01 01 2021 For the Most URGENT Attention & Immediate Action of the Law Commission of India + Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in New Delhi India 1 message

Neelu Chaudhari <lotusprincess4u@gmail.com>

1 January 2021 at 22:23

To: dr.dpsharma@nic.in Cc: lee cant <leejaycant@yahoo.co.uk>, "FOUNDING M CELEBES H.E HADISON K.M 2878" <hadison2878@gmail.com>, ANDI KASMAN <andikasman2018@gmail.com>, Andrew Devine <devinebar@hotmail.com>, Anthony Badaloo <admin@church-hill.net>, usha nischal <nischal.usha@gmail.com>, S Sood <Spsmor@hotmail.com>, Ramola D Reports <ramolad@hushmail.com>,

PETITIONER IN WP(C) 6179/2007 + Swissindo Volunteer for India + UK + Others

Ms Neelu Chaudhari BPHARM. (HON)

c/o 450 New North Road

Hainault Essex IG6 3EB, UK

00447868060083 01 JAN 2021

Member-Secretary, Law Commission of India, 2nd Floor, ILI Building, Bhagwandas Road, New Delhi-110001, India. Fax: 91-11-23388870 or E-Mail at: dr.dpsharma@nic.in

Ref: 01 01 2021 For the Most Attention & Immediate Action of the Law Commission of India + Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in New Delhi India

206Th Report On Proposal For Enactment Of New Coroners Act

I am the aunt of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari. I am also the Petitioner on a White House Petition to claim $6 million on behalf of each of 7.6 billion Citizens, including all Indians in India Swissindo International Law.

Millions of Suspicious Deaths of Indians in India and Abroad, are not being investigated by all Governments, including the Indian Government due to Alleged Poverty whilst offers of $6 million offer to each of 7.6 billion Citizens Prosperity of Swissindo, made to all Governments by the Great President of the United Nations, are being Rejected and denied to 7.6 billion Citizens by Corrupt Governments and Leaders for over 10 years.

I note that the salaries of the Supreme Court Judges have gone up by more than 100% recently, despite Global Poverty rising around the world, including India. My attempt to file an action in Person in 2017, in the Supreme Court in New Delhi, resulted in sabotage by Corrupt officers of the Court.

See attached IMMEDIATE action demand

01 01 2021 For the Most URGENT Attention & Immediate Action of the Law Commission of India + Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in New Delhi India

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 01 2008 06 Report 206 18th Law Commission On Proposal For Enactment Of New Coroners Act in India.pdf EXHIBIT 02 2007 10 12 WPC 6179 2007 ARTICLE PAGE 80 PARA 4 _Amity_International_Journal_of_Juridical_Scie_007.pdf Exhibit 03 2020 10 07 14,153 White House Petitioners Demand $6m Swissindo P 1-11 for each of 7.6 billion people Exhibit 04 2010 06 14 Swisindo International Law 12 Signature at United Nations HQ New York Exhibit 05 2013 04 10 Swissindo Payments 1-11 $1 Quintillion World Quota 23p.pdf Exhibit 06 2013 06 20 Report of G8 Summit 2013 ref Sabotage of Swissindo Announcement by US President Obama Exhibit 07 2015 05 20 $138.99 Trillion Country Quota offer 6p Exhibit 08 2015 08 17 SWISSINDO P1-11 DIRECT BANK APPLICATION FORM Exhibit 09 2016 02 11 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan PAYMENT English Exhibit 10 2016 02 11 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan PAYMENT Indonesian.jpg Exhibit 11 2016 07 02 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments $600 Child $1200 Adult English Exhibit 12 2016 07 02 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments $600 Child $1200 Adult Indonesian Exhibit 13 2019 05 Authority by H.M. Mr Sino M1 to H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang

14 attachments

Exhibit 08 2015 08 17 SWISSINDO P1-11 DIRECT BANK APPLICATION FORM.jpg 247K

Exhibit 09 2016 02 11 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan PAYMENT English.jpg 647K

Exhibit 10 2016 02 11 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan PAYMENT Indonesian.jpg 898K

Exhibit 01 2008 06 Report 206 18th Law Commission On Proposal For Enactment Of New Coroners Act in India.pdf 179K

Exhibit 03 2020 10 07 14,153 White House Petitioners Demand $6m Swissindo P 1-11 for each of 7.6 billion people.pdf 70K

Exhibit 04 2010 06 14 Swisindo International Law 12 Signature at United Nations HQ New York.pdf 215K

Exhibit 06 2013 06 20 Report of G8 Summit 2013 ref Sabotage of Swissindo Announcement by US President Obama.pdf 101K

Exhibit 05 2013 04 10 Swissindo Payments 1-11 $1 Quintillion World Quota 23p.pdf 281K

EXHIBIT 02 2007 10 12 WPC 6179 2007 ARTICLE PAGE 80 PARA 4 _Amity_International_Journal_of_Juridical_Scie_007.pdf 813K

Exhibit 07 2015 05 20 $138.99 Trillion Country Quota offer 6p.pdf 910K

Exhibit 11 2016 07 02 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments $600 Child $1200 Adult English.pdf 655K

Exhibit 12 2016 07 02 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments $600 Child $1200 Adult Indonesian.pdf 988K

Exhibit 13 2019 05 Authority by H.M. Mr Sino M1 to H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang.pdf 451K

2021 01 01 URGENT ACTION BY LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA + SUPREME COURT OF New Delhi, INDIA.pdf 82K

Public Interest Writ Petition, Under Swissindo International Law, 14 June 2010, via 18th

Law Commission of India, to Mandate Prosperity Payments 1-11 of Swissindo, in India in

7 Days

Writ Petition Signed by 14,153 Petitioners on a White House Petition dated 7 October 2020

demanding their $6 million Swissindo Prosperity Payments for each of 7.6 billion Citizens

INDEX

Date Exhibit

No

Title Page

01 Jan 2021 00

Writ Petition Action Mandate for Law

Commission of India

1-10

June 2008

01 Report 206 18th Law Commission 11-44

12 Oct 2007 02 WPC 6179 2007 ARTICLE PAGE 80 PARA 4

2018

45-55

7 Oct 2020

03 14,153 White House Petitioners Demand

$6m Swissindo P 1-11 for each of 7.6 billion

people

56-58

14 Jun 2010 04 Swisindo International Law 12 Signature at

United Nations HQ New York

59

10 Apr 2013 05 Swissindo Payments 1-11 $1 Quintillion

World Quota 23p

60-82

20 Jun 2013

06 Report of G8 Summit 2013 ref Sabotage of

Swissindo Announcement by US President

Obama

83-86

20 May2015 07 20 $138.99 Trillion Country Quota offer 6p 87-92

17 Aug 2015

08 SWISSINDO P1-11 DIRECT BANK

APPLICATION FORM

93

11 Feb 2016

09 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan

PAYMENT English

94

11 Feb 2016

10 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan

PAYMENT Indonesian

95

02 July 2016

11 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments

$600 Child $1200 Adult English

96

02 July 2016

12 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments

$600 Child $1200 Adult Indonesian

97

19 May 2019

13 Authority by H.M. Mr Sino M1 to H.E. Mr

Hadison Manonorang

98

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW DELHI, INDIA C/O 18th LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA

(PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

IN THE MATTER OF:

Report 206 of the 18TH Law Commission of India,

for the Enactment of the Coroner Act 2008, in

India, (see Exhibit 01) was initiated by the UK

Petitioner Chaudhari Family in The Delhi High

Court in Writ Petition No.6179/2007, Social Jurist,

a Civil Rights Group Vs. Union of India (see

Exhibit 02). The Enactment is now 12 years

delayed, due to lack of funds in India to set up

Magistrates Courts, denying Murder

investigations of over 100,000, suspicious, Out of

State, and out of country deaths of Indians,

including Dowry Brides, in India and Abroad,

annually.

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

The same Petitioner Chaudhari Family

Demanded Swissindo Prosperity Payments 1-11,

under Swissindo International Law, on behalf of

7.6 billion people via a White House Petition,

Page 1

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

dated 07 October 2020, which was signed by

14,153 Petitioners from all over the World (see

Exhibit 03)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

Delhi High Court in Writ Petition No.6179/2007

was a Case of UK State Satanic Ritual Abuse,

Rape, Torture, Death & mutilation of Baby

Sunaina Chaudhari, who’s body still lies in a

freezer in a Mortuary in Pehar Ganj Mortuary,

New Delhi, India, since Feb 2007, to date,

following the Criminal Cover-up of her death in

the UK in 2000 by UK Coroners. (see Exhibit

02). Satanic Ritual Abuse inflicts millions of

Orphans in India at the hands of Satanic

Priests and child traffickers for Satanic Rituals.

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

Swissindo International Law, signed into law

by 12 World’s top Financial Organizations, on

14 June 2010, with a 30 day Acceptance

Mandate of all Offers made by H.E.

International The Great President - Royal,

K681 King ASM MR A1 Sino AS, S "2" IR

Page 2

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

SOEGIHARTONOTONEGORO, ST (H.M. Mr

Sino M1), failure of which is a crime under

International Law (see Exhibit 04)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

India trading under Pirate Currency of USA,

Stocks and Shares Gambling, despite the 70

year expiry date of 15 August 2017, of the

Independence of India, 14 August 2017 date of

70 year Expiry of Pakistan and 17 Aug 2015

date of the Expiry of the Republic of Indonesia;

of the “Non-Independence” of the so called

“Independent” countries, being hijacked by

USA Pirate Currency Banks, Trading illegally,

despite the Banking License 70 Year Expiry of

the United Nations Agreement with Indonesian

President Soekarno, to Rename the “League

of Nations”, (set up by Mohandas Gandhi in

1919), to the “United Nations” and move its

Headquarters to New York USA at the

Independence of Indonesia on 17 August 1945

for 70 years, which expired on 17 Aug 2015).

AND

Page 3

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

IN THE MATTER OF:

Offers of Swissindo Prosperity Payments 1-11

(eleven) of equal shares of $6 million to each

of 7.6 billion people; $138.99 Trillion to each

of 253 countries; a total of $1 Quintillion assets

were made to all Corporate Governments of

the world, repeatedly, but have been ignored

and denied since 2010 and since G8 Summit

2013 and since 17 Aug 2015, despite many

failed attempts to reach the people due to

Treasonous Slave Masters, hijacking

Governments under USA Pirate banks (see

Exhibits 05 to 12 inclusive);

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

New Delhi Supreme Court’s Validation of

Swissindo International Law Mandate in India,

of the International Authority of H.M. Mr Sino

M1, as evidenced by the attached document,

with an IMMEDIATE Acceptance Mandate in

India of any past, present or future Swissindo

offers made by H.M. Mr Sino M1, under

Swissindo International Law in the Public

Interests (see Exhibit 04);

AND

Page 4

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

IN THE MATTER OF:

New Delhi Supreme Court’s Validation of

International Witness Protection Security + VIP

Status for H.M. Mr Sino M1, Swissindo

Volunteers and Delegates and Security Staff in

India (and around the World) to enable

unlimited VIP Government Access Security

and Travel;

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

Supreme Court Order Mandate to Mitigate

Liability against the Government of India from

claims made by every Citizen of India, in the sum

of $6 million, by each Citizen, by Ordering

Immediate Joint Public Announcements, by

President Narendra Modi, acting under the

Authority of H.M. Mr Sino M1, via Authorized

Agent, H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang, (see

Exhibit 13) via Zoom, within 7 days, for the

Release of Payments 1-11 of Swissindo within

another 7 days in India (as well as the rest of the

world) due to Mass Poverty and Slavery by the

USA Pirate Corporate Structure.

Page 5

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

PREAMBLE Crimes are being committed against babies and children all over the world, due to poverty and the apparent lack of resources whilst offers of $1 Quintillion ($6 million assets to each Citizen of the World) and $138.99 Trillion to each of 253 countries are being concealed, denied and rejected by Corrupt leaders in Contempt of God, Honour, Law & Justice. Every Supreme Court in the World is Mandated to

1. Validate the Swissindo International Law Document dated 14 June 2010

2. Order their Leaders to a) make the Announcement to Release Swissindo Payments 1-11 to

their people within 7 days of receipt of this Writ Petition and accept the offer of $138.99 Trillion Country Quota

b) Agree with H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang, to Implement a Plan to Distribute Payments 1-11 to each Citizen in every country, within another 7 days

On Behalf of :-

H.E. International The Great President – Royal, K681 King ASM

MR A1 Sino AS, S "2" IR SOEGIHARTONOTONEGORO, ST

c/o World Office and Home of H.M. Mr Sino M1

JL Sultan Agung Griya Caraka Tirtayasa, 1-4 No. 24 Kedawung, Cirebon

Jawa Barat, INDONESIA 45153

c/o H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang c/o hadison2878@gmail.com, (see Exhibit

13) Based on:- I) Failure to investigate 100,000 annual Out of State Murders in India due to lack of resources and poverty, despite the recommendations in Report 206 of the 18th Law Commission of India, following the failure to Investigate, In India, the State rape, torture, death and mutilation, in a UK State Satanic Ritual, of Indian Baby, Sunaina Chaudhari, whose body is still in Freezer in a Mortuary

Page 6

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

in Pehar Gunj, New Delhi, since Feb 2007 to date, due to apparent lack of resources in India to administer Magistrates and Coroners’ Courts. II) The theft of $1 Quintillion (billion billion) from 7.6 billion people ($6 million each) by USA Bankers, in the False Prosecution in Criminal Case in Jakarta Indonesia to libel The Great President of United Nations and Gold Guardian in file 421/Pid.B/2018/PN.Sbr Vs Sugihartono Aka Sino Sugiharto Noto Negoro The False Prosecution, False Conviction, False Sentence and False Imprisonment of H.M. Mr Sino M1, in Contempt of Swissindo International Law, to rob 7.6 billion people of the world, including all Indians, has an ongoing Liability of $1 Quintillion, since G8 Summit June 2013 and 70 year Expiry of the Independence of India on 15 August 2017 (after which time there is no Legitimacy of the Corporate Banking and Government Structures anywhere in the world) and there is an Ongoing Liability against all Banks and Governments, for denying Swissindo Prosperity Payments 1-11 to 7.6 billion people and 253 countries in the total sum of $1 Quintillion.

IMMEDIATE PUBLIC INTEREST WRIT PETITION REMEDY DEMAND

This is Public Interest Writ Petition Remedy Demand supported by 14,153 signatures from all over the world, signed on a White House petition, dated 7th October 2020, see attached, (2) for the Urgent Attention of the 18th Law Commission and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia for his Immediate Kind Attention and Action; Due to the False Prosecution of H.M. Mr Sino M1, in Indonesia, his kind offer of $1 Quintillion was denied to all Indonesians and 7.6 billion people, in Contempt of Swissindo International Law. There is thus an Ongoing Liability against all Banks and Governments, in the sum of $1 Quintillion. To Mitigate Ongoing Liabilities against India, the 18th Law Commission and Chief Justice of Supreme Court in New Delhi, India, may, immediately:- Validate the authority of H.M. Mr Sino M1 as the The Great President of the United Nations;

Validate the World Office of Swissindo, at JL Sultan Agung Griya Caraka

Tirtayasa, 1-4 No. 24 Kedawung, Cirebon Jawa Barat, INDONESIA 45153 as

Page 7

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

per the c/o H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang email hadison2878@gmail.com

Validate the Urgent Joint Public Announcement, by the President of India

Narendra Modi, under the Authority of H.M. Mr Sino M1, via H.E. Mr Hadison

Manonorang email hadison2878@gmail.com, of Imminent Release of

Swissindo Payments 1-11, in 7 days in India, from date of email service of this

document in the Supreme Court of India, via 18th Law Commission, for

Implementation in a further 7 days, in India, (and the rest of the world);

Signed 14,153 Swissindo International Law Petitioners

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/i-demand-my-6m-gold-payments-1-

11-each-76-billion-people-under-swissindo-nesara-gesara-international-laws

NOTE: All Embassies of the World have been notified in Jakarta, Indonesia and in London, of the Ongoing Liabilities against their Country Leaders, in Denying their Citizens their Prosperity Payments 1-11 of Swissindo under Swissindo Internationa Law of 14 June 2010 since 07 Nov 2020, without Remedy. It remains for every Supreme Court, International Court and Law Commission to Validate the Offers of Swissindo Payments 1-11, IMMEDIATELY, via Government leaders, for Final Remedy by way of Public Announcements followed by online Applications for Pre-paid VISA Cards as arranged by the leaders via H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang email hadison2878@gmail.com Copied to Swissindo International Volunteers: c/o Head Office H.E. Lee Cant, 7 Barclay House, Well Street, Hackney, London, E9 7RA, UK Indonesian Volunteers - Indonesia and the World H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang c/o hadison2878@gmail.com, H.E. Mr Andi Kasman c/o andikasman2018@gmail.com + others UK Volunteers Lee Cant (UK + Australia) c/o leejaycant@yahoo.co.uk,Neelu Chaudhari for India + UK c/o lotusprincess4u@gmail.com,Mr Sham Sood for India + UK c/o spsmor@hotmail.com + Others

Page 8

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

India Volunteers Usha Nischal NGO Mahilayen Pragati ki Ore, S-1/77, Old Mahavir Nagar, P.O.Tilak Nagar New Delhi, Tilak Nagar, Delhi - 110018, Mandir Wali Gali Whatsapp 0091 9212002405 Email Usha Nischal nischal.usha@gmail.com + others Netherlands Volunteers For Netherlands + Europe + Indonesia Liesbeth Hofwegen c/o liesbeth@hofwegen.nl + Others Greece Volunteers Andrew Devine For Greece + New Zealand + UK c/o devinebar@hotmail.com + Others USA Volunteers Ramola Dharamraj of Ramola D Reports for USA + UK + ramolad@hushmail.com

Page 9

PublicInterestWritPetition,UnderSwissindoInternationalLaw,14June2010,via18thLaw

CommissionofIndia,toMandateProsperityPayments1-11ofSwissindo,inIndiain7Days

WritPetitionSignedby14,153PetitionersonaWhiteHousePetitiondated7October2020

demandingtheir$6millionSwissindoProsperityPaymentsforeachof7.6billionCitizens

ATTACHMENTS

Exhibit 01 2008 06 Report 206 18th Law Commission On Proposal For Enactment Of New Coroners Act in India.pdf EXHIBIT 02 2007 10 12 WPC 6179 2007 ARTICLE PAGE 80 PARA 4 _Amity_International_Journal_of_Juridical_Scie_007.pdf Exhibit 03 2020 10 07 14,153 White House Petitioners Demand $6m Swissindo P 1-11 for each of 7.6 billion people Exhibit 04 2010 06 14 Swisindo International Law 12 Signature at United Nations HQ New York Exhibit 05 2013 04 10 Swissindo Payments 1-11 $1 Quintillion World Quota 23p.pdf Exhibit 06 2013 06 20 Report of G8 Summit 2013 ref Sabotage of Swissindo Announcement by US President Obama Exhibit 07 2015 05 20 $138.99 Trillion Country Quota offer 6p Exhibit 08 2015 08 17 SWISSINDO P1-11 DIRECT BANK APPLICATION FORM Exhibit 09 2016 02 11 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan PAYMENT English Exhibit 10 2016 02 11 Debt + Gold Asset Backed Global Loan PAYMENT Indonesian.jpg Exhibit 11 2016 07 02 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments $600 Child $1200 Adult English Exhibit 12 2016 07 02 SWISSINDO Master Bond Monthly Payments $600 Child $1200 Adult Indonesian Exhibit 13 2019 05 Authority by H.M. Mr Sino M1 to H.E. Mr Hadison Manonorang Received by Name Sign Stamp B) AT OFFICE OF Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Received by Name Sign Stamp

Page 10

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

LAW COMMISSION

OF

INDIA

Proposal for enactment of new Coroners Act applicable to

the whole of India.

