20

lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 2: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 3: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 4: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 5: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 6: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 7: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 8: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 9: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 10: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 11: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 12: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 13: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 14: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 15: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 16: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 17: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 18: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 19: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 20: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair