56
© HDR, all rights reserved. © HDR, all rights reserved. © HDR, all rights reserved.

© HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

© HDR, all rights reserved.© HDR, all rights reserved.© HDR, all rights reserved.

Page 2: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Introduction to Industry Foundation Classes (IFCs)

03/10/2021

Page 3: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

01 History Lesson

02 Why IFC?

03 What is IFC?

04 IFC in Practice

05 How to get involved

Page 4: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

01 History Lesson

Page 5: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"

Page 6: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Interchangeable Parts

• Popularized the idea in late 1700’s

• Won Contract to provide 10,000 Muskets to US Military

• Gave famous demonstration to John Adams and Thomas Jefferson

Eli Whitney

Page 7: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Why Interchangeable Parts

Quality of Soldier Quality of Weapon

Page 8: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Why Interchangeable Parts

Quality of Soldier Quality of WeaponASSUME THIS IS CONSTANT

DUE TO TRAININGLimiting Factor – Varies by

Individual Weapon

Page 9: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Muskets Were Unique

• Cost more to Make

• If one part did not work,it was a problem

Page 10: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

One Part is a Problem

• Cost more to Make

• If one part did not work,it was a problem

Limiting Factor

Page 11: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Small Problems become Big Problems

Page 12: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Small Problems become Big Problems

• Custom Parts for many

Page 13: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Shared Parts

• No Customization

• Cohesive Unit

Quality of Soldier Quality of WeaponASSUME THIS IS CONSTANT

DUE TO TRAININGASSUME THIS IS CONSTANTDUE TO STANDARDIZATION

Page 14: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

02 Why IFC?

Page 15: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Interchangeable Parts

Quality of Engineer Quality of Tools

Page 16: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Interchangeable Parts

ASSUME THIS IS CONSTANTDUE TO TRAINING

Limiting Factor – Varies due to Interoperability

Quality of Engineer Quality of Tools

Page 17: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Current Process

Survey

Geotech

Utilities Preliminary Design

Final Design

Bidding and Letting Construction Asset

ManagementHandoff

Page 18: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Survey

Geotech

Utilities Preliminary Design

Final Design

Bidding and Letting Construction Asset

ManagementHandoff

Current ProcessInformation Exchanges

Page 19: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Current Process

Survey

Geotech

Utilities Preliminary Design

Final Design

Bidding and Letting Construction Asset

ManagementHandoff

Information Exchanges

Page 20: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

We Share Parts

Page 21: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Survey

Geotech

Utilities Preliminary Design

Final Design

Bidding and Letting Construction Asset

ManagementHandoff

Information ExchangesCurrent Process

Information Exchanges

Only works if the software is the same or within the same stack

Page 22: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Small Problems become Big Problems

Page 23: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Small Problems become Big Problems

• Custom Integrations for Many

Page 24: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Survey

Geotech

Utilities Preliminary Design

Final Design

Bidding and Letting Construction Asset

ManagementHandoff

Information ExchangesProcess with IFC

IFC

Page 25: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC Standardizes Exchange• No Customization

• Cohesive Unit

ASSUME THIS IS CONSTANTDUE TO TRAINING

Quality of Engineer Quality of ToolsASSUME THIS IS CONSTANTDUE TO STANDARDIZATION

Page 26: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

03 What is IFC?

Page 27: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC is a Software Standard

Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)

ISO 16739

Page 28: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC uses 3D Models

Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)

Geometry

Semantics

Attributes/Properties

RelationshipsInternal bearing, 2nd story, bearing on footing below and supporting slab above, structural system, has reinforcing

Column D-2, RGB140-142-140, Cast Concrete, 150lbs/ft3, 5400psi

Column

Solid: An extrusion of a 300mm x 300mm rectangular profile

Page 29: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC Structures Data

Superstructure

Substructure

:IfcSite :IfcBridge:IfcProject

IfcRelAggregates IfcRelAggregates

:IfcFacilityPartPredefinedType=SUPERSTRUCTURECompositionType=ELEMENTIfcRelAggregates

IfcRelAggregates

IfcSpatialStructureElement

IfcBridge IfcFacilityPart

:IfcFacilityPartPredefinedType=SUBSTRUCTURECompositionType=COMPLEX

:IfcFacilityPartPredefinedType=ABUTMENTCompositionType=PARTIAL

:IfcFacilityPartPredefinedType=PIERCompositionType=PARTIAL

:IfcFacilityPartPredefinedType=ABUTMENTCompositionType=PARTIAL

Source: André Borrmann

Page 30: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC Schema

Model View Definition (MVD)

Entire IFC Schema

MVDs

Source: Mark Baldwin (Mensch & Maschine)

