal
closure of ERT (the Greek Public National radio-
television network) by the neo-liberal government in
early June 2013, 2.000 journalists and technicians
occupied the huge building in Athens and continue
broadcasting for seven months through other channels and
the internet until December 2013. Several other
successful post-crisis initiatives exist in the
publishing sector with a daily newspaper (Efimerida ton
Syntakton) and hundreds of small co-operatives in the
restaurant and entertainment sector in all major cities.
7. The latest category, an outcome of recent months’
developments, is mobilizations against house evictions. Until now
there was a kind of protection of the first family house.
But the growing ineptness of Greek families and the
pressure of Troika multiplied the cases of house
foreclosures and this has generated strong supporting
movements in many cities.
In the thematic map we can see the spatial distribution
of some of these initiatives, around 252 in 5 groups
mainly in urban areas (see map in the end)
8
On going research on these grassroots initiatives
indicates that in the initial phase of establishing an
initiative the growing participation of younger educated
unemployed in combination with impoverished middle
classes and working poor and with a relative gender
balance. However, in latter phases and during the
everyday operation women and public sector pensioners
predominate. Other research based on surveys indicated
that in Greece (as well as in Spain), opposition to
austerity as well as participating in these grassroots
mobilizations increased with worsening of personal
financial situation and was combined with vote for a
left-wing party. In fact, 30-40% of Greeks who took part
in protest and later in voluntary organizations were
mainly coming from the Left. Social workers and welfare
users have been at the forefront, often with common
mobilizations in defense of public health or public
education.
Similar experiences are well known world wide from
times of war, economic, social and physical disasters
such as in Palestine, during the Yugoslav war, in
Argentina, New Orleans, Cuba and now in SE countries. In
Greece, while militant protest against austerity in
streets and squares seems to be slow down, with few
exceptions, a less militant but equally strong form of
protest and resisting austerity at multiple scales
acquire a key role in social movements. Some of these
initiatives are “accommodative”, others “transformative”
9
and no one knows how long they will last. But what those
cases demonstrate is a struggle to acquire political
hegemony over everyday life for thousands of people in
poverty and despair.
I will argue, however, that they can be seen as
emancipatory if we include the context in which they take
place. Twenty years ago in Europe such an approach could
be easily dismissed as tangential, even obfuscatory, in
the context of devising more radical policy approaches.
In the present crisis and under ultra neo-liberal attack,
when the whole society and country is turned to a
“territory of exception”, we have to fight for what we
not so long ago regarded as given basic rights of
citizens in democratic societies. And finally, these
cases are occurring in a highly polarised political
environment in which SYRIZA, is the main opposition in
parliament, first in the pools and with chances to form a
government in the coming elections, while the neo-Nazi
party Golden Dawn succeeded in gaining 7% of the national
vote, relying on the unemployed, macho and marginalised
segments of the population. SYRIZA in Greece like Podemos
in Spain, die Linke in Germany, the United Left in
Slovenia, the Bloco in Portugal and other radical
political forces across Europe, come out from mass
protest and movements as those described above. Now they
work within institutions, in their national Parliaments,
in regional and municipal governments and in the European
Parliament to resist and challenge austerity at different
10
fronts and scales. But this cannot happen until a radical
new type of welfare state is re-established and a major
democratic re-organization of the unequal and unjust
Eurozone and EU takes place.
These new left parties are faced with a well know
dilemma: although they are well aware that the welfare
state was the result of a historic compromise between
labour and capital, they are forced to fight for a new
type of welfare state because it is the last shield in
defence of the healthcare system, education, pensions,
social security and the environment. So the question is:
how to avoid the mistakes of the past and not again fall
into the trap of strengthening capitalism?
Taken together social movements, militant protest,
events, grassroots solidarity initiatives and the working
within institutions towards radical political
alternatives at the political scale, all challenge head-
on the one-dimensional emphasis that runs through neo-
liberal policy concepts and policies that “there is no
alternative”. And if in the longer-term these struggles
could be combined to contest issues and divisions
oppressing our daily life along with the imperatives of
capital, they can be seen as emancipatory. The road is
long….
11