Report No.206

JUNE 2008

Page 11

THE LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA

(REPORT NO. 206)

Proposal for enactment of new Coroners Act applicable to

the whole of India.

Presented to the Union Minister for Law and Justice,

Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India by Dr.

Justice AR. Lakshmanan, Chairman, Law Commission of

India, on the 10th day of June, 2008.

2

Page 12

The 18th Law Commission was constituted for a period of

three years from 1st September, 2006 by Order No.

A.45012/1/2006-Admn.III(LA), dated the 16th October,

2006 of Government of India, Ministry of Law and

Justice, Department of Legal Affairs, New Delhi.

The Law Commission consists of the Chairman, the

Member-Secretary, one full-time Member and six part-

time Members.

Chairman

The Hon’ble Dr. Justice AR. Lakshmanan

Member-Secretary

Dr. D.P. Sharma

Full-time Member

Prof. Dr. Tahir Mahmood

Part-time Members

Shri Justice I. Venkatanarayana

Shri O.P. Sharma

Dr. K.N. Chandrasekharan Pillai

Dr. Mrs. Devinder Kumari Raheja

Prof. Mrs. Lakshmi Jambholkar

Smt. Kirti Singh

The Law Commission is located at ILI Building,

3

Page 13

2nd Floor, Bhagwandas Road,

New Delhi-110 001.

Law Commission Staff

Dr. D.P. Sharma, Member-Secretary

Dr. Brahm Agrawal, Additional Secretary

Research Staff

Ms. Pawan Sharma : Addl. Law Officer

Shri J.T. Sulaxan Rao : Addl. Law Officer

Shri Sarwan Kumar : Deputy Law Officer

Shri A.K. Upadhyay : Deputy Law Officer

Dr. V.K. Singh : Assistant Law Officer

Shri C. Radha Krishna : Assistant Law Officer

Administration Staff

Shri D. Choudhury : Under Secretary

Shri S.K. Basu : Section Officer

Smt. Rajni Sharma : Assistant Library &

Information

Officer

4

Page 14

The text of this Report is available on the internet at:

http://www.lawcommissionofindia.nic.in

© Government Copyright 2008

Law Commission of India

Government of India

Ministry of Law and Justice

Department of Legal Affairs

New Delhi-110 001

India

The text in this document (excluding Government Logos)

may be reproduced free of charge in any format or

medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and

not used in a misleading context. The material must be

acknowledged as Government copyright and the title of

the document specified.

Any enquiries relating to this Report should be addressed

to the Member-Secretary, Law Commission of India, 2nd

Floor, ILI Building, Bhagwandas Road, New Delhi-

110001, India. Fax: 91-11-23388870 or E-Mail at:

dr.dpsharma@nic.in

Dr. Justice AR. Lakshmanan ILI Building (IInd Floor),

(Former Judge, Supreme Court of India) Bhagwandas Road,

5

Page 15

Chairman, Law Commission of India New Delhi-110 001

Tel.: 91-11-23384475 Fax: 91-23383564

DO No.6 (3)/137/2007-LC(LS) 10th June, 2008

Dear Dr. Bhardwaj ji,

Sub: Proposal for enactment of new Coroners Act

applicable to the whole of India.

I am forwarding herewith the 206th Report of the

Law Commission of India on “Proposal for enactment of

new Coroners Act applicable to the whole of India”.

The Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (C)

No.6179/2007 between Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group

Vs. Union of India had recommended to the Law

Commission of India to examine whether a legislation like

the Coroners Act, 1988 prevalent in the United Kingdom

is needed in this country and whether a suitable proposal

for this purpose could be made to the Parliament in this

regard.

In view of this, the Commission undertook this

study. It examined the Coroners Act, 1988 (UK), the

existing Coroners Act, 1871 which was a Central Act but

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Residence: No.1,Janpath, New Delhi-110011. Tel.:91-11-23019465.23793488.23792745

E-mail:ch.lc@sb.nic.in

6

Page 16

it has very narrow territorial limits in India, namely, the

ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of

Calcutta and Bombay, along with the relevant provisions

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Indian

Penal Code, 1860. The Commission is aware of the

enormously expanded scope of Article 21 of the

Constitution, viz., the right to know the correct cause of

death of any person, especially when the death is

unnatural or there are surrounding suspicious

circumstances.

The Commission is of the view that there is a

necessity of an independent authority to enquire into the

true and real cause of death of a person, even if such

person dies outside the territorial limits of the country.

Accordingly, a draft Bill has been appended and

annexed to this Report as Annex.

The Commission places on record the able assistance

rendered by Dr. R.G. Padia, Senior Advocate, Supreme

Court, in preparing this Report.

With kind regards,

Yours sincerely,

(Dr. Justice AR. Lakshmanan)

Dr. H.R. Bhardwaj,

Hon’ble Minister of Law and Justice,

Government of India,

Shastri Bhawan,

New Delhi-110 001.

7

Page 17

LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA

PROPOSAL FOR ENACTMENT OF NEW CORONERS

ACT APPLICABLE TO THE WHOLE OF INDIA

CONTENTS

Serial No. Title Page Nos.

1. Introduction 9 - 14

2. Annex 15-34

The Coroners Bill, 2008

8

Page 18

Introduction

Serious concern has been expressed at various

quarters on account of recent abnormal spurt in the

unnatural deaths, especially at places like hospitals, police

firings and police encounters, railways and other vehicles,

and even in the household by way of dowry deaths, raising

suspicions of adoption of illegal means with a strong

possibility of the complicity of the officials of the State. It

has also been found that in criminal cases, the divergent

post-mortem reports and the statements of witnesses have

led to an alarming rate of acquittal in criminal cases.

Moreover, scope of Article 21 has been enormously

expanded by the Apex Court, so as to include the right to

know or right to have the correct information and this will

also include the right to know the correct cause of death of

any person.

9

Page 19

It is also clear that public interest will be greatly

subserved and the moral fabric of our democratic

government would be considerably strengthened, if the

correct and true cause of the death of any person is known,

especially when the death is unnatural or there are

surrounding suspicious circumstances.

At present, in the entire country, the existing Coroners

Act, 1871 applies only in respect of very limited territorial

jurisdiction, namely, the ordinary original civil jurisdiction

of the High Courts of Calcutta and Bombay and thus the

entire territorial boundaries of even these two States have

not been covered under the said Act.

Suggestions have also been made from many quarters,

including by way of judicial decisions that such an Act

should be framed for the entire country. In Writ Petition No.

( C ) 6179/2007 between Social jurist, a Civil Rights Group

& Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. , a Division Bench of

Delhi High Court by its order dated 12.10.2007 has

recommended to the Law Commission to examine whether

a Legislation like the Coroners Act, 1988 prevalent in

10

Page 20

United Kingdom is needed in this country and whether a

suitable proposal for this purpose should be made to the

Parliament in this regard. However, the observations of the

Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the aforesaid case in paragraph

25 that “ there is admittedly no comparable legislation in

India nor has our attention been drawn to any by learned

counsel for the parties” do not appear to be correct and it is

clear that the learned counsel for either of the parties did not

draw the attention of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court to the

existing Coroners Act, 1871, which was a Central Act and it

was already operating in India, although within very narrow

territorial limits.

The cause for recommending a legislation like

Coroners Act in the country had arisen before the Delhi

High Court on account of the fact that a child of a tender

age of five months had died in England, but in spite of the

various valiant efforts taken by the parents of the child in

England, the exact cause of death of the child could not be

ascertained in England in spite of the two reports submitted

in England – one based on post-mortem examination and

another by Department of Forensic Medicine & Science,

University of Glasgow, England. The parents were not

11

Page 21

satisfied with the said report, but they could not prove the

medical negligence of the doctors in the United Kingdom,

because, according to them, the true cause of death could

not be found out and after a lapse of long seven years, the

parents had brought the body of the unfortunate child in

India in the year 2007 and after making several

correspondence with the governmental authorities, a Public

Interest Litigation was filed in the Delhi High Court.

However, the Delhi High Court after analyzing the existing

provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Code of

Criminal Procedure came to the conclusion that if the death

had occurred in England, unless there was any request made

by the Government in England or by any authority in that

country, a post-mortem examination of the dead body of the

unfortunate child could not be conducted de hors an

investigation into criminal offence under Section 174 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. It has been further held by the

Delhi High Court that in cases involving offences

committed outside India by Non-Indian citizens, such

jurisdiction is limited to and dependent on whether the

country of the authority competent in the country where the

offence is committed has requested the Central Government

to have the matter investigated under 166B of the Code of

Criminal Procedure. If there is no such request, a police

12

Page 22

officer in India cannot register a case or investigate the

commission of any offence that has taken place outside

India.

With a view to have uniformity of the law applicable

throughout India, it may be considered that the extant

Coroners Act, 1871 should be repealed in order that the

provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, viz., sections

174 to 176 govern the field in the aforesaid territorial

jurisdictions of Calcutta and Bombay also, besides the rest

of India. Further, enactment of a new Coroners Act

applicable to the whole of India, in addition to the said

provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is felt to be

the need of the hour.

In view of the aforesaid, it has been decided to suggest

to the Government of India that a necessary independent

authority may be constituted to inquire into the true and real

cause of death of a person, even if such a person dies

outside the territorial limits of the country. In order to attain

this objective, we recommend a model Bill to the

Government of India in the form given in the Annex.

13

Page 23

(Dr. Justice AR. Lakshmanan)

Chairman

(Prof. Dr. Tahir Mahmood) (Dr. D.P. Sharma)

Member Member-

Secretary

Dated: June 10, 2008

ANNEX

THE CORONERS BILL, 2008

14

Page 24

CHAPTER I

Preliminary

1. This Act may be called the Coroners Act, 2008.

2. It extends to the whole of India.

CHAPTER II

Appointment of Coroners

3. (1) Within the local limits of each district of a State

and also for every Union Territory, there shall be a Coroner.

Provided that one Coroner may be appointed for more

than one district by the concerned State Government.

4. Every such officer shall be appointed and may be

suspended or removed by the State Government.

5. Every Coroner shall be deemed a public servant within

the meaning of the Indian Penal Code.

15

Page 25

6. There shall be a separate cadre of Coroners in each

State. The Coroners shall be appointed by the State

Government in accordance with the Rules laying down their

qualifications, method of recruitment, terms and conditions

of their service including their salaries and allowances

payable by the concerned State and every such coroner will

be a whole time employee of the State concerned. Services

of the Coroners would be available during all times of a day

throughout.

CHAPTER III

Duties and Powers of Coroners

7. (1) When the Coroner is informed that the dead body

of a person is lying within his jurisdiction and there is

reasonable cause to suspect that such person has died under

any of the circumstances mentioned in section 11 or has died

a sudden death of which the cause is unknown, the Coroner

may proceed to hold a preliminary inquiry on the body.

Provided that if a Coroner is undertaking a journey

outside his district and finds a dead body on the road or at

16

Page 26

any other place lying unattended, and in his opinion

immediate and urgent action is necessary to be taken, he will

also have extra-territorial jurisdiction to take cognizance of

that dead body.

(2) For the purpose of an inquiry under subsection

(1), [the Coroner may], as son as practicable, after receipt of

the information proceed to view and examine the body. Such

view and examination shall be held in the presence of the

police officer to whose jurisdiction the case belongs and, if

possible, in the presence of the relations or friends, if any, of

the deceased and the Coroner may reduce to writing such

observations as the appearances of the body requires. When

the inquiry is concluded if the Coroner is satisfied as to the

cause of death and if a post mortem examination is in his

opinion not necessary, the Coroner may authorize the body to

be disposed of.

8. Where the Coroner has reason to believe that death has

occurred within his jurisdiction in any of the circumstances

mentioned in section 11 or 12 and that owing to the

destruction of the body by fire or otherwise, or disposal

thereof in contravention of any law for the time being in

force, or to the fact that the body is lying in a place from

17

Page 27

which it cannot be recovered, an inquest cannot be held

except by virtue of the provisions of this section, he may

report the facts to the State Government and the State

Government may, if it considers desirable so to do, direct an

inquest to be held touching the death. When such direction

is given, an inquest shall be held accordingly by the Coroner

and the provisions of this Act shall apply with such

modifications as may be necessary in consequence of the

inquest being held otherwise than on or after view of the

body.

9. “Exhumation of body for examination

23.- (1) A Coroner may order the exhumation of

the body of a person buried within his district

where it appears to him that it is necessary for the

body to be examined –

(a) for the purpose of his holding an inquest

into that person’s death or discharging any

other function of his in relation to the body

or the death; or

(b) for the purposes of any criminal proceedings

which have been instituted or are

18

Page 28

contemplated in respect of the death of that

person or of some other person who came by

his death in circumstances connected with

the death of the person whose body is

needed for examination.

(2) The power of a Coroner under this section

shall be exercisable by warrant under his hand.

(3) No body shall be ordered by a Coroner to be

exhumed except under this Section.”

10. A Coroner will have jurisdiction over a dead body

found within his territorial jurisdiction whether the death has

occurred in any part of the country or even abroad. The

cause of action will not depend on the cause of the death

which might be arisen at some other territorial jurisdiction

like bullet injury or administration of poison in some other

territory and the presence of the body will by itself determine

the cause of action by a Coroner.

11. (1) If it appears to the Coroner either before or in the

course of an inquiry under section 7 that there is reason to

suspect –

19

Page 29

(a) that the deceased came by his death by homicide,

suicide or infanticide; or

(b) that the death was caused by an accident, or

poison or machinery; or

(c) that the death was caused by an occurrence arising

out of the use of a vehicle in a street, public road

or in a private place; or

(d) that the death occurred in a prison in which the

deceased was a prisoner or that it occurred whilst

the deceased was in the custody of the police; or

(e) that the death occurred –

in a leper asylum appointed under the Lepers Act,

1898;

(f) in an asylum or mental hospital established or

licensed under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912;

(g) in a Borstal School established under the Bombay

Borstal Schools Act, 1929;

(h) in a Receiving Centre or Certified Institution

provided and maintained under the Bombay

Beggars Act, 1945;

(i) in any certified school, Remand Home or fit

person institution or approved place, established,

maintained, declared or recognized, as the case

may be, under the Bombay Children Act, 1948;

20

Page 30

in which the deceased was received, detained,

committed to, confined or kept, as the case may

be, under the orders of any authority competent to

pass such orders under the said Acts; or

(j) that the death occurred in circumstances the

continuance or possible recurrence of which is

prejudicial to the health or safety of the public or

any section of the public:

and in any other case, if it appears to the Coroner

either before or in the course of the preliminary

inquiry that there is reason for holding an inquest,

he shall proceed to hold such inquest, whether or

not the cause of death arose within his

jurisdiction;

(k) that the death is caused in a hospital/nursing

home, whether run by Government, a trust –

public or private, or a purely private hospital or

nursing home;

(l) death has occurred on the railways or tramways or

airways or other vehicles, whether mechanically

propelled or driven by hand;

(m) death has occurred in a police firing;

(n) death has occurred in a police encounter;

21

Page 31

(o) death has occurred in public parks or at places of

public resort;

(p) dowry deaths within the households where there is

a complaint regarding the demand of dowry by

any person;

Provided that a Coroner will have no jurisdiction

in case of death of a person who is under

detention or arrest of the defence forces under the

command of an official of the defence forces.”

(2) Such inquest shall ordinarily be held in the

Coroner’s Court house.

(3) The Coroner may hold one inquest on the bodies

of several persons provided that they all are believed to have

come by their deaths, in or in consequence of one and the

same incident.

(4) Every such inquest shall be deemed to be a

judicial proceeding within the meaning of section 193 of the

Indian Penal Code and for the purpose of any such inquest

the Coroner shall have and may exercise all the powers of a

Criminal Court under section 340 and section 345 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

22

Page 32

12. (1) Where a person dies –

(a) in a prison situate within the local limits of

the Coroner’s jurisdiction, the

Superintendent of the prison,

(b) while in the custody of the police, the police

officer in charge of the station concerned,

(c) in any of the places referred to in clause (e)

to (j) of subsection (1) of section 11, the

Superintendent where there is a

Superintendent appointed for such place and

elsewhere, the person in charge of the place,

(d) in respect of the cases covered under clauses

(k) to (p) of section 11 by the concerned

authority or the individual, shall report the

death to the Coroner and await his orders

before the body is disposed of.

(2) Any Superintendent of prison, or any such police

officer or any Superintendent or person in charge of the place

referred to in clause (e) to (j) of subsection (1) of section 11,

concerned authority or the individual under clauses (k) to (p),

who fails to comply with the requirements in subsection (1)

23

Page 33

shall, on conviction before a Magistrate, be punished with

fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.

13. (1) Any person who, with the intention of preventing

the holding of an inquest on a dead body which the Coroner

is bound to hold under section 11, buries, cremates or

otherwise disposes of it, and any person who with such

intention abets such burial, cremation or disposal of a dead

body shall, on conviction before a Magistrate, be punished

with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.

(2) Such punishment shall be in addition to the

punishment to which such person may be liable for any

offence of which he may be found guilty in respect of the

death of the deceased or under section 201 of the Indian

Penal Code.

14. A Coroner may order a body to be disinterred within a

reasonable time after the death of the deceased person, either

for the purpose of taking an original inquisition where none

has been taken, or a further inquisition is, in the opinion of

the Coroner, necessary or desirable in the interests of justice.

24

Page 34

15. The Coroner will conduct the inquest himself by calling

such number of credible witnesses as he deems fit, but not

less than three in number.

16. At or before the first sitting of an inquest on a body the

Coroner shall view the body.

Provided that when a preliminary inquiry on the body

has been held under section 7, or if from the medical

evidence or from a medical certificate, the Coroner is

satisfied that no advantage will result from such viewing, the

Coroner may dispense with a view of the body at the inquest.

17. The Coroner shall then make proclamation for the

attendance of witnesses, or, where the inquiry is conducted in

secret, shall call in separately such person who knows

anything concerning the death.

18. (1) It shall be the duty of all persons acquainted with

the circumstances attending the death to appear before the

inquest as witnesses – The Coroner shall inquire of such

circumstances and the cause of death, and if before or during

the inquiry he is informed that any person, whether within or

without the local limits of his jurisdiction, can given evidence

25

Page 35

or produce any document material thereto, may issue a

summon requiring him to attend and give evidence or

produce such document on the inquest.

(2) When any person so summoned fails to appear

and the summons has been proved to be duly served on him

in time to admit of his appearing in accordance therewith and

no reasonable excuse is offered for such failure, the Coroner

may, after recording his reasons in writing, issue a warrant

for his arrest. Such warrant shall be executed as if it were

issued under section 87 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973.

(3) Any person disobeying a summons issued under

subsection (1) shall be deemed to have committed an offence

under section 174, section 175 or section 176 of the Indian

Penal Code, as the case may be.

(4) For the purpose of causing prisoners to be brought

up to give evidence the Coroner shall be deemed a Criminal

Court within the meaning of Part IX of the Prisoner’s Act,

1900.

26

Page 36

19. (1) If before proceeding to view a body under section

7 or at the view or at any stage of an inquest by jury, it

appears to the Coroner that a post mortem examination of the

body is necessary to ascertain the cause of death, he may

direct such examination to beheld by the civil surgeon or by a

duly qualified registered medical practitioner invited to

attend as a witness. The Coroner may also direct an

analysis of any of the organs or parts of the body or of their

contents. Every medical witness other than the Chemical

Examiner to Government and the Coroner’s Surgeon shall be

entitled so such reasonable remuneration as the Coroner

thinks fit. For the purpose of such post mortem examination

the Coroner may order the removal of the body to any place

within his jurisdiction which may be provided for that

purpose.

(2) Any document purporting to be a report under the

hand of any Chemical Examiner or Assistant Chemical

Examiner to Government upon any matter or thing duly

submitted to him for examination, or analysis and report in

the course of any proceeding under this Act, may be used as

evidence in any inquest under this Act and in any subsequent

inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973.

27

Page 37

20. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the

Coroner may at any stage of the proceedings under this Act

for the purposes of preservation of safe custody, order the

removal of the body to any place within his jurisdiction

which may have been provided for that purpose.

21. (1) All evidence given under this Act shall, except in

the case provided in subsection (2), be on oath and the

Coroner shall be bound to receive evidence on behalf of the

person who is alleged to have caused or to be concerned in

causing the death of the deceased person.

(2) If such person himself wishes to make a statement

it shall be the duty of the Coroner to warn him that he is not

bound to make any statement; but if such person persists, the

Coroner shall, without administering him any oath, record his

statement in full after duly warning him that any

incriminating statement which he may make may be used in

evidence in any subsequent inquiry, trial or other proceeding

under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(3) For the purpose of section 26 of Indian Evidence

Act, 1872, a Coroner shall be deemed to be a Magistrate.

28

Page 38

(4) Witnesses unacquainted with the English

language shall be examined through the medium of an

interpreter, who shall be sworn to interpret truly as well the

oath as the question put to, and the answers given by each

witness.

22. The Coroner may adjourn the inquest from time to time,

and from place to place.

23. (1) If on an inquest touching a death, the Coroner is

informed that criminal proceedings, have been instituted

against some person before a Magistrate in respect of an

offence touching the death of the deceased, he may adjourn

the inquest and submit his proceedings to the Magistrate.

(2) For the purposes of this section, the expression

“the criminal proceedings” means the proceedings before a

Magistrate and before any court to which the accused person

is committed for trial or before which an appeal from the

conviction of that person is heard, and criminal proceedings

shall not be deemed to be concluded until no further appeal

can be made in the course thereof.

29

Page 39

24. When all the witnesses have been examined, the

Coroner shall sum up the evidence, the Coroner shall

thereafter will submit his report with the necessary details

and reasons to the Commissioner of Police. The report will

be regarded as a material evidence in any Court or any other

criminal proceedings.

25. The Coroner may also, where the report justifies him in

taking the belief that the death of the deceased person was

occasioned by an act which amounts to an offence under any

law in force in India he may issue his warrant for the

apprehension of the person who is found to have caused the

death of the deceased person, and send him forthwith to a

Magistrate empowered to commit him for trial.

26. When the proceedings are closed, or before, if it be

necessary to adjourn the inquest, the Coroner shall give his

warrant for the [disposal] of the body on which the inquest

has been taken.

27. No inquest shall be quashed for any technical defect.

30

Page 40

In any case of technical defect, a Judge of the High

court may, if he thinks fit, order the inquest to be amended,

and the same shall forthwith be amended accordingly.

Provided that any person who is not satisfied with the

report of the Coroner may approach the High Court by

moving an application for appointment of another Coroner

and for the submission of his report, and if the High Court is

satisfied, it may direct accordingly. The High Court may

also direct an inquest by a Coroner of a different district

within its own jurisdiction.

28. It shall no longer be the duty of the Coroner to inquire

whether any person dying by his own act was or was not felo

de se, to inquire of treasure trove or wrecks to seize any

fugitive’s goods, to execute process or to exercise as Coroner

has no jurisdiction conferred by this Act.

CHAPTER IV

Rights and Liabilities of Coroners

31

Page 41

29. All disbursements duly made by a Coroner for fees to

medical witnesses and the like, shall be repaid to him by the

State Government.

30. Every Coroner may from time to time, with the previous

sanction of the State Government, appoint, by writing under

his hand, a proper person to act for him as his deputy in the

holding of inquests.

All inquests taken and other acts done by any such

deputy, under or by virtue of any such appointment, shall be

deemed to be the acts of the Coroner appointing him:

Provided that no such deputy shall act for any such

Coroner except during the illness of the said Coroner, or

during his absence for any lawful and reasonable cause.

Every such appointment may at any time be cancelled

and revoked by the Coroner by whom it was made.

31. Coroners and Deputy Coroners shall be privileged from

arrest while engaged in the discharge of their official duty.

32

Page 42

32. Any Coroner or Deputy Coroner failing to comply with

the provisions of this Act, or otherwise misconducting

himself in the execution of his office, shall be liable to such

fine or simple imprisonment for a period not exceeding three

months as the Chief Justice of the High Court, upon summary

examination and proof of the failure or misconduct, thinks fit

to impose.

33. The Chief Justice of the High Court may act suo motu

or on the complaint of any person. However, no criminal

proceedings would be initiated against any Coroner by any

person or authority by reason of his failure to perform any

part of his duty or for any misconduct.

34. The State Government shall have the power to make

Rules in order to implement the provisions of the Act.

33

Page 43

34

Page 44

79Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

Inquest of Inquest Report

Dr. Neha Bahl

Assistant Professor, Amity Law School, AUUP, Noida

Dr. N.K. Bahl

Professor of Law, Dept of Law, Delhi Metropolitan Education, Noida,

Mr. Ashwani Pant

Assistant Professor, Amity Law School, AUUP, Noida

I. Introduction

Criminal investigation is a search for truth and anything which aids this, search should be encouraged. The scope of Article 21 of Constitution of India includes the right to know or right to have the correct information and this will also include the right to know the correct cause of death of any person.

Serious concern has been expressed at various quarters on account of recent abnormal spurt in the unnatural deaths, especially at places like hospitals, police firings, police encounters, railways & other vehicles, and even in the house hold by way of dowry deaths. It has also been found that in criminal cases, the divergent post-mortem reports and the statements of the witnesses have lead to an alarming rate of acquittal. Thus, the public interest will be greatly served and the moral fabric of our democratic government would be considerably strengthened, if the correct and true cause of death of any person is known, especially when the death is unnatural or there are surrounding suspicious circumstances. The preparation of ‘inquest’ report is an important aspect of investigation.

The term inquest means (quas ists, i.e., to seek) legal or judicial inquiry to ascertain the matter of fact. Inquest implies inquiry about case of death, which is apparently not due to natural causes.

Abstract

The law of crimes requires a case to be built by the prosecution which puts the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable

doubt. A number of procedural safeguards, therefore, are inbuilt in the run-up to the trial to ensure that none of the

steps leading to determination of guilt of the accused are hushed up and rather the State machinery works in an efficient

manner. Preparation of the inquest report is conducted under the CrPC as a record of crime which even though not a

substantive piece of evidence, is an important basis for determining the commission of the offence.

The present research work throws light on the provision of Inquest Report as contained in Section 174, CrPC, which

guides police to inquire and report in cases of suicide. This is confined to the ascertainment of the apparent cause of

death of a person. This article throws light on discovering whether in a given case the death was accidental, suicidal and

homicidal or caused by an animal. It is with this limited purpose that persons acquainted with the facts of the case are

summoned and examined under Section 175, CrPC. The details of the overt acts are not necessary to be recorded in the

inquest report.

Keywords: Right to know, unnatural deaths, dowry deaths, ratio decidendi, Coroner, extra territorial jurisdiction, Inquest, Panchnama

Page 45

80 Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

Such an inquiry is necessary to apprehend and punish the offender. It is a sort of preliminary inquiry into the cause of a sudden, suspicious and unnatural death, known as inquest. An inquest is a fact finding inquiry, conducted by an appointed authority with or without a jury, to establish reliable answers regarding identity of the deceased, place and time of his death.

According to the Black’s Law Dictionary, the word ‘inquest’ means an inquiry by medical officer or sometimes with the aid of a jury into the manner of death of a person, who has died under suspicious circumstances or who has died in prison. The English Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary defines the word ‘inquest’ means an official investigation to find out the cause of somebodies death especially when it has not happened naturally.

The village Chowkidar is duty bound to report at the Police Station, the occurrence in or near his village of any sudden or unnatural death under suspicious circumstances or the discovery in or near his village of any corpse or part of a corpse in circumstances which lead to reasonable suspicion that such a death has occurred.

Foreign case of an N.R.I.

Baby Sunaina died in a UK Hospital but her body was kept waiting for more than 7 years in a local mortuary for a dignified cremation. The parents of unfortunate Sunaina, who passed away at a tender age of 5 months in the same hospital where she was born, fought a long and grim battle in the UK to prove their charge that the child died on account of medical negligence of the doctors working in the hospital. The correct cause of death of the child could not be ascertained in England in spite of two reports- one based on post-mortem examination and another by Department of Forensic Medicines and Science, University of Glasgow, England. The parents of Sunaina were not satisfied with the said reports; they could not prove medical negligence of the doctors in the UK, because, according to them, the true cause of death could not be ascertained. After a lapse of long 7 years, the parents brought the body of Sunaina in India in the year 2007.

A Public Interest Litigation was filed in Delhi High Court, Social Jurist, A Civil Rights group and another v. Union of India and others. This writ petition was dismissed. The ratio decidendi of this case was that the death of Sunaina had occurred in England and a post-mortem examination of the dead body of Sunaina cannot be conducted beyond jurisdiction (de hors) u/s., 174 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It was further held by the Delhi High Court that in cases involving offences committed outside India by non-Indian citizens, such jurisdiction is limited and dependent on whether the country of the authority competent in the country where the offence was committed has requested the Indian Government to have the matter investigated u/s 166B of Cr.P.C. There was no such request, hence a police officer in India cannot register a case or investigate the commission of any offence that has taken place outside India.

The parents of Sunaina could not get justice because of above mentioned legal jugglery. The need of the hour is that an independent authority should be constituted to inquire into the true and real cause of death of a person, even if such a person dies outside the territorial limit of India.

134Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th edition-1999 at Page No. 796.135English Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary at Page 801.136Rule 129 of Police Regulations and Section 40(d) Cr.P.C.137Writ petition no. (C) 6179/2007 decided by Division Bench of Delhi High Court on 12.10.2007.138Hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.139For details see Law Commission of India 206th report on enactment of New Coroners Act.

Page 46

81Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

In order to solve the above mentioned legal lacunae, Law Commission of India in its 206th report has recommended The Coroners Bill, 2008 on 10th June, 2008 to cover the cases of unnatural deaths even if they are caused beyond the territorial jurisdiction of India.

II. Brief Summary of Proposed Coroners Act

The term ‘Coroner’ has originated from English Common Law. Coroner is a person appointed by the State Government to inquire into causes of all unnatural or suspicious deaths. One Coroner shall be appointed for each district of State and Union Territory. One Coroner may be appointed for more than one district by the concerned State Government. Every Coroner shall be a public servant within the meaning of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Whenever, the Coroner is informed that the dead body of the person is lying within his jurisdiction and there is reasonable cause to suspect that such person has died in unnatural and suspicious circumstances or has died a sudden death of which the cause is unknown, the Coroner may proceed to hold a preliminary inquiry on the body. The Coroner will also have extra territorial jurisdiction to take cognizance of dead body, which is found on the road or at any other place lying unattained outside the district, for which he appointed.

For the purpose of inquiry, after receipt of information, the Coroner may proceed to view and examine the body. Such view and examination shall be held in the presence of the police officer to whose jurisdiction the case belongs and, if possible, in the presence of the relations or friends, if any, of the deceased and the Coroner may reduce to writing such observations as appearance of dead body requires. A Coroner will have jurisdiction over a dead body found within his territorial jurisdiction whether the death has occurred in any part of the country or even abroad. Thus, the presence of the body will itself determine the cause of action by a Coroner. Such inquest shall ordinarily be held in the Coroners Court House and every such inquest shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within a meaning of Section 193 I.P.C. and Coroner may exercise all the powers of a Criminal Court u/s 340 and 345 Cr.P.C. The Coroner will conduct the inquest himself by calling at least 3 credible witnesses. Normally in Panchnama/inquest, five witnesses are invited.

The Coroner will make a proclamation for the attendance of witnesses, or where the inquiry is conducted in secret, shall call the witnesses separately, who know anything concerning the death. The Coroner shall be deemed a Criminal Court within the meaning of Part IX of the Prisoners Act, 1900 for the purposes of causing prisoners to be brought before him for giving evidence. If it appears to the Coroner that a post-mortem examination of a dead body is necessary to ascertain the cause of death, he may direct such examination to be held by a Civil Surgeon. For the purposes of preservation of safe custody of the dead body, Coroner can order the removal of the body to any place within his jurisdiction. The Coroner shall take evidence on oath. The Coroner shall be deemed to be a Magistrate for the purposes of Section 26 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

But, if on an inquest touching a death, the Coroner is informed that Criminal Proceedings have been instituted against some person before a Magistrate in respect of an offence touching the death of the deceased, he may adjourn the inquest and submit his proceedings to the Magistrate.

When all the witnesses have been examined by the Coroner, he shall some up the evidence and submits his report to the Commissioner of Police. This report will be regarded as material evidence in any court or any other criminal proceedings. When the inquest proceedings are closed, the Coroner shall give his warrant for the disposal of dead body. A person, who is not satisfied with the report of Coroner, may approach respective High Court for appointment of another Coroner.

140Hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.

Page 47

82 Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

A Coroner may appoint any person as Deputy Coroner who will work during the absence of Coroner for any lawful and reasonable cause. Coroners and Deputy Coroners shall be privileged from arrest while engaged in discharge of their official duties.

III. Police to Enquire and Report on Suicide, etc. - Present Indian Law

Cr.P.C. provides that when the officer in charge of a police station or some other police officer specially empowered by the State Government in that behalf receives information that a person has committed suicide, or has been killed by another or by an animal or by machinery or by an accident, or has died under circumstances raising a reasonable suspicion that some other person has committed an offence, he shall immediately give intimation thereof to the nearest Executive Magistrate empowered to hold inquests, and, unless otherwise directed by any rule prescribed by the State Government, or by any general or special order of the District or Sub-divisional Magistrate, shall proceed to the place where the body of such deceased person is, and there, in the presence of two’ or more respectable inhabitants of the neighborhood, shall make an investigation, and draw up a report of the apparent cause of death, describing such wounds, fractures, bruises, and other marks of injury as may be found on the body, and stating in what manner, or by what weapon or instrument, if any, such marks appear to have been inflicted.

The report shall be signed by such police officer and other persons, or by so many of them as concur therein, and shall be forthwith forwarded to the District Magistrate or the Sub-divisional Magistrate.

