Rusk Junior High School 2014-2015 Campus Plan - Rusk ISD

1

Rusk Junior High School

037-907-041

2014-2015

Campus Plan

Total Student Count: 532 Number of At-Risk: 277 Percent At-Risk: 52.1% Title I, Part A Campus

Regardless of the circumstance into which a child is born, we will give them the best that can be offered!

We Learn…… No Excuses

2

* 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 D A T A U S E D F O R 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 P L A N U N T I L C U R R E N T D A T A I S A V A I L A B L E .

* 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4 D A T A U S E D F O R 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5 P L A N U N T I L C U R R E N T D A T A I S A V A I L A B L E .

As of 10-24-14

Entity Count

White Black Hisp At Risk

LSES Sp ED

504 LEP ESL

GT AVID

6th grade 185 115 24 21 85 91 19 13 6 6 0

7th grade 185 126 29 30 89 99 10 9 3 11 16 8th grade 159 145 24 15 100 78 19 16 4 17 21 Total 529 386 77 66 274 268 48 38 14 34 37

Campus Improvement Committee Meetings will be in October, February, & May with others TBA

Topics of Discussion: 1. Planning and Goal Setting 2. Curriculum and Instruction 3. Budgeting 4. Staff Development 5. School Organization

Decisions will be based on a Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) with the 8 subtopics as listed below:

1. Jill Hardy – 8th Grade Team Leader, Math School Culture and Climate 2. Terri Garner – 7th Grade Team Leader, English Curriculum, Instruction/& Assessment 3. Martha Peloquin – 6th Grade Team Leader, History Student Achievement 4. Angela Jones – 6th Gr. Sunshine Committee, Math Demographics 5. Ashley Boyett – 8th Gr. DEIC , Science Family and Community Involvement 6. Andrea Russell– 7th Gr. Hospitality Team, Math Staff Quality, Recruitment, & Retention 7. Brandy Cook – 7th Gr. AVID Site Team, Science Technology

8. Laura Christopher - 6th Gr. GT/Pride & Legacy, Reading Pages 1-5 (TOC, Title Page, etc.) 9. Leah Besson -- 7th Gr. Student Needs Committee, Science School Organization 10. John Burkhalter – Principal 11. Kathy Guidry – Asst. Principal 12. Angela Dowling – Counselor 13. Parents: Pat Hardy, Danielle Swindell 14. Community Members: Robby Arrington, Tracy Session

3

Table of Contents RJH Cultural Philosophy ................................................................................................................................ 5

.......................................................................................... 6 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary

SCHOOL CONTEXT AND ORGANIZATION ...................................................................................................... 6 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary .......................................................................................... 7

DEMOGRAPHICS............................................................................................................................................ 7 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary .......................................................................................... 8

FAMILY AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................. 8 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary .......................................................................................... 9

TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary ........................................................................................ 10

SCHOOL CULTURE AND CLIMATE ................................................................................................................ 10 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary ........................................................................................ 11

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 11 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary ........................................................................................ 12

STAFF- QUALITY/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 12 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary ........................................................................................ 13

CURRICULUM/INSTRUCTION/ ..................................................................................................................... 13 ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................................... 13

RJH Goals, Objectives, & Strategies ........................................................................................................ 14

2014-2015 Priorities ................................................................................................................................ 14

DEMOGRAPHIC AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT .......................................................................................... 15 Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 15

OBJECTIVE 1 OF 7: Attendance & Retention ....................................................................................... 15

OBJECTIVE 2 OF 7: Reading Department ............................................................................................ 16

OBJECTIVE 3 of 7: Math Department .................................................................................................. 19

OBJECTIVE 4 of 7: Science Department ............................................................................................. 21

OBJECTIVE 5 of 7: Writing Department .............................................................................................. 22

OBJECTIVE 6 of 7: Social Studies/History Department ....................................................................... 24

OBJECTIVE 7 of 7: Health Department ................................................................................................ 25

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, & ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 27 Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 27

OBJECTIVE 1 of 3: Curriculum ............................................................................................................ 27

OBJECTIVE 2 of 3: Instruction ............................................................................................................. 28

OBJECTIVE 3 of 3: Assessment ........................................................................................................... 29

STAFF- QUALITY/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 30

4

Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 30

OBJECTIVE 1 of 1: Professional Development .................................................................................... 30

FAMILY and COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................. 32 Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 32

OBJECTIVE 1 of 2: Communication ................................................................................................... 32

OBJECTIVE 2 of 2: Healthy Career Exploration ................................................................................. 34

SCHOOL CULTURE & CLIMATE .................................................................................................................... 35 Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 35

OBJECTIVE 1of 4 : Student Character and Discipline .......................................................................... 35

OBJECTIVE 2 of 4: Staff Morale ........................................................................................................... 37

OBJECTIVE 3 of 4 : Drop Out Rate ....................................................................................................... 38

OBJECTIVE 4 of 4 : Healthy, Safe & Orderly School Environment ....................................................... 38

TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. 40 Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 40

OBJECTIVE 1 of 3: Technology for Student Performance ................................................................... 40

OBJECTIVE 2 of 3: Internet Presence ................................................................................................. 42

OBJECTIVE 3 of 3: Staff Development with Technology ..................................................................... 42

SCHOOL CONTEXT & ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................................... 44 Goals and Strategies ............................................................................................................................... 44

OBJECTIVE 1 of 2: Leadership For School Staff And Facilities ............................................................ 44

OBJECTIVE 2 of 2: State Compensatory Education Funded Activities ............................................... 44

5

RJH Cultural Philosophy Mission – The WHY…..

Regardless of the circumstance into which a child is born, we will give them the best that can be offered!

We Learn….. No Excuses

Vision – What we aspire to become. To combine relevant knowledge with real-world situations.

Values – Our Commitments…. 1. We Believe…... that building relationships with students and staff that foster

motivation, support and teamwork is top priority. 2. We Believe…… we must create a caring and stimulating environment for maximum

student success. 3. We Believe….. we must be positive, open minded, cooperative, friendly, and

courteous to all we encounter.

Goals – Our Achievements…. 1. US HISTORY – TO HAVE 75% OF ALL STUDENTS AND ALL SUB-

POPS IN 8TH GRADE PASS THE STATE TEST. ALL FACULTY WILL

INCLUDE STRATEGIES TO MEET THIS GOAL. 2. RTI NEEDS – MOVEMENT WITHING TIERS BASED ON DATA EACH

QUARTER 3. PLC – TO BE DATA DRIVEN TO DETERMINE OUR INTERVENTIONS

AND ENRICHMENTS

6

Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary For School Year: 2014 – 2015

SCHOOL CONTEXT AND ORGANIZATION

Area Reviewed Data Sources

Reviewed Summary of Strengths

Summary of Needs (Weaknesses)

Prioritized objectives, describing use of funding

Leadership for school staff and facilities State Compensatory Education Funded Activities

CIC meetings Team meetings Faculty surveys Master Schedule Staff Handbook Duty Rosters 2013-2014 Campus Plan

Structures in place Expectations for professionalism among staff Schedule – maximizing time Administrators who listen to staff for ideas Global Calls Skyward Access Internal and External

Facility updates… sign, cleaning, new lettering on front Improve communication between campus leadership teams Vertical alignment within JH grades along with Intermediate and HS

Work with the maintenance department for facility updates. Our campus will work toward putting processes and structures in place to support intervention of target students.

7


DEMOGRAPHICS





Attendance • Skyward Database • 13-14 Campus Plan • AVID Data System • Special Populations

Reports • Transfer Student

Data

• LSES numbers are stable.

• Free breakfast to all students

• AVID student feedback along with future goals.

Increase attendance among low performing students

To have our attendance rate match or surpass last year’s rates.

8


FAMILY AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT





Communication Healthy Career Exploration

Parent – Teacher conferences Registration participation Attendance at extra-curricular functions Website Emails Skyward Family Access

Open door policy for parents with less than 24 hour turnaround for returned calls.

Keeping a positive perception.

To provide open lines of positive communication between the parents, staff and students. To improve the skills of students which will work in our community.

9


TECHNOLOGY Area Reviewed Data Sources




Student Performance Internet Presence Staff Development

STAR Chart results Teacher survey CIC meeting minutes Team meetings

Technology Department’s willingness to work for solutions. Flexibility of staff and students.

Teacher familiarity and comfort with use of laptops for instructional purposes. Reliability of connectivity with the laptops.

Increase technology use in classrooms to enhance student performance Regular updates of RJH webpage Increase the appropriate use of technology for students and staff

10


SCHOOL CULTURE AND CLIMATE





Staff Morale Student Character and Discipline Student Drop-Out Healthy, Safe & Orderly School Environment

Last Year’s Campus Plan Staff participation in social activities Dialogue participation in lunch conversations Drop Out Data Teacher and Student Survey

Staff morale Character Days Drop Out rate is minimal. Volunteer Mentor Program Staff Involvement in Support Committees Adjustment of the School Calendar with a break every month except February.

Staff morale is a challenge with no time for academic teaming for teachers to communicate effectively The need for more parental involvement

We will take active steps to foster positive morale on campus. Our campus will work toward reducing the number of conduct problems referred to the office and increase character. Our campus will strive to reduce the dropout rate. RJH will strive to provide an environment that is designed to prevent or reduce violence and illegal activities as well as an efficient response to all emergencies keeping all students safe and healthy.

11


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Area Reviewed Data Sources Reviewed

Summary of Strengths



Attendance Reading Math Science Writing Social Studies/History Health Education

2014 STAAR raw scores grades 6-8

Areas that scored at or above the state average in the Spring of 2014 included: Reading 6th - +6 7th - +6 8th - +4 Math 6th - +4 8th - +12 Writing +6 Science +9

Improvement in the following areas will allow us to exceed the state averages and improve our number of students receiving an Advanced Performance: 7th Gr. Math -2 8th Gr. Hist. -20

In each testing area of STAAR the district will work toward all subgroups scoring above state average. Subgroups include: All Students A. American Hispanic White Male Female Eco Dis At-Risk

Student Pregnancy Rates

No pregnancies between any of our students

Continue to be pro-active to build positive and healthy esteems. Continue Choosing the Best.

Strengthen and utilize the School Health Advisory Council to support the implementation of all school health policies and practices – SCE Funds

TELPAS Results

Many students advanced one proficiency level

In TELPAS RJH will move toward each student advancing at least one proficiency level each year to meet AMAO Objectives and standards

Retention Rates

One retention for 13-14 last year.

Continue to seek motivational strategies

The district will work toward a retention rate less than the state average.

12

Comparison of At-Risk Students to All Students

The removal of students moving into 7th gr. from the At-Risk list.

Need more students to be successful on the STAAR test.

The campus/district will work toward decreasing the gap between All Students and At- Risk students.


STAFF- QUALITY/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT





Staff Quality/ Professional Development

HQ Report Professional Development Plan for Teachers Sub calendar & applications Staff Turnover

100% of teachers are highly qualified.

Staff development for STAAR rigor and relevance. More men in classrooms Female in gym Sub for campus daily, pre-assigned Professional Development Plan for each team member.

Increase or maintain the percentage of teachers receiving high-quality professional development on each campus to 100%. Ensure low-income students and minority students are not taught at higher rates than other student groups by inexperienced, out-of-field, or non-highly qualified teachers. Attract and retain highly qualified teachers.

13

Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary For School Year: 2014-2015

CURRICULUM/INSTRUCTION/ ASSESSMENT

Area Reviewed Data

Sources Reviewed

Summary of Strengths



Curriculum

Scope and Sequence Listings TEKS

Implementing Dr. Bill Daggett’s and Margaret Kilgo strategies.

Teachers reported the need for more STAAR resources

Campus will work toward 100% of grade levels/subjects having a complete sequence showing student expectations. Campus will work toward 100% of teachers utilizing their grade/subject sequence. Campus will work toward training all teachers on the Teacher Toolkit in planning with the targeted student expectations.

Instruction

Master Schedule Professional Development Calendar

Maximum efficiency in the Master Schedule

Campus will work toward all teachers using the Teacher Toolkit in planning including selecting research based instructional strategies Campus will work toward all teachers knowing and teaching the standards.

Assessment Academic assessments Quick Checks

Past success on STAAR

Campus will work toward all teachers requiring that kids show proof of learning at least daily. Campus will work toward all teachers improving their questioning strategies.

14

RJH Goals, Objectives, &

Strategies

2014-2015 Priorities Goals, objectives and strategies address our identified needs for 2014 – 2015: Beginning with 2014 – 2015, Rusk ISD has identified the following goals:

• (1) All students within all demographic areas, will graduate from High School and reach high standards. At a minimum, all student achievement will be at the level of proficiency or better on assessments in:

o reading/language arts, o mathematics, o science and o social studies.

All students will demonstrate exemplary performance in comparison to state performance standards. • (2) All students will be provided a well-balanced and appropriate curriculum, keeping abreast of the

development of creative and innovative instructional techniques, to improve learning. • (3) All students will be taught by highly qualified staff current in professional development. • (4) All students in the community will have families that are full partners with educators in the education

of their children. • (5) All students will be educated in a school culture and climate that is safe, drug-free, and conducive to

learning. • (6) All students will have the benefit of technology that is implemented and used to increase the

effectiveness of student learning, instructional management, staff development and administration. • (7) All students will be educated in a school context and organization which ensures processes,

structures, decision-making and overall leadership address quality teaching and learning.

15

DEMOGRAPHIC AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Goals and Strategies

OBJECTIVE 1 OF 7: Attendance & Retention

Goal: (1) All students within all demographic areas, will graduate from High School and reach high standards. At a minimum, all student achievement will be at the level of proficiency or better on assessments in:


All students will demonstrate exemplary performance in comparison to state performance standards. Area from Needs Assessment: Attendance and Retention Objective from Needs Assessment: To have our attendance rate match or surpass last year’s rates. The district will work toward a retention rate less than the state average. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible

Funding Resources

Timelines Evidence of Implementation

Formative/ Summative Evaluation Data

__ Completed __ Continue

Celebrate perfect Teachers, None EOY Increase perfect Attendance __ Completed

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

6th Grade 96.21 96.6 96.86 96.62 96.62 96.26 96.16 96.74 96.397th Grade 95.82 95.97 96.49 96.63 95.55 96.76 95.83 96.77 96.688th Grade 95.45 95.48 95.84 96.63 95.9 96.02 96.08 96.19 96.31

94.5

95

95.5

96

96.5

97

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

16

attendance.

Assistant Principal

Ceremony

attendance for each grade level

Reports __ Continue

Increase extra-curricular and co-curricular choices for more interest and participation

Principal

None Fall 2014 and Spring 2015

More interest in school because of participation

Attendance and participation


Send letter to parents and contact parent by phone. Initiate legal action through Truant Officer when necessary.

Attendance Clerk on campus, Assistant Principal and Principal

None Weekly each Thursday

Increase attendance

Improved attendance rate


OBJECTIVE 2 OF 7: Reading Department Goal: (1) All students within all demographic areas, will graduate from High School and reach high standards. At a minimum, all student achievement will be at the level of proficiency or better on assessments in:


All students will demonstrate exemplary performance in comparison to state performance standards.

ReadingArea from Needs Assessment: RJH will toward each student advancing at least one proficiency level each Objective from Needs Assessment:

year to meet AMAO Objectives and standards for the TELPAS assessment as well as advance all of our students reading levels to meet or exceed the state average in all subgroups. Strategies/Actions Person to be

Leader

Time Frame

Evidence of Implementation

Funding Resources


*Develop student’s profiles using disaggregation of STAAR data and the A/R STAR test. We will assess needs of individual students for effective instructional purposes in the classroom, TEAM, and content mastery. Computer assisted instruction will be provided through content

Teachers

2014-2015

Improve STAAR scores through practice and mastery of objective. Computer printouts on student achievements and lesson plans also will be used.

General Budget and SCE Funds

Evaluation through content mastery reports, progress reports, and report cards. Evaluations by comparing test scores, six weeks


17

mastery and I-Station via individual laptops. In addition extended instruction is provided by teacher during TEAMs and in tutorials during conference time, before/after school, and during elective class time. .

grades, Benchmark tests, STAAR practice tests, daily observations and daily grades.

*The Accelerated Reading Program will be continued in all subjects areas. Various incentives will be used to motivate students.

Librarian Teachers, and Aides

2014-2015

Students will be STAR tested to determine individual reading levels. A plan of action according to specific abilities will be established to improve reading comprehension and fluency, accumulated A/R points and A/R passing percentage.


Improvement on Renaissance STAR grading levels and improved goals through the year.


Use of Rosetta Stone to assistant LEP students reading and understanding levels

ESL Certified Teachers and CM

2014-2015

Teacher input ESL Funds TELPAS analysis


Glencoe Literature Texas Treasures 6th, 7th, 8th McGraw-Hill Reading (6th)

Reading Teachers

2014-2015

Teacher observation

General Funds

Improvement in TEKS Based Test Scores - Benchmarks


Provide tutoring for students in need of special teacher instruction.

Principal Counselor Faculty

2014-2015

Improved STAAR scores and quarterly grades.


Team meetings, individual student reports, and lesson plans will be a tool used to evaluate.

__ Completed Continue

Tier II - Reading Labs (SALT or Read 180) including maintenance agreement to support Read 180 system. Students identified as Dyslexic will be served through these instructional

Boyett, Wright, Christopher, Renner

2014-2015

Low student-teacher ratio for reinforcement of target objectives in reading including phonics, fluency and

General & SCE Funds

STAAR scores


18

setting when appropriate. Tier III – EE Reading

comprehension.

Improve reading fluency, comprehension, listening skills, and general self-confidence of students through the community volunteers who listen to students read and interact with students one on one.

Principal

2014-2015

Sign in sheets

Activity Funds

Volunteer Celebration in late Spring with student feedback


Staff Development

Region VII. Service Center & Principal

2014-2015

Sign in sheets Title Funds and General Funds

Creative ideas in the classrooms to improve student performance


Provide enrichment programs and extended activities for GT students

Principal & GT Teachers

2014-2015

Improving STAAR Scores, student daily grades, increased AR points, behavior management Greater participation and achievement at UIL

GT Funds Leadership development among our students


Practice State Assessments will be administered throughout the year with students working in workshop settings based on results.

Principal Counselor Subject area Teachers

2014-2015

Student Participation

General Funds

Improved STAAR scores


Performance rewards will be used to enhance the educational advancement of our students.

Central Office and Principal

2014-2015

Checks being delivered in November

General Funds

High staff morale and improved student STAAR scores


Teachers create and adjust quickchecks parallel to STAAR assessment.

Reading Teachers

June 2015

Observation of Quickchecks and their updates

General Funds

Quickchecks and other assessments are in line with the STAAR assessment.


19

OBJECTIVE 3 of 7: Math Department Goal: (1) All students within all demographic areas, will graduate from High School and reach high standards. At a minimum, all student achievement will be at the level of proficiency or better on assessments in:



MathArea from Needs Assessment: In Math on the STAAR assessment, our staff will work toward all Objective from Needs Assessment:

subgroups scoring above state average. Subgroups include: All Students, A. American, Hispanic, White, Male, Female, Eco Dis, At-Risk. Strategies/Actions Person

who Leads

Time Frame


Funding


-Administer quickchecks by grade level to target areas of strengths and weaknesses.

Math Dept.

2014-2015

Higher spring practice scores than fall practice scores

In Budget


Daily Warm Ups over STAAR Objectives.

Math Dept.

Daily

Teacher Walk-Throughs

General Budget

Higher STAAR scores and student awareness of STAAR objectives.

