1
The study carried out in three villages (Parakan Muncang, Curug Bitung,Cisarua), in Nanggung sub-district, West Java, Indonesia Total area of 109.99 km 2 , 70.223 km 2 (63.8%) constitute of arable land Elevation: 200-1800 m above sea level Annual rainfall is varies between 3,000 mm to 4,000 mm The average annual temperature ranging between 22 o C and 34 o C A baseline study was conducted to document the social and economic impacts of adopting trees, managing agroforestry systems and improving tree product marketing practices as part of the USAID funded ‘Agroforestry Innovation and Livelihood Enhancement Program’ implemented by World Agroforestry Centre – ICRAF Southeast Asia and Winrock International, with assistance from RMI (the Indonesian Institute for Forest and Environment). Introduction Introduction The data generated by this study will be used for farm-level economic analysis: (a) Analysis of the progress of agroforestry system in social and economic term, (b) Analysis of the financial return to the farm under different scenario, and (c) Orientation to farm budget and financial analysis by a selected group of interested farmers for examining their management options including market linkages. DEMOGRAPHY Fam ily m em ber 1. Totalhousehold m em bers (persons) 2. R ange (persons/household) 3. A verage household size 4. H ousehold Size 1 -4 19 54.30% 17 48.60% 14 40.00% 50 47.60% 5 -8 10 28.60% 17 48.60% 21 60.00% 48 45.70% 9 < 6 17.10% 1 2.90% 0 0.00% 7 6.70% 5. Nuclearfam ily 27 77.10% 26 74.30% 31 88.60% 84 80% 6. Extended fam ily 8 22.90% 9 25.70% 4 11.40% 21 20% A ge Structure < 15 46 25.40% 62 36.70% 82 45.60% 190 35.80% 15 - 64 125 69.10% 103 60.90% 97 53.90% 325 61.30% 64 < 10 5.50% 4 2.40% 1 0.60% 15 2.80% LaborForce ~ Proportion oflaborForce 135 74.60% 107 63.30% 98 54.40% 340 64.20% ~ A verage laborforce perhousehold D ependency ratio Prim ary schoolenrolm entrate 84.60% 75.00% 74.50% 77.1 34.10% 57.90% 83.70% 55.90% 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 2 – 11 2 – 12 2 – 8 2 – 12 181 169 180 530 Sam ple V illages n = 35 n = 35 n = 35 N = 105 Parakan M uncang C urug Bitung C isarua Most of the respondents (73.3%) engaged in agriculture as their main occupation, but only 16% of families rely on agriculture as their main source of income One-fifth of the respondents also engage in other activities out side their farm for additional income. Educational attainment, 5.7 % of the respondents were illiterate, and most of the respondents (81.9%) never went beyond elementary level. Primary school enrollment rate is also low (77.1%). LAND HOLDING INCOME AND EXPENDITURE FINDINGS FINDINGS n Rp 000 % n Rp 000 % n Rp 000 % n Rp 000 % Agriculturalincom e 34 64,21017.635 133,823 46 35 103,64633.2104 301,67831.2 O fffarm incom e 31 260,94971.625 126,92043.732 206,73166.2 88 594,60061.5 O therIncom e 21 39,22210.714 22,740 7.8 11 8,896 2.9 46 70,858 7.3 Totalhouseholds’incom e 35 364,381 100 35 290,683 100 35 312,073 100 105 967,136 100 Range (Rp 000/year) Minimum M aximum A verage fam ily incom e perhousehold (Rp 000/year) Incom e percapita (Rp 000/year) Proportion ofpeople below poverty line ~ ofIndonesia (Rp 1,158,144 capita -1 year -1 ) ~ ofWestJava (Rp 1,157,460 capita -1 year -1 ) 31.4 620 24,547 8,916 1,733 36.7 36.7 30.4 30.4 577 24,399 8,305 1,720 31.4 325 37,667 10,410 2,013 325 37,667 9,211 1,824 Sam ple Villages 32.8 32.8 M uncang C urug B itung C isarua Agricultural activities alone contribute 31.2% to the total households’ income Off-farm incomes contribute the most to the total hh income (61.5%) The