View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 1
Services in digital libraries
Following functions?Following new capabilities?
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 2
Traditionally, major library functions
• COLLECTION– selection & acquisition of
information resources• following criteria & policies
• ORGANIZATION– intellectual representation – processing– physical arrangements
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 3
major functions ...
• HOUSING COLLECTIONS• ACCESS PROVISION
– locating, obtaining items in the collection• intellectually, physically
• PRESERVATION• PROFESSIONAL FUNCTIONS
– e.g. subject bibliographies– major in some library models
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 4
Traditionally, major services
• Mostly followed functions– access to library objects
• circulation, document delivery• interlibrary loan, • reading facilities• reserve
– provision of information• reference• searching
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 5
major services ...
– dissemination• e.g. SDI
– user specific services• children, adults, training ...
– subject specific services• pathways, bibliographies ...
– general• lecture series, events ...
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 6
Issues in translation into digital libraries
• What library services can be adopted into a digital environment? – what main characteristics dictate
services?– how to do that effectively &
efficiently?
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 7
Issues in using new capabilities
• What do digital environments offer that is unique?– how to translate that into new
services?– how to do that effectively &
efficiently?
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 8
New characteristics of digital collections
• COLLECTION: Digital objects– digitized or borne digital– texts & other media connected– direct searching possibilities
• ORGANIZATION– multiple organizations &
representations possible– relationships, linking possible
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 9
characteristics ...
• HOUSING– distributed, location could be
anywhere
• ACCESS– local & distributed access
through network(s)
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 10
DL services
• So far mostly extension from traditional services– horseless carriage model– constrained by requirements to build
digital libraries first
• New services & new modes of old services just emerging
• Next: examples
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 11
access to library objects
• direct access in library– own or library computers
• remote access– part open to all - most dl now
publicly accessible– part restricted to own community
or subscription
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 12
provision of information• provision of search tools• search of reference sources• search of databases• assembly of reference links
– e.g. Martindale
• reference– online question answering– collaborative reference
• e.g. QuestionPoint by LoC
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 13
dissemination
• document delivery– library sources– outside sources e.g. Uncover
• electronic reserve– delivered to library– library assembled
• interlibrary loan• cooperatives
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 14
user specific services
• assembly of pages specific to user groups – children, teens ...
• weblinks - local, national ...– links for specific purposes
• e.g. taxes, jobs, genealogy ...
– exploring the Internet sites
• Internet connection
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 15
subject specific services
• made or assembled in a variety of subjects & media– e.g. American Memory, Perseus
• area coverage– government documents (Mich), library
acquisition (Berkeley), legislative (LoC) ...
• local, regional history sources
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 16
subject ...
• subject guides, research & reference gateways– extension of pathways– probably a most, innovative tool
• comprehensive subject coverage– NLM health information
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 17
general
• training, tutorials– on & off line– instructional materials
• library information– policies, instruction, pointers …
• online exhibits• dl & other software tools
– for ftp (Berkeley, ibiblio)
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 18
New DL services: Who?
• Will they be developed by– librarians?– computer scientists?– commercial outfits?– user groups?
• All are now in the play• Need cooperation among various
groups
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 19
Commercial library services
• Given subjects, areas– Bartleby - verse– Alibris - booksellers, collectors– AcademicInfo - education– Web Developers Virtual Library
• Reference– Ask Jeeves & many others
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 20
Conclusions
• DL services provide for– great challenges, but also – great opportunities to innovate
• Exploit characteristics of digital world for services– but link to user needs and
characteristics
• Economics play a critical role– $$$$$$ vs. possible services
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University 21