00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/22/2019 00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

    1/6

  • 7/22/2019 00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

    2/6

    832 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. 35, NO. 4, JULY/AUGUST 1999

    Fig. 1. One pole of the stator and rotor core.

    Section II introduces the generator components. In Section III,

    we present our analysis of the PM generator. In Section IV,

    we describe testing and, lastly, in Section V, the conclusions

    are summarized.

    II. COMPONENTS OF THE GENERATOR

    In this paper, we discuss only one unit module of the

    generator. The generator consists of an 18-pole PM. The stator

    and the rotor cores are made of precut transformer lamination

    silicon steel (gauge 26, M19). The stator and rotor cores can

    be made on a per-pole basis, reducing the cost of complete

    dies required to stamp a conventional lamination configuration.

    The geometry of the stator and the rotor core could have

    been optimized, however, this project focuses on the proof

    of concept.

    A. RotorThe cross section of the stator and rotor pole is illustrated in

    Fig. 1. Each pole is constructed from two identical core stacks

    and the PM is sandwiched in between. The rotor is constructed

    to allow an expansion in the axial direction, for example, to

    increase the magnet surface. The flux directions at the top

    (outer radius) and the bottom (inner radius) of the rotor pole

    are the opposite. Around the perimeter of the rotor, the flux

    direction of one pole is opposite of the flux direction in the

    next pole, as shown by the white arrows in Fig. 2. The ratio of

    the magnetic surface area to the pole surface area determines

    the focusing factor. The chosen geometry enables the designer

    Fig. 2. PM generator with toroidal winding.

    to increase the length of the rotor core without affecting the

    stator geometry and vice versa.

    The rotor poles are attached to a nonmagnetic disk thatholds the rotor cores. The shaft is attached to the disk to rotate

    the rotor core. A nonmagnetic stainless steel belt is strapped

    around the rotor core to keep the rotor poles in place. Since

    the rotor speed is low, centrifugal force created when the rotor

    rotates is not very high. There are nine pole pairs on the rotor.

    Between two rotor poles, there is a small gap to minimize

    interpolar magnetic leakage.

    B. Stator

    The stator consists of two stator sides. There are nine poles

    attached to each stator side. The poles on each side are attached

    to a plate (not shown in Fig. 2) which holds the stator polesin place. In the prototype, one side of the stator core can be

    rotated (within a limited angle range) with respect to the other

    stator side. Thus, the position of the stator cores in one side

    can be shifted with respect to the other sides. The shift can

    be adjusted to control the phase shift between the first stator

    side and the second stator side.

    C. Stator Winding

    The stator winding is wound like a torus or a washer. With

    a toroidal form, the stator winding can be easily assembled

    and automated for production. The stator winding between the

    stator poles is exposed to open air, which improves cooling.

    In general, the load to the wind turbine is regulated as acube function of the rotor revolutions per minute to operate the

    wind turbine at the optimum efficiency. The tip-speed ratio (the

    ratio of the blade-tip speed to the wind speed) should be kept

    constant at the optimum power coefficient of the wind turbine.

    With this load characteristic, as the wind speed increases, the

    load is regulated to follow the wind speed. Thus, the load is

    increased as the wind speed increases.

    One advantage of wind power systems is the location of the

    generator. It is mounted on a tower above the ground. The

    cooling mechanism is better up on the nacelle than inside a

    ground-level building because the generator is always exposed

  • 7/22/2019 00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

    3/6

    MULJADI et al.: AXIAL-FLUX MODULAR PM GENERATOR WITH A TOROIDAL WINDING 833

    Fig. 3. Expansion for multimodule generation.

    to air flow that is proportional to the generator load. Duringlow wind speeds, the heat transfer from the winding is lower;

    however, the heat generated in the winding is lower, too. The

    opposite is true at high wind; more heat is generated in the

    winding, but more air flow is available to transfer the heat

    away.

    We built one module unit for a single-phase generator. The

    stator windings at the two sides are connected in parallel to

    generate a single-phase output. The rotor shaft is attached to

    the stator sides through the bearings, which are attached to the

    stator plate. The rotor core has a width of 6.35 cm (2.5 in)

    and a diameter of 29.2 cm (11.5 in). The overall width of the

    generator is 16.5 cm (6.5 in), excluding the two stator plates.