When the case involves suicide by a woman within seven years of her marriage; or the case relates to the death of a woman within seven years of her marriage in any circumstances raising a reasonable suspicion that some other person committed an offence in relation to such woman; or the case relates to the death of a woman within seven years of her marriage and any relative of the woman has made a request in this behalf; or there is any doubt regarding the cause of death; or the police officer for any other reason considers it expedient so to do, he shall] subject to such rules as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf, forward the body, with a view to its being examined, to the nearest Civil Surgeon, or other qualified medical man appointed in this behalf by the State Government, if the state of the weather and the distance admit of its being so forwarded without risk of such putrefaction on the road as would render such examination useless.

Any District Magistrate or Sub-divisional Magistrate and any other Executive Magistrate specially empowered in this behalf by the State Government or the District Magistrate are empowered to hold inquest.

Law of Inquest keeping pace with Society

Sub-section (3) of Section 174 was added by the Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983. This amendment was enacted to deal with the increasing incidents of dowry deaths or cases of cruelty to married women by their in-laws. Provision was made for inquest by Executive Magistrates for post-mortem in all cases where a woman has, within seven years of her marriage committed suicide or died in circumstances raising a reasonable suspicion that some other person has committed an offence u/s. 498-A of the I.P.C.

141See Section 174 (1) Cr.P.C.142This portion was substituted by Act no. 46 of 1983 vide Section 3.143See Section 174 (4) Cr.P.C.

Page 48

83Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

III. Scope of Inquest

The provisions of section 174 and 175 Cr.P.C., afford a complete and autonomous Code in itself for the purposes of inquiries in cases of accidental or suspicious deaths u/s 174. Section 174, 175 and 176 Cr.P.C., deal with inquiries into suicide or inquiries into sudden, violent or unnatural deaths, Section 174 provides for such inquiries by the police: Section 176 provides for inquest by Magistrates. The police-officer making an inquiry under this section cannot order the exhumation of a human body but a Magistrate can do so u/s 175, which should be read in conjunction with S. 174. Enquiry u/s 174 is permissible till inquest is over.

It is the duty of the nearest Magistrate so empowered to hold an enquiry into the cause of death either instead of or in addition to investigation held by the police officer u/s. 174 of Cr.P.C. If after an enquiry under Se. 174 or S. 176 Cr.P.C., during which statements are also to be recorded, if evidence and materials are collected to make it a prima facie case of any offence, a regular investigation was to follow even without any formal complaint from anybody.

Objective of Inquest Proceedings

The objective of the inquest proceedings is merely to ascertain whether a person has died under unnatural circumstances or an unnatural death and if so, what is the cause of death. The question regarding the details as to how the deceased was assaulted or who assaulted him or under what circumstances he was assaulted is foreign to the ambit of scope of the proceedings u/s. 174. The names of the assailants and the manner of assault are not required to be mentioned in the inquest report. The purpose of preparing the inquest report is for making a note in regard to identification marks of the accused.

The purpose of holding an inquest is very limited, viz., to ascertain as to whether a person has committed suicide or has been killed by another or by an animal or by machinery or by an accident or has died under circumstances raising a reasonable suspicion that some other person has committed an offence.

Details of Assault and Assailant - The proceedings under Section 174 relating to inquest report have a very limited scope. The object of the proceedings is to ascertain whether a person had died under the circumstances which were doubtful or an unnatural death and if so what is the cause of death. The questions regarding details such as how the deceased was assaulted or who assaulted him, etc. are beyond the scopes of the proceedings under this section. Details of overt acts in the inquest report are not necessary as the scope of proceeding under this section is very limited.

144Kishwar Jahan v. State of West Bengal, 2008 Cr.L.J. 1766 at 1769 (Cal).145Nidhan Biswas v. State of Tripura, 2006 Cr.L.J. 2429 at 2434.146Ibid.147Mer Malade Veja v. State of Gujarat, 1998 Cr.L.J. 4412 (Guj-DB); Radha Mohan Singh v. State of U.P., 2006 Cr.L.J. 1121 at 1127; Ravi v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, 2007 Cr.L.J. 2740 at 2743 (SC); Mahendra Rai v. Mithlesh Rai, (1997) 10 SCC 605; Bhikan Behera v. State of Orissa, 1995 Cr.L.J. 2998 (Ori-DB); Suresh Rai v. State of Bihar, 2000 Cr.L.J. 3457 at 3461; Suresh v. State of U.P., 2000 Cr.L.J. 2792 (All-DB); State v. Satish Shetty, 2008 Cr.L.J. 2490 at 2498. 148Ravi v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, 2007 Cr.L.J. 2740 at 2743.149Radha Mohan Singh v. State of U.P., 2006 Cr.L.J. 1121 at 1127 & 1128.150Amar Singh v. Balvinder Singh, AIR 2003 SC 1161; Radha Mohan Singh v. State of U.P., 2006 Cr.L.J. 1121 at 1127; Basit Ali v. M.P., 1976 Cr.L.J. 776 (MP-DB); Yogendra Singh v. Rajasthan, 1980 Cr.L.J. NOC 113 (Raj); Podda Narayana, AIR 1975 SC 1252; Shukla Khader v. Nausher Gama, AIR 1975 SC 1324; Bhikhari Bahera v. State of Orissa, 1995 Cr.L.J. 2998 (Ori-DB); Khujii @ Surendra Tiwari v. State of M.P., 1991 (3)Crimes 82, 89 (SC).

Page 49

84 Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

An inquest report is not substantive evidence. Therefore questions regarding the details as to how the deceased was assaulted or who assaulted him or under what circumstances he was assaulted, are beyond the scope of the report submitted by the police u/s. 174 Cr.P.C.

Details of Injuries of Deceased- The report of inquest is primarily intended at finding out the nature of injuries and the apparent cause of death, while the doctor who holds post-mortem examination examines the body of the deceased from the medico legal point of view and accordingly it is the post-mortem report that is supposed to contain the details of the injuries though scientific examinations.

Absence of names of Witnesses- Mere absence of names of witness of crime in the inquest report does not render the evidence of witnesses doubtful. The evidence of a witness cannot be rejected merely because his name is not mentioned in inquest report. Absence of the name of the eye witness in the inquest report is not a ground to refuse to rely on his evidence. It is not necessary that the names of eye witnesses should be mentioned in the inquest memo. An inquest under this section is concerned with establishing the cause of death. It is not necessary that all witnesses be examined. Absence of the name of a witness in the inquest report does not prove that he was not an eye witness to the occurrence.

Absence of names of Accused- There is no provision in law or practice requiring the police to mention the names of the assailants in the inquest report, omission to do so is not fatal. The names of the accused persons and the weapons possessed by them need not be mentioned in the inquest report. The omission of the name of the accused in the inquest report does not lead to the inference that the name of the accused was not disclosed as murderer till the completion of the inquest report. Where there is no column in inquest report for mentioning the name of the assailants, omission of the names of the assailant in the inquest report is not fatal. The omission of the name of accused in in requisition memo/inquest report is not fatal to prosecution case.

Mention of the name of accused and eye witness in the inquest report is not necessary. Due to non-mentioning the name of the accused in the inquest report, it cannot be inferred that FIR was not in existence at the time of inquest proceedings.

151Pedda Narayana v. State of A.P., 1975Cr.L.J. 1062152Baldeo v. State of U.P., 2004 Cr.L.J. 2686 at 2689 (All-DB)153Sunil Singh v. West Bengal, 2007 Cr.L.J. 516 at 520; Baldeo v. State of U.P., 2004 Cr.L.J. 2686 at 2689; Mafabhai Nagarbhai Raval v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1992 SC 2186.154Narpatsingh v. State of Rajasthan, 1990 Cr.L.J. 2720 at 2725; Radha Mohan Singh v. State of U.P., 2006 Cr.L.J. 1121 at 1127 (SC); Rama Shankar v. State of U.P., 2008 Cr.L.J. 129 at 132 (All-DB).155Babu Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1996 SC 3250; Khujji v. State of M.P. AIR 1991 SC 1853.156Khujji v. State of M.P. AIR 1991 SC 1853.157Purkha Ram v. State of Rajasthan, 1998 Cr.L.J. 918 (Raj-DB).158Shakila Khader v. Nausher Gama, AIR 1975 SC 1324.159Amar Singh v. Balwinder Singh, 2003 Cr.L.J. 1283 at 1289 & 1290 (SC); Radha Mohan Singh v. State of U.P., 2006 Cr.L.J. 1121 at 1127 (SC); Mahendra Rai v. Mithilesh Rai , 1997 SCC (Cri) 899; Baleshwar Mandal v. State of Bihar, AIR 1997 SC 3471; Naresh Kumar v. State of Haryana, 1997 Cr.L.j. 2216 (P&H); Siddalingappa v. State by Circle Inspector of Police, 1993 Cr.L.J. 397 (Kant-DB)160Murli Chaurasia v. State of U.P., 1995 Cr.L.J. 2782 at 2783 & 2784 (All).161Shaikh Ayub v. State of Maharastra, AIR 1998 SC 1285; see also Baleshwar Mandal v. State of Bihar, AIR 1997 SC 3471.162Ram Sajiwan Singh v. State of Bihar, AIR 1996 SC 3265.163Shashidhar Singh v. State of M.P., 1998 Cr.L.J. 2676 (M.P.-DB).

Page 50

85Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

Merely because the witnesses on the inquest report who are also eye-witnesses did not give out the name of the accused persons while describing the cause of death in the inquest report does not render the presence of the eye-witness on the spot doubtful.

Omission of accused’s weapon- The name of the weapon possessed by the accused need not be mentioned in the inquest report. Non-mentioning of the weapon of assault, is not fatal, because the purpose of inquest report is to record apparent cause of death describing the injuries as may be found on the body of the deceased. The opinion given in the inquest report does not attain finality because the dead body has to be subjected to post-mortem examination, which is done by medical expert and is more authentic. The mention in the inquest report that deceased died of gunshot was held sufficient, omission of the type of the gun was held of no consequence.

Omission of empty cartridges- Non-mentioning in the inquest report of empty cartridges found near the dead body of the deceased does not rule out the presence of empty cartridges on the spot. If the injuries are also not described in details in the inquest report, it is not a circumstance against the prosecution because the investigating officer is not a medical expert.

Omission of crime number- Where the investigating officer has deposed that the omission of the crime number in inquest report is by mistake, the convincing and reliable evidence of eye-witnesses cannot be disbelieved. Where the FIR has been lodged promptly, the omission to mention crime number in the inquest report cannot be attached significance. The inquest report is a document of vital importance and has to be prepared promptly.

Delay in inquest- if the inquest report is unreasonably delayed, then begins the scope for questioning the genuineness of the FIR, its contents and the time of its recording. In case of dowry deaths it would be of considerable assistance if an appropriate high priority is given to the expeditious investigation, if special magisterial machinery is created for prompt investigation and efficient investigative techniques and procedures are followed.

Absence of prescribed form- The form no. 211 prescribed by the U.P., Police Regulations no doubt contains the column relating to the name of the complainant, time of commencement and time of conclusion of the inquest report. They appear to have been prescribed in the form for the purpose of having check on the movement and conduct of the police officials. It cannot give the handle to spoil the prosecution case by merely omitting to mention them in the prescribed form of the inquest report and related papers. Similarly, the complete entries without committing any omission or lapse in preparing the inquest report form, can give any premium to the prosecution case. It has to be

164Rama Shankar v. State of U.P., 2008 Cr.L.J. 129 at 132 (All-DB); Radha Mohan Singh v. Lal Saheb, AIR 2006 SC 951; Amar Singh v. Balvinder Singh, AIR 2003 SC 1164.165Suresh Rai v. State of Bihar, 2000 Cr.L.J. 3457 at 3461; Eqbal Baig v. State of A.P., AIR 1987 SC 923.166State of U.P. v. Abdul, AIR 1997 SC 2512; Murli Chaurasia v. State of U.P., 1995 Cr.L.J. 2782 at 2783 & 2784 (All).167See Supra note 19.168Rajju v. State of U.P., 1994 Cr.L.J. 105 (All-DB).169Bhikam Singh v. State, 2004 Cr.L.J. 2120 at 2128 & 2129 (All-DB).170See supra note 19 at 2689 (All-DB).171Krishna Pal Singh v. State of U.P., AIR 1996 SC 733.172Niranjan Shil v. State of Tripura, 1999 Cr.L.J. 4498 (Gau-DB).173Banwari v. State of Rajasthan, 1979 Cr.L.J. 161 at 166 (Raj-DB).174Mahabir Singh v. State, AIR 1983 SC 826.175Shri Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi, 1983 Cr.L.J. 1081 at 1086 (SC).

Page 51

86 Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

judged in each case as to what is the effect of such lapses. It is settled law that taking singly such lapses cannot be sufficient to lead to the conclusion that the investigation was tainted or unfair. Where interpolation has been made in inquest report, prosecution case is rendered doubtful.

Admissibility of statements recorded during inquest- The statement of a witness recorded by the investigators during the inquest would be within the inhibition of S. 162 Cr.P.C. The statement recorded u/s 174 Cr.P.C., cannot be used as a substantive piece of evidence. At the most it can be used only as a previous statement to corroborate or contradict the person making it at the trial. The statements contained in an inquest report, to the extent they relate to what the investigating officer saw and found are admissible, but any statement made therein on the basis of what he heard from others, would be hit by S. 162 Cr.P.C. Where inquest report is signed by witnesses, the statements made in inquest report are hit by S. 162 Cr.P.C., and will, therefore, not be admissible in evidence, if they were not examined as witnesses at trial. However, S. 174 Cr.P.C., does not put embargo on the powers of the police officers from obtaining the signatures of the witnesses on their respective statements.

IV. Evidentiary Value of Inquest Report

The statement made by the investigating officer in inquest report is not a statement made by any witness before the police during investigation but it is a record of what the Investigating Officer himself observed and found, such an evidence is the direct or the primary evidence in the case and is in the eye of law the best evidence. Unless the record is proved to be suspect and unreliable, perfunctory or dishonest, there is no reason to disbelieve such a statement in the inquest report. A statement in inquest report does not fall within the four corners of S. 162. The statement of the Investigating officer in the inquest report is not a statement made by any witness before the police during the investigation.

Inquest report and post-mortem report cannot be termed to be basic or substantive evidence and any discrepancy occurring therein can neither be termed to be fatal nor even a suspicious circumstance which would warrant a benefit to the accused and the resultant dismissal of the prosecution case. The contents of inquest report cannot be treated as evidence, but they can be looked into to test the veracity of the witnesses.

Discrepancy between inquest report and postmortem report- Post-mortem is conducted by an expert; hence opinion expressed by him would carry more weight than the opinion and findings of a layman given in inquest report.

176Budhish Chandra v. State of U.P., 1991 Cr.L.J. 808 at 818 (All-DB); see also Krishna Pal Singh v. State of U.P., AIR 1996 SC 733.177State of Haryana v. Shibu Narain, 2008 AIR SCW 5400 at 5402 & 5403.178Razik Ram v. Chouhan, AIR 1975 SC 667 at 684; Harkiat Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1997 SC 3231; Santosh v. State of Chhatisgarh, 2001 Cr.L.J. 216; Suresh Rai v. State of Bihar, AIR 2000 SC 2207.179George v. State of Kerala, AIR 1998 SC 1376; Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab, (1991) 4 SCC 341.180Nirpal Singh. v. State of Haryana, AIR 1977 SC 1066.181Santosh v. State of Chattisgarh, 2002 Cr.L.J. 1180 at 1183 (Chattisgarh). 182Rameshwar Dayal v. State of U.P., AIR 1978 SC 1558 at 1565.183Ibid at 1567.184Harihar Ray v. State of Orissa, 1986 (1) Crimes 657, (Ori-DB).185Munshi Prasad v. State of Bihar, 2001 Cr.L.J. 4708 at 4712 (SC); Babu Poojari v. State of Karnataka, 1993 SCC (Cri) 997.186Kuldip Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1992 SC 1944.

Page 52

87Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

Signature of eye witness- The practice of getting eye-witness sign the inquest report is not only unwholesome but unwarranted.

Condition of body- When the body remained fully exposed to the heat and humidity for over thirty hours and it is not surprising that the rigor mortis had passed off ordinarily. After rigor mortis has passed off, the process of purification sets in but it may set in even earlier during summer depending on the heat and humidity. The body changing colour and emitting foul smell are the two special characteristics of the decomposition process.

Inquest in Presidency Towns- In the Presidency Towns of Bombay and Calcutta the coroner holds inquests, and not the police, under the Coroner’s Act (IV of 1871). In Madras the office of Coroner has been abolished by Act V of 1889.

Metropolitan Magistrate can hold inquiry after Coroner’s inquest- A Metropolitan Magistrate is not ousted of his jurisdiction because the Coroner has held an inquiry into the cause of death of a person and drawn up an inquisition. He is competent to hold a preliminary inquiry even though the accused has been committed to the High Court by the Coroner. No analogy exists between a Coroner’s inquest and inquiry into the cause of death under the Cr.P.C.

Power to summon persons for inquest- A police officer proceeding under section 174 Cr.P.C., may, by order in writing, summon two or more persons as aforesaid for the purpose of the said investigation, and any other person who appears to be acquainted with the facts of the case and every person so summoned shall be bound to attend and to answer truly all questions other than questions the answers to which would have a tendency to expose him to a criminal charge or to a penalty or forfeiture.

There is no need to examine all the eye witnesses at an inquest. It is not incumbent on the police-officer to record verbatim and separate statements of the persons examined by him under the section . This section empowers him to summon any person who appears to be acquainted with the facts of the case and every person to summoned shall be bound to attend the inquest and answer truly all the questions other than questions the answers to which would have a tendency to expose him to a criminal charge or to a penalty or forfeiture. The statement made by such person is a “previous statement” with the meaning of S.162 Cr.P.C., and it shall not be signed. So the statement made by such a person to police officer is in the course of the investigation, and when reduce to writing, it shall be used only by the accused to contradict such witness in the manner provided by S.145 of the Evidence Act, 1872 or with the permission of the court the prosecution could use if for re-examination only to explain the matter referred to its cross examination .