__ Completed __ Continue Daily

Students will be given word problems to learn the process of finding facts from written text as well as mathematical computations to solve problems.-

Math Teachers Principal & Counselor

2014-2015

Student work and gradebooks

General Budget

Evaluation through testing and daily work. Each student’s progress will be evaluated. Higher STAAR scores and six weeks grades

__ Completed __ Continue Weekly

Intensified and extended instruction using computers, manipulative, teacher aides, and tutorials before, after, and during school to reinforce instruction. Use of Reflex Math with teachers using STAAR format for all assessments.

Math Teachers

2014-2015 Daily

Observing Benchmarks and reports from Reflex Math

SCE Funds (see attached)

Increases motivation in mathematics and higher results on classroom work and test. Higher STAAR Scores and better student motivation

__ Completed __ Continue Daily

Staff Development for improving math performance.

Region IV & VII Service

Monthly Sign in sheets General Funds

Creative ideas in the classrooms to improve student

__ Completed __

20

Center & Principal

performance Continue Monthly

Targeted students will be given extended instruction through Math Lab, morning and afternoon tutorials

Math Teachers, Math Lab Teachers

2014-2015

Lesson Plans and Department Meetings


Higher scores, achievement through periodic check of time spent in Math Lab for Math instruction.

__ Completed __ Continue bi-weekly in PLC’s.

EE – Math for Tier III purposes

McCown Each Quarter

RtI Participation

General Budget

Higher STAAR scores Reduction in Tier II & III students.


Provide extended learning opportunities for G/T students through the GATES programs.

Math Teachers

2014-2015

Administrative Observations

General Budget

Commended performance results on STAAR


Provide teacher aide to work with students. Use Content Mastery for support in teaching lessons. Provide IEP modification and intervention programs for students.

Math Teacher, C.M. Teacher Aide

Daily

Sign in sheets and ARD meetings


Staff evaluations __ Completed __ Continue Daily

Grade level Math teachers will create a PLC that will meet on a regular basis to improve communication and planning.

Math Teachers

Bi Weekly

Meeting Minutes and Observations

General Budget

Higher Scores __ Completed __ Continue

Word Wall in each classroom to strength/reinforce vocabulary

Math Teachers

2014-2015

Classroom Observations

General Budget

More aligned curriculum and share ideas.

Oct 20 Completed __ Continue

Practice State Assessments will be administered in Spring with students working in tutorial settings based on results

Principal Counselor Teachers

2014-2015


General Funds

Improved STAAR scores


Performance rewards will be used to enhance the educational advancement of our students.

Central Office and Principal

Weekly

Checks being delivered in November

General Funds

High staff morale and improved student STAAR scores


CAMT Betty Collins

July 2015

Meal Reimbursement Forms

Title II-A

Attain new ideas and instructional strategies to assist our students to be successful.


21

OBJECTIVE 4 of 7: Science Department




ScienceArea from Needs Assessment: In 8th Grade Science on the STAAR assessment, our staff will work Objective from Needs Assessment:

toward all subgroups scoring above state average. Subgroups include: All Students A. American Hispanic White Male Female Eco Dis At-Risk Strategies/Actions Person who

Leads

Time Frame


Funding


Field Trips and Critical problem solving activities and guest speakers.

Science Teachers

2014-2015

Students will participate in field trips that expose them to career opportunities, validate the importance of science & reinforce classroom concepts

General Funds

Successful STAAR scores


Instruction more individualized based on pre-test assessment with daily warm-ups over STAAR Objectives

Science Teachers

2014-2015

Students will be given a selection of quickcheck questions to examine.

No cost Grades on integrated assignment in each class as well as successful STAAR scores


Professional Development of Science Department

Science Department Betty Collins

2014-2015

Attend CAST by Science Teachers and

Title VI General Fund

1. To increase instructional strategies and

Oct 20 Completed __

22

J. Burkhalter have Science Teachers involved with Region VII Collaboratives.

ideas 2.To develop leadership among our teachers

Continue

Use technology to support STAAR requirements

Classroom Teachers and Technology Department

2014-2015

Classroom Observations

General Budget

Higher STAAR Scores Quickchecks


Teachers create and adjust quickchecks parallel to STAAR level questioning and show mastery of the TEKS

Science Teachers

2014- 2015


General Budget

Benchmarks and other assessments are in line with the STAAR assessment.


We will assess needs of individual students for effective instructional purposes in the classroom, TEAM, and content mastery. In addition extended instruction is provided by teacher during TEAM and in tutorials during conference time, before/after school, and during elective class time.

Science Teachers along with entire 8th grade PLC

2014-2015

Improve STAAR scores through practice and mastery of objective. DMAC data and lesson plans also will be continually evaluated.

General Budget; SCE

Evaluation through content mastery reports, progress reports, and report cards. Evaluations by comparing test scores, quarterly grades, Quickchecks, STAAR practice tests, daily observations and daily grades.


Spend increased lab time with hands-on experiences targeting STAAR objectives where students scored lowest according to quickchecks.

Science Teachers

2014-2015

Students will see more relevance to what they are learning which enhances their performance.

General Budget

Better results on lab assignments, which guide students through hands-on experimentation and inquiry.


OBJECTIVE 5 of 7: Writing Department Goal: (1) All students within all demographic areas, will graduate from High School and reach high standards. At a minimum, all student achievement will be at the level of proficiency or better on assessments in:


23


WritingArea from Needs Assessment: In 7th Grade Writing on the STAAR assessment, our staff will work toward Objective from Needs Assessment:

all subgroups scoring above state average. Subgroups include: All Students A. American Hispanic White Male Female Eco Dis At-Risk Strategies/Actions Person who

Leads

Time Frame


Funding


Disaggregating of information through 7th grade PLC will assess needs of individual students for effective instructional purposes.

Garner Thompson Counselor

2014-2015

Student Schedules

General Budget

Results of quickcheck tests will show improvement


Emphasis on capitalization and punctuation in all content areas.

All classroom teachers & aides

2014-2015

Lesson Plans and Administrative Observations

General Budget

Students will show improvement in punctuation and capitalization.


Daily Oral Language (DOL) journals, and proofreading will be directed towards STAAR objective

English Teachers

2014-2015

Teacher observation

General Budget

Student grade will reflect improvement of STAAR skills


Teach methods of writing geared toward STAAR prompts with emphasis on grammar

English Teachers

2014-2015

Pre and Post test will reflect improvement

General Budget

Improvement on Quickchecks

Use of Writing 6th & 7th 2014- Administrative General Students will __ Completed

24

With Power, Glencoe Texas Treasures Literature, Write Source, Scholastic Action, Scholastic Scope

Grade English Teachers

2015

Observations

Budget show improvement in language and literature skills

__ Continue

Use of Study Island as an instructional technology tool.

Language Arts Teachers

2014-2015

Lesson Plans and Administrative Observations

General Budget

All English students will be given quickchecks to determine mastery of skills


OBJECTIVE 6 of 7: Social Studies/History Department



All students will demonstrate exemplary performance in comparison to state performance standards. Social Studies/HistoryArea from Needs Assessment:

The campus/district will work toward decreasing the gap between All Students Objective from Needs Assessment:and At-Risk students and ensure students grasp a useful knowledge of history from 1607-1865. Strategies/Actions Person who

Leads

Time Frame


Funding


Social Studies curriculum development will be based on STAAR indicators through incorporating TEKS material in all levels of instruction.

History teachers and principal

2014-2015

ASA sub-populations and ASA of all populations meet minimum expectations on the Social Studies STAAR test.

General Funds



Sponge and Warm-up activities will be directed toward STAAR objectives.

History teachers

2014-2015


General Funds

Students daily sponge activities will improve


25

Extended and intensified instruction will be implemented using the resources available in the Library and on Internet.

History teachers

2014-2015

Lesson Plans and Observations

General Funds



Disaggregating quickcheck scores

History Department

2014-2015

DMAC results General Funds

Specified lessons to target weaknesses


Safari Montage will be used to support TEKS requirements

History Teachers

2014-2015


General Funds



Administer quickchecks by grade level to target areas of strengths and weaknesses

History teachers, Content Mastery teachers, and all teachers

2014-2015


General Funds

ASA of sub-populations will pass the Social Studies STAAR test. ASA of all populations will pass the Social Studies STAAR test.


Word Wall

History teachers

2014-2015

Classroom Observation

General Budget

Improve Knowledge of Words


Channel One News

All Homeroom 1st Period Teachers

2014-2015


No Expenses

Improve knowledge of world events


OBJECTIVE 7 of 7: Health Department Goal: (1) All students within all demographic areas, will graduate from High School and reach high standards. At a minimum, all student achievement will be at the level of proficiency or better on assessments in:



HealthArea from Needs Assessment: Strengthen and utilize the School Health Advisory Council to support the Objective from Needs Assessment:

implementation of all school health policies and practices

26

Strategies/Actions Person who Leads

Time Frame


Funding


Use of daily activities that will ensure students success on Fitness Gram

Health and PE teachers as well as coaches

May 2015

Use of daily activities that will ensure students success on Fitness Gram

General Funds

100% of students within the Health Fitness Zone


Implementation of all recommendations from the SHAC.

Counselor, Principal

May 2015

All recommendations will be met.

General Funds

Implementation of all recommendations from the SHAC.


All PE classes to be using the Health textbook and other resources to teach the TEKS

Health and PE teachers Principal

2014-2015


General Funds

Health Awareness among students


Develop a favorable menu to meet all federal and state guidelines for all student meals

Food Service Director

2014-2015

Lunch Menus Food Service Funding

Meals eaten by students


27

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, & ASSESSMENT


OBJECTIVE 1 of 3: Curriculum Goal: (2) All students will be provided a well-balanced and appropriate curriculum, keeping abreast of the development of creative and innovative techniques, to improve learning. Area from Needs Assessment: Curriculum Objective from Needs Assessment: Campus will work toward 100% of grade levels/subjects having a complete sequence showing student expectations, 100% of teachers utilizing their grade/subject sequence, and all teachers using the Teacher Toolkit in planning with targeted student expectations. Strategies/Actions Lead Person

Funding Resources

Time Frame Evidence of Implementation


Administrative Updates and Reminders via meetings and emails.

Office Team General Funds

2014-2015 Email Memos Does the staff know the ABC’s of RISD?

__Met Strategy __Continue Strategy

Targeted Intervention and Enrichment during TEAM times.

Grade Level PLC Leaders

General Funds SCE

2014-2015 Rosters Pre & Post Assessment STAAR Results

Teacher feedback and STAAR results


Reflex Math Usage for the lowest students.

Math Dept. General Funds

2014-2015 Reflex Math Reports

STAAR Results


All dyslexic students will have the opportunity to receive additional support in academic areas.

CM teachers Glynis Friederich L. Christopher Ashley Renner Betty Frazer Reading Teachers

General Funds

On-going Use of the following: Content Mastery, System 44, Read 180, SALT

Improved scores in Reading, Math and Writing


G.T. students will participate in training sessions for academic competition (U.I.L)

Angela Jones General Funds

Fall Semester

Practice Schedules of all UIL Coaches

U.I.L. Academic District Meet Participation


GT students have an opportunity to work on curriculum that has increased depth and complexity and may be accelerated.

GT Certified Teachers

GT Funding

August – Face to Face with observations throughout the year.


Participation in 6 Hour Annual Update in August of 2015.


28

Offering of advanced classes of rigor: Pre-Algebra 7th Algebra I 8th

TSDE 8th

Agriculture 8th

Mashell Gates Jill Hardy Shonda Rogers Ag Teacher Counselor Principal

General Funds

2014-2015 Master Schedule

Student participation - rosters

Oct 20 CIC – Met __Continue

Listen to PLC’s to discuss District and Campus Goals

Principal with all teachers

General Funds

Calendar of dates and times throughout the year.

Meeting Minutes Teacher and Administrative Feedback


OBJECTIVE 2 of 3: Instruction Goal: (2) All students will be provided a well-balanced and appropriate curriculum, keeping abreast of the development of creative and innovative techniques, to improve learning. Area from Needs Assessment: Instruction Objective from Needs Assessment: Campus will work toward all teachers using the Teacher Toolkit in planning including selecting research based instructional strategies and knowing and teaching the standards. Strategies/Actions Lead

Person

Funding Resources

Time Frame



Increase the number of Special Ed students served in mainstream or instructional setting of 41 and taking STAAR.

Principal, Counselor and Special Ed. Dept.

Special Education Funding

May 2014to plan for 13-14

Reports that include all 41 and 42 on the campus.

Did the number decrease? Did we adjust our schedule to reflect 79 minutes or less of instructional delivery in a sped setting?


Provide an additional reading class centered on reading improvement (SALT or Read 180)

Friederich, Renner, Christopher, Boyett

General Funds; SCE

2014-2015 Class Rosters Improved Reading scores Renaissance Enterprise & STAAR


All students who have not mastered STAAR objectives will have an opportunity to improve their reading, writing, science, history and/or math skills.

All Teachers General Funds

2014-2015 Use of TEAM times for targeted interventions

Improved student confidence and STAAR scores


29

Tutorials before and after school for at-risk students

All Teachers General Funds

2014-2015 Attendance STAAR Results


Ensure FAPE is provided to students in ISS and/or DAEP.

Asst. Principal

All Year Student BIP’s ensure that all measures are utilized before general education academic instruction is altered due to time in ISS.

10 Day Charts – No student has exceeded.


Accelerated Instruction Plan (AIP) Students that fail STAAR Reading and Math

Reading & Math Teachers

General Funds

May, June, July 2015

Observation during 1st Six Weeks

STAAR Results


OBJECTIVE 3 of 3: Assessment Goal: (2) All students will be provided a well-balanced and appropriate curriculum, keeping abreast of the development of creative and innovative techniques, to improve learning. Area from Needs Assessment: Assessment Objective from Needs Assessment: Campus will work toward all teachers improving their questioning strategies with all teachers requiring that kids show proof of learning at least weekly. Strategies/Actions Lead

Person

Funding Resources

Time Frame



8th graders will participate in CAPS assessment and Career Cruising along with the Explore Test.

Counselor

Testing Materials Budget SCE

May 2015

Student participation.

Counselor and student feedback.


6th grade GATES reassessment to identify areas of academic strengths.

Counselor General Funds

Spring 2015 Reassessment results

Correct academic placement by subject area strength


Improved Reading Scores

Reading Teachers

General Funds

All Year Renaissance Enterprise Reports



Improved Math Scores

Math Teachers General Funds

All Year Renaissance Enterprise Reports



30

STAFF- QUALITY/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT


OBJECTIVE 1 of 1: Professional Development Goal: (3) All students will be taught by highly qualified staff current in professional development.

Area from Needs Assessment: Professional Development Objective from Needs Assessment: Increase or maintain the percentage of teachers receiving high-quality professional development on campus to 100% by participating in local, regional and state and national professional development. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible

Funding Resources

Time Frame




System 44/Read 180

Read 180 Specialist Special Ed and RTI Teachers

Title I SCE

Dates TBA

Special Education and RTI students enrolled in and using System 44/Read 180

# of Students showing growth from BOY to EOY


Conference for Advancement of Math Teaching (CAMT)

Betty Collins J. Burkhalter, Math Teachers

Title I June 24-26, 2015 Houston GR Brown

Teachers implement knowledge gained into classroom

STAAR scores above state average


Conference for the Advancement of Science Teaching (CAST)

B. Collins J. Burkhalter Science Teachers

Title I Nov. 20-22, 2014 Dallas Anatole




Space Exploration Educators Conference (SEEC)

B. Collins J. Burkhalter Boyett, Cook

Title I Feb. 6-8, 2015 Austin




AVID Summer Institute

TBA, Russell Watkins

High School Allotment

June 2015 Dallas

AVID Teachers implementation of strategies

AVID student success stories


Gifted & Talented Certification 6 Hour Update

J. Burkhalter GT Certified Staff

General 2014-2015 Through the year

Certificates from Region VII

Delivery of GT instruction to applicable students


Gifted & Talented Certification 30 Hour Initial Training

Kellis General Summer 2015

Certificates from Region VII

Delivery of GT instruction to applicable


31

students Professional Learning Community (PLC) Study

Burkhalter Peloquin, Garner, Hardy

General July 16-18, 2015 San Antonio

Sign in Sheets Improved implementation of PLC’s on campus.


Texas Computer Educators Assoc. Conference (TCEA)

Betty Collins J. Burkhalter Henderson

Title II,A Feb. 3-7, Austin


Increased technology in instruction.


TASSP - Leadership Conference

J Burkhalter K Guidry Teacher Leaders

General 2nd week of June 2015

Leadership ideas implemented.

Increased leadership among staff


PLC Updates Theresa Gates

General Every other month from 1-4 p.m.

Attendance by Burkhalter Hardy, Garner, Peloquin or their designee

Improved PLC’s on campus.


Summer Staff Development for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment (ELA, Math, Social Studies & Science) with focus on collaboration between Special Ed and Regular Ed teachers

Betty Collins J. Burkhalter Teachers

Title I June 3-4, 2015

Scope and Sequence, Instructional Practice and benchmark assessments (modified and general) reviewed



Maintain highly qualified teachers in all subject areas

J. Burkhalter B. Collins

General Funds

August 2014

100% Highly Qualified Staff

HQ Report submitted by T. Gates


Job Fair Attendance J. Burkhalter B. Collins S. Davis

General Funds

Spring and Summer of 2014

HQ Applications for positions available

All positions filled with HQ applicants


32

FAMILY and COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT


OBJECTIVE 1 of 2: Communication

Goal: (4) All students in the community will have families that are full partners with educators in the education of their children.

Area from Needs Assessment: Communication Objective from Needs Assessment: To provide open lines of positive communication between the parents, staff and students. Strategies/ Actions

Person Responsible

Funding Resources

Timeline Evidence of Implementation


Consequences & Rewards Presentation from County Juvenile Probation Dept.

Student Council - Drug & Alcohol Committee

None

November

Observation

Feedback from staff and students

__Met __Continue

Meet the Teacher

All Teachers

General Funds

August 2014

Attendance

Feedback from Staff & Community

Oct 20 CIC Met __Continue

Parent Conferences

Teachers

General Funds

On-going

Attendance

Student Improvement in academics and behaviors

__Met __Continue

Letters home to individual parents

Staff

General Funds

On-going

Attendance and response to the notice.

Participation

__Met __Continue

Phone Calls Staff

General Funds

All year Attendance

Parent perception of our school

__Met __Continue

Extra Curricular Activities

Staff Leaders

General Funds

All year Schedules of events

Ticket Money Sales & Attendance

__Met __Continue

Web Site Secretary & Librarian

Tech Funds

All year Update checks

Counter of how many hits

__Met __Continue

Skyward Gradebook (Assignments online)

Teachers

General Funds

All year Family History in Skyward

Improved student performance

__Met __Continue

Newspaper Articles

Office Staff

General Funds

All year Student/Parent Community Responses

Number of articles in paper.

__Met __Continue

33

G/T –Parent Breakfast

Principal and GT Team

Activity Funds

September

Attendance

Understanding of GT.

__Met __Continue

Volunteer Program

Principal and Office Team

Activity Funds

October Attendance

Mentor Program Participation


Volunteer Program Appreciation Celebration

Office Team and Hospitality Committee

Activity Funds

April

Attendance

Positive comments from mentors and mentees

__Met __Continue

Parent Table in Foyer

Office personnel

General Funds

On going

Replenishing of supplies regularly

Observing perusal of guests


Provision of individual assessment results of academic assessments

Counselor General Funds

On going Awareness of student results through parent communication.

Improved student performance

__Met __Continue

Parent Newsletter

Office Team

General Funds

Each Report Card

Attached to each report card.

