18
© 2010 School Services of Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

© 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

© 2010 School Services of California, Inc.

Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Page 2: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Board/Staff/Community Timeline

Page 3: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

© 2010 School Services of California, Inc.

Revenue Limit Deficit Factors

8.14

0%

11.0

10%

10.1

20%

8.80

1%

8.80

1%

8.80

1%

6.99

6%

0.00

0%

0.00

0%

0.00

0%

3.00

2%

2.14

3%

0.89

2%

0.00

0%

0.00

0%

7.84

4%

18.3

55%

18.3

55%

0.000%

2.000%

4.000%

6.000%

8.000%

10.000%

12.000%

14.000%

16.000%

18.000%

20.000%

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

Page 4: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Enrollment History & Projection

2635

2691

2734

26852694

26792676

2693 2693

2570

2502

2450

2300

2350

2400

2450

2500

2550

2600

2650

2700

2750

Enrollment

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

Year

Page 5: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Declining Enrollment

243 student loss or 9% reduction from 2007-08 CBEDS to 2010-11 enrollment projections

K-3 151 student loss 19% reduction

4-5 16 student increase

6-8 32 student loss 5% reduction

9-12 76 student loss 8% reduction

Page 6: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

K-5 Average Class Sizes & 2010-11 Proposed Staffing Ratios

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

K1st2nd3rd4th5th

Page 7: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

© 2010 School Services of California, Inc.

Why Do We Need To Reduce Our Expenditures?

3 Year Loss of Revenue Limit Funding

15% reduction in revenue limit funding from the state since 2007-08Ongoing loss of $690.70/pupil

$1.7 million due to state budget reductions

243 student loss since 2007-08Ongoing loss of funding until enrollment increases

$1.2 million due to declining enrollment

Total loss of funding to our district – $2.9 million

Total cuts for 2009-10 school year - $1.4 millionOffset this year by federal stimulus funds of $1 million

Need $1.5 million in reductions to balance the budget

Page 8: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

General Fund Expenditures

Books & Supplies10%

Persnonnel Cost81%

Operating Expenditures9%

Page 9: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Personnel Expenditures

Certificated Administration7%

Teacher Salaries58%

Certificated Unrepresented6%

Classifed Salaries26%

Classified Administration3%

Page 10: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Furlough Days

1 Furlough Day for all employees = $75,000

DPOLTA $45,000CSEA $15,000Unrepresented $15,000

1 Furlough Day for a teacher represents about .0055 reduction

Average teacher salary is $58,000

1 Furlough day would be a $319 reduction in gross pay

3 Furlough day would be a $928 reduction in gross pay

Page 11: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Transportation

2008-09 the district received $846,000 for transportation and contributed $157,000 from the general fund

2009-10 the district will receive $678,000 and plans to contribute $280,000 from the general fund

Approximately 760 students ride the bus each day on 15 routes

Our district has a 90% free & reduced lunch count and would only be able to charge the 10% that are riding the bus

Page 12: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Athletics

District spends $197,000 on athletics at Bryant and Dos Palos High School

Cost includes coaching stipends, travel, and supply budget

Approximately 350 students participate at Dos Palos High School

Our district has a 90% free & reduced lunch count and would only be able to charge the 10% that are eligible for athletics

Page 13: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Other Questions

Board Benefits7 members at $9,000 each for $63,000. Pay the same amount as active employees

Allocated $180,000 for travel/training of which $150,000 is specific categorical funding for training

Can you use student ratios for Classified positions?Classified positions are also being evaluated and will be recommending to reduce to desired student ratios. March 15th deadline does not apply to classified positions

Reconfigure Oro Loma to a K-3 Necessary Small School to increase the level of funding

When will staff know who’s moving from reconfiguring DPE to include 3rd grade? Staff movement will follow decision on reconfiguration.

Page 14: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Other Questions

Why buy consumable workbooks each year?Funding comes from a categorical program specifically for instructional material purposes

Can we have a 4 day work week?

Do we need WestEd?

Can we reduce 12 month employees to 11 month employees12 month classified positions are being evaluated, will be recommended for reduction where possible

Trim form the top

Page 15: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Oro Loma Class Sizes & 2010-11 Proposed Staffing Ratios

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

K

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5th

6th

7th

8th

Page 16: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Oro Loma Enrollment

186

111

75

167

102

65

104

70

34

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Total EnrollmentOL StudentsTown Students

Page 17: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Oro Loma – K-3 Necessary Small School

Why K-3 Necessary Small School?

Need approximately 200 students to operate a K-8 school without financial limitations

Would need to force town students to Oro Loma to fill school at K-8 or current K-5 configuration

What is a Necessary Small School?

Schools that serve small populations, usually because they are in sparsely populated areas. These schools receive extra funding because they cannot realize economies of scale from their current enrollment boundaries

Must be at least 10 miles from the nearest school

District wide Average Daily Attendance must be less than 2,501

School must have student daily attendance between 1-96

Can have maximum of 4 teachers

Page 18: © 2010 School Services of California, Inc. Governor’s Proposals for 2010-11 K-12 Education

Oro Loma – K-3 Necessary Small School

Configuring Oro Loma as a K-3 Necessary Small School will:

Allow the district to generate additional revenue per student

Possibly as much as $150,000 which reduces the gap between revenues generated and operational expenditures

Keeps the school open in a reduced capacity for the residents of Oro Loma until the student population increases