The witness must answer all questions. Refusal to answer question is punishable. Again, the person examined at an inquest is bound to answer truly all questions other than questions the answers to which would be incriminating. Section 161 Cr.P.C., also imposes such an obligation to speak the truth. A witness speaking falsely under this section commits the offence of intentionally giving false evidence.

187Rohit Yadav v. State of Bihar, 2007 Cr.L.J. (NOC) 202 (Pat).188Nagaji v. State of Rajasthan, 1988 (1) Crimes 371 (Raj-DB).189Daryao Singh v. State of M.P., (1991) 2 SCC 588. 190In Re. Troylokhnath Biswas, (1878) 3 Cal 742.191See Section 175 (1) Cr.P.C..192In Re, Mettu Pentayya, AIR 1960 AP 545.193Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab, 1991 (2) Crimes 191, 200(SC).

Page 53

88 Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

V. Magisterial Inquest

When any person dies while in the custody of the police or when the case is of the nature referred to in clause (i) or clause(ii) of sub-section (3) of section 174, the nearest Magistrate empowered to hold inquests shall, and in any other case mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 174, any Magistrate so empowered may hold an inquiry into the cause of death either instead of, or in addition to, the investigation held by the police officer ; and if he does so, he shall have all the powers in conducting it which he would have in holding an inquiry into an offence.

Where any person dies or disappears, or rape is alleged to have been committed on any woman, while such person or woman is in the custody of the police or in any other custody authorized the magistrate or the Court, under Cr.P.C., in addition to the inquiry or investigation held by the police, an enquiry shall be held by the Judicial Magistrate or the Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be within whose local Jurisdiction the offence has been committed.

The Magistrate holding such an inquiry shall record the evidence taken by him in connection therewith according to the circumstances of the case.

Whenever such Magistrate considers it expedient to make an examination of the dead body of any person who has been already interred or buried, in order to discover the cause of his death, the Magistrate may cause the body to be disinterred and examined.

Where an inquiry is to be held under this section, the Magistrate shall, wherever practicable, inform the relatives of the deceased whose names and addresses are known, and shall allow them to remain present at the inquiry.

The Judicial Magistrate or the Metropolitan Magistrate or Executive Magistrate or police officer holding an inquiry or investigation, as the case may be, shall, within twenty-four hours of the death of a person, forward the body with a view to its being examined to the nearest Civil Surgeon or other qualified medical man appointed in this behalf by the State Government, unless it is not possible to do so for reasons to be recorded in writing.

In case of an inquest near relatives of the deceased shall be informed. The Law Commissioners in 37th Report observed as follows:-

“A suggestion to inform the relatives of the person whose dead body in the subject-matter of the inquest under section 176 has been found worth accepting, and we recommend a provision to that effect. ‘Relatives’ in this contest would mean father, mother, son, daughter, wife or husband as far as can be ascertained. The obligation will be to inform them, as far as practicable.”

194See Section 179 I.P.C.195See Section 193 I.P.C.196See Section 176 (1) Cr.P.C..197Inserted by the Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2005 (25 of 2005), S. 18. Enforced w.e.f., 23.06.2006 vide Notification No. S.O. 923(E), dt. 21.06.2006.198See Section 176 (2) Cr.P.C.199See Section 176 (3) Cr.P.C.200See Section 176 (4) Cr.P.C.201Section 176(5) Cr.P.C. was inserted by the Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2005 (25 of 2005), S. 18. Enforced w.e.f. 23.06.2006 vide Notification No. S.O. 923(E), dt. 21.06.2006.

Page 54

89Amity International Journal of Juridical Sciences (Vol-4) 2018

S.176 Cr.P.C. was amended to provide that in the case of death or disappearance of a person or rape of a woman while in the custody of a police, there shall be a mandatory judicial inquiry and in case of death, examination of the dead body shall be conducted within 24 hours of death of the deceased.

Scope of Magisterial Inquest- when any person dies whilst in custody of the police, it is obligatory on the nearest magistrate to hold an inquest. In any other case mentioned in S.174 (1) Cr.P.C., the Magistrate may hold an inquest either instead of, or in addition to, the investigation held by the police office. The relatives of the dead person should, whenever possible, be notified and allowed to be present in the inquiry. Upon a direction by Government the Magistrate holds an inquiry u/s.174 and 176 Cr.P.C., and records evidence and submits a report to the Government; while acting so the Magistrate does not function as a court and no revision against it will lie . Joint inquiry by the police and Magistrate u/s. 176 Cr.P.C., is prohibited. The proceedings u/s 176 Cr.P.C., are judicial proceedings and the High Court can exercise its jurisdiction over such proceedings u/s 397 and 401 or u/s 482 of Cr.P.C.

VI. Conclusion

The entire purpose of preparing an inquest report is to investigate into, and draw up a report of apparent cause of death, describing such wounds as may be found on the body of the deceased and stating, in what manner, or by what weapon or instrument such wounds appear to have been inflicted. The object of inquest is merely to ascertain whether a person died under suspicious or unnatural circumstances and, if so, what was its apparent cause. The question who assaulted him or how he was assaulted or under what circumstances he was assaulted are foreign to the ambit of an inquest. Name of the accused persons need not be mentioned in the inquest because the basic purpose of inquest is to inquire into apparent cause of death, namely, whether it is suicidal, homicidal, or accidental or by some machinery. The inquest report cannot be treated as substantive evidence but may be utilized for contradicting the witnesses of inquest. However, the Law Commission of India in its 206th Report has recommended that inquest report should be regarded as material evidence in any court or other criminal proceedings. The commission has also recommended that the Coroner should have powers to cover the cases of unnatural deaths even if the death is caused beyond the territorial jurisdiction of India.

References1. Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Code of Criminal Procedure – As Amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013,

22nd ed. 2017, Lexis Nexis, Nagpur.

2. K.D. Gaur, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 2016, Universal Law Publishing, Delhi

3. Monir M., The Law of Evidence, 10th ed. 2016, Universal Law Publishing, Delhi

4. K.D. Gaur, The Indian Evidence Act, 2016, Universal Law Publishing, Delhi

5. R.V. Kelkar, Criminal Procedure, 6th ed. 2016, Eastern Book Company, Lucknow

202See Law Commission’s 37th report, Page 148, Para 522; See also Law Commission’s 41st Report Vol.I, P.82, Para 14.25.203Ismat Sara v. State of Karnataka, 1982 Cr.L.J. 1076 (Kant.)204See Supra note 6.205Ibid.

Page 55

WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO CALL ON CONGRESS TO ACT ON AN ISSUE:

I Demand my $6m goldPayments, 1-11, for each of 7.6

billion people, underSWISSINDO, NESARA, GESARA

International LawsCreated by N.C. on October 07, 2020

United States is violating all International laws, by trading illegally, outside Gold Mandate Laws ofSWISSINDO, NESARA + GESARA, thereby causing Destruction, Impoverishment and Enslavementof Humanity, under US Corporate Dictatorships globally.

Prosperity Payments 1 to 11 (P1-11) of Swissindo were made International law, with 30 day ActionMandate, on 14 June 2010, at the United Nations HQ in New York, USA, by its President, H.E. MrSino, K681, King of Kings, of Indonesia, and 12 Worlds top Financial organisations, UN, WBG, ICOJ,ICC, IMF, BIS, IMF, FATF, HM QUEEN, The Vatican, US Fed & US Treasury.

Mr Sino was falsely jailed and is under House Arrest to stop $1 Quintillion asset backedSWISSINDO P1-11 for 7.6 billion people

Release Mr Sino Release P1-11 ($6 million per person)

14,153 SIGNED 100,000 GOAL

FOREIGN POLICYGOVERNMENT & REGULATORY REFORMHOMELAND SECURITY & DEFENSE

Page 56

   

MORE ON HOW IT WORKS

Closed Petition

This petition has been archived because it did not meet the signature requirements. It can nolonger be signed.

VIEW PETITIONS YOU CAN SIGN

How Petitions Work

Create a Petition

Call on the White House to take action on the issue that matters to you.

Gather Signatures

Share your petition with others, build a community for the change you want to make.

100,000 Signatures in 30 Days

Get an o�icial update from the White House within 60 days.

1

2

3

1,214,142 SIGNED 100,000 GOAL

★INDICT & ARREST Moon Jae-in for SMUGGLING theChinaVirus into the US & ENDANGERING the national security ofUS & ROK!

Popular Petitions

FOREIGN POLICYHEALTH CAREHOMELAND SECURITY & DEFENSE

Page 57

Return to top

675,534 SIGNED 100,000 GOAL

We Call For Investigations Into The "Bill & Melinda GatesFoundation" For Medical Malpractice & Crimes AgainstHumanity

617,223 SIGNED 100,000 GOAL

Qatar's secret funding to America's Higher Learning Institutesfor favorable "image" in the country

603,523 SIGNED 100,000 GOAL

Terrorism To Get Upperhand If Karman Has Representation InSocial Media Regulatory Body

VIEW MORE POPULAR PETITIONS

HEALTH CAREHOMELAND SECURITY & DEFENSE

CIVIL RIGHTS & EQUALITYEDUCATIONFOREIGN POLICY

FOREIGN POLICYHOMELAND SECURITY & DEFENSE

Page 58

Page 59

F.L.O. FESSELIO LIUZES ORFILIZE K.H.K. N EO IMAM MAHDI

Rabu, 10 April 10th, 2013

- - EXHIBITS AB GLOBAL FUNDSEXHIBITS AB GLOBAL FUNDS - -

GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTGLOBAL DEVELOPMENTNEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTHNEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH

AAE.A2: ASIA. AFRICA. EUROPE. AMERICA. AUSTRALIAAAE.A2: ASIA. AFRICA. EUROPE. AMERICA. AUSTRALIAGLOBAL FUNDSGLOBAL FUNDS

DAFTAR NAMA NEGARA – NEGARA ANGGOTA PBBDAFTAR NAMA NEGARA – NEGARA ANGGOTA PBBPENERIMA HUMAN OBLIGATIONPENERIMA HUMAN OBLIGATION

DANDANKUOTA NEGARA PENJAMIN JAMINAN NEGARA – NEGARA PENGHASIL DEVISAKUOTA NEGARA PENJAMIN JAMINAN NEGARA – NEGARA PENGHASIL DEVISA

TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO – OPPT MULTINATIONAL TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO – OPPT MULTINATIONAL

THE WORLD OF CERTIFICATETHE WORLD OF CERTIFICATETHE CONTACT PROJECT EXHIBITS ABTHE CONTACT PROJECT EXHIBITS AB

CERTIFICATE GLOBAL IMMUNITYCERTIFICATE GLOBAL IMMUNITY

AUTHORIZED FIN-103 REMITTANCE CODEAUTHORIZED FIN-103 REMITTANCE CODENEW PAYMENT REFERENCE NUMBER IS OUT. ALLOCATION NUMBER A/100, DEXLOG/PINNEW PAYMENT REFERENCE NUMBER IS OUT. ALLOCATION NUMBER A/100, DEXLOG/PIN

OVERDUE PAYMENT INTO ACCOUNT SWIFTLY WITHOUT ANY MORE DELAYOVERDUE PAYMENT INTO ACCOUNT SWIFTLY WITHOUT ANY MORE DELAYTHE IMMEDIATE MANDATORY NOMINAL EXPRESS SERVICE CHARGE / AUTHORIZED MT. 799.THE IMMEDIATE MANDATORY NOMINAL EXPRESS SERVICE CHARGE / AUTHORIZED MT. 799.

105. FIN-103 REMITTANCE CODE105. FIN-103 REMITTANCE CODERELEASE ALL PAYMENT INTRUCTIONS TO IMMEDIATELY – OPPTRELEASE ALL PAYMENT INTRUCTIONS TO IMMEDIATELY – OPPT

TOTAL CERTIFICATED SHARES : US$. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF : GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT

PAYMENT 1-11TREATY EVENT UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL

PERMANENT MISSION TO THE KINGDOM OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION

IN TO

NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 1 / 23

AAUTHORITYUTHORITY V VETOETO

BBIGIG T TOPOP R ROYALOYAL – K681 K – K681 KINGING OFOF K KINGING''SS – AM1 – AM1NNEOEO THETHE U UNITEDNITED K KINGDOMINGDOM OFOF S SKYKY E EARTHARTH

SSWISSINDOWISSINDO W WORLDORLD T TRUSTRUST I INTERNATIONALNTERNATIONAL O ORBITRBIT

TTHEHE C COMMITTEEOMMITTEE OFOF 300 300

TTHEHE I INTERNATIONALNTERNATIONAL O ORGANICRGANIC A AGENCYGENCY

UUNITEDNITED N NATIONATION O ORGANISATIONRGANISATION

EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B

SingletonThe UN-SWISSINDO Program's Declaration & Grants Government Team (Thread ID:1-1TB79N) International Bullion Department

Exhibit AB Banking Activities in House Operation

Page 60

REFERENCE : CERTIFICATION ASBLP-0333902-2010INFINITE BANK STATEMENTS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300 - THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIC AGENCY

UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION

SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECTS

OWNER ACTUAL GENUINE CURRENCY PAPER – MONEY WORLD (GOLD & SILVER COINS)GLOBAL SINGLE CURRENCY

"ESTWO CURRENCY CARD" IMPLEMENTING PROGRAM HUMAN OBLIGATION IN ALL LOCATIONS

SYMBOL : "N$2"FIXED RATE : N$2/US$. = 225THE WORLD OF CERTIFICATE

GLOBAL HUMAN OBLIGATION PROJECTS

DEWAN IKATAN DOCUMENT INTERNATIONAL

CERTIFICATE CODE : 99.98 FM-001-777

EXHIBITS AB INSTRUCTION : AUTHORIZED MT.799. MT. 105. MT. 103IPI-INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT TRANSACTION MT. 105.CLEARANCE PROGRAM UBS. WORLD BANK. BANK OF INDONESIA 2012THE COMMITTEE OF 300THE WORLD BANK GROUP

GIS CODE N° ASM-001/ASBLP-0330-2012

OOPSKOP CENTRAL BUFFER STOCK NATIONALITY

UNITED STATE BANK WASHINGTON D.C. REPORT PROGRAM

TESTAMENTORY DISPOSITION INTERNATIONAL

UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND

PATENT LICENSEE SWISSINDO AGREEMENT

COUNTRY : GLOBAL

COUNTRY NAME : THE KINGDOM'S OF THE UNITED NATION ORGANIZATION

GRANTOR : ESTWO CARD CURRENCY IDENTICAL EXHIBITS AB CERTIFICATE OF UBS

EXHIBIT A : GOLD CERTIFICATE UBS (LIST OF 001-LIST OF 2350)COLLATERAL SUPER MAJORITY TOTAL : 4.760.920.184 KGS.IDENTIFYING : HOLDER CERTIFICATE QR-154-321-CO-003496 JM, LONDON AZL 18VOLUME : 70.000.000.000 KGS.

DEPOSIT CONTROL STATEMENT INVEST DEPOSIT

LEGALIZED : NO. 6568895788923. DECEMBER 4, 1960POSITION CODE : A. 001. A. 045.BASEL-TULINGEN – 45309684934 – F - 546572

SOCIÉTÉ DE BANQUES SUISSES

POSITION CODE : A. 0001. A. 045.BERN – 436537932 - SUISSE

INVESTMENT CLUB : BG – 65364292 – G – 76578899832

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 2 / 23

Page 61

TOP SECRET CONFORMATION ID-HISTORY OWNERSHIP

MICRO FILM : DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMENT INTERNASIONAL

CERTIFICATE CODE : 99.98REG. SEALED SECURER : SERIES 1-4 ASSET-INCOME-PERSONALKINGDOM CODE : 244.245.247

OUT-PUT INTERNATIONAL TRADING & OUT-PUT INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT

AUDITED : INFINITE BANK STATEMENTS MARCH 30TH, 2012THE COMMITTEE OF 300THE WORLD BANK GROUP

RENEWED : CURRENCY PAPER – MONEY WORLD

REPLACE : THE LARGEST PAYMENT PROCESSOR PRICE & ORDER THE CURRENCY CARD OF THE KEYNESS LAW

US PAYMENT AGENT : UNITED STATE BANK WASHINGTON D.C. REPORT PROGRAM EXHIBITS AB

USA TAX PAYER : FINAL REPORT, LOW COLUMBIA RIVER BACKWATER, WASHINGTON D.C. 1941

PREPARED BY : TETRA TECH FOR IR. SOEKARNO TO IR. SUGIHARTONO.

MASTER ACCOUNT AGREEMENT

WIRE TRANSFER / BANK TRANSFER

BANK NAME : FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, NEW YORK – USAACCOUNT NUMBER : 552552542AMTOTAL DEBT :

GRANTEE : PRICE ORDER THE WORLD CURRENCY

VALUE : CURRENCY CARD: N$2. 1,000,000.00 OR US$. 225,000,000.00USE : US$. 6,000,000.00AUTOMATED / MONTH SILVER CARD : US$. 600,00 &GOLD CARD : US$. 1,200,00REGULATION E : BIS – BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT

GLOBAL FUNDS

INSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE ACCOUNT RECORD FROM THE IRS TO WIRE TRANSFER FEDERAL RESERVE BANK - USA TO COMMERZBANK – GERMANY ON THE CAPACITY OWNER CENTRAL BANKS BY:

BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A.

INTEGRATED PARTICIPANTS’S & BENEFICIARY FREEDOM FOREVER 111DECLARATION PF TRANSACTION NUMBER A5-A.A.A.A.A-303-333-742-42INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION WORLD BANK INSTITUTION

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE

OPPT – ONE PERSON PUBLIC TRUST: NEO IMMAM MAHDI ARMY [NATO-SEATO-NON BLOCK “TNI”]MILITARY ORDER : 20120960EXECUTIVE ORDER : UN – 104222 SWISSINDO

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 3 / 23

Page 62

BENEFICIARY:

1. AFGANISTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 34.048.326 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.021.450 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 45.015.292.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 204.289.956.000.000

2. ALBANIA Jumlah Penduduk: 4.417.920 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 169.920 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.570.630.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 26.507.520.000.000

3. ALGERIA/ALJAJAIR Jumlah Penduduk: 38.033.487 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.179.038 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 51.002.258.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 228.200.924.640.000

4. ANDORRA Jumlah Penduduk: 103.679 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.988 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.570.630.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 26.507.520.000.000

5. ANGOLA Jumlah Penduduk: 14.243.054 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 441.535 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 19.099.692.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 85.458.322.560.000

6. ANTIQUA & BARBUDA Jumlah Penduduk: 91.520 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.728 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 121.243.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 549.120.000.000

7. ARGENTINA Jumlah Penduduk: 37.710.535 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.169.027 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 52.556.817.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 226.263.211.200.000

8. ARMENIA Jumlah Penduduk: 3.087.329 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 92.620 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.081.480.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 18.523.976.640.000

9. AUSTRALIA Jumlah Penduduk: 24.045.391JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 745.407 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 75.000.000.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 145.000.000.000.000

10. AUSTRIA Jumlah Penduduk: 10.277.940 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 395.305 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 17.612.471.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 61.667.642.400.000

11. AZERBAIJAN Jumlah Penduduk: 3.998.932 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 119.968 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 5.286.628.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 23.993.592.480.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 4 / 23

Page 63

12. BAHAMAS Jumlah Penduduk: 355.680 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 10.602 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 471.195.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.134.080.000.000

13. BAHRAIN Jumlah Penduduk: 747.038 iwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 22.411 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 987.659.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 482.229.440.000

14. BANGLADESH Jumlah Penduduk: 159.688.777 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 4.790.663 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 211.124.523.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 958.132.662.240.000

15. BARBADOS Jumlah Penduduk: 266.240 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 7.936 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 352.707.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.597.440.000.000

16. BELARUS Jumlah Penduduk: 12.674.126 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 487.466 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 21.718.620.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 76.044.758.400.000

17. BELGIUM Jumlah Penduduk: 13.507.815 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 519.531 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 23.147.101.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 81.046.892.160.000

18. BELIZE Jumlah Penduduk: 319.280 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 9.517 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $422.973.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.915.680.000.000

19. BENIN Jumlah Penduduk: 9.783.550 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 303.290 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 13.118.575.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 58.701.302.400.000

20. BHUTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 709.614 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 21.288 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 938.180.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 4.257.683.040.000

21. BOLIVIA Jumlah Penduduk: 10.400.000 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 322.400 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 14.828.745.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 62.400.000.000.000

22. BOSNIA HERZEGOVINA Jumlah Penduduk: 5.930.200 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 363.393 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $. 30.000.000.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $. 36.000.000.000.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 5 / 23

Page 64

23. BOTSWANA Jumlah Penduduk: 2.215.446 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 68.679 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 2.970.875.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 13.292.678.880.000

24. BRAZIL Jumlah Penduduk: 199.722.636 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 6.191.402 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 275.570.657.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.198.335.815.040.000

25. BRUNEI DARUSSALAM Jumlah Penduduk: 396.626 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 11.899 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 524.379.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.379.755.040.000

26. BULGARIA Jumlah Penduduk: 9.326.720 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 358.720 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.982.442.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 55.960.320.000.000

27. BURKINA FASO Jumlah Penduduk: 17.522.407 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 543.195 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 23.497.249.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 105.134.440.320.000

28. BURUNDI Jumlah Penduduk: 8.961.947 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 277.820 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 12.017.818.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 53.771.683.680.000

29. CAMBODIA Jumlah Penduduk: 13.924.466 jiwa

Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 417.734 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 18.409.537.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 83.546.798.400.000

30. CAMEROON Jumlah Penduduk: 21.008.886 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 651.275 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 28.172.558.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 26.053.316.480.000

31. CANADA Jumlah Penduduk: 34.915.920 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.040.763 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 46.255.655.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 209.495.520.000.000

32. CAPE VERDE Jumlah Penduduk: 477.918 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 14.815 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 640.880.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.867.510.880.000

33. CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC Jumlah Penduduk: 5.020.384 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 155.632 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 6.732.249.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 30.122.302.080.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 6 / 23

Page 65

34. CHAD Jumlah Penduduk: 11.494.343 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 356.325 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.413.718.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 68.966.058.720.000

35. CHILI Jumlah Penduduk: 17.778.041 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 551.119 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 24.493.945.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 106.668.244.800.000

36. CHINA Jumlah Penduduk: 1.374.926.389 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 41.247.792 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.817.790.179.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 8.249.558.335.200.000

37. COLOMBIA Jumlah Penduduk: 43.184.888 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.338.732 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 59.698.585.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 259.109.329.440.000

38. COMOROS Jumlah Penduduk: 837.313 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 25.957 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.122.822.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 5.023.880.160.000

39. CONGO Jumlah Penduduk: 4.465.454 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 138.429 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 5.988.098.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 26.792.725.440.000

40. COSTA RICA Jumlah Penduduk: 4.762.160 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 141.949 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 6.307.665.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 28.572.960.000.000

41. IVORY COAST Jumlah Penduduk: 20.721.240 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 642.358 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 28.748.978.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 124.327.438.560.000

42. CROATIA Jumlah Penduduk: 5.509.403 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 211.900 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.441.016.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 33.056.418.720.000

43. CUBA Jumlah Penduduk: 11.652.160 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 347.324 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $15.436.450.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 69.912.960.000.000

44. CYPRUS Jumlah Penduduk: 824.308 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 24.729 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.089.818.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 4.945.848.960.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 7 / 23

Page 66

45. CZECH REPUBLIC (CEKO) Jumlah Penduduk: 12.589.866 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 484.226 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 21.574.229.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 75.539.193.600.000

46. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA Jumlah Penduduk: 24.418.259 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 732.548 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 32.282.378.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 146.509.552.800.000

47. DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO Jumlah Penduduk: 76.441.061 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.369.673 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 102.506.159.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 458.646.364.800.000

48. DENMARK Jumlah Penduduk: 6.792.231 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 261.240 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 11.639.293.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 40.753.383.840.000

49. DJIBOUTI Jumlah Penduduk: 574.266 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 17.802 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 770.082.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 3.445.596.960.000

50. DOMINICA Jumlah Penduduk: 69.680 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.077 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 92.310.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 418.080.000.000

51. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Jumlah Penduduk: 10.493.600 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 312.790 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 13.901.630.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 62.961.600.000.000

52. ECUADOR Jumlah Penduduk: 14.823.620 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 459.532 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 20.523.450.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 88.941.721.440.000

53. EGYPT Jumlah Penduduk: 92.454.617 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.866.093 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 123.980.065.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 554.727.700.800.000

54. EL SALVADOR Jumlah Penduduk: 6.409.520 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 191.053 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 8.491.156.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 38.457.120.000.000

55. EQUATORIAL GUINEA Jumlah Penduduk: 704.893 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 21.852 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 945.249.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 4.229.359.680.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 8 / 23

Page 67

56. ERITREA Jumlah Penduduk: 6.284.169 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 194.809 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 8.426.963.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 37.705.012.800.000

57. ESTONIA Jumlah Penduduk: 1.681.327 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 64.666 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 2.881.154.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 10.087.964.640.000

58. ETHIOPIA Jumlah Penduduk: 94.852.110 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.940.415 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 127.195.000.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 569.112.660.480.000

59. FIJI Jumlah Penduduk: 881.088 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 27.314 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.213.931.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 5.286.528.000.000

60. FINLAND Jumlah Penduduk: 6.567.271 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 252.587 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 11.253.799.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 39.403.628.160.000

61. FRANCE Jumlah Penduduk: 74.914.424 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.881.324 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 128.374.759.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 449.486.544.000.000

62. GABON Jumlah Penduduk: 1.685.885 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 52.262 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 2.260.742.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 10.115.308.320.000

63. GAMBIA Jumlah Penduduk: 1.984.004 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 61.504 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 2.660.515.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 11.904.023.040.000

64. GEORGIA Jumlah Penduduk: 4.816.075 jiwa

Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 144.482 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 6.367.332.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 28.896.447.840.000

65. GERMANY Jumlah Penduduk: 100.332.927 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.858.959 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 171.932.572.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 601.997.560.320.000

66. GHANA Jumlah Penduduk: 26.520.801 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 822.145 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 35.563.943.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 159.124.804.800.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 9 / 23

Page 68

67. GREECE (YUNANI) Jumlah Penduduk: 12.934.407 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 497.477 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 22.164.743.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 77.606.443.200.000

68. GRENADA Jumlah Penduduk: 108.160 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.224 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 143.287.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 648.960.000.000

69. GUATEMALA Jumlah Penduduk: 14.588.080 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 434.837 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 19.325.000.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 87.528.480.000.000

70. GUINEA Jumlah Penduduk: 11.192.514 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 346.968 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.008.970.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 67.155.085.920.000

71. GUINEA BISSAU Jumlah Penduduk: 1.706.995 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 52.917 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 2.289.061.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 10.241.967.840.000

72. GUYANA Jumlah Penduduk: 808.754 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 25.071 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.114.272.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 4.852.523.520.000

73. HAITI Jumlah Penduduk: 10.434.320 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 311.023 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 13.823.100.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 62.605.920.000.000

74. HONDURAS Jumlah Penduduk: 7.764.640 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 231.446 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 13.823.100.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 46.587.840.000.000

75. HUNGARY Jumlah Penduduk: 12.515.372 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 481.360 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 21.446.576.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 75.092.234.880.000

76. ICELAND Jumlah Penduduk: 383.957 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 14.768 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 657.955.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.303.739.360.000

77. INDIA Jumlah Penduduk: 1.193.915.035 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 35.817.451 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.578.475.068.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 7.163.490.210.240.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 10 / 23

Page 69

78. INDONESIA Jumlah Penduduk: 260.000.000 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 7.936.702 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: Rp.1.500.000.000.000.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: Rp.14.050.000.000.000.00

79. IRAN Jumlah Penduduk: 68.510.232 jiwa

Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.055.307 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 90.571.211.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 411.061.391.520.000

80. IRAQ Jumlah Penduduk: 29.350.028 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 880.501 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 38.801.040.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 176.100.169.440.000

81. IRELAND/IRLANDIA Jumlah Penduduk: 5.324.800 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 204.800 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.124.676.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 31.948.800.000.000

82. ISRAEL Jumlah Penduduk: 7.396.853 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 221.906 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.778.731.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 44.381.120.160.000

83. ITALY Jumlah Penduduk: 74.374.522 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.860.559 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 127.449.572.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 446.247.129.120.000

84. JAMAICA Jumlah Penduduk: 2.827.760 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 84.289 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 3.746.139.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 16.966.560.000.000

85. JAPAN Jumlah Penduduk: 132.380.173 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.971.405 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 175.007.912.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 794.281.038.720.000

86. JORDAN Jumlah Penduduk: 6.446.624 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 193.399 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 8.522.501.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 38.679.744.480.000

87. KHAZAKHSTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 16.293.194 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 488.796 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 21.539.766.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 97.759.165.920.000

88. KENYA Jumlah Penduduk: 43.402.285 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.345.471 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 58.201.723.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 260.413.707.840.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 11 / 23

Page 70

89. KIRIBATI Jumlah Penduduk: 96.234 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.983 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 132.588.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 577.405.920.000

90. KUWAIT Jumlah Penduduk: 2.700.423 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 81.013 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 3.569.986.500 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 16.202.540.640.000

91. KYRGYZSTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 5.571.144 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 167.134 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.365.108.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 33.426.862.560.000

92. LAOS PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REP. Jumlah Penduduk: 6.944.635 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 208.339 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.181.502.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 41.667.812.160.000

93. LATVIA Jumlah Penduduk: 2.820.536 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 108.482 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.833.323.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 16.923.216.960.000

94. LEBANON Jumlah Penduduk: 4.130.819 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 123.925 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 5.460.983.500 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 24.784.911.840.000

95. LESOTHO Jumlah Penduduk: 2.371.175 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 73.506 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 3.179.706.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 14.227.050.240.000

96. LIBERIA Jumlah Penduduk: 1.438.024 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 44.579 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.928.367.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 8.628.141.600.000

97. LIBYA Jumlah Penduduk: 7.022.251 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 217.690 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.416.718.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 42.133.503.360.000

98. LIECHTENSTEIN Jumlah Penduduk: 42.466 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.633 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 72.771.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 254.797.920.000

99. LITHUANIA Jumlah Penduduk: 4.150.440 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 159.632 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.112.273.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 24.902.641.920.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 12 / 23

Page 71

100. LUXEMBOURG Jumlah Penduduk: 644.426 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 24.786 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.104.299.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 3.866.553.600.000

101. MADAGASKAR Jumlah Penduduk: 22.983.277 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 712.482 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 30.820.182.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 137.899.663.200.000

102. MALAWI Jumlah Penduduk: 15.847.022 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 491.258 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 21.250.586.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 95.082.131.040.000

103. MALAYSIA Jumlah Penduduk: 28.891.200 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 866.736 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 38.194.455.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 173.347.200.000.000

104. MALDIVES/MALADEWA Jumlah Penduduk: 410.799 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 12.735 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 565.984.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.464.793.760.000

105. MALI Jumlah Penduduk: 14.095.823 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 436.971 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 18.902.279.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 84.574.938.240.000

106. MALTA Jumlah Penduduk: 495.837 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 19.071 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 849.674.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.975.019.840.000

107. MARSHALL ISLANDS Jumlah Penduduk: 73.898 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.291 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 101.814.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 443.389.440.000

108. MAURITANIA Jumlah Penduduk: 3.482.492 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 107.957 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.669.962.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 20.894.952.000.000

109. MAURITIUS Jumlah Penduduk: 1.429.128 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 44.303 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.916.437.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 8.574.770.880.000

110. MEXICO Jumlah Penduduk: 116.815.667 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.482.004 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 154.754.000.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 700.894.003.680.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 13 / 23

Page 72

111. MICRONESIA (Federated States of) Jumlah Penduduk: 112.429 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.485 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 154.901.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 674.575.200.000

112. MONACO Jumlah Penduduk: 39.077 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.503 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 66.963.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 234.461.760.000

113. MONGOLIA Jumlah Penduduk: 3.115.925 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 93.478 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.119.565.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 18.695.551.680.000

114. MONTENEGRO Jumlah Penduduk: 767.327 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 29.513 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.314.915.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 4.603.959.360.000

115. MAROCCO Jumlah Penduduk: 38.791.500 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.202.536 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 52.018.740.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 232.748.998.560.000

116. MOZAMBIQUE Jumlah Penduduk: 24.113.572 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 747.521 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 32.335.889.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 144.681.432.480.000

117. MYANMAR Jumlah Penduduk: 51.104.000 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.316.080 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $. 97.000.000.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 320.000.000.000.000

118. NAMIBIA Jumlah Penduduk: 2.346.523 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 72.742 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 3.146.647.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 14.079.137.280.000

119. NAURU Jumlah Penduduk: 11.024 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 342 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.188.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 66.144.000.000

120. NEPAL Jumlah Penduduk: 30.699.879 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 920.996 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 40.588.309.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 184.199.271.360.000

121. NETHERLANDS Jumlah Penduduk: 20.344.045 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 782.463 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 34.861.936.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 122.064.271.680.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 14 / 23

Page 73

122. NEW ZEALAND Jumlah Penduduk: 4.607.616 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 142.836 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 6.348.207.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 27.645.696.000.000

123. NICARAGUA Jumlah Penduduk: 5.972.720 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 178.033 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.912.496.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 35.836.320.000.000

124. NIGER Jumlah Penduduk: 17.032.798 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 528.017 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 22.841.693.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 102.196.785.600.000

125. NIGERIA Jumlah Penduduk: 176.110.615 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 5.459.429 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 236.161.373.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.056.663.691.200.000

126. NORWAY Jumlah Penduduk: 5.155.844 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 198.302 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $8.835.150.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 30.935.062.080.000

127. OMAN Jumlah Penduduk: 3.444.106 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 103.323 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.553.142.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 20.664.633.600.000

128. PAKISTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 174.472.531 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 5.234.176 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 230.654.430.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.046.835.185.760.000

129. PALAU Jumlah Penduduk: 20.971 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 650 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 28.892.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 125.823.360.000

130. PANAMA Jumlah Penduduk: 3.592.160 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 107.074 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.758.000.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 21.552.960.000.000

131. PAPUA NEW GUINEA Jumlah Penduduk: 7.001.280 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 217.040 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.646.111.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 42.007.680.000.000

132. PARAGUAY Jumlah Penduduk: 6.619.906 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 205.217 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.120.667.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 39.719.434.560.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 15 / 23

Page 74

133. PERU Jumlah Penduduk: 28.308.035 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 877.549 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 39.001.791.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 169.848.207.360.000

134. PHILIPPINES Jumlah Penduduk: 96.388.711 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.891.661 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 127.435.515.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 578.332.266.720.000

135. POLAND Jumlah Penduduk: 46.826.338 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.801.013 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 80.242.489.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 280.958.028.000.000

136. PORTUGAL Jumlah Penduduk: 12.389.399 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 476.515 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 21.230.756.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 74.336.396.160.000

137. QATAR Jumlah Penduduk: 965.780 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 28.973 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.276.771.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 5.794.682.400.000

138. REPUBLIC of KOREA (Selatan) Jumlah Penduduk: 51.202.158 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.536.065 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $67.694.373.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $307.212.946.560.000

139 REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA Jumlah Penduduk: 4.369.359 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 168.052 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.487.415.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 26.216.155.680.000

140. ROMANIA Jumlah Penduduk: 26.279.034 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.010.732 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 45.032.245.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 157.674.204.480.000

141. RUSSIAN FEDERATION Jumlah Penduduk: 178.148.613 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 6.851.870 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 305.278.798.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.068.891.676.320.000

142. RWANDA Jumlah Penduduk: 11.654.668 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 361.295 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.628.711.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 69.928.010.880.000

143. SAINT KITTS and NEVIS Jumlah Penduduk: 54.080 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.612 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 71.643.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 324.480.000.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 16 / 23

Page 75

144. SAINT LUCIA Jumlah Penduduk: 178.880 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 5.332 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $547.926.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $9.590.880.000

145. ST VINCENT & THE GRENADINES Jumlah Penduduk: 123.171 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.818 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $169.701.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 739.028.160.000

146. SAMOA Jumlah Penduduk: 183.984 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 5.704 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 253.486.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.103.905.920.000

147. SAN MARINO Jumlah Penduduk: 35.897 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.381 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 61.516.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 215.379.840.000

148. SAO TOME & PRINCIPE Jumlah Penduduk: 236.670 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 7.337 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 317.370.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.420.018.080.000

149. SAUDI ARABIA Jumlah Penduduk: 24.453.863 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 733.616 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $32.328.252.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 46.723.179.200.000

150. SENEGAL Jumlah Penduduk: 15.258.265 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 473.006 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 20.461.073.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 91.549.592.160.000

151. SERBIA Jumlah Penduduk: 8.966.754 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 344.875 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.365.598.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 53.800.524.960.000

152. SEYCHELLES Jumlah Penduduk: 97.343 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.018 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 130.535.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 584.057.760.000

153. SIERRA LEONE Jumlah Penduduk: 7.166.491 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 222.161 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.610.144.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 42.998.947.680.000

154. SINGAPURE Jumlah Penduduk: 4.792.494 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 143.775 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 6.335.724.500 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 28.754.962.080.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 17 / 23

Page 76

155. SLOVAKIA Jumlah Penduduk: 6.613.601 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 254.369 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 11.333.190.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 39.681.607.680.000

156. SLOVENIA Jumlah Penduduk: 2.459.792 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 94.607 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.215.146.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 14.758.754.400.000

157. SOLOMON ISLANDS Jumlah Penduduk: 502.406 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 15.575 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 692.197.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 3.014.437.920.000

158. SOMALIA Jumlah Penduduk: 10.941.068 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 339.173 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 14.671.786.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 65.646.409.920.000

159. SOUTH AFRIKA Jumlah Penduduk: 54.585.672 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.692.156 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 73.198.455.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 327.514.031.520.000

160. SOUTH SUDAN Jumlah Penduduk: 13.520.000 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 419.120 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 18.627.369.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 81.120.000.000.000

161. SPAIN (Spanyol) Jumlah Penduduk: 54.481.894 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.095.458 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 93.361.194.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 326.891.366.880.000

162. SRI LANGKA Jumlah Penduduk: 21.973.924 jiwa

Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 659.218 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 29.051.725.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 131.843.543.520.000

163. SUDAN Jumlah Penduduk: 45.722.532 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.417.398 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 61.313.135.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 274.335.191.520.000

164. SURINAME Jumlah Penduduk: 455.547 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 14.122 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 627.626.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 2.733.282.240.000

165. SWAZILAND Jumlah Penduduk: 1.250.690 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 38.771 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.677.154.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 7.504.142.880.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 18 / 23

Page 77

166. SWEDEN Jumlah Penduduk: 11.146.651 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 428.717 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 19.101.120.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 66.879.908.160.000

167. SWITZERLAND Jumlah Penduduk: 9.653.769 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 371.299 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 16.542.888.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 57.922.612.800.000

168. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIK Jumlah Penduduk: 20.537.489 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 616.125 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 27.152.615.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 123.224.936.640.000

169. TAJIKISTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 7.500.359 jiwa

Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 225.011 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 9.916.225.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 45.002.156.160.000

170. THAILAND Jumlah Penduduk: 68.113.030 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.043.391 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 90.052.237.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 408.678.179.520.000

171. TIMOR LESTE Jumlah Penduduk: 1.142.857 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 49.407 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.850.000.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 6.862.000.000.000

172. TOGO Jumlah Penduduk: 6.698.919 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 207.666 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 8.983.135.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 40.193.512.320.000

173. TONGA Jumlah Penduduk: 119.277 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 3.698 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 164.335.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 715.659.360.000

174. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Jumlah Penduduk: 1.392.560 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 41.509 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $1.844.825.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 8.355.360.000.000

175. TUNISIA Jumlah Penduduk: 11.669.198 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 361.745 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 15.648.196.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 70.015.189.920.000

176. TURKEY Jumlah Penduduk: 74.768.519 jiwa

Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.243.056 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 98.851.459.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 448.611.115.680.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 19 / 23

Page 78

177. TURKMENISTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 5.386.756 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 161.603 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 7.121.830.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 32.320.535.520.000

178. TUVALU Jumlah Penduduk: 11.960 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 371 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 16.478.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 71.760.000.000

179. UGANDA Jumlah Penduduk: 36.020.844 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.116.646 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 48.303.337.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 216.125.064.480.000

180. UKRAINE Jumlah Penduduk: 57.476.286 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.210.626 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 98.492.440.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 344.857.718.400.000

181. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Jumlah Penduduk: 4.806.255 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 144.188 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 6.354.350.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 28.837.529.760.000

182. UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT Jumlah Penduduk: 76.407.926 jiwa BRITAIN & NORTHERN IRELAND Jumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.938.767 Personil

Anggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 130.934.053.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 458.447.558.400.000

183. UNITED REPUBLIC of TANZANIA Jumlah Penduduk: 45.678.806 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 1.416.043 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 61.254.500.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 274.072.836.960.000

184. UNITES STATES of AMERICA Jumlah Penduduk: 327.245.360 JiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 10.659.020 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $. 525.000.000.000Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $. 1.965.000.000.000.000

185. URUGUAY Jumlah Penduduk: 3.290.248 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 101.998 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 4.533.185.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 19.741.488.000.000

186. UZBEKISTAN Jumlah Penduduk: 29.399.179 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 881.975 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 38.868.654.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 176.395.071.840.000

187. VANUATU Jumlah Penduduk: 226.427 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 7.019 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 311.963.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 1.358.560.320.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 20 / 23

Page 79

188. VENEZUELA (Bolivarian Republic of) Jumlah Penduduk: 28.206.672 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 874.407 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 36.862.137.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 169.240.032.000.000

189. VIET NAM Jumlah Penduduk: 89.561.221 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 2.686.837 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 118.408.890.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 537.367.328.160.000

190. YEMEN Jumlah Penduduk: 23.933.911 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 718.017 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 31.643.024.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 143.603.466.240.000

191. ZAMBIA Jumlah Penduduk: 13.200.857 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 409.227 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 17.702.124.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 79.205.143.680.000

192. ZIMBABWE Jumlah Penduduk: 12.677.718 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 393.009 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 17.000.603.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 76.066.305.120.000

193. VATIKAN Jumlah Penduduk: 1.014 jiwaJumlah Rekrutmen Konsultan: 39 PersonilAnggaran Biaya Rekrutmen: $ 1.738.000 Besar Pembayaran Human Obligation: $ 6.084.000.000

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 21 / 23

Page 80

NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH

MAIN DOMICILIE AND OFFICE

BA1 (OFFICIAL 1, EXHIBIT A) (9/97)CAPITALIZED TERM ARE USED IN THIS NOTES SHALL HAVE THE MEANING SPECIFIED IN OPERATION ALFA OMEGA A.A.A-FM.001-777, AUTHORIZED CLEARANCE PROGRAM UBS. WORLD BANK. BANK OF INDONESIA IN TO OWNER CENTRAL BANKS BY BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A BELOW OR IN ORDER PROVISION OF THIS NOTES.

I OR WE, HAVE AGREED TO PAY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, UBS (THE “MAKER”) COMPANY VALIDLY EXISTING THE LAWS OF THE SWITZERLAND, WITH ITS MAIN HOME AND OFFICES AT.......................

GLOBAL

A. ADDRESS-1 OWNERSHIP : CONSORTIUM INTERNATIONALITY

SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT

JL. SULTAN AGUNG TIRTAYASA, GRIYA CARAKA K1-4 NO. 24 CIREBON-INDONESIA 45153TELP. (0231) 8493503

CREATOR : OWNER, USER, FUNDER LENDER HANDLING BANKS HAVE TO PROVIDE MICRO FILM

MEDALLION HELPING ONE HUNDRED YEARS TO CREATE THE FUTURE

ACCOUNT MASTER AGREEMENT

COMMERZBANK (GERMANY) ACCOUNT NO. 7772938241 STANDING BALANCE ACCOUNT NO. 77762534AM – 605

B. ADDRESS-2 OFFICE : HEAD MASTER OFFICE:INDONESIAOWNER CENTRAL BANKS BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1ACOMMERZBANK AGSUMMITMAS BUILDING TOWER II, 6TH FLOOR,JL. JEND. SUDIRMAN KAV. 61-62, JAKARTA SELATAN -12190, INDONESIA, DKI JAKARTA

FAX.(021) 2526514 - TELP.(021) 2526510FOREIGN BANK:GERMANYBULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1ACOMMERZBANK AGHEAD OFFICE

COMMERZBANK AG60261 FRANKFURT/MAIN

PHONE: +49 69 136-20 FAX: +49 69 285-389

C. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE : NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE:UNITED NATIONS SWISSINDO – ONE PERSONAL ONLY NO COMMERCIAL O P P T – ONE PERSON PUBLIC TRUST

Brian Kellybkelly5142@gmail.com – www.peoplestrust1776.org – Phone: (619) 709-2083

Thanks to all your attentions, I want to talk you in the name of God and on behalf The People's Republic of Indonesia and the Big Five Continents and or 253 Nations.

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 22 / 23

Page 81

(S(SIGNATUREIGNATURE OFOF C CERTIFYINGERTIFYING O OFFICIALFFICIAL*)*)AUTHORITY VETOAUTHORITY VETO

DEWAN IKATAN DOCUMENT OF INTERNATIONALDEWAN IKATAN DOCUMENT OF INTERNATIONALCERTIFICATE CODE 99.98CERTIFICATE CODE 99.98

BBIGIG T TOPOP R ROYALOYAL, K.681 K, K.681 KINGING O OFF K KINGING’’SS AM-1/M-1 AM-1/M-1TTHEHE G GREATESREATES P PRESIDENTRESIDENT OFOF THETHE U UNITEDNITED N NATIONATION O ORGANIZATIONRGANIZATION

PPRESIDENTRESIDENT C COMMISSARIESOMMISSARIES B BANKSANKS C.L.M 7650089799 F.C 56453 C.L.M 7650089799 F.C 56453SSPECIALPECIAL F FEDERALEDERAL R RESERVEESERVE B BOARDOARD 552552542AM 552552542AM

CCONSORTIUMONSORTIUM I INTERNATIONALNTERNATIONAL T TRUSTRUST O OFFICERFFICER

MR.A1.SMR.A1.SINOINO.AS.S”2”.IR.S.AS.S”2”.IR.SOEGIHARTONOTONEGOROOEGIHARTONOTONEGORO,ST,ST(N(NAMEAME ANDAND T TITLEITLE))JJANUARYANUARY 07, 2013 07, 2013

FULL EXTENT INTERNATIONAL OF LAWFULL EXTENT INTERNATIONAL OF LAWTTHISHIS ISIS COVERINGCOVERING BYBY ORIGINALORIGINAL WITHWITH OFFICIALOFFICIAL S STAMPTAMP, S, SEALEAL OROR M MEDALLIONEDALLION®®

IINDIVIDUALNDIVIDUAL I INTERPRETEDNTERPRETED ISIS A ABSOLUTEBSOLUTE T TITLEITLE..TTHEHE S STAFFTAFF ISIS NOT I NOT INTERPRETEDNTERPRETED..

NNOTARYOTARY ISIS NOT A NOT ACCEPTABLECCEPTABLE..

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF MR SOEGIHARTO SWISSINDO INTERNATIONAL TRUST AND BIG-BULLION BANK RATU MAS KENCANA, ROOM 1A-A1

MICHEL VALETTE PRESIDENT, ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT (OMD)SWISSINDO SPECIAL OPERATION EXECUTIVE

TOP PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TASK FORCE OF MILITARY

REPRESENTATIVES OF NATO-SEATO-NON BLOCK & UNO SECURITY COUNCIL

ALAIN ATLANI VICE-PRESIDENT, ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT (OMD)TOP PRESIDENT BOARD OF GOVERNOR'S WORLD BANK

JOSE ALFREDO RAMIREZ RAMIREZ DEPUTY REGIONAL COORDINATOR, ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT (OMD)MEMBER OF THE OMD EXECUTIVE COUNCIL TOP PRESIDENT BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A

REPRESENTATIVES OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING SYSTEM & GRANTS GOV'T THREAD ID:1-1TB79N

Signature Guarantee Medallion Program-Patent Licensee SWISSINDO Agreement-Estwo (N$2) - Exhibits AB Page 23 / 23

Page 82

Neo The United Kingdom Of God Sky Earth

HISTORICAL OF JUSTICE HUMAN OBLIGATIONS UN SWISSINDO INTERNATIONAL ORBIT

https://alangjr042.blogspot.com/2013/06/ref-release-unlimited-ad45210666cp1_5997.html

Kamis, 20 Juni 2013

Ref: Release Unlimited AD452106/66/C.P1-11/ECB/2013 NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AUTOMATED OWNER MASTER ACCOUNT AGREEMENT Know to all man, Participant's & Beneficiary with the People on Earth Ref: Release Unlimited AD452106/66/C.P1-11/ECB/2013 To: Big Top Royal, K.681 King of King's M-1 MR.S1.SINO.AS.S"2".IR.SOEGIHARTONOTONEGORO,ST. R E P O R T Subject: Update 22hrs German-Time Regarding G8 Meeting and Obama-Merkel Meeting Dear Sir: We have received several pieces of information listed here below regarding the release: 1. Our sources in the Pentagon have been advised that SWISSINDO needs to apply the strongest pressure possible for an immediate release. There have been more than sufficient time given to the German Central Bank and Commerzbank to execute your instructions and to no avail. Right now, we do not know whether Commerzbank already received the re-confirmed Payment Instructions through UNO channel or not (as written in your last email); if not, the suggestion is that you please re-issue the Mandate Letter with effective date for execution by the Federal Reserve (according with US Laws, the FED can force a transaction) within the next twenty four hours without any further delay allowed; this could be executed in close cooperation with the Pentagon. 2. The front image to the public given during the Group of Eight G8 meetting was that a coordinated effort by the industrial economies to prevent Tax

Page 83

Evasion worldwide but we have been informed the private discussions were as to how best to execute the Monetary Emission and solve the issues as the German Chancellor could not provide any further excuses to justify delay in releasing the funds. 3. We have been informed that the FED Chairman was pushed out on the pressure exerted by the Pentagon against the White House. The basic players and their interactions are described here below: Here is the person who handles all in the shadow of the planet in recent years, this former great servant of the American State has for many years his knowledge and influence to research the political and financial power, with spent most of his career in the Secret Service, with "official" stints as Secretary of State, Adviser, Ambassador, etc.., found its mark around the assassination of Patrice Lumumba in the Congo, the Coup of 1974 in Portugal, etc. .. After his position as National Security Advisor under Ronald Reagan, he became head of the Carlyle Group, which specializes in weapons trafficking, various activities of money laundering operations "covert" for the CIA, etc.. and finally large financial-monetary transactions; Carlyle even became for many years the "Fund of Funds", handling the financial market (Singapore, Hong Kong, Frankfurt, etc..) by investment funds (Hedge Funds, Pension Funds, etc.) in the economy and control most of the "Financial Programs". was also present at the "Board of Trustees" of the Rand Corporation (CIA bis) and "Chairman Emeritus" of the US-Taiwan Business Council (it was he who "invented" YCT-Yeh Che Tsai), he created many years the myth of the "Chinese fortunes," and the massive use of fake Bank Guarantees / criminal from HSBC, Barclays , UBS, Standard Chartered Bank, etc.. And these "guarantees" were obviously assembled from figures annual interest of "Reserves Accounts" criminal network that aside to be shared between the various links of influence and power sharing "Committee of 300", IMF , Bilderberg, etc.. This is of course: Frank Carlucci, who sponsored the appointment of Dominique Strauss-Khan, and Christine Lagarde, the IMF, in order to organize the looting of countries in economic difficulties (African Countries, Greece, Portugal, Spain, etc.). the link was very evident as one of the leaders of Carlyle is Mr Olivier Sarkozy, brother of Nicolas Sarkozy (French ex-President), the latter had received formal instruction to block the work of the OMD, as they had identified that the OMD was supported by the Division 10 and SWISSINDO System. It is obvious that Carlucci controlled until the last few days several members of the U.S. government, the CIA, the Pentagon itself (for weapons, officials and secret contracts). This is Frank Carlucci who had appointed Ben Bernanke to head the Federal Reserve, as Robert Zoellick at the World Bank's role has always been to

Page 84

develop and manipulate the people responsible for "infiltrate" the major institutions. The execution of large commercial programs entrusted to his accomplice William Chase McQuade (attachment), head of the global number one "commodities" trader by the criminal manipulation of prices, which impoverishes commodities producing countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Carlucci The recent action of the Pentagon helped bring down Ben Bernanke and several members of his network is Bernanke on instructions Carlucci, blocking the Federal Reserve in carrying out the operation "Commerzbank". It is inconceivable that Commerzbank does not execute a payment order from the Fed, because the Fed can legally "force" the transfer from one account to another, from the U.S. dollar, legal currency of the USA Indeed, if it not done, it is because Blessing knew he was "protected" by Bernanke and Angela Merkel, herself taking orders from various financial relay Carlucci, we find here the links already identified: Carlucci - Carlyle Group Carlucci - Taiwan Carlucci - Rand Corporation Carlucci - CIA Carlucci - IMF Carlucci - World Bank Carlucci - Edge Funds Carlucci - Pension Fund Carlucci - Goldman Sachs Carlucci - Bernanke Carlucci - Obama Goldman Sachs - Mrs Blessing Mrs. Blessing - Martin Blessing Martin Blessing - Angela Merkel Angela Merkel - Nicolas Sarkozy Angela Merkel - Barrack Obama Carlucci - Commerzbank Carlyle - Olivier Sarkozy Olivier Sarkozy - Nicolas Sarkozy Nicolas Sarkozy - Dominique Strauss-Khan Nicolas Sarkozy - Christine Lagarde Nicolas Sarkozy - Olivier Griffon It is necessary to examine the behavior of President Obama, who apparently tried to prevent the Commerzbank 1-11 payments operation and our analysis is that he had not understood the meaning of the operation, as it was "intoxicated" by Ben Bernanke, who made him believe that the release of funds was dangerous without strict "money laundering" controls, which is obviously ridiculous given the activities Carlucci is known to handle, but it

