Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
1
Synthesis of Maghemite Nano-particles using Micro-emulsion technique and its application in
removal of Heavy elements from Waste-Water Presenting R. Hitesh
1, M.Virendrasinh
2, B. Pushpajitsinh
3
1, 2, 3
Faculty of Engineering Technology & Research, Ta Bardoli Dist Surat
E-mail addresses: [email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
Abstract: This paper investigates the synthesis and applicability of Maghemite( -Fe2O3) nanoparticles for the selective removal of toxic
heavy metals like Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI), Divalent Copper Cu(II) and Divalent Nickel Ni(II).The nanoparticles are formed by the
co-precipitation reaction of ferrous and ferric salts with organic base, cyclohexylamine and into a water-in-oil micro emulsion using
AOT(Aerosol-OT) as surfactant. Formation of Maghemite Nanoparticles is indicated by Red-Brown Color particles precipitated on
addition of cyclohexylamine. In contrast, cyclohexylamine does not avoid the aggregation of the particles during the synthesis. The
Maghemite nanoparticles of 5.615 nm (Hydrodynamic Diameter) were synthesized using Micro-Emulsion method. The Hydrodynamic
diameter of Maghemite Nanoparticles is characterized by DLS (Dynamic Light Scattering).Batch experiments were carried out to
determine the adsorption kinetics and mechanisms of Cr (VI), Ni (II) and Cu (II) by Maghemite nanoparticles. The adsorption process
was found to be highly pH dependent, which made the nanoparticles selectively adsorb these three metals from wastewater. The
adsorption of heavy metals reached equilibrium rapidly within 10 min. The formed Micro-emulsion is stable and characterized by
stability test using turbid scan for 12 Hrs.
Keywords: Maghemite Nano-particles, Micro-Emulsion, Characterization, Adsorption kinetics, Stability test
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
2
1. Introduction:
The presence of heavy metals like Cr (VI) Ni (II) and Cu (II) in
wastewater and surface water is becoming a severe
environmental and public health problem [1] [2] Adsorption is
a conventional but efficient technique to remove heavy metals
or organics from aqueous solutions. The adsorbents used in
Adsorption are highly porous materials, providing adequate
surface area for adsorption. However, the existence of intra-
particle diffusion may lead to the decrease in the adsorption
rate and available capacity, especially for macro-molecules.
Thus, developing an adsorbent with large surface area and
small diffusion resistance is of great significance in practical
engineering applications.
With the latest development of Nanotechnology various types
of Nano-particles are synthesized using various methods like
Sol-gel, Co-precipitation, Thermal methods, Micro-emulsion
and other physical methods.
Micro-emulsions are a special class of ‘‘dispersions’’
(transparent or translucent) that actually have little in common
with emulsions. They are better described as ‘‘swollen
micelles’’. The term micro-emulsion was first introduced by
Hoar and Schulman [3] who discovered that by titration of a
milky emulsion (stabilized by soap such as potassium oleate)
with a medium-chain alcohol, such as pentanol or hexanol, a
transparent or translucent system was produced.
This technique can be applied in oil-recovery, as a fuel, in
agrochemicals, in synthesizing nanoparticles, in food industry
etc.
Maghemite has a cubic unit cell in which each cell contains 32
O ions, 21⅓ Fe3+
ions and 2⅔ vacancies. The cations are
distributed randomly over the 8 tetrahedral and 16 octahedral
sites [4].
In this study, monodisperse Maghemite Nanoparticles [5] are
synthesized using Micro-Emulsion Technique and is applied in
removal of selective Heavy metals like Cr (VI) [6], Ni (II), Cu
(II) from waste water [7].Maghemite nanoparticle as a novel
adsorbent is expected to offer an attractive and inexpensive
option for the removal of heavy metals by considering its
simple synthesizing method, high surface area, and magnetic
properties. Cr (VI), Cu (II), and Ni (II) were chosen as the
metal adsorbate because they commonly exist in the effluents
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
3
of plating factories, petroleum, electrolytic refining plants, and
acid mining industries. Thus the objective of this study is:
Synthesis of nanoparticles using Micro-Emulsion technique
and using those nanoparticles as adsorbate for removal of
Heavy metal from waste water of Industrial Effluent.