Listening to Parent Feedback

__Met __Continue

Global Calls Principal General Funds

Quarterly or as needed

Reports of each call generated.

Reports of each answered call.

__Met __Continue

Notices of concerns

Secretary General Funds

Sept. 12 Oct. 3 Nov. 7 Dec. 5 Jan. 30 Feb. 27 April 17 May 8

Mail outs Are grades improving on each report card?

__Met __Continue

Community Speakers during PLC Grade Level Teams Meetings

Principal and Counselor

General Funds

Sept. 15 Dec. 15 Feb. 9 March 23 April 27

Student participation

Student Feedback

__Met __Continue

34

OBJECTIVE 2 of 2: Healthy Career Exploration

Goal: (4) All students in the community will have families that are full partners with educators in the education of their children.

Area from Needs Assessment: Healthy Career Exploration Objective from Needs Assessment: To improve the skills of students which will work in our community. Strategies/ Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline


Funding Resources


Learn to use correct finger positions in use of technology

All Students 2014-2015

Improvement in speed and accuracy while using a keyboard

General Budget

WPM at the end of the year


Learn to use Parliamentary rules and procedures

FFA students

2014-2015


General Budget

Teacher Feedback


Learn to use the internet & strengthen problem solving skills

TEAM Teachers

2014-2015

Class Projects General Budget

STAAR Results


Provide career investigation opportunities through the use of Career Cruising and guest speakers.

AVID Site Team, Counselor, Teachers

2014-2015

Community and Teacher Observation during Enrichment Times.

General Budget

Feedback from Counseling Office


35

SCHOOL CULTURE & CLIMATE Goals and Strategies

OBJECTIVE 1of 4 : Student Character and Discipline

Goal: (5) All students will be educated in a school culture and climate that is safe, drug-free, and conducive to learning.

Area from Needs Assessment: Student Character and Discipline Objective from Needs Assessment: Our campus will work toward reducing the number of conduct problems referred to the office and increase character. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible


Funding Formative/ Summative Evaluation Data

Honor Code will be learned by all staff and students at RJH

All Staff 2014-2015

Daily Announcements and postings on campus

General Fund

Knowledge of Honor Code in May of 2015


RISD School Song will be learned by all staff and students at RJH

All Staff 2014-2015

Postings in all classrooms and in gym and cafeteria for assemblies

Activity Funds

Knowledge of School Song in May of 2015


Maltreatment training

Instructional Department

August 2014

Sign-in sheets

General Fund

Accurate reporting of maltreatment


Bullying training

Counselor

August 2014

Sign-in sheets

General Fund

Accurate reporting of bullying


Red Ribbon Week Counselor October 2014

Observation of student behavior in the school climate

Counselor’s Budget

Student Feedback


Teachers will display and model character words among students. Lessons will encompass character words.

Teachers

Ongoing Observation of student behavior in the school climate

General Funding

Teacher and Student Behaviors


-Banners are posted throughout the school

Student Leadership Class/

Through May 2015

Observations General Budget

Monthly Viewing


36

displaying character words.

Counselor

-The newspaper will be sent pictures and/or articles about accomplishment and activities for character development throughout the year.

Office Team

Ongoing Number of Local Newspaper articles that reflect student accomplishments

General Budget

File of clippings


Morning Routines All Staff and Student Leadership Class

Daily Use of Channel One followed by pledges to flags and the RISD Honor Code along with the moment of silence.

General Budget

Daily Viewings


-Counseling Groups

Counselor

ThroughMay 2015

Improved self images of students involved.

In Budget


Character Days Counselor’s office

Early Release Days

Observations of student creations from discussions

General Budget

Teacher and student evaluation


- AVID will use notebooks, teamwork training, guest speakers and field trips to address various character qualities

AVID Teachers

ThroughMay 2015

Number of discipline referrals by grade level (7th and 8th AVID) will decrease

High School Allotment Funding

Calendar of trips, events, and speakers.


-Encourage student and teacher to wear red and black on Fall Thursdays to promote and show school pride

Teachers Coaches Teams

Football season

Student participation

No cost Thursday viewings


To create positive self-awareness and positive choices among our students.

Counseling Office

August 2014/May 2015

Few student problems Better choices made by students in the program.

In Budget Counselor feedback


Reinforce teachers along with common and consistent classroom management procedures across

J. Burkhalter and Guidry

Ongoing

Calm and safe atmosphere is present in our

building.

In Budget

Referral Records


37

the grade levels and the campus.

Create a system of disciplinary management with an understandable filing system and parent contact procedure.

Mrs. Guidry and Team Leaders

Ongoing Calm and safe atmosphere is present in our building.

General Budget

Guest Feedback


Provide Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP) services including teacher, assistant, supplies, etc.

Principal AEP Teacher

August 2014/May 2015

Master Schedule SCE Reduced discipline referrals and increased STAAR scores

__ Completed __Continue

OBJECTIVE 2 of 4: Staff Morale Goal: (5) All students will be educated in a school culture and climate that is safe, drug-free, and conducive to learning.

Area from Needs Assessment: Staff Morale Objective from Needs Assessment: We will take active steps to foster positive morale on campus. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible



Encouraging word, notes and emails

All Staff

Weekly Basis

Email Folder $0 Staff morale is high and upbeat


Beginning of Year “Positive Party”

Office Team

First day of in-service

Observation $50

Staff morale is high and upbeat


Birthday Celebrations & Cards

Secretary & Hospitality Committee

Monthly for Cards

Signatures from office team

$80

Smiles are created.


Back to School Meal

J. Burkhalter August

PO for purchases

$300

Feedback from participants


Weekly “Kudos” in Principal emails

J. Burkhalter Weekly

Email Folder $0

Morale of Staff is encouraged


Christmas Cards from Office

Office Staff

December

Secretary feedback

$135 Feedback from recipients.


Encouragement Gifts

All Staff

November & February

Office Team Feedback

$400

Staff morale is high and


38

upbeat Fun Fridays

J. Burkhalter Fridays

Staff Participation

$0



December Social & Secret Santa Celebration

All Staff Invited

December

Staff Participation

$200

Number of those participating


Grade Level Activities

Grade Level Teams

On Going

Staff Participation

$0



All Staff Appreciation Luncheons

Sunshine Committee

November, February, May

PO for purchases

$900

Comments from participants


Monthly Meeting Treats

Office Team Monthly Petty cash receipt book

8 @ $40= $320

Consumption of goodies.


OBJECTIVE 3 of 4 : Drop Out Rate Goal: (5) All students will be educated in a school culture and climate that is safe, drug-free, and conducive to learning.

Area from Needs Assessment: Student Drop Out Rate Objective from Needs Assessment: Our campus will to reduce the dropout rate. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible



Rusk Junior High will continue maintenance less than .5% for the school year 2014-2015.

Attendance clerk, principal, and assistant principal

Throughout the year.

Drop Out Rate General Budget

Number of “98” codes on record


OBJECTIVE 4 of 4 : Healthy, Safe & Orderly School Environment Goal: (5) All students will be educated in a school culture and climate that is safe, drug-free, and conducive to learning.

Area from Needs Assessment: Healthy, Safe & Orderly School Environment Objective from Needs Assessment: RJH will strive to provide an environment that is designed to prevent or reduce violence and illegal activities as well as an efficient response to all emergencies keeping all students safe

39

and healthy. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible



Character Education

Teachers Counselor P.E. Teachers

On-going

Reduced discipline referrals with a positive school climate

General Budget

Increased student integrity


Drug-Free Red Ribbon Week

Counselor & Student Council

October Increased awareness of the misuse and dangers of drugs

In Budget

Student behavior


Use of cameras in hallways, at exits and outside of buildings, to provide 24 hour surveillance of buildings and grounds.

J. Burkhalter Kathy Guidry Theresa Gates Maintenance Dept. Office Personnel


Reduce discipline referrals and encourage a positive school climate

General Budget

Spot checks throughout the year.


Assemblies to groups and individuals to decrease bullying and misbehavior.

Counselor Kathy Guidry

Throughout the year

Increase awareness of bullying on and off campus. Decrease bullying among students.

General Budget

Student Survey and Bullying incident report


Group counseling Salvaging Sisterhood group/ Leadership/Grief, etc.

Counselor

As needed

Improve positive relationship among students

In Budget

Increased relationship skills among students


Emergency Training -fire drills -shelter-in–place drills -Site evacuation drills

Principal Teachers

On going

Emergency Preparedness Procedures Manual Video during in-service Lesson Plan Documentation

In Budget

End of the Year Report


Require all visitors to sign in and wear a visitor tag while on campus.

Office Team

On-going

Awareness of all visitors on campus.

General Budget

Viewing Raptor reports and carbon copies of tags.


Require parents to Office Team On-going Knowledge of General Attendance __ Completed

40

sign out students who leave campus before school is dismissed

the location of all students

Budget records. __ Continue

Provide random drug dog visits

J. Burkhalter Fall & Spring Decreased use of drugs

General Budget

Student Survey


TECHNOLOGY Goals and Strategies

OBJECTIVE 1 of 3: Technology for Student Performance

Goal: (6) All students and staff will have the benefit of technology that is implemented and used to increase the effectiveness of student learning, instructional management, staff development and administration. Area from Needs Assessment: Student Performance Objective from Needs Assessment: Increase technology use in classrooms to enhance student performance Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible



Each classroom will have a set of computers for student use.

Classroom Teacher

All Year

All students will have access to a laptop in each classroom.

General Fund Title I Title II, A

Feedback will be ongoing.


Update calculators to ensure up-to-date technologies are used in the classrooms

Hardy

March 2015

Students will be proficient in the use of calculators in problem solving

Title VI

Observation of calculator use in class.


Implement use of Channel One before school

D. Miller

May 2015

Students will exhibit proficient knowledge of current events and improve base of knowledge of world news.

No Cost

Monitoring daily use.

__Completed __Continue

Use of Brain Pop, Edhelper, Spelling City & Study Island, Safari Montage, IStation, Renaissance Place

Science, Math, ELA, & History Depts.


100% success in the technology applications expectations as well as increased knowledge and

SCE Funds



41

motivation to learn

Read 180 implementation for Tier 2.

Renner & Williams

May 2015

Improve scores in classes and on STAAR

General Funds

Leveled progress reports


SALT (Strategies and Literary Tactics) using Don Johnson, Lexia, Read Naturally, and Renaissance Enterprise.

Christopher, C. Guidry

All Year

Students will exhibit proficient knowledge of current events research abilities.

General Funds

Renaissance Enterprise Reports


Career Cruising

Angela Dowling

2nd , 4th, 6th Six Weeks

Students will be more knowledgeable of possible careers and education requirements use of technology

General Budget as well as SCE Funds

Student Feedback


Reflex Math

Math Labs and EE – Tier 2 & 3

All Year

Students will be better prepared for computation.

General Budget as well as SCE Funds

Better understanding of basic math facts.


Parent laptop checkout system

J.Burkhalter

May 2015

Increased student use of technology when computers are not present in the home.

General Budget

Parent feedback


Complete trouble tickets as they arise for the Tech Team to mend.

All Staff Ongoing Help Desk Reports General Budget

Weekly Reports


Internet Safety Training

TEAM Rosters

Fall Semester

Signed certificates of completion

General Budget

Safe behavior while on the internet


Renaissance Place Products and Rosetta Stone

Ms. Miller & ESL Teacher

All Year Increased student knowledge through on-going instruction in the integration of information technology and information literacy.

General Budget

STAAR test scores


42

OBJECTIVE 2 of 3: Internet Presence Goal: (6) All students and staff will have the benefit of technology that is implemented and used to increase the effectiveness of student learning, instructional management, staff development and administration. Area from Needs Assessment: Internet Presence Objective from Needs Assessment: Regular updates of RJH webpage Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible



Use of Webpage by parents, students, and community for research

All Staff

Weekly

Students, teachers, and parents will be more knowledgeable and abreast of school activities

General Fund Titles I;II- A,VI

Counter on websites


Updated webpages with current information.

All Staff Ongoing Increased digital understanding and improved communication

General Fund Titles I;II- A,VI

Observations and Teacher Survey


OBJECTIVE 3 of 3: Staff Development with Technology Goal: (6) All students and staff will have the benefit of technology that is implemented and used to increase the effectiveness of student learning, instructional management, staff development and administration. Area from Needs Assessment: Technology for Staff Development Objective from Needs Assessment: Increase the appropriate use of technology for staff. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible



Teacher use Skyward Gradebook, Edhelper, Study Island, IStation Renaissance, etc. Online card

All Teachers Miller

Ongoing Ongoing

Administrative Observations Administrative

General Fund Titles I;II- A,VI along with SCE Funds

Gradebook and classroom observations Interview

__Completed __Continue __Completed

43

catalogue and video library

Observations with Miller __Continue

Use of data projectors, Write Pads, visual presenters in the classrooms.

Principal

Ongoing

Use by teachers Increase student interest and improve student assessment techniques

Classroom observations


Provide teachers a laptop computer

Principal

Ongoing

Increase research and teacher technology.

Teacher survey


Ongoing training of staff on instructional software

Technology Instructional Specialist

All Year

Increase use of instructional technology in the classroom

Schedule of trainings provided


Every student/teacher sign AUP

Tech Dept

Sept.. 2014

Random File Checks

In Budget

Look at binder.


Use of Password Responsibility Chart

Office Team Oct. 2014 Delivery to all staff.

General Budget

Teacher Survey


Wireless capabilities school wide

Principal

Check Status Fall and Spring

Students and teachers will have increased access to research and teaching technology

Technology Budget

Connectivity abilities


44

SCHOOL CONTEXT & ORGANIZATION


OBJECTIVE 1 of 2: Leadership For School Staff And Facilities

(7) All students will be educated in a school context and organization which ensures Goal: processes, structures, decision-making and overall leadership address quality teaching and learning.

Leadership For School Staff And FacilitiesArea from Needs Assessment: Work with the maintenance department for facility updates. Objective from Needs Assessment:

Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible

Funding Resources



Increase communication and ownership among campus leadership teams

Principal and CIC

General funds

Ongoing Meeting minutes PLC evidences

Teacher Survey


Continue to foster a voice for all staff in decision making

Office Team General funds

Ongoing Meeting among teams and PLC’s.

Teacher Survey


OBJECTIVE 2 of 2: State Compensatory Education Funded Activities

(7) All students will be educated in a school context and organization which ensures Goal:

processes, structures, decision-making and overall leadership address quality teaching and learning.

State Compensatory Education Funded ActivitiesArea from Needs Assessment: Our campus will work toward creating processes and structures to Objective from Needs Assessment:

support intervention of target students. Strategies/Actions Person

Responsible

Funding Resources




Content Mastery Christina SCE Ongoing CM Reports Student __Completed

45

will enhance lessons with small group help

Gault

Funds success on STAAR and benchmarks

__Continue

Summer School – Accelerated Instruction will be provided for students in need.

Principal and Asst. Principal

SCE Funds

By May 2015

Sign in sheets Student success on June tests


Teacher aides will be used in classroom and in pull out programs to enhance learning

Principal SCE Funds

Ongoing Schedules of Teacher Assistants

Teacher feedback


TEAM times will be used with all students for intervention and enrichment time.

Grade Level Leaders

SCE Funds

August Student schedules

Teacher and student feedback


Students will plan for their academic future

Counselor SCE Funds

Fall and Spring

EXPLORE test results

Career Cruising activity


46

Activities/Strategies Partially or Wholly Budgeted with SCE: ACTIVITIES/ STRATEGIES

HIGH SCHOOL JR. HIGH INTERMEDIATE ELEMENTARY PRIMARY

Individualized Instruction/ Small Group

X S. Nimitz

(EOC) Payroll Costs $19,478

FTE’s-.40

X CM- C. Gault

$2,735 FTE’s-.07

Targeted Instruction- Besson, G. Blackmon,

Boyett, Burkhalter, Christopher, Cook,

Day, Eckel, Friederich, Garner, Gates, C. Guidry, Harris,

Henderson, Kellis, Moore, Peloquin, Robbins, Russell,

Thompson, Wallace, Watkins, B Williams,

C Williams $69,448

FTE’s-1.68 Math-Day, Jones,

Gates, Russell $47,572

FTE’s-1.21

X Reading Lab/Small

Group-Turner $54,558

FTE’s-1.0 Math Lab/Small Group-

Franklin, Priest $64,403

FTE’s-1.23 Targeted Instruction-

Bixler, Bottoms, Boudreaux, Bowman, Carroll, Cox, Dominy,

Frazer, Fredericks, Lucas, Oliver, Pepin, C Ruiz

$77,132 FTE’s-1.70

X Lab/Small Group- Gordon, Kearney,

Nichols $97,581

FTE’s-1.92 Targeted Instruction-

Beck, Brogdon, Clayton, Cook,

Hickman, Hoffman, Howell, Jinkins,

Kadlecek, Mabry, Moore, Peters, Sunday,

Tucker $44,675

FTE’s-1.02

X Targeted Instruction- Berryman, Blackmon, Cahalane, Covington, Dyess, Eckel, Garner, Goff, Peters, Sanders,

Simpson, Starkey, Thompson, Williams,

Y’Barbo $42,465

FTE’s-1.06

Specialized Reading Program

X Reading Lab-

Christopher, C Guidry, C Williams

$50,228 FTE’s-1.28

Pre-Kindergarten-4 Year Old Program-Extended to Full-day

X Teachers and Aides-

Payroll Costs-$198,119 FTE’s-7.8

Pre-Kindergarten-3 Year Old Program

X Teachers and Aides-

Payroll Costs-$64,858 FTE’s-2.0

Pre-Kindergarten X Supplies-$2,000

Misc Oper Costs-$8,150 TOTAL:$10,150

Targeted Interventionist Program

X McCown $50,293

FTE’s-.93

X M. Black $49,401

FTE’s-1.0

X Morgan $37,161

FTE’s-1.0

X Gunn, McNew

$57,642 FTE’s-1.47

Teacher Aides/Assistants X $31,587

FTE’s-1.77

X $30,387

FTE’s-1.68

X $32,931

FTE’s-1.62

X $102,733

FTE’s-5.20 Extended Day X

Payroll Costs-$1,041 (EOC)

X Payroll Costs-$17,435

Misc Oper Costs-$2,000

TOTAL:$19,435


Supplies-$500 Misc Oper Costs-$2,000

TOTAL:$22,537





Extended Year (Summer School)


(EOC)


Supplies-$500 TOTAL:$8,826


Supplies-$500 Misc Oper Costs-$500

TOTAL:$10,887



Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)-Basic Services

X Payroll Costs-Teacher and Assistant-$44,332 Contracted Svc-$5,848

Supplies-$500 Janitorial-$1,785

Utilities-$984 TOTAL-$53,449

X Payroll Costs-Teacher and Assistant-$6,331 Contracted Svc-$866

Supplies-$250 Janitorial-$1,785

Utilities-$984 TOTAL-$10,216

47

Activities/Strategies from prior years that are not budgeted with SCE:

ACTIVITIES/ STRATEGIES

HIGH SCHOOL

JR. HIGH INTERMEDIATE

ELEMENTARY PRIMARY

DOR-Dropout Recovery (Nondisciplinary Alternative Education Program-NAEP)