Page 85

convinced Merkel and Obama to oppose the actions instructed by SWISSINDO; Bernanke Obama even threatened to resign in case of release of funds... Incidentally, it allowed F. Carlucci and W. Chase McQuade continue to collect monstrous profits by speculation, taking advantage of the lack of liquidity in the financial market. This is the real reason he had control inside the IMF, to seize the assets of indebted countries, of course, Carlucci also buys cheap (50-52%) Medium Term Notes (MTN) from his base in the Netherlands, to finance the deficit, of course through the Funds that he controls ... The latest information (from: Mr. Noyer, Governor of the Bank of France and Chairman of the Directors of the BIS), dated Wednesday, 06/19/2013 - 15:00, the Federal Reserve announced in specialized financial circuits that release of funds must occur as soon as Mrs. Merkel has agreed (?). Mr. Obama is having lunch today with Ms. Merkel to explain the new guidelines. We have just been informed (22h00 - German Time) that Mrs Merkel has declared not to be involved within the Commerzbank transaction; this could mean she has been told by President Obama to authorize the transaction ? Separately, we send you a copy of the Status of OMD, dated December 02nd, 2008; you can read (Page 2 - Chapter 1 "Definitions") that we had planned the creation within OMD of two Divisions: FHSG (Forum of Head of States and Governments) & COPERRE (Committee of Permanent Representatives); these two entities were supposed to initiate the concept of "Monetary Council", to receive the requests of the Beneficiaries and to allocate them their quota. When Mrs. Angela Merkel asks for "parity" participation in the monetary decision-making regarding quota allocations, to protect "democracy", she has just to read what we have written... Dear Sir, please advise us regarding your instructions issued to the Monetary Authorities. THE CORPS DIPLOMATIC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TOP PRESIDENTS UN-SWISSINDO MULTINATIONAL I.H.O-INTERNATIONAL HANDLE ORGANIZATION-N.O.S 459 Michel Valette, Top President Task Force Multinational Alain Atlani, Top President Governors The World Bank Group Alfredo Ramirez, Top President Bullion Big Bank Ratu Mas Kencana Room A1-1A

Page 86

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNATIONAL-CROWN COUNCIL XIII M1

GENERAL LAND OVER AUTHORITY-PROPERTY-ESTATE VAN EIGHENDOM VERPONDING-CONVANEL T-UBS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED NATIONS

**************

12 ISTAINI AGUNG NGESTI TUNGGAL M1

RESOLUTION MONETARY REFORM NON-CONTROVERCIAL JURISDICTION

OWNER ACTUAL CURRENCY PAPER-MONEY WORLD (GOLD & SILVER COINS)-ACCEPTABLE COLLATERAL FOR THE TREASURY

TAX AND LOAN PROGRAM (31 CFR PART 203)

ACCEPTABLE CERTIFICATION FINAL REGISTER SEALED SECURER EXHIBIT’S AB

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNASIONAL

PRE-PAID, PRE-AUTHORIZED, PRE-APPROVED, PRE-AUTHORIZED DEBIT PAYMENT-AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES-AUTHORIZED MESSAGE/FAX MT.999 SWIFT INTEGRATION PROJECTS. EXHIBIT’S GLOBAL COLLATERAL AUTHORITY.

AUTHORIZED CLAIM AND ORDER BY: FORMAT SOCIAL-ECOSOC LEADERS OF 253/357 COUNTRIES ECOSOC REGISTER NO. 441

COUNTRY NAME :[....................................................................................................................*]

LEADER NAME :[....................................................................................................................*]

CURRENCY NAME :[....................................................................................................................*]

QUOTA : DOCUMENT NOTICE OF PAYMENT ORDER 1-11.........................* AMOUNT QUOTA : US$. 138,990,000,000,000.-.........................................................................* CONVERSION TO : CURRENCY ESTWO EQUAL EXCHANGE : 2.25 US DOLLAR (NATIONAL LEVEL)..............................................* RATIFIES : FLOW CHART 3039-2060 ACCEPTS : EXHIBIT’S AB...........................................................................................* TRANSACTION : NEW CURRENCY “ESTWO” FOR NATIONAL AND,

GLOBAL CURRENCY.............................................................................* ESTWO EXCHANGE : ESTWO CURRENCY GROUP

(1) ONE GLOBAL ESTWO 225 US DOLLAR..................* (2) ONE CONTINENT ESTWO 22.5 US DOLLAR. (3) ONE NATIONAL ESTWO 2.25 US DOLLAR.................*

HOLDER CERTIFICATE : QR-154-321-CO-003496 JM, LONDON AZL 18/AS 1344 VOLUME PLATINUM : 70.000.000.000,-...........................................................................................* GUARANTOR : EXHIBIT’S AB UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND AUTHORIZED : CASH-M1, M2 IS SUM M1.......................................................................* TITLE : PATENT LICENSEE AGREEMENT

Page 87

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNATIONAL-CROWN COUNCIL XIII M1

GENERAL LAND OVER AUTHORITY-PROPERTY-ESTATE VAN EIGHENDOM VERPONDING-CONVANEL T-UBS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED NATIONS

TYPE : CENTRAL BANK INSTITUTION..........................................................* GENERAL NOTE : NEW PRINTING UNDER YOUR REQUEST DESIGNS SUBJECT : MASTER ACCOUNT RECORD DESIGN............................................* PROGRAM : HUMAN OBLIGATION, VENUS PROJECT AND NATIONAL

DEVELOPMENT BY YOUR PROPOSAL............................................* AUTHORIZED PRINTING “CURRENCY”: SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT SOLE

CO.LTD. LAO P.D.R...................................................................................* AUTHORIZED CASH-M1: NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH SPECIAL SUPERVISION: THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED

NATIONS-GOD SKY EARTH TRUST. (UNGSE TR)..........................*

On behalf your country inheritance,

I authorize my country and my Central Bank for DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNASIONAL under signed of 25 Parent Countries Multinational for all countries to Close and Opened again of theGlobal Collateral under The Keyness Law Authority owner actual genuine currency paper-Money World (Gold & Silver Coins).

This resolution monetary reform, for global fiscal and monetary system with full knowledge, and signing this Request and Statement, on behalf of Exhibit’s AB and Bank Protection and Security transfer of CTU-24 Global Collateral of Multiple Currency in action by order The Founding Father’s National and International Law, Owner States-M1 as New Inheritance, Certificate Code 99.98 Series 1-4 Assets-Income-Personal Organization for recall of Old Testamentary Unauthorized by Owner States-M1.

The NEW INHERITANCE, Confirmation Letter UBS NO. UNS-AG/SBG/6118/045/RS.DRS/01/VII/2001, 2015: Internal Revenue Services-IRS has issued a notice to provider ownership Collateral Super Majority TICKET 1319126 UBS A.G to Authorization Instruction UBS A.G to IRS by Exhibit A Instruction and Exhibit B Mortgage Statement. This is Authorization Article 1 Law 4, Article 2 Law 6, Article 7 Law 7, Article 8 Law 10, Article 9 Law 11, Article 12 Law 15, Article 14 Law 21 Article 15 Law 24 Final Rule 903 or 904 Annual Report 2010 and BA1 (Official 1, Exhibit A) (9/97) for completing this Petition under Support of Grants Government Team in Investing Gold 2012 (THREAD ID:1-1TB79N) to transfer Stock Share Ownership Service by automated response for Responsibility of Infinite Bank Statements 2012, EURO CLEAR 2014. Its all under Certificate Code Owner States-M1. M2 is sum M1.

UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND “UBS” APPLICATION WOULD BE UNLAWFULL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAW OF ANY SUCH STATE”.

You are hereby notified that the Account Control Agreement in all banks dated as of January 7, 2010, among you, the undersigned and Multibank 2009-1 CRE Venture, LLC (the “Company”), and or Final Audite “INFINITE BANK STATEMENTS” by Special Supervision of The Committee of 300-The World Bank Group-United Nations under Reg. ASBLP-0333902-2012, EURO CLEAR 2014 a copy of which is attached hereto (the “Agreement”), is terminated and that you have no further obligations to the Collateral Agent pursuant to the Agreement.

You are, on behalf Final Audite The Committee of 300-The World Bank Group-

United Nations, Register ASBLP-0330-2012 on March 30, 2012 including EURO CLEAR

2014 in action by order Royal,K.681 M1. Notwithstanding any previous instructions to you, you are hereby instructed to accept all future directions

with respect to any of the Accounts from the Company. This notice terminates any obligations you may have to the Collateral Agent with respect to any of the Accounts; provided, however Very truly yours, that nothing contained in this notice shall alter any obligations which you may otherwise owe to the Collateral Agent pursuant to any other agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this notice shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement. Its all under Exhibit’s AB, and Holder Certificate QR-154-321-CO-003496 JM, London AZL 18/AS 1344.

HOLDER CERTIFICATE QR-154-321-003496 JM, LONDON AZL 18/AS 1344 VOLUME 70.000.000.000 KGs.

ENDORSE: This is the signing of a check by Owner States-M1, the holder so that it may be

transferred to another party. Some endorsements are restrictive such as "For Deposit Only" or special

Page 88

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNATIONAL-CROWN COUNCIL XIII M1

GENERAL LAND OVER AUTHORITY-PROPERTY-ESTATE VAN EIGHENDOM VERPONDING-CONVANEL T-UBS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED NATIONS

such as "Pay to the Order of," where the transferee is named to Restart Deposit of International Certificate by New Printing of the Currency to this Planet.

ABSOLUTE TITLE: A legal document that shows a person or entity has total ownership of real estate or other property. Pre-Paid,

Pre-Authorized, Pre-Approved including Authorized Debit Payment-Authorization Agreement of the United

States by this Authorized Message/Fax MT.999 or all SWIFT Integration Project for Represent The World Bank

in Lao P.D.R.

This Certificate for New Configuration of the Global Banking System by: HOLDING ASSET’S: SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT SOLE CO.LTD

HELD BY:

Subject:

Subject:

Subject: General Note: General Note: General Note: General Note:

General Instruction:

SECURITY TRANSFERER CTU-24 MULTIPLE CURRENCY WITH CONVERSION CHANGE TO ESTWO. UN-SWISSINDO LAW. Transmissions Consortium International USA-SWISS and Financiers Consortium International INDONESIA. Final Audite, Infinite Bank Statements by Special Supervision, The Committee of 300-The International Organic Agency/World Bank Group-United Nations. Resolution Corporate and Institutions. General Interagency Bank Merger UBS-WB-BI State Program. Total Assets, Cash U.S. DOLLAR Liquid Unlimited in Indonesia. Conversion Currency Change to ESTWO Serial M1-2015.Certificate Shares One Quintillion in United States Dollar, Conversion to ESTWO for 2015. Printing the first world currency “ESTWO” Patent Licensee Agreement, with Code M1-Microfilm-1 “M1”.

DATE: / / 2015

ACCEPTABLE CERTIFICATION [OFFICIAL SEAL, STAMP OR MEDALLION]

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNASIONAL

CONTINENT OF

[ASIA] [AFRICA] [EUROPE] [AMERICA] [AUSTRALIA]

THE LEADER KING/QUEEN/PRESIDENT

[COUNTRY NAME]

/S/

[LEADER NAME]

PRESIDENT DIRECTOR SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT

SWISSINDO BANKER’S ASSOCIATION-SBA

/S/

(SISAMAI SAYASONE)

ROYAL,K.681 M1 NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH

/S/ H.M.MR.SINO.AS.S”2”.IR.SOEGIHARTONOTONEGORO,ST.

99.98

[This is Patent Licensee Agreement collateral document for ESTWO Currencies will be printing by Swissindo World Trust

International Orbit Sole Co.Ltd. using security paper and hologram under Exhibit’s AB for Construction of Universe Project]

Page 89

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNATIONAL-CROWN COUNCIL XIII M1

GENERAL LAND OVER AUTHORITY-PROPERTY-ESTATE VAN EIGHENDOM VERPONDING-CONVANEL T-UBS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED NATIONS

**************

AUTHORIZED CASH M1 DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNASIONAL

CERTIFICATE CODE 99.98 WORLD BANK. UNION BANK OF METAL SWITZERLAND. BANK OF INDONESIA

REGISTERED SEALED SECURER

THE WORLD KEY MASTER GOVERNMENT CENTER

PARENT of AGREEMENT AUTHORITY of 25 COUNTRIES

MULTINATIONAL

ROYAL,K.681 M1 AUTHORIZED CLAIMS AND RESOLUTION OF SEAL

NEW WORLD AGREEMENT FOR MONETARY REFORM 2015 THE GREATEST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS

SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT

INTERNATIONAL C.L LEADERSHIP WORLD SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT

ALBISRIEDER AC.USD,P.1568-1120 BANK OFFICER, INFINITE BANK STATEMENTS UBS-UNPRI

IN ACTION BY SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT-LAO P.D.R CONFIRMATION LETTER

UBS NO. UNS-AG/SBG/6118/045/RS.DRS/01/VII/2001, 05/05/2015

From: OWNER STATES CASH-M1 NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT

For: HIS EXCELLENCY SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT SOLE CO.LTD. AUTHORIZED INTER AGENCY MERGER BANK WORLD BANK. UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND. BANK OF INDONESIA LAO P.D.R

To: BENEFICIARY BENEFIT PRESIDENT LAO P.D.R CHOUMALY SAYASONE

And

SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS (CERTIFICATION ASBLP-0333902-2010 INTERNATIONAL SELECTION ORGANIZATION)

BULLION BIG BANK RATU MAS KENCANA ROOM A1-1A

Page 90

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNATIONAL-CROWN COUNCIL XIII M1

GENERAL LAND OVER AUTHORITY-PROPERTY-ESTATE VAN EIGHENDOM VERPONDING-CONVANEL T-UBS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED NATIONS

THE LEADER OF 253 COUNTRIES / UN-MEMBER/ICSID-MEMBER

HELD By: NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH

Consortium: SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT (INDONESIA-LAO P.D.R) Subject: JOINT OPERATION, MONETARY REFORM OF CURRENCY “ESTWO” 2015

Subject: INAGURATION IN KERATON SUROKARTO HADININGRAT,

CENTRAL JAVA, INDONESIA-LAO P.D.R.

Greeting Ladies and Gentlement on this Planet

I AM, Royal, K.681 H.M. MR.Sino.AS Soegihartonotonegoro,ST.-M1. It is my honour to PRESENT to you a newMonetary Reform system for the Global Currency System, a Secret Control Monetary Finance System under Super Global Collateral Majority with Patent Licensee Agreement 2015. Please Ratify and Accept the EXHIBIT’S AB Form, Format Social-ECOSOC, Flow Chart 3039-2060 as your Cash/M1 claim. To be paid, approved under my authorization as the Contract will be Closed and the Contract will only be Opened again, by the owner M1’s knowledge only.

You have 14 days starting from today’s date to make your claim to recieve the new Quota of $138,990,000,000,000to protect your country and your people. You will also receive Human Obligation of $6 000.000,-per-person and an ATM card with Guaranteed expense Allocation per-Month of $600 USD for youth, or $1.200 USD for adult, including a conversion to your new ESTWO Currency + (Name your Currency) on behalf Payment Order P1-11 of this Authority Mandate, as part of the Global Immunity in your hand. We will meet You in Solo once the Form of “Register ECOSOC 441”is signed for the Greatest Event of the “NEW WORLD AGREEMENT” (NWA) contract in KERATON SUROKARTO HADININGRAT, Central Java, Indonesia, this year 2015.

Contact: SWISSINDO WORLD TRUST INTERNATIONAL ORBIT Lao P.D.R Vientiane Capitol

Congratulations! Attention to All your people and your country on this planet, this is in your hands now and for

the next generation for all time as, The People of The New Inheritance.

ACCEPTABLE CERTIFICATION [Official Seal, Stamp or Medallion]

Date: May 20, 2015-05-13

EXHIBIT’S AB NEO THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GOD SKY EARTH UNGSE TRUST, FORM SS-4 OMB.NO. 4515-0003 USA

ROYAL,K.681 M1 THE GREATEST PRESIDENT/UN-CHAIRMAN EXPRESS

H.M.MR.SINO.AS.S”2”.IR.SOEGIHARTONOTONEGORO,ST. Neo Consortium International Trust Officer

The Authorization General Land Over Authority, All Property, Estate NOT giving to any governmentor institutions to change/removed to other user name /transacts without permission to Royal,K.681-OwnerStates-M1 and coverage by Security Transfer of CTU-24 Counter Terrorist Unit-24, to protect and respect with Single Owner P1.PKC-NKRI 17-8-1945 Patent Licensee Agreement. Owner States-M1.

This Authorized for Document Program Exhibit’s AB using Security Paper will be printed ink in Lao P.D.R to all New World Agreements. This paper cannot be altered, and this investment legal right is by the

Single Inheritance, Owner States-M1®❶€∞► sino.as_sugihartono@ungse.org

Page 91

DEWAN IKATAN DOKUMEN INTERNATIONAL-CROWN COUNCIL XIII M1

GENERAL LAND OVER AUTHORITY-PROPERTY-ESTATE VAN EIGHENDOM VERPONDING-CONVANEL T-UBS

THE COMMITTEE OF 300-THE WORLD BANK GROUP-UNITED NATIONS Page 92

Page 93

Page 94

Page 95

Page 96

Page 97

Page 98