Page 31: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IDM and MVD

IDMMVD

Page 32: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IDM and MVD

MVD DEVELOPERSIFC MVD

EXPORTS

Page 33: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IDM and MVD

PIERProperty Set Property ValueInformation Name Pier 01Information Type BInformation Material Concrete

IFC4.3 Schema Properties

Property Set Property ValueAASHTO Info Custom Property 01 Value 01AASHTO Info Custom Property 02 Value 02AASHTO Info Custom Property 03 Value 03

Data Dictionary Properties

Page 34: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC DEPLOYMENT

Page 35: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

IFC Candidate Standards

IFC RoadCandidate Standard Status: Published

The focus of this phase is to implement and validate the Candidate Standard IFC 4.3 and bring it to the status of a Final Standard and publish it as an ISO Standard. Phase 1 included the “Requirements Analysis Report” which was published and the delivery of the schema extension Candidate Standard.

This phase is a Call for Participation to the software vendor community to implement and test the standard against a specific set of use cases.

IFC BridgeCandidate Standard Status: Published

The ifcBridges team delivered this Standard and as part of the project execution plan were able to deliver against these collective team goals:• WP1 – Common Definitions and Data Requirement• WP2 – ifcBridge Extension and MVD Development• WP3 - bSDD• WP4 – Roadmap and next phase• WP5 – Deployment and Dissemination

The project is now complete and is widely available for use.

Page 36: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

04 IFC in Practice

Page 37: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2020 buildingSMART Award Winner Innovation in Client Leadership

Norwegian Public Roads Administration“Machine Readable Norwegian Classification Manual for Bridge Registrations”Norway

Open standards enabled:

Open machine-readable manual

Bridge designers used IFC software

Developed using Linked Data and semantic web

Integrating ontologies was key

ifcOWL, IFC 2x3, IFC4

“To use of openBIM® and other open standards is the very essence of this

project”

Elin Dalen-Rasmussen, Norwegian Public Roads Administration

Page 38: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2020 buildingSMART Award Winner IFC for Design: Panama Canal 4th Bridge

Open standards enabled:

Open machine-readable manual

Bridge designers used IFC software

Developed using Linked Data and semantic web

Integrating ontologies was key

ifcOWL, IFC 2x3, IFC4

“To use of openBIM® and other open standards is the very essence of this

project”

Elin Dalen-Rasmussen, Norwegian Public Roads Administration

Open standards enabled:

Open machine-readable manual

Bridge designers used IFC software

Developed using Linked Data and semantic web

Integrating ontologies was key

ifcOWL, IFC 2x3, IFC4

Page 39: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2017 buildingSMART Award Winner IFC Model for Operations & Maintenance

Norwegian Public Roads Administration“Machine Readable Norwegian Classification Manual for Bridge Registrations”Norway

First “bridge with brains” usin g embedded senors

Gov. Mario M. Cuomo Bridge3.1-mile crossing of the Hudson River with eight l traffic lanes, dedicated bus

lanes and a shared-use pedestrian/bike path on the northern span. Owner: New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA)Design Consultant: HDR Design-Build Contractor: Tappan Zee

• Connected to Construction Documentation (specifications, DWR’s, NCR’s)

• Models from 4 different software applications

• Over 1 million connections between the 2D documents and the 3D model

• IFC format enabled the connections to be automated

Page 40: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2020 buildingSMART Award Special MentionTeam Collaboration using openBIM®

“To use of openBIM® and other open standards is the very essence of this

project”

Elin Dalen-Rasmussen, Norwegian Public Roads Administration

IFC based standards enabled team collaboration and project information to be shared by:

• 36 BIM users across 8 different companies

• 20 models from 5 disciplines using 6 different software applications

• Federation of a total of 1,370,000 IFC structural objects.

Page 41: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2020 buildingSMART Award FinalistResearch Project: IFC Model Based Workflows

Norwegian Public Roads Administration“Machine Readable Norwegian Classification Manual for Bridge Registrations”Norway

“To use of openBIM® and other open standards is the very essence of this

project”

Elin Dalen-Rasmussen, Norwegian Public Roads Administration

Research Summary

• Paper-less project

• Model-based design to enable digital workflows

• Limited number of drawings

• Specification of work and cost estimation were automated

• 4 design programs linked to a cost estimation software based on IFC

• 50% time reduction, especially at revisions

Page 42: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2020 buildingSMART Award WinnerAsset Management Open standards enabled:

Over 100 disparate models

successfully geo-located,

exported to IFC

250,000+ elements modelled

within the terminal

Mandated openBIM delivery

requirements for Native and

IFC models for AIM

requirements

Improved productivity

Auckland AirportAuckland Airport maps its future with openBIMNew Zealand

“openBIM enabled us to do more with less by being free to work between multiple tools as needed, without having to work within the constraints of one software”