X

General Fund

Head Start X General Fund

Class-size Reduction

Saturday School X General Fund

Pregnancy Services X General Fund

X General Fund

FTE’s-1.33 FTE’s-.19 Dyslexia Program X

Supplies-$175 Travel-$100

TOTAL-$275

X Dyslexia-Collins

$18,562 Supplies-$2,250

Travel-$300 TOTAL-$21,112

FTE’s-.50

X Dyslexia-Collins

$18,562 Supplies-$400

Testing Materials-$500 Travel-$300

TOTAL-$19,762 FTE’s-.50

X Supplies-$955

Testing Materials-$250 Travel-$100

TOTAL-$1,305

Contracted Services-Instructional

X $1,050

X $1,050

Supplies-Instructional X $650

X Supplies-$1,000

Reading Material-$500

X Supplies $1,250

Reading Materials $250

X $600

Guidance & Counseling X Testing Materials-

$250

X Testing Materials-$300



48

JUNIOR HIGH (SW w/ ED DISADV >=40%) Teachers:

BESSON, LEAH 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION BLACKMON, GEORGE 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION BOYETT, ASHLEY 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION BURKHALTER, ANGELA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION CHRISTOPHER, LAURA 28% 0.28 READING LAB/IMPROVEMENT CHRISTOPHER, LAURA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION COOK, BRANDY 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION

GAULT, CHRISTINA 7% 0.07 CONTENT MASTERY-INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION, TUTORIALS

DAY, SHERRY 43% 0.43 MATH LAB/IMPROVEMENT DAY, SHERRY 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION ECKEL, JOSEPH 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION FRIEDERICH, GLYNIS 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION GARNER, TERESA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION GATES, BARBARA MASHELL 14% 0.14 MATH LAB/IMPROVEMENT GATES, BARBARA MASHELL 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION GUIDRY, CASEY 14% 0.14 READING LAB/IMPROVEMENT GUIDRY, CASEY 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION HARRIS, BRITTANY 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION HENDERSON, CRYSTAL 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION JONES, ANGELA 50% 0.50 MATH LAB/IMPROVEMENT KELLIS, AMANDA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION MCCOWN, DONNA 93% 0.93 TARGETED INTERVENTIONIST MOORE, SONNIE 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION PELOQUIN, MARTHA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION ROBBINS, REBECCA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION RUSSELL, ANDREA 14% 0.14 MATH LAB/IMPROVEMENT RUSSELL, ANDREA 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION THOMPSON, DENISE 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION WALLACE, JENNIFER 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION WATKINS, STEVEN 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION WILLIAMS, BRIAN 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE 86% 0.86 READING LAB/IMPROVEMENT WILLIAMS, CHRISTINE 7% 0.07 TARGETED INSTRUCTION

Aides: FRAZER, BETTY 77% 0.77 TEACHER ASSISTANT

GUILLEN, STEPHANIE/N JENNINGS 100% 1.00 TEACHER ASSISTANT

TOTAL PIC 30 FTEs % 6.94

DAEP BASIC SERVICES-PIC 29 Teachers: ALLISON, ZACHERY 7% 0.07 DAEP BASIC SERVICES

ROSE, ROBIN 1% 0.01 DAEP BASIC SERVICES SMITH, MICAH 1% 0.01 DAEP BASIC SERVICES WALLEY, BILLIE 1% 0.01 DAEP BASIC SERVICES

49

Aides: DOVER, KAREN 9% 0.09 DAEP BASIC SERVICES

TOTAL PIC 29 FTEs

0.19

TOTAL JR HIGH FTEs

7.13

RUSK JR HIGH STATE COMPENSATORY BUDGET

2014-2015

2014-15 ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

BUDGET

199 E 11 6119 00 041 0 30 000 PROF PERSONNEL

JH

SCE SW 196,148.00

199 E 11 6119 00 041 0 30 870 PROF PERSONNEL

LONGEVITY JH

SCE SW 2,780.00

199 E 11 6119 00 041 0 30 875 PROF PERSONNEL

PERFORMANCE PAY JH

SCE SW 1,770.00

199 E 11 6119 00 041 0 30 896 PROF PERSONNEL

INCENTIVE PAY JH

SCE SW 284.00

199 E 11 6119 00 041 0 30 897 PROF PERSONNEL

EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 12,500.00

199 E 11 6119 40 041 0 29 000 PROF PERSONNEL

AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 3,927.00

199 E 11 6119 40 041 0 29 870 PROF PERSONNEL

AEP/DOR LONGEVITY JH

DAEP-SP 40.00

199 E 11 6119 40 041 0 29 875 PROF PERSONNEL

AEP/DOR

PERFORMANCE PAY JH

DAEP-SP 40.00

199 E 11 6119 40 041 0 29 896 PROF PERSONNEL

AEP/DOR

INCENTIVE PAY JH

DAEP-SP 4.00

199 E 11 6129 00 041 0 30 000

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

JH

SCE SW 25,503.00

199 E 11 6129 00 041 0 30 875

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

PERFORMANCE PAY JH

SCE SW 270.00

199 E 11 6129 00 041 0 30 897

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 500.00

199 E 11 6129 40 041 0 29 000

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 1,570.00

199 E 11 6129 40 041 0 29 875

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

AEP/DOR

PERFORMANCE PAY JH

DAEP-SP 32.00

199 E 11 6141 00 041 0 30 000

SOCIAL SECURITY/MEDICARE

JH

SCE SW 2,987.00

199 E 11 6141 00 041 0 30 870


LONGEVITY JH

SCE SW 40.00

199 E 11 6141 00 041 0 30 875


PERFORMANCE PAY JH

SCE SW 30.00

199 E 11 6141 00 041 0 30 896

SOCIAL SECURITY/MEDICAR

INCENTIVE PAY JH

SCE SW 4.00

50

E

199 E 11 6141 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 189.00

199 E 11 6141 40 041 0 29 000


AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 70.00

199 E 11 6141 40 041 0 29 870



DAEP-SP 1.00

199 E 11 6141 40 041 0 29 875


AEP/DOR

PERFORMANCE PAY JH

DAEP-SP 1.00

199 E 11 6142 00 041 0 30 000

GROUP HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE

JH

SCE SW 15,687.00

199 E 11 6142 40 041 0 29 000

GROUP HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE

AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 459.00

199 E 11 6143 00 041 0 30 000

WORKER'S COMPENSATION

JH

SCE SW 1,108.00

199 E 11 6143 00 041 0 30 870


LONGEVITY JH

SCE SW 14.00

199 E 11 6143 00 041 0 30 875


PERFORMANCE PAY JH

SCE SW 10.00

199 E 11 6143 00 041 0 30 896


INCENTIVE PAY JH

SCE SW 1.00

199 E 11 6143 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 65.00

199 E 11 6143 40 041 0 29 000


AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 28.00

199 E 11 6145 00 041 0 30 000

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

JH

SCE SW 147.00

199 E 11 6145 00 041 0 30 870


LONGEVITY JH

SCE SW 2.00

199 E 11 6145 00 041 0 30 875


PERFORMANCE PAY JH

SCE SW 1.00

199 E 11 6145 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 8.00

199 E 11 6145 40 041 0 29 000


AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 4.00

199 E 11 6146 00 041 0 30 000

TEACHER RETIREMENT/TRS CARE

JH

SCE SW 4,968.00

199 E 11 6146 00 041 0 30 870


LONGEVITY JH

SCE SW 61.00

199 E 11 6146 00 041 0 30 875


PERFORMANCE PAY JH

SCE SW 46.00

199 E 11 6146 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 267.00

199 E 11 6146 40 041 0 29 000


AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 154.00

199 E 11 6146 40 041 0 29 870

TEACHER RETIREMENT/TRS


DAEP-SP 1.00

51

CARE

199 E 11 6146 40 041 0 29 875


AEP/DOR

PERFORMANCE PAY JH

DAEP-SP 2.00

199 E 11 61-- -- --- - -- --- *PAYROLL COSTS

271,723.00

199 E 11 6249 00 041 0 30 000 CONTRACTED R&M

JH

SCE SW 1,050.00

199 E 11 6299 40 041 0 29 000

MISC CONTRACTED SERVICES

AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 756.00

199 E 11 62-- -- --- - -- ---

*CONTRACTED & PROF. SERVICES

1,806.00

199 E 11 6399 00 041 0 30 000 GENERAL SUPPLIES

JH

SCE SW 650.00


DYSLEXIA JH

SCE SW 175.00


AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 250.00

199 E 11 63-- -- --- - -- ---

*SUPPLIES & MATERIALS

1,075.00

199 E 11 6499 00 041 0 30 897

MISC OPERATING COSTS

EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 2,000.00

199 E 11 64-- -- --- - -- ---

*OTHER OPERATING COSTS

2,000.00

199 E 11 ---- -- --- - -- --- *INSTRUCTION

276,604.00

199 E 13 6299 40 041 0 29 000


AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 110.00

199 E 13 62-- -- --- - -- ---


110.00

199 E 13 6411 00 041 0 30 912

TRAVEL-EMPLOYEE ONLY

DYSLEXIA JH

SCE SW 100.00

199 E 13 64-- -- --- - -- ---


100.00

199 E 13 ---- -- --- - -- ---

*CURRICULUM DEV.& INST.STF DEV

210.00

199 E 21 6119 00 041 0 30 897 PROF PERSONNEL

EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 1,000.00

199 E 21 6141 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 15.00

199 E 21 6143 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 5.00

199 E 21 6145 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 1.00

199 E 21 6146 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 21.00

199 E 21 61-- -- --- - -- --- *PAYROLL COSTS

1,042.00

199 E 21 ---- -- --- - -- ---

*INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

1,042.00

199 E 23 6129 00 041 0 30 897

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 1,000.00

199 E 23 6141 00 041 0 30 897

SOCIAL SECURITY/MEDICAR

EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 15.00

52

E 199 E 23 6143 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 5.00

199 E 23 6145 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 1.00

199 E 23 6146 00 041 0 30 897


EXT DAY JH

SCE SW 21.00

199 E 23 61-- -- --- - -- --- *PAYROLL COSTS

1,042.00

199 E 23 ---- -- --- - -- ---

*SCHOOL LEADERSHIP

1,042.00

199 E 31 6339 00 041 0 30 000 TESTING MATERIALS

JH

SCE SW 250.00

199 E 31 63-- -- --- - -- ---


250.00

199 E 31 ---- -- --- - -- ---

*GUIDANCE & COUNSELING

250.00

199 E 51 6259 40 041 0 29 000 UTILITIES

AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 326.00

199 E 51 6299 40 041 0 29 959


AEP/DOR JANITOR JH

DAEP-SP 1,785.00

199 E 51 62-- -- --- - -- ---


2,111.00

199 E 51 ---- -- --- - -- ---

*PLANT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS

2,111.00

199 E 93 6492 40 041 0 29 000

PAYMENTS TO FISCAL AGENTS SSA

AEP/DOR

JH

DAEP-SP 658.00

199 E 93 64-- -- --- - -- ---


658.00

199 E 93 ---- -- --- - -- ---

*PAYMENTS TO FISCAL AGENTS\MBRS

658.00

199 E -- ---- -- --- - -- --- *Expense

281,917.00

199 - -- ---- -- --- - -- --- *GENERAL FUND

281,917.00

TRANSPORTATION-EXTENDED DAY

1,822.00

SCE BUDGET EXCLUDING SUMMER SCHOOL

283,739.00

SUMMER SCHOOL 199 E 11 6119

00 699 0 30 041 PROF PERSONNEL

JH SUMM

SCE SW 6,500.00

199 E 11 6129 00 699 0 30 041

SUPPORT PERSONNEL

JH

SUMM

SCE SW 1,000.00

199 E 11 6141 00 699 0 30 041


JH

SUMM

SCE SW 109.00

199 E 11 6143 00 699 0 30 041


JH

SUMM

SCE SW 38.00

199 E 11 6145 00 699 0 30 041


JH

SUMM

SCE SW 5.00

53

199 E 11 6146 00 699 0 30 041


JH

SUMM

SCE SW 154.00

199 E 11 61-- -- --- - -- --- *PAYROLL COSTS

7,806.00


JH

SUMM

SCE SW 500.00

199 E 11 63-- -- --- - -- ---


500.00

199 E 11 ---- -- --- - -- --- *INSTRUCTION

8,306.00

199 E -- ---- -- --- - -- --- *Expense

8,306.00

199 - -- ---- -- --- - -- --- *GENERAL FUND

8,306.00

TRANSPORTATION-SUMMER SCHOOL

520.00

SCE SUMMER SCHOOL BUDGET

8,826.00

TOTAL STATE COMPENSATORY BUDGET

292,565.00

54

Rusk Jr. High School

State Compensatory Education Funds Additional Information as Required By Section 42.152, Texas Education Code

2014-2015 Supplemental direct costs and personnel attributed to compensatory education and accelerated instruction budgeted and addressed in the campus improvement plan are as follows: Expenditure Amount Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)

(Does not include extended day, week, or year FTEs)

Payroll Costs $283,955 7.13 Professional and Contracted Services

4,027

Supplies and Materials 1,825 Other Operating Costs 2,758 Debt Service 0 Capital Outlay 0 TOTAL $292,565

RISD Level II

# of SubPops

at or above

State Ave Total SubPops %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 27 67 40% 19 8 12

2012-2013 39 76 51% 11 10 152013-2014 55 75 73% 7 8 5

Math 2011-2012 21 66 32% 9 10 242012-2013 32 67 48% 7 9 172013-2014 44 65 68% 11 6 4

Writing 2011-2012 4 20 20% 6 1 92012-2013 7 20 35% 1 2 102013-2014 7 18 39% 4 3 4

Science 2011-2012 15 29 52% 3 4 72012-2013 21 27 78% 5 0 12013-2014 26 30 87% 1 2 1

Social Studies 2011-2012 0 9 0% 0 2 12012-2013 1 9 11% 1 2 52013-2014 8 19 42% 1 2 8

District Summary All Tests 2011-2012 67 191 35% 37 25 532012-2013 100 199 50% 25 23 482013-2014 140 207 68% 24 21 22

Elementary Level II %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 4 10 40% 2 2 2

2012-2013 9 11 82% 0 1 12013-2014 9 11 82% 1 1 0

Math 2011-2012 1 10 10% 2 5 22012-2013 5 11 45% 3 0 32013-2014 8 11 73% 2 1 0

Campus Summary All Tests 2011-2012 5 20 25% 4 7 42012-2013 14 22 64% 3 1 42013-2014 17 22 77% 3 2 0

Intermediate Level II %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 4 21 19% 5 3 9

2012-2013 9 19 47% 3 3 42013-2014 10 20 50% 1 5 4

Writing 2011-2012 1 10 10% 1 1 72012-2013 1 10 10% 0 2 72013-2014 0 10 0% 4 3 3

Math 2011-2012 9 21 43% 4 3 52012-2013 9 19 47% 1 4 52013-2014 11 20 55% 5 3 1

Science 2011-2012 7 11 64% 1 0 32012-2013 9 9 100% 0 0 02013-2014 8 10 80% 0 1 1


Summary Of Level II Performance of Campus SubPops compared to State Average

Jr. High Level II %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 14 28 50% 10 3 1

2012-2013 13 28 46% 6 2 72013-2014 20 25 80% 4 1 0

Writing 2011-2012 3 10 30% 5 0 22012-2013 6 10 60% 1 0 32013-2014 7 8 88% 0 0 1

Math 2011-2012 10 27 37% 3 2 122012-2013 17 28 61% 2 3 62013-2014 17 25 68% 3 2 3

Science 2011-2012 3 9 33% 1 1 42012-2013 9 9 100% 0 0 02013-2014 9 10 90% 0 1 0

Social Studies 2011-2012 0 9 0% 0 2 72012-2013 1 9 11% 1 2 52013-2014 0 10 0% 0 2 8


High School Level II %age Yellow Orange PinkEnglish I/II 2011-2012 5 8 63% 2 0 0

2012-2013 8 18 44% 2 4 32013-2014 16 19 84% 1 1 1

Algebra I 2011-2012 1 8 13% 0 0 52012-2013 1 9 11% 1 2 32013-2014 8 9 89% 1 0 0

Biology 2011-2012 5 9 56% 1 3 02012-2013 3 9 33% 5 0 12013-2014 9 10 90% 1 0 0

US History 2011-2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA2012-2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA2013-2014 8 9 89% 1 0 0


RISD Level III

# of SubPops

at or above

State Ave Total SubPops %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 18 67 27% 20 17 12

2012-2013 21 76 28% 26 16 132013-2014 21 75 28% 25 19 10

Math 2011-2012 12 66 18% 18 13 232012-2013 12 65 18% 13 27 132013-2014 16 66 24% 20 14 12

Writing 2011-2012 1 20 5% 15 1 32012-2013 4 19 21% 11 4 02013-2014 1 18 6% 12 4 1

Science 2011-2012 7 29 24% 13 7 22012-2013 15 27 56% 9 1 22013-2014 9 30 30% 9 7 5

Social Studies 2011-2012 0 9 0% 5 2 22012-2013 0 9 0% 3 2 42013-2014 7 19 37% 6 1 5

District Summary All Tests 2011-2012 38 191 20% 71 40 422012-2013 52 116 45% 62 50 322013-2014 54 208 26% 72 49 33

Elementary Level III %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 1 10 10% 1 3 5

2012-2013 9 11 82% 1 0 12013-2014 2 11 18% 2 5 2

Math 2011-2012 2 10 20% 6 1 12012-2013 10 11 91% 1 0 02013-2014 4 11 36% 3 4 0


Intermediate Level III %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 7 21 33% 4 6 4

2012-2013 5 19 26% 5 6 32013-2014 7 20 35% 4 7 2

Writing 2011-2012 0 10 0% 9 1 02012-2013 1 9 11% 6 2 02013-2014 0 10 0% 8 2 0

Math 2011-2012 2 20 10% 5 7 62012-2013 1 19 5% 2 12 42013-2014 4 20 20% 7 4 5

Science 2011-2012 3 11 27% 4 4 02012-2013 7 9 78% 2 0 02013-2014 3 10 30% 4 3 0


Summary Of Level III Performance of Campus SubPops compared to State Average

Jr. High Level III %age Yellow Orange PinkReading 2011-2012 7 27 26% 10 7 3

2012-2013 3 28 11% 11 7 72013-2014 4 25 16% 10 6 5

Writing 2011-2012 1 10 10% 6 0 32012-2013 3 10 30% 5 2 02013-2014 1 8 13% 4 2 1

Math 2011-2012 8 27 30% 5 4 102012-2013 1 27 4% 9 13 42013-2014 7 26 27% 9 8 2

Science 2011-2012 2 9 22% 3 2 22012-2013 3 9 33% 5 0 12013-2014 2 10 20% 1 3 4

Social Studies 2011-2012 0 9 0% 5 2 22012-2013 0 9 0% 3 2 42013-2014 2 10 20% 3 1 4


High School Level III %age Yellow Orange PinkEnglish I/II 2011-2012 3 9 33% 5 1 0

2012-2013 4 18 22% 9 3 22013-2014 8 19 42% 9 1 1

Algebra I 2011-2012 0 9 0% 2 1 62012-2013 0 8 0% 1 2 52013-2014 1 9 11% 1 2 5

Biology 2011-2012 2 9 22% 6 1 02012-2013 5 9 56% 2 1 12013-2014 4 10 40% 4 1 1

US History 2011-2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA2012-2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA2013-2014 5 9 56% 3 0 1


STAAR Scores - Reading Level II

Green – At or above state averageYellow – 1 to 4 points below state averageOrange – 5 to 8 points below state average

Pink - More than 8 points below state average

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 76 75 76 66 60 72 71 68 62 86 83 80 83 76 * 74 72 70 79 78 81 66 63 55 53 51 60 69 66 65 63 61 552013 Phase-In I Lev II 79 79 87 69 65 64 74 70 77 89 87 91 86 76 67 77 77 86 81 82 85 68 64 75 59 61 91 71 73 82 66 66 712014 Phase-In I Lev II 76 76 81 63 58 55 71 68 77 87 85 85 83 77 86 74 74 81 78 77 81 65 62 72 56 56 83 67 68 76 62 62 63

