4
Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000104 J Biotechnol Biomaterial ISSN:2155-952X JBTBM an open access journal Research Article Open Access Yousefpour et al. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 2011, 1:2 DOI: 10.4172/2155-952X.1000104 *Corresponding author: N. Askari, Materials Group, Engineering Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran, Tel: +98 09127877567; Fax: +98 0281-3780073; E-mail: [email protected] Received December 28, 2010; Accepted April 10, 2011; Published May 05, 2011 Citation: Yousefpour M, Askari N, Abdollah-Pour H, Amanzadeh A, Riahi N (2011) Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al 2 O 3 / HA Bio-nano-composites. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 1:104. doi:10.4172/2155- 952X.1000104 Copyright: © 2011 Yousefpour M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al 2 O 3 / HA Bio-nano-composites M. Yousefpour 1,2,3 , N. Askari 2,3 *, H. Abdollah-Pour 3 , A. Amanzadeh 3 and N. Riahi 2 1 Materials Science and Engineering Department, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran 2 Materials Group, Engineering Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran 3 National Cell Bank of Iran (NCBI), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran Keywords: Biocompatibility; Nanocomposite; Cellular response; Os- teoblast Introduction Hydroxyapatite (HA, Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 ), Zirconia (ZrO 2 ) and Alu- mina (Al 2 O 3 ) are known as important implant materials [1-3]. HA has oſten been considered as a candidate for use in load –bearing applica- tions due to bonds and promotes the new bone formation necessary for implant osseointegration to bone directly. However, its poor mechani- cal properties have limited its application to load-bearing parts [4-11]. Alumina and zirconia have excellent biocompatibility. e main advantages of Al 2 O 3 is its high hardness and wear resistance, while ZrO 2 exhibits higher strength and fracture toughness and the composite con- sisting of the two has higher ductility and fracture toughness than each constituent [12]. Some interest has been paid to composites comprising of hydroxyapatite and another phase of high mechanical properties and bio-inertness, such as alumina and zirconia [13]. Cerium oxide or Ceria is used to stabiles the tetragonal polycrystalline structure of zirconia at room temperature, the product called Ceria-partially stabilized zir- conia (Ce-TZP) [15]. Ce-TZP/Al 2 O 3 is a composite in which Ce-TZP particles are added to Al2O3 matrix as the second phase to modify the fracture behavior of composite because, it has high fracture toughness [14]. In additional, Ce-TZP/Al 2 O 3 nano-composites could be superior to Y-TZP in clinical use [16,17]. e biocompatibility of zirconia-alu- mina (ZA) nano-composites in load-bearing applications such as den- tal/orthopedic implants was significantly enhanced by the addition of bioactive HA [4]. In this work, the effect of HA is studied on biological properties of Ce-TZP/Al 2 O 3 . In order to, bio-nano-composites were fabricated by mechanical milling of pre-synthesized nano-scaled constituents, and cold pressing and sintering Phase analysis; strength and biological properties of produced composites were evaluated by different charac- terization methods. Experimental For this study, we used of Al 2 O 3 , HA and ZrO 2 nanopowders syn- thesized by sol-gel, chemical precipitation and hydrothermal methods (with particle sizes 112,9,12 nm respectively). e process Schematic is given in Figure 1. As is observed ZA nano -composite powders were prepared by fast milling machine (sharifi co. iran) of 70 vol% 10Ce-TZP and 30 vol% Al 2 O 3 powder in ethanol for 8 hr. Obtained powder was mixed with HA (up to 40vol%) in ethanol by fast milling machine again for 8 hr. Mixed slurry was dehydrated, crushed and sieved, and uniaxial cold pressed at a pressure of 200 MPa by universal test machine (Zwick roll-Z100). Cold pressed samples were sintered at 1600°C for 2 hr by electrical furnace (Vecstar). e density of the specimens was measured by the Archimedes method [ASTM B311-08]. Crystalline phase analysis was performed by XRD (Bruker model D8). e bending strength was mea- sured by means of three- point bend test with universal test machine (Zwick roll-Z100) [ASTM C1674-08]. In order to investigation the proliferation behavior on the ZA–HA composites, the samples used for cell tests were prepared from disc specimens with 10mm diameter that aſter polishing both sides with diamond slurries down to 1 mm, the specimens were washed and ster- ilized at 121 o C for 20 minutes. e samples were placed in a 24 well tissue culture plate and seeded with 25μl of the 3x10 4 cells/cm 2 MG63 (National Cell Bank of Iran-no NCBI C…) cell density suspension. Abstract Early years, bio-nano-composites materials are interesting in advanced engineering applications fields. In order to, biological properties of the 10Ce-TZP/Al 2 O 3 nano-composite was evaluated by the addition of HA nanopowder for medical applications. In this research, a bio-nano-composite consisting of CeO2- stabilized zirconia (Ce-TZP), Al 2 O 3 and Hydroxyapatite (HA) powders proposed to use for medical application .The first step, nano-powders of Ce-TZP and Al 2 O 3 , were blended by fast milling machine. Then, nano-powder of HA was added to the alumina - zirconia (ZA) mixture from 10 to 40 vol%, and homogenized again. In final step, mixed powder was cold pressed and sintered at1600°C for 120 min. Crystal phase of the sintered samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction(XRD),the density and bending strength were measured and cellular response test was performed with osteoblastic cell-lines by MG63 cell-lines and the morphology of the proliferated cells was observed with FESEM too. From the strength and cellular response evaluations of samples, specimens with 30 vol% HA showed the best result, also XRD patterns confirmed this results. Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials J o u r n a l o f B i o t e c h n o l o g y & B i o m a t e r i a l s ISSN: 2155-952X

