The Curious IncidentOf the Dog in the Night Time

Crossover Text Whitbread Award Winner (2003) Rather unsentimental portrayal (compared to

typical condescending sympathetic seriousness)

Really Unreliable Narrator (inscribed as normal and rational); his exceptionality is the normative basis for the narrative (Kevin as secondary voice and CIotDitN-T is not about overcoming autism, whereas Kevin and Max “overcome” [for a time at least] their disabilities)

Christopher’s obsessive need for sameness reflects early 20th C research into autism (outdated/not universally true)

This uniformity-or “logic”-is perhaps more a media conception

“Autism and the Contemporary Sentimental” by Stuart Murray

So little is known concretely about autism, it is easy to project the real onto it, for it to become stylized

We understand autism more through performance than through science

Neurologist Majia Holmer Nadesan suggests that autism is possibly “not a thing, but is a nominal category useful for grouping heterogeneous people all sharing communication practices deviating significantly from the expectations of normalcy”

“Autistic bandwagon”

the ultimate enigma: they are what we say they are

They are both unreliable and reliable They are different They are valid

The hidden nature of this cognitive impairment makes is “pretty”

The figure of the autistic individual has become a narrative marker of fascination for much cultural production across different media

Idiot Savant (at most 10% of Autistic people, according to Murray) is a fascinating concept (super crip)

Autism still connects with the origins of Disability Studies, the interest in exceptionality. Autism typically includes intelligence, and this satisfies the continuing anxiousness that finds comfort in disabled but smart.

Murray argues that autism in literature asks us to reflect on what it means to be human

“The traditional view of humanity is that it is based on a sense of empathy, morality, free will, and dignity. It is a fixed view, and this fixedness jars somewhat with the flexibility, or instability, of the human body [in literature of disability]” (“‘Is He Still Human? Are You?’” by Elaine Ostry)

Autism is a contemporary manifestation of such paradoxes based on parallels with technology, computing, an unarticulated sense of the potentially bewildering range of multiplicities of everyday life

…autistic characters in film enact policies of display that are central to the visual apprehension of disability not only in narrative but also in the wider cultural sphere. Rosemarie Garland-Thompson’s work on the modes of representation belonging to American freak shows in the [19th] and [20th] centuries…outlines a set of processes in which ‘staring at disability choreographs a visual relation between a spectator and a spectacle,’ and it is precisely this relationship constructed by the staring gaze that places autism on display for a majority audience…

A good story, but still a story…

Disability narratives as popular “fact” sources

Metaphysical mystery

Classic vs Hardboiled vs Metaphysical Curious Incident… uses the mystery

narrative as a meditation on the act of reading itself. Mystery moves from solving a crime to the philosophical pursuit of truth. In the postmodern form, the detective‘s pursuit of truth dismantles itself.