2. Material and Methods:
The Maghemite Nano-particles are synthesized by Micro-
Emulsion technique. First metal precursor solution(water-
phase) is prepared using Ferric Chloride (0.5 M) , Ferrous
Sulphate (0.25 M) and Hydrochloric acid (0.1M). In a separate
beaker surfactant AOT (Aerosol-OT) is dissolved in
Cyclohexane (Oil-phase).The Metal precursor is added to
solution of Cyclohexane and AOT in proportion of 90/7/3 and
is constantly stirred. After that the mixture is purged with
Nitrogen Gas for 5-10 minutes and heated up to 50-55 oC with
constant stirring. The formation of Micro-Emulsion is observed
when the liquid becomes non-light scattering to light scattering
i.e., hazy to transparent. After formation of Micro-Emulsion the
precipitating agent like organic base Cyclohexylamine is added
to Micro-Emulsion Finally Maghemite Nanoparticles are
obtained as Red-Brown color particles and separated and
washed with acetone and then with ultra-pure water thrice and
dried. The Stability of Micro-Emulsion is tested using Turbid-
Scan for 12 Hours and the particles Hydro-dynamic Diameter
is characterized by DLS.
2.1 Adsorption Studies:
Synthetic solutions were prepared of K2Cr2O7, NiCl2 and
CuSO4 in ultrapure water. Adsorption studies were performed
by rotating 0.1 g maghemite nanoparticles with 20 mL of metal
solution in a glass vial at room temperature of 25°C To
investigate the effect of pH, 20 mL of 100 mg/L Cr (VI), Cu
(II), and Ni (II) ternary component systems with pH ranging
from 2.0–10.0 were prepared by dissolving desired metal salts
in ultrapure water. The above solutions at different pH were
mixed with 0.1 g Nano scale maghemite for 24 h to reach
equilibrium. For adsorption kinetic studies, 0.1 g Nano scale
maghemite was added into 20 mL of 100 mg/L Cr (VI), Cu (II),
and Ni (II) single-solute individually. The pH of the suspension
for Cr (VI), Cu (II), and Ni (II) systems was, respectively,
adjusted to 2.5, 6.5, and 8.5. Volumes of 3 mL of samples were
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
4
taken for metal measurements at specific time intervals. The
measurement was carried on Atomic Spectroscopy for Cu (II)
and Ni (II) and Visible Spectroscopy for Cr (VI) using Quartz
Cuvette as a sample holder.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Characterization of Micro-Emulsion
The stability of Micro-Emulsion is tested using Turbid-Scan
(classic MA2000) for 12 Hours of time It was observed that BS
profiles for 12 hrs after interval of 15 min. were almost
superimposing. It indicated that the structure and average sizes
of the nanoparticles would slightly change with the progression
of time, but since the nanoparticles were stabilized by the
surfactant, no abrupt changes in BS data were observed.
Fig 3.1 BS Profile
3.2 Characterization of Maghemite nanoparticles
DLS (Malvern Zetasizer, Nano ZS 90, U.K.) measurements of
the cyclohexane/AOT/iron salt solutions were performed at
different temperatures to study the size of the microemulsion
nanodroplets. Fig. 2 shows the average size of nanodroplets as
a function of temperature. The average hydrodynamic diameter
of droplets is 30.48 nm at 45°C, 8.07 nm at 50° C, 8.23 nm at
55° C, 6.86 nm at 60° C and 5.65 nm at 63° C.