J Biotechnol Biomaterial 2011, 1:2 Biotechnology ... · PDF fileJ Biotechnol Biomaterial ... exhibits higher strength and fracture toughness and the composite con- ... Hydroxyapatite

  • Upload
    lyxuyen

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000104J Biotechnol BiomaterialISSN:2155-952X JBTBM an open access journal

Research Article Open Access

Yousefpour et al. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 2011, 1:2 DOI: 10.4172/2155-952X.1000104

*Corresponding author: N. Askari, Materials Group, Engineering Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran, Tel: +98 09127877567; Fax: +98 0281-3780073; E-mail: [email protected]

Received December 28, 2010; Accepted April 10, 2011; Published May 05, 2011

Citation: Yousefpour M, Askari N, Abdollah-Pour H, Amanzadeh A, Riahi N (2011) Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al2O3/HA Bio-nano-composites. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 1:104. doi:10.4172/2155-952X.1000104

Copyright: © 2011 Yousefpour M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al2O3/HA Bio-nano-compositesM. Yousefpour1,2,3, N. Askari2,3*, H. Abdollah-Pour3, A. Amanzadeh3 and N. Riahi2

1Materials Science and Engineering Department, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran 2Materials Group, Engineering Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran 3National Cell Bank of Iran (NCBI), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Keywords: Biocompatibility; Nanocomposite; Cellular response; Os-teoblast

IntroductionHydroxyapatite (HA, Ca10 (PO4)6(OH)2), Zirconia (ZrO2) and Alu-

mina (Al2O3) are known as important implant materials [1-3]. HA has often been considered as a candidate for use in load –bearing applica-tions due to bonds and promotes the new bone formation necessary for implant osseointegration to bone directly. However, its poor mechani-cal properties have limited its application to load-bearing parts [4-11].

Alumina and zirconia have excellent biocompatibility. The main advantages of Al2O3 is its high hardness and wear resistance, while ZrO2 exhibits higher strength and fracture toughness and the composite con-sisting of the two has higher ductility and fracture toughness than each constituent [12]. Some interest has been paid to composites comprising of hydroxyapatite and another phase of high mechanical properties and bio-inertness, such as alumina and zirconia [13]. Cerium oxide or Ceria is used to stabiles the tetragonal polycrystalline structure of zirconia at room temperature, the product called Ceria-partially stabilized zir-conia (Ce-TZP) [15]. Ce-TZP/Al2O3 is a composite in which Ce-TZP particles are added to Al2O3 matrix as the second phase to modify the fracture behavior of composite because, it has high fracture toughness [14]. In additional, Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nano-composites could be superior to Y-TZP in clinical use [16,17]. The biocompatibility of zirconia-alu-mina (ZA) nano-composites in load-bearing applications such as den-tal/orthopedic implants was significantly enhanced by the addition of bioactive HA [4].

In this work, the effect of HA is studied on biological properties of Ce-TZP/Al2O3. In order to, bio-nano-composites were fabricated by mechanical milling of pre-synthesized nano-scaled constituents, and cold pressing and sintering Phase analysis; strength and biological properties of produced composites were evaluated by different charac-terization methods.

