28
S Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

S

PersonalityAssessment

Ontology(PAO)

Brian Donohue and J. Neil OtteUniversity at Buffalo

Page 2: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

personalitya peculiar combination of affective, emotional, cognitive, and behavioral response patterns held by an individual

Page 3: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

S

OutlineI. Linking personality tests to the Five Factor

ModelII. Building PAOIII. Related OntologiesIV. Further Research

Page 4: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Existing Personality Tests:e.g. Myers-Briggs

Page 5: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Factorial Analysis

Factorial Analysis: A statistical method used to describe variability among observed, correlated variables in terms of a potentially lower number of unobserved variables.

Using Factorial Analysis, one can (for example) determine that six observed variables reflect the variations in two unobserved variables: ‘Exhibition,’ ‘Ascendance,’ ‘Dominance’

Extraversion ‘Borderline,’ ‘Low Objectivity,’ ‘Psychasthenia’

Neuroticism

Page 6: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Five Factor Model

Tupes and Christal (1961) found five recurrent factors in analyses of personality ratings in eight different samples:

“In many ways it seems remarkable that such stability should be found in an area which to date has granted anything but consistent results. Undoubtedly the consistency has always been there, but it has been hidden by inconsistency of factorial techniques and philosophies, the lack of replication using identical variables, and disagreement among analysts as to factor titles” (p. 12)

Page 7: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Five Factor Model

Page 8: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Five Factor Model

Page 9: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

From Personality Assaysto Five Factors

Page 10: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Building the Ontology

Scope: What do we need to account for? Factors, e.g.

Agreeableness Subfactors, e.g. Feeling Assays, e.g. Myers-Briggs Persons with Roles Values representing the

specified output of the assay

Concern: Discrepancies among the questionnaires! Quantity: Few vs. Many Format: True/False,

Multiple Choice, Ordinal vs. Interval

Thoroughness: for some, only two factors evaluated…

Negatively correlated values

Page 11: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

PAO 1.0

Initial thought: If subfactors are reducible to the five factors, e.g. ‘Likability’ (Hogan) to Agreeableness, then a measurement of a subfactor just is a measurement of one of the five factors.

So we’ll just say they’re equivalent classes…

Page 12: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 13: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 14: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

MULTIPLE INHERITANCE

Page 15: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

PAO 1.0

How do processes and the data produced by the assays fit into the ontology?

Page 16: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Related Ontologies

Mental Functioning Ontology

Emotion Ontology

Neuropsychological Testing Ontology

Page 17: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Emotion Ontology

Page 18: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Neuropsychological Testing Ontology

Page 19: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

PAO 2.0:Improvements

Assays are processes (occurrents)

Each personality test has parts, which are each assays of appropriate personality dimensions (Five Factors)

Each assay has a specified output, ranging from 1 to 100

Personality dimensions are parts of personality

Personality is a disposition of a person

Persons have roles: evaluator, evaluant…

Page 20: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

PAO 2.0:Some Examples

Hogan Personality Inventory has_part some Likability_Assay.

Likability_Assay has_specified_output some Likability_Score.

Likability_Score is_a Agreeableness_Score.

Agreeableness_Score is_a Scalar_Personality_Measurement Datum that contains information of measurement of definite value (1-100) of Agreeableness of some Personality of some Person.

Agreeableness is_a Personality_Dimension characterized by…

Page 21: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 22: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 23: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 24: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 25: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo
Page 26: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Negatively Correlated Scores

x = 100 - n

Page 27: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Further Research:We’d like to see…

The incorporation of standards to automate diagnosis.

A significance score for each test to allow for aggregation of tests and test scores.

Page 28: Personality Assessment Ontology (PAO) Brian Donohue and J. Neil Otte University at Buffalo

Thank you!

Q & A