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 77 76 77 66 59 57 72 70 68 88 84 84 85 76 * 75 74 69 79 78 82 61 58 40 51 49 45 70 67 71 58 55 442013 Phase-In I Lev II 72 71 70 60 55 30 65 60 52 85 80 80 81 76 * 70 68 64 74 73 73 53 45 33 46 47 75 62 62 62 54 51 492014 Phase-In I Lev II 74 72 75 62 57 79 69 65 62 84 80 76 81 74 * 71 70 72 77 74 78 58 56 43 49 49 40 65 64 70 55 53 50

His.St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

2012 Phase-In I Lev II 77 76 75 68 60 54 72 68 46 87 84 83 85 83 50 75 74 71 79 78 80 51 45 0 46 48 40 70 66 61 55 53 442013 Phase-In I Lev II 77 85 83 68 74 69 74 78 74 89 92 90 85 78 * 75 73 75 79 77 78 53 47 * 49 69 75 69 80 75 73 67 572014 Phase-In I Lev II 76 75 76 66 60 56 71 67 70 88 84 81 85 82 * 74 73 74 78 78 79 52 48 43 50 50 100 68 67 63 59 58 60

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 75 75 71 68 62 63 67 65 63 86 84 74 84 75 80 72 71 69 77 79 74 38 36 * 36 39 80 67 65 67 49 50 442013 Phase-In I Lev II 71 72 66 63 55 38 63 61 50 85 82 75 82 80 * 69 70 64 73 74 73 32 29 * 34 42 * 61 63 51 67 45 352014 Phase-In I Lev II 77 77 83 68 62 77 71 72 77 88 84 86 85 80 * 74 74 83 80 80 83 48 48 * 41 45 * 69 70 80 56 56 70

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 76 75 81 70 62 70 70 70 77 86 82 83 85 75 * 72 71 74 80 80 86 37 37 * 34 32 71 69 66 75 52 52 502013 Phase-In I Lev II 77 78 78 71 63 87 71 69 73 88 86 73 86 79 83 75 75 73 80 81 79 38 35 * 38 42 88 69 70 83 52 54 522014 Phase-In I Lev II 75 75 81 66 57 62 68 67 71 87 84 86 84 80 * 72 70 75 78 78 88 34 31 * 37 38 * 65 66 71 51 52 67

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 80 80 85 73 65 76 74 75 76 90 87 87 88 85 87 78 79 84 82 82 86 34 33 * 40 39 * 73 72 80 58 59 652013 Phase-In I Lev II 84 90 92 78 82 100 79 86 97 92 95 91 91 89 80 80 81 76 87 87 85 46 48 * 46 63 86 77 86 87 75 78 822014 Phase-In I Lev II 83 82 86 76 70 83 77 75 83 92 89 88 90 83 83 80 78 84 85 86 89 43 41 * 47 47 * 75 75 84 66 65 75

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 68 69 73 59 54 43 59 57 57 82 78 80 79 73 * 62 63 64 74 75 81 18 16 * 24 23 * 57 57 61 42 43 532013 Phase-In I Lev II 65 65 67 55 47 33 56 55 53 81 76 76 78 70 * 60 59 59 70 72 76 18 14 * 22 21 59 54 55 59 40 40 422014 Phase-In I Lev II 62 63 77 53 47 59 55 53 79 78 75 81 76 70 80 56 56 67 69 71 87 21 16 * 23 26 55 52 54 72 44 44 56

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

All AA His. White

At-Risk

His. White 2+ ELL SPED

All AA

All AA His. White 2+

At-Risk

ELL SPED ECODISMale Female

At-Risk

At-Risk

At-Risk

ELL SPED ECODIS At-Risk

2+

2+ ELL SPED ECODIS

ELL SPED ECODISMale Female

All AA ECODIS

All AA His. White 2+ ELL SPED ECODIS

His. White 2+

Male Female

At-RiskAll AA ECODIS

All AA White

ELL SPEDHis. White 2+ Male Female

Male Female

ECODIS At-RiskAll AA His. White 2+ ELLMale Female

Male Female

Male Female

SPED

8 Reading

Eng. I

Eng. II

3 Reading

4 Reading

5 Reading

6 Reading

7 Reading

STAAR Scores - Reading Level II



R 2012 Phase-In I Lev II 61 46 NA 54 27 NA 60 42 NA 64 51 NA 65 59 NA 55 36 NA 68 57 NA 21 12 NA 20 17 NA 53 36 NA 38 23 NA R 2013 Phase-In I Lev II 78 78 72 71 67 54 71 68 79 88 84 73 87 80 * 75 74 60 81 81 83 31 25 * 36 32 39 69 69 61 61 61 61

R/W 2014 Phase-In I Lev II 66 66 72 55 48 36 58 56 68 81 77 80 79 78 * 61 60 66 71 73 78 20 16 * 22 19 14 55 56 70 46 46 50

STAAR Scores - Reading Level III



St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Level III 21 17 13 12 7 3 14 12 5 30 23 17 28 17 * 19 16 6 23 19 19 10 7 0 9 10 20 11 10 6 8 6 12013 Level III 20 18 25 11 8 14 14 10 23 30 24 28 27 20 17 18 16 24 22 20 26 9 7 25 9 9 22 11 11 16 7 6 92014 Level III 17 14 12 9 5 18 10 7 13 27 20 12 23 10 0 15 13 10 18 15 13 7 4 0 7 6 0 9 8 7 6 5 3

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Level III 19 16 20 10 5 3 12 9 14 29 22 27 27 18 * 18 16 22 19 16 19 5 4 0 7 8 27 9 9 10 5 5 72013 Level III 20 17 18 11 7 0 14 11 10 31 24 24 28 17 * 19 17 12 22 18 23 6 5 0 8 8 0 12 11 15 7 6 32014 Level III 18 15 18 10 6 5 12 8 14 27 21 22 25 14 * 16 13 11 20 17 24 6 4 0 7 7 20 10 9 11 5 4 6

His.St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

2012 Level III 17 15 8 10 7 4 11 8 0 26 20 9 24 18 17 15 14 8 18 16 7 3 2 0 5 6 0 8 8 4 4 3 22013 Level III 20 17 14 12 6 4 13 9 9 31 24 18 29 19 * 19 15 15 22 18 12 4 2 * 6 7 13 11 10 12 5 4 62014 Level III 20 18 14 10 7 6 13 10 5 32 25 18 28 22 * 19 16 6 21 19 21 4 2 0 7 8 0 11 11 7 5 5 1

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Level III 17 15 10 10 6 6 10 7 6 28 22 11 25 13 20 16 14 9 19 17 12 2 0 * 3 2 0 8 7 11 3 2 02013 Level III 20 19 16 12 7 5 13 10 0 32 26 20 29 23 * 19 18 14 21 20 18 2 1 * 5 7 * 11 11 6 4 4 22014 Level III 15 12 12 8 4 0 9 7 3 24 17 17 22 14 * 13 10 11 17 14 13 2 1 * 3 3 * 7 7 7 2 2 0

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Level III 18 15 14 11 7 10 11 9 6 28 21 17 27 18 * 15 13 14 21 18 14 1 1 * 3 1 0 9 8 9 3 3 42013 Level III 16 15 10 9 6 0 10 8 13 26 21 11 24 14 17 14 13 13 18 17 7 1 1 * 3 3 17 8 8 9 3 2 02014 Level III 19 18 17 11 6 5 12 9 7 31 24 20 28 21 * 18 16 15 21 19 19 1 1 * 4 4 * 10 10 8 3 3 3

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Level III 19 17 17 11 7 24 12 9 14 30 23 17 28 21 * 17 15 9 21 19 25 1 0 * 3 2 * 9 9 11 3 3 42013 Level III 24 22 20 15 10 11 17 14 10 36 29 24 34 23 0 21 19 20 28 85 20 2 1 * 4 4 0 14 13 11 5 6 32014 Level III 23 21 13 14 9 6 15 12 11 35 28 13 32 20 33 20 18 10 26 23 16 1 0 * 4 4 * 13 12 13 5 4 3

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Level III 8 7 7 4 3 0 4 3 0 13 10 9 12 10 * 6 5 1 10 10 12 0 0 * 1 0 0 3 3 3 1 1 32013 Level III 11 9 7 6 3 5 6 4 0 18 13 8 18 10 * 7 6 5 14 12 10 0 0 * 1 1 0 4 4 1 1 1 22014 Level III 6 5 4 2 1 0 3 2 3 12 7 6 11 7 0 4 3 3 9 7 5 0 0 * 0 0 0 2 2 4 1 0 1

MaleAll AA His. White 2+

All AA His. White 2+ At-Risk

Female ELL SPED ECODIS At-Risk

Male Female ELL SPED ECODIS

ELL SPED ECODIS At-Risk

All AA His. White 2+ Male

All AA White 2+ Male Female

All AA His. White 2+ ECODIS At-Risk


Male

Male Female ELL SPED


All AA His. White 2+ ECODIS At-Risk


Male Female ELL SPED

3 Reading

4 Reading

5 Reading

6 Reading

7 Reading

8 Reading

Eng. I

STAAR Scores - Reading Level III



St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD R 2012 Level III 9 4 NA 5 1 NA 6 1 NA 11 6 NA 11 9 NA 7 3 NA 10 6 NA 0 0 NA 0 1 NA 5 2 NA 1 1 NA R 2013 Level III 21 18 20 11 7 15 13 11 0 31 23 24 30 21 * 18 14 12 24 22 26 1 0 * 2 2 0 11 10 10 5 4 6

R/W 2014 Level III 6 4 5 2 1 0 3 2 0 10 6 7 10 6 * 4 3 0 7 6 10 0 0 * 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 2

Female ELL SPED ECODIS At-RiskEng. II


STAAR Scores - Mathematics Level II



All AA His. White 2+ ELL SPED ECODIS At-RiskSt. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

2012 Phase-In I Lev II 68 66 64 50 43 38 64 64 57 79 73 72 74 69 * 68 66 66 68 65 63 64 64 50 45 44 80 60 57 55 55 51 482013 Phase-In I Lev II 79 69 77 69 48 40 74 66 64 89 76 93 86 66 50 69 68 83 70 69 71 68 61 67 59 49 87 71 62 71 57 55 542014 Phase-In I Lev II 70 69 77 53 48 45 67 66 84 80 77 79 74 66 71 70 69 76 70 69 79 67 65 79 47 44 60 62 61 72 59 56 64


2012 Phase-In I Lev II 68 65 69 52 45 33 64 64 67 78 73 79 73 64 * 68 64 63 68 66 73 61 57 58 41 39 73 60 57 60 52 46 382013 Phase-In I Lev II 68 65 63 52 45 23 64 63 52 79 72 73 74 70 * 68 65 60 69 66 66 60 52 33 41 40 54 60 58 53 55 50 432014 Phase-In I Lev II 70 68 72 53 49 55 66 64 76 80 74 75 76 66 * 70 67 76 71 68 68 62 60 57 44 44 43 62 60 69 52 49 48


2012 Phase-In I Lev II 77 75 77 65 57 54 74 71 71 86 81 83 83 77 50 77 74 72 78 76 83 64 55 40 47 45 80 71 67 69 59 54 522013 Phase-In I Lev II 75 86 88 61 73 69 71 84 76 85 91 96 81 75 * 75 72 82 75 74 82 62 54 * 46 67 89 68 82 83 76 71 612014 Phase-In I Lev II 79 76 80 65 60 67 75 73 70 87 83 84 84 75 * 78 76 81 79 77 80 67 63 57 52 53 80 72 70 70 64 62 68


2012 Phase-In I Lev II 77 77 73 64 58 38 73 74 69 87 84 79 83 78 100 77 76 66 78 79 82 59 57 * 41 43 50 71 70 69 56 56 472013 Phase-In I Lev II 74 75 72 61 56 50 69 71 36 85 82 80 81 76 * 73 74 67 75 75 56 52 49 * 38 46 43 66 68 60 51 52 422014 Phase-In I Lev II 79 79 82 66 63 77 74 77 68 88 85 86 84 79 * 77 78 81 80 80 82 62 61 * 47 50 * 72 73 76 61 61 68


2012 Phase-In I Lev II 71 72 60 56 52 38 65 69 52 83 78 65 83 74 * 70 71 59 71 72 61 45 48 * 34 36 25 63 63 51 46 49 192013 Phase-In I Lev II 71 74 78 58 55 59 66 70 73 83 81 80 78 72 100 71 73 44 72 75 50 49 48 * 37 43 88 64 67 73 49 51 572014 Phase-In I Lev II 67 67 65 54 46 33 61 61 57 81 76 70 75 70 * 67 66 62 68 68 69 41 34 * 34 33 * 58 58 49 44 42 44


2012 Phase-In I Lev II 76 78 85 64 61 59 70 75 90 87 85 88 83 82 * 76 78 83 76 79 86 50 52 * 44 46 * 69 71 80 55 59 692013 Phase-In I Lev II 77 89 92 67 79 93 74 87 100 86 93 92 84 74 * 77 80 87 77 82 85 59 60 * 48 74 83 71 85 88 74 78 862014 Phase-In I Lev II 79 82 91 68 65 89 76 79 89 88 88 92 84 84 100 79 81 89 80 82 94 60 59 * 52 55 * 73 77 89 65 67 85


2012 Phase-In I Lev II 83 81 70 75 73 57 79 79 79 90 85 69 89 80 * 81 80 45 84 83 71 60 58 * 50 49 * 77 76 60 66 64 442013 Phase-In I Lev II 78 79 65 69 67 55 74 75 67 88 83 67 86 79 * 76 76 63 81 81 69 51 53 * 43 45 58 71 73 65 59 60 552014 Phase-In I Lev II 81 81 88 72 71 89 77 78 88 90 86 86 87 77 * 79 79 89 83 84 87 56 53 * 46 50 100 75 76 88 67 68 78

Male Female

Male Female

Male Female

Male

Male Female

Male Female

Male Female

Female

3 Math

6 Math

7 Math

8 Math

Algebra I

5 Math

4 Math

STAAR Scores Mathematics - Level III




2012 Level III 15 12 14 6 3 3 10 11 5 21 15 18 19 11 * 15 13 11 14 12 17 10 10 0 7 7 30 8 7 6 7 5 32013 Level III 16 13 24 7 5 5 12 10 36 22 17 25 20 14 33 16 13 27 15 13 22 11 10 42 7 6 11 10 9 21 8 6 132014 Level III 16 13 14 7 4 0 12 10 13 21 17 15 20 9 29 16 13 13 15 12 15 12 9 5 7 7 0 10 9 12 8 6 5


2012 Level III 13 10 10 5 3 3 10 8 5 18 12 14 18 10 * 13 10 7 13 9 13 7 5 * 5 6 18 7 6 5 6 4 32013 Level III 16 13 7 7 4 0 12 11 5 23 16 9 20 14 * 16 12 9 15 13 6 8 8 0 6 6 20 10 9 3 7 6 02014 Level III 20 15 17 9 6 0 16 13 14 28 19 21 25 13 * 20 15 15 20 16 18 12 10 0 8 7 14 13 11 10 8 6 10


2012 Level III 19 15 9 9 5 0 14 10 0 27 20 12 25 13 0 19 15 11 19 14 7 7 3 0 6 6 0 10 8 4 6 4 02013 Level III 21 17 13 10 7 4 16 11 9 30 22 17 28 17 * 22 17 11 20 16 16 9 4 * 7 7 11 13 11 7 8 4 32014 Level III 22 17 19 12 8 6 17 14 0 30 21 24 29 13 * 22 17 19 22 17 19 10 6 0 7 7 20 14 12 5 7 5 7


2012 Level III 19 18 4 9 7 0 13 13 0 29 22 6 26 15 0 20 18 4 19 18 4 5 3 * 4 5 13 11 10 0 5 3 02013 Level III 16 14 9 8 5 0 11 10 0 24 18 11 22 14 * 16 14 9 16 14 9 4 3 * 4 4 * 9 8 3 4 3 02014 Level III 17 15 14 8 5 0 12 11 4 26 19 19 24 15 * 18 14 11 17 15 16 5 4 * 4 4 * 10 9 8 4 3 1


2012 Level III 11 9 3 4 3 0 7 7 0 18 12 5 16 9 * 11 10 4 11 9 2 2 1 * 2 2 0 5 4 1 2 2 22013 Level III 9 9 2 3 2 0 6 6 0 15 12 4 13 7 0 9 8 2 9 9 4 2 1 * 2 1 11 4 5 3 1 1 02014 Level III 11 9 4 4 2 0 7 5 0 18 13 5 16 10 * 11 10 3 11 9 4 2 1 * 2 2 * 5 5 3 2 1 0


2012 Level III 7 6 11 2 2 6 4 3 0 11 8 14 9 6 * 7 6 12 6 6 11 1 1 * 1 0 * 3 3 5 1 1 02013 Level III 5 5 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 8 6 0 7 5 * 5 4 0 5 5 0 1 1 * 1 1 0 2 3 0 1 1 02014 Level III 8 8 9 3 2 0 5 5 6 13 11 12 12 7 0 8 8 8 8 8 9 1 1 9 1 1 * 4 4 10 1 1 2


2012 Level III 17 12 1 8 5 0 11 9 0 24 16 2 24 14 * 17 13 2 16 12 0 4 1 * 3 2 0 9 7 0 3 2 02013 Level III 16 13 2 7 5 0 10 9 0 24 16 2 23 13 * 16 12 3 16 13 0 3 1 * 2 1 * 8 8 0 3 2 22014 Level III 18 14 4 8 6 0 12 10 3 28 19 5 25 15 * 17 13 5 19 15 3 3 2 * 2 2 17 10 8 4 3 2 2

Female

Male Female

Male Female

Male Female

3 Math

4 Math

5 Math

6 Math

7 Math

8 Math

Algebra I

Male Female

Male Female

Male Female

Male

STAAR Scores - Writing Level II



St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD71 68 62 61 51 35 67 61 68 81 77 68 78 70 * 67 62 53 76 75 68 54 48 40 37 36 36 63 59 54 51 46 3671 67 61 62 55 52 65 59 40 80 75 68 78 71 * 66 62 51 76 73 71 54 45 0 38 35 38 62 59 56 53 25 3173 70 70 63 56 60 69 63 57 81 76 74 80 70 * 68 64 61 79 75 78 59 55 29 39 37 33 65 62 63 55 50 37

AllSt. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RSID St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

71 72 71 64 60 50 65 64 61 82 78 80 81 74 40 65 65 63 78 79 79 30 30 * 27 25 57 63 62 62 45 48 4270 71 71 63 59 53 63 63 73 81 78 72 79 74 67 64 64 62 76 79 77 30 29 * 26 24 69 61 63 64 42 45 4370 71 76 63 55 52 64 63 64 82 79 82 79 78 * 63 64 67 78 79 87 30 26 * 27 30 * 61 62 66 46 46 56

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD55 54 47 45 39 21 44 41 41 70 64 53 68 56 * 49 48 33 60 61 61 8 6 * 11 10 0 41 41 38 26 26 3048 47 51 37 30 36 38 37 39 64 58 53 62 51 * 41 40 38 55 56 61 9 7 * 10 8 45 35 35 41 22 23 30

2014 Phase-In (Combined with Reading- Scores reported with Reading)

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD46 30 NA 38 17 NA 43 28 NA 49 32 NA 50 48 NA 39 22 NA 52 38 NA 9 8 NA 8 11 NA 36 23 NA 20 10 NA52 51 50 38 32 38 43 40 47 68 60 52 64 51 * 47 45 33 57 57 61 10 8 * 11 29 17 39 39 37 27 27 30