ExperimentalFor this study, we used of Al2O3, HA and ZrO2 nanopowders syn-

thesized by sol-gel, chemical precipitation and hydrothermal methods (with particle sizes 112,9,12 nm respectively). The process Schematic is given in Figure 1.

As is observed ZA nano -composite powders were prepared by fast milling machine (sharifi co. iran) of 70 vol% 10Ce-TZP and 30 vol% Al2O3 powder in ethanol for 8 hr. Obtained powder was mixed with HA (up to 40vol%) in ethanol by fast milling machine again for 8 hr. Mixed slurry was dehydrated, crushed and sieved, and uniaxial cold pressed at a pressure of 200 MPa by universal test machine (Zwick roll-Z100). Cold pressed samples were sintered at 1600°C for 2 hr by electrical furnace (Vecstar). The density of the specimens was measured by the Archimedes method [ASTM B311-08]. Crystalline phase analysis was performed by XRD (Bruker model D8). The bending strength was mea-sured by means of three- point bend test with universal test machine (Zwick roll-Z100) [ASTM C1674-08].

In order to investigation the proliferation behavior on the ZA–HA composites, the samples used for cell tests were prepared from disc specimens with 10mm diameter that after polishing both sides with diamond slurries down to 1 mm, the specimens were washed and ster-ilized at 121oC for 20 minutes. The samples were placed in a 24 well tissue culture plate and seeded with 25μl of the 3x104 cells/cm2 MG63 (National Cell Bank of Iran-no NCBI C…) cell density suspension.

AbstractEarly years, bio-nano-composites materials are interesting in advanced engineering applications fields. In order

to, biological properties of the 10Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nano-composite was evaluated by the addition of HA nanopowder for medical applications. In this research, a bio-nano-composite consisting of CeO2- stabilized zirconia (Ce-TZP), Al2O3 and Hydroxyapatite (HA) powders proposed to use for medical application .The first step, nano-powders of Ce-TZP and Al2O3, were blended by fast milling machine. Then, nano-powder of HA was added to the alumina - zirconia (ZA) mixture from 10 to 40 vol%, and homogenized again. In final step, mixed powder was cold pressed and sintered at1600°C for 120 min. Crystal phase of the sintered samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction(XRD),the density and bending strength were measured and cellular response test was performed with osteoblastic cell-lines by MG63 cell-lines and the morphology of the proliferated cells was observed with FESEM too.

From the strength and cellular response evaluations of samples, specimens with 30 vol% HA showed the best result, also XRD patterns confirmed this results.

Journal of Biotechnology & BiomaterialsJo

urna

l of B

iotechnology &Biom

aterials

ISSN: 2155-952X

Citation: Yousefpour M, Askari N, Abdollah-Pour H, Amanzadeh A, Riahi N (2011) Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al2O3/HA Bio-nano-composites. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 1:104. doi:10.4172/2155-952X.1000104

Page 2 of 4

Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000104J Biotechnol BiomaterialISSN:2155-952X JBTBM an open access journal

Cells were allowed to adhere for 2 hours then flooded with 1 ml of Dul-becco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco-USA), 2mM L-glu-tamine (Gibco), 100 IU/ml of penicillin and 100µg/ml of streptomycin (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco-USA) and placed back into the incubator. The fabricated specimens, including pure HA as a positive control, were placed into a 24-well plate, which was followed by plating on all the discs.

The cells were cultured for 7 days in a humidified incubator under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37oC. After detaching the cells from the specimens with a trypsin-EDTA solution (0.25% trypsin, 0.05% EDTA-Gibco) and staining with 0.4% trypan blue, the living cells were count-ed using a hemocytometer (Paul Marienfeld GmbH & Co-Germany). Each set of tests was performed in triplicate.

For observation the morphology of the proliferated cells with FESEM (Hitachi s-4160) cells were cultured for 5 days as above then fixation with glutaraldehyde(2.5%),dehydration with graded ethanol (50%,60%,70%,80%,90%and 100%).

The results were expressed as means with standard errors. The data were then analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc paired Student’s two-tailed t-test. The significance levels were notified significant (*, if p< 0.05) and highly significant (**, if p<0.01) in the tables.

Results

Figure 2 shows the densities of the ZA nano-composites contain-ing various amounts of HA. Compared to the theoretical density, which was calculated by the rule of mixture, the density of the specimens with a low HA content almost matched with the theoretical value. However, as the amounts of HA were increased, the discrepancy between the measured and theoretical densities increased.