    The weight of one stator pole unit is 217 g (or 3.9 kg for 18poles). The weight of the stator winding for one side is 2061

    g or 4122 g for both sides. The weight of one rotor pole unit

    is 612 g, including the PM (or 11 kg for 18 poles).

    D. Expansion for Multimodule Generation System

    The power from the stator can be actively controlled using

    power switches [insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs)]

    or passively controlled using a diode rectifier. Fig. 3 shows a

    possible configuration of the power converter to process the

    power generated by the generator. The generator may consist

    of one or more modules. In this configuration, only three

    unit modules are shown. Each unit module of the generatoris paired with one leg module of power switches on the power

    converter side. Thus, the power converter and the generator

    can be expanded in a similar fashion. The power generated is

    converted back to the utility via a three-phase inverter, which

    can be controlled to produce good power quality.

    III. DESIGN ANALYSIS

    The analysis of the generator is based on the wind-turbine

    requirements. The steady-state analysis was performed as

    the first step to get the first cut of design criteria. The

    finite-element analysis was performed to refine the magnetic

    analysis. Finally, a dynamic analysis was performed in the

    laboratory to validate generator performance under dynamic

    conditions.

    A. Steady-State Analysis

    The prime mover for this generator is a wind turbine. One

    characteristic of wind turbines is that the rotational speed is

    lower than most prime movers. To avoid using a gearbox,the generator is direct driven. Multiple poles must be used to

    allow slow-speed operation.

    Most horizontal axis wind turbines operate at about the

    same tip-speed ratio range. Larger turbines use a larger blade

    radius. Thus, for the same wind speed range, the larger turbines

    require a lower rotor speed than smaller turbines. For example,

    a 300-kW turbine operates at about 40 r/min; the 10-kW

    turbine operates at about 400800 r/min, depending on the

    choice of the blade radius range of tip-speed ratio. In the

    preliminary design presented in this paper, the 667-r/min speed

    is not an optimum design.

    From steady-state analysis, the following criteria are chosen:

    number of poles 18maximum operating

    frequency 100 Hz (at 667 r/min)number of phases

    per unit module 1 (two windings in parallel).

    The electric loading:

    stator current 11.0 A rms (at per-phase volt-

    age 58-V rms)

    wire chosen AWG 12

    current density

    in the slot J 3.4 10 A/m

    predicted copper losses

    at rated current 42 W.

    B. Finite-Element Analysis

    To analyze the magnetic circuit, the finite-element method

    was used to compute the flux density in the generator com-

    ponents. The main purpose of this analysis is to get the

    overall picture of the saturation levels in different parts of the

    generator, the iron losses in the components of the generators,

    and the worst case of demagnetization on the permanent

    magnet. In the finite-element analysis presented here, the

    generator uses a ferrite PM.

    1) No-Load Condition: In the no-load condition, the mag-

    netic path is analyzed to see the magnetic flux density in

    different parts of the magnetic paths. With the stator corein each side shifted by 180 , the maximum flux in the core

    happens when the stator core and the rotor core are aligned.

    Fig. 4 shows the flux lines at the no-load condition. Only one

    side of the stator core is shown. Some flux leakage is shown,

    such as at both ends of the rotor poles. The rotor core has low

    flux density with the highest flux density at the parts closest

    to the air gap. As shown in Fig. 4, the maximum flux density

    occurs at the corner of the U-shaped stator core. Fig. 5 shows

    the magnitude of the flux density along the horizontal line in

    the middle of the air gap. The maximum flux density at no load

    is 1.55 T. The flux density at the air gap is 0.9 T and the flux

  • 7/22/2019 00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

    4/6

    834 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. 35, NO. 4, JULY/AUGUST 1999

    Fig. 4. Flux lines at no-load condition.

    Fig. 5. Flux density at no-load condition.

    density at the permanent magnet is 0.24 T. The stator core and

    the rotor core have a flux density below the saturation point.

    2) Inductive Load at Rated Current: In this condition, the

    magnetic path is analyzed to see flux reduction at the air gap

    at the least favorable power factor. The generator is loaded to

    have rated current.

    3) Short-Circuit Condition: In this condition, the magnetic

    path is analyzed to see the demagnetization effects on the PM.