share of agricultural income to total family income correlates to average landholding size Almost all income (43.5%) is spent on consumption FARMING SYSTEM n Totalarea (H a) n Totalarea (H a) n Totalarea (Ha) n Totalarea (Ha) - H om e yard 34 0.83 35 0.48 35 14,25 104 2.74 - R icefiled 14 2.36 23 7.18 28 9.18 65 18.72 - K ebun and/orTegal 32 12.04 35 17.74 29 13.75 96 43.53 - Hom eyard 1 0.005 - - - - 1 0.005 - R icefiled 5 0.76 9 1.26 7 2.15 21 4.17 - K ebun and/orTegal 3 0.28 10 1.77 20 7.6 33 9.65 M ean M edian Std. D eviation R ange 0.02 – 2.73 0.112 – 3.85 0.055 – 4.52 0.02 – 4.52 0.665 0.758 1.053 0.862 0.225 0.544 0.66 0.405 0.465 0.814 0.98 0.753 Sam ple Villages N um berofsurveyed households ow ning the land N um berofsurveyed household controlling others’land D escriptive statistics oflandholding size Parakan M uncang C urug Bitung C isarua Fruit is the key kebun component present in of 86.7% of the kebuns. Timber is a component of 36.8% of the kebuns; annual/seasonal crops a component of 28.3% of the kebuns. Among 31 fruits species cultivated by farmers, banana is most popular one (cultivated in 75.9% of kebuns), followed by petai (47.2% of kebuns), and then mango (39.2% of kebuns). MARKETING Parakan M uncang C urug Bitung C isarua Total Numberofplotinvolve 89% 88% 85% 87% Sum (Rp. 000) 70% 59% 66% 64% Numberofplotinvolve 18% 46% 38% 37% Sum (Rp. 000) 13% 36% 30% 29% Numberofplotinvolve 36% 34% 18% 28% Sum (Rp. 000) 18% 5% 4% 7% R eturn gain from Fruits R eturns gain from Tim ber R eturns gain from A nnualC rops Common Market Channels Annual Crops : Farmer Collector/Merchant Local Market Fruit : Farmer Collector/Merchant Local Market Timber : Farmer Logger/Merchant Sawmill Merchant Consumer/Industry Bamboo : Farmer Logger/ Merchant Construction Industry The study found that a low percentage of fruits harvested are marketed. Most of the yields of the key fruit species planted in the kebuns, were not sold. The reasons for this are: Poster Prepared by: Kusuma Wijaya Average landholding size: 0.75 hectare per household 57.1% hh controlling less than 0.25 hectare of land 21.3% of total agricultural land belong to others and is cultivated by means of renting in, sharecropping, or Numpang Household Expenditures 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Parakan M uncang C urug Bitung C isarua Sam ple V illages % of T otalExpenditur M ealorFood B asic N eeds (H ousing,C lothing,Schooling,H ealth,Tranportation) N on B asic N eeds (IndividualN eeds,Tax,S ocialO bligation) There are seven timber species and bamboo cultivated by the surveyed households. Bamboo is the most dominant species cultivated in their kebun, followed by Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) and Afrika (Maesopsis eminii). Some plots were occasionally used for annual crops cultivation, mostly tubers such as cassava, Talas (Taro), sweet potato and lengkuas (Alpinia galanga), for own consumption and also for sale. For more information please contact : World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) SEA Regional Office PO Box 161, Bogor, INDONESIA Phone: +62 251 625415; Fax: +62 251 625416 Agroforestry Innovations and Livelihood Enhancement in the shadow of lucrative urban centres: A Socio-economic study Suseno Budidarsono, Kusuma Wijaya, James Roshetko, Gerhard Manurung The Study Site The Study Site The quality of fruit produced is not very high and thus not marketable The fruit species produced do not match market demand Post-harvest handling is poor, and/or d) that farmers lack adequate market information and market access.