Figure 3, illustrates the XRD patterns of different composite mate-rials. When no HA was added, only peaks corresponding to ZrO2 and

Al2O3 are present, as shown in Figure (3-a). With addition of 10, 20, 30 and 40 vol% HA (Figure (3-b-c-d-e), respectively), as well as the peaks corresponding to HA, TCP peaks, were also detected, that TCP com-ponent was originated from the reaction between HA and ZrO2. The bending strengths of the nanocomposites are shown in Figure 4, as the HA content was increased up to 40vol% the strength decreased of 850 to 137 MPa.

Biocompatibility tests are in progress. Figure 5 illustrates Cell pro-liferation results on the specimens after 7 days culture. The number of cells was significantly increased by the addition of 10% HA to the ZA (ANOVA, p<0.05). The number of cells increased steadily with further addition of HA (ANOVA, p±0.001). When 40% HA was added to the ZA, the proliferation rate on that specimen became comparable to that on the pure HA means of wells±S.D.

30 vol%Al2O3

70 vol%CeO2-ZrO2

fast milling for 8 hr in ethanol

0-40 vol% HA

fast milling for 8 hr in ethanol

cold press in 200 MPa

Sinter in 1600°C

Figure 1: Schematic of proces.

Figure 2: Schematic of density: ZA-HA nano-composites as a function of the HA content, bulk density g/cm3.

20 25 30 35 40 45 50

2Tetha

Inte

nsity

AA

Z

ZZ A

. . ..

a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 3: XRD patterns of nano-composites, a: without HA and with b: 10, c: 20, d: 30 and e: 40 vol% HA. .: TCP, .: HA, A: Alumina, and Z: Zirconia.

Citation: Yousefpour M, Askari N, Abdollah-Pour H, Amanzadeh A, Riahi N (2011) Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al2O3/HA Bio-nano-composites. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 1:104. doi:10.4172/2155-952X.1000104

Page 3 of 4

Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000104J Biotechnol BiomaterialISSN:2155-952X JBTBM an open access journal

Figuer 6 show morphology of the proliferated cells on the speci-mens. As was observed specimens with30vol%HA show most of the cell proliferation.

DiscussionAs a bio-inert implant material, ZA nano-composite is considered

to have sufficient strength. However, its biocompatibility such as sat-isfactory osseointegration and faster bone regeneration has to be im-proved by the addition of calcium phosphates such as HA, and TCP, [1,4]. TCP component was originated from the reaction between HA and ZrO2. Both HA and TCP are formed of calcium and phosphate component, which are essential to satisfactory osseointegration and faster bone regeneration to be achieved [4,7]. Just as shown in the XRD patterns ,intensities of the HA and TCP peaks increased steadily with increasing HA content.

ConclusionHydroxyapatite (HA)-zirconia-alumina (ZA) bio-nano-compos-

ites were produced by mechanical blending of separately synthesized nano-scaled powder. Composite materials were characterized by phase analysis and cellular response test. From mechanical and biological properties evaluation of the 10Ce-TZP/Al2O3/HA bio nano composites, specimens with 30 vol% of HA, was found to be the optimal composi-tion for biological applications.

Acknowledgement

Authors of paper, gratefully thank Semnan University, Qazvin Imam Khomeini International University and Pasteur Institute of Iran for the research support.

References

2. Benzaid R, Chevalier J, Saâdaoui M, Fantozzi G, Nawa M, et al. (2008) Frac-ture toughness,strength and slow crack growth in a ceria stabilized zirconia-alumina nanocomposite for medical application. Biomaterials 29: 3636-3641.

3. Sung YM, Kim DH (2003) Crystallization characteristics of yttria-stabilized zir-conia/hydroxyapatite composite nano powder. J Crystal Growth 254: 411-417.

4. Kong YM, Bae CJ, Lee SH, Kim HW, Kim HE (2005) Improvement in biocom-patibility of ZrO2- Al2O3nanocomposite by addition of HA. Biomaterial 26: 509-517.

5. Miao X, Chen Y, Guo H, Khor KA (2004) Spark plasma sintered hydroxyapatite-yttria stabilized zirconia composites. J Ceramics International 30: 1793-1796.