    In order to analyze the worst case scenario, the stator core

    and the rotor core are perfectly aligned and the short-circuit

    current is applied to the stator core. In this case, the short-

    TABLE IFLUX-DENSITY COMPARISON AT DIFFERENT

    MAGNETIC PATHS FOR DIFFERENT CONDITIONS

    Fig. 6. Open-circuit voltage.

    circuit current is about ten times the rated current. The result

    is tabulated in Table I.

    IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

    A. Experimental Setup

    The experiment was conducted to observe the performance

    of the generator. The generator is driven by a motor via a

    belt. The motor is a four-pole motor, with rated speed of 1800

    r/min. The motor is fed by a pulsewidth modulation (PWM)variable-frequency drive. The generator speed is driven to 667

    r/min. The output frequency at this speed is 100 Hz. The

    experiment is conducted only on a single unit generator. In

    the finite-element analysis, the PM used is ferrite; however, in

    this experiment, the PM chosen is a rare earth PM (NdFeB).

    B. Voltage and Current Waveforms

    The open-circuit voltage is measured at the terminal output

    of winding 2 (open circuit). The stator cores are shifted toward

    each other by 180 electrical degrees. The voltage waveform is

    captured from the scope, digitized, and plotted in Figs. 6 and

    7. In Fig. 7, the generator is loaded with resistive load up to

    rated load at 100 Hz. The voltage across the terminal output

    of the generator is a unity power factor load. Thus, the current

    waveform is reflected by this terminal voltage waveform.

    C. Parameter Determination Test

    A simple modified test is used to get the parameters of

    the PM. The experiment is shown in Fig. 8. One side of the

    generator (winding 1) is connected to a rated load at unity

    power factor. The generator is driven to generate a rated

    frequency. The other side of the winding (winding 2) is an

    open circuit. The voltage output of winding 1 is called terminal

    voltage and the open-circuit voltage of winding 2 is called

    open-circuit voltage . The angle difference between and

  • 7/22/2019 00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

    5/6

    MULJADI et al.: AXIAL-FLUX MODULAR PM GENERATOR WITH A TOROIDAL WINDING 835

    Fig. 7. Terminal voltage across resistive load.

    Fig. 8. Experimental setup.

    TABLE IIRESULTS FROM TEST DATA

    is called , which is the torque angle of the generator at

    this load. The power, current, and voltage output of winding

    1 are recorded.

    The parameters can be computed from the test data, and

    the results are listed in Table II. The efficiency is about

    75%, which is quite reasonable for a small and nonoptimized

    design. The efficiency can be increased by improving the

    magnetic design (minimizing the leakage and core losses) and

    mechanical design (lower friction and windage losses).

    V. CONCLUSION

    We have investigated the proposed generator for application

    in wind-power generation. In the first stage of implementation,

    a proof of concept of the generator was investigated. The

    magnetic and electric loading were shown to be within the

    limits of common practice of machine design. The gener-

    ator has the following advantages for wind-turbine genera-

    tion.

    The modular concept is suitable for commercially produc-

    ing limited quantities of machines with different sizes and

    output requirements. The components are manufactured

    on a per-pole basis. The tooling required is minimized.

    The design can be readily changed, such as the number

    of poles in one unit or the number of unit modules in a

    generator system. Although, in this paper, the mechanical

    design is not the main objective of the work, the mechan-

    ical construction of this generator was a challenge. The

    structure must be built to withstand any unbalanced axial

    forces that can cause the rotor to wobble. A significant

    mechanical design improvement can be made to the

    present design.

    The winding is torroidal in shape. Preformed winding can

    be utilized and the winding can be inserted in the stator

    core. For a low-volume production, the winding can be

    done manually. For high-volume production, automaticaxial machine winding would be more suitable.

    The axial-flux design makes it easier to increase the flux

    density in the air gap.

    To scale up the output power of the generator, more units

    can be stacked in the axial directions. The power con-

    verter required to process the power is readily compatible

    with the generator. Each unit module of the generator is

    matched with each leg of the power switches.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The authors wish to thank J. Bianchi for his assistance

    during the test setup and J. Adams for his help during thefabrication of this generator. They also wish to acknowledge

    the management at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory

    (NREL) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for their

    encouragement and approving the time and tools needed for

    this project.

    REFERENCES

    [1] B. J. Chalmers and E. Spooner, An axial-flux permanent-magnetgenerator for a gearless wind energy system, in Proc. PEDES96, NewDelhi, India, Jan. 1996, pp. 610612.