2014 Phase-In (Combined with Reading- Scores reported with Reading)

ELL

AA His. White

Male

2+ ELL

Female

Male Female

His. White 2+ EcoDis At-Risk

SPED EcoDis At-Risk

SPED

EcoDis At-Risk

2+ ELL

2+ ELL SPED

SPED EcoDis At-Risk

Male Female

Male Female

All AA His. White

AA His. White

Eng. II Writing

2013 Phase-In I Lev II


AA

All

All



Eng. I Writing


4 Writing2012 Phase-In I Lev II


7 Writing2012 Phase-In I Lev II



STAAR Scores - Writing Level III



St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD7 5 4 3 1 0 4 2 0 11 7 6 11 7 * 5 3 1 9 6 5 2 0 0 2 3 0 3 2 2 2 1 07 5 3 3 2 4 4 2 0 11 6 3 11 4 * 5 3 1 9 6 4 1 1 * 2 1 0 3 2 2 1 0 06 4 2 3 2 5 4 2 0 10 6 2 9 4 * 4 3 1 9 6 3 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 1 1 0

AllSt. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RSID St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

7 6 1 3 2 0 3 3 0 12 8 1 13 7 20 5 3 1 10 8 1 0 0 * 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 05 4 3 2 2 0 2 2 0 8 6 2 8 4 17 3 3 3 7 6 2 0 0 * 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 06 5 1 3 1 0 3 2 0 10 8 1 10 7 * 4 3 0 9 8 1 0 0 * 1 1 * 2 2 1 0 0 0

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD3 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 3 3 6 2 * 2 1 3 4 3 1 0 0 * 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 02 2 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 4 3 4 5 2 * 1 1 1 3 2 5 0 0 * 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0

2014 Level III (Combined with Reading- Scores reported with Reading)

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2 1 NA 1 0 NA 1 1 NA 3 1 NA 3 0 NA 2 0 NA 3 1 NA 0 0 NA 0 0 NA 1 0 NA 0 0 NA3 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 3 2 5 2 * 2 1 2 3 3 1 0 0 * 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

2014 Level III (Combined with Reading- Scores reported with Reading)

Female ELL SPED EcoDis At-Risk

2013 Level III

AA His. White

MaleAll AA His. White 2+

At-Risk

2013 Level III


2+ Male Female ELL SPED EcoDis

Female ELL

EcoDis

SPED EcoDis At-Risk

2013 Level III

All AA His. WhiteEng. II Writing

2012 Level III2013 Level III

At-Risk

4 Writing2012 Level III

2014 Level III

7 Writing2012 Level III

2014 Level III

2012 Level IIIEng. I Writing

2+ Male Female ELL SPED

STAAR Scores - Science Level II



St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD73 71 77 59 52 50 67 61 50 85 82 86 81 71 80 75 74 79 70 68 75 49 39 0 44 44 83 64 61 67 51 50 5273 71 74 58 53 68 67 61 68 85 81 85 82 74 * 75 73 88 70 69 74 54 45 * 44 48 50 65 63 73 53 49 6173 71 81 59 51 63 68 61 62 86 81 88 82 77 * 76 73 86 71 68 78 53 44 38 46 47 56 65 62 68 57 54 71

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD70 69 71 59 48 38 67 61 55 85 78 79 81 78 * 73 72 74 67 66 67 49 26 * 44 29 20 64 57 60 44 42 3275 73 86 63 56 74 68 65 77 86 81 90 84 69 * 77 75 87 73 71 85 43 34 * 36 36 88 66 65 78 52 50 6771 67 79 59 48 67 64 58 83 84 78 79 79 78 100 73 69 81 69 66 77 35 24 * 31 29 40 61 58 73 48 42 67


At-RiskAll AA Male Female EcoDis

At-Risk



ELL SPEDAll AA His. White

2014 Phase-In I Lev IIAt-Risk

EcoDis

His. White 2+

ELL SPED

ELL SPED

2+ Male Female

Male Female EcoDis


5 Science2012 Phase-In I Lev II

8 Science2012 Phase-In I Lev II

2012 Phase-In I Lev IIBiology


2014 Phase-In I Lev II2013 Phase-In I Lev II

STAAR Scores - Science Level III



St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD12 10 10 5 3 0 7 5 0 19 13 13 19 14 20 14 11 13 10 8 7 6 1 0 4 4 0 6 5 7 3 2 411 9 15 4 2 0 7 4 5 19 14 20 17 10 * 13 10 14 10 8 15 3 1 * 4 4 10 6 5 11 3 2 611 8 9 4 2 0 7 5 0 17 12 13 16 7 * 12 10 7 9 7 11 3 1 0 4 4 11 6 4 1 3 2 5


St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD9 7 7 4 2 0 4 4 0 15 9 10 15 5 * 10 8 9 8 5 6 1 1 * 2 2 0 3 3 3 1 1 1

12 8 10 5 2 13 7 5 11 21 12 10 20 9 * 13 9 6 12 8 15 1 0 * 2 1 0 6 4 6 2 1 412 9 9 5 3 4 6 4 3 19 12 10 18 8 20 12 10 14 11 8 4 1 0 * 2 1 0 5 4 9 2 1 2

SPED EcoDis At-RiskAll AA His. White 2+5 Science

2012 Level III

Male Female ELL

Female ELL SPED

2013 Level III

All AA His.

White 2+

White 2+ Male

ELL SPED EcoDis At-Risk

EcoDis At-Risk2014 Level III

2014 Level III

2014 Level III

8 Science2012 Level III


BiologyMale Female

2013 Level III

All AA His.

Green - At or above state averageYellow -- 1 to 4 points below state averageOrange -- 5 to 8 points below state average

Pink -- More than 8 points below state average

STAAR Scores - Social Studies Level IISt. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

2012 Phase-In I Lev II 59 55 47 49 36 25 50 45 25 74 63 54 71 60 * 64 59 58 55 50 35 22 15 * 27 20 20 48 42 35 33 29 1963 59 51 55 43 52 55 51 39 76 68 55 75 59 * 66 63 58 61 56 44 28 24 * 28 25 56 52 50 45 38 34 3362 56 41 51 40 33 53 46 44 76 66 42 72 58 50 65 59 45 58 53 38 25 17 * 27 25 20 50 46 42 37 32 26

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD2012 Phase-In I Lev II 63 65 NA 52 47 NA 59 58 NA 70 72 NA 69 51 NA 63 65 NA 63 65 NA 38 28 NA 33 27 NA 55 55 NA 47 44 NA

73 75 NA 61 60 NA 65 66 NA 83 83 NA 86 82 NA 75 79 NA 71 71 NA 35 33 NA 37 51 NA 65 68 NA 56 58 NA92 89 94 89 83 91 89 86 100 96 93 93 95 89 * 93 91 93 91 88 96 70 65 * 67 70 80 88 85 91 86 82 91

EcoDis At-RiskWhite 2+ Male Female ELL SPED

Male Female ELL SPED At-RiskEcoDis

2014 Phase-In I Lev II2013 Phase-In I Lev II

US History

8 Soc. Studies2+All AA His. White


All AA2014 Phase-In I Lev II

His.

Green - At or above state averageYellow -- 1 to 4 points below state averageOrange -- 5 to 8 points below state average

Pink -- More than 8 points below state average

STAAR Scores - Social Studies Level IIISt. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD

12 9 5 6 3 0 7 5 5 20 12 6 20 12 * 15 11 5 10 7 6 1 1 * 3 2 0 5 4 3 2 1 013 9 3 7 3 0 7 5 3 20 13 3 20 8 * 15 11 4 11 7 1 1 1 * 3 2 0 6 5 0 2 2 014 10 4 7 4 6 8 6 0 22 13 4 21 9 17 16 12 6 11 7 2 1 1 * 3 1 20 6 5 4 2 2 2

St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD St. Reg. RISD5 5 NA 2 1 NA 3 2 NA 9 7 NA 8 3 NA 7 6 NA 4 4 NA 1 0 NA 1 0 NA 2 3 NA 1 1 NA7 5 NA 4 1 NA 3 3 NA 9 7 NA 18 3 NA 8 7 NA 5 3 NA 1 3 NA 1 2 NA 3 2 NA 1 1 NA

16 11 17 9 4 0 10 7 12 25 14 22 23 14 * 20 14 26 12 8 11 2 1 * 4 4 0 9 7 10 6 3 7

SPED EcoDis At-Risk8 Soc. Studies


AA His.

Male Female ELL

EcoDis At-Risk


2012 Level III

2012 Level III

White 2+ Male Female ELL SPED


US HistoryAll

Accountability Indexes

Texas RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Texas RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Texas RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Texas RISD RHS RJH Int Elem2013 77 77 76 78 77 83 34 35 21 39 40 NA 71 68 69 71 68 79 85 81 81 NA NA NA2014 77 80 84 78 79 80 40 37 NA 35 36 59 38 38 43 39 38 44 69 61 64 29 26 28

Index 1 - Student Achievment Index 2 - Student ProgressIndex 3 - Closing Performance

GapsIndex 4 - Postsecondary

Readiness

Distinction Designation

* Distinction Earned

Year RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim2012-2013 *33% 0% 0% 0% 0% *33% 25% 0% 0% 0% None None None NA NA

Year RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim RHS RJH Int Elem Prim2013-2014 0% 25% 33% *67% *67% 17% 25% 33% *100% 100% 0% 50% 50% NA NA *33% 50% NA NA NA NA Q2 Q4 *Q1 *Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q2 Q2 14% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Postsecondary ReadinessAcademic Achievement in

Social StudiesTop 25 % in Student Progress

Top 25% in Closing Performance Gaps

Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA Top 25 Percent Student ProgressAcademic Achievement in Math

Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA

Academic Achievement in Math Academic Achievement in Science

System Safeguards

State Region RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Prim State Region RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Prim State Region RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Prim State Region RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Prim State Region RISD RHS RJH Int Elem Prim2012-2013 95% 91% 94% 90% 91% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 82% 90% 100% 100% NA NA NA NA 100% NA 0% NA NA NA NA NA 94% 93% 94% 93% 94% 100% 100% 100%2013-2014 96% 94% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 90% 100% 100% NA NA NA NA 0% NA 0% NA NA NA NA NA 96% 95% 98% 100% 91% 100% 100% 100%

Total System Safeguards ScoreParticipation Rates Graduation Rates Met Federal Limits on Alternative AssessmentsPerformance Rates

STAAR Reading Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 1

Year K 1st 2nd2012-2013 Rpt Cat 1 74% Rpt Cat 1 72% Rpt Cat 1 68% Rpt Cat 1 71% Rpt Cat 1 65% Rpt Cat 1 72% Rpt Cat 1 49% Rpt Cat 1 58%2013-2014 Rpt Cat 1 73% Rpt Cat 1 68% Rpt Cat 1 65% Rpt Cat 1 66% Rpt Cat 1 67% Rpt Cat 1 72% Rpt Cat 1 58% Rpt Cat 1 52%

2012-2013 5 ( A ) 4 ( A ) 75% 2 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) 45% 2 ( A ) 80% 1 ( A ) NT 1 ( A ) NT2013-2014 5 ( A ) 4 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) 78% 2 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) 70% 2 ( A ) 66% 2 ( A ) 65% 1 ( A ) NT 1 ( A ) NT

2012-2013 6 ( C ) 5 ( B ) 4 ( B ) 70% 2 ( B ) 74% 2 ( B ) 63% 2 ( B ) 77% 2 ( B ) 75% 2 ( B ) 71% 1 ( B ) 79% 1 ( B ) 65%2013-2014 6 ( C ) 5 ( B ) 4 ( B ) 76% 2 ( B ) 69% 2 ( B ) 63% 2 ( B ) 67% 2 ( B ) 60% 2 ( B ) 70% 1 ( B ) 77% 1 ( B ) 76%

2012-2013 5 ( C ) 6 ( D ) 5 ( C ) 4 ( C ) 88% 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 1 ( C ) NE 1 ( C ) NT2013-2014 5 ( C ) 6 ( D ) 5 ( C ) 4 ( C ) 58% 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 1 ( C ) NE 1 ( C ) NT

2012-2013 4 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 1 ( D ) NT 1 ( D ) NT2013-2014 4 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 2 ( D ) NE 1 ( D ) NT 1 ( D ) NT

2012-2013 5 ( D ) 6 ( E ) 5 ( D ) 4 ( E ) NE 2 ( E ) 84% 2 ( E ) 88% 2 ( E ) 74% 2 ( E ) NT 2 ( E ) NT 1 ( E ) NT 1 ( E ) NT2013-2014 5 ( D ) 6 ( E ) 5 ( D ) 4 ( E ) NE 2 ( E ) 97% 2 ( E ) NT 2 ( E ) 90% 2 ( E ) 89% 2 ( E ) NT 1 ( E ) NT 1 ( E ) 87%

2012-2013 6 ( B ) 7 ( A ) 6 ( A ) 5 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) NT2013-2014 6 ( B ) 7 ( A ) 6 ( A ) 5 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) NT 2 ( A ) NT

2012-2013 6 ( D ) 7 ( B ) 6 ( B ) 5 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NT 2 ( B ) NE 2 ( B ) NE2013-2014 6 ( D ) 7 ( B ) 6 ( B ) 5 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NT 2 ( B ) NE 2 ( B ) NE

2012-2013 3 ( C ) NE 3 ( C ) NT 3 ( C ) NE 3 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE

2013-2014 3 ( C ) NE 3 ( C ) NT 3 ( C ) NE 3 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE 2 ( C ) NE

2012-2013 10 (A ) 10 ( A ) 9 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NE 6 ( A ) NE 6 ( A ) NE2013-2014 10 (A ) 10 ( A ) 9 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NE 6 ( A ) NE 6 ( A ) NE

2012-2013 9 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 12 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NE 9 ( A ) NT 9 ( A ) NT 9 ( A ) NT 8 ( A ) NE 8 ( A ) NE

2013-2014 9 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 12 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NE 9 ( A ) NT 9 ( A ) NT 9 ( A ) NT 8 ( A ) NE 8 ( A ) NE

2012-2013 14 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NE2013-2014 14 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NE

2012-2013 11 ( E ) NE 10 ( D ) NE 10 ( D ) NE 10 ( D ) NE 9 ( D ) NT 9 ( D ) NT2013-2014 11 ( E ) NE 10 ( D ) NE 10 ( D ) NE 10 ( D ) NE 9 ( D ) NT 9 ( D ) NT

2012-2013 Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( B ) 61% Fig 19 ( B ) 66%2013-2014 Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( D ) NE Fig 19 ( B ) 64% Fig 19 ( B ) 67%

2012-2013 Fig 19 ( F ) Fig 19 ( F ) Fig 19 ( F ) Fig 19 ( F ) NE Fig 19 ( F ) 66% Fig 19 ( F ) 69% Fig 19 ( F ) 65% Fig 19 ( F ) 60% Fig 19 ( F ) 68%2013-2014 Fig 19 ( F ) Fig 19 ( F ) Fig 19 ( F ) Fig 19 ( F ) NE Fig 19 ( F ) 58% Fig 19 ( F ) 67% Fig 19 ( F ) 57% Fig 19 ( F ) 61% Fig 19 ( F ) 75%

NE indicates that the student expectation is not eligible for testing for that grade level.NT indicates student expectations that were not tested for that testing year.Whole numbers without a letter distinguish genres tested with Figure 19Red indicates performance of less than 70% student masteryGreen indicates perfomrance greater than or equal to 70%.Figure 19 questions are represented twice in the chart above but counted once in STAAR scores. See whole numbers for Figure 19 breakdown by genre.

Eng I Eng II3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th


Year K 1st 2nd2012-2013 Rpt Cat 2 67% Rpt Cat 2 62% Rpt Cat 2 69% Rpt Cat 2 67% Rpt Cat 2 62% Rpt Cat 2 74% Rpt Cat 2 61% Rpt Cat 2 67%2013-2014 68% 68% 64% 65% 68% 69% 65% 57%

2012-2013 4 4 3 2 NT2013-2014 4 4 3 2 NT

2012-2013 4 ( B ) 4 ( B ) 3 ( B ) 2 (B ) NT2013-2014 4 ( B ) 4 ( B ) 3 ( B ) 2 (B ) 78%

2012-2013 6 7 6 5 NT 3 60% 3 NT 3 58% 3 76% 3 78% 2 NT 2 79%2013-2014 6 7 6 5 81% 3 79% 3 59% 3 NT 3 44% 3 62% 2 61% 2 45%

2012-2013 6 ( B ) 7 ( A ) 6 ( A ) 5 ( A ) 73% 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) 68% 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NE 2 ( A ) NE 2 ( A ) NE2013-2014 6 ( B ) 7 ( A ) 6 ( A ) 5 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NE 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) NE 2 ( A ) NE 2 ( A ) NE

2012-2013 6 ( D ) 7 ( B ) 6 ( B ) 5 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NE 2 ( B ) NT 2 ( B ) NT2013-2014 6 ( D ) 7 ( B ) 6 ( B ) 5 ( B ) NE 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NT 3 ( B ) NE 2 ( B ) NT 2 ( B ) NT

2012-2013 3 ( C ) NT 3 ( C ) NE 3 ( C ) NT 3 ( C ) NT 2 ( C ) NT 2 ( C ) 70%2013-2014 3 ( C ) NT 3 ( C ) NE 3 ( C ) NT 3 ( C ) NT 2 ( C ) 83% 2 ( C ) NT

2012-2013 7 8 7 6 60% 4 61% 4 71% 4 65% 4 72% 4 73% 3 58% 3 62%2013-2014 7 8 7 6 77% 4 59% 4 71% 4 71% 4 76% 4 52% 3 NT 3 77%

2012-2013 7 ( A ) 8 ( A ) 7 ( A ) 6 ( A) 69% 4 ( A ) 65% 4 ( A ) NT 4 ( A ) 67% 4 ( A ) 82% 4 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) 70% 3 ( A ) NT2013-2014 7 ( A ) 8 ( A ) 7 ( A ) 6 ( A) 28% 4 ( A ) 80% 4 ( A ) 58% 4 ( A ) NT 4 ( A ) 56% 4 ( A ) 84% 3 ( A ) NT 3 ( A ) 50%

2012-2013 8 7 NE 5 70% 5 76% 5 NT 5 54% 5 NT 4 NT 4 NT2013-2014 8 7 NE 5 68% 5 NT 5 61% 5 NT 5 NT 4 44% 4 NT

2012-2013 8 ( A ) 7 ( A ) NE 5 ( A ) 27% 5 ( A ) NE 5 ( A ) NE 5 ( A ) 64% 5 ( A ) NT 4 ( A ) NT 4 ( A ) NT2013-2014 8 ( A ) 7 ( A ) NE 5 ( A ) NT 5 ( A ) NE 5 ( A ) NE 5 ( A ) NT 5 ( A ) NT 4 ( A ) 67% 4 ( A ) NT

2012-2013 8 9 9 8 64% 6 49% 6 NT 6 69% 6 49% 6 67% 5 65% 5 67%2013-2014 8 9 9 8 51% 6 70% 6 62% 6 59% 6 60% 6 50% 5 NT 5 60%

2012-2013 8 ( A ) 9 ( A ) 9 ( A ) 8 ( A ) 67% 6 ( A ) 54% 6 ( A ) 69% 6 ( A ) 57% 6 ( A ) 68% 6 ( A ) 54% 5 ( A ) 52% 5 ( A ) NT2013-2014 8 ( A ) 9 ( A ) 9 ( A ) 8 ( A ) 76% 6 ( A ) 68% 6 ( A ) 74% 6 ( A ) 61% 6 ( A ) NT 6 ( A ) 61% 5 ( A ) NT 5 ( A ) NT