6. Yoshida K, Hashimoto K, Toda Y, Udagawa S, Kanazawa T (2006) Fabrica-tion of structure-controlled hydroxyapatite/zirconia composite. J Eur Cer So 26: 515-518.

7. Rapacz-Kmita A, Ślósarczyk A, Paszkiewicz Z (2006) Mechanical properties of

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

01 02 03 04 05 0

HA content (vol%)

bend

ing

stre

ngth

(MPa

)

Figure 4: Schematic of bending strength: ZA-HA nano-composites as a function of the HA content.

Figure 5: Cell proliferation results on the specimens after 7 days cul-ture. 1:ZA,2:10HA,3:20HA,4:30HA,5:40HA,6: HA.

c

a b

Figure 6: Morphology of the proliferated cells on (a) pure ZA, (b) 30 vol%HA/ZA, (d) pure HA.

MeanComparison Difference q P value

Column A vs Column F -12.667 20.121*** P<0.001Column A vs Column E -12.000 19.062*** P<0.001Column A vs Column D -9.833 15.620*** P<0.001Column A vs Column C -1.167 1.853 ns P>0.05Column A vs Column B -1.000 --- ns P>0.05Column B vs Column F -11.667 18.533*** P<0.001Column B vs Column E -11.000 17.474*** P<0.001Column B vs Column D -8.833 14.032*** P<0.001Column B vs Column C -0.1667 --- ns P>0.05Column C vs Column F -11.500 18.268*** P<0.001Column C vs Column E -10.833 17.209*** P<0.001Column C vs Column D -8.667 13.767*** P<0.001Column D vs Column F -2.833 4.501** P<0.01Column D vs Column E -2.167 3.442* P<0.05Column E vs Column F -0.6667 1.059 ns P>0.05

1. Rapacz-Kmita A, Slosarczyk A, Paszkiewicz Z, Paszkiewicz C (2004) Phase stability of hydroxyapatite-zirconia(HAP-ZrO2) composites for bone replace-ment. J Molecular Structure 704: 333-340.

Citation: Yousefpour M, Askari N, Abdollah-Pour H, Amanzadeh A, Riahi N (2011) Investigation on Biological Properties of Dental Implant by Ce-TZP/Al2O3/HA Bio-nano-composites. J Biotechnol Biomaterial 1:104. doi:10.4172/2155-952X.1000104

Page 4 of 4

Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000104J Biotechnol BiomaterialISSN:2155-952X JBTBM an open access journal

HAP-ZrO2 composites. J Eur Cer So 26: 1481-1488.

8. Khalil KA, Kim SW, Kim HY (2007) Consolidation and mechanical properties of nanostructured hydroxyapatite-( ZrO2+3mol%Y2O3)bioceramics by high-frequency induction heat sintering. J Material science and ingineering A 456: 368-372.

9. Chiu CY, Hsu HC, Tuan WH (2007) Effect of zirconia addition on the microstruc-tural evolution of porous hydroxyapatite. J Ceramics International 33: 715-718.

10. Evis Z, Doremus RH (2007) Effect of YF3 on hot-pressed hydroxyapatite and monoclinic zirconia composites. Materials Chemistry and Physics 105: 76-79.

11. Rapacz-Kmita A, Ślósarczyk A, Paszkiewicz Z (2005) Hap- ZrO2 composite coatings prepared by plasma spraying for biomedical applications. J Ceramics International 31: 567-571.

12. Santos1 C, Souza RC, Daguano JKMF, Elias CN, Rogero SO (2007) Develop-

ment of ZrO2- Al2O3bioceramic composites. Congresso brasileiro de ceramica.

13. Li W, Gao L (2003) Fabrication of HAP- ZrO2(3Y) nanocomposite by SPS. Bio-materials 24: 937-940.

14. Tsukuma K, Shimada M (1985) Strength, fracture toughness and Vickers hard-ness of CeO2-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystals(Ce-TZP). J Materials Sci-ence 20: 1178-1184.

15. Yang G, Li JC, Wang GC, Min SL, Chen TC, et al. (2006) Investigation on strengthening and toughening mechanisms of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nano-composites. J Metallurgical and Materials A 37: 1969-1975.

16. Fischer J, Stawarczyk B (2007) Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nano-composite and a veneering ceramic. J Dental materials 23: 1500-1505.

17. Bhaduri S, Bhaduri SB (1997) Enhanced low temperature toughness of Al2O3-ZrO2 nano/nano composites. J Nanostructure Materials 8: 755-763.