    [2] E. Spooner and A. Williamson, Modular, permanent-magnet wind-turbine generators, in Conf. Rec. IEEE-IAS Annu. Meeting, San Diego,

    CA, Oct. 610, 1996, vol. 1, pp. 497502.[3] E. F. Fuchs, A. A. Fardoun, P. Carlin, and R. W. Erikson, Permanent

    magnet machines with large speed variations, in Proc. Windpower92,Seattle, WA, Oct. 1992, pp. 291299.

    [4] F. Carrichi, F. Crescimbini, and F. Mezzetti, Multistage axial-flux PMmachine for wheel direct drive, IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 32, pp.882887, July/Aug. 1996.

    [5] S. Huang, J. Luo, and T. A. Lipo, Analysis and evaluation of thetransverse flux circumferential current machine, in Conf. Rec. IEEE-IAS

    Annu. Meeting, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 59, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 378384.[6] R. Marsh, R. Chrenko, C. R. Gamble, D. Heberte, W. Holley, B. Javier,

    D. Koconis, R. Millis, T. Lipo, Y. Li, and F. Leonardi, Direct-drivewind turbine feasibility study, survey of turbine technologies, presentedat the AIAA Conf., Reno, NV, Jan. 5, 1997.

    [7] Direct-drive wind turbine feasability study, Electric Power ResearchInstitute, Palo Alto, CA, Rep. EPRI TR-106794, Apr. 1996.

  • 7/22/2019 00777191 Axial Flux Pmg Toroidal

    6/6

    836 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. 35, NO. 4, JULY/AUGUST 1999

    Eduard Muljadi (S83M84SM94) received theM.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineeringfrom the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    From 1988 to 1992, he was with the Departmentof Electrical and Computer Engineering, CaliforniaState University, Fresno, as an Assistant and Asso-ciate Professor. In June 1992, he joined the NationalRenewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. Hiscurrent research interests are in the fields of electricmachines and power electronics, with emphasis on

    renewable energy applications. He is the holder oftwo patents in power conversion for renewable energy.

    Dr. Muljadi is currently a member of the Industrial Drives, ElectricMachines, and Industrial Power Converter Committees of the IEEE IndustryApplications Society. He is also a member of Eta Kappa Nu and Sigma Xi.

    C. P. Butterfield received the B.S. and M.S. degreesin mechanical engineering from the University ofMassachusetts, Amherst.

    He is the Manager of the Certification Program atthe National Wind Technology Center, National Re-newable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.He leads many technical review teams in evaluationof wind turbine designs. He managed the entireengineering development of two innovative windturbine designs that were considered state of theart at the time they were developed and deployed.

    He designed and developed a comprehensive aerodynamics test and researchprogram that became the model for several international aerodynamic researchefforts. Before his current position, he was a Research Engineer for windturbine aerodynamic research, a Manager of the Wind Energy AppliedResearch Program, and a Chief Engineer in charge of technical review teamsand technical direction for the Turbine Development Program at NREL.Before joining NREL, he was the owner and Vice President of Engineeringfor ESI, a company that designed, manufactured, and operated utility-scalewind turbines. He was involved with test engineering and technical reviewsfor the small wind turbine research program at Rockwell International. Hehas authored more than 60 publications concerning aerodynamics, structuraldynamics, electrical control, and testing of wind turbines.

    Mr. Butterfield was the recipient of the Technical Achievement Award fromthe American Wind Energy Association in 1983 and the NREL DirectorsAward in 1993.

    Yih-huie Wan received the B.S. degree from Na-tional Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, R.O.C., andthe M.S. degree from Southern Illinois University,Carbondale, IL, in 1973 and 1979, respectively, bothin electrical engineering.

    He is a Senior Engineer with the National Re-newable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.His main expertise is in electric power systemengineering, planning, and operation. Before joiningNREL, he worked as an Electrical Engineer for an

    electric power company in Oklahoma for ten yearsin substation and distribution feeder design, transmission system planning, andbulk power transaction analysis. His work at NREL includes renewable energytechnology assessment and integration of renewable energy technologies withthe electric utility grid. He has also done work in renewable energy policyanalysis, renewable energy resource assessment, and distributed generation.

    Mr. Wan is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Oklahoma.