Fig 2: DLS graph at different tempratures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
45° C
50° C
55° C
60° C
63° C
Num
ber
(%
)
Particle Size
Cyclohexylamine 12 hrs (23/11/13 17:43)
Back Scattering
0mm 20mm 40mm 60mm
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0:00
0:30
1:00
1:30
2:00
2:30
3:00
3:30
4:00
4:30
5:00
5:30
6:00
6:30
7:00
7:30
8:00
8:30
9:00
9:30
10:00
10:30
11:00
11:30
12:00
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
5
3.3 Effect of pH
The effect of solution pH on the removal of chromium, copper,
and nickel from ternary component systems during adsorption
process is shown in Figure below:
Fig 2: Effect of pH on % Removal Efficiency
As far as the metals are concerned, the removal efficiency was
highly pH dependent. The percentage of uptake of Cr (VI)
decreased gradually with an increase in pH, whereas the
percentage of removal of Cu (II) and Ni (II) increased with an
increase in pH. As observed, the maximum removal of Cr
occurred at about pH 2.5, while Cu and Ni were not at all
removed at this pH. With an increase in pH to 6.5, the removal
efficiency of Cu reached 92%; while only 16% of Ni was
removed. When the pH was further increased to 9.0, almost
92% of the Ni was removed. Thus, the selective removal of
these three metals can be verified by controlling the pH of the
solution. The dependence of metal removal on the pH can be
explained from the perspective of surface chemistry in an
aqueous phase; the surfaces of metal oxides are generally
covered with hydroxyl groups that vary in form at different pH
levels. The surface charge is neutral at the zero point of charge
pHpzc, which is 6.3 for maghemite. Below the pHpzc, the
adsorbent surface is positively charged, and anion adsorption
occurred by simple electrostatic attraction. Above the pHpzc,
the adsorbent surface is negatively charged, and cation
adsorption occurred. With an increase in pH, the uptake of Cr
(VI) ions decreased, which is apparently due to the higher
concentration of OH− ions present in the mixture that compete
with Cr (VI)species CrO42−
for adsorption sites. On the other
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
% Removal
pH
Cr(VI)
Ni (II)
Cu(II)
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
6
hand, as the adsorption surface is negatively charged pH
pHpzc, increasing electrostatic repulsion between negatively
charged Cr (VI) species and negatively charged nanoparticles
would also result in a release of the adsorbed HCrO4 −
and
CrO42−.
As far as Cu and Ni are concerned, the increase in
metal removal with pH is due to a decline in competition
between proton and metal species for surface sites; thereby
decreasing in positive surface charge and resulting in a lower
Columbic repulsion of the adsorbed metal. At a pH lower than
pHpzc, the percentage of adsorption of Cu and Ni should be
reduced to nearly zero; while it is not the case for Cu. It was
found that at a pH lower than pHpzc, the amount of Cu ions
was still adsorbed onto the maghemite, which suggested that
ion exchange between Cu2+
and H+ may play a role during this
pH range. This point will be further examined in the following
mechanism studies. Furthermore, at the same pH and initial
metal concentration, a higher percentage removal was recorded
for Cu (II) compared to Ni (II). In general, the preference of
common hydrous solids for metals has been related to the metal
electronegativity. Electronegativity values for Cu (II) and Ni
(II) are 2.00 and 1.91, respectively; hence Cu exhibited a
stronger attraction to maghemite than Ni [8]
3.4 Kinetics Studies
Since pH 2.5 and 6.5 are the optimal conditions for Cr (VI)
and Cu (II) adsorption, respectively, adsorption kinetics for Cr
and Cu were obtained by mixing 100 mg/L of single metal and
0.1 g maghemite nanoparticles at their optimal pH. As for Ni,
the maximum adsorption was found at pH 9.0. However,
heterogeneous precipitate of Ni is suspected to emerge on the
particle surface when the pH is higher than 9.0 .To ensure that
only an adsorption reaction occurs for Ni, the operating pH is
therefore defined to be 8.5. The effect of contact time on the
adsorption of Cr (VI), Cu (II) and Ni (II) at their optimal pH is
shown in figure. The metal removals seem to take place in two
phases. It is evident that, initially, that the rate of metal uptake
was significantly high, with much lower subsequent removal
rates that gradually approached an equilibrium condition. For
these three metals, the adsorption equilibrium was achieved
within 10 min. At equilibrium, the amount of Cr, Cu, and Ni
adsorbed was 27.4, 14.4 and 19 mg/g, respectively. The rapid
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
7
adsorption of metals is perhaps due to external surface
adsorption. Since nearly all of the adsorption sites of
maghemite nanoparticles exist on the exterior of the adsorbent
compared to the porous adsorbent, it is easy for the adsorbate to
access the active sites; hence, a rapid approach to
equilibrium.[9],[10].