2012-2013 8 ( B ) 9 ( B ) 9 ( B ) 8 ( B ) 73% 6 ( B ) 72% 6 ( B ) 58% 6 ( B ) NT 6 ( B ) 58% 6 ( B ) 84% 5 ( B ) 72% 5 ( B ) NT2013-2014 8 ( B ) 9 ( B ) 9 ( B ) 8 ( B ) 78% 6 ( B ) 78% 6 ( B ) 75% 6 ( B ) NT 6 ( B ) 64% 6 ( B ) 65% 5 ( B ) 66% 5 ( B ) NT

2012-2013 8 ( C ) NE 6 ( C ) NT 6 ( C ) NT 6 ( C ) 83% 6 ( C ) 58% 6 ( C ) NT 5 ( C ) 43% 5 ( C ) NT2013-2014 8 ( C ) NE 6 ( C ) NT 6 ( C ) NT 6 ( C ) NT 6 ( C ) NT 6 ( C ) 72% 5 ( C ) NT 5 ( C ) 45%

2012-2013 10 10 9 NT 7 NE 7 NT 7 NE 7 57% 7 NT 6 NT 6 NT2013-2014 10 10 9 74% 7 NE 7 42% 7 NE 7 71% 7 72% 6 NT 6 NT

2012-2013 10 ( A ) 10 ( A ) 9 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 6 ( A ) NT 6 ( A ) 60%2013-2014 10 ( A ) 10 ( A ) 9 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) 69% 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NE 7 ( A ) NT 6 ( A ) NT 6 ( A ) NT

2012-2013 11 10 71% 8 82% 8 NT 8 NT 8 60% 8 80% 7 67% 7 68%2013-2014 11 10 NT 8 NT 8 NT 8 79% 8 NT 8 83% 7 62% 7 59%

2012-2013 11 ( A ) 10 ( A ) 72% 8 ( A ) NT 8 ( A ) 73% 8 ( A ) 58% 8 ( A ) 67% 8 ( A ) 83% 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NT2013-2014 11 ( A ) 10 ( A ) 57% 8 ( A ) NT 8 ( A ) 69% 8 ( A ) 71% 8 ( A ) 77% 8 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) NT 7 ( A ) 53%

2012-2013 12 16 16 16 NT 14 NT 14 NT 13 NT 13 NT 13 NT 12 42% 12 NT2013-2014 12 16 16 16 NT 14 NT 14 67% 13 NT 13 NT 13 NT 12 NT 12 NT2012-2013 12 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT2013-2014 12 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT



2012-2013 14 ( C ) NT 13 ( B ) NT 13 ( C ) NT 13 ( C ) NT 12 ( C ) NE 12 ( C ) NE2013-2014 14 ( C ) NT 13 ( B ) NT 13 ( C ) NT 13 ( C ) NT 12 ( C ) NE 12 ( C ) NE

2012-2013 16 ( C ) 16 ( C ) NE 14 ( C ) NE 14 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NT 12 ( D ) NT 12 ( D ) NT2013-2014 16 ( C ) 16 ( C ) NE 14 ( C ) NE 14 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NT 12 ( D ) NT 12 ( D ) NT

2012-2013 Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) 63% Fig 19 ( D ) 62% Fig 19 ( D ) 72% Fig 19 ( D ) 69% Fig 19 ( D ) 67% Fig 19 ( D ) 72% Fig 19 ( B ) 61% Fig 19 ( B ) 66%2013-2014 Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) 68% Fig 19 ( D ) 66% Fig 19 ( D ) 65% Fig 19 ( D ) 62% Fig 19 ( D ) 64% Fig 19 ( D ) 68% Fig 19 ( B ) 64% Fig 19 ( B ) 67%

2012-2013 Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) 58% Fig 19 ( E ) 64% Fig 19 ( E ) 66% Fig 19 ( E ) 58% Fig 19 ( E ) 47% Fig 19 ( E ) NT Fig 19 ( A ) NE Fig 19 ( A ) NE2013-2014 Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) 56% Fig 19 ( E ) 59% Fig 19 ( E ) 41% Fig 19 ( E ) 73% Fig 19 ( E ) 53% Fig 19 ( E ) NT Fig 19 ( A ) NE Fig 19 ( A ) NE



Years K 1st 2nd2012-2013 Rpt Cat 3 71% Rpt Cat 3 62% Rpt Cat 3 64% Rpt Cat 3 61% Rpt Cat 3 69% Rpt Cat 3 66% Rpt Cat 3 76% Rpt Cat 3 72%2013-2014 Rpt Cat 3 63% Rpt Cat 3 66% Rpt Cat 3 69% Rpt Cat 3 67% Rpt Cat 3 63% Rpt Cat 3 63% Rpt Cat 3 69% Rpt Cat 3 69%

2012-2013 9 13 13 12 NT 10 65% 10 NT 9 65% 9 70% 9 74% 8 NT 8 NT2013-2014 9 13 13 12 44% 10 63% 10 NT 9 59% 9 55% 9 67% 8 NT 8 NT

2012-2013 9 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 12 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) 68% 9 ( A ) NE 9 ( A ) NE 9 ( A ) NE 8 ( A ) 79% 8 ( A ) 73%2013-2014 9 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 12 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) 81% 9 ( A ) NE 9 ( A ) NE 9 ( A ) NE 8 ( A ) 76% 8 ( A ) 70%

2012-2013 10 14 14 13 58% 11 NT 11 60% 10 67% 10 65% 10 72% 9 NT 9 NT2013-2014 10 14 14 13 65% 11 NT 11 65% 10 69% 10 56% 10 52% 9 NT 9 NT

2012-2013 10 ( A ) 14 ( A ) 14 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 81% 11 ( A ) 74% 11 ( A ) 61% 10 ( A ) 46% 10 ( A ) 73% 10 ( A ) 58% 9 ( A ) 76% 9 ( A ) 77%2013-2014 10 ( A ) 14 ( A ) 14 ( A ) 13 ( A ) 61% 11 ( A ) 65% 11 ( A ) 72% 10 ( A ) 74% 10 ( A ) 56% 10 ( A ) 52% 9 ( A ) NT 9 ( A ) NT

2012-2013 10 ( A ) 14 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 13 ( B ) 68% 11 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) 45% 10 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) 49% 9 ( B ) NT 9 ( B ) 94%2013-2014 10 ( A ) 14 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 13 ( B ) 58% 11 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) NT 9 ( B ) 83% 9 ( B ) NT

2012-2013 10 ( B ) 14 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 13 ( C ) 80% 11 ( C ) 60% 11 ( C ) 64% 10 ( C ) 69% 10 ( C ) 57% 10 ( C ) 70% 9 ( C ) 75% 9 ( C ) 68%2013-2014 10 ( B ) 14 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 13 ( C ) 76% 11 ( C ) 81% 11 ( C ) NT 10 ( C ) 74% 10 ( C ) NT 10 ( C ) 88% 9 ( C ) 62% 9 ( C ) 68%

2012-2013 10 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 13 ( D ) NT 11 ( D ) NT 11 ( D ) 60%2013-2014 10 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 13 ( D ) 72% 11 ( D ) 76% 11 ( D ) NT

2012-2013 11 ( E ) 71% 10 ( D ) 59% 10 ( D ) 76% 10 ( D ) 68% 9 ( D ) NE 9 ( D ) NE2013-2014 11 ( E ) 61% 10 ( D ) 84% 10 ( D ) 70% 10 ( D ) 64% 9 ( D ) NE 9 ( D ) NE

2012-2013 14 NE 12 NE 12 NT 11 NT 11 NT 11 59% 10 NT 10 NT2013-2014 14 NE 12 NE 12 NT 11 NT 11 76% 11 63% 10 61% 10 76%

2012-2013 14 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) NT 10 ( A ) NT2013-2014 14 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) NE 10 ( A ) 74% 10 ( A ) 72%

2012-2013 12 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) 65% 10 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) NE2013-2014 12 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) 62% 11 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) NT 10 ( B ) NE

2012-2013 11 15 15 15 NT 13 62% 13 NT 12 NT 12 72% 12 NT 11 NT 11 NT2013-2014 11 15 15 15 NT 13 NT 13 63% 12 NT 12 NT 12 NT 11 NT 11 52%

2012-2013 11 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 15 ( A) NE 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) 84% 11 ( A ) 59%2013-2014 11 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 15 ( A) NE 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 12 ( A ) NE 11 ( A ) NT 11 ( A ) 72%

2012-2013 11 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 65% 13 ( B ) NT 13 ( B ) 71% 12 ( B ) NT 12 ( B ) 80% 12 ( B ) 70% 11 ( B ) 61% 11 ( B ) NT2013-2014 11 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 70% 13 ( B ) NT 13 ( B ) NT 12 ( B ) NT 12 ( B ) 73% 12 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT 11 ( B ) NT

2012-2013 12 16 16 16 49% 14 NT 14 NT 13 69% 13 NT 13 NT 12 NT 12 NT2013-2014 12 16 16 16 69% 14 NT 14 67% 13 71% 13 NT 13 NT 12 72% 12 NT

2012-2013 12 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 13 ( A ) 69% 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) 73%

2013-2014 12 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 13 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT 12 ( A ) NT



2012-2013 14 ( C ) NT 13 ( B ) NT 13 ( C ) NT 13 ( C ) NT 12 ( C ) NE 12 ( C ) NE2013-2014 14 ( C ) NT 13 ( B ) NT 13 ( C ) 61% 13 ( C ) 58% 12 ( C ) NE 12 ( C ) NE

2012-2013 16 ( C ) 16 ( C ) NE 14 ( C ) NE 14 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NT 13 ( D ) NE 12 ( D ) NT 12 ( D ) NT2013-2014 16 ( C ) 16 ( C ) NE 14 ( C ) NE 14 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NE 13 ( D ) NT 13 ( D ) NE 12 ( D ) NT 12 ( D ) NT

2012-2013 Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) 58% Fig 19 ( D ) 62% Fig 19 ( D ) 72% Fig 19 ( D ) 69% Fig 19 ( D ) 67% Fig 19 ( D ) 72% Fig 19 ( B ) NT Fig 19 ( B ) NT2013-2014 Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) Fig 19 ( D ) 68% Fig 19 ( D ) 66% Fig 19 ( D ) 65% Fig 19 ( D ) 62% Fig 19 ( D ) 64% Fig 19 ( D ) 68% Fig 19 ( B ) 64% Fig 19 ( B ) 67%

2012-2013 Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) 63% Fig 19 ( E ) 64% Fig 19 ( E ) 66% Fig 19 ( E ) 58% Fig 19 ( E ) 47% Fig 19 ( E ) 72% Fig 19 ( A ) NE Fig 19 ( A ) NE2013-2014 Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) Fig 19 ( E ) 56% Fig 19 ( E ) 59% Fig 19 ( E ) 41% Fig 19 ( E ) NT Fig 19 ( E ) 53% Fig 19 ( E ) 42% Fig 19 ( A ) NE Fig 19 ( A ) NE


STAAR Writing Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 1/4 Essay

Years K 1st 2nd2012-2013 Rpt Cat 1 46% Rpt Cat 1 54% Rpt Cat 4 55% Rpt Cat 4 61%2013-2014 Rpt Cat 1 51% Rpt Cat 1 55% Rpt Cat 4 58% Rpt Cat 4 60%2012-2013 13 ( B ) 17 ( B ) 17 ( B ) 17 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 13 ( B ) 13 ( B )2013-2014 13 ( B ) 17 ( B ) 17 ( B ) 17 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 15 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 14 ( B ) 13 ( B ) 13 ( B )2012-2013 13 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 15 ( C ) 15 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 13 ( C ) 13 ( C )2013-2014 13 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 15 ( C ) 15 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 14 ( C ) 13 ( C ) 13 ( C )2012-2013 13 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 13 ( D ) 13 ( D )2013-2014 13 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 13 ( D ) 13 ( D )2012-2013 14 18 18 18 16 NE 16 15 15 NE 15 14(Literary) 14 NE2013-2014 14 18 18 18 16 NE 16 15 15 NE 15 14(Literary) NE 14 NE2012-2013 14 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 16 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 15 ( A ) NE 15 ( A ) 14 ( A ) 60% 14 ( A ) NE2013-2014 14 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 16 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 15 ( A ) NE 15 ( A ) 14 ( A ) NE 14 ( A ) NE2012-2013 19 17 (Narrative) 17 16 16(Narrative) 162013-2014 19 17 (Narrative) 17 16 16(Narrative) 162012-2013 19 ( A ) 17 ( A ) 48% 17 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 56% 16 ( A )2013-2014 19 ( A ) 17 ( A ) 53% 17 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 16 ( A ) 59% 16 ( A )2012-2013 15 19 19 20 18(Expository) 18 17 17(Expository) 17 15(Expository) 15(Expository)2013-2014 15 19 19 20 18(Expository) 18 17 17(Expository) 17 15(Expository) 15(Expository) NE2012-2013 15 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 20 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 43% 18 ( A ) 17 ( A ) 17 ( A ) 53% 17 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 49% 15 ( A ) 62%2013-2014 15 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 20 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 49% 18 ( A ) 17 ( A ) 17 ( A ) 51% 17 ( A ) 15 ( A ) 58% 15 ( A ) NE2012-2013 20 ( A ) i 18 ( A ) i2013-2014 20 ( A ) i 18 ( A ) i2012-2013 20 ( A ) iii 18 ( A ) iii 18 ( A ) i 17 ( A ) i 17 ( A ) i 17 ( A ) i 15 ( A ) i 15 ( A ) i2013-2014 20 ( A ) iii 18 ( A ) iii 18 ( A ) i 17 ( A ) i 17 ( A ) i 17 ( A ) i 15 ( A ) i 15 ( A ) i NE2012-2013 18 ( A ) iv 17 ( A ) iv 17 ( A ) v 17 ( A ) v 15 ( A ) ii 15 ( A ) ii2013-2014 18 ( A ) iv 17 ( A ) iv 17 ( A ) v 17 ( A ) v 15 ( A ) ii 15 ( A ) ii NE2012-2013 18 ( A ) ii 17 ( A ) ii 17 ( A ) ii 17 ( A ) ii 15 ( A ) iii 15 ( A ) iii2013-2014 18 ( A ) ii 17 ( A ) ii 17 ( A ) ii 17 ( A ) ii 15 ( A ) iii 15 ( A ) iii NE2012-2013 20 ( A ) ii 18 ( A ) ii 18 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii 15 ( A ) iv 15 ( A ) iv2013-2014 20 ( A ) ii 18 ( A ) ii 18 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii 15 ( A ) iv 15 ( A ) iv NE2012-2013 17 ( A ) iv 17 ( A ) iv

2013-2014 17 ( A ) iv 17 ( A ) iv2012-2013 15 ( A ) v 15 ( A ) v2013-2014 15 ( A ) v 15 ( A ) v NE2012-2013 15 ( A ) vi2013-2014 15 ( A ) vi NE2012-2013 20 21 19 NE 19 18 18 NE 18 16 NE 16(Persuasive) 60%2013-2014 20 21 19 NE 19 18 18 NE 18 16 NE 16(Persuasive) 60%2012-2013 20 ( A ) 21 ( A ) 19 ( A ) NE 19 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A ) NE 18 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 16 ( A )2013-2014 20 ( A ) 21 ( A ) 19 ( A ) NE 19 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A ) NE 18 ( A ) 16 ( A ) NE 16 ( A )2012-2013 18 ( C ) NE 18 ( C ) 16 ( D ) NE 16 ( D )2013-2014 18 ( C ) NE 18 ( C ) 16 ( D ) NE 16 ( D )2012-2013 16 ( E ) NE 16 ( E )

2013-2014 16 ( E ) NE 16 ( E )


STAAR Writing Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 1/4 Essay

Scores reported indicate performance broken down by type of essay.Student Expectations listed are tested within the essay.NE indicates a Student Expectation that is not eligible for testing at that grade level.Red indicates performance below 70%.Green indicates performance at or above 70%.

STAAR Writing Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 2/5 Revising

Years K 1st 2nd2012-2013 Rpt Cat 2 57% Rpt Cat 2 66% Rpt Cat 5 66% Rpt Cat 5 73%2013-2014 Rpt Cat 2 67% Rpt Cat 2 71% Rpt Cat 5 71% Rpt Cat 5 69%2012-2013 13 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 15 ( C ) 59% 14 ( C ) 59% 13 ( C ) 74% 13 ( C ) 76%2013-2014 13 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 17 ( C ) 15 ( C ) 70% 14 ( C ) 70% 13 ( C ) 70% 13 ( C ) 69%2012-2013 15 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 49% 17 ( A ) 75% 15 ( A ) NT 15 ( A ) 64%2013-2014 15 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 48% 17 ( A ) 71% 15 ( A ) 71% 15 ( A ) 72%2012-2013 18 ( A ) i NT2013-2014 18 ( A ) i NT2012-2013 18 ( A ) iii NT 17 ( A ) i NT 15 ( A ) i NT 15 ( A ) i NT2013-2014 18 ( A ) iii NT 17 ( A ) i NT 15 ( A ) i NT 15 ( A ) i NT2012-2013 17 ( A ) v NT 15 ( A ) ii NT 15 ( A ) ii NT2013-2014 17 ( A ) v NT 15 ( A ) ii NT 15 ( A ) ii NT2012-2013 17 ( A ) ii NT 15 ( A ) iii NT 15 ( A ) iii NT2013-2014 17 ( A ) ii NT 15 ( A ) iii NT 15 ( A ) iii NT2012-2013 18 ( A ) ii NT 17 ( A ) iii NT 15 ( A ) iv NT 15 ( A ) iv NT2013-2014 18 ( A ) ii NT 17 ( A ) iii NT 15 ( A ) iv NT 15 ( A ) iv NT2012-2013 17 ( A ) iv NT2013-2014 17 ( A ) iv NT2012-2013 15 ( A ) v NT 15 ( A ) v NT2013-2014 15 ( A ) v NT 15 ( A ) v NT2012-2013 15 ( A ) vi NE 15 ( A ) vi NT2013-2014 15 ( A ) vi NE 15 ( A ) vi NT2012-2013 20 ( A ) 19 ( A ) NE 18 ( A ) NT 16 ( A ) 51% 16 ( A ) 67%2013-2014 20 ( A ) 19 ( A ) NE 18 ( A ) NT 16 ( A ) 73% 16 ( A ) 55%2012-2013 16 ( C ) NT 16 ( C ) NT2013-2014 16 ( C ) NT 16 ( C ) NT2012-2013 18 ( C ) 49% 16 ( D ) 69% 16 ( D) NT2013-2014 18 ( C ) 73% 16 ( D ) 77% 16 ( D) 87%2012-2013 16 ( E ) 70% 16 ( E ) NT2013-2014 16 ( E ) NT 16 ( E ) NT2012-2013 16 ( F ) NT2013-2014 16 ( F ) NT

NT indicates student expectations not tested during this testing year.NE indicates student expectations not eligible for testing at that grade level.Red indicates performance less than 70%.Green indicates performance at or above 70%.