Karl Fitzpatrick, Auckland Airport

Page 43: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

2019 buildingSMART Award FinalistConstruction

Open standards enabled:

EURO €24 billion All construction

deliverables in IFC format 3D Rebar tool developed

with IFC Automatic exchanges

developed Model checking

ICOS Group, BYLOR Group and EDVANCE GroupHinkley Point C EPRUnited Kingdom

“The idea that IFC was the BIM deliverable method became agreed by the client due to

its efficiency and final on-site savings”

Véronique Remande, ICOS Groupe

Page 44: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

• Model was contractual deliverable

• Minimal 2D Documents for 3rd parties

• Bill of Bars generated from Bentley OBM

• IFC export sent to Fabricator

Utah SR36 over I-80, BlackrockBridge without Plans

Page 45: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

05 How to get involved

Page 46: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org
Page 47: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

BIM for Bridges and Structures Update

• Complete Information Delivery Manual (IDM)

• Complete Model View Definition (MVD)

• Coordinate with IFC4.3 Infra-Extensions Project

• Provide Software Vendors with testing materials

• Begin Return on Investment study

2021 Goals

Page 48: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Executive CommitteeCommittee Chairs + Independent Directors + Technical Director

Supported by bSI US Director (as an ex officio member)

Roads, Bridges and Tunnels Buildings Airports

Marketing

Bookkeeping

Admin

Industry Committees

AASHTO Chair Chair

Services

Education And

Certification

Chair

Specialty Committees

Technical

Chair

Chapter Organization

Exec Dir

TBD TBD

Chair Chair

Page 49: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Roads & Bridges Industry Committee - AGENDA1. Support Implementation of AASHTO Resolution to adopt IFC2. US Industry input to IFC Road Candidate Standard3. US Industry input to IFC Bridge Candidate Standard4. US Industry input to IFC Tunnel Candidate Standard (when published)5. US Industry input to buildingSMART’s Asset Management initiative6. Launch USDD with the NSBA/AASHTO/FHWA Bridge Glossary 7. Collaborate with the Digital Twins Consortium (per bSi + DTC Liaison

Partnership) on adopting the IFC Schema for Roads and Bridges 8. Collaborate with IDBE (per bSI + OGC Partnership) on GIS-BIM integration

for Roads & Bridges9. Collaborate with GS1 (per bSI + GS1 Partnership) on using Global Trade &

Global Location Identifiers for Roads & Bridges10. Coordinate with Education & Certification Committee of openBIM®

training & certification requirements for DOT’s, consultants and contractors

11. Nominate Juror for bSI Annual Awards Program12. Ensure that US implementation of IFC for transportation infrastructure

remains current with the bSI Technical Roadmap and IFC Schema updates13. Other ....

Members

Interim ChairWill Sharp, HDR

Roads & BridgesIndustry Committee

Page 50: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

AASHTO

TPF BIM for Infrastructure

TPF BIM for Bridges & Structures

JTCEES

AIM Sub-Committee

Roads & BridgesIndustry Committee

Roads & Bridges Industry Committee – Working Relationship with AASHTO

Page 51: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

USDDTPF-5(372)“Bridges”

TPF-X(nnn)“Roads”

Content Owner & Agency Service

DB FrameworkAggregationLinkingStorage

EditingSearchAccess API

US Chapter + AASHTO ‘USDD’ Bridge Glossary Project

Page 52: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

source: https://education.buildingsmart.org/

Training the Army …

Page 53: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

Chapter Education & CertificationCommittee - AGENDA1. Register Training Providers2. Promote benefits of open standards to the US

Construction industry3. openBIM Certification for Buildings4. openBIM Certification for Roads & Bridges 5. COBie Foundation Certification6. COBie Practitioner Certification7. LOD Certification (with BIM Forum)8. VDC Certification (with CIFE)9. openCDE Certification10. Other ....

ChairCalvin Kam

SBI, CIFE, GSA, FAIA

Education & Certification Committee

PCERT DirectorTony Rinella

SBI, AIA

Members

IndustryFHWAHDRAGC

ACEC

RogerGrant

Registered Training

Providers

Page 54: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

CIFE Summer Program 2020 55

2-Tiers of Professional Training Programs

Page 55: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org

@2020 buildingSMART USA | www.buildingsmartusa.org 56

Website: www.buildingSMARTusa.org

Email: [email protected]

LinkedIn: buildingSMART-USA

For More Information …

[email protected] [email protected]

Page 56: © HDR, all rights reserved. - Transportation.org