The study carried out in three villages (Parakan Muncang, Curug Bitung,Cisarua), in Nanggung sub-district, West Java, Indonesia Total area of 109.99

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The study carried out in three villages (Parakan Muncang, Curug Bitung,Cisarua), in Nanggung sub-district, West Java, Indonesia  Total area of 109.99

The study carried out in three villages (Parakan Muncang, Curug Bitung,Cisarua), in Nanggung sub-district, West Java, Indonesia

Total area of 109.99 km2, 70.223 km2 (63.8%) constitute of arable land

Elevation: 200-1800 m above sea level

Annual rainfall is varies between 3,000 mm to 4,000 mm

The average annual temperature ranging between 22o C and 34o C

A baseline study was conducted to document the social and economic impacts of adopting trees, managing agroforestry systems and improving tree product marketing practices as part of the USAID funded ‘Agroforestry Innovation and Livelihood Enhancement Program’ implemented by World Agroforestry Centre – ICRAF Southeast Asia and Winrock International, with assistance from RMI (the Indonesian Institute for Forest and Environment).

IntroductionIntroduction

The data generated by this study will be used for farm-level economic analysis: (a) Analysis of the progress of agroforestry system in social and economic term, (b) Analysis of the financial return to the farm under different scenario, and (c) Orientation to farm budget and financial analysis by a selected group of interested farmers for examining their management options including market linkages.

DEMOGRAPHY

Family member

1.   Total household members (persons)

2.   Range (persons/household)

3.   Average household size

4.   Household Size

1 - 4 19 54.30% 17 48.60% 14 40.00% 50 47.60% 5 - 8 10 28.60% 17 48.60% 21 60.00% 48 45.70% 9 < 6 17.10% 1 2.90% 0 0.00% 7 6.70%

5.   Nuclear family 27 77.10% 26 74.30% 31 88.60% 84 80%6.   Extended family 8 22.90% 9 25.70% 4 11.40% 21 20%

Age Structure

< 15 46 25.40% 62 36.70% 82 45.60% 190 35.80% 15 - 64 125 69.10% 103 60.90% 97 53.90% 325 61.30% 64 < 10 5.50% 4 2.40% 1 0.60% 15 2.80%Labor Force

~    Proportion of labor Force 135 74.60% 107 63.30% 98 54.40% 340 64.20%~    Average labor force per household

Dependency ratio

Primary school enrolment rate 84.60% 75.00% 74.50% 77.134.10% 57.90% 83.70% 55.90%

4 3 3 3

5 5 5 5

2 – 11 2 – 12 2 – 8 2 – 12

181 169 180 530

Sample Villages

n = 35 n = 35 n = 35 N = 105Parakan Muncang Curug Bitung Cisarua Most of the respondents (73.3%) engaged in

agriculture as their main occupation, but only 16% of families rely on agriculture as their main source of income

One-fifth of the respondents also engage in other activities out side their farm for additional income.

Educational attainment, 5.7 % of the respondents were illiterate, and most of the respondents (81.9%) never went beyond elementary level. Primary school enrollment rate is also low (77.1%).

LAND HOLDING

INCOME AND EXPENDITURE

FINDINGSFINDINGS

n Rp 000 % n Rp 000 % n Rp 000 % n Rp 000 %

Agricultural income   34 64,210 17.6 35 133,823 46 35 103,646 33.2 104 301,678 31.2

Off farm income 31 260,949 71.6 25 126,920 43.7 32 206,731 66.2 88 594,600 61.5

Other Income 21 39,222 10.7 14 22,740 7.8 11 8,896 2.9 46 70,858 7.3

 Total households’ income 35 364,381 100 35 290,683 100 35 312,073 100 105 967,136 100

Range (Rp 000/year)MinimumMaximum

Average family income per household (Rp 000/year)

Income per capita (Rp 000/year)

Proportion of people below poverty line~    of Indonesia (Rp 1,158,144 capita-1 year -1)

~    of West Java (Rp 1,157,460 capita-1 year -1) 31.4

62024,547

8,916

1,733

36.736.7

30.430.4

57724,399

8,305

1,720

31.4

32537,667

10,410

2,013

32537,667

9,211

1,824

Sample Villages

32.832.8

Parakan Muncang Curug Bitung Cisarua

Agricultural activities alone contribute 31.2% to the total households’ incomeOff-farm incomes contribute the most to the total hh income (61.5%)The share of agricultural income to total family income correlates to average landholding sizeAlmost all income (43.5%) is spent on consumption