17 ( C )17 ( C )

15 ( C )15 ( C )18 ( A )18 ( A )

14 ( C )14 ( C )

14 ( C )14 ( C )17 ( A )17 ( A )

17 ( A ) i17 ( A ) i17 ( A ) v17 ( A ) v17 ( A ) ii17 ( A ) ii

17 ( A )17 ( A )

17 ( A ) i17 ( A ) i

20 ( A )20 ( A )

18 ( C )

18 ( A )18 ( A )19 ( A )21 ( A )21 ( A ) 19 ( A ) 18 ( A ) 18 ( A )

18 ( C )

17 ( A ) iii17 ( A ) iii17 ( A ) iv17 ( A ) iv

17 ( A ) iii18 ( A ) iii20 ( A ) ii20 ( A ) ii

18 ( A ) iii 17 ( A ) iii

20 ( A ) iii20 ( A ) iii

18 ( A ) iv18 ( A ) iv18 ( A ) ii18 ( A ) ii

18 ( A ) i18 ( A ) i

17 ( A ) iv17 ( A ) iv17 ( A ) ii17 ( A ) ii

18 ( A ) i18 ( A ) i


STAAR Writing Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 3/6 Edit

Years K 1st 2nd2012-2013 Rpt Cat 3 64% Rpt Cat 3 64% Rpt Cat 6 68% Rpt Cat 6 72%2013-2014 Rpt Cat 3 60% Rpt Cat 3 66% Rpt Cat 6 59% Rpt Cat 6 71%2012-2013 13 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 62% 14 ( D ) 69% 13 ( D ) 74% 13 ( D ) 78%2013-2014 13 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 17 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 62% 14 ( D ) 52% 13 ( D ) 69% 13 ( D ) 76%2012-2013 16 ( A ) 20 ( A ) 21 ( A ) 20 ( A ) 69% 19 ( A ) 67% 17 ( A ) 71% 17 ( A ) 80%2013-2014 16 ( A ) 20 ( A ) 21 ( A ) 20 ( A ) NT 19 ( A ) 82% 17 ( A ) 71% 17 ( A ) 86%2012-2013 16 ( A ) i 20 ( A ) i 21 ( A ) i 20 ( A ) i NT 19 ( A ) i NT 17 ( A ) i NT 17 ( A ) i NT2013-2014 16 ( A ) i 20 ( A ) i 21 ( A ) i 20 ( A ) i NT 17 ( A ) i NT 17 ( A ) i NT2012-2013 16 ( A ) ii 20 ( A ) ii 21 ( A ) ii 20 ( A ) ii NT2013-2014 16 ( A ) ii 20 ( A ) ii 21 ( A ) ii 20 ( A ) ii NT2012-2013 16 ( A ) iii 20 ( A ) iii 21 ( A ) iii 20 ( A ) iii NT2013-2014 16 ( A ) iii 20 ( A ) iii 21 ( A ) iii 20 ( A ) iii NT2012-2013 19 ( A ) ii NT2013-2014 19 ( A ) ii NT2012-2013 19 ( A ) iii NT2013-2014 19 ( A ) iii NT2012-2013 20 ( A ) iv 21 ( A ) iv 20 ( A ) iv NT 19 ( A ) iv NT2013-2014 20 ( A ) iv 21 ( A ) iv 20 ( A ) iv NT 19 ( A ) iv NT2012-2013 16 ( A ) iv 20 ( A ) v 21 ( A ) v 20 ( A ) v NT 19 ( A ) v NT2013-2014 16 ( A ) iv 20 ( A ) v 21 ( A ) v 20 ( A ) v NT 19 ( A ) v NT2012-2013 20 ( A ) vii NT 19 ( A ) vii NT2013-2014 20 ( A ) vii NT 19 ( A ) vii NT2012-2013 20 ( A ) vii 21 ( A ) vii 20 ( A ) viii NT 19 ( a ) viii NT

2013-2014 20 ( A ) vii 21 ( A ) vii 20 ( A ) viii NT 19 ( a ) viii NT2012-2013 16 (A ) v 20 ( A ) vi 21 ( A ) vi 20 ( A ) vi NT 19 ( A ) vi NT 17 ( A ) ii NT 17 ( A ) ii NT2013-2014 16 (A ) v 20 ( A ) vi 21 ( A ) vi 20 ( A ) vi NT 19 ( A ) vi NT 17 ( A ) ii NT 17 ( A ) ii NT2012-2013 17 ( A ) iii NT 17 ( A ) iii NT2013-2014 17 ( A ) iii NT 17 ( A ) iii NT2012-2013 16 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 21 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 63% 19 ( B ) NT2013-2014 16 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 21 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 54% 19 ( B ) NT2012-2013 16 ( C ) 20 ( C ) 81% 19 ( C ) 63% 17 ( C ) 71% 17 ( C ) 68%2013-2014 16 ( C ) 20 ( C ) 79% 19 ( C ) 61% 17 ( C ) 55% 17 ( C ) 54%2012-2013 17 ( B ) 21 ( B ) 22 ( B ) 21 ( B ) NT 20 ( A ) 53% 18 ( A ) 56% 18 ( A ) 81%2013-2014 17 ( B ) 21 ( B ) 22 ( B ) 21 ( B ) NT 20 ( A ) 73% 18 ( A ) 42% 18 ( A ) 74%2012-2013 21 ( B ) i NT2013-2014 21 ( B ) i NT2012-2013 21 ( B ) ii NT2013-2014 21 ( B ) ii NT2012-2013 21 ( B ) iii NT2013-2014 21 ( B ) iii NT

19 ( A ) ii19 ( A ) ii19 ( A ) iii19 ( A ) iii

19 ( A ) iv19 ( A ) iv

20 ( A )20 ( A )

23 ( B ) ii23 ( B ) ii

20 ( A )

21 ( A )

21 ( A )

21 ( A )

23 ( B ) 20 ( A )

19 ( C )19 ( B )

19 ( C )20 ( C )20 ( C )

23 ( B )

19 ( C )19 ( C )20 ( A )20 ( A )

21 ( A )22 ( C )

22 ( B )22 ( C )

22 ( A ) iv22 ( A ) iv22 ( A ) v22 ( A ) v

22 ( A ) vii22 ( A ) vii22 ( A ) viii

22 ( A ) viii22 ( A ) vi22 ( A ) vi

22 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 19 ( B )

20 ( A ) vi20 ( A ) vi 19 ( A ) vi

19 ( A ) v19 ( A ) v

19 ( A ) vii19 ( A ) vii19 ( A ) viii

19 ( A ) viii19 ( A ) vi

20 ( B )

20 ( A ) iv20 ( A ) iv20 ( A ) v20 ( A ) v

20 ( A ) vii20 ( A ) vii20 ( A ) viii

20 ( A ) viii

19 ( A ) v19 ( A ) v

19 ( A ) iv19 ( A ) iv

22 ( A ) iii22 ( A ) iii

20 ( A ) ii20 ( A ) ii20 ( A ) iii20 ( A ) iii

22 ( A ) ii19 ( A ) ii19 ( A ) ii19 ( A ) iii19 ( A ) iii

22 ( A ) ii

22 ( A )22 ( A )

22 ( A ) i22 ( A ) i

20 ( A ) i20 ( A ) i

19 ( A ) i19 ( A ) i

20 ( A ) 19 ( A )20 ( A ) 19 ( A )

19 ( A ) i19 ( A ) i

19 ( A )19 ( A )

17 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 14 ( D ) 14 ( D )


14 ( D )17 ( D ) 15 ( D ) 14 ( D )

STAAR Writing Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 3/6 Edit

2012-2013 17 ( C ) 21 ( C ) 22 ( C ) 21 ( C ) 68% 20 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 59% 18 ( B ) 66% 18 ( B ) 63%2013-2014 17 ( C ) 21 ( C ) 22 ( C ) 21 ( C ) 53% 20 ( B ) 20 ( B ) 65% 18 ( B ) 50% 18 ( B ) 63%2012-2013 21 ( C ) i NT 20 ( B ) i 20 ( B ) i NT 18 ( B ) ii NT 18 ( B ) i NT2013-2014 21 ( C ) i NT 20 ( B ) i 20 ( B ) i NT 18 ( B ) ii NT 18 ( B ) i NT2012-2013 20 ( B ) iii 20 ( B ) ii NT 18 ( B ) iii NE 18 ( B ) iii NE2013-2014 20 ( B ) iii 20 ( B ) ii NT 18 ( B ) iii NE 18 ( B ) iii NE2012-2013 21 ( C ) ii NT 21 ( B ) ii 20 ( B ) ii 18 ( B ) i NT 18 ( B ) ii NT2013-2014 21 ( C ) ii NT 21 ( B ) ii 20 ( B ) ii 18 ( B ) i NT 18 ( B ) ii NT2012-2013 18 ( B ) 22 ( B ) 23 ( B ) 24 ( B ) 22 ( A ) NT 22 ( A )2013-2014 18 ( B ) 22 ( B ) 23 ( B ) 24 ( B ) 22 ( A ) 77% 22 ( A )2012-2013 22 ( A ) i NT2013-2014 22 ( A ) i NT2012-2013 22 ( A ) ii NT2013-2014 22 ( A ) ii NT2012-2013 24 ( B ) iv 22 ( A ) iii NT2013-2014 22 ( A ) iii NT2012-2013 22 ( A ) iv NT2013-2014 22 ( A ) iv NT2012-2013 22 ( A ) v NT 22 ( A ) iii2013-2014 22 ( A ) v NT 22 ( A ) iii2012-2013 22 ( D ) 23 ( D ) 22 ( B ) 66% 22 ( B ) i - iv2013-2014 22 ( B ) NT 22 ( B ) i - iv2012-2013 24 ( E ) 22 ( C ) 53% 22 ( C ) 21 ( A )2013-2014 24 ( E ) 22 ( C ) 58% 22 ( C ) 21 ( A )2012-2013 22 ( E ) 24 ( F ) 24 ( G ) 22 ( D ) NT 22 ( D ) 21 ( B ) 21 ( A ) 63% 19 ( A ) 60% 19 ( A ) 81%2013-2014 22 ( E ) 24 ( F ) 24 ( G ) 22 ( D ) NT 22 ( D ) 21 ( B ) 21 ( A ) 80% 19 ( A ) 61% 19 ( A ) 77%

NT indicates student expectations not tested during this testing year.NE indicates student expectations not eligible for testing at that grade level.Red indicates performance less than 70%.Green indicates performance at or above 70%.

21 ( A )21 ( A )

20 ( B ) i20 ( B ) i20 ( B ) ii

23 ( C ) ii

20 ( B ) ii

21 ( B ) i

23 ( C )23 ( C )

23 ( C ) ii20 ( B )20 ( B )

21 ( B ) i

21 ( B )21 ( B )

STAAR Math Vertical AlignmentReporting Category 1

Years K 1st 2nd2014-2015 Rpt Cat 1 Rpt Cat 1 Rpt Cat 1 Rpt Cat 1 Rpt Cat 1 Rpt Cat 1 Rpt Cat 1

2014-2015 2(A) 2(A) 2(A)

3(A)3(D)3(C)

2(B)2(F) 3(B) 2(C) 2(B)

2(l) 2(B) 2(A)2( C) 2(B) 2(B)

2(B) 2(A)2(E)

2(G)2(H)

2(F)2(G)

2(F)

2(D)

4(G) C2

2(F) 2(E)2(H)

2014-2015 3(B) 3(C)

3(A) 2(E)3(B)

2014-2015 3(C) 3(E)

2014-2015 3(F)

2014-2015 3(G) 3(C)

2014-2015 3(H) 3(D)

2014-2015 3(G)

2014-2015 6(A)

2(C)4(B)

3(D)

3(A)

2(C)2(A)

2(A)

Alg I3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

2(D) 2(C)2(D)2(D)2(B)

2014-2015

2(G)

2(C)2014-2015

2014-2015

2014-2015

2(E)2(D)

2014-2015

2014-2015

C2


2014-2015 6(C)

2014-2015 6(D)

2014-2015 6(E)

2014-2015 6(H)

2014-2015 6(I)

2014-2015 4(C)

2014-2015 4(D) 4(A) C2

4(E)4(F)4(G)

2(G)4(D) C2

2014-2015 5(B) 7(A) 4(A)

2014-2015 4(I)

5(C) C2 4(E)4(F)

5(D)5(E)

5(B) C2

2014-2015 7(C)

2014-2015 7(D)

8(A) C3 3(C) C38(B) C38(C) C3 10(C) C3

NE indicates a Student Expectation that is Not Eligible for testing at that grade.NT indicates not tested that testing year.If there is a C1, C2, or C3, that indicates that the Student Expectation is eligible for testing in the category noted. Cells filled with grid indicates no Student Expectation at that grade level.Red indicates performance of less than 70% student masteryGreen indicates performance of greater than or equal to 70%.

11(A) C3

5(C)

7(A)

4(D) C2

2014-2015 9(C) 7(A)

2014-2015

2014-2015

2014-2015 7(B)4(B) C25(A) C27(C) 5(A) C2


Years K 1st 2nd2014-2015 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 22015-2016 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 2 Rpt Cat 22014-2015 4(A)2015-20162014-2015 4(B)2015-2016

2014-2015 4(C)2015-2016

3(A) 3(B)3(B) 3(C)3(C) 3(E) 4(B)

3(F) 3(K)6(A) 4(D)

4(E)4(F)4(G) 4(C)4(K) 4(E)

4(F)4(H)

3(J)4(J) 3(A)

3(C)3(D)

2015-20163(A) 4(C)3(D) 4(A)3(F) 4(D)

3(E) 3(H)

4(G) 4(D)

4(H)3(D)3(E)3(I)3(F)3(G)3(L)

3(B)2015-2016

3(E)

2014-2015

2014-2015

4(A) 4(A) 3(A)

3(B)

3(B)

3(C)

4(B)

3(B)

3(A)3(E)

Algebra I3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

3(A)4(A)4(A)


4(D) C14(G)

2014-2015 6(B) 4(H)

4(D) C15(A)

5(E) 4(C) 5(A)4(D) 4(C) 5(E)

2015-20162014-2015 4(B)2015-2016

6(A) 5(B)6(C) 5(F)6(B) 5(I)

2015-20162014-2015 4(B)2015-2016

4(E) C14(F) C14(G) C15(B)5(C) C1

2015-20162014-2015 5(G)2015-20162014-2015 5(H)2015-20162014-2015 9(A) 10(A) 8(A)2015-20162014-2015 9(B) 10(B)2015-20162014-2015 9(C) 10(C) 8(B)2015-2016

5(F) 7(C) 5(A) 10(A) 11(A) 8(C)5(G) 5(D)

5(B)5(D)5(E)

5(B)

2014-2015 5(C) 4(E) C1 7(A) C1

2014-2015

7(C) 5(A)

4(B)2014-2015 2(C) C1

2014-2015 4(D)

2014-20155(B)

2014-2015 5(A) 4(B)

7(B) C1

4(A)

4(A)

10(B) 11(B) 9(A)

7(A)




Years K 1st 2nd2014-2015 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 32015-2016 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3 Rpt Cat 3

6(A) 6(C) 6(A) 3(A)6(B) 3(B)6(C)

2014-2015 6(D)

6(G)6(H)

8(A) 3(C)

8(B)

8(C) 10(C)2015-20162014-2015 7(C)

2014-2015 7(D)

2014-2015 7(E)

8(A)8(B)8(C)

2015-20167(A) 7(A) 9(D)

7(B)7(D)7(C) 9(B)

9(E) 7(B)7(E) 9(G) 7(C)

2014-2015 5(A)2015-20162014-2015 5(B)2015-20162014-2015 5(C)2015-20162014-2015 5(C) NE 4(G) NE 8(B) 8(A) NE 6(A)2015-20162014-2015 8(C) NE 6(C)

6(D)6(D)2014-2015

6(E)2014-2015

8(A) 6(B)

2014-2015


11(A)7(A) C19(C)2014-2015

4(E)4(H)7(A)

9(A)8(C)2014-2015


2015-20168(C)

9(A) 7(A)9(B)

2015-20169(C)9(D) 7(B)

2015-20162014-2015 7(C)2015-20162014-2015 7(D)2015-20162014-2015 8(A) 11(C) 8(D)2015-20162014-2015 6(C) 6(B) 10(A)2015-20162014-2015 10(B)2015-20162014-2015 10(C)2015-2016

6(E) 6(A) 8(C)8(B)

7(D) 10(D)7(E)

7(B)

2014-2015 9(F) 6(A) 10(D)

2014-2015 6(C) 6(B)


4(H)

5(A)6(D)6(A)

8(D)

8(D)

2014-2015

2014-2015

7(A)8(C)

2014-2015

2014-20155(D)


Years K 1st 2nd2014-2015 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 42015-2016 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 4 Rpt Cat 42014-2015 4(C) 5(A) 4(C)

2014-2015 5(C)2015-20162014-2015 5(D)2015-2016

2014-2015 9(B) 11(A)2015-20162014-2015 6(G)2015-20162014-2015 8(B) 8(B) 10(B) 8(A) 9(A) 9(A) 12(A)2015-2016

12(B)12(C) 11(B)12(D)

2015-20162014-2015 12(B)2015-20162014-2015 12(C) 11(C) NE2015-2016

8(C) 8(C) 10(D)10(C) 8(B) 9(B) 9(C)

2015-20162014-2015 13(B)2015-20162014-2015 11(C) 10(D) NE 10(D) NE 14(A)2015-20162014-2015 11(D) 9(D) 10(E) 10(C) NE 14(B) 12(A)2015-20162014-2015 14(C)2015-20162014-2015 11(D) 14(E) 12(E) NE2015-20162014-2015 11(E) 14(F)2015-20162014-2015 11(D) 14(G)2015-20162014-2015 9(A) 9(A) 9(A) 10(A) 10(A) 13(A)2015-20162014-2015 10(F) 13(B)2015-20162014-2015 11(F) 9(B) 10(B)

2014-2015 13(C)2015-2106

13(A)2014-2015

2014-2015 12(A)



2014-2015 13(D)2015-20162014-2015 11(B) 9(C) NE 13(F) 12(C)2015-20162014-2015 9(C) 11(A) 9(E) 10(C) NE 13(E) 12(D)2015-20162014-2015 9(D) 9(B) 10(B) 14(H) 12(G)2015-20162014-2015 10(E)

NE indicates a Student Expectation that is Not Eligible for testing at that grade.NT indicates not tested that testing year.

If there is a C1, C2, or C3, that indicates that the Student Expectation is eligible for testing in the category noted. Cells filled with grid indicates no Student Expectation at that grade level.Red indicates performance of less than 70% student masteryGreen indicates performance of greater than or equal to 70%.

STAAR Math Vertical AlignmentProcess Standards

Years K 1st 2nd2014-2015 1(A) 1(A) 1(A) 1(A) 1(A) 1(A) 1(A) 1(A) 1(A)2015-20162014-2015 1(B) 1(B) 1(B) 1(B) 1(B) 1(B) 1(B) 1(B) 1(B)2015-20162014-2015 1(C) 1(C) 1(C) 1(C) 1(C) 1(C) 1(C) 1(C) 1(C)2015-20162014-2015 1(D) 1(D) 1(D) 1(D) 1(D) 1(D) 1(D) 1(D) 1(D)2015-20162014-2015 1(E) 1(E) 1(E) 1(E) 1(E) 1(E) 1(E) 1(E) 1(E)2015-20162014-2015 1(F) 1(F) 1(F) 1(F) 1(F) 1(F) 1(F) 1(F) 1(F)2015-20162014-2015 1(G) 1(G) 1(G) 1(G) 1(G) 1(G) 1(G) 1(G) 1(G)

Cells with centered notation only (no column for data entry) are taught but not eligible for testing at that gradeMerged cells without notation are not taught at that grade levelWhole numbers without a letter distinguish genres tested with Figure 19Red indicates performance of less than 70% student masteryFigure 19 questions are represented twice in the chart above but counted once in STAAR scores. See whole numbers for Figure 19 breakdown by genre.

Alg I3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Documents

Rusk Junior High School 2014-2015 Campus Plan - Rusk ISD