Fig 4 Adsorption capacity v/s Time
4. Conclusions:
The maghemite nanoparticles with a diameter of around 5.6 nm
were successfully synthesized using a Micro-Emulsion method
in a laboratory. The adsorption studies illustrated that the Nano
scale Maghemite was very effective for the removal of Cr (VI),
Cu (II) and Ni (II) from wastewater. Adsorption of metals by
Nano scale Maghemite reached equilibrium within 10 min and
the removal efficiency was highly pH dependent, which also
governs selective adsorption of metals from the solution. The
optimal pH for the selective removal of Cr, Cu, and Ni is 2.5,
6.5, and 8.5 respectively.
5. Reference:
[1] Salnikow, K.,and Zhitkovich, A.(2008). “Genetic and
epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and
cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium. “Chemical
Research in Toxicology 21(8), 28-44.
[2] Ochoa-Herrera, V., León G., Banihani, Q.;,Field,J.A., and
Sierra-Alvarez R.(2011). “Toxicity of copper(II) ions to
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-30 20 70 120
Cu(II) pH=6.5
Ni(II) pH=8.5
Cr(VI) pH=2.5
Ad
sorp
tio
n C
apac
ity
(mg/
g)
Time(min)
OYCE 2014
10th
Outstanding Young Chemical Engineers
Hosted at Thadomal Shahani Engineering College, Mumbai. 8
th& 9
th March 2014
8
microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems.”
Science of Total environment. , 412, 380-385.
[3] T. P. Hoar, J. H. Schulman, Micro emulsion Theory and
Practice, Academic Press, New York, 1977, 102-152 .
[4] Gribanov, N.M., Bibik, E.E., Buzunov, O.V., Naumov,
V.N.(1990). “Physicochemical regularities of obtaining highly
dispersed magnetite by the method of chemical condensation.”
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic material 85,7-10.
[5] Vidal-Vidal,J. Rivas, M.A. Lopez-Quintela, Synthesis of
monodisperse maghemite nanoparticles by the microemulsion
method Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering
Aspects 288 (2006) 44–51 51.
[6] Hu,J. Chen,G. and Irene, Lo,M.C., and ASCE,M.(2006).
“Selective Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial
Wastewater Using Maghemite Nanoparticle: Performance and
Mechanisms.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(7),
709-715.
[7] Hu,J. Chen,G. and Irene, Lo,M.C.(2005) “Removal and
recovery of Cr(VI) from wastewater by maghemite
nanoparticles.” Water Research 39(18):4528-4536.
[8] Seco, A., Marzal, P., and Gabaldon, C. (1997).
“Adsorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions onto
activated carbon in single Cu and Ni systems and in binary Cu–
Ni, Cu–Cd, and Cu–Zn systems.”Journal of Chemical
technology and Biotechnology , 68(1), 23-30.
[9] Brown, P. A., Gill, S. A., and Allen, S. J. (2000). “Metal
removal from wastewater using peat.” Water Research, 34
(16), 3907–3916.
[10] Lalvani, S. B., Hubener, A., and Wiltowski, T. S. (2000).
“Chromium adsorption by lignin.” Energy Sources, 22(1), 45–
56.