FARMING SYSTEM

n Total area (Ha) nTotal area

(Ha)n

Total area (Ha)

nTotal area

(Ha)

-      Home yard 34 0.83 35 0.48 35 14,25 104 2.74-      Ricefiled 14 2.36 23 7.18 28 9.18 65 18.72-      Kebun and/or Tegal 32 12.04 35 17.74 29 13.75 96 43.53

-      Homeyard 1 0.005 - - - - 1 0.005-      Ricefiled 5 0.76 9 1.26 7 2.15 21 4.17-      Kebun and/or Tegal 3 0.28 10 1.77 20 7.6 33 9.65

Mean

Median

Std. Deviation

Range 0.02 – 2.73 0.112 – 3.85 0.055 – 4.52 0.02 – 4.52

0.665 0.758 1.053 0.862

0.225 0.544 0.66 0.405

0.465 0.814 0.98 0.753

Sample Villages

Number of surveyed households owning the land

Number of surveyed household controlling others’ land

Descriptive statistics of landholding size

Parakan Muncang Curug Bitung Cisarua

Fruit is the key kebun component present in of 86.7% of the kebuns. Timber is a component of 36.8% of the kebuns; annual/seasonal crops a component of 28.3% of the kebuns.

Among 31 fruits species cultivated by farmers, banana is most popular one (cultivated in 75.9% of kebuns), followed by petai (47.2% of kebuns), and then mango (39.2% of kebuns).

MARKETING

Parakan Muncang

Curug Bitung

Cisarua Total

Number of plot involve 89% 88% 85% 87%

Sum (Rp. 000) 70% 59% 66% 64%

Number of plot involve 18% 46% 38% 37%

Sum (Rp. 000) 13% 36% 30% 29%

Number of plot involve 36% 34% 18% 28% Sum (Rp. 000) 18% 5% 4% 7%

Return gain from Fruits

Returns gain from Timber  

Returns gain from Annual Crops

Common Market ChannelsAnnual Crops : Farmer Collector/Merchant Local MarketFruit : Farmer Collector/Merchant Local MarketTimber : Farmer Logger/Merchant Sawmill Merchant Consumer/IndustryBamboo : Farmer Logger/ Merchant Construction Industry

The study found that a low percentage of fruits harvested are marketed. Most of the yields of the key fruit species planted in the kebuns, were not sold. The reasons for this are:

Poster Prepared by: Kusuma Wijaya

Average landholding size: 0.75 hectare per household57.1% hh controlling less than 0.25 hectare of land 21.3% of total agricultural land belong to others and is cultivated by

means of renting in, sharecropping, or Numpang

Household Expenditures

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Parakan Muncang Curug Bitung Cisarua Sample Villages

% o

f Tota

l Expendit

ure

s

Meal or Food Basic Needs (Housing, Clothing, Schooling, Health, Tranportation)Non Basic Needs (Individual Needs, Tax, Social Obligation)

There are seven timber species and bamboo cultivated by the surveyed households. Bamboo is the most dominant species cultivated in their kebun, followed by Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) and Afrika (Maesopsis eminii).

Some plots were occasionally used for annual crops cultivation, mostly tubers such as cassava, Talas (Taro), sweet potato and lengkuas (Alpinia galanga), for own consumption and also for sale.

For more information please contact :

World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) SEA Regional Office

PO Box 161, Bogor, INDONESIAPhone: +62 251 625415; Fax: +62 251 625416

Agroforestry Innovations and Livelihood Enhancement in the shadow of lucrative urban centres:

A Socio-economic studySuseno Budidarsono, Kusuma Wijaya, James Roshetko, Gerhard

ManurungThe Study SiteThe Study Site

The quality of fruit produced is not very high and thus not marketable The fruit species produced do not match market demand Post-harvest handling is poor, and/or d) that farmers lack adequate market information and market

access.